9
What ought the Thebans to have done? Page 1 of 9 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy ). Subscriber: University of Oxford; date: 02 May 2015 University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship Online The Tangled Ways of Zeus: And Other Studies In and Around Greek Tragedy Alan H. Sommerstein Print publication date: 2010 Print ISBN-13: 9780199568314 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2010 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568314.001.0001 What ought the Thebans to have done? Alan H. Sommerstein (Contributor Webpage) DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568314.003.0020 Abstract and Keywords This chapter asks why the Thebans, and especially their royal family, are made to suffer so terribly by Dionysus in Euripides' Bacchae. Pentheus' tyrannical behaviour and his evidence-proof hatred and contempt for Dionysus lead him to ruin; was there an alternative that could have avoided it? The approaches of Cadmus and Teiresias do not seem to provide one. The chorus, however, and the common people of Thebes, embrace Dionysus simply and unquestioningly as a bringer of pleasure; the elite might have done likewise. They still suffer more than they, or anyone, deserves; nor has Dionysus' wanton savagery done anyone any good. Keywords: Euripides, Bacchae, Dionysus, Pentheus, Thebes, tyrannical, pleasure Something goes terribly wrong in Bacchae. The god Dionysus, son of the Theban

What Ought the Thebans to Have Done

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

From A. H. Sommerstein, The Tangled Ways of Zeus

Citation preview

Page 1: What Ought the Thebans to Have Done

What ought the Thebans to have done?

Page 1 of 9

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

UniversityPressScholarshipOnline

OxfordScholarshipOnline

TheTangledWaysofZeus:AndOtherStudiesInandAroundGreekTragedyAlanH.Sommerstein

Printpublicationdate:2010PrintISBN-13:9780199568314PublishedtoOxfordScholarshipOnline:September2010DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568314.001.0001

WhatoughttheThebanstohavedone?

AlanH.Sommerstein(ContributorWebpage)

DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568314.003.0020

AbstractandKeywords

ThischapteraskswhytheThebans,andespeciallytheirroyalfamily,aremadetosuffersoterriblybyDionysusinEuripides'Bacchae.Pentheus'tyrannicalbehaviourandhisevidence-proofhatredandcontemptforDionysusleadhimtoruin;wasthereanalternativethatcouldhaveavoidedit?TheapproachesofCadmusandTeiresiasdonotseemtoprovideone.Thechorus,however,andthecommonpeopleofThebes,embraceDionysussimplyandunquestioninglyasabringerofpleasure;theelitemighthavedonelikewise.Theystillsuffermorethanthey,oranyone,deserves;norhasDionysus'wantonsavagerydoneanyoneanygood.

Keywords:Euripides,Bacchae,Dionysus,Pentheus,Thebes,tyrannical,pleasure

SomethinggoesterriblywronginBacchae.ThegodDionysus,sonoftheTheban

Page 2: What Ought the Thebans to Have Done

What ought the Thebans to have done?

Page 2 of 9

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

princessSemele,hasreturnedtoThebestoestablishhiscultthere.EveryspectatorwatchingtheplayattheCityDionysiaknowsthatthiscult,likeDionysus'giftofwine,canbringgreatpleasureandgreatreleaseofmentaltension.AndyetitsarrivalinThebesproducescatastrophe.Semele'snephewPentheus,thekingofThebes,istorninpiecesbyhismotherAgaue,hersistersInoandAutonoe,andtheotherwomenofThebes;AgauereturnstoThebesintriumph,believingshehaskilledalion,anddisplayingPentheus'headontheendofherritualrod(thyrsos);andfinallytheentirefamily,includingAgaue'sagedfatherCadmus,areexpelledfromthecity.Whyhasthishappened?

Inonesense,Dionysushimselfanswersthisquestionrightatthebeginning.Semele,madepregnantbyZeus,hadperishedthroughtheguileofZeus'sever‐jealousconsortHera.Thestory(toldsomewhatallusivelyinBacchae)isthatHera,indisguise,persuadedSemeletoaskZeustovisitherinhisfulldivinesplendour;Zeus,havingpromisedSemeletodowhatevershewished,couldnotrefuseherrequest,andthelightning‐fireofhispresencedestroyedher.Zeussnatchedherunborninfantfromtheflamesandsewedhimupinhisownthigh,eventuallytobe‘born’asecondtime.

CadmusturnedSemele'shouseandtombintoa[33]shrine(6–12).HersistersAgaue,Ino,andAutonoetookaverydifferentview(26–31).TheyclaimedthatSemelehadreallybeenpregnantbyamortallover,<that>atherfather'ssuggestion<she>hadcoveredhershamebypretendingZeuswasthefatherofherbaby,andthatZeushaddestroyedhertopunishthislie.Becauseofthisslander,the(p.278) threesisters,withalltheotherwomenofThebes,havebeen‘driveninmadnessfromtheirhomes’,andmadetowearDionysus'sacredgarbandperformhisrituals(32–8).

That,however,neednothavehadcatastrophicresults.IfThebes,asDionysusputsit(39–40),‘learn[s]…thatitisuninitiatedinmybacchiccult’,andadoptsitofficially,Dionysuswilldoubtlessletthewomengohome(cf.804–7).ButwillThebesdothat?NotifPentheushashisway.He‘fightsagainstthegods,’saysDionysus,‘oratleastagainstme,debarsmefromlibations,anddoesnotmentionmeinhisprayers’(45–6);hemaytrytobringthewomenhomebyforce—inwhichcaseDionysuswill‘joinwiththemaenadsastheirgeneral’(52)withunstated,butevidentlyfatal,resultsforPentheus.

Dionysus'indictmentofPentheusmayatfirstsightseemalittleunjust.PentheuswasabroadwhenDionysuscametoThebes(215),andhashadnowayofknowingthatheevenexists,muchlessthathedemandsuniversalworship.Whatismore,itisperfectlyreasonablethatheshouldbelieveSemele'sinfanthadperished(sincethatiswhatnormallyhappenswhenapregnantwomansuffersaviolentdeath,andnooneinGreeceknowsofanyevidencetothecontrary)andperfectlyreasonablethatheshouldbelievethebaby'sfatherwasnotZeus(forZeuswouldnothavedestroyedhisownoffspring).Butwhateversympathywemayinitiallyhaveforhim[34]isdissipatedwithextraordinaryrapidityaswegettoknowhimbetter.Dionysus'condemnationisquiteunjustifiedintermsofwhatPentheushaddonepreviously;butwhatPentheusdoessubsequentlyshows,attheveryleast,thathewasridingforafallofsomesort.

Page 3: What Ought the Thebans to Have Done

What ought the Thebans to have done?

Page 3 of 9

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

Pentheusstartsputtinghimselfinthewrongalmostfromthemomentheappears.Hehasimprisonednumerousfreebornwomeninchains(226–32)onthebasisofunsubstantiatedrumour(‘Ihear’216,‘theysay’233).Ifhecatchestheirpriest(whoisreallyDionysusindisguise)hewillexecutehimbystoning(356)orbydecapitation(241)—apunishmentutterlyabhorrenttoGreeks—andthereisnoindicationthattherewillbeanytrial.Hetellshisowngrandfatherthatheismakingaridiculousfoolofhimself(250–2,344–5).HeaccusestheprophetTeiresiasofbeingcomplicitintheintroductionofthenewcultinthehopeofincreasinghisprofessionalincome(255–7)—andweknowthatwhensomeoneaccusesTeiresiasofcorruptionitisalwaysabadsign(askOedipus,orCreon(p.279) inAntigone);laterheordersthephysicaldestructionofTeiresias'seatofaugury(346–51),thusputtinghimselfinthewrongwithApolloaswellasDionysus.NowonderTeiresiasendsthescene(367–9)byhopingthatPentheus,whosenamemeans‘manofgrief’,maynotbringgrieftoCadmusandhisfamily.

Sofar,aswehaveseen,Pentheushasspokenandactedentirelyonthebasisof<rumours>—someofwhichwillprovecompletelyfalse(notablytheallegationthatthewomen'sbacchicritesareacoverforsexualdebauchery).Nowhebeginstoreceiveauthenticinformationwhichmakesitobviousthatagodisatwork.Theguardwhohasarrestedthesupposed[35]priestreportsthattheimprisonedwomenhavebeenmiraculouslyliberated,theirfeetbeingunchained,andtheprisondoorsopened,bynomortalhand(443–8):Pentheus'response,incredibly,istoordertheguardstoletgoofthepriest'sarms,‘becausenowheisinthenet,heisnotspeedyenoughtoescapeme’(451–2).Itisasifhehadnotheardwhathadjustbeensaidtohim—notthelastinstanceofsuchselectivedeafnessorblindness.Andafteraninterviewinwhichcontemptofthenewcultisstrangelymingledwithcuriosity(cf.471–80),hehasthe‘priest’lockedupinthepalacestables,andgratuitouslyaddsthathisAsianfollowerswillbeseizedasslaves(511–14).

Therefollowsanothermiracle,orseriesofmiracles,ofwhichthistimePentheusisaneyewitness.Amightyvoiceisheard;thepalaceshakes;thesacredfireonSemele'stombsuddenlyflaresup;andpresentlythe‘priest’walkscalmlyoutofthepalace,hisprisonhavingbeendemolished.Pentheusmeanwhilehasbeenkeptbusytyingupabull(618–21),fightingthefire,andtryingtokillaphantom(629–31).Surelybynowhemusthavesomesuspicionthatheisupagainstsomethingtoopowerfulforhim?Nottheleast:hisnextorderistocloseallthecity'sgates(653)asifthiswerearoutinejailbreak.

ThefinalproofthatPentheus'wholeapproachisbothfalseanddangerouscomesimmediatelyafterwards,asaherdsmanarriveswithnewsfromMountCithaeron.Hehasseenthebacchantsonthemountain,andtheyareasorderlyasamilitarygarrison:theyaredividedintothreecompanieseachunderacommander(680–2),theyrisepromptlyatreveille(689–94)andadjusttheiruniforms[36]carefully(695–8),theyperformtheirritualsatfixedtimes(723–4),andsexualityanddrunkennessarenowheretobedetected.Onthe(p.280) otherhand,theimpossibleandthemiraculousseemtobemattersofroutine:thewomenuselivesnakesasbelts(698),sucklefawnsandwolf‐cubs(699–702),andbyastrokeoratouchmakethegroundflowwithmilk,honey,water,and

Page 4: What Ought the Thebans to Have Done

What ought the Thebans to have done?

Page 4 of 9

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

wine(704–11).Allutterlyamazing,andutterlyunthreatening—exceptofcoursethatsocietywillcollapseifthewomenaren'trestoredtosanity,andtoThebes,fairlysoon.This,though,cannotbedonebyforce,astherestoftheherdsman'snarrativemakesclear.Whenheandhisfriends,encouragedbyaknow‐allfromthecity(717–21),trytocapturethewomen,theyimmediatelyrunamok,tearcattleinpieces,raidtwovillages,andputthearmedinhabitantstoflight;andloadsdonotburdenthem,firedoesnotburnthem,weaponsdonotwoundthem.HowwillPentheusrespondtothis?

Herespondsinhisaccustomedmanner.Hehasbynowwitnessed,orbeencrediblyinformedof,fifteenortwentymanifestmiracles.Andasever,heneitheracceptsnordeniestheirreality;hejustignoresthem.Heordersanimmediatemilitaryexpeditionagainstthebacchants(780–5),vowingto‘stirupagreatdealofwomen'sblood’onMountCithaeron(796–7)—oblivious,itseems,tothefact,ofwhichwehaverecentlybeenrepeatedlyreminded(682,690,720,728),thatoneofthesewomenishisownmother.Itisperhapssignificantthathereferstothemashis‘slaves’(803),asifheweretheKingofPersia1—doublyironic,this,consideringhowheprideshimselfonhisGreekness(483,779)incontrasttobarbariansliketheLydian‘priest’andhisfollowers.Wenowexpectthethreatenedmilitaryexpedition(cf.52)tobelaunched,andDionysustotakecommand[37]ofhismaenadarmyaspromised.Whathappensisratherdifferent.

ForatthismomentDionysusshowsthatheis,afterall,agodofjustice.Pentheushasshownhimselfatyrantwithnorespectformanorgod,readytoinsulthisgrandfather,imprisonorkillhismother,chopoffheadsonmeresuspicion,andtreatfreepeoplelikeslaves,wilfullyblindanddeaftotheplainestevidencethatasuperhumanagencyisatwork—andyetDionysusoffershimawayout.‘Iwill(p.281) bringthewomenhere’,hesays,‘withouttheuseofarms’(804).Thebescanberestoredtonormalitywithoutanybloodbeingshed.Ofcourse,thereisaprice:thedefinitiveestablishmentofDionysiaccultatThebes(807–8).Butwhyonearthnot?Onalltheavailableevidence,thecultbringspleasureand,unlessprovoked,nopain.ButPentheuswillhavenoneofit:‘Bringmemyarmourouthere.Andyou,stoptalking’(809).Thedisguisedgoddoesn'tstoptalking,andPentheusnevergetshisarmour;infact,thenexttimeweseehimhewillbedressedasawoman,andthetimeafterthathewillbeasetofdetachedbodyparts.

Pentheus'approachtotheDionysiacphenomenonhasbeenadisastrousfailure,andthisnaturallyleadsustoaskwhatalternativeapproach,ifany,couldhavebeensuccessful.Theplayactuallyoffersusaconsiderablerangeofoptions,beforeitnarrowsitsfocustoshowustheconsequencesoftheonechosenbyPentheus.

ThefirstoftheseoptionsispresentedbythechorusofLydianbacchantsintheiropeningsong(parodos).Onepartofthissongnarratesthebirth(s)andinfancy[38]ofDionysus;otherpartsgiveadetailedandevocativepictureofhisecstaticworship,firstinthestreets(64–87),theninthemountains(135–69).Thesongisfullof‘barbarian’elements:thewomenareAsian,theyweartheweirdgarbofbacchicritual,carryanddoubtlessbeatdrums;therearerepeatedreferencestoLydia,Phrygia,evenSyria,allofwhichtotheGreekmindwereplacesthatslavescamefrom.Themountainritualconsistsofrunning,leaping,falling,dancing,singing,shouting,withdrums,pipes,andtorches,andits

Page 5: What Ought the Thebans to Have Done

What ought the Thebans to have done?

Page 5 of 9

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

focusandobjectistohuntdowngoats,teartheminpiecesandeattheirrawflesh(139).Itmaywellbedoubtedhowanyonecouldthinkitwisetointroducesuchpracticesasthisintoasocietythatwishedtobesaneandsafe.Inparticular,acrucialpsychologicalprerequisite,apparently,iswhatthechoruscall‘communalizingthesoul’(75–6):abandoningindividuality,mergingone'spersonalityintheswarm.Suchanexperiencecanbeextremelyupliftingandpleasurable.Itcanalso,however,beextremelydangerous:‘herdinstinct’,‘crowdhysteria’,‘mobviolence’,arealldesignationsofwhatcanhappenifthisprocessgetsoutofhand.TheGreekpolisisaplacewherelawrulesandwheretheindividualcitizenisresponsibleforhisactions.Attheveryleast,evenifoneacceptsthatadegreeofuninhibitedreleasemaybebeneficial,itmust(p.282) bekeptwithinsomekindofboundaries.Thereisnosignthatthischorusiswillingtoacceptanythingofthekind.Theyclaimauthorityoverthestreetsandhousesandtheirinhabitants(68–70);theybecomeanimalized,wearingfawnskinsandgallopinglikefillies(137–8,164–9);theytearanimalsapartasiftheyownedthem,notcaringthatgoatsmighthaveagoatherd.IfthisiswhatThebesandPentheusarebeingoffered,onecanwellunderstandiftheyfeeltheyhavetorejectit.

[39]NextweseetwoThebans,TeiresiasandCadmus,bothagedmen.Theymaynotbeabletogalloplikefilliesorteargoatsinpieces,buttheydobelieveitistheirdutytojoinintheworshipofDionysus.Theyhave,though,twoverydifferentapproachestothecult.

ThefateofCadmusintheplaymaywellseemunjust.EarlyintheprologueDionysuspraisesCadmusforcreatingashrinetoSemele(10–11),andwelearnalsothathe,unlikehisdaughters,hadalwayspubliclymaintainedthatSemele'sloverhadbeennoneotherthanZeus.OnlearningthatSemele'ssonhasreturnedtoThebesasagod,Cadmusiseagertodohimhonour.ThatCadmusisintheendbereavedofhistreasuredgrandsonisofcoursenotinconsistentwiththis:thepunishmentoftheguiltyinevitablyhasside‐effectsontheirinnocentkin.ButCadmusalsoreceivesfromDionysusaspecificpunishmentofhisown:exilefromThebestoabarbarianland,andtransformationintoasnake(1330–4,1354–60).ItistruethathewilleventuallygototheIslesoftheBlest(1337–8),butoverallhisfateisundoubtedlymeantasapunishment,asDionysusmakesclearinwordsthatareaddressedtoCadmusaswellashisdaughters:‘Ifyouhadknowntobesensible,whenyourefusedtobe,youwouldnowbehappy,withthesonofZeusforyourally.…Youhaveunderstoodustoolate;youdidnotknowuswhenyoushouldhavedone.…Iwasagod,andyouinsultedme’(1341–7).

AndCadmusadmitsthecharge(1344,1346,1377–8),evenwhilepleadingformercy.Whatisheadmittingbeingguiltyof?Iftheplayoffersanexplanationatall(andsurelyitoughtto),itmust[40]comeinthesceneinwhichCadmusandTeiresiasareconfrontedbyPentheus.ItmaynotmattermuchthatCadmustellsPentheusthat‘evenif,asyouclaim,thisgoddoesnotexist,youshouldpretendhedoes’forthehonourofSemeleandthefamily(333–6);takenbyitself,thatmightbejustCadmusdesperatelytryingtogetthroughto(p.283) Pentheuswithanargumentthatmightpossiblyappealtohim.ButCadmushadspokenlikethattoTeiresiastoo:

Ihavecomeprepared,wearingthissacredattireofthegod;

Page 6: What Ought the Thebans to Have Done

What ought the Thebans to have done?

Page 6 of 9

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

forsinceheismydaughter'sson,itisrightthatheshouldbemagnifiedandglorifiedtothebestofourability. (180–3)

AdmittedlyCadmus,asthefirstmortalevertohaveagodforagrandchild,isinauniquepositionwithnoprecedenttoguidehim,buthislanguagestronglysuggeststhatheismagnifyingandglorifyingDionysusonlybecauseDionysusishisgrandson—doing,infact,preciselywhathelaterrecommendsPentheustodo,and‘tellingafinelie’inthefamily'sinterest.Hisattitudealsochangesthesignificanceofwhatweheardintheprologue:theinsistencethatSemele'sloverhadbeendivine,thecreationofashrinetoher,nowlooklikethecontrivancesofaheadoffamilydeterminedtoputapositivespinonwhatmighthavebeenaveryshamingepisode.Tosaytheleast,wecannotbesureheactuallybelievesDionysusisagod.

NowitistruethatGreekreligion,generallyspeaking,wasamatterofpracticeratherthanofbelief.Thegods,onthewhole,didn'tmindwhatmortalsthoughtaboutthem,solongastheyreceivedtheirduesintheformofprayerandespeciallysacrifice.Butasthe[41]trialofSocrateswouldsoonshow,beliefcouldn'tbeignored,becauseitcouldhaveaneffectonpractice.Ifthebeliefspreadsthatthegodsdonotreallyexist,soonerorlaterthecommunitywilldecidethatitcanuseitsresourcesbetterthanbysendingthemupinsmoketothesenon‐existentgods—andifbyanychancethegodsdoinfactexist,suchadecisioncouldhaveunfortunateconsequences.AndDionysus,inparticular,canonlybetrulyworshippedbythosewhothrowtheirwholebeingintotheactofworship—andonecanhardlybedoingthatifoneisthinkingofDionysusasafamilyasset.ItisthereforeappropriatethatwhereasthechorusofAsiandevoteescondemnsPentheus(263–5)andpraisesTeiresias(328–9),theysaynothingatallaboutCadmus.

Teiresias,intragedy,isnearlyalwaysright,andtheaudiencemaywelllooktohimforsomewordsofpiouswisdominanattempttosetPentheusonamoreprudentpath.Theymayperhapsbedisappointed.Teiresiasspeakslesslikeaprophetthanlikeasophist.Herationalizeseverything;allthemysteryandtheecstasydisappear.(p.284) Dionysusistheinventorof(orperhapsis)wine,whichisgoodfordrowningsorrows,inducingsleep,andpouringinlibations(278–85).HewasneversewnupinZeus'sthigh;thatstorywascreatedthroughtheconfusionoftwosimilar‐soundingwords(286–97).Healsohas(inrealityratherminor)connectionswithprophecyandwar(298–305).AndwhileDionysuswillnotcompelwomentobechaste,awomanwhoistrulychastebynaturewillnotchangehernatureunderhisinfluence(which,foranoverwhelminglymaleaudiencethatwasnotdisposedtothinkparticularlyhighlyofwomen'smoralcapacity,wouldbegaverybigquestion).Allthisisallverywell,butithaslittletodowiththekindofecstaticworship[42]thatwehaveheardpartlydescribed,partlyenactedbythechorusintheiropeninglyric.ItisanattempttotameDionysusandmakehimintoareasonablegodthatreasonable,educatedlatefifth‐centuryAthenianscanrationallyworship.Ifthatisthekindofgodhewantstobe,hewouldneverhavecometoThebesaccompaniedbytheseoutlandishbarbarianwomen.

Page 7: What Ought the Thebans to Have Done

What ought the Thebans to have done?

Page 7 of 9

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

Orsoweprobablythink,untilthesceneendsandtheoutlandishbarbarianwomensingtheirsecondode.Andtooursurprisewefindthatallthewildecstasieshavevanished,tobereplacedbythenotexactlysober,butatanyrateboundedandsocializedpleasuresofthatcivilized,urban(e)institution,thesymposium(376–85).Thechoruscommend‘alifeofquietnessandgoodsense’(389–90)andwarnagainstthedangerof‘notthinkingmortalthoughts’andof‘chasinggreatthings’insteadofmakingthebestofwhatonecanget(395–9).TheypraytobetakentoCyprusorPieria(402–16),thelandsofAphroditeandoftheMuses.TheconnectionbetweenDionysusandtheMuseswouldbeobvioustoeveryAthenianspectator;andAphrodite,astheHerdsmanwillremindus(773–4),is(intherightcontext)anessentialpartofthegoodlife.InthefinalstanzaDionysus'associationwith‘thepainlessdelightofwine’isre‐emphasized,asishisdemocraticnature:heoffershisgifts‘equallytotheprosperousandtheinferior’(421–2).Morethanoncethechorusexpressarejectionofwhatmaybecalledintellectualism(tosophon,395);trueintelligence(sophia)issomethingdifferent—itisacceptingthehumanconditionandtheopinionsandpracticesof‘themassesofordinarypeople’(430).Thisdistinctionbetweentwocontrastingconnotationsofsophia—beingcleverenoughtoknowwhat'sgood(p.285) forone,andbeingtoocleverforone'sowngood—runsrightthroughtheplay.2

[43]Isthistheanswerwehavebeenseeking?Itseemssurprisinglybanalandnaive,andresolutelyoblivioustothetragicaspectsofhumanexistence.Acceptlife'spleasures—song,dance,food,drink,sex,sleep,andgoodcompany(thelistingisKennethDover's3—inanother,thoughstillDionysiac,context—andallofthemfigureinthechoralodewehavebeenlookingat);don'ttrytorationalizethemintoconformitywithsomehigh‐flownphilosophicalschema;respectpopulartraditions,especiallyreligiousones;thatistruewisdom,andwillbringhappiness.Naiveornot,thisviewdoesseemtobeendorsedbyalltheThebancommonersweseeintheplay.Theguardwhoarrestedthedisguisedgodwasreluctanttodosoandtoldhisprisonerasmuch(441–2),andhetellsPentheus‘thisman…isfullofmiracles’(449–50).Theherdsman,thoughfearfuloftheking'sanger(670–1),urgeshimtoacceptthenewgod,notleastbecause‘theysay…hegavemortalsthevinewhichputsastoptogrief;andifthereisnomorewine,thereisnomoreAphrodite,noranyotherhumanpleasure’(771–4).AndthemessengerwhoreportsPentheus'deathconcludesthat‘toknowone'splace(sōphronein)andreverethedivineisbest,andIthinkitisalsowisest’(1150–1).

Thereis,afterall,nocontradictioninbelievingthatlifehasbothitstragedies,manyofthemunavoidable,anditspleasures,andthatsincetotalrenunciationofthepleasureswillnothelponeescapethetragedies,itisfoolishnottoacceptthem(withinreason,ofcourse).IfPentheushasrejectednormalpleasures(andonecertainlydoubtsifhe'dmakeagoodcompanionforasymposium),itseemsonlytohaveledhimtoseekpervertedones:hiswayofshowingaffectionforhisgrandfatherhadbeentoaskwhomCadmuswantedhimtopunish(1310–12,1318–22),[44]andheisluredtohisdeathby(p.286) beingofferedthechancetospyonthemaenads'allegedsexualorgies.Andhisevidence‐proofhatredandcontemptforDionysusandallhestandsforleadstoanappallingcatastrophethatwasentirelyavoidable.

Page 8: What Ought the Thebans to Have Done

What ought the Thebans to have done?

Page 8 of 9

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

ItremainstruethatthoughPentheusandCadmus,AgaueandInoandAutonoe,havealldeservedtosuffer,theyallsufferfarmorethantheydeserve,orthananyonedeserves—andthatisthenoteonwhichtheplayends.Itmaywellbe,asRichardSeafordsupposes,4thatDionysus'speechasdeusexmachina(mostofwhichhasbeenlostfromtheonlymanuscript)includedinstructionsforestablishinganorganizedcultofDionysusatThebes;buttheThebanswhowillbenefitfromthatcultarenotonstage.ThosewhoarepresentareCadmus,thelonelyoldmanfacingafutureheloathes;Agaue,themotherwhohaskilledherson;andthatson'sdismemberedbody,overwhosetornlimbs,onebyone,Agaue,inanotherlostpassage,hadlovinglylamented.AsofteninEuripides,humanloveseemstheonlyconsolationinacruelworld:fatheranddaughterpartwithanembrace(1363–7),andAgauewillshareherexilewithhersisters(1381–2).Theythemselvesmayhavemadetheworldcruellerthanitneedhavebeen,butwecanpitythemnevertheless—aseventhechorusdo(1327–8).

Andwecangoalittlebeyondpity.Intheplay'slastgenuinewords,Agauesays:

MayIgowherefoulCithaeronshallneverseemeagainnorIseteyesonCithaeron,andwherenothyrsosisdedicated,toremindme![45]Letthembetheconcernofotherbacchants! (1383–7)

JustasthesavagezealofPentheuswascounter‐productive,sotoo,atleastinonerespect,hasbeenthezealoussavageryofhiscousinDionysus.Ithasbenefitednobody,atleastinThebes(sinceDionysuscouldhavedestroyedPentheus,orrenderedhimharmless,inmanylessatrociousways),andithasirrevocablyalienatedthissisterofSemele.ItisentirelyunderstandablethatAgaueshouldthusloatheandshunthatwhichcausedherruin.Shecannotbeexpectedto(p.287) reflect—butweshould—thatsomanythingsinthisworldhavecausedtheruinofsomeoneatsometimethatwecannotpossiblyshunthemall.WehaveseeninthisplaythatDionysusisarisky,destabilizinggod;butdeliberately,obsessivelytoavoidallriskandinstabilityisitselfriskyanddestabilizing.Anddeliberately,obsessivelytoavoidpleasureassuchmerelyensuresthatlifewillbeallpain—asiftherewasn'tenoughofthatanyway.5

Notes:

(1)OntheGreekbeliefthatbarbarianswerethe‘slaves’oftheirrulers,cf.Eur.Hel.276,andseeHall(1989:193–7).Anothertyrant,Lycus,speakssimilarlyinEur.HF251.

(2)Goodsophia:266,427,480,641,656,839,1151.Badsophia:30,200,203.Thetwoarecontrastedat395.Pentheuscondemnsthesophistries,asheseesthem,ofthepriestwhoisinfactDionysusat489and655;inhislaterdelusionhepraisesthesophiaofthedisguisedgodasthelatterschemestodestroyhim(824),andAgaue,alsodeluded,praisesthegod'ssophiainurgingonthemaenadstohuntthe‘lion’whowasinfactherson(1190).

(3)Dover(1968:p.liii),listingthegoodthingsofwhich,intheworldofAristophanic

Page 9: What Ought the Thebans to Have Done

What ought the Thebans to have done?

Page 9 of 9

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

comedy,‘thenormalman…takesasmuchashecan’.

(4)Seaford(1996:252–3).

(5)ThischapterwasoriginallypublishedinT.ShashaandD.Stuttarded.EssaysonBacchae(Brighton:aodpublications,2006)32–45;andagaininA.Beale(ed.),EuripidesTalks(London:BristolClassicalPress,2008)23–32.Insertedpagenumbersrefertothefirstpublication.IammostgratefultotheActorsofDionysusforgivingpermissionforthisrepublication,towhichafewfootnoteshavebeenadded.

Accessbroughttoyouby: UniversityofOxford