Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www.ieagreen.org.uk
What have we learnt about monitoring What have we learnt about monitoring from largefrom large--scale COscale CO22 storage projects?storage projects?
Neil Wildgust, Tim Dixon
AAPG/SEG/SPE Hedberg ConferenceAugust 2009, Vancouver
www.ieagreen.org.uk
Contracting Parties and SponsorsContracting Parties and Sponsors
www.ieagreen.org.uk
What have we learnt to date What have we learnt to date -- projects?projects?• Review current operational large-scale CCS projects
• Assess learning from projects• Identify gaps in the global CCS project portfolio
• Focus on projects relevant to full-commercial scale operation• Includes:
• Large-scale pilot• Demonstration• Commercial
• Excludes• Small and medium pilot• Lab scale
• Define criteria – Identify projects – Collect information - Analyse
www.ieagreen.org.uk
Criteria for largeCriteria for large--scale storage projectsscale storage projects• Indicative criteria defined for ‘large-scale operational projects’
• Not required to be integrated CCS
• Storage project criteria• Was, or had been, operational by the end of 2008• Injected over 10,000 tCO2 per year with the purpose of geological
storage• Commercial CO2-EOR was excluded unless there was a monitoring
programme to provide learning
www.ieagreen.org.uk
Projects identifiedProjects identifiedBellingham Cogeneration Facility
IFFCO CO2 Recovery Plant –Aonla
CASTOR Project Prosint Methanol PlantGreat Plains Synfuel Plant Rangely CO2 ProjectIMC Global Soda Plant Schwarze PumpeIn Salah SECARB - Cranfield IIK12-B Shady Point Power PlantKetzin Project SleipnerMRCSP - Michigan Basin Snohvit LNG ProjectNagaoka SRCSP - Aneth EOR-Paradox BasinOtway Basin Project SRCSP - San Juan BasinPembina Cardium Project Sumitomo Chemicals PlantPetronas Fertilizer Plant Warrior Run Power PlantIFFCO CO2 Recovery Plant –Phulpur WeyburnChemical Co. “A” CO2Recovery Plant Zama EOR Project
www.ieagreen.org.uk
Bellingham Cogeneration Facility
IFFCO CO2 Recovery Plant –Aonla
CASTOR Project Prosint Methanol PlantGreat Plains Synfuel Plant Rangely CO2 ProjectIMC Global Soda Plant Schwarze PumpeIn Salah SECARB - Cranfield IIK12-B Shady Point Power PlantKetzin Project SleipnerMRCSP - Michigan Basin Snohvit LNG ProjectNagaoka SRCSP - Aneth EOR-Paradox BasinOtway Basin Project SRCSP - San Juan BasinPembina Cardium Project Sumitomo Chemicals PlantPetronas Fertilizer Plant Warrior Run Power PlantIFFCO CO2 Recovery Plant -Phulpur WeyburnChemical Co. “A” CO2 Recovery Plant Zama EOR Project
Bellingham Cogeneration Facility
IFFCO CO2 Recovery Plant –Aonla
CASTOR Project Prosint Methanol PlantGreat Plains Synfuel Plant Rangely CO2 ProjectIMC Global Soda Plant Schwarze PumpeIn Salah SECARB - Cranfield IIK12-B Shady Point Power PlantKetzin Project SleipnerMRCSP - Michigan Basin Snohvit LNG ProjectNagaoka SRCSP - Aneth EOR-Paradox BasinOtway Basin Project SRCSP - San Juan BasinPembina Cardium Project Sumitomo Chemicals PlantPetronas Fertilizer Plant Warrior Run Power PlantIFFCO CO2 Recovery Plant -Phulpur WeyburnChemical Co. “A” CO2 Recovery Plant Zama EOR Project
Projects identifiedProjects identified
Capture over 100ktCO2
Injection over 10ktCO2 for storage
Monitored EOR over 10ktCO2
Capture over 10ktCO2 from flue gas
Coal bed storage over 10ktCO2
www.ieagreen.org.uk
Project LocationsProject Locations
Capture over 100ktCO2
Injection over 10ktCO2 for storage
Monitored EOR over 10ktCO2
Capture over 10ktCO2 from flue gas
Coal bed storage over 10ktCO2
www.ieagreen.org.uk
Extent of coverage vs ZEP project matrix Extent of coverage vs ZEP project matrix
Demonstrated in operational large projects
Not demonstrated in operational large projects
Project matrix courtesy of EU Technology Platform for Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants - ZEP (2008)
www.ieagreen.org.uk
Extent of CoverageExtent of Coverage• If integrated CCS from electricity
production is a 4 link chain:• Electricity production• Capture• Transport• Storage
• 2 and 3 link chains have been demonstrated over 1Mt CO2 per year
www.ieagreen.org.uk
Net CONet CO22 Storage per YearStorage per Year
www.ieagreen.org.uk
PermeabilityPermeability
www.ieagreen.org.uk
Extent of coverage Extent of coverage –– MonitoringMonitoring• 2D seismic• 3D seismic• 4D seismic• Vertical seismic profiling• Cross-well seismic• Electrical conductivity• Microseismic• Passive seismic• Soil gas sampling• Detector arrays• Eddy covariance
• Observation wells• Time lapse microgravity• Well temperature and
pressure• Well logs• Tracers• Ground water geochemistry• Interferometry• Satellite imaging• Tilt meters
www.ieagreen.org.uk
Monitoring Selection ToolMonitoring Selection Tool
www.ieagreen.org.uk
Common Monitoring TechniquesCommon Monitoring TechniquesTechnique No of Sites Positive
commentsNegative
comments
DH temp/pressure 11
Surface seismic 10 2 3
Soil gas 9
Geochemical 8 1
VSP 8 1
Microseismic 7 1
Gravity 4 1
Crosswell seismic 3 1 1
Electrical Conductivity 3 1
Satellite 3 1
www.ieagreen.org.uk
Questionnaire Comments on Questionnaire Comments on Surface Seismic (Surface Seismic (SiteSite--Specific!Specific!))
• “Seismic is unlikely to be cost-effective in the long run”• “Glacial till cover made seismic difficult to use”• “A recent attempt at 3D seismic did not reveal useful information
– so we do not consider effective for monitoring CO2 floods”• “The seismic survey clearly demonstrated an ability to detect
anomalies in the reservoir caused by CO2 invasion”• “Detecting pressure propagation using seismic signals is
sometimes easier than detecting the CO2 itself”• “Pre-injection surface seismic MIGHT have made subsequent
seismic more useful”
www.ieagreen.org.uk
Comments on Other TechniquesComments on Other Techniques
• “Gravity, VSP and downhole flowmeters will not deliver credible results”
• “Microseismic seemed more effective as a safety measure to ensure the injection did not cause any fracturing or induced seismicity”
• “Crosswell seismic worked quite well”
www.ieagreen.org.uk
Emerging ThemesEmerging Themes• Injectivity – importance, problems, solutions• Material corrosion – less than anticipated• Seismic
• Effective for monitoring the CO2 plume - where it can be used
• Not quantitative beyond a certain resolution• Relatively expensive (?)
• Other monitoring – e.g. electrical conductivity viewed as promising; desire for better direct sampling at reservoir conditions; can we move from R&D to commercial suite of tools?
www.ieagreen.org.uk
IEA GHG Monitoring NetworkIEA GHG Monitoring Network
www.ieagreen.org.uk
Recent Monitoring Network MeetingRecent Monitoring Network Meeting
• Impressive imaging resolution from seismic survey at Sleipner
• Detailed description of the successful satellite imaging at In-Salah
• Continued monitoring of the Nagaoka test site is showing the dissolution of CO2 in brine
• Electrical conductivity survey from Ketzin project showing promising results
www.ieagreen.org.uk
IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D ProgrammeIEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme• General - www.ieagreen.org.uk• CCS - www.co2captureandstorage.info• GHGT – www.ghgt.info