Upload
gladys-allison
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
What Have we Learned about Homeownership?
Lessons from Current Research
Stephanie Moulton, PhDJohn Glenn School of Public Affairs
The Ohio State [email protected]
Overview1. Homeownership Benefits
• Types of benefits• Reasons for benefits
2. The State of Homeownership• Homeownership trends & gaps• The subprime boom & bust
3. Homeownership Sustainability• Causes of mortgage delinquency and default• The role of homebuyer education, lenders and nonprofits
4. Homeownership Affordability• CRA and affordable lending programs• The MRB program
Homeownership Benefits• Economic Well-Being
• Housing security, build wealth, stabilize housing costs• Neighborhood Stabilization
• Less turnover, fewer vacant or abandoned properties• Child Outcomes
• Improved reading and math scores, graduation rates• Social Capital
• Political involvement, community involvement, home maintenance
• Mediators• Residential stability, parental well-being, neighborhood quality• Quality of housing and geographical location• Cost of housing, equity accumulation, house price appreciation
Engelhardt 2009; Haurin et al. 2002; Galster et al. 2007; McCarthy et al. 2001
Why Gaps in Homeownership?
From Hibler et al. 2008; Haurin et al. 2007; Herbert et al. 2005
1. Income, Wealth & Credit Constraints2. Household Formation3. Location Preferences4. Information Constraints (lack of information about
process)5. Supply Side Constraints
– Access to lending institutions– Access to affordable housing – Discrimination
Lessons from Subprime Lending• Prevalence among low income and minority borrowers
• 1/3 of the gains to homeownership among minorities from subprime
• 2004 HMDA: high cost first lien 32.4% minority; 8.7% non-minority
• Adversely selecting borrower• 30-50% could have qualified for prime mortgages• Less educated consumers (75% subprime search; 90% prime)
• Lender differences/ Institutional determinants• Brokers and non-CRA institutions (IMC 5xs high cost in
Cleveland)• Crowd out between subprime and affordable lending
Calem, Gillen and Wachter 2004; Carr, James H. & J. Schuetz. 2001; Immergluck 2009; Lax et al. 2004; Nelson 2009
Homeownership Sustainability
Options Perspective• Equity in the home “skin
in the game”• Interest rates• Housing values• Transaction costs
Triggering Events
• “Exogenous” shocks• Change in income or life
circumstance• Change in payments or
mortgage terms
Avery et al. 1996
Moderators
• Credit constraints• Social support, education• Community characteristics• Lender/ institutional characteristics
Performance of Low-Income and Minority Mortgages (LIMM)• LIMM borrowers more likely to default than other borrowers
• More external shocks, less equity, less information• LIMM borrowers are less likely to refinance (prepay) when it
would be cost-beneficial to do so• Poor credit quality, high LTV ratios, less mobility, less
information• Predictors
• Credit score: less than 620 5 times more likely to default than borrowers with credit scores between 680-720.
• High Loan to Value ratio: more likely to default• Lower income: more likely to default• High debt to income: may be more likely to default• Higher costs of loan: more likely to default
Firestone et al. 2007; Alexander et al. 2002; Moulton 2009
Mortgage Outcomes: Institutions Matter!• Lenders Matter
• Loans originated by Third Party Originators more likely to default
• Loans originated by community lenders less likely to default• Loan servicers matter
Alexander et al. 2002; Moulton 2009
Mortgage Outcomes: Homebuyer Education?• Freddie Mac’s “Affordable Gold” program (Hirad and Zorn 2002)
• 40,000 borrowers• Face to face counseling reduced delinquency 41 percent• Face to face education reduced delinquency 23 percent• No reduction for telephone or book education/counseling
• Other Research?• Some evidence that counseled borrowers are more likely to
refinance under “optimal” conditions; only face to face counseling or education
• Limitations• Selection• Education: the mode or the content?• Support, advice and relationshipsHirad and Zorn 2002; Quercia and Spader
2008; Hartarska and Gonzalez-Vega 2005
• What is the CRA?• Covers insured depository lending institutions, lending within their
assessment areas- where they have bank offices or branches.• Demonstrate “reinvestment,” 50% of which is a “lending test”;
evaluated on lending to LMI borrowers with incomes below 80% AMI.
• Did CRA loans cause (or contribute to) the mortgage crisis?• Only 6 percent of high cost loans were eligible for CRA credit.• CRA loans have lower interest rates and more affordable terms.• CRA loans 70% less likely to default than similar subprime loans.• CRA loans less likely to default when made locally, in assessment
areas.• CRA loans mostly originated by banks, rather than brokers
Affordable Mortgage Programs: Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) Lending
Immergluck 2009; Laderman and Reid 2009; Canner and Bhutta 2008; Ding et al. 2008
Affordable Mortgage Programs: The Mortgage Revenue Bond (MRB) Program
Source: HMDA Data, First Lien Owner-Occupied Originated Mortgages
Affordable Mortgage Programs: The Mortgage Revenue Bond (MRB) Program• Lender Participation
• Larger, local, FHA (+); High cost (-)• Borrower Need
Moulton 2009
Affordable Mortgage Programs: The Mortgage Revenue Bond (MRB) Program• Mortgage Sustainability
• Lower delinquency and foreclosure rates than other similar borrowers
• Significant lender differences in delinquency and foreclosure
• Mortgage Affordability• Increase in MRB lending in an area, less likely to receive high
cost mortgage 2004-2006
• Next Steps• Homebuyer education• Targeting minority borrowers• Institutional networks and the MRB program
Concluding Thoughts
• Potential Benefits of Homeownership• Homeownership Gaps• Lessons from Subprime Lending• Causes of Mortgage Delinquency• Role of Affordable Mortgage Programs
DISCUSSION
References & ResourcesAlexander, William P., Scott D. Grimshaw, Grant R. McQueen and Barrett A. Slade. 2002. Some Loans are More Equal than Others: Third Party
Originators and Defaults in the Subprime Mortgage Industry. Real Estate Economics 30(4): 667-97.
Avery, Robert, Raphael Bostic, Paul Calem and Glenn Canner. 1996. Credit Risk, Credit Scoring and the Performance of Home Mortgages. Federal Reserve Bulletin July 2006. Available online at: http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/bulletin/1996/796lead.pdf
Canner, G., & Bhutta, N. 2008. Staff analysis of the relationship between the CRA and the subprime crisis. Memo to Sandra Braunstein, Director, Consumer and Community Affairs Division, Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Available online at http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/20081203_analysis.pdf
Carr, James H. & J. Schuetz. 2001. Financial services in distressed communities: Framing the issue, finding solutions. Fannie Mae Foundation, August.
Engelhardt, Gary, Michael Eriksen, William Gale, and Gregory Mills. 2009. What are the social benefits of homeownership? Experimental evidence for low-income households. Journal of Urban Economics. Forthcoming.
Firestone, Simon, Robert Van Order and Peter Zorn. 2007. The Performance of Low-Income and Minority Mortgages. Real Estate Economics 35(4): 479-504.
Galster, George, Dave E. Marcotte, Marvin B. Mandell, Hal Wolman, and Nancy Augustine. 2007. “The Impact of Parental Homeownership on Children’s Outcomes during Early Adulthood,” Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 785-827.
Hartarksa, Valentina, Claudio Gonzalez-Vega, and David Dobos. 2002. Credit Counseling and the Incidence of Default on Housing Loans by Low Income Households. Rural Finance Program, The Ohio State University.
Haurin, Donald R., Toby L. Parcel and R. Jean Haurin (2002). “Does Homeownership Affect Child Outcomes?” Real Estate Economics, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 635-666.
References & ResourcesHaurin, Don and Hazel Morrow-Jones. 2006. The Impact of Real Estate Market Knowledge on Tenure Choice: A Comparison of Black and White
Households. Housing Policy Debate. 17(4): 625-654.
Herbert et al. 2005, Homeownership Gaps Among Low Income and Minority Borrowers, Available online at: http://www.huduser.org/Publications/pdf/HomeownershipGapsAmongLow-IncomeAndMinority.pdf
Hilber, Christian A.L. and Yingchun Liu. 2008. Explaining the black–white homeownership gap: The role of own wealth, parental externalities and locational preferences. Journal of Housing Economics. 17: 152-174.
Hirad, Abdighani and Peter M. Zorn. 2002. Pre-purchase Homeownership Counseling: A Little Knowledge is a Good Thing. Low Income Homeownership: Examining the Unexamined Goal. N. P. Retsinas and E. S. Belsky. Washington DC, The Brookings Institute: 146-174.
Laderman, Elizabeth and Carolina Reid. 2009. CRA Lending During the Subprime Melltdown. Revisiting the CRA: Perspectives on the Future of the Community Reinvestment Act. San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank. Available online at: http://www.areaa.org/cms/cra_lending_during_subprime_meltdown.pdf.
Lax, Howard, Michael Manti, Paul Raca and Peter Zorn. 2004. Subprime lending: An investigation of economic efficiency. Housing Policy Debate 15(3): 533-71.
McCarthy, George, Shannon Van Zandt and William Rohe. 2001. The Economic Benefits and Costs of Homeownership.: A Critical Assessment of the Research. Research Institute for Housing America. Available online at: http://www.housingamerica.org/Publications/TheEconomicBenefitsandCostsofHomeownership:ACriticalAssessmentoftheResearch.htm
Moulton, Stephanie. 2009. Originating Lender Localness and Mortgage Sustainability: An Evaluation of Delinquency and Foreclosure in Indiana’s Mortgage Revenue Bond program. Under Review.
Nelson, Lisa. 2009. CRA Lending in the 4th District. A Look Behind the Numbers. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland 2(1). www.clevelandfed.org/communitydevelopment
Quercia, Roberto and Jonathon Spader. 2008. Does Homeownership Counseling Affect the Prepayment and Default Behavior of Affordable Mortgage Borrowers? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 27(2): 304-325.