WELCOME

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION

CORPORATE SAFETY TRAINING

29 CFR 1904

YOUR INSTRUCTOR

COURSE OBJECTIVES

This Course Is Designed to Introduce Basic Skills in Accident Investigation. Root cause analysis and statistical evaluation of accidents can be very complex. This course is designed for the majority of cases that can be diagnosed rapidly and where outside assistance is not normally required.

NOTE

Accident Prevention.

Introduce Accident Investigation & Establish Its Role in Today’s Industry.

Introduce Some Basic Skills in the Recognition & Control of Occupational Hazards.

Provide Basic Accident Investigation Skills for Supervisors.

Introduce Accident Investigation Techniques.

COURSE OBJECTIVES(Continued)

BASIS FOR THIS COURSE

Statistically, accident investigation results in prevention Elimination of workplace injuries & illnesses where possible Reduction of workplace injuries & illnesses where possible Development of efficient accident investigative procedures OSHA Safety Standards require:

Accidents be investigated Training be conducted Hazards and precautions be explained A “Safety” program be established Job Hazards be assessed and controlled

REGULATORY STANDARDTHE GENERAL DUTY CLAUSE

FEDERAL - 29 CFR 1903.1

EMPLOYERS MUST: Furnish a place of employment free of recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees. Employers must comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.

OSHA ACT OF 1970

29CFR - SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS

1904 - RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS

APPLICABLE REGULATIONS

IDENT INVESTIGATIONACC

APPLICABLE REGULATIONS

ANSI - Z16.2 - 1995

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH

ANSI - Z16.3 - 1994

INJURY STATISTICS, EMPLOYEE OFF THE JOB INJURY EXPERIENCE RECORDING AND MEASURING

OSHA CIVIL PENALTIES POLICY

BEFORE MARCH 1, 1991:

VIOLATION NARRATIVE: TEN (10) EMPLOYEES WERE NOTED NOT WEARING EYE PROTECTION IN AREAS WHERE A REASONABLE PROBABILITY OF EYE INJURY COULD OCCUR.

PENALTY: $500DANGER

EYE PROTECTIONREQUIRED BEYOND

THIS POINT

OSHA CIVIL PENALTIES POLICY

AS OF MARCH 1, 1991:

CHANGES IN PENALTY COMPUTATION:

1. PENALTIES BROKEN OUT INDIVIDUALLY.

2. PENALTIES INCREASED SEVEN FOLD.

(Continued)

OSHA CIVIL PENALTIES POLICY

AS OF MARCH 1, 1991:

VIOLATION NARRATIVE: TEN (10) EMPLOYEES WERENOTED NOT WEARING EYE PROTECTION IN AREAS WHERE A REASONABLE PROBABILITY OF EYE INJURY COULD OCCUR.

$ 10 VIOLATIONS TIMES $500 = $5000$ 5000 TIMES SEVEN = $35,000

PENALTY: $35000 BEFORE MARCH, 1991: $500 AS OF MARCH, 1991: $35,000

(Continued)

PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

Review job specific hazards Implement corrective actions Conduct hazard assessments Conduct accident investigations Provide training to all required employees Install engineering controls where possible Institute administrative controls where possible Control workplace hazards using PPE as a last resort

ALL EMPLOYERS MUST:ACCIDENTINVESTIGATIONPROGRAM

IDENT INVESTIGATIONACC

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION IS IMPORTANT

Improve quality. Improve absenteeism. Maintain a healthier work force. Reduce injury and illness rates. Acceptance of high-turnover jobs. Workers feel good about their work. Reduce workers’ compensation costs. Elevate SAFETY to a higher level of awareness.

A GOOD PROGRAM WILL HELP:

SAFETYSTATISTICS

“It is estimated that in the United States, 97% of the money spent for medical care is directed toward treatment of an illness, injury or disability. Only 3% is spent on prevention.”

Self-Help Manual For Your BackH. Duane Saunders, MSPTby Educational Opportunities

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION IS ALSO PREVENTION

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION

DEDICATION PERSONAL INTEREST MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT

IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION PROGRAM REQUIRES:

NOTE:

UNDERSTANDING AND SUPPORT FROM THE WORK FORCEIS ESSENTIAL, WITHOUT IT THE PROGRAM WILL FAIL!

TRAINING SAFETY COMMITTEE WORKSITE ANALYSIS STATISTICAL REVIEWS MEDICAL MANAGEMENT PROMPT INVESTIGATIONS SUPERVISOR INVOLVEMENT HAZARD PREVENTION AND CONTROL

KEY PROGRAM ELEMENTS

KEY PROGRAM ELEMENTS(Continued)

WORKSITE ANALYSIS

RECORDS REVIEW PERIODIC SURVEYS JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS SYSTEMATIC SITE ANALYSIS

SAF ETY

KEY PROGRAM ELEMENTS(Continued)

SAFETY COMMITTEE

GOAL SETTING WRITTEN PROGRAM EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT REGULAR PROGRAM ACTIVITY TOP MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT PERIODIC PROGRAM REVIEW AND EVALUATION

KEY PROGRAM ELEMENTS(Continued)

HAZARD PREVENTION AND CONTROL

PPE REDUCTION ENGINEERING CONTROLS ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS OPTIMIZATION OF WORK PRACTICES

DANGER

EYE PROTECTIONREQUIRED BEYOND

THIS POINT

MANAGEMENT’S ROLE

CONSIDERATIONS:

1. SUPPORT THE PROCESS.

2. ENSURE YOUR SUPPORT IS VISIBLE.

3. GET INVOLVED.

4. ATTEND THE SAME TRAINING AS YOUR WORKERS.

5. INSIST ON PERIODIC FOLLOW-UP & PROGRAM REVIEW.

6. IMPLEMENT WAYS TO MEASURE EFFECTIVENESS.

THE SUPERVISOR’S ROLE

CONSIDERATIONS:

1. TREAT ALL “NEAR-MISSES” AS AN ACCIDENT.

2. GET INVOLVED IN THE INVESTIGATION.

3. COMPLETE THE PAPERWORK (WORK ORDERS, POLICY CHANGES, ETC.) TO MAKE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS.

4. GET YOUR WORKERS INVOLVED.

5. NEVER RIDICULE ANY INJURY.

6. BE PROFESSIONAL - YOU COULD SAVE A LIFE TODAY.

7. ATTEND THE SAME TRAINING AS YOUR WORKERS.

8. FOLLOW-UP ON THE ACTIONS YOU TOOK.

THE EMPLOYEE’S ROLE

CONSIDERATIONS:

1. REPORT ALL ACCIDENTS AND NEAR-MISSES IMMEDIATELY.

2. CONTRIBUTE TO MAKE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS.

3. ALWAYS PROVIDE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE INFORMATION.

4. FOLLOW-UP WITH ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

WRITTEN PROGRAM

WRITTEN PROGRAMS MUST BE:

DEVELOPED IMPLEMENTED CONTROLLED PERIODICALLY REVIEWED

Hold regular accident review meetings. Document meetings. Encourage employee involvement. Bring employee complaints, suggestions, or concerns to the attention of management. Feedback without fear of reprisal should be provided. Analyze statistical data concerning accidents, and make

recommendations for corrective action. Follow-up is critical.

SAFETY COMMITTEE

COMMITTEES SHOULD:

PROGRAM REVIEW AND EVALUATION

Analysis of trends in injury/illness rates. Job hazard analysis assessments. Employee surveys. Review of results of facility evaluations. Up-to-date records of job improvements tried or

implemented. Before and after surveys/evaluations of job/worksite

changes.

EVALUATION TECHNIQUES INCLUDE:

INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE CONTROLS

ENGINEERING CONTROLS FIRST CHOICE

Work Station Design Tool Selection and Design Process Modification Mechanical Assist

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS SECOND CHOICE

Training Programs Job Rotation/Enlargement Pacing Policy and Procedures

PERSONNEL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT LAST CHOICE

Gloves Wraps Shields Eye Protection Non-Slip Shoes Aprons

ACCIDENT CAUSATION

Domino Theory. Multiple Causation Theory.

ACCIDENT CAUSATION

The occurrence of an injury invariably results from a completed sequence of factors, the last one of these being the injury itself. The accident which caused the injury is in turn invariably caused or permitted directly by the unsafe act of a person and/or a mechanical or physical hazard.

Domino Theory.

The unsafe act: Climbing a defective ladder. The unsafe condition: A defective ladder. The corrective action 1: Replace the ladder. The corrective action 2: Forbid use of ladder.

ACCIDENT CAUSATION

Domino Theory. (One act or condition)

ACCIDENT CAUSATION

Factors combined in random fashion to cause accidents.

Multiple Causation Theory.

Was he or she properly trained? Was he or she reminded not to use it? Did the employee know not to use it? Why did the supervisor allow its use? Did the supervisor examine the job first? Why was the defective ladder not found?

ACCIDENT CAUSATION

Multiple Causation Theory. (Contributing factors)

Horseplay. Defeating safety devices. Failure to secure or warn. Operating without authority. Working on moving equipment. Taking an unsafe position or posture. Operating or working at an unsafe speed. Unsafe loading, placing, mixing, combining. Failure to use personal protective equipment.

ACCIDENT CAUSATION

Unsafe Acts

Improper PPE. Improper tools. Improper guarding. Poor housekeeping. Improper ventilation. Defective equipment. Improper illumination. Unsafe dress or apparel. Hazardous arrangement.

ACCIDENT CAUSATION

Unsafe Conditions (Environmental)

Fatigue. Unclassified Improper attitude. Defective hearing. Defective eyesight. Muscular weakness. Lack of required skill. Intoxication (alcohol, drugs). Lack of required knowledge

ACCIDENT CAUSATION

Unsafe Personal Factors

Improper attitude. Lack of knowledge or skill. Physical or mental impairment

ACCIDENT CAUSATION

Behavioristic Causes

Slip, Trip. Struck by. Overexertion. Struck against. Fall on same level. Fall to different level. Caught in, on, or between. Contact with - heat or cold. Contact with - electric current. Inhalation, absorption, ingestion, poisoning.

ACCIDENT CAUSATION

Types of Accidents

Accident type. Nature of injury. Source of the injury. Location of accident. Hazardous condition. Affected part of body.

ACCIDENT CAUSATION

Key Facts

ACCIDENT CAUSATION

Assessing the Facts Nationality. Language. Occupation. Gender. Department. Name of supervisor. Years employed. Length of time on job.

Responsibility. Age. Type of accident. Environmental cause. Unsafe act. Behavioristic cause. Cost. Time lost.

1. Obtain the supervisor report of the accident. 2. Obtain the injured worker’s report (if possible). 3. Obtain reports from witnesses, if any. 4. Investigate the accident. 5. Record all the facts. 6. Assess the specifics of the accident. 7. Correlate the specifics with known trends. 8. Determine a course of action to take. 9. Assign responsibility for corrective action. 10. Follow-up as required.

ACCIDENT CAUSATION

Steps in Causal Analysis

WHAT SHOULD BE REPORTED:

All injuries or job-related illnesses.

Near-miss incidents.

Vehicular, structural or equipment damage.

Procedural deficiencies.

Potentially unsafe conditions.

Potentially unsafe behaviors.

ACCIDENT REPORTING

CONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION

Determine principal causes. Determine contributing causes. Develop strategies for corrective action. Establish a timetable for corrective action. Assign responsibility for corrective actions.

Purpose of the Investigation:

JHA assessment forms. Direct observation. Video Tape. Action photographs. Documentary accounts. Accident statistics. Employee interviews. Employee surveys.

Collecting the data:

Continued

CONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION

TANGIBLE INDICATORS:

Accident Records

Production Records

Personnel Records

Employee Surveys

SAFETYSTATISTICS

ContinuedCONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION

TEAM COMPOSITION:

Supervisor. Safety officer. Maintenance. Field experts (if needed). Care provider (if needed). Injured employee (if possible). Who else can you think of that may be needed?

ContinuedCONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION

ContinuedCONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION

PRINCIPAL QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED:

WHO? WHAT? WHY? WHEN? WHERE? HOW?

Who was injured? Who was working with him/her? Who else witnessed the accident? Who else was involved in the accident? Who is the employee's immediate supervisor? Who rendered first aid or medical treatment?

ContinuedCONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION

WHO?

What was the injured employee’s explanation? What were they doing at the time of the accident? What was the position at the time of the accident? What is the exact nature of the injury? What operation was being performed? What materials were being used? What safe-work procedures were provided?

ContinuedCONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION

WHAT?

What personal protective equipment was used? What PPE was required? What elements could have contributed? What guards were available but not used? What environmental conditions contributed? What related safety procedures need revision? What shift was the employee working? What ergonomic factors were involved?

ContinuedCONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION

WHAT?

When did the accident occur? When did the employee start his/her shift? When did the employee begin employment? When was job-specific training received? When did the supervisor last visit the job?

ContinuedCONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION

WHEN?

Why did the accident occur? Why did the employee do what he/she did? Why did co-workers do what they did? Why did conditions come together at that moment? Why was the employee in the specific position? Why were the specific tool/equipment selected?

ContinuedCONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION

WHY?

Where did the accident occur? Where was the employee positioned? Where were eyewitnesses positioned? Where was the supervisor at the time? Where was first aid initially given?

ContinuedCONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION

WHERE?

How did the accident occur? How many hours had the employee worked? How did the employee get injured (specifically)? How could the injury have been avoided? How could witnesses have prevented it? How could witnesses have better helped? HOW COULD THE COMPANY HAVE PREVENTED IT?

ContinuedCONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION

HOW?

Instruct employee in proper behavior? Warn employee of potential hazard? Supply appropriate safeguard? Supply appropriate PPE? Eliminate the unsafe condition? Repair or modify the unsafe condition? Implement procedural changes?

ContinuedCONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION

WHAT'S NEXT?

ContinuedCONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION

INTERVIEWING WITNESSES:

Select a comfortable, private location. Set the person at ease. Explain that the situation, not them is the focus. Solicit ideas to prevent future recurrence. Consider diagrams or drawings. Remain neutral in your demeanor. Take notes or record the discussion. Review the statements before terminating.

WRITING THE REPORT

REPRESENTING THE DATA:

Condense into the company accident form. Compile statistical data for representation. Assign responsibility and prioritize. Make recommendations for correction. Recommend a timetable for correction. Consider funding for corrective actions. Forward copies to OSHA as required. Distribute internally as required. Follow-up at periodic intervals.

FORMULATING CONTROL MEASURES

TRAINING INITIATION OR ENHANCEMENT

ELIMINATE OR REDUCE EXPOSURE

ENGINEERING CONTROL MEASURES

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL MEASURES

APPLICATION OF SAFE WORK PRACTICES

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT

WRITING THE REPORTContinued

THE GREATEST DEFICIENCY IN

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION IS

LACK OF COMPETENT FOLLOW-UP!

FOLLOW-UP

INCIDENCE RATES

INCIDENCE RATE CALCULATION: Incidence rates can be calculated by counting the incidences and reporting the recordable injuries per 100 full time workers per year per facility.

(NUMBER OF NEW CASES X 200,000*)

NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED/FACILITY/YEAR

* 200,000 = Approximate annual work hours for 100 workers per facility.

* The same method can be applied to departments production lines, or job types with each facility.

JOB DESIGN

GOOD JOB DESIGNREDUCES Discomfort, Fatigue, Aches & Pains

Injuries & Illnesses, Work Restrictions

AVOIDS Absenteeism, Turnover, Complaints,Poor Performance, Poor Vigilance

ABATES Accidents, Production Problems,Poor Quality, Scrap/Rework

Continued

GOOD JOB DESIGN

PREVENTS Economic Loss, Loss in Earning Power,Loss in Quality of Life, Pain & Suffering

PREVENTS Economic Loss, Loss in Expertise,Compensation Costs, Damaged Goods& Equipment

EMPLOYEE:

EMPLOYER:

JOB DESIGN

REMEMBER, YOU CONTROL YOUR FACILITY OR AREA!

REVIEW THEIR PROCEDURES WITH THEM BEFORE STARTING THE JOB!

DETERMINE THEIR SAFETY PERFORMANCE RECORD!

DETERMINE WHO IS IN CHARGE OF THEIR PEOPLE!

DETERMINE HOW THEY WILL AFFECT YOUR EMPLOYEES!

TIPS FOR USING CONTRACTORS

OSHA'S PERCEPTIONOF A SUCCESSFUL PROGRAM

1. DETAILED WRITTEN REPORTS.

2. DETAILED WRITTEN PROCEDURES

3. EXTENSIVE EMPLOYEE TRAINING PROGRAMS

4. PERIODIC REINFORCEMENT OF TRAINING

5. DISCIPLINED PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION

6. FOLLOW-UP

WORK AT WORKING SAFELY

Training is the key to success in managing safety in the work environment. Attitude is also a key factor in maintaining a safe workplace. Safety is, and always will be a team effort, safety starts with each individual employee and concludes with everyone leaving at the end of the day to rejoin their families.

Patricia A. Ice Industrial Hygienist