43
MBA DL: Economics of the Business Environment: Vulnerability WBS Live June 2010 John Old University of Warwick

wbsliveJune2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: wbsliveJune2010

MBA DL: Economics of the Business Environment: Vulnerability WBS Live June 2010

John Old

University of Warwick

Page 2: wbsliveJune2010

The 3 basic concepts in EBE

VulnerabilityExposureProtection and Mediation

These are the 3 central concepts in EBE which we use to explain the events in the organisation you choose to analyse for the final assignment

April 8, 2023

Page 3: wbsliveJune2010

Short Run Vulnerability (Lesson 1)

Vulnerability is about the ‘hurt’ that can be done to a business’s costs and its profits by the market and the macroeconomy

Page 4: wbsliveJune2010

Exposure

a) in the marketplace (Lessons 2 and 3) Market Exposure is about whether a business is actually ‘hurt’

or ‘helped’ by the markets where it sells goods and/or services and also where it buys its inputs. Is it in ‘Strategic Hell’ ?

b) in the global economy (Lessons 4 - 8 )

Macro exposure is about whether a business is actually ‘hurt’ or ‘helped’ by changes in the local and global macroeconomy, which are totally outside its control

Page 5: wbsliveJune2010

Some key accounting identities

Total Profit = (Price – Average Total Cost) x Volume of Output/Sales

Page 6: wbsliveJune2010

The object of the firm…

Not to minimise total costNot even to minimise average costNor to maximise priceOr even revenueIt’s to make profits – which requires balancing price (and revenue) with cost

Page 7: wbsliveJune2010

An assumption in a lot of economic analysis – “Profit Maximisation”?...

This does not mean that firms will set out to squeeze every last penny out of their poor workers and customersBut , faced with two alternatives – one which makes money, and one which loses it – they will choose the first.In economic terms this means comparing the marginal revenue (the extra earned from an extra unit of output) with the marginal cost (the extra cost of producing it)If we assume that as output increases MC is constant (CR) or increases (DR)And MR is constant or falls (you can’t normally raise the price as you increase output)If MC<MR then it’s worth increasing outputIf MC>MR then output should be cutAnd “profit maximisation” occurs where MC=MRSo profit maximisation occurs where MC=MRAnd firms will tend to move towards this level of outputEspecially where competition is intense

Page 8: wbsliveJune2010

“Profit Maximisation”?...This does not mean that firms will set out to squeeze every last penny out of their poor workers and customersBut , faced with two alternatives – one which makes money, and one which loses it – they will choose the first.In extreme competitive conditions (“perfect competition” or “strategic hell”) firms have to behave as if they were “profit maximisers” In economic terms this means that in this market situation they have to continually look for cost savings, etc, otherwise they will be driven out of business by othersThe maximum profit achievable is the minimum required for survival

Page 9: wbsliveJune2010

Some key accounting identities

Total Profit = (Price – Average Total Cost) x Volume of Output/SalesSo profits fall as output and sales fall(Price – Average Total Cost) is the “profit margin”And this will also fall if Average Total Cost rises

Page 10: wbsliveJune2010

When economic conditions change, why are some firms affected more than others?

“Vulnerability”…the ‘hurt’ that can be done to a business’s costs and its profits by the market and the macroeconomyWhat do a firm’s cost conditions look like?

Page 11: wbsliveJune2010

Economists typically classify costs as

“Long run” – where the organisation can vary all the inputs, or “factors of production”eg when building on a “green field site”, or entering a totally new industry and market“Short run” – one or more significant factors can’t be variedOur focus here is essentially short-run

Page 12: wbsliveJune2010

Economists also classify costs as

Fixed – don’t vary with the level of outputexamples?capital costs, R&D, (some) advertising and marketing, Variable – vary with the level of outputexamples?Materials and components, energy, labour?In the long run, all costs are variable

Page 13: wbsliveJune2010

In reality, it’s not as clear cut

Some costs are “quasi-fixed”especially some types of labourfirms may have invested in trainingemployees have firm-specific knowledge“permanent” employees may have greater commitment, “motivation” etc (see OB!)

Page 14: wbsliveJune2010

Key determinants of the AC curve

How large are “fixed” costs – ones that will be the same irrespective of output?What happens to variable costs as output increases? Will these rise or fall? “Increasing”, “constant” or “diminishing” returns?

Page 15: wbsliveJune2010

The “Fixed cost” effect

Suppose a firm has FC of €10 million If it produces 1 million units, then average fixed cost (AFC) = (€10 million/I million) = €10 per unitIf it produces 5 million, then AFC = €2 per unitIf 10 million, AFC = €1 per unitAnd so on

Page 16: wbsliveJune2010

This alone would produce a downward sloping “short-run” average cost curve

But can be reinforced by increasing returns (eg division of labour effects)These will reduce average variable costSo average total cost falls even more as output is increasedBut eventually the firm is probably going to run into diminishing returnsWhich push up average variable cost, and, if they are strong enough, average total cost

Page 17: wbsliveJune2010

Cost

Output (Q)

AC

0 Q1 Q0

AC1 AC0

Hence the “text-book” “U-shaped” average cost curve

Page 18: wbsliveJune2010

Cost/ Price

Output (Q) 0

AC1 “flute”

AC

“Type 1 Vulnerability”

Page 19: wbsliveJune2010

Cost/ Price

Output (Q) 0

D1

AC1 “flute”

AC

“Type 1 Vulnerability”

Page 20: wbsliveJune2010

Cost/ Price

Output (Q) 0 Q0

€0

D1

AC1 “flute”

AC

“Type 1 Vulnerability”

Page 21: wbsliveJune2010

Cost/ Price

Output (Q) 0 Q1 Q0

€1

€0

D1

AC1 “flute”

D2

AC

“Type 1 Vulnerability”

Page 22: wbsliveJune2010

Cost/ Price

Output (Q) 0 Q1 Q0

€1

€0

D1

AC2 “saucer” “saucer”

AC1 “flute”

D2

AC

“Type 1 Vulnerability”

Page 23: wbsliveJune2010

Cost/ Price

Output (Q) 0 Q1 Q0

€1 €2

€0

D1

AC2 “saucer” “saucer”

AC1 “flute”

D2

AC

“Type 1 Vulnerability”

Page 24: wbsliveJune2010

Last year in the UK…

Setanta TVSold (sports) subscription TV in the UK Major contract - £392m pa for Premier League footballMajor (but not only) source of revenue – subscriptionsNeeded 1.9m subscribers to break evenOnly had 1.2m!

Page 25: wbsliveJune2010

Type 2 Vulnerability

is caused by a shift in the cost curve so costs rise at all levels of outputis important in an upturn (costs of inputs “bid up”)High type 2 Vulnerability is caused by high input cost intensityeg cost of construction materials for builders(Wembley stadium???)

Page 26: wbsliveJune2010

“Type 2 Vulnerability”

Cost

Output (Q)

AC1

0

Page 27: wbsliveJune2010

“Type 2 Vulnerability”

Cost

Output (Q)

AC1

0

AC2

Page 28: wbsliveJune2010

Prices and Recession

Global Composite Carbon Steel Price(source: worldsteelprices.com)

0

200400

600

800

10001200

1400

Month

$/t

Page 29: wbsliveJune2010

CEMEX reports fourth-quarter and full-year 2009 results

MONTERREY, MEXICO. January 26, 2010 - CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (NYSE: CX), announced today that consolidated net sales decreased 17% in the fourth quarter of 2009, to US$3.4 billion, and decreased 28% for the full year, to US$14.5 billion, versus the comparable periods in 2008. Adjusting for the exclusion of our Venezuelan operations, the sale of our assets in Australia and the Canary Islands, and currency fluctuations, net sales decreased 20% in the fourth quarter and decreased 19% for the full year of 2009.

EBITDA fell 37% in the fourth quarter of 2009 to US$474 million and decreased 35% for the full year to US$2.7 billion. On a like-to-like basis, EBITDA decreased 39% in the fourth quarter and decreased 25% for the full year of 2009.

http://www.cemex.com/qr/mc_qr_012610.asp

Page 30: wbsliveJune2010

What does the AC curve look like in practice?

Cost

Output (Q)

AC

0 Q1 Q* (MES)

AC1 AC0

AC1

Page 31: wbsliveJune2010

“MES”?

The “Minimum Efficient Scale” (or “Minimum Efficient Size”) of operationsHow big is this relative to the market?How much cost disadvantage is a firm at if it produces significantly less than MES?

Page 32: wbsliveJune2010

What does the AC curve look like in practice?

Cost

Output (Q)

AC

0 Q1 Q* (MES)

AC1 AC0

AC1

Page 33: wbsliveJune2010

What does the AC curve look like in practice?

Cost

Output (Q)

AC

0 Q1 Q* (MES)

AC1 AC0

AC2

AC1

Page 34: wbsliveJune2010

What does the AC curve look like in practice?

Cost

Output (Q)

AC

0 Q1 Q* (MES)

AC1 AC0

AC2

AC3

AC1

Page 35: wbsliveJune2010

What does the AC curve look like in practice?

Cost

Output (Q)

AC

0 Q1 Q* (MES)

AC1 AC0

AC2

AC3

AC1

AC4

Page 36: wbsliveJune2010

You can infer the shape of AC various ways

Eg studying past accounts of the firmsBut there are other waysOther published information“engineering estimates”Published economic estimatesThe key point is that you make sensible inferences from whatever data is available

Page 37: wbsliveJune2010

For example

Fixed and variable costsWhat proportion of the firm’s costs are really fixed (or “quasi-fixed”?) →“Type 1 vulnerability”“Internal” and “external” costs“Type 2 vulnerability” will be greater, the more of a firm’s costs are “bought in”

Page 38: wbsliveJune2010

Economic Vulnerability in Practice : The Case of Nippon Steel

Steel Production Costs in 2009 ( Source : SteelontheNet )

%Internal Costs as a % of Total Costs 28%Fixed costs as a % of Internal Costs 85% ( high type 1 )External ( Bought-in) Costs as a % of Total Costs 72% ( high type 2 )Iron Ore as a % of Total Costs 25%Coal as % of Total Costs 34%Other external costs ( scrap, oxygen,energy etc ) 13%

Page 39: wbsliveJune2010

To summarise - Vulnerability…

Shows how much the firm could be “hurt” by changes in its product market (because sales volumes fall)And in its input markets (because input prices rise)

Page 40: wbsliveJune2010

Another key question is

How exposed is the firm to such markets?For example, in its product market does the firm simply have to take the “going market price”?Or can it have an “active pricing strategy”?Does it have some control, or discretion over input prices?

Page 41: wbsliveJune2010

In economic terms, this is about how competitive the product and input markets areLessons 2 and 3 deal with this.

Page 42: wbsliveJune2010

At the seminar in September

We’ll be developing the concept of “exposure”…to the firm’s product and input markets…and to the wider macroeconomy…and looking at some of the implications of all this for strategy

Page 43: wbsliveJune2010

Anything else?