Upload
wei
View
51
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Wavelet Spectral Finite Elements for Wave Propagation in Composite Plates with Damages. Ratneshwar Jha, Clarkson University S. Gopalakrishnan, Indian Institute of Science Grant Number FA9550-09-1-0275 Period: April 2009 – Nov 2012 Program Manager: Victor Giurgiutiu/David Stargel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Wavelet Spectral Finite Elements for Wave Propagation in Composite Plates with Damages
Ratneshwar Jha, Clarkson UniversityS. Gopalakrishnan, Indian Institute of Science
Grant Number FA9550-09-1-0275Period: April 2009 – Nov 2012
Program Manager: Victor Giurgiutiu/David Stargel
AFOSR Annual Structural Mechanics Grantees/Contractors Meeting
28 July 2009 Fairborn, OH
Project Objectives
Develop Methodology for Prediction of Damage Type and Severity in Composite Plates Using Lamb Waves
Task 1
Develop Spectral Finite Element (SFE) models for damages in composite plates (delamination, arbitrarily oriented crack, transverse crack)
Task 2
Perform extensive experimental studies with various type and level of damages; Obtain characteristic signals for damages using ‘time reversal’ technique; Implement efficient damage detection methods
Outline
• Background• Time Reversal • Modified Time Reversal• Experimental Setup• Results and Discussions• Conclusions
Spectral Finite Element
Spectral finite element method highly suitable for wave propagation analysis due to its frequency domain approach; Yields models that are many orders smaller than conventional FEM
Wavelet spectral finite element can accurately model 2-D plate structures of finite dimensions, unlike the existing Fourier transform based SFE which cannot handle waveguides of short lengths
WSFE – 1 Element
2-D FE - 6432 four-noded plane stress quad elements
Axial velocity at midpoint of edge AB in [04/904] cantilever plate with LX =0.5 m and LY=0.25 m due to tip impulse load applied in axial directions along AB
Introduction
• In the case of detection of small delaminations, the spectral finite element analysis is more sensitive to small stiffness changes and has been used extensively .
• Such spectral finite element models are available only for few regular geometries, which is the motivation for the development of an approximate model.
• In this presentation an approximate spectral finite element model is developed, where the wave number is approximated using a suitable approximation function of frequency , the coefficients of which are obtained from the experimentally measured dispersion relation
3/)1()3/3(2
)3/2(1
nnaaak
Wave number is approximated using a suitable approximation function of frequency
where ω is the frequency
dk
dωCg
(1)
Therefore from equation (1),
gn
n Caaad
dk/11)3/)1((1)3/3(
21)3/2(
1
(2)
WAVE NUMBER APPROXIMATION
This approximated wave number is now applied to the equation for finding the spectral amplitudes of the displacement fields and the stiffness matrix is calculated in the same way as an exact model
0 1 2 3 4
x 10-4
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Time (Sec)
Load
(N)
0 2 4 6 8
x 104
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3x 10
-5
Frequency (kHz)
Spe
ctra
l am
plitu
de
0 0.5 1 1.5
x 10-3
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Time (sec)
Load
(N) 0 5 10 15
x 104
0
2
4
6
x 10-5
frequency(Hz)
spec
tral a
mpl
itude
Single frequency tone-burst sinusoidal pulse modulated at 20kHz.The spectral amplitude over the frequency axis is shown in inset
Broad band pulse used to study the response of the beam. The spectral amplitude over the frequency axis is shown in the inset
Signals used for SFE Simulations
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 120000
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Wavenum
ber,
kb
Frequency (Hz)
Theoryn=4n=5n=6n=7
. Spectrum relation for the beam (An aluminum beam of 0.8 m length and cross sectional area 10 mm x 10 mm ) using Timoshenko beam theory and approximate model
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
x 10-3
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6 T
ransvers
e v
elo
city a
t im
pact
node(m
m/s
ec)
Time(sec)
theory
approx(n=7)
Comparison of transverse velocity history at the cantilever tip due to a modulated sine pulse applied at the same location using approximate model (n=7)
and using theory
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
x 10-3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Tra
nsvers
e v
elo
city
at im
pact node(m
m/s
ec)
Time(sec)
theory
n=7
n=6
n=5
n=4
Comaprison of transverse velocity history at the cantilever tip due to the broad band pulse applied at the same location using approximate model
and using theory
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
x 10-3
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
Tra
nsve
rse
ve
locity a
t im
pa
ct n
od
e(m
m/s
ec)
Time(sec)
Theory
approx (n=7)
Comparison of the transverse velocity history calculated at the tip of the cantilever using approximate spectral model and using theoretical SFEM results for the delaminated beam (L=0.8 m, L1=0.2 m and delamination
length=15 mm)
0 0.5 1 1.5
x 10-3
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Time (sec)
Tra
nsvers
e v
elo
city
at im
pact node (
mm
/sec)
theory
approx (n=7)
Comparison of the transverse velocity history at the tip of the cantilever beam using approximate model (n=7) and theory for the delaminated beam (L=1 m, L1=0.75 m, delamination length=20 mm)
• Numerical results shows that the approximate model using only seven points (n=7) itself shows excellent match with the theory, in both healthy and delaminated beam.
• This implies that the model is suitable for the detection of damage location in a delaminated beam
Time Reversal Method
• Ing and Fink (1998)– Increase Lamb wave resolution using Time Reversal Mirrors– Detect flaws using a pulse-echo technique
• Sohn and Park (2004 and 2007)– Baseline free damage detection– Detect presence and location of flaws using pitch-catch technique
(using A0 Lamb wave mode)
– Analyze effects of temperature on TRM
• Butenasand and Kazys (2006)– Numerical validation of TRM
• Giurgiutiu (2008)– Experimental and analytical validation of TRM using A0, S0 and
A0+S0 modes
Modified Time Reversal Method
Significant reduction in actuation hardware
Damage Index
Quantifies difference between actuated and time reversed signals
Sohn-Park et al.
Current
2
2 2
( )N
L
N
I VDI
I
Modified Damage Index
• Sohn-Park normalize input and time reversed signals with their peak amplitudes– DI quantifies changes in frequency and signal
shape– DI does not capture amplitude change
• Current procedure normalizes both input and time reversed signals with a common value
- DI quantifies amplitude change as well
Experimental Setup
Actuation signal Tone burst
• 20 kHz• 9.5 cycles
Damage Index Values (Baseline)
Damage Index Values (Path 1-2)
Damage Index Values (Path 1-3)
Damage Index Values (Path 2-3)
Results (Signal Path 1-2)
Results (Signal Path 1-3)
Results (Signal Path 2-3)
Conclusions
• Results show that modified time reversal method identifies damage – Presence– Location– Severity
• Baseline (healthy) data for test specimen not needed