W-333, AIRFIELD LIGHTING SYSTEM, MARKINGS, … · i Orlando Executive Airport W-333 Airfield Lighting System, Marking, Signage and Other Airport Equipment Assessment Final Report

FINAL

REPORT

Prepared By AVCON, INC.

5555 E. Michigan Street, Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32822

407.599.1122 407.599.1133

www.avconinc.com 2015.070.04

ORLANDO EXECUTIVE AIRPORT (ORL) Orlando, Florida

W-333, AIRFIELD LIGHTING SYSTEM, MARKINGS, SIGNAGE

AND OTHER AIRPORT EQUIPMENT ASSESSMENT

DECEMBER 2015

GREATER ORLANDO AVIATION AUTHORITY

Prepared For GREATER ORLANDO AVIATION AUTHORITY

http://www.avconinc.com/

i

Orlando Executive Airport W-333 Airfield Lighting System, Marking, Signage

and Other Airport Equipment Assessment

Final Report December 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... ES-1 1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................... 1-1 2 HISTORY .................................................................................................................... 2-1 3 ELECTRICAL INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 3-1 4 SITE VISIT SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 4-1 5 AIRFIELD LIGHTING VAULT ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 5-1

A. GENERAL .......................................................................................................... 5-1 B. ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND DISTRIBUTION ................................................... 5-1 C. CONSTANT CURRENT REGULATORS (CCR) ................................................. 5-7 D. PAPI POWER AND CONTROL AT THE AIRFIELD LIGHTING VAULT ............ 5-12 E. MIXING CABLES OF VARIOUS VOLTAGE SYSTEMS.................................... 5-13 F. LIGHTNING PROTECTION AND GROUNDING ............................................... 5-14 G. WORKING SPACE ABOUT EQUIPMENT (8) Appendix F ................................ 5-14 H. SAFETY BOARD .............................................................................................. 5-17 I. AIRFIELD LIGHTING VAULT STRUCTURE ..................................................... 5-17 J. AIRFIELD LIGHTING HOME RUN DUCT BANK .............................................. 5-17 K. AIRFIELD LIGHTING CONTROL AND MONITORING SYSTEM (ALCMS) ...... 5-18

6 AIRFIELD LIGHTING EQUIPMENT ............................................................................ 6-1 A. RUNWAY 7-25 ................................................................................................... 6-1 B. RUNWAY 13-31.................................................................................................. 6-4 C. AIRFIELD SIGNAGE .......................................................................................... 6-5 D. TAXIWAY LIGHTING .......................................................................................... 6-6 E. AIRPORT ROTATING BEACON ........................................................................ 6-7 F. EAST RAMP HIGH MAST LIGHTING ................................................................. 6-8 G. WIND CONES .................................................................................................. 6-10

7 SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS ...................................................................................... 7-1 A. SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS AND EQUIPMENT UPGRADES ........................... 7-1

8 MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................................ 8-1 A. RPM PLACEMENT ............................................................................................. 8-1 B. ENHANCED AIRFIELD MARKINGS ................................................................... 8-2 C. RUNWAY 7-25 RUBBER REMOVAL .................................................................. 8-3

9 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 9-1 A. AIRFIELD LIGHTING VAULT DISTRIBUTION ................................................... 9-1 B. AIRFIELD LIGHTING HOME RUN DUCT BANK AND L-824 CABLE ................. 9-1 C. AIRFIELD LIGHTING AND SIGNAGE ................................................................ 9-1 D. AIRPORT ROTATING BEACON ........................................................................ 9-2 E. MISCELLANEOUS NAVAIDS ............................................................................. 9-2 F. EAST RAMP HIGH MAST LIGHTING ................................................................. 9-2

10 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)/ IMPLEMENTATION PLAN............... 10-1 A. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................. 10-1 B. APPROACH ..................................................................................................... 10-1

ii




C. PROJECT PRIORITIZATION............................................................................ 10-2 D. SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 10-2

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Aerial Photo of Orlando Executive Airport (ORL) .................................................1-1 Figure 2: Orlando Army Air Base - Circa 1954 (3) Appendix F ....................................................2-1 Figure 3: Airfield Lighting Evaluation Scope ........................................................................3-1 Figure 4: Airfield Lighting Vault (AFL Vault) ........................................................................5-1 Figure 5: 230 kW, 288 kVA Diesel Generator .....................................................................5-2 Figure 6: Airfield Lighting Vault Electric Room Southeast Wall from Left to Right:

Panel MDP-1, Automatic Transfer Switch, Normal Power Main Disconnecting Means ...........................................................................................5-3

Figure 7: Interior of Automatic Transfer Switch ...................................................................5-3 Figure 8: Vault and Generator Shunt Trip “Break Glass” Stations .......................................5-4 Figure 9: Typical Phenolic Nameplates on Main Disconnect and Regulator #4 ...................5-5 Figure 10: Sample Phenolic Nameplate on the Front of a CCR ............................................5-5 Figure 11: Generic Arc-Flash label .......................................................................................5-7 Figure 12: 1986 “HSB” CCR .................................................................................................5-8 Figure 13: PAPI Step-Up Transformers in Vault .................................................................. 5-12 Figure 14: Working Space Between Runway 7-25 CCR and ALCMS ................................. 5-16 Figure 15: Height and Width of Working Space for Transformer and Contactor .................. 5-16 Figure 16: Small Spall in Vault Roof Deck .......................................................................... 5-17 Figure 17: ALCMS and Pilot Control Lighting ...................................................................... 5-18 Figure 18: Runway 25 PAPI ..................................................................................................6-1 Figure 19: Runway 7 PAPI ....................................................................................................6-2 Figure 20: Runway 25 Runway End Indicator Light (REIL) ...................................................6-3 Figure 21: Runway 31 L-862E Threshold Lights ...................................................................6-4 Figure 22: Taxiway Directional Sign and Location Sign (note faded panels) .........................6-5 Figure 23: Existing L-861T ....................................................................................................6-6 Figure 24: L-802A Airport High Intensity Rotating Beacon ....................................................6-7 Figure 25: High Mast Lighting on North Ramp ......................................................................6-8 Figure 26: Existing Utility Service to be Removed .................................................................6-9 Figure 27: Runway L-807(L) Wind Cone (Centerfield) ........................................................ 6-10 Figure 28: Runway 7 L-806(L) Wind Cone .......................................................................... 6-10 Figure 29: Runway 13 L-806 Wind Cone ............................................................................ 6-11 Figure 30: Runway 31 L-806(L) Wind Cone ........................................................................ 6-11 Figure 31: Existing Airfield Wireless Camera Installation ......................................................7-1 Figure 32: Existing Raised Pavement Marker (RPM) ............................................................8-1

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Existing CCR Summary ...................................................................................... 5-7 Table 2: Existing CCR Power Circuit Data ........................................................................ 5-9 Table 3: Table 1 CCR Output Current From FAA AC 150/5345-10H .............................. 5-10 Table 4: Step B5/B100 Light Output and Life as Related to Current Tolerances ............. 5-11

iii




Table 5: CCR Output Current as a Percentage of Light Output and Lamp Life ............... 5-11 Table 6: NFPA® 70 NEC 2014 - Working Spaces .......................................................... 5-14 Table 7: Summary of Recommended Capital Improvements .......................................... 10-3

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A: Exhibit E-100 - Airfield Lighting Vault One-Line Diagram Exhibit E-101 - Airfield Lighting Vault Building #179 Floor Plan Exhibit E-102 - Vault Panelboard MDP-1 and A Schedules Exhibit E-103 - Vault Panelboard B Schedule Exhibit E-104 - East Ramp High Mast Lighting (Existing & Proposed) Exhibit E-105 - East Ramp High Mast Lighting 14 CFR Part 77 Contours Exhibit E-106 - Airfield Lighting Color Coded Circuit Outline Exhibit E-107 - Airfield Lighting Ductbank Exhibit E-108 - Existing Airfield Gate and Camera Locations

APPENDIX B: Engineer’s Preliminary Opinion of Cost

APPENDIX C: Exhibit C-101 - Proposed RPM Placement Exhibit C-102 - Proposed Enhanced Airfield Markings Exhibit C-103 - Proposed Rubber Removal

APPENDIX D: Consultant’s Staff Resume Summary

APPENDIX E: Informational References

APPENDIX F: Report Bibliography

APPENDIX G: Information Sources

APPENDIX H: Pages from FDOT Statewide Striping Contract (Hi-Lite)

APPENDIX I: Utility System Base Map Updates Airfield Lighting Cabling Map FAA Airfield Cabling Map (Transmitted Under Separate Cover)

APPENDIX J Generator Load Bank Test Results

ES-1




EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The Greater Orlando Aviation Authority (GOAA) retained AVCON, Inc. (AVCON) to complete an Airport-wide Lighting System, Marking, Signage and Other Airport Equipment Assessment, including a Condition Assessment of the electrical vault at Orlando Executive Airport (ORL), as a follow-up to a similar facility assessment performed in 2002. The project included the following major elements:

Completion of an operational and code assessment of the airfield lighting vault; Visual review of the existing airfield lighting, guidance signs and other NAVAID systems; East Ramp concept high mast lighting; Evaluation of the existing Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Security Cameras; Evaluation of the enhanced airfield markings, raised pavement markers (RPMs), and

rubber removal at designated locations on the airfield; and Development of a CIP Implementation Plan (2015-2026) to complete the recommended

options. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS During the summer and fall of 2015, several meetings and site visits with ORL and other GOAA staff were conducted as part of the project to evaluate the existing facilities and to prepare recommendations for GOAA to address and implement their repairs, rehabilitation, and/or replacement. In summary, the following was assessed:

Airfield Lighting Vault Distribution – Overall, the airfield lighting vault electrical distribution is in satisfactory condition. Interior working space around the electrical equipment has several issues that must be addressed, including compliance with working space conditions, grounding repairs and additional lightning protection installation.

Airfield Lighting Vault - The existing vault building is an aging and out-of-date structure, and the footprint is not conducive to further expansion. The existing regulators and generator are also older, making replacement parts difficult to obtain. Multiple near and long term solutions are addressed in the report, with the ultimate recommendation being a complete replacement of the vault and all associated equipment (including a new location).

Airfield Lighting Equipment: o Home Run – In the short term, the airfield lighting vault home run cabling needs

to be replaced. Long term, the home run duct bank and cabling will need to be replaced to accommodate the new airfield lighting vault.

ES-2




o Lighting and Signage – The existing quartz incandescent lighting and signage systems need to be replaced with energy efficient LED fixtures and signs. To gain the most efficiency, the L-830 isolation transformer needs to be matched to the fixture/sign power rating. The airfield signs, lighting fixtures (all incandescent), L-824 cables, L-823 connectors, and L-830 isolation transformers should also be replaced.

o Airport Rotating Beacon – Similar to other electrical components on the airfield, the Airport’s rotating beacon needs to be replaced and the tower updated as described further in this report (including a new location). Multiple near term repair efforts are also provided in the interim while funding for the beacon replacement is procured.

o NAVAIDs (PAPIs, REILs, and Wind Cones) – Replacement is recommended for each of the Airport-owned PAPIs and REILs (with the exception of the Runway 13 REIL), and require adjustment in order to comply with Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) Engineering Brief 79. Of the five (5) existing wind cones, three (3) are LED units. It is recommended that the remaining two (2) units be upgraded to LED, as well as improving the electrical service to all of the wind cones, to ensure compliance with FAA EB-79.

Apron High Mast Lighting – The existing high mast lighting on the East Ramp is

located in the center of the ramp, which is not desirable. New high mast lighting is being proposed on the north edge of the East Ramp.

Surveillance Cameras – The existing Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) cameras are outdated (analog) and non-functional a portion of the time. New digital cameras will be installed and will utilize the existing power source at each location (solar or hard wired). In addition, upgraded software is being proposed to replace the old system.

Miscellaneous Civil Improvements – Various surface improvements within the airfield pavement footprint are being recommended, including new taxiway centerline reflective raised pavement markers (RPM), rubber removal, enhanced taxiway centerline markings, and Surface Painted Holding Position Signs (SPHPS), all in an effort to improve aircraft safety on the airfield and to prevent runway incursions.

CIP IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The final component of this Airport facility assessment was to construct a Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which compiles a listing of associated costs for all of the recommended improvements identified above and within the report. The cost estimates were developed for GOAA in order to create projects of different timeframes/priorities for funding and budgeting purposes (between 2015-2026). Table ES.1 summarizes the various cost estimates within the framework requested by GOAA, including prescribed percentages of the construction costs for Detailed Pricing Allowance, Mobilization, Maintenance of Traffic (MOT), Professional Fees, and Contingency.

ES-3




Table ES-1: Summary of Recommended Capital Improvements (2015-2026)

1-1




1 BACKGROUND Pursuant to an agreement between the Greater Orlando Aviation Authority (GOAA) and AVCON, Inc. (AVCON), a Contract Addendum was issued to AVCON on May 13, 2015, authorizing the completion of an Airport-wide Lighting System, Marking, Signage and Other Airport Equipment Assessment, including a Condition Assessment of the electrical vault at Orlando Executive Airport (ORL) – see Figure 1, aerial photo. In 2002, a similar Airport equipment-related assessment was conducted for ORL. As the development and implementation of the future airfield enhancements move forward, is important that the lighting and signage systems be evaluated and updated as well. The work was performed on behalf of GOAA, who is responsible for the operation, maintenance and development of the Orlando Executive Airport.

The project provides for the following major elements:

Completion of an operational and code

assessment of the airfield lighting vault; Visual review of the existing airfield

lighting and guidance signs; East Ramp concept high mast lighting;

and Evaluate enhanced airfield markings,

raised pavement markers (RPMs), and rubber removal at designated locations on the airfield.

The project goal is to evaluate the existing airfield lighting vault, airfield lighting and signs, and address the requirements for upgrades or enhancements to the airfield lighting and the Airport’s NAVAIDS systems. The evaluation is documented in this Report for review by GOAA.

Figure 1: Aerial Photo of Orlando Executive Airport (ORL)

2-1




2 HISTORY Orlando Executive Airport (ORL) is conveniently located just three (3) miles from the commercial center of Central Florida, Downtown Orlando, which makes it an attractive destination for the business, leisure recreational traveler. The Airport has convenient access to Orlando’s vacation, industrial and business centers. All major destinations are within minutes of the Airport. ORL provides air services through two (2) fixed base operators (FBO) and is equipped to provide many services to the local community, such as law enforcement, air ambulance, and search/rescue capabilities, and functions as the main reliever airport for Orlando International Airport (MCO), serving General Aviation (GA) traffic. The Airport is

sited on 989 acres owned by the City of Orlando. The Greater Orlando Aviation Authority (GOAA) is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the Airport and receives valuable input from the Orlando Executive Airport Advisory Committee (AAC). (1) Appendix F The Orlando Municipal Airport (ORL) opened in 1928 as the first commercial airport in Central Florida, at which time Pan Am offered service to Cuba and Puerto Rico from ORL. In 1940, the US Army Air Corp assumed control of the Airport. The Army used the Airport as a training facility and renamed it Orlando Army Air Base (see Figure 2, aerial photo).

Figure 2: Orlando Army Air Base - Circa 1954 (3) Appendix F

2-2




In 1946, the Airport was returned to the City of Orlando and reverted back to its original name (Orlando Municipal Airport), offering commercial service flights by Delta, Eastern and National Airlines. In the early 1960s, commercial service began to migrate 8 miles south to McCoy AFB property (now Orlando International Airport) and in 1961 was renamed Herndon Airport. In 1976, the City ceded control of the Airport to GOAA. In 1982, the Airport was renamed Orlando Executive Airport, as it remains today. Since its origin as a municipal airport in 1928, ORL has served the aviation needs of the local community and the State. (2) Appendix F Based on a review of record documents, it appears the last substantial upgrade to the Airport’s airfield lighting systems was completed under the BP-21 project in 2001. The scope of BP-21 included rehabilitation of the Runway 7-25 the edge lighting. Record documents also reflect that the last substantial upgrades to the Airport’s signage system appears to have been completed under BP-33 in 2007. A majority of the airfield signage was upgraded within the framework of the BP-33 project. (4) Appendix F

Since the time of these last major rehabilitation projects, the aviation industry has been replacing and upgrading existing incandescent airfield lighting systems using energy-efficient Light Emitting Diode (LED) light source technology. Generally, LED light sources have a 50% or greater energy efficiency over incandescent (halogen quartz) light sources. LED technology has allowed for substantially more efficient and low-energy lighting fixtures and signs. In Central Florida, the sun’s ultraviolet (UV) rays cause the airfield sign panel colors to fade. The signs with panels directly facing the sun will typically fade to the point of needing replacement within approximately five (5) years. Panels not directly facing the sun may last up to seven (7) years. As noted above, eight (8) years have passed since the last major signage upgrade at ORL. It is understood that GOAA’s intention is to replace the existing incandescent airfield lighting and signage systems with new LED light sources to improve visibility of the airfield, reduce maintenance costs, and reduce the life-cycle cost.

3-1




3 ELECTRICAL INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this Report is to document the evaluation of the physical characteristics and the electrical condition of the existing airfield lighting vault and its associated power distribution system. This includes the power system as it originates from the utility service point (normal power), through the vault building distribution system, to the constant current regulators (CCR) and ultimately out to the airfield lighting fixtures. The airfield

lighting vault is equipped with a standby generator should normal power fail. The design of any proposed vault improvements is not included in this Report. Additionally, this Report documents the results of a visual review of specific existing airfield lighting and NAVAID systems. The specific airfield lighting systems evaluated are shown in Figure 3 below.

Figure 3: Airfield Lighting Evaluation Scope

4-1




4 SITE VISIT SUMMARY

AVCON’s electrical staff assigned to the project, Mark Goodacre and Carl Johnson, toured the Orlando Executive Airport’s (ORL) airfield lighting vault on May 26, 2015. The purpose of this initial site visit was to review the current status of the airfield lighting systems with Chris Batiste. At the time of the inspection, Mr. Batiste was the Greater Orlando Aviation Authority (GOAA) maintenance electrician responsible for the electrical systems at ORL. Due to his hands-on knowledge of ORL’s systems, AVCON sought Mr. Batiste’s expertise to determine if any known concerns existing regarding the systems discussed in this Report. AVCON discussed the existing conditions of the Airport electrical systems with GOAA Electrical Maintenance. A summary follows: Runway 7-25 L-824 cable and L-830

isolation transformers have an extremely low insulation resistance value and are in need of replacement;

Runway 7-25 High Intensity Runway Light (HIRL) fixtures are 14 years old and incandescent; replacement with HIRL LED fixtures should be considered;

Overall, the airfield lighting home run cables generally have a low insulation resistance value and are in need of replacement;

The Runway 31 Runway End Identifier Lights (REILs) are in need of replacement;

Runway 7, Runway 13, and Runway 31

Precision Approach Path Indicators (PAPIs) are in need of replacement;

Runway 13-31 fixtures, cables, and transformers and are in need of replacement; LED HIRLs should be considered;

The Runway 13-31 threshold light

configuration does not conform with current Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards and must be addressed;

The Airfield signage is generally in poor condition, especially on the west and south sides;

Taxiways on the west side of the airfield,

south of Runway 7-25, and east of Runway 13-31 utilize incandescent fixtures, which are generally in poor condition; replacement with LED fixtures should be considered.

During the morning of July 21, 2015, AVCON’s electrical staff met GOAA’s maintenance electrician at the airfield lighting vault. The purpose of this visit was the photographic inventory and to visually evaluate the airfield lighting vault equipment. Following the airfield lighting vault review, AVCON’s electrical staff met with Mary Maher (Manager, ORL General Aviation/GOAA) and Hilary Maull (AVCON Project Manager) for an airfield tour. Ms. Maher escorted the AVCON Team throughout the AOA to examine various aspects of the airfield being included in this Report.

4-2




On October 1, 2015, Ms. Maull and Mr. Goodacre met Ms. Maher onsite to perform a field review of the existing airfield cameras, solar panels, etc., as well as to inventory and evaluate the five (5) existing wind cones on the airfield. Following the airfield visit, Ms. Maher provided access to the Airport offices

where the camera equipment is housed and monitored. It was noted that several of the airfield cameras were not producing viable images at the time of the visit. The Airport’s project binders from previous airfield camera projects were also made available to AVCON staff for review.

5-1




5 AIRFIELD LIGHTING VAULT ASSESSMENT A. GENERAL

The Orlando Executive Airport (ORL) airfield lighting (AFL) vault, Building #179, is located on the north side of the Airport adjacent to the Atlantic Aviation FBO. The ORL AFL vault’s physical address is 401 Herndon Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32803. See Figure 4 for photo of Airfield Lighting Vault.

B. ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND

DISTRIBUTION Please refer to the Airfield Lighting Vault

One Line Diagram (Drawing E-100) and the Airfield Lighting Vault Floor Plan (Drawing E-101) during the following discussion. Drawings E-100 and E-101 can be found in Appendix A. The AFL vault is equipped with an 800 ampere, 208Y/120-volt, three-phase, four-wire electrical distribution system. The normal (utility) power is provided by Orlando Utilities Commission (OUC). Normal power is

connected via an OUC 300 kVA oil-filled transformer, OUC #202P202. The OUC transformer is located approximately 35 feet south of the vault. The OUC electrical service meter number is #16507948. The AFL vault normal power main disconnecting means (utility main circuit breaker) is located on the southeast wall of the vault electric room and is labeled with a phenolic nameplate. A 230 kW, 288 kVA standby diesel generator set is available for backup power, should the normal power fail. The diesel generator set was manufactured by Cummins Power Generation of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and is equipped with an integral 800 ampere circuit breaker. The circuit breaker is mounted on the generator and is contained within the generator enclosure, not within the vault building. The standby generator, shown in Figure 5, failed in the spring of 2014. An emergency repair purchase order was executed to provide repair services for the standby generator; however, parts for the existing PC3100 generator control system were no longer available. Cummins Power South removed and replaced the PC3100 control with the new PC3300 control along with a new annunciator, display, engine wiring harness, alternator wiring harness, and governor control, which included load bank testing and start-up service.

Figure 4: Airfield Lighting Vault (AFL Vault)

5-2




In general, the generator appears to have been well maintained during its life. It was recorded that a two-hour load bank test was performed on October 1, 2015. The generator performed adequately during the test. Moving forward, it is recommended that the following minimum durations for an annual load bank test:

25% load 30 minutes 50% load 30 minutes 75% load 1 hour 100% load 2 hours (plus standard cool

down period)

It is further recommended that during the annual load bank test, the generator run a minimum of two (2) hours at full load to burn off any unburned fuel residue that was not burned during normal exercising or utility failures during the year. When generators are run at medium-to-light loads, “wet stacking” occurs. This happens as a result of unburnt fuel being retained on the exhaust side of the turbocharger. Running at 100% load will burn out the fuel residue during the load bank test, indicated by the dark black smoke coming out of the exhaust. Once the residue is cleaned out, the exhaust smoke will typically turn somewhat clear.

Figure 5: 230 kW, 288 kVA Diesel Generator Generator Load Test Report

5-3




Both the normal (utility) power and generator (standby) electrical sources provide power to the airfield lighting systems and vault through a Cummins Power Generation Automatic Transfer Switch, model OTPCD-5004568 (refer to Figures 6 & 7). The automatic transfer switch and the main vault power distribution panel are located on the southeast wall of the AFL vault electric room. The switch is equipped with the manufacturer’s label which identifies it as an automatic transfer switch, but is not labeled with a phenolic nameplate. The switch provides power to the main vault power distribution panel (MDP-1), and is rated 800-ampere, 208 volts, four pole. Verification of the circuit breaker trip settings or calibration of the trip units are not included within the scope of this Report.

Figure 6: Airfield Lighting Vault Electric Room Southeast Wall from Left to Right: Panel MDP-1, Automatic Transfer Switch, Normal Power Main Disconnecting Means

Figure 7: Interior of Automatic Transfer Switch

5-4




Panel MDP-1 is a main lug only, 800 ampere, 208Y/120 volt, three phase, four-wire panel. MDP-1 provides power to the Runway 7-25 constant current regulator (CCR), the Runway 13-31 CCR, a spare CCR, Panel A, and Panel B. Panel A is a main lug only, 400 ampere, 208Y/120 volt, three phase, four-wire panel, and provides power to six (6) taxiway CCRs, three (3) PAPIs, and other NAVAID equipment. Panel B is a main lug only, 400 ampere, 208Y/120 volt, three phase, four-wire panel, and provides power to the vault loads

and other miscellaneous loads. The panels are labeled with phenolic nameplates which identify the panel designations only. See Figure 8 and Exhibit E-101 in Appendix A for additional information. There are two shunt trip “Break Glass” stations for the vault power. One station (normal) is located adjacent to the door on the north exterior face of the electric room; the other station (standby) is located on the northeast corner of the generator enclosure.

Figure 8: Vault and Generator Shunt Trip “Break Glass” Stations Currently, both the existing shunt trip signs appear small and unnoticeable (only the building unit identifies multiple stations to trip power). It is recommended to combine the two existing shunt trip stations into a single station, and install a large sign indicating “SHUNT TRIP” immediately adjacent to the station. In an emergency situation, this installation would assist in quickly and effectively locating both shunt trips, to help mitigate the potential for a shock hazard or a fatal accident.

Panel schedules are identified on Drawings E-102 and E-103, Appendix A. These panel schedules are based on as-built drawings and information obtained during the site visit, and appear to be complete. The normal power and generator main disconnect devices have phenolic nameplates identifying their function, as do most of the CCRs. However, not all sources of power are included on the phenolic nameplates. See photos below (Figure 9), depicting typical phenolic nameplates found on the vault equipment.

5-5




Figure 9: Typical Phenolic Nameplates on Main Disconnect and Regulator #4 It is important that nameplates adequately describe the function of the particular equipment involved. Nameplates for panelboards and other equipment should include the panel/equipment designation, panel name, source(s) of power & voltage, and phase of the supply. For example, "Equip YY, Panel A, fed from Panel XYZ, 480/277V, 3-phase, four-wire." Consistency is key to the effectiveness of nameplates. The unique name, number, power source(s)/phase number, voltage level, and

any additional pertinent information about each piece of equipment should be included on the nameplate that is referencing the respective equipment. For example, in Figure 9, the nameplate calls out “MAIN DISCONNECT.” It is unclear if this is indicating the “normal power” or “standby power”, etc. Similarly, the CCR nameplate does not indicate the source of CCR control power. See Figure 10 for an example of a nameplate providing the proper information.

Figure 10: Sample Phenolic Nameplate on the Front of a CCR

5-6




The present total demand on the electrical service and system loads were provided to GOAA as part of BP-21 in 2001 and in the assessment performed in 2002. An arc-flash hazard assessment is an effective means of identifying electrical hazards in the work place. More specifically, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires that an assessment be performed to: “determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).” There are no records of an Arc-Flash Hazard Assessment being performed in the past at ORL, but a Short Circuit/Coordination/Arc-Flash Study is highly recommended for the AFL vault electrical system. See Figure 11 for a generic Arc-Flash label. An effective electrical safety program is best developed when employees understand and abide by OSHA and the National Fire

Protection Association (NFPA) requirements, as identified below. NFPA® 70E, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace – 2015 is a national consensus standard recognized by OSHA as an effective means to provide safe working conditions for electrical workers. NFPA 70E defines a Risk Assessment as “An overall process that identifies hazards, estimates the potential severity of injury or damage to health, estimates the likelihood of occurrence of injury or damage to health, and determines if protective measures are required.” Article 110 requires the electrical safety program to have a risk assessment procedure. (6) Appendix F NFPA 70E is not an OSHA standard but is used by OSHA as a means to determine if an employer has made a good faith effort to conform with OSHA’s General Duty Clause:

OSHA General Duty Clause

“SEC. 5. Duties (5) (a) Each employer

(1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees; (2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act.

(b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations, and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct.”

5-7




Figure 11: Generic Arc-Flash label

Also, please reference NFPA® 70, National Electrical Code, 2014 (NEC) Articles 110.21 and 110.24. (7) Appendix F C. CONSTANT CURRENT REGULATORS (CCR)

Table 1: Existing CCR Summary

EXISTING CCR SUMMARY

Circuit Name Circuit Description

CCR Size/ Step

Manuf. CCR Tech.

CCR FAA Type

CCR Age

R/W 7-25 Runway 7-25 Edge, HIRL 30/5 Crouse-

Hinds Ferro L-828 Est.14 yr.

R/W 13-31 Runway 13-31 Edge, HIRL 30/5 Siemens Thyristor L-828 9 yr.

1 Taxiway Circuit # 1 10/3 Siemens Thyristor L-828 13 yr.

2 Taxiway Circuit # 2 7.5/3 ADB Thyristor L-828 Est.19 yr.

3 Taxiway Circuit # 3 4/3 ADB Thyristor L-828 23 yr.

4 Taxiway Circuit # 4 15/3 Siemens Ferro L-829 7 yr.



HSB Hot Standby CCR 30/5 ADB Ferro L-828 29 yr.

5-8




Only three (3) of the nine (9) CCRs are of the ferro-resonant design (remainder are Thyristor). Ferro-resonant CCRs are typically more efficient and generate less electrical noise than other technologies. Ferro-resonant CCRs, across the spectrum, are typically the most efficient CCR technology throughout their entire load range. Having said that, loading a CCR below 50% is the least efficient segment of a CCR load profile. While the CCRs are capable of 100% loading, typical loading for taxiway CCRs is between 65% and 80% and typical loading for runway CCRs is in the 80% to 90% range. These values are used as a rule of thumb on new designs to allow for expansion. Measurement of the existing CCR loading was not included in the scope of this Report. If the phased conversion of incandescent lamps to LED light sources is implemented throughout the airfield, existing CCRs loads will be decreasing. It is recommended in the future for ORL to power two smaller circuits from a common CCR to increase CCR load and improve efficiency. The loads may be

combined at the vault, retaining smaller circuits which are easier to troubleshoot in the field.

FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5345-10H, dated November 5, 2014, Specification for Constant Current Regulators and Regulator Monitors, is the contemporary version of the AC that specifies the types, sizes, output current, steps, and monitoring points for CCRs. A service life of twenty years or more can typically be expected from these types of CCRs. However, lightning and other events out of the Airport’s control can severely shorten a CCR’s life expectancy. Based upon the CCR serial numbers, five (5) of the CCRs are more than fifteen years old. The “HSB” CCR was manufactured in 1986, as shown in Figure 12. ADB discontinued manufacturing of this CCR model in 2002, thirteen years ago, when their “Signature Series” branding was created.

Figure 12: 1986 “HSB” CCR

5-9




Some CCR parts are no longer available and it is anticipated that support for spare parts will continue to become more challenging. For example, it is believed that the controller board for the HSB CCR may no longer be available. Parts for these older CCRs are expected to become more and more difficult to obtain. Lack of spare parts will shorten the useful life of these older CCRs. Therefore it is strongly recommended to replace the CCRs. A single wholesale replacement is ideal, resulting in a commonality of units and parts; however, if funding restraints are of concern, a phased approach may be considered, replacing the older units first. All of the CCRs have a 6.6-ampere output, and range in size from 4 kW to 30 kW. The two Runways 7-25 HIRL and Runway 13-31 HIRL CCRs have five (5) brightness steps, while all other CCRs have three (3) brightness steps.

The current FAA Advisory Circular 150/5340-30H, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids require High Intensity Runway Lighting (HIRL) systems to be five brightness steps while the Medium Intensity Runway Lighting (MIRL) and Medium Intensity Taxiway Lighting (MITL) are required to be three brightness steps. The vault building is equipped with heating and air conditioning equipment to maintain the internal temperature within acceptable limits. The branch circuits providing electrical power to the CCRs appear to be in good condition. The electrical equipment and CCRs are properly maintained, and the AVL vault is kept clean. The CCRs are enclosed within the AVL vault. The CCRs are fed from the panels listed in Table 2 below:

Table 2: Existing CCR Power Circuit Data

EXISTING CCR POWER CIRCUIT DATA

Circuit Name Circuit Description CCR Size/

Step Panel Circuit Input Voltage

R/W 7-25 Runway 7-25 Edge, HIRL 30/5 MDP-1 5, 7 208V, 1PH

R/W 13-31 Runway 13-31 Edge, HIRL 30/5 MDP-1 1, 3 208V, 1PH

1 Taxiway Circuit # 1 10/3 PANEL A 9, 11 208V, 1PH

2 Taxiway Circuit # 2 7.5/3 PANEL A 5, 7 208V, 1PH





HSB Hot Standby CCR 30/5 MDP-1 9, 11 208V, 1PH

5-10




The CCR output currents should be maintained within the limits specified in FAA AC 150/5345-10H, Specification for Constant Current Regulators and Regulator Monitors.

FAA AC 150/5345-10H Table 1, reprinted in Table 3, denotes the proper CCR output current with the allowable current ranges. Electric current has a significant effect on the lamp brightness and lamp life as demonstrated by the information following this table.

Table 3: Table 1 CCR Output Current From FAA AC 150/5345-10H

TABLE 1 CCR OUTPUT CURRENT FROM FAA AC 150/5345-10H

CLASS STYLE STEP NOMINAL OUTPUT ALLOWABLE RANGE

1 1 3 6.6 A 6.50 A – 6.70 A

2 5.5 A 5.40 A – 5.60 A

1 4.8 A 4.70 A – 4.90 A

1 2 5 6.6 A 6.50 A – 6.70 A

4 5.2 A 5.10 A – 5.30 A

3 4.1 A 4.00 A – 4.20 A

2 3.4 A 3.30 A – 3.50 A

1 2.8 A 2.70 A – 2.90 A

2 2 5 20.0 A 19.70 A – 20.30 A

4 15.8 A 15.50 A – 16.10 A

3 12.4 A 12.10 A – 12.70 A

2 10.3 A 10.00 A - 10.60 A

1 8.5 A 8.20 A – 8.80 A If CCR output current is higher than required, it can significantly reduce lamp life. Whereas a lower than required output current results in inadequate lighting for the pilot while maneuvering on the airfield. Small changes

in CCR output current result in large changes in light output. Variations within the allowable current limits can significantly impact the lighting system, as listed below in Table 4.

5-11




Table 4: Step B5/B100 Light Output and Life as Related to Current Tolerances

STEP B5/B100 LIGHT OUTPUT AND LIFE AS RELATED TO CURRENT TOLERANCES

(5) Appendix F

UPPER CURRENT LIMIT

NOMINAL CURRENT

LOWER CURRENT LIMIT

% OF LAMP LIFE

% OF LUMEN OUTPUT

6.7 A 79% 110%

6.6 A 100% 100%

6.5 A 145% 90%

Source: Data extrapolated from Visual Aids Digest and ADB Airfield Solutions. Low lumen output could result in a significant hazard. Table 5 compares CCR current output to light output and lamp life. In addition to the level of operating current, many other factors affect lamp life such as vibration, heat sources, and mechanical

connections. The data in the table only considers operating current and should not be construed as a guarantee of lamp life in an active airfield lighting fixture. (8) Appendix F

Table 5: CCR Output Current as a Percentage of Light Output and Lamp Life

Source: Data provided by Visual Aids Digest and ADB Airfield Solutions

Note 1: >440% the lamp will probably fail in some other mode prior to reaching this lamp life.

CCR OUTPUT CURRENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF LIGHT OUTPUT AND LAMP LIFE

(5) Appendix F CCR Step

CCR Output Current

Percent of Max Current

Percent of Max Light Output Percent of Lamp Life

7.26 amps 110% 181% 10% 6.93 amps 105% 135% 31% 6.73 amps 102% 113% 62% 6.67 amps 101% 106% 79%

B5/B100 6.6 amps 100% 100% 100% 6.53 amps 99% 94% 127% 6.4 amps 97% 83% 207% 6.34 amps 96% 78% 266% 6.2 amps 94% 68% 440%

B30 5.5 amps 83% 31% Note 1 B4 5.2 amps 79% 23% Note 1 B10 4.8 amps 73% 14% Note 1 B3 4.1 amps 62% 5.2% Note 1 B2 3.4 amps 52% 1.7% Note 1 B1 2.8 amps 42% 0.5% Note 1

5-12




The CCR layout is shown on drawing E-101 in Appendix A. All ORL CCRs are the “DRY” type. “DRY” type indicates the CCRs are air cooled. Generally, many of the older technology CCRs were the “WET” type, oil-cooled. The dry type CCRs perform well and typically require less maintenance since there is no insulating oil requiring regular dielectric testing. The CCRs are currently sitting directly on the concrete floor of the airfield lighting vault. The respective CCR supply conductors are routed from the respective panel through conduit and wire-way to the CCR. Each CCR is bonded to the system ground bus using a copper conductor. See E-101 in Appendix A. The output (5 kV series circuits) of the CCRs are routed through a conduit to the output wire-way. The output wire-way is connected to the airfield lighting underground duct bank and manhole system via conduit. The CCR outputs presently exit the vault and are routed through a manhole immediately east of the vault and then on to the airfield. See E-106 and E-107 in Appendix A.

The interface with the field circuits occurs on the CCR Room east wall (see Drawing E-101, Appendix A). The circuits are routed into the conduit, which penetrates the floor and enters the manhole, before going to the airfield. L-823 connector kits are located in the wire-way to allow disconnecting and shorting of the CCR/airfield lighting circuits for troubleshooting purposes. However, no S-1 cut outs are installed, and therefore access to sections of the wire-way is difficult. D. PAPI POWER AND CONTROL AT

THE AIRFIELD LIGHTING VAULT Panel A provides power to the three (3) PAPIs, the Airport’s rotating beacon, wind cones, airfield lighting control & monitoring system (ALCMS) panel, and the L-854 radio controller. The PAPI power is turned on/off by a contactor. The state of the contactor (on/off) is controlled by the ALCMS. The 208 volts from Panel A, via the contactor is stepped up to 480 volts by a transformer in the vault prior to being sent out to the airfield. See Figure 13.

Figure 13: PAPI Step-Up Transformers in Vault

5-13




E. MIXING CABLES OF VARIOUS VOLTAGE SYSTEMS The wire-way and manhole/duct system used for the 5 kV (5000 volts) airfield lighting series circuit cables is also currently being used for the 480 volt feeders to the PAPIs and other circuits operating at less than 1000 volts. The fiber optic cable used for the ALCMS is also installed within a portion of the airfield lighting duct bank. The 2014 National Electric Code (NEC) Section 300.3(C)(2) (excerpt following)

identifies two categories of circuits: a.) above 1000 volts (ex. 5 kV airfield lighting series circuit unshielded cables); and b.) 1000 volts or less (ex. PAPIs and other NAVAIDs), and prohibits mixing of the two. Therefore, an additional raceway/manhole separate from the 5 kV airfield lighting series circuit cables is needed to house the 1000 volt and less cables.

NEC Section 300.3(C)(2) 300.3 Conductors. (C) Conductors of Different Systems. (1) 1000 Volts, Nominal, or Less. Conductors of ac and dc circuits, rated 1000 volts, nominal, or less, shall be permitted to occupy the same equipment wiring enclosure, cable, or raceway. All conductors shall have an insulation rating equal to at least the maximum circuit voltage applied to any conductor within the enclosure, cable, or raceway. Secondary wiring to electric-discharge lamps of 1000 volts or less, if insulated for the secondary voltage involved, shall be permitted to occupy the same luminaire, sign, or outline lighting enclosure as the branch-circuit conductors. Informational Note No. 1: See 725.136(A) for Class 2 and Class 3 circuit conductors. Informational Note No. 2: See 690.4(B) for photovoltaic source and output circuits. (2) Over 1000 Volts, Nominal. Conductors of circuits rated over 1000 volts, nominal, shall not occupy the same equipment wiring enclosure, cable, or raceway with conductors of circuits rated 1000 volts, nominal, or less unless otherwise permitted in C(300.3)(2)(a) through (C)(2)(d). (a) Primary leads of electric-discharge lamp ballasts insulated for the primary voltage of the ballast, where contained within the individual wiring enclosure, shall be permitted to occupy the same luminaire, sign, or outline lighting enclosure as the branch-circuit conductors. (b) Excitation, control, relay, and ammeter conductors used in connection with any individual motor or starter shall be permitted to occupy the same enclosure as the motor-circuit conductors. (c) In motors, transformers, switchgear, switchboards, control assemblies, and similar equipment, conductors of different voltage ratings shall be permitted. (d) In manholes, if the conductors of each system are permanently and effectively separated from the conductors of the other systems and securely fastened to racks, insulators, or other approved supports, conductors of different voltage ratings shall be permitted.

5-14




Conductors having non-shielded insulation and operating at different voltage levels shall not occupy the same enclosure, cable, or raceway. FAA type L-824 5 kV airfield lighting cable is unshielded. A 7.5 kW and larger CCR have an output voltage of greater than 1,000 volts. F. LIGHTNING PROTECTION AND

GROUNDING

The airfield lighting vault is not equipped with a lightning protection system. Central Florida is one of the highest density lightning flash areas in North America. It is recommended that the airfield lighting vault be equipped with a NFPA 780 and UL 96 compliant lightning protection system. Grounding of the constant current regulators (CCR) appears adequate and in good condition. However, the CCR ground bus does not make a complete loop around the vault interior, allowing for a single point of failure. It is recommended that the ground bus be arranged in a loop configuration.

G. WORKING SPACE ABOUT EQUIPMENT (8) Appendix F

The existing ORL AFL vault interior equipment layout is shown on Drawing E-101 in Appendix A, which does not comply with 2014 NEC “working space” requirements. The subsequent paragraphs are an abbreviated summary of NFPA® 70, National Electrical Code, 2014 (NEC) requirements focusing on working space around electrical equipment since the output voltage of a fully loaded 30 kW, 6.6 ampere CCR is 4,545 volts; Article 110, Part III “Over 600 Volts, Nominal” is also applicable to this discussion. (Note: A 4 kW CCR has an output of 606 volts. A 20 kW CCR has an output of 3,030 volts.) Assembled below is a summary of NEC work space depth requirements. The dimensional data is cited from NEC Table 110.26(A)(1) and Table 110.34(A).

Table 6: NFPA® 70 NEC 2014 - Working Spaces

NFPA® 70 NEC 2014 - WORKING SPACES

NOMINAL VOLTAGE TO

GROUND

MINIMUM CLEAR DISTANCE

CONDITION 1 CONDITION 2 CONDITION 3

0–150 V 3 FT 3 FT 3 FT 151–600 V 3 FT 3 FT 6 IN. 4 FT 601-2500 V 3 FT 4 FT 5 FT

2501–9000 V 4 FT 5 FT 6 FT

Note: Where the conditions are as follows:

5-15




Condition 1 — Exposed live parts on one side of the working space and no live or grounded parts on the other side of the working space, or exposed live parts on both sides of the working space that are effectively guarded by insulating materials. Condition 2 — Exposed live parts on one side of the working space and grounded parts on the other side of the working space. Concrete, brick, or tile walls shall be considered as grounded. Condition 3 — Exposed live parts on both sides of the working space. Condensing NEC Sections 110.26(A)(2) and 110.32 provides the following criteria for the width of work space in front of electrical equipment: Equipment operating over 600 volts - 36

inches. Equipment operating at 600 volts and less

- width of the equipment or 30 inches, whichever is greater.

NEC Section 110.26(A)(3) states: “Height of Working Space. The work space shall be clear and extend from the grade, floor, or platform to a height of 2.0 m (61⁄2 ft.) or the height of the equipment, whichever is greater. Within the height requirements of this section, other equipment that is associated with the electrical installation and is located above or below the electrical equipment shall be permitted to extend not more than 150 mm (6 in.) beyond the front of the electrical equipment.”

It should also be noted that NEC required working space is not permitted to be used for storage. Some typical “Working Space about Equipment” discrepancies are discussed below: 1. Working space in front of CCRs (Figure

14): The distance between the face of the CCR and the face of the ALCMS is required to be 4 feet for CCRs less than 20 kW and 5 feet for CCRs 20 kW or larger. Good practice would be to allow for the larger CCR clearance. The CCR in question is the 30 kW Runway 7-25 CCR which requires 5 feet of working space. The existing spacing is 4 feet - 4 inches. The ALCMS is considered a grounded metal enclosure.

5-16




Figure 14: Working Space Between Runway 7-25 CCR and ALCMS

In addition, non-standard clear working space distances occur in the following locations:

CCR 2 & CCR 3 CCR 1 & CCR 6 R/W 7-25 CCR and L-854 radio controller

2. The height of the working space in front of a transformer and a contactor shall be clear and extend to the floor. The width of the working space shall be 30 inches.

Figure 15: Height and Width of Working Space for Transformer and Contactor

Transformer & Contactor

13-31 CCR

7-25 CCR

Front of ALCMS

7-25 CCR Front of PCL

5-17




Equipment above or below the other/separate equipment requiring access cannot extend more than 6 inches beyond the front of the cabinet. As shown in Figure 15 above, the Runway 13-31 CCR extends more than two feet in front of the transformer and contactor. This condition also exists at multiple locations within the AFL vault. H. SAFETY BOARD The existing airfield lighting vault is not equipped with a FAA AC 150/5340-26C Safety Board. The components and make-up of a Safety Board is described in FAA AC 150/5340-26C, Chapter 2 Part 2.6. I. AIRFIELD LIGHTING VAULT

STRUCTURE The existing AFL vault structure is approximately 75 years old and is showing various signs of deterioration. For example, there is indication of water intrusion in at least two locations and the exterior doors do not seal well. In addition, the following retro-fit installations and indications of decline are present: Hole in concrete roof deck for HVAC duct

work Electric room roof beam damaged during

2001 construction Steel channel reinforcement of the

concrete beam for previous building expansion (CCR room)

Detached roof flashing above entrance doors

Distressed concrete roof deck (south side of building)

Concrete spalls on underside exterior of deck (see Figure 16); signs of moisture penetration

Figure 16: Small Spall in Vault Roof Deck In addition to the above, the “DANGER – HIGH VOLTAGE” signs are missing on the double doors entering the electric room and on the generator enclosure doors. J. AIRFIELD LIGHTING HOME RUN

DUCT BANK The existing airfield lighting home run duct bank was constructed with the original vault circa 1940. The last major update to the airfield lighting vault was performed in 2001. No work was performed on the airfield lighting duct bank at that time. The Airport reported that several of the existing conduits within the duct bank are no longer useable. The duct bank system is the vehicle that connects the airfield lighting power source to the airfield lighting. It is imperative to have a functional airfield lighting duct bank network.

5-18




Older duct banks, prior to PVC, were constructed of materials that swell with age and choke off the conduit cross-sections. Since conduits have started to fail, persistent failure is expected to continue. There is not a cost-effective remedial action available to repair the conduits. A new home run duct bank should be constructed. The new home run duct bank route will be dependent upon the location selected for the new vault. A proposed route is shown on Drawing E-107 contained in Appendix A. If a new vault should be constructed, the homerun duct bank will need to be coordinated with the new vault location. GOAA has funded a project to replace all L-824 cable in the airfield lighting home run circuits. K. AIRFIELD LIGHTING CONTROL

AND MONITORING SYSTEM (ALCMS)

The existing airfield lighting control and monitoring system (ALCMS) is an ADB Airfield Solutions “Navigator Series” L-890 airfield lighting control system. FAA AC 150/5345-56B, Specification for L-890 Airport Lighting Control and Monitoring System (ALCMS), dated 9/29/2011 describes the function and operation of an L-890 system. The ALCMS was installed in 2002.

The system has four major components: Vault PLC Enclosure Vault L-854 Radio Controller (Pilot

Controled Lighting – PCL) Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) PCL

Enclosure ATCT Touch Screen

Figure 17: ALCMS and Pilot Control Lighting

5-19




See Figure 17 for a photo of the Vault PCL enclosure and the PCL enclosure. The vault and ATCT enclosures communicate via a fiber optic connection. The ATCT controls the airfield lighting via a touch screen control panel, which is located in the tower cab. When the tower closes for the evening, the ALCMS is set for “Pilot Control”. During this time, the airfield lighting is

activated by the aircraft radio, via the PCL. It is intended that three clicks on the microphone turns the lights on to the B10 step, five clicks turns the airfield lighting on to the B30 step, and seven clicks turns the airfield lighting on to the B100 step (full intensity). The ALCMS was tested during the sight visit and appears to be functioning properly.

6-1




6 AIRFIELD LIGHTING EQUIPMENT A. RUNWAY 7-25 Runway 7-25 is 6,004 feet long by 150 feet wide and is the primary runway of the Orlando Executive Airport (ORL). The runway is equipped with the following lighting and NAVAID systems: Airport-owned high intensity runway edge

lighting (HIRL). Airport-owned Runway 7 L-881 (2-box)

precision approach path indicator (PAPI). FAA-owned Runway 25 L-880 (4-box) PAPI.

See Figure 18. FAA-owned Runway 25 L-849 Runway End

Indicator Light (REIL).

FAA-owned Runway 7 end is equipped with a FAA-owned MALSR and ILS approach.

FAA-owned Runway 25 ILS and DME approach.

The intention of this Assessment is to evaluate conformance with FAA Engineering Brief EB-79 for all Airport-owned equipment. The existing HIRL L-862 runway edge lights are 14 years old and are quartz incandescent type.

Figure 18: Runway 25 PAPI

6-2




The existing Runway 7-25 high intensity runway light (HIRL) circuit has a low insulation resistance value. FAA AC 150/5340-26C, Maintenance of Airport Visual Aid Facilities, states any circuit measuring less than 1 megohm “is destined for rapid failure.” It is recommended that the quartz incandescent L-862 runway edge lights, L-824 cables, L-823 connectors, and L-830 isolation transformers are replaced, and that light emitting diode (LED) fixtures be considered for replacement of the quartz runway edge lights. However, LED HIRLs, while listed for use by the FAA, are not currently eligible for federal funding participation. When replacing home run cables, all cabling within the common conduit/duct should be

replaced at the same time. It is recommended that design for all future lighting system projects include requirements for field lightning arrestor assemblies, which help protect the fixtures, cables and transformers from the adverse effects of lightning. The existing Runway 7 PAPI is showing its age and is voltage powered. FAA Engineering Brief No. 79 (EB-79), Determining RSA NAVAID Frangibility and Fixed-By-Function Requirements currently mandates the PAPI Power and Control Unit (PCU) and electrical distribution equipment be located outside the runway object free area (ROFA). See Figure 19.

Figure 19: Runway 7 PAPI

6-3




FAA AC 150/5345-28G, Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) Systems, 9/29/2011 states that the maximum allowable distance between the nearest light housing assembly and the PCU is 100 feet. The 100 foot requirement limits the ability to move the PCU out of the ROFA. For this reason, current driven FAA Style B PAPIs should be considered. Another reason to consider using a current driven PAPI is the routing of power cables to the PAPI units in the field. The existing voltage-powered circuits are in the same duct bank and manhole system as the 5 kV airfield lighting series circuit cables. As previously discussed in Chapter 5, NEC Section 300.3(C) prohibits mixing the 5 kV airfield lighting series circuit unshielded cables with the 1000 volt and less voltage-powered PAPI cables in the same raceway or enclosure. Increasing the vault size to add three additional constant current regulators (CCRs) for the three GOAA-owned and maintained PAPIs on Runways 7, 13, and 31 may be cost prohibitive. Since the airfield lighting circuits

are being converted to LED, some of the circuits may be combined on a single CCR and create space for new dedicated PAPI CCRs. Refer to Chapter 5, Section G for details concerning NEC required working space in the vicinity of airfield lighting equipment. Per recommendations made in Chapter 5, a new airfield lighting vault should be considered and included in the Airport’s capital improvement plan.

Part of the Runway 25 & 13 REIL equipment also needs to be relocated in accordance with EB-79. In Figure 19, the copper counterpoise wire is marked by the white vertical PVC pipe. The disposition of the copper counterpoise wire needs to be determined and the white vertical PVC pipe removed. See Section G of this Chapter for additional information regarding Runway 7-25 wind cones.

Figure 20: Runway 25 Runway End Indicator Light (REIL)

6-4




B. RUNWAY 13-31

Runway 13-31 is 4,625 feet long by 100 feet wide. The Runway is equipped with the following lighting and NAVAID systems: Airport-owned high intensity runway edge

lighting (HIRL). Airport-owned Runway 13-31 L-881 (2-

box) precision approach path indicator (PAPI) on both runway ends.

Airport-owned Runway 13 L-849 runway end indicator light (REIL) (new unit).

FAA-owned Runway 31 L-849 REIL.

The intention of this Assessment is to evaluate conformance with FAA Engineering Brief EB-79 for all Airport-owned equipment.

The existing Runway 31 threshold lights are located outboard of the Runway. See Figure 21. FAA Advisory Circular 150/5340-30H, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids states the outer light is to be in line with the runway edge lights. It is recommended that the Runway 31 threshold lights are relocated to comply with the FAA AC. Recommendations for the Airport-owned HIRLS, REILS, and PAPIS associated with Runway 13-31 are similar to those identified in Section A of this Chapter for Runway 7-25.

Figure 21: Runway 31 L-862E Threshold Lights

6-5




C. AIRFIELD SIGNAGE

Airfield signage is generally in poor condition, particularly on the west and south sides of the Airport. The majority of the signs on the airfield are older, ADB incandescent signs as shown in the photos below (see Figure 22), which also includes the runway 7-25 runway

distance remaining (RDR) signs. The existing signs and some panels were installed in the 2007 time period. The ADB signs can be recognized by the tapered lamp housing screw tops. This model sign uses a quartz incandescent lamp.

Figure 22: Taxiway Directional Sign and Location Sign (note faded panels)

6-6




L-858 sign may have a 10 to 20 year life span depending upon severity of weather exposure and level of maintenance. Typically, 15 years can be an expected life span. The cost of light-emitting diode (LED) signs has decreased considerably in the last few years. Currently, the cost of a new LED sign and a new quartz incandescent sign are virtually the same for a 4-module unit. However, the one-module incandescent sign is still less expensive than its LED counterpart. AVCON recommends replacing the older signs with new LED models in lieu of simply replacing panels. The longer life of the LED units, resulting in lower maintenance costs and reduced energy usage, makes the

LED signs a desirable and economical choice. D. TAXIWAY LIGHTING

The taxiways south of Runway 7-25 and east of Runway 13-31 (taxiways E, E1, E2, E3) all utilize incandescent fixtures, as shown in Figure 23, and are generally in poor condition. The west side taxiways (A, E4, E6, F, G, H, K) all utilize incandescent fixtures and are also generally in poor condition. The quartz incandescent L-861T taxiway edge lights, L-824 cables, L-823 connectors and L-830 isolation transformers are all recommended for replacement with LED fixtures.

Figure 23: Existing L-861T (Quartz Incandescent) Taxiway Edge Light with Damaged Concrete Base

6-7




E. AIRPORT ROTATING BEACON

Airport rotating beacons typically have an expected life of up to 20 years depending upon the impacts of environment conditions, as well as the quality and frequency of the maintenance performed over the life of the equipment. The Airport’s existing L-802A high intensity rotating beacon is estimated to be approximately 45 years old and beyond its useful life (see Figure 24). In addition, the existing beacon’s manufacturer stopped making this model in the 1970’s. It is ultimately recommended to include a complete airport rotating beacon replacement in the capital improvement budget. A separate siting study will also be necessary to select the most suitable location and determine the proper rotating beacon mounting height. Case in point – the existing beacon pole is too short. As a result, the beacon light reflects off of some of the nearby hangars.

Short-term basic service/repair efforts may be completed to keep the existing beacon in working order until funding is available for a

complete replacement. These recommended efforts include: replacing the existing bulb with a longer-life, metal halide lamp; inspection/repair of the existing fall protection system; re-painting the existing beacon and pole; and various grounding improvements. Currently, the existing beacon pole has a strike termination device installed, but no visible grounding electrode. It is recommended to have a local grounding electrode installed and bonded to the beacon pole and the circuit equipment grounding conductor. It is further recommended that the lightning protection system on the beacon be inspected for compliance with NFPA 780.

Due to the condition of the existing equipment, GOAA Maintenance staff no longer climbs the pole to service the rotating beacon and appurtenances. Therefore, a lift rented will likely be required to perform the above-recommended items. It should be noted that the existing beacon does have some salvage value for parts.

Figure 24: L-802A Airport High Intensity Rotating Beacon

6-8




F. EAST RAMP HIGH MAST LIGHTING

A proposed layout for the East Ramp high mast lighting is shown on Drawing E-104 and the 14 CFR Part 77 airspace surfaces are shown on Drawing E-105 (see Appendix A). The new East Ramp area lighting design should comply with IES Recommended Practice, RP-37, Outdoor Lighting for the Airport Environment. Figure 25 shows typical high mast lighting on the Airport’s North Ramp.

The proposed lighting layout on Drawing E-104 (see Appendix A) shows adding three additional poles to complement the one existing high mast pole on the East Ramp. Initially, four high mast poles were identified by the Airport for re-use. The individual pole information is summarized below:

Pole # Pole Height From OEA Project # Pole NE-6 61 ft. HX-001

Pole N6 65 ft. 2.5 in. HX-001 Pole 27 60 ft. 2.75 in. BP-8 Pole 29 50 ft. 1 in. BP-8 However, after further evaluation, it was determined that the height of the poles was not appropriate for re-use and that adjustments would need to be made for re-use. Modification to ensure the proper structural integrity to meet current wind loading criteria is estimated to be more costly than the full replacement value. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing poles be salvaged for parts and new poles be purchased and installed.

Figure 25: High Mast Lighting on North Ramp

6-9




As identified on Drawing E-105, the maximum pole height that can be installed at the north edge of the East Ramp is 65 feet due to Part 77 protected surface restrictions. The poles will be spaced away from the taxiway and ramp edges to maintain proper aircraft clearance. LED fixtures will be recommended for this application. Because LED fixtures are far more energy efficient, it may be possible to feed the new poles from the existing high mast circuit. The electrical service will need to be investigated to determine its capacity to

feed additional lighting loads at the time of design. If the service is not capable of providing power, design of a new service will be required. Once the new East Ramp lighting is installed and fully operational, the three existing poles, fixtures, foundations, and electrical service (Figure 26) are recommended for removal. Minor surface repairs will be required where the foundations are removed.

Figure 26: Existing Utility Service to be Removed

6-10




G. WIND CONES

The Airport’s centerfield wind cone is shown in Figure 27. This wind cone is an L-807 LED, internally lighted wind cone with a 12 foot sock. The wind cone is located in the infield area between Taxiways A, B and E. FAA EB-79 describes the agency’s requirements for Fixed-By-Function

equipment, in which the power disconnect switch is not considered Fixed-By-Function. Because the location of the centerfield wind cone disconnects do not comply with FAA EB-79, they need to be removed/reworked for compliance.

Figure 27: Runway L-807(L) Wind Cone (Centerfield)

Figure 28: Runway 7 L-806(L) Wind Cone

6-11




Runway 7 is equipped with an L-806 supplemental wind cone (Figure 28 above). The supplemental wind cone is an internally lighted LED unit. The electrical service needs to be adjusted to be compliant with FAA EB-79. The air terminal on the electrical disconnect regularly snags the wind cone’s fabric sock.

Runway 13 is equipped with an L-806 supplemental wind cone (Figure 29). The supplemental wind cone is an externally lighted incandescent unit. The electrical service needs to be adjusted to be compliant with FAA EB-79. The air terminal on the electrical disconnect regularly snags the wind cone’s fabric sock. The same criteria applies to the Runway 25 L-806 supplemental wind cone. It is recommended that both the Runway 13 and 25 wind cones are replaced with LED units.

Runway 31 is equipped with an L-806 supplemental wind cone (Figure 30). The supplemental wind cone is an externally lighted LED unit. The electrical service also needs to be adjusted to be compliant with FAA EB-79. The air terminal on the electrical disconnect regularly snags the wind cone’s fabric sock.

Figure 30: Runway 31 L-806(L) Wind Cone

Figure 29: Runway 13 L-806 Wind Cone

7-1




7 SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS A. SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS AND EQUIPMENT UPGRADES

The existing analog technology security cameras installed at ORL have been operating since 2005 (see Figure 31 below for typical installation). This camera technology has been surpassed by digital cameras with higher pixel ratings and Internet Protocol (IP) capability addressing each individual camera. Several fixed analog surveillance cameras are located on the airfield powered by Photovoltaic (PV) systems with wireless radio links to transmit the video data back to the head-end equipment, and the head-end infrastructure located in the ORL Airport Administration Building. These cameras are strategically located at the ramp entrances to Taxiways F, G, B, B1, A (named accordingly for each associated taxiway), and an additional camera is mounted on a hangar in close proximity to Runway 13 threshold. The cameras monitor traffic from the West, North and East Ramps onto the associated taxiways and capture both aircraft and motor vehicular traffic entering and exiting the taxiways from the ramp areas.

In addition, there is a single Pan Tilt Zoom (PTZ) camera located on the southwest corner of the ORL Airport Administration Building. This camera previously monitored the access at the Rickenbacker Drive gate. When the new GOAA airport maintenance building was constructed, the line of sight from the Airport Administration Building to the gate was blocked. It is recommended that a new fixed camera be installed to monitor this gate.

Figure 31: Existing Airfield Wireless Camera Installation

7-2




The PTZ camera on the corner of the Airport Administration Building should be replaced with a new high resolution digital PTZ camera to observe operations across the airfield within sight of the Airport Administration Building. The next door U.S. Customs & Border Protection Office has a fixed analog camera mounted on the outside of the building to monitor activities at the adjacent ramp. It is recommended that this camera be replaced and programmed to interface with the ORL video network. The U.S. Customs & Border Protection Office shall be provided with the video from this camera on a monitor within the U.S. Customs & Border Protection Office. Access Gates E-9 and E-4 have analog fixed cameras to observe vehicular traffic entering and exiting the ramp areas. These cameras are also connected on a wireless communication network back to the Airport Administration building. It is recommended that these cameras be upgraded to new digital units and have wireless components installed to improve the transmission of data to the head end equipment. The additional access points along the airport perimeter fence Gates E-1, E-2, E-3 and Rickenbacker gate do not have surveillance cameras installed to monitor gate activity.

It is recommended that security cameras be installed to monitor activities at gate locations E-1, E-2, E-3 and the Rickenbacker gate area. These cameras shall be capable of operating in a low-light environment to record

activities at night. Camera feeds from these locations may not be achieved with a straight line of sight from each location to the Airport Administration Building. Line of sight will require an aggregate point, such as the airport rotating beacon, to collect the data transmission from each gate location. The video data will then be transmitted to the head-end equipment from the aggregate point. The aggregate point must be of sufficient height to establish line of sight between the head-end and each camera location. Replacement of the analog cameras and associated wireless equipment at each airfield camera location is recommended. Each camera location shall be equipped with a new IP digital camera, hardened network switch, wireless link with bandwidth sized to transmit video data, and lightning protection of all components. The head-end equipment located in the GOAA Communications Room should be replaced with new equipment to accept the digital video data from the field, a new Network Video Recorder (NVR) and software to record and display the feeds from all cameras installed on the ORL network. The NVR shall be capable of storing a minimum of 30 days of video data from all cameras and should be scalable to accept future expansion of the camera network. NVR’s shall be procured with multiple terabyte storage capacity that can be expanded for future growth of the network.

7-3




To summarize, the following is recommended:

Install new Internet Protocol (IP) fixed

digital cameras on the airfield (total of 7); Install new Internet Protocol (IP) fixed

digital cameras on the existing access gates E-9 and E-4 (total of 2);

Install new Internet Protocol (IP) fixed digital cameras on the access gates E-1, E-2, E-3 and Rickenbacker (total of 4);

Install a new digital PTZ high resolution camera on the ORL Airport Administration Building (Total of 1).

Upgrade the wireless network to accommodate the new cameras’ data stream;

Upgrade the head-end equipment in the GOAA Communications Room to record the video streams.

8-1




8 MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS A. RPM PLACEMENT

Raised pavement markers (RPMs) are square reflective markers that adhere to asphalt or portland concrete cement pavement. They are used to supplement pavement markings and delineate vehicle travel paths, including airport taxiway centerlines. These can enhance safety during periods of reduced visibility, such as inclement weather or nighttime operations. Historically at Orlando Executive Airport (ORL), these RPMs have been placed along taxiway centerlines (green), along taxiway edges (blue), and near mandatory runway holding position locations (red/white). Visual observation during the project field investigation identified many of the previously placed markers as missing or damaged in various locations (see Figure

32). As such, AVCON was asked to provide a layout and associated cost estimate to replace the RPM system throughout the airfield. There is currently no Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) guidance specification or requirement for RPMs. For general airport conformance, the RPMs were laid out as per the taxiway centerline lighting spacing identified in FAA AC 150/5340-30G, at 100 foot spacing (Note: taxiway centerline lighting is not required for the operations and conditions present at ORL). See Drawing C-101 of Appendix C for the proposed layout. The installation costs associated with the proposed layout are identified Appendix B, Bid Schedule H.

Figure 32: Existing Raised Pavement Marker (RPM)

8-2




It is our understanding that the taxiway edge lighting system was previously direct buried, often rendering it non-functional, and therefore the primary reason for the initial installation of the RPMs. ORL’s current taxiway edge lighting system is now all cable-in-conduit throughout the airfield and is far more reliable than the previous system. Based on the information above, as well as the initial cost of installation and the costs associated with maintaining the RPMs, we do not recommend the replacement of the RPM system. If the system is to be installed, we recommend coordination with the FAA for a determination of whether or not a Modification of Standards (MOS) is required, as this installation would be non-standard. B. ENHANCED AIRFIELD MARKINGS

ORL staff has requested evaluation of enhanced taxiway centerline markings and Surface Painted Holding Position Signs (SPHPS) at all entrances to the Airport’s primary runway, Runway 7-25. We understand this request was generated from the FAA Runway Safety Action Team (RSAT) initiative. Per FAA AC 150/5340-1L, Chapter 4, Section 4.1, “All taxiways regardless of their width have a centerline marking, and whenever a taxiway intersects a runway, the taxiway should have a surface painted runway holding position marking. For 14 CFR Part 139 certificated airports, all taxiways that intersect a runway must have a surface painted runway holding position sign and an enhanced taxiway centerline marking.” In addition and per FAA AC 150/5340-1L,

Chapter 4, Section 4.3, the purpose of the “enhanced taxiway centerline marking provides supplemental visual cues to alert pilots of an upcoming runway holding position marking (Pattern A) for minimizing the potential for runway incursions. To reinforce situational awareness before entering a runway, this safety enhancement is only used on those taxiways that directly enter a runway.” Appendix C, Drawing C-102 identifies the proposed layout of both enhanced taxiway centerline striping and SPHPS at all taxiway intersections with Runway 7-25. The construction costs associated with the proposed markings are identified Appendix B, Bid Schedule H. An upcoming FAA Runway Incursion Mitigation (RIM) related project may address the enhanced taxiway centerline and SPHPS markings at the Taxiway E4 and Runway 7 intersection. Because ORL is not a Part 139 Airport, the FAA Orlando ADO has previously denied funding requests for these airfield markings and at that time also made note of the potential need for a Modification of Standards (MOS) if the proposed markings were to be installed. If these markings are to be installed, we recommend further discussion and coordination with the FAA for a determination of whether or not an MOS application is required.

8-3




C. RUNWAY 7-25 RUBBER REMOVAL

Contaminants, such as rubber deposits from tires of landing jet aircraft, can lead to friction loss on runway pavement surfaces as well as obscure pavement markings. Heavy rubber deposits can completely cover the pavement surface texture causing loss of aircraft braking capability and directional control, particularly when runways are wet. As part of the “Other Considerations” scope of this project, it was requested that AVCON carry out a visual assessment of the runway rubber deposits of Runway 7-25. As such, a cursory visual evaluation was performed. Rubber deposits were found to be present between 1,000 feet and 2,000 feet from the landing threshold on both Runway 7 and Runway 25, which is the anticipated range (see Appendix C, Drawing C-103). The build-up on the Runway 7 end was significantly more than that of the Runway 25 end; however; neither runway end exhibited obstruction/obscuring of runway markings due to rubber deposits. Discussions with ORL staff indicate that rubber removal has not been performed on Runway 7-25

since the last asphalt pavement overlay in 2001. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) currently maintains an existing Statewide Runway Airport Painting Contract with Hi-Lite Markings, Inc. The Contract includes multiple services related to cleaning, removing, and painting airfield markings, utilizing pre-determined, pre-approved specifications and unit prices for each service (prices vary depending on quantity and physical location of the work). In 2014, the FDOT added runway rubber removal services to the State Contract (see Appendix H for the project relative excerpt of the Contract). Given the volume of jet traffic on Runway 7-25 and the absence of previous rubber removal services, AVCON recommends the use of the State Contract to perform the minor requirements of this operation. Estimated construction costs are provided in Appendix B, Bid Schedule H, based on the State Contract unit prices for Orange County, Florida.

9-1




9 SUMMARY A. AIRFIELD LIGHTING VAULT

DISTRIBUTION

The airfield lighting vault electrical distribution is in acceptable condition. Interior working space around the electrical equipment has several issues that must be addressed. The existing working space does not comply with NFPA or OSHA requirements. A short circuit/coordination/arc-flash study needs to be performed. The vault grounding system needs some repairs, the vault ground bus should be loop configured and a NFPA 780 lightning protection system should be installed on the vault. The vault building structure is showing its age and the footprint is not conducive to further expansion. It is recommended that GOAA consider constructing a new airfield lighting vault. The new vault would address all of the issues associated with the existing facilities and would ensure a functional electrical distribution system for the next twenty plus years. The new facility would have space to allow for future airfield lighting expansion. The new airfield lighting vault could be located adjunct to the VOR on the south side of the airport. The new facility should allow for ample power capacity and floor space for twenty years or more of growth. A siting study will need to be performed to confirm an acceptable location. A short term fix would be to remove the furniture in the Electrical Room and relocate the equipment with in-adequate NEC working

space. This action could solve the immediate issues relating to employee safety. B. AIRFIELD LIGHTING HOME RUN

DUCT BANK AND L-824 CABLE

The airfield lighting vault home run electrical duct bank will need to be reworked/replaced to accommodate the new airfield lighting vault. The existing airfield lighting home run circuit L-824 cables are in poor condition. It is recommended to replace these L-824 cables in the near future. The Aviation Authority has already funded this activity in its current budget year. C. AIRFIELD LIGHTING AND

SIGNAGE

The quartz incandescent lighting systems need to be replaced with energy efficient light emitting diode (LED) fixtures and signs. To gain the most efficiency, the L-830 isolation transformer needs to be matched to the fixture/sign power rating. The airfield signs, lighting fixtures (all incandescent), L-824 cables, L-823 connectors, and L-830 isolation transformers should all be replaced. LED signs/fixtures will be specified for the replacement items. It is recommended that sign replacement is initiated with the oldest units first, but all incandescent airfield signs should ultimately be replaced with LED airfield signs.

9-2




Some constant current regulator (CCR) parts are no longer available and spare CCR parts support will continue to become more challenging. The best solution for the Aviation Authority is to replace the CCRs. This could be a phased operation, replacing the older units first. However, a single wholesale replacement would result in a commonality of parts. New energy-efficient ferro-resonant CCRs should be considered. Obtaining parts for the older CCRs is problematic. D. AIRPORT ROTATING BEACON

A new rotating beacon is recommended for the Airport, as the existing beacon is beyond its useful life. In the interim, various minor repairs can be completed to keep the beacon operational until the new beacon is constructed. A siting study will be required before the new beacon location and height can be confirmed. E. MISCELLANEOUS NAVAIDS

The airport owned PAPIs and REILs should all be replaced (except the Runway 13 REIL) and need to comply with FAA Engineering Brief 79. The existing five wind cones are LED units. The electrical service to the wind cones needs to be made compliant with FAA EB-79. A submersible plug/connector may be considered as a local disconnect to allow maintenance to work on a de-energized unit. FDOT requires that the L-807 wind cone

lighting also light the segmented circle. This issue needs to be addressed. F. EAST RAMP HIGH MAST

LIGHTING

Three (3) new LED high mast lighting poles and fixtures are recommended for the East Ramp. No interim repair/service efforts are recommended prior to the installation of the new lighting. G. SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS

New digital Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) cameras (and upgraded software) are recommended for installation to replace the existing analog cameras and will utilize the existing power source at each location (solar or hard wired). H. MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL

IMPROVEMENTS

Various surface improvements within the airfield pavement footprint are being recommended, including new taxiway centerline reflective raised pavement markers (RPM), rubber removal, enhanced taxiway centerline markings, and Surface Painted Holding Position Signs (SPHPS), all in an effort to improve aircraft safety on the airfield and to prevent runway incursions.

10-1




10 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)/ IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

A. METHODOLOGY

Preliminary project cost estimates for improvements recommended within this report are included in Appendix B, comprising the Orlando Executive Airport (ORL) Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the period between 2015 and 2026. Per Greater Orlando Aviation Authority (GOAA) request, the CIP was developed with the following assumptions considered in preparation of the project cost estimates:

All dollars are stated in CY 2015 costs (no escalation incorporated);

Individual project costs are rounded to the nearest $1,000;

Grand Total costs are rounded to the nearest $100,000;

Markups: o 15 percent Detailed Pricing Allowance

included in Construction Cost; o 10 percent Mobilization included in

Construction Cost; o 4 percent Maintenance of Traffic

included in Construction Cost; o 25 percent Professional Fees included

in Total Project Cost; o 15 percent Contingency included in

Total Project Cost.

The above criteria was incorporated into each of the individual project cost estimates.

B. APPROACH

Given the age, remaining service life, and condition of much of the airfield electrical equipment evaluated within this report, it is recommended to ultimately replace a majority of the SE components. For several items, specifically the Airfield Lighting Vault building and its related infrastructure and equipment (including emergency generator), as well as the rotating airport beacon, it is understood that replacement of such items at one time is not feasible from a budgetary perspective. Therefore, both interim solutions (defined as occurring within the next five years) and long term capital improvements (defined as occurring beyond the next five years) recommendations were identified. Interim solutions include less expensive, maintenance-type measures, while long term recommendations consider complete major rehabilitation/replacement or new construction. This approach of breaking out interim and long term projects should provide GOAA with sufficient time to program and implement the long term projects in coordination with the state and federal funding agencies, as well as to include project matching funds in ORL’s annual budget, while still maintaining functional airfield equipment.

10-2




C. PROJECT PRIORITIZATION

Each of the project cost estimates generated were presented in a separate “Schedule Table” and assigned an alpha identifier (Schedule A, B, C, etc.). The schedules were then provided to GOAA for revisions and comment, who assigned a priority and approximate timeframe for the proposed work to be completed. Additionally, standalone project costs were assigned to rehabilitate the runway & taxiway lighting and signage system. As future upgrades of the airfield pavement surfaces are contemplated, it is typically convenient to incorporate these upgrades to the airfield lighting and signage systems at that same time, if funding is available. Based on GOAA input, the timing of the lighting and signage improvements were aligned with the anticipated airfield pavement rehabilitation projects schedule, resulting in a prioritized plan (Table 1) which summarizes and prioritizes the recommended airfield facility upgrades and other airport capital improvements and project cost estimates.

D. SUMMARY

Table 7 follows, which summarizes the CIP methodology, approach, and prioritization described above. This table presents a clear and concise implementation plan to assist GOAA staff in moving forward with their budgeting and other coordination for these recommended future ORL Airport capital improvement projects.

10

-3

Orla

ndo

Exec

utiv

e Ai

rpor

t W

-333

Airf

ield

Lig

htin

g S

yste

m, M

arki

ng, S

igna

ge

and

Oth

er A

irpor

t Equ

ipm

ent A

sses

smen

t Fi

nal R

epor

t

Dec

embe

r 201

5

Tabl

e 7:

Sum

mar

y of

Rec

omm

ende

d C

apita

l Im

prov

emen

ts

APPENDIX A

Exhibits E-100 thru E-108

APPENDIX A - AIRFIELD

LIGHTING VAULT ONE-LINE

DIAGRAM

GREATER ORLANDO AVIATION AUTHORITY

Project Number:

Date:

Drawn:

Checked:

Drawing

PROJECT NAME

AVCON, INC.

ENGINEERS & PLANNERS

5555 E. MICHIGAN ST. SUITE 200 ORLANDO, FL 32822-2779

OFFICE: (407)-599-1122 FAX: (407) 599-1133

CORPORATE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER: 5057

www.avconinc.com

N.T.S.

2015.070.04

12/15

K.W.C.

M.A.G.

E-100

ORLANDO EXECUTIVE AIRPORT

AIRFIELD LIGHTING AND SIGNAGE

EQUIPMENT ASSESSMENT

WIR

EW

AY

ALCS

MAIN

WIREWAY

ATS

MDP-1

PNL A

230KW GENERATOR

PN

L B

(NORMAL)

UTILITY

SHUNT

TRIP

WIREWAY

DISCONNECT

GENERATOR

ANNUCIATOR

PANEL

L-854

AIRFIELD

LIGHTING

MANHOLE

OVERHEAD

CANOPY

CCR

T3

CCR

T2

CCR

13-31

R/W

CCR

R/W

7-25

CCR

HSB

CCR

T1

CCR

T4

CCR

T5

CCR

T6

CCR

SP

DRIVEWAY

(STANDBY)

GENERATOR

SHUNT

TRIP

FAA ASOS POWER

SERVICE

EQUIPMENT

AIRFIELD LIGHTING

VAULT CURRENT

TRANSFORMER CABINET

AIRFIELD LIGHTING

VAULT UTILITY METER

REGULATOR ROOM

ELECTRICAL

ROOM

AIRPORT ROTATING

BEACON

GR

EA

TE

R O

RL

AN

DO

A

VIA

TIO

N A

UT

HO

RIT

Y

Pro

je

ct N

um

be

r:

Da

te

:

Dra

wn

:

Ch

ecke

d:

Dra

win

g N

o.:

PR

OJE

CT

N

AM

E

AVCON, INC.



OFFICE: (407)-599-1122 FAX: (407) 599-1133


www.avconinc.com

20

15

.0

70

.0

4

12

/1

5

K.W

.C

.

M.A

.G

.

E-1

01

OR

LA

ND

O E

XE

CU

TIV

E A

IR

PO

RT

AIR

FIE

LD

LIG

HT

IN

G A

ND

S

IG

NA

GE

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

A

SS

ES

SM

EN

T

APPENDIX A - AIRFIELD LIGHTING VAULT BUILDING #179 FLOOR PLAN

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'

0 1' 2' 8'

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

4'

GR

EA

TE

R O

RL

AN

DO

A

VIA

TIO

N A

UT

HO

RIT

Y

Pro

je

ct N

um

be

r:

Da

te

:

Dra

wn

:

Ch

ecke

d:

Dra

win

g N

o.:

PR

OJE

CT

N

AM

E

AVCON, INC.



OFFICE: (407)-599-1122 FAX: (407) 599-1133


www.avconinc.com

20

15

.0

70

.0

4

12

/1

5

K.W

.C

.

M.A

.G

.

E-1

02

OR

LA

ND

O E

XE

CU

TIV

E A

IR

PO

RT

AIR

FIE

LD

LIG

HT

IN

G A

ND

S

IG

NA

GE

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

A

SS

ES

SM

EN

T

APPENDIX A - VAULT PANELBOARD MDP-1 AND A SCHEDULES

GR

EA

TE

R O

RL

AN

DO

A

VIA

TIO

N A

UT

HO

RIT

Y

Pro

je

ct N

um

be

r:

Da

te

:

Dra

wn

:

Ch

ecke

d:

Dra

win

g N

o.:

PR

OJE

CT

N

AM

E

AVCON, INC.



OFFICE: (407)-599-1122 FAX: (407) 599-1133


www.avconinc.com

20

15

.0

70

.0

4

12

/1

5

K.W

.C

.

M.A

.G

.

E-1

03

OR

LA

ND

O E

XE

CU

TIV

E A

IR

PO

RT

AIR

FIE

LD

LIG

HT

IN

G A

ND

S

IG

NA

GE

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

A

SS

ES

SM

EN

T

APPENDIX A - VAULT PANELBOARD B SCHEDULE

GR

EA

TE

R O

RL

AN

DO

A

VIA

TIO

N A

UT

HO

RIT

Y

Pro

je

ct N

um

be

r:

Da

te

:

Dra

wn

:

Ch

ecke

d:

Dra

win

g N

o.:

PR

OJE

CT

N

AM

E

AVCON, INC.



OFFICE: (407)-599-1122 FAX: (407) 599-1133


www.avconinc.com

20

15

.0

70

.0

4

12

/1

5

K.W

.C

.

M.A

.G

.

E-1

04

OR

LA

ND

O E

XE

CU

TIV

E A

IR

PO

RT

AIR

FIE

LD

LIG

HT

IN

G A

ND

S

IG

NA

GE

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

A

SS

ES

SM

EN

T

APPENDIX A - CONCEPTUAL EAST RAMP HIGH

MAST LIGHTING (EXISTING AND PROPOSED)

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET

N

o

r

t

h

0' 200'

GR

EA

TE

R O

RL

AN

DO

A

VIA

TIO

N A

UT

HO

RIT

Y

Pro

je

ct N

um

be

r:

Da

te

:

Dra

wn

:

Ch

ecke

d:

Dra

win

g N

o.:

PR

OJE

CT

N

AM

E

AVCON, INC.



OFFICE: (407)-599-1122 FAX: (407) 599-1133


www.avconinc.com

20

15

.0

70

.0

4

12

/1

5

K.W

.C

.

M.A

.G

.

E-1

05

OR

LA

ND

O E

XE

CU

TIV

E A

IR

PO

RT

AIR

FIE

LD

LIG

HT

IN

G A

ND

S

IG

NA

GE

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

A

SS

ES

SM

EN

T

APPENDIX A - EAST RAMP HIGH MAST

LIGHTING 14 CFR PART 77 CONTOURS


N

o

r

t

h

0' 200'

LEGEND

T4

T6T1

T2

T3

R7

R13

T5

R

U

N

W

A

Y

7

-

2

5

R

U

N

W

A

Y

1

3

-

3

1

E

6

E4

E5

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

E

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

A

TA

XIW

AY

B

WEST

RAMP

TA

XIW

AY

F

TA

XIW

AY

G

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

K

A

E4

E

3

E

2

E

1

E

4

A4

A3

A2

A1

E6

T

A

X

I

L

A

N

E

E

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

A

E

3

A5

A6

E

A

S

T

R

A

M

P

NORTH RAMP

NORTHEAST RAMP

GR

EA

TE

R O

RL

AN

DO

A

VIA

TIO

N A

UT

HO

RIT

Y

Pro

je

ct N

um

be

r:

Da

te

:

Dra

wn

:

Ch

ecke

d:

Dra

win

g N

o.:

PR

OJE

CT

N

AM

E

AVCON, INC.



OFFICE: (407)-599-1122 FAX: (407) 599-1133


www.avconinc.com

20

15

.0

70

.0

4

12

/1

5

K.W

.C

.

M.A

.G

.

E-1

06

OR

LA

ND

O E

XE

CU

TIV

E A

IR

PO

RT

AIR

FIE

LD

LIG

HT

IN

G A

ND

S

IG

NA

GE

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

A

SS

ES

SM

EN

T

APPENDIX A - AIRFIELD LIGHTING COLOR CODED CIRCUIT OUTLINE


North

0' 500'

LEGEND

CIRCUIT - T1

CIRCUIT - T2

CIRCUIT - T3

CIRCUIT - T4

CIRCUIT - T5

CIRCUIT - T6

CIRCUIT - R7

CIRCUIT - R13

R

U

N

W

A

Y

7

-

2

5

R

U

N

W

A

Y

1

3

-

3

1

E

6

E4

E5

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

E

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

A

TA

XIW

AY

B

WEST

RAMP

TA

XIW

AY

F

TA

XIW

AY

G

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

K

A

E4

E

3

E

2

E

1

E

4

A4

A3

A2

A1

E6

T

A

X

I

L

A

N

E

E

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

A

E

3

A5

A6

E

A

S

T

R

A

M

P

NORTH RAMP

NORTHEAST RAMP

GR

EA

TE

R O

RL

AN

DO

A

VIA

TIO

N A

UT

HO

RIT

Y

Pro

je

ct N

um

be

r:

Da

te

:

Dra

wn

:

Ch

ecke

d:

Dra

win

g N

o.:

PR

OJE

CT

N

AM

E

AVCON, INC.



OFFICE: (407)-599-1122 FAX: (407) 599-1133


www.avconinc.com

20

15

.0

70

.0

4

12

/1

5

K.W

.C

.

M.A

.G

.

E-1

07

OR

LA

ND

O E

XE

CU

TIV

E A

IR

PO

RT

AIR

FIE

LD

LIG

HT

IN

G A

ND

S

IG

NA

GE

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

A

SS

ES

SM

EN

T

APPENDIX A - AIRFIELD LIGHTING DUCTBANK


North

0' 500'

LEGEND

EXISTING DUCKBANK

PROPOSED REPLACEMENT

HOME RUN DUCTBANK

R

4

E

6

E4

E5

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

E

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

A

TA

XIW

AY

B

WEST

RAMP

TA

XIW

AY

F

TA

XIW

AY

G

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

K

A

E4

E

3

E

4

A4

A3

E6

T

A

X

I

L

A

N

E

E

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

A

E

3

A5

A6

E

A

S

T

R

A

M

P

NORTH RAMP

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

P

E

E

P

P

R

U

N

W

A

Y

1

3

-

3

1

R

U

N

W

A

Y

7

-

2

5

P

E

GR

EA

TE

R O

RL

AN

DO

A

VIA

TIO

N A

UT

HO

RIT

Y

Pro

je

ct N

um

be

r:

Da

te

:

Dra

wn

:

Ch

ecke

d:

Dra

win

g N

o.:

PR

OJE

CT

N

AM

E

AVCON, INC.



OFFICE: (407)-599-1122 FAX: (407) 599-1133


www.avconinc.com

20

15

.0

70

.0

4

12

/1

5

K.W

.C

.

M.A

.G

.

E-1

08

OR

LA

ND

O E

XE

CU

TIV

E A

IR

PO

RT

AIR

FIE

LD

LIG

HT

IN

G A

ND

S

IG

NA

GE

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

A

SS

ES

SM

EN

T

APPENDIX A - EXISTING AIRFIELD GATE AND CAMERA LOCATIONS


500'0'

North

(4) NEW ADDITIONAL DIGITAL IP

CAMERAS INSTALLED, GATES

E-1, E-2, E-3 & RICKENBACKER.

(7) EXISTING AIRFIELD FIXED

ANALOG CAMERAS CHANGED

TO DIGITAL IP CAMERAS

(1) EXISTING PTZ ANALOG CAMERA

CHANGED TO DIGITAL IP

CAMERA

(2) EXISTING GATE (E-4 & E-9)

FIXED ANALOG CAMERAS

CHANGED TO DIGITAL IP

CAMERAS

LEGEND

EXISTING ANALOG CAMERA

TO BE CHANGED TO DIGITAL

CAMERA

E

P

PROPOSED DIGITAL CAMERA

EXISTING ANALOG PAN,TILT,

ZOOM (PTZ) CAMERA TO BE

CHANGED TO DIGITAL PTZ

CAMERA

CAMERA

MODIFICATIONS

AND ADDITIONS

E

APPENDIX B

Engineer’s Preliminary Opinion of Cost

APPENDIX B Page 1 of 16

TOTAL

SCHEDULE A RUNWAY 13-31 NEW LIGHTS & SIGNS, REILS & PAPI 742,000$

SCHEDULE B RUNWAY 7-25 NEW LIGHTS, SIGNS 731,000$

SCHEDULE C TAXIWAY LIGHTING - CIRCUIT T4 - WEST OF RUNWAY 13, NORTH OF RUNWAY 7 598,000$

SCHEDULE D TAXIWAY LIGHTING - CIRCUIT T5 - SOUTH OF RUNWAY 7, EAST OF RUNWAY 31 395,000$

SCHEDULE E NEW AIRPORT ROTATING BEACON 164,000$

SCHEDULE F NEW AIRFIELD ELECTRICAL VAULT 1,656,000$

SCHEDULE G NEW DUCTBANK HOME RUN TO NEW AIRFIELD ELECTRICAL VAULT 620,000$

SCHEDULE H RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS & ENHANCED AIRFIELD MARKINGS 52,000$

SCHEDULE I RUNWAY 7-25 RUBBER REMOVAL 21,000$

SCHEDULE J CCTV CAMERA INSTALLATION/REPLACEMENT AND SYSTEM UPGRADES 333,000$

SCHEDULE K NEW AIRFIELD WINDSOCKS 194,000$

SCHEDULE L NEW CABLE HOME RUN TO EXISTING AIRFIELD ELECTRICAL VAULT 175,000$

SCHEDULE M REHABILITATE EXISTING AIRFIELD ELECTRICAL VAULT & EMERGENCY GENERATOR 106,000$

SCHEDULE N REHABILITATE EXISTING AIRFIELD ROTATING BEACON 49,000$

SCHEDULE O NEW HIGH MAST LIGHTING - EAST RAMP 308,000$

SCHEDULE P SITING STUDY FOR NEW AIRFIELD VAULT AND NEW AIRPORT ROTATING BEACON 75,000$

GRAND TOTAL OF ALL SCHEDULES 6,219,000$

ASSUMPTIONS: GRAND TOTAL (ROUNDED) 6,300,000$

1. GRAND TOTALS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST $100,0002. ALL DOLLARS STATED IN CY 2015 COSTS (NO ESCALATION CONSIDERED)3. 15% DETAILED PRICING ALLOWANCE INCLUDED IN CONSTRUCTION COST 4. 10% MOBILIZATION INCLUDED IN CONSTRUCTION COST5. 4% MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC INCLUDED IN CONSTRUCTION COST6. 25% PROFESSIONAL FEES INCLUDED IN TOTAL PROJECT COST7. 15% CONTINGENCY INCLUDED IN TOTAL PROJECT COST

DESCRIPTION

GREATER ORLANDO AVIATION AUTHORITYORLANDO EXECUTIVE AIRPORT (ORL)

W-333, AIRFIELD LIGHTING SYSTEM, MARKING, SIGNAGE AND OTHER AIRPORT EQUIPMENT ASSESSMENT

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED AIRFIELD FACILITY UPGRADES & OTHER AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND PROJECT COST ESTIMATES - December 2015

2015.070.04

SUMMARY OF SCHEDULES


Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Extension

1 L-104-1 TEMPORARY POWER AND TEMPORARY AIRFIELD LIGHTING LS 1 $ 12,750 12,750$

2 L-105-1 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION LS 1 $ 21,250 21,250$

3 L-108-1 1/C L-824 TYPE C - UNSHIELDED #8 AWG 5KV STRANDED COPPER CABLE - INSTALLED IN DUCT OR CONDUIT LF 23923 $ 2 40,669$

4 L-108-2 1/C #2 AWG SOLID COPPER COUNTERPOISE WIRE - INSTALLED OVER DUCT OR CONDUIT LF 2,000 3$ 6,000$

5 L-108-3 0.75" DIA. BY 10.00' LONG COPPER CLAD STEEL SECTIONAL GROUND ROD EA 240 $ 85 20,400$

6 L-110-1 1W2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC DIRECT EARTH BURIED DUCT LF 1,000 3$ 2,975$

7 L-125-1 L-850C RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT (CLEAR/CLEAR) - NE EA 1 $ 850 850$

8 L-125-2 L-850C RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT (YELLOW/CLEAR) - NE EA 2 $ 850 1,700$

9 L-125-3 L-862 RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT (CLEAR/CLEAR) - NE EA 3 $ 850 2,550$

10 L-125-4 L-862YC RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT (YELLOW/CLEAR) - NE EA 38 $ 850 32,300$

11 L-125-5 L-862ERG RUNWAY THRESHOLD/END LIGHT (GREEN/RED) - NE EA 16 $ 850 13,600$

12 L-125-6 L-858(L) SIGN - SINGLE/DOUBLE FACE, SIZE 2, 1 MODULE EA 3 $ 3,400 10,200$



15 L-125-9 FIELD LIGHTING ARRESTOR ASSEMBLY EA 4 $ 638 2,550$

16 L-155-1 L-849I (L) REIL STYLE E, LED, CURRENT DRIVEN, 3 STEP, RUNWAY 13-31 - NEW COMPLETE EA 2 $ 21,250 42,500$

17 L-154-1 L-880 PAPI, 4 BOX, CONSTANT CURRENT DRIVEN, RUNWAY 13-31 - NEW COMPLETE EA 2 $ 38,250 76,500$

18 L-154-2 L-881 PAPI, FAA FLIGHT INSPECTION FEE AL 1 $ 6,800 6,800$

19 M-001-1 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 1 $ 39,942 39,942$

20 M-001-2 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC (4%) LS 1 $ 15,977 15,977$

DETAILED PRICING ALLOWANCE (15%) LS 1 $ 59,913 59,913$

ASSUMPTIONS: $ 516,000

1. CONSTRUCTION/PROJECT COSTS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST $1,000 129,000$

2. ALL DOLLARS STATED IN CY 2015 COSTS (NO ESCALATION CONSIDERED) 645,000$

97,000$

742,000$

SCHEDULE A - RUNWAY 13-31 NEW LIGHTS & SIGNS, REILS & PAPI

PROFESSIONAL FEES (25%)

TOTAL PROJECT COST

CONSTRUCTION COSTS

CONTINGENCY (15%)

SUBTOTAL


W-333, AIRFIELD LIGHTING SYSTEM, MARKING, SIGNAGE AND OTHER AIRPORT EQUIPMENT ASSESSMENTENGINEER'S PRELIMINARY OPINION OF COSTS - December 2015

2015.070.04



1 L-104-1 TEMPORARY POWER AND TEMPORARY AIRFIELD LIGHTING LS 1 12,750$ 12,750$

2 L-105-1 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION LS 1 21,250$ 21,250$

3 L-108-1 1/C L-824 TYPE C - UNSHIELDED #8 AWG 5KV STRANDED COPPER CABLE - INSTALLED IN DUCT OR CONDUIT LF 29,663 2$ 50,427$


5 L-108-3 0.75" DIA. BY 10.00' LONG COPPER CLAD STEEL SECTIONAL GROUND ROD EA 490 85$ 41,650$


7 L-125-1 L-850C RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT (YELLOW/CLEAR) - NE EA 8 850$ 6,800$

8 L-125-2 L-850C RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT (CLEAR/CLEAR) - NE EA 3 850$ 2,550$

9 L-125-3 L-862 RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT (CLEAR/CLEAR) - NE EA 15 850$ 12,750$

10 L-125-4 L-862 RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT (BLANK/CLEAR) - NE EA 2 850$ 1,700$

11 L-125-5 L-862 RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT (YELLOW/CLEAR) - NE EA 32 850$ 27,200$

12 L-125-6 L-862E RUNWAY THRESHOLD/END LIGHT (RED/GREEN) - NE EA 8 850$ 6,800$

13 L-125-7 L-862E RUNWAY THRESHOLD/END LIGHT (OBSCURED/GREEN) - NE EA 8 850$ 6,800$

14 L-125-8 L-862E RUNWAY THRESHOLD/END LIGHT (RED/CLEAR) - NE EA 2 850$ 1,700$

15 L-125-9 L-862E RUNWAY THRESHOLD/END LIGHT (RED/OBSCURED) - NE EA 6 850$ 5,100$

16 L-125-10 L-858(L) SIGN - SINGLE/DOUBLE FACE, SIZE 2, 1 MODULE EA 3 3,400$ 10,200$



19 L-125-13 L-858B(L) RDR SIGN - SINGLE FACE, SIZE 5 EA 12 3,400$ 40,800$

20 L-125-14 FIELD LIGHTING ARRESTOR ASSEMBLY EA 4 638$ 2,550$







96,000$

731,000$

SCHEDULE B - RUNWAY 7-25 NEW LIGHTS, SIGNS

CONSTRUCTION COSTS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (15%)

TOTAL PROJECT COST



2015.070.04








6 L-110-1 1W2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC DIRECT EARTH BURIED DUCT LF 500 3$ 1,488$

7 L-110-2 1W2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC DIRECTIONAL BORED DUCT LF 300 26$ 7,650$

8 L-125-1 L-861T(L) TAXIWAY EDGE LIGHT LED, (BLUE) - NE EA 177 723$ 127,883$

9 L-125-2 L-858Y(L) SIGN - SINGLE/DOUBLE FACE, LED, SIZE 2, 2 MODULE EA 7 4,675$ 32,725$










78,000$

598,000$

SCHEDULE C - TAXIWAY LIGHTING - CIRCUIT T4 - WEST OF RUNWAY 13, NORTH OF RUNWAY 7

CONSTRUCTION COSTS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (15%)

TOTAL PROJECT COST



2015.070.04






4 L-108-2 1/C #2 AWG SOLID COPPER COUNTERPOISE WIRE - INSTALLED OVER DUCT OR CONDUIT LF 500 3$ 1,500$


6 L-110-1 1W2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC DIRECTIONAL BORED DUCT LF 250 27$ 6,750$

7 L-125-1 L-858Y(L) SIGN - SINGLE/DOUBLE FACE, LED, SIZE 2, 2 MODULE LF 2 4,950$ 9,900$

8 L-125-2 L-858Y(L) SIGN - SINGLE/DOUBLE FACE, LED, SIZE 2, 3 MODULE LF 5 6,300$ 31,500$

9 L-125-3 L-861T(L) TAXIWAY EDGE LIGHT LED, (BLUE) - NE EA 122 765$ 93,330$








52,000$

395,000$

SCHEDULE D -TAXIWAY LIGHTING - CIRCUIT T5 - SOUTH OF RUNWAY 7, EAST OF RUNWAY 31

CONSTRUCTION COSTS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (15%)

TOTAL PROJECT COST



2015.070.04



1 L-104-1 TEMPORARY POWER AND TEMPORARY AIRFIELD LIGHTING LS 1 425$ 425$


3 L-101-1 L-801A ROTATING BEACON, CLASS 1, MEDIUM INTENSITY / WITH NEW BEACON TOWER EA 1 85,000$ 85,000$







22,000$

164,000$

SCHEDULE E - NEW AIRPORT ROTATING BEACON

CONSTRUCTION COSTS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (15%)

TOTAL PROJECT COST



2015.070.04



1 L-105-1 EXISTING ELECTRICAL VAULT DEMOLITION LS 1 17,500$ 17,500$

2 L-109-1 NEW AIRFIELD ELECTRICAL VAULT -COMPLETE LS 1 875,000$ 875,000$




ASSUMPTIONS: $ 1,152,000


2. ALL DOLLARS STATED IN CY 2015 COSTS (NO ESCALATION CONSIDERED) 1,440,000$

216,000$

1,656,000$


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (15%)

TOTAL PROJECT COST

SCHEDULE F - NEW AIRFIELD ELECTRICAL VAULT



2015.070.04

CONSTRUCTION COSTS





3 L-110-2 18W2" SCHEDULE 80 PVC CONCRETE ENCASED, DIRECTIONAL BORE LF 500 153$ 76,500$




7 L-125-1 JUNCTION CAN PLAZA - 18 CANS EA 3 20,000$ 60,000$







81,000$

620,000$

SCHEDULE G - DUCTBANK HOME RUN TO NEW AIRFIELD ELECTRICAL VAULT (SITE TBD)

CONSTRUCTION COSTS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (15%)

TOTAL PROJECT COST



2015.070.04



1 RPM-1 RPM REMOVAL EA 150 10.00$ 1,500$

2 RPM-2 RPM PLACEMENT EA 255 35.00$ 8,930$

3 P-101-5-2-1 ENHANCED AIRFIELD MARKINGS - Surface Prep, Cleaning of Existing Markings SF 2,150 0.20$ 430$

4 P-620-1-1-2 ENHANCED AIRFIELD MARKINGS - Yellow Paint w/ Type III Beads SF 6,450 0.75$ 4,840$

5 P-620-1-3-2 ENHANCED AIRFIELD MARKINGS - Black Paint w/ no Beads SF 6,450 0.35$ 2,260$

6 P-620-4-2 ENHANCED AIRFIELD MARKINGS - SPHPS EA 12 700.00$ 8,400$







3. UNIT PRICES ARE BASED ON FDOT STATEWIDE AIRFIELD STRIPING CONTRACT (FY 2015) 7,000$

52,000$


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (15%)

TOTAL PROJECT COST



2015.070.04

CONSTRUCTION COSTS

SCHEDULE H - RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS (RPMs) & ENHANCED AIRFIELD MARKINGS



1 P-101-5-1 RUNWAY 7-25 RUBBER REMOVAL SF 50,000 0.20$ 10,000$


3 M-001-2 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC (4%) LS 1 $ 400 400$





3. UNIT PRICES ARE BASED ON FDOT STATEWIDE AIRFIELD STRIPING CONTRACT (FY 2015) 3,000$

21,000$



2015.070.04

SCHEDULE I - RUNWAY 7-25 RUBBER REMOVAL

CONSTRUCTION COSTS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (15%)

TOTAL PROJECT COST



1 CCTV-1 NEW DIGITAL FIXED CAMERAS (REPLACES OLD CAMERAS) EA 8 5,000$ 40,000$

2 CCTV-1 NEW DIGITAL FIXED CAMERAS (ADDITIONAL GATE LOCATIONS) EA 4 5,000$ 20,000$

3 CCTV-1 NEW ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATION SERVICE FOR NEW/ADDITIONAL CAMERA LOCATIONS EA 4 15,000$ 60,000$

4 CCTV-2 NEW WIRELESS COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT EA 11 4,000$ 44,000$

5 CCTV-3 NEW AGGREGATE POINT WIRELESS COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT EA 1 12,000$ 12,000$

6 CCTV-4 NEW DIGITAL PTZ CAMERA FOR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING EA 1 5,000$ 5,000$

7 CCTV-5 NEW GENETEC SOFTWARE (UPGRADE) LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$

8 CCTV-6 NEW MONITORS EA 2 500.00$ 1,000$

9 CCTV-7 NEW COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT (HEAD END REPLACEMENT) LS 1 25,000.00$ 25,000$







44,000$

333,000$



2015.070.04

SCHEDULE J - NEW CCTV CAMERA INSTALLATION/REPLACEMENT AND SYSTEM UPGRADES

CONSTRUCTION COSTS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (15%)

TOTAL PROJECT COST



1 L-107-1 L-806(L), STYLE 1A, SIZE 1, LED EXTERNALLY LIT WIND CONE EA 4 7,500$ 30,000$

2 L-107-2 L-807(L), STYLE 1A, SIZE 2, LED EXTERNALLY LIT WIND CONE WITH SEGMENTED CIRCLE EA 1 9,000$ 9,000$

3 L-108-1 1/C L-824 TYPE C - UNSHIELDED #8 AWG 5KV STRANDED COPPER CABLE - INSTALLED IN DUCT OR CONDUIT LF 10,000 2.00$ 20,000$

4 L-108-2 1/C #2 AWG SOLID COPPER COUNTERPOISE WIRE - INSTALLED OVER DUCT OR CONDUIT LF 4,000 3.00$ 12,000$

5 L-108-3 0.75" DIA. BY 10.00' LONG COPPER CLAD STEEL SECTIONAL GROUND ROD LF 50 100.00$ 5,000$

6 L-110-1 1W2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC DIRECT EARTH BURIED DUCT LF 4,000 3.00$ 12,000$

7 L-110-2 1W2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONCRETE ENCASED DUCT OR DIRECTIONAL BORED DUCT LF 1,000 12.00$ 12,000$







26,000$

194,000$



2015.070.04

SCHEDULE K - NEW AIRFIELD WINDSOCKS

CONSTRUCTION COSTS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (15%)

TOTAL PROJECT COST




2 L-108-1 1/C L-824 TYPE C - UNSHIELDED #8 AWG 5KV STRANDED COPPER CABLE - INSTALLED IN DUCT OR CONDUIT LF 40,000 2.00$ 80,000$

3 L-125-1 JUNCTION CAN PLAZA - 12 CAN EA 1 12,000.00$ 12,000$







23,000$

175,000$



2015.070.04

SCHEDULE L - HOME RUN CABLE REPLACEMENT TO EXISTING AIRFIELD ELECTRICAL VAULT

CONSTRUCTION COSTS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (15%)

TOTAL PROJECT COST



1 L-105-1 EXISTING ELECTRICAL VAULT ROOF REPAIRS LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$

2 L-105-2 RELOCATE EXISTING REGULATORS (INTO EXISTING OFFICE) LS 1 40,000$ 40,000$

3 L-105-2 SERVICE EXISTING GENERATOR LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$







14,000$

106,000$



2015.070.04

SCHEDULE M - AIRFIELD ELECTRICAL VAULT REPAIRS

CONSTRUCTION COSTS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (15%)

TOTAL PROJECT COST



1 L-101-1 PAINT EXISTING BEACON LS 1 15,000$ 15,000$

2 L-101-2 SERVICE BEACON (REPLACE BULBS/TRANSFORMERS, ETC.) LS 1 10,000$ 10,000$







7,000$

49,000$



2015.070.04

SCHEDULE N - REHABILITATE EXISTING AIRPORT ROTATING BEACON

CONSTRUCTION COSTS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (15%)

TOTAL PROJECT COST



1 L-115-1 DEMOLITION OF EXISTING POLES (3) & EXISTING ELECTRICAL SERVICE LS 1 20,000$ 20,000$

2 L-115-2 HIGH MAST ELECTRICAL SERVICE - COMPLETE LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$

3 L-115-3 HIGH MAST LIGHTING ASSEMBLY (65' POLE) - COMPLETE EA 3 40,000$ 120,000$







41,000$

308,000$



2015.070.04

SCHEDULE O - NEW HIGH MAST LIGHTING - EAST RAMP

CONSTRUCTION COSTS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (15%)

TOTAL PROJECT COST

APPENDIX C

Exhibits C-101 thru C-103

AIRFIELD LIGHTING

VAULT

AIRPORT ROTATING

BEACON

R

U

N

W

A

Y

7

-

2

5

R

U

N

W

A

Y

1

3

-

3

1

E

6

E4

E5

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

E

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

A

TA

XIW

AY

B

TA

XIW

AY

F

TA

XIW

AY

G

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

K

A

E4

E

3

E

2

E

1

E

4

A4

A3

A2

A1

E6T

A

X

I

L

A

N

E

E

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

A

E

3

A5

A6

E

A

S

T

R

A

M

P

NORTH RAMP

LEGEND

PROPOSED GREEN TAXIWAY

CENTER LINE RPM

PROPOSED RED/WHITE HOLD

POSITION MARKING RPM* *

AIR TRAFFIC

CONTROL TOWER

**

*

*

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

***************

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

TOTAL RPMs (GREEN) = 220

TOTAL RPMs (RED) = 35

RPM = RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS

WEST

RAMP

B1

GR

EA

TE

R O

RL

AN

DO

A

VIA

TIO

N A

UT

HO

RIT

Y

Pro

je

ct N

um

be

r:

Da

te

:

Dra

wn

:

Ch

ecke

d:

Dra

win

g N

o.:

PR

OJE

CT

N

AM

E

AVCON, INC.



OFFICE: (407)-599-1122 FAX: (407) 599-1133


www.avconinc.com

20

15

.0

70

.0

4

12

/1

5

U.V

.

H.W

.M

.

C-1

01

OR

LA

ND

O E

XE

CU

TIV

E A

IR

PO

RT

W-333 A

IR

FIE

LD

LIG

HT

IN

G A

ND

SIG

NA

GE

E

QU

IP

ME

NT

A

SS

ES

SM

EN

T


North

0' 500'

APPENDIX C - PROPOSED RPM PLACEMENT SITES

R

U

N

W

A

Y

7

-

2

5

R

U

N

W

A

Y

1

3

-

3

1

E

6

E4

E5

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

E

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

A

TA

XIW

AY

B

TA

XIW

AY

F

TA

XIW

AY

G

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

K

A

E4

E

3

E

2

E

1

E

4

A4

A3

A2

A1

E6

T

A

X

I

L

A

N

E

E

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

A

E

3

A5

A6

E

A

S

T

R

A

M

P

NORTH RAMP

LEGEND

ENHANCED TAXIWAY CENTERLINES (150') - 10 LOCATIONS

SURFACE PAINTED HOLDING POSITION SIGN (SPHPS) - 10 LOCATIONS

WEST

RAMP

B1

AIRFIELD LIGHTING

VAULT

AIRPORT ROTATING

BEACON

ENHANCED T/W

CENTERLINE, TYP.

SPHPS, TYP.

AIR TRAFFIC

CONTROL TOWER

2

5

-

7

2

5

-

7

2

5

-

7

2

5

-

7

2

5

-

7

GR

EA

TE

R O

RL

AN

DO

A

VIA

TIO

N A

UT

HO

RIT

Y

Pro

je

ct N

um

be

r:

Da

te

:

Dra

wn

:

Ch

ecke

d:

Dra

win

g N

o.:

PR

OJE

CT

N

AM

E

AVCON, INC.



OFFICE: (407)-599-1122 FAX: (407) 599-1133


www.avconinc.com

20

15

.0

70

.0

4

12

/1

5

U.V

.

H.W

.M

.

C-1

02

OR

LA

ND

O E

XE

CU

TIV

E A

IR

PO

RT

W-333 A

IR

FIE

LD

LIG

HT

IN

G A

ND

SIG

NA

GE

E

QU

IP

ME

NT

A

SS

ES

SM

EN

T


North

0' 500'

APPENDIX C - PROPOSED ENHANCED AIRFIELD

MARKINGS LOCATIONS

R

U

N

W

A

Y

7

-

2

5

R

U

N

W

A

Y

1

3

-

3

1

E

6

E4

E5

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

E

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

A

TA

XIW

AY

B

TA

XIW

AY

F

TA

XIW

AY

G

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

K

A

E4

E

3

E

2

E

1

E

4

A4

A3

A2

A1

E6

T

A

X

I

L

A

N

E

E

T

A

X

I

W

A

Y

A

E

3

A5

A6

E

A

S

T

R

A

M

P

NORTH RAMP

25'

A

P

P

R

O

X

.

1

,

0

0

0

'

25'

A

P

P

R

O

X

.

1

,

0

0

0

'

WEST

RAMP

B1

LEGEND

PROPOSED RUBBER REMOVAL

(50,000 SQFT +/-)

GR

EA

TE

R O

RL

AN

DO

A

VIA

TIO

N A

UT

HO

RIT

Y

Pro

je

ct N

um

be

r:

Da

te

:

Dra

wn

:

Ch

ecke

d:

Dra

win

g N

o.:

PR

OJE

CT

N

AM

E

AVCON, INC.



OFFICE: (407)-599-1122 FAX: (407) 599-1133


www.avconinc.com

20

15

.0

70

.0

4

12

/1

5

U.V

.

H.W

.M

.

C-1

03

OR

LA

ND

O E

XE

CU

TIV

E A

IR

PO

RT

W-333 A

IR

FIE

LD

LIG

HT

IN

G A

ND

SIG

NA

GE

E

QU

IP

ME

NT

A

SS

ES

SM

EN

T


North

0' 500'

APPENDIX C - PROPOSED RUBBER REMOVAL SITES

AERIAL SOURCE: GOOGLE MAPS; FEBRUARY 2015

APPENDIX D

Consultant Staff Resume Summary

APPENDIX D AVCON, INC. - Personnel Resume Summary

Mark A. Goodacre, ACE

Mark Goodacre is an electrical designer with AVCON, INC. (AVCON) with over 30 years of experience in design and construction of varied projects throughout the aircraft manufacturing and aerospace industrial industries. Mark is an AAAE Airport Certified Employee (ACE) in the field of Airfield Lighting Maintenance and has attended several Airfield design and maintenance seminars with some of the industry’s leading manufacturers and associates. As an AVCON designer for the last 7 years, Mark’s focus has been on airfield lighting, approach lighting systems, instrument landing systems and airfield vaults. He excels in the preparation of project design documentation and load calculations for airfield lighting circuits. Mark is also proficient in the development of project base files from existing record drawings and field visits, preparation of design documentation for airfield lighting layout and circuitry for all associated runways, taxiways and parking aprons. Mark has been employed by AVCON since 2008. Carl S. Johnson II, EC, ACE

Carl Johnson is a Senior Aviation Lighting Specialist with AVCON. He has forty plus years of experience in the planning, design, construction, and maintenance of electrical distribution systems, airfield lighting and NAVAID systems. For the last twenty-eight years, Carl’s primary focus has been the design and construction administration/inspection of airfield lighting and NAVAID systems. He has completed the OSHA 30 Hour course, is a Licensed Electrical Contractor and is an AAAE Airport Certified Employee (ACE) in the field of Airfield Lighting Maintenance. Carl has participated in numerous forums and committees relating to airfield lighting, grounding, and lightning protection. He has an extensive knowledge of NFPA, NEC, FAA, IEEE, and military standards. Carl has provided expert testimony on the state of airfield lighting practice during project mediation and litigation. Carl is a Principal Member of the NFPA 780 Technical Committee for Lightning Protection and UL’s Standards Technical Panel 96 which covers activity for UL 96, Standard for Lightning Protection Components, and UL 96A, Standard for Installation Requirements for Lightning Protection Systems. He has also presented numerous papers on Airfield Lighting, Lightning Protection and Electrical Safety. Carl has been employed by AVCON, INC. since 2000. Hilary W. Maull, P.E.

Ms. Maull is a Project Manager in the Airports division of AVCON, with nearly 17 years of experience in all civil airfield design and construction of multiple projects for both General Aviation and Commercial Service Airports. Ms. Maull graduated from the University of Central Florida with a Bachelor’s Degree in Civil Engineering and is a registered and licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Florida. Her areas of expertise include all phases of airfield design including development of contract documents, technical specifications, and construction plans; stormwater permitting; cost estimating; formulation of FAA Form 7460; JACIP support and FAA ADO coordination; bidding; preparation of FAA Grant applications; construction administration; resident inspection; and project closeout. Additionally, Ms. Maull has experience with preparation of contract scopes, project schedules, and consulting fees, as well as coordination between clients and regulatory agencies. Ms. Maull has worked at AVCON since 2008.

APPENDIX E

Informational References

APPENDIX E INFORMATIONAL REFERENCES

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circulars http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/advisory_circulars/

150/5300-13A, Change 1

Airport Design, 2/26/2014 (Including Errata, 8/21/14)

150/5320-12C

Measurement, Construction, and Maintenance of Skid-Resistant Airport Pavement Surfaces, 9/27/2013

150/5340-1L Standards for Airport Markings, 9/27/2013

150/5340-5D Segmented Circle Airport Marker System, 9/25/2013. 150/5340-18F Standards for Airport Sign Systems, 8/16/2010 150/5340-26C Maintenance of Airport Visual Aid Facilities, 6/20/2014 150/5340-30H Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids, 7/21/2014 150/5345-3G Specification for L-821 Panels for Remote Control of

Airport Lighting, 9/29/2010 150/5345-5B Circuit Selector Switch, 9/14/2006

150/5345-7F Specification for L-824 Underground Electrical Cable for Airport Lighting Circuits, 8/19/2013 150/5345-10H Specification for Constant Current Regulators and Regulator Monitors, 11/5/2014 150/5345-12F Specification for Airport and Heliport Beacons, 9/24/2010 150/5345-13B Specification for L-841 Auxiliary Relay Cabinet

Assembly for Pilot Control of Airport Lighting Circuits, 9/20/2007

150/5345-26D Specification for L-823 Plug and Receptacle, Cable Connectors, 9/30/2008 150/5345-27E Specification for Wind Cone Assemblies, 9/26/2013 150/5345-28G Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) System, 9/29/2011 150/5345-39D Specification for L-853 Runway and Taxiway Retroreflective

Markers, 9/26/2011

150/5345-42G Specification for Airport Light Bases, Transformer Housings,

Junction Boxes and Accessories, 1/23/2013

150/5345-44J Specification for Taxiway and Runway Signs, 9/29/2010 150/5345-46D Specification for Runway and Taxiway Light Fixtures, 5/19/2009

150/5345-47C Specification for Series to Series Isolation Transformers for Airport

Lighting Systems, 7/22/2011 150/5345-49C Specification L-854, Radio Control Equipment, 7/22/2011 150/5345-53D Airport Lighting Equipment Certification Program, 9/26/2012 150/5345-54B Specification for L-884, Power and Control Unit for Land and Hold

Short Lighting Systems, 9/30/2009 150/5345-55A Specification for L-893, Lighted Visual Aid to Indicate Temporary

Runway Closure, 6/27/2007 150/5345-56B Specification for L-890, Airport Lighting Control and Monitoring

System (ALCMS), 9/29/2011 150/5370-10G Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports, 7/21/2014 EB-79 Engineering Brief No. 79, Determining RSA NAVAID Frangibility

and Fixed-by-Function Requirements National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) http://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/document-information-pages NFPA 70 National Electrical Code – 2014 NFPA 70B Recommended Practice for Electrical Equipment Maintenance -

2006 NFPA 70E Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace – 2015 NFPA 780 Standard for the Installation of Lightning Protection Systems – 2014

Miscellaneous:

OSHA: https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owasrch.search_form?p_doc_type=STANDARDS&p_toc_level=1&p_keyvalue=1910 14 CFR Part 77 Part 77 Safe, Efficient Use and Presentation of Navigable

Airspace 14 CFR Part 139 Certification of Airports 29 CFR 1910 Occupational Safety and Health Standards - General Industry 29 CFR 1926 Occupational Safety and Health Standards – Construction IEEE 142-2007 Green Book – Grounding of Industrial and Commercial power

Systems, 2007 IEEE C2-2012 National Electrical Safety Code, 2012 IES-RP-37 Outdoor Lighting for the Airport Environment

APPENDIX F

Report Bibliography

APPENDIX F

REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY

References:

1. http://www.orlandoairports.net/orl/index.htm 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orlando_Executive_Airport 3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Training_Center_Orlando 4. OEA/GOAA furnished record drawings and reports. 5. OSH ACT of 1970; 29 USC 654 6. NFPA 70E, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace – 2015 7. NFPA 70©, National Electrical Code – 2014 8. David Rainey, Seward Ford, Visual Aids Digest and ADB Airfield Solutions

http://www.orlandoairports.net/orl/index.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orlando_Executive_Airport

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Training_Center_Orlando

APPENDIX G

Information Sources

APPENDIX G INFORMATION SOURCES

Contact Company Telephone #

Perry Suganuma Allen Enterprises 407-857-6778

Keith Meese Allen Enterprises 407-857-6778

Ed Runyon ADB Airfield Solutions 614-573-8259

Tony Sharp Florida Detroit Diesel 904-730-4234

Seward Ford Visual Aids Services, Inc. 860-687-1115

David Rainey Navaid Lighting Associates, Inc. 662-895-0349

Mary Maher Orlando Executive Airport 407-894-9831

Chris Batiste Orlando Executive Airport 407-894-2132

APPENDIX H

Pages from FDOT Statewide Striping Contract (Hi-Lite)

STATE OF fl..OR!OA OEPAAT!.Ei'<T OF TRANSPORTATION

ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT 375-040.0SA

PROCUREMENT 11/1l8

Paget of2

Modification I Amendment No for Contract No. =B=D-'-X=6=8'------Financial Project LD Vendor No. F161381276 Procurement No. RFP-DOT-13/14-9016-GH OMS Catalog Class No 991-605

This Agreement of Assignment made and effective this _d{Q_~ _ day of .z;lz~ ~ among Hi-Ute Markings. Inc Hi-Ute Airfield SeNlces, LLC and the State of Florida Department of Transportation ("Department"),

W IT N ES S ET H:

WHEREAS, Assignor has entered mto Agreement No. BDX68 (hereinafter "the Agreement") dated February 20, 2014 with the Department; and the Department retained the Vendor to perform §tatewide airport runway painting services

WHEREAS, said Agreement 1s by its terms assignable only upon the pnor written consent of the Department; and

WHEREAS, the Assignor desires to assign the Agreement to Assignee and Assignee is willing to perform all remaining duties and obligations under the Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration flowlng among the parties hereto, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do agree as follows

1, Assignor hereby grants, bargains, sells, conveys, transfers, assigns, and sets over its entire d!Jties under the Agreement to Assignee su!)ject to the convenants and conditlons herein mentioned

2 Assignee hereby assumes all obligations of Assignor under the Agreement for all work undertaken by Assignor prior to the effective date of Assignment of tne Agreement including but not limited lo existing liabilities and subconsultant obligations; and Assignee hereby assumes the Agreement and will hereafter perform faithfully all of the covenants, sfipulations and agreements contained therein.

3. Assignor and Assignee hereby request that the Department consent to the assignment of the Agreement to the Assignee

4. The Department consents to the asslgnment of the Agreement to Assignee; provided. however, the Department's consent to this transfer will not constitute a waiver of the general prohibition against assignment contained in the Agreement as to further assignments and will not constitute a release of Assignor under the Agreement to the extent of Assignor's performance up to the effective date of this Assignment or to tl:le extent of Assignee's failure to perform under the Agreement hereafter, it being understood that this Assignment will not be deemed to effect a novaUon. Assignor will remain fully liable for all obligations of the Agreement.

5. All sums which become payable by the Department under this Agreement for services rendered on and after the date of this assignment agreement wlll be made to the Assignee, as between Assignor and Assignee in the event a dispute arises between Assignor and Assignee as to the allocation or division of the Department's payment between Assignor and Assignee, such dispute will be resolved strictly between Assignor and Assignee and the department will have no liability or responslbllity whatsoever m regard to resolving any such dispute. Assignor and Assignee hereby agree that, when the Department will have made payments pursuant to the Agreement. regardless of whether such payments have heretofore been made to Assignor or hereafter to Assignee~ which in the aggregate are equal to the total sums payable by the Department under the Agreement, such payment will constitute satisfaction m full of the Department's obllgafion to pay the sums which it is obligated to pay pursuant to the Agreement With respect to work and materials heretofore furnished by Assignor pursuant to the Agreement, Assignor will, to the extent that it has not heretofore been paid for such work and materials by the Department, look solely to Assignee for payment for such work and materials

6. Assignee specifically acknowledges and agrees that no time extension or requests for additional compensation or supplemental agreements will be granted due lo this Assignment or the dupllcation of any services of Assignor by

STATE Of FLORIDA DEPARTMENT or TRANSPORTATION

ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT 375-040.0SA

PROCUREMENT 11108

P"ljo2of2

Assignee, 1t being understood that Assignee will stand m the place of Assignor as though no assignment has occurred.

7. Asslgnor hereby represents, and Assignee hereby accepts, that there are no claims or demands against the Department arising out of or related to the performance under the Agreement prior to !he effective date hereof, except for contractual compensation which may not have yet been paid, and any such claims, other than contractual compensation, are hereby waived and released.

ASSIGNOR: Hi-Lite Markings, lnc Vendor Name

ASSIGNEE: Hi,Ute Alrfleld Services. LLC Vendor Name

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OFT

BY:

Richard Biter (Print/Type)

Assistant Secretary. lntermodal Systems Development TiTLE

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION 375-040-19 PROCUREMENT

OGC-07113 STANDARD WRITTEN AGREEMENT

~ / [)' Page1of8

Agreement No.: _QU='-'""""-"'-~-"-'((J""--lr-~-· ________ _

Financial Project l.D.: -------------~~--

F .E. L D. No: F161381276 --------~---~-----~

Appropriation Bill Number(s)/Line Item Number(s) for 1st year of

contract, pursuant to s. 216.313, F.S.: -{re_q_w-·red-,-or-co-ntra-· -cts-in-e-xcess_o_f_$5_m_illi-on~)

Procurement No.:· RFP-DOT-13/14-9016-GH

D.M.S. Catalog Class No.: 991-605 ----=-------------~

BY THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this d_tJg day of ~ .... , .:Ja-1 .. s=V , by and between the STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, herelnafterCai(ed the "i%P~ment" and

Hi-Lite Markings, Inc. of 18249 Hi-Lite Drive, Adams Center, NY 13606 duly authorized to conduct business in the State of Florida, hereinafter called "Vendor," hereby agree as follows:

1. SERVICES AND PERFORMANCE

A. In connection with statewide airport runway painting

the Department does hereby retain the Vendor to furnish certain services, information, and items as described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and made a part hereof.

B. Before making any additions or deletions to the work described in this Agreement, and before undertaking any changes or revisions to such work, the parties shall negotiate any necessary cost changes and shall enter into an Amendment covering such work and compensation. Reference herein to this Agreement shall include any amendment{s) ..

C. All tracings, plans, specifications, maps, computer files, and reports prepared or obtained under this Agreement, as well as all data collected, together with summaries and charts derived therefrom, shall be the exclusive property of the Department without restriction or limitation on their use and shall be made available, upon request, to the Department at any time during the performance of such services and/or upon completion or termination of this Agreement. Upon delivery to the Department of said document(s), the Department shall become the custodian thereof in accordance with Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. The Vendor shall not copyright any material and products or patent any invention developed under this Agreement. The Department shall have the right to visit the site for inspection of the work and the products of the Vendor at any time.

D. All final plans, documents, reports, studies, and other data prepared by the Vendor shall bear the professional's seal/signature, in accordance with the applicable Florida Statutes, Administrative Rules promulgated by the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, and guidelines published by the Department, in effect at the time of execution of this Agreement. In the event that changes in the statutes or rules create a conflict with the requirements of published guidelines, requirements of the statutes and rules shall take precedence.

E. The Vendor agrees to provide project schedule progress reports in a format acceptable to the Department and at intervals established by the Department. The Department shall be entitled at all times to be advised, at its request, as to the status of work being done by the Vendor and of the details thereof. Coordination shall be maintained by the Vendor with representatives of the Department, or of other agencies interested in the project on behalf of the Department. Either party to this Agreement may request and be granted a conference.

F. All services shall be performed by the Vendor to the satisfaction of the Director who shall decide all questions, difficulties, and disputes of any nature whatsoever that may arise under or by reason of th ls Agreement, the prosecution and fulfillment of the services hereunder and the character, quality, amount of value thereof; and the decision upon all claims, questions, and disputes shall be final and binding upon the parties hereto. Adjustments of compensation and contract time because of any major changes in the work that may become necessary or desirable as the work progresses shall be subject to mutual agreement of the parties, and amendment(s) shall be entered into by the parties in accordance herewith.

Reference herein to the Director shall mean the

Assistant Secretary, lntermodal Systems Development

2. TERM

375-040-19 PROCUREMENT

OGC-07113 Page 2 ofll

A. Initial Term. This Agreement shall begin on date of execution and shall remain in full force and effect through completion of all services required or December 31, 2016 , whichever occurs first. Subsequent to the execution of this Agreement by both parties, the services to be rendered by the Vendor shall commence and be completed in accordance with the option selected below. (Select box and indicate date(s) as appropriate):

D Services shall commence and shall be completed by ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

or date of termination, whichever occurs first.

18] Services shall commence upon written notice from the Department's Contract Manager and shall be completed by December 31, 2016 or date of termination, whichever occurs first.

D Other: S_ee Exhibit "A"

B. RENEWALS (Select appropriate box):

D This Agreement may not be renewed.

18] This Agreement may be renewed for a period that may not exceed three (3) years or the term of the original contract, whichever is longer. Renewals are contingent upon satisfactory performance evaluations by the Department and subject to the availability of funds. Any renewal or extension must be in writing and is subject to the same terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and any written amendments signed by the parties.

C. EXTENSIONS. In the event that circumstances arise which make performance by the Vendor impracticable or impossible within the time allowed or which prevent a new contract from being executed, the Department, in its discretion, may grant an extension of this Agreement. Extension of this Agreement must be ln writing for a period not to exceed six (6) months and is subject to the same terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and any written amendments signed by the parties; provided the Department may, in its discretion, grant a proportional increase in the total dollar amount based on the method and rate established herein. There may be only one extension of this Agreement unless the failure to meet the criteria set forth in this Agreement for completion of this Agreement is due to events beyond the control of the Vendor.

It shall be the responsibility of the Vendor to ensure at all times that sufficient time remains in the Project Schedule within which to complete services on the project In the event there have been delays which would affect the project completion date, the Vendor shall submit a written request to the Department which identifies the reason(s) for the delay and the amount of time related to each reason. The Department shall review the request and make a determination as to granting all or part of the requested extension.

3. COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT

A. Payment shall be made only after receipt and approval of goods and services unless advance payments are authorized by the Chief Financial Officer of the State of Florida under Section 215.422(14 ), Florida Statutes.

8. If this Agreement involves units of deliverables, then such units must be received and accepted in writing by the Contract Manager prior to payments_

C. Bms for fees or other compensation for services or expenses shall be submitted in detail sufficient for a proper preaudit and postaudit thereof.

D. The bills for any travel expenses, when authorized by terms of this Agreement and by the Department's Project Manager, shall be submitted in accordance with Section 112.061, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 3 - Travel, Department's Disbursement Operations Manual, 350-030-400.

E. Vendors providing goods and services to the Department should be aware of the following time frames. Upon receipt, the Department has five {5) working days to inspect and approve the goods and services, unless otherwise specified herein. The Department has twenty (20) days to deliver a request for payment (voucher) to the Department of Financial Services. The twenty (20) days are measured from the latter of the date the invoice is received or the goods or services are received, inspected and approved.


OGC-07113 Page 3of 1l

F. If a payment is not available within forty (40) days, a separate interest penalty as established pursuant to Section 215.422, Florida Statutes, shall be due and payable, in addition to the invoice amount, to the Vendor. Interest penalties of less than one (1) dollar shall not be enforced unless the Vendor requests payment. Invoices which have to be returned to a Vendor because of Vendor preparation errors shall result in a delay in the payment. The invoice payment requirements do not start until a properly completed invoice is provided to the Department.

G. The State of Florida, through the Department of Management Services, has instituted MyFloridaMarketP!ace, a statewide eProcurement system. Pursuant to Section 287.057(22), Florida Statutes, all payments shall be assessed a transaction fee of one percent (1%), which the Vendor shaU pay to the State. For payments within the State accounting system (FLAIR or its successor), 1he transaction fee shall, when possible, be automatically deducted from payments to the Vendor. If automatic deduction is not possible, the Vendor shall pay the transaction fee pursuant to Rule 60A-1.031 (2), Florida Administrative Code. By submission of these reports and corresponding payments, Vendor certifies their correctness. All such reports and payments shall be subject to audit by the State or its designee. The Vendor shall receive a credit for any transaction fee paid by the Vendor for the purchase of any item(s) if such item(s) are returned to the Vendor through no fault, act, or omission of the Vendor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a transaction fee is non-refundable when an item is rejected or returned, or declined, due to the Vendor's failure to perform or comply with specifications or requirements of the Agreement. Failure to comply with these requirements shall constitute grounds for declaring the Vendor in default and recovering reprocurement costs from the Vendor in addition to all outstanding fees. VENDORS DELINQUENT !N PAYING TRANSACTION FEES MAY BE EXCLUDED FROM CONDUCTING FUTURE BUSINESS WITH THE STATE_

H. A vendor ombudsman has been established within the Department of Financial Services. The duties of this individual include acting as an advocate for vendors who may be experiencing problems in obtaining timely payment(s) from a state agency. The Vendor Ombudsman may be contacted at (850) 413-5516.

!. Records of costs incurred under terms of this Agreement shall be maintained and made available upon request to the Department at all times during the period of this Agreement and for three (3) years after final payment for the work pursuant to this Agreement is made. Copies of these documents and records shall be furnished to the Department upon request. Records of costs incurred shall include the Vendor's general accounting records and the project records, together with supporting documents and records of the Vendor and all subcontractors performing work on the project, and aH other records of the Vendor and subcontractors considered necessary by the Department for a proper audit of project costs.

J. The Department, during any fiscal year, shall not expend money, incur any liability, or enter into any contract which, by its terms, involves the expenditure of money in excess of the amounts budgeted as available for expenditure during such fiscal year. Any contract, verbal or written, made in violation of this subsection is null and void, and no money may be paid on such contract. The Department shall require a statement from the comptroller of the Department that funds are available prior to entering into any such contract or other binding commitment of funds. Nothing herein contained shall prevent the making of contracts for periods exceeding one { 1) year, but any contract so made shall be executory only for the value of the services to be rendered or agreed to be paid for in succeeding fiscal years. Accordingly, the Department's performance and obligation to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon an annual appropriation by the Legislature.

4. INDEMNITY ANO.. PAYMENT FOR CLAIMS

A. INDEMNITY: To the extent permitted by Florida Law, the Vendor shall indemnify and hold harmless the Department, its officers and employees from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, includlng, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees, to the extent caused by negligence, recklessness, or intentional wrongful misconduct of the Vendor and persons employed or utilized by the Vendor in the performance of this Agreement.

It is specifically agreed between the parties executing this Agreement that it is not intended by any of the provisions of any part of the Agreement to create in the public or any member thereof, a third party beneficiary hereunder, or to authorize anyone not a party to this Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of this Agreement.

PAYMENT FOR CLAIMS: The Vendor guaranties the payment of all just claims for materials, supplies, tools, or labor and other just claims against the Vendor or any subcontractor, in connection with the Agreement. The Department's final acceptance and payment does not release the Vendor's bond until an such claims are paid or released.

B. LIABILITY INSURANCE. (Select and complete as appropriate):

O No general liability insurance is required.


OGC-07113 Page4 of8

181 The Vendor shall carry and keep in force during the term of this Agreement, a general liability insurance policy or policies with a company or companies authorized to do business in Florida, affording public liability insurance with a combined bodily injury limits of at least$ 200,000.00 per person and$ 300,000.00 each occurrence, and property damage insurance of at least

$ 200,000.00 each occurrence, for the services to be rendered in accordance with this

Agreement.

O The Vendor shall have and maintain during the term of this Agreement, a professional liability insurance policy or policies or an irrevocable letter of credit established pursuant to Chapter 675 and Section 337.106, Florida Statutes, with a company or companies authorized to do business in the State of Florida, affording liability coverage for the professional services to be rendered in accordance with this Agreement in. the amount of$

C. WORKERS' COMPENSATJON. The Vendor shall also carry and keep in force Workers' Compensation insurance as required for the State of Florida under the Workers' Compensation Law.

D. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BOND. (Select as appropriate):

!&l No Bond is required.

D Prior to commencement of any services pursuant to this Agreement and at all times during the term hereof, including renewals and extensions, the Vendor will supply to the Department and keep in force a bond provided by a surety authorized to do business in the State of Florida, payable to the Department and conditioned for the prompt, faithful, and efficient performance of this Agreement according to the terms and conditions hereof and within the time periods specified herein, and for the prompt payment of all persons furnishing labor, materials, equipment, and supplies therefor.

E. CERTIFlCATION. With respect to any general liability insurance policy required pursuant to this Agreement, all such policies shall be issued by companies licensed to do business in the State of Florida. The Vendor shall provide to the Department certificates showing the required coverage to be in effect with endorsements showing the Department to be an additional insured prior to commencing any work under this Contract. The certificates and policies shall provide that in the event of any material change in or cancellation of the policies reflecting the required coverage, thirty days advance notice shall be given to the Department or as provided in accordance with Florida law.

5. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS

A. The Vendor shall allow public access to al! documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by the Vendor in conjunction with this Agreement. Specifically, if the Vendor is acting on behalf of a public agency the Vendor shall:

(1) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the Department in order to perform the services being performed by the Vendor.

(2) Provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the Department would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, or as otherwise provided by law.

(3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law.

(4) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the Department all public records in possession of the Vendor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate pub!ic records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the Department in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the Department.

Failure by the Vendor to grant such public access shall be grounds for immediate unilateral cancellation of this Agreement by the Department. The Vendor shall promptly provide the Department with a copy of any request to inspect or copy public records in possession of the Vendor and shall promptly provide the Department a copy of the Vendor's response to each such request.


OGC-07/13 Page 5ol8

B. The Vendor agrees that it shall make no statements, press releases or publicity releases concerning this Agreement or its subject matter or otherwise disclose or permit to be disclosed any of the data or other information obtained or furnished in compliance with this Agreement, or any particulars thereof, during the period of the Agreement, without first notifying the Department's Contract Manager and securing prior written consent. The Vendor also agrees that it shall not publish, copyright, or patent any of the data developed under this Agreement, it being understood that such data or information are works made for hire and the property of the Department

C. The Vendor shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work or payment for work thereof, and will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability in the performance of work under this Agreement.

D. !f the Vendor is licensed by the Department of Business and Professional Regulation to perform the services herein contracted, then Section 337.162, Florida Statutes, applies as follows:

(1}

(2)

(3)

If the Department has knowledge or reason to believe that any person has violated the provisions of state professional licensing laws or rules, it shall submit a complaint regarding the violations to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. The complaint shall be confidential.

Any person who is employed by the Department and who is licensed by the Department of Business and Professional Regulation and who, through the course of the person's employment, has knowledge to believe that any person has violated the provisions of state professional licensing laws or rules shall submit a complaint regarding the violations to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. Failure to submit a complaint about the violations may be grounds for disciplinary action pursuant to Chapter 455, Florida Statutes, and the state licensing law applicable to that licensee. The complaint shall be confidential.

Any complaints submitted to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation are confidential and exempt from Section 119 .07(1 ). Florida Statutes, pursuant to Chapter 455, Florida Statutes, and applicable state law.

E. The Vendor covenants and agrees that it and its employees and agents shall be bound by the standards of conduct provided in applicable law and applicable rules of the Board of Business and Professional Regulation as they relate to work performed under this Agreement. The Vendor further covenants and agrees that when a former state employee is employed by the Vendor, the Vendor shall require that strict adherence by the former state employee to Sections 112.313 and 112.3185, Florida Statutes, is a condition of employment for said former state employee. These statutes will by reference be made a part of this Agreement as though set forth in full. The Vendor agrees to incorporate the provisions of this paragraph in any subcontract into which it might enter with reference to the work performed pursuant to this Agreement.

F. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids, proposals, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of thirty-six (36) months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list.

G. An entity or affiliate who has been placed on the discriminatory vendor list may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids, proposals, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity.

H. The Department shall consider the employment by any vendor of unauthorized aliens a violation of Section 274A(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. If the Vendor knowingly employs unauthorized aliens, such violation shall be cause for unilateral cancellation of this agreement.

I. Pursuant to Section 216.347, Florida Statutes, the vendor may not expend any State funds for the purpose of lobbying the Legislature, the judicial branch, or a state agency_

6. JERMINATION AND DEFAULT

375-04()..19 PROCUREMENT

OGG· 07113 Page 6 of B

A. This Agreement may be canceled by the Department in whole or in part at any time the interest of the Department requires such termination. The Department reserves the right to terminate or cancel this Agreement in the event an assignment be made for the benefit of creditors.

B. If the Department determines that the performance of the Vendor is not satisfactory, the Department shall have the option of (a) immediately terminating the Agreement, or (b) notifying the Vendor of the deficiency with a requirement that the deficiency be correctedwithrn a specified time, otherwise the Agreement will be terminated at the end of such time, or (c) taking whatever action is deemed appropriate by the Department.

C. If the Department requires termination of the Agreement for reasons other than unsatisfactory performance of the Vendor, the Department shall notify the Vendor of such termination, with instructions as to the effective date of termination or specify the stage of work at which the Agreement is to be terminated. ·

D. If the Agreement is terminated before performance is completed, the Vendor shall be paid only for that work satisfactorily performed for which costs can be substantiated. Such payment, however, may not exceed an amount which is the same percentage of the agreement price as the amount of work satisfactorily completed is a percentage of the total work called for by this Agreement. All work in progress shall become the property of the Department and shall be turned over promptly by the Vendor.

E. For Agreements $1,000,000 and greater, if the Department determines the Vendor submitted a false certification under Section 287.135(5), Florida Statutes, been placed on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the Sudan List or the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the Iran Petroleum Energy Sector list, the Department shall either terminate the Agreement after it has given the Vendor notice and an opportunity to demonstrate the Department's determination of false certification was in error pursuant to Section 287.135(5)(a), Florida Statutes, or maintain the Agreement if the conditions of Section 287.135 ( 4 ), Florida Statutes, are met.

7. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTS

A. The Vendor shall maintain an adequate and competent staff so as to enable the Vendor to timely perform under this Agreement and may associate with it such subcontractors, for the purpose of its services hereunder, without additional cost to the Department, other than those costs within the limits and terms of this Agreement. The Vendor is fully responsible for satisfactory completion of all subcontracted work. The Vendor, however, shall not sublet, assign, or transfer any work under this Agreement to other than subcontractors specified in the proposal, bid, and/or Agreement without the written consent of the Department.

8. Select the appropriate box:

D The following provision is not applicable to this Agreement:

0 The following provision is hereby incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement:

It is expressly understood and agreed that any articles that are the subject of, or required to carry out this Agreement shall be purchased from a nonprofit agency for the blind or for the severely handicapped that is qualified pursuant to Chapter 413, Florida Statutes, in the same manner and under the same procedures set forth in Section 413.036( 1) and (2), Florida Statutes; and for purposes of this Agreement the person, firm, or other business entity (Vendor) carrying out the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be substituted for the state agency (Department) insofar as dealings with such qualified nonprofit agency are concerned. RESPECT of Florida provides governmental agencies within the State of Florida with quality products and services produced by persons with disabilities. Available pricing, products, and delivery schedules may be obtained by contacting:

RESPECT 2475 Apalachee Pkwy Tallahassee, Florida 32301-4946 Phone: (850)487-1471

D The following provision is hereby incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement:


OGC-07113 Page 7 of8

It is expressly understood and agreed that any articles which are the subject of, or required to carry out this Agreement shaH be purchased from the corporation identified under Chapter 946, Florida Statutes, in the same manner and underthe procedures set forth in Sections 946.515(2) and (4), Florida Statutes; and for purposes of this Agreement the person, firm, or other business entity (Vendor) carrying out the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be substituted for this agency (Department) Insofar as dealings with such corporation are concerned. The "corporation identified" is Prison Rehabilitative Industries and Diversified Enterprises, Inc. (PRIDE). Available pricing, products, and delivery schedules may be obtained by contacting:

PRIDE Enterprises 12425 - 28th Street. North St. Petersburg, FL 33716~1826 (800)643-8459

fgj This Agreement involves the expenditure offederal funds and Section 946.515, Florida Statutes, as noted above, does not apply. However, Appendix I is applicable to all parties and is hereof made a part of this Agreement.

8. MISCELLANEOUS

A. The Vendor and its employees, agents, representatives, or subcontractors are not employees of the Department and are not entitled to the benefits of State of Florida employees. Except to the extent expressly authorized herein, Vendor and its employees, agents, representatives, or subcontractors are not agents of the Department or the State for any purpose or authority such as to bind or represent the interests thereof, and shall not represent that it is an agent or that it is acting on the behalf of the Department or the State. The Department shall not be bound by any unauthorized acts or conduct of the Vendor or its employees, agents, representatives, or subcontractors. Vendor agrees to lnclude this provision in all its subcontracts under this Agreement.

B. All words used herein ln the singular form shall extend to and include the plural. All words used in the plural form shall extend to and include the singular. All words used in any gender shall extend to and include all genders.

C. This Agreement embodies the whole agreement of the parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained herein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous communications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. The State of Florida terms and conditions, whether general or specific, shalt take precedence over and supersede any inconsistent or conflicting provision in any attached terms and conditions of the Vendor.

D. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that if any part, term or provision of this Agreement is by the courts held to be illegal or in conflict with any law of the State of Florida, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected, and the rights and obligations of the parties shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreement did not contain the particular part, term, or provision held to be invalid.

E. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida.

F. In any legal action related to this Agreement, instituted by either party, the Vendor hereby waives any and all privileges and rights it may have under Chapter 47 and Section 337.19, Florida Statutes, relating to venue, as it now exists or may hereafter be amended, and any and an such privileges and rights it may have under any other statute, rule, or case law, including, but not limited to those grounded on convenience. Any such legal action may be brought in the appropriate Court in the county chosen by the Department and in the event that any such legal action is filed by the Vendor, the Vendor hereby consents to the transfer of venue to the county chosen by the Department upon the Department filing a motion requesting the same.

G. If this Agreement involves the purchase or maintenance of information technology as defined in Section 282.0041, Florida Statutes, the selected provisions of the attached Appendix II are made a part of this Agreement.

H. If this Agreement is the result of a formal solicitation (Invitation to Bid, Request for Proposal or Invitation to Negotiate), the Department of Management Services Forms PUR1000 and PUR1001, included in the solicitation, are incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Agreement.

.. ..

> > . . ·· vendof 1Contractor: .• -·· · ..

··.·. ~~~f~~t"~~~::r~~~~EJ~~~~j~id~~!t~~·· • • •• • •••

J~ .· . • .· Tlrne hi or 111e.e~~ni~)~s t~ eaCl1 a~d ~\'aiYb~~~ti<JU~b£i;~~A9rW~~rir:

K,· ·~·· .· . . .· f'AAAC15d!5S4:t:F1L ..

--·. c .· · oiti~rriliv1$~Qiis:<

· .. • ...................... · ... ·...• ( ii( <i•••················· .·

< .. > .·

. t!~~~bMcNeely . . . -·· Title~ / Vice President!S~les .·_. __ ... · · .. · .

_ .. ··_ .. · .···· ·_ >. . Ri2ti~~t(. <.. i ....... _.·._.· .· ..

.... . (f':fitiVfype)? .

. ... . • .·_.•_ ••. >-.-·J~~:i~£fu~~.Jh~~~i~yshi~~v~lo~~rjti·· _.· . . · .. ___ _.._ __ ,..,,,,-~~?"-.-. -- ·.?""i'~~~·.· .. ,-.··:·· .. ·.:.· .. ··-.....-..,...~~~......,..,_~ .............. ~,.,..,.,...,..,,,. __ ,.,,, :.:""'·.~ ............ .,, ............ ,"""·· .. """··.,..·· "-~-""' -· =·~..,,.,..~-.,.,._.,,,,_,.,........,.._.,,....__,,,,,.,,.,,.,_···,.,, . .-..,,· .,,,., .. ";.;...· ·..,.· . .. ...,, ... ·,,;.,··: ~··:=.:··.-o.·'---_ .... -'-......... ·:.""".· ... ....,.·: :.,...:·::~ .... _ .... """:· .. ,,...·.·.·-· ·_.··.·'c"····~--""" .... .., ......... _. ~~""""'-~~..,,...._.......,.,._..,..,_;.,~

··. '.EQBi.QfiBABIJ:tUWLtlSEO~LX: > . \>_· •. _.·_._• ..

·~~n:···~---··~···· ... -~L .. >·~~···/>-.. . •' ..

. . . . . ··. . . . . .·· .·

::-..· ........... :· . . : ... :....:. :·\:~: ·'.->. ·.: .·

EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES

STATEWIDE AIRPORT RUNWAY PAINTING

I. OBJECTIVE:

To provide a statewide contract based upon best overall value which may be awarded to

different vendors based on geographic limitations, which can be used at public airports

throughout the state to provide painting and rubber removal services which include; Runway,

Taxiway, Apron and Terminal areas (additionally this includes gate/safety envelope painting,

lead in lines and stop bars). The specifications to this contract are contained within Attachment

"A" which is the FAA standards for specifying construction of airports per FAA Advisory Circular

No: 150/5370-10F as provided. Additional standards for airport markings are contained within

Attachment "B", per FAA Advisory Circular No: 150/5340-1 L (found at link below):

http://www.faa.gov/documentUbrary/media/Advisory Circular/150 5340 1 L.pdf

II. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED:

The services to be provided consist of 1.) The preparation of the surface prior to painting to

include removal of existing paint, dirt, laitance, and loose materials, 2.) The painting of

numbers, markings, and stripes on the surface of runways, taxiways, aprons and terminal areas,

and 3.) The removal of rubber buildup on runways with all work to be conducted in accordance

with the specifications as described in Attachment "A" and Attachment "B" as provided, and at

the locations directed by the Airport Manager, Engineer or designee.

Al

Hmaull

Highlight

EXHIBIT "B"

METHOD OF COMPENSATION

1.0 PURPOSE:

This Exhibit defines the limits and method of compensation to be made to the Vendor for services set forth in Exhibit "A" and the method by which payments shall be made.

2.0 ASSIGNMENT OF WORK:

Vendor services shall be requested by the customer on an as-needed basis. Services to be provided on each project will be initiated and completed as directed by the requesting facility's Project Manager. A "Letter of Authorization" will be issued for each project scheduled.

3.0 COMPENSATION:

There is no Budgetary Ceiling; funds will be encumbered for each Letter of Authorization.

This is a Term Contract for an Indefinite Quantity whereby the Vendor agrees to furnish services during a prescribed period of time. The specific period of time completes such a contract. The customer will authorize services based on need and availability of budget. Execution of this Agreement does not guarantee that the work wilt be authorized.

4.0 ESTABLISHMENT OF LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION AMOUNT:

For each "Letter of Authorization" (LOA) the Vendor, following the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit "A", shall prepare an estimate of work and price based on the rates established in Exhibit "C". Once an acceptable Maximum Amount has been agreed upon by the Vendor and the facility's Project Manager, a ''Letter of Authorization" shall be issued by the Project Manager. The Project Manager shall obtain fund approval for each authorization by an approved encumbrance prior to issuing the "Letter of Authorization".

5.0 PROGRESS PAYMENTS:

The Vendor shall submit monthly invoices to the customer in a format acceptable to the customer. For the satisfactory performance of the services detailed in each "Letter of Authorization", the Vendor shall be paid up to the Maximum Amount of each Authorization. Payment for services shall be made at the contract rates in Exhibit "C". The contract rates shall include the costs of salaries, overhead, fringe benefits and operating margin.

Exhibit "B"- MOC RFP-DOT-13/14-9016-GH

Page 1of2

6.0 DETAILS OF UNIT RATES:

Details of Unit Rates for the performance of the Vendor's services set forth in Exhibit "A" are contained in Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof.

7.0 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY:

This contract does not involve the purchase of Tangible Personal Property, as defined in Chapter 273, F.S. inventory control label(s) to be affixed to all property. The Vendor will accommodate physical inventories required by the Department.

Exhibit "B"- MOC RFP-DOT-13/14-9016-GH

Page 2 of2

EXHIBIT "Cn "PRICE PROPOSAL ..

District 5 Counties - Flagler, Marion, Volusia, Seminole, lake, Sumter, Orange, Brevard and Osceola.

Item Number item Description Price ..

P-101-5-1 Rubber Removal $ 0.100 so.ft P-101-5-2 Surface Preparation, Cleaning of existing markings

. ' .·.·, '··· ,. ''

P-101-5-2-1 Surface Preparation - {0-5,000 sq.ft) $0.150 sg.ft p.101-5-2~2 Surface Preparation -(5i001-20,000 sq.ft} $0.100 S~hft P-101-5·2""3 Surface Preparation -{>20,000 sq.ft} $0.005 so.ft P-101-5-3 Paint Removal {Grinding) $0.940 sa.ft P-101-5-4 Paint Removal (Waterblasting} $1.740 so.ft P-101-5-5 Paint Removal (Combination of methods} $1.740 so.ft: P-620-1-0 Runway/Taxiway Painting ·- -· -- .· .. '' - ;_.:· . "

P--620-1-1-1 Runway/Taxiway Painting -White (0-5,000 sq.ft) $ 0.150 so.ft P-620-1·1-2 Runway/Taxiway Painting-White (5,001-20.000 sq.ft) $ q.150 sg.i! P-620-1-1..J Runway/Taxiway Painting -White (>20.000 sq.ft) $ 0.150 sg.ft P-620-1 ·2~1 Runway/Taxiway Painting - Yellow (0-5,000 sq.ft) $ 0.150 - sa.ft

- P-620·1-2-2 Runway/Taxiway Painting-Yellow (5;001-20,000 sq.ft) $ 0.150 so.ft P-620-1 ·2-3 Runway/Taxiway Painting - Yellow {>20,000sq.ft) $ 0.150 sg.ft P~620·1·3-1 Runway/Taxiway Painting - Black (0-5,000 sq.ft) $ 0.200 sq.ft ...,____ P-620·1·3~2 Runway/Taxiway Painting - Stack (5,001-20,000 sq.ft) $ 0.250 so.ft P-620-1-3-3 Ru.nway/Taxiway Painting - Black (>20,0QO sq.ft} $ 0.200 so.ft P-620-1-4-1 Runway/Taxiway Painting - Red {0-5,000 sq.ft} $ 0.030 so.ft P-620~1-4-2 Runway/Taxiway Painting-- Rad (5,001-20,000 sq.ft) $ 0.030 so.ft P-620-1-4--3 Runway/Taxiway Painting - Red (>20,000 sq.ft} $ 0.030 so.ft P-620~1-5-1 Runway/Taxiway Painting - Green (0-5,000 sq.ft} $ 0.150 sg.ft P-62<M-5-2 Runway/Taxiway Painting - Green (5,001-20,000 sq.ft) $ 0.150 sn.ft P-620-1-5-3 Runway/Taxiway Painting - Green (>20,000 sq.ft) $ 0.150 sg.ft

. P-620-1-6 Runway/Taxiway Painting --Temporary, Primer Coat $ 0.150 Sa.ft P-620·2·0 Reflective Media ,·- : .. ·.-.';'. _:_> ·,:'-.:.-'::.:,.

' -

P·620-2~1 Reflective Media - (Type f} $ 0.250 so.ft P-620-2·2 Reflective Media - {Type Ill) $ 0.490 so.ft P-620-3-0 Paint Enhancements ,•···· '/>, P-620-3-1-1 Paint Enhancements - Biocide Additive $ 0.100 so.ft P~620""3·1 ·2 Paint Enhancements - Rust Discoloration Formulation $ 0.100 sgJt P-620-4-0 Surface Painted Signs .··.-·, :.

'.

P-6204·1 _ Surface Painted Signs {Waterborne} $ 2.890 so,ft P-6204-2 Surface Painted Signs (Preformed Thermoplastic) $18.890 sg.ft P-620..5-0 Miscellaneous ,.:_.·-:

._, ..

Set up Cost (Cost shall include all mobilization costs, cost of Sq.ft P-620-5-1 salaries, overhead, fringe benefits, operating margin, expenses and

$ 0. 110 travel expenses} -P~620-5-2 Night Time Work Required due to Airport Schedule ONLY $ 0.150 $q.ft --

APPENDIX I

Utility System Base Map Updates Airfield Lighting Cabling Map

FAA Airfield Cabling Map

(BEING TRANSMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER)

APPENDIX J

Generator Load Bank Test Results

6438 University Blvd, Ste 15 Winter Park FL 32792* Ph 407-261-5543*407-261-5546 * www.apowersolution.com

LOAD BANK TEST REPORT Note: The following test is performed IAW published APS Load Bank Procedures

(Note phasing prior to connecting load bank)

Test Notes:

Equip. Operational: Equip. in Auto: Breaker(s) On:

Additional Service(s) Req.: Auth. To Perform: Auth. By: Proposal Required:

Test Completed Test Performed By Date Hour Meter APS Service Request Number

CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:

(Note phasing prior to connecting load bank)

Customer Unit Location Unit Make Unit S/N Rated Kw

Time ACV Ph 1&2 ACV Ph 2&3 ACV Ph 3&1 AC Amps-1 AC Amps-2 AC Amps-3 Hertz Kw Oil Press. Water Temp. Battery Charge Exh. Opacity Vibration Unusual Noise Ambient Temp.

Documents

W-333, AIRFIELD LIGHTING SYSTEM, MARKINGS, … · i Orlando Executive Airport W-333 Airfield Lighting System, Marking, Signage and Other Airport Equipment Assessment Final Report