vup.de · Web viewRules and procedures for carrying out and management of accreditation of conformity assessment bodies to which the same requirements, rules and procedures apply

Nr. Vorgabe Änderungsvorschlag (Formulierung) Begründung/Anmerkung

INTERNATIONAL STANDARDISO/IEC CD 2 17011Conformity assessment —Requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies

Version: 29.01.2016

VUP-Stellungnahme (ENTWURF) Stand: 18.02.2016

ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (the International Electrotechnical Commission) form the specialized system for worldwide standardization. National bodies that are members of ISO or IEC participate in the development of International Standards through technical committees established by the respective organization to deal with particular fields of technical activity. ISO and IEC technical committees collaborate in fields of mutual interest. Other international organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO and IEC, also take part in the work. In the field of conformity assessment, ISO and IEC develop joint ISO/IEC documents under the management of the ISO Committee on Conformity assessment (ISO/CASCO).The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the different types of document should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. ISO and IEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not constitute an endorsement.For an explanation on the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the WTO principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following URL: Foreword - Supplementary informationISO/IEC 17011 was prepared by the ISO Committee on Conformity Assessment (CASCO).This International Standard specifies the general requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies. Peer evaluation mechanisms have been created at regional and international levels, through which assurance is provided that accreditation bodies are operating in accordance with this International Standard. Those who have passed such an evaluation can become members of mutual recognition arrangements. Through regular re-evaluations, the continued adherence to this International Standard is assured. In the context of this International Standard, conformity assessment activities include but are not limited to testing, calibration, inspection, certification of management systems, persons, products, processes and services, provision of proficiency testing, production of reference materials and validation and verification.It is important for interested parties to know that Conformity assessment bodies are competent to perform their tasks. For that reason there is an increasing demand for impartial attestation of their competence. Such attestation is done by accreditation bodies that are impartial and independent in relation to the conformity assessment bodies and the conformity assessment bodies' clients. Accreditation bodies conduct regular assessments of Conformity assessment bodies to ensure that conformity assessment bodies conform with relevant international standards, specifications and other normative documents.A system to accredit Conformity assessment bodies should provide for a consistent application of conformity assessment to international consensus based standards and conformity assessment schemes in order to benefit public health, safety, environment and welfare and support regulators and end users.It should facilitate national and cross-border trade, as pursued by trade authorities and organizations.In this International Standard, the following verbal forms are used:- “shall” indicates a requirement;- “should” indicates a recommendation;- “may” indicates a permission;- “can” indicates a possibility or a capability.Further details can be found in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.

VUP-Anhörung: Vers. 29.01.2016ISO IEC CD2 17011 1 (37)


Conformity assessment —Requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies

1 Scope

14-10

This International Standard specifies requirements for the competence, consistent operation and impartiality of accreditation bodies assessing and accrediting conformity assessment bodies. NOTE 1 Conformity assessment bodies' activities include but are not limited to testing, calibration, inspection, certification of management system, persons, products, processes, and services, provision of proficiency testing, production of reference materials and validation and verification.NOTE 2 Accreditation bodies operating in accordance with this International Standard do not have to offer accreditation to all types of Conformity assessment bodies.

2 Normative References

212-18

The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies. ISO 9000, Quality management systems — Fundamentals and vocabulary ISO/IEC 17000, Conformity assessment — Vocabulary and general principles ISO/IEC Guide 99, International vocabulary of metrology -- Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM)

3 Terms and definitions

320-21

For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO/IEC 17000 and the 20 following apply.

3.122-26

accreditationthird-party attestation related to a conformity assessment body conveying formal demonstration of its competence to carry out specific conformity assessment tasksSOURCE: ISO/IEC 17000:2004, 5.3

3.227-30

accreditation bodyauthoritative body that performs accreditation SOURCE ISO/IEC 17000:2004, 2.6, modified note removed



3.331-33

accreditation body logo logo used by an accreditation body to identify itself

3.534-37

accreditation symbol symbol issued by an accreditation body to be used by accredited conformity assessment bodies to indicate their accredited status

3.638-43

appealrequest by a conformity assessment body for reconsideration of any adverse accreditation decision related to its desired accreditation status NOTE to entry: Requests from Conformity assessment bodies for reconsideration of other decisions such as those related to non –conformities or corrective action requests can be handled under complaints.

appealrequest by a conformity assessment body for reconsideration of any adverse accreditation decision made by the accreditation body related to assessment activities or to its desired accreditation status

NOTE to entry: Requests from Conformity assessment bodies for reconsideration of other decisions such as those related to non –conformities or corrective action requests can be handled under complaints.

CABs should also have the possibility to contradict in terms of detected non-conformities and/or corrective actions request.

Then, the note, which offers the opportunity for complaints in case of “other decisions” is not needed.

3.744-52

assessmentprocess undertaken by an accreditation body to determine the competence of a conformity assessment body, based on standard(s) and/or other normative documents and for a defined scope of accreditation NOTE to entry: Assessing the competence of a conformity assessment body involves assessing the competence of the entire operations of the conformity assessment body, including the competence of the personnel, the validity of the conformity assessment methodology and the validity of the conformity assessment results.

3.853-56

assessor person assigned by an accreditation body to perform, alone or as part of an assessment team, an assessment of a conformity assessment body

3.957-62

complaint expression of dissatisfaction, other than appeal, by any person or organization, to an accreditation body, relating to the activities of that accreditation body or of an accredited conformity assessment body, where a response is expected SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17000:2004, 6.5



3.1063-68

conformity assessment bodybody that performs conformity assessment activities and that can be the object of accreditation NOTE to entry: Whenever the word “conformity assessment body” is used in the text, it applies to both the “applicant and accredited Conformity assessment bodies” unless otherwise specified. SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17000:2004, 2.5, modified - Note of 2.5 replaced by the Note to

3.1169-77

consultancy participation in any of the activities of a conformity assessment body subject to accreditation EXAMPLES: - preparing or producing manuals or procedures for a conformity assessment body; - Participating in the operation or management of the system of a conformity assessment body; - Giving specific advice or specific training towards the development and implementation of the management system, operational procedures and/or competence of a conformity assessment body.

3.1278-82

technical expert person assigned by an accreditation body, working under the responsibility of an assessor, who provides specific knowledge or expertise with respect to the scope of accreditation to be assessed

NOTE to entry: A technical expert is not expected to have assessor qualifications and training

technical expert person assigned by an accreditation body, working under the responsibility of an assessor, who provides specific knowledge or expertise with respect to the scope of accreditation to be assessed NOTE to entry: A technical expert is not expected to have assessor qualifications and training

The note confuses. Does “technical expert” stand for the german “Fachbegutachter”? If this is the case, why this person should have no assessor qualification and training?

3.1383-85

extending accreditationprocess of adding conformity assessment activities to the scope of accreditation

3.1486-90

interested parties parties with a direct or indirect interest in accreditationNOTE to entry: Direct interest refers to the interest of those who undergo accreditation; indirect interest refers to the interests of those who use or rely on accredited conformity assessment activities.

3.1591-93

team leaderassessor who is given the overall responsibility for the management of an assessment

3.1694-96

reducing accreditation process of cancelling part of the scope of accreditation

3.1797-99

scope of accreditationspecific conformity assessment activities



for which accreditation is sought or has been granted

3.18100-102

suspending accreditation process of temporarily making accreditation invalid, in full or for part of the scope of accreditation

3.19103-105

withdrawing accreditationprocess of cancelling accreditation

3.20106-109

witnessing observation by the accreditation body of a conformity assessment body carrying out conformity assessment activities within its scope of accreditation

Clear definition The wording does not make clear, that “witnessing” is an observation of conformity assessment activities, which does not take place in fixed or mobile facilities of CABs..

3.21110-115

remote assessment an assessment of a conformity assessment body physical or virtual site, using electronic meanNOTE to entry: A virtual site is an on-line environment allowing persons to execute processes, for example in a cloud environment

3.22116-129

assessment techniquesmethods used by an accreditation body to perform the assessment NOTE to entry: Assessment techniques, can include but are not limited to: - on-site assessment, - remote assessment, - witnessing, - document review, - file review, - measurement audits,- review of performance in proficiency testing and other intercomparisons, - validation audits, - unannounced assessments.

3.23130-135

conformity assessment activity an activity conducted by a conformity assessment body which includes but is not limited to testing, calibration, inspection, certification of management systems, persons, products, processes, and services, provision of proficiency testing, production of reference materials and validation and verification

3.24136-140

assessment programme set of assessments consistent with a specific accreditation scheme that the accreditation body performs on a specific conformity assessment body during an accreditation cycle.



3.25141-143

Accreditation decision decisions on granting, maintaining, extending, reducing, suspending and withdrawing of accreditation

3.26144-146

granting accreditationprocess of awarding accreditation for a defined scope of accreditation

3.27147-152

accreditation scheme Rules and procedures for carrying out and management of accreditation of conformity assessment bodies to which the same requirements, rules and procedures apply NOTE to entry: Accreditation scheme requirements include ISO/IEC 17020, ISO/IEC 17021, ISO/IEC 17025, ISO/IEC 17024, ISO 17034, ISO/IEC 17043 , ISO/IEC 17065, ISO 15189 and ISO 14065.

3.28153-158

assessment plandescription of the activities and arrangements for an assessment NOTE to entry: Adapted from ISO 19011:2011 definition 3.15

3.29159-164

personnelindividuals, internal or external, of the accreditation body carrying out activities for the accreditation bodyNOTE to entry: These include committee members and volunteers.

3.30165-167

maintaining accreditationprocess which confirms the continuance of accreditation for a defined scope

4 General requirements

4.1169-176

Legal entity The accreditation body shall be a legal entity, or a defined part of a legal entity such that it can be held legally responsible for its accreditation activities.

NOTE 1 Governmental accreditation bodies are deemed to be legal entities on the basis of their governmental status. Where the governmental accreditation body is part of a larger governmental entity, the government is responsible for identifying the accreditation body in a way that no conflict of interest with governmental Conformity assessment bodies occur. NOTE 2 An accreditation body that is part of a larger body may operate under a different name.



4.2177-207

Accreditation agreement The accreditation body shall have a legally enforceable agreement with the CAB that requires the conformity assessment body to conform to at least the following:a) to commit to fulfil continually the requirements for accreditation for the scope for which accreditation is sought or granted and to commit to provide evidence of fulfilment. This includes agreement to adapt to changes in the requirements for accreditation, as set out in 8.2.5;b) to cooperate as is necessary to enable the accreditation body to verify fulfilment of requirements for accreditation;c) to provide access to locations, personnel, information, documents and records as necessary to verify fulfilment of requirements for accreditation ;d) to provide evidence about the impartiality and the level of independence of the conformity assessment body;e) to arrange the witnessing of conformity assessment services when requested by the accreditation body;f) to have, where applicable, legally enforceable arrangements with their clients that commit the clients to provide, on request, access to accreditation body assessment teams to assess the conformity assessment bodies performance carrying out conformity assessment activities at the client’s site;g) to claim accreditation only with respect to the scope for which it has been granted accreditation;h) to commit to follow the accreditation body's policy for the use of the accreditation symbol;i) not to use its accreditation in such a manner as to bring the accreditation body into disrepute;j) to inform the accreditation body without delay of significant changes relevant to its accreditation, in any aspect of its status or operation relating to: - its legal, commercial, ownership or organizational status,- the organization, top management and key personnel,- resources and location(s)- scope of accreditation, and - other such matters that may affect the ability of the conformity assessment body to fulfil requirements for accreditation;



k) to pay fees as determined by the accreditation body;l) to assist in the investigation and resolution of any accreditation related complaints about the conformity assessment body referred to it by the accreditation body.

4.3 Use of accreditation symbols and other claims of accreditation

4.3.1209-218

The accreditation body shall take measures to ensure that the accredited conformity assessment body:a) fully conforms with the requirements of the accreditation body for claiming accreditation status, when making reference to its accreditation in communication media;b) does not make any misleading or unauthorized statement regarding its accreditation;c) upon withdrawal of its accreditation, discontinues its use of any reference to an accredited status,d) does not allow the fact of its accreditation to be used to imply that a product, process, service, management system or person is approved by the accreditation body;e) inform its affected clients of the suspension, reduction or withdrawal of its accreditation and the associated consequences.

The accreditation body shall take measures to ensure that the accredited conformity assessment body:a) fully conforms with the requirements of the accreditation body for claiming accreditation status, when making reference to its accreditation in communication media;b) does not make any misleading or unauthorized statement regarding its accreditation;c) upon withdrawal of its accreditation, immediately discontinues its use of any reference to an accredited status,d) does not allow the fact of its accreditation to be used to imply that a product, process, service, management system or person is approved by the accreditation body;e) inform its affected clients of the suspension, reduction or withdrawal of its accreditation and the associated consequences without undue delay.

For reasons of fair competition and consumer protection timings have to be specified

4.3.2219-231

When an accreditation body has an accreditation symbol, the accreditation body shall have the legal right to use it and the accreditation symbol shall be legally protected. The accreditation body shall have a policy governing the use of the accreditation symbol .This policy shall specify as a minimum:a) that the accreditation symbol or claim of accreditation status is not affixed to an item or product (or any part of it) or used to imply that an item or product has been certified;b) requirements for reproduction of the accreditation symbol;c) requirements for the use and monitoring of the accreditation symbol in combination with any mark;d) requirements for any reference to accreditation;e) requirements for the use of the symbol in media;f) that the conformity assessment body only uses the accreditation symbol for the specific services covered by the scope of accreditation.



4.3.3232-233

The accreditation symbol shall have, or be accompanied with, a clear indication as to which conformity assessment activity the accreditation is related.

4.3.4234-238

The accreditation body shall take suitable action to deal with incorrect or unauthorised claims of accreditation status, or misleading, or unauthorised use of accreditation symbols and accreditation body's logo.NOTE Suitable actions may include request for corrective action, withdrawal of accreditation, publication of the transgression and, if necessary, legal action.

4.4 Impartiality requirements

4.4.1240-241

The accreditation body shall be organized and operated so as to safeguard the objectivity and impartiality of its activities. Accreditation shall be undertaken impartially.

4.4.2242-243

The accreditation body shall be accreditation activities and shall not allow commercial, financial or other pressures to compromise impartiality.

4.4.3244-247

The accreditation body shall have top management commitment to impartiality. It shall have and make public an impartiality policy which includes the importance of impartiality in carrying out its accreditation activities, managing conflict of interest and ensuring objectivity of its accreditation activities.

4.4.4248-251

All accreditation body personnel and committee members who could influence the accreditation process shall act objectively and shall be free from any undue commercial, financial and other pressures that could compromise impartiality. The accreditation body shall require all personnel to disclose any potential conflict of interest whenever it may arise.

4.4.5252-260

The accreditation body shall have a process to identify, analyse, evaluate, treat, monitor, and document on an ongoing basis the threats to impartiality arising from its activities including any conflicts arising from its relationships or from the relationships of its personnel. The process shall include identification of and consultation with appropriate interested parties as described in 4.4.8 to advise on matters affecting impartiality including openness and public perception.



NOTE 1 Sources of threats to impartiality of the accreditation body can be based on ownership, governance, management, personnel, shared resources, finances, contracts, outsourcing, training, marketing and payment of a sales commission or other inducement for the referral of new clients, etc.NOTE 2 One way of fulfilling the consultation with the interested parties is by the use of a committee

4.4.6261-264

Where there are any threats to impartiality, the accreditation body shall document and demonstrate how it eliminates or minimizes such threats and document any residual risk. The demonstration shall cover all potential threats that are identified, whether they arise from within the accreditation body or from the activities of other persons, bodies or organizations.

4.4.7265-266

Top management shall review any residual risk to determine if it is within the level of acceptable risk.

4.4.8267-268

When there is an unacceptable risk to impartiality and the related threat cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level, then accreditation shall not be provided.

4.4.9269-274

The accreditation body shall document and implement a process to provide opportunity for effective involvement by interested parties for safeguarding impartiality. The accreditation body shall ensure a balanced representation of interested parties with no single party predominating.

NOTE Interested parties can include: the accreditation body, conformity assessment bodies, their associations and their clients, industry services, trade associations, scheme owners, governmental regulatory bodies or other governmental services, or non-governmental organizations including consumer organizations.

Move to clause 5.6 and create a new 5.6 as follows:The accreditation body shall document and implement a process to provide opportunity for effective involvement by interested parties in its accreditation system. for safeguarding impartiality. The accreditation body shall ensure a balanced representation of interested parties with no single party predominating.The accreditation body shall have formal rules for the appointment, terms of reference and operation of committees that are involved in the accreditation process, and shall identify the interested parties participating.

NOTE Interested parties can include: the accreditation body, conformity assessment bodies, their associations and their clients, industry services, trade associations, scheme owners, governmental regulatory bodies or other governmental services, or non-governmental organizations including consumer organizations.

There should be a general clause for the involvement of interested parties.



4.4.10275-283

The accreditation body’s policies, processes and procedures shall be non-discriminatory and shall be administered in a non-discriminatory way. The accreditation body shall make its services accessible to all applicants whose requests for accreditation fall within the scope of its accreditation activities and the limitations as defined within its policies and rules. Access shall not be conditional upon the size of the applicant conformity assessment body or membership of any association or group, nor shall accreditation be conditional upon the number of conformity assessment bodies. NOTE It is not considered discriminatory when an accreditation body refuses services to a conformity assessment body because of proven evidence of fraudulent behaviour, falsification of information or deliberate violation of accreditation requirements.

4.4.11284-287

The accreditation body shall not offer or provide any service that affects its impartiality, such as:a) those conformity assessment activities mentioned in the scope of this International Standard and b) consultancy.

4.4.12288-295

In case the accreditation body is linked (see Clause 4.4.8, Note 1) to any body offering consultancy or undertaking those conformity assessment activities mentioned in the scope of this International Standard, the accreditation body shall have:a) different top management (see clause 5.5); b) different personnel in the decision-making processes of accreditation (see clause 5.6); c) distinctly different name, logos and symbols; and d) evidence that such bodies do not influence the outcome of an assessment and for accreditation decision.

4.4.13296-311

The accreditation body’s activities shall not be presented as linked with consultancy or other services that pose an unacceptable threat to impartiality. Nothing shall be said or implied that would suggest that accreditation would be simpler, easier, faster or less expensive if any specified person(s) or consultancy were used.



NOTE Accreditation bodies may carry out, for example, the following duties that are not considered a threat to impartiality:- Arranging and participating as a lecturer in training, orientation or educational courses, provided that these courses confine themselves to the provision of generic information that is freely available in the public domain, i.e. they cannot provide specific solutions to a conformity assessment body in relation to the activities of that organization;- Adding value during assessments, e.g. by identifying opportunities for improvement as they become evident during the assessment without recommending specific solutions;- Advising new accreditation bodies on development of accreditation process;- Advising scheme owners on accreditation requirements, including requirements within relevant conformity assessment standards

4.5 Financing and liability

4.5.1313-316

The accreditation body shall have the financial resources, demonstrated by records and/or documents, required for the operation of its activities. The accreditation body shall have a description of its source(s) of income.

The accreditation body shall have the financial resources, demonstrated by records and/or documents, required for the operation of its activities. The accreditation body shall have a description of its source(s) of income. On request, CABs shall have access to these records and descriptions unless they are not made publicly available.

At least CAB should be able to know in detail how the income (esp. fees) is used, particularly when fees of the CAB are the main source of income.

4.5.2317-319

The accreditation body shall evaluate the risks arising from its activities and have arrangements to cover liabilities arising from its activities.

4.6 Establishing and extending accreditation activity

4.6.1321-324

The accreditation body shall document its accreditation activities, referring to the relevant International Standards or other normative documents. The accreditation body shall develop or adopt an accreditation scheme for each type of accreditation activity.

4.6.2325-331

The accreditation body may adopt and/or develop application or guidance documents, normative documents and/or participate in their development. The accreditation body shall ensure that such documents have been formulated by committees or persons possessing the necessary competence and, where relevant, with participation of appropriate interested parties. NOTE Where international application or guidance documents are available, these can be used.



4.6.3332-333

The accreditation body shall have a policy and procedures to determine the suitability of the conformity assessment schemes and standards for accreditation purposes.

4.6.4334-341

The accreditation body shall establish procedures for extending its accreditation activities. The following shall be considered for inclusion in the procedures: a) analysis of its present competence, suitability of extension, resources, etc.; b) accessing and employing expertise from external sources; c) evaluating the need for application or guidance documents; d) initial selection and training of assessors; and e) training accreditation body’s personnel.

The accreditation body shall establish procedures for extending its accreditation activities. The following shall be considered for inclusion in the procedures: a) analysis of its present competence, suitability of extension, resources (particularly financing), etc.in the new field; b) accessing and employing expertise from external sources; c) evaluating the need for application or guidance documents; d) initial selection and training of assessors; and e) training accreditation body’s personnel.

The accreditation body should particularly provide information how the extension will be financed.(Kommentierung gegenüber DIN): Der Ablehnungsgrund der WG gegenüber dem VUP-Vorschlag ist nicht nachvollziehbar: “Financing is not included in the document anymore”)

5 Structural requirements

5.1343-344

The accreditation body shall document its entire organizational structure, including lines of 343 authority and responsibility.

5.2345-346

The accreditation body shall have a description of its legal status, including the names of its owners if applicable, and, if different, the names of the persons who control it.

5.3347-348

The accreditation body shall have authority and be responsible for its accreditation decisions which shall not be subject to approval by any other organization or person.

5.4349-351

The accreditation body shall document the duties, responsibilities and authorities of top management and other personnel associated with the accreditation body who are involved in the accreditation process.

5.5352-364

The accreditation body shall identify the top management having overall authority and responsibility for each of the following: a) development of policies relating to the operation of the accreditation body; b) supervision of the implementation of the policies and procedures; c) supervision of the finances of the accreditation body;d) decisions on accreditation;e) performance of assessments and accreditation processes;f) responsiveness to complaints and



g) contractual arrangements;h) provision of adequate resources ;i) delegation of authority to committees or individuals, as required, to undertake defined activities on behalf of top management;j) safeguarding of impartiality

5.6365-367

The accreditation body shall have formal rules for the appointment, terms of reference and operation of committees that are involved in the accreditation process, and shall identify the parties participating.

New 5.6 (wording see 4.4.9). There should be a general clause for the involvement of interested parties.

6 Resources requirements

6.1 Competence of personnel

6.1.1370-372

General considerations The accreditation body shall have processes to ensure its personnel have appropriate knowledge and skills relevant to the accreditation activities and geographic areas in which it operates.

6.1.2 Determination of competence criteria

6.1.2.1374-378

The accreditation body shall have a process for determining and documenting the competence criteria for personnel involved in the management and performance of assessments and other accreditation processes. Competence criteria shall be determined with regard to the requirements of each accreditation scheme and shall include the required knowledge and skill for performing accreditation functions.

6.1.2.2379-381

Annex A specifies the knowledge and skills that an accreditation body shall define for specific functions. Where additional specific competence criteria have been established for a specific standard or scheme, these shall be applied.

6.1.3 Competence Management

6.1.3.1383-393

The accreditation body shall have a documented process for the initial competence evaluation, and on-going monitoring of competence and performance of all personnel involved in the management and performance of assessments and other accreditation processes, applying the determined competence criteria. The accreditation body shall ensure that its evaluation methods are effective. The output from the evaluation and monitoring process shall be the identification of personnel who have demonstrated the level of competence required for the individual



functions of the accreditation process. Competence shall be demonstrated prior to the individual taking the responsibility for the performance of their functions within the accreditation body. The group or individual that takes the accreditation decisions shall understand the applicable standard and accreditation requirements, and shall have demonstrated competence to evaluate the outcomes of the assessment including related recommendations of the assessment team.

6.1.3.2394-399

The accreditation body shall have processes for selecting, training and formally authorizing assessors. The accreditation body shall have processes for selecting and authorizing technical experts and familiaziring them with relevant requirements and procedures used in the accreditation process. The initial competence evaluation of an assessor shall include determining the ability to apply required knowledge and skills during assessments. One method of evaluating an assessor is observing the assessor conducting an assessment by competent individuals.

6.1.3.3400-402

The accreditation body shall use assessors and technical experts possessing the required assessment skills and knowledge.

The accreditation body shall use assessors and technical experts possessing the required assessment skills and knowledge.

Why this sentence? Is this compatible with the definition of “technical expert”?

6.1.3.4403-406

The accreditation body shall identify training needs and shall provide access to specific training to ensure its team leaders, assessors, technical experts and other personnel involved in accreditation processes are competent for the functions they perform.

6.1.3.5407-412

There shall be a documented process for monitoring competence and performance of all personnel, based on the frequency of their involvement and the level of risk linked to their functions. In particular, the accreditation body shall review and record the competence of its personnel in the light of their performance in order to take any necessary corrective action including identification of training needs.

6.1.3.6413-417

The accreditation body shall monitor each assessor considering each accreditation scheme for which the assessor is deemed competent. The documented monitoring process of assessors shall include a combination of on-site evaluation, review of assessment reports and feedback from personnel, conformity assessment bodies or from other interested parties.



6.1.3.7418-420

Each assessors shall be observed during an assessment at least every three years unless there is sufficient supporting evidence that the assessor is continuing to perform competently.

6.2 Personnel involved in the accreditation process

6.2.1422-423

The accreditation body shall have a sufficient number of competent personnel to manage and support all its accreditation functions for all schemes.

6.2.2424-425

Accreditation body shall employ, or have access to, a sufficient number of assessors and technical experts to cover all of its accreditation schemes.

The accreditation body shall employ, or have a process to safeguard a sufficient number of assessors and technical experts to cover all of its accreditation schemes.

A sufficient number has to be well-managed and organized to avoid delays in performing accreditation. Therefor a requirement for a process is needed

6.2.3426-430

The accreditation body shall require all personnel to have a written agreement by which they commit themselves to conform with applicable policies and implement processes as defined by the accreditation body. The agreement shall address aspects relating to confidentiality and impartiality and shall require all personnel to notify the accreditation body of any existing or prior relationships which may compromise impartiality.

6.2.4431-433

The accreditation body shall give assessors and technical experts access to an up-to-date set of documented procedures giving assessment instructions and all relevant information on the accreditation processes.

6.3 Personnel records

6.3435-439

The accreditation body shall maintain personnel records, including relevant qualifications, training, competence, results of monitoring, experience, professional status and professional affiliations. This includes management and administrative personnel in addition to those performing accreditation functions.

6.4 Outsourcing

6.4.1441-443

The accreditation body shall itself normally undertake the assessment on which accreditation is based. Where outsourcing is needed the accreditation body shall describe the conditions under which outsourcing may take place and shall have a procedure for outsourcing.

6.4.2444-446

The accreditation body shall have an enforceable agreement covering the outsourcing arrangements, including confidentiality and conflicts of interests, with each body that provides outsourced services.



6.4.3447

Accreditation decisions shall not be outsourced.

6.4.4449-458

The accreditation body shall: a) take responsibility for all activities outsourced to another body; b) ensure that the body that provides outsourced services, and the individuals that it uses, conform to requirements of the accreditation body and also to the applicable provisions of this International Standard, including competence, impartiality and confidentiality; c) ensure that the body that provides outsourced services, and the individuals that it uses, are not involved, either directly or through any other employer, with an organization to be assessed, in such a way that impartiality could be compromised; and d) obtain the written consent of the conformity assessment body to use a particular provider of any outsourced parts of the assessment.

6.4.5459-467

The accreditation body shall have a process for the approval and monitoring of all bodies that provide outsourced services used for accreditation processes, and shall ensure that records of the competence of all personnel involved in accreditation processes are maintained.

NOTE 1 For all clauses of 6.4, where the accreditation body engages individuals or employees of other organizations to provide additional resources or expertise, the use of these individuals does not constitute outsourcing provided they are individually contracted to operate under the accreditation body's management system (see 6.2.3).NOTE 2 Mutual recognition arrangements based on this international standard may fulfill some of the requirements in 6.4.2, 6.4.4 and 6.4.5

7 Process requirements

7.1469-471

GeneralThe Accreditation process covers all activities from application through to granting and maintenance of accreditation.

7.2472-475

Accreditation criteria The general requirements for accreditation of conformity assessment bodies shall be those set out in the relevant International Standards or other normative documents for the operation of conformity assessment bodies.



7.3. Application for accreditation

7.3.1477-489

The accreditation body shall require an authorized representative of the applicant conformity assessment body to make a formal application that includes the following: a) general features of the conformity assessment body, including legal entity, name, address(es), legal status and human and technical resources; b) general information concerning the conformity assessment body such as its activities, its relationship in a larger corporate entity if any, addresses of all its physical location (s) and, if applicable, information on activities conducted at virtual location (s) to be covered by the scope of accreditation; c) a clearly defined scope of activities including a list of standards normative documents, methods or procedures for which the conformity assessment body seeks accreditation, including limits of capability where applicable;d) A commitment to continuously fulfil the requirements for accreditation and the other obligations of the conformity assessment body, as described in 4.2.

7.3.2490-492

The accreditation body shall require the applicant conformity assessment body to provide information demonstrating that the accreditation requirements are addressed prior to commencement of the assessment.

7.3.3493-494

the accreditation body shall review the information supplied by the conformity assessment body to determine the suitability of the application for accreditation to initiate an assessment.

7.3.4495-498

before the initial assessment, a preliminary visit may be conducted with the agreement of the conformity assessment body. This visit may result in identification of deficiencies in the system of the applicant conformity assessment body or its competencies. The accreditation body shall have clear rules and shall exercise due care to avoid consultancy during such activities.

7.4 Resource review

7.4.1500-502

The accreditation body shall review its ability to carry out the assessment of the applicant conformity assessment body, in terms of its own policy and procedures, its competence and the availability of personnel suitable for the assessment activities and decision making.

The accreditation body shall review its ability to carry out the assessment of the applicant conformity assessment body, in terms of its own policy and procedures, its competence and the availability of personnel suitable for the assessment activities and decision making.

7.4.2503-

the review shall also include the ability of the accreditation body to carry out the



505 initial assessment in a timely manner. Where the initial assessment cannot be conducted in a timely manner this shall be communicated to the conformity assessment body.

7.4.3 new (As a result of the resource review) the accreditation body shall inform the CAB about the estimated costs. At least, AB shall offer publicly available calculators or information about the costs for typical classes of CAB.

CAB should also receive information about the costs.They should be able to calculate them in advance.

7.5 Preparation for assessment

7.5.1507-513

The accreditation body shall appoint an assessment team consisting of a team leader and, where required, a suitable number of assessors and/or technical experts for the scope to be assessed. When selecting the assessment team, the accreditation body shall ensure that the expertise brought to each assignment is appropriate. In particular, the team as a whole: a) shall have appropriate knowledge of the specific scope of accreditation; and b) shall have understanding sufficient to make a reliable assessment of the competence of the conformity assessment body to operate within its scope of accreditation.

7.5.2514-519

The accreditation body shall inform the conformity assessment body of the names of the members of the assessment team and the organization they belong to, sufficiently in advance to allow the conformity assessment body to object to the appointment of any particular assessor or technical expert with supporting justification. The accreditation body shall have a policy for dealing with such objections.

7.5.3520

The accreditation body shall clearly define the assignment given to the assessment team.

7.5.4522-527

The accreditation body shall establish procedures to assess the conformity assessment bodies competence to perform all activities in its scope of accreditation irrespective of where these activities are performed. These procedures shall describe the manner in which the scope for which its applicant and accredited conformity assessment bodies is covered through the use of a combination of on-site assessments and other assessment techniques sufficient to provide confidence in the conformity assessment body conformance with the relevant accreditation criteria.

The accreditation body shall establish procedures to assess the conformity assessment bodies competence to perform all activities in its scope of accreditation irrespective of where these activities are performed. These procedures shall describe the manner in which the scope for which its applicant and accredited conformity assessment bodies is covered through the use of a combination of on-site assessments and other assessment techniques sufficient to provide confidence in the conformity assessment body conformance with the relevant accreditation criteria.

(Back to previous wording in CD 1 to) hold flexibility in conducting different assessment techniques.



7.5.5528-532

The procedures shall ensure that the assessment team assesses the performance of a sample of the conformity assessment activities representative of the scope. The assessment shall cover a sufficient sample of locations and personnel to determine the competence of the conformity assessment body to perform the activities covered by its scope of accreditation.

7.5.6533-538

In selecting these activities the accreditation body shall consider the risk associated with the activities covered by the scope of accreditation and the experience gained or performance of the conformity assessment body. NOTE: There are circumstances where an accreditation body may determine that an on site assessment is not applicable.

7.5.5539-544

The accreditation body shall develop an assessment plan to cover the activities to be assessed, the locations at which activities will be assessed, the personnel to be assessed where applicable and the assessment techniques to be utilized. The accreditation body shall consider witnessing where appropriate or applicable to the conformity assessment body. The accreditation body shall justify where witnessing is not appropriate or applicable.

The accreditation body shall develop an assessment plan to cover the activities to be assessed, the locations at which activities will be assessed, the personnel to be assessed where applicable and the assessment techniques to be utilized. The accreditation body shall consider witnessing where appropriate or applicable to the conformity assessment body. The accreditation body shall justify where witnessing is not appropriate or applicable.

(Back to previous wording in CD 1). “witnessing”, as a possible assessment technique should not be highlighted, nor should the AB be forced to justify not using witenssing.

7.5.6545-547

The accreditation body shall confirm, with the conformity assessment body the date(s) and plan for the assessment.

7.5.7548-551

The accreditation body shall ensure that the assessment team is provided with the appropriate criteria documents, previous assessment records if applicable, and the relevant documents and records of the conformity assessment body.

The accreditation body shall ensure that the assessment team is provided in time with the appropriate criteria documents, previous assessment records if applicable, and the relevant documents and records of the conformity assessment body.

The assessment team should receive relevant documents from the accreditation body in time.

7.6 Review of documented information

7.6.1553-556

The assessment team shall review all relevant documented information supplied by the conformity assessment body to evaluate its system for conformity with the relevant standard(s) and other requirements for accreditation.

7.6.2557-559

The accreditation body can decide not to proceed with further assessment based on the review of the documented information. In such cases, the results with their justification shall be reported in writing to the conformity assessment body.

7.7 Assessment



7.7.1561-564

The accreditation body shall have documented procedures for describing the application of the assessment techniques (see 3.22) used, the circumstances in which they are to be used and the rules for determining assessment durations. The documented procedures shall include how the accreditation body will report the assessment findings to the conformity assessment body.

7.7.2565-568

For an assessment whether performed on-site or remotely, the assessment team shall commence the assessment with an opening meeting at which the purpose of the assessment and accreditation criteria are clearly defined, and the assessment plan as well as the scope for the assessment are confirmed.

7.7.3569-572

The assessment team shall conduct the assessment based on the assessment plan to gather objective evidence that the conformity assessment body is competent for the requested scope through conformance with the relevant standard(s), other requirements for accreditation and the conformity assessment body own management system.

7.7.4573-576

The assessment team shall analyse all relevant information and evidence gathered prior to and during the assessment. This analysis shall be sufficient for the team to determine the extent of competence and conformity of the conformity assessment body with the requirements for accreditation.

7.7.5577-578

Where the assessment team cannot reach a conclusion about a finding, the team shall refer back to the accreditation body for clarification.

7.7.6579-600

The accreditation body’s reporting procedures shall ensure that the following requirements are fulfilled: a) For an assessment whether performed on-site or remotely, a meeting shall take place between the assessment team and the conformity assessment body at the end of the assessment. At this meeting, the assessment team shall report on the findings identified during the assessment and provide a written report detailing any nonconformities. An opportunity shall be provided for the conformity assessment body to clarify the findings including the nonconformities, if any, and their basis; b) a written report on the outcome of the assessment shall be provided to the conformity assessment body without undue delay. This assessment report



shall contain comments on competence and conformity, and shall identify nonconformities, if any, to be resolved in order to conform with all of the requirements for accreditation. Comments on competence and conformity included in the assessment report shall be adequate to support the conclusions arising from the assessment. The team’s observations on areas for possible improvement may also be presented to the conformity assessment body but shall not recommend specific solutions; c) the accreditation body shall require the conformity assessment body to provide an analysis of the extent of the non conformities and a root cause analysis, and to describe within a defined time the specific actions taken or planned to be taken to resolve any identified nonconformities; d) if the final report on the outcome of the assessment [Clause 7.7.6 b)] differs from the report delivered at the close of the assessment [Clause 7.7.6 a)], the accreditation body shall provide an explanation to the assessed conformity assessment body.

7.7.7601-602

The accreditation body shall remain responsible for the content of all of its assessment reports.

7.7.8605-612

When nonconformities are identified, the accreditation body shall define time limits for correction and/or corrective actions to be implemented. The accreditation body shall ensure that the responses of the conformity assessment body to resolve nonconformities are reviewed to determine if the actions are considered to be sufficient and effective. If the conformity assessment body responses are found not to be sufficient, further information shall be requested. Additionally, evidence of effective implementation of actions taken may be requested, or a follow-up assessment may be carried out to verify effective implementation of corrective actions.

7.8 Accreditation decision-making

7.8.1614

The accreditation body shall describe its process for all types of accreditation decisions.

7.8.2615-618

The accreditation body shall ensure that each decision on granting, maintaining, extending, reducing, suspending and withdrawing of accreditation is taken by competent person(s) or committee(s) different from those who carried out the assessment, unless the reduction, suspension or withdrawal is requested by



the conformity assessment body.

7.8.3619-620

Where the accreditation is to be maintained without change to the scope of accreditation, an independent decision is not required unless it follows a reassessment.

Clear process and wording in case of maintaining accreditation

What does that mean? Who is deciding what and how? The assessment team?

7.8.4621-634

The information provided to the accreditation decision-maker(s) shall include the following: a) unique identification of the conformity assessment body; a) date(s) and type(s) of assessment(s) ( e. g initial, reassessment); b) name(s) of the assessor(s) and/or technical expert(s) involved in the assessment; c) unique identification of all locations assessed; d) proposed scope of accreditation that was assessed; e) the assessment report(s); f) a statement on the adequacy of the internal organization and procedures adopted by the conformity assessment body to give confidence in its competence, as determined through its fulfilment of the requirements for accreditation; g) sufficient information to demonstrate the satisfactory response to all nonconformities; h) where relevant, any further information that may assist in determining fulfilment of requirements and the competence of the conformity assessment body; i) where appropriate, a recommendation as to the accreditation decision for the proposed scope.

7.8.5635-636

The accreditation body shall, prior to making a decision, be satisfied that the information is adequate to decide that the requirements for accreditation have been fulfilled.

7.8.6637-640

The accreditation body shall, in a timely manner, make the accreditation decision on the basis of an evaluation of all information received (see 7.9.3) and any other relevant information. Accreditation decisions, with justifications, shall be communicated to the conformity assessment body.

The accreditation body shall, in a timely manner without undue delay, make the accreditation decision on the basis of an evaluation of all information received (see 7.9.3) and any other relevant information. Accreditation decisions, with justifications, shall be communicated to the conformity assessment body.

There should be no delay in making and communicating the decision.

7.8.7641-644

Where the accreditation body uses the results of an assessment already performed by another accreditation body, it shall have assurance that the other accreditation body was operating in accordance with the requirements of this International Standard.



7.9 Accreditation information

7.9.1646-659

The accreditation body shall provide information on the accreditation (see note below) to the accredited conformity assessment body in the form of the scope of accreditation that shall identify the following: a) the identity and, where relevant, the logo of the accreditation body;b) the name of the legal entity of the accredited conformity assessment body; c) locations of the accredited conformity assessment bodies, and as applicable the conformity assessment activities performed at each location and covered by the scope of accreditation.; d) the unique accreditation number of the accredited conformity assessment body; e) the date from which it comes into force and if applicable its expiry date; f) a statement of conformity and a reference to the international standard(s) or other normative document(s), including issue or revision used for assessment of the conformity assessment body. NOTE: The scope of accreditation can be provided in a certificate or other suitable means (e.g. electronic media)

.

7.9.2659-660

The effective date of accreditation, shall be the date of or a date after the accreditation decision.

7.9.3661-720

In addition, the scope of accreditation shall, at least, identify the following: a) for certification bodies: - the type of certification; - conformity assessment scheme where relevant; - the standards or normative documents, or regulatory requirements or types thereof, to which management systems, products, processes and services, or persons are certified, as applicable; - industry sectors, where relevant;- product categories, where relevant, and personnel categories where relevant. b) for inspection bodies: - the type of inspection body (e.g. as defined in ISO/IEC 17020); - the field and range of inspection for which accreditation has been granted, and; - the regulations, standards or specifications or types thereof containing the requirements against which the inspection is to be performed, as applicable.c) for calibration laboratories: - the calibration and measurement capability (CMC) expressed in terms of: - measurand or reference material;



- calibration/measurement method/procedure and/or type of instrument/material to be calibrated/measured; - measurement range and additional parameters where applicable, e.g., frequency of applied voltage; - uncertainty of measurement. d) for testing laboratories: - quantity/parameter tested;- materials or products tested; - tests or types of tests performed and, where appropriate, the methods and/or equipment used. e) for proficiency testing providers: - schemes that the proficiency testing provider is competent to provide; - type of proficiency testing items; - the measureand(s) or characteristic(s) or where appropriate the type of measureand(s) or characteristic that are to be identified, measured or tested; and - techniques for determination of the assigned values and its uncertainty. f) for reference material producers: - Specific types of reference materials (certified, non- certified or both); - the reference material matrix / artefact;

- the property(ies) characterized; - range of assigned property values and for certified reference materials, corresponding uncertainties; and - the principle of the characterization techniques used to assign property(s) values.g) for validation and verification activities: - identification of the activity (validation or verification or both); - the regulations, standards or specifications or types thereof containing the requirements against which the validation and verification is to be performed, as applicable; - validation/verification programme where relevant; and - industry sectorh) For other conformity assessment activity: - standards or normative documents that the conformity assessment body has to conform with; - the specific conformity assessment services the CAB is accredited for; - the regulations, standards or specifications or types thereof containing the requirements against which the conformity assessment activity is to be performed, as applicable.



7.10 Accreditation cycle

7.10.1722-724

An accreditation cycle begins at or after the date of the decision for granting the initial accreditation or decision after reassessment (see 7.10.4) and shall not be longer than 5 years.

An accreditation cycle begins at or after the date of the decision for granting the initial accreditation or decision after reassessment (see 7.10.4) and ends with the decision of accreditation after the reassessment and shall not be longer than 5 6 years.

The period of 5 year is still not useful, since main assessment activities are required in a two-year-cycle.

Furthermore it should be clarified when the accreditation cycle ends

7.10.2725-729

The accreditation body shall apply an assessment programme ( 3.24) for monitoring and assessing the conformity assessment body activities during the accreditation cycle to ensure that all conformity assessment activities representative of the scope of accreditation are assessed during the accreditation cycle (see 7.5.4).

Within the defined accreditation cycle, the requirements of the standards or other normative documents containing requirements for CABs and the scope of accreditation shall be assessed based on risk assessment performed and documented by the accreditation body.To ensure that the accredited CAB continuously fulfils the requirements of accreditation, the time between assessment activities shall not exceed 2 years. A sample of the scope of accreditation shall be assessed at least every two years. The accreditation body shall consider on-site assessment at least every two years where appropriate or applicable. The accreditation body shall justify where on-site assessment is not appropriate or applicable.

Chapter 7.10.2 and 7.10.3 should be combined.

There should be no highlighting of “on-site”. There should be more “flexibility”, which assessment techniques are appropriate. At least, the accreditations body has to justify if on-site assessments is not appropriate or applicable.

7.10.3730-740

The assessment programme shall ensure, the requirements of the international standards and other normative documents containing requirements for conformity assessment bodies and the scope of accreditation shall be assessed based on a risk assessment performed and documented by the accreditation body. The time between on site assessment shall not exceed 2 years. A sample of the scope of accreditation shall be assessed at least every two years. NOTE 1 There are circumstances where an accreditation body may determine that an on site assessment is not applicable. NOTE 2 There is no requirement for formal methods for risk assessment or a documented risk assessment process

7.10.4741-746

Before the end of the accreditation cycle, a reassessment shall be conducted taking into consideration the information gathered from assessments performed over the accreditation cycle and an independent accreditation decision shall be made. The reassessment shall cover all the requirements of the relevant standards or normative documents with which the conformity assessment body shall conform.

Before the end of the accreditation cycle a reassessment shall be conducted taking into consideration the information gathered from assessment activities performed over the accreditation cycle and an independent accreditation decision shall be made. Therefor the accreditation body shall have a process and criteria to evaluate the performance and stability of the CAB during the accreditation cycle. The reassessment shall be designed on this basis and shall ensure that all requirements of accreditation were covered during the accreditation cycle and that the AB can make an, where applicable independent accreditation decision (see 7.8.3) to renew or maintain accreditation for the next accreditation cycle. .

The position and “scope” of a reassessment is still not clear.

Within the accreditation cycle the different requirements of accreditation (normative and scope ones) shall be appropriately monitored based on risk assessments. The „reassessment“ is part of this cycle and could therefore be part of the assessment programme. It should not be an additional obligatory (100%) assessment event similar to audit during the initial accreditation process. Furthermore it should have a clearer link to assessment activities and results before.To align the reassessment as "final" assessment activity, so that the next cycle can start, its



design should depend on the performance and stability of the KBS during the cycle. This requires a process and criteria to reflect this.

7.10.5747-751

The accreditation body may conduct extraordinary assessments as a result of complaints or changes, or other such matters that may affect the ability of the conformity assessment body to fulfil requirements for accreditation. The accreditation body shall advise Conformity assessment bodies of this possibility.

7.11 Extending accreditation

7.11.1753-756

The accreditation body shall have a procedure for extending the scope of an accreditation already granted. Based on the risk associated with the activities to be covered in the scope extension, the accreditation body shall define the appropriate assessment technique to perform and consider the corresponding requirements defined in 7.3 to 7.9.

7.11.2757-758

The accreditation body shall take into account extensions granted when reviewing the assessment programme and planning the subsequent assessment.

7.12 Suspending, withdrawing or reducing accreditation

7.12 Add a new subclause and requirements for the AB especially for cases, when the CAB decides to reduce the scope of accreditation.

7.12 is configured as a "sanctions- chapter" and focusses on the decision-making process of the AB. What is, if the CAB decides to withdraw accreditation temporarily or to reduce the scope?

7.12.1761-763

The accreditation body shall make decisions to suspend and/or withdraw accreditation when an accredited conformity assessment body has failed to meet the requirements of accreditation.

7.12.2764-767

The accreditation body shall make decisions to reduce the scope of accreditation of the conformity assessment body to exclude those parts where the conformity assessment body has 765 failed to meet the requirements for accreditation.

7.12.3768-771

Where there is evidence of fraudulent behaviour, or the conformity assessment body intentionally provides false information or conceals information, the accreditation body shall initiate its process for withdrawal of accreditation.

7.12.4772-775

Where a conformity assessment body is providing certification to any standard used as a basis for accrediting conformity



assessment body (e.g. ISO/IEC 17025 or ISO 15189), the accreditation body shall initiate its process for suspension of accreditation.

7.12.5776-780

The accreditation body shall make decisions to suspend and/or withdraw accreditation when an accredited conformity assessment body has failed to meet the requirements of accreditation or to abide by the rules for accreditation

7.12.6 (new)

In case of suspension, withdrawal or reduction of accreditation the certificate and the published information on the CAB shall be modified as applicable.

For reasons of transparency and fair competition information about the suspension, withdrawal or reduction of accreditation should be made publicly available. Especially the unauthorized use of certificate or accreditation symbol should be stopped.

(Kommentierung gegenüber DIN):Der Ablehnungsgrund der WG gegenüber dem VUP-Vorschlag st nicht nachvollziehbar (“not agreed, covered in 8.3”). Es gibt kein Kapitel 8.3

7.13 Complaints

7.13.1782-786

The accreditation body shall have a documented process to receive, evaluate and make decisions on complaints. The accreditation body shall, where appropriate, ensure that a complaint concerning an accredited conformity assessment body is first addressed by the conformity assessment body.

7.13.2787-788

A description of the handling process for complaints shall be available to any interested party.

7.13.3789-790

Upon receipt of a complaint, the accreditation body shall confirm whether the complaint relates to accreditation activities that it is responsible for and, if so, shall deal with it.

7.13.4791-792

The accreditation body shall be responsible for all decisions at all levels of the handling process for complaints

7.13.5793-799

The handling process for complaints shall include at least the following elements and methods: a) a description of the process for receiving, validating, investigating the complaint, and deciding what actions are to be taken in response to it; b) tracking and recording complaints, including actions undertaken to resolve them; c) ensuring that any appropriate action is



taken.

7.13.6800-802

The accreditation body shall be responsible for gathering and verifying all necessary information to validate the complaint.

7.13.7803-805

The accreditation body shall acknowledge receipt of the complaint, and provide the complainant with progress reports and the outcome.

7.13.8806-808

The decision to be communicated to the complainant shall be made by, or reviewed and approved by, individual(s) not involved in the activities in question.

7.13.9809-811

The accreditation body shall give formal notice of the end of the complaint handling process to the complainant.

7.14 Appeals

7.14.1813-814

The accreditation body shall have a documented process to receive, evaluate and make decisions on appeals.

7.14.2815

A description of the handling process for appeals shall be available to any interested party.

7.14.3816-817

The accreditation body shall be responsible for all decisions at all levels of the handling process for appeals.

7.14.4818

Investigation and decision on appeals shall not result in any discriminatory actions.

7.14.5819-824

The handling process for appeals shall include at least the following elements and methods:a) a description of the process for receiving, validating, investigating the appeal, and deciding what actions are to be taken in response to it; b) tracking and recording appeals, including actions undertaken to resolve them; c) ensuring that any appropriate action is taken.

7.14.6825-827

The accreditation body receiving the appeal shall be responsible for gathering and verifying all necessary information to validate the appeal.

7.14.7828-830

the accreditation body shall acknowledge receipt of the appeal, and provide the appellant with progress reports and the outcome.

7.14.8831-833

The decision to be communicated to the appellant shall be made by, or reviewed and approved by, individual(s) not involved in the activities in question.



7.14.9834-837

the accreditation body shall give formal notice of the end of the appeals handling process to the appellant.

8 Information requirements

8.1 Confidential information

8.1.1840-847

The accreditation body shall be responsible, through legally enforceable agreements, for the management of all information obtained or created during the accreditation process. The accreditation body shall inform the conformity assessment body, in advance, of the information it intends to place in the public domain. Except for information that the conformity assessment body makes publicly available, or when agreed between the accreditation body and the conformity assessment body such as the purpose of responding to complaints, all other information obtained during accreditation process is considered proprietary information and shall be regarded as confidential except as required by law.

8.1.2848-850

When the accreditation body is required by law or authorized by contractual arrangements to release confidential information, the conformity assessment body shall, unless prohibited by law, be notified of the information provided.

8.1.3851-855

Information about the conformity assessment body obtained from sources other than the conformity assessment body (e.g. complainant, regulators) shall be confidential between the conformity assessment body and the accreditation body. The provider (source) of this information shall be confidential to the accreditation body and shall not be shared with the conformity assessment body, unless agreed by the source.

8.1.4856-858

Personnel, including any committee members, contractors, personnel of external bodies, or individuals acting on the accreditation body's behalf, shall keep confidential all information obtained or created during the performance of the body's activities, except as required by law.

8.2 Publicly available information

8.2.1860-875

The accreditation body shall make publicly available through publications, electronic media or other means, without request, and update at adequate intervals, the following:a) detailed information about its accreditation schemes, its assessment



and accreditation processes; b) reference to the documents containing the requirements for accreditation; c) information about the fees relating to the accreditation; d) a description of the rights and obligations of conformity assessment bodies; e) information on procedures for lodging and handling complaints and appeals; f) information about the authority under which the accreditation body operates; g) a description of the accreditation body rights and duties; h) general information about the means by which the accreditation body obtains financial support; i) information about the accreditation body activities, other than accreditation; j) information on the use of the accreditation symbol and; k) information about international recognition arrangements in which it is involved.

8.2.2876-882

As a minimum the accreditation body shall make the following information about Conformity assessment bodies publicly available without request: a) name and address of each accredited conformity assessment body; b) scopes of accreditation and; c) where applicable, suspension or withdrawal of accreditation, including dates and scopes. NOTE In exceptional cases, access to certain information can be limited on the request of the conformity assessment body (e.g. for security reasons).

8.2.3883-885

The accreditation body shall give due notice of any changes to its requirements for accreditation. It shall take account of views expressed by interested parties before deciding on the precise form and effective date of the changes.

8.2.4886-888

Following a decision on, and publication of, the changed requirements, it shall verify that each accredited body conforms to the changed requirements.

9 Management system requirements

9.1 General

9.1.1891-895

The accreditation body shall establish, document, implement and maintain a management system that is capable of supporting and demonstrating the consistent achievement of the requirements of this International Standard. In addition to meeting the requirements of clauses in this



International Standard, the accreditation body shall implement a management system in accordance with option A or with option B.

9.1.2896-900

The accreditation body's top management shall establish and document policies and objectives for its activities. The top management shall provide evidence of its commitment to the development and implementation of the management system in accordance with the requirements of this International Standard. The top management shall ensure that the policies are understood, implemented and maintained at all levels of the accreditation body's organization.

9.1.3901-905

The accreditation body's top management shall assign responsibility and authority for: a) ensuring that policies and procedures needed for the management system are established, implemented and maintained; and b) reporting to top management on the performance of the management system and any need for improvement.

9.1.4906-915

Option A, as a minimum the management system of the accreditation body shall address the following as elaborated in 9.2 to 9.8 below: - management system - control of documents - control of records - non confomities and corrective actions - improvements - internal audits - management reviews

9.1.5916-919

Option B, an accreditation body that has established and maintains a management system, in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001, and that is capable of supporting and demonstrating the consistent fulfilment of ISO/IEC 17011, fulfils at least the management system section requirements (9.2 to 9.8).

9.2 Management system

9.2.1921-925

The accreditation body shall operate a management system appropriate to the type, range and volume of work performed. All applicable requirements of this International Standard shall be addressed either in a manual or in associated documents. The accreditation body shall ensure that the manual and relevant associated documents are accessible to its personnel and shall ensure effective implementation of the system’s procedures.



9.2.2926-927

The accreditation body shall continually improve effectiveness of its management system in accordance with the requirements of this International Standard.

9.3 Document control

9.3929-938

The accreditation body shall establish procedures to control all documents (internal and external) that relate to its accreditation activities. The procedures shall define the controls needed: a) to approve documents for adequacy prior to issue; b) to review and update as necessary and re-approve documents; c) to ensure that changes and the current revision status of documents are identified; d) to ensure that relevant versions of applicable documents are available at points of use; e) to ensure that documents remain legible and readily identifiable; f) to prevent the unintended use of obsolete documents, and to apply suitable identification to them if they are retained for any purpose; and g) to safeguard, where relevant, the confidentiality of documents.

9.4 Records control

9.4.1940-941

The accreditation body shall establish procedures to define the controls needed for the identification, storage, protection, retrieval, retention time and disposition of its records.

9.4.2942-944

The accreditation body shall establish procedures for retaining records for a period consistent with its contractual and legal obligations. Access to these records shall be consistent with the confidentiality arrangements.

9.5 Nonconformities and corrective actions

9.5946-957.

The accreditation body shall establish procedures for the identification and management of nonconformities in its own operations. The accreditation body shall also, where necessary, take actions to eliminate the causes of nonconformities in order to prevent recurrence. Corrective actions shall be appropriate to the impact of the problems encountered. The procedures shall cover the following: a) identifying nonconformities (such as from complaints and internal audits); b) determining the causes of nonconformity; c) correcting nonconformities;d) evaluating the need for actions to ensure that nonconformities do not



recur; e) determining the actions needed and implementing them in a timely manner; f) recording the results of actions taken; g) reviewing the effectiveness of corrective actions.

9.6 Improvement

9.6959-961

The accreditation body shall establish procedures to identify opportunities for improvement and to take actions to eliminate the causes of risks. These actions taken shall be appropriate to the impact of the risks.

9.7 Internal audits

9.7.1963-965

The accreditation body shall establish procedures for internal audits to verify that they conform to the requirements of this International Standard and that the management system is implemented and maintained

9.7.2966-968

Internal audits shall be performed normally once a year. An audit programme shall be established, taking into consideration the importance of the processes and areas to be audited, as well as the results of previous audits.

9.7.3969-971

The frequency of internal audits may be reduced if the accreditation body demonstrates that its management system has been effectively implemented according to this International Standard and has proven stability.

9.7.4972-979

The accreditation body shall ensure that: a) internal audits are conducted by qualified personnel knowledgeable in accreditation, auditing and the requirements of this International Standard; b) internal audits are conducted by personnel different from those who perform the activity to be audited; c) personnel responsible for the area audited are informed of the outcome of the audit; d) actions are taken in a timely and appropriate manner; and e) any opportunities for improvement are identified.

9.8 Management reviews

9.8.1981-984

The accreditation body's top management shall establish procedures to review its management system at planned intervals to ensure its continuing adequacy and effectiveness in satisfying the relevant requirements, including this International Standard and the stated policies and objectives. These reviews shall be conducted at least once a year.



9.8.2985-1000

Inputs to management reviews shall include, where available, current performance and 985 improvement opportunities related to the following: a) results of audits; b) results of peer evaluation where relevant; c) participation in international activities, where relevant; d) safeguarding impartiality;e) feedback from interested parties; f) new areas of accreditation; g) trends in nonconformities; h) status of corrective actions; i) the status of actions to address risks and opportunities; j) follow-up actions from earlier management reviews; k) fulfilment of objectives; l) changes that could affect the management system; m) analysis of appeals; n) analysis of complaints.

9.8.31001-1007

The outputs from the management review shall include actions related to: a) improvement of the management system and its processes; b) improvement of services and accreditation process in conformity with the relevant standards and expectations of interested parties; c) need for resources; and d) defining or redefining policies, goals and objectives.



Annex A (Normative) – Required knowledge and skills for functions in the accreditation process



Nr. Vorgabe Änderungsvorschlag (Formulierung) Begründung / Anmerkung

Annex1008-1023

NOTE 1 Knowledge and skills should be covered by a team as a whole. A team may consist of one or more persons. NOTE 2 (X) indicate that there may be a lower level of required knowledge and skill than indicated for functions with X. NOTE 3 Accreditation scheme requirements are including for example ISO/IEC 17020, ISO/IEC 17021-1, ISO/IEC 17025, ISO/IEC 17024, ISO/IEC 17034, ISO/IEC 17043 , ISO/IEC 17065, ISO 15189 and ISO 14065. NOTE 4 Conformity assessment scheme requirements are for example ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 9096, (include test or inspection standards)

xx.02.2016 (HTM)


Documents

vup.de · Web viewRules and procedures for carrying out and management of accreditation of conformity assessment bodies to which the same requirements, rules and procedures apply