40
5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2 Draft 09/01/2009 (Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech's University Libraries: [email protected] ) (Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.) Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you in making a sound decision. Name: James Ailsworth Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2. KlausRobert Muller and Benjamin Blankertz. Toward noninvasive braincomputer interfaces. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 23(5):125128, 2006. Report generated on: 05092016 at : 11:45:45 Based on the information you provided: Factor 1 Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyright work weighs: in favor of fair use Factor 2 Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: in favor of fair use Factor 3 Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of the copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use Factor 4 Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use of the copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2. Klaus­Robert M uller and Benjamin Blankertz. Towardnoninvasive brain­computer interfaces. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 23(5):125­128, 2006.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 11:45:45

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

 

Page 2: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

Page 3: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 4. Gert Pfurtscheller, C Guger, G M uller, G Krausz, and CNeuper. Brain oscillations control hand orthosis in a tetraplegic. Neuroscience letters, 292(3):211­214, 2000.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 11:56:31

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

 

Page 4: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

Page 5: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 1. An H Do, Po T Wang, Christine E King, Sophia N Chun, andZoran Nenadic. Brain­computer interface controlled robotic gait orthosis. Journal of neuroengineering andrehabilitation, 10(1):1, 2013.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 12:02:47

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

Page 6: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

 

Page 7: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 1. Yuanqing Li, Kai Keng Ang, and Cuntai Guan. Digital signalprocessing and machine learning. In Brain­Computer Interfaces, pages 305{330. Springer, 2009.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 12:09:10

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

 

Page 8: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

Page 9: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 3. Tangient LLC. Phantom sensations and perceptions, April2012.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 14:49:43

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs:against fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

 

Page 10: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

Page 11: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.3. Gerwin Schalk and J urgen Mellinger. Brain sensors andsignals. In A Practical Guide to Brain­Computer Interfacing with BCI2000, pages 9­35. Springer, 2010.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 12:52:13

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

 

Page 12: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

Page 13: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and J urgen Mellinger. Brain sensors andsignals. In A Practical Guide to Brain­Computer Interfacing with BCI2000, pages 9­35. Springer, 2010.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 12:55:00

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

 

Page 14: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

Page 15: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 7.6. Jonathan Wolpaw and Elizabeth Winter Wolpaw. Brain­computer interfaces: principles and practice. OUP USA, 2012.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 13:09:48

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

 

Page 16: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

Page 17: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Slide 30. Christian Kothe. Introduction to modern brain­computerinterface design ­ lecture 7: Oscillatory processes, June 2014.General­Purpose Software for Brain­Computer InterfaceResearch, Data Acquisition, Stimulus Presentation, and Brain Monitoring. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 14:44:52

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs:against fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

Page 18: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

 

Page 19: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 7.9. Jonathan Wolpaw and Elizabeth Winter Wolpaw. Brain­computer interfaces: principles and practice. OUP USA, 2012.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 13:19:51

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

 

Page 20: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

Page 21: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 7.10. Jonathan Wolpaw and Elizabeth Winter Wolpaw. Brain­computer interfaces: principles and practice. OUP USA, 2012.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 13:23:33

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

 

Page 22: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

Page 23: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 5.3. Gerwin Schalk and J urgen Mellinger. A Practical Guide toBrain­Computer Interfacing with BCI2000: General­Purpose Software for Brain­Computer Interface Research, DataAcquisition, Stimulus Presentation, and Brain Monitoring. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 14:38:11

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

Page 24: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

 

Page 25: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 1. Benjamin Blankertz, Ryota Tomioka, Steven Lemm, MotoakiKawanabe, and Klaus­Robert Muller. Optimizing spatial  filters for robust eeg single­trial analysis. Signal ProcessingMagazine, IEEE, 25(1):41­56, 2008.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 14:57:13

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

Page 26: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

 

Page 27: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 4.27. Richard O Duda, Peter E Hart, and David G Stork.Pattern classi cation. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 17:55:54

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

 

Page 28: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

Page 29: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 6. Yuanqing Li, Kai Keng Ang, and Cuntai Guan. Digital signalprocessing and machine learning. In Brain­Computer Interfaces, pages 305{330. Springer, 2009.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 12:13:03

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

 

Page 30: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

Page 31: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Table 19.1. Alois Schlogl, Julien Kronegg, Jane E Huggins, and SteveG Mason. 19 evaluation criteria for bci research. Toward brain­computer interfacing, 2007.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 15:16:21

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

 

Page 32: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

Page 33: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Table 19.2. Alois Schlogl, Julien Kronegg, Jane E Huggins, and SteveG Mason. 19 evaluation criteria for bci research. Toward brain­computer interfacing, 2007.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 15:19:58

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

 

Page 34: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

Page 35: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 1. Alexandre Barachant, St ephane Bonnet, Marco Congedo, andChristian Jutten. Multiclass brain­computer interface classi cation by riemannian geometry. Biomedical Engineering,IEEE Transactions on, 59(4):920­928, 2012.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 17:00:56

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

Page 36: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

 

Page 37: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 7. Benjamin Blankertz, Steven Lemm, Matthias Treder, StefanHaufe, and Klaus­Robert M uller. Single­trial analysis and classifi cation of erp components a tutorial. NeuroImage,56(2):814{825, 2011.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 17:08:57

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

Page 38: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2

 

Page 39: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2

Draft 09/01/2009

(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])

(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)

Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results

This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.

Name: James Ailsworth

Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2. Alexandre Barachant, St ephane Bonnet, Marco Congedo, andChristian Jutten. Riemannian geometry applied to bci classi cation. In Latent Variable Analysis and Signal Separation,pages 629­636. Springer, 2010.

Report generated on: 05­09­2016 at : 17:03:40

Based on the information you provided:

Factor 1

Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 2

Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use

Factor 3

Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Factor 4

Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use

Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use

 

Page 40: Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results...Description of item under review for fair use: Figure 2.6. Gerwin Schalk and Jurgen Mellinger. Brain sensors and signals. In A Practical

5/9/2016 VT Fair Use Analysis Results

http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 2/2