174
Self Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engineering Programme (TIER–I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PART-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING KAKINADA (AUTONOMOUS) Kakinada (A.P) January, 2015 To

· Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Self Assessment Report (SAR)For

Accreditation of Postgraduate Engineering Programme (TIER–I)

M.TechMACHINE DESIGN

PART-A & PART-B

Submitted by

DEPARMENT OFMECHANICAL ENGINEERING

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OFENGINEERING KAKINADA

(AUTONOMOUS)

Kakinada (A.P)

January, 2015

To

NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDATION (NBA)New Delhi – 110 003, India

Page 2: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

(January 2013 format)

CONTENTS

PART- A Page No

I. Institutional Information……………………………………………………...

II. Departmental Information…………………………………………………….

III. Programme Specific Information……………………………………………..

PART- B

1. Vision, Mission and Programme Educational Objectives……………………….

2. Programme Outcomes……………………………………………………………..

3. Programme Curriculum…………………………………………………………...

4. Students’ Performance…………………………………………………………….

5. Faculty Contributions……………………………………………………………...

6. Facilities and Technical Support……………………………………………….....

7. Teaching-Learning Process………………………………………………………..

8. Governance, Institutional Support and Financial Resource

Continuous Improvement………………………………………………………….

Page 3: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

PART-A

I. Institutional Information

I.1.Nameandaddressoftheinstitutionandaffiliatinguniversity:

J.N.T. University College of Engineering Kakinada (A)Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University KakinadaPithapuram Road, KAKINADA, East Godavari DistrictPin: 533 003, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA

I.2.Name, designation, telephone number, and e-mail address of the contact person for the NBA:

Dr. G.V.R. Prasada Raju, PrincipalPh: 0884-2300823(O); Fax: 0884- 2386516Mobile: 09618522555Email: [email protected]

I.3.History of the institution (including the date of introduction and number of seats of various programmes of study along with the NBA accreditation, if any) in a tabular form:

Year Description Intake

1946 College started with the fallowing programmes (Intake Strength)

1. Civil Engineering 40

2. Mechanical Engineering 40

3. Electrical and Electronics Engineering 40

1958 Telecommunication Engineering 15

1972 Telecommunication Engineering converted into Electronics and 50

Communication Engineering

1975 Intake increased to

1. Civil Engineering 50

2. Mechanical Engineering 50

3. Electrical and Electronics Engineering 50

Page 4: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

1987 Additional course started

1. Computer science and Engineering 15

2002 Intake increased to 50

Computer science and Engineering

S.No Description Intake Year of Accreditation

Strength Establishment Status

1 Civil Engineering 50 1946 YES

2 Mechanical Engineering 50 1946 YES

3 Electrical and Electronics Engineering 50 1946 YES

4 Electronics and communication 50 1958 YES

Engineering

5 Computer Science and Engineering 50 1988 YES

6 Petrochemical Engineering 50 2009 No

7 Petroleum Engineering 50 2010 No

Page 5: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Sl. No. Program Intake Year of Establishment

1. Soil Mechanics Engineering 18+7* 1974 – 75

2. Structural Engineering 18+7* 2002 – 03

3. Advanced Electrical Power System 18+7* 2002 – 03

4. High Voltage Engineering 18+7* 1972 – 78

5. CAD/CAM 18+7* 2001 – 02

6. Machine Design 18+7* 1972 – 73

7. Instrumentation & Control Engineering 18+7* 1975 – 76

8. Computer & Communication 18+7* 2005 – 06

9. Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) 18+7* 2002 – 03

10. Information Technology 18+7* 2008 – 09

11. Petroleum (Pipeline) Engineering 18+7* 2014 – 15

* Sponsored category - seats filled by the University

I.4.Ownershipstatus:Govt. (central/state) / trust/ society (Govt./NGO/private)/ Private/ other: State Government

I.5.Mission and Vision of the Institution:

VISION: To be a premier institute of excellence developing highly talented holistic human capital that contributes to the nation through leadership in technology and innovation through engineering education.

MISSION:

To impart Personnel Skills and Ethical Values for Sustainable Development of the Nation. To create Research & Industry oriented centers of excellence in all engineering disciplines. To be a renowned IPR generator and repository for innovative technologies. To develop Research and Industry oriented technical talent. To benchmark globally the academic & research output.

Page 6: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

I.6.OrganizationalStructure:

Organizational chart showing the hierarchy of academics and administration is to be included

I.7.Financialstatus: Govt.(central/state)/grants-in-aid/not-for-profit / private self-Financing /other: State Government

I.8.Natureof the trust/society: It’s a Govt. Institute and not under any trust or society.

I.9.External sources of funds:

Name of the externalCAY CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3

Source

2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 2012-13

ICS70,35,015 57,91,747 67,88,319 1,05,39,137

Page 7: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

I.10. Internally acquired funds:

Name of theCAY CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3

internal source

2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 2012-13

Students‘ fee 1,95,98,198 1,76,95,346 1,38,89,670 1,30,59,260

I.11Scholarships or any other financial assistance provided to students

(Instruction: If any scholarship or financial assistance is provided to the students, then the details of such assistance over the last three financial years have to be listed here. Also mention needs to be made of the basis for the award of such scholarship).

Type of scholarship 2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 2012-13

SC 33,48,560 27,75,340 30,84,230 29,15,450

ST 10,42,720 11,67,440 6,99,200 11,14,230

OBC 79,55,680 64,56,140 27,29,500 76,20,826

Minorities 11,72,192 92,887 7,26,195 8,20,295

General 35,04,300 33,80,900 27,29,500 40,61,700

TEQIP-II for PG 41,62,586 59,25,497 36,00,000 ---

TEQIP-II for PhD 41,39,788 37,13,285 12,96,000 1,85,806

I.12Basis/criterion for admission to the institution:

GATE, State Level Entrance Examinations PGECET for PG Courses and EAMCET and ECET for UG Programs (Conducted by Andhra Pradesh state Government)

Page 8: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

I.13Total number of engineering students:

CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3

2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 2012-13

Total no. of boys: 1079 1082 1054 1103

Total no. of girls: 795 751 684 679

Total no. of students: 1874 1833 1738 1782

I.14Total number of employees

(Instruction: Total number of employees, both men and women, has to be listed here. The data may be categorized in a tabular form as teaching and supporting staff.)

Minimum and maximum number of staff on roll in the engineering institution, during the CAY and the previous CAY (1st July to 30th June):

A. Regular Staff

Items  

CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

2015-16 2014-15 2013-14

Min Max Min Max Min Max

Teaching staff in engineering

M 61 65 63 65 65 65

F 24 24 24 24 24 24

Teaching staff in science & humanities

M 6 7 6 7 7 7

F 2 2 2 2 2 2

Non-teaching Staff

M 97 97 97 97 97 97

F 16 16 16 16 16 16

Total Sanctioned Teaching Posts – 118 Total Sanctioned Non teaching Posts – 243

(Instruction: Staff strength, both teaching and non-teaching, over the last three academic years has to be listed here.)

B. Contract Staff

Page 9: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Items  

CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

2015-16 2014-15 2013-14

Min Max Min Max Min Max

Teaching staff in engineering

M 22 22 20 20 15 15

F 18 18 17 17 13 13

Teaching staff in science & humanities

M 20 20 23 23 19 19

F 11 11 10 10 13 13

Non-teaching Staff

M 95 95 84 84 84 84

F 27 27 19 19 19 19

II. DEPARTMENTAL INFORMATION

II.1. Name and address of the department:

Department of Mechanical Engineering,University College of Engineering Kakinada (A),JNTUK, Kakinada-533003

II.2. Name, designation, telephone number, and email address of the contact person for the NBA:

Sri. M Kumara SwamyProfessor & Head, Department of Mechanical EngineeringPh No: 0884-2300854(O), 08978618555(M)E-Mail: [email protected]

II.3. History of the department including date of introduction and number of seats of various programmes of study along with the NBA accreditation, if any:

II.4. Mission and Vision of the Department

Programme of Study Description

Under GraduateB. Tech (Mechanical Engg.)

Started with 40 seats in 1946 Intake increased to 50 in 1975

Post Graduatei) M. Tech (Machine Design)

ii) M. Tech (CAD/CAM)

i) Started with 12 seats in 1972Intake increased to 18 in 2001Intake increased to 25 in 2008

ii) Started with 18 seats in 2001

Page 10: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

MISSION

To offer high quality graduate and post graduate programs in Mechanical Engineering in order to mould the learners into globally competitive technologists who are professionally challenged, intellectually influenced and socially responsible. The department strives to make the learners inculcate and imbibe physical and practical perception and pro-active nature so as to enable them to acquire a vision for exploration and an insight for advanced technological innovations.

VISION

To nurture the excellence in modeling, design and of modern mechanical engineering systems by imparting timeless core values to the learners and to mould the institution into a centre of academic excellence and advanced research.

II.5. List of the programmes/ departments which share human resources and/or facilities of this department/programme (in %):

DEPARTMENT THEORY LABORATORY %

Civil Engineering1. Engineering Drawing2. Engineering Mechanics3. CAED

1. Engg Workshop 2. AutoCAD Lab 08

Electrical and Electronics Engineering

1. Engineering Drawing2. Engineering Mechanics3. Hydraulics & Prime

Movers

1. Engg Workshop2. Thermal Engg

08

Electronics Communications

Engineering

1. Engineering Drawing2. Engineering Mechanics 1. Engg Workshop 05

Computer Science Engineering

1. Engineering Drawing2. Engineering Mechanics 1. Engg Workshop 05

Petroleum Engineering

1. Engineering Drawing2. Engineering Mechanics3. Elements of Mech Engg4. CAED

1. Engg Workshop2. Basic Engg Lab3. AutoCAD lab4. Process Heat Transfer Lab5. Petroleum Analysis Lab6. Simulation Lab

16

Petro-Chemical Engineering

1. Engineering Drawing2. Engineering Mechanics3. Elements of Mech Engg4. CAED

1. Engg Workshop2. Basic Engg Lab3. AutoCAD lab4. Process Heat Transfer Lab5. Petroleum Analysis Lab6. Simulation Lab

16

Page 11: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

School of Renewable Energy

& Environment

1. CFD2. Basic Energy Engg 1. Simulation Lab 05

II.6. Total number of students: Under Graduation (UG) : 253 Post Graduation (PG) :100

II.7. Minimum and maximum number of staff on roll during the current and three previous academic years (1st July to 30th June) in the department:

CAY CAY minus1 CAY minus 2Min Max Min Max Min Max

Teaching faculty in the Department 20 24 19 20 17 20Teaching faculty with the programme B.Tech (Mech.)M.Tech (Machine Design)M.Tech (CAD/CAM)

140303

180303

130303

140303

110303

140303

Non-teaching staff 24 30 24 25 24 24

II.7.1. Summary of budget for the CFY and the actual expenditure incurred in the CFYm1, CFYm2 and CFY3 (exclusively for this programme in the department):

Mechanical Engineering Department

Items

Bud

gete

d in

CFY

20

15-1

6

Act

ual E

xpen

ses i

n C

FY

2015

-16

Bud

gete

d in

CFY

ml

2014

-15

Act

ual E

xpen

ses i

n C

FYm

l 20

14-1

5

Bud

gete

d in

CFY

m2

2013

-14

Act

ual E

xpen

ses i

n C

FYm

2 20

13-1

4

Bud

gete

d in

CFY

m3

20

12-

13

Act

ual E

xpen

ses i

n C

FYm

3 20

12-1

3

Lab Equipment

2000000

1865280 650000 672320 450000 459115 250000

0257999

4Lab Equipment (with TEQIP-II)

3800000

3837196 2600000 263459

0        

Software (with TEQIP-II)

               

Lab consumable 200000 181830 100000 72997 150000 179170 140000 145564

Maintenance and spares                

Training & Travel (with 200000 202347 1100000 111733

0 625000 636272 12000 12863

Page 12: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

TEQIP-II)Misc.expenses for academic activities

        50000 50000 22000 21850

Total 6200000

6086653 4450000 449723

7127500

0132455

7267400

0276027

1

III. PROGRAMME SPECIFIC INFORMATION

III.1.Name of the Programme PG in Machine Design

III.2. Title of the Degree Master of Technology in Machine Design

III.3. Name, designation, telephone number, and email address of the Program coordinator for the NBA:

Dr.B. BalakrishnaProfessor & Head, Department of Mechanical EngineeringPh No: 0884-2300854(O), 08978618555(M)E-Mail: [email protected]

III.4. History of the programme along with the NBA accreditation, if any:

Programme Description

PG in Machine Design

Started with 12 seats in 1972Intake increased to 18 seats in 2001, Again

Intake increased to 25 seats in 2008 Accredited in 2004

NAAC “A” JNTU

III.5. Deficiencies, weaknesses/concerns from previous accreditations: NIL

III.6. Total number of students in the programme: 50 (25+25)

III.7. Minimum and maximum number of staff for the current and three previous academic

years (1st July to 30th June) in the program

CAY CAY minus1 CAY minus 2Min Max Min Max Min Max

Teaching faculty in the Department 20 24 19 20 17 20

Page 13: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Teaching faculty with the programme M.Tech (Machine Design) 03 03 03 03 03 03Non-teaching staff 8 10 8 8 8 8

III.8. Summary of budget for the CFY and the actual expenditure incurred in the CFYm1, CFYm2 and CFY3 (exclusively for this programme in the department):

PART-B

1. VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAMME EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (75 )

1.1. Vision and Mission (5)

1.1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the institute and department (1)(List and articulate the vision and mission statements of the institute and department)

INSTITUTE

Machine Design

Items

Bud

gete

d in

CFY

20

15-1

6

Act

ual E

xpen

ses i

n C

FY

2015

-16

Bud

gete

d in

CFY

ml

2014

-15

Act

ual E

xpen

ses i

n C

FYm

l 20

14-1

5

Bud

gete

d in

CFY

m2

2013

-14

Act

ual E

xpen

ses i

n C

FYm

2 20

13-1

4

Bud

gete

d in

CFY

m3

20

12-

13

Act

ual E

xpen

ses i

n C

FYm

3 20

12-1

3

Lab Equipment 1000000 932640 325000 336160 225000 229557 1250000 1289997Lab Equipment (with TEQIP-II)

1900000 1918598 1300000 1317295        

Software (with TEQIP-II)                

Lab consumable 100000 90915 50000 36498 75000 89585 70000 72782

Training & Travel (with TEQIP-II)

100000 101173 550000 558665 312500 318136 60000 6431

Misc.expenses for academic activities

        25000 25000 11000 10925

Total 3100000 3043326 2225000 2248618 637500 662278 1337000 1380135

Page 14: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

University College Engineering Kakinada (UCEK) established in the year 1946, is the first premier technical institute in the state of Andhra Pradesh, It is a Government institution found under AICTE/UGC. Towards the accomplishment of its vision, at present the institute offers 7 UG programs (5 are accredited by NBA) and 13 PG Programs. The institute is permanently affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kakinada (JNTUK), Kakinada Andhra Pradesh. The institute is scaling up its post graduate education and research through TEQIP-II

VISION

To be a premier institute of excellence developing highly talented holistic human capital that contributes to the nation through leadership in technology and innovation through engineering education. 

MISSION

1. To impart Personnel Skills and Ethical Values for Sustainable Development of the Nation. 2. To create Research & Industry oriented centers of excellence in all engineering disciplines.3. To be a renowned IPR generator and repository for innovative technologies.4. To develop Research and Industry oriented technical talent.5. To benchmark globally the academic & research output.

DEPARTMENT

Department of Mechanical Engineering is established from the inception (1946) of the institute to meet the requirements of the mechanical industry and the society /discipline after the consultation with various stakeholders. The department started with an initial intake of 40 students in UG Program in ME and the intake is enhanced to 50 in the year 1976. In 1972, the department started a PG Program in “Machine Design (MD)” with an initial intake of 12 and the intake is enhanced to 18 students in the year 2001 again 18 to 25 in the year 2008. The department also started another PG Program in “Computer Aided Design and Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM)” in the year 2001 with an initial intake of 18 and the intake is enhanced to 25 students in the year 2008.

MISSION

To offer high quality graduate and post graduate programs in technical education in order to mould the learners into globally competitive technologists who are professionally challenged, intellectually influenced and socially responsible. The department strives to make the learners inculcate and imbibe physical and practical perception and pro-active nature so as to enable them to acquire a vision for exploration and an insight for advanced technological innovations.VISION

To nurture the excellence in Modeling, design and of modern mechanical engineering systems by imparting timeless core values to the learners and to mould the institution into a centre of academic excellence and advanced research.

1.1.2. Indicate how and where the Vision and Mission are published and disseminated (2)(Describe in which media (e.g. websites, curricula, books, etc.) the vision and mission are published and how these are disseminated among stakeholders)

Page 15: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

The Mission and Vision are published at

Department website :ht t p://www.jnt ucek .ac.in / ME College website :ht t p:// www.jnt ucek .ac.in / Curriculum booksNotice boards

Apart from this, Mission and Vision are disseminated to all the stakeholders of the programs through faculty meetings, student awareness workshops, student induction programs, and parent meetings.

1.1.3. Mention the process for defining Vision and Mission of the department (2)(Articulate the process involved in defining the vision and mission of the department from the vision and mission of the institute.)

The department established the vision and mission through a consultative process involving the stakeholders of the department, the future scope of the department and the societal requirements as shown in Figure 1.1. In establishing the vision and mission of the department, the following steps were followed:

Step 1: Vision and Mission of the institute are taken as basis.Step 2: Views are taken from stakeholders of the department/programme such as industry, administration, parents and professional bodiesStep 3 : The accepted views are analyzed and reviewed to check the consistency with the vision and mission of the institute.

Figure 1.1: Process for defining Vision and Mission of the Department

1.2. Programme Educational Objectives (10)

Page 16: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

1.2.1. Describe the Programme Educational Objectives (PEOs) (1)(List and articulate the programme educational objectives of the programme under accreditation)

Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) of the Machine Design are established through a consultation process is described in Sec.1.2.4 and these address the following broad aspects.

“ What our g raduates co u ld do best ” “ H o w our graduates would approach problem solv i ng” “ W hat values our graduates sh o uld have ” “What should be our graduate to our society”

Program Educational Objectives of the PG in Machine Design are:

1.2.2. State how and where the PEOs are published and disseminated (1)

(Describe in which media (e.g. websites, curricula, books, etc.) the PEOs are published and how these are disseminated to stakeholders)

The PEOs are published at

Department website :ht t p://www.jnt ucek .ac.in / ME College website :ht t p:// www.jnt ucek .ac.in / Curriculum booksNotice boards

Additionally, the dissemination of PEOs to all the stakeholders of the program is done through student awareness programs, student induction programs and faculty meetings.

1.2.3. List the stakeholders of the programme (1)(List stakeholders of the programme under consideration for accreditation and articulate their relevance)Our program has identified the following constituencies as Student, Alumni, Faculty, Employer (Industry /Institute) and Parents.

PEO 1. Excel in professional career and/or scientific research by acquiring knowledge in advanced mathematical, computational and engineering principles.

PEO 2. Analyze real life problems and design eco friendly mechanical systems as an appropriate promissing solutions that are technically sound, economically feasible and socially acceptable.

PEO 3. Exhibit professionalism, ethical attitude, communication skills, team work in their Profession and adapt to current trends by engaging in lifelong learning.

PEO 4. Inculcate or imbibe entrepreneurship quality to establish professional industry with wide spread technological facilities as a global competitor.

Page 17: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Stu d ent

Most prominent role in the program. Students feedback is considered to introduce innovative teaching and learning

methodologies Students input will help in program to introduce the elective courses to meet

current trends.

Fa c ul t y

Involve a vital role in working of the program. Faculty involves in various committees to check the consistency of the program. Faculty provides inputs for designing the program, PEOs/POs establishment,

Course Objectives and assessment.

Al u mni

Focus group because they are a measure of the long-term success of our program.

Alumni feedback helps in curriculum design to meet recent trends in engineering.

Recollect their presence during their program study and advise the department with necessary inputs in point of student career.

E m ployer (Industry /Institute)

Represents the major end users of our graduates. Gives higher focus to the program on future data to create awareness with

current industry Gives inputs which overcome the gap between programe and industry

Paren t s

Expects their wards in good professional career, innovation and research.

1.2.4. State the process for establishing the PEOs (3)(Describe the process that periodically documents and demonstrates that the PEOs are based on the needs of the programme’s various stakeholders.)

The Program Educational Objectives are established through a consultation process involving the core constituents such as: Students, Alumni, Faculty, Employer (Industry/Institute) and Parents. The PEOs are established through the following process steps:

Step 1 : Vision and Mission of the Department are taken as a basis to interact with various stake holders and graduate attributes defined by NBA are also kept in view.

Step 2 : Program Coordinator consults the key constituents and collects their views and submits the views to Program Assessment Committee.

Page 18: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Step 3 : Program Assessment Committee summarizes the collected views and expresses its opinion on the views and forwards the same to Department Advisory Board.

Step 4 : Department Advisory Board deliberates on the views expressed by the Program Assessment Committee and formulates the accepted views based on which PEOs are established

Figure 1.2: Process for establishing PEOs

1.2.5. Establish consistency of the PEOs with the Mission of the institute (4)(Describe how the Programme Educational Objectives are consistent with the Mission of the department.

PEO’S DESCRIPTION

Key ComponentsFrom Department

Mission

Qua

lity

educ

atio

n

Prof

essi

onal

car

eer

Hig

her

educ

atio

n

Soci

ally

res

pons

ible

Res

earc

h

PEO 1Excel in professional career and/or scientific research by acquiring knowledge in advanced mathematical, computational and engineering

√ √ √ -- √

PEO 2 Analyze real life problems and design an eco friendly mechanical systems as an appropriate

√ √ -- √ √

Page 19: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

promising solutions that are technically sound, economically feasible and socially acceptable

PEO 3

Exhibit professionalism, ethical attitude, communication skills, team work in their profession and adapt to current trends by engaging in lifelong learning

√ √ -- √ --

PEO 4Inculcate or imbibe entrepreneurship quality to establish professional industry with wide spread technological facilities as a global competitor.

√ √ -- √ --

1.3. Achievement of Programme Educational Objectives (20)

1.3.1. Justify the academic factors involved in achievement of the PEOs (10)(Describe the broad curricular components that contribute towards the achievement of the Programme Educational Objectives.)

The curriculum is one of the main tools to prepare students in achieving PEOs. Therefore, the relevance of the courses in the program to PEOs needs to be quantified in order to establish their level of support to PEOs. The description of curricular components of the Machine Design Program relevant to PEOs is shown in Table 1.2

Table 1.2: Course Component distribution of credits and PEOs of the Department

Course Component PEOsCurriculum Content

(% of total number of credits of the program )

Advanced Optimization PEO1, PEO2 10Advanced Engineering courses PEO2, PEO3 40

Professional core PEO 1, PEO2, PEO3 30Electives PEO1, PEO2, PEO4 20

1.3.2. Explain how the administrative system helps in ensuring the achievement of the PEOs (10)

(Describe the committees and their functions, working process and related regulations.)The following administrative setup is put in place to ensure the achievement of PEOs andPOs

Program Coordinator Department Advisory Board

Program Coordinator

Interacts and maintains liaison with key stake holders, students, faculty, Department Head and employer.

Monitors and reviews the activities of program independently. Schedules program work plan in accordance with specifications of program

objectives and outcomes. Oversees daily operations and coordinates activities of program with interrelated

activities of other programs, departments or staff to ensure optimum efficiency and compliance with appropriate policies, procedures and specifications given by HOD.

Conducts and interprets various surveys required to assess POs and PEOs

Page 20: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Department Advisory Board

DAB consists of head of the department, program coordinators, and the representatives of key stake holders

DAB chaired by head of the department monitors the progress of the program and future issues related to program

Develops and recommends new or revised program goals and objective and continuously review the programs

1.4. Assessment of the achievement of the Programme Educational Objectives (35)

1.4.1. Indicate tools and processes used in assessment of the achievement of the PEOs (5)Describe the assessment process that periodically documents and demonstrates the degree to which the Programme Educational Objectives are attained. Also include information on:a) Listing and description of the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the

evaluation of each programme educational objective is based. Examples of data collection processes may include, but are not limited to, employer surveys, graduate surveys, focus groups, industrial advisory committee meetings, or other processes that are relevant and appropriate to the programme;

b) The frequency with which these assessment processes are carried out. In order to assess the attainment of PEOs, each PEO is further subdivided as follows:

PEO 1 : Excel in professional career and/or scientific research by acquiring knowledge in advanced mathematical, computational and engineering principles.

PEO 1.1. Progress in professional careerPEO 1.2. Scientific Research

PEO 2 : Analyze real life problems and design an eco friendly mechanical systems as an appropriate promising solutions that are technically sound, economically feasible and socially acceptable.

PEO 2.1. Analyse real life problemPEO 2.2. Design and develop economically feasible and socially acceptable Eco friendly mechanical systems

PEO 3 : Exhibit professionalism, ethical attitude, communication skills, team work in their profession and adapt to current trends by engaging in lifelong learning

PEO 3.1. Professional conduct and interpersonal skillsPEO 3.2. Adapting to current trends in technology

PEO 4 : Inculcate or imbibe entrepreneurship quality to establish professional industry with wide spread technological facilities as a global competitor.

PEO 4.1. Establish professional industryPEO 4.2. A global competitor

PEO Assessment

Assessment Criteria DataCollection Responsible

Committee

Goal

Page 21: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Tool

PEO1

PEO1.1

Placement record

Number of students placed in campus

interviewOnce in

year

Program Assessment Committee

30-35%

Number of students placed after graduation

Once in year

Program Assessment Committee

15-20%

Employersurvey

How satisfied are you withthe performance of our

graduates

After 2 years of

graduation

DepartmentAdvisory

Committee50-60%

Alumnisurvey

How comfortable wereyou in the training/initial

months in your first employment

After 2years of

graduation

ProgramAssessmentCommittee

70-80%

What is your progress inthe employment

After 2years of

graduation

ProgramAssessmentCommittee

70-80%

PEO1.2

Performancein

the program

How many studentspassed

with distinction/First class

Once inyear

ProgramAssessmentCommittee

70-80%

Entrance test GATE For Phd Once in year

ProgramAssessmentCommittee

50-60%

Alumnisurvey

Have you pursued anyhigher education

Once inyear

ProgramAssessmentCommittee

50-60%

Alumnisurvey

What is your Doctors’degree that you had

pursued? (Phd)”

Once inyear

ProgramAssessmentCommittee

50-60%

PEO2

PEO2.1

Employersurvey

Do our graduates haveinclination to identify

problems in society

After 2years of

graduation

DepartmentAdvisory

Committee30-40%

Alumnisurvey

What is the nature ofprojects you handled after your graduation (either in

employment or individually)

After 2years

of graduation

ProgramAssessmentCommittee

50-60%

PEO2.2

Alumnisurvey

To meet the current jobrequirements, please

specify the tools/Technologies you used

other than what you have learnt during the

program

After 2years

of graduation

ProgramAssessmentCommittee

50-60%

PEO3

PEO3.1

AlumniSurvey

What is the size of yourteam in profession when

working in teams

After 2years of

graduation

ProgramAssessmentCommittee

50-60%

Page 22: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Employer survey

How do you rate our graduates written and oral

communication abilities

After 2 years of

graduation

Department Advisory

Committee30-40%

PEO3.2

AlumniSurvey

We have taken any Internship courses minimum 6 months

duration since graduation

After 2 years of

graduation

Program Assessment Committee

50-60%

PEO 4

PEO4.1

AlumniSurvey

What is the size of yourteam in profession when

working in teams

After 2years of

graduation

ProgramAssessmentCommittee

50-60%

Employer survey

How do you rate our graduates written and oral

communication abilities

After 2 years of

graduation

Department Advisory

Committee30-40%

PEO4.2

AlumniSurvey

We have taken any Internship courses minimum 6 months

duration since graduation

After 2 years of

graduation

Program Assessment Committee

50-60%

1.4.2. Provide the evidence for the achievement of the PEOs (30)a)The expected level of attainment for each of the programme educational objectives; b) Summaries of the results of the evaluation processes and an analysis illustrating the extent to which each of the programme educational objectives is being attained; and c)How the results are documented and maintained.

The Program assessment Committee and Program Coordinator measure the level to which our program has met each of the PEOs independently as explained. The collected evidences are depicted below.

PEOs A t tain m ent Sum m ary:

PEO1 is said to be reached 71.2% of attainment in terms of professional career. This attainment level can be improved further with more emphasis of graduates in Higher Education.

PEO2 is attained in the level of 77% with respect to graduate participation in handling societal problem with sound computing solutions.

PEO3 assessment evidences that 68% graduates exhibit professionalism in team work and engage in continuous education.

PEO4 assessment evidences that 30% graduates shows remarkable improvement in securing jobs in reputed MNCs

E v idences:

Page 23: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Results analysis and placement data files are placed in department office. Competitive entrance exams data files are placed in department office. Alumni Survey data is collected through google forms and 50% of alumni

were responded. Employer Survey is done through email and documents files are

available in the department office.

1.5. Indicate how the PEOs have been Redefined in the past (5)(Articulate with rationale how the results of the evaluation of the PEOs have been used to review/redefine the PEOs)

Figure 1.14 illustrates the process of redefining the existing PEOs.

The process is initiated by Department Advisory Board during PEOs assessment and attainment process.

To redefine, the existing PEOs assessment data is gathered through direct and indirect assessment methods.

To improve the program performance, the collected data is analyzed to identify the need for redefining PEOs.

Based on identified changes in terms of curriculum, regulations and PEOs, the administrative system like BOS, Academic Council and Program Assessment Committee involve appropriate actions.

Figure 1.14: Redefining PEOs process

Page 24: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

PROGRAMME OUTCOMES

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

2. PROGRAMME OUTCOMES (250)

2.1. Definition and Validation of Course Outcomes and Programme Outcomes (20)

2.1.1. List the Course Outcomes (COs) and Programme Outcomes (POs) (1)(List the course outcomes of the courses in programme curriculum and programme outcomes of the programme under accreditation)

POs describe what students are expected to know or be able to do by the time of graduation from the program. Program Outcomes are established as per the process described in 2.1.3. The Program Outcomes of PG in Machine Design are:

Page 25: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

COURSE OUTCOMES

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Course Code-Course Course Outcomes

S.No Programe Outcome

I Ability to apply knowledge of advanced computational tools, mathematics, and modern trends in Machine Design.

II Ability to analyze a problem, identify and formulate several computational methods requirements appropriate to its solution.

IIIAbility to design, implement, and evaluate new approaches, to the problems, processes, components, to meet desired needs with appropriate consideration for public health and safety, cultural, societal and environmental consideration.

IVAbility to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data.

VAbility to use current techniques, skills, and modern tools necessary for innovative practice.

VIAbility to analyze the local and global impact of various design techniques on individuals, organizations and society.

VII Imbibe an ability to design or develop new computational tools for easy and accurate solutions.

VIII Understanding of professional, ethical, legal, security and social issues and responsibilities in the design of new engineering systems.

IX Ability to function effectively individually and on teams, including diverse and multidisciplinary, to accomplish a common goal.

X Ability to focus on the research activities appropriate to the discipline.

XI Recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in continuing professional development and lifelong learning.

XIIUnderstanding of engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects.

Page 26: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

MD101Computational Methods in

Engineering

1. use numerical methods in engineering analysis and computing,

2. Familiar with numerical solutions of linear and nonlinear equations,

3. Acquaint with fitting data with a function (having error) by linear, multiple linear and polynomial regression.

4. Familiar with the solution techniques of boundary value and characteristic value problems,

5. Apply Fourier and Laplace transforms and perform transformations between time and frequency domains.

6. Solve partial differential equations (one dimensional and two dimensional) (Elliptic, parabolic, hyperbolic) by finite difference method,

7. Implement algorithms and programming for solving complicated problems using numerical methods

MD102Advanced Mechanics of

Solids

1. Able to identify the failure modes of different structural members and apply various energy methods for statically determinant and in determinant structures.

2. Gets acquainted with solving problems of curved beams and beams with un-symmetrical loading

3. Able to apply the Soap-film analogy concept for torsional problems with non-circular cross section

4. Exposed to solve the contact stress problems like rail wheels contact with rail track, hip joint

5. Explain the stresses under two bodies in contact

MD103Advanced Mechanisms

1. Understand the degrees of freedom for plane and spatial mechanisms

2. To understand spatial mechanisms. Ensure the practical Applications of 4 –bar mechanisms in different configurations.

3. To construct the graphical representation of overlay method and calculate angular displacement for various locations for given problem.

4. To be able to construct path generation and point generation of synthesis for given function of variables.

5. To analyze the D-H Notation and establish link parameters for different manipulators

6. To learn Vectorial representation knowledge is required to make successfully construct the graphical representation of Euler – savry equation

Page 27: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

MD104Mechanical Vibrations

1. Analyze the various 1-D periodic and periodic responses of an vibrating system with and without damping.

2. Able to determine modal parameters and mode shapes of Two and multi degree freedom systems by the application of analytical methods

3. Ability to understand the numerical methods for quick estimation of 1st natural frequency of multi degree freedom systems and calculate it.

4. Apply the knowledge of the various physical vibration measuring instruments and their applications in real life vibration data acquisition.

5. Evaluate the vibratory response of the various continuous systems found in most common engineering applications such as beams, strings, beams and shafts.

MD105Design with advanced

Materials

1. Characterize materials structure and properties2. Acquaint the knowledge of understanding the microstructure

and properties of advanced materials.3. Design and operation of processes to engineer the required

properties in a given material4. Model the processes to engineer the required properties in a

given material.5. Acquired the knowledge of smart materials, nano materials

MD1061Design of Automobile

Systems

1. The students will get a thorough view on modern techniques in “design of automobile systems, emphazising practical methods”.

2. To provide in-depth knowledge about modern automotive systems

3. Apply creative thinking skills for idea generation of Automobile systems

4. Translate conceptual ideas into design of Automobile components

MD1062Product Design

1. Apply creative thinking skills for idea generation2. Translate conceptual ideas into clear sketches3. Present ideas using IT application software and physical model4. Able to identify causes of failure through fault free analysis and

perform failure analysis 5. To carryout perform product testing under thermal, vibration,

electrical and combined environments.

MD1063Geometric Modeling

1. The students will get a thorough view on modern techniques in geometric modeling, emphasizing practical methods and the mathematical theory.

2. The students will get a thorough view on representation of curves in various mathematical forms and their solving.

3. The students will get a thorough view on Bezier and B-spline curves in particular.

4. The students will get a thorough view on representation of surfaces in various mathematical forms and their solving.

Page 28: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

5. The students will get a thorough view on representation of solids and their mathematical modelling.

MD1064Industrial Robotics

1. Identify various robot configuration and components, 2. Select appropriate actuators and sensors for a robot based on

specific application3. Carry out kinematic and dynamic analysis for simple serial

kinematic chains, 4. Write a program for pick and place operations and design a cell

for a small manufacturing unit 5. Studied about different types of Robot cell layouts

MD201Advanced Optimization

Techniques

1. Students at the end of the course learn advanced optimization techniques to show real-life problems

2. Got familiar with numerical optimization techniques with many examples.

3. Learnt Genetic Programming and genetic algorithm methods for optimization of problems.

4. Students can able to formulate and solve various practical optimization problems in manufacturing and service organizations

5. Learnt the application of optimization in Manufacturing System.

MD202Experimental Stress

Analysis

1. Student should be able to chose the appropriate method for measuring strain

2. Students should be able to apply optical techniques for measurement of strain & stress

3. To understand the photo elasticity concepts to ensure the practical awareness.

4. To be able to analyzing 3-Dimentiosnal photo elasticity for interpretation of resulting fringe pattern.

5. To learn scientific knowledge is required for design of brittle coatings.

6. To analyzing the formation of moire fringes for measuring the slope and displacement fields for various engineering applications.

7. Able to apply the fringe order pattern concepts for calculation the stresses and starins.

MD203Advanced Finite Element

Method

1. Identify mathematical model for solution of common engineering problems.

2. Solve ordinary and partial differential equations by using energy methods.

3. Validate a Finite Element model using a range of techniques.4. Formulate simple problems into finite elements. 5. Solve structural and thermal problems. 6. Solve complicated structural problems for stress analysis under

different loads with material and geometrical non-linearity.

Page 29: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

MD2041Fracture Mechanics

1. After completion of this course students will acquire the knowledge for applying fracture mechanics theory

2. To calculate stress areas and the ''energy release rate'' around crack tips and crack growth due to fatigue.

3. To develop the theory of fracture by different postulator- Griffith’s theory and fracture toughness etc.

4. Understand the concepts of elastic-plastic functional machines (EPFM) theorems

MD2042Non- Destructive Evaluation

1. Define different non-destructive testing (NDT) methods and to be able to demonstrate various NDT techniques to evaluate materials during processing and finished products and structures.

2. Explain the principles of conventional NDT methods (visual inspection, magnetic methods, thermal methods, radiography, Eddy current testing, ultrasonic inspection).

3. Analyze the different NDT methods to select the appropriate techniques for inspections.

MD2043Design for Manufacture

1. Design components for machining 2. Simulate the casting design and choose the best casting process

for a specific product. 3. Evaluate the effect of thermal stresses in weld joints4. Design components for sheet metal work by understanding in

depth the sheet metal processes and their formation mechanisms

MD2044Continuum Mechanics

1. Perform tensor analysis applicable to stress analysis problems.2. Apply dynamic concepts of Lagrangian and Eulerian concepts

to continuous and discrete systems.3. Solve some of the practical problems like airplane, locomotive

and automobile systems

MD2051Tribology

1. Students will demonstrate basic understanding of friction, lubrication and wear processes.

2. Students will become familiar with mathematical tools used to analyze tribological processes.

3. To enhance students' awareness of tribological issues in the design of machine components, such as rolling element bearings, journal bearings, thrust bearings, seals and braking systems.

4. Students will become familiar with common anti-friction and anti-wear components and the lubricants used therein.

5. Students will be able to describe the detailed operation of selected anti-friction or anti-wear components.

6. Students will be exposed to design a tribological system for optimal performance. Students will be able to develop technical project reports and technical presentations

Page 30: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

MD2052Signal Analysis and

Condition Monitoring

1. Ability to analyse various types of signal and its analysis like FFT, filtering, windowing etc.

2. Enhance the students abilities to apply different types of signals in the form of stationary, non stationary and transient for mechanical components.

3. Able to apply condition monitoring techniques to industrial machinery for health monitoring

4. Able to compare the response of mechanical system behaviour with ISO standards.

MD2053Computational Fluid

Dynamics

1. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems by approximating complex physical systems in fluid flow by simplified canonical models.

2. Knowledge of fluid mechanics and its mathematical description.

3. An ability to apply knowledge of math and science to engineering by describing continuous fluid-flow phenomena in a discrete numerical sense.

4. An ability to use the techniques, skills, & engineering tools necessary for engineering practice by applying numerical methods to a "real-world" fluid-flow problem, integrating various numerical techniques in formulating a numerical solution method for that problem.

MD2054Design Synthesis

1. Design process and methodologies of systematic design 2. Selection of fits for different design situations

Design of cast forged sheet metal parts and welded constructions

3. Problems formulation for design optimization 4. Design for assembly and dismantling

D2061Pressure Vessel Design

1. Vessel and pipe work failure modes2. Thin shell theory Basic calculations: shell/heads (elliptical/

torispherical /cone): Overview3. Basic calculations/tables for reinforcement of openings 4. Discontinuity stresses: head-to-shell5. Basic calculations: bending, saddles: Overview6. Allowable material stresses and basic material types

MD2062Mechanics of Composite

Materials

Some understanding of types, manufacturing processes, and applications of composite materials

1. Ability to analyze problems on macromechanical behavior of lamina

2. Ability to analyze problems on micromechanical behavior of lamina

3. Ability to analyze problems on macromechanical behavior of laminate

4. Ability to analyze problems on bending and vibration of laminated plates and beams

Page 31: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

MD2063Mechatronics

1. Identify and explain various elements of a mechatronics system

2. Model and simulate simple physical systems

3. Suggest appropriate sensors and actuators for an engineering application

4. Write simple microcontroller programs

MD2064Theory of Plasticity

1. Describe the elastic and plastic behaviour from stress-strain curves for materials;

2. Recognize typical plastic yield criteria established in constitutive modelling

3. Understand the physical interpretation of material constants in mathematical formulation of constitutive relationship

4. solve analytically the simple boundary value problems with elasto-plastic properties;

5. Develop constitutive models based on experimental results on material behaviour

MD107Machine Dynamics Lab

1. Calculate natural frequency, mode shapes and balancing (static dynamic) of mechanical systems

2. Perform direct and inverse kinematic analysis of planar and spatial robot.

3. Get exposed to identify the various failure modes

MD207Design Practice Lab

1. Make drawings of 2D & 3D models using CAD software package in all completeness.

2. Generate 3D models, surface and assembly modeling using modeling software package for further analysis using FE analysis softwares.

Seminar - I

Comprehensive viva voce

Project - Part I

Seminar -II

Project Part II & Viva Voce

Page 32: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

2.1.2. State how and where the POs are published and disseminated (1)(Describe in which media (e.g. websites, curricula, books, etc.) the POs are published and how these are disseminated among stakeholders)The Program Outcomes are published at

Department website :ht t p://www.jnt ucek .ac.in / ME/ College website :http://www.jnt ucek .a c .in/ Curriculum books Notice boards

Apart from this, Program outcomes are made reachable to all the stakeholders of the program through education, faculty workshops, student awareness workshops, programs, student induction programs and faculty meetings.

2.1.3. Indicate processes employed for defining the POs (3)(Describe the process that periodically documents and demonstrates that the POs are defined in alignment with the graduate attributes prescribed by the NBA.)Program Outcomes are established through the consultation process with stake holders keeping the Graduate Attributes defined by NBA as basis. Department Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives are also kept in view. The professional society namely ASME guidelines on curriculum and graduate outcomes are also considered in the detailed establishment process is depicted in Figure 2.1.

Figure 2.1: Process for defining POs

2.1.4. Indicate how the defined POs are aligned to Graduate Attributes prescribed by the NBA (7)

Page 33: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

(Indicate how the POs defined for the programme are aligned with the Graduate Attributes of the NBA as articulated in accreditation manual.)

The Graduate Attributes of NBA and the Program Outcomes defined for the program are aligned to each other as shown in Table 2.2.

Graduate Attributes prescribed by NBA:

I. Engineering knowledge II. Problem analysis

III. Design & development of solutions IV. Investigation of complex problemV. Modern tools usage VI. Engineer and society

VII. Environment & sustainability VIII. EthicsIX. Individual & team work X. CommunicationXI. Lifelong learningXII. Project management & finance

Table 2.2: Alignment of Program Outcomes to Graduate Attributes

PO

GAPO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

I √II √III √IV √V √VI √VII √VIII √IX √X √XI √XII √

Page 34: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

2.1.5. Establish the correlation between the POs and the PEOs (8)(Explain how the defined POs of the programme correlate with the PEOs)As the outcomes are expected to attain by the prime of graduate and PEOs are expected to attain few years after post graduation, they have as many contributions as shown in Table 2.3. Each PEO is contributed to at most 6-7 Program Outcomes and each program Outcomes are in contributing to one or more PEOs as shown in Table 2.3. In this table the letters “L” and “H” indicate low and high correlations of the outcome with the PEO and a blank indicates absence of correlation.Table 2.3: Mapping between Program Outcomes to Program Educational Objectives

PEO

PO

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII

PEO1

PEO 1.1: Progress inprofessional career L L H H H H

PEO 1.2: Scientific research L L H H H

PEO2

PEO2.1: Societalproblem analysis and development of feasible and acceptablesolutions

L L H H H H

PEO2.2: Design an d de v e lo p economically feasible and socially acceptable

L L H H H

PEO3

PEO 3.1:Professional conduct and interpersonal skills

L L H H L L H H

PEO 3.2: Adapting to current trends in technology L L H H L

PEO4

PEO 4.1: Establish professional industry L L H H L L H

PEO 4.2: A global competitor L L H H

2.2. Attainment of Programme Outcomes (75)

2.2.1. Illustrate how the course outcomes contribute to the POs (5)(Provide the correlation between the course outcomes and the programme outcomes. The strength of the correlation may also be indicated)The program outcomes are achieved through curriculum that offers a number of mandatory courses as well as elective courses. Each course has defined course outcomes that are

Page 35: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

mapped to the program outcomes and a set of performance criteria that are used to provide quantitative measurement of how well course outcomes are achieved.

Page 36: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Name of the Course Course OutcomesPOs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Computational Methods in Engineering

Aggregate Contribution of the CourseUse numerical methods in engineering analysis and computing.

M M L L M L M L L M M L

Familiar with numerical solutions of linear and nonlinear equations.M M M M M L H L M M L L

Acquaint with fitting data with a function (having error) by linear, multiple linear and polynomial regression. M M L M L L L L L M L L

Familiar with the solution techniques of boundary value and characteristic value problems. H H L M M L M L L M L L

Apply Fourier and Laplace transforms and perform transformations between time and frequency domains. M M L M M L L L M M L L

Solve partial differential equations (one dimensional and two dimensional) (Elliptic, parabolic, hyperbolic) by finite difference method. H H L M M L M L M M L L

Implement algorithms and programming for solving complicated problems using numerical methods. M M L M M L M L M M L L

Advanced Mechanics of Solids

Aggregate Contribution of the CourseAble to identify the failure modes of different structural members and apply

various energy methods for statically determinant and in determinant structures M M H H L

Gets acquainted with solving problems of curved beams and beams with un-symmetrical loading L M M M

Able to apply the Soap-film analogy concept for torsional problems with non-circular cross section L L H L L L

Exposed to solve the contact stress problems like rail wheels contact with rail track, hip joint M M

Explain the stresses under two bodies in contact M MAggregate Contribution of the Course

Page 37: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Advanced Mechanisms

Understand the degrees of freedom for plane and spatial mechanismsM H

To understand spatial mechanisms. Ensure the practical Applications of 4 –bar mechanisms in different configurations M H H M

To construct the graphical representation of overlay method and calculate angular displacement for various locations for given problem M M M M H

To be able to construct path generation and point generation of synthesis for given function of variables. H M M H H

To analyze the D-H Notation and establish link parameters for different manipulators H M M H H

To learn vectorial representation knowledge is required to make successfully construct the graphical representation of euler – savry equation H M M M H

Mechanical Vibrations

Aggregate Contribution of the CourseAnalyze the various 1-D periodic and periodic responses of an vibrating system with and without damping

H H M M L M

Able to determine modal parameters and mode shapes of Two and multi degree freedom systems by the application of analytical methods

M L H L L

Ability to understand the numerical methods for quick estimation of 1st natural frequency of multi degree freedom systems and calculate it.

L L M LApply the knowledge of the various physical vibration measuring instruments and their applications in real life vibration data acquisition.

H M H L M M H L

Evaluate the vibratory response of the various continuous systems found in most common engineering applications such as beams, strings, beams and

H H M M M H M

Design with advanced Materials

Aggregate Contribution of the CourseCharacterize materials structure and properties L L M L

Page 38: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Acquaint the knowledge of understanding the microstructure and properties of advanced materials. H L M

Design and operation of processes to engineer the required properties in a given material L L H L L M

Model the processes to engineer the required properties in a given material. L M L L M H L M

Acquired the knowledge of smart materials, nano materials

Design of Automobile Systems

Aggregate Contribution of the CourseThe students will get a thorough view on modern techniques in “DESIGN

OF AUTOMOBILE SYSTEMS, EMPHAZISING PRACTICAL METHODS”.

L H M

To provide in-depth knowledge about modern AUTOMOTIVE systems M M M M L M M

Apply creative thinking skills for idea generation of Automobile systems M H H M H M

Translate conceptual ideas into design of Automobile components M M H H M H

Product Design

Aggregate Contribution of the Course

Apply creative thinking skills for idea generation M M HTranslate conceptual ideas into clear sketches L H H L HPresent ideas using IT application software and physical model L L L M M L

Able to identify causes of failure through fault free analysis and perform failure analysis L H M L M

To carryout perform product testing under thermal, vibration, electrical and combined environments. L L H H L

Geometric Modeling Aggregate Contribution of the Course

Page 39: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

The students will get a thorough view on modern techniques in geometric modeling, emphasizing practical methods and the mathematical theory. H M H L

The students will get a thorough view on representation of curves in various mathematical forms and their solving

The students will get a thorough view on Bezier and B-spline curves in particular

The students will get a thorough view on representation of surfaces in various mathematical forms and their solving

The students will get a thorough view on representation of solids and their mathematical modelling

Industrial Robotics

Aggregate Contribution of the CourseIdentify various robot configuration and components L L H H L L L H L M H LSelect appropriate actuators and sensors for a robot based on specific

application L L H H H L L H H H H H

Carry out kinematic and dynamic analysis for simple serial kinematic chains H H L H H M H H H H H H

Write a program for pick and place operations and design a cell for a small manufacturing unit H H H H H L H H H H H H

Studied about different types of Robot cell layouts

Advanced Optimization Techniques

Aggregate Contribution of the CourseStudents at the end of the course learn advanced optimization techniques

to show real-life problems L L L H M H M

Got familiar with numerical optimization techniques with many examples.

Learnt Genetic Programming and genetic algorithm methods for optimization of problems

Page 40: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Students can able to formulate and solve various practical optimization problems in manufacturing and service organizations M L M H H M H H M

Learnt the application of optimization in Manufacturing System.

Experimental Stress Analysis

Aggregate Contribution of the CourseStudent should be able to chose the appropriate method for measuring

strain M H M M H

Students should be able to apply optical techniques for measurement of strain & stress M M H M H

To understand the photo elasticity concepts to ensure the practical awareness M H M H

To be able to analyzing 3-Dimentiosnal photo elasticity for interpretation of resulting fringe pattern H M H

To learn scientific knowledge is required for design of brittle coatings M M H

To analyzing the formation of Moire fringes for measuring the slope and displacement fields for various engineering applications M M M H

Able to apply the fringe order pattern concepts for calculation the stresses and strains M M M M H

Advanced Finite Element Method

Aggregate Contribution of the CourseIdentify mathematical model for solution of common engineering problems.

H M L L M L L L L M M L

Solve ordinary and partial differential equations by using energy methods.H M L L L L M L L L L L

Validate a Finite Element model using a range of techniques. M M M H M L H L M L L M

Formulate simple problems into finite elements. M M L H M L H L M L L MSolve structural and thermal problems. H M M H H M H M H H M H

Page 41: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Solve complicated structural problems for stress analysis under different loads with material and geometrical non-linearity. M H L H H L H M H H H H

Fracture Mechanics

After completion of this course students will acquire the knowledge for applying fracture mechanics theory M H H L M L L

To calculate stress areas and the ''energy release rate'' around crack tips and crack growth due to fatigue. H M H M M L L

To develop the theory of fracture by different postulator- Griffith’s theory and fracture toughness etc. H H H M L M

Understand the concepts of elastic-plastic functional machines (EPFM) theorems M H H H M L M

Non- Destructive Evaluation

Aggregate Contribution of the CourseDefine different non-destructive testing (NDT) methods and to be able to

demonstrate various NDT techniques to evaluate materials during processing and finished products and structures

L M M L M L L

Explain the principles of conventional NDT methods (visual inspection, magnetic methods, thermal methods, radiography, Eddy current testing, ultrasonic inspection).

L H L M M L

Analyze the different NDT methods to select the appropriate techniques for inspections. L L M H H M

Design for Manufacture

Aggregate Contribution of the Course

Design components for machining H M L M M H L L L H H LSimulate the casting design and choose the best casting process for a

specific productM M L M H L L L L L H L

Evaluate the effect of thermal stresses in weld joints H M H H H H L L L L H LDesign components for sheet metal work by understanding in depth the

sheet metal processes and their formation mechanismsM M M M H L L L L L H L

Page 42: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Simulate the casting design and choose the best casting process for a specific product. M M H M H L L L L L H L

Continuum Mechanics

Aggregate Contribution of the CoursePerform tensor analysis applicable to stress analysis problems

L H L M L L L L

Apply dynamic concepts of Lagrangian and Eulerian concepts to continuous and discrete systems. M H M H M L M L

Solve some of the practical problems like airplane, locomotive and automobile systems H H L M M H L L M M

Page 43: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Tribology

Aggregate Contribution of the CourseStudents will demonstrate basic understanding of friction, lubrication and

wear processes.H M L L M

Students will become familiar with mathematical tools used to analyze tribological processes.

H M L M L L

To enhance students' awareness of tribological issues in the design of machine components, such as rolling element bearings, journal bearings, thrust bearings, seals and braking systems.

H H L L L

Students will become familiar with common anti-friction and anti-wear components and the lubricants used therein

M M L L L

Students will be able to describe the detailed operation of selected anti-friction or anti-wear components.

M M L

Students will be exposed to design a tribological system for optimal performance. Students will be able to develop technical project reports and technical presentations

H H H

Signal Analysis and Condition

Monitoring

Aggregate Contribution of the Course

Ability to analyse various types of signal and its analysis like FFT, filtering, windowing etc

M M H H H L L

Enhance the students’ abilities to apply different types of signals in the form of stationary, non stationary and transient for mechanical components. L H L M M M

Able to apply condition monitoring techniques to industrial machinery for health monitoring

L L L L H M

Able to compare the response of mechanical system behaviour with ISO standards.

H L M H L

Aggregate Contribution of the Course

Page 44: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Computational Fluid Dynamics

An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems by approximating complex physical systems in fluid flow by simplified canonical models.

H M M L L L L L M L L L

Knowledge of fluid mechanics and its mathematical description H H M L L L L L L L L L

5. An ability to apply knowledge of math and science to engineering by describing continuous fluid-flow phenomena in a discrete numerical sense. H H H H L L H L L L L L

6. An ability to use the techniques, skills, & engineering tools necessary for engineering practice by applying numerical methods to a "real-world" fluid-flow problem, integrating various numerical techniques in formulating a numerical solution method for that problem.

H M H H M L H L M H M M

Design Synthesis

Aggregate Contribution of the CourseDesign process and methodologies of systematic design M H L L L

Selection of fits for different design situations M M L L L L

Problems formulation for design optimization L M LDesign for assembly and dismantling M M L M L

Design of cast forged sheet metal parts and welded constructions M H H M L

Pressure Vessel Design

Aggregate Contribution of the Course

Vessel and pipe work failure modes M L L M L M L

Thin shell theory H H M L M L L

Basic calculations: shell/heads (elliptical/torispherical /cone):Overview H H M L L

Basic calculations/tables for reinforcement of openings H M H M M

Discontinuity stresses: head-to-shell M M L L

Basic calculations: bending, saddles: Overview M M M

Page 45: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Allowable material stresses and basic material types H H M L L M

Mechanics of Composite Materials

Aggregate Contribution of the Courseunderstanding some of types, manufacturing processes, and applications of composite materials

M

Ability to analyze problems on macromechanical behavior of lamina H H M LAbility to analyze problems on micromechanical behavior of lamina H H M M LAbility to analyze problems on macromechanical behavior of laminate M M H M L

Ability to analyze problems on bending and vibration of laminated plates and beams

H H H M M

Mechatronics

Aggregate Contribution of the Course

Identify and explain various elements of a mechatronics system L L LModel and simulate simple physical systems H L H M MSuggest appropriate sensors and actuators for an engineering application H M M

Write simple microcontroller programs M M H L M L

Theory of Plasticity

Aggregate Contribution of the CourseDescribe the elastic and plastic behavior from stress-strain curves for materials;

L M L L L

Recognize typical plastic yield criteria established in constitutive modeling M L

Understand the physical interpretation of material constants in mathematical formulation of constitutive relationship H M H H H M

solve analytically the simple boundary value problems with elasto-plastic properties; M H M L M M

Develop constitutive models based on experimental results on material behaviour

M H H H L M

Page 46: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

January-2013 Format January-2015 Dept. of Mech. Engg, University College of Engineering Kakinada

Machine Dynamics Lab

Aggregate Contribution of the CourseCalculate natural frequency, mode shapes and balancing (static dynamic) of mechanical systems

M H H L L M

Perform direct and inverse kinematic analysis of planar and spatial robot M L H L L

Get exposed to identify the various failure modes M H M

Design Practice Lab

Aggregate Contribution of the CourseMake drawings of 2D & 3D models using CAD software package in all completeness.

L L M H L L M L L H M L

Generate 3D models, surface and assembly modeling using modeling software package for further analysis using FE analysis softwares. H M M H H M H L L H H L

Page 47: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

2.2.2. Explain how modes of delivery of courses help in attainment of the POs (5)(Describe the different course delivery methods/modes (e.g. lecture interspersed with discussion, asynchronous mode of interaction, group discussion, project etc.) used to deliver the courses and justify the effectiveness of these methods for the attainment of POs. This may be further justified using the indirect assessment methods such as course-end surveys.)

Content delivery methods:

POGIL: POGIL is an acronym for Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning. POGIL activities involve giving students a model to work with, and then asking a series of leading and challenging questions. This allows them to construct their own knowledge of a concept.The following are the various other content delivery methods used to deliver the courses:

POGIL Lecture interspersed with discussions Lecture with a quiz Tutorial Demonstration ( Such as model, laboratory, field visit ) Group Discussion Group Assignment/ Project Presentations Asynchronous Discussion

Learning Resources sharing

On-line learning system - Moodle is in use to perform asynchronous activities to assign various tasks like group assignments / group projects and to share the materials.In addition to the syllabus mentioned in the curriculum, the students are exposed themselves as they are provided with the e-content through national and

International portals such as:NPTEL :http://nptel.iitm.ac.inMIT Open Courseware :http://ocw.mit.edu/inde x .htm

The delivery methods are chosen appropriate to meet the Program Outcomes. The generalized mapping of the of the course delivery methods to the program outcomes is shown in Table 2.5.With the implementation of the specified delivery methods, the effectiveness of the courses are enhanced which is illustrated in Figure 2.2 to Figure 2.5 for few sample courses. Effectiveness of course delivery methods for the attainment of Program

Table 2.5: Generalized mapping of course delivery methods to the program outcomes

Content Delivery Methods

POs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Lecture interspersed withdiscussions

Lecture with a quiz

Page 48: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Tutorial Demonstration Group Discussion Group Assignment/ Project Presentations

2.2.3. Indicate how a s s e s s m e n t tools used to assess the impact of delivery of course/course content contribute towards the attainment of course outcomes/programme outcomes (15)(Describe different types of course assessment and evaluation methods (both direct and indirect) in practice and their relevance towards the attainment of POs ).

In our institute, there are two ways of course assessments conducting in the semester wise and year wise to attain course outcome as well as programme outcome. The adopted course assessments methods are as follows:

1) Direct Assessment methods which are adopted in semester wise, as a mandatory requirements to promote the students from one stage to the other stages. However in each course outcome asserted by certain credit points (or simply called credits). The graduate should secure all the credits to achieve program outcome.

2) Indirect Assessment methods which are used to improve the course delivery, COs and POs. There are several surveys are conducted year wise towards improving the POs.

The detailed structure of the direct assessment and the expectations towards the attainment of the POs with rubric assessment is given in the Table: 2.6.The expected level of attainment versus how many number of POs covered under direct assessment is shown through the bar graph in Figure 2.2. By virtue of this assessment all the POs are attained at satisfactory level.

Table: 2.6. No of POs attained under the direct tool

Rubrics: 1 = Most relevant 2 = More relevant 3= Minor relevant

Summarised POs:

PO1: Knowledge PO2: Analyze a Problem PO3: Design and Implement

PO4: conduct experiments PO5: Use current techniques

PO6: Analyze the local and global impact

PO7: Develop new computational tools

PO8: Professional, ethical, legal, security

PO9: Function effectively individually

PO10: Focus on the research activities PO11: Lifelong learning. PO12: Leader in a team

Type of Direct Assessment Theory Examination Practical Examination Project Examination

Internal External Internal External Internal ExternalAssessm

ent Direct Test Direct Test Direct

TestDirect Test

Seminars Thesis Report /

Page 49: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Mode Viva-VoceWeighta

ge 40% 60% 40% 60% 50% Successful / Reject

Frequency of

Assessment

Twice in each

semester

Once in each semester

Continuous

throughout semester

Once in each

semester

Once in each

semester

At the end of

completion of Project

work

Relevanc

e towards the attainment of PO

PO1

1 3 4

PO2

2 1 1

PO3

1 2 1

PO4

4 3 4

PO5

2 2 2

PO6

3 1 1

PO7

4 2 2

PO8

2 3 2

PO9

2 2 3

PO10

4 2 2

PO11

3 2 2

PO12

3 2 1

Summary of attainment of POs

Most relevance in the attainment of POs 3 out of 12 POs 5 out of 12 POs 8 out of 12 POs

More relevance in the attainment of POs4 out of 12 POs 7 out of 12 POs 4 out of 12 POs

Minor relevance in the attainment of POs3 out of 12 POs 4 out of 12 POs Zero out of 12 POs

The way in which the indirect assessment methods are used to improve the course delivery, COs, POs and PEOs are shown in Figure 2.2.

Page 50: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Figure: Indirect Assessment methods impact on Course delivery, COs, POs and PEOs

2.2.4. Indicate the extent to which project work / thesis contributes towards attainment of POs (50)

(Justify how the project works/thesis works carried out as part of the programme curriculum contribute towards the attainment of the POs.)The project work should carry in the entire 3rd and 4th semesters, it is to be carried to fulfil the following objectives.

The project work is to be carried out based on the exposure on the latest developments in the relevant field.

The project work should improve the skills in literature survey and use to the current field of work.

The project work is to develop abilities for identifying and defining exact problem formulation in the chosen field.

The project work should able to acquire knowledge in order to analyze and solve the given problem.

The project work should able to enhance the presentation and documentation skills in order to explore on the real world problem in his career.

These objectives are assessed for the expected attainment of POs with the assessment is given in the expected attainment of POs by the extent of project

Summarised POs PO1: Knowledge PO2: Analyze a Problem PO3: Design and

Implement

PO4: conduct experiments

PO5: Use current techniques

PO6: Analyze the local and global impact

PO7: Develop new computational tools

PO8: Professional, ethical, legal, security

PO9: Function effectively individually

PO10: Focus on the research activities PO11: Lifelong learning. PO12: Leader in a

teamProject Work Objectives in the attainment of POs

Contribution towards the attainment

Exposure to the latest

developments

Literature survey

Problem formulation

Analysis and problem solving

skills

Documentation

and presenta

tion skills

PO1

Alumni SurveyImpacts on POs and PEOs Graduate SurveyImpacts on COs and POs Student Feed Back Impacts on Course Delivery

Page 51: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

of PO

PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

Course Credits % of weight ageTheory 36 45%

Practical 4 5%Seminar 4 5%

Project Work 36 45%Total 80 100%

2.3. Evaluation of the attainment of Programme Outcomes (125)2.3.1. Describe assessment tools and processes used for assessing the attainment of

each PO (25)Describe the assessment process that periodically documents and demonstrates the degree to which the Programme Outcomes are attained. Also include information on:

a) Listing and description of the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each the programme outcome is based. Examples of data collection processes may include, but are not limited to, specific exam questions, student portfolios, internally developed assessment exams, project presentations, nationally-normed exams, oral exams, focus groups, industrial advisory committee; b) The frequency with which these assessment processes are carried out.

Mode of Assessment PEO Relevance PO RelevanceInternal Assessment PEO1, PEO3 PO2, PO3, PO5, PO10, PO12Student Internship PO7, PO11

SeminarsPEO3, PEO4

PO5, PO8, PO10Project Reviews PO1, PO4, PO6

Paper Publications PO8, PO12External Assessment

PEO1, PEO2, PEO4PO5, PO8 ,PO10

Tutorials PO10Group Discussions PO2, PO9

Presentations PEO2, PEO4 PO6, PO11Technical Quiz PO6, PO5, PO12

The program outcomes are assessed with the help of course outcomes of the relevant courses through direct and indirect methods.

Direct measures are provided through direct examinations or observations of student knowledge or skills against measureable course outcomes.

The knowledge and skills described by the course outcomes are mapped to specific

Page 52: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

problems on internal exams/home assignment/group task. Throughout the semester the faculty records the performance of each student on each course outcome. The sample course assessment is enclosed in APPENDIX. At the end of the semester students receive grades from external exams.

Indirect assessment strategies are implemented by embedding them in the course end survey, Graduate survey and Alumni Survey which are enclosed in APPENDIX.

Finally, program outcomes are assessed with above mentioned data and Program Assessment Committee concludes the Po attainment level. The sample PO assessment is enclosed in APPENDIX.

Program Outcomes Assessment and Attainment

Programe

Outcome: I

Ability to apply knowledge of advanced computational tools, mathematics, and modern trends in engineering appropriate to the discipline.

The program assessment committee reviews all course outcomes which are relevant to this PO. Specifically the task was to review the course outcome assessment results towards PO assessment for each course and to draw some conclusion on how the program outcomes are attained. This program outcome is considered as two sub program outcomes namely ability of applying the knowledge of mathematics and sciences and Engineering/Computational fundamentals. The abilities are broadly assessed with programming skills, logical thinking, problem solving and design of engineering problems.

Evidences:

Internal and external exam papers for these courses are available in examination section. Course end survey, Graduate survey, and Alumni Survey documents files are available in the department office.

Programe Outcome: II

Ability to analyze a problem, and identify and formulate several different computational methods requirements appropriate to its solution.

The program assessment committee reviews all course outcomes relevant to this PO. Specifically the task was to review the courses assessment results towards PO assessment for each course and to draw some conclusion on how the program outcomes attained. This program outcome is considered as two sub program outcomes namely: Analyze a given problem and Identify and define the computing requirements for a given problem which are appropriate to its solution

The ability of the students in understanding the description and definition of the problem is assessed from the term paper and apply this knowledge in development of the projects.

Evidences:

Internal and external exam papers for these courses are available in the examination section. Samples copies of Term Paper, Major Project are available in the department Library.

Page 53: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Programe Outcome: III

Ability to design, implement, and evaluate a new approaches, to the problems, process, component, to meet desired needs with appropriate consideration for public health and safety, cultural, societal and environmental consideration.

This outcome is assessed using direct and indirect assessment methods with selected courses and student participation in research projects. The student is able to design a system which may consist of components or processes which should be realistic in terms of its functions. The student should also be able to evaluate the performance of the system. The program assessment committee is reviewed all course outcomes which are relevant to this PO. Specifically the task was to review the courses assessment results towards PO assessment for each course and to draw some conclusion on how the program outcomes attained.

This program outcome is considered as two sub program outcomes namely Mathematics and sciences and Engineering/Computing fundamentals. The abilities listed are broadly assessed with programming skills, logical thinking, problem solving and design of engineering problems.

Evidences:

Sample copies of internal examinations are available in the department examination cell. Course end survey, Graduate survey and Alumni survey documents files are available in the department office

Programe Outcome: IV

Ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data.

The program outcome refers to the four different learning levels of Bloom’s taxonomy as: Designing experiments, Conducting experiments, Analyzing data, Interpreting data. The order of difficulty flows from top to bottom. Students are able to select topic, identify problems, formulate questions, design and carry out experiments in various lab courses in the program curriculum. Faculty provides a set of data from which student analyzes the data, discuss possible reasons for deviations between predicted and measured results from an experiment.

From the lab courses, this outcome is assessed with student abilities in design, test analytical and experimental solutions. The evaluation is done based on how the student designed solution for a given problem and draw conclusions from a range of results.

The program assessment committee is reviewed all course outcomes which are relevant to this PO. Specifically the task was to review the courses assessment results towards PO assessment for each course and to draw some conclusion on how the program outcomes attained.

Evidences:

Course end survey, Graduate survey and Alumni Survey documents files are available in the department office Course manuals, lab experiments list of courses are placed in department office.

Page 54: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Programe Outcome: V

Ability to use current techniques, skills, and modern tools necessary for innovative practice.

The integral role of a graduate ability to use modern operating systems, computing languages, environments and tools is used for measuring this outcome. Utilizing the wide range of internet tools, techniques and hardware is assessed from the courses

Evidences:

Sample copies and evaluation copies of Term Paper, Project are available in the department Library. Course end survey, Graduate survey and Alumni survey documents files are available in the department office

Programe Outcome: VI

Ability to analyze the local and global impact of various design techniques on individuals, Organizations and society.

The ability of students in terms of design, manipulate and manage databases is assessed by internal and external examinations with the above tabulated courses. And this outcome is assessed by students’ participation in presentations of conference papers, seminars organized by other colleges/universities by learning implementation design methodologies and usage of advanced techniques in problem solving.

Evidences:

Sample copies of internal examinations are available in the department examination cell. Samples copies of Term paper, Project are available in the department Library. Annual report of the department for workshops, seminars, professional body activities, is placed in department office. Exit survey, Alumni and Employer Survey documents files are available in the department office.

Programe Outcome:

VII

Imbibe an ability to design or develop new computational tools for ease and accurate solutions.

Our program is expected to equip future engineers not only with professional knowledge, abilities and skills but also the ability to address

Environmental and safety issuesGlobal and Societal issues

These abilities were assessed with the tabulated courses from the above Table during the program with the help of direct and indirect assessment tools.

To identify the importance of understand and discuss the societal and contemporary issues as part of Program level statistics and survey reports are considered. Apart from this the students participate widely in

Blood donation camps Greenery enrichment programs

Page 55: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

In addition, students participation in co curricular activities like participation in debate, general quiz, group discussions etc. during the activities of student chapters is considered for the assessment of this PO. Evaluating the curricular, extracurricular and survey assessments, it is evident that a positive impact is being made throughout the curriculum in developing knowledge and an awareness of contemporary issues. Within the curriculum, students were exposed to contemporary issues related to engineering especially.

Evidences:

Annual report of the department for extracurricular activities placed in department office. Course end survey, Exit survey and Alumni Survey documents files are available in the department office.Result Analysis and number of students enrolled for subjects considered are placed in the department office.

Programe Outcome:

VIII

An understanding of professional, ethical, legal, security and social issues and responsibilities in the design of new engineering systems.

Graduates are intended to understand ethics and professional conduct related to ME and should be able to identify the legal issues related to patents, plagiarism etc..To achieve this as a part of curriculum, extra curriculum aspects are considered. Based on the analysis of the results, the faculty members who were introducing and/or reinforcing the code of ethics in their courses were asked to reinforce the importance of knowing the ACM code of ethics and professional conduct.

Evidences:

Samples copies of Major Project are available in the department Library. Annual report of the department for workshops, seminars, professional body activities, is placed in department office. Exit survey, Alumni and Employer Survey documents files are available in the department office

Programe Outcome: IX

Ability to function effectively individually and on teams, including diverse and multidisciplinary, to accomplish a common goal.

Team work has always been common element in engineering learning. This PO is evaluated by developing the professional skills which includes responsible teamwork, creativity and communication skills with professional and to prepare them for the complex actual work environment and for life-long learning. The attainment of these can be accessed through the tabulated courses that are part of the curriculum using direct and indirect assessment tools.

The rubric considers planning, sharing, listening, and other aspects of team work. As appropriate, findings from course end survey, graduate survey and alumni surveys and discussions were compiled to determine how well graduates are performing relative to this outcome. The assessments for all students in the program were collected and analyzed with a focus on individual work and on teams to accomplish common goals.

Page 56: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Evidences:

Samples copies of Major Project are available in the department Library. Annual report of the department for workshops, seminars, professional body activities, is placed in department office Course end survey, Graduate survey and Alumni Survey documents files are available in the department office.

Programe Outcome: X

Ability to focus on the research activities appropriate to the discipline.

The ability of the students to communicate effectively is assessed regularly during the program through various courses. The communication abilities are broadly categorized into oral and written communication skills. Precisely, these abilities are assessed over the tabulated courses during the program using appropriate assessment tools for each course. In addition to these courses, these abilities are also assessed by the faculty in other courses when students present the seminars and write the home assignments.Measurements considered under this section to assess the PO are:

Evidences:Internal and external exam papers for these courses are available in examination section. Samples copies of Term Paper, Mini Project and Major Project are available in the department Library. Annual report of the department for co-curricular activities and competitive exams data is placed in department office. Exit survey, Alumni and Employer Survey documents files are available in the department office.

Programe Outcome: XI

Recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in continuing professional development.

The ability of the students to identify and use information sources by her/him self to prepare term paper s and develop mini and major projects in general for curriculum based courses are considered for assessing lifelong learning capabilities. Precisely, these abilities are assessed over the tabulated courses during the program using appropriate assessment tools for each course. Importance to Lifelong learning skills is observed using tools during and after the program completion.

Students were encouraged to take professional certification exams like Brain Bench, as part of a global learning process. This will help students to gain more qualifications and prepare them for the future IT workforce requirements

Evidences:

Samples copies of Term Paper, Mini Project and Major Project are available in the department Library. Annual report of the department for workshops, seminars, professional body activities, and industrial visits data is placed in department office. Exit s u r v e y , Alumni and Employer Survey documents files are available in the department office

Programe Outcome: XII

An understanding of engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects.

The ability of applying engineering and management principles as an individual, team member and team head to manage projects is assessed by the activities done on time, and according to specifications. The students are encouraged to perform individual projects or

Page 57: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

group projects.

A score of 3 is derived from the PO attainment rubric which shows that PO is achieved. Based on the analysis of the results, the faculty members were asked to reinforce the importance of engineering and management principles and apply these to manage projects.

Evidences:

Samples copies of Mini Project and Major Project are available in the department Library Sample copies of internal examinations are available in the department examination cell.2.3.2. Indicate results of evaluation of each PO (100)c) The expected level of attainment for each of the programme outcomes;d) Summaries of the results of the evaluation processes and an analysis illustrating the extent to which each of the programme outcomes are attained; ande) How the results are documented and maintaine

Page 58: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Direct AssessmentThe program outcome assessment plan is set to primarily confirm that the students are achieving the desired outcomes. It is also used to improve the program and the student learning, based on real evidence.

Assessment Tools

Expected Level of Attainment of POs Summaries of the results of the

evaluation processes

Analysis for the expected level of Attainment

How the results are documented and PO1

PO2

PO3

PO4

PO5

PO6

PO7

PO8

PO9

PO10

PO11

PO12

Course Work(Evaluated regularly) 2 3 3 3 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2

All courses have been conducted in all semesters and

recorded in Attendance Registers

Conducting course work regularly helps the student to attain fundamental and

applied knowledge for problem solving

(Assignment and Tutorials)

Record of time tables and attendance in each semester is available in Academic Section

University Examinations

(Internal-Theory and

Labs

3 3 3 3 2 1 2 2 2 3 1 1

Internal exams are conducted twice

per semester with weight age of 40

marks.The results are

tabulated in Results Table I

Helps to assess the regularity and attainment of course

work by the students.

Record of Internal examination (Lab and

University Examinations

(External-Theory and

Labs)

2 2 3 3 3 3 1 2 2 2 2 3

External exams are conducted at the end of semester

with weight age of 60 marks.

The results are tabulated in

Results Table I

Direct evidence for the attainment of POs through

achievement of Course Outcome in accordance with

students performance in examination

Copies of end semester question papers and

Project Work 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 1 2

Project work is carried out by the students in III and IV semester and Final evaluation

and Grade Assignment is

done by external examiner

Enables students to attain expertise in core and specific domain with interpersonal and project management

skills

Status of the project is evaluated by Project Review Committee and record of attendance is

Seminar 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 2

Seminars on state-of-art of the

computer science are conducted in

III Semester and is being evaluated internally for 50

marks

Enables students to acquire and improve self learning

capabilities and presentation skills

Seminars are evaluated by Project Review Committee and record of attendance is

Indirect AssessmentThe evaluation is based on the surveys conducted to solicit assessments from the program constituents, such as: graduating or exit students, faculty, alumni and employers. In addition to these, assessments

were carried out based on placement data, the achievements disseminated in media/public forum and the feed backs from professional bodies.

Assessment Tools

Expected Level of Attainment of POs Summaries of the results of the

evaluation processes

Analysis for the expected level of AttainmentPO

1PO2

PO3

PO4

PO5

PO6

PO7

PO8

PO9

PO 10

PO 11

PO 12

Placements 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 2 3 2

Number of Students are placed in various

IT industries (Wipro,CapGemini, Infosys, HoneyWell,

etc.)Placement Record

Number of Students placed is an indirect

evidence for attainment for POs

Placement records are maintained by Training

Alumni Survey 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 Conducted annually information about

graduates perception of their learning

Graduate Surveys

(Mid and End of the Course)

2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 Conducted twice per semester

Key survey to assess the achievement of desired outcomes. It helps to

improve the program and student learning, based on

real evidence

Employer Survey 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 Conducted annually

Reflects on students learning. They assess

opinions or thoughts about the graduates knowledge

or skills

Higher Studies 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 1 2 3 3 1 Conducted annually

Number of students registered for Higher

studies is an evidence to assess the research and

self learning skills.

Page 59: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL
Page 60: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

2.4. Use of evaluation re su l t s to w ar ds i mp r o v e m e nt of pr o g r a mm e (3 0 )

2.4.1. Indicate how results of evaluation used for curricular improvements (5)(Articulate with rationale the curricular improvements brought in after the review of the attainment of POs)

By analyzing the results of program outcome assessment in terms of direct and indirect assessments, necessary actions are recommended to improve the program curriculum. After each semester, faculty analyzed and evaluated the collected data from each course and from all other sources (surveys).The Module coordinators discuss the results with faculty to identify the need for improvement. Prepare an action plan accordingly. Once the action has been completed, data for that performance indicator should again be collected, analyzed, and evaluated by the program assessment committee to see the performance.This process continues until the performance improve to the target valueThe results are discussed with Department Advisory Board

2.4.2. Indicate how results of evaluation used for improvement of course delivery and assessment (10)(Articulate with rationale the curricular delivery and assessment improvements brought in after the review of the attainment of POs)Figure 2.40 Illustrates the process of revising/redefining existing program outcomes.

The need for revise / redefine of existing Pos is identified with the help of the assessment results of PO attainment from direct/indirect assessment methods.

The improvement of PO attainment is considered in three possible phases : Curriculum, Delivery methods/course outcomes and program outcomes.For curriculum, the program coordinator initiates the process with the views of Module coordinator. The Department advisory board notices the required changes and takes approval with BOSThe module coordinator initiates the process to change delivery methods/course outcomes in course assessment and discuss with program assessment committeeTo improve the program performance, the Program Coordinator analyze the PO assessment and attainment and discuss the necessary revise changes in existing Pos with program assessment committee/department advisory board.

Page 61: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Figure 2.40: Process for Revising/Redefining POs

Page 62: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

3. PROGRAMME CURRICULUM (75)

3.1. Curriculum (15) 3.1.1. Describe the Structure of the Curriculum (5) The detailed Course Structure is given in the Table 3.1. In a week, it is required to conduct 4 lecture periods for every theory subject and 4 practical periods for laboratory. Every theory subject and practical is assigned with 3 and 2 credits respectively. There are two seminars conducted in third and forth semesters, each Seminar is allotted with 2 credits. There is only one project work conducted in third and forth semesters, it is allotted with 36 credits. The total number of credits fulfilled by the PG student by the end of the course work is given in the Table 3.2. I Semester

S.No. Course Code Course Title

Total Number of Contact Hours

CreditsL T P Total

Hours1 MD101 Computational Methods in Engineering 4 0 0 4 32 MD102 Advanced Mechanics of Solids 4 0 0 4 33 MD103 Advanced Mechanisms 4 0 0 4 34 MD104 Mechanical Vibrations 4 0 0 4 35 MD105 Design with advanced Materials 4 0 0 4 3

6Elective – IMD 106

MD 1061 Design of Automobile Systems

4 0 0 4 3MD 1062 Product DesignMD 1063 Geometric ModellingMD 1064 Non Destructive Evaluation

7 MD107 Machine Dynamics Lab 0 0 4 422

II Semester

S.No. Course Code Course Title

Total Number of Contact Hours

CreditsL T P Total

Hours1 MD201 Optimization and Reliability 4 0 0 4 32 MD202 Experimental Stress Analysis 4 0 0 4 33 MD203 Finite Element Method 4 0 0 4 3

4

Elective – II

MD 204

MD2041 Fracture Mechanics

4 0 0 4 3MD 2042 Gear EngineeringMD 2043 Design for ManufacturingMD 2044 Continuum Mechanics

5

Elective - III

MD 205

MD 2051 Tribology

4 0 0 4

3

MD 2052 Signal Analysis and Condition Monitoring

MD 2053 Computational Fluid DynamicsMD 2054 Design Synthesis

6 Elective-IV

MD 206

MD 2061 Pressure Vessel Design

4 0 0 4 3MD 2062 Mechanics of Composite

MaterialsMD 2063 MechatronicsMD 2064 Theory of Plasticity

7 MD207 Design Practice Lab 0 0 4 422

III Semester

Page 63: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

S.No. Course TitleTotal Number of Contact Hours

CreditsL T P Total Hours

1 Seminar - I 0 0 3 22 Comprehensive viva voce 23 Project - Part I 14

18

IV Semester

S.No. Course TitleTotal Number of Contact Hours

CreditsL T P Total Hours

1 Seminar -II 0 0 3 22 Project Part II & Viva Voce 18

20

3.1.2. Justify how the curricular structure helps for the attainment of the POs and the PEOs (10)(Articulate how the curricular structure helps in the attainment of each PO and PEO)The course work is organised in three parts as theory course, practical course and project work by which the graduate becomes knowledgeable in the programme, leading to attainment of POs and PEOs. The theory course work provides programme specific knowledge to inculcate the graduate to become researcher or employee or entrepreneur or self sustained human being to achieve his own goal, which is another prime attainment of PO and PEO The practical course work and project work enable the graduate to be suitable to the industry

Summarised PEOs: PEO1: Learning primarily the concepts of Machine Design PEO3: To undertake research

PEO2: Employment in teaching, govt sector and etc PE04:ResearchSummarised POs:

PO1: Knowledge PO2: Analyze a Problem PO3: Design and Implement

PO4: conduct experiments PO5: Use current techniques PO6: Analyze the local and global impactPO7: Develop new

computational toolsPO8: Professional, ethical, legal, security

PO9: Function effectively individually

PO10: Focus on the research activities PO11: Lifelong learning. PO12: Leader in a

team Rubric L =Low M = Medium H = High

PO/PEOCourse Component

Theory courses Laboratory courses Seminars Project workPOs PO1 H M L H

PO2 H L L HPO3 H M M HPO4 M H L MPO5 H H M HPO6 H L L HPO7 H L L HPO8 M M H HPO9 H M H M

Page 64: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

PO10 H H H HPO11 H H H HPO12 M L H H

PEOs

PEO1 H H H HPEO2 H M H MPEO3 H M H HPEO4 L L H H

3.2. Indicate interaction with R&D organisations / Industry (40)(Give the details of R&D organisations and industry involvement in the programme such as industry-attached laboratories and partial delivery of courses and internship opportunities for students)

An expert from Industry is considered to be a member of Board of Studies who takes active role in the curriculum design

Department is associated with Infosys campus connect program. Students are provided and given internship in INFOSYS Pvt Limited, DRDO,

NSTL and InfoTech Hyderabad for completion of project work. The department is conducting workshops/ Seminars regularly inviting experts

from R&D, Industry and premier institutes. PG program curriculum has been designed based on industry needs. Some of the

courses are delivered by industry experts through webinars. Faculty development programs are be ing conducted by Infosys, Wipro and

TCS

3.3. Curriculum Development (15)

3.3.1. State the process for designing the programme curriculum (5)(Describe the process that periodically documents and demonstrates how the programme curriculum is evolved considering the PEOs and the POs)The department has taken several measures in framing the curriculum for the attainment of the program outcomes. Various workshops and seminars were conducted on the aspects of curriculum design to enrich the faculty with the best practices.

An awareness of PEOs / Pos and the relevance to program criteria by Dr. Narasaiah A workshop on “Curriculum Design” by, K. Ravi Kumar from IITD.

- Several ideas were provided to faculty regarding identification of domains, subjects to be grouped, content framing towards the benefit of the students.

- Interactive sessions were held for better understanding on design steps Course outcomes and learning resource design by Dr

After these awareness workshops detailed procedure as shown in figure 3.4 is followed to design the curriculum.

Page 65: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Figure 3.4: Curriculum development process

Successive Three Programme Curriculum Revisions

R07 R09 R13

Process in updating programme curriculum

B.O.Smeeting

B.O.Smeeting

B.O.Smeeting

Periodical documents Available, Revised by Combined JNT University

Available, Revised by Combined JNT University

Available, Revised on

3.3.2. Illustrate the measures and processes used to improve courses and curriculum (10)(Articulate the process involved in identifying the requirements for improvement in courses and curriculum and provide the evidence of continuous improvement of courses and curriculum)

The course coordinator along with programme specific faculty analyzes PG student theory & practical course work results, course end survey and subjects studied. The collective information in chosen subjects in the past revision is supplied to the BOS committee. The BOS Committee analyzes the chosen number of core branch subjects, other subjects and their importance to adopt them in the main course or in electives. Then the BOS committee identifies the need for curricular improvement as per the current needs of technological development and industryFollowing is the process in identifying the requirements for improvements in the curriculum and is shown in Figure 3.5.

Page 66: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

The process is initiated by Department Advisory Board for the improvement of the curriculum

To redefine, the feedback data on existing curriculum is gathered through direct and indirect assessment methods.

To improve the courses, the collected data is analyzed to identify the need for redefining.

Based on identified changes in terms of courses, data on future, current industry need, program outcomes, program educational objectives, the administrative system like BOS, Academic Council and Program Assessment Committee involve appropriate actions to revise the curriculum

Fig 3.5

3.4. Course Syllabi (5)

(Include, in appendix, a syllabus for each course used. Syllabi format should be consistent and shouldn’t exceed two pages.)

The syllabi format may include: Department, course number, and title of course

Designation as a required or elective course Pre-requisites Contact hours and type of course (lecture, tutorial, seminar, project etc.,.) Course Assessment methods (both continuous and semester-end assessment) Course outcomes Topics covered Text books, and/or reference material

The course syllabus of the MACHINE DESIGN is given in APPENDIX

Page 67: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

4. STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE (100)

4.1. Admission intake in the programme (15)

Year

Sanctioned

Strength of the

Programme

Number of Students Admitted

Percentageof seats filled

Number of Students

Admitted with Valid GATE

Score/PG entrance of State

Percentage of Students with Valid GATE

Score/PG entrance of

State

CAY (2015-16) 18+7 25 100 14+2 64.0

CAY (2014-15) 18+7 25 100 10 + 08 72.00

CAYm1(2013-14) 18+7 26+3* 100 12+06+08 61.50

CAYm2(2012-13) 18+7 24 96 09 + 09 75.00

Average percentage of seats filled through approved procedure 99

Average percentage of students admitted with valid GATE Score/PG

entrance of state

68.13

*Including Industry sponsored, Foreign Nationals, NRI, PIO and Spot Admitted candidates

Average percentage of seats filled through approved procedure = 99

Average percentage of students admitted with valid GATE Score/PG entrance of state = 68.13

YearNumber of StudentsAdmitted

API = AcademicPerformance Index

= Average CGPA or Average Marks on a Scale of 10 (Compiled from the

Graduation Records)

CAY (2015-16) 25 (Students under course work)

CAY (2014-15) 25 6.53

CAYm1(2013-14) 29 7.21

CAYm2(2012-13) 24 7.42

Average API 7.00

Average API = 7.00

4.1.1 Number of seats filled through the admission procedure approved by the University (5)

Page 68: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Assessment will be based on average percentage of seats filled through approved procedure and points awarded to be proportionate accordingly.

Assessment = 68.13/ 10 = 6.813

4.1.2 Quality of students as judged from their complete graduation records (5)

Assessment = 1.5 × Average API

= 1.5 ×7.0

= 10.54.1.3 Number of students admitted having a valid GATE score/PG entrance of state (5)

Assessment = 10 x (Average percentage of students admitted with valid GATE Score / PG entrance of state)

= 10 x 68.13 = 681.3

4.2. Success Rate (20)(Provide data for the past three batches of students)

GI = Graduation Index= (Number of students graduated from the programme) / (Number of students joined the Programme)

Average GI =0.81

Assessment = 20 x Average GI= 20 x 0.76

= 16.27

4.3. Academic Performance (20)Academic Performance = 2 * API = 2* 7.0 = 14.0

Where API = Academic Performance Index

Year

Number of Students

Graduated from the

Programme

Number ofStudents Joined

theProgramme

GI

LYG(2013-2015) 29 29 1.0

LYG m1 (2012-14) 17 24 0.71

LYG m1 (2011-13) 22 30 0.73

Average GI 0.81

Page 69: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

= Mean of Cumulative Grade Point Average of all Successful Students on a 10 point CGPA System

OR= Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students / 10

Av. API = 7.17Academic Performance = 2 x Av. API = 14.34

4.4. Placement and Higher Studies (20)

Assessment Points = 20 × (x + 3y)/N

Where, x = Number of students placedy = Number of students admitted for higher studies with valid qualifying Scores/ranks, andN = Total number of students who were admitted in the batch to

maximum Assessment points = 20

Item 2013-20152012-14 201 –13

Number of admitted students corresponding to LYG (N)

2924 30

Number of students who obtained jobs as per

the record in the

07

7 2

ItemLYG(2013-

15)

LYG(CAYm1)

(2012-14)

LYG(CAYm2)(2011-13)

Approximating the API by the following mid-point analysis9 < Number of students with CGPA < 10.0 00 00

8 < Number of students with CGPA < 9.0 03 03 03

7<=8 17 17 11

6<=7 09 08 05

5<=6 -- 02 01

Total -- 30 20

Approximating API by Mid-CGPA -- -- --Mean of CGPA/Percentage of all the students (API)

7.28 7.42 6.81

Page 70: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Number of students who opted for higher studies

with valid qualifying

00 0

Assessment points

4.835.83 1.33

Average assessment points = 4.0

4.5 Professional Activities (25)

4.5.1 Membership in Professional Societies / Chapters and organising engineering events (5)(Instruction: The institution may provide data for past three years).

4.5.2 Participation and their outcomes in international/national events (5)(Instruction: The institution may provide data for past three years).

4.5.3 Publication and awards in international/national events (10)(Instruction: The institution may list the publications mentioned earlier along with the names of the editors, publishers, etc.).

4.5.4 Entrepreneurship initiatives and innovations (5)(Instruction: The institution may specify the efforts and achievements.)

1. Entrepreneurship Awareness Programme organised by Centre for Entrepreneurship development, JNTUK Kakinada on 5th and 6th March 2014

Page 71: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

5. F A C U L T Y CON T RI BU T I ON S ( 200) List of Faculty Members: Exclusively for the Programme / Shared with other Programmes

Name of the faculty member

Qualification,

university, and year of graduation

Designation and date of joining

the institution

Distribution of teaching load

(%)

Number of

research p

ublications in journals

and con

ferences since

joining

IPR

s

R&D and consultancy work with amount

Holding an i

ncubation

unit

Interaction with

outside world1st

Year UG PG

Dr. B. Balakrishna Ph.D

Professor & HOD

05/12/201640 70 --

IJ: 17NJ: 02IC: 16NC: 02

-- -- -- --

Dr. V. Ramachandra

Raju

Ph.D Professor03/06/2003 -- 80 20

IJ:61NJ: 15IC:05

NC: 11

--

Provided Consultancy

during 2003-05 as a hod in the thermal Engg.

Laboratory Appx. Rs 50,000.00

-- --

Dr. K.Mallikarjuna

Rao Ph.D Professor --

IJ: 17NJ:10IC:01

NC: 13

-- -- -- --

Dr.G. Ranga Janardhana Ph.D Professor

02/11 /1992 -- 80 20

IJ:52NJ: 46IC: 42NC: 34

-- -- --

Post Doc research at

hoseo university

south korea

Dr.V.V Subba Rao Ph.D Professor

24/09 /1994 40 30 30

IJ: 22NJ: 02IC: 15NC: 10

-- -- --

Post Doc research at

hoseo university

south korea

Page 72: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Dr. A.Gopala Krishna Ph.D Professor

01/11/2000 -- 50 50

IJ:40NJ:10IC:30

NC: 18

--Research carried of

Rs.68.06 lakhs-- --

Sri M. Kumara Swamy M.Tech

Associate Professor

06/02/199020 -- 80

IJ:13NJ: -IC:02

NC: 10

-- -- -- --

Smt. A.Swarna Kumari Ph.D

Associate Professor

07/01/199130 70 --

IJ: 04NJ: 02IC: 02

NC: 04

-- -- -- --

Sri L.Vinod Babu M.S

Associate Professor

09-07-1985 30 40 30

IJ:01NJ:IC:

NC: 02

-- -- -- --

Dr. K. Meera Saheeb Ph.D

Associate Professor

22/01/201330 35 35

IJ: 08NJ: 00IC:06

NC: 07

- - - -

Dr. D. LingarajuPh.D

Assistant Professor

31/12/201240 40 20

IJ: 03NJ: --IC: 05NC: 07 -- 25 Lakhs

7 Lakhs--

Attending one month R&D Training at New York university,

USA

Sri V. Jaya Prasad M.Tech

Assistant Professor

01.01.201320 60 20

IJ:02NJ:01IC:01

NC: 03

-- -- -- --

Sri V.Kalyanamanoh

ar M.TechAssistant Professor

02-01-201330 40 30 -- -- -- -- --

Sri M.Madusudan

Prasad M.TechAsst.

Professor02-01-2013

30 40 30 -- -- -- -- --

Page 73: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Sri K.Krishna Bhaskar M.E, Assistant

Professor03-01-2013

-- 50 50

IJ: 01NJ: --IC: 02NC: 01

-- -- -- --

Smt. B.L. Manasa M.Tech Asst.

Professor04-01-2013

20 50 30 -- -- -- -- --

Sri V.Vara Prasad M.Tech

Assistant Professor

07-01-201320 40 40

IJ: 01NJ: --IC: 03NC: 01

-- -- -- --

Sri Kalapala Prasad

M.E,M.Tech, (Ph.D)

Asst. Professor

09-01-201330 40 30

IJ:02NJ:02

IC:NC: 01

-- -- -- --

Sri K.Dileep Kumar M.Tech

(Ph.D)

Asst. Professor

21-01-201330 40 30

IJ:NJ:

IC:08NC: 03

-- -- -- --

Sri D. Brahmeshawara

RaoM.Tech(Ph.D) Lecturer 80 20 -- -- -- -- -- --

Smt V. Roopavani M.Tech Lecturer 80 20 -- -- -- -- -- --

5.1 Student Teacher Ratio (STR) (20)(Instruction: The institution may complete this table for the calculation of the student-teacher ratio (STR). Teaching loads of the faculty member contributing to only undergraduate programme (2nd, 3rd, and 4th year) are considered to calculate the STR.)

U1 = Number of Students in UG 2nd Year

U2 = Number of Students in UG 3rd Year

U3 = Number of Students in UG 4th Year

Page 74: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

P1 = Number of Students in PG 1st Year

P2 = Number of Students in PG 2nd Year

N1 = Total Number of Faculty Members in the Parent Department

S=Number of Students in the Parent Department = U1 + U2 + U3 + P1 + P2Student Teacher Ratio (STR) = S / N1

Assessment = [20 x 13 /STR], subject to maximum of 20.

Average Assessment = 24.75

5.2. Faculty strength in PG programme (20)

Year U1 U2 U3 P1 P2 S N1 STR Assessment

CAY(2015-2016) 48 58 58 25 22 211 21 10.05 25.87

CAYm1(2014-2015) 59 57 61 22 26 225 21 10.71 24.27

CAY m2(2013-2014) 51 56 62 22 25 216 22 9.82 26.48

CAY m3(2012-2013) 56 62 61 25 28 232 20 11.60 22.41

Average 24.75

X = Number of faculty members with Ph.D available for PG ProgrammeY = Number of faculty members with Ph.D. / M.Tech. / M.E available for PG ProgrammeAssessment will be done on the basis of the number of faculty members with Ph.D/ M.Tech/ M.E., available for the PG programme. [Minimum number suggested: 4]

Year X Y AssessmentCAY (2015-16) 2 4 10

CAY(2014-2015) 2 4 10 CAY m1(2013-2014)

2 4 10Average 10

Assessment = 20 x [X/Y]Average Assessment = 10.00

5.3. Faculty Qualifications (30)

Assessment = 4 × FQIwhere, FQI = Faculty qualification index

= (10x + 6y + 4 z0)/N2such that, x + y +z0 ≤ N2; and z0 ≤ z

where, x = Number of faculty members with PhD

Page 75: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

y = Number of faculty members with ME/ M Tech z = Number of faculty members with BE / B.Tech / M.Sc.

x y z N FQI Assessment

2012-2013 07 13 00 20 7.40 29.6

2013-2014 08 14 00 22 7.45 29.8

2014-2015 09 12 00 21 7.71 30.85

2015-2016 09 12 00 21 7.71 30.85

Average Assessment 30.23

2013-14 2014-15 2015-160

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

No.of faculty members with Ph.DNo. of faculty members with M.E/M.Tech

5.4. Faculty Competencies correlation to Programme Curriculum (15)(Indicate the faculty competencies (specialization, research publication, course developments etc.) to correlate the programme curriculum)

Name of the Faculty Designation Qualification Areas of Specialization

No. of research

publications

Faculty competenc

ies

Dr. B. Balakrishna Ph.D Professor & HOD 05/12/2016 Thermal Engg 37

Dr. V. Ramachandra Raju

Ph.D Professor03/06/2003 Thermal Engg 92

Dr. K.Mallikarjuna Raomd

Ph.D Professor Machine Design 31

Dr.G. Ranga Janardhana Ph.D Professor

02/11 /1992 CAD/CAM 174

Dr.V.V Subba Raomd Ph.D Professor

24/09 /1994 Machine Design 49

Page 76: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Dr. A.Gopala Krishna

cc Ph.D Professor01/11/2000 CAD/CAM 98

Sri M. Kumara Swamy M.Tech

Associate Professor

06/02/1990CAD/CAM 25

Smt. A.Swarna Kumari Ph.D

Associate Professor

07/01/1991

Thermal Engineering

12

Sri L.Vinod Babu M.S

Associate Professor

09-07-1985 MS 03

Dr. K. Meera Saheebcc Ph.D

Associate Professor

22/01/2013

Production Engineeing

40

Dr. D.Linga Rajucc PhD

Assistant Professor

31/12/2012CAD/CAM 15

Sri V. Jaya Prasad M.TechAssistant Professor

01.01.2013

Mtellurgy and Material Science

07

Sri V.Kalyan Manohar M.Tech

Assistant Professor

02-01-2013CIM 00

Sri M.Madhusudan Prasad M.Tech Asst. Professor

02-01-2013 CIM 00

Sri K.Krishna Bhaskar M.E, Assistant

Professor03-01-2013

CAD/CAM 04

Ms. B.L. Manasa M.Tech Asst. Professor04-01-2013 Machine Design 00

Sri V.Vara Prasad M.TechAssistant Professor

07-01-2013CAD/CAM 05

Sri Kalapala Prasad M.E,M.Tech, (Ph.D)

Asst. Professor09-01-2013

IE/ Machine Design

05

Sri K.Dileep Kumar M.Tech(Ph.D)

Asst. Professor21-01-2013 Machine Design 11

5.5. Faculty as participants/resource persons in faculty development / training activities (15)(Instruction: A faculty member scores maximum five point’s f o r a participation/resource person)Participant/resource person in two week faculty development programme: 5 points

Page 77: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Participant/resource person in one week faculty development programme: 3 Points

Name of the faculty

Max. 5 per faculty

2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

Dr. B. Balakrishna -- -- --

Dr. V. Ramachandra Raju

One Week Faculty Development

Program-- --

Dr. K.Mallikarjuna Rao -- -- --Dr.G. Ranga Janardhana -- -- --

Dr.V.V Subba Rao -- --

Resource Person On two week

ProgramTot=05 Points

Dr. A.Gopala Krishna -- -- --Sri M. Kumara Swamy -- -- --Smt. A.Swarna Kumari -- -- --

Sri L.Vinod Babu -- -- --

Dr. K.Meera SahebTwo week faculty

development programme

Tot=05 Points

1.Paper presented at NUAA,China

2.One week faculty development programme

3. One week at workshop,ESCI4. One week workshop at NIT WarangalTotal= 12 Points

1. Two week faculty

development programme(RM)

2. Two week faculty

development programme(IPR)

3. One week workshop

Tot=13 Points

Dr. D.Linga Raju --

-4 week orientation course at JNTUH,

12.05.14 to 07.06.14

Tot=10 Points

Resource person at vignan college of

engineering; Participant 4 week

orientation programme

Tot=10 Points

Page 78: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Sri V. Jaya Prasad --

-4 week orientation course at JNTUH,

12.05.14 to 07.06.14

Tot=10 Points

2 weeks refresher course at JNTUK,

01.05.15 to 15.05.15

Total=10 Points

3 weeks refresher course at AU, 28.09.15 to

17.10.15Total= 10 points

Sri V.Kalyanamanohar -- --

4 week orientation course at AU, 04.08.14 to

30.08.14Total= 10 Points2 weeks refresher course at JNTUK,

01.05.15 to 15.05.15

Tot=05 Points

Sri M.Madusudan Prasad -- -- --

3 weeks refresher course at AU, 28.09.15 to

17.10.15Total=10 Points

Sri K.Krishna Bhaskar -- --

Participant in one week faculty

development in NITTTR

CHANDIGHARTot=03 Points

4 week orientation course at AU,

23.04.15 to 20.05.15

Total =10 Points

3 week Refresher course at SVU,

16.11.15 to 06.12.15

Tot= 10 points

Ms. B.L. Manasa -- -- --

Sri V.Vara Prasad -- --

Participant in one week faculty

development in NITTTR

CHENNAITot=03 Points

Sri Kalapala Prasad -- --

4 week orientation course at AU,

23.04.15 to 20.05.15

Tot= 10 points

Page 79: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Sri K.Dileep Kumar --

-4 week orientation course at JNTUH,

12.05.14 to 07.06.14

Tot=10 Points

--

3 weeks refresher course at RU, 03.08.15 to

24.08.15Total=10 Points

Sum 08 42 7940

N (Number of faculty positions required for an STR)

16 16 15 15

Assessment = 3 × Sum/N

1.5 7.875 15.808

Average assessme

nt10.56

5.6. Faculty Retention (15)

Assessment = 3 × RPI/Nwhere RPI = Retention point index

= Points assigned to all faculty members

where points assigned to a faculty member = 1 point for each year of experience at the institute but not exceeding 5.

Item 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Number of faculty members w i t h experience of less than l year (x0)

0 0 0

Number of faculty m e m b e r s w i t h 1 to 2 years experience (x1) 0 0 0

Number of faculty m e m b e r s with 2 to 3 years experience (x2) 4 4 0

Number of faculty m e m b e r s with 3 to 4 years experience (x3) 1 11

Number of faculty m e m b e r s with 4 to 5 years experience (x4) 0 0 2

Number of faculty m e m b e r s with more than 5 years experience (x5)

17 1718

N 22 22 21

RPI = x1 + 2x2 + 3x3 + 4x4 + 5x5 96 96 101

Page 80: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Assessment 13.09 13.09 14.43

Average Assessment

2013-14 2014-15 2015-1612

12.5

13

13.5

14

14.5

15

Faculty Retention

Faculty Retention

5.7. Faculty Research Publications (FRP) (30)(Instruction: A faculty member scores maximum five research publication points depending upon the quality of the research papers and books published in the past three years.)

Assessment of FRP = 6 × (Sum of the research publication points scored by each faculty member)/N

The research papers considered are those ( i ) which can be located on Internet and/or are included in hard-copy volumes/proceedings, published by reputed publishers, and ( i i ) the faculty member’s affiliation, in the published papers/books, is of the current institution.

Include a list of all such publications and IPRs along with details of DOI, publisher, month/year, etc.

Name of the faculty (contributing to

FRP)

FRP points (max. 5 per faculty)

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-16

Dr. B. Balakrishna 01 02 01 02

Dr. V. Ramachandra Raju 13 12 05 03

Dr. K.Mallikarjuna Rao 03 02 02 02

Dr. G. Ranga Janardhana 09 06 05 04

Dr. V. V Subba Rao 03 03 04 02

Dr. A.Gopala Krishna 01 01 01 04

Sri M. Kumara Swamy

Smt. A.Swarna Kumari 04 02 03 01

Sri L.Vinod Babu

Dr. K. Meera Saheeb 00 01 15 09

Page 81: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Dr. D. Linga Raju 03 02 02 02

Sri V. Jaya Prasad 00 02 01 03

Sri V.Kalyanamanohar 00 00 00 00

Sri M.Madhusudan Prasad 00 00 00 00

Sri K.Krishna Bhaskar 00 00 02 03

Ms. B.L. Manasa 00 00 00 00

Sri V.Vara Prasad 00 00 02 03

Sri Kalapala Prasad 01 00 03 03

Sri K.Dileep Kumar 00 00 03 08

Sum 38 33 49 49

N (Number of faculty positions required for an

STR of 15)

16 16 15 15

Assessment o f FRP = 6 × Sum/N

14.25 12.37 19.6 19.6

Average assessment 16.45

5.8. Faculty Intellectual Property Rights (FIPR) (10)

Assessment of FIPR = 2 × (Sum of the FIPR points scored by each faculty member)/N

(Instruction: A faculty member scores a maximum of five FIPR points. FIPR includes awarded national/international patents, design, and copyrights.)

Name of faculty m e m b e r (contributing to FIPR)

FIPR points (max. 5 per faculty member)2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-16

Dr. B. Balakrishna -- -- -- --

Dr. V. Ramachandra Raju -- -- -- --

Dr. K.Mallikarjuna Rao -- -- -- --

Dr. G. Ranga Janardhana -- -- -- --

Dr. V. V Subba Rao -- -- -- --

Dr. A.Gopala Krishna -- -- -- --

Sri M. Kumara Swamy -- -- -- --

Smt. A.Swarna Kumari -- -- -- --

Sri L.Vinod Babu -- -- -- --

Page 82: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Dr. K. Meera Saheeb -- -- -- --

Dr. D. Linga Raju -- -- -- --

Sri V. Jaya Prasad -- -- -- --

Sri V.Kalyan Manohar -- -- -- --

Sri M.Madhusudan Prasad -- -- -- --

Sri K.Krishna Bhaskar -- -- -- --

Ms. B.L. Manasa -- -- -- --

Sri V.Vara Prasad -- -- -- --

Sri Kalapala Prasad -- -- -- --

Sri K.Dileep Kumar -- -- -- --

Sum 00 00 00 --

N 20 20 21 21

Assessment o f FIPR = 2 × Sum/N 00 00 00 00

Average assessment 00 00

5.9 Funded R&D Projects and Consultancy (FRDC) Work (30)(Instruction: A faculty member scores maximum 5 points, depending upon the amount.) A suggested scheme is given below for a minimum amount of Rs. 1 lakh:)

Assessment of R&D and consultancy projects = 4 × ( Sum of FRDC by each faculty member)//NFive points for funding by national agency,Four points for funding by state agency/ private sectorTwo points for funding by the sponsoring trust/society.

Name of faculty member (contributing to FPPC)

FRDC points (max. 5 per faculty)

2012 - 2013 2013 – 2014 2014 - 2015 2015-16

Dr. A. Gopalakrishna

01 ProjectRs.9.45 lakhs

Tot: 05 Points

1 projectRs.9.44 lakhs

Tot: 05 Points

03 projectsRs 28.62lakhsTot: 15 Points

01 ProjectsRs 20.55lakhs

Total=05 Points

Dr. D. Lingaraju --1 project

Rs. 25 LakhsTot=5 points

Tot: 05 Points

1 projectRs. 7 Lakhs

Tot =5 Points

--

Sum 05 10 20 05

N 20 21 21 21

Assessment o f FRDC = 4 × Sum/N

01 1.9 3.8 0.95

Page 83: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Average assessment2.22

2013-14 2014-15 2015-160

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

FRDC

FRDC

5.10. Faculty Interaction with Outside World (15)

FIP = Faculty interaction pointsAssessment = 3 × (Sum of FIP by each faculty member)/N

(Instruction: A faculty member gets a maximum of five interaction points, depending upon the type of institution or R&D laboratory or industry, as follows)

Five points for interaction with a reputed institution abroad, institution of eminence in India, or national research laboratories, Three points for interaction with institution/industry (not covered earlier).

Points to be awarded, for those activities, which result in joint efforts in publication of books/research paper, pursuing externally funded R&D / consultancy projects and/ or development of semester-long course / teaching modules.

Name of faculty member (contributing to FIP)

FIP points

2012 - 13 2013 – 14 2014 - 2015 2015-2016

Dr. V. Ramachandra Raju -- -- 03 points institution --

Dr. V.V. Subba Rao 05 Points abroad --

Dr. K. Meera Saheb 00 05 points Abroad --

Dr. D. Linga Raju -- -- 05 points Abroad --

Sum 00 00 18 --

N 20 20 21 --

Page 84: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Assessment o f FIP = 3 × Sum/N 00 00 2.57 --

Average assessment 0.86

2013-14 2014-15 2015-160

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

FRDC

Page 85: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

6. FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT (75)

Description of classrooms, faculty rooms, seminar, and conference halls: (Entries in the following table are sampler entries)

Room Description Usage Shared / Exclusive?

Capacity

Rooms Equipped with

Class Room No.1 Class room for 2nd

year Exclusive 55

Class Room No.4 Class room for 3rd

year -do- 55 LCD Projector with Screen

Class Room No.3 Class room for 1st

year -do- 55 LCD Projector with Screen

Class Room No.2 Class room for M.Tech -do- 30 LCD Projector with

Screen

Class Room No.5 Class room for M.Tech -do- 30 LCD Projector with

Screen

Class Room No.6 Class room for 4th

year -do- 55

Seminar Room no 1 Seminars & Conferences Exclusive 100 LCD Projector with

ScreenMeeting room no. Seminar Hall Exclusive 100

Faculty rooms (n) 15 … Exclusive …. PC, Internet, Book rack…

Alumni AuditoriumInternational

Conferences & Workshops

Shared 300 Latest Facilities

6.1 Classrooms in the Department (15)

6.1.1 Adequate number of rooms for lectures (core/electives), seminars, tutorials, etc., for the programme (5)

(Instruction: Assessment based on the information provided in the preceding table.)Assessment based on the information provided in the above table

The number of class rooms available in the department are sufficient to meet the academic requirements of UG & PG Programmes.

6.1.2 Teaching aids-multimedia projectors, etc. (5)

Assessment based on the information provided in the above tableAll the class rooms are equipped with adequate academic infrastructure. In addition 1white board, 2 OHPs and 3 LCD projectors, 1 PA system are available in the department for audio visual needs of class work.6.1.3 Acoustics, classroom size, conditions of chairs/benches, air circulation, lighting,

exits, ambience, and such other amenities/facilities (5) (Instruction: Assessment based on the information provided in the preceding table and the inspection thereof.)

Page 86: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

S.No Item Description

1 Acoustics Acoustics are good in all the class rooms

2 Class Room Size The size is sufficient to accommodate up to 60 students. Approx are of class rooms is 70sq.m

3 Chairs / Benches The condition is good in all the class rooms

4 Air Circulation The class rooms are provided with sufficient windows and fans

5 Lighting Sufficient no. of tube lights are provided

6 Ambience Good academic ambience is maintained in the classes and in the vicinity of the department

6.2 Faculty Rooms in the Department (15)

6.2.1 Availability of individual faculty rooms (5)(Instruction: Assessment based on the information provided in the preceding table.)

Assessment based on the information provided in the above table

All the faculty members have individual rooms and with internet facility

6.2.2 Room equipped with white/black board, computer, Internet, and such other amenities/facilities (5)

(Instruction: Assessment based on the information provided in the preceding table)

Assessment based on the information provided in the above table

All faculty rooms equipped with white/black board, computer, internet, Printer, book racks, etc.

6.2.3 Usage of room for counselling / discussion with students (5)(Instruction: Assessment based on the information provided in the preceding table and the inspection thereof.)

Assessment based on the information provided in the above table and the inspection thereof

Individual faculty rooms are sufficient for student counseling and discussion

The following table is required for the subsequent criteria.

Page 87: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

6.3 Laboratories in the Department to meet the programme curriculum requirements and the POs (30)

Curriculum Lab

Description

Exclusive use/shared?

Space/# Students

# of experiments

Quality of instrument

sLab manuals

CIM Laboratory Exclusive 50 sq.m / 25 12 IBM

SystemsAvailable

Machine Dynamics Laboratory

Exclusive 72 sq.m / 25 08 Good Available

CAD Laboratory Exclusive 96 sq.m / 25 13 IBM

Systems Available

Computer Programming

LaboratoryExclusive 72 sq.m / 25 36 IBM

Systems Available

Instrumentation Laboratory Exclusive 72 sq.m / 25 10 Good Available

Metrology & Machine Tools

LaboratoryExclusive 460 sq.m /

25 16 Good Available

Production Technology Laboratory

Exclusive 500 sq.m / 25 12 Good Available

Fuels & Lubricants Laboratory

Exclusive 90 sq.m / 25 08 Good Available

Heat Transfer Laboratory Exclusive 96 sq.m / 25 11 Good Available

Thermal Engineering Laboratory

Exclusive 1200 sq.m / 25 13 Good Available

Metallurgy Laboratory Exclusive 72 sq.m / 25 11 Good Available

OOPS through JAVA

LaboratoryExclusive 96 sq.m / 25 25 IBM

Systems Available

Engineering Workshop Practice

Exclusive 700 sq.m / 25 10 Good Available

6.3.1 Adequate, well-equipped laboratories to meet the curriculum requirements and the POs (10)

(Instruction: Assessment based on the information provided in the preceding table.)

Assessment based on the information provided in the above tableThe department has sufficient no. of laboratories to meet the requirements of Mechanical Engineering. The laboratories in the department are well equipped with the latest softwares and technologies so as to provide required infrastructures to carry out in-house projects for final year students as well as R&D activities.

Page 88: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

6.3.2 Availability of computing facilities in the department (5)(Instruction: Assessment based on the information provided in the preceding table.)

Assessment based on the information provided in the above table

200 computers are available in the department laboratories and for UG / PG / Project works

6.3.3 Availability of research facilities to conduct project works / thesis work (5) (Articulate the facilities provided to carry out the project works/thesis).

Assessment based on the information provided in the above table

All labs are available with tech. support within and beyond working hours

6.3.4 Availability of laboratories with technical support within and beyond working hours (5)

(Instruction: Assessment based on the information provided in the preceding table.) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table

6.3.5 Equipment to run experiments and their maintenance, number of students per experimental setup, size of the laboratories, overall ambience, etc. (5)

(Instruction: Assessment based on the information provided in the preceding table.)

4 students per experiment in laboratories and 1 student per system in computational laboratories, 1 student per job in workshops.

6.4 Technical Manpower Support in the Department (15)

Designation (Pay-scale)

Exclusive /shared work?

Date of Joining

QualificationOther

Technical Skills

gained?

ResponsibilityAt joining Now?

N.Venkateswara Rao

Draughtsman Mech.(15280-40510)

Exclusive 23.4.79 DME DME Drafting Carpentry & Tin Smithy

A.Appa RaoTech.Asst Gr-I(13660- 38570)

Exclusive 8.12.82 ITI ITI Foundry

V.Satyanarayana Mechanic(11860-34050) Exclusive 8.6. 82 ITI DME Materials

Testing IC Engines &

HMT Labs

B. Satyanarayana M/Maistry(11860-34050) Exclusive 8.6. 82 JTS JTS Surveying IC Engines &

HMT Labs

Sri K.G LingamMechanic(11860-34050) Exclusive 14.9.71 Gen.

Mechanic

Gen.Mechani

cMetrology

Machine Tools Lab

Ch.Subba RaoMechanic(11860-34050) Exclusive 15.3. 86 ITI ITI

Inst. Lab & Machine

Dynamics Lab

L.VeerannaFitter Foreman(11860-34050) Exclusive 12.11. 87 ITI ITI

Robot Pragramm

ing

CNC Lab

P. Appa Rao Mechanic(11860-34050) Exclusive 8.7. 82 ITI B.Tech Instrumen

tationMetallurgy Lab

N. Satyanarayana S/Maistry(11860-34050) Exclusive 8.6. 82 ITI ITI Black Smithy

Section

Ch.N.SubramanyamCarpentry Foreman(11860-34050)

Exclusive 7.3. 83 ITI ITIModern

Carpentry tools

Carpentry Section

M.Ayyanna Mechanic(11860-34050) Exclusive 08.12. 93 JTS JTS Store

KeepingElect.Works

K.V.V. Satyanarayana

Boiler Attendant(11860-34050) Exclusive 16.11. 91 ITI ITI Tin

SmithyInst. Lab &

Metallurgy LabB.S.K.Ch. Bhaskara W/S Artisan Exclusive 5.12. 91 Certificate Certificat Engine Inst. Lab &

Page 89: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Rao(11860-34050) in

Automobile

e in Automob

ileMechanic

Machine Dynamics Lab

S.ShabuddinW/S Artisan(11860-34050) Exclusive 25.9. 93 DME DME

Computer aided test

rigs

IC Engines & HMT Labs

G.V.S.Prasad Varma

W/S Artisan(11860-34050)

Exclusive 29.9. 93 ITI

Diploma in

Computer

Applications

Computer Hardware

& Software Installatio

ns

CAD, Data Structures, JAVA Labs

6.4.1 Availability of adequate and qualified technical supporting staff for programme-specific laboratories (10)

(Instruction: Assessment based on the information provided in the preceding table.)Assessment based on the information provided in the above tableAdequate and qualified technical supporting staff for each lab are available

6.4.2 Incentives, skill-upgrade, and professional advancement (5)(Instruction: Assessment based on the information provided in the preceding table.)Assessment based on the information provided in the above tableAll technical staff are regularly trained in modern tools and deputed to training programmes

7. T E ACHIN G -LEARNI N G P R O CESS ( 7 5)

S.Brahmaji Rao W/S Artisan(11860-34050) Exclusive 16.11. 91 ITI ITI Machinist Fitting Section

G.Nageswara RaoW/S Artisan(11860-34050) Exclusive 24.9. 93 Certificate

in Drawing

Certificate in

DrawingMMT Lab

Painting

P.Kodanda Ram

W/S Artisan(11860-34050) Exclusive 26.11. 93 ITI ITI

MMT Lab

D.Ramakrishna W/S Artisan(11860-34050) Exclusive 25.9. 93 ITI ITI Wiring &

Welding

P.Tatabbai W/S Artisan(11860-34050) Exclusive 26.7. 91 ITI ITI Carpentry

V. Purushothama Raju

W/S Artisan(11860-34050) Exclusive 12.10. 91 ITI ITI Black Smithy

Section

S.Seshagiri Rao W/S Artisan(11860-34050) Exclusive 12.08.94 ITI ITI Tin Smithy

T.Lakshmi

Lab Attender

Exclusive 4.12.86 5th class 5th class

Instrumentation & Metallurgy

Labs

G.S.P. Mukherjee Lab Attender Exclusive 23.09.94 10th class 10th class CAD, CIM & C Language, Labs

S.V Ramana Lab Attender Exclusive 20.09.93 9th class 9th class HMT & IC Engines Lab

B.V Ramana Attender Exclusive 09.07.02 5th class 5th class Dept. Office B.Ramesh Attender Exclusive ITI ITI Dept. Office

G. Mohan Reddy Cleaner Exclusive 09.08.91 7th class 7th class WorkshopSmt.M. Kannamma Sweeper Exclusive Workshop

Page 90: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

7.1 Evaluation process: course work (25)

7.1.1 Evaluation Process – Class test / mid-term test schedules and procedures for systematic evaluation, internal assessments. (10)

(Assessment is based upon the efficacy of the evaluation process being followed. Relevant data may be inserted here.)

Rol

l

No

Nam

e

Branc

h

Spe

ciali

zati

on

Mid 1

Marks

(theory)

(Out of

40)

Mid 2

Marks

(theor

y)

(Out

of 40)

Avera

ge of

two

mid

exams(

theory

)

(out of

40)

End Exam

Marks

(theory)

(out of 40)

Total

(theor

y)

(out of

100)

Lab

Internal

Marks

(out of

40)

Lab

End

Exa

m

Mar

ks

(out

of

60)

Tota

l

Lab

Mar

ks

(out

of

100)

x X ME MD x x x x x x x x

The performance of the candidate in each semester shall be evaluated subject-wise, a maximum of 100 marks for theory and 100 marks for Laboratory, on the basis of Internal Evaluation and End Semester Examination.

For the theory subjects, 60 marks shall be awarded based on the performance in the End Semester Examination, 40 marks shall be awarded based on the Internal Evaluation. The internal evaluation shall be made based on the average of the marks secured in the two Mid Term-Examinations conducted, one in the middle of the Semester and the other immediately after the completion of instruction.

Each midterm examination shall be conducted for duration of 180 minutes with 5 questions to be answered out of 8 questions. For practical subjects. 60 marks shall be awarded based on the performance in the End Semester Examinations, 40 marks shall be awarded based on the day-to-day performance in Laboratory as Internal Marks.

A candidate shall be deemed to have secured the minimum academic requirement in a subject if he secures a minimum of 40% of marks in the End Examination and a minimum aggregate of 50% of the total marks in the End Semester Examination and Internal Evaluation taken together. If a candidate secures a minimum of 40% of marks in the End Examination and 40% - 49% of the total marks in the End Semester Examination and Internal Evaluation taken together and secures an overall aggregate of 50% in the total semester he may be passed in those subjects also.

In case the candidate does not secure the minimum academic requirement in any subject (as specified in 5.4) he has to reappear for the End Examination in that subject. A candidate shall be given one chance to re-register for each subject provided the internal marks secured by a candidate are less than 50% and he has failed in the end examination.

In such case candidate must re-register for the subject(s) and secure required minimum attendance. The attendance in the re-registered subject(s) shall be calculated separately to decide upon the eligibility for writing the end examination

Page 91: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

in those subject(s). In the event of taking another chance, the internal marks and end examination marks obtained in the previous attempt are nullified.

At a given time a candidate is permitted to re-register for a maximum of two subjects in addition to the subjects of regular semester subjects.

The viva-voce examination shall be conducted at the end of the course work and at the end of 4th semester or later depending on the completion of the Project.

Laboratory examination for M.Tech courses must be conducted with two Examiners, one of them being Laboratory Class Teacher and second examiner shall be appointed by the University.

The evaluation of written examination carried by the concerned faculty. The Assessment table for awarding internal marks is as follows:

Q.No. a b c d Total1 122 123 124 12

Total Marks 60Assessment = evaluation by the concerned faculty

7.1.2 Seminar and Presentation Evaluation (10)(Assessment is based upon the methodology being followed and its effectiveness)

There shall be two seminar presentations during III semester and IV semester. For seminar, a student under the supervision of a faculty member, shall collect the literature on a topic and critically review the literature and submit it to the department in a report form and shall make an oral presentation before the Project Review Committee consisting of Head of the Department, Supervisor and two other senior faculty members of the department. For each Seminar there will be only internal evaluation of 50 marks. A candidate has to secure a minimum of 50% of marks to be declared successful.

Relevance of the topic

Depth in knowledge on the topic

Research exposure on the topic

Results and discussions

Presentation Skills

Assessment = Evaluated by the Project Review Committee

7.1.3 Performance and Feedback [3](Assessment is based upon effective implementation of the following activitieso Post-semester feedback to students on their performanceo Extra care for poor performers and remedial classes

o Comparison of mid and end semester performance Relevant data may be inserted here

The performance of each candidate after every semester is evaluated and the feedback is

given to each student. If any student has backlogs in a semester.

Page 92: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

We conduct remedial classes for them in the evening hours without disturbing the normal working hours. The feedback given to the students helps them to improve in their weak areas in the coming semesters.

7.1.4 Mechanism for addressing evaluation related grievances [2](Assessment is based upon the efficacy of the mechanism being followed. Relevant data may be inserted here.)

The course coordinator is asserted to consider the grievances cases. The case may be taken by the department or recommended to the institute. The institutional head will look after the case, he may solve the case or constitute a committee depending on the nature of the case.

Assessment = It is adjudge by the department /Institutional head / Constituted Committee

The Department of Mechanical Engineering, UCEK, JNTUK, providing a mechanism for addressing all grievances of students.

The students can simply write their problems in a paper in terms of hospitality, class work, feedback about faculty, marks evaluation, resources requirement etc., to the HOD indirectly by disposing into a grievances box at the ground floor of ME Department.

Monthly the suggestions/requests made by the students will directly addressed by the HOD.

7.2 Evaluation Process: Project Work / THESIS (25)

Details of Thesis Allocation, Evaluation and Presentation:

Year Name ofCandidate

Name of Supervisor/

Joint supervisor

Title ofThesis

Whether Evaluation Committee

was Constituted

(Yes/No)

Name of the

External Member

Thesis Presentation

Dates

The details of CAY m2 is shown in Appendix

7.2.1 Allocation of Students to Eligible Faculty Members (supervisors) [10]

The faculty who are having P.G qualification are eligible for project supervisors Each faculty member is to be accepted for supervision of the project for specific number of PG students depending upon the total strength available in that academic year

Assessment = Students are having choice to choose the supervisor based on the research interest of the student and the supervisor

7.2.2 Constitution of Evaluation Committee with at least One External Member [10]

For the evaluation project, a project review Committee (PRC) was constituted with Head of the Department and two other senior faculty members. Registration of Project Work: A candidate is permitted to register for the project work after satisfying the attendance requirement of all the subjects, both theory and practical.

Page 93: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

A candidate is permitted to submit Project Thesis only after successful completion of theory and practical course with the approval of PRC not earlier than 40 weeks from the date of registration of the project work The thesis shall be adjudicated by one external examiner selected by the University. For this, the Principal of the College shall submit a panel of 5 examiners, eminent in that field, with the help of the guide concerned and head of the department.

Name & address of the supervisorName & address of the External Examiner Name of the Internal ExaminerDate of the Viva-Voce Examination

Report of the viva – voce examinationA – excellentB – goodC – satisfactoryD – unsatisfactory

Assessment = Thesis evaluated by the internal and external examiner

7.2.3 Schedule Showing Thesis Presentation at least twice during the semester [5]

The work on the project shall be initiated at the beginning of the II year and the duration of the project is two semesters. A candidate is permitted to submit Project Thesis only after successful completion of theory and practical course with the approval of PRC not earlier than 40 weeks from the date of registration of the project work. The candidate has to pass all the theory and practical subjects before submission of the thesis.

Assessment = Presentation evaluation is adjudged by the project review committee during the III and IV semester.

& At the end of the thesis work it is evaluated by the internal

and external examiners

7.3 Teaching Evaluation And Feedback System [10]

7.3.1 Guidelines for Student Feedback System [3](Assessment is based upon the effectiveness of the guidelines for student feedback system. The design and effective implementation of the guidelines are essential for student feedback system.)

Students Feedback about the subject teacher is based on the following criterion on scale of 20 points for each criterion and 100 point for all the criterion.

1. Depth of Knowledge in the subject and clarity of expression2. Syllabus coverage and utilization of class time3. Judgment of Student Merit4. accessibility to student for discussion of subject outside the class room5. Helping the students for their personality development

Based on these criterion the performance of the faculty measured for the effective course delivery.

Assessment = Average Score on the 20 point scale of the above 5 criterion

Page 94: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

7.3.2 Analysis of Feedback by HOD and the Faculty [2](Assessment is based upon the methodology being followed for analysis of feedback and its effectiveness.)

The automated feedback is taken though online before the commencement of the end theory examination and these feedback forms are preserved. This feedback is taken by the examination section under the confidential ship of Vice-Principal of the College. These feedback forms are evaluated by the software. There is no role of the HOD in the analysis of the feedback system. However one committee constituted for analysis of the automated feedback system. The members of the feedback analysis committee are as follows:

Dr. P.Subba Rao, Professor & Vice-Principal, ChairmanDr Padmaja Rani, Professor & HOD in Physics, MemberDr B.Balakrishna, Professor & Head of Mech. Engineering, MemberDr Dekshethulu, Professor & Head of Maths and SS Dept., Convener

Assessment = Automated Feedback analysis by the system software

7.3.3 Corrective Measures and Implementation Followed [5](Assessment is based upon the effectiveness of the implementation of the corrective measures and subsequent follow-up.)

The result of the feedback analysis is communicated to the respective departments and to the concerned faculty, so as to enable them on knowing their weakness in the course delivery. Based on the feedback analysis one of the faculty may secure best teacher award. The award of best teacher is given to encourage the teaching staff for ensuring effective course delivery. However the weak performance staff may be advised to improvise their technical skills. In this regard staff members are encouraged to attend faculty development courses, workshops, refresher courses and training programmes.

Assessment = Automated Feedback analysis by the system software

7.4 Self learning beyond syllabus and outreach activities [15]

7.4.1 Scope for self-learning (5)(Instruction: The institution needs to specify the scope for self learning / learning beyond syllabus and creation of facilities for self learning / learning beyond syllabus.)

The students are assigned with the following tasks for enabling them in self learning They have been exposed themselves for gaining knowledge to deliver seminar. They have been assigned to get literature survey for carrying project work. They have been assigned to practice the usage of required software package

from the user manuals in order to carry project works.

7.4.2 Generation of self-learning facilities, and availability of materials for learning beyond syllabus (5)(Instruction: The institution needs to specify the facilities for self- learning / learning beyond syllabus.)

Page 95: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

The following facilities are provided for self learning The internet laboratory is provided for the students Access for ASME and Science direct licensed e – journals are provided The students are need to self learn PRO-E, ANSYS fundamentals and their

tool boxes according to their requirement in the project It is proposed to procure MATLAB – R 13

7.4.3 Career Guidance, Training, Placement, and Entrepreneurship Cell (5)(Instruction: The institution may specify the facility and management to facilitate career guidance including counselling for higher studies, industry interaction for training/internship/placement, Entrepreneurship cell and incubation facility and impact of such system

The Department of Computer Science and Engineering, UCEK, JNTUK, provides effective and efficient career guidance for the students. we invite experts from different organizations to motivate our students, counsel them, understand their field of interest and guide them.

This enables the students to choose right path for their prosperous career. Proper training is required in order to acquire employability skills. we conduct the following programmes under training process:

Resume Writing Mock Interviews Mock tests on Aptitude and Analytical skills Time management Interpersonal Skills How to brand “U” Group Discussions Programming skills and effective communication skills

We have very good record regarding placements for the students. we have 100% placement record from the past years. our students get placed in top companies like,Wipro,Infosys,Capjemini,Oracle,Techmahendra,Dst,Juno,CATechnologies,Infotech,Accenture and many other companies.

Entrepreneurship results in new organizations or revitalize mature organizations. The Entrepreneurship cell works hard to develop the creativity in the students so that they can probably have a period of self-employment of one or more years. We expose the people to the benefits of entrepreneurship and getting them to participate in entrepreneurial-related activities

Page 96: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

8 . GOVE R N A NCE, I N S T I TUTIONAL SUPP O RT A ND FI N AN C IAL R E S OU R CES (7 5 )

8.1. Campus Infrastructure and Facility (5)8.1.1. Maintenance of academic infrastructure and facilities (2)

(Instruction: Specify distinct feature)Infrastructure facility Maintenance Description

Land Built up Area Exclusive for the Institution

Land : 110 acresBuild-up floor space: sq. m.

Cleanliness is maintained by the outsourced peopleMaintained at the institute level

Class Rooms Well-furnished class rooms are cleaned by out sourced sweepers every day

Seminar HallsSeminar hall (equipped with PA systems and LCD) of the department is maintained by departmental – in charge faculty & Technician at regular intervals

Tutorial Rooms Tutorial rooms are cleaned every day and maintained by faculty in charge.

Laboratories

A faculty in charge and a laboratory technician looks after the maintenance of each laboratory. They put together propose the budget for the required consumables, new equipment, repairs and calibration if required

Equipment

In addition to the centralized department level stock registers (for Non-consumables and Consumables) technicians maintain the logbook for equipment of the laboratory. They prepare the preventive maintenance schedules under the guidance of faculty-in-charge and carry out regular maintenance as per the schedules.

Computers

A programmer/ Technician and a faculty in-charge of each computer laboratory are responsible for maintenance of systems and software. Programmer carryout maintenance of each computer at regular intervals and record in the logbook. Faculty in charge prepares necessary budget and submit to HOD.

Main Library

All the books are accessioned accordingly by the serial number of accession number and classified subject wise and shelved in the rack according to call numbers regularly.

Dept. Libraries

Faculty members of departments can borrow books from Dept. Library, and students in their free time can make use of the books available in the Dept. Library. One Faculty member is made in-charge of the Dept. Library.

Internet /Intranet

Internet related matters are maintained by a team offaculty, systems administrator and programmers in computer science department. They maintain the daily band width, usage, band width allocation, sharing etc.

Electricity Maintenance Engineer, Two technicians and one attender look after the maintenance of electricity.

Water A number of bore-wells available to meetrequirements of garden and toilets. It caters needs of Staff & Students,

Page 97: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Buildings etc.

Table 8.1: Academic Infrastructure & Facilities Maintenance details Ambience, Green cover

S.No Infrastructure details Built up Areain Sq. mt

Carpet Areain Sq. mt

No of Rooms

1 Administrative AreaPrincipal’s Office 700.73 588.75 11

Centralized computing center 283.02 261.49 02Vice-Principal’s Office 163.9 147.34 02

Exam Section 740.55 505.65 09MIST LabCivil Dept 4169.00 3828.11EEE Dept 3648.83 2996.74

Mech Dept 3692.53 2958.21ECE Dept 2217.93 2656.41CSE Dept 3553.7 2755.78

PE&PCE Dept 2475.00 1065.432 Hostel Facilities

Boys Hostels Nalanda Hostel 4892.95 2800 52

Narendra Hostel 3182.60 1953.24 36Nagarjuna Hostel 3364 2462.10 84

Girls Hostel – Nagavali Hostel 5775.77 5136.74 1443 General Amenities

Staff Quarters 650.00 595.10 15Library – college 1575.00 1350.00 06Library – central 3814.99 2216.12 36

Guest House 1700.54 1673.94 24Post Office 81.00 72.00 06

Bank 210.00 185.00 05Water treatment plant 30.00 25.00 01

Dispensary 275.38 235.92 064 Students Amenities centre

Canteen 125.00 115 02Stores 30.00 25.00 02

5 Sports Complex

The college is spread over 110.0 acres of land surrounded by greenery of the fertile lands. The college evinces interest in ambience management, Landscaping, environmental preservation including water harvesting without losing the professional touch.

Maintenance: One supervisor and 12 gardeners maintain the Green cover.

Built-up space:

• College Buildings are constructed in the form of different blocks covering an instructional area of 21841.36 sq.m and administrative area of 1888.20sq.m.

• All the Engineering Departments are located in separate & wide blocks.

Page 98: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

• The campus is surrounded by a compound wall separating the college • From the surrounding environment. All the buildings are well connected by wide

internal roads so that the central facilities are accessible to all the members of faculty and students.

Maintenance: DE, AE and supervisors, site engineers and work inspectors take care the Engineering section and perform repairs and maintenance job.

Following are some of the highlights of the ambience management and landscaping

• Multi-color plantation highlighting the verdure with nominal inscription• Adorning the statue of the benefactor of the college with a bio-necklace.• The towering emeralds on the main road Clasping green at the faculty parking lot

Green carpet on the quadrangle.• Sponsored sports complex having alumni sponsored multi-functional gymnasium,

play courts, sports facilities, running track spanning over 15+ acres• Rows of ‘natural oxygen’ pots all over the college• In order to create eco-friendly atmosphere, lawns are developed and maintained

around different blocks• Underground pipelines interconnect the sprinklers for watering plants, Lawns etc.

Ambience of the work places

• Each and every Department has sufficient number of classrooms and laboratories that are fully ventilated and provided with necessary concealed electrical wiring and electrical items like fans, lights, computer systems with internet connectivity etc.

• Faculty members are provided with separate staff rooms with all the necessary facilities (Like internet facility, intercom)

• Proper maintenance of Classroom infrastructure

Environmental Preservation

Following items present the efforts related to environmental preservation

• With a missionary zeal related to social forestry, around 200 well-grown trees are spread over the entire area of the campus.

• For continuing next-gen greenery, the college is nursing about 1000 plants• Thus, the college administration is keen on the environmental protection and

preservation, and to take up measures to reduce soil erosion and land degradation.

Cleanliness

• Cleanliness is maintained on the campus by disposing all the waste material on a daily basis with the help of sufficient man-power. Wastewater is drained out by the well- maintained side canals.

• All the Biodegradable waste such as dry leaves twigs and paper are collected on a daily basis, and made into good compost which again is added to the soil to maintain soil fertility.

• Each block is provided with toilets in each of the floors for boys, girls and faculty separately. All the toilets are cleaned everyday

• Besides the regular cleaning process, the environmental protection in the college is maintained by some activities like plantation in which the students (Student activity

Page 99: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Canteen YesNumber of Canteen (s) 02

Area 125 sq. mDaily Usage More than 200+

center (SAC)) and also participate as a part of NSS Programs.

Maintenance: One Sergeant with the help of 100 maintenance workers (attenders, weepers, scavengers etc.) performs the maintenance job.

Water Harvesting

• In order to facilitate the water harvesting, the college has taken a few measures like absorption pit method and percolation pit method.

• There is enough open space and mud paths to harvest the rain waters• There is enough extent of plantation to reduce evaporative loss and soil erosion.

8.1.2. Hostel (boys and girls), transportation facility, and canteen (1)

• College is having four boys’ hostels and three girl hostels’ (viz., Nalanda, Narendra, Nagarjuna, Nagavali hostels etc.,) having 172 rooms for boys and 144 rooms for girls.

• A total of 1350 students are staying in hostels (700 boys and 648 girls students)

Table 8.2: Hostel Details

Hostels No of Rooms No of students Accommodated

Hostel for Boys 220 700

Hostel for Girls 208 648

Transport

UCEK (A) is located in the heart of the city and easily accessible. Maximum percentage of students will stay in hostels and day scholars others will utilize the public transportation system.

Canteen facility is available for students, faculty and staff on subsidized rates in the campus.

Table 8.3: Canteen Details

8.1.3. Electricity, power backup, telecom facility, drinking water, and security (2)(Instruction: Specify the details of installed capacity, quality, availability, etc.)

A. El e ctricity a nd P ow e r b a c k -up:

One of the regular teaching faculties of the EEE department will act as the Project Engineer and supported by one AE and supervisors/electricians staff. The college has wide spread arrangements for power connections with a substation (maintained by APEPDCL), control panel and decentralized power panels. Panels and Distributions boxes are available at

Page 100: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Individual Departments. Generator backup is available, as shown in the table. The campus is partly (>70%) having underground cabling system.

S.No Department Generator capacity1 Principal Office 63 KVA2 Guest House 63 KVA3 Civil/HSS Dept. 63 KVA4 CSE/ECE 63 KVA5 EEE/Library/ME 140 KVA6 Ladies Hostel 40KVA7 Alumni Auditorium/placement office 63 KVA8 Sports Complex 140KVA

9 HostelsTenders are floated for procuring 120KVA generator for hostels

10 PC/PCETenders are floated for procuring 120KVA generator

B. Tele c om fa c ility:

• The college has created facilities for smooth and fast communication involving different kinds of phone connections in tune with the requirements

• Landline telephones are available in the Chambers of the Principal, Vice-Principal, and Steno to the principal, office of the Principal, Training and Placement Cell and in Autonomous (confidential) section.

• Intercom facility is extended to the functionaries in the Office of the principal, chambers of Heads of Departments, Department Offices, select laboratories, Main entrance and other importance units of the college.

The college has the following kinds of telephone connections

Landline connections with STD facility (BSNL) 59FAX 1Mobile Phones 25Intercom Phone connections 51

C. Dri n ki n g w a ter

The college has two (2000lph and 3000lph) capacity water purifying units with Reverse Osmosis process. It supplies purified water to college, hostels and other places (as shown in the table).

S.No Supply Bodies No of (20lit) cans1 Hostels 902 Staff Quarters 603 College 204 Departments 405 General 40

Page 101: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Equipment available with the plantTable 8.5: Water Plant Equipment details

S.No Name of the Equipment Cost of the item1. Reverse Osmosis Water Plant (2000lph) 8.00 Lakhs

2Reverse Osmosis Water Plant (3000lph) (for hostels) 9.00 Lakhs

D. S e curi t y Measures of t h e c o llege:

Infrastructural:

• All the buildings are constructed taking proper care with the required iron gates and windows.

• All the buildings have two or more entrances/ exits which are managed based on the need.

• All the classrooms, laboratories, offices, libraries and all the places of work are properly locked without prejudice to the balance of secrecy and transparency.

Human Resource oriented:

• The college has a three-tier security system supported by specialized security personnel (served through an authorized man power agency) with 27 security persons.

• In-house mechanism- there are 3 watchmen for principal office and 10 Watchmen (one for each department during night shifts) who work on three shifts

• The college hired the services of a reputable security agency in Kakinada through which 27 Security personnel work in the college.

• The annual financial commitment on the college is about Rs.21 lakhs (app) for both the items put together.

8.2. Organization, G ov er n a nc e , a n d T r an s pa re n c y ( 10 )

8.2.1. Governing body, administrative setup, and functions of various bodies (2) (Instruction: List the governing, senate, and all other academic and administrative bodies; their memberships, functions, and responsibilities; frequency of the meetings; and attendance therein, in a tabular form. A few sample minutes of the meetings and action taken reports should be annexed.)

Organization and GovernanceTo enhance the good governance the college has a well-marked administrative setup conforming to the norms of the AICTE and the UGC.

Page 102: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Figure 8.1: Internal Organization StructureThe following statutory committees are functioning in the college to look after the administrative and academic procedures as per the norms stipulated by the University Grants Commission.

StatutoryC

ommittees

Number ofMembers

Functions & Responsibilities

Frequency of Meetings

Attendance2012

Meetings

GoverningCouncil

(Annexure)12

Academic

Administrative & approvals related to faculty, staff &

students.

Four times in a year 80%

AcademicCouncil 22

Scrutinizing and Approval

Proposals with or without modifications of BOS with regard to

Academic Regulations,

Curricula, Syllabi etc.,

Once in ayear 95%

Board ofStudies

HOD, All Faculty of the department &Five outside experts from

Preparation of Academic

Regulations, Curricula, Syllabi etc.,

Once in a year 95%

Page 103: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

to CFIs (IITs/NITs) Industry.

Governing Council:

The Governing Council (BoG) of UCEK is constituted by the JNTUK, Kakinada, as per the UGC’s norms. University is the deciding authority and Principal is the Member Secretary with twelve members, including UGC nominee, University nominee, State govt. nominee, eminent people from different industries and members invited by the Principal from senior faculties of the College. The Council usually meets four times a year to discuss various policy matters. The main objective is to ensure that the students and the staff have trust and confidence in the good governance of the College. It is also to see that all those involved in the governance fulfill their responsibilities and accountabilities effectively. Prof. M. R. Madhav, (Retd., IIT Kanpur) and currently Professor Emeritus, JNTU Hyderabad; Visiting Professor, IIT, Hyderabad is presently the Chairman of the Governing Council. All the minutes of the governing council meetings are uploaded in UCEK website (http://jntucek.ac.in/teqip.php).

College Academic Committee:

The College Academic Committee (CAC) is the apex body of academics and essentially responsible for the framing, regulating, organizing and sustaining the standards of teaching, research, and examination of the College. CAC consists of University nominees, eminent people from industries, Heads of the Departments, Senior Professors of respective departments, nominated teachers and so on. Principal is the Chairman of the CAC. The Committee reviews all academic matters and the related administrative issues, too.

The Principal/Head of the Institution:

UCEK is headed by the Principal and mainly concentrates on academic (with the help of vice-principal) and administrative activities. He is the strategic figure, accountable to the Governing Council. He is held answerable to the University in matters of administration. He is the reviewing authority of the functioning of the various academic departments, teaching and non-teaching. Above all, the Principal is the custodian of the College’s discipline among the students, monitor of the research, convener of various programmes held in the College and so on. Besides, the Principal implements TEQIP Programme, by directing its components viz., Finance, the Academic, the Procurement and Mentoring Committees. In particular his duties and responsibilities lie in:a. Planning policy matters concerning administration as well as academicsb. Managing the College as per the norms of the University in particular and the UGC in

generalc. Overseeing the fair conducting of examinations, semester wise, and timely declaration

of the results on completion of evaluation with promotion of successful studentsd. Ensuring the management of financial resources and maintenance of proper accounting

as per the University norms.e. Co-coordinating the industry-institute interaction along with Research and

Development activitiesf. Maintain the quality management systemg. Participating in the regional and national level policy planning meetings.h. Every Funded project has a coordinator who is totally responsible along with his or her

team for the project. Principal wields the financial power.

Page 104: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

i. On the whole, the members of faculty and non-teaching staff of the college believe in the dignity of labor, and all the functions of the college are meticulously planned, properly coordinated and perfectly executed.

j. All the monetary transactions (both the receipts and payments) are processed through a Nationalized bank

Vice-Principal: The Vice-Principal plays multiple and responsible roles. His chief responsibility is to officiate as the Principal in the latter’s absence. Among several responsibilities, the following are the most significant:

Academic Responsibilities:

Assist the Principal in finalization of prospectus, syllabi, academic calendar, registration, examination and classroom arrangement for proper teaching.

Responsible for conducting the mid semester, end semester or any other component of examinations and assisted by two Officers In-charge of Exams (OIEs) for this purpose.

Responsible for maintenance of up-to-date academic records of students. Assist the Principal in the organization of academic committee meetings and all matters

related with it. Assist and provide any necessary liaison with other academic organizations. Assist the Principal for issue of certificates and other student related activities. Help the Principal in the formulation of new courses, in finalizing the Registration of

Students, in conducting the Academic Council Meeting etc. Preside over the curricular and co-curricular activities cell or wings.

Administrative Responsibilities:

Assist the Principal in preparing the institutional planning, in deciding the academic calendars, in fixing the work schedules, in deciding upon the examination and evaluation of each course and so on.

Associates with the Principal in recruiting and training of the various faculties. Collaborates with the Principal in supervising the financial matters such as scholarships

for the students of reserved categories, grants-in-aid for developmental activities from government and non-government agencies, maintaining proper accounts and records and so on.

Assist the Principal in attending to the grievances of both the staff and the students. Plays the role of the liaison officer between the parents and the institution, between the

Principal and the staff and between the teaching staff and students.

Heads of the Department:

The Head of Department is usually the senior Professor the department. Provides leadership in both under graduate (B. Tech) and post graduate (M. Tech) courses in the relevant field of specialization. Heads of the Department are responsible for the academic and administrative

management of the department. They take active part in research guidance and teaching-learning processes; they guide

the assistant and associate professors and approve their teaching plans. Participates in not only the curriculum designing, but also developing new programmes

and projects They play vital roles in policy planning, monitoring the evaluation and promotional

activities at both the individual departmental and institutional levels.

Page 105: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Besides catering to the needs of students by means of counseling and interaction at the department, they also hold interactions with industry and society.

They provide consultancy services not only to the students but also to the industrial clientele.

The faculty and students are involved in several activities in addition to academic assignments. The sense of involvement makes them develop a sense of belonging for the institution.

In addition to the committees or bodies presented above, the college has the following Non-statutory committee

1. Examinations committee2. Grievance appeal committee3. Student affairs and welfare committee4. Academic audit committee5. College Development Planning and Evaluation committee6. Co-curricular & Extra-curricular activities committee7. Games and sports committee8. Counseling Coordination Committee(Anti Raging Committee)9. Academic Results Monitoring committee (College Academic Committee)10. Purchase committees

The said committees have been functioning in the college in order to facilitate the successful functioning of autonomy. Each of the committees has been conducting its meetings the minutes of which have been ratified in the governing body meetings from time to time.

The Disciplinary committees have been constituted on a dynamic basis both for academic and for general discipline. Principal constitutes the committees whenever the situation demands.

In addition to the above, A n ti Raggi n g C o mmitt e es are formed with staff of the college with specific schedules and locations (department premises, hostel premises, canteen and library premises and overall college premises) in the college especially during the initial months of academic session for the I year students of B.Tech and other programmes.

Implementation of TEQIP: UCEK (A) has participated in TEQIP-I, stood I position in A.P and 11th position in India, and currently participating in TEQIP-II. In the light of the award of TEQIP-II grant to the college, the college has formed the Institutional TEQIP unit (Coordinator, Nodal Officers and administrative staff) as per the recommendations enshrined in the Project Implementation Plan issued by the National Project Implementation Unit (NPIU)/SPFU of the Government of India.

8.2.2. Defined rules, procedures, recruitment, and promotional policies, etc. (2) (Instruction: List the published rules, policies, and procedures; year of publications; and state the extent of awareness among the employees/students. Also comment on its availability on Internet, etc.)

As the college is the government college follows norms recommended by the UGC/AICTE and state govt. norms (e.g., G.O.Ms.No.14), and also faculty recruitments and CAS promotions are taken care by the University with the necessary permissions from the

Page 106: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Governor/MDC/EC under the supervision of governor’s and UGC nominee. Recruitment of faculty and staff for regular appointment is done by the JNTUK

staff selection committee headed by the Vice chancellor All the newly recruited staff is made aware of these rules through orientation

programmes. These are also made available on the college website.

8.2.3. Decentralization in working including delegation of financial power and grievance redressal system (3)

(Instruction: List the names of the faculty members who areAdministrators/decision m a k e r s for various responsibilities. Specify the mechanism and composition of grievance redressal system, including faculty association, staff-union, if any.)

As the college is the constituent college of JNTUK, follows the University norms. The principal is given the power to spend Rs.1,00,000/- (for procuring non-

consumables) and Rs. 25,000/- for procuring consumables/maintenance Heads of departments are permitted to spend Rs. 5,000/-. The account is periodically

reviewed by the principal. Based on the grievance, Grievance redressal committees are constituted to address

the grievances. Principal constitutes separate committees based on the requirements. Based on the

recommendations of the individual committees Principal takes action.

Administrators/ Decision makers:

Head of the Institution : PrincipalHeads of Academic sections : Vice Principal

The following members of faculty have been assigned with administrative responsibilities.The following members of faculty have been assigned with administrative responsibilities

Table 8.6: List of faulty with academic responsibilities

S.No Name of the member of faculty Designation Additional / Administrative

responsibility(ies)*

Civil Engineering Dept.,

1 V. Srinivasulu Professor of CE Head, Civil Engineering

2 Dr. P. UadyaBhaskar Professor of CE Director, Academic & Planning

3 Dr. G. V. R. PrasadaRaju Professor of CE Registrar of the University

4 Dr. V. Ravindra Professor of CE Director, Infrastructure Development & Chief Engineer

5 Dr. K. Purnanandam Professor of CE Program Director, Information and Library Sciences

6 Dr. P. SubbaRao Professor of CE Vice-Principal & Program Director, BICS

7 Dr. K. Ramu Professor of CE Additional Controller of Examinations

Page 107: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

8 Dr. D. KoteswaraRao Professor of CE Program Director, Games, Sports & Administration

9 Dr. B. Krishna Rao Assoc., Professor Additional Controller of Examinations

10 Dr. K. Padma Kumari Professor in Geology

Head, Spatial Information Technology

EEE Dept.,

11 Sri. V.V.N. Murthy Assoc., Professor Head, EEE Dept.

12 Dr. M. RamalingaRaju Professor in EEE Dept.,

Director, Foreign University Relations

13 Dr. CH. Saibabu Professor in EEE Dept., Director of Evaluatoins

14 Dr. S. Sivanagaraju Professor in EEE Dept., Nodal Officer, TEQIP – II

15 Dr. K. Ravindra Asst., Professor Project Engineer, Electrical

16 Sri. T. Murali Mohan Asst., Professor Deputy Warden

17 Sri. K. Srikumar Asst., Professor NSS, JNTUK, Kakinada

18 Dr. K. Venkata Reddy Asst., Professor Additional Controller of Examinations

19 Sri. M. NageswaraRao Asst., Professor Office of Academic Section, UCEK

20 Sri. M. RavindraBabu Asst., Professor NSS Program Office, UCEK

ME Dept.,

21 Dr. B. Balakishna Professor of ME Head, ME Dept.,

22 Dr. V. RamachandraRaju Professor of MEDirector, Center of Excellence e-Resource Development and Deployment

23 Dr. G. Rangajanardhana Professor of ME Director, Institute of Science and Technology

24 Dr. V. V. SubbaRao Professor of ME Head, PE & PCE Dept.,

25 Dr. A. Gopala Krishna Professor of ME Head, Aviation Engg., & Program Director, Nano Technology

26 Sri. M. Kumara swamy Assoc., ProfessorAdditional Controller of Examinations & Nodal Officer, TEQIP – II

27 Dr. A. SwarnaKumari Professor of ME Coordinator, Equal Opportunity Cell

28 Dr. K. MeeraSaheb Assoc., Professor Coordinator, Academic & Planning

29 Dr. D. LingaRaju Asst., Professor Training and Placement Officer

30 Sri. V. Jaya Prasad Asst., Professor Deputy Warden

Page 108: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

31 Sri. K. Prasad Asst., Professor Deputy Warden

ECE Dept.,

32 Dr. A. M. Prasad Professor of ECE Head, ECE Dept., & Nodal Office, TEQIP - II

33 Dr. K. Babulu Professor of ECE Controller of Examinations & Nodal Officer, TEQIP - II

34 Dr. B. PrabhakaraRao Professor of ECE Rector & Vice-Chancellor I/c

35 Dr. S. Srinivas Kumar Professor of ECEDirector, Research & Development &Coordinator, Inter University Center for Teacher Education

36 Dr. I. SantiPrabha Professor of ECE Director, Empowerment of Women & Grievances

37 Dr. K. Padma Raju Professor of ECE Principal, UCEK

38 Smt. U. V. RatnaKumari Asst., Professor Office of Academic Section

39 Smt. P. PushpaLatha Asst., Professor Deputy Warden

40 Smt. A. Rajani Asst., Professor Deputy Warden

Depet., of CSE

41 Dr. L. Sumalatha Professor of CSE Head, CSE Dept.,

42 Dr. J.V.R. Murthy Professor of CSE Director, Industry Institute Interaction Placements &Training

43 Dr. K. V. Ramana Professor of CSE Program Director, Entrepreneur Development Cell

44 Sri. A. Krishna Mohan Assoc., Professor Coordinator, RGYK Project and Cultural

45 Dr. MHM. Krishna Prasad Assoc., Professor Coordinator, TEQIP – II

46 Dr. K. Sahadevaiah Assoc., Professor Coordinator, MSIT Program

47 Dr. D. Haritha Assoc., Professor Additional Controller of Examinations

48 Smt. E. Suneetha Asst., Professor Deputy Warden

49 Sri. S. Chandra Sekhar Asst., Professor Deputy Warden

Mathematics Dept.,

50 Dr. GVSR. Deekshitulu Professor of Mathematics

Head, Dept. of Mathematics and Officer I/c of Hostels

51 Dr. V. Ravindranath Professor of Mathematics Director, Admissions

Page 109: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Grievance Redressal Committee

The Grievance redressal committee is intended to undertake the processes of attending to the grievances put forward by the students and staff. It focuses on setting proper facilitation procedures for settling the issues in a cordial atmosphere. The committee is expected to initiate proper or appropriate enquiry or investigative mechanism within 24hours from the receipt of the complaint in written form duly signed by complainant(s). The committee is expected to meticulously adhere to the standard arbitration procedures of the college and those of AP education act 1982, A prohibition of ragging act 1997, AP service rules corrected up to 01-04-2008, Industrial disputes act 1947(Section-9C Chapter IIB), the administrative tribunal act1985, negotiable instruments act 1881, Societies registration act 1860and all other such enactments of the Government of Andhra Pradesh and Government of India from time to time.

Scope of the operations:

The committee shall take into consideration all the redressal criteria and rules and regulations of the college, University and government of Andhra Pradesh both in admitting the complaint and in conducting the enquiry. The committee is expected to commence its operations by constituting a special committee in case of need.The observations, findings, suggestions and recommendations are merely recommendatory in nature and do not carry any legal binding for the college to follow or implement. The committee is expected to submit the minutes of its meetings along with observations, suggestions, if any, and resolutions to the respective statutory committees for further processing the same at the deliberations. The chairman and the members of the committee shall undertake all the operations in coordination with the Heads of the departments and administrative office.

Composition of the committee: A senior member of the faculty is appointed as Chairman/Chairperson by the Principal Members are the faculty are nominated by the Principal The chairman is expected to undertake all prime duties of the committee, namely

convening the meetings, recording minutes, recording special observations and suggestions, if any, processing the data and obtaining ratification of the minutes, resolutions, observations, taking necessary steps for tabling the said documents for ratification by the statutory bodies etc.

Basic functions of the committee:

The following items fall under the purview of the committee. The committee is expected to extend its co-operation to the members of faculty and staff appointed or drafted for specific tasks from time to time like other members of faculty including heads of departments or non- teaching staff appointed or drafted by the Principal for taking up a special enquiry related to any complaint, controller of examinations and other personnel drafted by the principal in case of an examination oriented grievance etc. The activities are classified in two categories planning, monitoring & execution.

Planning Activity:

Preparing the grievance redressal procedures from time to time and notifying the

Page 110: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

tenets to the staff and students. Studying and compiling the relevant enactments of the Government of AP and

Government of India.Monitoring and Execution

Receiving appeals from the students and staff. Identifying the gravity of the appeal. Ascertaining the legal implications of the appeal. Ascertaining whether it falls under the purview of a non-statutory committee or not. Classification of appeals into academic, administrative and discipline-oriented. Constitution of a separate committee in case of need. Ascertaining the provisions of the committee. The committee may meet within 24 hours from the time of commencement of its operation and decide over the course of enquiry. Ascertaining the individuals to be involved in the enquiry. Categorizing the individuals enquired - Prime accused, second accused, connivers, Witnesses etc. based on the item if it is related to an act of indiscipline. Recording the depositions with time and date. Submission of the report after deliberations among the members of the committee Based on the report, the action taken can be finalized. The disciplinary action is finalized since the item falls under the jurisdiction of the Principal except in such circumstances which warrant the intervention of the statutory bodies namely Governing Body, Finance committee, Academic council, boards of studies and ultimately the University administration. In case of an academic appeal, constituting a house-committee and subsequently the committee with experts from other institutions, and finally referring the reports of the committee to the academic council If it is an administrative appeal, an in-house committee has to be constituted the report of which shall be sent to the university administration for further action.

Meeting Schedule and Process of convening a meeting:

The chairman is expected to issue a circular with the schedule and agenda one week in advance. However the chairman reserves the right to conduct any emergency session under certain circumstances that can be deemed to be an emergency situation. If it is not possible for the chairman to convene a meeting because of any academic or administrative reasons, one of the senior members of the committee can take up the responsibility of convening the meeting with the prior approval of the Principal. Tentative schedule of the meetings during an academic year has to be drawn by the chairman.

Quorum and other standard tenets:

An Attendance of 2/3rd of the committee is considered as the quorum for any of the meetings. The committee may prepare a draft plan for items presented supra for further processing by the relevant bodies. If any member comes up with an innovative proposal, he/she may be advised to prepare a full-stretch document of the project put forward with projected financial commitment with relevant documents failing which such open suggestions can deferred to the next meeting by requesting the members to be more focused in their approach. The deliberations are strictly confidential and shall be confined to in-house circulation, and if any member is found leaking the information to external agencies, the

Page 111: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

matter shall be reported for correctional administration.8.2.4. Transparency and availability of correct/ unambiguous information (3) (Instruction: Availability and dissemination of information through the Internet. Information provisioning in accordance with Right to Information Act, 2005).

Transparency:In order to ensure transparency, the college takes the following measures.

Academic and Administrative Transparency:

All internal Professors of the department concern together with external members from reputed academic institutes and industries are the members of the Board of studies being headed by HOD.

All the issues are discussed in the meetings of the Heads of Departments, which are held periodically the minutes of which are circulated to all the departments.

The decisions taken and the issues discussed in meetings of the Heads of Departments are informed to the faculty in the department level meetings

Every important information is published in the college website (www.jntucek.ac.in) All the decisions taken by the Statutory bodies pertaining to particular items are

informed to all the staff/faculty All the important pieces of information are sent to the faculty, staff and students There are Notice Boards in all the Blocks through which information is made

available to the staff and students and circulars related to students are sent to the class rooms/laboratories.

Academic calendars, examinations schedules, results and all the important items are placed on the College website

The Mandatory Disclosure is presented on the website including the academic regulations and syllabus.

All the information about the college is made crystal clear through the college web-site.

Every parent can get information about his/her ward’s attendance and performance through internet.

The college has arranged web mail facility to the entire faculty with individual Ids for faster and more accurate information.

8.3. Bu d get Al l oc ati on, U ti l i z a t ion, a nd P u bl i c A cc o u nt i ng ( 10 ) (Instruction: The preceding list of items is not exhaustive. One may add other relevant items if applicable.)Summary of current financial year’s budget and the actual expenditures incurred (exclusively for the institution) for three previous financial years.

Page 112: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

8.3.1. Adequacy of budget allocation (4)(Instruction: Here the institution needs to justify that the budget allocated over the years was adequate.)

University timely provides the financial support for meeting the requirements of students and faculty, e.g., recently University has issued Laptops for Professors and Associate Professors to enhance the research activity and usage of e-content.The yearly budget is prepared according to the needs and requirements of the departments taking into consideration of annual intake of students, laboratory & infrastructure developments and also including students, faculty & staff requirements and promotions and latest technologies etc.In general, proposal along with estimates will be prepared by each department and reviewed in HODs meeting along with the Principal and submitted to the concern authority, e.g., Registrar/University.After deliberations formal proposal made altered in departments and forwarded to Principal for preparing updated/consolidated proposal at college level and submitted to the University.8.3.2. Utilization of allocated funds (5)(Instruction: Here the institution needs to state how the budget was utilized during the last three years.)

Table 8.8: Fund Utilization report

Utilization of allocated funds2014-15 2013-

14 2012-13 2011-12

103.08% 88.19% 94.75% 101.20%

8.3.3. Availability of the audited statements on institute’s Website (1)(Instruction: Here the institution needs to state whether the audited statements are available on its Website.)

8.3 Budget Allocation, Utilization and Public Accounting (10)Items 2015-16 2015-16 2014-15 2014-15 2013-14 2013-14

  Budget Utilization Budget Utilization Budget UtilizationInfrastructural Built up 18000000 18066600 40000000 42939589 250000000 255300000Library 3000000 2989324 2100000 2101737 5500000 5432550Laboratory Equipment 13250000 13261763 12500000 12927701 10000000 10278476Laboratory Equipment (with TEQIP-II) 7500000 7522673 6000000 6089659 25000000 26730612

Laboratory Consumables 90000 85384 150000 166195 500000 488219Teaching & Non-Teaching Salaries 184900000 184910692 172000000 171939037 145000000 144930092

TEQIP-II Salaries 859200 859200 859200 849772 675000 675687R&D (with TEQIP-II) 650000 638484 175000 174706 100000 67127Training and Travel 250000 245151 250000 246124 350000 332094Training and Travel (with TEQIP-II) 3500000 3149254 4000000 3921918 3500000 3388188

Total 231999200 231728525 238034200 241356438 440625000 447623045

Page 113: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

2011–12 NO Yes URL:http://jntucek.ac.in/office.php

2012–13 NO Yes URL:http://jntucek.ac.in/office.php

2013–14 NO Yes Auditing is over, need to get the statements.

Page 114: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Table 8.9: Details of Audited Statements

8.4 Pr o g r am S pe ci f i c B u d get Al l oc ati on, U ti l i zat ion ( 1 0)

Summary of budget for the CFY and the actual expenditures incurred in theCFYm1and

CFYm2 (exclusively for this program in the department):

Machine Design

Items

Bud

gete

d in

CFY

20

15-1

6

Act

ual E

xpen

ses i

n C

FY

2015

-16

Bud

gete

d in

CFY

ml

2014

-15

Act

ual E

xpen

ses i

n C

FYm

l 20

14-1

5

Bud

gete

d in

CFY

m2

2013

-14

Act

ual E

xpen

ses i

n C

FYm

2 20

13-1

4

Bud

gete

d in

CFY

m3

20

12-

13

Act

ual E

xpen

ses i

n C

FYm

3 20

12-1

3

Lab Equipment

1000000 932640 325000 336160 22500

0 229557 1250000

1289997

Lab Equipment (with TEQIP-II)

1900000 1918598 1300000 131729

5        

Software (with TEQIP-II)

               

Lab consumable 100000 90915 50000 36498 75000 89585 70000 72782

Maintenance and spares                

Training & Travel (with TEQIP-II)

100000 101173 550000 558665 312500 318136 60000 6431

Misc.expenses for academic activities

        25000 25000 11000 10925

Total 3100000 3043326 2225000 224861

863750

0 662278 1337000

1380135

Table 8.10: Program Budget Details

8.4.1. Adequacy of budget allocation (3)

(Instruction: Here the institution needs to justify that the budget allocated over the years was adequate.)

The budget is progressively increased to meet the new facilities for equipment, replacement of outdated equipment and new labs due to revision in syllabi.

8.4.2 Budget allocation for Research facilities (4)(Instruction: Articulate the provisions in the budget to carry out the research by post

Page 115: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

graduate students)

Items

Bud

gete

d in

C

FY

20

15-1

6

Bud

gete

d in

CFY

ml

201

4-15

Bud

gete

d in

C

FYm

2

201

3-14

Bud

gete

d in

C

FYm

3

2012

-13

Lab Equipment

1000000 325000 22500

0125000

0Lab Equipment (with TEQIP-II)

1900000 1300000    

Training & Travel (with TEQIP-II)

100000 550000 312500 60000

Total300000

0 217500053750

0131000

0

8.4.3. Utilization of allocated funds (3)(Instruction: Here the institution needs to state how the budget was utilized during the last three years.)

Year Budgeted Expenses Utilization of funds

Budgeted in CFY (2015- 2016) 3000000  2952411 98.41%

Budgeted in CFY1 (2014- 2015) 2175000  2212120 101.70%

Budgeted in CFY2 (2013- 2014) 537500  547693 101.89%

Budgeted in CFY3 (2012- 13) 1310000  1296428 98.96%

Table8.11: Fund Utilizations report

8.5. Library (25)

8.5.1. Library space and ambience, timings and usage, availability of a qualified librarian and other staff, library automation, online access, networking, etc. (5)

(Instruction: Provide information on the following items) Carpet area of library (in m2) Reading space (in m2) Number of seats in reading space Number of users (issue book) per day Number of users (reading space) per day

Page 116: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Timings: During working day, weekend, and vacation Number of library staffNumber of library staff with degree in Library Management Computerization for search, indexing, issue/return records Barcoding used. Library services on Internet/Intranet INDEST or other similar membership Archives

Table 8.12: Details of LibraryCarpet area of library (in sq. meters) 120Reading space (in sq. meters) 95Number of seats in reading space 100Number of users (issue book) per day 250Number of users (reading space) per day 100Timings: During working day 8.00 AM 8.00 PMWeekend 9.00 AM 4.00 PMVacation 9.00 AM 4.00 PMNumber of library staff 9

Number of library staff with degree in Library 3

Management Computerization for search, indexing, issue/return records Bar coding used YES

Ambience: The library has good ventilation with both sides’ windows and to provide sufficient ventilation on the top required number of lights and fans are fitted. We are maintaining SC, ST Book Bank Scheme separately and separate technical Section is available for classification and cataloguing. We have Separate Digital Library fore-resources. The books are arranged according to subject classification and arranged in the library in systematic manner. We have a separate Newspaper section. We are conduction user orientation programme for fresh students every year. Separate reference sections for textbooks are also available in the library.

Library services on Internet/Intranet INDEST or other similar membership Archives: YES;

8.5.2. Titles and volumes per title (4)Number of titles14658 , Number of volumes 50455

Table 8.13: Details of Titles and Volumes in LibraryA.Y Number of New

Titles AddedNumber of New Editions Added

Number of New Volumes Added

2010-11 195 195 5002011-12 110 110 2262012-13 895 895 25802013-14 203 203 4732014-15 90 65 155

8.5.3. Scholarly journal subscription specific to the programme (8)

Page 117: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Table 8.14: Scholarly journal subscription detail

DetailsCAY CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm32014-15 2013-14 2012-13 2011-12

ScienceAs soft copy 103 103 103 NILAs hard copy NIL NIL NIL NIL

Engg and TechAs soft copy 891 891 891 891As hard copy NIL NIL NIL NIL

8.5.4. Digital Library (3)Availability of digital library contents:If available, then mention number of courses, number of books, etc. Availability of an exclusive server:Availability over Intranet/Internet: Availability of exclusive space/room: Number of users per day:

Table 8.15: Digital Library DetailsDigital Library (3)Availability of digital library contents: YESIf available, then mention number of courses, 5100Number of e-books, etc. 1181Availability of an exclusive server: YESAvailability over Intranet/Internet: YESAvailability of exclusive space/room: YESNumber of users per day: 250

8.5.5. Library expenditure on books, magazines/journals, and miscellaneous contents (5)

CIVIL ENGINEERINGLibrary expenditure on books, magazines/journals, and miscellaneous contents

Year

Expenditure

Comments,if anyBook

Magazines/journals

(for hard copysubscription)

Magazines/journals(for soft copy

subscription)Rs

Misc.Contents.

Rs

2008 – 09 14000 NIL NIL

2kva UPS 15,000New Gen Lib(Software)2,00,000

NIL

2009 – 10 45350 NIL NIL NIL NIL

2010 - 11 20000 NIL Rs. 1,10,000 (ASCE) NIL NIL

2011 – 12 151500 NIL Rs,1,34,820 (ASCE) NIL NIL

2012 – 13 255000 NIL Rs, 1,56,038 (ASCE) NIL NIL

Page 118: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

2013 – 14 131612 NIL Rs, 1,60,644 (ASCE) NIL NIL

2014-15 3950 NIL 1,99,615(ASCE) NIL NIL

ME ENGINEERINGLibrary expenditure on books, magazines/journals, and miscellaneous contents

YearExpenditure

Comments,if anyBook

Magazines/journals(for hard copysubscription)

Magazines/journals(for soft copysubscription)

Misc.Contents

2008 – 09 14500 NIL NIL NIL NIL

2009 – 10 42814 NIL NIL NIL NIL

2010 – 11 26500 NIL 1,05,050 (ASME) NIL NIL

2011 – 12 149500 NIL 1,15,346 (ASME) NIL NIL

2012 – 13 275000 NIL 1,33,517 (ASME) NIL NIL

2013 – 14 159620 NIL 1,60,644 (ASME) NIL NIL

2014-15 3450 NIL 1,66,140 (ASME) NIL NIL

EEE ENGINEERINGLibrary expenditure on books, magazines/journals, and miscellaneous contents

YearExpenditure

Comments,if anyBook

Magazines/journals(for hard copysubscription)

Magazines/journals(for soft copysubscription)Rs,

Misc.Contents

2008 – 09 13500 NIL NIL NIL NIL

2009 – 10 42600 NIL NIL NIL NIL

2010 – 11 27350 NIL NIL NIL NIL

2011 – 12 165000 NIL1,05,342 (Engineering. Library)

NIL NIL

2012 – 13 285000 NIL 2,66,430 (IEEE) NIL NIL

2013 – 14 130210 NIL 3,12,768 (IEEE) NIL NIL

2014-15 1325 NIL 6,42,525 (IEEE) NIL NIL

Page 119: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

ECE ENGINEERINGLibrary expenditure on books, magazines/journals, and miscellaneous contents

Year

Expenditure

Comments,if anyBook

Magazines/journals(for hard copysubscription)

Magazines/journals(for soft copysubscription)

Misc.Contents

2008 – 09 12650 1500 NIL NIL

2009 – 10 40100 1500 NIL

Sony dual layer dom Cameras 232002 Scanners20400

NIL

2010 – 11 23787 1500 NIL

1.5 Ton A\C (Split)27500L.G.PlasmaT.V.42”45000

NIL

2011 – 12 147719 20001,05,342 (Engineering. Library)

NIL NIL

2012 – 13 235000 2000 1,19,059 (Acess Engineering ) NIL NIL

2013 – 14 115260 2000 1,19,059 (Acess Engineering ) NIL NIL

2014-15 825 1,52,750 (Access Engineering) NIL NIL

COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERINGLibrary expenditure on book, magazines/journals, and miscellaneous contents

YearExpenditure Comme

nts,if anyBook

Magazines/journals(for hard copysubscription)

Magazines/journals(for soft copysubscription)

Misc.Contents

2008 – 09 5906 2000 NIL 2 computer44000 NIL

2009 – 10 43206 2200 NIL

Bees Software40000HP Server80000Barcode Printer 24500HP DeskTops59000

NIL

Page 120: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

2010 – 11 21297 2200 NIL NIL NIL

2011 – 12 124841 22001,05, 342

(Engineering. Library)

NIL NIL

2012 – 13 152973 220061,050 (ASTM )1,19,059 (Access

Engg.)NIL NIL

2013 – 14 121358 2500 4,59,459 (Elsevier)72,600 (ASTM) NIL NIL

2014-15 450 NIL49,0945 (Engg. + Computer Science) (Elsevier)

NIL NIL

Table 8.16: Library Budget Details

8.6 Incubation facility (5)(Instruction: Specify the details of incubation facility in terms of capacity, utilization terms and conditions, usage by students)

University is in the process of establishing an Innovative Research Center (IRC) with all centralized research facilities, to support students and inculcate industry oriented and innovative research on 24X7 basis in the college campus.

8.6. Inte rn et (5 )

(Instruction: The institute may report the availability of Internet in the campus and its quality of service.

Table 8.17: Internet Facility Details

Name of the Internet provider BSNL, RailtelAvailable bandwidth 20 mbps (1:1) and 15mbps sharedAccess speed Very GoodAvailability in an exclusive lab for Internet use? Yes

Availability in most computing labs? YesAvailability in departments and other units? YesAvailability in faculty rooms? YesInstitute’s own Email facility to faculty/students

Yes

Security/privacy to e-mail/Internet users:

Yes- The college has an IT policy which provides guidelines for usage of IT infrastructure and addresses security & privacy issues of users.

8.7. Sa f e t y N o rms a n d C h e c ks ( 5 )

8.7.1. Checks for wiring and electrical installations for leakage and earthing (1)

Page 121: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

As the some of the buildings are constructed six decades back, they are having metal conduit wiring. They are replaced by PVC conduit concealed/surface wiring in almost all major places due to ageing and deteriorated conditions. However all the newly constructed buildings PVC conduit concealed wiring is only preferred. The wiring for lighting equipment and power equipment has been segmented and the protective distribution boards are provided. The distribution boxes contain Isolators, MCB’s and ELCB’s for proper protection of short circuits and earth leakage. These are provided in sufficient number in every floor of the multi stair building and laboratories along with proper earthing. The sufficient numbers of earth pits are also provided for various buildings and laboratories to protect equipment’s. Separate earth pits are erected for lighting equipment, power equipment and laboratory equipment in every department.The electrical maintenance section verifies various electrical installations, electric wiring and the status & working conditions of the protective equipment’s. The staff of this section was repaired/replaced failed electrical gadgets as and when required. They will maintain curing, rusting, junk clearance at joints, replacing metallic links and etc at each earth pits. They will assure continuity test for proper earth connection.In laboratories fire extinguishers are provided for emergency clearing of any electrical fire accidents.

8.7.2. Safety of civil structure (1)

The University has a separate directorate (Infrastructure Development), headed by a Professor of CE as the Chief Engineer, and takes all precautions including soil and material testing, load testing, seismic analysis etc., before constructing a building. The following measures get meticulously executed before, during and after construction.

Processes of Construction

University is having full-time engineers to support work on the construction. The plans are developed and taken care directorate. The site is inspected and necessary fortification gets done. The soil testing, environmental precautions will take care by the department. Necessary approvals are obtained by relevant government bodies All the norms laid down by the law-enforcing authorities are adhered to. Stability tests are carried out on in-house facilities.

Safety management of civil structures

The college accords prime importance to safety of the constructions. The flooring is monitored on a periodic basis and whenever there is need it is

repaired. The ceiling is monitored and care is taken in order to see that there would not be

rashes. Window frames are checked and painted whenever there is a need. Buildings are white washed on a periodic basis. Doors are protected from white ants and painted on a periodic basis. Roofs of the buildings are maintained and steps are taken to prevent seepage. Proper drainage system is provided to prevent water logging. The Department of Civil Engineering maintains all these activities.

Page 122: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

8.7.3. Handling of hazardous chemicals and such other activities (2) (Instruction: The institution may provide evidences that it is taking enough meas (Instruction: A faculty member scores maximum five research publication points depending upon the quality of the research papers and books published in the past three years. Uses for the safety of the civil structures, fire, electrical installations, wiring, and safety of handling and disposal of hazardous substances. Moreover, the institution needs to show the effectiveness of the measures that it has developed to accomplish these tasks.)The college takes all the care regarding the chemicals or other materials which may turnout be hazardous in nature

One of the places where chemicals are largely used is the Chemistry Laboratory. The chemicals are given in diluted form to the students at the time of experiments

In addition to diluting the chemicals teachers and supporting staff warn about the possible dangers of mishandling or careless handling of those chemicals.

Exhaust fans and fuming cupboard are arranged in the chemistry Laboratory in order to remove gasses and odorous chemicals from the Laboratory.

In the Physics laboratory also, specific care is taken in order not get the students and staff exposed to the LAZER beamer.

The following care is taken in work shop and in other labs

Students are required to wear uniform/apron and shoes in order to protect them from welding spark heat etc. Also, they will use black glass shield to protect their eyes from ultraviolet rays liberated in the arc welding sparks.

All the welding cables are properly insulated in order to avoid electric shock to the students and insulation tape is widely fixed around cuts to the electrical wires, if any.

All the tools have been periodically sharpened to have proper cutting at moderate effort and the clamping of the work pieces has been done properly.

Mains are switched off when electrical connections are in progress. Fuse wire is provided in the circuit in order to eliminate burning of entire circuit, in the case of over loads.

Since scissors and G.I. Sheet, chisels have sharp edges; students are given instructions that they should handle them properly in order to avoid cuts.

All the rotating Hattie machines, milling machines, drilling machines are covered with proper guards to avoid accidents when the operator is dealing with the change of belt on the pulleys, etc.

Petrol, Diesel and lubricants are kept in proper tins by sealing them with caps. Match sticks are not allowed to light in fuel lab to avoid explosion and fire

accidents. Students are instructed to maintain minimum one meter distance from rotating

members like fly wheels, fans, pulleys of the I.C. Engines’. Exhaust manifold and silencer pipe are insulated properly to avoid injuries to the

students and staff. Exhaust gasses are left far away to avoid air pollution in the lab. Students have to wear hand glouse, masks for nose etc. While working with the

chemicals and proper ventilation is provided for the composite Laboratory. Freon gas leakage is arrested by using proper seals at the pipe joints and guards&

meshes are provided for safety.

8.8. Counseling and Emergency Medical Care and First-aid (5)(Instruction: The institution needs to report the availability of the facilities discussed here.)

Page 123: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Availability of counseling facility Arrangement for emergency medical care Availability of first-aid unit

Availability of counseling facility:The college has a multi layered Counseling mechanism.General Counseling and Mentorship:

With the help of University, college has appointed two counselors (one for boys hostel and one for girls hostel) to perform group counseling as well as individual counseling.

Behavioral Counseling:

The college invites experts in the field and arranges Lectures and orientation programmes to offer training in several aspects related to organize and fruitful human behavior.

Qualifications of Counselors and Mechanisms Adopted:

The members of faculty of the college who are Post graduates and above Guest counselors are eminent or recognized trainers.

General counseling goes on a regular basis and whenever there is any need a special counseling is conducted. Records are maintained by the respective teacher counselors.

Professional Ethics course for students: Since thought structuring is a core principle in personality development, a course on Professional Ethics has been made mandatory for all the students

Life skills, Soft skills and up bringing one’s life: For this the courses in communication skills have specifically been designed in order that the students acquire a thorough understanding regarding the patterns of social and professional behaviors

Arrangement for emergency medical care

The College has a hospital with Govt. medical officer, three nurses and other staff. Govt. medical officer is under deputation from Dist. Medical and Health Dept. As per OP register from (1/1/2014) to 31.12.2014, 7300 persons (staff/students)

utilize the hospital. In general, at least 20 members (student/staff) per day and 650 members

(student/staff) per month utilize the hospital There is an availability of first Aid kit in the hospital Monthly expenditure of the hospital is Rs. 80,000/- to Rs. 90,000/- (drugs including

blankets and towels)Even though the hospital is located within the college campus, college is having an

Ambulance

Page 124: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

9. CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT (75)

This criterion essentially evaluates the improvement of the different indices that have already been discussed in earlier sections.

From 9.1 to 9.5 the assessment calculation can be done as follows.

If a, b, c are improvements in percentage during three successive years, assessment can be calculated as

Assessment = (b-a)/ (100-min (b,a))+(c-b)/(100-min(c,b))

9.1 Improvement in Success Index of Students (5)

From 4. 2

Items LYG (a) LYGm1(b) LYGm2(c) AssessmentSuccess index 1.0 0.71 0.73 0.27%

9.2 Improvement in Academic Performance Index of Students (5)From 4.

3

Items LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 Assessment

API 6.53 7.21 7.42 0.95%

Page 125: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

9.3 Improvement in StudentTeacher Ratio (5)

From 5. 1

Items CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 Assessment

STR 10.05 10.71 9.82 0.25%

9.4 Enhancement of Faculty Qualification Index (5)

From 5. 3

Items LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 Assessment

FQI 7.71 7.71 7.45 0.28

9.5 Improvement in Faculty Research Publications, R&D Work, Consultancy and Testing Work (10)

From 5.7 and 5.9

Items LYG (a) LYGm1(b) LYGm2(c) Assessment

FRP 19.6 19.7 12.37 8.37

Items LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 Assessment

FRDC 0.95 3.8 1.9 4.8

9.6 Continuing Education (10)

In this criterion, the institution needs to specify the contributory efforts made by the faculty members by developing the course/laboratory modules, conducting short-term courses/workshops, etc., for continuing education during the last three years.

A.Y 2013-2015

Name of the Staff Designation Name of the Conference

/Workshop Organized Details Commencement Date Place

Dr.V.V.Subba Rao

Prof

Two day workshop on “Advanced finite element

applications in Design and Manufacturing Systems”

40April-26th

& 27th University SENATE

HALL

Page 126: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Sri K. Krishna Bhaskar Asst.Prof,

one day workshop on “Intervention methods &

Project life cycle management”

35March 1st

2013University SENATE

HALLDr.K Meera

Saheb and

Dr D.Linga Raju Asst.Prof, Asst.Prof

Recent Advances in Composite Materials 40

March 14-15th 2014

University SENATE

HALL

Sri.V Jaya PrasadAnd

Sri K.Dileep Kumar

Asst.Prof, Asst.Prof

Advanced Materials and Processes 35

April5-6th 2014

University SENATE

HALL

Dr.V Ramachandra

Raju and Dr.D. Lingaraju

Prof and Asst.Prof

Applications and Advances in CFD 40

April9-11th 2014

University SENATE

HALL

Dr.A Gopala Krishna, Sri. V.

Kalyana Manohar and

Sri.M.Madusudan Prasad

Prof and Asst. Prof

National Conference on New frontiers in Mechanical

Engineering 50July

18-19th 2014

University SENATE

HALL

Dr. Ranga Janardanaand

Dr.D. Lingaraju Prof. and Asst.Prof

Advanced Manufacturing Quality and Inspection 40 08-Dec-

2014

University SENATE

HALL

Dr.Balakrishna

Prof. Recent Advances in Manufacturing Technology 80

University SENATE

HALL

Page 127: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

9.7 New Facility Created (15)

Specify new facilities created during the last three years for strengthening the curriculum and/or meeting the POs:1. Established separate Computer Lab exclusively for PG students2. Established CAD Laboratory with 42 i3 configuration systems with a worth of

26 lakhs 3. Ansys (Multi Physics) 4. VCR Diesel Engine Test Rig5. Siemens PLM Software is planned to procure (in pipeline)6. Desktops to all Research Scholars

S.No Name of the Equipment

1 Robot and Automatic Storage and Retrieval System

2 Simulation Software Package - Msc Adams 2005

3 Universal Robo kit

Page 128: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

4 Pentium IV Processor - Computer Systems – 60 No.

Intel@ CoreTM i3-2120- 45 Nos

5 CAD Software for Analysis & Modeling-

Iron CAD V7.0 (20 Users)

6 Manufacturing Software - Edge CAM V 9.0 (5)

7 CAD Software for Analysis - ANSYS (Research Version)

(25 Users)

8 MATLAB version 7.0.1 (All tool boxes) (Single user)

9 Modeling Software – IDEAS V 9.0 (5 Users)

10 NX CAD/CAM ( PLM- SIEMENS SOFTWARE)

11 UPS 10 K.V.A – 3 No.s

12 Intel@ CoreTM i5-24 Nos

13 Name of the Equipment

14 LCDs-4 +2 (order placed) =6

15 Workshop Power Tools

16 Lathe Machines

17 Milling Machines

18 Industrial robot

19 Diamond cutting machine

20 Auto-collimator

21 Profile Projector

22 Machine tool dynamometers

23 Slip gauges

24 Optical comparator

25 Name of the Equipment

26 Parkinson type Gear testing machine

27 IC Engine Test rig

28 Automatic Specimen Grinder and Polisher

29 Ericsson cupping tester, Metal Spectro scope with accessories,

Page 129: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

Micro Hardness Tester, Electro polishing Machine

30 Computer Systems

31 HP Laser Printers – 5 (4 – PC, 1- Network)

32 OHP – 2 No.s

33 42" Plasma Display panel (1)

Interactive white board (1)

Digital visual presenter(1)

Digital copier(1)

34 Modular Furniture(60)

35 Computer chairs (50)

36 Plastic Injection Moulding Machine

37 Blow Moulding Machine

38 Name of the Equipment Recently Purchased under TEQIP - II

39 Dead Weight tester

40 Ultrasonic flaw detector (NDT)

41 Image analyzer

42 Micro-tensile strength machine

43 Dual Laser infrared thermometer

Page 130: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL
Page 131: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL
Page 132: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL
Page 133: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

9.8 Overall Improvements since last accreditation, if any, otherwise, since the commencement of the programme (20)

Specify the strengths/weakness

Improvemets brought in

Contributed byList the PO(s),

which are strengthened

Commentsif any

CAY

Established Advanced

Computing Lab with High Performance

Facility

JNTUK PO2, PO3, PO4

Students able to use and practice

advanced Computing

Techniques and tools

Inclusion of Seminar to the Curriculum JNTUK PO8, PO10

Students are able to improve

presentations and Self learning

CAYm1

Conduct of Campus Recruitment

Training classes for Students

JNTUK PO6, PO7, PO8, PO10

To improve the interpersonnel

skills and professional behaviour

Organizing Technical Fest in the

DepartmentJNTUK PO6, PO7, PO8,

PO10

To improve the interpersonnel

skills

CAYm2

Provides E-Class Rooms with LCD projector, PC with Internet connection

JNTUK PO1, PO2, PO10

To create qualitative Teaching –

learning environment

Page 134: · Web viewSelf Assessment Report (SAR) For Accreditation of Postgraduate Engine e ring Programme (T I ER– I) M.Tech MACHINE DESIGN PAR T-A & PART-B Submitted by DEPARMENT OF MECHANICAL

DECLARATION

The head of the institution needs to make a declaration as per the format given below:

This Self-Assessment Report (SAR) is prepared for the current academic year ( ) andthe current financial year ( ) onbehalf of the institution.

I certify that the information provided in this SAR is extracted from the records and to the best of my knowledge, is correct and complete.

I understand that any false statement/information of consequence may lead to rejection of the application for the accreditation for a period of two or more years. I also understand that the National Board of Accreditation (NBA) or its sub-committees will have the right to decide on the basis of the submitted SAR whether the institution should be considered for an accreditation visit.

If the information provided in the SAR is found to be wrong during the visit or subsequent to grant of accreditation, the NBA has right to withdraw the grant of accreditation and no accreditation will be allowed for a period of next two years or more and the fee will be forfeited.

I undertake that the institution shall co-operate with the visiting accreditation team, shall provide all desired information during the visit and arrange for the meeting as required for accreditation as per the NBA’s provision.

I undertake that, the institution is well aware of the provisions in the NBA’s accreditation manual concerned for this application, rules, regulations and notifications in force as on date and the institute shall fully abide by them.

Place: Signature, Name, and Designation of the

Date: Head of the Institution with seal