Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
52F18SE0047 63.2)39 TURTLEPOND LAKE 010
REPORT ON GLATZ PROPERTY
VICTORIA ALGOMA MINERAL COMPANY LIMITED
DRYDEN AREA ONTARIO
OCTOBER 9TH, 1966 VANCOUVER, B.C.
Rose KIOD, P . ENO. MINING ENGINEER
SUMMARY
SEVERAL MINERALIZED OUTCROPS or OIORITC OCCUR
IN THE CENTRAL SECTION OF THE PROPERTY. ASSAYS IN THE
ORDER OF 0,40$ COPPER AND 0 .20% N ICKEL ARE OBTAINED FROM
THESE OUTCROPS.
AN ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED ON
THE CENTRAL 9 CLAIMS, AND SEVERAL INTERESTING CONDUCTORS
HAVE BEEN FOUND NEAR THE MINERALIZED OUTCROPS.
DRILLING OF THE CONDUCTORS is RECOMMENDED.
LOCATION AND ACCESS IB I UTY
THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ABOUT 30 MILES SOUTH
OF DRYDEN, ONTARIO, BETWEEN DINORWIO LAKE AND UPPER
MANITOU LAKE. A LOCATION MAP ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT.
THE SOUTH LIMITS ROAD OF THE ORYOEN PAPER COMPANY
PASSES THROUGH THE WESTERLY CLAIMS, AND ROUGH TRACTOR ROADS
RUN EASTERLY FROM THIS ROAD THROUGH THE C LAIMS.
PROPERTY.DETAILS
THE PROPERTY CONTAINS 56 CONTIGUOUS AND UNPATENTED
MINING CLAIMS. THESE CLAIMS ARC NUMBERED AS FOLLOWS:
K 38593 TO 38600
K 38960
K 39408 TO 39454
THE LOCATIONS OF THE INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS IS SHOWN
ON ACCOMPANYING MAPS. THE K 39 CLAIMS ARE SHOWN WITH THE
K 39 PREFIX OMITTED.
HISTORY or PROPERTY
THERE is NO EVIDENCE OF PREVIOUS STAKING OR
LINECUTTING ON THE CLAIMS, NOR 16 THERE ANY REOORO OF
WORK DONE OR STAKING IN THE FILES OF THE ONTARIO DEPARTMENT
OF MINES. IT is CONCLUDED THAT NO PREVIOUS WORK HAS BEEN
DONE.
GEOLOGY
THE GENERAL GEOLOGY, AS TAKEN FROM MAPS A2c,ANO
50E OF THE ONTARIO DEPARTMENT OF MINES, is SHOWN ON AN
ACCOMPANYING MAP.
THE PROPERTY LIES LARGELY WITHIN ANOESITIC ROOKS,
ACCORDING TO MAP 42c. IT WAS NOTED DURING THE GEOPHYSICAL
WORK ON THE CENTRAL NINE CLAIMS THAT THESE CLAIMS ARE
LARGELY UNDERLAIN BY DIORITIC INTRU6IVES. A BAND OF
DIORITE6 IS MAPPED ON THE ADJOINING MAP 50E TO THE NORTH,
AND THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THESE ROCKS WOULD PASS
THROUGH THE CENTRAL CLAIMS. )T IS CONCLUDED THAT THE
PROPERTY COVERS AN ANDE8ITIC SERIES AND A DIORITIC
INTRUSIVE COMPLEX, AND THE DI OR ITE-GRANITE CONTACT AREA.
A SMALL GRANITE PLUG IS MAPPED BY THE 0. D. M.
NEAR THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF THE CENTRAL 9 CLAIM GROUP. A
SIMILAR PLUG WAS NOTED AT THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THESE
CLAIMS DURING THE GEOPHYSICAL WORK. IT IS NOT KNOWN YET
WHETHER THIS IS ONE AND THE SAME INTRUSIVE.
THE MINERALIZED OUTCROPS, WHOSE LOCATIONS ARE
SHOWN ON THE ELECTROMAGNETIC RESULTS MAP, CONTAIN OBALOO-
PYRITE, PYRRHOTITE, AND PYRITE IN DISSEMINATED FORM. THE
- 3 -
GEOLOGY (CONT'D)
MINERALIZATION OCCURS WHERE THE ROCK FRACTURING HAS BEEN
MORE CLOSELY SPACEo(ABOUT 1 FOOT) AND SOME 8 ILICIF1CAT I ON
USUALLY ACCOMPANIES. THE FRACTURE PATTERNS STRIKE E-W
AND N45E. GENERALLY THE ROOKS ARE NOT CLOSELY FRAOTURCDI
60 THAT THE MINERALIZATION IS SOMEWHAT PATCHY.
1 TOOK THREE SAMPLES OF THE BETTER MINERALIZED
MATERIAL FROM THREE OUTCROPS. THE ASSAYS RANGCP FROM 0,30$
TO 0.5656 COPPER, AND 0.05$ TO 0,36$ NICKEL.
THE DIORITE HOST ROCK SEEMS TO BE A COMPLEX OF
SEVERAL INTRUSIONS OF VARYING TEXTURES BUT SIMILAR COMPO
SITION.
GEOPHYSICAL RESULTS
PICKET LINES WERE CUT ACROSS THE 9 CLAIM CENTRAL
GROUP AT 200 FOOT SPACING, AND IN THE NORTH-SOUTH DIRECTION.
A REMOTE SOURCE MAGNETIC FIELD WAS USED, AND READINGS OF
THE DIP ANGLE AND QUADRATURE RESPONSE OF THE RESULTANT FIELD
WERE TAKEN AT 100 FOOT INTERVALS ALONG THE PICKET LINCC,
THE LOCATIONS OF THE CONDUCTORS FOUND ARC SHOWN
ON THE ACCOMPANYING MAP.
CONDUCTORS A, c, AND D ARE STRONGLY CONDUCTIVE
FEATURED. CONDUCTORS B AND E ARE WEAKLY CONDUCTIVE, NONE
OF THE CONDUCTORS ARE MAGNETIC, CONDUCTOR F IS WEAK AND VAOUE,
CONDUCTORS A AND B LIE NEAR THE MINERALIZED OUT
CROPS. THE GEOPHYSICAL EVIDENCE SUGGESTS A FAULT AS SHOWN
ON THE MAP, AND THERE 18 ALSO A SCARP FEATURE TOPOORAPHIOALLY
AT TWO POINTS ALONG THIS FAULT,
1. THERE is A REASONABLE CHANCE THAT ONE OR MORE or THE
CONDUCTORS REPRESENTS IMPORTANT 6ULFIDE MINERALIZATION,
THE KNOWN SURFACE SHOWINGS CONTAIN COPPER AND
NICKEL VALUES, AND IT IS QUITE POSSIBLE THAT ONE OF THE
CONDUCTORS 18 CAUSED BY SIMILAR MINERALIZATION IN MUCH
GREATER AMOUNT.
IT IS UNLIKELY THAT THE CONDUCTORS ARE DUE TO
GRAPHITE, PINCE GRAPHITE IS VERY RARE IN DIORITIC ROCKS,
?. CONDUCTORS A AND C MAY BE FAULTED SEGMENTS OF THE
SAME CONDUCTOR, SIMILARLY CONDUCTORS B AND 0 MAY ALSO
BE THE SAME CONDUCTOR BEFORE FAULTING,
RECOMMENDATJONS
A. CONDUCTORS A AND B SHOULD BE EXPLORED BY DRILLING.
B, IF THE RESULTS ARE ENCOURAGING, THE OTHER CONDUCTORS
GHOULO ALSO BE TESTED.
COST. ESTIMATES
1000 FEET OF AXT DRILLING & $6.00 PER FOOT .... $ 6,000.00
SUPERVISION, TRANSPORTATION .................... . 2jOOOAQO
TOTAL « $ 8,000.00
Rose KIDDVANCOUVER, B.C. MINING ENGINEER OCTOBER -9TH, 1966
C.E..R T I F (GATE
I, ROSS KlDD, OF THE ClTY OF VANCOUVER, IN THE
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, oo HEREBY CERTIFY THAT!
1. I AM A CONSULTING MINING ENGINEER LIVING IN
WEST VANCOUVER, B.C.
2. I AM A GRADUATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO IN
MINING ENGINEERING, 19^9.
3. I HAVE BEEN PRACTISING MY PROFESSION SINCE GRADUATION.
4. | HAVE NO INTE«ST, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, NOR DO
! EXPECT TO RECEIVE ANY INTEREST, DIRECTLY OR
INDIRECTLY, IN THE PROPERTY OR SECURITIES OF VICTORIA
ALGOMA MINERAL COMPANY LIMITED.
5. THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT ARE BASED
UPON AN EXAMINATION OF THE PROPERTY ON JULY 216T AND
22ND, 1966, AND UPON A GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY OF THE
CENTRAL 9 CLAIMS CONDUCTED BY ME IN AUGUST AND
SEPTEMBER, 1966, AND UPON DATA CONTAINED IN MAPS
420 AND 50E OF THE ONTARIO DEPARTMENT OF MINES.
VANCOUVER, B.C. OCTOBER 9TH, 1966
Ross KIDO, P. ENQ. MINING ENGINEER
• >....... .. , . . ..'
.
• *
!
1'
4
••• !
LGi O »»••«>**
LOG AT
VICTORIA ALGOMA Ml
llllCH > 15OMl .6
ONTARIO
LEGEND
BV1 GEOPUVSl
AGGLOMERATE.
COM PL EX
kQCATIJQNLIMITEDAL.COMA
r
\
^--^
'i.
« .. «
•. v*"
**
r —
—..J2
>y.
- ,—
^.X
-—~
—r*
"
" 1
1 ?
3
ui!-j ju. o d.
CONPtGUR/*TfOHr>x X
y PLOTTtHG F>O>l>J~i
MOREAU, WOODARD & CO. LTD.POLARIZATION & REStSTfV.'TY S
TJA
T7 3 ——-
7? I
_;i*5
• 1 04- •JI7 / o•00 >*"
„*.*. (SI ^7,500
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
GKOUMD CONTACT
Z2N I4N i
IZN ZH
MfTAL
o-Z 0.5
ft? ,t>-2
713 _- ,0.7 ,0-50.9-
WORLD MINING CONSULTANTS LTD.
ANOMALOUSTURTLE PC NO LAKE AREA
ONTARIO
POSSIBLE t tttlttl
<?-3/ , 5-C r P sSCALE - ! /
MOREAU, WOODARD & CO. LTD.INDUCED POLARIZATION &. RESISTIVITY SURVEY
•nZ
77 I
A P PA KENT RESISTIVITY
MfTAL
•n r —
772 —
2S4
GKOVffP
O-/
Uj 00Ul
WORLD MINING CONSULTANTS LTD.
ANOMALOUSTURTLE POND LAKE A
5ATTERL V
ONTARIO
11 n 11 nie-S ' C-3! , 5-O
— 20C FEET
'MOKEAU. WOODARD & CO. LTD.
773
WORLD MINING CONSULTANTS LTD.
t 11 f 11 11S .-,". •'- "r-cr f *
\
CONFIGURATION X
MOREAU, WOODARD & CO. LTD.INDUCED POLARIZATION & K£S/5TfV/TY SURVEY
X = tOO F££T
y PLOTTING POIHT
TI4.
773
771
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
3.N
METALFK£QUENCY EFFECT
711
772
TJ3
774
WORLD MINING CONSULTANTS LTD.
ANOMALOUS AREA
PROBABLE - - — — —
POSSIBLE t t H 11 It
;e?>: <?-3/ f 5-O {-p.*
TURTLE POND LAKE AREA
ONTARIO
SCALE: I
xM—————•*•-• •4*-
MOREAU, WOODARD & CO. LTD.INDUCED POLARIZATION & REStSTlVITY S URV£Y
X PL£?~!-T!*IG POIMT
TJ-4 ;3,860
103UJ
-t-
WORLD MINING CONSULTANT? LTD.
ANOMALOUS AREA
POSSfBLE t trilttl
<?,3/ , 5-O c-p s .
TURTLE POND LAKE AREA TOWNSHIP
OHTAR10
SCALE: I
ELECTG.ODE CON P!GUx r> x x
X -
MOREAU, WOODARD & CO. LTD.'NOUCED POLARIZATION & RESISTIVITY
SC-5C
T73
•nZ
77 I
APP/)f?er*T RESISTIVITY
METALEFFECT
T?2 —
TJ3 -
I2.S
WORLD MINING CONSULTANTS LTD.
ANOMALOUS AREA
DEFINITE i i i
POSSIBLE I til I I It
: C-^>l , 5-C
TURTLE PONO LAKE
SATTERL y
ONTARIO
SCALE-. I
EL. f
X - Z OO
MOREAU, \NOODARD <S CO. LTD.POLARIZATION & RESISTIVITY SURVEY
T7-A __
773-—--
771
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
,18050
TJI ———
772 — - . ._
JZ860
COHTACT
25- 4-
Z-7
WORLD MINING CONSULTANTS LTD.
ANOMALOUS /IREA
O£f'/,V I TIT — ii n ••
POSSIBLE t I III I ti
<.. C- 3 / , 5 -C f-f s
TURTLE POND LAKE AREA 5ATTERLY TO WSHIP
ONTARIO
SCALE-- '.INCH = Z OO
63.2139 TURTLEPOND LAKE 030
November 19> 1966, " Officers and Directors, Victoria Algoma Mineral Co. Ltd,, 9th Floor, 88 University Ave,, Toronto,
Gentlemen,
Herewith is a brief report covering your Dryden Area copper-nickel prospect. My examination included a very hfcrried look at frozen core and a more leisurely study of the geophysical results including magnetometer, Ronka 16, and IP surveys cover ing only the immediate vicinity of the known mineralization. Thus, at this point, my knowledge of the property is not only general and limited, it is base on a distorted study of the facts that are available today. Therefore my opinions are significant in the strategical rather than the tactical sense.
First, a few general facts.
Drill holes 1,3, and 4 show widespread, irregular, and disperse sulphide mineralization over core lengths of the order of 10, 50, and 100 plus feet. The sulphides include pyrite, pyrrhotite, and chalcopyrite and are present in amounts that should KBHsiifcHfcB constitute good IP survey targets* Drill hole 2 collared in barren chloritized gabbro and passed into barren (/) lavas at depth.
The property is an excellent copper-nickel prospect, In the broad sense the geological environment consists of volcanis in contact with a gabbro intrusive and sulphide minerals and sapphire blue quartz are found in the volcanics. This is a favourable environment « one in which producing mines are located. The detailed geology of the sulphide mineralization is quite unknown at present.
Some narrow core sections, a few inches to a few feet in length, have been split and assayed and have returned copper-nickel values of ore grade. However, none of the mineralization 1 have seen had the dimensions and grade required for economic production. The property is a prospect and is being explored in the hope of finding an orebody.
- 2
The Ronka 16 electromagnetic results are most encouraging. They show two crudely parallel conductors some 400 to 600 feet apart over a strike length of about 2000 £«et. The conductors look to be deep-seated. Drilling the conductors has located appreciable sulphide mineralization in 3 out of 4 holes. The Ronka 16 is a relatively new geophysical, tool and for this, and other considerations, many exploration people are skeptical of Ronka 16 results. On the Victoria Algoma property the Ronka 16 results have led the exploration (perhaps by chance) toward copper-nickel mineralization.
The IP survey results are unbelievably disappointing. One suspects that the survey instrument was out of order.Also, the survey covered too small an area to give a clear picture of the background character of the area and insufficient detail work was done on the lines where some positive indications were found. On no line was an indisputable IP anomalous area indicated, Nowhere do the Ronka 16 conductors coincide with possible IP anomalies. Futther IP work might materially assist in explor* ing the property, but on the evidence to date, one would prefer to be guided by the Ronka 16 results.
Here follows my opinions and recommendations.
1 have no particular opinion for or against the immediate further exploration of the prdperty nor the direction that continuing exploration should take. I recommend that the advice of Mr. Ross Kidd be followed !, '
The Dryden copper-nickel property is a valuable prospect and the Company should plan on maintaining the property until a very thorough appraisal of the property and the surround ing area can be completed.
The detailed geology of the showing area should be developed by means of cross-sectional arid piari geology based on diamond drill logs and their interpretation.
The drill cores assayed. Admittedly, none approach, in my opinion, However, there is a large carries copper and nickel of these values is bound the prospect end several
should be extensively sampled andof the drill cores I have seen
ore grade over long core lengths*volume of rock which undoubtedly.values and the absolute measurement to influence the future exploration of square miles of the surrounding area,
Respectfully submitted,
SUMMARY
FOUR INTERESTING CONDUCTORS WERE FOUND IN THE
VICINITY OF SEVERAL SURFACE SHOWINGS CONTAINING COPPER-
NICKEL 8ULFIDE8.
IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THREE OF THESE CONDUCTORS
SHOULD BE DRILLED, ,
INTRODUCTION
VICTORIA ALGOMA OPTIONED THE GLATZ CLAIMS BECAUSE
OF SEVERAL SURFACE SHOWINGS CONTAINING LOW BUT INTRIGUING
NICKEL-COPPER VALUES, AND BECAUSE INITIAL ELECTROMAGNETIC
PROSPECTING DISCLOSED A STRONG CONDUCTOR NEAR THE SHOWINGS,
PICKET LINES WERE THEN CUT ACROSS THE CLAIMS AND A
THOROUGH ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY WAS CARRIED OUT, PARTIAL
MAGNETIC CHECK WORK WAS ALSO DONE.
THE GEOPHYSICAL RESULTS ARE SHOWN ON THE ACCOMPANYING
MAP.
AT THE SAME TIME, RECONNAISSANCE GEOLOGICAL MAPPING
OF THE AREA WAS CARRIED OUT BY LORNE 6. HALLADAY, AND THE*
RESULTS IN THE GLATZ CLAIM AREA ARE ALSO SHOWN ON THE MAP.
RESULTS
SEVEN EM CONDUCTORS WERE LOCATED WITHIN THE CLAIMS,
FOUR OF THESE, CONDUCTORS A, B, C, AND 0, ARE CONSIDERED TO
HAVE POSSIBLE ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE. CONDUCTOR E 18 THOUGHT
TO REPRESENT A CONTACT SHEAR BETWEEN OIORITC AND VOLCANIC
ROCKS', CONDUCTORS F AND G ARC THOUGHT TO BE SHEARS ASSOC
IATED WITH NEARBY GRANITE STOCKS,
* 2 *
RESULTS (CONT'D)
NONE OF THE CONDUCTORS HAVE MAGNETIC CORRELATION.
SINCE THE KNOWN SURFACE SULFiDC MINERALIZATION 18 MAGNETIC
ALLY POSITIVE, THIS IB AN UNFAVORABLE FEATURE. THERE IB A
POSSIBILITY, HOWEVER, THAT THEY MAY REPRESENT PYRlTC AND
CHALCOPYRITE, RATHER THAN PYRRHOTITE AND OHALCOPYRITE, |N
WHICH CASE THEY WOULD BE NONPMAQNET1C BUT STILL OF ECONOMIC
INTEREST.
TO TEBT THIS POSSIBILITY, DRILLING OF THREE OF THE
BETTER CONDUCTORS IS RECOMMENDED.
THE posiTiONiNe OF THE CONDUCTORS SUGGESTS CROSS-
FAULTING WITH MODEST DISPLACEMENTS OF THE CONDUCTORS. THE
APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF THESE ASSUMED FAULTS ARE SHOWN ON
THE MAP.
ALMOST ALL THE GEOPHYSICAL FEATURES ARC CONFINED TO
A BODY OF MIXED DIORITE AND QABBRO WHICH OCCUPIES A CENTRAL
LOCATION WITHIN THE CLAIMS. SINCE THESE ROCKS ARC THC
NORMAL HOSTS TO NICKEL DEPOSITS, THIS IS A FAVORABLE ASPECT
AND ADDS TO THE INTEREST OF THE GEOPHYSICAL FEATURES.
THE MAGNETIC HIGHS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THC ONE
STRETCHING FROM LINE 15 TO LINE 19 NCA/R THC BASE LINE, ARCi
RATHER FORMLESS AND RANDOM IN APPEARANCE. IT 18 CONSIDERED} { ' : THAT THEY ARE DUE TO MAGNETITE AND PY^RHOTITC INCREASE, AND
ARC PERHAPS ASSOCIATED WITH ONE OR MORJH OF THC ASSUMED FAULTS.
THE ONE EXCEPTION LIES ON STRIKE OF CONDUCTOR A. IT IS NON-! - I ' \ :'-'' '
CONDUCTIVE BUT MAY BE DUE TO DISSEMINATED PYRRHOTITE.
, v, /4
- - 3 -
RESULTS (CONT'D)
CONDUCTOR A is JUDGED TO B I DEEP-SEATED, PERHAPS
IN THE ORDER OF 300 FEET BELOW SURFACE.
THE OTHER CONDUCTORS ARE NEAR-SURFACE.
CONCLUSIONS
,!
1. CONDUCTORS A, C, AND D ARE STRONG AND DEFINITE,
C OR D WAV BE FAULTED SEGMENTS OF CONDUCTOR A.
2. CONDUCTOR B is VAGUE AND INDEFINITE, BUT HAS NEARBY
MAGNETIC HIGHS.
3. MOST OF THE SURFACE SHOWINGS ARE LOCATED NEAR CONDUCTORS
A AND B.
4. EXPLORING OF THE A AND B AREA BY CROSS-SECTIONING
DRILL HOLES IS WARRANTED,
5. FURTHER FOLLOW-UP ON CONDUCTOR C WILL BE WARRANTED IF
INITIAL DRILL RESULTS ARE FAVORABLE.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. THREE DRILL HOLES, SHOWN ON THE MAP, ARE RECOMMENDED.
2. THE TOTAL FOOTAGE IS ABOUT 1500 FEET.
3. THE TOTAL COST OF THIS WORK WOULD BE ABOUT $ 10,000.
ROB8 KlDDVANCOUVER, B.C. MINING ENGINEER JANUARY 9TH, 1967
APPENDIX ONE
METHODS, Of SURVEY:
THE ELECTROMAGNETIC WORK WAS DONE WITH A RONKA EM 16
UNIT. THIS UNIT USES HORIZONTAL TRANSMISSIONS FROM NAVAL
VLF BROADCAST STATIONS AS A PRIMARY FIELD. READINGS ARE
MADE OF THE REAL AND QUADRATURE PHASES O F T HE VERTICAL
COMPONENT OF ANY SECONDARY FIELDS PRESENT.
THE ADVANTAGES OF THE UNIT ARE GREAT DEPTH PENETRATION
AND EASE OF OPERATION, WHILE THE DI8ADVANTAGES ARE TOO MUCH
SENSITIVITY GIVING RISE TO OVERBURDEN AND SHEAR ZONE
CONDUCTORS, AND SOMETIMES POOR COUPLING BETWEEN THE TRANS
MITTER STATION AND THE EXPECTED CONDUCTORS.
IN THIS CASE TRANSMITTER STATIONS AT CUTLER, MAINE
AND IN MARYLAND WERE USED, AND THE COUPLING WAS GOOD.
THE QUADRATURE PROFILES ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE MAP,
BUT IN EACH CASE THEY CORROBORATED THE POSITION OF THE
VARIOUS CONDUCTORS AS SHOWN BY THE DIP ANGLE PROFILES.
THE MAGNETIC RESULTS WERE FROM A SHARPE MF-1 FLUXGATE
MAGNETOMETER READING THE VERTICAL COMPONENT OF THE EARTH*S
MAGNETIC FIELD. THE MAGNETIC NORMAL IS TAKEN AS ABOUT 500
GAMMAS.
\
<"*" c* 0 o. C3 C"2 5 o *~^ **3 §
. -.. _ ^j -o- .a M j^̂̂ CJ
O o -
0 1o . -"- -
~f".fc
'•O
-J—
1*
.
*£> €S >-t
C*5''*
"ES 9>
'•l^
j -S?'-
& f£ f\ |J» CJ*
"l^
J "
;O '
-'
^t?'
1'-
? * ,,-:
o o 3 C. c.
• o c*
-W T a •_>
.is •£ c* S3 f O X
Jv- 3 £-C
^' << <3 -D:
rt 5» s •1 v«-
O W-.
€*
•.•-
rr::.
,«. O- >>•
-OJ
X* O
:-*< X» }-«
•O -3 :i';;
O .-**>..
' "-8
^ -
.:- ^+
»;-*
J -•r
ft>
;
' U
" t.1 .
*
.'s 5- .% o 3 ;c » ""'
C
**-•
i* CJ o J3 Jf-
19 >-»
-•V
O •O
,./H •»* •
*•.-
•» »̂•..-
c* a S 2- o• .
e*-
':
. -
O -
o .<«•
.;. o.
^•S'&
."..
;;5V: •b -. .
*«.- 2 w
;•-: ,g
-...
-53 •
•- - o-
..-.
{-.t
o:.
v O
-
;.'•>»
;,
*- < 3 v«
. *^ ^*
' -
"3•2
- '••
'•,.
"•-• c*
-
V
CO
r3
• • O
*J
« O
<
Cn
3
, •
0
3
7T•.
•»
' SJ-"
._
S> :
t->o
rt:£!
>-*
> O
.•o
o 2--
'.".-
;'. S
S £1
JS
,
- • '
- «t
• ff
" 0
i^
• C
*'
" '
.--•- »-»
' '• o
• - •
o """
• --••
<< t-
- S
, - . ^
» -
- ,' 9
: .
--••:-
t*.:
:iV
-.^
c*
ax
oO
^ -
• —"J
O
"
"• "-.
•; *•
----
.:o.
'^;.
"r^v
'\^
^ '1^
- ••• '
• •V
;<
"•"'.":
<*-"
--.V
T-'.
^ .-•"
-1':' "
•''-
5-*i"
•;"""<9
--"" ":
"-.-• ~
-f-'-r
-. ";-v
• ..
- JT
-'
-w^
'-**•
- '"
•-
"• " -
•': J-"
: --C
B "-
- " \£
* - -
* - -•
"CC
" -
-. .
.- '-~
x£ "-
•••'--"•-.
"'-"'•
- O
•".
'-•-" "
- "•" :
'-.-•-'
;-*
"J
'.''":
-' - -
-r"
"'., tr?
; •;.,
r - -
' . .".-
.••• *
~ „
_--; "
- : --
*' J5
'* "
" '
' ''"""^
i." '""
""" '"
"-••
.0
:.'. '.-
:-v-'>
^.:"v
v^';
;•5
•-
"•-
-."•
V.-
H*;
- -
-'->-
-,
--
- •"
.- -"-
-"-•
' " -
" -
S-
'•':
. .
•-.
OJ
•/-
-f -
' i- '.
' ->'=
^
r j-
j -"
; - •.
.-••-,"•
-. :-=A
-, • •-,.
; .-•,:
;,.-
»-.
,-'
• • • T
."-
'* -..:
, .-. .
•"-
'-\n"
; -;•
>•:>-•
:•" ;v
..:-;.
;"'--'>-
."- v-
- -"
•<?
'" -
'" -
.' - •
:. "•:
-
;"" " r
- ~-
'"•-..-
: ^4 ̂
-.,--\
-; :~:
?;\.
";;;i;..y
^:">v
^W^:s
^;-.p
:-;:--
:^-
"2.-
.-
~,^
'.---
-v,:
;-:,
- ..,
- • M
,--,*
. -
; -..,•
••--
:---.•
-v. -.
-;.--.-:
" j-*
.:-\
;.-::-
^ ?:;
-,.-_-r
-/.;-'^
-...-.-
-^" •
'- ^g
-""
-"..-
/''-",.
.'"•''
/-';.-
."- r
- ~:
\-'V
"--
----
v
::-^
'•
- "',-
' :'
":," :
-^ .-
._.;.
"" ;
' " '
".;.-
X;V-
"--:;X
- >'v
J>V'
"^v-
ii~.v;
' •-:-••:
':"-/
-M
'." "
-: "
-'"'•"
" -
.*;
•''••
:":.-
_•.:"
-• '
.•'"
-;-,
""''-
' --
V>
V'
""'
"'• '". ;
"; '"
-̂^A
^-'^
^- y"
:."'~; ;
:\Vv
'"'
"•-' " ".-
" '-'-
-.'';.
/ ^
":-.-J-
:^--"-
^ - -
-*•""
' '"--
." "-
. ^,
-.^"
•-"""•
- "".>
•»•••*
-":. /
••-:
"-:'.
.'
tfr^
l
12 * ?T*
1 ""
' C Is I * i: t° 1^ ? **
*
|J1
»
i w_* i§ k^* J •r*-
*• a
|- "-'
* .
;^"'-'
'
-; ^V
•;/•--
."^
;_
•"•"
--
ouoncy, i.e. fi?6 cyc3oo la broadcast from a horizontal * ronsmitter ,
coil and received by a oimilar coll two hundred foot distant. A ref-< ; ' ' • ' . • ' " ' . • •.'.'.:'•
orcnco ni^na! which will bo exactly In phase with tho transmitter sig-
rf.il .tr> transmitted by means of ft cable to tho transmitter coil location;
t.hf! uno of A oaWo oueuroo thut thi ) »l(',nal w.UX not ho ''ff^ctod by so*
^.•iK'ary ;.:.li. ficldo, Tliio olgrial ia then, compared to the fc: j;Jlflod eig-
ntil oe.ived by ^,he rocoivor coll. -"!' one of the eif.nalo is electron!- .'•O • ' • " . , : ", :, '"' • ;.
cally ohiftocl through 180 , tho rofrrcnco and received coil can bo bal*
at,'.: otl GO tliat a null will bo hoard if ear phones aro connected acroas
r. "bridge" fcr.T:>od : by tho oip,nal fror tho reference. /cable and that from
the r(»ceivor coil. In noutral grouno for '•. instance, if tho earphones we-
xv; placed acr< os tho outputs jjn tho cable from the tronomittor coil, a• - '•' ••.'.. ." • • •. ,','.'. ••' '•'•'•' ,\_ ,'.'.'•',"•
n5. (';.]al could bo heard. If tho oi^nal received by 'the receiver »<?oil w«r«
ac\ k jUi)t<«vl' no ao to bo oxuctly ICO o\it of- 'phase, upon oti.itable .'. ampllf toa-
t:lou t il would nullily tho oiftnftl. from tlio cablo if It wore cpiinQCtcd to
•iarphoniio, :'.ioc«)'ic!<iry curronto induced iii u conductor in tho vicinity of.• - '' . ' ' \ • •.. ' : ''.•-.'•.•' '•:•.••'•
•-ho tr/inrniittor v.'culd radiate oocondary H»H. fioldo which would tend to
d^.otort the signal detected by. tho receiver coil, Tlie roeultant o
wc;u3d differ in phaoo and amplitude from that normally received* Ey
of suitable oloctronic circuitry th<3 phase and amplitude; observed' by th«
rocoivor coil cv n bo rooolvod into components in phuoo and out of phace
with tlio rofcrorce ui/?nal» " :;'^-' •""•*"' \ ' ' • -' :V; . ';... ; ' ; '. ;•/- ' 'l :̂ > ' '.-'•'.'' - .
In tho ir.otr'umont described at the beginning of this .discussion :
.-.' ' ,' • '''.'.. ' •• ..'•• .•' :"., ••'* V.V5 .. : •'
tlj'j inphano and outof phase Indicator dials are eet to <) at a etatlon
located where there are no significant secondary E.M. fields frpa con-
auctors. Tho instrument io couvoyod along a line of o survey grid by ,
i-,vo .'.-.on, one bcarj.n/f tho transmitter, the othor•bearing the receiver
nva co-.uponMator conoolo. A cablo connects tho tr/msmittor coil to tho
receiver cxtisoloj onctlior short cable connects thie conr.ole to tho.roC'-
«Av«r coll no that. tho.two signals may bo compared and nullified at the .
C'-p.r.ole, Tho two units aro aeparated the length of tho scale ( usually
tv;o hnndvcd foot); a roadinr, ie taken and recorded us being flt a posi*
t:ior. rddvray between the two coilq. The reading is subsequently recorded
(-.. a pl/in of tha / v rid at thie 3.ocation. From profileu of the inphase
m:<\ out of plirujo ccmpononts," which nre drawn to a scale of c>ne inch to
j.('i out of phaoo r.J^ft or 10^ of in'.j»ha0o<yhift,- tho location and do-
j'lth of cori'lnctor '»'<nfj cnn \ >o d.oterin.1nod fro:n generally l;nown thaory. For
jr::,i/iric'>, Ui'> r.-i!.;<'r» of t-})0 conductor would: He utiilor4 t.ho irifloption F"0i«
q's of tiio curves and tho dopth thoroof would be indicated roughly by tho ; "v
-,\'', .-'.tauco from tho curve maxima to their Inflection .point's.
01 CD
s
ILU
-J
01
uo
92°45' 92° 30'I
49°37' 30-
49°30'
WABIGOON L AKE
INDIAN ! R ESERVE
WABIGOON
SATTER LYFOR STATUS REFER TO TWP. PLAN
No. M.2035
31H *1|MW ***h,mi .,,^7lJlim ,3<HU I 31*3
- _ i. _ _ _ r^ I It. \
49°37'30"
37
34
33'
49°30'
92°30
495923
AREA OF
TURTLEPOND LAKEDISTRICT OF KENORA
KENORA MINING DIVISION
SCALE: 1-INCH = 4O CHAINS
LEGEND
PATENTED LAND
CROWN LAND SALELEASES
LOCATED LAND
LICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLY
SURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADS
KING'S HIGHWAYS
RAILWAYSPOWER LINES
MARSH OR MUSKEGMINES
CANCELLED
C.S.
© Loc
NOTES
400' Reserve around all takes 8k rivers
ra Ef V.'t-r CO ARE '; E ) B'
or; - r AFTi.i rr,^hDRVOEC -A:-- .'•
ONT. DEPT. OF MINES MINING LANDS BR.
THIS MAP FOR CHECKING PURPOSES ONLY - MUST NOT BE SOLD.
PLAN NO. M.2663
DEPARTMENT OF MINES
- ONTARIO -
S2FiaSEW47 63.2139 TURTLEPOND LAKE £00
CO CO 10
H
m cr O
ol
m
01 O>GD UO
GLATZ OPTION
GEOPWVSICAL RESULTS
QE.QLOGV ^ LORKJE. B. UAUUADAV — OCT.
GENERAL GEOLOGV
OR.A.M ITE
DIORITE
VO1.C A.KIIC'
OU TCKOP
TKACTOft R.OA.O
VICTORiA ALGOMA MINERAL COMPANV LIMITEDI INCH 20O FEET
LEGEND
o si~r A P< i o
COMDUCTOR
CONTOUKS
DIP AMGUE. FICK.T
WFER.REO GEOLOGICAL.
SURFACE. SUL.FIDE.
DRML.L.
KEV MAP
52F10SEM47 63.2)39 TURTLEPOND LAKE
52RiaSE0047 63.2139 TURTLEPOND LAKE £20
