Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Vibrational Motion
Key ideas
• Harmonic motion
• Parabolic potential
• Energy levels
• Wave functions
• Gaussian function
• Hermite polynominals
• The virial theorem
Vibrational Motion
Restoring force proportional to displacement = harmonic motion
F kx= −
k = force constant
F dVdx
= − and
21V kx2
=
“Parabolic potential energy”
Fig. 12-25
The Schrödinger equation is therefore
2 2
22
d 1- kx E2m dx 2
Ψ+ Ψ = Ψ
This is a standard equation with known solutions (later)...
For the boundary conditions that infinitely large extensions are
forbidden it can be shown that the permitted energies are
V1E (v )2
ω= + : 12k
mω =
v = 0, 1, 2, ...
And the separation between levels is
vv+1E E ω− = which is independant of v.
Fig. 12-26
Note also there is a zero point energy
01E2ω=
As with the particle in the box, the position is not completely
uncertain therefore the momentum cannot be zero.
Wave Function for Harmonic Motion
2 2 2
22
d 1- kx E2m dx 2
Ψ+ Ψ = Ψ
Has solutions of the form
(x) N (polynomial in x) (Gaussian function)Ψ = × ×
N = normalizing constant
Gaussian = bell shaped curve of the form 2xe−
Fig. 12-27
Polynomial = VH (y) - a Hermite polynomial
Solutions are
2y
2V VV N H (y)(x) e−=Ψ
1
2 4xy :α mk
α = =
Hermite’s satisfy the relationships
0H 1=
V V VH 2yH 2vH 0′′ ′− + =
And V+1 V V-1H 2yH 2vH−= (recursion)
v VH
0 1
1 2y
2 24y 2−
3 3y 12y8 −
4 4 216y 48y 12− +
5 35 y 120y16032y − +
And have the property
So the ground state V = 0 for the harmonic oscillator has
2y2
0 0(x) N e−
Ψ =2x22α
0N e−
=
12 4
mkα =
And therefore the probability density is
2
2x
2 2 α0 0(x) N e
−=Ψ
a bell shaped distribution.
Fig. 12-28
First vibrational level above ground state, v = 1
22
2xy
1 2α211
2N( N 2yα
x) e x e−−
= × × =Ψ
This has value 0 at x = 0 and the probability density 21 (x)Ψ has maxima at
x α=± 1
2 4
mkα =
Fig. 12-29
Fig. 12-31
Note as v→higher, the probability densities are higher at higher
potentials, consistent with a classical picture.
• Moving slowly near the turning points.
• Moving quickly near the vertical.
What are the νN ? - Normalization
2y
2V V(x) H (y)e
−Ψ = :
xyα
=
un-normalized
*V Vdx
∞
−∞
Ψ Ψ∫ *V Vα dy
∞
−∞
= Ψ Ψ∫22 -y
Vα H (y)e dy∞
−∞
= ∫ 1
V2α π 2 v!=
Therefore
1 12 2
V V
1(απ 2 v!)
N =
Note V f(v)N =
Calculating the Properties of Oscillators
• We have the wave functions.
• Need to calculate expectation values for the operator
corresponding to the property.
i.e. *V Vdx
∞ ∧
−∞
Ω = Ψ ΩΨ∫
E.g. for mean displacement, x we evaluate
*V Vx x dx
∞
−∞
= Ψ Ψ∫2 2y y
2 2V V
2V (H e )x(H e )dxN
∞− −
−∞
= ∫
Which looks horrendous
... but the Hermite polynomial properties help simplify the task...
2 2y y2 2
V V2
Vx (H e )x(H e )dxN∞
− −
−∞
= ∫ 2 2y y
2 2 2V V
2V (H e )y(H e )dyα N
∞− −
−∞
= ∫
22 yV V
2V H y H e dyα N
∞−
−∞
= ⋅ ⋅∫
Now we use the recursion relationship to write
V V-1 V+1yH vH + H12
=
So 2 2y yV-1 V V+1 Vx ν H H e dy+ H H e dy1
2
∞ ∞
−∞ −∞
= ∫ ∫
But from the properties of Hermite polynomial these are both equal to zero.
x (mean displacement) = 0 So the oscillator is equally likely to be on either side of x = 0.
For the mean square displacement we evaluate
V
2 * 2x x dx∞
−∞
= Ψ Ψ∫
In the same way... (by applying the recursion relation twice). In this case (∼2 pages of algebra!) we find that not all terms are zero
and
2
12
x (v+ )12 (mk)
=
Thus 2x increases with v corresponding to densities in Fig. 12-31
and to the classical increase in the swing of the oscillator with more
excitation (energy).
... with the result 212
x (v+ )12 (mk)
=
It’s easy to calculate the mean potential energy
122V (v )1 1 1 kkx ( )
2 2 2 m= = +
Which are wrote earlier as (v )1 1 ω2 2
= +
The total energy (see solution to Schrödinger equation)
E (v )1 ω2
= +
KE V (v )1 1 ω2 2
= = +
Which is a special case of the virial theorem:
“If the potential energy has the form bV ax= , then the potential energy and kinetic energy are related by
KE b(V)2 =
Here we have b = 2 so KE V=
Rotational Motion
• Rotation in 2D
• Rotation in 3D
• Spin
Rotation in 2D
Particle mass m on a circular path radius r in the (x,y) plane.
In classical terms
V = 0 everywhere so total KE E=
2
Kp2m
E E= =
Angular momentum around z axis
zJ pr= ±
2
z2
J2mr
E =
2mr moment of inertia I= =
2
zJ2I
E =
Now applying QM methods we will show that not all values of E are allowed.
i.e. both E and I are quantized.
Qualitative Argument
z prJ = ± : hλ
p =
zhrλ
J = ±
For constructive interference the only allowed λ are
l
2πrm
λ = , ml quantum number
Fig. 12-33
Thus zm hr m hhr
λ 2πr 2πJ l l= ± = =
z 0, 1, 2...J m , ml= = ± ±
And 2
zJE2I
=2 2
2Iml=
The corresponding wave functions are l
im
m 12
e( )(2π)
φ
φ =Ψ
(See next...)
More Rigorous Argument
The Hamiltonian (with V = 0) is
2 2 2
2 2H2m x y
∂ ∂= + ∂ ∂
And the wave function is a function of the angle φ .
Switching to spherical polar coordinates (recall rx cosφ= , ry sinφ= ) we derive
2
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 21 1r rrx y r φ
= + +∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+
∂∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
But, in this case, const.r = so we discard the r∂∂
terms (= 0)
2 2
2 2H -2mr
=Φ∂∂
(note 2I mr= )
H EΨ = Ψ
So we have 2
2
22IEΨ
=Φ∂∂
Ψ
Which can be solved....
2
2
22IEΨ
= ΨΦ∂∂ General solution is;
im
m 12
e( )(2π)
l
l
φ
φ =Ψ ; 2 2
Em
2Il= (any ml )
Acceptable solutions must be single valued.
i.e. Ψ must satisfy a cyclical boundary condition
( 2π) ( )φ φ+ =Ψ Ψ
So l
l
im ( 2π)
m 12
e
(2π)( 2π)
φ
φ+
=Ψ +l lim im 2π
12
e e
(2π)
φ
=
lim
12
e( )(2π)
φ
φ =Ψ
2imπ( )( 2π) eφφ =Ψ + Ψ
( )iπe 1= − so this is equivalent to ( ) l2m1 (0)( 2π)φ −Ψ + = Ψ
And m must be 0, 1, 2...± ±
We have 2 2
lEm
2I= , l 0, 1, 2...m = ± ±
All rotational (except l 0m = ) are doubly degenerate, i.e. the energy is independent of the sense of rotation.
Angular momentum
Recall xdp
i dx∧= similarly zi
i φ∧ ∂=
∂
zi∧
angular momentum operator
l
l
mz m
di
i dφ∧ ΨΨ = im
lim ei
φ=
im
12
e
(2π)
φ Ψ =
lmlm= Ψ
So the angular momentum is also quantized z zmll = , 0, 1, 2m = ± ±
Fig. 12-40
For given lm we know zl exactly however to locate the particle we
evaluate
l l
im im
m m 1 12 2
e e*(2π) (2π)
φ φ− + =
Ψ Ψ = 12π
Probability density is independent of φ and knowing the location on
the ring is impossible.
Angular momentum and angle are complementary observables.
Rotation in 3 Dimensions
Particle mass m, free to move anywhere on the surface of a sphere radius r.
Analogously to the particle on a ring, the wave functions must now satisfy two critical boundary conditions, giving rise to two quantum numbers.
The Schrödinger equation is
2
2H2m
= ∇ ( 22 2 2
2 2 2+ +x y z
∇ =∂ ∂ ∂∂ ∂ ∂
)
The wave functions are (switching to spherical polar coordinates)
(θ, )φΨ (since r = constant)
Which can be separated and solved.
Acceptable (cyclic) solutions have 2 quantum numbers
0, 1, 2...l = , -1, -2... -m l l l l l=
For each l there are (2l+1) values of lm .
The actual form of Ψ ’s are called the “spherical harmonics” l,mlY (θ, )φ
It follows from the solution that
2
E ( +1) 2Il l= , 0,1, 2l =
And that there are (2 +1)l Ψ ’s for each energy, so the levels are
(2 +1)l - fold degenerate (one for each ml ).
Since 2J
2IE = (classically)
12( +1)J l l= ; l = 0, 1, 2 ....
And we have already seen that
zJ ml= ; ml = l, l-1, ..., -l
Space Quantization and Vector Representation
Fig. 12-52
J is represented by a vector length 12( +1)l l , orientated so that the projection
on the z axis is length ml .
The idea that only certain orientations of angular momentum vector in space
are allowed is called “space quantization”
Note: Because we have specified zJ (using ml ) we can say nothing
about xJ or yJ (the 3 operators do not commute with each other). So
the vectors should be pictured as cones with the vectors sweeping
around the z-axis.
Fig. 12-59
Spin
Stern-Gerlach experiment
Ag atoms beamed through an inhomogeneous magnetic field – (2) bands of
Ag atoms emerge (non-classical result because of space quantization).
Fig 12-55
But if angular momentum l gives rise to (2l + 1) orientations then l=12
.
A non-integer ⇒ not rotation of the electrons around the nucleus (l must be
an integer).
⇒Must be the SPIN of the electron around its own axis.
Spin angular momentum = 12s(s+1) , Sm s, s-1, ... -s=