Upload
duongkhuong
View
250
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS SYSTEM GUIDELINES 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 1
VETAC Q+NOSS SYSTEM GUIDELINES
VETAC’s Quality Assurance and Endorsement System to develop and deliver National
Qualifications based on National Occupational Skills Standards (Q+NOSS)
National Qualifications Authority
Vocational Education and Training Awards Council
United Arab Emirates
June 2014
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 2
About the National Qualifications Authority
On the 23rd
of August 2010, President His Highness Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan issued Federal
Decree No. 1 ‘Establish and Maintain the National Qualifications Authority’. Key functions of the
National Qualifications Authority (NQA) are:
coordinating with related entities the establishment and implementation of an internationally-
recognised education and training system for the UAE
developing and implementing the Qualifications Framework for the Emirates, QFEmirates, which is a
singular integrated structure covering all qualifications in the UAE
facilitating the transfer, shift and continuity of learning of individuals between different education
and training pathways
contributing to the enhancement of vocational education and training quality in the country.
NQA aims to deliver outcomes that assist the UAE to keep pace with scientific and technological
progress and meet the country’s economic and social development needs.
In order to execute its mandate across the vocational education and training (VET) sector, the NQA
Board has established the Vocational Education and Training Awards Council (VETAC). This operating
body is responsible for managing, coordinating and quality assuring the outcomes of the VET sector.
VETAC’s primary focus is to develop the system of vocationally related and occupationally oriented
qualifications for UAE’s VET sector.
For more information about the VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines, contact:
General Manager
National Qualifications Authority
Address: P.O. Box 63003, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Phone: +9712 815 6666
Fax: +9712 815 6677
Web: www.nqa.gov.ae
This document is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported
license. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit this work, so long as you attribute it to the
National Qualifications Authority and Vocational Education and Training Awards Council and not alter,
transform or build upon this work.
To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 3
1. About these Guidelines 4
2. UAE’s Q+NOSS Model 5
3. Components of Q+NOSS 8
4. Applying to develop Q+NOSS 13
5. Quality Assurance and Endorsement Process 16
6. Developing an Occupational Profile (STEP 1) 23
7. Writing NOSS (Unit Standards) (STEP 2) 28
8. Writing National Qualifications (STEP 3) 42
9. Delivery of Q+NOSS 48
Appendix 1: Application Forms for Q+NOSS development by Recognised National Development
Committees (RNDCs) 49
Appendix 2: Q+NOSS Templates 70
Appendix 3: Examples - Occupational Profile, NOSS/Unit Standard and National Qualification 80
Appendix 4: International Standards Classification of Occupations (ISCO) System 96
Appendix 5: Discipline Codes Convention 97
Appendix 6: Sector Codes Convention 98
Appendix 7: Writing Elements for Unit Standards 100
Appendix 8: Writing Performance Criteria for NOSS (Unit Standards) 104
Appendix 9: Developing Evidence Requirements for NOSS (Unit Standards) 111
Appendix 10: Functional Hierarchy 119
Appendix 11: QFEmirates Summary Guide 123
Appendix 12: Credit Matrix 128
Appendix 13: Summary Grid of Level Descriptors 132
Appendix 14: QFEmirates Grid of Level Descriptors 136
Appendix 15: NQA Glossary of Terms 146
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 4
1.
The VETAC Quality Assurance and Endorsement System to develop National Qualifications based on
National Occupational Skills Standards (Q+NOSS) presented in the VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines
provides practical guidance and information for stakeholders who are involved in developing,
reviewing, validating, maintaining, and using UAE Occupational Profiles, National Occupational Skills
Standards (NOSS) and National Qualifications. These stakeholders include, but are not limited to:
industry/enterprises
industry sector councils and committees
Awarding Bodies
Recognised National Development Committees
Federal and local government agencies
professional associations
regulatory and licensing bodies
technical writers/NOSS developers
education and training providers
community groups
These guidelines cover:
national VET qualifications based on NOSS in the UAE (UAE’s Q+NOSS Model)
the components of Q+NOSS
developing Q+NOSS based on VETAC’s Quality Assurance and Endorsement Process for
developing occupational profiles, unit standards and national qualifications
applying to VETAC or the relevant awarding body to develop Q+NOSS
applying to VETAC or the relevant awarding body to deliver Q+NOSS.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 5
2.
In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), industry representatives and experts develop national vocational
qualifications and awards based on a VETAC model that ensures these qualifications meet the needs of
the labour market. Given that national qualifications are based on National Occupational Skills
Standards (NOSS) that specify competent performance expected in employment, VETAC refers to them
as Q+NOSS.
The flowchart below illustrates the elements of VETAC’s Q+NOSS Model:
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 6
These elements are as follows:
There are three steps in developing Q+NOSS – developing an Occupational Profile (Step 1),
developing National Occupational Skills Standards (NOSS) (Step 2), and developing a National
Qualification (Step 3).
For each step, developers must follow VETAC’s Quality Assurance and Endorsement Process by
providing evidence of industry-led research, development, consultation and validation to ensure
Q+NOSS meet the needs of the industry.
Sector Advisory Committees (SACs) in 12 different industry sectors are responsible for developing
Q+NOSS. As SACs are not yet established, VETAC is constituting focused bodies known as
Recognised National Development Committees (RNDCs) as an interim measure to develop
Q+NOSS. RNDCs apply to register as well as to undertake each step of the Q+NOSS development
process.
Once VETAC endorses Q+NOSS, NQA places them on the Qualifications Register and Information
System (QRIS), enabling Registered Training Providers to apply to offer training and assessment
services for national qualifications and awards to learners.
The Q+NOSS model has a range of benefits, including those shown in the figure on the following
page:
NOSS are agreed statements specifying competent performance expected in employment, which
comprises the knowledge, skills and aspects of competence required of an individual performing
in the workplace, in a work-related function or occupational area.
NOSS encompass the ability to transfer and apply knowledge, skills and aspects of competence in
new situations and environments.
Q+NOSS are developed by involving industry, government and VET stakeholders.
Q+NOSS are quality assured to ensure they are consistent and meet the needs of the industry
and learners.
Q+NOSS are used for international benchmarking.
Q+NOSS are used by providers to design and provide vocational education and training, and
assessment.
Q+NOSS are a valuable tool for defining roles at work, staff recruitment, supervision and
appraisal.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 7
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 8
3.
The first step in developing a national vocational qualification involves the design of an Occupational
Profile for a specific occupation in order to identify the knowledge, skills and attributes required to
perform in an occupation. The next step is to develop National Occupational Skills Standards (NOSS)
comprised of individual unit standards that are required for an occupation and are grouped by
industry sector. Once developed, NOSS are packaged together and aligned to the national
qualifications framework for the UAE, the QFEmirates, to form a national qualification.
Therefore, there are three components of Q+NOSS - Occupational Profiles, Unit Standards and
National Qualifications. The figure below illustrates the relationship between occupational profiles,
national occupational skills standards (i.e. individual ‘unit standards’ forming an occupation and
grouped by industry sector) and national qualifications, with the components of each.
3.1 Occupational Profiles
An Occupational Profile provides a summary overview of an occupation at a national level. It does not
represent a job, but represents the national combination of many jobs that align and relate to the
occupation. The occupational title is the national title to be used and adopted in the Occupational
Profile.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 9
For the purposes of international data comparisons and statistical national reporting, the occupation
title must correspond with the same/similar title used in the International Standards Classification of
Occupations (ISCO), and managed by the International Labour Organisation (ILO) (see Appendix 4).
Confirming a national Occupational Profile and listing the various jobs correlated to it, provides the
most effective and efficient approach. Where it can be shown a job aligns to the same occupational
family it is possible to simply map these many titles to the recognised national occupational title and
then in turn to the ISCO title. The added value of corresponding with the ISCO title is that it:
facilitates easy referencing for those looking to recruit, or those looking for employment in
country or external to the country
can be used for assisting in national data collection exercises (such as Census 2011 in Abu Dhabi)
and reporting of information for the same job families
simplifies communication and occupational data comparisons between government, employers,
employees, the community and international bodies for respective occupations.
In addition to the important process of identifying the title of the occupation, the Occupational Profile
provides an abridged and ‘approved national description’ of an occupation. Included in the description
are the key features of an occupation. That is:
the mix of activities and tasks performed
knowledge, skills and attributes required
the likely work context/conditions
qualification/education requirements
required experience.
This information may be augmented with industry and career information related to:
occupational size (i.e. size of the organisation by number of employees)
indicative salaries
employment outlook/job prospects
related occupations/job titles/career progression
examples of mapped job titles to the occupation and relevant employers.
The development of an Occupational Profile provides the added value that they are a qualitative
precursor tool used to commence the process of developing National Occupational Skills Standards
and Qualifications (Q+NOSS).
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 10
The establishment of national Occupational Profiles provides a national resource by:
being a central reference document for building and contextualising relevant occupational
outcomes and requirements
being an essential building block to progress organisational and respective development activities
informing the development of NOSS and national qualifications
improving the prospects for enhanced synergies and consistency in the recognition of same
occupation across relevant stakeholders. For example:
employers seeking to develop job descriptions
undertaking workplace reform or managing and planning employee careers
institutions looking to identify future programs that align and link with growth in the labour
market
research activities or compliance regimes that seek to identify occupational linkages.
improving community understanding, recognition and acceptance
helping to build confidence in the labour market of the role and scope of occupations.
3.2 National Occupational Skill Standards (Unit Standards)
In the UAE, National Occupational Skills Standards (NOSS) are agreed statements that specify
competent performance expected in employment. They provide information on the performance, skills
and knowledge required by industry for specific jobs. They describe what a person needs to do, know
and understand to carry out their role in a consistent and competent way. They also enhance a
person’s ability to transfer and apply the knowledge, skills and aspects of competence in new
situations and environments.
NOSS are:
national because they can be used in every part of the UAE where the functions (jobs) are carried
out
occupational because they are about specific jobs in the workplace
skills because they describe the performance required of an individual when carrying out
functions in the workplace, i.e. in their job (as a plumber, police officer, engineer, etc.)
standards because they detail an agreement among relevant stakeholders regarding the level of
the knowledge, skills and competencies required in a particular job.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 11
National Occupational Skills Standards (NOSS) comprise of individual unit standards that form an
occupation and are grouped by industry sector. A unit standard specifies the knowledge, skills and
performance, work outcomes, standard of performance to be demonstrated, conditions under which
work is performed (such as technologies and processes/procedures), and evidence required for the
assessment of competence.
A unit standard:
is the building block for all national qualifications and awards. It is the smallest package of
outcomes achievement that can be formally recognised and recorded for a relevant award
is developed by industry representatives and experts in the field to reflect industry needs and the
world of work i.e. they are expressed in performance-based terms to ensure outcomes are linked
to the labour market
is aligned to, and consistent with, the relevant level of the 10-level national qualifications
framework for the UAE, the QFEmirates, relative to its complexity and breadth.
is the national performance benchmark instrument against which all assessment is conducted in
order to deem an individual competent for the prescribed performance
may need to have regard for prospective funding models
should not be too small or too large.
3.3 National Qualifications
National qualifications are typically aligned to individual national qualifications frameworks established
in the respective country and approved exclusively for use in that country. Often they are the only
recognised qualifications that attract government funding and increase portability/recognition for
learners undertaking them. Increasingly therefore, there is a stronger correlation emerging between
the development of qualifications that use occupational skills standards within a qualifications
framework with a country’s occupational classification system.
The two figures on the next page are conceptual diagrams that illustrate the infrastructure at
international, UAE and local level, and tools and resources that are typically established in modern
competitive economies. This infrastructure underpins and improves consistency and recognition in the
use of approved qualifications and occupational data, terminologies and descriptions (core reference
platform).
Stakeholders tap into this infrastructure as a benchmark resource or reference tool to refer to, build,
contextualise, adapt, or modify as they see fit, to meet their needs. For example, employers may use
benchmarks as a starting reference point for recruitment, re-skilling and retention practices as a means
of communicating with the wider world for the same occupation or qualification requirements.
Institutions too, use the same to demonstrate to their prospective learners the occupations that lead
from the qualifications they achieve.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 12
Infrastructure underpinning and improving consistency and
recognition in the use of approved qualifications
Operational – tools and resources
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 13
4.
The development of Q+NOSS is to be segregated across twelve (12) industry sectors and undertaken
by 12 exclusive industry Sector Advisory Committees (SACs). VETAC recognises SACs as an effective
and forward-looking mechanism to contribute to the improvement of workforce (labour market) skills,
performance and outcomes of vocational education and training.
The 12 industry sectors identified reflect key economic indicators, industry scope, social context,
employment and population size, vocational skills mix, and skills demands evident across the Emirates.
VETAC will establish a SACs body for each of these 12 sectors:
1 Government services and public administration
2 Community, health and social services
3 Business, administration and financial services
4 Tourism, hospitality, retail and leisure services including personal care services
5 Arts, culture and entertainment
6 Education, learning and social development
7 Building and construction, estates and assets development and management
8 Utilities and infrastructure
9 Energy resources – oil, natural gas, petrochemical, chemical and mining/quarrying
10 Manufacturing
11 Logistics and transport
12 Agriculture, livestock and fishery
SACs will develop, validate and submit to VETAC for endorsement, relevant Occupational Profiles,
National Occupational Skills Standards and National Qualifications (Q+NOSS). They are also
responsible for identifying and providing advice on skills issues, trends and requirements applicable to
their sector.
These bodies will comprise key business, government, community, industry leaders and associated
stakeholders such VET practitioners, with appropriate individual expertise and professional networks.
This arrangement ensures SACs are well placed to engage with enterprises of all sizes and enables the
identification of generic, specific and emerging skills needs that support current and future
employability of individuals in the economy and business, and underpin local community
development.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 14
Recognising it will take some time for SACs to be established, VETAC has resolved to establish focused
bodies known as Recognised National Development Committees (RNDCs) as an interim measure
pending the full establishment of respective SACs. The RNDCs will be formally recognised to project
manage and undertake the process of development, validation and submission for endorsement of
national qualifications and National Occupational Skills Standards (Q+NOSS) for the prescribed
industry sector and covering a list of agreed occupations. Conditions, terms and processes approved
by VETAC for developing Q+NOSS to attain their endorsement remain the same. RNDCs will be
incorporated within respective industry SACs operations, as and when each SAC is established.
There are four parts to the application form related to RNDCs, which are included in these guidelines
(Appendix 1). These forms are as follows:
Part A: Application to be approved to become a Recognised National Development Committee
(RNDC)
Part B: Application for approval to develop an Occupational Profile (which includes undertaking a
functional analysis) for the industry sector skills and sub-sector skills areas
Part C: Application for approval to develop National Occupational Skills Standards (NOSS)
Part D: Application for approval to develop National Qualifications based on National
Occupational Skills Standards (Q+NOSS)
See the table on the following page for the stages and steps in RNDC applications for Q+NOSS
development.
15
Stages and Steps for RNDC Applications for Q+NOSS Development
Stage Step Objective Entity handling
the application Procedure Result of the procedure Outcome
Submitting
RNDC
Application A
Official RNDC
notification of intent to
develop Q+NOSS
NQA / VETAC
1. Reviewing the application
2. Producing a report and
submitting it to NQA GM
3. Notifying the RNDC
Notifying RNDC of approval and it
should move to the next step
Notifying RNDC of disapproval and
should reapply
NQA / VETAC registers
Q+NOSS to be
developed
Submitting
RNDC
Application B
Occupational Profile
development, including
undertaking a functional
analysis to identify the
key functions of the
occupation
Awarding body
+
RNDC
Involving industry and sub-
industry experts where this
occupation is found to
produce the functional map,
key functions and basic data
Notifying RNDC of approval of the
Occupational Profile, functional
map, key functions and basic data
and it should move to the next step
Notifying RNDC of disapproval and
it should reapply
Placement of
Occupational Profile
on NQA database
Submitting
RNDC
Application C
NOSS development
Awarding body
+
RNDC
+
NQA / VETAC
1. Consultations with experts
2. Benchmarking
3. Workshops
4. NOSS writing
5. NOSS review
6. NOSS validation
7. Submission for endorsement
Notifying RNDC of approval of
NOSS to be submitted to VETAC for
endorsement
Notifying RNDC of disapproval and
it should reapply
Placement of
endorsed NOSS on
NQA database
Submitting
RNDC
Application D
Qualifications
development
Awarding body
+
RNDC
+
NQA / VETAC
1. Consultations with experts
2. Benchmarking
3. Workshops
4. Qualification validation
5. Submission for endorsement
Notifying RNDC of approval of
qualifications to be submitted to
VETAC for endorsement
Notifying RNDC of disapproval and
it should reapply
Placement of
endorsed
qualifications on QRIS
database
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 16
5.
Industry representatives and experts in the field develop occupational profiles, NOSS and national
qualifications following VETAC’s approved application, development, consultation and validation
processes. These requirements are part of VETAC’s Quality Assurance and Endorsement Process as set
out below. Although the process largely relates to the development of National Occupational Skills
Standards (NOSS), most of the process is relevant to the development of Occupational Profiles and
national qualifications based on NOSS.
VETAC’s Quality Assurance and Endorsement Process
5.1 Research (Step 1)
Each step of the Q+NOSS development process involves, to varying degrees, research in the form of
gathering labour market intelligence and consulting with industry and key stakeholders from across
the UAE in order to identify the need for and scope of Q+NOSS development.
The extent of the research will be guided by the intended scope of the Q+NOSS, its content and
complexity, and the number of industry groups and key stakeholders who may need to be involved in
its development and implementation. These stakeholders may include:
employee and community organisations
employer organisations
professional associations
government agencies/departments
regulatory and/or licensing bodies
education and training providers.
The process will identify and reach agreement on the competencies needed by the industry in broad
terms, including:
any statutory, licensing or regulatory requirements
the future requirements of industry i.e. anticipated future directions, including changes in
technology and skill requirements
scope and the development process for the NOSS.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 17
5.2 Q+NOSS development (Step 2)
The aim of the development step is to develop Q+NOSS in line with research findings and to ensure it
is fit-for-purpose.
Developers must work with a group of industry experts and practitioners identified in the research and
consultation stage in order to identify:
the skills, knowledge and competencies required by the industry
any specific industry and workplace requirements/standards/regulatory requirements (e.g. legal,
OH&S, licensing)
current international standards for the occupation for benchmarking purposes.
The documentary evidence of the development process to be provided to VETAC is to include:
details of the industry representatives on the development team
details of each writer on the development team (name, position, organisation and qualifications)
details of the development process, in particular:
methodologies used which may include interviews/surveys/observations, review of technical
documents, discussions at working groups and workshops, and findings from a functional
analysis
time, date location of meetings, workshops, observations and details of each participant
(name, position and organisation).
evidence of benchmarking against international occupational standards (include copies of the
standards).
When designing occupational profiles, NOSS and national qualifications, developers must consider the
rules of design:
Occupational profiles (which includes a functional analysis) are to be referenced to the
International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO) – see Appendix 4
NOSS are to be developed from Occupational Profiles
NOSS (Unit Standards) are packaged and aligned to form national qualifications.
The Discipline Codes Convention (Appendix 5) and Sector Codes Convention (Appendix 6) from
the QFEmirates Handbook are followed.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 18
5.3 Industry review (Step 3)
The aim of this stage is to seek industry experts’ and practitioners’ review of Q+NOSS details and
appropriateness.
This involves:
the developers from the Sector Advisory Committees or Recognised National Development
Committees arranging a review by industry/technical experts and practitioners from industries
across the UAE. The reviewers will be asked to verify that the skills, knowledge and competencies
and additional information in the Q+NOSS meet current and future industry requirements and
standards.
the developers amending the Q+NOSS as required based on feedback and resubmitting for
review (note: a number of reviews may be required to achieve an agreement on final version for
validation).
the final version of the Q+NOSS being developed and forwarded for validation by industry
experts.
Documentary evidence of the industry review process to be provided to VETAC is to include:
when, where and how the review sessions were conducted
details of those who participated in review sessions (name, position, organisation, qualifications,
experience and signatures)
copies of documents provided to reviewers
record of responses and comments
record of amendments resulting from feedback
final, industry approved version of the Q+NOSS to be forwarded for validation.
5.4 Industry validation (Step 4)
The aim of this stage is to obtain industry validation that a Q+NOSS is fit-for-purpose and meets the
present and near future needs of industry, society and the employee.
This will involve:
the developers arranging validation by industry/technical experts and practitioners from
industries across the UAE who will use the Q+NOSS. These experts are to validate that the
Q+NOSS:
is fit-for-purpose (that it is appropriate and of the standard required)
meets the present and future needs of industry and employees
is finally submitted to NQA for Endorsement and listing on the national database.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 19
In the instance of the Q+NOSS not being validated, it should revert to the "development group" for
further consideration and amendment as required.
Documentary evidence of the industry validation process is to include:
when, where and how the validation was conducted
details of those who participated in the validation (name, organisation, brief description of
relevant qualifications/experience and signatures)
copies of documents provided to validators
record of responses
final, industry validated version of the Q+NOSS to be submitted to NQA for Endorsement.
5.5 VETAC Endorsement (Step 5)
The aim of this stage is to obtain official VETAC Endorsement.
This involves:
VETAC reviewing the QA process and evidence provided to ensure it is appropriate and has
involved adequate consultation with industry and other relevant stakeholders throughout the
research, development, review, and validation steps of the process.
Outcomes being advised to developers and stakeholders:
Approval and publishing of Endorsed Q+NOSS on NQA’s national database
Advice and detailed actions required where Endorsement is denied by VETAC.
The body that initiated and coordinated Q+NOSS development is to provide VETAC with a portfolio
of evidence for each step. This includes:
1. A covering letter
2. Executive Summary covering:
a brief background to the development of Q+NOSS, including the initiating body, key aspects
about the industry and why particular occupations/functions were selected for which Q+NOSS
were developed
the scope of endorsement sought (list of Q+NOSS being submitted for Endorsement)
key aspects and issues experienced during the development
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 20
acknowledgements related to IP/copyright and ownership of the products
name and contact details of the body and authorised person submitting the Q+NOSS for
Endorsement.
3. Documents prepared and gathered throughout the Q+NOSS development process as evidence
that each step was completed in line with VETAC quality assurance and endorsement requirements
4. Completed checklist of VETAC requirements for completion of the Q+NOSS template.
Checklist of VETAC Requirements for Q+NOSS Endorsement
Steps Evidence
1. Research Brief overview on need and scope of the Q+NOSS based on original market
intelligence/research.
Confirmation statement and attachment of the RNDC certificate from the NQA
confirming the organisation was a recognised body to develop Q+NOSS with
NQA/VETAC.
The Feasibility Statement produced during the research phase, updated with
details that include in particular, industry context, data and trends, as well as
functional analysis and resultant functional map for each occupation/function
that contribute to the development of an Occupational Profile. Also, the
Q+NOSS to be developed.
List of a representative sample of stakeholders across the UAE that are
expected to participate to Q+NOSS development, review and validation.
The proposed work plan.
List of technical writers/development team appointed at commencement and
progressively updated towards completion of the work.
2. Development Details of the nation-wide development process (methodologies used)
including SAC/RNDC members oversighting the development, number of
meetings held, members in attendance and minutes; as well as any working
committees/groups and/or subcommittees/groups established and convened
for particular purposes as well as their respective members, meeting dates,
attendances and minutes; and workshops/forums/meetings or the like with
the respective list of attendees, dates held, minutes/outcomes and comments
received.
This includes details of review sessions (dates, location, participants’ names,
organisations and positions), when, where and how they were conducted.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 21
Steps Evidence
3. Review Copies of documents provided to reviewers.
Record of responses, comments and outcomes.
Actions undertaken in response to received recommendations and comments/
feedback to production of drafts ready for the validation step.
Details of imported and tailored/adapted Q+NOSS (if applicable).
Details of any IP/copyright issues in using, adopting or adapting Q+NOSS
from other national or proprietary sources, including where adopted clearance
from the source.
The Quality Assurance process adopted to ensure development of the NOSS
and qualifications were in accord with VETAC’s requirements (VETAC Q+NOSS
System Guidelines and entered into the VETAC template). It includes
confirming, with evidence, the alignment of each Q+NOSS and the outcomes
of the qualification against the QFEmirates (Grid and Matrix).
4. Validation Details of the nation-wide validation process (date, location, participants’
names, organisation and position).
Copies of documents provided to reviewers.
Records of signatures, responses, comments and outcomes.
Issues encountered and issues that remain outstanding and may need VETAC’s
assistance in resolving. For example, stakeholder differences in supporting
validation during consultation and discussion processes having been
vigorously pursed remain gridlocked, and in need of suggestions to resolve
the impasse.
An overview document encompassing a list of occupations/functions, an
Occupational Profile for each of the occupations, and a functional map for
each and matrix of qualifications and related NOSSs. This includes their
respective QFEmirates level and highlighting the NOSS that are in common
and used across more than one qualification.
The qualification structures for each qualification and respective NOSS.
1 x hard copy in a folder(s) with qualification structure with NOSS
appropriately arranged in order detailed in the qualification structure.
1 x soft copy of the same
A signed declarations statement (letter) from the SAC/RNDC that the final
products confirm to the VETAC Q+NOSS development requirements and are
submitted for Endorsement on behalf of the industry.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 22
Steps Evidence
5. Endorsement Endorsement Submission Report received and processed by VETAC for
acceptance and presentation to VETAC for consideration and review, and if
accepted, Endorsement. Subsequently, if endorsed, placed on the
Qualifications Register and Information System (QRIS).
The report should be presented in a commentary style, providing a historical
story of the process of development and validation by industry of the
Q+NOSS being submitted to VETAC. Evidence documents such as reports,
minutes, Q+NOSS, and related support documents are to be placed as
tabulated attachments to the report and referenced in the commentary.
In developing this report, consideration should be given to confirming the
NOSS and the qualification(s) for Endorsement are unique to the UAE, and
specifically designed for UAE conditions (fit for purpose) even if they
encompass international standards
The submission process is as follow:
The Endorsement Submission Report including covering letter and Executive Summary are to be
forward to the General Manager, NQA.
An executive summary to be included outlining key points of evidence that confirms the
following:
1. The Q+NOSS was developed in accordance with VETAC Q+NOSS development requirements
2. Nationwide industry consultations and validation occurred throughout the development
3. The set (summary) of the national qualification(s) and NOSS(s) for which Endorsement is
sought
4. ‘Acceptance Statement’ acknowledging that once the Q+NOSS materials/products are
submitted to VETAC and endorsed, ownership transfers to the UAE Government and they
become the property of the UAE government held in trust by the NQA.
If the Q+NOSS has drawn on content from standards in other countries, an IP/copyright
statement confirming there are no copyright issues or formal release must be obtained by the
original owner and included in the submission.
The submission is to be marked as “Q+NOSS Endorsement Submission Report for VETAC”.
Three (3) hard paper-based copies and one electronic copy of the Endorsement Submission
Report and one (1) hard copy and one (1) electronic version of each Q+NOSS are to be provided.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 23
6.
The first step in developing a national vocational qualification is
designing an Occupational Profile. Information about the
knowledge, skills and performance criteria required for an
occupation guides the development of NOSS (unit standards)
and qualifications/awards for this occupation.
To help with this activity, developers commence with a functional
analysis. They then use this information to help create an
Occupational Profile that they submit to VETAC for approval.
6.1 Functional Analysis
A paper produced by The World Bank Human Development Network, the European Union (EU)
European Training Foundation, and the Educational Resources Information Center Clearinghouse on
Adult, Career, and Vocational Education (ERIC/ACVE)* provides a useful definition of a functional
analysis.
Functional analysis (FA) starts with the identification of the key purpose of an occupation in the major
sectors where it is found and identification of the main functions, breaking down these in turn into
sub-functions until outcomes for each function are identified following a strictly logical sequence. The
technique can be applied to multiple sectors, to a single sector, or at an individual enterprise level
(where it would produce a job, as opposed to an occupational, analysis). By concentrating on the
functions or results/outcomes instead of the activities, the descriptions produced are independent of
the technology or methods used to achieve the function. In other words, instead of describing what
people are doing, FA describes what people have to achieve. The logic behind FA is that functions are
not independent, but are in strict relation to the working environment.
The methodology starts with functional mapping, which is an analysis of the sector starting with the
key purpose statement and subsequently analysing down to individual functions.
Each of these functions can be analysed again to form functions that represent the responsibilities and
duties of people in employment.
*Source: Fretwell, David H., Morgan V. Lewis, and Arjen Deij. "A Framework for Defining and Assessing Occupational and Training
Standards in Developing Countries." Information Series 386 (2001). <http://www.unevoc.unesco.org/e-
forum/A_Framework_for_Defining_Training_Standards.pdf>.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 24
Functions identified and derived from a functional analysis are mapped out, typically in an illustrative
form, commencing with the key purposes statement of an occupational area or a sub-group of the
occupational area to the units standards to be developed.
Fetwell, Lewis and Deij (2001) referred to three related specifications of a functional analysis:
The employment specification – what the person must be able to do in employment
The learning specification – what a person needs to learn to be effective in employment
The assessment specification – how to document what the person has learned compared to the
employment specification.
Here is a simple example of functional analysis/map for an occupation in a restaurant.
Functional Map
Key purposes: Prepare the
restaurant, serve food and
drinks, and process accounts
Prepare a restaurant for food
service and special events
Prepare a restaurant for food service
Plan and prepare for special
events
Prepare and serve food and
drinks to customers
Serve food and drinks to customers
Prepare, cook, and serve food at the table
Mix and serve drinks and manage the bar service
Take payment for services and
accounts
Take payment for food and drinks
Reconcile and process amounts
Contribute to the organisation of work, effective
relationships, and social environmental
requirements
Employment and learning specifications for the task: Serve food and drinks to customers:
Employment Specification Learning Specification
Performance The Range The Skills Required The Knowledge
(a) Welcome customers
politely, take and store
coats and other
personal items
Customers: individuals,
groups, special needs (e.g.
disabilities)
Recognising and
responding to
customers' special
needs
Effective communication
with customers
The characteristics and
needs of different
customers
The principles of
effective communication
Storage of customer
property and legal
responsibilities
(b) Check reservations,
offer options where
tables are not
available, and show
customers to a table
Options: waiting for a
table to clear, making
later reservations,
suggesting an alternative
restaurant
Effective communication
with customers
Interpreting reservation
books
The principles of
effective communication
Reservation systems
Go to Appendix 10 for more information about functional analysis and mapping.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 25
6.2 Occupational Profile Template
After gathering labour market intelligence, undertaking a functional analysis and producing a
functional map for this occupation, developers are in a good position to complete an Occupational
Profile using VETAC’s template (Appendix 2). Key fields are:
main activities/tasks
knowledge, skills and attributes required
likely work context/conditions
qualification/education requirements
required experience
occupational size (i.e. size of the organisation by number of employees)
indicative salaries
employment outlook/job prospects
related occupations/job titles/career progression.
Once validated by industry and endorsed by VETAC, the profile will become the ‘approved national
description’ of an occupation.
The following table explains the fields in the Occupational Profile template that is available in
Appendix 2. An example of a completed Occupational Profile for a photographer is available in
Appendix 3.
Explanation of the contents of an Occupational Profile
No. Field Details
1. ISCO-08 occupational
title/code
The International Labour Organisation’s International Standard
Classification of Occupations (ISCO) system is a tool for organising all
jobs in an establishment, an industry or country, into a clearly defined set
of groups according to the tasks and duties in the job.
Search ISCO’s 08 Manual to find the 4-digit code of the occupation:
http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/B30EE525-22DB-4C1B-B8D5-
6D12934AF00A/0/isco08.pdf
If a developer proposes a different and unique UAE title to the ISCO
occupational title, it must be a derivative of the ISCO title and augment
the ISCO title.
2. Brief occupational
descriptor
A brief description of the occupation consistent with and in line with
ISCO-08 code identified in feasibility study.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 26
No. Field Details
3. Occupational
summary
A statement summarising what the occupation is consistent and in line
with ISCO-08 code identified in the feasibility study.
4. Activities/tasks Main (high level) activities and tasks performed in the occupation.
5. Knowledge, skills and
attributes
Knowledge, skills and attributes required for the occupation drawing on:
QFEmirates Handbook for qualifications and employment indicators
international sources
expertise of industry representatives and technical sub-committee
members experienced in qualifications and pathways, occupational
standards and education and training curriculum development.
6. Work context/
conditions A summary of the conditions or context in which the work is performed.
7.
Qualification/
education
requirements
The minimum qualification, award or education required for the
occupation.
8. Experience Outline the experience typically required for the occupation.
9. Example employers Typical UAE employers that have such occupations.
10. Occupational size Expected occupational size of an organisation requiring this occupation:
Less than 5,000 employees
5,000 to 30,000 employees
Over 30,000 employees
Predicting occupational size involves drawing on:
international sources
Ministry of Labour (MoL) Labour Market Information System (LMIS)
discussions with industry, government representatives and technical
sub-committee experienced in human resources, labour market and
workforce statistics, qualifications, pathways and occupational
standards
11. Indicative salary An indicative salary for this occupation is:
significantly higher than the industry average (over 30% higher)
higher than the industry average (5% to 30% higher)
the same as the industry average
below the industry average
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 27
No. Field Details
12. Employment outlook/
job prospects
Employment outlook/job prospects for this job are:
very good
good
average
below average
13. Related occupations/
job titles/career
progression
Related occupations/job titles/career progression that correspond with
this occupation.
14. Examples of allied
occupation/job titles
Examples of allied/related occupation/job titles.
15. Discipline A cross-sectorial code system for 26 discipline areas in the UAE has been
developed to provide information for future data analysis. Identify which
discipline applies to this occupation.
See Appendix 5: Discipline Codes Convention
16. Industry sector As part of the national coding system, 12 industry sectors have been
identified from a range of national activity indicators. The sectors were
derived from information related to such activities as economic, social
context, employment and population size as well as synergies in the mix
of occupational and vocational areas. Identify which industry sector and
industry sub-sector applies to this occupation.
See Appendix 6: Sector Codes Convention
17. Optional related
information
This field includes any additional information about this occupation,
which will inform users. It may include commentary related to the level of
supervision.
18. Developed by Title of the Sector Advisory Committee (SAC), the Recognised National
Development Committee (RNDC) initiating the development of the
Occupational Profile, or other bodies in special circumstances.
19. Validated by Names and qualifications/experience of representatives from the listed
organisations/stakeholder bodies involved in the approval process
20. Recommended review
date
Date the Occupational Profile should be reviewed and how often
reviewed (frequency) to ensure that it is current and still fit for purpose.
21. Endorsement date To be completed by VETAC.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 28
7.
The second step in developing a national vocational qualification
is developing National Occupational Skills Standards (NOSS),
which comprise of individual unit standards that form an
occupation and are grouped by industry sector.
A unit standard is the specification of knowledge and skills
required for workplace performance and their application in the
workplace to the expected standards of performance. It also
explains the conditions under which work is performed (such as
technologies and processes/procedures), and evidence required
for the assessment of competence.
This section of the guidelines aims to provide the necessary information for developers to complete
the Unit Standards template in Appendix 2. Similar to the previous section, there is an explanation of
each of the fields in this template as well as an example of a completed unit standard in Appendix 3.
7.1 Components of a unit standard
As shown in the figure on the following page, the key components of a unit standard are elements,
performance criteria, and evidence to support a judgement as to whether a person has the
competence against the specifications of a unit standard.
Elements describe the more detailed outcomes that learners’ knowledge and skills are assessed
against. Collectively, these comprise the outcome expressed by the title. In order to be credited with
the unit standard, a candidate/learner must achieve all of the outcomes described in the elements.
Individual elements are important as they:
tell the learner what they are expected to do and achieve
form the basis for the definition of content, activities, assessment and outcomes for a given unit
guide the planning of activities for delivery and assessment of that unit
Developers also need to determine the number of performance criteria required to assess
performance against the element/learning outcome and later the evidence requirements for the
performance criteria. Every performance criteria has at least three (3) parts:
Behaviour
Conditions of the environment
The standard
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 29
Competency-based training provides learners with the knowledge, skills and understanding to
demonstrate competence against standards and performance criteria in an applied context. It is the
process of collecting evidence and making judgements about whether competency has been
achieved. Evidence requirements specify the critical evidence required to demonstrate achievement of
the element and performance criteria.
See Appendices 7, 8 and 9 for more information about elements, performance criteria and evidence.
Key components of a Unit Standard
Other components of a unit standard are:
Unit standard title
Unit type (Knowledge and Skills OR Application)
Unit descriptor
QFEmirates level
Credit value
Function
Grading
Title of the Skills Advisory Committee or
Recognised National Development Committee
Discipline
Industry sector
Industry sub-sector
Date of endorsement, review and version
number
Elements
Performance criteria
Evidence requirements
CoreLife Skills
Additional information specific to the unit
Key words and terms
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 30
The component of ‘Unit standard’ is packaged as Knowledge and Skills units or Application units:
Knowledge and Skill Units Application Units
Cover information on what candidates need to
know and skills they need for a particular work-
related function or occupational area
Content broken into elements (learning
outcomes) and subdivided into assessable
performance criteria
Are graded as either Pass or Fail where there is
a specific risk (e.g. health and safety, personal
care) or as a percentile (mark) out of 100%
Credit value is set at 1 Credit = 15 hours (11
hours knowledge and 4 for skill development)
Assess candidate’s competence in the
application of the knowledge and skills for a
particular work-related function or
occupational area
Content broken down into work process
outcomes such as ‘Plan’, ‘Do’ and ‘Complete’
and sub-divided into assessable performance
criteria as agreed by industry
Are graded either Competent or Not Yet
Competent
Credit value is set at 1 Credit = 15 learning
hours
7.2 Important notes to developers of unit standards
Each unit standard describes a key part of a specific job. The full range of knowledge, skills and
performance (competencies) required for a particular job can be specified by grouping together
units of occupational standards to form national vocational qualifications and awards.
The number and type of unit standards developed for each NOSS will be determined by the
development team in consultation with industry representatives and other experts.
The development of unit standards is led by SACs bodies or Recognised National Development
Committees and requires the involvement of all stakeholders.
Unit standards should reflect industry needs and the world of work, and be expressed in
performance-based terms i.e. outcomes linked to the labour market.
Unit standards should be aligned to a QFEmirates level relative to their complexity and breadth
and can be used for formal recognition purposes and to build qualifications.
Unit standards are not only applicable to learning and assessment activities; they can be used for
HR and industrial applications/purposes e.g. recruitment, retention, re-skilling and employee
performance management systems.
They must list, in manageable ‘performance-based’ terms and have:
assessable outcomes
the minimum acceptable evidence required to confirm an individual’s competence for a
specified job.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 31
Unit standards should have sufficient ‘specificity’ to maximise consistency of interpretation and
minimise the potential for misinterpretation across users (e.g. workplace assessors, vocational
trainers, program designers, curriculum developers) with respect to acceptable evidence. This
should include specific requirements unique to the unit as well as acceptable simulation for
workplace assessments (high risk) or other significant requirements as agreed and approved by
industry.
Unit standards must be written using language that is clear, concise and understandable to users.
7.3 Unit Standards Template
The following table explains the fields in the Unit Standards template (see Appendix 2 for the template
and Appendix 3 for an example).
PART A: DETAILS OF A UNIT STANDARD
No. Field Details
1. Reference code VETAC assigned reference code
2. Unit standard title The title of a unit standard expresses the main outcome that a
candidate/learner will need to know and/or can do.
Each title begins with a verb and is linked to the taxonomy of functional
levels aligned to the UAE qualifications framework.
For example:
Conform to workplace health and safety requirements
Assess learner achievement in the workplace
Prepare surfaces for painting/decorating
Construct floral arrangements
Develop teams and individuals to enhance performance
See Appendix 7: Writing elements for unit standards
3. Unit type Units are to be classified as either:
Knowledge and Skills – information and expertise required to
enable the person to complete a task and/or job to a specified
standard.
Application – requiring practical demonstration in the workplace or
approved simulated environment of the application of knowledge
and skills in a workplace context.
4. Unit descriptor A unit descriptor is a summary of the elements (learning outcomes) of a
unit standard in terms of knowledge and skills and/or workplace tasks/
applications and may include behaviours, aptitude and values.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 32
No. Field Details
A unit descriptor:
provides a brief description of the unit content
suggests for whom the unit is intended
provides an indicator about work conditions that apply.
5. Elements Elements (learning outcomes) in a unit standard describe the activities
that make up the broader function or job. They:
tell the candidate/learner what they are expected to know and do.
guide the planning of activities for the delivery and assessment of
that unit.
are expressed in a language that is clear to the candidate/learner
and to those advising the learner, whether they are presented in
English or Arabic.
start with a verb and use the taxonomy related to functional levels.
The number of elements in a unit standard will vary depending on
complexity, depth and type of unit:
Knowledge and
Skills units = minimum of 3 and maximum of 10
Application
units
= minimum of 3 (plan, conduct/do,
review/complete) and maximum of 4 unless
otherwise justified and approved by the
industry review panel.
See Appendix 7 - Writing elements for unit standards
6. QFEmirates Level The QFEmirates sets out Level Descriptor statements for the 10 levels of
the UAE national qualifications framework. These guide allocation of an
appropriate level for the unit being developed.
Level Descriptors define what is expected to be achieved at the
respective level in relation to knowledge, skills and aspect of
competence (autonomy and responsibility, role in context and self-
development) required. The level guides those using unit standards to
develop national qualifications.
See:
Appendix 11: QFEmirates Summary Guide
Appendix 14: QFEmirates Grid of Level Descriptors
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 33
No. Field Details
7. Credit value The credits allocated to unit standards reflect the notional (estimated)
learning time expected for learners to meet the outcomes in these unit
standards.
Notional learning time includes:
time spent in structured tuition and self-paced learning and practice
time taken to gather and provide evidence for assessment
time taken to be assessed in all the outcomes and contexts.
One credit represents 15 notional hours of learning, practice and
assessment for vocational qualifications in the QFEmirates.
Knowledge and Skills (K&S) units comprise 11 hours of formal
instruction and four (4) hours of formally structured skill development.
The credit value of K&S units depends on the notional learning time
specified for that unit based on the complexity and content in the unit.
For example, K&S units with notional learning time of 30 hours would
have a credit value of 2.
Application units have a maximum value of one credit (15 hours).
See Appendix 12: Credit Matrix
8. Function Function refers to a group of actions and decisions required to perform
the duties and responsibilities in specific jobs. They are organised into a
hierarchy of six (6) types of functions that indicate the types of actions
and/or decisions involved. The six types of functions that are aligned to
levels in the QFEmirates are:
Function QFEmirates level
Policy and strategy 9 - 10
Managing 7 - 8
Specifying 6 - 7
Controlling 6
Maintaining capability 4 - 6
Performing/carry out 1 - 4
Developers are required to select an appropriate function.
See Appendix 10: Functional hierarchy
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 34
No. Field Details
9. Entry information
and prerequisites
Addition of this information is not mandatory.
Entry information may state:
no entry requirements
critical prerequisites (health, safety or legislative requirements)
the recommended occupational competence and currency required
Knowledge and Skills units or Application units required (pre-
requisites)
the equivalences (as formally agreed by industry bodies such as
SACs).
Note: The Registered Training Provider (RTP) delivering this unit is
responsible for ensuring candidates/learners have met any entry
requirements specified in this section prior to entry and/or delivering
the unit.
10. Grading All units must specify how the unit is to be graded. There are two forms
of grading that apply:
Knowledge and Skills units may be either:
Pass/Fail for units where there is a specific risk (such as health
and safety, personal care)
graded out of a percentile of 100% for units covering general and
discipline knowledge
Application units are recorded as either Competent/Not Yet
Competent.
11. Links to other
units
List of units and/or occupations the unit standard relates to, including
interrelated/co-requisites units. Useful for Assessors in planning holistic
assessments across more than one unit standard.
12. Discipline A cross-sectorial code system for 26 discipline areas in the UAE has been
developed to provide information for future data analysis. Identify which
discipline applies to this unit standard.
See Appendix 5: Discipline Codes Convention
13. Industry sector As part of the national coding system, 12 industry sectors have been
identified from a range of national activity indicators. The sectors were
derived from information related to such activities as economic, social
context, employment and population size as well as synergies in the mix
of occupational and vocational areas. Identify which industry sector and
industry sub-sector applies to this unit standard.
See Appendix 6: Sector Codes Convention
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 35
No. Field Details
14. Industry activity Indicate the key activity in the industry related to this unit.
For example: The unit, Follow basic agricultural pesticide safety
procedures, is, related to the industry activity of environmental
conservation in agriculture.
15. Photos Optional. Photos that are relevant to this unit standard.
16. Developed by Title of the Sector Advisory Committee (SAC) or Recognised National
Development Committee (RNDC) initiating the development of this unit
standard, or other body in special circumstances.
17. Developer’s
website Add website of the developer
18. Endorsement date To be completed by VETAC
19. Recommended
review date
Date the Unit Standard should be reviewed and how often reviewed
(frequency) to ensure that it is current and still fit for purpose.
20. Version No. To be completed by VETAC
PART B: PERFORMANCE CRITERIA, EVIDENCE AND CORELIFE SKILLS FOR ELEMENT
(Copy this template if you have more elements)
1. ELEMENT DETAILS (key activities/elements of the work covered by the unit):
Reference code VETAC assigned reference code Name of element See Field 5 in Part A
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA (how the candidate will demonstrate they have achieved the outcomes):
Performance criteria describe the activities, knowledge, skills and understanding required to demonstrate achievement of the elements. That is, the workflow sub-divided into
assessable performance (or assessment) criteria (commencing with a measurable verb), in a detailed and unambiguous statement of what an individual must demonstrate and
be able to do. They should be:
attainable
specific
observable
meaningful
measurable.
The number of performance criteria for an element will vary according to complexity and breadth of the element.
They should endeavour to cover:
task skills
task management skills
contingency management skills
job/role environment skills
See Appendix 8 - Writing performance criteria for unit standards
2. EVIDENCE REQUIREMENTS
Evidence requirements specify the critical evidence required to demonstrate achievement of the element and performance criteria. They describe what and how the
candidate/learner has to provide and/or demonstrate. Evidence requirements provide information on:
the appropriate assessment context (environment, setting)
the resources required for assessment
the conditions under which assessment is to take place
how evidence is to be provided and recorded
the evidence required for each performance criteria in an element
the evidence required covering two or more of the performance criteria in an element.
Developers may assess against each performance criteria or design holistic assessment covering two (2) or more performance criteria.
See: Appendix 9 - Developing evidence requirements for unit standards (includes collating, recording and storing evidence)
3. RELEVANT CORELIFE SKILLS ( you can tick more than one)
CoreLife Skills cover all essential skills that underpin and support performance and functionality in work learning for a particular job/work task. In unit standards, performance
criteria is to be mapped to one or more CoreLife Skills.
Collecting, analysing,
organising and
applying information in
a given context
Communicating in
formation, concepts
and ideas
Initiating and
organising self-
activities including
motivation, exploration
and creativity
Working with others in
teams including
leadership
Solving problems
including using
mathematical ideas and
techniques
Applying information
and communication
technology (ICT)
Participating in social
and civic life including
ethical practice
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 38
PART C: INFORMATION SPECIFIC TO A UNIT STANDARD
Information provided in this section includes details on the scope, the range of variables and other
details that have a critical impact on the quality of the performance required. Unit standard developers
will determine which fields to complete and the amount of information provided in each field
depending on the NOSS being developed and through consultation with stakeholders.
No. Field Details
1. Reference code VETAC assigned reference code
2. Unit standard
title
Same title as Part A
3. Underpinning
knowledge and
skills required for
this unit
Underpinning knowledge represents the supporting and basic
information and knowledge required to perform competently in a
specified range of workplace contexts and conditions and be able to
transfer to new situations and environments (understanding of). Should
cover the ‘whats’, the why ‘whys’ and the ‘hows’ (facts,
principles/rationale and methods).
Knowledge and Skills units may include:
industry/sector specific requirements
context specific knowledge & understanding.
Application units may include:
workplace procedures
previous experience.
4. Standing
operating
procedures and
applicable
regulations
Standard operating procedures (internal) – encompass established
procedures and formal work instructions and/or arrangements of an
organisation, enterprise or statutory authority of how work is to be done
and by whom and including (e.g.): record keeping – electronic, written,
visual, oral or combination. Standing operating procedures and
applicable regulations may include:
occupational health and safety procedures
procedures for operating instruments, apparatus and other
equipment
quality assurance requirements and procedures
complaint and appeals procedures
prescribed processes and measures such as :
conformity notices
customer/client requirements and specifications
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 39
No. Field Details
design specifications
job plans
job safety analysis, risk assessment and hazard identification
documentation
permissions to work e.g. work permits
people, customers, stakeholders
documentation e.g. transport dispatches, site orders, instructions
schedules, programs, plans.
Requirements (external third party):
Relevant specifications and/or legal such as occupational health,
safety and security; occupational licensing, occupational
requirements to follow, where applicable:
legislation
regulations
standards
codes of practice
manufacturer’s specifications, schedules, manuals and catalogues
policy and/or guidelines – government and/or industry
Risk assessment policies, procedures and practices
5. General
resources, tools,
equipment and
supplies
This section may include information which will guide the delivery and/or
assessment such as:
tools, plant, equipment, technologies, resources, materials,
techniques, systems, work processes and/or supplies associated with
the unit and required for the assessment of the candidate
protective equipment and supplies required
6. Special
requirements
Special requirements may include information on:
specific simulation conditions applicable to the unit as approved by
VETAC
specific legislative/regulatory/standards and codes of practice
financial i.e. budget considerations/requirements, cost to the
organisation, cost to the candidate/learner
human resources i.e. people involved in the assessment processes,
authorisations/approvals required
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 40
No. Field Details
access and equity requirements of the candidates/learners.
7. Additional
information on
evidence
requirements and
the assessment
process
Additional information on evidence requirements and the assessment
process includes:
range statements that specify the range of contexts (settings,
environments), circumstances and conditions to which the assessment
arrangements may apply
required skills e.g. language, literacy, technical, mathematical, etc.
work issues e.g. dealing with unexpected contingencies, time pressure,
etc.
operational limitations e.g. level or responsibility, autonomy, cost, time,
classification level, physical/environmental limitations, etc.
Information/guidelines on allowable adjustments.
8. Delivery details
and pathways
This field specifies where delivery and assessment is to be conducted,
based on the unit type. For example:
Knowledge and Skills units - learning and assessment in
vocational/educational setting or an approved simulated environment.
Application units - primarily workplace delivery or it can be a
combination of vocational training and workplace delivery.
Education pathways identify other qualifications/awards that a
graduate can enrol in after completing the qualification/award. Where
the qualification/award is stand-alone and does not prepare
learners/candidates for further study, the outcome statement should
make this clear. Information on education pathways may also include
details of formal agreements aligning/incorporating the unit with other
qualifications/awards or units.
Employment/career pathways identify the career areas in which a
graduate may be qualified to work or the contribution they may make to
their community.
9. Reference
material
Reference material can be from the NQA, relevant government bodies
and the candidate’s/learner’s own organisation. This may include:
Federal and/or local legislation and regulations
international regulations and/or standards
organisational and/or industry codes of practice, guidelines
organisational/industry standards
organisation’s and/or manufacturer’s specifications, schedules and
manuals
glossary of terms
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 41
PART D: KEY TERMS
The purpose of this section is to list key words and terms related to the unit.
For example, some key words and terms for the unit, Help to prepare sites for construction work are:
No Key words/terms Definition
1. Equipment and material Tools, clothing, products or other items needed for a work
activity.
2. Hazards Any substance, physical effect, or condition with potential to
harm people, property or the environment.
3. Heights Where a worker may be required to carry out activities at
heights.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 42
8.
Unit standards are packaged together and aligned to the national
qualifications framework for the UAE, the QFEmirates, to form a national
qualification for an industry sector. This is the third and final step in the
Q+NOSS development process.
8.1 National Qualifications Template
The following table explains the fields in the qualifications template.
No. Field Details
1. General Profile of Qualification/Award
1.1 QFEmirates level The QFEmirates sets out Level Descriptor statements for the 10 levels
of the UAE national qualifications framework. These guide allocation
of an appropriate level for the unit being developed. Level Descriptors
define what is expected to be achieved at the respective level in
relation to knowledge, skills and aspect of competence (autonomy
and responsibility, role in context and self-development) required. The
level guides those using unit standards to develop national
qualifications.
1.2 QFEmirates level and
full title of
qualification/award
For example, Level 1 Component Award in Construction Work
(General) and Level 5 Diploma in Business Administration.
See:
Appendix 13: QFEmirates Summary Grid of Descriptors
Appendix 14: QFEmirates Grid of Level Descriptors
1.3 Type of qualification/
award
To ensure consistency across different users and between different
qualifications, a title convention is required for respective qualification
types and the array of agreed qualifications that will be used. This is as
well as titles that will be ascribed to each qualification, at each level of
the Framework. There are three qualifications types in the QFEmirates:
‘Principal’ Qualification - the major qualification type with formal
recognition at each level that captures a typical achievements for
the level including all five strands of learning outcomes.
‘Composite’ Award - provide formal recognition for learners who
achieve a set of cohesive learning outcomes including, in varying
combinations, all five strands of learning outcomes. This may
involve fewer learning outcomes and/or less complexity compared
to a Principal Qualification.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 43
No. Field Details
‘Component’ Award - provide formal recognition of achievement of
a limited number of learning outcomes which may relate to all or
only some of the strands of learning outcomes.
1.4 Kind of qualification/
award
VETAC uses two (2) kinds of qualifications:
One kind is comprised solely of Knowledge and Skills (K&S) and is
used as a pathway for those preparing for work, those seeking
advance standing in higher education programs or seeking more
advanced knowledge and skills in preparation for career advances.
The other is comprised of a combination of Application unit
standards interrelated with the respective pre-requisite Knowledge
and Skills unit standards (KSA). The Application based qualification
thus, reflects that a learner has demonstrated the acquisition of
respective knowledge and skills and applied such to the standard
of performance required in the workplace.
1.5 Summary scope for
this qualification/
award
Broad learning outcomes envisaged (scope) for the qualification/
award at this level.
1.6 QFEmirates Summary
Level Descriptor for
this qualification/
award
A set of learning outcome statements for each level is called ‘Level
Descriptors’. They distinguish the levels within a qualifications
framework. Level Descriptors form the foundation for specific
qualifications design and development (i.e. qualifications are
developed for specific needs and aligned to the appropriate level). For
each qualification, an individual ‘profile’ (specification) is produced
using the Level Descriptors.
See:
Appendix 13: QFEmirates Summary Grid of Descriptors
Appendix 14: QFEmirates Grid of Level Descriptors
2. Completion requirements
2.1 Code and title
(note: VETAC will
generate a code based
on its national coding
system described in the
QFEmirates Handbook)
The title should reflect the intended outcome of the qualification in
terms of:
sector activities
discipline
field of learning/work and/or
subject matter/topic area covered.
For example: Level 1 Component Award in Construction Work (General)
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 44
No. Field Details
2.2 ISCO code and title The International Labour Organisation’s International Standard
Classification of Occupations (ISCO) system is a tool for organising all
jobs in an establishment, an industry or country into a clearly defined
set of groups according to the tasks and duties in the job.
Search ISCO’s 08 Manual to find the 4-digit code of the occupation:
http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/B30EE525-22DB-4C1B-B8D5-
6D12934AF00A/0/isco08.pdf
If a developer proposes a different and unique UAE title to the ISCO
occupational title, it must be a derivative of the ISCO title and
augment the ISCO title.
2.3 License to Practice or
regulatory
requirements
Any statutory, licensing or regulatory requirements such as:
legislation
regulations
standards
codes of practice
government and industry policies/guidelines
manufacturer’s specifications/schedules/manuals/catalogues.
3. Specialisation/pathways
3.1 Qualification/award
pathways
Other qualifications/awards that a graduate can enrol in after
completing this qualification/award.
e.g. Advanced Diploma in Business Administration to Bachelor of
Business Administration
3.2 Industry sector and
industry sub-sector
As part of the national coding system, 12 industry sectors (with sub-
sectors) have been identified from a range of national activity
indicators. The sectors were derived from:
information related to such activities as economic, social context,
employment and population size
synergies in the mix of occupational and vocational areas.
See Appendix 6: Sector Codes Convention
3.3 Discipline A cross-sectorial code system for 26 discipline areas in the UAE has
been developed to provide information for future data analysis.
Identify which discipline applies to this unit standard.
See Appendix 5: Discipline Codes Convention
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 45
No. Field Details
3.4 Functions
Function refers to a group of actions and decisions required to
perform the duties and responsibilities in specific jobs. They are
organised into a hierarchy of six (6) types of functions that indicate
the types of actions and/or decisions involved. The six types of
functions are aligned to levels in the QFEmirates:
Function QFEmirates level
Policy and strategy 9 - 10
Managing 7 - 8
Specifying 6 - 7
Controlling 6
Maintaining capability 4 - 6
Performing/carry out 1 - 4
Developers are required to select an appropriate function.
See Appendix 10: Functional hierarchy
3.5 Photos Optional. Photos relevant to the unit standard.
4. Entry requirements for this qualification/award
Addition of this information is not mandatory.
Entry information may state:
no entry requirements
critical prerequisites (health, safety or legislative requirements)
the recommended occupational competence
Knowledge and Skills units or Application units required (pre-requisites)
the equivalences (as formally agreed by industry bodies such as SACs).
Note: The Registered Training Provider (RTP) delivering this unit is responsible for ensuring
candidates/learners have met any entry requirements specified in this section prior to entry and/or
delivering of the unit.
4.1 Pre-requisites
1. Minimum requirements (qualification
or award required for entry)
e.g. Diploma in Aircraft
Maintenance
2. Other minimum mandatory
requirements such as competence
and experience
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 46
No. Field Details
4.2 Advisory entry
requirements (Non-mandatory but recommended)
4.3 Developed by Sector Advisory Committee (SAC), Recognised National Development
Committee (RNDC) or other body in special circumstances
4.4 Endorsement date To be added by VETAC
4.5 Review date Recommended review date
4.6 Version No. To be added by VETAC
5. Completion rules
5.1 Core unit standards Core unit standards are those which are mandated by industry to form
the core requirements of the qualification. All core unit standards
must be achieved.
5.2 Stream core unit
standards
A stream of study made up of related unit standards that learners
must undertake. For example, an Associate Degree of Business may
have four major streams of study - Accounting, Management, Human
Resources Management and Marketing.
Select Apply or Not Apply.
5.3 Unit standards -
options
Unit standards that relate to specific areas of work which are in
addition to the core units.
Select Apply or Not Apply.
6. Unit Standards
SNo. Title Unit Code Credit Value
Core unit standards
Add
no. Add title of unit standard Add code Add value
Stream core units
Add
no. Add title of unit standard Add code Add value
Unit standards - options
Add
no. Add title of unit standard Add code Add value
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 47
Total Credit Value of Unit Standards
For example:
the total Credit Value for a Certificate 2 (KSA) is 24.
the total Credit Value for an Advanced Diploma (KSA) is 132 compared to 120
Advanced Diploma (K&S).
See Appendix 12: Credit Matrix
XXX
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 48
9.
Delivery of NOSS-based qualifications and awards relates to:
institutions wishing to deliver NOSS-based qualifications that have been developed through
Sector Advisory Committees or Recognised National Development Centres and endorsed by
VETAC
transition arrangements during the establishment of the Vocational Education and Training
Awards Council (VETAC) and its processes and procedures to develop and endorse national
qualifications/awards based on NOSS.
These arrangements enable providers with the opportunity:
to trial ‘proof of concept pilots’ led by VETAC
to have time to transfer to new arrangements if they seek to operate within VETAC’s criteria
The Quality Assurance Standards for the Registration (QASR) of Training Providers ensure the baseline
quality and operation of and a process of continuous improvement.
9.1 Eligibility to deliver Q+NOSS
The NQA recognises only those vocational education and training qualifications delivered through
quality-assured Registered Training Providers (RTPs). A provider currently offering training
qualifications must:
hold or obtain a commercial license determined by the Department of Economic Development’s
categories for the provision of training as well as any applicable local regulatory or licensure
approvals prior to its submission for registration
apply to VETAC for initial registration in the NQA Directory of Education and Training Providers
that is accessible to the public
apply to VETAC for full registration as an Registered Training Provider to deliver national
vocational qualifications/awards
include the offering of Q+NOSS in the submitted Scope of Registration.
If approved, a Registered Training Provider agrees to abide by the conditions set out in the Quality
Assurance Standards for the Registration (QASR) of Training Providers. If an RTP intends to renew its
registration at the end of its registration period, it will need to participate in a quality audit. Details are
set out in the Standards for the Quality Audit of Training Providers.
For more information about delivering Q+NOSS, refer to the above QASR standards.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 49
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 50
Part A: Application for approval as a
Recognised National Development Committee (RNDC)
The purpose of this application form (Part A) is for an organisation to apply to become a Recognised
National Development Committee (RNDC) for Q+NOSS (qualification development) purposes.
Organisations can collaborate to become an RNDC to develop an Occupational Profile(s), National
Occupational Skills Standards (NOSS) and/or National Qualification(s) for a specific occupation(s) in
the UAE. It must indicate the relevant 4-digit International Standards Classification of Occupations
(ISCO) code, industry sector and industry sub-sector for the occupation(s). The information in this
application will enable VETAC to ensure that an existing RNDC is not undertaking similar development.
Applicants are required to be familiar with the requirements set out in VETAC Q+NOSS System
Guidelines before completing this form.
If approved by VETAC (or the relevant SAC or awarding body if established), the organisation is able to
progress to the three remaining parts of Q+NOSS development:
Part B: Development of an Occupational Profile(s)
Part C: Development of National Occupational Skills Standards (NOSS)
Part D: Development of a National Qualification(s) based on NOSS
1. Organisational details
Name of lead organisation(s) seeking
to form an RNDC
Names of other organisations
participating in the application (if any)
Name of relevant awarding body (if
established)
2. Name and details of key contact person/s
Title and name
Position
Telephone contact
Email contact
Add more rows if required
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 51
3. Purpose for applying to become an RNDC
4. Resourcing and funding/sponsorship arrangements for the RNDC
5. Occupation(s) for which the Occupational Profile(s), NOSS and/or National Qualification(s) is to
be developed, including the relevant 4-digit ISCO-08 code
Occupation 1 4-digit ISCO code
Occupation 2 4-digit ISCO code
Occupation 3 4-digit ISCO code
Add more rows if required
Search ISCO’s 08 Manual to find the 4-digit code of the occupation(s):
http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/B30EE525-22DB-4C1B-B8D5-6D12934AF00A/0/isco08.pdf
6. Main industry sector and sub-sector most relevant to the occupation(s)
Industry-sector Industry sub-sector
Occupation 1
Occupation 2
Occupation 3
Add more rows if required
Go to Appendix 6: Sector Codes Convention in the VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines for codes.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 52
7. Industry stakeholders supporting the development an Occupational Profile(s), NOSS and/or
National Qualification (Q+NOSS)
List the organisations consulted Location/Emirate
Add more rows if required
8. Findings from preliminary consultations
9. Submitting an application
VETAC will only accept applications and supporting documents in electronic form, and will only consider
complete applications. Providers are to email their completed application and supporting documents to
[email protected]. The submission is to be marked as “RNDC Part A: RNDC Application Form”. The
application will be processed by VETAC or the relevant SAC or awarding body if established.
10. Declaration to be completed by the Chief Executive or legal representative of the organisation(s)
applying to become a Recognised National Development Committee
I understand that the National Qualifications Authority (NQA) and the Vocational Education and Training
Awards Council (VETAC) may share information about this application and our organisation with other
relevant agencies in accordance with the provisions of the NQA Decree Federal Decree No. 1 ‘Establish and
Maintain the National Qualifications Authority’ (23 August 2010) and criteria set out in the VETAC Q+NOSS
System Guidelines.
I understand that should this application for Recognised National Development Committee (RNDC) status be
successful, our organisation must demonstrate compliance against the above criteria.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 53
I understand that this application may be refused or cancelled if our organisation:
fails to provide true and correct information of a material nature in this application; or
fails to fulfil the undertakings made in this declaration.
Signature of CEO/Legal Representative signature:
Print Name:
Date:
Witness’s signature:
Print Name:
Date:
(If more than one organisation is participating in the RNDC application, add details and signatures of the
CEOs/legal representatives from these organisations).
For official use only:
Internal outcome of review of application to become an RNDC
Note: In the absence of a relevant SAC or awarding body, VETAC will undertake this review.
A. Criteria Checklist
Checklist Yes No
All sections completed
Clearly describes the purpose of the RNDC
Identifies the occupation(s) to be covered by the RNDC
An existing RNDC is not undertaking Q+NOSS development for the same
occupation(s)
Resourcing and funding arrangements are satisfactory
Stakeholders have been identified
Preliminary consultations justify the need for Q+NOSS
Declaration section completed and signed
Letter from organisation(s) on official letterhead requesting to apply for RNDC status
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 54
B. Review Committee Decision
Approved – Recommend organisation’s application to be an approved RNDC.
Not approved – Organisation’s application to be an RNDC is not approved. Advice and details of any
actions required are detailed below.
C. Comments/actions required
D. Official Approval Details
Approved by
Position
Signature
Date
E. Notification Details
The date the organisation was notified
of outcome
Name of contact person the notification
was sent to
Name of VETAC Approval Officer
Signature
Date
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 55
Part B: Application for approval to develop an Occupational Profile
The purpose of this application form (Part B) is for an organisation with Recognised National
Development Committee (RNDC) status to apply to develop an Occupational Profile (that includes a
functional analysis) for an occupation(s) for an industry sector/sub-sector in the UAE. An Occupational
Profile consists of information about the knowledge, skills and performance criteria for an occupation.
It guides the development of a National Qualification based on national occupational skills standards
(NOSS) for this occupation (Q+NOSS).
The information provided in this form will enable VETAC (or the relevant SAC or awarding body if
established) to determine that the development process is in line with the VETAC Q+NOSS System
Guidelines. Applicants are required to be familiar with these guidelines before completing this form.
If VETAC approves the Occupational Profile(s) developed by the RNDC, the organisation is able to
progress to the two remaining parts of Q+NOSS development:
Part C: Development of National Occupational Skills Standards (NOSS)
Part D: Development of a National Qualification(s) based on NOSS
1. Organisational details
Name of RNDC seeking to develop an
Occupational Profile(s)
Name of lead organisation(s)
Names of other organisations
participating in the application
Name of relevant awarding body (if
established)
2. Name and details of key contact person/s
Title and name
Position
Telephone contact
Email contact
Add more rows if required
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 56
3. Details of Occupational Profile(s) to be developed, including the relevant 4-digit ISCO-08 code
Occupation 1 4-digit ISCO code
Occupation 2 4-digit ISCO code
Occupation 3 4-digit ISCO code
Add more rows if required
Search ISCO’s 08 Manual to find the 4-digit code of the occupation(s):
http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/B30EE525-22DB-4C1B-B8D5-6D12934AF00A/0/isco08.pdf
4. Main industry sector and sub-sector most relevant to the occupation(s)
Industry-sector Industry sub-sector
Occupation 1
Occupation 2
Occupation 3
Add more rows if required
See Appendix 6: Sector Codes Convention for codes.
5. Industry stakeholders supporting the development of the Occupational Profile(s)
List the organisations consulted Location/Emirate
Add more rows if required
6. Findings from preliminary consultations
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 57
7. Brief details of the scope and process for the development of the Occupational Profile(s)
8. Resourcing and funding/sponsorship arrangements for the Occupational Profile(s)
9. Submitting an application
VETAC will only accept applications and supporting documents in electronic form, and will only consider
complete applications. Providers are to email their completed application and supporting documents to
[email protected]. The submission is to be marked as “RNDC Part B: Occupational Profile Application
Form”. The application will be processed by VETAC or the relevant SAC or awarding body if
established.
10. Declaration to be completed by the Chief Executive or legal representative of the
organisation(s) applying to develop an Occupational Profile
I understand that the National Qualifications Authority (NQA) and the Vocational Education and Training
Awards Council (VETAC) may share information about this application and our organisation with other
relevant agencies in accordance with the provisions of the NQA Decree Federal Decree No. 1 ‘Establish and
Maintain the National Qualifications Authority’ (23 August 2010) and criteria set out in the VETAC Q+NOSS
System Guidelines.
I understand that should this application to develop an Occupational Profile be successful, our organisation
must demonstrate compliance against the above criteria.
I understand that this application may be refused or cancelled if our organisation:
fails to provide true and correct information of a material nature in this application; or
fails to fulfil the undertakings made in this declaration.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 58
Signature of CEO/Legal Representative signature:
Print Name:
Date:
Witness’s signature:
Print Name:
Date:
(If more than one organisation is part of the RNDC applying to develop an Occupational Profile(s), add details
and signatures of the CEOs/legal representatives from these organisations).
For official use only:
Internal outcome of review of application to develop an Occupational Profile(s)
Note: In the absence of a relevant SAC or awarding body, VETAC will undertake this review.
A. Criteria Checklist
Checklist Yes No
All sections completed
Clearly describes the scope and development process of the Occupational Profile(s)
Identifies the occupation(s) to be covered by the RNDC
An existing RNDC is not undertaking development of the same Occupational Profile(s)
Resourcing and funding arrangements are satisfactory
Stakeholders have been identified
Declaration section completed and signed
Letter from organisation(s) participating in the RNDC on official letterhead requesting
to apply to develop an Occupational Profile(s)
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 59
B. Review Committee Decision
Approved – Recommend organisation’s application to develop an Occupational Profile be approved.
Not approved – Organisation’s application is not approved. Advice and details of any actions required are
detailed below.
C. Comments/actions required
D. Official Approval Details
Approved by
Position
Signature
Date
E. Notification Details
The date the organisation was notified
of outcome
Name of contact person the notification
was sent to
Name of VETAC Approval Officer
Signature
Date
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 60
Part C: Application for approval to develop
National Occupational Skills Standards (NOSS)
The purpose of this application form (Part C) is for an organisation with Recognised National
Development Committee (RNDC) status to apply to develop National Occupational Skills Standards
(NOSS) for an industry sector/sub-sector in the UAE. NOSS comprise unit standards that form an
occupation. A unit standard is the specification of knowledge and skills require for workplace
performance and their application in the workplace to the expected standards of performance.
The information provided in this form will enable VETAC (or the relevant SAC or awarding body if
established) to determine that the development process is in line with the VETAC Q+NOSS System
Guidelines. Applicants are required to be familiar with these guidelines before completing this form.
If VETAC approves the NOSS developed by the RNDC, the organisation is able to progress to the last
part of the Q+NOSS process:
Part D: Development of a National Qualification(s) based on NOSS (Q+NOSS).
1. Organisational details
Name of RNDC seeking to develop
NOSS
Name of lead organisation(s)
Names of other organisations
participating in the application
Name of relevant awarding body (if
established)
2. Name and details of key contact person/s
Title and name
Position
Telephone contact
Email contact
Add more rows if required
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 61
3. Title of NOSS (unit standards) to be developed
Unit standard 1
Unit standard 2
Unit standard 3
Add more rows if required
4. Main industry sector and sub-sector most relevant to the NOSS
Industry-sector Industry sub-sector
Unit standard 1
Unit standard 2
Unit standard 3
Add more rows if required
Go to Appendix 6: Sector Codes Convention in the VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines for codes.
5. Industry stakeholders supporting the development of the NOSS
List the organisations consulted Location/Emirate
Add more rows if required
6. Findings from preliminary consultations
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 62
7. Brief details of the scope and process for the development of NOSS
8. Resourcing and funding/sponsorship arrangements for NOSS
9. Submitting an application
VETAC will only accept applications and supporting documents in electronic form, and will only consider
complete applications. Providers are to email their completed application and supporting documents to
[email protected]. The submission is to be marked as “RNDC Part C: NOSS Application Form”. The
application will be processed by VETAC or the relevant SAC or awarding body if established.
10. Declaration to be completed by the Chief Executive or legal representative of the organisation(s)
applying to develop NOSS
I understand that the National Qualifications Authority (NQA) and the Vocational Education and Training
Awards Council (VETAC) may share information about this application and our organisation with other
relevant agencies in accordance with the provisions of the NQA Decree Federal Decree No. 1 ‘Establish and
Maintain the National Qualifications Authority’ (23 August 2010) and criteria set out in the VETAC Q+NOSS
System Guidelines.
I understand that should this application to develop NOSS be successful, our organisation must demonstrate
compliance against the above criteria.
I understand that this application may be refused or cancelled if our organisation:
fails to provide true and correct information of a material nature in this application; or
fails to fulfil the undertakings made in this declaration.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 63
Signature of CEO/Legal Representative signature:
Print Name:
Date:
Witness’s signature:
Print Name:
Date:
(If more than one organisation is part of the RNDC applying to develop NOSS, add details and signatures of
the CEOs/legal representatives from these organisations).
For official use only:
Internal outcome of review of application to develop NOSS
Note: In the absence of a relevant SAC or awarding body, VETAC will undertake this review.
A. Criteria Checklist
Checklist Yes No
All sections completed
Clearly describes the scope and development process of NOSS
Identifies the NOSS to be covered by the RNDC
An existing RNDC is not undertaking development of the NOSS
Resourcing and funding arrangements are satisfactory
Stakeholders have been identified
Declaration section completed and signed
Letter from organisation(s) participating in the RNDC on official letterhead requesting
to apply to develop NOSS
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 64
B. Review Committee Decision
Approved – Recommend organisation’s application to develop NOSS be approved.
Not approved – Organisation’s application is not approved. Advice and details of any actions required are
detailed below.
C. Comments/actions required
D. Official Approval Details
Approved by
Position
Signature
Date
E. Notification Details
The date the organisation was notified
of outcome
Name of contact person the notification
was sent to
Name of VETAC Approval Officer
Signature
Date
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 65
Part D: Application to be approved to develop a National Qualification/
Award based on National Occupational Skills Standards (Q+NOSS)
The purpose of this application form (Part D) is for an organisation with Recognised National
Development Committee (RNDC) status to apply to develop to a National Qualification(s)/Award(s)
based on National Occupational Skills Standards for an industry sector/sub-sector in the UAE
(Q+NOSS).
The information provided in this form will enable VETAC (or the relevant SAC or awarding body if
established) to determine that the development process is in line with the VETAC Q+NOSS System
Guidelines. Applicants are required to be familiar with these guidelines before completing this form.
1. Organisational details
Name of RNDC seeking to develop a
National Qualification(s)
Name of lead organisation(s)
Names of other organisations
participating in the application
Name of relevant awarding body (if
established)
2. Name and details of key contact person/s
Title and name
Position
Telephone contact
Email contact
Add more rows if required
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 66
3. National Qualification(s)/Award(s) to be developed
Qualification/award 1
Qualification/award 2
Qualification/award 3
Add more rows if required
4. Main industry sector and sub-sector most relevant to the National Qualification(s)
Industry-sector Industry sub-sector
Qualification/award 1
Qualification/award 2
Qualification/award 3
Add more rows if required
Go to Appendix 6: Sector Codes Convention in the VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines for codes.
5. Industry stakeholders supporting the development of the National Qualification(s)
List the organisations consulted Location/Emirate
Add more rows if required
6. Findings from preliminary consultations
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 67
7. Brief details of the scope and process for the development of the National Qualification(s)
8. Resourcing and funding/sponsorship arrangements for the National Qualification(s)
9. Submitting an application
VETAC will only accept applications and supporting documents in electronic form, and will only
consider complete applications. Providers are to email their completed application and supporting
documents to [email protected]. The submission is to be marked as “RNDC Part D: National
Qualification Application Form”. The application will be processed by VETAC or the relevant SAC or
awarding body if established.
10. Declaration to be completed by the Chief Executive or legal representative of the organisation(s)
applying to develop a National Qualification(s)
I understand that the National Qualifications Authority (NQA) and the Vocational Education and
Training Awards Council (VETAC) may share information about this application and our organisation
with other relevant agencies in accordance with the provisions of the NQA Decree Federal Decree No. 1
‘Establish and Maintain the National Qualifications Authority’ (23 August 2010) and criteria set out in
the VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines.
I understand that should this application to develop a National Qualification(s) be successful, our
organisation must demonstrate compliance against the above criteria.
I understand that this application may be refused or cancelled if our organisation:
fails to provide true and correct information of a material nature in this application; or
fails to fulfil the undertakings made in this declaration.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 68
Signature of CEO/Legal Representative signature:
Print Name:
Date:
Witness’s signature:
Print Name:
Date:
(If more than one organisation is part of the RNDC applying to develop a National Qualification(s), add details
and signatures of the CEOs/legal representatives from these organisations).
For official use only:
Internal outcome of review of application to develop a National Qualification(s)
Note: In the absence of a relevant SAC or awarding body, VETAC will undertake this review.
A. Criteria Checklist
Checklist Yes No
All sections completed
Clearly describes the scope and development process of a National Qualification(s)
Identifies the National Qualification(s) to be covered by the RNDC
An existing RNDC is not undertaking development of the National Qualification(s)
Resourcing and funding arrangements are satisfactory
Stakeholders have been identified
Declaration section completed and signed
Letter from organisation(s) participating in the RNDC on official letterhead requesting
to apply to develop a National Qualification(s)
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 69
B. Review Committee Decision
Approved - Recommend organisation’s application to develop a National Qualification(s) be approved.
Not approved – Organisation’s application is not approved. Advice and details of any actions required are
detailed below.
C. Comments/actions required
D. Official Approval Details
Approved by
Position
Signature
Date
E. Notification Details
The date the organisation was notified
of outcome
Name of contact person the notification
was sent to
Name of VETAC Approval Officer
Signature
Date
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 70
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 71
OCCUPATIONAL PROFILE TEMPLATE
No. Field Details
1
ISCO-08 occupational
title and code
See Appendix 4 for
these groups
Title
ISCO 4-digit code
Or unique code:
2. Brief occupational
descriptor
3. Occupational summary
4. Activities/tasks
5. Knowledge, skills and
attributes
6. Work context/
conditions
7. Qualification/education
requirements
8. Experience
9. Example employers
10. Occupational size
Less than 5,000 employees
5,001 to 30,000 employees
Over 30,000 employees
11. Indicative salary
Significantly higher than the industry average (over 30% higher)
Higher than the industry average (5% to 30% higher)
The same as the industry average
Below the industry average
12. Employment outlook/
job prospects
Very good
Good
Average
Below average
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 72
No. Field Details
13.
Related occupations/
job titles/career
progression
14. Examples of allied
occupation/job titles
15.
Discipline
See Appendix 5:
Discipline Codes
Convention
16.
Industry sector
See Appendix 6: Sector
Codes Convention
Sector
Sub-sector
17. Optional related
information
18. Developed by
Name of Sector Advisory
Committee (SACs)
Name of Recognised
National Development
Committee (RNDC)
Name of other body
19. Validated by
20. Recommended review
date
Review date
Frequency of review
21. Endorsement date To be completed by VETAC
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 73
UNIT STANDARDS TEMPLATE
PART A: DETAILS OF A UNIT STANDARD
No. Field Details
1. Reference code VETAC assigned reference code
2. Unit standard title
3. Unit type Knowledge and Skills OR Application
4. Unit descriptor
5. Elements
No. Element
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
Add more rows if required
6. QFEmirates level 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10
7. Credit value
8. Function
Policy and strategy QF 9-10
Managing QF 7-8
Specifying QF 6-7
Controlling QF 6
Maintaining capability QF 4-6
Performing/carry out QF 1-4
9. Entry information
and prerequisites
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 74
No. Field Details
10. Grading
Knowledge and Skills unit:
Pass/Fail Percentile 100%: ______%
OR
Application unit:
Competent/Not Yet Competent
11. Links to other units
12.
Discipline
See Appendix 5:
Discipline Codes
Convention
13.
Industry sector
See Appendix 6:
Sector Codes
Convention
Sector
Sub-sector
14. Industry activity
15. Photos
16. Developed by
Name of Sector Advisory
Committee (SACs)
Name of Recognised National
Development Committee (RNDC)
Name of other body
17. Developer’s
website
18. Endorsement date To be added by VETAC
19. Recommended
review date
Review date
Frequency of review
20. Version No. To be added by VETAC
75
PART B: PERFORMANCE CRITERIA, EVIDENCE AND CORELIFE SKILLS FOR ELEMENT (use/copy this part of the template for each Element)
1. ELEMENT DETAILS:
Reference code VETAC assigned reference code Name Same title as Part A
2. PERFORMANCE CRITERIA:
Performance Criteria 1 Specific evidence for PC1:
Performance Criteria 2 Specific evidence for PC2:
Performance Criteria 3 Specific evidence for PC3:
Performance Criteria 4 Specific evidence for PC4:
Add more rows if required
3. EVIDENCE REQUIREMENTS (Holistic)
4. RELEVANT CORELIFE SKILLS ( you can tick more than one)
Collecting, analysing,
organising and
applying information in
a given context
Communicating
information, concepts
and ideas
Initiating and
organising self and
activities including
motivation, exploration
and creativity
Working with others in
teams including
leadership
Solving problems
including using
mathematical ideas and
techniques
Applying information
and communication
technology (ICT)
Participating in social
and civic life including
ethical practice
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 76
PART C: INFORMATION SPECIFIC TO A UNIT STANDARD
Information provided in this section includes details on the scope, the range of variables and other
details that have a critical impact on the quality of the performance required. Unit standard developers
will determine which fields to complete and the amount of information provided in each field
depending on the NOSS being developed and through consultation with stakeholders.
No. Field Details
1. Reference code VETAC assigned reference code
2. Unit standard title Same title as Part A
3. Underpinning knowledge and
skills required for this unit
4. Standing operating
procedures and applicable
regulations
5. General resources, tools,
equipment and supplies
6. Special requirements
7. Additional information on
evidence requirements and
the assessment process
8. Delivery details and pathways
9. Reference material
PART D: KEY TERMS
The purpose of this section is to list key words and terms related to the unit.
No Key words/terms Definition
1.
2,
3.
4.
Add more rows if required
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 77
NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS/AWARDS TEMPLATE
No. Field Details
1. General Profile of Qualification/Award
1.1 QFEmirates level 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10
1.2
QFEmirates level and
full title of
qualification/award
1.3 Type of qualification Principal Composite Award Component Award
1.4 Kind of qualification/
award
Knowledge and Skills (K&S)
Knowledge, Skills and Application (KSA)
1.5
Summary scope for
this qualification/
award
1.6
QFEmirates Summary
Level Descriptor for
this qualification/
award
2. Completion requirements
2.1 Title
2.2 ISCO title and code
Title:
4-digit ISCO code:
2.3
License to Practice or
regulatory
requirements
3. Specialisation/pathways
3.1 Qualification/award
pathways
3.2 Industry sector
Sector
Sub-sector
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 78
No. Field Details
3.3 Discipline
3.4 Functions
Policy and strategy QF 9-10
Managing QF 7-8
Specifying QF 6-7
Controlling QF 6
Maintaining capability QF 4-6
Performing/carry out QF 1-4
3.5 Photos
4. Entry requirements for this qualification/award
4.1 Pre-requisites
Minimum requirements
(qualification or award
required for entry), and
Other minimum
mandatory requirements
such as competence and
experience
4.2 Advisory entry
requirements (Non-mandatory but recommended)
4.3 Developed by
Name of Sector Advisory
Committee (SACs)
Name of Recognised
National Development
Committee (RNDC)
Name of other body
4.4 Date endorsed by
VETAC To be added by VETAC
4.5 Recommended
review date
Review date
Frequency of review
4.6 Version no. To be added by VETAC
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 79
5. Completion rule details
5.1 Core unit standards All core unit standards must be achieved
5.2 Stream core unit
standards Apply Not apply
5.3 Unit standards -
options Apply Not apply
6. Unit Standards
SNo. Title Unit Code Credit Value
Core unit standards
1.
2.
3.
Add more rows if required
Stream core units
1.
2.
3.
Add more rows if required
Unit standards - options
Add more rows if required
Total Credit Value of Unit Standard
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 80
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 81
EXAMPLE OF AN OCCUPATIONAL PROFILE FOR A PHOTOGRAPHER
No. Field Details
1. ISCO-08 occupational
title/code 3431
2. Brief occupational
descriptor
Photograph subjects or news worthy events, using still cameras, colour or
black-and-white film, and variety of photographic accessories.
3. Occupational
summary
Photographers operate still cameras to photograph people, events,
scenes, materials, products and other subjects. Photographers may be
self‐employed or employed by photographic companies, multimedia
houses or large organisations.
4. Activities/tasks
Taking photographs for advertising, or other commercial, industrial or
scientific purposes and to illustrate stories and articles in newspapers,
magazines and other publications
Taking portrait photographs of persons and groups of persons
Operating computers to manipulate photographic images
Determining picture composition, making technical adjustments to
equipment and photograph subject
Studying requirements of a particular assignment and decide on type
of camera, film, lighting and background accessories to be used
Operating scanners to transfer photographic images to computers
Adapting existing photographic images to create new digitized
images to be included in multimedia products
Using airbrush, computer or other techniques to create the desired
visual effect.
5. Knowledge, skills and
attributes
Knowledge of techniques, principles and equipment of modern
photography including still, motion, colour, and black and white
photography
Knowledge of film properties, film composition, adapting digitised
images and their suitability for generalized and specialized
photography
Knowledge of how to control light and achieve different photographic
effects
Knowledge of cameras, flashes, computers, lenses and films
Knowledge of chemical composition, structure, and properties of
substances and of the chemical processes and transformations that
they undergo
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 82
No. Field Details
Good problem-solving and time management skills
English (technical finance related) Language – Knowledge of the
structure and content of the photographic related technical English
terminologies
Information Communications Technology – knowledge and use of
relevant photographic and multimedia applications and programs
Team work or individual – job may require him/her to work alone or in
conjunction with accounting, administrative and financial
professionals.
6. Work context/
conditions
Photographers need to have a good sense of colour, and good hand-eye
co-ordination and reflexes. They also need to be reasonably fit as they
may have to carry heavy cases of equipment.
7.
Qualification/
education
requirements
Certificate in photography or related field of work, higher qualification or
equivalent.
8. Experience 2 - 3 years and above
9. Example employers
Emirates Palace Hotel, National Consultative Council, Abu Dhabi National
Exhibition Company, Abu Dhabi Tourism Authority (ADTC), national
newspapers and media companies
10. Occupational size Less than 5,000 employees
11. Indicative salary Above the industry average
12. Employment
outlook/job prospects Very good
13.
Related occupations/
job titles/career
progression
Aerial photographer
Commercial photographer
Industrial photographer
Photo-journalist
Photographer
Portrait photographer
Scientific photographer
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 83
No. Field Details
14. Examples of allied
occupation/job titles
Film camera operator
Video camera operator
Electronics mechanic
Photographic equipment repairer
Photogravure photographer
Photolithographer
15. Discipline M – Arts and Culture including libraries
16. Industry sector Sector: E – Arts, Culture and Entertainment
Sub-sector: E00 Arts
17. Optional related
information None
18. Developed by To be added - Relevant Sector Advisory Committee (SACs) or Recognised
National Development Committee (RNDC)
19. Validated by To be added – name and qualifications/experience of representatives
20. Recommended review
date
Review date To be added
Frequency of review To be added
21. Endorsement date To be added by VETAC
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 84
EXAMPLE OF A NOSS/UNIT STANDARD:
Help to prepare sites for construction work
Unit Standards Template
No. Field Details
1. Reference code G05Q01A004A
2. Unit standard title Help to prepare sites for construction work
3. Unit type Knowledge and Skills OR Application
4. Unit descriptor
This standard specifies the outcomes required to help prepare
construction work areas. It includes complying with regulations,
organisational and health and safety procedures when preparing work
areas. The worker is sometimes called assistant, helper, unskilled
worker or labourer.
5. Elements
No. Element
E1 Organise resources to prepare sites
E2 Prepare sites for construction work
E3 Comply with site safety requirements
6. QFEmirates Level 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10
7. Credit value
8. Function
Policy and strategy QF 9-10
Managing QF 7-8
Specifying QF 6-7
Controlling QF 6
Maintaining capability QF 4-6
Performing/carry out QF 1-4
9. Entry information
and prerequisites No entry requirements
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 85
No. Field Details
10.
Grading Knowledge and Skills:
Pass/Fail Percentile 100%: ______%
OR
Application units:
Competent/Not Yet Competent
11. Links to other units None
12.
Discipline
See Appendix 5:
Discipline Codes
Convention
Q – Construction, and building, maintenance, servicing and repair
13.
Industry sector
See Appendix 6:
Sector Codes
Convention
Sector G – Building and construction, estates and assets
development and management
Sub-sector G05 Building and construction
14. Industry activity Construction of large commercial and residential buildings
15. Photos
16. Developed by
Name of Sector Advisory
Committee (SACs)
Name of Recognised National
Development Committee
(RNDC)
Organisation name not disclosed
Name of Other body
17. Developer’s website Organisation name not disclosed
18. Endorsement date 02/03/2014
19. Recommended
review date
Review date 02/03/2017
Frequency of review Every 3 years
20. Version No. 1
86
PART B: PERFORMANCE CRITERIA, EVIDENCE AND CORELIFE SKILLS FOR ELEMENT (note: there are three elements in this unit standard)
1. ELEMENT DETAILS:
Reference code L00Z01A003A Name 1. Organise resources to prepare sites
2. PERFORMANCE CRITERIA:
Performance Criteria 1.1 Obtain instructions for work from the supervisor before starting any work on site Specific evidence for PC1.1: None - Holistic (see below)
Performance Criteria 1.2 Check correct resources, equipment and materials are available to carry out work Specific evidence for PC1.1: None - Holistic (see below)
Performance Criteria 1.3 Complete visual safety checks on all tools before use and report any damage Specific evidence for PC1.1: None - Holistic (see below)
Performance Criteria 1.4 Arrange adequate and appropriate space in line with job requirements and the
supervisor’s instructions for materials storage Specific evidence for PC1.1: None - Holistic (see below)
3. EVIDENCE REQUIREMENTS (Holistic)
At least two records of the candidate in the workplace or simulated environment one at least two occasions, correctly:
Following work instructions
Checking availability of resources, equipment and materials
Completing visual safety checks on all tools
Arranging adequate and appropriate space
Note: this is holistic assessment that applies to all elements in this unit
4. RELEVANT CORELIFE SKILLS ( you can tick more than one)
Collecting, analysing,
organising and
applying information in
a given context
Communicating in
formation, concepts
and ideas
Initiating and
organising self-
activities including
motivation, exploration
and creativity
Working with others in
teams including
leadership
Solving problems
including using
mathematical ideas and
techniques
Applying information
and communication
technology (ICT)
Participating in social
and civic life including
ethical practice
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 87
PART C: INFORMATION SPECIFIC TO A UNIT STANDARD
Information provided in this section includes details on the scope, the range of variables and other
details that have a critical impact on the quality of the performance required. Unit standard developers
will determine which fields to complete and the amount of information provided in each field
depending on the NOSS being developed and through consultation with stakeholders.
No. Field Details
1. Reference code G05Q01A004A
2. Unit standard title Help to prepare sites for construction work
3.
Underpinning knowledge
and skills required for this
unit
Skills required for helping to prepare sites for construction work:
1. Follow work instructions
2. Comply with regulatory, organisational, and health and
safety procedures
3. Learn on the job
4. Work effectively as part of a team
5. Follow site HSE plans
Understand how to help to prepare sites for construction work:
1. The importance of attending the induction program
2. Who to obtain work instructions from and the importance
of following them
3. The sequence of work to be undertaken to determine when
to start preparing sites
4. Where and how to obtain required resources
5. Basic regulatory, health and safety and organisational
requirements for working on construction sites
6. Different types of resources, equipment and materials
required and how to use them
7. Storage requirements for different types of equipment,
materials and resources
8. Types, uses, inspection, cleaning and fitting of PPE
9. The importance of completing work within allocated times
10. Types of hazards and risks that may occur and how to deal
with them
11. Organisational security procedures for equipment and
materials including access to work areas
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 88
No. Field Details
12. Procedures to follow:
12.1. in the event of accidents, incidents or ill health
12.2. when working at heights
12.3. for the safe use of equipment and materials
12.4. for safe manual handling
12.5. for safe waste disposal
12.6. during adverse weather conditions.
4.
Standing operating
procedures and applicable
regulations
Environmental, health, safety and welfare requirements must
include: Abu Dhabi Environment, Health and Safety
Management System Regulatory Framework, - Dubai
Construction code of practice, - Meeting the requirements of
relevant Emirate environment, health and safety management
regulations, - Regulations on disposal of waste materials
including hazardous materials, - Other statutory and/or
regulatory requirements that may be in force,
5. General resources, tools,
equipment and supplies
Equipment for site preparation work:
Equipment and materials will vary between roles so the worker
must therefore understand and demonstrate knowledge of all
types of equipment and materials which may be used in their
role.
6. Special requirements None
7.
Additional information on
evidence requirements and
the assessment process
Locations - indoors and outdoors
Instructions - face to face and at a distance
8. Delivery details and pathways
This standard may be included in entry-level work for skilled and
semi-skilled workers in the construction industry. Training
providers must contextualise this standard to meet the training
needs, learning preferences and workplace context of individuals
and groups of workers.
9. Reference material
Manuals and specifications for preparing work sites for
construction work:
Technical specifications for preparing work sites for
construction work
Technical manuals related to work site preparation
Manufacturer's guidance notes on work site preparation and
safety in the construction industry.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 89
PART D: KEY TERMS
The purpose of this section is to list key words and terms related to the unit.
No Key words/terms Definition
1. Equipment and material Tools, clothing, products or other items needed for a work
activity.
2. Hazards Any substance, physical effect, or condition with potential to
harm people, property or the environment.
3. Heights Where a worker may be required to carry out activities at
heights.
4. Method statement
How to carry out activities including what equipment
and materials to use.
Within the method statement there are also standard
criteria, health and safety, and environmental
identifications of hazard.
5. Personal Protective Equipment
(PPE)
Items that construction workers can use to protect
themselves against hazards.
PPE includes but not limited to gloves, safety helmet, eye
protection, face protection, foot protection and
appropriate clothing.
6. Risk
Risk is the product of the measure of the likelihood of
occurrence of an undesired event and the potential adverse
consequences which this event may have upon:
People – injury or harm to physical or psychological
health,
Environment – water, air, soil, animals, plants and social.
Risk – frequency x consequences
7. Supervisor The person who has the job to oversee and guide the work
or activities of a group of other people.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 90
EXAMPLE OF A NATIONAL QUALIFICATION:
Advanced Diploma in Aircraft Maintenance/Aeronautical Technologies
No. Field Details
1. General Profile of Qualification/Award
1.1 QFEmirates Level 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10
1.2
QFEmirates level and
full title of
qualification/award
Level 6 Advanced Diploma in Aircraft Maintenance/Aeronautical
Technologies
1.3 Type of qualification Principal Composite Award Component Award
1.4 Kind of qualification/
award
Knowledge and Skills (K&S)
Knowledge, Skills and Application (KSA)
1.5
Summary scope for
this qualification/
award
The holder of an Advanced Diploma qualification (Level 6) has
demonstrated competence in a specialist body of knowledge and
understanding of a field of work or discipline and related boundaries
and theorems; planning and implementation of solutions and
responses to complex problems and situations within given
parameters that may be varied, unpredictable and unfamiliar; and can
perform autonomously across a range of skills and functions without
guidance and limited supervision. It includes supervising technical,
supervisory or design processes with full autonomy in technical and
supervisory contexts; adopting para-professional roles under guidance
whilst supporting and observing ethical standards; setting
achievement of group outcomes; and supervising the work of others.
1.6
QFEmirates
Summary Level
Descriptor for this
qualification/award
Learning outcomes at Level 6 indicate specialised factual knowledge
and an understanding of the boundaries in a field of work or discipline
and an understanding of allied knowledge and theories in related
fields of work or disciplines. In the case of the para-professional
respective discipline, it also covers:
applying specialist technical, creative and conceptual skills in
planning and developing strategic solutions to varied,
unpredictable and unfamiliar problems, be they abstract and/or
concrete
managing with autonomy complex work procedures and
processes, resources or learning, including leading or supervising
teams within a technical or professional activity with little support
and adopting, and where appropriate, para-professional roles
under guidance
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 91
No. Field Details
using appropriate research tools and strategies
presenting, explaining and/or critiquing interdependent complex
matters
producing from a wide-range of information, coherent texts
covering complex and/or diverse relations
selecting, applying, assessing and communicating a wide-range
mathematical procedures and representations in a broad-range of
contexts
drawing on experience of operational interaction in work or
learning including supervision of people and projects
addressing own learning needs and function independently and
within learning groups
supporting and observing ethical standards.
2. Completion requirements
2.1 Title Advanced Diploma in Aircraft Maintenance/Aeronautical Technologies
2.2 ISCO code and title ISCO: 7232 Title: Aircraft engine mechanics and repairs
2.3
License to Practice or
regulatory
requirements
EASA 147-Part 66 (CAT B)
3. Specialisation/pathways
3.1 Qualification/award
pathways BSc in Aircraft Maintenance/Aeronautical Engineering
3.2 Industry sector
Sector H – Utilities and infrastructure
Sub-sector H20 Engineering Services
3.3 Discipline T – Engineering and technical services inc. installation, maintenance,
servicing and repair
3.4 Functions
Policy and Strategy QF 9-10
Managing QF 7-8
Specifying QF 6-7
Controlling QF 6
Maintaining Capability QF 4-6
Performing/carry out QF 1-4
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 92
No. Field Details
3.5 Photos
4. Entry requirements for this qualification/award
4.1 Pre-requisites
Minimum requirements
(qualification or award
required for entry), and
Diploma in Aircraft
Maintenance/Aeronautical
Technologies
Other minimum mandatory
requirements such as
competence and experience
4.2 Advisory entry
requirements (Non-mandatory but recommended)
4.3 Developed by
Sector Advisory Committee
(SACs) Name:
Recognised National
Development Committee
(RNDC)
Organisation not disclosed
4.4 Date endorsed by
VETAC To be endorsed
4.5 Review date To be endorsed
4.6 Version No. 1.
5. Completion rule details
5.1 Core unit standards All core unit standards must be achieved
5.2 Stream core unit standards Apply Not apply
5.3 Unit standards - options Apply Not apply
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 93
No. Field Details
6. Unit Standards
SNo. Title Unit Code Credit Value
Core Unit Standards
1. Apply analytical methods for aircraft engineers H20T06K001A 5
2. Demonstrate knowledge of engineering systems and circuit
theorems and their applications H20T06K004A 5
3. Conduct an engineering project and its related activities H20T06K008A 5
4. Demonstrate knowledge of fundamental principles of
business management for engineers H20T06K016A 5
5. Apply analytical methods to solve engineering problems H20T06K013A 5
Stream Core Unit Standards
1. Demonstrate knowledge of advanced principles and
application of mechanical science H20T06K014A 4
2. Understand and apply electrical and electronic circuit
theorems H20T06K015A 4
3. Understand and apply principles and application of aircraft
systems H20T06K017A 4
4. Understand principles of aircraft design H20T06K018A 4
5. Understand aerodynamic stability and control H20T06K002A 4
6 Understand automatic flight control systems maintenance H20T06K003A 4
7. Understand communication and navigation systems
maintenance H20T06K005A 4
8. Understand and use aircraft fluid systems H20T06K006A 4
9. Apply further principles of aircraft fluid systems
maintenance H20T06K007A 4
10. Explain and demonstrate aircraft structure integrity H20T06K009A 4
11. Understand and demonstrate advanced propulsion
technology H20T06K010A 4
12. Understand and apply principles of advanced flight
instrument systems H20T06K011A 4
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 94
No. Field Details
13. Understand and apply thermodynamic principles of gas
turbine systems H20T06K012A 4
Unit Standards - Options
None
Total Credit Value of Unit Standards 77
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 95
Other Appendices
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 96
The International Labour Organisation’s (ILO’s) International Standard Classification of Occupations
(ISCO) System is used for classifying occupations and for data gathering and reporting. It is an
international system that has an interrelationship between qualifications and occupations and used by
Ministry of Economy (MoE) in the UAE for its occupational data gathering and reporting tool system.
The internationally recognised ISCO unit groups provide a titling and code convention for each of the
437 listed occupations as well as a general description of the occupation. The UAE adopted directly the
ISCO titling and code convention. This convention sets the framework for recognising the myriad of
jobs in the labour market.
There are many different titles used in industry to represent the same job or occupation family.
Employers usually like to reflect their particular setting or context when looking to recruit or advertise
for prospective job applicants. It would be extremely difficult to list all these in a statistical system,
given the nature and life cycle of jobs in modern economies is dynamic and ever changing. However,
all jobs can be clustered together and included in one of the 437 ISCO listed occupations. They can be
shown to represent a respective job family. It is simply an exercise of mapping these many titles and
related descriptions to the recognised UAE adopted ISCO titles. More importantly, ISCO also provides
a ready-made reference source for linking to the QFEmirates.
Occupations in ISCO are divided into four (4) groups:
major groups – total of 10 with 1 digit code
sub-major groups – total of 43 with 2 digit code
minor groups – total of 130 with 3 digit code
unit groups – total of 436 with 4 digit code (used for Q+NOSS)
ISCO 10 Major Occupational Groups (1 digit code)
ISCO08_CD GRP_DESC
0 Armed forces occupations
1 Managers
2 Professionals
3 Technicians and associate professionals
4 Clerical support workers
5 Service and sales workers
6 Skilled agricultural, forestry and fishery workers
7 Craft and related trades workers
8 Plant and machine operators, and assemblers
9 Elementary occupations
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 97
To augment and provide greater specificity of outcomes for future data analysis, the following cross-
sectorial discipline code structure has been developed:
Code Discipline
A Security, protective and public safety services
B Governance, public administration and statutory services
C Community services
D Health services
E Social services
F Office and administration support - clerical services
G Management professionals
H Legal services
I Business and financial professional services
J Hospitality and tourism services
K Leisure and sports services
L Retail and personal care services
M Arts and culture including libraries
N Entertainment and media services
O Education services
P Vocational training and workforce development services
Q Construction, and building maintenance, servicing and repair
R Architecture and town planning services
S Property, real estate and facility management services
T Engineering and technical services - inc. installation, maintenance, servicing and repair
V Science and mathematics
U Mining and quarrying services
W Manufacturing, production, process, and assembly
X Logistics
Y Transport and warehousing
Z Farming, fishing and forestry services
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 98
The following sector coding convention includes codes for related industry sub-sectors:
No Code Sector classification Code Sub-sector category
1 A Government services and public
administration
A15 Defence forces
A30 Government services
A65 Public administration
2 B Community, health and social
services
B10 Community
B35 Health services
B75 Social services
3 C Business, administration and
financial services
C00 Administration
C05 Business services
C25 Financial services
4 D
Tourism, hospitality, retail and
leisure services including personal
care services
D35 Hospitality
D45 Leisure services
D65 Personal service
D70 Retail
D80 Tourism
5 E Arts, culture and entertainment
E00 Arts
E10 Culture
E20 Entertainment and media
6 F Education, learning and social
development
F20 Education
F22 Educational consultancy
F35 Higher education
F45 Learning and social development
F90 Vocational education and training
F95 Workplace learning
7 G
Building and construction, estates
and assets development and
management
G05 Building and construction
G40 Infrastructure development
G65 Property, real estate and facility management
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 99
No Code Sector classification Code Sub-sector category
8 H Utilities and infrastructure
H10 Communications
H15 Electricity
H20 Engineering services
H30 Gas
H75 Scientific and mathematics
H85 Utilities support
H95 Water
9 I
Energy resources - oil, natural gas,
petrochemical, chemical and
mining/quarrying
I25 Fertiliser
I50 Mining/quarrying
I55 Natural gas
I60 Oil
I64 Other
I65 Petrochemical and chemical
10 J Manufacturing
J16 Design and innovation - manufacturing
J65 Process and assembly manufacturing
11 K Logistics and transport
K45 Logistics
K80 Transport
K95 Warehousing
12 L Agriculture, livestock and fishery
L00 Agriculture
L25 Fishery
L45 Livestock
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 100
Elements describe the more detailed outcomes that learners’ knowledge and skills are assessed
against. Collectively, these comprise the outcome expressed by the title. In order to be credited with
the unit standard, a candidate/learner must achieve all of the outcomes described in the elements.
Individual elements are important as they:
tell the learner what they are expected to do and achieve
form the basis for the definition of content, activities and assessment for a given unit
guide the planning of activities for delivery and assessment of that unit
As a result, they need to be very clear, unambiguous and accessible to candidates/learners and
teachers/trainers/assessors.
Developers need to consider the following points in developing the elements for a unit:
Terminology and language
Use a single, clear action verb for each element statement; complex statements with several verbs
are hard to assess.
If acronyms or abbreviations are used the names should be in full the first time they are used, with
the acronym or abbreviation following in brackets. Thereafter, the acronym or abbreviation may
be used within that unit standard.
Use the level descriptors and summary level descriptors from the QFEmirates to support the
writing of elements and learning outcomes at a given level.
Write in short sentences to maintain clarity.
Avoid:
vague statements such as ‘be aware of’, ‘know about’, ‘ensure’ and ‘demonstrate’ as they can
mean different things to different people.
words such as ‘necessary’, ‘suitable’, ‘appropriate’, ‘clearly’, ‘accurately’ and ‘correctly’ as they will
be assumed
‘qualifiers’ such as ‘effective’ or ‘possible’ which can mean different things to different people
terminology such as ‘a range of’ or ‘typical’ which can mean different things to different people
quantifiers such as ‘two’ or ‘ten percent’
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 101
implied alternatives through, for example, use of the slash (/) sign unless it is used for and/or and
the meaning is explicit
gender, ethnic or other bias in the elements and learning outcomes and that the language is
inclusive and does not limit access.
Alignment of learning and assessment requirements
Check that the unit elements are aligned and relevant to the unit and qualification learning
outcomes.
Ensure that the elements are measurable through an appropriate form of assessment.
Ensure that the elements are unbiased and accessible to different groups of learners.
Make sure there is a clear link between elements and the assessment requirement.
Try to avoid writing elements as narrowly defined tasks – this can reduce the scope, constrain
learning activity and give limited flexibility in the assessment method for the teacher/
trainer/instructor/assessor.
Think about the assessment method – in very broad elements it can be difficult to assess
consistently if it is not clear what is being assessed.
Structural requirements
Ensure that the elements can be reasonably achieved in the timescale of the unit and the
resources are available.
Avoid the use of just one element within a given unit standard.
Elements which deal with knowledge and skills can be more difficult to write than those dealing
with application. If not careful, they can become a summary of a qualification rather than explicit
statements of the learning. It must be very clear whether the learning required involved
comprehension or analysis, application or evaluation. It is, therefore, important to keep looking at
the guidance on level descriptors, produced by VETAC.
It is also important that a unit does not have too many elements. There is no right number;
however, typically a unit will have between three (3) to ten (10) elements. Less than three (3)
elements can lead to atomisation; more than ten (10) elements could result in over-assessment.
Avoid long unit standard titles. The title will be included on the national database/register and
overly long titles may present problems on data length. As the title will also appear on the
candidate/learner’s transcript, a long title may affect the presentation on the document.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 102
Typical ‘descriptors’ for elements by levels in the QFEmirates
There is no such thing as a ‘typical’ descriptor for a given level and it is not realistic to produce a list of
verbs aligned to the levels of the QFEmirates. The complexity of the unit standard and its elements
determines the level. For example, ‘Identify the difference between quantum mechanics and classical
mechanics’ is not a level 1 skill. Regardless of the verb used, it should include an action.
Most descriptors are aligned to Blooms Taxonomy that is a way to classify instructional activities or
questions as they progress in difficulty. Higher level activities require higher level thinking skills.
Descriptors are also based on three different forms of learning preference:
Cognitive - development of intellectual/mental skills i.e. knowledge
Effective - growth in feelings or emotions
Psychomotor - manual or physical skills
Blooms Taxonomy of verbs by learning preference
Learning
preference
Categories (building in difficulty for each
learning preference)
Examples of verbs that could be used
(depending on context)
Cognitive Knowledge
Recognition and recall of facts
define, describe, identify, distinguish,
list, name, recall, select, state
Comprehension
Interprets, translates, summarises
(requires knowledge)
classify, conclude, differentiate,
distinguish, estimate, explain, express,
formulate, illustrate, interpret,
summarise
Application
Uses information
(requires comprehension)
apply, calculate, complete, construct,
develop, employ, interpret, organise,
predict, prepare, produce, relate, solve,
use. design
Analysis
Separates whole into parts; distinguishes
between facts and inference
(requires application of information)
analyse, appraise, compare, conclude,
contrast, deduce, diagnose, differentiate,
distinguish, select, verify
Synthesis
Combines parts to from new entities
(requires analysis)
create, devise, design, discuss, explain,
modify, organise, plan, produce, revise,
summarise, examine
Evaluation
Involves decision-making, judgments,
selection based on rationale/criteria
(requires evaluation)
Appraise, assess, compare, conclude,
critique, evaluate, explain, examine,
interpret, judge, summarise, standardise
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 103
Learning
preference
Categories (building in difficulty for each
learning preference)
Examples of verbs that could be used
(depending on context)
Effective Receiving
Aware of; passively attending to stimuli;
listening
choose, describe, follow, give, name,
locate, select, use, erect
Responding
Complies to expectations by reacting to
stimuli
assist, aid, compile, discuss, greet,
perform, present, report, select
Valuing
Displays behaviour consistent with a single
belief or attitude in situations where not
required to obey
complete, differentiate, explain, justify,
propose, report, select,
Organising
Committed to a set of values as displayed by
behaviour
arrange, combine, compare, complete,
explain, formulate, identify, integrate,
modify, organise, prepare, relate
Characterising (internalising values)
Total behaviour is consistent with
internalised values
modify, perform, propose, qualify, revise,
solve, verify
Psychomotor Perception
The process of becoming aware by way of
senses
associate, choose, compare, describe,
differentiate, identify, select
Set
Readiness for a particular kind of action or
experience
arrange, adjust, explain, display, identify,
locate, organise, proceed, respond,
show, state,
Guided response
Overt act of an individual under the guidance
of an instructor
adapt, copy, correct, follow, practice,
react, reproduce, respond, repeat,
simulate
Mechanism
Occurs when a learned response has become
habitual
assemble, calibrate, calculate, construct,
display, fasten, fix, manipulate, measure,
organise, set-up
Complex overt response
Performance of a motor act that is complex
arising from the movement pattern required,
and may include the resolution of uncertainty
adjust, assemble, build, calibrate,
combine, display, fix, integrate,
manipulate, measure, organise, regulate
Adaption
Altering motor activities to meet problematic
situations
adapt, alter, change, convert, integrate,
order, rearrange, revise, standardise
Origination
Creating new acts or ways of manipulating
skills, abilities and understandings developed
in the psychomotor area
arrange, build, combine, compose,
construct, create, design, develop,
formulate, initiate, make, originate
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 104
Performance criteria are evaluative statements which specify what is to be assessed and the required
level of performance to demonstrate achievement of the elements - it is here that the activities, skills,
knowledge and understanding which provide the evidence of competent performance are specified.
Behaviour
The behaviour element describes what the candidate/learner is expected to do on completion of the
training. It consists of:
A subject - The candidate/learner is always the subject of the behaviour. If not directly stated, the
candidate/learner is understood to be the subject
A verb - An action verb states what the candidate/learner is expected to do. The action must be
observable and measurable.
An object - The object is what the action verb acts upon.
Example: COMPLY with organisational quality procedures and processes.
In this example, the unstated subject is the candidate/learner, the performance action verb is COMPLY,
and the object of the action verb is organisational quality procedures and processes.
Conditions or environment
Describes the actual conditions under which the task will occur or be observed such as:
any equipment or resources that will be available
any limits or restrictions that will exist when the candidate/learner performs the task.
Example: TRACE signal flow through the receiver, using the schematic diagram provided.
The standard
The standard element of a learning outcome indicates how well the candidate/learner is expected to
perform the behaviour. It specifies the quantity and/or quality of the performance. Usually, safety
objectives require a 100% correct response or performance. Processes need to be ‘in correct order’ and
products are +/- a tolerance.
Example: Using a calculator, multiply two three-digit numbers and write the answer to the nearest tenth.
In this example ‘nearest tenth’ clearly states the degree of accuracy required for satisfactory
achievement of the objective.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 105
Steps in writing performance criteria
Step 1 – Write the behaviour
Step 2 – Write the condition
Step 3 – Write the standard
Step 1: Write the behaviour
Write a statement that describes an observable and measurable behaviour based on the requirements
related to the duty or task specified in the unit element/learning outcome. The candidate/learner is the
subject of the behaviour.
The action verb should state what the candidate/learner is expected to do. The action must be
observable and measurable. In other words, the action verb must be a performance-oriented verb.
Select a verb that is appropriate for the skill, knowledge or performance identified in the element/
learning outcome (see over for action verbs). Include an object that describes or identifies what the
action verb acts upon. See Appendix 7 for further information about verbs.
Performance-oriented action verbs like ‘describe’, ‘construct’, and ‘remove’ can be observed and
measured whereas verbs like ‘understand’ and ‘know’ are not performance-oriented and cannot be
observed.
Appropriate Action Verbs
Category Verb
Skill Adjust
Align
Calibrate
Change
Clean
Construct
Demonstrate
Enter
Exchange
Inspect
Install
Isolate
Locate
Load
Manipulate
Measure
Move
Operate
Perform
Plot
Position
Remove
Repair
Replace
Start
Test
Trace
Analyse Analyse
Categorise
Compare
Contrast
Diagram
Differentiate
Sequence
Simplify
Summarise
Synthesise Adapt
Compose
Create
Design
Develop
Elaborate
Formulate
Generalise
Invent
Originate
Plan
Propose
Re-arrange
Solve
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 106
Category Verb
Evaluate Conclude
Decide
Evaluate
Justify
Judge
Prioritise
Prove
Rank
Rate
Recommend
Support
Apply Apply
Calculate
Construct
Dramatise
Model
Restructure
Simulate
Translate
Use
Comprehend Classify
Describe
Discuss
Explain
Identify
Organise
Outline
Predict
Rephrase
Show
Summarise
Recall Define
Identify
Label
List
Name
State
Tell
Recognise Match Identify Sequence
Step 2: Write the condition
Determine the situation, circumstance and condition under which the behaviour will be performed in
the workplace. Begin by examining the source that has been identified in the element/learning
outcome. It may provide you with part of the performance criteria.
There are several types of conditions. Condition types and examples are provided in the following
table. Select a condition type that is appropriate for the element/learning outcome. In some instances,
an element/learning outcome may require more than one condition. Write a phrase that describes the
condition, which may include the words ‘given’ and ‘using’.
Condition types and examples
Condition Types Examples
Condition elements that list the equipment or
resources given the candidate/learner in performing
the behaviour
TRACE signal flow through the receiver, using the
schematic diagram provided.
ALIGN the IF strip of the radio receiver. Use of the
technical manual is permitted.
MULTIPLY two three-digit numbers, using a
calculator.
Condition elements that set limits or restrictions on the
candidate/learner in performing the behaviour
FIELDSTRIP the.45 calibre pistol while blindfolded.
COMPUTE the surface area of a sphere without the
aid of a calculator.
More than one condition may be required to describe
circumstances in which the candidate/learner will
perform the desired behaviour
Select tools to BUILD a frame house, given boards cut
to size.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 107
Step 3: Write the standard
Describing the standard for correctly performing the behaviour is the final step. The standard indicates
how well the candidate/learner is expected to perform the behaviour. It can focus on the quantity
and/or quality of the performance of the candidate/learner.
Standard types and examples are provided in the following table to give you some ideas. Write a
standard that is appropriate for the element/learning outcome.
Standard type Example Explanation
Standard
operating
procedure
Perform the procedure the pilot follows to
complete an instrument landing, given the
situation requirements for an instrument
approach and the local airfield regulations. The
performed steps will be in correct order and will
comply with Navy instructions and local
regulations.
‘Navy instructions and local
regulations’ are the standard
operating procedure (SOP).
Frequently, this type of standard
specifies the actual publication
where the SOP can be found.
Standard that
implies NO
ERROR
Compute the surface area of the sphere to two
decimal points, given the diameter of a sphere
and a calculator.
Adding ‘without error’ would not
increase the requirements for
accuracy.
Minimum
acceptable level
of performance
Multiply two three-digit numbers, given a
calculator, and write the answer to the nearest
tenth.
‘Nearest tenth’ clearly states the
degree of accuracy required for
satisfactory achievement of the
objective.
Specific timing
requirements
Type a letter, from a 200-word draft, without
error at a minimum rate of 40 words per minute.
Time is an important factor, so it is
included in the standard.
Rate of
production
Type final report from a draft copy, without
error at a minimum of 20 pages per day.
The amount produced daily is an
important factor, so it is included in
the standard.
Qualitative
requirements
Adjust a misadjusted carburetor to idle
smoothly at 500 rpm, given the necessary tools.
Smoothness is a qualitative standard
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 108
Blooms Taxonomy of verbs by level of thinking skills
Level Type of Activity
or Question Verbs used for objectives
Lowest Level Knowledge define, memorise, repeat, record, list, recall, name, relate, collect,
label, specify, cite, enumerate, tell, recount
Comprehension restate, summarise, discuss, describe, recognise, explain, express,
identify, locate, report, retell, review, translate
Application exhibit, solve, interview, simulate, apply, employ, use,
demonstrate, dramatise, practice, illustrate, operate, calculate,
show, experiment
Higher Levels Analysis interpret, classify, analyse, arrange, differentiate, group, compare,
organise, contrast, examine, scrutinise, survey, categorise, dissect,
probe, inventory, investigate, question, discover, text, inquire,
distinguish, detect, diagram, inspect
Synthesis compose, setup, plan, prepare, propose, imagine, produce,
hypothesise, invent, incorporate, develop, generalise, design,
originate, formulate, predict, arrange, contrive, assemble, concoct,
construct, systematise, create
Evaluation judge, assess, decide, measure, appraise, estimate, evaluate, infer,
rate, deduce, compare, score, value, predict, revise, choose,
conclude, recommend, select, determine, criticise
Definitions of verbs
Verb Definition
Apply a rule
To state a rule as it applies to a situation, object, or event that is being analysed. The
statement must convey analysis of a problem situation and/or its solution, together with
the name or statement of the rule that was applied.
Assess
To stipulate the conditions by which the behaviour specified in an objective may be
ascertained. Such stipulations are usually in the form of written descriptions. For obvious
reasons, ‘assess’ is rarely used as a verb in learning outcomes at elementary school level.
Classify To place objects, words, or situations into categories according to defined criteria for
each category. The criteria must be made known to the candidate/learner.
Compose To formulate a composition in written, spoken, musical, or artistic form.
Construct To make a drawing, structure, or model that identifies a designated object or set of
conditions.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 109
Verb Definition
Define
To stipulate the requirements for inclusion of an object, word or situation in a category
or class. Elements of one or both of the following must be included: (1) The
characteristics of the words, objects, or situations that are included in the class or
category. (2) The characteristics of the words, objects or situations that are excluded in
the class or category. To define is to set up criteria for classification.
Demonstrate
The candidate/learner performs the operations necessary for the application of an
instrument, model, device, or implement. Note: There is a temptation to use demonstrate
in objectives such as ‘the candidate/learner will demonstrate his/her knowledge of vowel
sounds.’ As the verb is defined, this is an improper use of it.
Describe
To name all of the necessary categories of objects, object properties, or event properties
that are relevant to the description of a designated situation. The objective is of the form,
‘The candidate/learner will describe this order, object, or event’ and does not limit the
categories that may be used in mentioning them. Specific or categorical limitations, if
any, are to be given in the performance standards of each objective. When using this
verb in an objective, it is helpful to include a statement to the effect of what the
description, as a minimum, must reference.
Diagram
To construct a drawing with labels and with a specified organisation or structure to
demonstrate knowledge of that organisation or structure. Graphic charting and mapping
are types of diagramming, and these terms may be used where more exact
communication of the structure of the situation and response is desired.
Distinguish To identify under conditions when only two contrasting identifications are involved for
each response.
Estimate
To assess the dimension of an object, series of objects, event or condition without
applying a standard scale or measuring device. Logical techniques of estimation, such as
are involved in mathematical interpolation, may be used. See MEASURE.
Evaluate
To classify objects, situations, people, conditions, etc. according to defined criteria of
quality. An indication of quality must be given in the defined criteria of each class
category. Evaluation differs from general classification only in this respect.
Identify To indicate the selection of an object of a class in response to its class name, by pointing,
picking up, underlining, marking or other responses.
Interpret
To translate information from observation, charts, tables, graphs and written material in a
verifiable manner.
Label
To stipulate a verbal (oral or written) response to a given object, drawing or composition
that contains information relative to the known, but unspecified structure of these
objects, drawings or compositions. Labelling is a complex behaviour that contains
elements of naming and identifying.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 110
Verb Definition
Locate
To stipulate the position of an object, place or event in relation to other specified objects,
places or events. Ideational guides to location such as grids, order arrangements and
time may be used to describe location. Note: LOCATE is not to be confused with
IDENTIFY.
Measure
To apply a standard scale or measuring device to an object, series of objects, events, or
conditions, according to practices accepted by those who are skilled in the use of the
device or scale.
Name To supply the correct name, in oral or written form for an object, class of objects,
persons, places, conditions or events that are pointed out or described.
Predict To use a rule or principle to predict an outcome or to infer some consequence. It is not
necessary that the rule or principle be stated.
Reproduce To imitate or copy an action, construction or object that is presented.
Solve
To effect a solution to a given problem, in writing or orally. The problem solution must
contain all the elements required for the solution and may contain extraneous elements
that are not required for solution. The problem must be posed in such a way that the
candidate/learner is able to determine the type of response that is acceptable.
State a rule To make a statement that conveys the meaning of the rule, theory, or principle.
Translate To transcribe one symbolic form to another of the same or similar meaning.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 111
Competency-based training
Competency-based training provides learners with the knowledge, skills and understanding to
demonstrate competence against standards and performance criteria in an applied context. The
national VET system is competency-based, built around nationally endorsed industry standards – in the
UAE, National Occupational Skills Standards (NOSS).
Competency-based assessment
Competency-based assessment is the process of collecting evidence and making judgements about
whether competency has been achieved. There is information in this section that will help those who
are designing, conducting and validating competency-based assessments.
Evidence Requirements
Evidence requirements specify the critical evidence required to demonstrate achievement of the
element and performance criteria. They describe what and how the candidate/learner has to provide
and/or demonstrate.
Evidence requirements provide information on:
the appropriate assessment context (environment, setting)
the resources required for assessment
the conditions under which assessment is to take place
how evidence is to be provided and recorded.
Unit standards may be designed with:
evidence required for each performance criteria in an element or
evidence required covering two or more of the performance criteria in an element.
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL)
Recognition of prior learning includes learning that has occurred outside formal education and
training. Developers and assessors must ensure:
RPL is offered to candidates/learners on enrolment
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 112
that the RPL process is structured to minimise the time and cost to applicants
the education and training provider provides adequate information, support and opportunities for
participants to engage in the RPL process.
Rules of evidence
Assessment must be based on what is sometimes termed the 'rules of evidence' - validity, reliability,
fairness and flexibility. This is also good teaching and assessment practice and ensures the best
learning outcomes for candidate/learners. These rules are as follows:
Validity means that the evidence relates to the unit competency, addresses essential skills and
knowledge, dimensions of competency and employability skills.
Reliability means that the assessment tool and process will produce consistent outcomes when
applied by a range of assessors in a range of contexts.
Fairness means that the assessment will not disadvantage any person and will take into account
the characteristics of the person being assessed.
Flexibility means that the assessment tool and process allows for assessment in a range of
assessment contexts.
Sufficiency of evidence
One of the questions most frequently asked by assessors is – how much evidence is needed?
Some assessors are accused of collecting too little evidence while others collect too much. In fact, the
volume of evidence collected will vary according to the competency being assessed and the context of
assessment.
Although there are cases of specific units of competency where required evidence is prescribed,
generally there are no rules for quantity. Rather than focusing on the quantity of evidence, assessors
need to ensure that assessment decisions are based on quality evidence that demonstrates the
candidate/learner is competent against the criteria for the unit of competency.
(Adapted from Training Package Assessment Materials Kit, 2001 Department of Education, Training & Youth Affairs, Australia.)
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 113
Types of evidence
Evidence is information upon which an assessor makes a judgement of competency. Evidence may
include:
Types of evidence Examples
Direct demonstration/observation Performance of a task, or range of tasks, either in the workplace or in a
simulated work environment, witnessed directly by an assessor
Indirect demonstration Use of photographs, videos, etc. showing performance of a task when the
assessor cannot be present
Products Models, items and objects that have been made, fixed or repaired by the
candidate/learner
Workplace documents Rosters, budgets, reports, standard operating procedures etc. developed
by the candidate/learner
Questions - written and oral
Asking the candidate about real or hypothetical situations to check
understanding, task management and contingency management skills.
May be short answer, discussion, multiple choice, etc.
Assignments Projects, reports, essays, etc. relevant to the LLN requirements of the unit
of competency
Third party reports Documented and verified reports from supervisor, colleague, subject
expert, trainer and/or others
Self-assessment A candidate’s/learner’s personal statement on their performance (not
generally sufficient in isolation)
Simulation Simulated activity to accommodate difficult to demonstrate criteria e.g.
emergencies, contingencies, difficult behaviours etc.
Portfolios Collections of evidence compiled by the candidate
(Adapted from Training Package Assessment Materials Kit, 2001. Department of Education, Training & Youth Affairs)
Examples of appropriate types of evidence for Knowledge and Skills units and Application units
Knowledge and skill Units Application Units
Assessment of the candidate/learner in simulated
situations
Skills tests
Oral and written questions
Assignments
Projects
Case studies
Observation of performance in a work environment
Examining products of work
Questioning the learner
Witness testimony
Candidate’s/learner’s statements (reflective
accounts/narrative of activities undertaken)
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 114
How to determine and design appropriate assessment and evidence requirements
Developers can use the following steps to target appropriate evidence:
Read the elements/learning outcomes to develop a picture of competence
Check the additional information provided in the NOSS for recommendations and or
requirements
Identify where the evidence will come from (that is, the workplace or off-the-job)
Identify the evidence required to demonstrate competence
Map the proposed evidence against the performance criteria for the relevant unit or cluster of
units that make up the qualification/award
Check that the evidence complies with the rules of evidence
Validate assessment strategy (with stakeholders including assessors)
Validate assessment tools (with stakeholders including assessors)
It is good practice to adopt candidate/learner-centred and workplace-centred approaches to the
collection of evidence, rather than relying on a one-method-fits all approach. Negotiate with employers
and candidates/learners to determine what evidence is already available and/or to develop
appropriate assessment methods.
Assessment activities may be undertaken in work or project teams, and therefore may provide
evidence of competency for more than one candidate. In this situation a personal statement,
additional questioning or third-party report may be required to confirm an individual’s contribution
and performance.
Language, literacy and numeracy in assessment
In the process of working out what evidence is required or when developing assessment tools, the
developer and assessor should pay particular attention to the language, literacy and numeracy skill
level of the candidate and the requirements of the units of competency.
There is often a tendency to rely on written tests and essays, particularly in assessment of
underpinning knowledge. In many units of competency, however, writing is either not required or is a
minimal requirement to perform the described work task.
Evidence that requires skills beyond those specified in the unit of competency should be avoided.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 115
Equity groups and reasonable adjustment
Reasonable adjustment, sometimes called reasonable accommodation or allowable adjustment is
designed to ensure that all people are treated equally in the assessment process – this means that,
wherever possible, ‘reasonable’, adjustments are made to the assessment process to meet the
individual needs of candidate/learner.
Equity groups may include, but are not limited to:
candidates/learners with English as a second language
candidates/learners with literacy or numeracy difficulties
candidates/learners in remote locations
women in non-traditional industries
candidates/learners with sensory impairment
candidates/learners with physical or intellectual disabilities.
Reasonable adjustment may mean:
making learning materials and methods accessible
adapting the physical environment and equipment
making adjustments to the procedures for conducting assessment
making adjustments to the evidence gathering techniques.
(Source: Training Package assessment materials: Kit to support assessor training, Commonwealth of Australia, 2001)
Evaluating and recording evidence
If the assessment process has been valid, reliable, fair, and flexible and the evidence is sufficient then
the professional decision on the competency of candidate/learner should be a straightforward
appraisal of the evidence.
If an assessor/trainer is uncomfortable with making a decision they should review:
the assessment process, or
the evidence provided.
An unsuccessful assessment outcome should not be viewed as a failure by either the assessor or the
candidate/learner, but rather as a means to identify additional learning needs. Candidates/learners
should be given the opportunity for reassessment and detailed explanation of where weaknesses exist
in performance.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 116
Providing candidates/learners with pre-assessment information and feedback on
assessment outcomes
The following is the minimum assessment information that candidates/learners need:
Assessment must provide for the candidate/learner to be informed of the context and purpose of
the assessment and the assessment process
Assessment must provide for feedback to the candidate/learner about the outcomes of the
assessment process and guidance on future options in relation to those outcomes
Assessment must provide for reassessment on appeal
RPL must be offered to all candidates/learners on enrolment.
All pre-assessment information should be included in the unit Information document that is provided
to each at the beginning of the unit.
Feedback on assessment outcomes can be provided on written assessments or the assessment
feedback template can be used.
Validation and moderation
Validation means confirming that something is fit for a purpose, and in this context an education and
training provider should validate its assessment strategies by:
reviewing, comparing and evaluating the assessment processes, tools and evidence contributing
to judgements made by a range of assessors against the same competency standards, at least
annually
documenting any action taken to improve the quality and consistency of assessment.
Validation may occur:
pre-assessment to validate assessment strategies and tools
post-assessment to validate assessment outcomes, which is usually referred to assessment
moderation.
The term 'moderation' is used in this context to describe the process by which assessment tools,
processes and judgements are validated. If the moderation process does not validate the assessment
processes, tools and outcomes, then actions to be taken to improve the quality and consistency of
assessment need to be documented.
Validation requires assessors to meet – physically or virtually – at least once a year to discuss and
confirm that assessments (including RPL):
meet the requirements of the endorsed components of training packages and the outcomes
specified in the course/units of competency
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 117
comply with the assessment guidelines included in the applicable training packages or the
assessment requirements specified in accredited courses
are valid, reliable, fair and flexible
provide for applicants to be informed of the context and purpose of the assessment and the
assessment process
focus on the application of knowledge and skills to the standard of performance required in the
workplace and cover all aspects of workplace performance, including dimensions of competency
involve the evaluation of sufficient evidence to enable judgements to be made about whether
competency has been attained
provide for feedback to the applicant about the outcomes of the assessment process and
guidance on future options in relation to those outcomes
are equitable (link to equity groups and assessment) for all persons, taking account of individual
needs relevant to the assessment
provide for reassessment on appeal.
Collating, recording and storing assessment evidence
The candidate/learner is responsible for:
maintaining personal records of assessment event(s) and evidence gathered for a specified unit in
their professional portfolio.
The assessor is responsible for:
collating documents (signed by both the assessor and the candidate/learner) related to the
assessment process including:
pre-assessment evaluation form
assessment plans
feedback reports
action/review plans
collating evidence of assessment events which may be recorded in any the following formats:
written
visual
oral and/or
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 118
a combination of above
recording assessment outcomes (signed by both the assessor and the candidate/learner).
The internal quality assurer is responsible for:
reviewing documents and audio and visual records used to make assessment decisions and
internal quality assurance auditing processes including:
assessment plans, audit plans and action plans
outcomes of progress reviews
assessment forms and written outcomes of internal quality auditing and reviews
material from VETAC and relevant awarding body.
The training provider is responsible for:
overseeing the collation and verification of candidate details and entry requirements
submitting assessment results to VETAC in line with quality assurance requirement processes
the security and storage of evidence.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 119
Occupational Functional Hierarchy
Occupational profiles/descriptions typically use functional verbs to specify what actions and/or
decisions are required to perform the respective duties and responsibilities. They are generally
structured in a functional hierarchy that closely reflect the verbs used in the employability indicators
descriptors and in turn align with the QFEmirates level descriptors. That is, a common but notional
thread can be identified at each level that links the QFEmirates, the employability indicators and the
functions performed in an occupation.
The following six types of functions are generally considered the key and most common functional
areas represented in a hierarchical form and across occupations and organisations. By establishing the
QFEmirates and the employability indicators as the benchmark reference tool or core language
reference platform, augmented by the common and key functional areas, the opportunity for
increasing consistency across occupational descriptions and their market recognition is enhanced. This
in turn leads to improved community and stakeholder awareness, understanding and confidence of
occupational nomenclatures (titles) and meanings ascribed to them in the market across all levels of
the QFEmirates.
Six key and hierarchical functional areas and definitions
Six Key and hierarchical
functional areas Types of actions and/or decisions (function definition)
A Policy and strategy A high level function for researching, establishing, managing and strategising
policies and philosophy
B Managing The function of managing personnel, systems, resources and processes
C Specifying The function of specifying, implementing and assessing personnel, systems,
resources and processes
D Controlling The function of controlling, regulating and monitoring activities related to
personnel, systems, resources and processes
E Maintaining
credibility
The function of maintaining the capability of employees/independents and a
healthy organisational culture and safe workplace
F Performing/
carrying out
The function of carrying out the work activities to produce and maintain goods
and services
The function of performing simple tasks in a controlled environment
Functions are generally organised into a hierarchy which denotes the types of actions and/or decisions
involved. Policy type functions refer to executive decisions where policy is made and objectives are
formulated. Control type functions relate to middle management actions and decisions to monitor
day-to-day affairs and assure that executive decisions are met. Operational type functions involve the
routine activities or work of the enterprise.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 120
General Principle
Qualification titles Level Indicative
employability indicator Function Function description
VET HE
Doctoral
degree 10
Leading
specialist/expert Policy and Strategy
A high level function for establishing and
managing policies, philosophy and strategies Applied
Master
Master’s
degree 9 Higher professional
Applied
Graduate
Diploma
Post
Graduate
Diploma
8 Professional Managing The function of managing personnel, systems,
resources and processes
Applied
Bachelor
Bachelor
degree 7
Para-professional and
higher technical Specifying
The function of
specifying, implementing
and assessing systems
and processes
Controlling
The function of
controlling,
regulating and
monitoring
activities related to
personnel, systems,
resources and
processes
Advanced
Diploma
Higher
Diploma 6
Supervisory and
technical
Maintaining
capability
The function of
maintaining including
coordinating the
capability of employees
and healthy
organisational culture
and safe workplace
Diploma Associate
degree 5 Highly skilled
Certificate 4
4 Skilled
Certificate 3 3 Semi-skilled
Performing The function of carrying out the work activities to
produce and maintain goods and services Certificate 2 2 General
Certificate 1 1 Basic Entry level and functional
employment
The function of performing simple tasks in a
controlled environment
Three key benchmark reference tools that depict a common set of national terminologies and
definitions have now been identified for use by those formulating occupational descriptions and the
related duties and responsibilities. The use of the benchmark tools can assist in harmonising and
developing consistency. The three tools are:
1. The QFEmirates and its related level descriptors and qualification profiles(requirements) for a given
learning outcomes
2. Employability indicators of QFEmirates levels – range and descriptors
3. Key and hierarchical functional areas and definitions - actions and/or decisions
The three can be linked together in a matrix to provide formal information for demonstrating the
notional interrelationship between qualifications and functions performed in an occupation and vice
versa. The following illustration denotes the notional interrelationship that applies.
National functional framework model and indicative alignment to QFEmirates outcomes
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 121
Functional Taxonomy
The verb taxonomies are appended to each function, as per the table below – Notional Function and
Taxonomy Framework. This table provides an augmented base structure (core language reference
platform) for technical practitioners to support their activities, such as HR personnel, recruitment
specialists, organisational specialists and/ or job design specialists, as well as curriculum, qualification,
occupational stands or occupational profile writers or developers.
QF level Function Taxonomy
9-10 Policy Analyse, Develop, Forecast, Research
7-8 Managing Evaluate, Lead , Manage
6-7 Specifying Assess, Commission, Design, Develop, Direct, Estimate, Facilitate, Implement,
Investigate, Report, Specify
6 Controlling Audit, Control, Diagnose, Evaluate, Inspect, Institute, Mobilise, Monitor, Plan,
Procure, Regulate, Schedule, Supervise, Verify
4-6 Maintaining
capacity Administer, Comply, Coordinate, Develop, Maintain, Organise, Respond, Test, Utilise
1-4 Performing/
carry out
Align, Apply, Assemble, Attend, Build, Calibrate, Carry out, Check, Compile, Conduct,
Configure, Construct, Contribute, Control, Deliver, Document, Erect, Fabricate, Fault-
find, Identify, Install, Make, Modify, Monitor, Operate, Overhaul, Perform, Position,
Prepare, Produce, Provide, Rectify, Repair, Select, Sell, Service, Store, Troubleshoot,
Undertake, Use
Functional Analysis
Functional analysis is a process used to identify activities a person is expected to do as part of their
job. Functions are not random activities. Functions must have a clear purpose and outcome that are
valuable to an employer.
Having identified the three key benchmark reference tools and in particular, the functional key area, a
further level of disaggregation can be undertaken, as this level of aggregation is to high for identifying
duties and functions of an occupation. That is, unpacking the high level (key) functional areas in
smaller elements using aligned verb taxonomies to help provide more clarity as to the actions and/or
verbs decisions, and which typically reflect and are used in general workplace applications.
Functional Map
Once these functions people are expected to perform are identified, it becomes easier to produce a
functional map and identify the knowledge, skills and aspects of competence they need for a
particular occupation – in other words, the content of the national occupational skills standards.
Here is an example of a function map for “Assure safe installation and operation of electrical systems of
wiring, equipment and accessories” for the occupation of an Electrical Installations Technician.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 122
Functional map
“Assure safe installation and operation of electrical systems of wiring, equipment and accessories”
(Electrical Installations Technician)
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 123
To remain internationally competitive, a country must prioritise the development of skills and
qualifications to keep up with emerging technologies, materials, systems and workplace environments,
including new jobs. This helps to develop a nation’s social capital and improves a country’s wellbeing.
There is an urgent and ongoing need for human (workforce) development of the UAE citizens (i.e.
Emiratisation) and non-UAE residents. The country must address emerging skills shortages and gaps;
increase labour market opportunities for individuals through education and training; and develop
policies that improve economic, social and personal competitiveness.
A National Qualifications Framework for the UAE
Many nations have recognised that a key step in realising a highly skilled and productive workforce is
through a ‘national qualifications framework’ that encompasses all forms of learning. A national
qualifications framework is simply a means of describing qualifications and the relationships between
them to enable individuals to develop their skills and progress.
In August 2010, President His Highness Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan issued Federal Decree No.
1 Establish and maintain the National Qualifications Authority. The Decree sets out sixteen (16) aims
and objectives, which the Board of the National Qualifications Authority (NQA) is to pursue. It includes
the establishment of a United Arab Emirates Qualifications Framework (QFEmirates) that serves as the
national frame of reference for qualifications and is internationally recognised.
The vision of the UAE National Qualifications Authority is “to have distinct national qualifications that
enhance economic and social development’.
Benefits of the QFEmirates
The QFEmirates is a truly integrated system, enabling all qualifications to be described and compared,
recognising achievement in learning from the most elementary task to the most complex, using
recognised and agreed common titles. It includes formal structured learning, achieved typically in
schools, colleges, universities and training centres and informal and non-formal (both structured and
unstructured) learning achieved typically in the workplace or community. As a single, integrated
system, the QFEmirates can be used by the country’s decision-makers to develop strategic education
and training policies to improve the country’s economic, social and personal effectiveness and
standing in the world. The Framework also:
provides access to new learning opportunities for all citizens and residents
creates new learning pathways and progression routes
helps individuals to make decisions about what they want to do next and to continue learning while
working or in their community
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 124
improves opportunities for individuals to work abroad without having to repeat qualifications
enables people to be recognised for the work they do in the workplace and communities as part of
their skills development
enables qualifications achieved abroad to be recognised as equivalent to UAE qualifications,
encouraging international mobility
by using a common language to describe qualifications, describes a national and international
qualifications in way that employers and learners can understand. Employers will be able to state
clearly the level of education required when advertising jobs and candidates will be able to check
whether they have the skills required to apply.
Design of the QFEmirates
The design of the QFEmirates is based on three fundamental building blocks:
Levels
Each of the ten (10) levels represents a hierarchy of relative difficulty, complexity and depth. The higher
the qualifications framework level, the greater the challenge and the demand expected of a learner in
order to be awarded the relevant qualification.
Learning outcomes
Learning outcomes define what a learner has learned and not what they have been taught. They are
expressed in terms of:
knowledge - learned from practical or professional experience as well as from formal instruction or
study and can comprise description, memory, understanding, thinking, analysis, synthesis, debate
and research
skill - is the learned ability to perform a function that in some way responds to or manipulates the
physical, informational or social environment. Skills may be cognitive (such as use of logical,
intuitive, creative and conceptual thinking) and practical (such as manual dexterity and the use of
methods, techniques, processes, materials, tools and instruments)
aspects of competence, comprising three strands – autonomy and responsibility, role in context and
self-development – the effective use of knowledge and skill in occupations and in social and civic
life
The ten levels and the five ‘strands’ of learning outcome statements define the Level Descriptors,
indicating the complexity of learning for each level, the expected level of achievement for each level
and how each level relates to occupations in the world of work.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 125
Strands of learning outcomes
Level X
Strand 1 Strand 2 Strand 3 Strand 4 Strand 5
Knowledge Skill Autonomy and
responsibility Role in context
Self-
development
There are three types of qualifications in the QFEmirates:
‘Principal’ Qualification - the major type of qualification with formal recognition at each level, and
capture a typical achievements for the level including all five strands of learning outcomes.
‘Composite’ Award - provide formal recognition for learners who achieve a set of cohesive learning
outcomes including, in varying combinations, all five strands of learning outcomes. This may
involve fewer learning outcomes and/or less complexity compared to a Principal Qualification.
‘Component’ Award - provide formal recognition of achievement of a limited number of learning
outcomes which may relate to all or only some of the strands of learning outcomes.
Principal Qualification titles used in the QFEmirates (each with its own profile)
Level Generic
Nomenclature
Vocational Education
and Training (VET) Higher Education (HE)
General Education
(G 12 – GE)
10 Doctoral Degree — Doctoral —
9 Master Degree Applied Master Master —
8 Graduate Diploma Applied Graduate
Diploma Postgraduate Diploma —
7 Bachelor Degree Applied Bachelor Bachelor —
6 Diploma* Advanced Diploma Higher Diploma —
5 Diploma*/
Associate Degree Diploma Associate Degree —
4 Certificate* Certificate 4 — Secondary School
Certificate (G 12)
3 Certificate* Certificate 3 — TBA
2 Certificate* Certificate 2 — —
1 Certificate* Certificate 1 — —
Aspects of competence
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 126
Making use of credits in the QFEmirates
Credit is the term used to internationally to identify the amount of learning that is required to
successfully complete a qualification. ‘Credit value’ is used to identify the notional number of hours of
learning required to achieve one credit. In the UAE a notional value of 15 hours (with additional study
hours) equates to one (1) credit. This means that for a qualification with a value of 3 credits, a typical
learner must successfully complete 45 hours of learning to achieve the required standard.
Credits can be also be ‘accumulated’ to enable transfer to other qualifications offered by recognised
education and training institutions within the UAE or abroad. This means, for example, that a learner
may not have to repeat all learning if they move from one education provider to complete a
qualification. Ultimately a system of ‘Credit Accumulation and Transfer’ will be developed in the UAE to
enable this to occur consistently by licenced education and training providers.
CoreLife Skills
Many countries have introduced ways to recognise or acknowledge the role particular generic skills
play in underpinning work, learning and life. The recognition of these skills is important because they
underpin the ability of learners to learn throughout their lives and so promote lifelong learning.
To ensure that UAE citizens have the best foundation for learning, work and life, literacy and numeracy
have been explicitly embedded within the learning outcome Level Descriptors for qualifications at
levels one (1) to six (6) within the QFEmirates. In addition, seven CoreLife Skills have been introduced,
which will be used across the general education, higher education and vocational education and
training sectors. They are:
Collecting, analysing, organising and applying information in a given context
Communicating information, concepts and ideas
Initiating and organising self and activities, including motivation, exploration and creativity
Working with others in teams including leadership
Solving problems including using mathematical ideas and techniques
Applying information and communication technology (ICT)
Participating in social and civic life including ethical practice
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 127
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL)
As well as being able to transfer credit to other recognised education and training institutions at home
or abroad, QFEmirates enables the recognition of prior learning (RPL) to take place. This involves the
assessment of previously unrecognised skills and knowledge an individual has achieved outside the
formal education and training system. RPL assesses this unrecognised learning against the
requirements of a qualification in respect primarily of the outcomes to be achieved.
By removing the need for duplication of learning, RPL encourages an individual to continue upgrading
their skills and knowledge through structured education and training towards formal qualifications and
improved employment outcomes.
International qualifications within the QFEmirates
The UAE is a major receiver of foreign issued qualifications and awards. This applies to nationals that
may have successfully completed a foreign qualification or award in another country, or in-country
(UAE) and expatriates that are engaged in employment in the UAE.
An important benefit of the QFEmirates is that qualifications achieved in this way can be recognised as
equivalent to UAE qualifications by mapping learning outcomes. This encourages the international
mobility of learners, understanding of overseas qualifications through alignment with frameworks in
other countries and enables the UAE to ensure that it is benefitting from those with the very best
knowledge and skills to support its economic and social development.
The NQA is establishing processes in association with the Ministry of Education’s General Education
Commission, the Commission for Academic Accreditation, and Vocational Education and Training
Awards Council to identify equivalencies with and recognise international qualifications.
Implementation of the QFEmirates
The introduction of a new system of qualifications, such as the QFEmirates, can pose a challenge to
education and training administrators and providers. It can impact on employability and recognition
arrangements for qualifications issued prior to implementation. Issues and unintended consequences
may arise from time to time.
The NQA, and its Board, recognise that implementation of the QFEmirates will need to be led and
managed with the involvement of all stakeholders. The NQA will take every step to smooth the
implementation process and continuously review the impact of the QFEmirates, by working closely
with Federal government, the two Commissions, VETAC, recognised education and training providers,
employers, and. of course, learners.
128
Principal Qualifications Credit Matrix
QFEmirates
level
General Education
Commission (GEC)
General Education
(GE) sector
Commission for Academic Accreditation (CAA)
Higher Education (HE) sector
Vocational Education and Training Awards Council (VETAC)
Vocational Education and Training (VET) sector
Qualification title
- Academic/
Institutional1
HE
CAA Unique
Credit
value(s)
assigned to
each
QFEmirates
level***
Min
imu
m c
um
ula
tive
cre
dit
valu
e
Total nominal
cumulative
contact hours
Qualification title -
VET
Based on the use of two (2) kinds of interrelated
VET2 qualifications^^
Qualification title
- General
Education
^Minimum cumulative
VET credit value# for
Total notional
VET cumulative hours
K&S
Unique
credits/
level3 C
um
ula
tive
Ap
pli
cati
on
Total
credit
value of
KSA
Contact
Hours
K&S
Ap
pli
cati
on
ho
urs
Total
KSA
hours
Level 10
Doctorate 54 or more 204 3,060 No qualification available at this level
Level 9
Master 6 to 12 150 -
156 2,250 – 2,340 Applied Master 10 200 18 218 3,000 270 3,270
Level 8 Postgraduate
Diploma* 24 144 2,160
Applied Graduate
Diploma 30 190 16 206 2,850 240 3,090
Level 7
Bachelor 30 120** 1,800 Applied Bachelor 40 160 14 174 2,400 210 2,610
Level 6
Higher Diploma 30 90 1,350 Advanced Diploma 40 120 12 132 1,800 180 1,980
Level 5
Associate Degree 60 60 900 Diploma 20 80 10 90 1,200 150 1,350
Level 4 Secondary School
Certificate (G 12)^
Certificate 4 20 60 8 68 900 120 1,020
Level 3
TBA Certificate 3 20 40 6 46 600 90 690
Level 2
Certificate 2 10 20 4 24 300 60 360
Level 1
Certificate 1 10 10 3 13 150 45 195
129
VETAC uses two (2) kinds of qualifications. One kind is comprised solely of knowledge and skills and is used as a pathway for those preparing for work, those
seeking advance standing in higher education programs or those seeking more advanced knowledge and skills in preparation for career advances. The other kind
of qualification is comprised of a combination of application unit standards interrelated with the respective pre-requisite knowledge and skills unit standards.
The Application based qualification thus, reflects that a learner has demonstrated the acquisition of respective knowledge and skills and applied such to the
standard of performance required in the workplace. These two kinds of qualifications recognise the nature of the UAE VET market and historical learner and
cultural preferences. They are aimed at stimulating, opening up and promoting multiple pathways for learners seeking or undertaking VET qualifications.
# VETAC uses notional minimum quantum of 1 credit = 15 hours which is comprised of 11 hours formal instruction and 4 hours formally structured skills
development for knowledge and skills based unit standards with a minimum annual nominal delivery total of 600 hours or their equivalent, and with an additional
expected study/experiential-load of 22 hours i.e. tutorial, studies, skills practice, workplace exposure. The notional minimum annual total is based on a
program/course of 30 hours (attendance time) at 7.5 hours per day for 4 days or 6 hours per day for 5 days of which 8 hours covers the formally structured skills
development component.
In relation the credit value assigned to Application based unit standards, a value of one (1) credit or 15 hours is accorded to these in recognition of the learner
undertaking unstructured work performance and/or workplace development and in particular, covers the assessment arrangements and processes used over time
(formative and normative evidence) to gather, review, discuss and make judgements of the learner’s/candidate’s performance. No greater value can be assigned
to a unit.
The credit value for the two kinds of VET qualifications is as follows:
1. For qualifications comprised of only knowledge and skills based unit standards the relative credit value of each unit standard will vary and be dependent on
the breadth, complexity and relationship with the respective level of the QFEmirates. It also will correspond with the notional minimum quantum formulae
referred to above.
In terms of the total credit value for such a qualification at each level of the QFEmirates, a total has been assigned and is detailed in the table at column
labelled minimum cumulative credit value, for knowledge and skills.
^ For example, knowledge and skills unit standards based VET qualification of Certificate 4 requires 60 credits to complete or 900 hours. In this example, a
qualifications developer may develop a qualification comprised of Level 4 (horizontal) knowledge and skills unit standards having a combined value of no
less than (a minimum) 20 credits in the core of the qualification, AND should lower level unit standards be required to make up the qualification, no more
than (a maximum) the credit value specified as per the matrix is permissible, at each level (vertical); that is level 3 = 20, level 2 = 10, level 1 = 10. It is also
possible to develop a qualification with all unit standards coming from Level 4, as this is greater than the minimum permissible.
130
2. For Application based qualifications which are comprised of knowledge, skills and application, a credit value limit is assigned to each QFEmirates, recognising
that Application based unit standards have a maximum value of 1 credit. However, a qualification may have more Application unit standards than the
assigned total for the qualification at that level.
The additional credit value is not recognised for qualification credit value completion requirements. Notwithstanding, all unit standards required to complete
(completion rules) must be achieved. Qualifications are not endorsed with a lesser number than that assigned for the respective level.
For example, an Application based Diploma qualification and comprised of knowledge, skills and application units has been endorsed with fifteen (15)
application unit standards to be completed. Table E.1 Principal Qualifications Credit Matrix shows that a credit value of 80 credits (or 1,200 hours) for the
knowledge and skills based unit standards applies and Ten [10] credits or 150 hours for the application unit standards. In this instance, the learner would be
required to complete all 15 application units. The 15 credits are noted and reported on the transcript.
Source: QFEmirates Handbook, Annexure E – Indicative Qualifications and Awards Credit Matrix.
131
Composite Awards and Component Awards Credit Matrix - VET Qualifications
QFEmirates
Composite Awards Component Awards
C
K&S
C
A
Total
KSA
U
K&S
U
A
Total U
KSA
C
K&S
C
A
Total
KSA
U
K&S
U
A
Total U
KSA
Level 10
Level 9 100 9 109 14 1 15
Level 8 96 8 104 16 1 17 48 4 52 18 2 20
Level 7 80 7 87 20 1 21 40 3 43 10 2 12
Level 6 60 6 66 20 1 21 30 3 33 10 1 11
Level 5 40 5 45 10 1 11 20 2 22 4 1 5
Level 4 30 4 34 10 1 11 16 2 18 6 1 7
Level 3 20 3 23 10 1 11 10 1 11 5 1 6
Level 2 10 2 12 6 1 7 5 1 6 4 1 5
Level 1 4 1 5 4 1 5 1 1 2 1 1 2
Legend: to Composite and Component Awards Credit Matrix: 1. C = Cumulative and
U = Unique to the level and are comprised of a recognisable parcel of learning outcomes only at the level
3. Legend for predominately VET based Component and Composite Awards: K&S = Knowledge and skills A = Application
KSA = Knowledge, skills and application
2. The Notes on this page and the following pages form an integral part of this Composite and Component Awards Credit Matrix and are to be read in conjunction with it.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 132
Level Summary Level Descriptor
10
Learning outcomes at Level 10 indicate a systematic mastery of a highly specialised field of
knowledge that is comprehensive, deep and overarching and at the frontier of a professional field
of work or discipline, with the capacity for critical analysis, evaluation and synthesis of new and
complex ideas. It also includes:
conceptualising, designing, implementing and adapting substantial research processes using
highly developed cognitive and creative expert skills and intellectual independence
leadership experience and expertise in the development of new and creative approaches that
extend or redefine existing knowledge or professional practice, encompassing responding with
substantial authority and autonomy to the development of new ideas or processes or systems
in challenging and novel work or learning contexts
accounting for overall governance of processes and systems
analysing and critiquing the state of learning in a specialised field and contribute to its
advancement
self-evaluating and leading contributions to professional knowledge, ethics and practice
including in unfamiliar and unpredictable learning contexts
leading and managing complex professional processes
consistently and sensitively managing highly complex and diverse ethical issues leading to
informed, fair and valid judgements.
9
Learning outcomes at Level 9 indicate self-directed, comprehensive, highly specialised knowledge
and practical learning, some of which is at the forefront of knowledge in a specialised field that
provides a basis for originality and advanced knowledge and skills in research, analysis, evaluation
and/or innovation encompassing complex ideas, information, concepts and/or activities and
developing and/or applying ideas, often within a research context. It also includes:
advanced problem-solving skills
the integration of and formulation of judgements
taking account of social and ethical issues and responsibilities and reflecting experience of
managing change in a highly complex, unpredictable and unfamiliar context that requires new
strategic approaches and/or intervention or conceptual abstract solutions
planning skills to develop and execute a major project/activity outcome with appropriately
selected research methodologies to produce sound conclusions
presenting, explaining and/or critiquing highly complex matters
managing professional activities in such context
self-evaluating and taking responsibility for contributing to professional knowledge and
practice including unfamiliar learning contexts
developing and implementing further learning consistently and sensitively
consistently and sensitively managing highly complex ethical issues leading to informed, fair
and valid decisions.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 133
Level Summary Level Descriptor
8
Learning outcomes at Level 8 indicate advanced specialised knowledge and critical understanding
in a specialised field of work or discipline and at the interface between fields as well as a
comprehensive understanding of critical approaches to creating a systematic and coherent body of
knowledge and concepts gained from a range of sources. It also covers:
acquiring comprehensive knowledge of current research and innovations in a field of work,
discipline or professional practice
specialist field and integration of knowledge from different fields of work or disciplines
skills in solving complex unpredictable and/or abstract problems with intellectual independence
and making judgements that take into account social or ethical issues
skills to adopt a professional approach to operating in a complex environment including the
design and development of creative approaches to the management of complex work
processes and organisation, resources or learning
leading and managing teams within a technical or professional activity or working effectively as
an individual
leading the strategic performance of professional teams and self
presenting, explaining and/or critiquing substantively complex matters
taking responsibility for contributing to professional practice in complex and sometimes
unfamiliar learning contexts
leading, contributing and implementing ethical standards.
7
Learning outcomes at Level 7 indicate knowledge and critical understanding of the well-established
principles and practice in a broad field of work or discipline and is specialised factual and
theoretical. It includes an understanding of the boundaries in a field of work or discipline,
encompassing a broad and coherent body of knowledge and concepts, with substantive depth in
the underlying principles and theoretical concepts. It also covers:
allied knowledge and theories in related fields of work or disciplines and in the case of
professional respective discipline
using methods of enquiry, critically analysis and selection of different approaches to solving
problems
an understanding of the limits of the knowledge and skill acquired
technical, creative and analytical skills to solve specialised problems using evidentiary and
procedural based processes in predictable and new contexts that include devising and
sustaining arguments associated with a field of work or discipline
evaluating and implementing appropriate research tools and strategies
evaluating and managing complex and unpredictable work procedures and processes,
resources or learning
managing technical, supervisory or design processes in unpredictable, unfamiliar and varying
contexts
presenting, explaining and/or critiquing complex and unpredictable matters
self-evaluating and responsibility for contributing to professional practice
undertaking regular professional development
contributing to and observing ethical standards.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 134
Level Summary Level Descriptor
6
Learning outcomes at Level 6 indicate specialised factual knowledge and an understanding of the
boundaries in a field of work or discipline and an understanding of allied knowledge and theories
in related fields of work or disciplines. In the case of the para-professional respective discipline, it
also covers:
applying specialist technical, creative and conceptual skills in planning and developing strategic
solutions to varied, unpredictable and unfamiliar problems, be they abstract and/or concrete
using appropriate research tools and strategies
managing with autonomy complex work procedures and processes, resources or learning,
including leading or supervising teams within a technical or professional activity with little
support and adopting, and where appropriate, para-professional roles under guidance
presenting, explaining and/or critiquing interdependent complex matters
producing from a wide-range of information, coherent texts covering complex and/or diverse
relations
selecting, applying, assessing and communicating a wide-range mathematical procedures and
representations in a broad-range of contexts
drawing on experience of operational interaction in work or learning including supervision of
people and projects
addressing own learning needs and function independently and within learning groups
supporting and observing ethical standards.
5
Learning outcomes at Level 5 indicate knowledge is comprehensive and specialised within a field of
work or discipline and encompasses the underlying theoretical and abstract concepts with
significant depth in some areas as well as a broad understanding of allied knowledge and theories.
It also covers:
technical, creative and conceptual skills appropriate to solving a wide-range of problems
including diagnosing and implementing solutions to abstract, familiar and non-routine
problems within a field of work or discipline and using appropriate information retrieval
methods, tools and techniques independently with autonomy
supervising others or coordinating subordinates and peer groups
supporting para-professional roles under guidance
presenting, explaining and/or critiquing complex matters
producing from information, coherent texts covering complex relations
applying, reflecting and communicating an array of mathematical procedures and
representations and contexts
self-direction in learning and have experience of practice in both common and exceptional
situations
comprehending and observing ethical standards.
Document Title Version Date Owner Page
VETAC Q+NOSS System Guidelines 1 June 2014 NQA/VETAC 135
Level Summary Level Descriptor
4
Learning outcomes at Level 4 indicate a broad range of specialised and relevant associated
knowledge, including some theoretical and abstract concepts with limited depth. It also covers:
using specialist cognitive and practical skills to identify and deploy known solutions to defined
problems including deployment of appropriate retrieval tools and which may be subjected to
change in a number of contexts
implementing given approaches to complex procedures and processes, leading and being
accountable for small peer teams within a technical activity, and providing limited supervision
presenting and explaining information concepts and ideas
producing from pieces of information, cohesive texts that may be short and varied
applying, reflecting and communicating an assortment of mathematical procedures and
representations in a number of contexts, which may be interrelated
taking responsibility for own learning within a predictable environment
complying with ethical standards.
3
Learning outcomes at Level 3 indicate a range of knowledge that is broad, mainly factual and
procedural, and includes that which is similarly related, in a field of work or discipline. It also covers:
a limited range of cognitive and practical skills required to carry out tasks
applying routine solutions to predictable and occasional unpredictable problems and defined
retrieval information and data tools under indirect supervision, in a controlled environment
within procedural or predefined parameters, presenting and using information
generating from organised pieces of information, simple and cohesive texts that are typically
short and explicit
using, confirming and communicating straight forward mathematical procedures and
representations
taking limited responsibility for own learning.
2
Learning outcomes at Level 2 indicate general, factual knowledge, using routine skills and the
capacity to undertake relatively simple, repetitive tasks and solve specific problems under direct
supervision in a structured environment. It also covers:
participating in group activities
presenting and/or explaining information
generating from structured information simple and clear texts, which are typically short and
explicit
recognising, performing, confirming and communicating everyday straight forward
mathematical procedures and representations
using structured learning resources in a supervised environment.
1
Learning outcomes at Level 1 indicate elementary and foundation knowledge and skills for life,
work and/or learning, and the capacity to undertake simple, repetitive tasks with close supervisory
support. It also covers:
identifying and forming simple texts
using, checking and communicating everyday functional mathematical procedures and
representations
using well-supported learning resources under direct supervision.
136
Level Descriptors are sets of learning outcomes statements that define levels in a framework of qualifications. This grid sets out descriptor statements for a framework of
ten (10) levels for the UAE. The statements are set out in five ‘strands’, building to a grid of 50 statements. The five strands comprise one each describing knowledge and
skill and three describing aspects of competence (autonomy and responsibility, role in context, and self-development). These Level Descriptors form the foundation for the
QFEmirates. Note: The descriptor statements defining any particular level should be read concurrently across all five strands of learning outcomes to affirm a level. The
Level Descriptors are cumulative e.g. the descriptor for Level 5 assumes the inclusion of all of the outcomes in the preceding levels.
Source: Qualifications Framework Emirates Handbook, 2012, http://www.nqa.gov.ae/En/OpenData/Pages/default.aspx
Level Knowledge Skill Autonomy & responsibility Role in context Self-development
10
comprehensive, deep and
overarching knowledge at the
frontier of a professional field of
work or discipline and at the
interface between different fields or
disciplines
new knowledge, as judged by
independent experts applying
international standards, created
through research or scholarship, that
contributes to the development of a
field of work or discipline
a range of mastered skills and
techniques, including synthesis,
evaluation, planning and
reflection, required to extend and
redefine existing knowledge or
professional practice or to
produce original knowledge
advanced skills in developing
innovative solutions to critical
problems in research using highly
developed cognitive and creative
expert skills and intellectual
independence
highly developed expert
communication and information
technology skills to present,
explain and/or critique highly
complex and diverse matters to
specialist academic, peer
specialists/experts and/or
professional audiences
can act with substantial
authority, creativity,
autonomy, independence,
scholarly and professional
integrity in a sustained
commitment to the
development of new ideas or
processes or systems in
challenging and novel work
or learning contexts
can account for overall
governance of processes and
systems
can lead action to build and
transform socio-cultural
norms and relationships
can originate and manage
complex professional
processes
can lead and take full
responsibility for the
development and
strategic deployment of
professional teams and
self
can initiate and deploy
qualities associated with
professional leadership of
peer groups and teams
can analyse and
critique the state of
learning in a
specialised field and
contribute to its
advancement
can self-evaluate and
lead contributions to
professional
knowledge, ethics and
practice including in
unfamiliar and
unpredictable
learning contexts
can consistently and
sensitively manage
highly complex and
diverse ethical issues
leading to informed,
fair and valid
judgements
137
Level Knowledge Skill Autonomy & responsibility Role in context Self-development
9
comprehensive, highly specialised
knowledge in a field of work,
discipline and/or professional
practice, and at the interface
between different fields, including
frontier concepts and recent
developments
advanced knowledge of applicable
research principles and methods
critical awareness of knowledge
issues, as the basis for original
thinking; encompassing appropriate
processes of enquiry and current
processes of knowledge production
detailed body of knowledge of
recent developments in a field of
work, and/or discipline
advanced skills required in
research, analysis, evaluation
and/or innovation of complex
ideas, information, concepts
and/or activities
skills to develop new knowledge
and procedures and to integrate
knowledge from different fields
using highly developed cognitive
and creative skills and intellectual
independence to the field of work
or discipline
advanced problem-solving skills to
analyse highly complex issues with
incomplete data and develop
innovative solutions and proposals
relevant to an
academic/professional field, field
of work or discipline
planning skills to develop and
execute a major project or
comparable activities (that
includes a significant range of
variables and complexity) with
appropriately selected research
methodologies producing sound
conclusions
highly developed specialist
communication and information
technology skills to present,
explain and/or critique highly
complex matters
can function autonomously
and/or take responsibility for
managing professional
practices, work, processes or
systems, or learning contexts
that are highly complex,
unpredictable and unfamiliar,
and require new strategic
approaches and/or
intervention or conceptual
abstract solutions
can account for high level
governance of processes and
systems
can analyse and reflect on
socio-cultural norms and
relationships and act to build
and transform them
can initiate and manage
professional activities that
may include a highly
complex environment
can take responsibility for
leading the strategic
performance and
development of
professional teams and
self
can self-evaluate and
take responsibility for
contributing to
professional
knowledge and
practice including
unfamiliar learning
contexts
can develop and
implement further
learning consistently
and sensitively
can consistently and
sensitively manage
highly complex ethical
issues leading to
informed, fair and
valid decisions
138
Level Knowledge Skill Autonomy & responsibility Role in context Self-development
8
advanced specialised knowledge and
critical understanding in a specialised
field of work or discipline and at the
interface between fields
comprehensive understanding of
critical approaches to creating a
systematic and coherent body of
knowledge and concepts gained
from a range of sources
comprehensive knowledge of current
research and innovations in a field of
work, discipline or professional
practice and impact of these
developments on accepted theory
and practice
problem-solving skills applied to a
specialist field and the integration
of knowledge from different fields
of work or disciplines to solve
complex unpredictable and/or
abstract problems with intellectual
independence
identify appropriate sources of
information or analytical
techniques in investigations that
lead to conclusions and solutions
to problems
critical selection of appropriate
research instruments and
strategies associated with the field
of work or discipline
highly developed advanced
communication and information
technology skills to present,
explain and/or critique
substantively complex matters
can take responsibility for
designing and developing
creative approaches to
managing and evaluating
complex work processes and
organisation, resources or
learning, including leading
and managing teams within a
technical or professional
activity or working effectively
as an individual
can express a comprehensive,
internalised, personal world
view, while accepting
responsibility to society at
large and to socio-cultural
norms and relationships
can manage professional
activity that may be in a
complex environment
can take responsibility for
leading the strategic
performance of
professional teams and self
can coordinate peer
relationships with qualified
practitioners and lead
multiple, complex groups
can initiate and support the
management of
professional development
mentoring activities
can self-evaluate and
take responsibility for
contributing to
professional practice
in complex and
sometimes unfamiliar
learning contexts
can self-evaluate and
take responsibility for
maintaining and
enhancing currency in
the profession or
discipline
can lead, contribute
and implement ethical
standards
139
Level Knowledge Skill Autonomy & responsibility Role in context Self-development
7
specialised factual and theoretical
knowledge and an understanding of
the boundaries in a field of work or
discipline, encompassing a broad
and coherent body of knowledge
and concepts, with substantive depth
in the underlying principles and
theoretical concepts
an understanding of allied
knowledge and theories in related
fields of work or disciplines and in
the case of professional disciplines
including related regulations,
standards, codes, conventions
understanding of critical approach to
the creation and compilation of a
systematic and coherent body of
knowledge and concepts gained
from a range of sources
a comprehensive understanding of
critical analysis, research systems and
methods and evaluative problem-
solving techniques
familiarity with sources of current
and new research and knowledge
with integration of concepts from
outside fields
technical, creative and analytical
skills appropriate to solving
specialised problems using
evidentiary and procedural based
processes in predictable and new
contexts that include devising and
sustaining arguments associated
with a field of work or discipline
evaluating, selecting and applying
appropriate methods, procedures
or techniques in processes of
investigation towards identified
solutions
evaluating and implementing
appropriate research tools and
strategies associated with the field
of work or discipline
highly developed advanced
communication and information
technology skills to present,
explain and/or critique complex
and unpredictable matters
can take responsibility for
developing innovative and
advanced approaches to
evaluating and managing
complex and unpredictable
work procedures and
processes, resources or
learning
can manage technical,
supervisory or design
processes in unpredictable,
unfamiliar and varying
contexts
can work creatively and/or
effectively as an individual, in
team leadership, managing
contexts, across technical or
professional activities
can express an internalised,
personal view, and accept
responsibility to society at
large and to socio-cultural
norms and relationships
can function with full
autonomy in technical
and supervisory contexts
and adopt para-
professional roles with
little guidance
can take responsibility for
the setting and
achievement of group or
individual outcomes and
for the management and
supervision of the work of
others or self in the case
of a specialisation in field
of work or discipline
can participate in peer
relationships with
qualified practitioners and
lead multiple, complex
groups
can take responsibility for
managing the
professional development
and direct mentoring of
individuals and groups
can self-evaluate and
take responsibility for
contributing to
professional practice,
and undertake regular
professional
development and/or
further learning
can manage learning
tasks independently
and professionally, in
complex and
sometimes unfamiliar
learning contexts
can contribute to and
observe ethical
standards
140
Level Knowledge Skill Autonomy & responsibility Role in context Self-development
6
specialised factual knowledge and an
understanding of the boundaries in a
field of work or discipline,
encompassing a broad and coherent
body of knowledge and concepts,
with depth in the underlying
understanding of the principles and
concepts
an understanding of allied
knowledge and theories in related
fields of work or disciplines and in
the case of para-professional
respective discipline including
related regulations, standards, codes,
conventions
an understanding of critical
approach and analysis, research
approaches and methods and
analytical problem-solving
techniques from a range of sources
familiarity with sources of current
and existing knowledge and the
integration of concepts from related
fields
literacy to comprehend and/or
produce coherent texts, covering
complex and/or diverse relations
from a wide-range of information
numeracy covering a wide-range of
mathematical procedures and
representations used across a broad-
range of contexts
specialist technical, creative and
conceptual skills appropriate to
solving complex problems
associated with a field of work or
discipline
a comprehensive range of
specialist cognitive and practical
skills appropriate to planning and
implementing solutions to varied,
unpredictable and unfamiliar
problems within a field of work or
discipline
selection and use of appropriate
research tools and strategies
associated with the field of work
or discipline
advanced communication and
information technology skills to
present, explain and/or critique
interdependent complex matters
literacy skills to comprehend
and/or produce, from a wide-
range of information, coherent
texts covering complex and/or
diverse relations
numeracy skills to select, apply,
assess and communicate a wide-
range mathematical procedures
and representations in a broad-
range of contexts
can take responsibility for
developing appropriate
approaches to managing
complex work procedures
and processes, resources or
learning, including leading
teams within a technical or
professional activity with little
support
can supervise technical,
supervisory or design
processes in varied,
unpredictable, unfamiliar and
a broad-range of contexts
can work effectively as a
specialist or in team
leadership roles
can express an internalised,
personal world view,
reflecting engagement in
society at large and in socio-
cultural relationships
can function with full
autonomy in technical
and supervisory contexts
and adopt para-
professional roles under
guidance
can take responsibility for
the setting and
achievement of group
outcomes and for the
supervision of the work of
others
can take responsibility for
supervising the
development of
individuals and groups
can participate in peer
relationships with
qualified practitioners and
lead multiple groups
can evaluate own
learning and identify
learning weaknesses
and needs, in a
familiar and
unfamiliar
environment
can take initiative to
address learning
needs and function
independently and
within learning
groups
can support and
observe ethical
standards
141
Level Knowledge Skill Autonomy & responsibility Role in context Self-development
5
comprehensive, specialised
knowledge within a broad field of
work or discipline, including an
understanding of the underlying
theoretical and abstract concepts
with significant depth in some areas
a broad understanding of allied
knowledge and theories in related
fields of work or disciplines including
related regulations, standards, codes,
conventions and procedures
an understanding of information
assembly, retrieval methods and
logical problem-solving techniques
from a range of sources
recognition of sources of current
knowledge and the integration of
concepts from related fields
literacy to comprehend and/or
produce coherent texts covering
complex relations from an array of
information and contexts
numeracy covering an array of
mathematical procedures and
representations and contexts
technical, creative and conceptual
skills appropriate to solving a
wide-range of problems
associated with a field of work or
discipline that include a
comprehensive range of specialist
cognitive and practical skills
appropriate to diagnosing and
implementing solutions to
abstract, familiar and non-routine
problems within a field of work or
discipline
use of appropriate information
retrieval methods and tools and
techniques associated with the
field of work or discipline
comprehensive communication
and information technology skills
to present, explain and/or critique
complex matters
literacy skills to comprehend
and/or produce, from array of
information, coherent texts
covering complex relations
numeracy skills to select, apply,
reflect and communicate an array
of mathematical procedures and
representations and contexts
can take responsibility for
coordinating the
implementation of
appropriate approaches to
complex work procedures
and processes, resources or
learning, including leading
teams within a technical or
para-professional activity
can exercise coordination
and/or supervision in routine,
familiar and some non-
routine work or learning
contexts
can coordinate technical,
design processes in routine,
familiar, non-routine and an
array of contexts with
support available, if required
can express an internalised,
personal world view, in the
context of an understanding
of socio-cultural relationships
can function with
autonomy in technical
and coordination contexts
and support para-
professional roles under
guidance
can function both
independently and in a
coordination role with
multiple groups
can take responsibility for
coordinating the
development of
individuals and groups
can review and develop
the performance of self
and others
can evaluate own
learning and identify
learning needs in a
familiar environment
can take responsibility
for and plan own
learning within a
managed and non-
routine environment
can comprehend and
observe ethical
standards
142
Level Knowledge Skill Autonomy & responsibility Role in context Self-development
4
a broad range of specialised
knowledge, including some
theoretical and abstract concepts
with limited depth in some areas in a
field of work or discipline, including
facts, principles, processes and
general concepts
an understanding of relevant
knowledge in associated fields of
work or disciplines including
regulations, standards, codes,
conventions and procedures
knowledge of approaches used in
categorising coherent bodies of
knowledge and concepts gained
from a range of sources
an understanding of retrieval tools
and problem solving techniques and
procedures
recognition of sources of current
knowledge and concepts from
related fields
literacy to comprehend and/or
produce cohesive texts covering
various pieces of information
numeracy covering an array of
mathematical procedures and
representations in a number of
contexts
a range of specialist cognitive and
practical skills required to identify
and deploy known solutions to
defined problems, including
accomplishing functions and
solving problems by selecting and
applying relevant methods, tools,
equipment, materials and
information
deployment of appropriate
retrieval tools associated with the
field of work or discipline
effective communication and
information technology skills to
present, and explain information
concepts and ideas
literacy skills to comprehend
and/or produce, from pieces of
information cohesive texts, which
may be short and varied
numeracy skills to identify, apply,
reflect and communicate an
assortment of mathematical
procedures and representations in
a number of contexts, which may
be interrelated
can take responsibility for
implementing appropriate
approaches to complex work
procedures and processes,
resources or learning,
including leading peer teams
within a technical activity
can exercise self-
management within activity
guidelines that are usually
predictable, but are subject
to change in a number of
contexts, and which may be
interrelated
can take responsibility with
readily available support and
under limited supervision for
completion of functions in
work or learning
can take responsibility for
consistency of self-
understanding and behaviour
in accordance with socio-
cultural norms
can function both
independently and in a
limited supervisory and/or
facilitative role with
multiple groups
can take responsibility for
the routine work of
others, and for the nature
and quality of some
outputs
can take responsibility
for own learning
within a predictable
environment with
limited supervision
can identify and
comply with advised
ethical standards
143
Level Knowledge Skill Autonomy & responsibility Role in context Self-development
3
a broad range of mainly factual and
procedural knowledge of a field of
work or discipline, including some
theoretical knowledge of a specific
area, basic processes, materials and
terminology
knowledge of similar fields of work
or disciplines and related codes,
conventions and procedures
knowledge of information
classification, retrieval and data tools
and problem solving procedures
from a range of sources
awareness of sources of current
knowledge from relevant fields
literacy to comprehend and/or
generate simple and cohesive short
and explicit texts from organised
information
numeracy covering the use of
straight forward mathematical
procedures and representations
a limited range of cognitive and
practical skills required to carry
out tasks and apply routine
solutions to predictable and
occasionally unpredictable
problems using simple rules,
techniques, instruments and tools
apply defined retrieval information
and data tools associated with the
field of work or discipline
communication and information
technology skills to present and/or
explain within procedural or
predefined parameters
literacy skills to comprehend
and/or generate from organised
pieces of information structurally
simple and cohesive texts, which
are typically short and explicit
numeracy skills to identify, use,
confirm and communicate straight
forward mathematical procedures
and representations
can take responsibility for
completion of tasks in work
or learning, including leading
small teams within a technical
or group activity in familiar
and predictable contexts
can work or learn under
indirect supervision with
some autonomy, with access
to structured support
required
can use self-understanding to
take responsibility for
behaviour in accordance with
socio-cultural norms
can function both self-
sufficiently and in a
facilitative role within
small groups under
indirect supervision
can adapt own behaviour
to group norms and
contribute to group
activities
can demonstrate
awareness of the roles,
responsibilities and
requirements of others in
work or learning contexts
can learn within a
managed and indirect
supervised
environment
can comply with
advised ethical
standards
144
Level Knowledge Skill Autonomy & responsibility Role in context Self-development
2
general, factual knowledge of a
defined field of work or discipline,
including knowledge of basic
processes, materials and terminology
information of related fields of work
or disciplines and relevant
conventions and procedures
awareness and uses of information
retrieval tools and procedures for
responding to defined problems
literacy to comprehend and/or
generate short and explicit simple
and clear texts from structured
information
numeracy covering straight forward
everyday mathematical procedures
and representations
general skills to carry out simple,
routine tasks and procedures
under guidance, within a defined
context to respond to or solve
specific problems
use of specific retrieval tools
associated with the field of work
or discipline
communication and information
technology skills to present and/or
explain within routine or
predefined parameters
literacy skills to comprehend
and/or generate from structured
information simple and clear texts,
which are typically short and
explicit
numeracy skills to recognise,
perform, confirm and
communicate everyday straight
forward mathematical procedures
and representations
can take responsibility for
completion of specifically
structured tasks in work or
learning, including
participating in small teams
within a technical or group
activity in relatively
predictable and immediate
contexts
can work or learn, with little
autonomy, under direct
supervision in a controlled
context including small
organised teams with
structured support required
can take responsibility for
behaviour in a managed
and/or routine environment
can function within
familiar and structured
groups under supervision
can adapt own behaviour
to group norms and
participate in group
activities
can recognise roles and
responsibilities of others
in a work or learning
context
can learn within a
structured and
supervised
environment
145
Level Knowledge Skill Autonomy & responsibility Role in context Self-development
1
elementary and foundation
knowledge for life, work and/or
learning
recognition of functional enquiry
tools and procedures used for
responding to well-defined problems
literacy to identify and form simple
and clear texts from well-defined
and structured information
numeracy to generate straight
forward everyday mathematical
ideas, notations and techniques
practical skills required to carry
out directed activity involving
repetitive and foreseeable
processes to solve well-defined
problems within a familiar and
predictable context
use of functional enquiry tools
associated with life, work and/or
learning
communication and information
technology skills to present within
routine and predefined
parameters
literacy skills to form simple texts
from highly-structured or pre-
defined information
numeracy skills to use, check and
communicate everyday functional
mathematical procedures and
representations
can take responsibility for
completion of highly
structured tasks in work or
learning, including
participating in small teams
in predictable and self-
contained contexts
can work or learn in closely-
defined and highly-structured
directly supervised contexts
can function within
familiar and structured
groups under direct
supervision
can function in specific
roles under direct
supervision
can access and use a
range of well-
supported learning
resources under direct
supervision
146
Term Definition
Access and Equity
The policies and approaches to ensure education and training are responsive to the diverse needs of individual learners, including
individuals who face barriers due to age, gender, cultural difference, disability, language, literacy and numeracy, and any other
potential learners who are experiencing barriers in relation to access, participation and achievement of outcomes.
Accreditation of a
Qualification
The quality assured process through which the qualification regulator/awarding body confirms that a qualification/program conforms
to the standards of the NQA regulator.
Accreditation of an
Education and
Training Provider (ETP)
A formal, and transparent, quality assured process, based on internationally accepted standards, through which an organisation is
granted approval to deliver education and training qualifications.
Advanced Standing The granting of credits (of a program/course/semester) indicating that the learner is deemed to have satisfied the requirements for
which the credits have been awarded. It may include exemption where applicable.
Alignment The process whereby a qualification, usually developed or issued by a foreign entity, is mapped to a defined level of the NQF to
demonstrate that the learning outcomes of that qualification match the learning outcomes of the defined NQF level.
Appeal A formal process by which an individual learner or institution may 'challenge' a regulator or an awarding body on the outcome of a
decision affecting that individual learner or institution.
Applied Qualifications
and Programs
A qualification or program that prepares learners for technical, career-specific fields of employment, through emphasis on knowledge,
skills and competences relevant to the workplace. This emphasis is reflected in the teaching and learning strategies, time spent in the
workplace environment, assessment methods, industry engagement, and the relevant experience of instructors.
Articulation
The mechanism or process by which qualifications or programs are linked to provide learners with multiple entry and exit points,
vertically and horizontally, enabling them to progress through levels of qualifications offered within formal education and training
systems.
147
Term Definition
Aspects of
Competence
The effective and creative deployment of knowledge and skill, including general social and civic life, as well as specific occupational
contexts. Aspects of competence also encompass the learner’s ability to acknowledge the boundaries of their knowledge and ski ll and
plan to transcend these through further learning. Aspects of competence are typically acquired by practice and reflection. For the
description of aspects of competence, it is essential to make explicit the contexts in which the learners can apply their knowledge and
skill. The QFEmirates descriptors therefore, include explicit statements of context for aspects of competence, categorised in terms of
autonomy and responsibility, role in context and self-development.
Assessment The processes used to evaluate achievement of the expected learning outcomes (knowledge, skills and competences), leading to a
certification of a qualification or part of a qualification.
Assessment Criteria Description of the requirements a learner is expected to meet or demonstrate to determine that specified learning outcomes have
been achieved; these may also be referred to as ‘performance criteria’.
Assessor A qualified individual authorised and able to conduct internal/external assessments and make a judgement on a learner’s
competences.
Audit The process of reviewing practices against documented standards and procedures.
Authority The regulatory body responsible for setting policy, developing, maintaining, implementing and regulating the qualifications framework
for the UAE (known as the QFEmirates). Refer also to National Qualifications Authority.
Autonomy and
Responsibility
In the context of QFEmirates this is one of the three aspects of competence within the five strands of the Level Descriptors of the
framework. Autonomy refers to the ability of an individual to self-manage his/her own learning and development, and is the basis for
determining one's responsibility. Responsibility refers to the demonstration of commitment to completing set tasks as an individual or
in conjunction with others.
Award A certified qualification conferred or granted on successful completion of a qualification/program. The term may be applied to a full
(Principal) qualification or smaller cohesive volumes of learning outcomes i.e. Composite and Component Awards.
Awarding Body An entity, entitled through legislation or other formal mandate from a regulatory authority, to approve under its remit, the
development and issuing of qualifications formally recognising the achievements of a given parcel of endorsed learning outcomes.
148
Term Definition
Benchmarking
The continuous process of measuring and comparing products, services and practices with selected and comparable systems or
organisations considered to be examples of best practice, both inside and outside the UAE, for the purpose of continuous
improvement.
Career Guidance or
Advice
Services and activities intended to assist individuals of any age and at any point throughout their lives, to make educational, training
and occupational choices.
Certificate An official document issued by an awarding or regulatory body, which records the successful completion of an education/training
qualification, program or a course of studies.
Certification System A formal process of documentation, recognising successful completion of a qualification or part of qualification awarded to a learner,
or recording the achievement based on a standard assessment of knowledge, skills and aspects of competence.
Classification of
Qualification/Award
Types
Categories of qualifications, in relation to each other, based on achievement of different parcels of learning and associated outcomes.
Client Those constituencies that attend and/or purchase units of learning and/or assessment e.g. learners, governments, agencies, industries
and other enterprises.
Cognitive Skills A set of mental skills acquired in logical and creative thinking, and includes reasoning, perception and intuition.
Commission for
Academic
Accreditation (CAA)
The Federal Government’s Quality Assurance Agency charged with promoting educational excellence across diverse institutions of
higher learning in the UAE. Through licensure of post-secondary educational institutions, and accreditation of individual programs,
CAA strives to assure high quality education, consistent with international standards.
Comparability of
Qualifications
Extent to which it is possible to establish equivalence between the level and outcomes of qualifications at the national, international,
or even at the sectoral or regional levels.
149
Term Definition
Compendium of
National Occupational
Skills Standards and
Qualifications
An integrated set of relevant documents developed by competent industry advisory bodies recognised and endorsed by the
respective accreditation/awarding body as Skills Advisory Committees (SACS); and which contain national occupational skills standards
(NOSS) and qualifications, as well as assessment guidance relevant to the industry sector.
Competency
The proven ability to use knowledge, skills and other abilities, within a context of a system of values, to perform a function against a
given standard in work or study situations, and in professional and/or personal development. In the NQF, ‘competence’ is described in
terms of autonomy and responsibility, self-development, and role in context.
Compliance Indicates that requirements of the published quality standards have been met based on an evaluation/audit and evidence reviewed.
Complaints Process A process by which a client of, or other interested parties, may raise concerns about the a licensed education and training provider’s
policies, procedures, services or products with a view to having them addressed and/or improved.
Component Award The smallest parcel of cohesive learning outcomes that can be achieved for formal recognition within the NQF. It may encompass all
or only some of the five strands of learning outcomes defining the level.
Composite Award An award for formal recognition of learners who achieve a cohesive set of learning outcomes encompassing , in varying combinations,
all five strands of learning outcomes, but not the full combination of learning outcomes required for a Principal Qualification.
Continuous
Improvement
The planned and ongoing process that enables an organisation to systematically review and improve its policies, procedures, products
and services to generate better outcomes for clients and to meet changing needs. Continuous improvement involves collecting,
analysing and acting on relevant information from clients, staff and other interested parties.
150
Term Definition
CoreLife Skills
An NQA branded title for generic skills or key competencies required in the context of the UAE. They are considered core and essential
skills that underpin and support performance and functionality in work, and everyday life. The seven [7] CoreLife Skills are as follows:
1. Collecting, analysing, organising and applying information in a given context
2. Communicating information, concepts and ideas
3. Initiating and organising self and activities, including motivation, exploration and creativity
4. Working with others in teams including leadership
5. Solving problems including using mathematical ideas and techniques
6. Applying information and communication technology (ICT)
7. Participating in social and civic life including ethical practice
Credit A measure of the volume of learning required for a qualification or part qualification, quantified as the number of notional hours
required for achieving the specified learning outcomes. In the NQA VET system one credit is equated to 15 notional hours of learning.
Credit Accumulation The total number credits towards the completion of a qualification or a part qualification.
Credit Matrix A table indicating the total credit value assigned to a qualification at the prescribed level in QFEmirates.
Refer also to QF Handbook Annexure E – Indicative Qualifications and Awards Credit Matrix.
Credit Value
The numerical value relating to notional learning hours. The credit hours scheme as used in QFEmirates with a value of 15 hours of
learning equating to one [1] credit. Equivalent international schemes may be deployed by learning providers .
See also QF Handbook Annexure E – Indicative Qualifications and Awards Credit Matrix.
Curriculum
A systematic group of units/courses or sequences of subjects required for a graduation or certification in a major field of study. it
includes defining training goals, content, methods (including assessment) and material, as well as arrangements for training teachers
and trainers.
Descriptor Generic statements which specify the learning outcomes and the purpose of a qualification at a given level, defined in terms of
knowledge, skills and competence. The descriptor can be used for describing and comparing qualifications.
151
Term Definition
Distance Learning
A method of learning which may use print, radio, television, computer-based communications, satellite broadcasting, teleconferencing
or other educational technologies which allows learners to study on their own without having to regularly attend classes in
conventional classrooms.
E-Learning Computer-based instruction (courseware) on-line over the public internet, private distance learning networks, or in house via an
intranet.
Education and
Training Provider (ETP)
The entity responsible for delivering education and training qualifications/programs/courses, ensuring compliance with recognised
standards, and achievement of the specified learning outcomes.
Employability The combination of factors which enable individuals to progress towards or get into occupational roles, to stay in employment and/or
to progress in a career pathway.
Endorsement
The formal process of the recognition/accreditation of the UAE’s Q+NOSS (National Occupational Skills Standards)-based
qualifications and their components by the National Qualifications Authority (NQA). The requirements include evidence of nation-wide
stakeholder support, and that their content meets the awarding bodies technical and validation requirements.
Entry Level
Requirements
The minimum knowledge, skills, and/or competencies,and/or work experience that a learner must have completed in order to be
admitted for study towards a qualification or part qualification; this may include recognition of other forms of prior learning such as
non-formal and informal learning and work experience.
Equivalency
A formal process whereby an overseas qualification/award or unit is recognised as demonstrating achievement of learning outcomes
mapped to a specific level of QFEmirates. The term may be applied to direct comparison and alignment of qualifications obtained
overseas with those available in the UAE.
Equivalent Unit A unit from a qualification/award that is deemed to be of equivalent outcomes and level such that it can count towards a new
qualification/award in place of a designated mandatory or optional unit.
Exit Level The required knowledge, skills and aspects of competence that a learner should achieve, or be expected to achieve, on completion of
a qualification/program, and against which the learner is assessed.
152
Term Definition
External Assessment An assessment that is conducted by a qualified and licensed person or body not directly involved in the development and/or delivery
of the qualification/program.
Foreign (Overseas)
Qualification
A qualification accredited by an awarding body in the country of origin and normally delivered by a foreign institution that is
accredited/licensed in the national education and training system of the country of origin. The foreign qualification may be offered
inside the UAE by a Registered Training Provider following approval by the NQA.
Formal Learning Planned learning that derives from activities within a structured learning setting such as a school, college or training institution.
Framework or
Qualifications
Framework
The integrated and organised structure for qualifications in the UAE (QFEmirates).
General Education
(GE)
One of the three sectors of the UAE’s Education and Training System. It is a 12-year education system (Grades 1-12) whose exit point
is the Secondary School Certificate placed at Level 4 of QFEmirates.
General Education
Commission (GEC)
The organisational unit within the Ministry of Education (MoE), responsible for supervising the compulsory Grade 12 Secondary School
Certificate quality of outcomes and equivalences with QFEmirates.
Grid of Level
Descriptors
The structural representation of ten [10] levels and five [5] ‘strands’ of learning outcome statements that total fifty [50] outcome
statements within QFEmirates.
See also QF Handbook Annexure C – Grid of Level Descriptors.
Gulf Qualifications
Framework
A ten-level reference tool that can be used to link the national qualifications frameworks and systems of the GCC Member States to
each other. It acts as a translation instrument to compare qualifications and make their outcomes more readable for individuals,
employers, and education and training providers.
Higher Education (HE) One of the three sectors of the UAE’s education and training system. It covers all types of qualifications/programs/courses of study,
training or training for research, at the post-secondary level. HE covers levels 5-10 of QFEmirates.
153
Term Definition
Integrated
Qualifications
Framework
A comprehensive system for description, classification, registration, and articulation of quality-assured qualifications, and in which
relevant components of the education and training system (in the three sectors) relate to each other to enhance learner access to the
system, progression within the system, and lifelong learning.
Issuing body See definition for Awarding Body.
Industry
The representative bodies, entities or agencies that have a stake in the design of learning outcomes leading to a qualification or
award, such as businesses; employer and employee representatives; government agencies or bodies; regulatory and licensing bodies;
education, training and assessment practitioners; community; and professional bodies.
Informal Learning
The semi-structured or non-structured learning that occurs over time and in a variety of places through experiences, such as learning
at home, work, life, family, social, leisure activities, and through daily interactions and shared relationships among members of society.
Unlike formal or non-formal learning, informal learning is not organised or externally-structured in terms of standards, objectives, time
or learning support, but when appropriately documented may be recognised for credit.
Initial Accreditation The provisional approval procedure for a qualification and its associated programs to be delivered by a training provider. This term
applies to non-National Qualifications where the National Occupational Skills Standards are yet to be developed.
Initial Registration
The listing on the NQA website directory of a training provider prior to the NQA’s quality assurance procedure to become a fully
registered training provider (RTP). The information provided includes the legal status of the provider, training field/s and contact
details.
Internal Assessment Assessment conducted by the education and training provider against criteria provided by the awarding body and subsequently
subjected to external verification.
International Sectoral
Organisation
An association of national organisations concerned with (and sometimes representing) interests associated with a profession or an
area of economic activity. For example, the updated version of International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO). The
occupational classification system of major, sub-major, minor and unit groups are designated the International Standard Classification
of Occupations, 2008 (ISCO-08). ISCO classifies jobs and a job is defined for the purposes of ISCO-08 as a set of tasks and duties
performed or meant to be performed, by one person, including employers or in self-employment.
154
Term Definition
Learner A generic and inclusive term which refers to individuals in the process of learning, whether at school, colleges, universities, institutions,
apprenticeships, or undergoing training, including non-formal and informal learning.
Learning
The cumulative process whereby an individual assimilates increasingly complex and abstract knowledge, acquires skills and develops
competencies. The term is used generically to refer to all aspects of learning whether acquired through general, vocational,
professional or higher education and training, or though formal, non-formal or informal processes.
Learning from
Experience
Learning through experience, as opposed to participating in formal programs of education or training; much adult learning occurs in
this way, and the learner often needs help to recognise skills, knowledge, understanding and competence gained in non-formal or
informal ways. This expression is synonymous with ‘experiential learning.
Learning Outcomes Statements of what the learner is expected to know, understand and be able to do after completing the learning process. In
QFEmirates, learning outcomes are defined in terms of knowledge, skills and aspects of competence.
Learning Outcome
Descriptors (LODs)
Categorised statements made to define the learning outcomes for a specified framework level. In QFEmirates, the core factors of
knowledge, skills, and aspects of competence are elaborated in five learning outcome strands knowledge, skill, autonomy and
responsibility, role in context and self-development; and are used respectively by accreditation/awarding bodies for their activities and
defined as follows:
1. Knowledge
The cognitive representation of ideas, events or happenings. It can be learned from practical or professional experience as well as from
formal instruction or study and can comprise description, memory, understanding, thinking, analysis, synthesis, debate and research.
The QFEmirates descriptors refer to theoretical and/or factual aspects of knowledge.
2. Skill
The learned ability to perform a function that in some way responds to or manipulates the physical, informational or social
environment of the individual. This strand of learning outcome incorporates the concept of ‘know-how’, which is the procedural
knowledge required to carry out a task. Know-how may be assessed directly or implied from performance; otherwise skill can only be
measured by performance. The QFEmirates descriptors refer to skills as cognitive (use of logical, intuitive, creative and conceptual
thinking) and practical (involving manual dexterity and the use of methods, techniques, processes, materials, tools and instruments).
155
Term Definition
3. Aspects of Competence
The effective and creative deployment of knowledge and skill in human situations, including general social and civic life, as well as
specific occupational contexts. Aspects of competence also encompass the learner’s ability to acknowledge the boundaries of their
knowledge and skill and plan to transcend these through further learning. Aspects of competence are typically acquired by practice
and reflection. For the description of aspects of competence, it is essential to make explicit the contexts in which the learners can
apply their knowledge and skill. The QFEmirates descriptors therefore, include explicit statements of context for aspects of
competence, categorised in terms of autonomy and responsibility, role in context and self-development, defined as follows:
Learning Outcome
Descriptors (LODs)
continued
3.1 Autonomy and Responsibility
Autonomy and responsibility can be considered as opposite ends of a spectrum of learned abilities to apply knowledge and skill in
situations of varying challenge and complexity. It refers to the scope of authority to make decisions independently in given situations.
It includes the level of self-awareness and self-management.
Responsibility refers to the acquired ability to understand, appreciate and interact with the social and cultural structures of community,
society and/or work and execute decisions and actions relative to the level, and account for them. The QFEmirates descriptors contain
statements describing the outcomes that signify balanced achievement in both aspects of autonomy and responsibility appropriate to
each level.
3.2 Role in Context
For many purposes, being able to function in groups and contexts is a key aspect of how knowledge and skills are put to effective use.
This requires learning to adopt appropriate roles within the group and apply social skills and an understanding of the tasks of the
group within context. Higher levels of competence are associated with the ability to adopt multiple roles as well as with roles requiring
leadership, initiative, contextual awareness, autonomy and responsibility as well as participation in more complex groups.
3.3 Self-Development
This strand encompasses the learned ability of an individual to recognise, acknowledge and reflect on the boundaries of his/her
current knowledge, skill and competence, and engage to transcend these limitations through further learning. Self-development,
therefore, relates to how and to what extent the learner can manage his/her own learning.
Level An indication of the relative complexity and/or depth of achievement and the autonomy required to demonstrate that achievement by
the learner. There are ten [10] levels in the QFEmirates; they differ from one level to another with the greatest complexity at Level 10.
156
Term Definition
Level Descriptor A set of statements that facilitate the referencing of achievements at a particular level in the qualifications framework (QFEmirates).
Lifelong Learning Learning activities that are undertaken throughout life, formally, informally, and non-formally to acquire knowledge, skills and
competence within personal, social and/or employment-related contexts.
Meta-Framework
An organising system that enables users to understand how qualifications embedded in different national and sectoral systems relate to
one another. It does this through a structure of common reference levels of learning outcomes (e.g. the European Qualifications
Framework.) However, it does not provide detailed comparison of qualifications or any of the regulatory, legal, wage bargaining and
quality assurance functions that are often deemed necessary at national or sectoral level. This means that a meta-framework can look
quite different to national qualifications frameworks. (Source - Definitions, Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 23 April 2008 on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning).
Ministry of Education
(MoE) The UAE’s ministry responsible for compulsory general education to Grade 12.
Ministry of Higher
Education & Scientific
Research (MoHESR)
The UAE’s ministry responsible for higher education.
Moderation The process which confirms that assessment has been conducted based on the approved requirements and indicators and that it is
fair, reliable and valid . Synonymous with verification.
Mutual Recognition of
Qualifications
The reciprocal recognition by one or more countries or regulatory bodies of qualifications (e.g. certificates, diplomas or degrees)
awarded in (or by) one or more other countries or other regulatory bodies.
National Occupational
Skills Standards
An industry-determined and authority-endorsed specification of performance which sets out the skills, knowledge and aspects of
competencies required by individuals to perform effectively in employment in the UAE.
National Qualification A qualification developed to meet a specific national priority need or interest, and whose development has involved, for the purpose
of endorsement, the appropriate national industry or profession advisory body related to the qualification outcomes.
157
Term Definition
National Qualifications
Authority
The National Qualifications Authority (NQA), established by Decree No 1, issued by H.H. the President of the UAE on August 23, 2010,
to take the responsibility, in coordination with relevant entities, for developing and implementing the National Qualifications
Framework (NQF) and all the associated policies and procedures.
National Qualifications
Framework
A common reference point and an instrument for the description, development and classification of qualifications according to a set of
criteria for specified levels of learning achieved. The framework is aimed to integrate and coordinate national qualifications
subsystems and improve the transparency, access, progression and quality of qualifications in relation to the labor market and the
society. Referred to as QFEmirates.
Nationally Recognised
Qualification (NRQ)
logo
The visual representation placed on the qualification/award testamur confirming its national identity and approval by the NQA.
Non-Formal Learning
Learning that takes place through a structured and/or unstructured process of learning but does not lead to a formally recognised
qualification. Typically, it may include workshops, community courses, e-learning programs, interest based courses, short courses, or
conference/forum style seminars.
Notional Learning
Hours
The learning time an average learner would take to achieve the defined learning outcomes. It includes contact time, research,
completion of assignments, assessment, and time spent in structured learning and in the workplace.
Fifteen [15] notional learning hours equate to one credit.
Occupation A set of jobs in which the main tasks and duties are characterised by a high degree of similarity and are grouped together as an
occupation to which the person may be associated through the main job currently held, a second job, or a job previously held.
Occupational
Qualification
A qualification associated with a trade or occupation which results from work-based learning. This covers knowledge unit(s) and
practical unit(s) as well as work experience.
Pathway Sequencing of qualifications that allows learners to move vertically, or horizontally, through NQF levels, and between academic,
vocational, or professional sectors.
Portability The transfer of learning and experience from one context to another, or the transfer of credits from one qualification to another.
158
Term Definition
Professional
Qualification
Occupationally-directed qualification which includes all learning (knowledge and skills) and competency standards specified for a
particular profession. It usually develops specialist skills required for the profession, and may be linked to registration with a
professional body.
Program Inventory of activities, content and/or methods of education or training implemented to achieve education or training objectives
(acquiring knowledge, skills and/or competences), organised in a logical sequence over a specified period of time.
Progression The process by which learners can be allowed to move through NQF levels either horizontally at the same level or vertically to a higher
level when accumulating an appropriate combination of credits.
QASR The criteria developed by VETAC to quality assure and register Education and Training Providers (ETPs) as Registered Training
Providers (RTPs).
Q+NOSS Industry-determined and authority-endorsed and industry sector-based National Occupational Skills Standards (NOSS) with associated
qualifications comprised of unit standards.
Qualification
A coherent and cohesive set of learning outcomes obtained, in a form of a certificate, diploma or a degree, only when an awarding/
regulatory body determines, following established standards, that an individual has achieved such learning outcomes related to a
complete qualification.
Qualification Level An indication of the relative complexity and/or depth of expected knowledge, skills, and aspects of competence to be achieved by the
learner.
Qualifications
Authority Refers to National Qualifications Authority (NQA).
Qualifications
Framework for the
Emirates (QFEmirates)
The instrument for the classification of qualifications according to a set of criteria for specified levels of learning outcomes that need to
be achieved, enabling qualifications to be described and compared. A new framework of qualifications aims to integrate and
coordinate certification subsystems within the UAE and improve the transparency, access, progression, transferability and quality of
such qualifications in relation to the employment sectors and other structures in civil society. A framework of qualifications has
particular relevance as an aid in the recognition of foreign qualifications.
159
Term Definition
Qualification
Recognition
The process whereby a qualification, such as a foreign award, is compared to a level in the National Qualifications Framework for the
purposes of employment and/or access to education and training in UAE.
The qualification may be:
Aligned: the process whereby a qualification of a professional/awarding body, usually based in another country, is recognised by the
NQF to a relevant level.
Included: the process whereby a qualification designed and issued by a UAE awarding body, and covers the learning outcomes
associated with the relevant level of the NQF, is recognised (included) within the NQF.
Placed: the process whereby a qualification developed by a recognised awarding body before the establishment of NQF, even if not
described in terms of learning outcomes or may not completely conform with the awards currently included in the NQF, is placed at
the relevant level of the NQF.
Qualifications Register
Information System
(QRIS)
The NQA’s electronic management information system, which contains records of qualifications, awarding bodies, regulatory bodies,
NOSS details, learner achievements, Sector Advisory Committees (SACs), and all related information such as registrations,
endorsements and accreditations.
Qualifications
Structure
The totality of qualifications (general education, vocational education and training, and higher education) aligned to the QFEmirates
and the way in which they relate to each other.
Qualifications System
All the policies, procedures, and processes relevant to developing and operationalising NQF, qualifications, quality assurance
processes, assessment, awarding processes, skills recognition and other mechanisms that link education and training to the labor
market and social and economic development.
Qualification Title A short description that indicates the level, size and content of the qualification.
Qualification Unit
Standard
A detailed description which defines the purpose, content, scope, target sector, structure and assessment arrangements for a
qualification. It also covers the type, level, core and elective units, and credit value.
Quality Assurance A transparent and continuous process aimed at evaluating the quality of education and training through assessment, monitoring,
review and changes as required to improve the provision.
160
Term Definition
Quality Assurance
Processes (QAP)
The mechanisms or regimes that facilitate achievement and consistency of outcomes in the development, approval, quality of content,
assessment and delivery of learning against the QFEmirates. Mechanisms may include policies, conventions, processes, procedures,
rules, criteria, guidelines, tools and/or verification instruments, and whose purpose it is to ensure and enhance the quality of outcomes
provided by awarding bodies operating within the auspices of the NQA.
Recognition The process whereby qualifications are aligned to a level in QFEmirates and approved for the purposes of employment or access to
education and training in the UAE.
Recognition of Prior
Learning (RPL)
An assessment process that involves evaluating an individual’s unrecognised knowledge, skills, and competences obtained mainly
through informal and non-formal learning, regardless of how, when, and where that learning occurred, with the aim of determining
the level and credits to be recognised towards a qualification.
Record of
Achievement
A composite record of a learner’s varied achievements and learning experiences over a period of time. It typically contains records of
formal and informal learning experiences, credits gained, modules studied, units completed, reflections on achievements, agreed
learning plans, and evaluations of own learning.
Referencing The process whereby an alignment relationship is agreed between qualification frameworks. For example, between the Gulf
Qualifications Framework and National Qualification Frameworks of the GCC Countries.
Registration A quality assured process which formally acknowledges, by an awarding body and the regulatory authority, that a provider meets
relevant standards in order to deliver and assess (endorsed/accredited) qualifications.
Registered Training
Provider (RTP)
An organisation approved by the NQA and relevant awarding body, and in compliance with NQA standards, to deliver training
programs. An RTP can be private, semi-government, or a government education entity such as schools, colleges, institutes of
technology or universities, adult and community organisations, commercial and enterprise training providers and industry bodies
where training is not necessarily their core business.
Regulatory Body In the context of education and training, a regulatory body is an external public or government entity that has been empowered by
legislation to oversee and control the educational/training process, standards and outputs germane to it.
161
Term Definition
Secondary School
Certificate (Grade 12)
The formal document issued by the Ministry of Education certifying the student has successfully achieved the accumulative learning
outcomes of Levels 1-4 of the NQF, following a public examination administered by the Ministry. The SSC (known as the Grade 12
Certificate) is placed at Level 4 of the NQF and considered by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific research as the entry pre-
requisite for post-secondary education and training admission.
Sector A grouping of educational, industry or professional organisations and/or activities on the basis of their main economic/social function,
product, service or technology.
Sector Advisory
Committees (SACS)
An exclusive industry body recognised by the relevant accreditation/awarding body to undertake research, development and
validation of respective sets of learning outcomes leading to a qualification or award as well as employment and skills development
activities.
Sectoral Qualification An award confined to a specified sector, which may exist at national and international levels.
Self-Assessment The process or methodology carried out by a provider, or learner, to analyse, judge, and evaluate its performance through predefined
criteria to determine the best way to improve it.
Short Course
A short duration education and training program which, should it be accredited, qualify a learner to get credit(s) towards a
qualification, in particular towards Composite and Component Awards. The short course may be for the purpose of professional
development and progression in a career.
Simulation
A realistic exercise set up specifically to assess all, or aspects of, knowledge, skills and/or aspects of competence that replicate real
work situations and is used in circumstances where it would be difficult, high risk, or costly to assess within the work context (e.g. fire-
fighting procedure, dealing with an emergency first-aid situation). Simulation, where approved, must reflect workplace conditions;
reflect the intent of the standards; involve realistic and authentic activities; and undergo quality assurance processes. Performance
against the standards may NOT be simulated in some instances, unless approved by the relevant accreditation/awarding body.
Skills The ability, cognitive or practical, to apply knowledge and use knowhow to complete tasks and solve problems. These include
technical, interpersonal, creative, and communication skills.
Skills Standards
The benchmark for competency required in a given occupation within an industry sector. They form the basis upon which specific
national vocational education and training qualifications are designed and developed and can also be used to help define job roles,
measure staff performance, and identify and develop routes for progression and professional development.
162
Term Definition
Stakeholder
An organisation, establishment, body, agency or individuals with a recognised interest in the QFEmirates and/or is affected by the
QFEmirates, such as education and training providers, industry representatives and professional groups, Government, quasi-
Government, regulators, employers, employees/workers/volunteers, education and training practitioners and professionals, learners
and the community.
Standards
Criteria/specifications which detail prescribed outcomes established by the National Qualifications Authority or respective
accreditation/awarding bodies as well as detailed specifications that indicate the type and level of knowledge, skill, and aspects of
competence required for an individual to perform specific functions and activities, and/or fulfil linked professional requirements.
Strands See ‘Learning Outcome Descriptors (LODs).
Taxonomy A system of classifying learning outcomes in a qualifications framework.
Testamur A document (parchment/diploma/deed) issued by an authoritative body that testifies that the recipient has successfully met a
specified set of learning outcomes.
Transcript A record, normally printed, detailing for a given qualification/award, formally recognised parcels of learning outcomes achieved
against the standards/requirements set by the relevant accreditation/awarding body.
Transferability of
Learning Outcomes
The extent to which knowledge, skills and competences can be used, validated or certified in a new education and training or
occupational context.
Types of Qualifications Categories used in the QFEmirates to distinguish different parcels of learning outcomes relative to each other i.e. Principal
Qualification, Composite Award and Component Award.
Unit Standard
The smallest part of a qualification that can be assessed, validated and certified. It is a set of knowledge, skills and competences which
constitute a part of a qualification or even can stand alone. It can be specific to a single qualification or common to several
qualifications.
Upskilling Short-term targeted training typically provided following initial education or training, and aimed at supplementing, improving or
updating knowledge, skills and/or competences acquired during previous training.
163
Term Definition
Validation The confirmation through the provision of objective evidence that an education and/or training course or program is appropriate for
the attainment of knowledge, skill and/or aspects of competence.
VETAC
Vocational Education and Training Awards Council: A federal regulatory and supervisory body which reports to the NQA and is
responsible for setting VET strategies, approving VET awarding bodies, managing and quality assuring the process of awarding VET
qualifications based on standards, criteria, procedures, and policies developed by the Council and approved by the NQA.
Vocational Education
and Training (VET)
The continuum of technical knowledge, skills, and competencies required to effectively perform a particular occupation. It covers a
wide range of careers and industries such as technology, hospitality, office work, retail, marketing etc. VET qualifications are placed at
Levels 1-9 of the NQF.
Vocational Education
and Training Awarding
Bodies
Entities approved by VETAC that are responsible for registering and assessing VET providers which come under their jurisdiction. They
manage, based on the standards, criteria, procedures, and policies developed by VETAC, the process of issuing NOSS-based
qualifications and the implementation of these the standards, criteria, procedures, and policies by the relevant VET providers.