VERY INTERESTING!!! GOOGLE THIS!!!

Sayeed Farouk TAX AUDITOR, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATIONhttps://www.google.com/#q=Sayeed+Farouk+TAX+AUDITOR%2C+CALIFORNIA+BOARD+OF+EQUALIZATION

9 results (0.54 seconds) 

Did you mean: Syed Farouk TAX AUDITOR, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

Search ResultsProfessional Positions - Board of Equalizationhttps://www.boe.ca.gov/exams/projobs.htm

oState Board of EqualizationThe State Board of Equalization administers 25 different tax programs which ... Property Auditor Appraiser, Business Taxes Representative, Tax Auditor, and Tax ... is available from the California Department of Human Resources Home Page.Missing: sayeed farouk

[PDF]Tax Auditor, Board of Equalization 5599-4267-1EQ31 ...https://jobs.ca.gov/jobsgen/1eq31.pdf

oo

CaliforniaCalifornia State Board of Equalization may hire approximately 125 Tax Auditorsannually. Those individuals who have the greatest breadth and depth of ...Missing: sayeed farouk

Internet Examination Information - Board of Equalizationhttps://www.boe.ca.gov/exams/examinfo.htm

oState Board of EqualizationBoard of Equalization, State of California. Log In | About BOE .... and comply with tax laws. Click here to review the Examination Bulletin for the Tax Auditor.Missing: sayeed farouk

[PDF]state board of equalization - State of Californiawww.boe.ca.gov/exams/pdf/ta.pdf

oo

State Board of EqualizationIt is an objective of the State of California to achieve a drug-free state workplace. ... The application and examination for the Tax Auditor, Board of Equalization, ...Missing: sayeed farouk

California State Board of Equalization Tax Auditor Salaries ...www.glassdoor.com › Salaries › Tax Auditor

oGlassdoorSep 9, 2015 - Average salaries for California State Board of Equalization Tax Auditor: $48510. California State Board of Equalization salary trends based on ...Missing: sayeed farouk

Suspect ID'd in San Bernardino Massacre as Syed Farookwww.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3367447/posts?page...

oFree Republic4 days ago - Suspect ID'd in San Bernardino Massacre as Syed Farook ... Farook was a business taxes representative for the California State Board of Equalization, ...Farouk lived at a home with his wife and children in Corona, ... As I suspected, Amish Tea Party member working as a California tax auditor for cover.

separate page - IDEAS - RePEchttps://ideas.repec.org/r/ecm/emetrp/v48y1980i4p817-38.html

o

"Fiscal equalisation: Principles and an application to the European Union," BERG ... What Matter?," NBER Working Papers 6668, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. ...... Balli, Faruk & Basher, Syed Abul & Jean Louis, Rosmy, 2011. ...... "An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Government Tax and Auditing Policies ...

Citation data for document RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:48:y ... - CitEccitec.repec.org/d/ecm/emetrp/v_48_y_1980_i_4_p_817-38.htmlRevisiting Agency Theory: Evidence of Board Independence and Agency Cost ... Is Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Associated with Tax .... Disaggregation,auditor conservatism and implied cost of equity capital: An ...... Rana, Faisal ; Basher,Syed Abul ; Balli, Faruk . ...... Evidence from California Hospitals.

Loot.co.za: Sitemapwww.loot.co.za/index/html/index1983.html9780837337883 0837337887 Unemployment Insurance Tax Auditor, National ... and Gynecology - Cases, Questions, and Answers for Board Review, Ricardo Azziz,. ...... 9780151626663 0151626669 A Mother's Secret - A Novel, C.A. Haddad ...... 9780470978337 0470978333 Turbo Coding, Turbo Equalisation and ...

BOE Audit RepresentationAdwww.bismarktax.com/Audit notice? Get representation. Tax attorneys ready to protect you!

In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 9 already displayed.If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.

Gun grab speech todayI have one thing to say: This entire "Islamic terror" ruse was set up as a precursor to this speech. And I'd like people to consider something: We are on the cusp of war with Russia. What nation would want a gun ban in America right before such a war?

RUSSIA. I have NEVER trusted Russia. And even if Russia is not the problem anymore, people ought to clearly see at least that it is the cold war cronies of Russia that are in control of the American government now, and even if Russia is not the bad guy now, the fact these cronies in our government want a gun grab right before what looks like it could be a world war means ONE THING: The want America to lose that war. CONSIDER THIS DURING OBAMA'S SPEECH: A gun grab now? ARE YOU KIDDING? who would want that, other than the enemy?

I posted the following to the comment section of a popular news site, and it is a great summary of what is in the report below:

There are a number of problems with the so-called terror attack.

1. The shooter was posting to Facebook during the attack (time records show he could not have done this, so if the shooting happened at all, it was staged by someone else.)

2. When you look at the scenes where the SUV is shot up, they prove the story presented about how it happened to be a lie. Yes, there is a shot up SUV, but all the windows are rolled up, and if active shooters really were threatening police and shooting them from this SUV the windows had to have been rolled down because you can't point a large gun from a space as small as an SUV unless you point it out an OPEN window. The fact the windows are rolled up and shot out in all photos proves no one fired anything from that vehicle and ALL bullets came from police.

3. There is a lawyer working the case for the shooter's family, and he has revealed that both the man and woman were found handcuffed and shot to death in the back of the SUV, which means the SUV had to have been being driven via remote control for the media cameras because you can't drive while handcuffed, shot to death, and stuffed behind the back seat. All of America's cars are now by law at least partially drive by wire and ALL are completely hooked up to the cell phone system at ALL TIMES by Federal law (all models made since 2004,) which makes remote takeover possible. Obviously this is what happened in this case, because dead men can't drive.

There are many many many other huge inconsistencies which proves the shooting was done to make Muslims look horrible and provide an excuse to control the American people, and our Islamic patsy was probably chosen for this because he was a state tax auditor up until a very short time before this happened, (and was transferred to another job for the state) most likely because he uncovered criminal activity. I think someone wanted to get rid of him, and that (along with the fact that he was Muslim) is why he was chosen.

LITMUS TEST TIME. Dec 5 2015

Vac. wrote:

Read your words about the California FF and how the 'alternative media' is simply aping the msm script - quite true. The available sources of real news are getting so slender as to be near extinction. I want, therefore to do everything in my power to aid your cause, but it seems like jimstonefreelance is a real hot potato! On Thursday I cited that url on a western board I was accustomed to using, as an alternative place for readers to go for a real deal look at what's going on. Within 6 hours of so doing, the post was scrubbed, my avatar blocked, and a full scale assault of slander and lies placed in its stead! Unreal. The credibility of all these gatekeeper western "alternative media" sites is unwinding faster than a kite in the wind!

My response: Here is your litmus test. Take all of the sites that are parroting the MSM script and throw them straight in the trash, no matter how good they looked in the past. Take all alternative web sites that are playing people's ignorance, saying no one in the family knew what the female shooter looked like because her head was always covered (as well as other things) and throw them straight in the trash. Take any alt media site that is hopping on the "it was real this time" meme and throw it in the trash.

At least a few people know that countless fake truth sites were set up in the past decade, feeding good info for years, only to gain people's trust so they could be used as weapons at a time like this. If they are parroting the MSM script this time it does not make them right just because they gave good info in the past, it just exposes them as the fake opposition. There are a few good sites out there, but they are like trying to find strawberries in a

patch full of aphids. PICK YOUR SIDES NOW, EVERYONE HAS THEIR PANTS DOWN AND IT IS LITMUS TEST TIME.

_________________________

.

.

.

.

.

.

.Pallas cat wrote:

Muslims don't spell "Farook" that way. It should've been Farooq instead. Why? Because K in Arabic maps to "Q" only. Case study: Muslims write "Quran", not "Koran". This just basically proved that the name of the terrorist was devised by someone unrelated to the Muslim faith, and has "koran" in his/her vocabulary.....hmmm

My response: Ouch, that is a painful one for the fakers, you are absolutely right. The fact this was

spelled wrong on an ID card speaks volumes. That would never happen and also proves this girl did not have that card made. It has to be a dropped in fake, and the spelling error in the word "REVENUE" on the same card is a similar bonus.

Someone does not get it!

Black cars ?What do you mean to prove by showing different set of black cars, different types, at different positions, at different place and in different year season?!

Note the sunlight - the sunlit scene is from summer, not from winter... (the horizontal view on FBI sunlit city scene is just a completely different one from the aerial view - someone sent you a bad image?!)

My response: Nope. No mis placed images here . . . . All are still being shown in the same video sequence from the MSM and are still being presented as the same scene. I have re-confirmed this many times and even shot a video of the latest Mexican newscast, to prove the same error is being broadcast even here. They screwed this so seriously it looks like they are testing to see if the flu shots wrecked everyone's brain badly enough for the general population to accept it as one scene!

If you think it is my mistake, it is only because you can't accept that the lies are that provable and that this is not all real. It is a major comedy type screw up.

To see what this guy is referencing, click here

Enough facts are in to paint a very clear picture nowThe lawyer that got assigned to this case ended up being a huge problem for the false flag crew because he ended up being a good guy. And he spilled a key piece of evidence on national television - that both shooters were found behind the back seat of the SUV shot to pieces and  already in handcuffs.  So this opens a huge can of worms that blows a lot of secrets, the story HAS TO go like this now:

The couple was hunted down as they were out and about together, murdered, and stuffed in the back of the SUV behind the rear seat. Subsequently (and there is no other way this could happen) the SUV, which was completely modern and full drive by wire, was then remote control driven "Hastings style" and the police shot it full of holes until a bullet cut a wire somewhere and it stopped. The police reported the couple was in full combat gear, but in reality the wife (who was the only one shown after the police shot up the SUV) was in shorts, high heels, and a short bare tummy blouse.

So the story about combat gear is a lie, and because the couple were already handcuffed, the story about "brandishing weapons and shooting at police" was also a lie, which is

subsequently proven by the fact that the windows were rolled up when shot out.

THIS IS PERHAPS THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT FOR BUSTING THIS ENTIRE RUSE: In ALL photos and video, the windows of the SUV are rolled up yet shot out. Yet the police claimed they were receiving fire from

assault rifles from this vehicle. If this couple was using assault rifles, they would not have been able to fire them through closed windows because the barrels are too long, it is impossible to be in a car and point one out the side with the windows rolled up because there simply is not enough room in a car to do that. And no one is stupid enough to try to shoot a gun in an enclosed chamber like a car with the windows rolled up, the back blast would be severe. The fact they were up in all photos is cold proof no bullets were ever fired from this SUV, all the bullet damage is from police.

The histories of the supposed shooters may be fabricated. This is because when the reporters ransacked the house, they "found" this ID on the left here, notice how "Revenue" is spelled. There is no reason to have a fake ID like this, this is supposed to be a state work ID and if she did not actually have that job, there would be no purpose in having any ID for it at all. So this ID was forged, probably by the media and/or whoever staged this false flag.

So now we have a fake ID, an impossible shooting scene (they did not shoot from the vehicle as police claimed even if they were not found dead behind the back seat already in handcuffs) and because they were behind the back seat in handcuffs, we also are FORCED TO have a story about a remote controlled vehicle being shown on the news. There is absolutely no other way this can happen. And the fact reporters and neighbors were allowed into the home so soon afterward, before any real investigation could be completed, is the icing on the cake, if this was real this would have never happened, NEVER, IN ANYONE'S LIFE.

Additionally, we have two SUV shooting scenes clearly shown on camera. If there was only one shooting, and one nut case Islamic couple, there would be ONE SUV shot up in ONE location, not two.

There is a lot on this page now, for everything referenced above, complete with photos, scroll down the page. This is important stuff - this HAS TO be spread to bust this scam or the NWO will probably get America to support World War 3, the ALL THE WRITING WE NEED TO BLOW THIS SCAM WIDE OPEN IS ON THE WALL NOW AND YOUR FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT, ARCHIVE AND POST!

BLOCKBUSTER: HUSBAND AND WIFE "SHOOTER" WERE PULLED FROM BEHIND THE REAR SEAT OF THE SUV, ALREADY (LONG BEFORE) SHOT TO DEATH AND ALREADY IN HANDCUFFS.

Maybe that is why Alt media is under attack - the scammers of this last false flag are busted multiple ways!

Lawyer's testimony (for whatever reason they have one) confirms - those working the case closely and not affiliated with the MSM have confirmed that both were shot dead and in handcuffs long before the police shot hundreds of rounds into the SUV, and the SUV was probably therefore being driven via remote control for the TV cameras, which that particular SUV allows completely because it is full drive by wire. A little "Hastings action" here.

BLOCKBUSTER: CONFIRMED: let me repeat this: The couple blamed were not even patsies and were not the shooters. They were murdered in cold blood beforehand (most likely because as I initially stated, both were state employees and the husband up until recently worked in financial auditing for the state, and was recently assigned to be a health inspector.) Most likely this couple was chosen to be eliminated in this ruse (IF THEY ARE EVEN DEAD) because as an auditor most likely Sayed discovered something "inconvenient."

The lawyer's testimony is on video HERE

The couple's home has been ruined for all forensic work.

Over 100 reporters have been allowed in and no serious police investigation was ever done because real investigations take weeks, not hours. This is because the patsies are innocent, and the police/FBI and whoever else set up this false flag do not want a real investigation. WE NEED TO FIND OUT WHO THE LANDLORD IS AND IF THE LANDLORD IS A JEW. THE LANDLORD IS NOW OBVIOUSLY COMPLICIT, THERE IS NO CONCEIVABLE WAY THE LANDLORD WOULD ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN WHEN THE RENT WAS PAID INTO THE FUTURE UNLESS THE LANDLORD SPECIFICALLY WANTED THE INVESTIGATION TO BE DESTROYED. THIS PROVES THE LANDLORD IS A SUSPECT IN THE REAL CRIME. ADDITIONALLY, THERE IS NO CONCEIVABLE WAY THE POLICE WOULD EVER ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN, THEY WOULD HAVE NAILED THE PLACE IN MINUTES. THIS PROVES THE POLICE ARE COMPLICIT IN THE REAL CRIME AS WELL.

Over 100 reporters have been through the house. The neighbors are looting it as well. This most likely proves the couple really was shot to death, and also DEFINITELY proves they are innocent because if they were not completely innocent the police would have had that house on absolute lockdown. After all, there were

supposed to be explosives there, RIGHT? Do the police just barn door any place that could have explosives for any old cattle to walk through? HELL NO!

GUILTY OF THE FALSE FLAG AND ALMOST DEFINITELY OF MURDER: The San Bernardino Police Department, Many of the reporters, and obviously this would have all been staged by the Jewish community via the FBI and Mossad for the sole purpose of making Americans hate Muslims, because the Jews are going to kick off world war 3 and want the Arab world destroyed so they can have their ERETZ ISRAEL. This will be difficult to accomplish if Americans do not hate Muslims. This shooting is NOT what they are saying it is folks, the fact the house was not on lockdown PROVES IT.

Here is more on the fakery:

Re San Bernardino Shooting

Channel surfed and caught a bit of the news which I never listen to but wanted to see the latest. Ohmylord, they are soooooo taking advantage of ignorant Americans -- now they are saying that since the woman wore a hijab her brothers in law did not know what she looked like. Are we that stupid??? It's common knowledge that the women of all countries do not wear their hijhab or covering or head scarves in the family at all, they only put them on when going outside. Therefore, this is blarney.

And it points to the likely reason as being she did not want anybody to know what she was up to, because she was either working for the enemy or Israel or .... Otherwise, she'd not have covered up around her family. None of these stories make any sense, and the media/planners/jewish establishment are making fools of everybody who believes it hook, line and sinker as if sleep walking, never any independent thinking. Because of this, as a country we will probably just keep going farther and farther down the drain.

My response: It really is frustrating watching it all, and how ignorant the American population really is. IF the story about her never unveiling in front of family is true, something is definitely screwy. I doubt it, that would be unbelievable and I think it just took them a while to AI a face up or something of that sort but who knows. . . .

I am confident that this staged shooting and the Paris attacks were a direct response to the fact Russia has proven ISIS is run by Washington DC and the typical B.S. that happens when the Jewish community wants people to support a war. If they get away with this, the ONLY END will be glass parking lots all over America, which is precisely what the Jewish community wants. They own Russia to a huge extent, will play both sides, and with gun owning America nuked out of the picture they will then be free to simply take the entire world. Iran is another obstacle, but Iran is a 4 (very large) nuke country, practically nothing is needed to wipe them out. Absent nukes the going would be tough though . . . .

The only hope as far as I see it is miscalculation of world support, before you can pull any scam like this on the people you need virtually unilateral support. If they have miscalculated and do not own even one powerful nation as well as they think, they will lose this. They are walking the razor blade with this one.

I would not take indicators such as Russia banning GMO to mean Russia is the good guy. Though Russia completely banning GMO is a good thing, it could also mean "shadow" Russia is pushing GMO's to wreck everyone but themselves. Who knows. But they were pressured to accept them so that is a plus in their favor, indicating the evil is elsewhere. My great hope is that the evil the world faces all really is centered in England, Israel and the U.S., and that Russia can fix this honestly. But I don't have my fingers crossed, Russia actually being the good guy rather than being owned and played is in my opinion on the far fringe of hope.

More from "Vac"

Jim, you can be sure that your pages are well studied by the kinds of media groups I referred to last message, as the _____________ site has hurried full bore in an attempt to reestablish it's shaken credibility – only to give itself another black eye! They rushed out a story on Friday with the kind of 'breaking news' overtones reserved for the biggest of scoops; Turkish Troops Said To Invade Iraq Near Mosul - only to be rebuked by their own sources, for 'exaggerating' a 'routine rotation of troops' into claims of invasion.This gives us an opportunity to peer deeper into the murky world of 'mainstream' and 'alternative' media distortions – and perhaps even gain some further insight into what they are designed to achieve.

The Turkish government fed a story on Friday to it's media outlets about the presence of Turkish army personnel in a part of Iraq close to Mosul. The various shadings of the story -all of which center on the training of militia groups in Iraq supposed to be fighting ISIL- range from a report of Turkish military trainers being sent to a camp close to that city – accompanied by some 20-25 tanks and a company of troops – to a full scale invasion of that country in order to crush the "Daesh" Islamist extremists which Ankara is under extreme pressure to appear to be fighting – rather than supporting.

Drawing upon an initial report by zionist propagandda asset Stratfor, the ZH story speculated that the report of Turkish armored battalions arriving north of Mosul in preparation for a coordinated attack on the ISIL forces holding that city where in fact cover for an incursion designed instead to protect the oil transport route which which that same terrorist organization has been shipping stolen Iraqi oil through Turkey. The kernel of truth hidden within that surmise apparently resulted in a very public rebuke from the 'intelligence-gathering' outfit which purports to offer balanced and objective geopolitical assessments while really advancing the Yinan Plan objectives of the terrorist state occupying Palestine.

The convolutions of the real story are so great as to offer great challenge to any attempt to cut through the smoke and mirrors of dueling 'management perception' machines attacking from all sides. Nevertheless, it is necessary to make the effort. To do so, first we have to delve into the very murky world of Kurdish politics. An ancient ethnicity whose modern population straddles the borders of at least four neighboring countries in the region, the Kurds are themselves divided – by religious, political, and cultural fracture, into very discordant and competing parts.

The Kurdish part of northern Iraq has maintained a state of quasi independence since the virtual breakup of that country in the aftermath of the purposeful American destruction of its infrastructure and fragile socio-religious detente. They have supported that breakaway status via the possession of richly productive oil fields, the product of which has been shipped to Turkey for domestic consumption for several years now. This economic relationship has also produced a tactical political alliance between the Kurdish faction that has taken over the political leadership of the breakaway Iraqi parcel by refusing to hold elections after the expiration of their elected mandate – and the government in Ankara, which similarly, in refusing to acknowledge the results of their defeat at the polls in June of this year, decided to rule without reference to law or constitution. The result of this is that the KRG of breakaway Kurdish Iraq are allied against BOTH the PKK guerrilla forces fighting for Kurdish autonomy within Turkey, and the PYD militia of the Syrian Kurds who have gained control of large sections of the northern part of that country bordering Turkey.

As a result of this factional infighting between Kurds in the three countries, the Turks have been able to keep their internal and external opponents off balance, and rearrange the political spectrum on their immediate borders in favor of advancing their project of destabilizing and ultimately destroying the Syrian state so as to divide it between themselves and the zionist entity. The KRG government of northern Iraq is in turn a client state of that entity, which has long sought to use the Kurdish independence struggle to assist in the break up of the secular middle eastern states established in the aftermath of WW1 so as to become the dominant military and economic power in the region. Likewise, they have used the neo-Ottoman colonial fantasies of the wannabe Caliph in Ankara to make Turkey a defacto asset in the same plan.

Significant amounts of the stolen Iraqi oil which the Kurds market through Turkey ends up in the hands of the same buyers as the stolen Syrian and Iraqi oil which the ISIL terrorists sell to the tune of $2 million a day – arriving via tanker trucks to ports in western Turkey to be loaded onto tankers which sail to Malta and off-load to waiting ships which then head to the port of Askhelon in occupied Palestine. The Russians have now provided the documentation of the mechanics of this trade with the direct accusation of Turkish management of the distribution network, but the Turks have made sure that the domestic media does not touch that story on fear of more imprisonment on 'terrorism' charges.

This latest media blitz to give the impression that the Turks have joined the coalition's land campaign against ISIL – a fabrication in and of itself – requires that the Sunni militia forces in Iraq under their control are used as a cover for the insertion of Turkish 'boots on the ground' which will later be employed against the PYD forces that are not far away, in

that of northern Syria where the borders of the three countries meet. Those Sunni militia forces are a part of the Shia-dominated militia forces which have sprung up under very loose control of the Iraqi government as the primary opponents of ISIL in that country. Because the Ankara regime is run by religious fanatics of the SUNNI kind, they foster the efforts of their religious co-brethren all over to the middle east while working hard to counter the Shia majority nations intent to group themselves into a bloc. Under the pretense of training these Sunni militiamen, the Turks have inserted theselves into Iraqi territory in a manner that they have not dared to repeat in Syria.

If you can get ahold of a map showing Sinjar, in the Ninawa region of northern Iraq west of Mosul, you will see the area of conflict likely to become even more intensely meddled with. The Kurdish breakaway forces fighting under the name of Pershmerga have clashed with Kurdish PKK forces in this area for months, accusing each other of failing to fight against the 'Islamic State' terrorists holed up there. You will see on the map how close to the Syrian border that place is ,and the cul de sac in the extreme northeast of Syrian territory - that can be snipped easily. I previously mentioned that the PYD Kurdish forces aligned with the Kurdish PKK will cross the Euphrates heading west in order to take all the remaining border where Turkey-sponsored terrorists are resupplied in Syria. I also stated that the Turkish army would balk at entering the Syrian theatre. The work around is obvious. By moving forces that are already openly – in effect – free to move around wherever they like on Iraqi soil, over to the border with Syria, they can pose a threat in the back of their Kurdish enemies which will force them to hold back from committing themselves fully to the western thrust. And since their Kurdish KPG friends are more than willing to see the Turks move in to protect their oil racket, against both their Kurdish enemies and their ISIL competitors... the Turks keep themselves free from (valid) charges that they are fighting the Kurds instead of fighting ISIL! All this achıeved without the Turkish army setting foot in Syria.

All these internecine struggles and Machiavellian manipulations must seem endlessly confusing to the reader. And I haven't even touched upon the different political tendencies which split the factions of the Kurdish population, in addition the the religious ones. And it seems that the Kurds are not clean and clear of hegemonist tendencies in the areas of northern Syria which they have taken control of. Reports of ´´ethnic cleansing´´ of minority Arabs and Turks have filtered through repeatedly - though it remains hard to confirm their accuracy. Kurdish Sunnis, Kurdish Alevis, Kurdish Shias, even Kurdish Yazidi, Combine that with Marxist and conservative factions and you have a mess - which the Turks are deviously exploiting to their advantage at every turn.

What does all this mean going forwards?

The project of a greater Kurdistan will be fought for with more Kurdish & Turkish blood. It will remain stillborn but serve the purpose for whıch it was always ıntended - to further fracture the sovereignity of states standiıng in the way of the ´´Project for a New Middle East.´´ If the Kurds can be induced to turn upon each other´then both Turkey and its terror statelet ally wıll be happy to pick up the pieces. Stopping the PYD from cuttiıng off their terrorist proxy forces along the Turkish border is the short term goal of

this latest media blıtz. Having the Kurds destroy themselves as an effective opposition is the ıntermediate one. Ultimately - the long term goal is to make Turkey & Syria & Iraq all rump states... reduced to the kind of smouldering wreckage that LİBYA is today. That may seem to be a strange goal for the people running the show ın Ankara at the moment - but there is simply no accountıng for the degree of madness whıch sectarian religious & ethnic hatred can induce in such persons. As the zıonist strıng pullers well know.

A ´routine troop rotation´ or the beginning of ´an invasion of Iraq?´ BOTH narratives are more smoke and mirrors. Everybody has their own agenda to realize in this developing tragedy. There seems to be a great emphasis in the Zerohedge and other western media outlets storylines that ´this is all about oil´ theme. It is not. It´s about blood - at the end of the day. It always is.

Dec 4 2015

I tried to administer this web site earlier today but was not able to log in. Nothing spurious, occasional happenstance.

UPDATE: Hmm, maybe not happenstance, Whatreallyhappened posted the following:

"ANNOUNCEMENT: Yes, the WRH server is being repeatedly attacked, and so are the servers of other Independent Media, which suggests that there is another huge false-flag being planned, and they want to shut off any challenges to the official story. Recall that in the weeks before 9-11, the FBI shut down the websites of Muslim charities so they would not argue against the rush to blame Muslims for 9-11. This appears to be more of the same."

The fact the bodies were already in handcuffs laying behind the back seat does not look very good either!

Media running scam after scam, Facebook page not legitimate

An alias was used to frame Tashfeen, there is no evidence whatsoever she actually set up the facebook page and "pledged to ISIS(tm) yet CNN is reporting it as real when they ought to know better.

With regard to this hoax shooting I am not going to post any of the official story other than to rip it apart

You can get lies anywhere, even Infowars, Zero hedge and others are pumping B.S. on this topic and I don't call it responsible to find the clearest story in the MSM and parrot it. The entire story line is a fabrication, and there is cold hard proof. In the picture below, the Mexican press had a full helicopter fly around of the top scene, and it DEFINITELY is not the second scene, there is no error there, the entire story is fake and rotten to the core AND FOR THOSE WHO CLAIM TO BE "ALTERNATIVE"

OR "TRUTHERS" TO PARROT IT AS THE MSM PRESENTS IT IS A DISSERVICE TO EVERYONE AND A BACK STAB TO EVERYONE YOU PRETEND TO INFORM.

I have a message to the "alternative" media: There is no B.S. here and if you want to comfortably sit the fence parroting MSM B.S. just because it is the safest thing and

easiest thing to do you have no place, you might as well be them and all you will do is enable world war 3 by failing to apply your brain in even the simplest way. If you are that intellectually tired, GO TO BED, it would be better to hear nothing from you than to hear a scammer's lie repeated!

NEW MASS SHOOTING

I am actually scared this time and a little bit sad. Obviously this shooting did not happen the way they say it did, and the massive pounce on the "Islamic terror" meme strongly implies to me that the establishment needs huge public support for something horrible they plan to do soon. And I really think Trump's bantering about "dancing Muslims" was the precursor to this, I think he knew this was going to go down and seeded the public conscience ahead of this storm to cause the hatred to grow when watered . . . . and with headlines like "Muslim newlyweds slaughter co-workers who threw them a baby shower"   (thanks anonymous for that tip) well, I think there is a little proof.

I really wish the ostrich tactic worked and I could just bury my head and make it all go away . . . . the way they morphed this story is spooky, if you did not read the full report there is a lot here, just take a look at what they did with this. I half think that both shooters, because they were both on the state payroll, cooperated with this false flag and have now been given new identities for a huge payoff. Newly married, they will now

probably cruise off into the sunset, leaving their old world behind. Then again they could have been murdered. Who knows.

This story has morphed in all aspects and is all over the map as "they" adjust it to circumvent discoveries. But I found the photo that proves the current version of the story is a lie.

As I predicted last night, the shooters would end up being a husband and wife team, because the name they originally chose for the female shooter would cause political problems with Turkey. Additionally, This morning, all key elements about the male shooter being a health inspector who was present at a christmas party for autistic and disabled children up until 20 minutes before the shooting are gone because the think tanks could not come up with a way a man in a suit could get mad and then conduct a well coordinated attack in full combat gear with two other people 20 minutes later unless the number of shooters was reduced to 2, and the other shooter was his wife.

Original story line: Sayed Farook, a state health inspector got mad at the party, stormed off, and returned 20 minutes later with two other people and shot the place up.

Current story line: Sayed Farook left with his wife in the early morning and was not seen all day until he showed up at the shooting. Police found them 4 hours after the shooting and shot them to death in their black SUV, and BOTH SHOOTERS WERE WEARING COMBAT STYLE CLOTHING WHILE SHOT BY POLICE. Problem: I found a key photo apparently screen captured out of a video, and fixed the tone curve to reveal what was there. And what came out of the murk proves this is a lie:

The dead woman is in high heels, shorts and short blouse. No blood anywhere after being filled with bullets.

QUICK: Hit Google, read the current version of the story, and then try to explain the way this woman is dressed, and the lack of blood. They will change the story as needed, so get while the getting is good!

San Bernardino makeup shooting after Planned Parenthood attack failed

"Two shooters (now the only suspects) are dead (how convenient) and were shot to death by police in their car. Muslim man and woman. Probably husband and wife. Let's see if they morph the story to two men rather than a man and a woman, because now they already morphed the story from long rifles to

handguns and assault rifles and three shooters to two, who arrived in 4 cars and left in one. I am sure situational artificial intelligence has been assigned to comb the web for public opinion and script the story line accordingly, which is why it keeps changing, often in irrational ways".

The Muslim man was a former business tax executive for the state who had changed jobs and was now a health inspector for the state. So in this story line we have at least one guy that may have needed to be gotten rid of.

This picture to the left destroyed the planned parenthood shooting story, which proves all that happened was the abortionists/staff ripped the doorway out with a wrecking bar, (details below, I am scraping up the details on this new hoax (or whatever it turns out to be) ANYWAY they needed a make up shooting after the last one was shredded by the hoaxters themselves with a wrecking bar - hopefully this new shooting was as fake as the Planned Parenthood event and no one actually died.

In this new event we have 14 "dead" and this one is MEGA suspicious because it happened at a government party at 10:59 AM I MEAN AM and it did not break on any major news outlet until three and a half hours later. RT said it happened at a golf course early on.

Someone get onto Craigslist for San Bernardino, go to "gigs" and see if they hired anyone to stage this, dig back a month or so. I can get to craigslist but it is time consuming to dig through and I am looking elsewhere.

Digging . . . . .

JEWISH LIE NUMBERS INVOLVED!!!! BUSTED!!! This shooting happened at a "Christmas party" with "600" people and I think Dec 2 is a little early for that. There was a video being shot from pretty much minute 1, (15 minutes after the shooting started,) there were hundreds of ambulances on scene, a tent set up to handle the shooting complete with lawn chairs, in other words, This was probably a drill.

The shooters have Islamic names. That works perfect for Trump's story about dancing Muslims on 911, when we all know it was dancing Israelis. Trump has gotten disgusting with this topic as far as I see it.

The center this happened at has had so many active shooter drills lately that employees just thought it was another drill. There were no roadblocks set up which is very strange if this was real. Local news channels were there, reporting live, WAY TOO FAST, (proving foreknowledge) yet there was a huge delay in getting the news out via larger channels of up to 7 hours, which is why I missed this until now. WHY THAT HUGE TIME DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MAJOR NEWS OUTLETS AND LOCAL NEWS?

Unlike the canned parenthood ruse, this time the shooters are all dead. There were three of them OOPS, now only two, (male and female Muslims) driving four vehicles. That looks like a blooper in the story line. One vehicle was a "van packed with weapons" which is for me a stupid line that sounds great because after all, how can the original 3 people carry enough weapons on them to "pack a van"? but that works for the OOH AAH factor I guess and is subject to change . . . . UPDATE, IT DID, READ ON AND IF THERE WERE 4 VEHICLES INVOLVED, WHY DID ALL 3 SHOOTERS LEAVE IN ONE?LONG GUNS WERE USED THIS TIME (OOPS, THIS CHANGED ALSO, now it is assault rifles but could end up being a mix) to provide a way for the government to go after hunting rifles. And you can only really carry 2 long guns, they are heavy and I'd challenge anyone to shoot with more than 1 extra strapped across the back, I have never seen that done with long rifles, so this means the "van packed with weapons" story was written by a fool. But that story line is fading as AI corrects it.

"The San Bernardino PD's SWAT team was training nearby when the call came in of multiple shots fired just before 11 a.m. local time, Lieutenant Richard Lawhead told KTLA. They were already suited up and "ready to roll," allowing for a rapid response time." This shooting supposedly took place at a party for disabled people which were predominantly autistic. So the story line is: SHOOTERS SHOOT DISABLED AUTISTIC CHILDREN, DOUBLE SYMPATHY WHACK!, another near promise this is all a set up.

People are skeptical. Here are a few quotes from a popular forum:

"So...a Christmas part on Dec. 2nd, 11:00am on a Wednesday. RIIIGGHHHTTTT. Guy leaves, arms up, puts on tactical gear then gets two friends, arms them up and they dress in tactical gear and they all return and shoot the place up? BWAAHAHAHAHAHA! Even the narratives on this crap are stupid and unbelievable. "

"Of course. Just called up a few buddies, donned their gear and joined in for a mass shooting. Seems likely."

"Interesting - there was a Police "Training event" going on "close by." So the response time was very fast! How convenient!!!"

"one would have to be literally Forrest Gump retarded to not see the same repeating pattern".

My response: Yep.

They got a bloody nose from the fakeness of the canned parenthood show, and thus far have only used assault rifles and hand guns in their shooting ruses. So that has a limited impact on the weapons tyrants fear worse - long rifles, of which the best can penetrate practically anything all the while "assault rifles" are comparative wimps. Long rifles often kick very hard which is undesirable in combat, where people go down a lot easier than

bears. All this new take on things proves to me is that they want ALL guns now, including deer and big game rifles.

I think I am coming to this conclusion: As part of the police training exercise that was going on nearby, 3 police officers were sent to the disabled center to "shoot it up" as part of a drill so the rest of the police could get a surprise call for a mass shooter, and respond as if it was a real event. They were all dressed in combat gear, (as such police are) and left in a black SUV (as such police would). That is starting to look like the real story here, and to get a Muslim tie in, later they murdered a Muslim man and probably his wife as the drove away from their home four and a half hours later.

Update: As this story morphs, it looks like they are attempting to establish an "Islamic terror" theme with the key shooter being mad about the event serving pork while he was there doing a health inspection for the state! That is wafer thin, what will they think of next?.

Two shooters (now the only suspects) are dead (how convenient) and were shot to death by police in their car. Man and woman "still dressed in combat gear and fully armed after leaving their home over 4 hours after the shooting". Originally the woman's name was "Tayyeep Bin Ardogan" but they rescinded that possibly for political relations with Turkey and they probably want the end theme to be that this was done by husband and wife so they can explain how this shooting was organized and executed so quickly after Sayeed Farouk (the state health inspector) got pissed about pork being served. Names gotta match for that take on the story. Let's see if they morph the story to two men rather than a man and a woman, because now they already morphed the story from long rifles to handguns and assault rifles and three shooters to two, who arrived in 4 cars and left in one. I am sure situational artificial intelligence has been assigned to comb the web for public opinion and script the story line accordingly, which is why it keeps changing, often in irrational ways.

Maybe tomorrow the story line will be: "Husband and wife Islamic killing team murders autistic children over steamed pork fueled rampage." After all, if this really is being handled by situational AI as it sure appears to be, a computer just might spew that. And I fear there might really be two dead people in this false flag - a state health inspector that needed to be gotten rid of, and whoever was inconveniently with him when they shot up his car.

Free RepublicBrowse · Search

News/ActivismTopics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Suspect ID'd in San Bernardino Massacre as Syed FarookDaily Beast ^ | 12/2/15 | Oliver Jones Katie Zavadski 

Posted on 12/2/2015, 7:53:23 PM by jimbo123

-snip-

Farook was a business taxes representative for the California State Board of Equalization, according to his LinkedIn profile. He is a 2003 graduate La Sierra High School, and most recently studied finance at California State University Fullerton until 2013.

Records show Farook bought a two bedroom Corona home in March 2014. Farouk's social media profile shows he is married and has at least one young child. His wife did not return messages left on Wednesday.

Farouk lived at a home with his wife and children in Corona, California.

(Excerpt) Read more at  thedailybeast.com ...

TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror

KEYWORDS: islam; koranimals; muslims; obamalegacy

 

1 posted on 12/2/2015, 7:53:23 PM by jimbo123[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Just looking at that picture, it’s obvious he was driven to lash out in violence as a result of extreme poverty and the squalid conditions in which persons of Middle Eastern descent are forced to live in the racist hell of Amerikkka.

2 posted on 12/2/2015, 7:55:42 PM by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

NBC says the other dead man is his brother.

Activated cell?

Odd ‘workplace violence’ if it’s not terrorism...

3 posted on 12/2/2015, 7:56:07 PM by TigerClaws[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Daily Beast must be “deeply saddened.”

4 posted on 12/2/2015, 7:56:29 PM by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Syed Farook - one of how many sleepers in the U.S.?

5 posted on 12/2/2015, 7:57:53 PM by Carl Vehse[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Let's not jump to any conclusions 'bout Muslims! And I wanna give a Shout Out to my man Syed Farook!

6 posted on 12/2/2015, 7:58:15 PM by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

As I suspected, Amish Tea Party member working as a California tax auditor for cover.

7 posted on 12/2/2015, 7:58:41 PM by Hamilcar_Barca[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

More to come tonight, or soon? FBI agent hemming and hawing like he knows it’s over. Jack ass.

8 posted on 12/2/2015, 7:58:55 PM by gusopol3[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

He does have that “look” we’re all used to.

9 posted on 12/2/2015, 7:58:56 PM by JimSEA[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

This does not comport with Obama’s agenda. Pie in his face time once again. Can you say, Radical Islamic terrorists?” Or, is it just a wild coincidence that they are moslems?

10 posted on 12/2/2015, 7:59:11 PM by Sasparilla[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Obviously a White Islamic.

11 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:00:16 PM by GreenHornet[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

"The dead suspects were dressed in 'assault-style clothing' and were carrying assault-style weapons and handguns, Burguan said. He said an officer was shot in the confrontation but didn't suffer a life-threatening wound and was expected to be OK.

Multiple sources from multiple agencies identified one of the three attackers at the resource center to NBC News as Syed Farook. No other information was available, but a knowledgeable source said another member of the trio is believed to be Farook's brother.

The identity of the woman was unknown."

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/san-bernardino-shooting/authorities-respond-report-shooting-san-bernardino-california-n472976 

12 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:00:45 PM by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better, safer America)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

And I guess no one in Jersey City is cheering?

13 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:01:06 PM by SMGFan (Sarah Michelle Gellar is now on twitter @SarahMGellar)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

The MSM really needs to call in Captain Obvious on this case.

14 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:01:37 PM by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for qeverything you have. Don't wait. Do it today.)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Certainly looks MODERATE.

15 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:02:02 PM by gusopol3[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Any word who the woman was? Was she a shooter or just the getaway driver?

16 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:02:16 PM by Blood of Tyrants (There's a right to gay marriage in the Constitution but there is no right of an unborn baby to life.)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

 

Support Free Republic PO Box 9771

FResno, CA 93794

Keep freedom ALIVE!!

Thank you all very much!!

God bless.- 

17 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:03:23 PM by RedMDer (Support Free Republic and Keep FReedom ALIVE!)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Hmmm.

I seem to recall someone named trump saying something about these ones and their “families”.

I can’t quite remember what his point was though...

18 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:03:49 PM by chris37 (heartless)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Rampant Islamophobia can trigger these kinds of reactions. It’s a wonder that more don’t snap.

19 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:05:02 PM by sphinx[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

a business taxes representative for the California State Board of Equalization

So, he's a PROFESSIONAL terrorist... 

20 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:05:15 PM by kiryandil ("When Muslims in the White House are outlawed, only Barack Obama will be an outlaw")[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Work related issues; foreclosure, women would not go out with him... 

21 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:05:33 PM by Bon mots[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Farook said he hasn't seen his son in some time. "He was very religious. He would go to work, come back, go to pray, come back. He's Muslim." 

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/suspect-involved-calif-massacre-identified-article-1.2453471 

22 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:05:47 PM by jimbo123[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Correct me, if I’m wrong...But, didn’t Jack kill this guy several years ago?

23 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:07:56 PM by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Fox News is tiptoeing around even saying his name much less saying he’s of middle east extraction. I’m really sick of this. We knew everything there was to know about the wacko in Colorado within 3 hours of his being arrested.

24 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:09:25 PM by Mercat (attempting to catch a Chewbacca fart and paint it green.)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

FBI agent hemming and hawing like he knows it’s over. Jack ass.

I find it interesting that they are even using the word “terrorism” at this point. Before the Paris massacre, they would have tried to sweep this under the rug too. Now, even the Feds realize they will lose all credibility if they try that again.

25 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:10:58 PM by rbg81 (is pr)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Actually, if you look carefully you’ll notice a bead of sweat on his left cheek. Obviously, it was global warming that put him over the edge.

26 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:12:24 PM by KevinB (Barack Obama: Our first black, gay, Kenyan, Socialist, Muslim president!)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Islamic sleeper cell. Gotta ban Islam! Californians need to buy guns!

27 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:12:56 PM by Lopeover (2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

What is the matter with the mealy mouthed Fox reporters? Megan Kelly, Adam Housely and Kathrine Harrage are all acting as timid as the police in identifying the terrorists. Instead of banning guns, let’s ban this worthless media.

28 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:12:56 PM by txrefugee[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

 

29 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:13:33 PM by RaceBannon (Rom 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123; All

“A Global Warming-induced incident”

30 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:14:46 PM by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Was the woman wearing a Tactical Burka?

Must be a sister. Otherwise she couldn't be seen out in public unless with a male relative. 

31 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:16:13 PM by HP8753 (Live Free!!!! .............or don't.)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

“Workplace violence” “common sense gun control”

/Baraq Hussein Obama

32 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:17:23 PM by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

“Correct me, if I’m wrong...But, didn’t Jack kill this guy several years ago?”

Needed a laugh tonight. Thanks for that.

33 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:18:11 PM by juggernaut[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

Fox News is tiptoeing around even saying his name much less saying he’s of middle east extraction. I’m really sick of this

To his credit at 8 PM tonight Orielly had on two guests who both named Saeed and said it was muslim terrorism. One guest went on to say it seems to be an attack modeled after the attack in Paris a few weeks ago. -Tom 

34 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:18:39 PM by Capt. Tom[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

What the hell are you talking about? Everyone knows he was driven to “lash out” because of “climate change”... Sheesh, didn’t you hear our genius president?

35 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:18:39 PM by Bullish (Face it, insanity is just not presidential.)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Looks like a Helluva shiner on the right eye.

36 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:20:35 PM by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Daily Beast has the wrong guy.

See

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3367426/posts

For the right Syed Farook.

37 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:22:02 PM by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Quite the ugly goat cheese infested and worthless waste of DNA. Extradite them all to iran or some other filthy moslem desert.

38 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:22:54 PM by soycd[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Obviously these are moderate Muslims with fast and furious weapons, and nothing to do, so they decided to kill some people. It’s not terrorism. They were upset over the 1 percent holding them down, and the oil industry holding back clean energy while Americans exploit the world’s wealth. Global warming fits in there somewhere. They are Obama voters who were mad about having to live under a Constitution written by a bunch of white racists who were controlled by Christians and the NRA.

39 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:24:09 PM by pallis[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

“Marwan” — and about 160 other a-holes. We need Jack.

40 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:29:45 PM by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU.)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Father says he is a devout Muslim. No wonder he attacked a Christmas party.

41 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:30:51 PM by Parley Baer[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

Foxs largest shareholder outside the original founders is Muslim.

42 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:31:20 PM by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: soycd

Drop them from c-130s. I volunteer to pack all the parachutes; no, I insist!

43 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:31:46 PM by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU.)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

Me? No!

44 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:32:21 PM by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

But you will never, never, ever hear them say ‘Islamic terrorism’ or ‘Muslim terrorism.’

45 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:33:28 PM by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

Woosies at FOX don’t want to talk about terrorists. They want to talk about the problem of mental illness behind mass shooters. Cowardly, worthless media talking heads.

46 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:36:54 PM by cblue55 ("Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants,")[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

“Home Grown Terrorist”

don’t buy into the media and government bs. He is an Islamic Jihadist regardless of where he got radicalized. He belongs to the Nation of Islam.

47 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:47:05 PM by FreeAtlanta (Restore Liberty!)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

you forgot the sarcasm tags

48 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:49:48 PM by FreeAtlanta (Restore Liberty!)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Touche.

49 posted on 12/2/2015, 8:56:55 PM by rbg81 (is pr)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Good old amish name as I’ve ever heard.

What did we Americans do to incite the poor young man?

50 posted on 12/2/2015, 9:09:28 PM by KosmicKitty (Liberals claim to want to hear other views, but then are shocked to discover there are other views)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free RepublicBrowse · Searchhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3367447/posts?page=1

Turkish reader sent the real history of what is happening in Turkey now

This is what is perceived/known by someone on the ground in Turkey. English is one of the primary languages in Turkey, which explains why this is so well written

Jim. Took your advice and moved to a public facility. I don't live close to a town so this one is an irregular opportunity. I may miss some developments going forwards, but will do my best to stay on top of it.

"So a crisis between the military and the government must be provoked... which has to cause the military leaders to be arrested for 'treason'"

Boom. This one is unfolding live time. The western media has picked it up... but as usual not in correct form. ZeroH - using their 'informed sources' ( Seven arrows owned)Reuters, and (state agit-prop tool)Anadolu wire services, advises

"A court in Istanbul has ordered the arrest of three senior army officers, including two generals on charges of espionage and leading a terrorist group in a case involving the search of Turkish intelligence trucks in 2014.

General Hamza Celepoglu was accused of forming and leading an armed terrorist organization and of trying to overthrow the Turkish government. General Ibrahim Aydin and a retired colonel, Burhanettin Cihangiroglu, were accused of forming and leading an armed terrorist organization as well as spying and trying to oust the Turkish government"

These gentlemen are Gendarmerie officers, NOT "Regular Army officers" - the distinction is critical here. Although formally a part of the Turkish Army, this component is the fault line which the faction in contol in Ankara will exploit to gain mentioned objective. Gendarmerie command reports directly to the Minister of the Interior-not Army General Staff, in all but training matters. This puts their command structure not just in a state of potential conflict of interest, but also allows the would be Caliph to open the attack on the Army without a direct frontal assualt. Classic byzantine intrigue and turkish de-light left hook.

Gendarmerie ... by the way... operate as constabulary in areas outside of municipal type policing. Their role could be deemed similar to that of provincial police - or state troopers. Except that they are HEAVILY militarized. Nothin missing from that Arsenal. They are therefore exactly halfway between police and the regular Army. More on that later.

IF he was to arrest a general of the army - directly under General Staff command - it is known that Erdogan would provoke a crisis in short order. Therefore the intermediate road has been chosen to lead to the showdown in increments. Army staff cannot intervene to save colleagues under command of Interior. But they can receive a clear message.

These officers are 'guilty' of no more than attempting to protect members of their down chain of command. A duty and responsibility well understood by military personnel through milennia. The actual search of the trucks - MIT(turkish state intelligence/like CIA)-hired vechicles busted by chance on orders of a local prosecutor- was carried out by local Gendarmerie personnel. Who are already in jail - for carrying out their public duties on direct order of the civil government! The trucks were carrying weaponry destined for "Syrian rebels" - who actually are Turkish members of the "Grey Wolves" Gladio-style fascist gang fighting in Syria while snugged amongst the local Turkmen minority. Though they are usually aligned politically with the opposition nationalist MHP party, the current government has undercut that alliance by directly funding the para's in attacking Syria - using them as proxy tool in a war that their army has refused to countenance.

There will be many army dining halls today where officers walking in will be looking at each other with the silent question - so when does the other shoe drop? They know better than to openly talk about what has happened - due to the abundance of human and mechanical 'listening devices' spread everywhere in their midst. Erdogan has once again managed to find the perfect tool to divide and confuse his potential challengers - political, military or civil. Fear of being caught in invented coup-mongering is expected to keep most of the officer class from starting to talk amongst themselves.

The government will not move directly against the military - yet. Parsing this move for a look forward, seems that they will use the Gendarmerie as stalking horse. That group has the lead role in fighting against the Kurdish 'rebels' within Turkeys borders - the army is for foreign operations - supposedly. The state is actively encouraging/instigating conflict between the Kurdish PKK and the armed forces - formal and informal. Gangs of guys with Islamist style long beards style are showing up all through the Kurdish regions pretending to be police, They conduct assassinations, instigate riots against Kurdish businesses, leave threatening messages on walls. It's not hard to see that a conflict between the Gendarmerie and the state's jihadi paras is eventually going to be 'engineered' - in which those remaining professional elements in the Gendarmerie will be forced to take action against the state's gangsters in order to conduct their duties... and will be accused of 'treason' for doing so! A purge of all the professionals - to be replaced by the complicit stooges already in place below them, will ensue.

Here's the probable scenario that I couldn't get a handle on two days ago. - Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG) will shortly try (again)to cross the Euphrates River into the western zone that the crazies in Ankara have declared "off limits" - even though it is Syrian territory(!) The goverment will order the (regular)Army to detach forces from regular missions to secure the area - because it's proxy forces in the region have been severely decimated by the Russkie strikes. (Keep in mind that the Air Force component of the

Turkish military has been knocked out of the skies as aftereffect of the Russian bomber downing.The Army will balk.

Curiously enough Jim - Gendarmerie General Command is responsibility for some parts of the Iranian and Syrian borders and the whole Iraqi border by law since 1988. But much much worse...they are also tasked with military police responsibilites - eg. provosts with responsibility over the Army! Truly messy, as we watch whom arrests whom... and counter arrests potentially!

Little by little, as the screw turns, the Army will be forced to either watch helplessly, or take up with talk of a coup - which will be turned against them in no time, like is happening now with the invention of a phony Iranian syping ring to hang blanket guilt on these particular generals.. Iran and Russia - lining up together as now 'unfriendly' neighbors on the borders of this tin pot dictatorship. It is getting more explosive by the minute, with Putin laying out a list of sanctions that will drive home the final nail in the economy's coffin. Sinister thing is... most of the effects of those chosen(agricultural and tourism) will be felt in the western region - whose the voters traditionally go with the CHP opposition - therefore undermining the last cohesive base of potential anti-regime grassroots resistance! Lose/lose again.

Think it may be time to start praying that there is some rare talent for strategic thinking amongst those Army guys. We need a coup very very badly now. I say we, in more than just a domestic sense... because the bottom line with these crazies in Ankara is simply this: if we go down, everybody goes! Wıth so many meddlers in the mix in this neighborhood now, Turkey is a gigantic suicide bomber - with the number of a bombs you have pointed out as already in country, the vest that they may well be wearing when they go! Erdogan cannot risk a repeat of the successful Eygptian coup against his muslim brotherhood buddies - he'll try to take all of us infidels down before allowing it. (these are NOT real Muslims... by the way - they have violated pretty much every tenet of that religion... on a daily basis!)

(One more important note to address. There has also been mumbling in the western press about Turkey's "trump card" being their ability to close the Bosphorus to Russian naval traffic. That is a canard. The only legal way that the wanna be Caliph can close those straits - is under a state of declared war! In peacetime, traffic is legally guaranteed by international convetion to be open to all traffic. Short of declaring a state of war against Russia - the ultimate last round in the roulette revolver - he cannot and will not close those straits to Russian traffic. If you see a confirmed report that they are closed... you will know we are truly in for it!)

Question for you! If you follow any of these zerohedge type collapsenik sites at all, you will have noticed how they steer their readers to 'rootin for Putin,' 'death of the dollar,' basically 'death to america' in essence. Seen from outside the fishbowl, this seems kind of bizarre behavior, or more bluntly, similar to suicide bombers and their vests! Seems less a random trend than a constructed meme designed to encourage Amerikans into

participating actively in their own final snuff film. What think you about this - who is steering these people towards self destructive fantasies - and why?

Alright. That already seems like a lot/too much? for a message panel. Feel free to advise as to what you see appropriate in length/format. I could do up some stuff focusing on backgrounders like -the usual suspects(aka cryptos)role behind all of this- the religious dynamic, or the case of who these Kurds are. Send off in an email to your address here as word file from public facility, if that sounds good n secure. Be safe... keep up the great job!

My response: Posted in entirety, this is where WW3 might start so everything is important.

Planned Parenthood is doing make up work after the broad scale bust on their shooting hoaxPlanned Parenthood has obviously unleashed an army of trolls, posting bible quotes which "justify and legitimize abortion".

The quotes involve "the breath which gives life" and a so-called abortion potion "priests used to use to cause women to abort" that is "written right into the bible".

Here is their primary argument:

All of it is a lie, as presented:

"What if life doesn't begin at conception? What if the Biblical definition of "life" would allow even the latest of late-term abortions? What if right-wing Christians have it all wrong? To figure out if this is the case, it's best to start at the beginning - specifically, in the book of Genesis. Please turn your Bibles to Chapter 2, verse 7:"

"And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul." My comment: So that justifies abortion? Quite the twist! "Since the Bible is the word of God and God is infalliable, anti-abortion fanatics have nothing to complain about. Simply put, life begins when one draws his or her first breath. This, of course, isn't the only reference like this. Job 33:4 reads:

"The spirit of God has made me, and the breath of the Almighty gives me life."

My comment: Nothing about abortion there. The breathing quote is obviously figurative. How does that support abortion? And even if the breathing part was relevant, it is the MOTHERS BREATH that gives the baby life in the womb. The breath is still supporting life for both.

Ezekiel 37:5-6 is also very clear on the matter:

"Thus says the Lord God to these bones: Behold, I will cause breath to enter you, and you shall live. And I will lay sinews upon you, and will cause flesh to come upon you, and

cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and you shall live; and you shall know that I am the Lord."

My comment: This describes a process, many of which happen in the womb. Surprisingly (not) Planned parenthood skips the first parts and only focuses on "the drawing of breath". In reality, that particular bible quote says life is sacred all the way to conception.

"Once again, life begins upon the drawing of the first breath. Of course, there does seem to be some leeway (where it is acceptable to kill a baby even after the first breath:) Leviticus 27 makes it very clear that babies have no value to God until they are one month old."

MY COMMENT: Here is the relevant portion of Leviticus 27, which they left out entirely, expecting you to take their word for it:

27 And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying,

2 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When a man shall make a singular vow, the persons shall be for the Lord by thy estimation.

3 And thy estimation shall be of the male from twenty years old even unto sixty years old, even thy estimation shall be fifty shekels of silver, after the shekel of the sanctuary.

4 And if it be a female, then thy estimation shall be thirty shekels.

5 And if it be from five years old even unto twenty years old, then thy estimation shall be of the male twenty shekels, and for the female ten shekels.

6 And if it be from a month old even unto five years old, then thy estimation shall be of the male five shekels of silver, and for the female thy estimation shall be three shekels of silver.

So in verse 6, since the lowest age mentioned is 1 month, anyone below that age has no value and it is perfectly OK to kill them! HA HA HA, nice perverted canned parenthood twist there! See how Abortionists skew things? And the topic of these bible verses have nothing to do with abortion! AND NOW ONTO THE "MAGICAL ABORTION POTION" NEXT:

"If anything, Christians should only be angry if a child is killed after he or she takes his or her first breath - especially since God gives them a recipe for a magical abortion potion in Numbers 5:11-31:

My insert: They omitted the following verses immediately before the following which read "The Test for an Unfaithful Wife" to hopefully cause people to take this out of context, and cause them to assume the verses prior said something like "how to expel an unwanted pregnancy". As a correction, I'll put them here:

11 Then the LORD said to Moses, 12 "Speak to the Israelites and say to them: 'If a man's wife goes astray and is unfaithful to him

13 by sleeping with another man, and this is hidden from her husband and her impurity is undetected (since there is no witness against her and she has not been caught in the act),

14 and if feelings of jealousy come over her husband and he suspects his wife and she is impure--or if he is jealous and suspects her even though she is not impure--

Those previous verses were omitted so they could twist the subsequent verses to fit their agenda, implying that the previous verses (above) meant the following was an abortion formula:

15 Then shall the man bring his wife unto the priest, and he shall bring her offering for her, the tenth part of an ephah of barley meal; he shall pour no oil upon it, nor put frankincense thereon; for it is an offering of jealousy, an offering of memorial, bringing iniquity to remembrance.

16 And the priest shall bring her near, and set her before the Lord:

17 And the priest shall take holy water in an earthen vessel; and of the dust that is in the floor of the tabernacle the priest shall take, and put it into the water:

18 And the priest shall set the woman before the Lord, and uncover the woman’s head, and put the offering of memorial in her hands, which is the jealousy offering: and the priest shall have in his hand the bitter water that causeth the curse:

19 And the priest shall charge her by an oath, and say unto the woman, If no man have lain with thee, and if thou hast not gone aside to uncleanness with another instead of thy husband, be thou free from this bitter water that causeth the curse:

20 But if thou hast gone aside to another instead of thy husband, and if thou be defiled, and some man have lain with thee beside thine husband:

21 Then the priest shall charge the woman with an oath of cursing, and the priest shall say unto the woman, The Lord make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the Lord doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell;

22 And this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels, to make thy belly to swell, and thy thigh to rot: And the woman shall say, Amen, amen.

23 And the priest shall write these curses in a book, and he shall blot them out with the bitter water:

24 And he shall cause the woman to drink the bitter water that causeth the curse: and the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter.

25 Then the priest shall take the jealousy offering out of the woman's hand, and shall wave the offering before the Lord, and offer it upon the altar:

26 And the priest shall take an handful of the offering, even the memorial thereof, and burn it upon the altar, and afterward shall cause the woman to drink the water.

27 And when he hath made her to drink the water, then it shall come to pass, that, if she be defiled, and have done trespass against her husband, that the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter, and her belly shall swell, and her thigh shall rot: and the woman shall be a curse among her people.

28 And if the woman be not defiled, but be clean; then she shall be free, and shall conceive seed.

The Big Guy clearly believes in the right to choose — as long as that choice is made by a man. Sure, the potion is magic but it causes an abortion no matter how you slice it.

My comment: At no point does that scriptural passage say any child would be expelled or any miscarriage would take place, and even if a miscarriage did take place she would still be able to "conceive seed" later which nullifies the entire pretext of this which is obviously instead some magic ritual to make a woman barren by magic if she cheated. So what we have here is a desperate twisting of scriptures to justify an agenda, and such a psychopathic desperate grabbing at straws to justify an abortion agenda ought to be enough to get the writer dragged in to see a shrink!

Aaah yes, canned parenthood. What more would anyone expect?

The obvious real agenda here: To eventually make it publicly acceptable to murder newborns at up to one month of age, (every reference given here is done to hopefully at least justify partial birth abortion, where the baby is delivered alive, and prevented from drawing it's first breath while the brain is sucked out) and additionally, justify killing up to one month of age. Why? So these monsters don't have to fear jail time if they ever get caught murdering newborns in their satanic child sacrifice rituals.

Dec 1 2015

UPDATE: I have now pasted a letter from Iran's Ayatolla Kahmenei below the canned parenthood shooting report a day earlier than I was going to post it because it is a MUST READ.

It is official - Abortion clinic shooting was staged by a leftist liberal pro choice transvestite!

Shootout never happened.

* No officer shot.

* CPR dummy used.

* Shooting staged entirely by Planned Parenthood with willing liberal leftist transvestite accomplice with shady sexual history that includes criminal offenses.

*

Damage to the abortion clinic is not from gunfire. It is from a wrecking bar ripping the face off. This is supposed to be shootout damage. How did a shootout totally rip the door frame out and rip the face off the building when it was supposed to be all happening through a window all the while there is not a single bullet hole anywhere? ANSWER: They ripped the face off themselves. There is only huge demolition type damage, why? ANSWER 2: Because this was staged by illiterate "never worked a day in their lives except to murder or leech" abortionists who had no knowledge of anything technical whatsoever, and it was beyond their ability to stage a realistic scene.

* No staff shot

* The mug shots of the "insane attacker" are obvious actor shots, this man is not insane, he is a so called "high intellectual" faking it for the camera. Initial impression looks real, but look again, especially in the side shot - there are no lines on his face that match what would be there if he really had that crazy look all the time, in fact the fake expression is pulling lines that should be there out of his face, plus you can see he is faking it anyway.

* Two un-named people dead with only the CPR doll dead at the scene, and in the news videos they handled it like a CPR doll, it looked like a CPR doll complete with matching hairline, which they handled totally improperly for the claimed injuries. The un-named dead in my opinion strongly supports the theory that Planned Parenthood had plans of killing people ex post facto to be blamed on this hoax.

This is the most shallow fake EVER.

I was skeptical when this story broke on a few of the major forums, but am now convinced completely - they really did use a CPR doll and no bullets were fired AT ALL.

IMPORTANT: An "eyewitness" hit my message window this morning, saying that the shooter ran into the abortion clinic for shelter after robbing a convenience store nearby, and that is why no one in the clinic was targeted. This is why I re-secured the mail window, because I knew that was disinfo and absolutely nothing else of substance on any topic came in, All messages (and an extremely short number of them) were written by the same individual across a few topics, with generic MSM info and nothing more. This proved the mail window had been compromised.

IF SOMEONE RAN INTO THE ABORTION CLINIC AND STARTED SHOOTING OUT A WINDOW WITH POLICE RETURNING FIRE, THERE SHOULD BE A BROKEN WINDOW WITH TONS OF BULLET HOLES IN THE STUCCO AROUND IT. THE ABSENCE OF THIS PROVES THE ENTIRE STORY TO BE A LIE. IF THEY COME UP WITH THAT SCENE NOW, THEY ARE STILL GOING TO HAVE TO EXPLAIN WHY THE FRONT ENTRANCE HAS OBVIOUS DEMOLITION DAMAGE WHEN THERE IS NOTHING IN THEIR HOAX STORY LINE TO ACCOUNT FOR IT.

So I totally shrugged off the convenience store robbery lie, and now know the reality - this was a leftist pro planned parenthood actor that staged a ruse. No one shot, and no one will be jailed, THIS SHOOTING IS ALL A COMPLETE HOAX.

I read numerous reports, and none talk about a storming of the building with the police ripping the whole face off, or a severe vehicle impact ripping the whole face off, nothing of the sort, folks, they are staging that demolition damage as shoot out damage and have no other explanation which means they are BUSTED BUSTED BUSTED. And because they are a technically illiterate abortion club, they will never understand why.

Take a look at this letter from Iran's Ayatollah Khameinei!This letter is exactly what you would expect to see from a high charismatic individual shortly before the battle of armageddon. He lays the geopolitical situation out clearly, despite still playing politics. This one actually scares me.

This got put in the censor bots and triggers auto bans on Twitter. I wonder why!

Permalink this letter here

In the Name of God, the Beneficent, the Merciful

To the Youth in Western Countries,

The bitter events brought about by blind terrorism in France have once again, moved me to speak to you young people. For me, it is unfortunate that such incidents would have to create the framework for a conversation, however the truth is that if painful matters do not create the grounds for finding solutions and mutual consultation, then the damage caused will be multiplied.

The pain of any human being anywhere in the world causes sorrow for a fellow human being. The sight of a child losing his life in the presence of his loved ones, a mother whose joy for her family turns into mourning, a husband who is rushing the lifeless body of his spouse to some place and the spectator who does not know whether he will be seeing the final scene of life- these are scenes that rouse the emotions and feelings of any human being. Anyone who has benefited from affection and humanity is affected and disturbed by witnessing these scenes- whether it occurs in France or in Palestine or Iraq or Lebanon or Syria.

I genuinely believe that it is only you youth who by learning the lessons of today's hardship, have the power to discover new means for building the future.

Without a doubt, the one-and-a-half billion Muslims also have these feelings and abhor and are revolted by the perpetrators and those responsible for these calamities. The issue, however, is that if today's pain is not used to build a better and safer future, then it will just turn into bitter and fruitless memories. I genuinely believe that it is only you youth who by learning the lessons of today's hardship, have the power to discover new means for building the future and who can be barriers in the misguided path that has brought the west to its current impasse.

It is correct that today terrorism is our common worry. However it is necessary for you to know that the insecurity and strain that you experienced during the recent events, differs from the pain that the people of Iraq, Yemen, Syria and Afghanistan have been experiencing for many years, in two significant ways. First, the Islamic world has been the victim of terror and brutality to a larger extent territorially, to greater amount quantitatively and for a longer period in terms of time. Second, that unfortunately this violence has been supported by certain great powers through various methods and effective means.

Today, there are very few people who are uninformed about the role of the United States of America in creating, nurturing and arming al-Qaeda, the Taliban and their inauspicious successors. Besides this direct support, the overt and well-known supporters of takfiri terrorism- despite having the most backward political systems- are standing arrayed as allies of the west while the most pioneering, brightest and most dynamic democrats in the region are suppressed mercilessly. The prejudiced response of the west to the awakening movement in the Islamic world is an illustrative example of the contradictory western policies.

The other side of these contradictory policies is seen in supporting the state terrorism of Israel. The oppressed people of Palestine have experienced the worst kind of terrorism for the last sixty years. If the people of Europe have now taken refuge in their homes for a few days and refrain from being present in busy places- it is decades that a Palestinian family is not secure even in its own home from the Zionist regime's death and destruction machinery. What kind of atrocious violence today is comparable to that of the settlement constructions of the Zionists regime?

This regime- without ever being seriously and significantly censured by its influential allies or even by the so-called independent international organizations- everyday demolishes the homes of Palestinians and destroys their orchards and farms. This is done without even giving them time to gather their belongings or agricultural products and usually it is done in front of the terrified and tear-filled eyes of women and children who witness the brutal beatings of their family members who in some cases are being dragged away to gruesome torture chambers. In today's world, do we know of any other violence on this scale and scope and for such an extended period of time?

Shooting down a woman in the middle of the street for the crime of protesting against a soldier who is armed to the teeth- if this is not terrorism, what is? This barbarism, because it is being done by the armed forces of an occupying government, should not be called extremism? Or maybe only because these scenes have been seen repeatedly on television screens for sixty years, they should no longer stir our consciences.

The military invasions of the Islamic world in recent years- with countless victims- are another example of the contradictory logic of the west. The assaulted countries, in addition to the human damage caused, have lost their economic and industrial infrastructure, their movement towards growth and development has been stopped or delayed and in some cases, has been thrown back decades. Despite all this, they are rudely being asked not to see themselves as oppressed. How can a country be turned into ruins, have its cities and

towns covered in dust and then be told that it should please not view itself as oppressed? Instead of enticements to not understand and to not mention disasters, would not an honest apology be better? The pain that the Islamic world has suffered in these years from the hypocrisy and duplicity of the invaders is not less than the pain from the material damage.

Dear youth! I have the hope that you- now or in the future- can change this mentality corrupted by duplicity, a mentality whose highest skill is hiding long-term goals and adorning malevolent objectives. In my opinion, the first step in creating security and peace is reforming this violence-breeding mentality. Until double-standards dominate western policies, until terrorism- in the view of its powerful supporters- is divided into “good†�and “bad†types, and until governmental interests are given precedence over human �values and ethics, the roots of violence should not be searched for in other places.

Unfortunately, these roots have taken hold in the depths of western political culture over the course of many years and they have caused a soft and silent invasion. Many countries of the world take pride in their local and national cultures, cultures which through development and regeneration have soundly nurtured human societies for centuries. The Islamic world is not an exception to this. However in the current era, the western world with the use of advanced tools is insisting on the cloning and replication of its culture on a global scale. I consider the imposition of western culture upon other peoples and the trivialization of independent cultures as a form of silent violence and extreme harmfulness.

Humiliating rich cultures and insulting the most honored parts of these, is occurring while the alternative culture being offered in no way has any qualification for being a replacement. For example, the two elements of “aggression†and “moral �promiscuity†which unfortunately have become the main elements of western culture, �has even degraded the position and acceptability of its source region.

So now the question is: are we “sinners†for not wanting an aggressive, vulgar and �fatuous culture? Are we to be blamed for blocking the flood of impropriety that is directed towards our youth in the shape of various forms of quasi-art? I do not deny the importance and value of cultural interaction. Whenever these interactions are conducted in natural circumstances and with respect for the receiving culture, they result in growth, development and richness. On the contrary, inharmonious interactions have been unsuccessful and harmful impositions.

We have to state with full regret that vile groups such as DAESH are the spawn of such ill-fated pairings with imported cultures. If the matter was simply theological, we would have had to witness such phenomena before the colonialist era, yet history shows the contrary. Authoritative historical records clearly show how colonialist confluence of extremist and rejected thoughts in the heart of a Bedouin tribe, planted the seed of extremism in this region. How then is it possible that such garbage as DAESH comes out of one of the most ethical and humane religious schools who as part of its inner core, includes the notion that taking the life of one human being is equivalent to killing the whole humanity?

One has to ask why people who are born in Europe and who have been intellectually and mentally nurtured in that environment are attracted to such groups? Can we really believe that people with only one or two trips to war zones, suddenly become so extreme that they can riddle the bodies of their compatriots with bullets? On this matter, we certainly cannot forget about the effects of a life nurtured in a pathologic culture in a corrupt environment borne out of violence. On this matter, we need complete analyses, analyses that see the hidden and apparent corruptions. Maybe a deep hate- planted in the years of economic and industrial growth and borne out of inequality and possibly legal and structural prejudice- created ideas that every few years appear in a sickening manner.

In any case, you are the ones that have to uncover the apparent layers of your own society and untie and disentangle the knots and resentments. Fissures have to be sealed, not deepened. Hasty reactions is a major mistake when fighting terrorism which only widens the chasms. Any rushed and emotional reaction which would isolate, intimidate and create more anxiety for the Muslim communities living in Europe and America- which are comprised of millions of active and responsible human beings- and which would deprive them of their basic rights more than has already happened and which would drive them away from society- not only will not solve the problem but will increase the chasms and resentments.

Superficial measures and reactions, especially if they take legal forms, will do nothing but increase the current polarizations, open the way for future crises and will result in nothing else. According to reports received, some countries in Europe have issued guidelines encouraging citizens to spy on Muslims. This behavior is unjust and we all know that pursuing injustice has the characteristic of unwanted reversibility. Besides, the Muslims do not deserve such ill-treatment. For centuries, the western world has known Muslims well- the day that westerners were guests in Islamic lands and were attracted to the riches of their hosts and on another day when they were hosts and benefitted from the efforts and thoughts of Muslims- they generally experienced nothing but kindness and forbearance.

Therefore I want you youth to lay the foundations for a correct and honorable interaction with the Islamic world based on correct understanding, deep insight and lessons learned from horrible experiences. In such a case and in the not too distant future, you will witness the edifice built on these firm foundations which creates a shade of confidence and trust which cools the crown of its architect, a warmth of security and peace that it bequests on them and a blaze of hope in a bright future which illuminates the canvass of the earth.

Sayyid Ali Khamenei

http://82.221.129.208/ifyouareinamericayouprobablycantseethise8.html

HASHAM v. CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATIONResetAAFont size:Print  53

United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit.Zia U. HASHAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 98-3193.    Decided: January 5, 2000

Before COFFEY, RIPPLE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges. Fern N. Trevino (argued), Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Grace Allen Newton (argued), Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Zia U. Hasham (“Hasham”) filed charges of discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., against his employer, the State of California Board of Equalization (“CBOE”).   Plaintiff filed formal and informal complaints alleging discrimination with CBOE and also filed a charge with the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission (“EEOC”), which issued a right to sue letter on March 19, 1996.   Before the EEOC and also in federal court,1 Hasham claimed that CBOE discriminated against him based on his Pakistani national origin, his Muslim religion and also because of his age (over 40 years of age).   District Court Judge William Hart granted CBOE summary judgment on the age and religion discrimination claims but allowed the claim of national-origin discrimination to proceed to trial.   The jury found in Hasham's favor and awarded him back pay and compensatory damages in the amount of $350,000.   On post-trial motions, the trial judge upheld the jury's liability verdict but vacated rather than reduced the compensatory damage award of $350,000 while awarding Plaintiff $15,548 in back-pay, $4,188.48 in interest, a promotion to a Supervising Tax Auditor I (“Supervisor I”) position in Houston, Texas with seniority retroactive to August 1993 and attorneys fees and costs.2  On September 3, 1998, the trial court granted the defendant's motion to stay the money judgment and order of promotion. Three months later on December 10, 1998, the court lifted the stay on Plaintiff's promotion and granted him his promotion due to a Supervisor I job opening.   The defendant now appeals the district court's denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law and motion for a new trial.   CBOE also appeals the trial judge's evidentiary rulings and jury instructions.   We affirm.I. BACKGROUNDThe CBOE is an administrative agency of the State of California and assumes the charge of auditing those businesses located outside California and doing business within California and who may be liable for payment of California sales and use tax.   The CBOE out-of-state district maintains field offices in Chicago, New York and Houston.   Each field office is directed by an area administrator who reports to a district administrator.   Both Sidney Zigelman (“Zigelman”), the area administrator for the Houston branch office of the out-of-state district, and Bruce Henline (“Henline”), the out-of-state district administrator,3 served from July 1991 through the time of Hasham's promotion denial.CBOE's offices maintain four types of auditing positions in the out-of-state district offices, entry level Tax Auditor I (“Auditor I”), Tax Auditor II (“Auditor II”), Associate Tax Auditor (“Auditor III”)  and Staff Tax Auditor.   The out-of-state district has a long standing practice of promoting all Auditor I's to Auditor II, provided they successfully complete the mandatory probationary period and meet job expectations.   Similarly, there is a long standing practice of promoting all Tax Auditor II's to Tax Auditor III provided they pass the required examination and have an acceptable job performance.   As CBOE's most senior tax auditing position, Staff Tax Auditor is a competitive post, requiring a promotional exam score within the top three ranks.   This position has the responsibility of performing difficult and complex audits-audits of large, multi-national corporations.Under CBOE's competitive promotion system, auditors desiring to be considered for a particular promotion must initially express an interest in the particular promotion and achieve one of the top three scores on the applicable promotional exam, which consists of both a written and an oral exam.   Promotional exams are given approximately every two years and candidates who score above a minimum 70% on the exam are ranked based on their scores on an information list.4  When a vacancy arises, the CBOE Selection Unit certifies a list containing the names and addresses of “eligible candidates” for the position to the appointing authority.   Only those candidates who have scored in the highest three ranks on the applicable exam and initially expressed an interest in the particular position at the time the list was certified are considered “eligible candidates” (i.e., “they are ‘reachable’ for the vacancy”).   The candidates on the certification list are then contacted a second time to determine if they are interested in that particular vacancy.5  Also, CBOE's promotion policy provides that all employees, regardless of their field office location, are permitted to compete for promotions within the out-of-state district.Plaintiff Hasham is a U.S. citizen and has been employed by CBOE since 1981 as an out-of-state district auditor in the Chicago office.   He received promotions to Auditor II and III and after a competitive exam process, was promoted to Staff Tax Auditor in 1988.   In 1990, Hasham took the promotional exam for a Supervisor I position, and scored the second highest exam in the Chicago office.   In 1992, Hasham again took the exam and scored the highest among the Chicago, New York and Houston offices.   He also passed the Supervising Tax Auditor II (“Supervisor II”) exam, which tests for knowledge and skills above what is tested on the Supervisor I exam.   As a result, Hasham's name appeared on the Houston office certification lists in 1991 and 1992.In July 1993, a Supervisor I position in the Houston office became available and at the time, Brian Wiggins (“Wiggins”), Hasham and Steve Smith (“Smith”) were ranked within the top three ranks on the applicable certification list, 1, 2 and 3, respectively.   During the first week of August 1993, Hasham called Zigelman to inquire about the Supervisor I position.   During the conversation, Hasham advised Zigelman that he had three school-age children and inquired about the quality of the Houston public schools.   Hasham asserts that after the conversation, Zigelman criticized his Indian/Pakistani

accent to a fellow Houston employee6 and said that Hasham was worrying about the Houston schools “as if he would get the job.”7

On August 18, 1993, Zigelman participated in a phone interview with Hasham that lasted but a few minutes with Zigelman asking only a few general questions.   Despite the fact that Zigelman admitted at trial that Hasham's performance in the job interview was “excellent,” Hasham did not receive the promotion.   Instead, Smith, a white auditor in the Houston office, was selected.A. Qualifications of Hasham and SmithHasham scored an 87 on the Supervisor I exam while Smith scored an 83.   Hasham has a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Karachi, Pakistan, and a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration and a Masters of Science degree in Accounting from Roosevelt University in Chicago.   At the time of the promotion at issue, Hasham had informed Zigelman that he was a certified public accountant (“CPA”), while Smith on the other hand, had a Bachelor's degree in accounting but was not qualified as a CPA.According to Zigelman's testimony at trial, prior to his promotion of Smith, every supervisor in the Houston office was a CPA.   Further, as of September 1993, Hasham had twelve and one-half years of tax auditing out-of-district accounts experience in contrast to Smith's six years.   Moreover, Hasham had completed several difficult and large “mega” audits (audits of large multi-national corporations) for CBOE, while Smith had yet to complete even one as of September 1993 and had more aged audits8 than Hasham.   Also, prior to recommending Smith for the promotion, Zigelman contacted Lynn Thompson, Hasham's supervisor at the time, and received a favorable reference.B. Zigelman's Promotion DecisionZigelman recommended Smith for the Supervisor I position and district administrator Henline concurred.9  Zigelman, in an affidavit filed with the trial court, claimed that he chose Smith for four reasons:  (1) he worked with Smith personally and knew the quality of his work firsthand;  (2) experience did not play a major role in the ultimate promotion decision because the candidates were equally experienced;  (3) he preferred to promote from in-house to improve worker morale;  and (4) he wanted to retain another employee, Carol Cross (“Cross”) who caused the vacancy by requesting a voluntary demotion.   In making his decision, Zigelman admitted that he did not consider the complexity of the audits that the respective candidate had responsibility for nor did he consider Hasham's superior experience to that of Smith.   He also stated that he did not take into account that Hasham had been asked to train new auditors, teach a law class or temporarily fill in for a supervisor.   Further, prior to 1993, Zigelman on two occasions had an opportunity to make promotions to supervisory positions:  Carol Cross and Joe Clayton.10

Following Smith's promotion, Hasham filed his discrimination claim with the EEOC and thereafter with the district court.   After a jury trial, Hasham was awarded back pay and compensatory damages.   On post-trial motions, the trial judge upheld the jury's liability verdict while vacating the compensatory damages award and awarded Plaintiff $15,548 in back pay, calculated from the date of his promotion denial, $4,188.48 in interest, the Supervisor I promotion with seniority, calculated from the date of his promotion denial, and attorneys fees and costs.   Defendant CBOE appeals.II. ISSUESOn appeal, Appellant CBOE argues that the record fails to lend support to a finding of intentional national-origin discrimination;  the district court committed reversible error in its evidentiary rulings and jury instruction;  and the jury's verdict was based upon passion and prejudice.III. DISCUSSIONA. Intentional National Origin Discrimination CBOE argues that the record fails to support the jury's finding of intentional discrimination.   Noting that the trial court denied CBOE's motion for a judgment as a matter of law on these grounds, we interpret Appellant's issue presented for review as a challenge to the court's denial which we review de novo.   See Williams v. Pharmacia, 137 F.3d 944, 948 (7th Cir.1998).   This Court is limited to deciding only whether the evidence presented at trial, with all the reasonable inferences drawn there from, “is sufficient to support the verdict when viewed in the light most favorable to the [plaintiff].”   See Collins v. Kibort, 143 F.3d 331, 335 (7th Cir. 1998).   We will overturn a jury verdict for the plaintiff only if we conclude that “no rational jury could have found for the plaintiff.”   See Emmel v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 95 F.3d 627, 629(7th Cir. 1996).   Indeed, this standard is applied “stringently in discrimination cases where witness credibility is often crucial.”  Williams, 137 F.3d at 948. Hasham's discrimination claim arises under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a), which makes it unlawful for an employer to “discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's ․ national origin.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a).   CBOE denies that Hasham's national origin played a role in its decision to promote Smith over him and claims that it promoted Smith for performance and business reasons wholly unrelated to Hasham's national origin.   The two accepted ways of establishing that an employer violated this prohibition are:  first, by direct evidence (taking the form of, “I did not promote you because of your national origin”) or second, indirect evidence.   See Troupe v. May Dept. Stores Co., 20 F.3d 734, 736 (7th Cir.1994).   Because employers are usually careful not to offer smoking gun remarks indicating intentional discrimination, the Supreme Court established the burden shifting approach as a means of evaluating indirect evidence of discrimination.   See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973).   Even so, the elements of proof in an employment discrimination case need not be “rigid, mechanized, or ritualistic.”  Furnco Const. Corp. v. Waters, 438 U.S.

567, 577, 98 S.Ct. 2943, 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978).   Thus, this Circuit has also held that a combination of direct and circumstantial evidence, “none conclusive in itself but together composing a convincing mosaic of discrimination against the plaintiff,” may allow a plaintiff to surpass the summary judgment hurdle.   See Troupe, 20 F.3d 734, 737 (7th Cir.1994).   Nonetheless, the McDonnell Douglas burden shifting framework provides “a useful organizational structure under which the parties and the ․ court can assess the need for a full trial.”   See Sattar v. Motorola, 138 F.3d 1164, 1169 (7th Cir.1998). Under the burden shifting method, the plaintiff must initially establish a prima facie case of unlawful discrimination demonstrating that he or she is in a protected class, qualified for the promotion, did not receive the promotion despite his or her qualifications and that a person not in the protected class was promoted instead (or other such evidence from which one can infer that the employment action was taken for an impermissible purpose).   See St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502, 506, 113 S.Ct. 2742, 125 L.Ed.2d 407 (1993);  Leffel v. Valley Financial Services, 113 F.3d 787, 793 (7th Cir.1997).   Defendant CBOE does not claim that Hasham failed to establish this.   Once the plaintiff has established his prima facie case, an inference of discrimination is created and the defendant has the burden to “clearly set forth, through the introduction of admissible evidence, reasons for its actions which, if believed by the trier of fact, would support a finding that unlawful discrimination was not the cause of the employment action.”  St. Mary's Honor Center, 509 U.S. at 507, 113 S.Ct. 2742 (emphasis and quotations omitted).   Should the defendant do so, the inference of discrimination disappears and the plaintiff must then demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the reasons proffered by the defendant were pretextual for intentional discrimination.   See id.   However, on post-trial review, whether Plaintiff's case is based on direct or indirect evidence, the McDonnell Douglas framework drops out of the analysis and we need only consider whether the record supports the resolution as to the ultimate question of intentional discrimination.   See Collins, 143 F.3d at 335.1. Discriminatory Comments It was revealed at trial that sometime around the month of August 1993, Zigelman made a comment to one of the auditors in the Houston office about the foreign accent of an auditor from the New York office named D. Patel.   Zigelman said that Patel was difficult to understand and then remarked about Hasham, “If you want to hear something difficult, you should have heard that guy from Chicago.   He was extremely difficult to understand.   In fact, how did he expect to be a supervisor if he can't communicate with people.”   Another Houston auditor also testified that he heard Zigelman on another occasion state in a demeaning tone that he could not understand Hasham.   However, Zigelman did testify at trial that there was “absolutely” no reason to believe that Hasham's accent would interfere with his ability to supervise.   (Tr. at 150.)   Also, in February 1992, Ruth Malloy and Pamela Hartman, two auditors in the Houston office, testified that they heard Zigelman say that he did “not want to hire any more foreigners” after he was told that an Asian applicant was waiting to be interviewed. (Tr. at 487, 496.)   We are of the opinion that a reasonable jury could have concluded that, in conjunction with Zigelman's contradictory testimony, his comments about Hasham's accent and comment about the hiring of foreigners demonstrated a discriminatory animus that governed his promotional decision, which we are in no position, “particularly ․ in employment discrimination cases[,] to ․ supplant[ ] our view of the credibility or weight of the evidence for that of ․ the jury.” Hybert v. Hearst Corp., 900 F.2d 1050, 1054 (7th Cir.1990).2. Evidence of Pretext Defendant argues that Smith was promoted for the following reasons:  Zigelman believed that Smith was the most qualified candidate;  to continue promoting in-house employees;  and to accommodate Carol Cross's voluntary demotion.   Obviously, it is the prerogative of the jury to weigh and balance the credibility of each and every witness and disbelieve or believe any or all reasonable testimony and evidence offered to support an employment decision.   See Emmel, 95 F.3d at 633-34.   A jury may also reasonably find the “proffered nondiscriminatory reason pretextual and that the real reason was in fact unlawful discrimination.”   Id. at 634 (citing McDonnell Douglas, 411 U.S. at 804, 93 S.Ct. 1817).   In other words, pretext is “a lie, specifically a phony reason for some [employment] action” by the employer. Perdomo v. Browner, 67 F.3d 140, 144-45 (quoting Russell v. Acme-Evans Co., 51 F.3d 64, 68 (7th Cir.1995)).   Pretext does not require that plausible facts presented by the defendant not be true, only that they not be the reason for the employment decision.   See Emmel, 95 F.3d at 634.   Indeed, circumstantial evidence can be offered to prove that Defendant's purported reasons for the promotion decision are not worthy of belief and thus pretextual.   See Huff v. UARCO, 122 F.3d 374, 380 (7th Cir.1997).   As we have previously stated,[Plaintiff's] circumstantial evidence was not presented in vain, however, for it can be used at the pretext stage of the McDonnell Douglas test to demonstrate the ultimate fact of discrimination.   Bearing this in mind, our task is to determine whether [Plaintiff] has come forward with sufficient evidence from which a trier of fact could reasonably infer that [her employer] denied her training or promotion on the basis of her race or national origin․Pafford v. Herman, 148 F.3d 658, 666 (7th Cir.1998).   Similar to the criminal law context, because “it is [often] so unlikely that direct evidence will be available,” United States v. Ranum, 96 F.3d 1020, 1026 (7th Cir.1996);  accord Emmel, 95 F.3d at 629 (“[E]mployers are usually careful not to generate such [direct discrimination] evidence ․”);  Castleman v. Acme Boot Co., 959 F.2d 1417, 1420 (7th Cir.1992) (noting that direct evidence of intent to discriminate is rarely found), we are of the opinion that there should be “nothing novel about establishing [intentional discrimination] through the use of circumstantial evidence, for ․ circumstantial evidence is not less probative than direct evidence, and, in some cases is even more reliable.”  United States v. Griffin, 150 F.3d 778, 785 (7th Cir.1998) (citations and quotations omitted).

From a review of the record, it seems evident that the testimony at trial raised substantial credibility issues relating to Zigelman's often contradictory proffered reasons for promoting Smith instead of Hasham.   At deposition, Zigelman testified that he believed that Smith, as a supervisor, would relate well to the staff.   On the other hand, a number of other Houston employees contradicted Zigelman's testimony and stated that Smith stayed to himself and thus, rarely interacted with people.  (Tr. at 424-25, 497.)   Smith even admitted that after two years on the job, he had yet to learn all the names of the Houston auditors.  (Tr. at 441.)   Further, Zigelman testified at trial that Hasham would make a very good supervisor and do a comparable job to Smith, had an “excellent” interview for the position and had a favorable reference from his supervisor (Tr. at 148.)   In spite of this testimony, on cross examination, Zigelman testified that one of the reasons he disfavored Hasham was because he was an “unknown quantity.”  (Tr. at 249-50.)Furthermore, it is interesting to note that Zigelman asserted in his affidavit that even though there was not a significant difference inexperience between the candidates, he still believed that Smith was the most qualified candidate.   On the other hand, Hasham had a higher exam score than Smith, double the years of experience working for the out-of-state district, more than double the years of experience as a Staff Tax Auditor and even passed the Supervisor II exam.   (Tr. at 147-55.)   Further, at the time of his decision, Zigelman was aware that Hasham was a CPA and Smith was not.  (Tr. at 155.)   Zigelman also was aware that Hasham had substantially more experience working on complex mega audits.  (Tr. at 200-04.)   At deposition, Zigelman even admitted that Hasham was more qualified than Smith when considering individual job-related factors, such as education, exam score and years of experience.   Although this Court has consistently held that courts should not sit as a super personnel department and second-guess an employer's personnel decision, see Brill v. Lante Corp., 119 F.3d 1266, 1272 (7th Cir.1997), these facts certainly put into question Zigelman's credibility as a witness and his proffered denial of any major difference in experience between the candidates, as well as his belief that Smith was the most qualified candidate.Zigelman also stated that although Hasham had superior auditing skills and experience, Staff Tax Auditing skills and experience were not controlling qualifications for a supervisory position.  (Tr. at 148-53.)   However, Zigelman admitted that a Supervisor I oversees the mega audits performed by Staff Tax Auditors and explains complex tax law issues to corporate taxpayers. (Tr. at 152-53.)   Indeed, the qualifications for Staff Tax Auditor and Supervisor I, in particular the communication, supervisory and leadership skills, were identical, admitted Zigelman.  (Tr. at 153-54.)Even though CBOE argues that Zigelman's decision was based, in part, on his desire to promote “in-house” from the Houston office to boost moral, CBOE has failed to point to any evidence in the record of such policy.   In fact, the record reflects that CBOE has rarely promoted from within the Houston office, as evidenced by the fact that most of the senior staff members of the Houston office received their promotions as a result of transfers from other offices.  (Tr. at 181-84.)   Even as an unspoken policy, CBOE contradicts itself on this assertion on several occasions because the record evidences that it has promoted outside candidates over in-house candidates. (Tr. at 404.)   Indeed, it appears that only after Hasham filed his complaint did Zigelman come up with the idea that he preferred to promote in-house.  (Tr. at 305-06.)CBOE further maintained that Smith was promoted so that it could retain Carol Cross.   In contrast, evidence was presented at trial that established that Henline had full authority to create a position for Cross with or without promoting Smith. (Tr. at 341-42.)   Also, Zigelman offered testimony in his affidavit stating, in essence, that he thought so highly of Smith's qualifications that he would have promoted him regardless of his desire to keep Carol Cross on staff. Again, when considering Zigelman's testimony in its totality, the jury might very well have considered his proffered reasons for his promotion decision suspect and thus, unreliable.3. Other Circumstantial Evidence of PretextIndeed, the trial record is replete with Zigelman's contradictory statements to the jury.   At deposition, he testified that according to the California merit system, he was obligated to recommend the most qualified candidate.   Conversely, at trial, Zigelman stated that although the merit system mandates that the most qualified candidate be promoted, he was not required to.  (Tr. at 144-45.)   He made the assertion without any explanation, or much less citing any specifics or examples, but only that his altered testimony was based on “literature” that he had read since his deposition, which he believed suggested that there is no firm requirement that the most qualified person be promoted.  (Tr. at 145.)   Indeed, despite his deposition testimony, Zigelman was steadfast in his statements at trial that when he promoted Smith over Hasham, he was not required to promote the most qualified candidate.  (Tr. at 145-46.) Accordingly, the jury could have reasonably found that Zigelman did not follow CBOE promotion policy, or, at the very least, again found Zigelman's explanation incredulous.11

At trial, Zigelman also testified that during the phone interview with Hasham, he asked him questions to determine whether his qualifications were superior to that of Smith.  (Tr. at 156-57.)   At the deposition, however, Zigelman testified that during Hasham's telephone interview, he asked “[n]ot a single question” to determine his qualifications.  (Tr. at 159.)12  Indeed, Zigelman's failure to express consistent explanations at trial or deposition could compel a jury to find that his proffered reasons for promoting Smith were pretextual for something much more invidious.   See also Perfetti v. First Nat. Bank of Chicago, 950 F.2d 449, 456 (7th Cir.1991)  (“If at the time of the adverse employment decision the decision maker gave one reason, but at the time of the trial gave another reason which was unsupported by the documentary evidence the jury could reasonably conclude that the new reason was a pretextual after-the-fact justification.”)   We also

are aware that Zigelman was the decision maker relating to the promotion and thus, his credibility, which was thoroughly impeached, was crucial to this case. As we have previously stated,[W]e will not second-guess a jury on credibility issues.   While this court's review is confined to the “cold pages” of an appellate transcript, the jury had an opportunity to observe the verbal and non-verbal behavior of the witnesses, including the subject's reactions and responses to the interrogatories, their facial expressions, attitudes, tone of voice, eye contact, posture and body movements․  [I]t is not the task of this appellate court to reconsider the evidence or assess the credibility of the witnesses.United States v. Hickok, 77 F.3d 992, 1006 (7th Cir.1996) (citations and quotations omitted).   Being “particularly careful in employment discrimination cases to avoid supplanting our view of the credibility or weight of the evidence for that of both the jury (in its verdict) and the judge (in not interfering with the verdict),” Hybert, 900 F.2d at 1054, we hold that CBOE was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law because, when viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff as we must, we conclude that a rational jury could have found that CBOE intentionally discriminated against Hasham on the basis of his national origin.   See Williams, 137 F.3d at 948-49.13

B. The District Court's Evidentiary Rulings Defendant CBOE contends that the district court committed reversible error when it made the following evidentiary rulings:  (1) admitted evidence of Smith's aged audits;14 (2)admitted evidence of Hasham's prior promotions; (3) admitted Zigelman's alleged comments regarding the “hiring of foreigners” and Hasham's accent;  and (4) admitted and denied various other evidence.   We give the trial court's evidentiary rulings special deference and will overrule them only for an abuse of discretion.   See United States v. Zizzo, 120 F.3d 1338, 1351 (7th Cir.1997).   But, we do not alter a district court's judgment every time we conclude there is an abuse of discretion in the admission of evidence.   See United States v. Wimberly, 60 F.3d 281, 286 (7th Cir.1995).   Indeed, “[n]o error in either the admission or the exclusion of evidence ․ is ground for granting a new trial or for setting aside a verdict or for vacating, modifying, or otherwise disturbing a judgment or order, unless refusal to take such action appears to the court inconsistent with substantial justice.”  Fed. R.Civ. P. 61 (emphasis added);  see Old Republic Ins. Co. v. Employers Reinsurance Corp., 144 F.3d 1077, 1082 (7th Cir.1998);  United States v. Saunders, 973 F.2d 1354, 1359 (7th Cir.1992).   A trial judge's evidentiary errors satisfy this standard only if a significant chance exists that they affected the outcome of the trial.   See Collins v. Kibort, 143 F.3d 331, 339 (7th Cir.1998).1. Smith's Aged Audits CBOE claims that Smith's monthly time reports reflecting his aged audits are irrelevant because Zigelman did not base his promotion decision on the number of aged audits of each candidate.   Thus, the defendant argues, the only evidentiary value of Smith's audits is to show that Hasham was more qualified.   Again, Defendant is correct in pointing out that this Court has consistently avoided stepping into the role of a super-personnel department and second guessing legitimate personnel decisions.   See Brill v. Lante Corp., 119 F.3d 1266, 1272 (7th Cir.1997);  Rand v. CF Industries, Inc., 42 F.3d 1139, 1146 (7th Cir.1994).   However, CBOE claims that Zigelman knew the quality of Smith's work product and work habits, and still believed that Smith was the most qualified candidate.   Smith's work performance, as evidenced in part by his monthly time reports, represents one of the criteria that Zigelman allegedly based his promotion decision on.   Because these reports reflect that even though CBOE expected that audits “be completed within nine months[;]” in 1993, “Smith alone had some five or six aged audits” not completed within nine months.  (Tr. at 206-07.)   Indeed, they are probative of whether Zigelman was in fact “very impressed with the quality of [Smith's] work” and consequently, whether this proffered reason was pretextual for discriminatory intent.   See Emmel, 95 F.3d at 633.   Smith's monthly time reports, along with Zigelman's acknowledgment that he spoke to Smith “many times” about his unacceptable number of aged audits, (Tr. at 207), contradicted Defendant's above assertion about the quality of Smith's work15 and was thus relevant as indirect discrimination evidence.   Accordingly, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted evidence of Smith's tardiness in the completion of his audits.16

2. Evidence of Prior Promotions CBOE contends that the district court erred when it allowed Hasham to testify about prior promotions that Zigelman was not involved in.   Hasham testified that despite receiving the second highest score on the supervisor promotional exam in 1990 and the highest score in the Chicago, New York and Houston offices on the 1992 exam, a Supervisor I position was filled without announcement in 1991 and Hasham was passed over for a vacancy in Chicago in 1992 in favor of a less qualified American-born Caucasian. Although Zigelman was not involved in the 1991 and 1992 promotion decisions, Henline was the approving official for these and the instant promotion.   Consequently, Henline's prior promotional decisions were relevant as circumstantial evidence of discriminatory conduct by Defendant in the instant promotion. Accordingly, we are of the opinion that the district court's decision to admit this evidence did not rise to the level of an abuse of discretion.17

3. Prejudicial CommentsCBOE, covering all of its tracks, also alleges that the testimony by Houston employees about Zigelman's alleged discriminatory comments were inadmissible stray remarks.   Zigelman's two comments at issue, occurring on different occasions, are that he did “not want to hire any more foreigners” and, stated in a demeaning tone, he couldn't understand Hasham's accent.

 In relation to the statement about foreigners, Defendant contends that the statement occurred 18 months prior to the promotion at issue and thus, was too remote in time and bore no relationship to Hasham because it dealt with hiring and not promoting.   CBOE also asserts that Zigelman's comment that he couldn't understand Hasham's accent, allegedly stated in a demeaning tone, is too ambiguous to prove intentional discrimination. Defendant's argument might have some merit if this was solely a direct proof case because remarks must indeed be related to the employment promotion decision to evidence discriminatory intent.   See Monaco, 1 F.3d at 660.   However, because Hasham presents his case through “indirect” evidence, remarks relied upon need only be probative of discriminatory bias when determining, along with other evidence, if Zigelman's proffered reasons for promotion were pretextual.   See Huff, 122 F.3d at 385.   Further, when evaluating the probative value of Zigelman's statements, his remarks do not stand alone;  in an indirect proof case, “no one piece of evidence need support a finding of” discrimination, but rather the court must take “the facts as a whole.” Futrell v. J.I. Case, 38 F.3d 342, 350 (7th Cir.1994).   The remark is only but a part of a pattern of falsehoods, contradictions and discriminatory statements by Zigelman that, as a whole, convincingly demonstrate intentional discrimination.   Thus, Defendant's distinctions between “hiring” and “promoting” and the 18 months separating the “foreigners” remark and the promotion in question are unpersuasive when considering the remark in conjunction with the aforementioned evidence of pretext. With regard to Zigelman's remark about Hasham's accent, Zigelman also testified that he had no reason to believe that Hasham's accent would interfere with his ability to supervise.  (Tr. at 150.)   When contrasted with Zigelman's tone and comment that he was not able to understand Hasham's accent and could not see “how did [Hasham] expect to be a supervisor if he can't communicate with people,” (Tr. at 431), again, serious credibility issues for Defendant's main witness, Zigelman, are raised, which could very likely have been one of the foundation blocks for the jury's clear finding of intentional discrimination.   Also, as the district court pointed out, the “accent” comment supports an inference of discriminatory intent, see Huff, 122 F.3d at 385, because accent is generally recognized as a manifestation of national origin and the comment was uttered by the decision maker in this case.   Accordingly, we are of the opinion that the trial judge did not abuse its discretion by admitting the remarks which allowed the jury to weigh their significance.   See Partington v. Broyhill Furniture Indus., Inc., 999 F.2d 269 (7th Cir.1993).4. Miscellaneous Evidentiary Rulings Defendant also challenges various other evidentiary rulings of the trial court.   The conduct of a trial and rulings on evidence, motions and trial direction, are subject to the sound discretion of the trial court.   See United States v. Doyle, 121 F.3d 1078, 1093 (7th Cir.1997).   Absent manifest abuse, a district court has and must have wide discretion over the scheduling and administration of a trial.   See United States v. Murvine, 743 F.2d 511, 514 (7th Cir.1984).   The trial court allowed Hasham to testify that Lynn Thompson, his supervisor in 1993, said that she believed that Hasham was more qualified than the other candidates, and also about his impressions relating to the 1992 Carol Cross promotion.   Because the record reveals that Defendant's line of questioning opened the door to such testimony, (Tr. at 104), there was no abuse of discretion by the trial judge.   Likewise, we are convinced that the trial court's admission of the testimony of Smith's co-workers focusing on Smith's work performance, which rebutted Zigelman's proffered reasons for the promotion and suggested pretext, was proper.   Further, because of the wide latitude necessarily afforded trial judges on relevance rulings, see Zizzo, 120 F.3d at 1351, we also refuse to hold that the denial of the following evidence offered by Defendant was an abuse of discretion:  Smith's performance evaluation, testimony of a non-decision maker as to the meaning of the ranking regulations, Henline's belief that Zigelman's reasons were valid, and Hasham's failure to mitigate his damages.   Finally, the trial court's decision not to allow the introduction of purported evidence of Zigelman's non-discriminatory animus in his pre-1991 promotional decisions also does not manifest abuse.   The trial judge's exclusion of testimony regarding Zigelman's friendly interaction with an employee of Iranian decent, an employee married to an Iranian, and exclusion of a photograph from his son's bar mitzvah picturing “minority” friends, was proper because of the apparent prejudice and lack of relevance to the case such evidence demonstrates.   Accordingly, we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in its evidentiary rulings.C. Jury Instruction Defendant next contends that the district court improperly denied its offered jury instructions on the issues of pretext, stray comments and time barred evidence.   Our review of a trial judge's jury instructions is limited to determining whether, as a whole, the instructions were sufficient to properly inform the jury of the applicable law.   See Hennessy v. Penril Datacomm Networks, Inc., 69 F.3d 1344, 1350 (7th Cir.1995).   The review consists of two parts:  the first question to be answered is whether the instructions misstate or insufficiently state the law.   See Maltby v. Winston, 36 F.3d 548, 560 (7th Cir.1994).   If they do, we next tackle the question of whether the flawed instruction “confused or misled the jury causing prejudice to a litigant.”  Doe v. Burnham, 6 F.3d 476, 479 (7th Cir.1993).  “[I]nstructions ‘which are accurate statements of the law and which are supported by the record will not be disturbed on appeal.’ ”   United States v. Vang, 128 F.3d 1065, 1069 (7th Cir.1997) (citation omitted).   However, even an erroneous instruction will be reversed “only if the jury's comprehension of the issues is so misguided that it prejudiced the complaining party.”  Id. (quoting United States v. Smith, 103 F.3d 600, 606 (7th Cir.1996) (quotation omitted)). Indeed, “we review a trial court's instructions to the jury with great deference.”   See United States v. Kelly, 167 F.3d 1176, 1178 (7th Cir.1999) (citation omitted).   When conducting this deferential review, litigants often “rephrase and reframe the testimony to their benefit and take jury instructions out of context when making their appellate arguments.”  

United States v. Mancillas, 183 F.3d 682, 707 (7th Cir.1999).   Thus, we analyze the jury instructions as a whole and not piecemeal to determine if the applicable instruction is an accurate recitation of the law.   See id.;   United States v. Liporace, 133 F.3d 541, 545 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1131, 118 S.Ct. 1823, 140 L.Ed.2d 959 (1998). Defendant does not argue that the trial judge's instructions were contrary to law or unsupported by the record.   Instead, CBOE argues that the trial judge should have included CBOE's proposed instructions.   First, CBOE offered its version of a St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502, 113 S.Ct. 2742, 125 L.Ed.2d 407 (1993), instruction that charged the jury that “even if they find that the reasons presented by the defendant were not the real reasons, the true reasons for their decision, that they do not then have to find for the plaintiff.”  (Tr. at 467.)   The trial judge rejected the proposed instruction as argumentative because it was phrased as a negative instruction.  (Tr. at 468.)   Further, even though CBOE's proposed instruction was not entirely supported by Hicks,18 “a judge [also] need not deliver instructions describing all valid legal principles.”  Gehring v. Case Corp., 43 F.3d 340, 343 (7th Cir.1994).   Rather than describing each possible inference of the evidence, the judge may and usually should leave the subject of the interpretation of the evidence to the argument of counsel.   See United States v. Sblendorio, 830 F.2d 1382, 1391 (7th Cir.1987).   Here, after review of the record, we are convinced that the trial judge issued a balanced and fair instruction that accurately stated the law.   Indeed, the court graciously allowed Defendant's lawyer to ask the jury to draw the inference expressed in his proposed instruction.  (Tr. at 468.) Defendant also requested that a stray discriminatory comments instruction be given:  comments which are not based on national origin or which cannot be reasonably interpreted as national-origin slurs or derogatory comments, do not constitute national origin discrimination and that evidence of a decisions maker's occasional or sporadic use of stereotypical remarks is generally insufficient, without more, to establish a Title VII violation.  (Tr. at 520.)   CBOE also requested that the trial judge instruct the jury that such remarks must be related to the employment decision and remarks that are too remote in time or are ambiguous cannot be evidence of discrimination.  (Id.)  Again, the district court declined to include these instructions because they were improper as written and created the appearance that the trial judge was commenting on the evidence.  (Tr. at 521.)   Instead, consistent with his evidentiary rulings,19 the judge stated that the derogatory comments were made by Zigelman, the decision maker for the promotion.  (Tr. at 521.)   Nonetheless, the trial judge exercised proper discretion by allowing Defendant's attorney to make the argument to the jury.   (Id.) Finally, Defendant contends that the trial court should have instructed the jury that CBOE cannot be held liable for any acts that transpired before March 1993, 300 days prior to Plaintiff filing his charge with the EEOC under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1).   CBOE was concerned that the jury would assign liability for previous employment acts that were presented by Hasham as circumstantial evidence of discrimination.   The trial judge declined to include the instruction because the proposed instruction improperly discussed statute of limitation problems and Hasham was not claiming relief for CBOE's prior employment decisions.  (Tr. at 521-22.)20  Instead, the court allowed Defendant's counsel to make the distinction in closing argument and also expressed its willingness to issue the instruction should Plaintiff's attorney argue for relief for those prior non-promotions.  (Tr. at 522-23.)   Defendant does not contend that Plaintiff's counsel made such an argument.CBOE does not challenge that the final jury instructions were unsupported by the record or the law, see Vang, 128 F.3d at 1069, but rather, that the court should have included its proposed additions.   In each of the district court's denials, Defendant was allowed to raise to the jury's attention the inferences referred to in its proposed instructions in closing argument.   See Sblendorio, 830 F.2d at 1391.   Accordingly, because the trial court's jury instructions were supported by the record and were a fair and accurate recitation of the law, we are convinced that there is no reason to disturb the trial judge's denials of Defendant's proposed additions to the instructions.   See Kelly, 167 F.3d at 1178.D. The Jury's Verdict It appears that CBOE argues that the district court erred when it denied CBOE's motion for a new trial.21  Defendant contends that the liability verdict was unsupported by the record and based on passion because the jury awarded Plaintiff $350,000 in compensatory damages without any supporting evidence.   This Court reviews the district court's denial of the motion for a new trial for “clear abuse of discretion,” see Emmel, 95 F.3d at 636, by looking to see if “the verdict is against the weight of the evidence.”  McNabola, 10 F.3d at 516.On a motion to alter the judgment, the district court vacated the $350,000 compensatory damages award because Hasham failed to offer any testimony dealing with the question of compensatory damages such as physical or emotional injury other than lost earnings.   Defendant attempts to bootstrap its contention that there was no evidence to support a finding of liability against CBOE on the trial judge's finding of a lack of evidence for compensatory damages.   We disagree because, as previously discussed, the jury's liability verdict against the defendant is based on circumstantial evidence of pretext.   Because the jury's liability verdict was grounded in evidence and testimony revealed at trial, Defendant has not established that the jury's verdict is against the weight of the evidence.   Thus, we hold that there was no abuse of discretion by the trial judge in denying the motion for a new trial on liability.22

IV. CONCLUSIONWe agree with the district court's denial of Defendant's motions for a judgment as a matter of law and denial of Defendant's motion for new trial because the evidence presented at trial supports the jury's finding of intentional national-origin discrimination against Defendant.   We also hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its evidentiary rulings and jury instructions.   The liability and amended damages judgment of the district court are

affirmed.FOOTNOTES1.   The district court's jurisdiction over Plaintiff's case is based on federal subject matter under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended and 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a)(4).2.   The attorneys fees and costs awards have not been determined as a result of the district court issuing an order on September 3, 1998, staying the entry of a money judgment.3.   As the out-of-state district administrator, Henline was required to approve all promotions and hires.4.   It appears from the record that applicants may review the information list.5.   Presumably, a candidate who had scored within the top three ranks on a promotional exam and who had previously expressed an interest in the position at the time of certification of the list, may withdraw for a number of reasons, such as, the particular vacancy is in another state.Further, Plaintiff contends that, by law, after the promotional list is certified, even if a candidate in the first rank withdraws, the promoting authority cannot then drop down and consider a candidate in the fourth rank.   Defendant disputes this by arguing that under the statute, candidates must indicate “their willingness to accept appointment under the conditions of the employment specified” in order to be considered within the “three highest ranks.”6.   James Zoes testified that Zigelman stated, “If you really want to hear something difficult, you should have heard that guy from Chicago.   He was extremely difficult to understand.   In fact, how did he expect to be a supervisor if he can't communicate with people.”  (Tr. at 430-31.)7.   Gregory Joseph (Tr. at 420-21).8.   Audits that remained uncompleted after six months.9.   It appears that the parties and the trial court did not consider Wiggins, a white candidate with the highest score, a serious contender for the Houston Supervisor I promotion.   As the district court pointed out on the motion for summary judgment, Zigelman, as the decision maker, apparently did not seriously consider Wiggins for the promotion because Wiggins had previously declined a promotion to the Houston office and was in line for a better promotion in the Sacramento office.   Although Zigelman disputes that these factors influenced his decision, a jury could have reasonably found that Wiggins was not a serious contender for the Supervisor I promotion at issue.10.   The trial judge limited evidence regarding Zigelman's and Henline's practice of promoting minorities to the time frame between 1991 and 1993 and to the positions of Supervisor and Staff Tax Auditor.  (Tr. at 277-81.)   Under this restriction, Hasham presented further evidence that as a result of promotions and hires during Henline's tenure, out of 31 supervisory positions in the out-of-state district offices during the period from 1992 to 1993, only two were held by non-whites.  (Tr. at 414.)11.   Further, Defendant, in essence, presented the jury with two contradictory and suspect lines of argument:  (1) Zigelman promoted Smith because he was the most qualified, or (2) because Zigelman was not required to promote the most qualified candidate, he was able to promote Smith.   Again, a jury could have reasonably found that each alternative contradicted either the trial evidence relating to Smith's qualifications or CBOE's promotion policy, respectively.12.   Hasham contends that Zigelman was obligated to promote one of the candidates from the top three ranks at time of certification and that at certification, Smith was the fourth ranked candidate.   Defendant responded by contending that Zigelman properly moved Smith up into the top three ranks because one of the candidates was not interested in the Houston promotion.   Although the parties dispute the proper interpretation of CBOE's promotions regulation, Zigelman felt compelled to make handwritten changes to Smith's rank to show that he, on paper, followed the ranking requirement.  (Tr. at 296.)   Nonetheless, the jury was free to weigh all the evidence relating to pretext, including Zigelman's admission that he did not feel obligated to make any such handwritten changes to the ranks of any other certification lists.  (Tr. at 296).13.   As previously discussed, Defendant also argues that the jury is not a super-personnel department that should second guess CBOE's alleged failure to promote the most qualified candidate.   Although CBOE correctly describes this Circuit's previous holdings, Appellant's argument, however, is inapplicable to this Court's instant inquiry because, as discussed above, on post-trial appeal, “we consider only whether the record supports the resolution of the ultimate question of intentional discrimination.”   Piraino v. International Orientation Resources, Inc., 137 F.3d 987, 990 n. 1 (7th Cir.1998).14.   The monthly time reports reflect the status of each auditor's assignments.   At trial, Zigelman admitted that he spoke to Smith on a number of occasions about the high number of audits he had yet to complete after nine months.  (Tr. at 206-07.)15.   It appears that Hasham had an acceptable number of aged audits.16.   Hasham also claims that CBOE waived the issue of the admissibility of Smith's monthly time reports by not challenging the pretrial order through a motion in limine.   However, the record reflects that, at a pretrial hearing, CBOE orally objected to including the monthly time reports in the pretrial order.   Nonetheless, we need not resolve this issue in light of the above discussion dealing with the time reports' probative value vis-a-vis pretext.17.   Further, Defendant contends that evidence of possible discriminatory conduct that is time-barred is inadmissible.   CBOE bases its claim on Rush v. Scott Specialty Gases, 113 F.3d 476 (3d Cir.1997), which found that untimely failure to promote claims prejudice timely claims and the computation of damages, and Dasgupta v. University of Wis., 121 F.3d

1138 (7th Cir.1997), which involved an untimely continuing violation claim.   However, because Hasham has neither based his claim on a continuing violation argument nor sued based on not receiving those prior promotions, we find CBOE's argument misplaced.18.   Hicks held that a plaintiff who has withstood the defendant's motion for summary judgment and has not been able to obtain summary judgment for himself and must therefore go to trial, can ask the jury to infer discrimination from the defendant's failure to present a credible explanation for why it terminated the plaintiff's employment and replaced him with a member of a nonprotected group.   See Hicks, 509 U.S. at 507, 113 S.Ct. 2742.19.   As previously discussed, we hold that the trial judge properly admitted Zigelman's comments relating to the hiring of foreigners and Hasham's accent.20.   As previously discussed, Defendant's argument that evidence of time-barred discriminatory conduct is inadmissible is inapplicable here because Plaintiff has neither based his case nor sued on a continuing violation claim.21.   Throughout its briefs, Defendant formulates the issues presented for review poorly.   CBOE presents this question for review as whether the jury's verdict was based upon passion and prejudice, and thus should be reversed.   Framing the issue and its accompanying discussion in such a way is uninstructive because it disregards the district court's denial of Defendant's motion for a new trial on these grounds which is the focus of our review.   Thus, the Court interprets the above question presented as whether the district court abused its discretion by denying the motion for a new trial because the jury's verdict was based upon passion and prejudice.22.   Plaintiff's attorney also requests that this Court sanction Defendant for filing a frivolous appeal.   Indeed, we are at a loss as to what basis in law supports Defendant's belief that the district court erred when it refused to admit a photograph, in which Zigelman was not even pictured, of his “minority” friends at his son's bar mitzvah as evidence of Zigelman's lack of discriminatory animus in promoting Plaintiff.   Otherwise, by and large, Defendant's arguments are sufficiently based in law and fact.COFFEY, Circuit Judge.http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1177515.html

No results foundSorry but "Syed Farouk " didn't return any results.

This could be because a government entity hasn't complied with Transparent California's public records

requests. Click here to view see which government entities haven't complied or try your search again:

© 2015 Transparent California

About | Contact | Blog | Disclaimer | FAQ

http://transparentcalifornia.com/salaries/search/?q=Syed+Farouk&y=2013

No results foundSorry but "Sayeed Farouk" didn't return any results.

This could be because a government entity hasn't complied with Transparent California's public records

requests. Click here to view see which government entities haven't complied or try your search again:

© 2015 Transparent CaliforniaAbout | Contact | Blog | Disclaimer | FAQ

http://transparentcalifornia.com/salaries/search/?q=Sayeed+Farouk