17
tical Integration: Make, or buy?

Vertical Integration: Make, or buy?. What are the issues? Technological Strategic Contractual Organizational In a dynamic context

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Vertical Integration: Make, or buy?

What are the issues?

Technological

Strategic

Contractual

Organizational

In a dynamic context

Technological

The ability to partition the work may be critical (I can’t “buy” if I can’t split the work off)

But task boundaries, degree of modularity etc may be endogenous –a product of the history of competition and of each firm’s strategic choices, as well as “given by nature”

Strategic

Avoid double marginalization

Control capacity

Generate complements

Control the evolution of interfaces

Contractual

If lawyers were free and contracts were

perfect…

Specialized assets create the incentive

for “hold up”

Uncertainty

Complexity

BUT:

Organizational

What happens to “effort” – to creativity, to entrepreneurial drive, to initiative – once we integrate?

Contracts , Organizations , and the Integration Decision

Independent contractor

Supplier

Asset

User

The supplier has “residual control rights”

Integrated firm

Supplier

Asset

User

The user has “residual control rights”

Hold up by independent contractors

Supplier

Asset

User

Result: Unwillingness to make “specific investments”

In a supplier

Threat: “Now that you’ve made

that investment in working with me --let’s renegotiate...”

Hold up within an integrated firm

Supplier

Asset

User

Result: Employees reluctant to invest in employer

specific assets

Threat: “We’ll pay you

what you can get elsewhere”

One – Shot Supply Relationships Independent contractor

Supplier

Asset

User

(Value = Q)

“Effort”

Intermediate good

User

(Value = P)

What do the supplier’s incentives look like?

What will the supplier try to do?

One – Shot Supply Relationships Independent contractor

What will happen if:

One – Shot Supply Relationships: Integrated Firm

Supplier

Asset

User

“Effort”

Intermediate good

User

(Value = P)

What do the employee’s incentives look like?

What will the employee try to do?

Make, Buy or Cooperate?

Supplier

Asset

User

(Value = Q)

“Effort”

Intermediate good

User

(Value = P)

Can relational contracts Fix this problem?

Make, buy or cooperate: Using a repeated game

$$$

Time

“Cheat” – fail to pay Q, pay P instead

Honor agreement: Pay Q

Punishment

What will make cooperation feasible?

Low incentives to cheat

“A reputation to uphold”

High incentives to cooperate

The expectation of an enduring relationship

The belief that the other guy understands “the nature of the game”