Vermont Letter

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Vermont Letter

    1/3

    219 North Main Street, Suite 402, Barre, VT 05641

    (p) 802-479-1030 (!) 802-479-1835

    Me"o to SB#$ %o&ernin' State

    MM*+#NM

    T*. SB#$ %o&ernin' State

    /+*M. +eea oo"e, Ver"ont Seretar o! uation

    SB$T. i"itation o! per!or"ane ate'orie !or upportin' i"pro&e"ent in

    earnin' an aein' hoo e!!eti&ene

    #T. No&e"er 2, 2014

    *ur purpoe in "eetin' toa i to appro&e per!or"ane threho on the SB#$

    ae"ent in o"piane ith the !eera reuire"ent that State report on tuentper!or"ane in ter" o! per!or"ane ate'orie an re&ie the :perent

    pro!iient;< Ver"ont oe not upport the ue o! per!or"ane threho a a &ai

    "ean o! o""uniatin' aout per!or"ane; =n aition, a o! et e ha&e itte

    e"piria e&iene reate to the &aiit o! the propoe ut ore !or atua

    iri"inatin' eteen thoe ho are :oe'e an areer rea< an thoe ho are

    not;

    *ur onern i a the "ore ree&ant 'i&en the hi'h ta>e an antion attahe to

    per!or"ane reati&e to thee threho ore uner !eera poi; Thi i a the "oreorrio"e 'i&en e?teni&e reearh on the e!!et o! peritent ineuait on hoo

    outo"e; Sine Ver"ont hoo, epite ein' hi'h orin' reati&e to the nation, are

    area oniere :o per!or"in'< uner N$B, thi i ha&e itte "ateria i"pat

    in Ver"ont; oe&er, = a" ure it i a onern !or other tate at the tae, here

    hoo i preita !ai ue to proe" that are i''er than the tre"enou e!!ort

    their teaher are "a>in' to i"pro&e the earnin' o! our hiren; # %ar *r!ie

    reent rote.

    Setting absurd standards and then announcing massive failures has undermined public

    support for public schools. . . . We are dismantling public school systems whose problems

    are basically the problems of racial and economic polarization, segregation and economic

    disinvestment. (Educational esearcher, !ugust"September #$%&,p.#')

    =ntea o! reportin' in ter" o! per!or"ane ate'orie, e ou report per!or"ane in

    ter" o! ae ore; # oi o o! e"piria reearh u''et that ae ore

    pro&ie "ore o"pete in!or"ation on per!or"ane an are "ore ue!u !or the

    purpoe o! in!or"in' i"pro&e"ent e!!ort; @e are inete in partiuar to the

  • 8/10/2019 Vermont Letter

    2/3

    Me"o to SB#$ %o&ernin' State

    Aa'e 2o! 3

    reearh o! #nre o1o! the ar&ar %rauate Shoo o! uation in o"in' to

    thee onuion.

    1; Cut scores are arbitrary:$ut ore are et throu'h hu"an u'"ent in a

    tanar ettin' proe, an are there!ore ueti&e eter"ination o!

    :appropriate< e&e o! per!or"ane; SB#$ i !ooin' et pratie to et thee

    ore, ut there i no tru oeti&e a to et threho ore; # SB#$ tet

    are ne, thee per!or"ane e&e are not et preiti&e o! !uture outo"e; =n

    !at, ei'n, SB#$ i a tet o! "ater o! etaihe urriuar tanar; @e

    an on hpotheiCe that it ao apture ee"ent o! o'niti&e an other >i

    that i e ue!u in o""unitie, oe'e an in areer;

    2; Proficiency bands reward schools who push students over bandlevels and

    provide no recognition for growth withinbands:#n anae o! tren or

    "a'nitue o! ore 'ap epen on here the pro!iien threho it reati&e

    to the itriution o! tet ore; /or e?a"pe, a hoo hoe tuent initiaore !ar eo pro!iient "i'ht ha&e &er ar'e 'ain in "ean ae ore, ut i!

    the tuent are ti orin' !ar eo the threho !or pro!iien, thee

    re"ar>ae 'ain i not e apture reportin' in per!or"ane ate'orie; =n

    ontrat, a hoo that e"ontrate &er "oet 'ain (perhap one point

    a&era'e ae ore) "a ee a &er ar'e inreae in the nu"er o! tuent

    orin' a pro!iient, i! it tuent, on a&era'e, are orin' &er oe to the

    pro!iien threho to tart; =n thi ae, the eon hoo ou appear to e

    "ore e!!eti&e, hie in truth the !irt i the "ore e!!eti&e hoo; Thu,

    reportin' in per!or"ane ate'orie itort an "irepreent the true tor o!i"pro&e"ent;

    3; Comparisons of the performance of subgroups (e.g. students in poverty vs.

    more affluent students) are distortedin the a"e a o"parion in the

    per!or"ane o! hoo are itorte;

    +eportin' in per!or"ane ate'orie ha a pui appea. @e i>e the apparent ertaint

    an arit o! ein' ae to ate'oriCe our tuent a :pro!iient;< oe&er, thi

    "irepreent the unerin' o"pe?it o! ahie&e"ent an ontriute to i"piti

    poiie that "a>e it i!!iut to ahie&e our pui purpoe;

    Ver"ont i preent at thi e?erie eaue e are o"pee to o"p ith threho

    reportin' N$B; oe&er, the !ou o! tate-e&e reportin' in Ver"ont i e ae

    ore, an in partiuar, "ean ore an han'e in ini&iua an "ean ore; @e

    eie&e thi i upport "ore reponie ue o! tet ata to in!or" i"pro&e"ent

    e!!ort at the hoo, itrit an uper&ior union e&e; @e enoura'e our SB#$

    1Ho, Andrew Dean. (2008). The problem with proficiency: Limitations of statistics and policy under No Child Left

    Behind. Educational Researcher. 37, 6, p. 351.

  • 8/10/2019 Vermont Letter

    3/3

    Me"o to SB#$ %o&ernin' State

    Aa'e 3o! 3

    partner to ao report uin' ae ore at the tate e&e, o that e an oeti&e

    e"phaiCe the o""it"ent e hare ith repet to ontruti&e ue o! ae"ent to

    upport te"ati i"pro&e"ent in earnin';

    @e ao in&ite our SB#$ partner to oin u in tranparent iuion aout hat e

    urrent an an annot in!er aout tuentD :oe'e an areer reaine< ae on

    SB#$ ore;

    ########