Upload
doanque
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Vented Column Technology Applied Vented Column Technology Applied to Proteomic to Proteomic MudPITMudPIT Analysis onAnalysis on
Long Capillary ColumnsLong Capillary Columns
Andrew W. Guzzetta and Allis S. Chien
Vincent Coates FoundationMass Spectrometry Laboratory
Department of Chemistry Stanford University Stanford California
Last year…. the long column and proteomics
What if?What if?
Space
What if we could do What if we could do MudPITMudPITon a 60 cm column?on a 60 cm column?
Available Column Technologies
Tri-Phasic MudPIT
SCX Reverse PhaseRP
Vented Technology
Reverse PhaseRP
1. Comparison of three directly coupled HPLC MS/MS strategies for identification of proteins from complex mixtures: single-dimension LC-MS/MS, 2-phase MudPIT, and 3-phase MudPIT. W. Hayes McDonald, Ryoma Ohi, David T. Miyamoto, Timothy J. Mitchison, and John R. Yates, III International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Volume 219, Issue 1 , 1 August 2002, Pages 245-251
2. Automation of Nanoscale Microcapillary Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry a Vented Column. Lawrence J. Licklider, Carson C. Thoreen, Junmin Peng and Steven P. Gygi* Anal. Chem. 2002, 74,3076-3083
MudPITMudPIT Meets Vented Column Meets Vented Column Technology Meets The Long Column.Technology Meets The Long Column.
SCX Reverse PhaseRP RP60 cm
Vent/Plug
Building the Double Vented Tetra PhasicMudPIT Device
Building The Building The TriphasicTriphasic MudPITterMudPITter
1 cm = 7 cm
Method
1. Place screen frit in the tee2. Swage with short piece of PEEK3. Pack Poros 104. Wash5. Pack SCX (Whatman Partisil, 5um)6. Wash7. Pack final section of Poros 108. Unswage9. Cut first segment of Poros 10 to length10. Reswage with new PEEK11. Cut off final length of fused silica capillary
Building The Building The TriphasicTriphasicColumnColumn
Continuous Vent Continuous Vent
The Discontinuous VentThe Discontinuous VentTriTri--PhasicPhasic On The ValveOn The Valve
MudPIT Gradients
Optimized for speed to test different models, not optimized for proteomic performance
LoadWashACN bump
Salt &Separate
Gradient 18
Initial conditions30ul/min 0%B
T %B1 510 570 4080 8080.1 5120 Stop
Purpose: Salt bump. Separate peptides on the analytical column.
Gradient 17
Initial conditions30ul/min 0%B
T %B1 54 510 8012 8012.1 520 Stop
Purpose load sampleonto first RP and washand elute onto SCX
10 cm Continuous Vent Human Serum MudPIT
0 mM
12.5 mM
25 mM
50 mM
250 mM
1000 mM
5000 mM
RT: 0.00 - 116.03
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110Time (min)
0
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
100
Rel
ativ
e A
bund
ance 0
50
1000
50
1000
50
100662.0 937.7
900.51068.9
689.2 812.6
1207.81292.7572.0
973.8 673.6481.0519.5 1106.9
1207.8631.5409.9 638.2 992.9
682.7
998.2648.2 993.0637.8625.4831.5
547.5
682.8 831.6764.1656.3 998.1
820.6 831.7
764.21137.8
1246.4
872.6461.9932.9 461.8903.01231.7 1366.1 461.9820.7
60 cm Continuous Vent Human Serum MudPIT
RT: 0.00 - 116.03
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110Time (min)
0
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
100
Rel
ativ
e A
bund
ance 0
50
1000
50
1000
50
100900.3872.8501.1481.1 812.7
1106.9709.1689.1
519.5 1263.4
841.5 1207.9710.5
572.1 556.0 598.6 673.6
409.8 992.91207.9517.4 998.4637.8
841.1573.0
648.3 855.1 831.5868.0543.5565.1
638.2517.3 826.6853.2 841.6
547.6 758.8 831.6683.0660.5
910.5 867.9
831.5
820.8927.6 1137.7 838.0932.9 1352.9851.4
1246.5403.9
872.2950.5
927.6432.2 715.1401.5 406.7
0 mM
12.5 mM
25 mM
50 mM
250 mM
1000 mM
5000 mM
Making the Cut
Comparing 10 and 60 cm Columns at the 25 mMSalt Step Using the Continuous Vent Method
10 CMRT: 22.58 - 95.12
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95Tim e (m in)
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Rel
ativ
e Ab
unda
nce
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100R
elat
ive
Abu
ndan
ce1207.8
631.5
626.7 714.5
714.3409.9
594.1517.4 638.2
992.9
998.2
973.7710.5
522.6522.6 1292.2572.9 841.1520.9 1222.9 1350.0 1118.3 1289.4 1348.4
409.8 992.91207.9517.4
992.8998.4638.4631.5648.1
594.1 637.8
543.6
855.0682.8
841.1
826.5573.01093.7520.9 819.71292.3 1393.6
926.3559.1709.31361.7 533.4
NL:4.03E9Base Peak F: + c ESI Full m s [ 400.00-1400.00] MS 25m m 10cm c
NL:4.11E9Base Peak F: + c ESI Full m s [ 400.00-1400.00] MS 25m m 60cm c
60 CM
XIC Plots For 10 and 60 Columns At The 25 mMSalt Step With The Continuous Vent Method
1.00E10
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70Time (min)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Rel
ativ
e Ab
unda
nce
517.4409.9
626.7631.5
631.2
1207.8
638.3
850.0
998.1
10 cm
1.00E10
35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80Time (min)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Rel
ativ
e Ab
unda
nce
517.3409.8
626.9
631.5
1207.9 638.4
849.8
998.4
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
60 cm
Evaluating The CV and DCV Experiments ByCounting Significant Peptides With Mascot
Formatting Options
CV vs. DCVCV vs. DCVShort vs. LongShort vs. Long
10 cm 10 cm DCVDCV
60 cm 60 cm DCVDCV % Gain% Gain
PeptidePeptideCountCount 537537 635635 18.318.3
10 cm 10 cm CVCV
60 cm 60 cm CVCV
PeptidePeptideCountCount 593593 739739 24.624.6
% Gain% Gain 10.410.4 16.416.4
CV vs. DCVCV vs. DCVShort vs. LongShort vs. Long
Peptide Peptide Count Count CategoryCategory(protein with n peptides)(protein with n peptides) 10 cm 10 cm DCVDCV 60 cm 60 cm DCVDCV % Gain% Gain
6+6+ 447447 498498 11.411.411--55 9090 137137 52.252.2
10 cm 10 cm CVCV 60 cm 60 cm CVCV6+6+ 486486 589589 21.221.211--55 107107 150150 40.240.2
ConclusionConclusion
Long columns are better at showing us Long columns are better at showing us a greater number of low level peptides.a greater number of low level peptides.The CV method is superior to the DCV The CV method is superior to the DCV method.method.Manufacture of the CV device needs to Manufacture of the CV device needs to be standardized and simplified.be standardized and simplified.
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
The Vincent & Stella Coates FoundationThe Vincent & Stella Coates FoundationMike Mike MacCossMacCoss, University of Washington, University of WashingtonAndy Andy GieschenGieschen, , AgilentAgilentThermoFinniganThermoFinnigan