Valvular (1)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    1/61

    Cases in Valvular Heart Disease

    Casos clinicos de cardiopatia valvular

    Howard Weitz, M.D.

    February 2012

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    2/61

    Case 1

    A 60 year old man underwent an aortic valve replacementas treatment of symptomatic aortic stenosis five years ago.A mechanical bileaflet aortic valve was implanted. He hasnormal left ventricular function and no history of atrial

    fibrillation. He has been maintained on warfarinanticoagulation with his INR apprx 2.5. You have beennotified that as treatment of chronic cholecystitis he isscheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 10days.

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    3/61

    Case 1

    The surgeon requests your recommendations regarding themanagement of his anticoagulation prior to surgery. You suggest:

    A. Perform the surgery while INR therapeutic.B. Discontinue warfarin 5 days prior to surgery and admit to hospital for

    continuous heparin infusion. Discontinue heparin 8-12 hours beforesurgery.C. Discontinue warfarin 5 days prior to surgery and begin low molecular

    weight heparin during the period of subtherapeutic INR.D. Discontinue warfarin 72 hours prior to procedure and restart warfarin

    within 24 hours after the procedure.E. Discontinue warfarin 72 hours prior to procedure and start heparin

    infusion12 hours after the procedure continuing until post procedurewarfarin is therapeutic

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    4/61

    Case 1

    The surgeon requests your recommendations regarding themanagement of his anticoagulation prior to surgery. You suggest:

    A. Perform the surgery while INR therapeutic.B. Discontinue warfarin 5 days prior to surgery and admit to hospital for

    continuous heparin infusion. Discontinue heparin 8-12 hours beforesurgery.C. Discontinue warfarin 5 days prior to surgery and begin low molecular

    weight heparin during the period of subtherapeutic INR.D. Discontinue warfarin 72 hours prior to procedure and restart warfarin

    within 24 hours after the procedure.E. Discontinue warfarin 72 hours prior to procedure and start heparin

    infusion 12 hours after the procedure continuing until post procedurewarfarin is therapeutic.

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    5/61

    Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with MechanicalValves who Require Interruption of Warfarin Therapy

    for Noncardiac Surgery

    Continue antithrombotic therapy for procedures wherebleeding inconsequential:

    Skin

    Eye surgery

    Dental

    Cleaning

    Caries

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    6/61

    Journal of the American Dental Association, November 2003

    Review of clinical studies: anticoagulants and dental proceduresWarfarin and Low dose aspirin (100 mg/d)

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    7/61

    Journal of the American Dental Association, November 2003

    Review of clinical studies: anticoagulants and dental proceduresWarfarin

    Low dose aspirin (100 mg/d)

    1

    The weight of evidence in the dental literature does not

    support the long-held belief that an oral anticoagulant regimenmust be altered or discontinued before most dental procedures,including oral surgery.

    Currently the INR does not require alteration of the therapy

    regimen unless the INR value is greater than 4.0, providedthat local hemostatic measures are used.

    Articles that document oral surgery experiences of patientstaking aspirin alone or in combination with clopidogrel have notreported any cases of unusual intraoperative or postoperativebleeding problems. This experience is anecdotal.

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    8/61

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    9/61

    Low risk of valve thrombosis

    Bileaflet aortic valveNormal LV functionSinus rhythm

    Stop warfarin 48-72 hours before proceRestart warfarin within 24 hours after

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    10/61

    High risk of valve thrombosis:mitral valvetricuspid valve

    Aortic valve ANDatrial fibrillationprior thromboembolismhypercoagulableolder generation valveLVEF < 30%a second mechanical valve

    therapeutic unfractionated hepawhen INR < 2.0Restart as soon as possible

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    11/61

    LMWH

    Usefulness / efficacy less well established by evidence / opinion

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    12/61

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    13/61

    How about LMWH for prosthetic valve?

    ACCP 2008 Guideline

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    14/61

    ACCP 2008 GuidelineBridging anticoagulation and mechanical valve

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    15/61

    High Risk for thromboembolism

    Mitral prosthesis

    Older aortic prosthesisRecent TIA, stroke

    Moderate Risk for thromboembol

    Bileaflet aortic valve ANDatrial fibrillation

    prior stroke, TIACHADS2 pts

    Low Risk for thromboembolism

    Bileaflet aortic valve

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    16/61

    Case 1: Prosthetic valve perioperative anticoag

    In patients at Low Risk of valve thrombosis (egbileaflet aortic valve and no risk factors ((atrial fibrillation,

    previous thromboembolism, left ventricular dysfunction, hypercoagulableconditions, older generation prosthetic valves, mechanical mitral valve,

    or more than one mechanical valve)), it is recommended thatwarfarin be stopped 48-72 hours before surgery

    and resumed within 24 hours following surgery.

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    17/61

    Case 2

    A 40 year old man has recently moved to your city and you are seeinghim for initial internal medicine evaluation.

    Hx: Heart murmur since childhood. He was told that it was due to anabnormal heart valve.

    Hx: Leads active life, exercises. No symptoms

    No medications.

    Pe: BP 130/55. HR 60

    II/VI crescendo - decrescendo systolic murmur heard in aortic areapeaking in mid-systole. Radiates to carotid arteries

    II/VI diastolic descrescendo diastolic blowing murmur heard in aortic arearadiating to left sternal border

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    18/61

    Case 2

    Echocardiogram

    Normal left ventricular systolic function

    Bicuspid aortic valve

    valve area 1.2 cm2, mean aortic valve gradient 28 mm Hg

    Mild aortic regurgitation Normal mitral and tricuspid valves

    Aortic root dilated 5.1 cm (normal < 4.0 cm)

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    19/61

    Case 2

    Upon review of the echocardiogramyou recommend:

    A. Repeat echo in 6 months

    B. Repeat echo in 1 year

    C. Initiate beta blocker therapy

    D. Aortic root replacement

    E. Aortic root replacement and aortic valve replacement

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    20/61

    Case 2

    Upon review of the echocardiogramyou recommend:A. Repeat echo in 6 months

    B. Repeat echo in 1 year

    C. Initiate beta blocker therapyD. Aortic root replacement

    E. Aortic root replacement and aortic valve replacement

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    21/61

    Case 2

    Echocardiogram

    Normal left ventricular systolic function

    Bicuspid aortic valve

    valve area 1.2 cm2, mean aortic valve gradient 28 mm Hg

    Mild aortic regurgitation Normal mitral and tricuspid valves

    Aortic root dilated 5.1 cm (normal up to 4.0 cm)

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    22/61

    Classification of Aortic Stenosis

    Mild Valve area > 1.5 cm2

    Mean aortic valve gradient < 25 mm Hg

    or Jet velocity < 3.0 m/s

    Moderate Valve area 1.0 1.5 cm2

    Mean aortic valve gradient 25-40 mm Hg

    Or Jet velocity 3.0 4.0 m/s

    Severe Valve area < 1.0 cm2

    Mean aortic valve gradient > 40 mm Hg Jet velocity > 4.0 m/s

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    23/61

    Our patient

    Bicuspid aortic valve

    Moderate aortic stenosis

    Mild aortic regurgitation

    Dilated aortic root

    Normal left ventricle

    No symptoms

    Healthy

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    24/61

    Case 2

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    25/61

    Case 2

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    26/61

    From: Tadros T., et l.: Circulation 2009;119;880-890

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    27/61

    Bicuspid aortic valve Ascending Aorta

    From: Fedak P, Verma S, David T., et al.: Circulation 2002;106;900-904

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    28/61

    Bicuspid Aortic Valve

    Most common congenital heart lesion 1-2% of population Males 4:1 Family clusters. Echo screening of first degree relatives

    Majority will require intervention (surgery)

    Consequences Aortic stenosis Aortic regurgitation Disease of the aorta (dilatation, dissection)

    More rapid than in idiopathic aortic dilatation

    No evidence that Beta blocker prevents progression of aortic

    dilatation

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    29/61

    When is BAV Surgery Indicated ?

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    30/61

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    31/61

    Ascending aorta replacement

    Aortic valve replacement

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    32/61

    Aortic valve replacement

    Approach to the patient with BAV severe AS or AR

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    33/61

    Approach to the patient with BAV severe AS or ARwho is undergoing valve replacement

    Approach to the patient with BAV severe AS or AR

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    34/61

    Approach to the patient with BAV severe AS or ARwho is undergoing valve replacement

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    35/61

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    36/61

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    37/61

    Case 2 Bicuspid aortic valve

    Surgery to repair or replace the ascending aorta in a patientwith bicuspid aortic valve is indicated when the ascendingaortic diameter is > 5.0 cm Bicuspid aortic valve disease is often accompanied by disruption of

    aortic media (elastin, collagen, smooth muscle) and may involve:

    Aortic valve Aortic annulus

    Sinus of valsalva

    Ascending aorta

    Pulminary trunk

    Coronary ostia

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    38/61

    Case 2: Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease

    Bicuspid aortic valve disease is often accompanied bydisruption of aortic media (elastin, collagen, smooth muscle)and may involve:

    Aortic valve

    Aortic annulus Sinus of valsalva

    Ascending aorta

    Pulminary trunk

    Coronary ostia

    Aortic dilatation may result in aortic dissection

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    39/61

    Case 3

    You recommend

    Answer D. Refer for mitral valve

    repair.

    He has symptomatic severe MR. Valve

    repair is the desired approach.

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    40/61

    From: Otto, C.: New England Journal of Medicine 345:740-746. 2001

    Ch i S Mi l R i i

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    41/61

    Chronic Severe Mitral Regurgitation

    From Otto, C. New England Journal of Medicine, 345:740-746, 2001

    Ch i S Mit l R it ti

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    42/61

    Chronic Severe Mitral Regurgitation

    From Otto, C. New England Journal of Medicine, 345:740-746, 2001

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    43/61

    Mitral Regurgitation - Surgical Rx.

    Valve repair when possible. Lower operative mortality

    Better late outcomes

    Better preservation of LV function.

    Lower likelihood of long term anticoagulation 7-10% reoperation at 10 years (similar reop rate

    following MV Replacement)

    If valve replacement necessary, preservechordal apparatus. Better post op LV function.

    Mitral valve repair (from Otto, C., Heart 83:2003)

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    44/61

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    45/61

    Case 3 Mitral regurgitation

    In the patient with severe mitral regurgitation andnormal left ventricular function, ejection fraction

    should be higher than normal.

    The treatment of symptomatic severe mitralregurgitation is surgery even if left ventricularfunction is normal and as long as the left ventricularejection fraction is > 30%.

    Mitral valve repair is preferred over mitral valvereplacement.

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    46/61

    Case 4

    Answer A. AVR

    He has severe aortic insufficiency and impairedleft ventricular function (LVEF < 50%)

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    47/61

    Chronic Aortic Regurgitation

    Chronic AI Increased stroke volume isejected into aorta - systemic hypertensionand increased afterload.

    Chronic Aortic Regurgitation - Medical Rx

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    48/61

    Chronic Aortic Regurgitation Medical Rx

    Vasodilator therapy (improve stroke vol., reduceregurgitant volume, does NOT decrease mortality)

    Three uses of vasodilators in chronic severe AR Rx when patient inoperable

    Short term improvement in hemodynamics while awaitingAVR

    Prolongation of the asymptomatic phasein pts with normalsystolic fxn.

    Only 2 studies (nifedipine; ACEI)

    Mixed results

    2006 Guideline witholds recommendation

    No data to support empiric use of diuretic,verapamil,ACE-I.

    Ch i S A i R i i

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    49/61

    Chronic Severe Aortic RegurgitationIndications for Valve Replacement

    Symptomatic

    Unoperated mortality > 10%/yr

    Asymptomatic with:

    Decreasing LV function (LVEF < 50%) Unoperated progression to symptoms > 25%/yr

    Increasing LV size (LV end systolic dimension > 55mm)

    Note: normal LV end systolic dimension < 45mm

    Case 4: Aortic regurgitation

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    50/61

    Case 4: Aortic regurgitationIndications for Valve Replacement Severe AR (June 2006)

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    51/61

    Case 5

    An 80 year old man presents for evaluation of fatigue.

    Known severe aortic stenosis (no angina, syncope, chf)

    No prior history of abnormal bleeding, or clotting disorder.

    Bp 120/70 HR 90 sinus

    III/VI mid peaking crescendo-decrescendo murmur of aorticstenosis heard in aortic area and radiating to carotids andprecordium

    Stool heme positive

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    52/61

    Case 5

    Echo: Severe aortic stenosis, normal left ventricular function

    No change from echo of one year ago

    Hbg 7.5 (was 14.0 six months ago), microcytic hypochromic

    Colonoscopy

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    53/61

    Colonoscopy

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    54/61

    Case 5

    Which of the following, in addition to the finding noted atcolonoscopy, best explains the cause of his anemia?

    A. Acquired disorder impairing platelet adhesion

    B. Inherited disorder impairing platelet adhesion

    C. Acquired disorder of thrombin generation

    D. Inherited disorder of thrombin generation

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    55/61

    Case 5

    Which of the following, in addition to the finding noted atcolonoscopy best explains the cause of his anemia?

    A. Acquired disorder impairing platelet adhesion

    B. Inherited disorder impairing platelet adhesionC. Acquired disorder of thrombin generation

    D. Inherited disorder of thrombin generation

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    56/61

    N Engl J Med 1958;259:196

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    57/61

    Von Willebrand Factor

    Gigantic multimeric protein

    Mediates adhesion of platelets to sites of vascular damage

    Large multimers cleaved by plasma metalloprotease underconditions of high shear stress

    Absence of large multimers of vWF cause bleeding fromgastrointestinal angiodysplasia

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    58/61

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    59/61

    From Warkentin TE, Moore JC, Anand SS, et al.: Gastrointestinal bleeding, anngiodysplasia, cardiovasculardisease and acquired von Willebrand syndrome. Transfus Med Rev 2003; 17:272-86.

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    60/61

    From Vincentilli A, Susen S, Le Tourneau T, et al.: Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in aortic stenosis.N Engl j Med 2003;349:343-9.

  • 8/2/2019 Valvular (1)

    61/61

    Case 5: Aortic stenosis and GI bleed

    Gastrointestinal bleeding in the setting of criticalaortic stenosis is often a result of gastrointestinalangiodysplasia and a relative decrease in

    functioning von Willebrands factor (vWF) caused by

    shear dependant vWF proteolysis. Aortic valvereplacement often results in recovery of active highmolecular weight multimers of vWF and cessationof bleeding.