UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Agents, assumptions and motivations behind REDD+

Lovera-Bilderbeek, A.S.E.

Link to publication

LicenseOther

Citation for published version (APA):Lovera-Bilderbeek, A. S. E. (2017). Agents, assumptions and motivations behind REDD+.

General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s),other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, statingyour reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Askthe Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam,The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

Download date: 24 Jan 2021

197

References

Abram, N.K., MacMillan, D. C., Xofis, P., Ancrenaz, M., Tzanopoulos, J., Ong, R., Goossens, B. et

al., 2016. Identifying where REDD+ financially out-competes oil palm in floodplain

landscapes using a fine-scale approach. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0156481, 23pp.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156481.

Acheampong, E., Insaidoo, T.F.G. and Ros-Tonen, M.A.F., 2016. Management of Ghana’s

modified Taungya system: challenges and strategies for improvement. Agroforestry

Systems 90(4), 659-674.

Adekunle, V.A.J., Olagoke, A.O. and Ogundare, L.F., 2010. Logging impacts in tropical lowland

humid forest on tree species diversity and environmental conservation, Journal of

Sustainable Forestry, 29(5), 517-538.

Agrawal, A. and Gibson, C., 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in

natural resource conservation. World Development 27(4): 629-649.

Agrawal, A., 2001. Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World

Development 29(10), 1649-1672.

Agrawal, A., 2007. Forests, governance, and sustainability: Common property theory and its

contributions. International Journal of the Commons 1(1), 111-136.

Aguilar, S., 2007. Elements for a robust climate regime post-2012: Options for mitigation. Review

of European Community and International Environmental Law 16(3), 356-367.

Agung Prasetyo, F., Suwarno, A., Purwanto and Hakim, R., 2009. Making policies work for

Payment for Environmental Services (PES): An evaluation of the experience of

formulating conservation policies in districts of Indonesia, Journal of Sustainable Forestry,

28(3-5), 415-433.

Aldy, J.E. and Stavins, R.N., 2012. The promise and problems of pricing carbon: Theory and

experience. Journal of Environment & Development 21(2), 152-180.

Alix-Garcia, J., de Janvry, A., Sadoulet, E. and Torres, J.M., 2005. An Assessment of Mexico’s

Payment for Environmental Services program. University of California at Berkeley, USA

and CIDE for the FAO Comparative Studies Service Agricultural and Development

Economics Division, Rome, Italy. 85 pp.

Allan, J.I. and Dauvergne, P., 2013. The Global South in environmental negotiations: The politics

of coalitions in REDD+, Third World Quarterly 34(8), 1307-1322.

Alter, K.J. and Meunier, S., 2009. The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on

Politics 7(1), 13-24.

Almeida, F. and Hatcher, J., 2011. What rights? Measuring the depth of indigenous peoples and

community forest tenure: Preliminary findings from a legal analysis of 33 forest tenure

regimes in 15 countries. Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington, D.C., USA, 8 pp.

Alvarado, L.X.R. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., 2007. Why are we seeing ‘REDD+’? An analysis of

the international debate on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in

Developing Countries. Analyses. Institut du Développement Durable et des Relations

Internationales, Paris, France, 28 pp.

Andam, K.S., Ferraro, P.J., Pfaff, A., Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A.A., 2008. Measuring the effectiveness

of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proceedings of the National

Academy of Sciences 105(42), 16089-16094.

Andersson, K. and Richards, K.R., 2001. Implementing an international carbon sequestration

program: Can the leaky sink be fixed? Climate Policy 1, 173-188

Andersson, K., Lawrence, D., Zavaleta, J. and Guariguata, M.R., 2015. More trees, more poverty?

The socioeconomic effects of tree plantations in Chile, 2001–2011. Environmental

Management DOI 10.1007/s00267-015-0594-x, 14 pp.

Andresen, S., 2007. Key actors in UN environmental governance: Influence, reform and leadership.

International Environmental Agreements 7, 457-468.

198

Angelsen, A. and Kaimowitz, D. (eds) 2001. Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation.

CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 436 pp.

Angelsen, A., 2007. Forest cover change in space and time: Combining the Von Thünen and forest

transition theories. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4117. The World Bank,

Washington, D.C., 43 pp.

Angelsen, A., Peskett, L., Brown, and Luttrell, C., 2008. What is the right scale for REDD+? The

implications of national, subnational and nested Approaches. CIFOR Infobrief no. 15,

CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 6 pp.

Angelsen, A., 2008a. REDD+ models and baselines. International Forestry Review 10(3), 465–275.

Angelsen, A. (ed.), 2008b. Moving ahead with REDD+: Issues, options and implications. CIFOR,

Bogor, Indonesia, 172 pp.

Angelsen, A., Brockhous, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W.D. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S.

(eds.) 2009. Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. CIFOR, Bogor,

Indonesia, 390 pp.

Angelsen, A., 2009. Incentives to sustain forest ecosystem services: a review and lessons for

REDD+. Natural Resources Issues No. 16. International Institute for Environment and

Development, London, UK with CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia and World Resources Institute,

Washington, D.C., USA, 47 pp.

Angelsen, A., 2010. Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,

www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0912014107, 6 pp.

Apgar, M.J., Allen, W., Moore, K. and Ataria, J., 2015. Understanding adaptation and

transformation through indigenous practice: The case of the Guna of Panama. Ecology

and Society 20(1): 45, 11 pp.

Arhin, A.A., 2014. Safeguards and dangerguards: A framework for unpacking the black box of

safeguards for REDD+. Forest Policy and Economics 45, 24-31.

Arriagada, R.A., Sills, E.O., Pattanayak, S.K. and Ferraro, P.J., 2009. Combining qualitative and

quantitative methods to evaluate participation in Costa Rica’s program of payments for

environmental services, Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 28(3-5), 343-367.

Arts, B., 1998. The political influence of global NGOs. Case Studies on the Climate and

Biodiversity Conventions. International Books, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 300 pp.

Arts, B., 2006. Non-State actors in global environmental governance – new arrangements beyond

the State. In: Koenig-Archibugi, M., Zürn, M. (Eds.), New modes of governance in the

global system – exploring publicness, delegation and inclusiveness. Palgrave Macmillan,

Hampshire, USA, 177-200.

Arts, B. and Buizer, M., 2009. Forests, discourses, institutions. A discursive-institutional analysis of

global forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 340-347.

Arts, B., Appelstrand, M., Kleinschmit, D., Pulzl, H. and Visseren-Hamakers, I., “Discourses,

actors and instruments in international forest governance”. In: Rayner, J., Buck, A. and

Katila, P. (eds.), 2010. Embracing complexity: Meeting the challenges of international

forest governance. A global assessment report. Prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel

on the International Forest Regime. IUFRO World Series Volume 28, Vienna, Austria, 172

pp.

Arts, B. and Visseren-Hamakers, I.J., 2012. Forest governance: Mainstream and critical views.

European Tropical Forest Research Network News 53, 3-10.

Arts, B., 2012. Forests policy analysis and theory use: Overview and trends. Forest Policy and

Economics 16, 7-13.

Asquith, N. M., Vargas Ríos, M. T. and Smith, J., 2002. Can forest- protection carbon projects

improve rural livelihoods? Analysis of the Noel Kempff Mercado climate action project,

Bolivia. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 7(4), 323-337.

199

Atmadja, S. and Verchot, L., 2012. A review of the state of research, policies and strategies in

addressing leakage from reducing emissionsfrom deforestation and forest degradation

(REDD+). Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 17, 311-336.

Aubertin, C., 2015. Deforestation control policies in Brazil: Sovereignty versus the market. Forests,

Trees and Livelihoods 24(3), 147-162.

Auer, M.R., 2000. Who participates in global environmental governance? Partial answers from

international relations theory. Policy Sciences 33(2), 155-180.

Aukland, L., Moura Costa, P. and Brown, S. 2003. A conceptual framework and its application for

addressing leakage: The case of avoided deforestation. Climate Policy 3, 123-136.

Aune, J.B., Alemu, A.T. and Gautam, K.P., 2004. Carbon sequestration in rural communities.

Journal of Sustainable Forestry 21(1), 69-79.

Backstrand, K., 2004. Scientisation vs. civic expertise in environmental governance: Eco-feminist,

eco-modern and post-modern responses, Environmental Politics 13(4), 695-714.

Backstrand, K and Lovbrand, E., 2006. Planting trees to mitigate climate change: Contested

discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism.

Global Environmental Politics 6(1), 50-75.

Backstrand, K. and Kylsater, M., 2014. Old wine in new bottles? The legitimation and

delegitimation of UN public–private partnerships for sustainable development from the

Johannesburg Summit to the Rio+20 Summit, Globalizations 11(3), 331-347.

Baker, J., Milner-Gulland, E.J. and Leader-Williams, N., 2011. Park gazettement and integrated

conservation and development as factors in community conflict at Bwindi Impenetrable

Forest, Uganda. Conservation Biology 26(1), 160-170.

Balmford, A. and Whitten, T., 2003. Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the

costs be met? Oryx 37(2), 238-250.

Barr, C.M. and Sayer, J.A., 2012. The political economy of reforestation and forest restoration in

Asia–Pacific: Critical issues for REDD+. Biological Conservation 154, 9-19.

Basnet, R, 2009. Carbon ownership in community managed forests. Journal of Forest and

Livelihood 8(1), 77-83.

Bauer, S., Biermann, F., Dingwerth, K., and Siebenhüner, B. 2009. Understanding international

bureaucracies: Taking stock. In: Biermann, F. and Siebenhünder, B (Eds.) Managers of

global governance. The influence of international environmental bureaucracies. The MIT

Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA / London, UK, 15-36.

Bausch, C. and Mehling, M., 2006. ‘Alive and kicking’: The First Meeting of the Parties to the

Kyoto Protocol. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law

15(2), 193-201.

Bekessy, S.A. and Wintle, B.A., 2008. Using carbon investment to grow the biodiversity bank.

Conservation Biology 22(3), 510-513.

Benessaiah, K., 2012. Carbon and livelihoods in Post-Kyoto: Assessing voluntary carbon markets.

Ecological Economics 77, 1-6.

Benjaminsen, T.A. and Svarstad, H., 2010. ‘The death of an elephant: Conservation discourses

versus practices in Africa. Forum for Development Studies 37(3), 385-408.

Bennett, M.T., 2008. China’s sloping land conversion program: Institutional innovation or business

as usual? Ecological Economics 65 (2008), 699-711.

Bernauer, T. and Betzold, C., 2012. Civil society in global environmental governance. The Journal

of Environment & Development, 2012 21, 62-66.

Betsill, M.M., and Corell. E., 2001. NGO Influence in international environmental negotiations: A

framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics 1(4), 65-85.

Beymer-Farris, B.A. and Bassett, T.J., 2012. The REDD+ menace: Resurgent protectionism in

Tanzania’s mangrove forests. Global Environmental Change 22, 332-341.

Biermann, F., 2007. ‘Earth System Governance’ as a crosscutting theme of global change research.

Global Environmental Change 17, 326-337.

200

Biermann, F, and Pattberg P., 2008. Global environmental governance: Taking stock and moving

forward. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33, 277-294.

Biermann, F., Davies, O. and van der Grijp, N, 2009a. Environmental policy integration and the

architecture of global environmental governance. International Environmental Agreements

9, 351-369.

Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., and Zelli, F., 2009b. The fragmentation of global

governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics 9(4),

14-40.

Biermann, F. and Siebenhüner, B. (Eds.), 2009. Managers of global change: The influence of

international environmental bureaucracies. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts,

USA/London, UK, 14 pp.

Biermann, F. and Gupta, A., 2011. Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A

research framework. Ecological Economics 70, 1856-1864.

Bishop, J., Kapila, S., Hicks, F., Mitchell, P. and Vorhies, F., 2010. New business models for

biodiversity conservation, Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3-5), 285-303.

Blom, B., Sunderland, T. and Murdiyarso, D., 2010. Getting REDD+ to work locally: Lessons

learned from integrated conservation and development projects. Environmental Science &

Policy 13, 164-172.

Bluffstone, R., Robinson, W. and Guthiga, P., 2013. REDD+ and community-controlled forests in

low-income countries: Any hope for a linkage? Ecological Economics 87, 43-52.

Bodle, R., Donat, L. and Duwe, M., 2016. The Paris Agreement: Analysis, assessment and outlook.

Background paper for the workshop “Beyond COP21: what does Paris mean for future

climate policy?”, January 2016, BMUB, Berlin, Germany, 30 pp.

Bohmelt, T and Betzold, C. 2012. The impact of environmental interest groups in international

negotiations: Do ENGOs induce stronger environmental commitments? International

Environmental Agreements DOI 10.1007/s10784-012-9180-3, 25 pp.

Bond, I., Grieg-Gran, M., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Hazlewood, P., Wunder, S. and Angelsen, A.,

2009. Incentives to sustain forest ecosystem services: A review and lessons for REDD+.

Natural Resources Issues 16. International Institute for Environment and Development,

London, UK with CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia and World Resources Institute, Washington,

D.C., USA, 47pp.

Bonnie, R., and Schwartzman, S., 2003. Tropical deforestation and reforestation and the Kyoto

Protocol. Conservation Biology 17(1), 4-5.

Börner, J. and Wunder, S., 2008. Paying for avoided deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: Form

cost assessment to scheme design. International Forestry Review 10(3), 496-511.

Börner, J., Wunder, S., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Rügnitz Tito, M., Pereira, L. and Nascimento, N.,

2010. Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: Scope and equity

implications. Ecological Economics 69(6), 1272-1282 .

Börner, J., Wunder, S., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Hyman, G. and Nascimento, N., 2011. REDD+

sticks and carrots in the Brazilian Amazon: Assessing costs and livelihood implications.

CCAFS Working Paper 8. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research

Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). Copenhagen,

Denmark, 42 pp.

Borrego, A. and Skutsch, M., 2014. Estimating the opportunity costs of activities that cause

degradation in tropical dry forest: Implications for REDD+. Ecological Economics 101, 1-

9.

Bottazzi, P., Cattaneo, A., Crespo Rocha, D. and Rist, S., 2013. Assessing sustainable forest

management under REDD+: A community-based labour perspective. Ecological

Economics 93, 94-103.

Boucher, D., Elias, P., Lininger, K., May-Tobin, C., Roquemore, S., and Saxon, E., 2011. The root

of the problem, what’s driving tropical deforestation today? Union of Concerned Scientists,

Cambridge, USA, 126 pp.

201

Boucher, D., 2015. The REDD+/carbon market offsets debate: Big argument, small potatoes.

Journal of Sustainable Forestry 34(6-7), 547-558.

Bouteligier, S., 2011. Exploring the agency of global environmental consultancy firms in earth

system governance. International Environmental Agreements 11, 43-61.

Boyd, E. and Schipper, E.L., 2002. The Marrakech Accord−−At the crossroad to ratification:

Seventh Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on

Climate Change. The Journal of Environment Development 11, 184-190.

Boyd E., May, P., Chang, M. and Veiga, F.C., 2007. Exploring socioeconomic impacts of forest

based mitigation projects: Lessons from Brazil and Bolivia. Environmental Science &

Policy 10, 419-433.

Boyd, E., Corbera, E. and Estrada, M., 2008. UNFCCC negotiations (pre-Kyoto to COP-9): What

the process says about the politics of CDM-sinks. International Environmental

Agreements 8, 95-112.

Boyd, E., 2009. Governing the Clean Development Mechanism: Global rhetoric versus local

realities in carbon sequestration projects. Environment and Planning A 41, 2380-2395.

Bozmoski, A. and Hepburn, C., 2009. The interminable politics of forest carbon: an EU outlook.

Background paper for forest carbon finance summit 2009: making forest carbon markets

work. Washington, DC. 6-8 March 2009

Bozmoski, A.S., and Hultman, N.E., 2009. Participant perceptions of risk and benefit in carbon

forestry: Evidence from central Tanzania. Journal of Environment & Development 19(1),

4-27.

Brockhaus, M. and Angelsen, A., 2012. Seeing REDD+ through 4Is: a political economy

framework. In: Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D., Verchot, L. (Eds.),

Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 15-30.

Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M. and Mardiah, S., 2013. Governing the design of national REDD+:

An analysis of the power of agency. Forest Policy and Economics 49, 23-33.

Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M. and Carmenta, R., 2014. REDD+ policy networks: Exploring

actors and power structures in an emerging policy domain. Ecology and Society 19(4): 29,

32 pp.

Brockington, D., Igoe, J. and Schmidt-Soltau, K., 2006. Conservation, human rights, and poverty

reduction. Conservation Biology 20(1), 250-252.

Broughton, E and Pirard, R., 2011. What’s in a name? Market-based instruments for biodiversity.

Health and Environment reports 8, Institut Français des Relations Internationales, Paris,

France, 82 pp.

Brown, K., 2001. Cut and run. Evolving institutions for global forest governance. Journal of

International Development 13, 893-905 .

Brown, M., 2010. Limiting Corrupt Incentives in a Global REDD+ Regime. Ecology Law

Quarterly, Vol. 37, 237 – 268.

Brown, L.D., Ebrahim, A. and Batliwala, S., 2012. Governing international advocacy NGOs. World

Development 40(6), 1098-1108.

Bruce, J., 2012. Identifying and working with beneficiaries when rights are unclear: Insights for

REDD+ initiatives. Program on Forests (PROFOR), Washington, D.C, USA, 88 pp.

Bryan, B.A., 2013. Incentives, land use, and ecosystem services: Synthesizing complex linkages.

Environmental Science & Policy 27, 124-134.

Bulkeley, H., 2000. Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network.

Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 18, 727-748.

Cacho, O.J., Wise, R.M. and MacDicken, K.G., 2004. Carbon monitoring costs and their effects on

incentives to sequester carbon through forestry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for

Global Change 154, 273-293.

Cacho, O.J., Marshall, G.R. and Milne, M., 2005. Transaction and abatement costs of carbon-sink

projects in developing countries. Environment and Development Economics 10, 597-614.

202

Cacho, O.J., Milne, S., Gonzalez, R. and Tacconi, L., 2014. Benefits and costs of deforestation by

smallholders: Implications for forest conservation and climate policy. Ecological

Economics 107, 321-332.

Cadman, T. and Maraseni, T., 2013. More equal than others? A comparative analysis of state and

non-state perceptions of interest representation and decision-making in REDD+

negotiations. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(3), 214-230.

Cain, Z. and Lovejoy, S., 2004. History and outlook for Farm Bill Conservation Programs. Choices,

4th Quarter, American Agricultural Economics Association, USA, 37-42.

Campbell, B.M., 2009. Beyond Copenhagen: REDD+, agriculture, adaptation strategies and

poverty. Global Environmental Change 19, 397-399.

Caplow, S., Jagger, P., Lawlor, K. and Sills, E., 2011. Evaluating land use and livelihood impacts of

early forest carbon projects: Lessons for learning about REDD+. Environmental Science

& Policy 14(2), 152-167.

Cashore, B., Galloway, G., Cubbage, F., Humphreys, D., Katila, P., Levin, K., Maryudi, A.,

McDermott, C. and McGinley, K., 2010. Ability of institutions to address new challenges.

In: Mery, G., Katila, P., Galloway, G., Alfaro, R., Kanninen, M., Lobovikov, M. and Varjo,

J. (Eds). Forests and Society ‒ Responding to Global Drivers of Change. International

Union of Forest Research Organizations World Series 25, Tampere, Finland: 441-485.

Castillo-Santiago, M.A., Hellier, A., Tipper, R. and de Jong, B.H.J., 2007. Carbon emissions from

land-use change: An analysis of causal factors in Chiapas, Mexico. Mitigation and

Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12, 1213-1235.

Cattaneo, A., Lubowski, R., Busch, J., Creed, A., Strassburg, B., Boltz, F. and Ashton, R., 2010. On

international equity in reducing emissions from deforestation. Environmental Science &

Policy 13, 742-753.

Cenamo, M.C. and Carrero, G.C., 2012. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest

Degradation (REDD+) in Apuí, Southern Amazonas: Challenges and caveats related to

land tenure and governance in the Brazilian Amazon, Journal of Sustainable Forestry 31(4-

5), 445-468.

Cerbu, G.A., Swallow, B.M. and Thompson, D.Y., 2011. Locating REDD+: A global survey and

analysis of REDD+ readiness and demonstration activities. Environmental Science and

Policy 14, 168-180

Chandrasekharan Behr, D., Cunningham, E.M., Kajembe, G., Mbeyale, G., Nsita, S. and

Rosenbaum, K.L., 2012. Benefit sharing in practice, insights for REDD+ initiatives.

Program on Forests (Profor), Washington D.C., USA, 152 pp.

Charnley, S., 2005. Industrial plantation forestry, Journal of Sustainable Forestry 21(4), 35-57.

Chen, X, Lupi, F., Vina, A., He, G and Liu, J., 2010. Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the

efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services. Conservation

Biology 24(6), 1469-1478.

Chester, C.C. and Moomaw, W.R., 2008. A taxonomy of collaborative governance: A guide to

understanding the diversity of international and domestic conservation accords.

International Environmental Agreements 8, 187-206.

Chhatre, A. and Agrawal, A., 2009. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood

benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(42),

17667-17670.

Chomba, S., Kariuki, J., Friis Lund, J. and Sinclair, F., 2016. Roots of inequity: How the

implementation of REDD+ reinforces past injustices. Land Use Policy 50, 202-213.

Chomitz, K.M., 2002. Baseline, leakage and measurement issues: How do forestry and energy

projects compare? Climate Policy 2, 35-49.

Chomitz, K.M., with Buys, P., De Luca, G., Thomas, T.S. and Wertz- Kanounnikoff, S., 2007. At

loggerheads? Agricultural expansion, poverty reduction, and environment in the tropical

forests. A World Bank Policy Research Report. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA,

284 pp.

203

Choumert, J., Combes Motel, P. and Dakpo, H.K., 2013. Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve for

deforestation a threatened theory? A meta-analysis of the literature. Ecological Economics

90, 19-28.

Coad, L., Campbell, A., Miles, L. and Humphries, K., 2008. The costs and benefits of protected

areas for local livelihoods: A review of the current literature. Working Paper. UNEP World

Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, U.K, 45 pp.

Cock, A.R., 2008. Tropical forests in the global States system. International Affairs 84(2), 315-333.

Colfer, C.J.P., 2011. Marginalized forest peoples’ perceptions of the legitimacy of governance: An

exploration. World Development 39(12), 2147-2164.

Combes Motel, P., Pirard, R. and Combes, J.-L., 2009. A methodology to estimate impacts of

domestic policies on deforestation: Compensated successful efforts for “avoided

deforestation” (REDD+). Ecological Economics 68, 680-691.

Contreras-Hermosilla, A., 2000. The underlying causes of forest decline. Occasional Paper 30,

CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 29 pp.

Cooley, D.M., Galik, C.S., Holmes, T.P., Kousky, C. and Cooke, R.M., 2012. Managing

dependencies in forest offset projects: Toward a more complete evaluation of reversal risk.

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 17, 17-24.

Coomes, O.T., Grimard, F., Potvin, C. and Sima, P., 2008. The fate of the tropical forest: Carbon

or cattle? Ecological Economics 65(2), 207-212.

Corbera, E., Kosoy, N. and Martínez Tuna, M., 2007. Equity implications of marketing ecosystem

services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America. Global

Environmental Change 17(3-4), 365-380.

Corbera, E. and Brown, K., 2008. Building institutions to trade ecosystem services: Marketing

forest carbon in Mexico. World Development 36(10), 1956-1979.

Corbera, E., Gonzalez Soberanis, C., and Brown, K., 2009. Institutional dimensions of payments

for ecosystem services: An analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry programme. Ecological

Economics 68, 743-761.

Corbera, E., Estrada, M. and Brown, K., 2010. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from

deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries: Revisiting the assumptions.

Climate Change 100, 355-388.

Corbera, E and Schroeder, H., 2011. Governing and implementing REDD+. Environmental

Science and Policy 14, 89-99.

Cotula, L., and Mayers, J., 2009. Tenure in REDD+: Start-point or afterthought? Natural Resource

Issues 15, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK, 58 pp.

Crossman, N.D., Bryan, B.A. and Summers, D.M., 2011. Carbon payments and low-costs

conservation. Conservation Biology 25(4), 835-845.

Daniels, A.E., Bagstad, K., Esposito, V., Moulaert, A. and Rodriguez, C.M., 2010. Understanding

the impacts of Costa Rica’s PES: Are we asking the right questions? Ecological Economics

69, 2116-2126.

Dargusch, P., Lawrence, K., Herbohn, J. and Medrilzam, 2010. A small-scale forestry perspective

on constraints to including REDD+ in international carbon markets. Small-scale Forestry

9, 485-499.

Daviet, F., 2009. Improving LULUCF offset projects: A carbon performance standard and

ecosystem services, Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3-5), 481-496.

Den Besten, J.W., Arts, B. and Verkooijen, P., 2014. The evolution of REDD+: An analysis of

discursive- institutional dynamics. Environmental Science & Policy 35, 40-48.

De Groot, R.S., Wilson, M.A. and Boumans, R.M.J., 2002. A typology for the classification,

description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological

Economics 41, 393-408.

Dellas, E., Pattberg, P. and Betsill, M., 2011. Agency in earth system governance: Refining a

research agenda. International Environmental Agreements 11, 85-98.

204

De Jong, B.H.J., Hellier, A., Castillo-Santiago, M.A. and Tipper, R., 2005. Application of the

‘Climafor’ approach to estimate baseline carbon emissions of a forest conservation project

in the Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, Mexico. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global

Change 10, 265-278.

De Jong, B.H.J. and Esquival Bazan, E., 2007. Application of the ‘‘Climafor’’ baseline to determine

leakage: the case of Scolel Té. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12,

1153-1168.

De Koning, F., Aguinaga, M., Bravo, M., Chiu, M., Lascano, M., Lozada, T. and Suarez, L., 2011.

Bridging the gap between forest conservation and poverty alleviation: The Ecuadorian

Socio Bosque program. Environmental Science & Policy 14, 531-542.

Di Gregorio, M., 2012. Networking in environmental movement organisation coalitions: Interest,

values or discourse? Environmental Politics, 21(1), 1-25 .

Dingwerth, K. and Pattberg, P., 2006. Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global

Governance 12(2), 185-203.

Doherty, E. and Schroeder, H., 2011. Forest tenure and multi-level governance in avoiding

deforestation under REDD+. Global Environmental Politics 11(4), 66-88.

Dombrowski, K., 2010. Filling the gap? An analysis of non-governmental organizations responses

to participation and representation deficits in global climate governance. International

Environmental Agreements 10, 397-416.

Dryzek, J.S., 2005. The politics of the earth. Environmental Discourses 2. Oxford University Press,

Oxford, UK, 270 pp.

Dudley, R.G., 2005. A generic look at payments for environmental services, plan or scam? Paper

prepared for the 23rd International System Dynamics Conference, Bogor, Indonesia and

Portland, Oregon, USA, 30 pp.

Dudley, R.G., 2010. A little REDD+ model to quickly compare possible baseline and policy

scenarios for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. Mitigation and

Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 15, 53-69.

Dulal, H.B., Shah, K.U. and Sapkota, C., 2012. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest

degradation (REDD+) projects: Lessons for future policy design and implementation,

International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 19(2), 116-129.

Dutschke, M. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., with Peskett, L., Luttrell, C., Streck, C. and Brown, J.,

2008. Financing REDD+, Linking country needs and financing sources. CIFOR, Bogor,

Indonesia, 6 pp.

Dutschke, M., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Peskett, L., Luttrell, C., Streck, C. and Brown, J., 2008. Mapping potential sources of REDD+ financing to different needs and national circumstances. Draft CIFOR working paper, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, Amazon Environmental Research Institute, Brasilia, Brazil and Overseas Development Institute, London, UK, 34 pp.

Dutschke, M., 2010. Forestry, risk and climate policy. Thesis for the University of Groningen, Cuvillier Verlag, Göttingen, Germany, 218 pp.

Eagleton-Pierce, M., 2011. Advancing a reflexive international relations. Millennium Journal of International Studies, 39(3), 805-823.

Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management

Review 14(1), 57-74.

Ekins, P, Kesicki, F. and Smith, A.Z.P., 2011. Marginal abatement cost curves: A call for caution.

UCL Energy Institute, University College London, UK, 37 pp.

Elias, P.E., 2013. How can we incentivize tropical forest restoration? Journal of Sustainable

Forestry 32(7), 694-701.

Eliasch, J., 2008. Climate change: financing global forests. The Eliasch review. Office of Climate

Change, London, UK, pp. 250.

Engel, S., Pagiola, S. and Wunder, S., 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in

theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 65(4), 663-674.

205

Eyckmans, J. and Finus, M., 2007. Measures to enhance the success of global climate treaties.

International Environmental Agreements 7, 73-97.

Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Börner, J., Violato-Espada, A.L., Nascimento, N., Piketty, M.G., 2011. Forest

loss and management in land reform settlements: Implications for REDD+ governance in

the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Science & Policy 14, 188-200.

Faeth, P., Cort, C. and Livernash, R., 1994. Evaluating the carbon sequestration benefits of forestry

projects in developing countries. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., USA, 97

pp.

FAO, 1998. Forest Resources Assessment (FRA) 2000 terms and definitions. FRA Working Paper

1, FAO, Rome, Italy, 154 pp.

FAO, 2007. Gender Mainstreaming in Forestry in Africa. Forest Policy Working Paper 18, FAO,

Rome, Italy, 61 pp.

FAO, 2010. State of the World’s Forests 2009. FAO, Rome, Italy, 378 pp.

FAO. 2015. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. FAO, Rome, Italy, 56 pp.

FAO, 2016. Forty years of community-based forestry, a review of its extent and effectiveness.

FAO, Rome, Italy, 168 pp.

Farley, J. and Costanza, R. 2010. Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecological

Economics 69, 2060-2068.

Farley, J., Aquino, A., Daniels, A., Moulaert, A., Lee, D. and Krause, A., 2010. Global mechanisms

for sustaining and enhancing PES schemes. Ecological Economics 69, 2075-2084.

Ferraro, P.J., 2011. The future of payments for environmental services. Conservation Biology 25(6),

1134-1138.

Fletcher, R., Dressler, W., Büscher, B. and Anderson, Z.R., 2016. Questioning REDD+ and the

future of market-based conservation. Conservation Biology 30(3), 673-675.

Forner, C., Blaser, J., Jotzo, F. and Robledo, C., 2006. Keeping the forest for the climate’s sake:

Avoiding deforestation in developing countries under the UNFCCC. Climate Policy 6, 2-

20.

Forsyth, T. 2007. Are environmental social movements socially exclusive? An historical study from

Thailand. World Development 35(12), 2110-2130.

Fosci, M., 2013. Balance sheet in the REDD+ +: Are global estimates measuring the wrong costs?

Ecological Economics 89, 196-200.

Fosci, M., 2014. The economic case for prioritizing governance over financial incentives in

REDD+. Climate Policy 13(2), 170-190.

Friis Lund, J. and Treue, T., 2008. Are we getting there? Evidence of decentralized forest

management from the Tanzanian Miombo woodlands. World Development 36(12), 2780-

2800.

Fritzen, S.A., 2007. Can the design of community-driven development reduce the risk of elite

capture? Evidence from Indonesia. World Development 35(8), 1359-1375.

Fry, I., 2002. Twists and turns in the jungle: Exploring the evolution of land use, land use change

and forestry decisions within the Kyoto Protocol. Review of European Community and

International Environmental Law 11(2), 159-168.

Fry, I., 2007. More twists, turns and stumbles in the jungle: A further exploration of the evolution

of land use, land use change and forestry decisions within the Kyoto Protocol. Review of

European Community and International Environmental Law 16(3), 341-355.

Fry, I., 2008. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: Opportunities and

pitfalls in developing a new legal regime. Review of European Community and

International Environmental Law 17(2), 166-182.

Fry, I., 2011. If a tree falls in a Kyoto Forest and nobody is there to hear it, will it be accounted for?

An insider’s view of the negotiations surrounding land use, land-use change and forestry

for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol. Review of European

Community and International Environmental Law 20(2), 123-138.

206

Gale, F., 1998. Constructing global civil society actors: An anatomy of the environmental coalition

contesting the tropical timber trade regime. Global Society 12(3), 343-361.

Garcia-Amado, LR.., Ruiz Perez, M., Reyes Escutia, F., Barasa Garcia, S. and Contreras Mejia, E.,

2011. Efficiency of payments for environmental services: Equity and additionality in a case

study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico. Ecological Economics 70, 2361-2368.

Gerber, J.F., 2011. Conflicts over industrial tree plantations in the South: Who, how and why?

Global Environmental Change 21, 165-176.

German, L., Villamor, G., Twine, E., Velarde, S.J. and Kidane, B., 2009. Environmental services

and the precautionary principle: Using scenarios to reconcile conservation and livelihood

objectives in upper catchments. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3-5), 368-394.

Gibbs, H.K., Brown, S., Niles, J.O., and Foley, J.A., 2007. Monitoring and estimating tropical forest

carbon stocks: Making REDD+ a reality. Environmental Research Letters 2, 045023, IOP

Publishing, UK, 14 pp.

Gillespie, A., 2006. Facilitating and controlling civil society in international environmental law.

Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 15(3), 327-338.

Gomez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P.L. and Montes, C., 2010. The history of ecosystem

services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment

schemes. Ecological Economics 69, 1209-1218.

Graichen, P., 2005. Can forestry gain from emissions trading? Rules governing sinks projects under

the UNFCCC and the EU Emissions Trading System. Review of European Community

and International Environmental Law 14(1), 11-18.

Gregersen, H., El Lakany, H., Karsenty, A and White, A, 2010. Does the opportunity cost

approach indicate the real cost of REDD+? Rights and realities of paying for REDD+.

Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington D.C., USA, 30 pp.

Grieg-Gran, M., Porras, I. and Wunder, S., 2005. How can market mechanisms for forest

environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World

Development 33, 1511-1527.

Grieg-Gran, M. 2006. The cost of avoiding deforestation: Report prepared for the Stern Review of

the economics of climate change: International Institute for Environment and

Development, London, UK, 26 pp.

Grondard, N., Loisel, C., Martinet, A. and Routier, J.B. 2008. Reducing emissions from

deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): Analysis of 7 outstanding issues for the

inclusion of tropical forests in the international climate governance. ONF International,

Paris, France, 52 pp.

Grubb, M., Laing, T., Counsell, T. and Willan, C., 2011. Global carbon mechanisms: Lessons and

implications. Climatic Change 104, 539-573.

Gsottbauer, E. and van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., 2012. Bounded rationality and social interaction in

negotiating a climate agreement. International Environmental Agreements 13, 25 pp.

Gupta, J., 2003. The Role of Non-State actors in international environmental affairs. Heidelberg

Journal of International Law 63(2), 459-486.

Gupta, J., 2005. Non-State Actors in international governance and law: A challenge or blessing,

ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 11(3), 497-517.

Gupta, J., 2008. Global change: Analysing scale and scaling in environmental governance. In:

Young, O, Schroeder, H. and King, L. (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change:

Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers, MIT Press, Cambridge,

Massachusetts, USA, pp. 225-258.

Gupta, J. and van der Grijp, N. (Eds.), 2010. Mainstreaming climate change in development

cooperation. theory, practice and implications for the European Union. Cambridge

University Press, UK, 348 pp.

Gupta, J. and Sanchez, N., 2012. Global green governance: Embedding the green economy in a

global green and equitable rule of law polity. Review of European Community and

International Environmental Law 21(1), 12-22.

207

Gupta, J., 2012. Glocal Forest and REDD+ Governance: win-win or lose-lose? Current Opinion in

Environmental Sustainability 4, 620-627.

Gupta, J., Grijp, N.M. van der and Kuik, O.J. (Eds.), 2013. Climate change, forests and REDD+:

Lessons for institutional design. Routledge, London, UK, 263 pp.

Gupta, J., 2014. The history of global climate governance. Cambridge University Press, UK, 262 pp.

Gupta, J. and Stec, S., 2014. Strengthening UNEP’s legitimacy: Towards greater stakeholder

engagement. UNEP perspectives 11. UNEP, 2014, 13 pp.

Haggard, S. and Simmons, B.A., 1987. Theories of international regimes. International

Organization 41(3), 491-517.

Hajek, F., Ventresca, M.J., Scriven, J. and Castro, A. 2011. Regime-building for REDD+: Evidence

from a cluster of local initiatives in South-Eastern Peru. Environmental Science & Policy

14(2), 201-215.

Hajer, M., and Versteeg, W., 2005. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics:

Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7(3),

175-184.

Hajer, M., 2006. Doing discourse analysis: Coalitions, practices, meaning, In: Van den Brink, M.

and Metze, T. (Eds.), 2006. Words matter in policy and planning - Discourse theory and

method in the social sciences. Netherlands Geographical Studies 33, 65-74.

Hallegatte, S., Bangalore, M., Bonzanigo, L., Fay, M., Kane, T., Narloch, U., Rozenberg, J., Treguer,

D. and Vogt-Schilb, A., 2016. Shock waves: Managing the impacts of climate change on

poverty. Climate Change and Development Series, World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA,

227 pp.

Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P and Rittberger, V., 1997. Theories of international regimes. Cambridge

University Press, UK, 248 pp.

Hatcher, J., 2009. Securing tenure rights and Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and

Degradation (REDD+). Social Development Working Paper 120, World Bank,

Washington D.C., USA, 24 pp.

Haug, C. and Gupta, J., 2013. Global forest governance. In Gupta, J., Van der Grijp, N. and Kuik,

O. (Eds.), 2013. Climate change, forests and REDD: Lessons for institutional design,

Routledge, London, UK, pp. 52-76.

Hayes, T. and Persha, L., 2010. Nesting local forestry initiatives: Revisiting community forest

management in a REDD+ world. Forest Policy and Economics 12, 545-553.

Headon S., 2009. Whose sustainable development? Sustainable Ddevelopment under the Kyoto

protocol, “the Coldplay Effect” and the CDM Gold standard. Colorado Journal of

International Environmental Law and Policy 20(2), 127-156.

Heaton, K., 2005. mitigating environmental and social impacts of intensive plantation forestry.

Journal of Sustainable Forestry 21(4), 75-96.

Hein, J., Adiwibowo, S., Dittrich, C., Rosyani, Soetarto, E. and Faust, H., 2015. Rescaling of access

and property relations in a frontier landscape: Insights from Jambi, Indonesia. The

Professional Geographer 68(3), 380-389.

Herzog, H., Caldeira, K. and Reilly, J., 2003. An issue of permanence: Assessing the effectiveness of

temporary carbon storage. Climatic Change 59, 293-310.

Hoehne, N., Wartmann, S., Herold, A. and Freibauer, A., 2007. The rules for land use, land use

changes and forestry under the Kyoto Protocol – lessons learned for the future climate

negotiations. Environmental Science and Policy 10, 353-369.

Holm Olsen, K., 2007. The clean development mechanism’s contribution to sustainable

development: A review of the literature. Climatic Change 84, 59-73.

Holm, S.O., 2015. A management strategy for multiple ecosystem services in boreal forests. Journal

of Sustainable Forestry 34(4), 358-379.

Holopainen, J. and Wit, M. (Eds)., 2008. Financing sustainable forest management. Tropenbos

International, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 169 pp.

208

Hovani, A. and Fotos, M., 2007. policy alternatives to increase the demand for forest-based carbon

sequestration, Journal of Sustainable Forestry 25(1-2), 99-117.

Huberman, D., 2009. World Heritage sites and the integration of biodiversity into an international

PES framework. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3-5), 456-480.

Huettner, M., 2012. Risks and opportunities of REDD+ implementation for environmental

integrity and socio-economic compatibility. Environmental Science & Policy 15, 4-12.

Huitema, D., and S. Meijerink. 2010. Realizing water transitions. the role of policy entrepreneurs in

water policy change. Ecology and Society 15(2): 26, 10 pp.

Humphreys, D., 2003. Life protective of carcinogenic challenge? Global forest governance under

advanced capitalism. Global Environmental Politics 3(2), 40-55.

Humphreys, D. 2006. Logjam. Deforestation and the crisis of global governance, Earthscan,

London, UK, 302 pp.

Humphreys, D., 2008. The politics of ‘avoided deforestation’: Historical context and contemporary

issues. International Forestry Review,10(3), 433--42.

Hunt, C. and Baum, S., 2009. The ‘hidden’ social costs of forestry offsets. Mitigation and

Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 14, 107-120.

IPCC, 1990. Climate change: The IPCC scientific assessment. Report prepared for

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change by Working Group I, Houghton, J.T.,

Jenkins, G.J. and Ephraums, J.J. (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, UK, New York, US

and Melbourne, Australia, 410 pp.

IPCC, 2002. Climate change and biodiversity, IPCC Technical Paper V. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, 77

pp.

IPCC, 2006. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories 4, Agriculture, forestry and

other land use. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme,

Eggleston, H.S., Buendia L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T. and Tanabe, K. (Eds). IGES, Japan, 20

pp.

IPCC, 2007. Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III

to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,

Pachauri, R.K. and Reisinger, A. (Eds.). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 104.

IPCC, 2013. Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker, T., Qin, D., Plattner, G., Tignor, M., Allen, S.,

Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V. and Midgley, P. (Eds.), 2013. Climate change

2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth

Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge

University Press, UK and New York, USA, 1535 pp.

IPCC, 2014. Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III

to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,

Pachauri, R.K. and Meyer, L.A. (Eds.). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.

IPCCA, 2011. Analytical background paper on the legal aspects of REDD+ and recent REDD+

policy developments. Indigenous Peoples Climate Change Assessment, Cuzco, Peru, 50 pp.

Irawan, S., Tacconi, L. and Ring, I., 2013. Stakeholders’ incentives for land-use change and

REDD+: The case of Indonesia. Ecological Economics 87, 75-83.

Jacquemont, F. and Caparros, A., 2002. The Convention on Biological Diversity and the Climate

Change Convention 10 years after Rio: Towards a synergy of the two regimes? Review of

European Community and International Environmental Law 11(2), 169-180.

James, A., Gaston, K.J. and Balmford, A., 2001. Can we afford to conserve

biodiversity? BioScience, 51(1), 43-52.

Jaung, W. and Soo Bae, J., 2012. Evaluating socio-economic equity of REDD+ in a rights-based

approach: Rapid equity appraisal matrix. Environmental Science & Policy 22, 1-12.

Jindal, R., Swallow, B. and Kerr, J.M., 2008. Forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in Africa:

Potential benefits and challenges. Natural Resources Forum 32, 116-130.

209

Jindal, R., Kerr, J.M. and Carter, S., 2012. reducing poverty through carbon forestry? Impacts of the

N’hambita Community Carbon Project in Mozambique. World Development 40(10), 2123-

2135.

Johns, T., Merry, F., Stickler, C., Nepstad, D., Laporte, N. and Goetza, S., 2008. A three-fund

approach to incorporating government, public and private forest stewards into a REDD+

funding mechanism. International Forestry Review 10(3), 458-464.

Kaimowitz, D. and Angelsen, A., 1998. Economic models of tropical deforestation. A review.

CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 140 pp.

Kaimowitz, D. 2008. The prospects for Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation

(REDD+) in Mesoamerica. International Forestry Review 10(3), 485-495.

Kanninen, M., Murdiyarso, D., Seymour, F., Angelsen, A., Wunder, S. and German, L., 2007. Do

trees grow on money? The implications of deforestation research for policies to promote

REDD+. Forest Perspectives 4, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 73 pp.

Kanowski, P.J., McDermott, C.L. and Cashore, B.W., 2010. Implementing REDD+: Lessons from

analysis of forest governance. Environmental Science & Policy 14, 111-117.

Karsenty, A., 2008. The architecture of proposed REDD+ schemes after Bali: Facing critical

choices. International Forestry Review 10(3), 443-457.

Karsenty, A., 2009. What the (carbon) market cannot do..., CIRAD, Paris, France, 4 pp.

Karsenty, A., and Ongolo, S., 2011. Can “fragile States” decide to reduce their deforestation? The

inappropriate use of the theory of incentives with respect to the REDD+ mechanism.

Forest Policy and Economics 18, 38-45.

Karsenty, A., Vogel, A. and Castell, F., 2012. ‘‘Carbon rights’’, REDD+ and payments for

environmental services. Environmental Science and Policy 35, 20-29.

Karsenty, A. 2012. Financing options to support REDD+ activities. CIRAD, Paris, France, 77 pp.

Kasa, S., Gullberg, A.T. and Heggelund, G., 2007. The Group of 77 in the international climate

negotiations: Recent developments and future directions. International Environmental

Agreements 8, 113-127.

Kashwan, P. and Holahan, R., 2014. Nested governance for effective REDD+: Institutional and

political arguments. International Journal of the Commons 8(2), 554-575.

Kindermann, G., M. Obersteiner, B. Sohngen J. Sathaye, K. Andrasko, E. Rametsteiner, B.

Schlamadinger, S. Wunder, R. Beach., 2008. Global cost estimates of reducing carbon

emissions through avoided deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of

Sciences 105(30), 10302-10307.

Kiss., A., Castro, G. and Newcombe, K., 2002. The role of multilateral institutions. Philosphical

Transactions of the Royal Society, London A 360, 1641-1652.

Kissinger, G., Herold, M., De Sy, V., 2012. Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: A

synthesis report for REDD+ policymakers. Lexeme Consulting, Vancouver, Canada, 48

pp.

Koellner, T., Sell, J. Gahwiler, M. and Scholz, R.W., 2008. Assessment of the management of

organizations supplying ecosystem services from tropical forests. Global Environmental

Change 18, 746-757.

Kosoy, N. and Corbera, E., 2010. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism.

Ecological Economics 69, 1228-1236.

Köthke, M., Leischner, B. and Elsasser, P., 2013. Uniform global deforestation patterns — An

empirical analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 28, 23-37.

Kothke, M., Schroppel, B. and Elsasser, P., 2014. National REDD+ reference levels deduced from

the global deforestation curve. Forest Policy and Economics 43, 18-28.

Krasner, S.D., 1982. Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes and intervening variables.

International Organization 36, 185-205.

Krause, T. and Nielson, T.D., 2014. The legitimacy of incentive-based conservation and a critical

account of social safeguards. Environmental Science & Policy 41, 44-51.

210

Kuik, O.J., 2013. REDD policies, global food, fiber and timber markets, and ‘leakage’. In: Gupta, J.,

Van der Grijp, N.M. and Kuik, O.J. (Eds.), 2013. Climate change, forests and REDD+:

Lessons for institutional design. Routledge, London, UK, 263 pp.

Kuik, O.J., 2014. REDD+ and international leakage via food and timber markets: A CGE analysis.

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 19, 641-655.

Kulovesi, K. and Gutierrez, M., 2009. Climate change negotiations update: Process and prospects

for a Copenhagen agreed outcome in December 2009. Review of European Community

and International Environmental Law 18(3), 229-243.

Lahsen, M., 2005. Technocracy, democracy and US climate politics: The need for demarcations.

Science, Technology and Human Values 30(1), 137-169.

Laing, T. and Palmer, C., 2015. Economy-wide impacts of REDD+ when there is political

influence. Resource and Energy Economics 40, 107-126.

Landell-Mills, N. and Porras, I.T., 2002. Silver bullet or fool’s gold? A global review of markets for

forest environmental services and their impacts on the poor. International Institute for

Environmental and Development, London, UK, 272 pp.

Larson, A.M. and Ribot, J.C., 2007. The poverty of forestry policy: Double standards on an uneven

playing field. Sustainability Science 2(2), 189-204.

Larson, A.M., 2011. Forest tenure reform in the age of climate change: Lessons for REDD+.

Global Environmental Change 21, 540-549.

Lasco, R.D., Pulhin, F.B. and Sales, R.F., 2007. Analysis of leakage in carbon sequestration projects

in forestry: A case study of upper Magat watershed, Philippines. Mitigation and Adaptation

Strategies for Global Change 12, 1189-1211.

Lawlor, K., Madeira, E.M., Blockhus, J. and Ganz, D.J., 2013. Community participation and

benefits in REDD+: A review of initial outcomes and lessons. Forests 4, 296-318.

Lederer, M., 2011. From CDM to REDD+ ‒ What do we know for setting up effective and

legitimate carbon governance? Ecological Economics 70, 1900-1907.

Lederer, M., 2012. The practice of carbon markets. Environmental Politics 21(4), 640-656.

Leggett, M. and Lovell, H., 2012. Community perceptions of REDD+: A case study from Papua

New Guinea, Climate Policy 12(1), 115-134.

Leimona, B., Van Noordwijk, M., de Groot, R. and Leemans, R., 2015. Fairly efficient, efficiently

fair: Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia.

Ecosystem Services 12, 16-28.

Lejano, R.P., 2006. The design of environmental regimes: Social construction, contextuality, and

improvisation. International Environmental Agreements 6, 187-207.

Lele, U., Kumar, N., Husain, S. A., Zazueta, A. and Kelly, L., 2000. The World Bank forest strategy:

Striking the right balance. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA, 153pp.

Lemaitre, S., 2011. Indigenous Peoples’ land rights and REDD+: A case study. Review of

European Community and International Environmental Law 20(2), 150-162.

Lesniewska, F., 2010. REDD+: The Copenhagen effect. Law Environment and Development

Journal, 102 -111

Lesniewska, F., 2014. UNFCCC REDD+ COP Decisions: The cumulative effect on forest related

law processes. International Community Law Review 15(1), 103-121.

Levin, K., McDermott, C. and Cashore, B., 2008. The climate regime as global forest governance:

Can reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) initiatives

pass a ‘dual effectiveness’ test? International Forestry Review 10(3), 538-549.

Lewis, S.J. and Russell, A.J., 2011. Being embedded: A way forward for ethnographic research.

Ethnography 12(3), 398-416.

Liu, J., Li, S., Ouyang, Z., Tam, C. Chen, X., 2008. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s

policies for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(28),

9477-9482.

211

Livengood, E. and Dixon, A., 2009. REDD+ and the effort to limit global warming to 2 C:

Implications for including REDD+ credits in the international carbon market. KEA 3,

New Zealand, 33 pp.

Locatelli, B., Rojas, V. and Salinas, Z., 2008. Impacts of payments for environmental services on

local development in northern Costa Rica: A fuzzy multi-criteria analysis. Forest Policy and

Economics 10, 275-285.

Lovbrand, E., 2004. Bridging political expectations and scientific limitations in climate risk

management – on the uncertain effects of international carbon sink policies. Climatic

Change 67, 449-460.

Lovera, S. 2008. REDD+: The pay-the-polluter principle. In Holopainen, J. and Wit, M. (eds).

Financing sustainable forest management. Tropenbos International, Wageningen, the

Netherlands, 28–32.

Lovera, S., 2009. REDD+ realities. In: Brand, U., Bullard, N., Lander, E., Müller, T. (eds.),

Contours of climate justice: Ideas for Shaping New Climate and Energy Politics. Dag

Hammarskjøld Foundation, Sweden, 46-53.

Luttrell, C., Schreckenberg, K., and Peskett, L., 2007. The implications of carbon financing for pro-

poor community forestry. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK, 5 pp.

Lyster, R., 2011. REDD+, transparency, participation and resource rights: The role of law.

Environmental Science and Policy 14(2), 118-126.

Maraseni, T.n., Neupane, P.R., Lopez-Castro, F. and Cadman, T., 2014, An assessment of the

impacts of the REDD+ pilot project on community forests user groups (CFUGs) and their

community forests in Nepal. Journal of Environmental Management 136, 37-46.

Massai, L., 2010. The long way to the Copenhagen Accord: Climate change negotiations in 2009.

Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 19(1), 104-121.

Matthews, R., Van Noordwijk, M, Lambin, E., Meyfroidt, P., Gupta, J., Verschot, L., Hergoualc’h,

K. and Veldkamp, E., 2014. Implementing REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from

Deforestation and Degradation): Evidence on governance, evaluation and impactsfrom

the REDD-ALERT project. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 19,

907-925.

Matz, N., 2005. Financial institutions between effectiveness and legitimacy – A legal analysis of the

World Bank, Global Environment Facility and Prototype Carbon Fund. International

Environmental Agreements 5, 265-302.

McCarthy, S. and Tacconi, L., 2011. The political economy of tropical deforestation: Assessing

models and motives. Environmental Politics, 20(1), 115-132.

McDermott, C.L. with Humphreys, D., Wildburger, C., Wood, P., Marfo, E., Pacheco, P. and

Yasmi, Y., 2010. Mapping the core actors and issues defining international forest

governance. In: Rayner, J., Buck, A. and Katila, P. (Eds.), 2010. Embracing complexity:

Meeting the challenges of international forest governance. A global assessment report.

Prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel on the International Forest Regime, IUFRO

World Series 28, Vienna, Austria, 19-36.

McDermott, M., Mahanty, S. and Schreckenberg, K, 2013. Examining equity: A multidimensional

framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services. Environmental Science

& Policy 33, 416-427.

McDermott, C.L., 2014. REDD+uced: From sustainability to legality to units of carbon—The

search for common interests in international forest governance. Environmental Science &

Policy 35, 12-19.

McElwee, P.D., 2011. Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest

conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or problem? Geoforum 43(3), 412-426.

McKinsey & Company, 2009. Pathways to a low-carbon economy. Version 2.0 of the global

greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. McKinsey & Company, 192 pp.

212

McNeely, J.A., Miller, K.R., Reid, W.V., Mittermeier, R.A.B., 1990. Conserving the World’s

Biological Diversity. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural

Resources, Gland, Switzerland, 193 pp.

Melick, D., 2010. Credibility of REDD+ and experiences from Papua New Guinea. Conservation

Biology 24(2), 359-361.

Mendelsohn, R.O., Dinar, A. and Williams, L., 2006. The distributional impact of climate change

on rich and poor countries. Environment and Development Economics 11, 159-178.

Mertz, O., Müller, D., Sikor, T., Hett, C., Heinimann, A., Castella, J.C., Lestrelin, G. et al., 2012.

The forgotten D: Challenges of addressing forest degradation in complex mosaic

landscapes under REDD+. Geografisk Tidsskrift, Danish Journal of Geography 112(1),

63-76.

Michaelowa, A., and Michaelowa, K., 2010. Climate business for poverty reduction? The role of the

World Bank. CIS Working Paper 59, Center for Comparative and International Studies,

Zurich, Switzerland, 23 pp.

Milder, J.C., Scherr, S. and Bracer, C., 2010. Trends and future potential of payment for

environmental services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries. Ecology and

Society 15(2):4, 19 pp.

Minang, P.A., McCall, M.K. and Bressers, H.Th.A., 2007. Community capacity for implementing

Clean Development Mechanism projects within community forests in Cameroon.

Environmental Management 39, 615-630.

Minang, P.A. and van Noordwijk, M., 2013. Design challenges for achieving reduced emissions

from deforestation and forest degradation through conservation: Leveraging multiple

paradigms at the tropical forest margins. Land Use Policy 31, 61-70.

Minang, P.A., Van Noordwijk, M., Duguma, L.A., Alemagi, D., Trong H.D., Bernard, F., Agung, P.

et al., 2014. REDD+ readiness progress across countries: Time for reconsideration.

Climate Policy 14(6), 685-708.

Mitlin, D., Hickey, S. and Bebbington, A., 2007. Reclaiming development? NGOs and the challenge

of alternatives. World Development 35(10), 1699-1720.

Mohammed, E.Y., 2011. Pro-poor benefit distribution in REDD+: Who gets what and why does it

matter? REDD+ Working Paper, International Institute for Environment and

Development, London, UK, 36 pp.

Morel, A.C. and Morel, B.F., 2012. How could carbon credits for reducing deforestation compete

with returns from palm oil: A proposal for a more flexible REDD+ valuation tool. Journal

of Sustainable Forestry 31(1-2), 11-28.

Moreno, C., Speich Chassé, D. and Furh, L., 2015. Carbon metrics – Global abstractions and

ecological epistemicide, an essay. Publication Series Ecology 42, Heinrich Böll Foundation,

Berlin, Germany, 60 pp.

Morgera, E. and Tsioumani, E., 2010. The evolution of benefit sharing: Linking biodiversity and

community livelihoods. Review of European Community and International Environmental

Law 19(2), 150-173.

Murray, B.C., 2008. Leakage from avoided deforestation compensation policy: Concepts, empirical

evidence, and corrective policy options. Working Paper, Nicolas Institute for

Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University, US, 34 pp.

Mustalahti, I. and Tassa, D.T., 2012. Analysis of three crucial elements of REDD+ in participatory

forest management. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 27(2), 200-209.

Neeff, T. and Ascui, F., 2009. Lessons from carbon markets for effective REDD+ architecture.

Climate Policy 9, 306-315.

Neeff, T., Göhler, D. and Ascui, F., 2014. Finding a path for REDD+ between ODA and the

CDM. Climate Policy 14(2), 149-166.

Nelson, F., Foley, C., Foley, L.S., Leposo, A., Loure, E., Peterson, D., Peterson, M. et al., 2010.

Payments for ecosystem services as a framework for community-based conservation in

Northern Tanzania. Conservation Biology 24(1), 78-85.

213

Nepstad, D.C., Soares-Filho, B., Merry, F., Moutinho, P., Rodrigues, H.O., Bowman, S.,

Schwartzman, S. et al., 2007. The costs and benefits of reducing carbon emissions from

deforestation and forest degradation in the Brazilian Amazon. Woods Hole Research

Centre, Falmouth, US, 32 pp.

Nepstad, D.C., McGrath, D.G. and Soares-Filho, B., 2011. Systemic conservation, REDD+, and

the future of the Amazon Basin. Conservation Biology 25(6), 1113-1116.

Newell, P., 2000. Climate change: Non-State actors and the politics of the greenhouse. Cambridge

University Press, UK, 236 pp.

Newell, P., 2012. Of markets and madness: Whose clean development will prevail at Rio+20? The

Journal of Environment & Development 21, 40-43.

Niles, J. O., Boyd, W., Lawlow, K., Myers Madeira, E. and Olander, L., 2009. Experience on the

ground, in the forests. International Forest Carbon and the Climate Change Challenge

Series – Brief 6, Nicholas Institute, Duke University, Durham, US, 7 pp.

Nillson, S. and Schopfhauser, W., 1995. The carbon-sequestration potential of a global afforestation

program. Climatic Change 30, 267-293.

Norgaard, R.B., 2010. Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder.

Ecological Economics 69, 1219-1227.

Novotny Couto Pereira, S., 2010. Payment for environmental services in the Amazon forest: How

can conservation and development be reconciled? The Journal of Environment &

Development 19(2), 171-190.

Nuzunda, E.F. and Mahuve, T.G., 2011. A SWOT analysis of mitigation of climate change through

REDD+. In Leal Filho, W. (Ed.), 2011. Experiences of climate change adaptation in

Africa. 201 Climate Change Management, Springer-Verlag Berlin, 201-216.

Okafor, O.C., 2006. Poverty, agency and resistance in the future of international law, an African

perspective. Third World Quarterly 27(5), 799-814.

Okereke, C., Bulkeley, H. and Schroeder, H., 2009. Conceptualizing climate governance beyond the

international regime. Global Environmental Politics 9(1), 58-79.

Okereke, C. and Dooley, K., 2010. Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to

avoided deforestation: Towards a post-Kyoto climate agreement. Global Environmental

Change 20, 82-95.

Olsen, N. and J. Bishop, 2009. The financial costs of REDD+: Evidence from Brazil and

Indonesia. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 77 pp.

Ostrom, E. and Nagendra, H., 2006. Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on

the ground, and in the laboratory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

103(51), 19224-19231.

Pagiola, S., 2008. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Environmental Economics

65, 212-224.

Palm, M., Ostwald, M. and Reilly, J., 2008. Land use and forestry based CDM in scientific peer-

reviewed literature pre-and post-COP 9 in Milan. International Environmental Agreements

8, 249-274.

Palmer, C., 2011. Property rights and liability for deforestation under REDD+: Implications for

‘permanence’ in policy design. Ecological Economics 70, 571-576.

Partzsch, L. and Ziegler, R., 2011. Social entrepreneurs as change agents: A case study on power

and authority in the water sector. International Environmental Agreements 11, 63-83.

Pattberg, P., 2005. What role for private rule-making in global environmental governance?

Analysing the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). International Environmental Agreements

5, 175-189.

Pattberg, P., 2006. Private governance and the South: Lessons from global forest policy. Third

World Quarterly 27(4), 579-593.

Pedroni, L., Dutschke, M., Streck, C. and Estrada Porrúa, M., 2009. Creating incentives for

avoiding further deforestation: The nested approach. Climate Policy 9(2), 207-220.

214

Pelletier, J., Kirby, KR. and Potvin, C., 2012. Significance of carbon stock uncertainties on emission

reductions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries. Forest

Policy and Economics 24, 3-11.

Pelletier, J., Busch, J. and Potvin, C., 2015. Addressing uncertainty upstream or downstream of

accounting for emissions reductions from deforestation and forest degradation. Climatic

Change 130, 635-648.

Peskett, L. And Harkin, Z., 2007. Risk and responsibility in reduced emissions from deforestation

and degradation. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK, 7 pp.

Peskett, L., Huberman, D., Bowen-Jones, E., Edwards, G. and Brown, J., 2008. Making REDD+

work for the poor. Overseas Development Institute and IUCN, London, UK, 80 pp.

Peskett, L., Schreckenberg, K. and Brown, J., 2011. Institutional approaches for carbon financing in

the forest sector: Learning lessons for REDD+ from forest carbon projects in Uganda.

Environmental Science & Policy 14(2), 216-229.

Peters-Stanley, M., Hamilton, K., Marcello, T. and Sjardin, M., 2011. Back to the future, state of the

voluntary carbon markets 2011. Bloomberg New Energy Finance and Forest Trends

Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, D.C., USA, 93 pp.

Peterson, A.L., Gallagher, L.A,, Huberman, D. and Mulder, I., 2012 Seeing REDD+: Reducing

emissions and conserving biodiversity by avoiding deforestation. Journal of Sustainable

Forestry 31(1-2), 29-58.

Pfaff, A., Robalino, J.A. and Sanchez-Azofeifa, A., 2008. Payments for environmental services:

Empirical analysis for Costa Rica. Working Papers Series, Terry Sanford Institute of Public

Policy, Duke University, US, 27 pp.

Phelps, J., Guerrero, M.C., Dalabajan, D.A., Young, B. and Webb, E.L., 2010. What makes a

REDD+ country? Global Environmental Change 20, 322-332.

Pirard, R. and Karsenty, A., 2009. Climate change mitigation: Should “avoided deforestation” be

rewarded? Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3-5), 434-455.

Pirard, R., 2012. Payments for Environmental Services (PES) in the public policy landscape:

“Mandatory” spices in the Indonesian recipe. Forest Policy and Economics 18, 23-29.

Pistorius, T., Schmitt, C.B., Benick, D. and Entenmann, S., 2010. Greening REDD+: Challenges

and opportunities for forest biodiversity conservation. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung

182(5/6), 82-98.

Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P., 2003. Common method biases in

behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal

of Applied Psychology 88(5), 879-903.

Pollini, J., 2009. Carbon sequestration for linking conservation and rural development in

Madagascar: The case of the Vohidrazana-Mantadia Corridor restoration and conservation

carbon project. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3-5), 322-342.

Porras, I., Barton, D.N., Miranda, M. and Chacon-Cascante, A., 2013. Learning from 20 years of

payments for ecosystems services in Costa Rica. International Institute for Environment

and Development, London, UK, 76 pp.

Potvin, C., Guay, B. and Pedroni, L., 2008. Is reducing emissions from deforestation financially

feasible? A Panamanian case study. Climate Policy 8, 23-40.

Putz, F.E. and Zuidema, P.A., 2008. REDD+ and reduced impact logging. In: Holopainen, J. and

Wit, M. (Eds)., 2008. Financing sustainable forest management. Tropenbos International,

Wageningen, the Netherlands, 155-158.

Putz, F.E. and Redford, K.H., 2009. Dangers of carbon-based conservation. Global Environmental

Change 19(4), 400-401.

PwC (Price Waterhouse Coopers), 2012. Assessing options for effective mechanisms to share

benefits: Insights for REDD+ initiatives. Program on Forests (PROFOR), Washington,

D.C., USA, 168 pp.

Rademaekers, K., Eichler, L., Obersteiner, M., Berg, J. and Havlik, P., 2010. Study on the evolution

of some deforestation drivers and their potential impacts on the costs of an avoiding

215

deforestation scheme. Report to the European Commission (Directorate-general for

Environment), COWI Consortium, ECORYS-IIASA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 74 pp.

Rayner, J., Buck, A., and Katila, P. (Eds.), 2010. Embracing complexity: Meeting the challenges of

international forest governance. A global assessment report prepared by the Global Forest

Expert Panel on the International Forest Regime. IUFRO World Series 28, Vienna,

Austria, 172 pp.

Redford, K.H. and Adams, W.A., 2009. Payments for ecosystem services and the challenge of

saving nature. Conservation Biology 23(4), 785-787.

Rendón Thompson, O.R., Paavola, J., Healey, J.R., Jones, J.P.G.R., and Torres, J., 2013. Reducing

emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): Transaction costs of six

Peruvian projects. Ecology and Society 18(1):17, 12 pp.

Resosudarmo, I.A.P., Atmadja, S., Ekaputri, A.D., Intarini, D.Y. and Indriatmoko Pangestuti Astri,

Y., 2014. Does tenure security lead to REDD+ project effectiveness? Reflections from five

emerging sites in Indonesia. World Development 55, 68-83.

Reynolds, T.W., 2012. Institutional determinants of success among forestry-based carbon

sequestration projects in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development 40(3), 542-554.

Richards, M., 2000. Can sustainable tropical forestry be made profitable? The potential and

limitations of innovative incentive mechanisms. World Development 28(6), 1001-1016.

Richards, K.R. and Stokes, C., 2004. A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: A dozen

years of research. Climatic Change 63, 1-48.

Richards, M. and Jenkins, M., 2007. Potential and challenges of payments for ecosystem services

from tropical forests. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK, 8 pp.

Robinson, B.E., Holland, M.B. and Naughton-Treves, L., 2014. Does secure land tenure save

forests? A meta-analysis of the relationship between land tenure and tropical deforestation.

Global Environmental Change 29, 281-293.

Rodriguez, L.C., Pascual, U., Murdian, R., Pazmino, N., and Whitten, S., 2011. Towards a unified

scheme for environmental and social protection: Learning from PES and CCT experiences

in developing countries. Ecological Economics 70, 2163-2174.

Roessing Neto, E., 2015. REDD+ as a tool of global forest governance. The International

Spectator 50(1), 60-73.

Ros-Tonen, M.A.F., Insaidoo, T. F. and Acheampong, E. 2013. Promising start, bleak outlook: The

role of Ghana's modified Taungya system as a social safeguard in timber legality

processes. Forest Policy and Economics 32, 57-67.

Ros-Tonen, M.A.F., Derkyi, M. and Insaidoo, T.F.G., 2014. From co-management to landscape

governance: Wither Ghana’s modified Taungya system? Forests 5, 2996-3021.

Rosendal, G.K., 2007. Norway in UN environmental policies: Ambitions and influence.

International Environmental Agreements 7, 439-455.

Rosendal, G.K. and Schei, P.J., 2014. How may REDD+ affect the practical, legal and institutional

framework for ‘payment for ecosystem services’ in Costa Rica? Ecosystem Services 9, 75-

82.

Royo, J., 2012. Agency and international relations, an alternative lens. E-International Relations,

http://www.e-ir.info/2012/08/28/agency-and-international-relations-an-alternative-lens/.

Rudel, T.K., Defries, R., Asner, G.P. and Laurance, W.F., 2009. Changing drivers of deforestation

and new opportunities for conservation. Conservation Biology 23(6), 1396-1405.

Salvini, G., Herold, M., De Sy, V., Kissinger, G., Brockhaus, M. and Skutsch, M., 2014. How

countries link REDD+ interventions to drivers in their readiness plans: Implications for

monitoring systems. Environmental Research Letters 9, 074004, 12 pp.

Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A., Pfaff, A., Robalino, J.A. and Boomhower, J.P., 2007. Costa Rica’s payment

for environmental services program: Intention, implementation and impact. Conservation

Biology 21(5), 1165-1173.

Sandbrook, C., Nelson, F., Adams, W. and Agrawal, A., 2010. Carbon forests and the REDD+

paradox. Fauna & Flora International Oryx 44(3), 330-334.

216

Santilli, M., Moutinho, P., Schwartzman, S., Nepstad, D., Curran, L. and Nobre, C., 2005. Tropical

deforestation and the Kyoto Protocol: An editorial essay. Climatic Change 71(3), 267-276.

Saravesi, A., 2012. The human rights dimension of REDD+. Review of European Community and

International Environmental Law 21(2), 102-113.

Sasaki, N. and Putz, F.E., 2009. Critical need for new definitions of ‘forest’ and ‘forest degradation’

in global climate change agreements. Conservation Letters 2(5), 226-232.

Saunders, J., Ebeling, J. and Nussbaum, R., 2008. Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest

degradation (REDD+): Lessons from a governance perspective. Proforest, Oxford, UK,

19 pp.

Schaphoff, S., Lucht, W., Gerten, D., Stich, S., Cramer, W. and Prentice, C.I., 2006. Terrestrial

biosphere carbon storage under alternative climate projections. Climatic Change 74, 97-

122.

Schipper, E.L.F. and Boyd, E., 2006. UNFCCC COP 11 and COP/MOP 1, at last, some hope?

Journal of Environment & Development 15(1), 75-90.

Schlager, E. and Ostrom, E., 1992. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual

analysis. Land Economics 68(3), 249-62.

Schlosberg, D., 2004. Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political

theories. Environmental Politics 13(3), 517-540.

Schroeder, H., 2010. Agency in international climate negotiations: The case of Indigenous Peoples

and avoided deforestation. International Environmental Agreements 10, 317-332.

Schwarze, R., Niles, J. O. and Olander, J., 2002. Understanding and managing leakage in forest-

based GHG-mitigation projects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of

London A 360, 1685-1703.

Scrieciu, S.S., 2007. Can economic causes of tropical deforestation be identified at a global level?

Ecological Economics 62(3-4), 603-612.

Scriven, J.N.H., 2012. Preparing for REDD+: Forest governance challenges in Peru’s Central Selva.

Journal of Sustainable Forestry 31(4-5), 421-444.

Seymour, F.J. and Dubash, N.K., 2000. Right conditions: The World Bank, structural adjustment,

and forest policy reform. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., USA, pp. 156.

Seymour, F.J., 2008. Forests, climate change, and human rights: Managing risks and trade-offs. In:

Humphreys, S. (Ed.). Human rights and climate change. Cambridge University Press,

Cambridge, UK, 207-237.

Seymour, F.J. and Forwand, E., 2010. Governing sustainable forest management in the new climate

regime. Wires Climate Change 1, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 803-810.

Shvidenko, A., Schepaschenko, D., McCallum, I. and Nilsson, S., 2011. Can the uncertainty of full

carbon accounting of forest ecosystems be made acceptable to policymakers? Climate

Change 103, 137-157.

Sierra, R. and Russman, E., 2006. On the efficiency of environmental service payments: A forest

conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Ecological Economics 59(2),

131-141.

Siikamaki, J. and Newbold, S.C., 2012. Potential biodiversity benefits from international programs

to reduce carbon emissions from deforestation. Ambio 41, 78-89.

Sikor, T., 2011. Financing household tree plantations in Vietnam: Current programmes and future

options. Working Paper 69, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 40 pp.

Simula, M., 2011. Analysis of REDD+ financing gaps and overlaps. REDD+ Partnership, FAO,

Rome, Italy, 99 pp.

Simula, M.A., 2015. Taking stock of the implementation of TFLET and REDD+ES thematic

programmes, Final report. ITTO, Yokohama, Japan, 127 pp.

Singh, P.P., 2008. Exploring biodiversity and climate change benefits of community-based forest

management. Global Environmental Change 18, 468-478.

Skutsch, M.M., 2005. Reducing carbon transaction costs in community based forestry management.

Climate Policy 5, 433-443.

217

Skutsch, M, Bird, N., Trines, E., Dutschke, M., Frumhoff, P., de Jong, B.H.J., van Laake, P. et al.,

2007. Clearing the way for reducing emissions from tropical deforestation. Environmental

Science and Policy 10, 322-334.

Skutsch, M.M., Zahabu, E. and Karky, B.S., 2009. Community forest management under REDD+:

policy conditions for equitable governance. Paper prepared for the 13th World Forestry

Congress, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 9 pp.

Skutsch, M.M. and McCall, M.K., 2010. Reassessing REDD+: Governance, markets and the hype

cycle, an editorial comment. Climate Change 100, 395-402.

Skutsch, M.M., Vickers, B., Georgiadou, Y. and McCall, M.K., 2011. Alternative models for carbon

payments to communities under REDD+: A comparison using the Polis model of actor

inducements. Environmental Science and Policy 14, 140-151.

Skutsch, M.M., Simon, C., Velazquez, A. and Fernandez, J.C., 2013. Rights to carbon and payments

for services rendered under REDD+: Options for the case of Mexico. Global

Environmental Change 23, 813-825.

Sloan, S., 2015. The development-driven forest transition and its utility for REDD+. Ecological

Economics 116, 1-11.

Smith, S and Scherr, S.J., 2003. Capturing the value of forest carbon for local livelihoods. World

Development 31(12), 2143-2160.

Smith, J. and Applegate, G., 2004. Could payments for forest carbon contribute to improved

tropical forest management? Forest Policy and Economics 6, 153-167.

Smouts, M.C., 2008. The issue of an international forest regime. International Forest Policy Review

10(3), 429-432.

Sobrevila, C. 2008. The role of Indigenous Peoples in biodiversity conservation, the natural but

often forgotten partners. World Bank, Washington D.C., USA, 84 pp.

Sohngen, B. and Mendelsohn, R., 2003. An optimal control model of forest carbon sequestration.

American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2), 448-457.

Sohngen, B., 2008. Paying for avoided deforestation – should we do it? Choices 23(1), 28-30.

Sommerville, M., Milner-Gulland, E.J., Rahajaharison, M. and Jones, J.P., 2010. Impact of a

community-based payment for environmental services intervention on forest use in

Menabe, Madagascar. Conservation Biology 24(6), 1488-1498.

Sotirov, M. and Memmler, M., 2012. The Advocacy Coalition Framework in natural resource policy

studies — Recent experiences and further prospects. Forest Policy and Economics 16, 51-

64.

Spence, C., Kulovesi, K., Gutierrez, M. and Munoz, M., 2008. Great expectations: Understanding

Bali and the climate change negotiations process. Review of European Community and

International Environmental Law 17(2), 142-153.

Srivastava, N., 2011. Changing dynamics of forest regulation: Coming full circle? Review of

European Community and International Environmental Law 20(2), 113-122.

Steg, L., De Groot, J.I.M., Dreijerink, L., Abrahamse, W. and Siero, F., 2011. General antecedents

of personal norms, policy acceptability, and intentions: The role of values, worldviews, and

environmental concern. Society & Natural Resources 24(4), 349-367.

Stephan, B., 2012. Bringing discourse to the market: The commodification of avoided

deforestation. Environmental Politics 21(4), 621-639.

Stephan, B. and Paterson, M., 2012. The politics of carbon markets, an introduction.

Environmental Politics 21(4), 545-562.

Stephenson, S., 2011. Does ODA grow on trees? A legal analysis of REDD+-ODA finance.

European Journal of Legal Studies 4(1), 81-101.

Stern, N.H., 2006. The Stern review: The economics of climate change. Cambridge University

Press, Cambridge, UK.

Stern, N.H., 2008. The economics of climate change. American Economic Review 98(2), 1-37.

Stevenson, H. and Dryzek, J.S., 2012. The discursive democratisation of global climate governance.

Environmental Politics 21(2), 189-210.

218

Stewart-Harawira, M., 2005. The new imperial order, indigenous responses to globalization. Huia

Publishers, Aotearoa-New Zealand.

Streck, C., Robert, O. S., Janson-Smith, T., and Tarasofsky, R. (Eds.), 2008. Climate change and

forests: Emerging policy and market opportunities. Royal Institute of International Affairs,

London, UK, 346 pp.

Streck, C., Gomez-Echeverri, L., Gutman, P., Loisel, C. and Werksman, J. 2009a. REDD+

institutional options assessment, developing an efficient, effective and equitable

institutional framework for REDD+ under the UNFCCC. Meridian Institute, Washington,

D.C., USA, 40 pp.

Streck, C., Tuerk, A. and Schlamadinger, B., 2009b. Forestry offsets in emissions trading systems: A

link between systems? Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 14, 455-

463.

Sullivan, S., 2009. Green capitalism, and the cultural poverty of constructing nature as service

provider. Radical Anthropology 3, 18-27.

Sun, B. and Sohngen, B., 2009. Set-asides for carbon sequestration: Implications for permanence

and leakage. Climatic Change 96, 409-419.

Sun Park, M., Sekyoung Choi, E. and Young, Y., 2013. REDD+ as an international cooperation

strategy under the global climate change regime. Forest Science and Technology 9(4), 213-

224.

Sunderlin, W.D., Hatcher, J. and Liddle, M., 2008. From exclusion to ownership? Rights and

Resources Initiative, Washington, D.C., USA, 64 pp.

Sunderlin, W.D., Sills, E.O., Duchelle, A.E, Ekaputri, A.D., Kweka, D., Toniolo, M., Ball, S. et al.,

2016. REDD+ at a critical juncture: Assessing the limits of polycentric governance for

achieving climate change mitigation. International Forestry Review 17(4), 400-413.

Swickard, N. and Carnahan, K., 2010. Integrating project and national REDD+: The importance of

the private sector. In Zhu, X., Ravnkilde, L. and De Lopez, M. (Eds.), 2010. Pathways for

implementing REDD+, experiences from carbon markets and communities. UNEP Risoe

Centre, Roskilde, Denmark, 71-86.

Tacconi, L., 2012. Redefining payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 73, 29-

36.

Tacconi, L., Mahanty, S. and Suich, H., 2013. The livelihood impacts of payments for

environmental services and implications for REDD+. Society & Natural Resources 26(6),

733-744.

The Munden Project, 2011. REDD+ and forest carbon, market critique and recommendations.

The Munden Project, New York, USA, 31 pp.

Thompson, A., 2006. Management under anarchy: The international politics of climate change.

Climate Change 78, 7-29.

Thompson, M.C., Baruah, M. and Carr, E.R., 2011. Seeing REDD+ as a project of environmental

governance. Environmental Science & Policy 14(2), 100-110.

Tomaselli, I., 2006. Brief study on funding and finance for forestry and forest-based sector, final

report. United Nations Forum on Forest, UN, New York, 63 pp.

Trivedi, M., Mitchell, A., and Mardas, N., 2008. The utility value of rainforests. In Holopainen, J.

and Wit, M. (Eds)., 2008. Financing sustainable forest management. Tropenbos

International, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 163-166.

Underdal, A., 2011. Strategies in international regime negotiations: Reflecting background

conditions or shaping outcomes? International Environmental Agreements 12, 129-144.

UNEP, 2002. Global Environmental Outlook 3. Earthscan, UK, 466 pp.

Unfcccint. (2017). Unfcccint. Retrieved 11 March, 2017, from

http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2017. Unfcccint. Glossary of Climate

Change Acronyms and Terms. Retrived 26 December 2016 from

http://unfccc.int/essential_background/glossary/items/3666.php.

219

Unruh, J.D., 2008. Carbon sequestration in Africa: The land tenure problem. Global

Environmental Change 18, 700-707.

Van Bodegom, A.J., Savenije, H. and Wit, M. (Eds.), 2009. Forests and climate change: Adaptation

and mitigation. Tropenbos International, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 160 pp.

Van der Hoff, R., Rajao, R., Leroy, P. and Boezeman, D., 2015. The parallel materialization of

REDD+ implementation discourses in Brazil. Forest Policy and Economics 55, 37-45.

Van Kooten, G.C., 2009. Biological carbon sequestration and carbon trading revisited. Climatic

Change 95, 449-463.

Vatn, A., Vedeld, P., Petursson, J. G. and Stenslie, E., 2009. The REDD+ direction. The potential

for reduced carbon emissions, biodiversity protection and enhanced development. A desk

study with focus on Tanzania and Uganda. Noragric Report 51, Norwegian University of

Life Sciences, Ås, Norway, 140pp.

Vatn, A., 2010. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological

Economics 69, 1245-1252.

Vatn, A., Barton, D.N., Lindhjem, H., Movik, S., Ring, I and Santos, R., 2011. Can markets protect

biodiversity? An evaluation of different financial mechanisms. Noragric Report 60.

University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway, 105 pp.

Vatn, A. and Vedeld, P., 2011. Getting ready! A study of national governance structures for

REDD+. Noragric report 59. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway, 43 pp.

Vatn, A. and Vedeld, P., 2013. National governance structures for REDD+. Global Environmental

Change 23, 422-432.

Villamor, G.B. and Lasco, R.D., 2009. Rewarding upland people for forest conservation:

Experience and lessons learned from case studies in the Philippines. Journal of Sustainable

Forestry 28(3-5), 304-321.

Visseren-Hamakers, I.J. and Glasbergen, P., 2006. Partnerships in forest governance. Global

Environmental Change 17(3-4), 408-419.

Vogler, J., 2003. Taking institutions seriously: How regimes can be relevant to multi-level

environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 3(2), 25-39.

Von der Goltz, J., 2009. High stakes in a complex game: A snapshot of the climate change

negotiating positions of major developing country emitters. Working Paper 177, Center for

Global Development, Washington, D.C., USA, 35 pp.

Von Moltke, K., 2002. Governments and international civil society in sustainable development: A

framework. International Environmental Agreements 2, 341-359.

Wang, Z. and Lu, Y., 2010. Compensation for the conversion of sloping farmland to forest in

China: A feasibility study of payment based on carbon sink. Journal of Environment &

Development 19(1), 28-41.

Wang, C., 2010. Lessons learned from global forestry projects in the carbon market. In Zhu, X.,

Ravnkilde, L. and De Lopez, M. (Eds.), 2010. Pathways for implementing REDD+,

experiences from carbon markets and communities. Carbon Market Perspectives, UNEP

Risoe Centre, Roskilde, Denmark, 17-28.

Wehkamp, J., Aquino, A., Fuss, S. and Reed, E.W., 2015. Analyzing the perception of deforestation

drivers by African policy makers in light of possible REDD+ policy responses. Forest

Policy and Economics 59, 7-18.

Weible, C.M., Sabatier, P.A. and Flowers, J., 2008. A guide to the advocacy coalition framework.

Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, Second Edition,1(1), 1-10.

Weible, C.M., Heikkila, T., de Leon, P. and Sabatier, P.A., 2012. Understanding and influencing the

policy process. Policy Sciences 45, 1-21.

Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S, 2007. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in

developing countries (REDD+): Insights from the UNFCCC COP-13 in Bali. Iddri – Idées

pour le débat 12, Paris, France, 5 pp.

220

Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Kongphan-Apirak, M. and Wunder, S., 2008. Reducing forest emissions in

the Amazon Basin, a review of drivers of land-use change and how payments for

environmental services can affect them. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 26 pp.

Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. and Kongphan-apirak, M., 2008. Emerging REDD+,aA preliminary

survey of demonstration and readiness activities. CIFOR Working Paper 46, CIFOR,

Bogor, Indonesia, 15 pp.

Wettestad, J., 2009. Interaction between EU carbon trading and the international climate regime:

Synergies and learning. International Environmental Agreements 9, 393-408.

White, A. and Martin, A., 2002. Who owns the worlds forests? Forest tenure and public forests in

transition. Forest Trends and Center for International Environmental Law, Washington,

D.C., USA, 32 pp.

Winkel, G., 2012. Foucault in the forests—A review of the use of ‘Foucauldian’ concepts in forest

policy analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 16, 81-92.

World Bank, 2003. World development report 2003: Sustainable development in a dynamic world:

Transforming institutions, growth, and quality of life. The World Bank, Washington, D.C,

USA, 273 pp.

World Bank, 2004. Sustaining forests: A development strategy. The World Bank, Washington D.C.,

USA, 28 pp.

World Bank, 2009. Gender in agriculture sourcebook. The World Bank, Washington D.C., USA,

764 pp..

World Commission on Forests and Sustainable Development, 1999. Our forests, our future,

summary report, World Commission on Forests and Sustainable Development, Winnipeg,

Canada, 38 pp.

Wordpresscom, 2010. World People's Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother

Earth. Retrieved 11 March, 2017, from

https://pwccc.wordpress.com/2010/04/24/peoples-agreement/

Wunder, S., 2005. Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts. CIFOR, Bogor,

Indonesia, 32 pp.

Wunder, S., Bui Dung The and Ibarra, E., 2005. Payment is good control is better: Why payments

for forest environmental services in Vietnam have so far remained incipient. CIFOR,

Bogor, Indonesia, 75 pp.

Wunder, S., 2006. Are direct payments for environmental services spelling doom for sustainable

forest management in the tropics? Ecology and Society 11(2): 23, 12 pp.

Wunder, S., 2007. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation.

In Conservation Biology 21(1), 48-58.

Wunder, S. and Albán, M., 2008. Decentralized payments for environmental services: The cases of

Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador. Ecological Economics 65(4), 685-698.

Wunder, S., Engel, S. and Pagiola, S., 2008. Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for

environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological

Economics 65(4), 834-852.

Wunder, S. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., 2009. Payments for ecosystem services: A new way of

conserving biodiversity in forests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3-5), 576-596.

Wwwunorg. (2017). Wwwunorg. Retrieved 11 March, 2017, from

http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/5session_factsheet1.pdf

Yasmi, Y., Kelley, L., Murdiyarso, D. and Patel, T., 2012. The struggle over Asia’s forests: An

overview of forest conflict and potential implications for REDD+. International Forestry

Review 14(1), 99-109.

Young, O.R., 1991. Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions

in international society. International Organization 45(3), 281-308.

Zaballa Romero, M.E., Traerup, S., Wieben, E., Ravnkilde Moller, J. and Koch, A., 2013.

Economics of forest and forest carbon projects. Translating lessons learned into national

REDD+ implementation. UNEP Risoe, Nairobi, Kenya, 100 pp.

221

Zadek, S., 2011. Beyond climate finance: from accountability to productivity in addressing the

climate challenge. Climate Policy 11, 1058-1068.

Zhu, X., Ravnkilde, L. and De Lopez, M. (Eds.) 2010. Pathways for implementing REDD+,

experiences from carbon markets and communities. Carbon Market Perspectives, UNEP

Riso Centre, Roskilde, Denmark, 156 pp.