Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Utilization of Biosolids for Pasture
Fertilization
Maria L. Silveira
UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
57th Annual Beef Short Course
Benefits of Biosolids Land Application
Essential nutrients: N, P, S and micronutrients
Nutrients are slowly released
Liming potential
Enhancement of soil chemical, biological and
physical properties
Key route of disposal for the 7 million tons of
biosolids produced annually
What are “Biosolids”?
•Biosolids are the by-product of
the treatment of domestic sewage
•Sewage sludge undergoes
pathogen control treatment that
meet regulatory requirements
•Sewage sludge that is disposed of
by landfill or incineration is NOT
considered biosolids
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Are all Biosolids Materials the Same?
•Biosolids characteristics vary considerably
• Federal regulation: 40 code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Part 503. Enforced by EPA
•State regulation: Chapter 62-640, FL
Administrative Code (FAC) regulations.
Regulated by FL-DEP.
•Two types of residuals: Class A (AA) or Class B
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Are all Biosolids Materials the Same?
Class A and Class B refer to the pathogen level.
Class A = Class AA (Florida)
Both materials are required to meet strict
pollutant criteria.
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Types of Biosolids
Class AA (exceptional quality) - contain minute levels of pathogens - no restrictions (bagged and marketed to the public) Class B - contain small, but compliant amounts of bacteria - restrictions for crop harvest, grazing animals (30-d restriction), and public contact
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
U.S. EPA Part 503 Regulatory Limits Metal Part 503 ceiling
concentration
(ppm)
As 75
Cd 85
Cu 4,300
Pb 840
Hg 57
Mo 75
Ni 420
Se 100
Zn 7,500
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
U.S. EPA Part 503 Regulatory Limits Metal Part 503 ceiling
concentration
(ppm)
Pollutant concentration limits for AA biosolids
(ppm)
As 75 41
Cd 85 39
Cu 4,300 1,500
Pb 840 300
Hg 57 17
Mo 75 ---
Ni 420 420
Se 100 36
Zn 7,500 2,800
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Typical Biosolids Chemical Composition
Characteristic Anaerobically
Digested
Lime
Stabilized
Pelletized
Solids (%) 25 25 92
Nitrogen (%) 5.6 3.8 2.4
Phosphorus (%) 2.2 1.0 2.7
Potassium (%) 0.2 0.4 ---
pH 8 12 12
Copper (ppm) 566 236 100
Zinc (ppm) 1484 321 100
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Biosolids “dilemma”
N-based rates provide excess P N availability
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Plant Available N in Various Biosolids Materials
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Time after application
Lime stabilized
Aerobically digested
Anerobically digested
Composted
Years Plant available N (%)
0-1 30-40 30-40 20-30 10-15
1-2 15 15 10 5
2-3 7 8 5 3
Biosolids “dilemma”
P-based rates very low (~1-2 T/A)
- Impractical
- Uneconomical
- Require greater land area
- Require supplemental N
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Phosphorus Availability in Various Biosolids Materials
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
BPR Cake
Biosolids
Alkaline
Stabilized
Biosolids
Composted
Biosolids
Conventional
Biosolids
Heat Dried
Biosolids
Biosolids Type
Wat
er e
xtra
ctab
le P
(% o
f Tot
al P
)
Source: Brandt et al. (2004)
Phosphorus Availability in Various Biosolids Materials
• P availability depends on biosolids treatments
• Biological nutrient removal (BNR) processes
increase P availability in biosolids
• Heat-drying and Al and Fe additions reduce P
availability
• Despite the greater P solubility, BNP still have
less soluble P than most manure and fertilizers
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Soluble P Concentrations in Fertilizer, Manures, and Biosolids
0102030405060708090
P sources
Wat
er s
olub
le P
(% o
f Tot
al P
)
TSPDairyPoultryBPRAerobicAnaerobic
Adapted from Elliott and O’Connor (2007)
Phosphorus Availability in Various Biosolids Materials
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
MC LC Uae LP Ucom PC BC TC Uan BP Pcom TS
Biosolids Source/Type
Phyt
oava
ilabi
lity
rela
tive
to tr
iple
su
per p
hosp
hate
(%)
HIGH MODERATE LOW
Source: O’Connor et al. (2004)
Bahiagrass Response to Biosolids Application (80 lb N/A)
Source: Adjei and Rechcigl (2002)
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
1998 1999 2000
Bah
iagr
ass
yiel
d (T
/ha)
Control
Slurry biosolids
Cake biosolids
Ammonium nitrate
c
a a
b
c c
a
a
a a b
b
Bahiagrass Response to Class B Biosolids Application
Source: Sigua et al. (2005)
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
1998 1999 2000
Bah
iagr
ass
yiel
d (T
/ha)
Control AMN
SBS7 SBS11
CBS
Effects of biosolids application on performance of grazing beef heifers
Source: Tiffany et al. (2000)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Biosolids source
Ave
rage
dai
ly g
ain
(kg/
d)
Ammonium nitrate
Baltimore (160 lb N/A)
Baltimore (320 lb N/A)Tampa (160 lb N/A)
Tampa (320 lb N/A)
Main Concerns Relative to Land Application of Biosolids
Pathogen spread
Heavy metal accumulation
Excessive load of plant nutrients
Odor to the neighborhood
Environmental Regulations
Over the past 30-yr, U.S. EPA has developed guidelines for the application and use of biosolids on agricultural lands
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Research Results
Vast scientific literature is available addressing
the effects of land application of biosolids
Land application of biosolids has been proven to
be a safe alternative to recycle nutrients in
forage-based animal production systems and to
efficiently reduce commercial fertilizer and lime
application
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Research Results
Phosphorus continues to be the main concern
related to biosolids land application. Phosphorus-
based nutrient management programs will
adversely impact biosolids recycling programs in
the US
There is an urgent need to develop programs
that account for differences in P loss potential
among biosolids types and the characteristics of
the receiving site
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Research Results
More than 30 years of research has
demonstrated that trace metals are currently not
a concern. Heavy metal concentrations in animal
manure and some fertilizers are comparable or
greater than those in biosolids
When properly applied, pathogens don’t pose
any treat to humans and/or animals
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Environmental Regulations
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Biosolids Regulations (senate Bill 392)
- “ After December 31, 2007, the department
may not authorize the disposal of domestic
wastewater residuals within the Lake
Okeechobee watershed unless the application can
affirmatively demonstrate that the phosphorus in
the residuals will not add to phosphorus loadings
in Lake Okeechobee or its tributaries. This
demonstration shall be based on achieving a net
balance between P imports relative to exports…”
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Biosolids Regulations (senate Bill 392)
- “ This prohibition does not apply to Class AA
residuals that are market and distributed as
fertilizer products in accordance with the
department rule”
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC
Thanks !
M. Silveira, Soil and Water Science, UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC