1
Using an Accurate Multi-Mode Chip Power Model to Analyze Power Integrity Differences between On-Board Voltage Regulator Modules (VRMs) and In-Package Integrated Voltage Regulators (IVRs) Ashwin Chintaluri*, Harish Gopalakrishnan+, Hesam Fathi Moghadam+ *Georgia Institute of Technology, +Oracle Labs SPICE Modeling using CPM Motivation Integration of Voltage Regulators offers several benefits: Load PDN now shorter →Z PDN of load ↓ Relaxed off chip impedance requirement → BOM cost ↓ Faster transient response An end to end PDN simulation is needed to understand and quantify the benefits of IVRs - a simple, accurate die model (the load) is required to enable this simulation CPM helps in the generation of this model Other alternatives such as SPICE would be too slow CPM provides R die and C die over a wide frequency range Die RLC extraction and SPICE modeling of load through Redhawk CPM Package and board SPICE models extracted with 3 rd party tools PMIC/IVR models from 3 rd party vendors Redhawk CPM provides a detailed on-die parasitic model, with breakup of all capacitive components and an estimate of power grid resistance The amount of intrinsic capacitance that exists in the design was used as the filter capacitor for the regulator in conjunction with explicit capacitors Captured the transient as well as AC behavior of the entire PDN with the load, quantifying the actual performance benefits o Orders of magnitude faster DVFS o Orders of magnitude faster response to load step conditions o Reduction of first level droop o Reduction of IR losses on the board CPM Results Advantages of IVRs (from our study) o Faster DVFS and regulator response time o Can increase number of independently controlled chip power domains o Rail merging allows board simplification o Reduction of board level losses Challenges, still to be addressed o Integration of Passives physical design tradeoffs o On-die Complexity Yield issues Heat dissipation problem Area overhead trade off based on distribution of point of load regulation Summary Advantages and Challenges with CPM Each bump can be modeled individually and bumps from the same power net can be partitioned together CPM can generate current signatures from nS to mS duration - SoC activity can be vector based or vectorless Large simulation times to generate netlists RedHawk (Figure courtesy Ansys ) (Figure courtesy Ansys ) time current T rep Ipeak Tr

Using an Accurate Multi-Mode Chip Power Model to Analyze

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    22

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Using an Accurate Multi-Mode Chip Power Model to Analyze

Using an Accurate Multi-Mode Chip Power Model to Analyze Power Integrity

Differences between

On-Board Voltage Regulator Modules (VRMs) and In-Package Integrated

Voltage Regulators (IVRs)

Ashwin Chintaluri*, Harish Gopalakrishnan+, Hesam Fathi Moghadam+

*Georgia Institute of Technology, +Oracle Labs

SPICE Modeling using CPM

Motivation

Integration of Voltage Regulators

offers several benefits:

• Load PDN now shorter →ZPDN

of load ↓

• Relaxed off chip impedance

requirement → BOM cost ↓

• Faster transient response

An end to end PDN simulation is needed to understand and

quantify the benefits of IVRs - a simple, accurate die model

(the load) is required to enable this simulation

• CPM helps in the generation of this model

• Other alternatives such as SPICE would be too slow

• CPM provides Rdie and Cdie over a wide frequency

range

• Die RLC extraction and SPICE modeling of load

through Redhawk CPM

• Package and board SPICE models extracted with 3rd

party tools

• PMIC/IVR models from 3rd party vendors

Redhawk CPM provides a detailed on-die parasitic model,

with breakup of all capacitive components and an estimate of

power grid resistance

• The amount of intrinsic capacitance that exists in the

design was used as the filter capacitor for the

regulator in conjunction with explicit capacitors

• Captured the transient as well as AC behavior of the

entire PDN with the load, quantifying the

actual performance benefits

o Orders of magnitude faster DVFS

o Orders of magnitude faster response to load

step conditions

o Reduction of first level droop

o Reduction of IR losses on the board

CPM Results

• Advantages of IVRs (from our study)

o Faster DVFS and regulator response time

o Can increase number of independently controlled chip

power domains

o Rail merging allows board simplification

o Reduction of board level losses

• Challenges, still to be addressed

o Integration of Passives – physical design tradeoffs

o On-die Complexity

• Yield issues

• Heat dissipation problem

• Area overhead – trade off based on distribution

of point of load regulation

Summary

Advantages and Challenges with CPM • Each bump can be modeled individually and bumps from

the same power net can be partitioned together

• CPM can generate current signatures from nS to mS

duration - SoC activity can be vector based or vectorless

• Large simulation times to generate netlists

RedHawk

(Figure courtesy Ansys )

(Figure courtesy Ansys )

time

current

Trep

IpeakTr