USAID ADAPTASI PERUBAHAN IKLIM DAN KETANGGUHANpdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00MZ6X.pdf · ADAPTASI PERUBAHAN IKLIM DAN KETANGGUHAN (APIK) –QUARTERLY REPORT (APRIL 01 JUNE 30, 2016) 9

ADAPTASI PERUBAHAN IKLIM DAN KETANGGUHAN (APIK) – QUARTERLY REPORT (APRIL 01– JUNE 30, 2016)

1

JULY 2016

This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development.

It was prepared by DAI.

USAID ADAPTASI PERUBAHAN IKLIM DAN KETANGGUHAN QUARTERLY REPORT NO. II: APRIL 01 – JUNE 30, 2016

USAID ADAPTASI PERUBAHAN IKLIM DAN KETANGGUHAN QUARTERLY REPORT NO. II: APRIL 01 – JUNE 30, 2016

Program Title: USAID Adaptasi Perubahan Iklim dan Ketangguhan

Sponsoring USAID Office: USAID/Indonesia Office of Environment

Contract Number: AID-497-C-16-00003

Contractor: DAI

Date of Publication: July 2016

Author: DAI

Cover photo: © Josh Estey/ USAID Indonesia

Fishermen are one of those who suffered the most from climate change, as they face

unprecedented changing weather and climate which threat their livelihood.

The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

ADAPTASI PERUBAHAN IKLIM DAN KETANGGUHAN (APIK) – QUARTERLY REPORT (APRIL 01– JUNE 30, 2016) 9

COVER STORY

Working Hand in Hand to Facilitate Better Development for More Resilient

Communities

For communities who live in coastal areas of South Konawe District, Southeast Sulawesi Province,

climate change is not merely a myth. High waves and sea level rise have damaged infrastructure

and settlement areas. Not only facing disasters such as tidal flooding, the very livelihood of

fishermen is also under threat. There is no other choice but to adapt to climate change and reduce

the risks of weather-related disasters.

Oftentimes, a development paradigm emphasizes economic improvement while sacrificing the

sustainability of natural resources, thereby exacerbating the causes of climate-related disasters

and making communities more vulnerable. Therefore, it is important to have a development plan

that can address these issues holistically.

United States Agency for International

Development (USAID) through Adaptasi Perubahan

Iklim dan Ketangguhan (APIK) or Climate Change

Adaptation and Resilience Project works with

national and local government to integrate climate

change adaptation and disaster risk reduction

measures into their planning, budgeting, and

operations.

The South Konawe Development Planning Agency (BAPPEDA) is currently developing the

Medium Term Regional Development Planning (RPJMD). In order to address climate change and

disaster risk reduction issues, the BAPPEDA has sought USAID APIK technical assistance to

inform the planning process. The inclusive and bottom-up approach of policymaking processes

will result in more factual and responsive policy that can address problems at the grassroots level.

Concerning the support provided by APIK, the BAPPEDA Secretary said, “I think the technical

assistance from USAID APIK is very useful. The programs will be implemented by related Local

Government Working Unit (SKPD).”

USAID APIK believes positive engagement with government and other stakeholders is critical

because creating more resilient communities cannot be done alone.

“I hope that partnership with USAID APIK can continue as

we still need to assist other stakeholders from the village to

the district level.” Hidayatullah,

Secretary of South Konawe Development Planning Agency

© Josh Estey/ USAID Indonesia Coastal communities are at the frontline facing climate-related disasters and have no choice but to adapt.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

COVER STORY .............................................................................................................. 9

TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................ 10

LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................... 11

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 13

RINGKASAN EKSEKUTIF ............................................................................................ 15

INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 17

REPORT OBJECTIVE ........................................................................................................ 17

OVERVIEW OF APIK ........................................................................................................ 17

TASK-LEVEL PROGRESS & RESULTS ....................................................................... 18

TASK 1: INTEGRATE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION INTO

NATIONAL-LEVEL POLICY AND COORDINATION .................................................................. 18

TASK 2: ENHANCE SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITY RESILIENCE TO CLIMATE

CHANGE AND WEATHER-RELATED NATURAL DISASTERS ................................................... 21

TASK 3: STRENGTHEN TARGETED CLIMATE AND WEATHER INFORMATION SERVICES .......... 25

TASK 4: AWARENESS AND CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PRIVATE SECTOR ................ 27

TASK 5: PROGRAM COORDINATION AND DOCUMENTATION ................................................ 29

CROSS-CUTTING INITIATIVES ........................................................................................... 31

START-UP ...................................................................................................................... 31

PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING ........................................................................ 31

RESILIENCE FUND ........................................................................................................... 32

GENDER ......................................................................................................................... 32

MONITORING AND EVALUATION ........................................................................................ 33

PLANS FOR NEXT QUARTER (BY REGION) .......................................................................... 33

APPENDICES ............................................................................................................... 36

APPENDIX A: SUMMARY TABLE OF RESULTS ..................................................................... 36

APPENDIX B: RISK MANAGEMENT .................................................................................... 39

APPENDIX C: LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS FOR CWI SURVEY ................................................... 40

APPENDIX D: COMMUNICATIONS PLATFORMS .................................................................... 43

APPENDIX E: MEDIA COVERAGE SUMMARY ........................................................................ 45


LIST OF ACRONYMS

AmCham American Chamber of Commerce

APIK Adaptasi Perubahan Iklim dan Ketangguhan

Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience

APEKSI Asosiasi Pemerintah Kota Seluruh Indonesia

Association of City Governments

APKASI Asosiasi Pemerintah Kabupaten Seluruh Indonesia

Association of District Governments

BAPPEDA Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah

Regional Development Planning Agency

BAPPENAS Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional

National Development Planning Agency

BMKG Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika

Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency

BNPB Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana

National Disaster Management Agency

CCA Climate Change Adaptation

COR Contracting Officer’s Representative

COP Chief of Party

CSR Corporate Social Responsibility

CWI Climate and Weather Information

DCOP Deputy Chief of Party

DRR Disaster Risk Reduction

FGD Focus Group Discussion

FY Fiscal Year

KADIN Kamar Dagang dan Industri

Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry

KLHK Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan

Ministry of Environment and Forestry

LPPM UHO Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Halu Oleo

Research and Community Service Institution University of Halu Oleo

ICA Indonesia Climate Alliance

IRBI Indonesia Disaster Risk Index

IUWASH PLUS Indonesia Urban Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene PLUS

M&E Monitoring and Evaluation

NGO Non-Government Organization

PIC Person in Charge

PIRS Performance Indicator Reference Sheet

PY Project Year

QPR Quarterly Progress Report

Planas PRB Platform Nasional Pengurangan Risiko Bencana

National Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction

RAN API Rencana Aksi Nasional Adaptasi Perubahan Iklim

National Action Plan for Climate Change Adaptation

SIDIK Sistem Informasi Data Indeks Kerentanan


Vulnerability Index Data Information System

SKPD Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah

Local Government Working Unit

Sub-IR Sub-Intermediate Result

USAID United States Agency for International Development

USG United States Government


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

APIK ramped up efforts this quarter to forge strong and lasting partnerships with governmental

and nongovernmental stakeholders alike. Continuing from the previous quarter, APIK held

‘resilience roadshow’ meetings in the form of stakeholder consultation and socialization

workshops both at provincial and city/ district levels. Feedback on the Project’s work plan,

proposed field activities, and site selection has been constructive. Notably, the level of demand

for support is high, with requests to further expand work beyond the initial set of cities and

districts already received in both East Java and Maluku. In parallel, at national level APIK further

strengthened relations with the National Development Planning Agency (BAPPENAS) and the

Ministry of Environment and Forestry (KLHK). Technical discussions have been ongoing with the

respective ministries to identify the priority areas for collaboration.

During the reporting period from April to June 2016, APIK commenced support for several

national climate change adaptation (CCA) and disaster risk reduction (DRR) initiatives in

accordance with the Project Year 1 (PY1) Work Plan. The APIK team strategically prioritized

support for those activities that will serve as a platform or foundation for upcoming subnational

interventions. The Project starting working with National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB),

for example, to improve its scorecard system for quantifying local government resilience. These

efforts will then feed directly into APIK’s implementation of city-and-district-level vulnerability

assessments in the coming quarter.

Following the initial round of resilience roadshows in each province, APIK also started to shift its

focus this quarter to the establishment of local resilience teams to address CCA/ DRR challenges

in a holistic, landscape-based manner. At the same time the Project also sought to opportunistically

engage in newly launched or ongoing mid-term planning processes as a means to introduce and

integrate CCA/ DRR into local government mid-term development plans and, importantly,

facilitate local government budget allocations for concrete adaptation actions. In South Konawe

Disrict, for example, APIK assisted the Local Government Working Unit (SKPD) to mainstream

CCA/ DRR into its mid-term Strategic Plan.

Additionally, APIK also started to engage various private sector actors this quarter, with initial

discussions indicating that, while many businesses understand that climate changes poses a risk to

their bottom line, they are unsure of the appropriate response. This combination of interest in

the potential impacts of climate change but uncertainty over the most effective adaptation strategy

represents a clear entry-point for APIK to make the case for climate-resilient business models,

including supply chain management, asset protection, labor optimization, and marketing strategies.

Also apparent this quarter was the potential to maximize impact through collaboration with other

United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and donor programs; APIK’s

geographic reach overlaps with that of Sustainable Ecosystem Advanced (SEA) and the newly

awarded Indonesia Urban Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (IUWASH PLUS), for example, in

Maluku and East Java. Similarly, APIK support to government-led initiatives will both build buy-in

and ownership of APIK’s efforts and, at the same time, lead to more rapid implementation given

that APIK can leverage existing programmatic momentum. APIK sees potential collaborative

actions with ministries that are broad in terms of program activities, e.g. building resilience

indicators through National Action Plan for Climate Change Adaptation (RAN API) or

strengthening the Vulnerability Index Data Information System (SIDIK) of KLHK.


With all personnel already hired and the three offices operational in Maluku, East Java, and

Southeast Sulawesi, in the coming quarter APIK will focus on escalating field activities to address

CCA-DRR in each local jurisdiction, while also nurturing strong resilience platforms (in the form

of a working group or forum) at the landscape level to provide for more comprehensive CCA/

DRR reforms. The positive responses of partners and stakeholders accompanied by the available

resources and expertise at APIK represent the necessary ingredients for achieving sustainable

impact across the three APIK landscapes.


RINGKASAN EKSEKUTIF

APIK meneruskan upaya untuk memastikan adanya kemitraan yang baik dan kuat dengan para

pemangku kepentingan, baik dari pemerintah maupun non-pemerintah. Melanjutkan dari periode

sebelumnya, APIK menyelenggarakan “roadshow ketangguhan” dalam bentuk konsultasi dengan

berbagai pihak dan lokakarya sosialisasi di tingkat provinsi maupun kabupaten/ kota. Penyampaian

rencana kerja, rancangan kegiatan, dan pemilihan lokasi mendapatkan respons positif dan komentar

yang konstruktif. Secara khusus, permohonan untuk dukungan dari APIK cukup banyak, dengan

adanya permintaan untuk memperluas area kerja dari kota dan kabupaten yang sudah ditetapkan

di Jawa Timur dan Maluku. Di tingkat nasional, APIK juga memperkuat hubungan dengan Badan

Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (BAPPENAS) dan Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan

Kehutanan (KLHK). Diskusi teknis dengan kementerian untuk mengidentifikasi prioritas kolaborasi

juga sudah dan akan terus berlangsung.

Pada periode pelaporan April – Juni 2016 ini, APIK mulai mendukung inisiatif adpatasi perubahan

iklim (API) dan pengurangan risiko bencana (PRB) sesuai dengan rencana kerja tahun pertama. Tim

APIK memprioritaskan dukungan untuk berbagai kegiatan yang akan menjadi wadah atau dasar dari

intervensi berikutnya di tingkat subnasional. APIK memulai kerja sama dengan Badan Nasional

Penanggulangan Bencana (BNPB) dengan mendukung perbaikan sistem scorecard untuk mengukur

ketangguhan pemerintah daerah. Upaya ini akan berkontribusi secara langsung terhadap

implementasi kegiatan APIK untuk penilaian kerentanan (vulnerability assessment) pada periode

kuartal berikutnya.

Sebagai kelanjutan tahapan awal kegiatan “roadshow ketangguhan” di setiap provinsi, pada periode

ini APIK fokus pada pembentukan tim ketangguhan lokal untuk mengatasi tantangan dalam API PRB

secara menyeluruh dan menggunakan pendekatan bentang lahan. Di saat yang bersamaan, APIK

juga memanfaatkan peluang untuk terlibat dalam proses penyusunan rencana pembangunan jangka

menengah yang baru dan yang sedang berjalan, serta memfasilitasi alokasi anggaran pemerintah

daerah untuk aksi kegiatan adaptasi yang konkrit. Sebagai contoh, APIK membantu Satuan Kerja

Perangkat Daerah (SKPD) untuk mengarusutamakan API PRB ke dalam dokumen perencanaan

jangka menengah Rencana Strategis (Renstra).

Pada periode ini, APIK juga mulai bertemu dan melibatkan berbagai aktor sektor swasta. Pada

pertemuan awal, terindikasi bahwa banyak pelaku bisnis yang paham bahwa perubahan iklim

memiliki risiko terhadap operasi mereka, namun mereka tidak yakin bagaimana cara yang tepat

untuk mengatasi risiko tersebut. Dengan adanya ketertarikan dan kepentingan pihak swasta

terhadap isu perubahan iklim dan ketidakpastian akan strategi yang tepat, APIK mengidentifikasi

peluang untuk intervensi dengan pembuatan model bisnis yang tangguh terhadap perubahan iklim.

Hal tersebut meliputi pengelolaan rantai pasok (supply chain), perlindungan aset, optimalisasi tenaga

kerja, dan strategi pemasaran.

Potensi untuk memaksimalkan dampak proyek melalui kolaborasi dengan program lainnya, baik

yang didanai oleh Badan Pembangunan Internasional Amerika Serikat (USAID) maupun lembaga

donor lain juga teridentifikasi pada periode ini. Cakupan area kerja APIK memiliki irisan dengan

area kerja program SEA dan IUWASH PLUS di Jawa Timur dan Maluku. Selain itu, dukungan APIK

terhadap inisiatif pemerintah akan berdampak positif dengan adanya dukungan dan rasa kepemilikan

terhadap upaya-upaya APIK, dan di saat yang bersamaan akan mendorong implementasi program


yang lebih cepat, serta memanfaatkan momentum program yang sudah ada. APIK melihat adanya

potensi kolaborasi dengan beberapa kementerian melalui aktivitas program yang luas, seperti

penyusunan indikator ketangguhan melalui Rencana Aksi Nasional Adaptasi Perubahan Iklim (RAN

API) ataupun memperkuat Sistem Informasi Data Indeks Kerentanan (SIDIK) dari KLHK.

Proses perekrutan staf dan operasionalisasi tiga kantor di Maluku, Jawa Timur, dan Sulawesi

Tenggara telah selesai, sehingga pada periode berikutnya APIK akan lebih fokus pada kegiatan di

lapangan terkait API PRB di wilayah kerja APIK, dan juga mendorong tim ketangguhan yang kuat

(dalam bentuk forum ataupun kelompok kerja) pada tingkat bentang lahan untuk mencapai format

API PRB yang lebih komprehensif. Respons positif dari para mitra dan pemangku kepentingan, dan

dengan sumber daya serta keahlian yang ada di APIK merupkan modalitas yang kuat untuk

mencapai dampak yang berkelanjutan pada tiga bentang lahan wilayah kerja APIK.


INTRODUCTION

REPORT OBJECTIVE This document represents the quarterly progress report (QPR) for quarter 3 of the

implementation period, extending from April 1 to June 30, 2016. It is submitted in accordance

with Section F.5.7 of the APIK Contract which states that the project shall prepare and submit to

the COR regular quarterly reports on the project’s interventions, issues, constraints, and progress

toward goals and achievements. This QPR is organized into the following subsections:

introduction, task-level progress and results, and cross-cutting initiatives. This QPR also includes

the following annexes: a summary table of results, risk management, and a glossary of acronyms.

OVERVIEW OF APIK USAID Indonesia’s “Adaptasi Perubahan Iklim dan Ketangguhan” (APIK) Project is a five year

initiative supporting the Government of Indonesia to strengthen climate and disaster resilience,

working in an integrated manner from the national level down to the regional and community

levels. In support of this overall objective, APIK seeks to:

Mainstream climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction into national and sub-

national governance frameworks;

Build the capacity of local communities and the private sector to address climate change

and weather-related natural hazards; and

Support the use of information for climate and disaster risk management among key

stakeholders.

At the national level, APIK provides technical assistance to central government ministries to

strengthen their understanding of climate change and the impact of weather-related natural

disasters, and to mainstream tools and approaches that facilitate the systematic integration of

climate change adaptation (CCA) and disaster risk reduction (DRR) in their core planning,

budgeting, and operations. Given the cross-cutting nature of CCA and DRR, APIK works with

economy-wide agencies such as the National Development Planning Agency (BAPPENAS) and the

National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB), as well as technical ministries like Environment

and Forestry (KLHK), Marine Affairs and Fisheries (KKP), Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM),

Public Works and Public Housing (PUPERA), Agrarian and Spatial Planning, and Agriculture

(Kementan).

At the subnational level, APIK seeks to build the capacity of local governments to address CCA

and DRR through their planning and operations, communicate about climate change, and

institutionalize resilience building practices in day-to-day activities. Further, the project works

directly with communities on the front lines of climate change and disaster resilience in the

targeted districts to implement measures and link those measures to the relevant government

processes in a holistic systems approach.

Cross-cutting the national and subnational level, APIK further seeks to mainstream CCA and DRR

into the private sector as well as improve the uptake and utilization of climate and weather

information (CWI) services. Private sector engagement is critical to addressing shared economic

risks and livelihoods, while improved climate and weather information services empower public

and private institutions alike to better prepare for and respond to climate and disaster risk.


TASK-LEVEL PROGRESS & RESULTS This section details progress and results to date per each of the five tasks of the APIK project. In

addition a table (also per task) is included detailing plans for the next quarter. Further, key

challenges encountered during this reporting period that could impact implementation are

summarized in the table in Appendix C.

TASK 1: INTEGRATE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION INTO NATIONAL-LEVEL POLICY AND COORDINATION

During the reporting period, Task 1 activities focused on supporting national agencies and

initiatives on CCA/ DRR including the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (KLHK), the National

Development and Planning Agency (BAPPENAS), Association of District Governments (APKASI),

Indonesia Climate Alliance (ICA), and the National Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction (Planas

PRB). As part of APIK support to KLHK, APIK and KLHK have initiated discussion on

strengthening Vulnerability Index Data Information System (SIDIK). A national workshop on SIDIK

will be held in the next quarter to disseminate SIDIK more broadly get inputs for improvements.

In addition, the Directorate of Climate Change Adaptation has expressed its interest for

collaboration with APIK on other programs.

To support BAPPENAS, APIK started to strengthen the role and functions of the Secretariat of

National Action Plan for Climate Change Adaptation (RAN API). Two of the specific activities

carried out during the quarter were the preparation of CCA/ DRR training modules for provincial,

district, and city government officials who are working in the field of regional development

planning. This training module will be used by Center of Education, Assistance, and Training or

Pusbindiklatren of BAPPENAS as the organizer of this training. In addition, the joint secretariat will

also develop indicators of resilience for each sector such that the impact of CCA strategies can

be better measured.

In an effort to accelerate cooperation with the APKASI, APIK held two meetings with the

association to define the scope of the partnership. One of the first priorities identified was the

national seminar of APKASI members to provide a basic understanding on CCA and DRR, and

the importance of mainstreaming these issues into development planning in the district. These

activities will be carried in the mid July 2016.

This quarter, APIK held two focus group discussions (FGDs) with APEKSI where APIK will support

APEKSI to do a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) analysis of the

organization as APEKSI begins to prepare its 2017-2019 work plan, including the extent to which

its work plan includes concrete linkages to CCA and DRR.

To strengthen civil society organizations active in CCA/ DRR, APIK began to work with the

Indonesia Climate Alliance (ICA) and the National Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction (Planas

PRB). Through a series of focus group discussions, APIK and ICA developed a draft framework

covering the next three years. Likewise, similar framework was developed on Planas PRB.


The following summarizes the progress of specific outputs under Task 1 for Project Year (PY) 1.

The progress of achieved target outputs FY16 are as follows:

1. Complete gap analysis RAN-API, including what is needed and what exists

Based on APIK analysis, the effectiveness of the RAN API remains constrained by the

absence of key policy instruments and operating guidelines. In this context, APIK’s

supports started with focus on development of training modules and define the most

appropriate indicators of vulnerability. APIK carried out a series of FGDs to obtain input

to enhance the concept of knowledge management and synergies with training for disaster

mitigation and monitoring and evaluation (for government employees). The FGDs were

also to gather information and clarification regarding the regulation of KLHK on

Guidelines of Action for Climate Change Adaptation. The FGDs also gathered feedback

for refinement of Knowledge Management of RAN API and training module on

mainstreaming adaptation.

2. Review and identify entry-points of National policies, plans, and programs that address CCA/ DRR.

APIK held a series of discussions with practitioners/ academia familiar with national

policies, plans, and programs that address CCA/ DRR come up with a list of

recommendations on policy assessment implementation that will be carried out in next

quarter.

3. Conduct an assessment of existing national level tools, guides, and approaches to CCA/ DRR

mainstreaming.

A scope of work for this activity has been developed and the assessment will take place

in the next quarter.

4. Develop CCA/ DRR cost-benefit analysis tool for at least one economic sector.

During this quarter period, the study is still on framework development process and the

research itself will be conducted in next quarter. It is agreed that East Java will be the

scope area for the study.

5. Supported and formulated a roadmap of ICA and Planas PRB (or the integration of their activities

in a single entity).

Two FGDs were conducted this quarter: the first FGD focused on challenges and

opportunities on the efforts on CCA and DRR convergence, including linkages to initial

performance indicators. The FGD 2 identified the need to better mainstream the

integration of CCA/ DRR, from the government, academician and practitioners

perspectives, and the role of each institution.

6. Series FGDs to develop APEKSI strategic planning (2016-2020) to address CCA and DRR

APIK conducted the first series of FGD attended by local government representatives,

several partner agencies and representatives of the city, several partner institutions and

representatives of government agencies, including KLHK and BNPB and NGOs. The

discussion identified initiatives, challenges and needs, both from the local and national

levels. To improve coordination and communication between the participants, a mailing

list will be created that can be used for dissemination of information and continue the

discussion on APIK support. In the second FGD, the participants released draft strategic

plans and indicators which are expected to be finalized by August of this year. Upcoming

activities include survey and mapping of the members of associations working on CCA/


DRR. The overall result will be discussed in the APEKSI National Meeting in December

2016.

Table 1. Task 1 Next Quarter Activity Plan

No Activity Venue Participant Q4 – PY 16

Task 1 July Aug Sept

1

Support targeted assistance to the

SIDIK. While TA will depend on

above assessment, likely entry-

points include a revised user

interface and integration of DR

criteria.

National Ministry of

Environment

and Forestry

2

Support APEKSI and APKASI to

organize an annual “municipal

resilience forum” that convenes

local government practitioners to

showcase successes in CCA/ DRR

integration, recognize municipal

resilience leaders, and formulate

policy recommendations to

national agencies.

National APEKSI and

APKASI

3

“Climate-week” collaboration with

KLHK/ BNPB/ Civil Society

Alliance through the national

climate change adaptation

workshop (i.e. climate week,

month of disaster risk reduction,

etc.).

National BAPPENAS and

key

implementing

counterpart

agency

4

Socialize conclusions and

recommendations of national

policy review to key stakeholders,

such as KLHK, BNPB, and

BAPPENAS to be taken into

consideration in the formulation of

policies and preparation of

supporting instruments.


key

implementing

counterpart

agency

5

Working closely with KLHK and

BNPB, facilitate the drafting of

policies and design guidelines or

standard instruments to support

the implementation of CCA and

DRR integration.


key

implementing

counterpart

agency

6

Supported and formulated a

roadmap of ICA and Planas PRB

(or the integration of their

activities in a single entity).

National ICA and Planas

PRB


TASK 2: ENHANCE SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITY RESILIENCE TO CLIMATE CHANGE AND WEATHER-RELATED NATURAL DISASTERS

The focus of Task 2 during the reporting period was the initial engagement of subnational

stakeholders and the implementation of the site selection process. A series of kick-off meetings

in the three target provinces (East Java, Southeast Sulawesi, and Maluku) at provincial level as well

as city and district levels were successfully conducted. During these meetings, APIK team along

with USAID and Indonesian Government representatives shared information about APIK,

including details on the strategic approach, selection of working areas, and expected results with

subnational key stakeholders such as Regional Development Planning Agency (BAPPEDA),

Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD), Forestry Office (Dishut), and Regional

Environment Office (BLHD).

These meetings were designed to solicit input from the local stakeholders into the design and

approach of APIK and thereby further strengthen local buy-in to APIK. In parallel, the team also

conducted field visits to ground-truth the site selection process and identify priority landscapes,

cities/districts, and hazards. The response from local government was very positive and they are

keen to be involved and contribute to implementation. Initial indications of government support

to APIK include; verbal agreement of partnership, establishing CCA and DRR landscape resilience

working group and providing office space in local government offices.

The following summarizes the progress of specific outputs under Task 2 for Project Year (PY) 1:

1. Fully executed partnership agreements with local government partners.

The establishment of city/ district-based working groups that are able to work at the

landscape level is integral to the success of APIK. Following the site selection, APIK

immediately engaged local governments in the process of setting up interdisciplinary

resilience teams that will serve as the cornerstone of subnational activities within the

reporting period that with a verbal commitment from key stakeholders. This will be

followed up by a formal agreement in the next quarter. The main obstacle in completing

official partnership agreement document is the official letter from KLHK to provincial

representatives detailing the APIK project implementation arrangement. APIK conducted

discussions with respective local government, particularly with provincial government to

establish the partnership agreement in Maluku, East Java, and Southeast Sulawesi. They

are keen to have the formal agreement as a basis for coordination as well as for budgeting

if resources need to be allocated by the local government in addressing CCA and DRR.

2. Resilience team established by executive decree within each Local Government and initial

meetings held.

Discussions have been carried out in all three provinces regarding establishing resilience

teams and there is local government agreement and support for this. The Presidential

Regulation Number 21/2011 stipulates that each province of Indonesia will establish a

resilience working group as the response of mitigation to the impact of greenhouse gases

and in addition Ministry of BAPPENAS Decree No. 38/M.PPN/HK/03/2012 on

Establishment of Coordination Team for Climate Change Management, are used by APIK

as a fundamental starting point to delivering the efforts to establish resilience team at

regional level. Furthermore, the existing CCA/ DRR working groups are encouraged to

mainstream CCA and DRR issues into the establishment of resilience team as initiated by


APIK. In the past quarter, APIK continued to work on the formation of the resilience

team. In Southeast Sulawesi, APIK in collaboration with provincial BAPPEDA is working

to have inputs from academia on the landscape approach that will be used as the basis for

formation of the resilience team. Similarly, in East Java APIK worked with provincial

BAPPEDA to establish a steering committee at provincial/landscape level, while in Maluku

APIK worked with provincial BAPPEDA to see existing forums for potential resilience

team as alternate to establishing new team/forum.

3. Compile existing vulnerability assessment guidelines/experiences and reports and develop

standard scope of work in the integration of CCA/ DRR.

The compilation of existing vulnerability assessment guidelines/experiences and reports

started on the first week of June 2016. The first step of the process is reviewing existing

vulnerability assessment tools. The documents reviewed are: SIDIK by KLHK; Climate

Risk Assessment by Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network (ACCCRN);

Vulnerability to Climate Change and Adaptation Assessment (KRAPI); I-CATCH by

Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries; and Climate Vulnerability and Capacity Analysis

(CVCA) by Care International. The next step will be to conduct FGDs in order to obtain

inputs and clarifications from experts as well as CCA/ DRR specialist from regional offices

regarding the results of the study and, together with academia and practitioners, APIK

will modify the tools for utilization at the landscape and community levels.

Risk assessments at the community level will be conducted through participatory action

research to further engage and empower community members. Climate analysis and

downscaled projections will be included in community-level risk assessments as

triangulation on how climate trends are likely to affect communities based on their

livelihoods and assets. Various climate impact scenarios can be developed from the

assessment, such as impact from environmental changes, populations, economic trends,

changes of intensity of disasters, etc.

4. Conduct baseline governance assessment at Province/ District/ Landscape level including budget

allocation for CCA/ DRR and existing policies and regulations regarding CCA/ DRR.

To enable city/ district to establish a baseline of current levels of disaster and climate

impact resilience and to identify priorities for investment and action, BNPB has been

applying the Local Government Self-Assessment Tools for Disaster Resilience (LGSAT)

since 2012. In 2014, the LGSAT was carried out in 55 cities/ districts in Indonesia. LGSAT

as a working document has been improved into Disaster Resilience Scorecard that in 2015

has been applied by BNPB to seven cities/ districts and this year is targeting another nine

cities/ districts. Results from the scorecard will directly feed into Indonesia’s status report

on the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction at the international level.

At the national level, BNPB is also enhancing a tool to measure the disaster risk. Previously

the Indonesia Disaster Risk Index (IRBI) was published in 2013 as an annex to the National

Action Plan on Disaster Management (RENAS PB) 2015-2019. This year BNPB is planning

to update and integrate both the Scorecard and IRBI to have a comprehensive

measurement tool that can be used to report at the national and international level.

APIK consider the above mentioned tools can be utilized to establish a baseline of current

level of disaster and climate impact resilience at each targeted city/ district, and to identify

priorities for both APIK’s intervention and local government’s investment and action.


However, BNPB has concern that it will not be practical to apply both tools to each city/

district as they have lots of overlapping measurements. Therefore, APIK has started to

support BNPB to review and integrate the Scorecard and the 71 Indicators as well as

making improvement to accommodate relevant climate change adaptation and climate

weather information and landscape issues. Improvement and integration of the Scorecard

and 71 Indicators will be conducted within next quarter. The integrated tool as result will

be applied to APIK’s targeted city/ district.

5. Explore options/approaches for the rollout of the USAID-supported InAware system in the priority

geographies by working with APIK resource partner Pacific Disaster Center.

APIK held a preliminary information session and a follow up discussion with Anom

Parikesit of the Pacific Disaster Center (PDC) who designed the InAware monitoring and

early warning system. The discussion identified possible collaboration of APIK and PDC

that include:

InAware training in APIK project locations.

Modification of InAware system to display certain locations (city/district) as a default,

overlay it with climate projection data (automatically received from BMKG and other

agencies and push the real time information to decision makers).

Modify and simplify the query system.

Modify the system so the local Operations Control Center (Pusdalops) of BNPB is

able to add/ create their own layers.

APIK will discuss the aforementioned options with BNPB during the coming quarter.




1 Support peer-to-peer learning with

recognized local government

leaders in CCA/DRR such as

climate teams in Semarang.

Sub-

National

APIK- key

stakeholder at

sub-national

level

2 Public policy review of existing

CCA/DRR governance framework

in targeted Local Governments.

Sub-

National

APIK- key

stakeholder at

sub-national

level

3 Conduct vulnerability assessment

training program in eligible districts

for local government, researchers,

and communities.

Sub-

National

APIK- key

stakeholder at

sub-national

level

4 Carry out landscape-based

stakeholder mapping and refer to

existing conflict assessment to

identify relevant trans-boundary

institutions, dynamics, opportunities

and challenges.

Sub-

National

APIK- key

stakeholder at

sub-national

level

5 Compile and compare district and

provincial spatial plans and assess

how that land-use zoning takes into

Sub-

National

APIK- key

stakeholder at


account ecological and hydrological

risk.

sub-national

level

6 Convene landscape-based “risk

roundtables” to identify shared

environmental risks across the

watershed/coastal/small islands as a

first step toward landscape-level

adaptation.

Sub-

National

APIK- key

stakeholder at

sub-national

level

7 Review existing library of

curriculum/ training modules with

BNPB and KLHK and develop draft

training schedules for priority

districts/ cities.

National BNPB and

KLHK

8 Assist BPBDs to initiate the

establishment of local disaster

community groups (KMPBs) under

the auspices of Resilient Village or

Desa Tangguh Bencana through

district decree.

Sub-

National

BPBD

9 Scientific based Vulnerability

Assessment / Risk Assessment tool

modification to integrate CCA and

DRR (to be utilized at landscape

and community level).

National Academia,

Practitioners,

and

10 Workshop to disseminate the

Scientific based Vulnerability

Assessment / Risk Assessment tool.

National Implementing

counterpart

agency ,

international

NGO, CSO,

practitioners,

and academia

11 Begin the process of community-

based vulnerability assessments and

risk profiles using participatory

climate risk mapping.

Sub-

National

APIK- key

stakeholder at

sub-national

level

12 Assess the implementation of

Village Law (UU Desa) at targeted

villages i.e. capacity and priority of

each village in implementing Village

Law with specific regard to

potential allocation of funds for

CCA / DRR activities through

Village Law.

National Key

implementing

counterpart

agency


TASK 3: STRENGTHEN TARGETED CLIMATE AND WEATHER INFORMATION SERVICES

Over the past quarter, APIK focused on stakeholder interviews and surveys of users across the

climate and weather information (CWI) services marketplace to identify specific needs at the

national level. APIK also commenced an assessment of CWI producers during the quarter,

meeting with BMKG and BNPB, although progress was somewhat slowed by the need to additional

formal briefings within BMKG.

APIK also carried out identification of potential synergies with local “maker movement” partners,

the status SIDIK assessment, the InAware assessment, and a coordination workshop with BMKG.

These works will continue in the next quarter including a scientific analysis on climate, weather

and hydrogeology with collaboration with BMKG.

The following summarizes the progress of specific outputs under Task 3 for Project Year (PY) 1:

1. Define and segment CWI user marketplace based upon information requirements and

listing/enumeration of key climate and weather information users.

The CWI user marketplace has been defined and segmented. The list of the key

stakeholders is available in Appendix C.

2. Carry out stakeholder interviews and surveys of users across the marketplace to identify specific

needs on the national and sub national level that end it with results/information of CWI needs

assessment final report.

During the quarter, APIK focused on conducting stakeholder interviews and surveys of

users across the marketplace to identify specific needs on the national level. Meanwhile,

at the subnational level are still in the stage of coordinating with the regional teams,

including detailed work plan development for each regional office, recruiting enumerators/

interviewers, as well as the preparation of survey materials. Furthermore a FGD was

conducted with the staff of three climatological stations in APIK regions, and two Regional

BMKG Offices (Balai Besar).

By the end of quarter three, approximately 30% of national stakeholders had already been

interviewed. Those stakeholders range from ministry level organizations, private sector,

stated-owned enterprises, NGOs and associations. The activity of the principal CWI

producer, BMKG, remains ongoing. One of the challenges has been many bureaucratic

hurdles required to set up meetings including with BMKG. Additionally, some private

sector organizations are difficult to contact. The assessment will continue until end of

August in parallel with local stakeholder interviews. A social media analysis has also been

conducted to optimize the utilization of social media for future strategy of climate,

weather and disaster information dissemination.

3. Assessment of the existing CWI producer regarding the roadmap, existing system, infrastructure,

procedure, human capacity, listing available data, resulting products (i.e., packaged data), and

evidence of actual application.

The producer assessment has thus far been limited to the Center for Climate Change and

Air Quality Division (PIKU) and has not yet extended to other divisions such as Deputy

of Meteorology, Database Center, Research and Development Center, and Education and

Training Center due to postponed courtesy meeting with the Head of BMKG.


A workshop on climate projections and climate change adaptation options for BMKG was

conducted on May 16 – 20. This workshop was attended by all climatological station staffs

around Indonesia. APIK collected the strategic roadmap of PIKUs related to RAN API and

DRR, and also identified some of BMKG activities which have potential collaboration with

APIK including enhancement of climate change information service (CCIS), publication of

high resolution (downscaling) climate projections (5x5km for Java), data integration, media

monitoring, climate-based insurance-related activity, and FGD on climate projection.

4. Identify menu of capacity-building options associated with the Roadmap, including exchanges,

internships, and study tours, course modules, and on the job training to increase capacity of

BMKG and BNPB staff.

The aforementioned SIDIK assessment conducted during the quarter resulted in an FGD

planned for early July. Furthermore, following the InAware assessment of end users at

BNPB, APIK submitted inputs regarding the next development phase of InAWare before

it is rolled out in the regions.




1

Construct climate information

services value chains. Using the

results of the interviews and

surveys, we will analyze how

disaster and climate information

progresses through the value chain.

National

APIK- key

stakeholder at

sub-national

level

2

Integrate all CWI supply gaps (i.e.,

unmet demand) and weaknesses in

the value chain into the CWI

roadmap and identify planned

technical assistance

National

APIK- key

stakeholder at

sub-national

level

3

Development CWI Roadmap for

CWI producer (Short, Mid and

Long Term) National

APIK- key

stakeholder at

sub-national

level

4

Summarize and integrate all CWI

supply gaps (i.e., unmet demand)

and weaknesses in the value chain

into the CWI Roadmap road map

and identify planned technical

assistance.

National

APIK- key

stakeholder at

sub-national

level

5

Identify menu of capacity-building

options associated with the

Roadmap, including exchanges,

internships, and study tours, course

modules, and on the job training to

increase capacity of BMKG and

BNPB staff.

National

APIK- key

stakeholder at

sub-national

level


6

Engage local universities as centers

of excellence in CWI service

provision. National

APIK- key

stakeholder at

sub-national

level

7

Evaluate potential community-

based CWI approaches using low-

cost, open-source tools, including

assessing the extent of the maker

movement in Indonesia

Sub-

national

APIK covered

districts

8

Design/conduct media campaigns in

conjunction with Indonesia’s

climate week to share the

preliminary results of the CWI

Roadmap.

National

APIK- key

stakeholder at

sub-national

level

TASK 4: AWARENESS AND CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PRIVATE SECTOR

During this reporting period, initial connections with several key associations were established,

including Indonesia Business Links (IBL), Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry

(KADIN), American Chamber of Commerce (AmCham), Indonesia Association on Agriculture

(PISAgro), Association of Indonesian Coffee Exporter (AEKI), Indonesian Board of Spices (Dewan

Rempah Indonesia), Indonesian Business Coalition for Sustainable Development (IBCSD), and

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Forums in provincial level located in Surabaya and also in

Blitar. APIK also entered into discussions with East Java Bank, State-owned Electricity Company

(PLN) Jawa Bali and PT Jatinom in East Java and Coca-Cola Indonesia at the national level,

identifying several concrete next steps such as engaging each company in investment for adaptation

within their business operation. Notably, the partnership with the AmCham shows strong

potential, and APIK will contribute to the Chamber’s upcoming newsletter as well as organizing a

“resilience roundtable” in coordination with AmCham.

The following summarizes the progress of specific outputs under Task 4 for PY1:

1. Drafting the map of business associations at the national level through series of discussions

relevant business associations, including actions and approaches that already adopted for CCA/

DRR.

Through several initial meetings, below are identified business associations:

Members of PISAgro have been experiencing the impact of climate change due to the

nature of its industry, agriculture. Nevertheless, their response to climate change is not

yet in place, let alone the convergence of CCA/DRR. Possible dissemination is positively

recognized by the Executive Director and the facilitation for APIK to its member has

taken place.

IBCSD is one of the few associations which already has the exposure to climate change

and disaster risks. When it comes to climate change, they are still focused on the


mitigation and have taken limited steps in adaptation. In terms of the activity level of its

members, some have suspended their membership due to economic slow-down in oil

industry. However, IBCSD and Indonesia Business Links (IBL), a different association

which has been working closely on corporate social responsibility agenda, has shown a

willingness to collaborate to raise awareness of climate change and disaster risks among

their members.

KADIN just recently changed its division name from Environment Division into Renewable

Energy and Environment. KADIN also has a division on research which APIK could also

engage once the perception survey has already been developed. KADIN’s national office

has a better platform than the regional offices, and thus, in terms of engagement, APIK

will first prioritize KADIN’s office in Jakarta. Importantly, climate change is not yet being

highlighted as a threat by KADIN in their public communications, nor is it being integrated

into yearly planning.

The CSR Forum in East Java has achieved notable success among other provinces in

Indonesia and is considered to be the best one in region. BAPPEDA has established a team

consisting of non-civil servants to facilitate the collaboration between development issues,

namely, environment, education, and health with various multi-national companies doing

business in East Java. The CSR Forum committee also has shown a positive response to

support APIK in conducting a CCA/DRR perceptions survey. At the same time, the CSR

Forum’s committee has only received limited exposure to CCA/ DRR issues.

AEKI represents a sector that is highly influenced by weather and climate conditions and

is willing to engage with APIK on capacity building for its coffee farmers and dissemination

of CCA/ DRR for its member. A different response, however, came from Indonesian

Board of Spices, as they are experiencing an ever increasing production in the recent

years. Nevertheless, initial steps to the Indonesian Board of Spices in regional level might

have different response and that will be carried on in the next quarter.

Aside from the above associations, through the AmCham, APIK met with Peter Myer, an

expert in insurance industry and Agness Stafford, a committee member of AmCham on

environment. In that meeting, it came up that developing a think tank might be one

possibility to address climate change issues in business sector. Currently, weather-related

insurance is already available in the agriculture sector, namely from ACA, and AXA.

2. Finalization of design and implement a survey of businesses in 2-3 targeted sectors concerning

climate change and disaster risk awareness and planning as perceptions survey of the business

community on CCA/ DRR issues.

APIK remains in development phase on designing the survey as the desk review has just

been completed. Three targeted sectors will be agriculture, food and beverages industry,

fisheries industry. Those sectors are identified as the most vulnerable industries with

regard to climate change whilst also considered to be essential in making sure food

security are at hand in a long run. The survey will be implemented in quarter 4 through

business associations and also less informal network in provincial level.

3. Identification of two initial economic sectors for in depth economic analysis, enlisting sector and

commodity experts and downscaled climate projection where appropriate in to final report of

sector-based “climate stories” for two economic sectors.


Based on Indonesia Statistics Agency (BPS) data, the contribution of agriculture in

Indonesia is only around 14 % of GDP, still well below the manufacturing sector which

contributes about 21 % of GDP. However, the agriculture sector plays an important

role in absorbing 35% of total workforce in Indonesia. On top of that, in the latest BPS

data, the fisheries sector in Indonesia contributed to 2.5% of GDP. It is still considered

to be small given the nature of Indonesia’s archipelago. Following the lead of Minister of

Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, the fisheries sector is expected to have a big leap as

various policies to protect Indonesia’s fishery industries are taken place. These two

sectors then shall be the focus in developing climate stories on the convergence of

CCA/ DRR in the business sector.




1

Conduct initial resilience

roundtables with key business

associations to disseminate the

results of the survey.

National

2

In partnership with national

business associations such as

AmCham and KADIN, organize

initial annual business forum on

climate and disaster risk reduction

in the private sector.

National

3

Map established business

associations at the provincial level

by district and by sector.

Sub-

National

4

In cooperation with provincial

business associations, design and

implement a survey of businesses in

at least one targeted economic

sector concerning climate change

and disaster risk awareness and

planning.

National

TASK 5: PROGRAM COORDINATION AND DOCUMENTATION

During this quarter, Task 5 focused principally on establishing its main communication channels

such as website and social media accounts, communication products, and also identifying media

stakeholders at the local level. Knowledge sharing is still limited due to early phase of engagement

with relevant stakeholders and project’s knowledge products are still in the production process.

APIK also already started collecting a database of contacts which consists of government

institutions, other organizations, private sectors, etc. This database will be used for information

and knowledge dissemination and updated accordingly as the recipient of APIK e-newsletter.

Several communication products such as project profile, brochure for private sector, and

stationeries are already upgraded based on USAID guidance and already disseminated to regional

offices.


The progresses of achieved target outputs FY16 are as follow:

1. APIK communications, outreach and knowledge management plan.

The communication, outreach, and knowledge management plan is finalized and will be

attached as a separate document from this quarterly report. The document is the second

version from the first draft submitted in PY1 work plan document.

2. Key communications platforms established and operating.

During this quarter reporting period, several communication channels have already been

established. APIK’s revamped website is still under development and will be fully online

and functioned early in the next quarter. APIK already has its social media accounts, such

as: Facebook page, Twitter, Youtube, and Google+ (see appendix D).

3. Develop Publications Manual, which will provide detailed guidelines on the formatting and

compilation of fact sheets, best practices, success stories, community profiles, etc.

Publications Manual has already been developed following USAID guidance and template

such as for success stories. The manual/ template consist of several basic questions to be

filled by field coordinators and/or other regional office staff. The manuals will be delivered

more in detailed during the visit to regional offices on August.

4. Organize regular USAID meetings with USAID IUWASH PLUS and SEA projects to share

approaches/progress on the integration of CCA/DRR across projects at national level as well as

in the three targeted provinces.

APIK has a common location with SEA, namely Maluku, where APIK took part in the SEA’s

socialization event in Maluku in the past quarter. During a brief discussion, it was identified

that potential collaboration might include protection of Ambon Bay through CCA/ DRR

efforts. Whilst in East Java, as common location of APIK and IUWASH (and IUWASH

PLUS), a potential collaboration might include joint efforts on water resources

conservation. Based on discussion with the Indonesian Water Utility Company (PDAM)

as IUWASH’s partner, APIK is expected to continue, replicate/ scale up, and improve

water resources conservation activities.

5. Organize Technical Team (Tim Teknis) of Climate Change and Disaster Resilience meeting and

Governance Board meeting with USAID Environment office and Executing Agency (BAPPENAS).

Pending finalization of APIK’s Technical Arrangement (TA), APIK conducted discussions

with several ministries on framing specific collaboration, e.g. on SIDIK with KHLK. Once

the TA is putted in place and likewise on the technical team, it is expected that such

discussions will be better coordinated and the collaboration will be more comprehensive.

6. Organize semi-annual meetings with technical team to share approaches/progress on the

integration of CCA/DRR being achieved by APIK at national level as well as in the three targeted

provinces.

While the TA is being finalized, APIK is keeping close relationship with ministries at the

national level as well as with key stakeholders and local government agencies at the

subnational level. In many cases, progress and plan of APIK’s activities and results were

discussed with stakeholders.





1

Conduct regional staff training on

APIK communications products and

approaches, collect photo stocks

and media visit to local level.

Sub-

National

3

Enhance coordination with other

USG sponsored efforts to

strengthen CCA/DRR capacity in

Indonesia (i.e. USDA, USACE and

others)

National

4 Knowledge exchange for other

project including USAID/OFDA National

CROSS-CUTTING INITIATIVES

Cross-cutting initiatives under APIK include the Resilience Fund, Gender, and also Monitoring an

Evaluation. This section provides an update on those initiatives, as well as give an overview of

administrative matters, deliverables submitted to USAID and general project start-up. Also included in this section is a summary table of activities for the next quarter in each region.

START-UP During the past quarter, APIK completed establishment of the three regional offices in Ambon

(Maluku), Kendari (Southeast Sulawesi), and Malang (East Java). The contracts with the landlords

have been completed. The offices are operational complete with the furniture and other

necessities in place. In Southeast Sulawesi, provincial BAPPEDA has provided its office space for

APIK staff. Currently APIK staff use it for better communication and coordination with the

province. APIK is preparing to have office space provided by BAPPEDA in Ambon, Maluku and Malang, East Java.

The procurement has been completed with all main office equipment and supplies such as

computers already purchased. In terms of personnel, all positions are already filled, except the

governance specialist for Maluku that will be filled in the next quarter. A candidate has been identified and will be active soon.

APIK conducted training and coordination meeting both for administrative and technical staff. On

the administrative part, it is important that all staff fully understand the Standard Operating

Procedure (SOP) and project manuals including Technical and Administrative Management

Information System (TAMIS) that are the backbone of the project management. On the technical,

the staff had the opportunity to build common understanding on the concept and plan for

implementation as well as synchronized efforts of national and subnational staff in implementing

APIK work plan.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING While a number of deliverables have been submitted to USAID during the earlier reporting period,

APIK is preparing inputs on the Evaluative Approach in addition to the Monitoring and Evaluation

Plan that was already submitted earlier. It is expected that such input will be submitted in July.


RESILIENCE FUND Currently APIK is working to complete two proposals which were unsolicited and were passed

on to APIK from the Indonesia Climate Change Trust Fund (ICCTF) as they are in line with

APIK strategy and geography. The proposals focus on community based climate change

adaptation in East Java and in addition Fish Aggregating Devices (FAD) and artificial reefs in

South East Sulawesi. The FAD proposal from Research and Community Service Institution

University of Halu Oleo (LPPM UHO) received administrative clearance from Mission of

Environmental Officer (MEO) regarding the FAD and Bio-reef tech.

The progresses of achieved target outputs FY1 are as follows:

1. Conduct initial round of competition in support of at least one “quick win” challenge grant in

each region as well as at the national level.

BAPPENAS and USAID agreed not to fund proposals under the ICCTF fund if their

activities are in three APIK’s areas. Thus, APIK received 27 proposals from the latest

call for proposals submitted to ICCTF in 2015. After proposal review and discussion,

APIK decided to accept two proposals from LPPM UHO that would work in South

Konawe, Southeast Sulawesi and PATTIRO that would work in Malang District, East

Java.

2. Socialize Resilience Fund at the regional level, conducting regional workshops with APIK staff to

review the processes for fund usages and identify possible topics/issues.

As laid out in the work plan, the socialization on resilience fund is to be conducted at

the regional level once recruitment is completed. On May 31, 2016 APIK held the

socialization for APIK Southeast staff in Kendari office.

Table 6. Resilience Fund Next Quarter Activity Plan


Resilience Fund July Aug Sept

1 Socialization to Maluku Ambon Staffs in Maluku

2 Socialization to East Java Malang Staffs in East

Java

3 Conduct Grant Orientation and

Signing Agreement - PATTIRO Malang

PATTIRO, APIK

Staff

4 Conduct Grant Orientation and

Signing Agreement – LPPM UHO Kendari

LPPM UHO,

APIK staff

5 Advance Request from PATTIRO

and LPPM UHO Jakarta

Regional and

Finance Officer

6 Overview financial assistance for

grantee Kendari

7 Overview financial assistance for

grantee Malang

GENDER During this reporting period, APIK focused on preparing detailed gender analysis to identify

potential gender issues, gaps and constraints faced by project beneficiaries. Internal gender


working group consists of representatives from each regional office and task team to oversee the

implementation of the action plan project-wide will be established. The working group will meet

biannually to track progress in meeting the action plan objectives and also to share common

problems and mitigation strategies. The working group also will develop internal gender guidelines

for project implementation, and provide recommendations to COP on how to facilitate a gender-

safe working environment.

Within the past quarter, Gender unit focused on gender assessment preparation such as

developing literature review, hiring STTA to conduct gender assessment, and disseminate USAID

and APIK gender approach to regional offices. The dissemination has been conducted in Kendari,

Southeast Sulawesi in May 2016 and will be conducted also in East Java and Maluku offices in next

quarter.

The progresses of achieved target outputs FY16 are as follows:

1. Building from USAID’s preliminary gender analysis, conduct detailed analysis that takes into

account the unique cultural contexts of the targeted cities/districts.

Literature review based on existing researches is being developed. APIK is also in the

process of hiring consultants to conduct gender assessment in each region.

2. Established APIK internal gender working group to monitor progress of the action plan and

formulate internal gender guidelines.

The potential members of internal working group will be selected after visits to East Java

and Maluku offices. Action plan and internal gender guidelines will be developed based on

findings of gender analysis.

MONITORING AND EVALUATION During this reporting period the M&E focus has been as follows:

1. Support Resilience Fund team to review and select potential proposal from ICCTF to be

funded by APIK.

2. Support Resilience Fund team to improving two potential proposals from PATTIRO and

LPPM UHO).

3. Conduct direct coaching to the selected grantee in finalizing the proposal.

4. Develop APIK evaluative approach.

5. Support technical personnel to develop detailed tasks work plan 2016 linked with

identification of tangible target output for each activity.

6. Support technical personnel to develop standard format of Scope of Work for each

activity and individual consultants.

7. Compile data and report that has been submitted by technical person and regional offices

to feed the finalization of Quarter Progress Report (Q3 PY16). In reference to indicators and results for APIK, please refer to appendix A for results table.

PLANS FOR NEXT QUARTER (BY REGION)

The following table 7 details the plans for the next quarter for each of the three regions


Table 7. Regional Next Quarter Activity Plan


East Java July Aug Sept

1 Kick off meeting in Jombang, Mojokerto and

Sidoarjo Districts, including courtesy call

Trawas Jombang,

Mojokerto, Sidoarjo

districts, East Java

province and KLHK

2 At least 1 Working Group/Forum meeting

conducted in each city/district partner to

follow up kick off meeting to each landscape.

7 city/ district 7 city/ district

3 Technical coordination meeting to initiate

provincial steering committee, facilitated by

Partnership Administration Bureau.

Surabaya Province

4 Landscape meeting, as a sharing event on

progress and constraints among 7

city/district and province, facilitated by

provincial steering committee and

Development Partner Communication

Forum or Forum Komunikasi Mitra

Pembangunan (FKMP).

Surabaya Province and 7 city/

district

Southeast Sulawesi July Aug Sept

1 Developments of partnership agreement

between APIK and Governor/ Mayor/

Regent

Kendari and

South

Konawe

APIK regional team,

DCOP, BAPPEDA,

Law and Regulation Bureau

2 Discussions to establish of Resilience

Working Group

Kendari,

South

Konawe

APIK regional team,

Southeast Sulawesi

BAPPEDA, Kendari

BAPPEDA, South

Konawe BAPPEDA

3 Technical support for development of

Medium Term Regional Development

Planning (RPJMD) Konawe Selatan 2016-

2021

South

Konawe

APIK regional team,

South Konawe

BAPPEDA,

Southeast Sulawesi

BAPPEDA

4 Technical support for development of

Strategic Plan of SKPDs 2016-2021in South

Konawe

Kendari,

South

Konawe

APIK regional team,

South Konawe

BAPPEDA, BPBD,

Environment Office

(BLH), Maritime and

Fisheries Office

(DKP) and

Agriculture Office

5 Monitor and support development of Local

Regulation on Disaster Management (Perda

PB)

Kendari APIK regional team,

Southeast Sulawesi

House of

Representatives

(DPRD)

6 Support baseline governance assessment at

province/ district / landscape level (IRBI and

Scorecard assessment)

Kendari,

South

Konawe

APIK regional team,

advisors from

Jakarta, partners

7 Support CWI survey (Task 3) Kendari,

South

Konawe

APIK regional ream,

advisors from

Jakarta, partners

8 Evaluation and follow up of proposal

submitted by LPPM UHO

Kendari,

Jakarta

Regional Manager,

DCOP, Resilience

Fund Manager


9 Identification of project sites at community

level

Kendari,

South

Konawe

APIK Regional

Team, BAPPEDA

10 Program coordination meeting Kendari,

Jakarta

APIK Regional team,

Jakarta Team,

BAPPEDA

Maluku July Aug Sept

1 Workshop with inter SKPD facilitated by

government

Ambon,

Masohi

APIK Regional team

2 Survey to Lease Island facilitated by

government

Haruku,

Saparua

APIK Regional team

3 Support CWI survey (Task 3) Ambon,

Haruku

Saparua

APIK Regional team

4 Signing Memorandum of Understanding

between APIK and provincial government

Ambon,

Masohi

APIK Regional team

5 Support baseline governance assessment at

province/ district / landscape level (IRBI and

Scorecard assessment)

Ambon,

Haruku

Saparua

APIK Regional team

6 Resilience Working Group workshop Ambon,

Haruku Saparua

APIK Regional team


APPENDICES

APPENDIX A: SUMMARY TABLE OF RESULTS

USAID Country Development Cooperation Strategy (CDCS) Objective

DO 3 Global Development Priorities of Mutual Interest Advanced

IR 3.3 Climate Change Mitigation and Resilience to Support a Green Economy Strengthened

Sub-IR 3.3 Adaptation and Risk Management Capacity Increased

Sub-IR 3.4 Engagement in key climate change and resilience dialogue strengthened

High-Level Outcome

1 The integration of CC and DRR into national and sub-national governance frameworks improved

2 Capacity of local communities and the private sector to address climate change and weather-related natural hazards strengthened

3 Utilization of information for climate and disaster risk management among key stakeholders improved

Indicator LoP

Target

FY 16 Targe

t

Progress Toward Targets Indicator

Total Achieved Target FY 16

Comments Q1

Actual Q2

Actual Q3

Actual Q4

Actual

High - Level Result (HLR)

1

Number of national and subnational institutions with improved capacity to integrate/address climate change and natural disaster risk

40 0 0 0 0 0 0

2

Number of laws, policies, strategies, plans or regulations addressing CCA AND/OR DRR revised, proposed, or adopted at the national/subnational level

50 0 0 0 0 0 0

3

Number of community and private sector stakeholders implementing appropriate CCA and/or DRR measures

130 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Number of people with increased capacity to adapt to climate change

4000 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Number of stakeholder entities using new or improved climate information services

155 0 0 0 0 0 0

6

Percentage of people with increased capacity to adapt to the impacts of climate change (as a result of CCA AND/OR DRR programming) that are women

40% 0 NA NA NA NA NA

7 Number of people participating in CCA AND/OR DRR training program and activity

30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

8

Amount of investment mobilized (in USD) for climate change as supported by USG assistance

3 million

0 0 0 0 0 0


(TLR) Task - Level Result - Task.1

1a

Number of laws, policies, strategies, plans or regulations addressing CCA AND/OR DRR revised, proposed, or adopted at the national level.

10 0 0 0 0 0 0

1b

Number of forums, tools, or other approaches operationalized to strengthen coordination on CCA AND/OR DRR mainstreaming

15 0 0 0 0 0 0

1c Number of changes made to the RAN-API based on lessons learned from the local level

10 0 0 0 0 0 0

1d

Number of CCA AND/OR DRR practitioners that access new/strengthened networks for sharing lessons learned and best practices at the provincial and local levels

500 0 0 0 0 0 0

1e

Percent change of awareness of national stakeholders of the economic and other impacts of climate change and weather-related natural disasters



2a

Number of local government development plans, processes, budgets and/or operations that reflect and address CCA and DRR

30 0 0 0 0 0 0

2b

Number of subnational government staff who demonstrate improved capacity to address and mainstream CCA AND/OR DRR

13 0 0 0 0 0 0

2c

Number of climate change and disaster risk assessments are completed to inform and prioritize risk reduction, and capacity to update and replicate them is institutionalized

10 0 0 0 0 0 0

2d

Multiple districts coordinating implementation of CCA AND/OR DRR measures that improve climate and disaster resilience at the landscape level

10 0 0 0 0 0 0

2e

Number of community CCA AND/OR DRR measures implemented with sustainable support from local government

100 0 0 0 0 0 0


3a

Number of Improved use of targeted weather and climate information services for priority decision-makers and consumers.

10 0 0 0 0 0 0

3b Number of Strengthened capacity of relevant institutions

National: 5

0 0

0

0

0

0


to develop and disseminate targeted, user-tailored weather and climate information services

Sub-national

: 50 Commu

nity: 100+

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0


4a

Climate risk management actions implemented as part of business operations in companies across multiple sectors

20 0 0 0 0 0 0

4b Number of private sector-related pilot activities contribute to local resilience

10 0 0 0 0 0 0

4c

Percent change of awareness of the economic and other impacts of climate change and weather-related natural disasters improved among the private sector



5a

Number of models developed and disseminated on successful integration of district, provincial and national strategies for CCA and DRR mainstreaming

12 0 0 0 0 0 0

5b

Number of tools/approaches/methodologies for integrating CCA and DRR vulnerability analysis and response/adaptation strategies used by other projects including USAID/OFDA

10 0 0 0 0 0 0


APPENDIX B: RISK MANAGEMENT

NO Problems Encountered Period

Encountered Proposed Solution Status

Technical Arrangement

1 While the Individual Arrangement for the USAID environment project portfolio has been concluded and signed by relevant parties, the Technical Arrangement (TA) for APIK is not yet signed.

Project Start-Up to date

Working closely with KLHK where as of end of June, BAPPENAS had sent a letter to KLHK (Dit. Gen. Climate Change) on final version of the TA. APIK is facilitating that KLHK will reply BAPPENAS’ letter stating that KLHK agrees on the TA.

In process

Program

2 Challenges arranging meetings with government officials and then ensuring their participation.

Project Start-Up to date

This is a perpetual challenge. APIK has been working hard with government officials to ensure meetings are arranged based on their schedules. Despite this often times government officials have other last minute priorities. It is important for APIK to build relationships with multiple representatives in government departments to ensure there is always someone that can join the meeting

In process


APPENDIX C: LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS FOR CWI SURVEY

No Stakeholders Division Sub Division

1 Meteorology,

Climatology, and

Geophysics Agency

(BMKG)

Deputy of Meteorology Center of Aviation and Maritime Meteorology

Center of Public Meteorology

Deputy of Climatology Center of Climate, Agro climate, and Maritime Climate

Center of Climate Change and Air Quality

Deputy on Instrument,

Calibration, Engineering, and

Communication Network

Center of Instrument, Engineering,

Center of Instrument, Engineering, and Calibration

Center of Database

Center of Communication Network

Inspectorate Research and Development Center

2 National Disaster Management Agency

(BNPB)

Deputy of Prevention and Preparedness

Directorate of Disaster Risk Reduction Directorate of Community Empowerment

Directorate of Preparedness

Deputy of Emergency Response Directorate of Emergency Response

Center of Data, Information,

and Public Relation

PDC (Pacific Disaster Centre)

3 National Development

Planning Agency

(BAPPENAS)

Deputy of Maritime and Natural

Resources Affairs

Directorate of Food and Agriculture

Directorate of Forestry and Natural Resources

Conservation

Directorate of Maritime and Fisheries

Directorate of Energy, Mineral, and Mining Resources

Directorate of Environment

Deputy of Regional

Development

Directorate of Spatial Plan and Land

Deputy of Human,

Communities, and Culture

Development

Directorate of Communities Health and Nutrient

Directorate of Irrigation, Urban and Settlement

Irrigation, Special Settlement and Underdeveloped

Areas

Center of Development

Planning Data and Information

4 Secretariat of RAN

API

Indonesia Climate

Change Trust Fund

5 Ministry of Public

Works and Public

Housing

Directorate General of Water

Resources

Directorate of Natural Resources Management

Directorate General of Cipta

Karya

Directorate of Settlement Infrastructure Integration

Research and Development

Agency

Center of Research and Development for Natural

Resources

Center of Research and Development for Road and

Bridge

Center of Research and Development for Housing and

Settlement

Center of Research and Development for Policies and

Technology Implementation

Supporting Office for

Development of Water

Supplier System

Monitoring and Evaluation of Services Performance

Secretariat General Center of Data and Information Technology

Water Resources Research and

Development Center

Irrigation Office

Hydrology and Groundwater Management


6 Ministry of Energy and

Mineral Resources

Directorate General of New

Energy, Renewable Energy, and

Energy Conservation

Directorate of New Energy and Renewable Energy

Center of Research and

Development

7 Ministry of

Environment and

Forestry

Forest Fires Task Force

Directorate General of Climate Change Management

Sub-directorate Planning Sub-directorate Climate Change Adaptation

Research, Development, and

Innovation Office

Directorate General of

Watershed and Protected

Forest Management

Directorate of Monitoring and Evaluation of Watershed

Management

Directorate of Forest and Land Rehabilitation


Forestry Planning and

Environment Management

8 Geospatial Information

Agency (BIG)

Deputy of Basic Geospatial

Information

Center of Topography and Toponymal Mapping

Center of Seaside Environment Mapping

Center of Borderline Mapping

Deputy of Thematic Geospatial

Information

Center of Thematic Integration and Mapping

9 Ministry of Maritime

Affairs and Fisheries

Secretariat General Data, Statistics, and Information Center

Directorate General of Catch

Fisheries

Directorate of Fisheries Harbor

Directorate of Fishermen

Directorate General of Farming

Fisheries

Directorate General of Maritime Management

Directorate of Maritime Spatial Plan Directorate Coastal Utilization

Directorate of Marine Conservation and Biodiversity

Directorate of Small Islands Utilization

Maritime and Fisheries

Research and Development

Agency

Coastal and Marine Resources Development and

Research Center

Marine Observation Research

Agency

10 Fisheries and Ocean

Research Agency

11 Ministry of Agriculture Directorate General of

Agriculture Facilities and

Infrastructure

Directorate of Land Protection and Expansion

Directorate of Agriculture Irrigation

Directorate General of Crops Directorate of Crops Protection


Plantation

Directorate of Plantation Protection

Secretariat General Agriculture Data and Information Center


Horticulture

Directorate of Horticulture Protection

Food Security Agency Center of Food Availability and Vulnerability

Agriculture Research and

Development Agency

Agro Climate and Hydrology Research Body

Horticulture Development Research Center

Plantation Development Research Center

12 Ministry of

Transportation

Directorate General of Water

Transportation

Directorate of Navigation

Directorate of Harbor

Directorate General of Air

Transportation

Directorate of Airport

Directorate of Flight Safety

Directorate of Flight Navigation

Directorate General of Land

Transportation

Directorate of Traffic and River, Lake, and Ferriage

Transportation

Directorate of Land Transportation Safety


Transportation Research and

Development Agency

Secretariat General Data and Information Center

13 Ministry of Health Directorate General of

Diseases Prevention and

Management

Health Research and Development Agency

Secretariat General Data and Information Center

14 Agrarian and Spatial

Planning

Directorate General of Spatial

Planning

Directorate of Spatial Planning

Directorate of Spatial Utilization


Agrarian Infrastructure

Directorate of Basic Mapping and Measures

Secretariat General Research and Development Center

Land, Spatial Plan, and Sustainable Food Agriculture

Data and Information Center

15 National Search and

Rescue Agency

(BASARNAS)

Data and Information Center

Deputy of Search and Rescue

Operations

16 Peatland Restoration

Agency (BRG)

Deputy of Planning and

Partnership

17 Financial Services

Authority (OJK)

Assets Market

18 National Aerospace

Agency (LAPAN)

Deputy of Remote Sensing Center of Remote Sensing Data and Technology

Center of Remote Sensing Utilization

19 Indonesian Research

Institute (LIPI)

Deputy of Geoscience Center of Oceanography Research

Center of Deep Sea Research

20 Center for Climate

Risk and Opportunity

Management

(CCROM)

21 Ministry of Information

and Communication


Information Application

Directorate of Information Security

Secretariat General Head of Data and Means of Informatics Center

22 Military Army

Navy

Air Force

23 Universities Faculty of Science or

Environment

Bandung Technology Institute (WCPL, Climate Change

Center, Center of Disaster Mitigation Research)

University of Indonesia (RCCC-UI, Center of Applied

Geography Research (PPGT), Center of Oceanography

Research

Bogor Agricultural Institute (Disaster Research Center,

Maritime and Coastal Natural Resources Research

Center, Tropical Horticulture Research Center

(PHKT), Southeast Asian Food and Agricultural Science

and Technology Center (SEAFAST)


APPENDIX D: COMMUNICATIONS PLATFORMS APIK Facebook page: facebook.com/usaidapik

APIK Twitter account: @USAID_APIK

https://twitter.com/USAID_APIK


Draft of revamped USAID APIK website


APPENDIX E: MEDIA COVERAGE SUMMARY

No. Date Title Media Link/ images

1 April

22,

2016

Konsel Launching

Program APIK

Kendari Pos

2 May 11,

2016

Rawan Bencana,

USAID Jadikan

Kota Kendari

Lokasi Program

APIK

Zona Sultra http://zonasultra.com/rawan-bencana-usaid-jadikan-kota-

kendari-lokasi-program-apik.html

3 May 11,

2016

USAID Luncurkan

Program APIK di

Kota Kendari, Ini

Manfaatnya

Zona Sultra http://zonasultra.com/usaid-luncurkan-program-apik-di-

kota-kendari-ini-manfaatnya.html

4 June 17,

2016

Pemkot Ambon

Komitmen Dukung

Program APIK

Antara

Maluku

http://ambon.antaranews.com/berita/33795/pemkot-

ambon-komitmen-dukung-program-apik

5 June 17,

2016

Program APIK

Didukung Pemkot

Ambon

Maluku Post http://www.malukupost.com/2016/06/program-apik-

didukung-pemkot-ambon.html

http://zonasultra.com/rawan-bencana-usaid-jadikan-kota-kendari-lokasi-program-apik.html

http://zonasultra.com/rawan-bencana-usaid-jadikan-kota-kendari-lokasi-program-apik.html

http://zonasultra.com/usaid-luncurkan-program-apik-di-kota-kendari-ini-manfaatnya.html

http://zonasultra.com/usaid-luncurkan-program-apik-di-kota-kendari-ini-manfaatnya.html

http://ambon.antaranews.com/berita/33795/pemkot-ambon-komitmen-dukung-program-apik

http://ambon.antaranews.com/berita/33795/pemkot-ambon-komitmen-dukung-program-apik

http://www.malukupost.com/2016/06/program-apik-didukung-pemkot-ambon.html

http://www.malukupost.com/2016/06/program-apik-didukung-pemkot-ambon.html


6 June 17,

2016

No title Kabar

Ambon

7 June 17,

2016

Pemkot Ambon

Dukung Sosialisasi

APIK

Kabar

Ambon

Documents

USAID ADAPTASI PERUBAHAN IKLIM DAN KETANGGUHANpdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00MZ6X.pdf · ADAPTASI PERUBAHAN IKLIM DAN KETANGGUHAN (APIK) –QUARTERLY REPORT (APRIL 01 JUNE 30, 2016) 9