USA v. Discala Et Al Doc 95 Filed 6 Nov 14

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 USA v. Discala Et Al Doc 95 Filed 6 Nov 14

    1/7

    c se

    1:14 cr 00399 ENV Document 85 1 Filed 10/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PagelD #: 490

    SLR:LDM:CSK

    F.#2013ROJ203

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    EASTERN DISTRICT OF

    NEW

    YORK

    X

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    - against -

    MARC WELXER,

    Defendant.

    X

    PRELIMINARY ORDER OF

    FORFEITURE

    14-CR-399(ENV)

    WHEREAS, on October 15, 2014, MARC WELXER (the Defendant ),

    entered a plea

    of

    guilty to Counts One and Three

    of

    the above-captioned indictment,

    charging violations of 18 U.S.C. 371, and

    15

    U.S.C. 78j(b) and 78ff; and

    WHEREAS, the Defendant has consented to the entry of a forfeiture money

    judgment in the amount of one million, four hundred thousand dollars ($1,400,000.00) in

    United States currency (the Forfeiture Money Judgment ) pursuant to

    18

    U.S.C.

    98l a) l) C),

    28 U.S.C. 246l(c), as property which constitutes or is derived from proceeds

    obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result

    of

    his violations

    of

    18 U.S.C. 371 and

    15

    U.S.C.

    78j(b) and 78ff, and/or as substitute assets, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 853(p).

    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED

    AND

    DECREED, on consent, by

    and between the United States and the defendant as follows:

    1 The Defendant shall forfeit to the United States the full amount of the

    Forfeiture Money Judgment, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. and 21 U.S.C. 853(p).

    United States v MARC WELXER, 14-CR-399(ENV)

    Preliminary Order

    of

    Forfeiture

    Page 1

    Case 1:14-cr-00399-ENV Document 95 Filed 11/04/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 537

  • 8/10/2019 USA v. Discala Et Al Doc 95 Filed 6 Nov 14

    2/7

  • 8/10/2019 USA v. Discala Et Al Doc 95 Filed 6 Nov 14

    3/7

    c se 1:14 cr 00399 ENV Document 85 1 Filed 10/21Jl4 Page 3 of 6 PagelD

    :

    492

    Marc Wexler, and all proceeds traceable thereto; and (f) all funds and/or securities currently

    on deposit in Morgan Stanley Brokerage Account 049-110784 held

    in

    the name

    of

    or for the

    benefit ofAlyse Wexler, and all proceeds traceable thereto.

    4. Within sixty (60) days of the United States Marshals Service s receipt

    of certified copies of this Preliminary Order ofForfeiture, the United States Marshals Service

    shall ensure that all the Forfeited Assets are liquidated and deposited into an interest bearing

    account and in partial satisfaction of the Forfeiture Money Judgment pending further order

    of

    this court.

    5.

    f

    he Forfeiture Money Judgment is not received as provided above,

    the Defendant shall forfeit any other property of his up to the value of the Forfeiture Money

    Judgment, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 853(p). The Defendant shall fully assist the government

    in effectuating the payment of the Forfeiture Money Judgment. The Defendant shall not file

    or interpose any claim

    or

    assist others to file or interpose any claim to any property against

    which the government seeks to execute the Forfeiture Money Judgment in any administrative

    or

    judicial proceeding.

    6. The Defendant knowingly and voluntarily waives his right to any

    required notice concerning the forfeiture of the money forfeited hereunder, including notice

    set forth in an indictment or information.

    In

    addition, the Defendant knowingly and

    voluntarily waives his right,

    if

    any, to a

    jury

    trial on the forfeiture

    of

    said money, and waives

    all constitutional, legal and equitable defenses to the forfeiture

    of

    said money, including, but

    not limited to, any defenses based on principles of double jeopardy, the Ex Post Facto clause

    of the Constitution, the statute of limitations, venue, or any defense under the Eighth

    United States v. MARC WELXER, 14-CR-399(ENV)

    Order ofForfeiture

    Page

    Case 1:14-cr-00399-ENV Document 95 Filed 11/04/14 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 539

  • 8/10/2019 USA v. Discala Et Al Doc 95 Filed 6 Nov 14

    4/7

    c se 1:14 cr 00399 ENV Document 85 1 Filed 10/21/14 Page 4 of 6 PagelD

    :

    493

    Amendment, including a claim

    of

    excessive fines. The forfeiture of the money forfeited

    hereunder is not to be considered a payment of a fine or restitution or a payment on any

    income taxes that may be due.

    7 Any person, other than the Defendant, asserting a legal interest in the

    Forfeited Assets may, within thirty (30) days of the final publication of notice

    or

    receipt of

    notice, or no later than sixty (60) days after the first date of publication, whichever is earlier,

    petition the court for a hearing without ajury to adjudicate the validity ofhis or her alleged

    interest in the property, and for an amendment

    of

    the order

    of

    forfeiture, pursuant to

    21

    U.S.C.

    853(n)(6). Any petition filed in response to notice

    of

    the forfeiture

    of

    the Forfeited

    Assets must be signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury and shall set forth the nature

    and extent of he petitioner's right, title, or interest in the property, the time and

    circumstances of the petitioner's acquisition

    of

    the right, title or interest in the property, any

    additional facts supporting the petit ioner's claim, and the relief sought.

    8 The Defendant shall not file or interpose any claim or assist others to

    file or interpose any claim to any

    of

    the monies and/or properties forfeited hereunder in any

    administrative or judicial proceeding. The defendant shall take whatever steps are necessary

    to ensure clear title to the Forfeited Assets pass to the United States, including, but not

    limited to, the execution of any documents necessary to effectuate the surrender of the

    Forfeited Assets to the United States. Further, if any third party files a claim to the Forfeited

    Assets, the Defendant will assist the government in defending such claim.

    f

    he Forfeited

    Assets are not forfeited in their entirety, the United States may seek to enforce this

    Preliminary Order against any other assets of the Defendant up to the value

    of

    the Forfeited

    United States v MARC WELXER, 14-CR-399(ENV)

    Order

    of

    Forfeiture

    Page

    Case 1:14-cr-00399-ENV Document 95 Filed 11/04/14 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 540

  • 8/10/2019 USA v. Discala Et Al Doc 95 Filed 6 Nov 14

    5/7

  • 8/10/2019 USA v. Discala Et Al Doc 95 Filed 6 Nov 14

    6/7

    Case 1:14 cr 00399 ENV Document 85 1 Filed 10/21/14 Page 6 of 6 PagelD : 495

    Attorney's Office, Eastern District ofNew York, 271 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New

    York 11201.

    Dated: Brooklyn4ew York

    V

    ~

    2014

    fJov.w r

    p

    {J.SIJT l/trrrt 1 ;1 .J

    H O N ~ E r u c

    } VIT LI NO-

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

    United States v.

    MARC

    WELXER, 14-CR-399(ENV)

    Order

    of

    Forfeiture

    Page6

    Case 1:14-cr-00399-ENV Document 95 Filed 11/04/14 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 542

  • 8/10/2019 USA v. Discala Et Al Doc 95 Filed 6 Nov 14

    7/7

    c se

    1:14 cr 00399 ENV Document 85 Filed 10/21/14 Page 1 of PagelD

    #:

    489

    SLR:LDM:CSK

    F.

    #2013R01203

    yECF

    The Honorable Eric N. Vitaliano

    United States District Judge

    Eastern District ofNew York

    225 Cadman Plaza East

    Brooklyn, New York 11201

    U.S.

    epartment

    o

    Justice

    United States Attorney

    Eastern District o New York

    27 Cadman Plaza ast

    Brooklyn New York 11201

    October 21, 2014

    ourtesy

    opy

    riginal filed

    lectronicall

    Re: United States v. Marc Wexler

    Criminal Docket No. 14-CR-399 (ENV)

    Dear Judge Vitaliano:

    Enclosed please find a proposed Preliminary Order of Forfeiture in the above

    captioned case, the terms ofwhich defendant Marc Wexler has agreed to in a plea agreement

    entered into in cormection with his October 15 2014 guilty plea. Accordingly, the

    government and the defendant, jointly, respectfully request that the Court so order the

    enclosed proposed order.

    Thank you for Your Honor's consideration

    of

    this request.

    By:

    Enclosure

    cc: Craig Carpenito, Esq. (via ECF)

    Respectfully submitted,

    LORETTA E. LYNCH

    United States Attorney

    Eastern District ofNew York

    a u ~ ~

    Claire S. Kedeshian

    Winston Paes

    Assistant U.S. Attorney

    (718) 254-6051/6023

    Case 1:14-cr-00399-ENV Document 95 Filed 11/04/14 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 543