U.S. ERA Region IIIU.S. EPA Region in Central Regional Laboratory Annapolis, Maryland November 23, 1994 ANALYTICAL RESULTS I WYSTONS SANITATION LF OU-2 [R2Q94136] Dear chrlti Corbett,

U.S. ERA Region IIICentral Regional Laboratory

Environmental Services DivisionAnnapolis, Maryland

ANALYTICAL REPORT*

KEYSTONE SANITATION LF OU-2

SUPERFUND REMOVAL/REMEDIAL Acct # TFA03N9L9Lab Request No. REQ94136

November 23, 1994

AR3UI3

U.S. EPA Region inCentral Regional Laboratory

Annapolis, Maryland

November 23, 1994

ANALYTICAL RESULTS I WYSTONS SANITATION LF OU-2 [R2Q94136]

Dear chrlti Corbett, (.3 W i

Bnelosed is our analytical report for the above case. It is organised intoseveral sections! Analytical Request and Sample Descriptions, Organic,Inorganic, and Microbiological Results* All data were reviewed by a peer and alaboratory manager*

Analytical Request and Sample Descriptionsi (General)Bach laboratory assigned number, station, description, matrix, sample dateand locational data is reported. A table summarizes the tests assigned toeach sample. A glossary and qualifier cede definition is provided.

Inorganic ResultsiFor requests assigned inorganic tests, results are grouped by service tgroup, e.g.. Metals. Sample results are reported; non-detects are providedwith the actual quantitation limit. Method description and quality controlprotocols are described in analyst narratives.

Organic ResultstFor the requested organic tests, results are grouped by service group,e.g., Volatile Organic Compounds. Only detected analytes are reported.Nominal Quantitation Limit (NQL) tables are provided for each servicegroup. Specific information for the calculation of Actual QuantitationLimits (AQL) achieved for a given sample is included. Quality controlvalues are provided in summary tables with acceptance criteria. Methoddescription and quality control protocols are described in analyst

. narratives*Microbiological Resultst

For requests assigned microbiological tests, sample results and qualitycontrol values are incorporated into a single table. Method descriptionand quality control protocols are described in analyst narratives.

If you have any questions, please call Rick Dreiseh, Laboratory Branch Chief,(410) 573-2646, or Skip tfeisberg, Organic Section Chief, (410) 573-2681 or KhinCho Thaung, Inorganic section Chief, (410) 573-2680.

Approval for Releases Quality Assurance Reviewt

Frederick Dreisch, Chief (31S20) Feggy Zayodny/ (3BS20)Laboratory Branch Quality Control Officer

y cci William Nentworth (Halliburton NUS Corp)

AR3IM32

M X RH S «

1&, .«!

1O)

vo J cco a\ sH M* f>en o

Q*H

OJ43 CO 3•U On) o y ^ffl u

•a uS S

u u u o o o u u o o

E1? g ' B ' S ' S ' l a o c n B ' S ' H ' S ' S ' B ' S ' E ' S ' B ' S ' S ' S ' S '

II

n n n n n n n c o n n

f l j a > f l ) t t ) 4 >a z s s s s s s s . s i s

•H *H <H -H *H -H -H iH V 1) 4) -H -H -H -H -H -H -H -H -H -H -HM ^ M M M M M I - I U U U M M M M M U M M M M M M MS O O O O O O O - H - H - H O O O O O O O O O O O O O

i J 4 J 4 J U U 4 J 4 J M M ^ U A J i J i J l J i J A J . U A J i J U W J J^ -H fH -r -H ft -H -H -3 C C C C C C C G

i-^v.^^-^-^-^^.4 M M M M M M M M^ 1 ) 4 ) 1 1 0 ) 0 ) 0 ) 1 1 0

CO « (tj (B (B (C n3s s a s s a s

^ \ \ _ :- 2 s •f„ Q Q Q Q

•H

n ft n nS 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 f l 0 2 i 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < * o o o o o o e 5 0 0 c >S . S I S J X s S S B ^ ^ ' ^ S S S * * * * * * * ' * '»• » * » .« * * » •»-

AR3UI33

en |jjH 55** POen o

IO*H

4J

Sdid um qH

8 vW Q

X

JJ

JJ

JJJJW

in

r-

o>00M

ON0

in

m

<r\COc*ON0

u>

**

<nCOM

o\o

0

U)

trt03(N

o\o

0

*f

<n00M

a\o

in

in

o\aa«mo

CO

u>

<y\CO(N

mo

o

eo

ovCO«o>o

o

CO

<nwM

a\o

o

o\

o\o\oio\o

M

c\

o\ON(N

ONO

O

a\

o\mneno

o

o>

a\a\(N

OtO

in

0

OA

atM

ONO

o

0

mm51c\o

•o -o T) -at> v v v•r4 -H -H iHy-t <w IM >M•H - -H -HO O O Oo. . a a aa

av m m m m m m v v a n v i m

* S£ 4 ) 0 ) O J H J 4 ) D H f - ' D 4 J € a 3 a )2 2 7 % % Z I X X X XO i O i C n d C n D i D i t J i O i O i D im c c c c c c m m c c c c c m

• H O O O O O O - H - r t O O O O O - H

m c c c c c B i g i g c c c c B ' "^ i i i i i g ^ ^ i i i i iTO'^'v.-s^^^^ 0} OJ'^.'X.^^'^^.

O f t ) 4 ) O 4 ) f t ) f t ) Q O f t > f t ) 4 ) t } f t )(U JJ JJ JJ *J AJ JJ V 4 ) J J j J 4 J 4 J J J— J J - - J - " — J n ( « ! m « ( nSE|fi5fisss||

•o^ k g g i g l g M MJ 3 O O O O O O J 3 2

O O O O O O O O O O D O O O

w Q S E S— — — —

• 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Pt r t r t f n f i c l r t n i i ' i r t n i f ' i p i f ' i f no o o o o a o o o o o o o o e

cnvo Jro enHS5

H if CO< cn oDH Ol I S§M ^|

• * ••Q 4fcHH ^.... H

d <D -fO O) 3 rt«H (tf OPO flJ t)d) (Q U

hw ^_O ^74J g

H "* 'd jjH S a raH x * - <u•Q H « 3O H H d )•H (Tj W pejb« I"H lij( p

m fll & CQ

o o w s^ "0 w m

C ^0) ^CJ

OJ

O HQ

fe HH

O *H JC"* "<

H 0

§ §CQ

P4 ?4

O wEH piCO WS&K co

H M•^ U OISM R) H•V fa 04

.'':>;•:•:•

: '!:g:

: I;

:!:j:i|

1

. '•£;toIM

;S' Oz"2

1

II•'•'a>:'i

1

[:;;ij

w>rija

iWi64l

i£|I™

111

1$ii

o

'11*0'

-£•o:

•<=

inP

,o

'W»•p

'•{NJ•'*•*

•5

HIII

X

X

X

X

17'cJC8L.

I>2'ou

*J9|1

1

I Mercury

by

X

X

X

X

in'I

1M"a

i

X

X

X

X

uaaL.Ol«aT3

jj<0

O)

i

1 Percent

Dry

X

X

X

X

u<uD)OJ

s4-»034-*•si

1 Percent

Dry

3$:HI

mii iini i1 ;

i k"to£_oS;ii; to•;•

•iS1.•*"•'i1p

lcf:

j:£|iSS

H/iv!-!

11i•|ii

1i1.IN.o

'vi0

ino

!•«*••'P

w»:<?

''f\i'!?*

:5

j:;;;X'

•IS:;;•;;;•.

II•;':'•'?•

1

I

!>;:: ;

:i;i;K::•:•

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X1L.

2I!£_

uina<3

-

1|8'o4J10va.

I1

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

cns

<3

inu

IV

a1

I

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

CO5uC3aai—

a

1a.

Ju

1s1uiO)t.o

4-*C

1

AR3UI35

o>

ICO

*!&Su aL. 4-101 V tl

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

I

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

AR3I4I36

9u

dJ

|j

&E

PA Region III

Section: MH^RAL

Centiir Regional Laboratory

Page: S*

Annapolis, Maryland

Facility: KEYSTONE SANITATION LF OU-2

Batch ID: REQ94136

Program: SUPERFUND REMOVAL/REMEDIAL

Account #: TFA03N9L9

TESTS REQUESTED

( X

= Test was Requested)

11II!$&:

igot>.1••&

Si*

111

ii:&

8

0

sAJO

0

11Pfllljll

111

O

°

if

111IIII11II

i1:JP11•£ss.*-'p

llll

111illllEiiil

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

fsuinao

in%'o

1

a

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

CO

CJC9

£inu'Eca?O1)£a1

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

CO

CJaD.S.•Ba?a.

CA

CJU

'is?oa

1

1i• \1

AR3UI37

cnvo Jco S2H \R

J 5j« CO2 <n o2 cx«uS H fa| «HO M •• "* ^ -j|- :S•* •• r-id 0) ^^ 4 *"4

°* ^1MO, JJ 0*** ^ -J IB*O ro OS ffl oCO <

hH —0 TiJJ (1)

i-l * T) JJSol Qsd-8ft 8&g J ff H <U•H S £ *TnH 4§ W

^*S & o«§0- ggj -H ._i W

^«^ B*w P4 X. H a) .«H| |H°J jtf S H IIt3 K 3*•* JJ S•*-* rSd ,o —u

CNI J |P •<O Hafa &\J Sg OSo->H JsSg&H*c*Asiie£ OSIP*<J **<wM S

o £H tfCO HX PjW PW ca**

51'i-l H•H WO Oa) Mfa O4 1

1

!

ii

i

ii

!

1

illIItil1pInN:•'":

1;11 ' :I 1gIN0q1 — jjp

..,,

It1: ;;;;. ;

:;|li::i;:|;ihill

iSI

t'ivii':'

I««;:«"a::;SO<

:;;i:;i:;;*S

HNisi1miipill:**••:jr;iPHii»|bSTi!

SLa: »n«r

'"M3i'Mjf1'**rr —

i'A»; *^ j

I '«-*"

i ——! oi

iS8-•

i.!;';1

I:

III

1n' * 1

i

'

pimmillw111lv;:!v;|t v!'!v]

I • •'•''''•r' • ' ' • I

H!

1

.,;0

i1hoi

': ;" v'••+

;Si'Hi,-IS

1 < •.«•. 'mm'':::«::'.mr : • x-x:;«'::••m:mmT..W-i'.f.1:: S

II

II

1Pm[i*,IiK*f*

::J2:^~if;'•TT'•::•'

:1«^ ]:*Ti

Oi,•*"(

1

•sl'.'•'.':' '.

•• ' 1

'

"

m

J:;:;;:]

1)1

:$*• 1;:|!X':j

:1II

:!:ii;'|

trXI X

1 x

1 x

X

x

x

XHXHX

iX

X

>J<o|ka4-11M5sC9

1,H*•2sHH

X

X

1 «£

1 yf

X

XuX

X

XHXX

X

d-1ca15*•*!•1§col

I s |

1 XI

1 %£ 1

1 %£ 1

X

X

X

X

X

i x

i x

! x1 x

X

1uC9aJHi

1<uj30.1

1I*\u"crai'\ao>

A R 3 I U I 3 8

rt

0) rlCD Q

C V0 Cfl•H (0JJ AU(1)W

215 I -i €. B E? S

J5 -J 8 5*i*3o fl|M? _« ?? K -M i^ *"««*; C da^§isiyi"4<T "i •" n, g .a .s ., <s - ~ c •^f?l^J S S - a 5 s > , x Sc.fiii'flfl; -o es

îtîillll s^B8ji*i1!H-iîiillflllllll.l•a « c * <n x g, g, .,

£&

AR3UI39

o= nDO—1 ™£i5< 1^"'<

• i• i

cs

o

° uCD

o

oO _| Qi0)

Z <3o-O)

<> oLLQXLUfi.

cS

UH

U«

H*•

do•HJJO0)CO

HHH

0•H

<$

<O4H»

TO•

t>

jrf

• *

0)0)flS111

M04Ja0

isi""jd'cn«

"is!•{

rt0)U

-a§HSM2

•iH0P4flirtH,5;

cnvo »3co cnH a ,t* CO^ C3O* rf!DS Bu

•• ••Q*H

O 3JJ Oa oCQ O4

CO

COH

wgco3OH

!*£ite

CJH5-1<J

fy»

Hd «0 HP

fa W

H ij§sr1 *-*

^ P4CO

O fc

EH SCO H

W CO• *

4J S•H 3

* i Sj•H D)0 ORS Mfa O4

(•y£4:liffiiin

O IIv- II00 IIg S u in m•* u CM r\j5. II *:««: in in

:;:;$£:iCtf'

iiIT r- uCO o ui) CO IIJ CM Z II

d sf u co *tHj 0 II ¥:«' <2 N-

M0)fU§ $§£a »»0)rH

§* ii(o ft:Sfew

in II

CM CM IIO O 11 »O «-O u. II • ••* ii in ino u S*£ -* in

ipla:: -J- CM

1ft

ro u0 IICM Z l!o - in

Q „TO in o, >.

^ £ £• • m s. s.

% N>•••£]}• M tf N1^: O CO g

^ C W

O O•%9)F C3O i n C O O ^ O C M O K I O % ± C 3 t n OiSig ro ' < O M O O -oo • t i <o • 10 in T- -o •:¥:W Kl«- 'fM > O O ^ O f O > f O O O O i n « < O M O » -S**Si C V J V C M T - O V T - C \ J « — K I K I K I t O C M O C M T — V V

isiigi••••iflf' O

•• ^ > rlifi* «- co o S>

••:]CK OO K) in C O ^ O C O O h ^ O <O« mo:'S-S: O *CM *Ô *O> * * *Ô . ^ O f M O >CM * *:::::;tfi in«- «N- . O C M O N - r O O ^ r O * — -O «— O «—¥<:&.• i - v i n i n o v ^ c M r M C M M r o - t ^ o v c M i n v v

$10$ tnS^ - » Q K I « - ' - O r a o r O C M C M « - > - « - K I - 4 - O O

^ ^^|«| 0 g 0S-Sft: x vx Six

0 0 «-s QQi oo in ^ ^ c M o t n o « i n o i n o^S * ' C M > t ^ > 'in •• -o - O O K I O -o • •?5i:3! «- V « - « - O V O « - r - « — C M C M C M C M V «— «— V-V

"S'

i p ^ s a § § c i c > ? S c > ^ S c > o J c>c>:§§

o o «-•:*:*:w OO in r - ^ d - < ^ O O O *CM mo§'" eo * K i i n i n *CM . * >in * o « — o ••*? . •egru»- « o . o N . i n o o o i n r ^ e o c M m c o o « —

,.:l |£ |l i 85- , II t-|5 ,fti— IT?-!" §"5 EC'S ^ Soli S £ S*** 3 * i « i : i - a - ' ' - - e 5 o S o ) £ t . o 4 - ' - . - .Isw: - ^ C c . a i } < ^ o c n

vOO

O0

V

Q

oV

i

oo

§sC/)

^tn

0

indv

?Z

in

°

°^r—

*

in

°

«-

ind

Thal

lium

MCM

CO

s

l"*in

oS

g;

-

Vanadium

CMr-

.

Kl

«-

O

g

s

°5S"

N

A R 3 U I U I

Section: INORGANICNarrative Page: 1

METALS DETERMINATIONS

Analysts:

R.T. McClain J.L. Molnar M.J. ChangLockheed Chemist Lockheed Chemist Lockheed Chemist

Methods:

Samples 940928-03, 940928-05, 940928-07, and 940928-10 from KeystoneSanitation LF OU-2 were prepared for analysis by acid digestion and analyzedby furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasmaoptical emission spectrometry. The results are presented in the attachedtable. The following are the digestion and analytical techniques and methodsemployed:

Digestion Methods

Method 3050, excluding HC1 for furnace AAS (excluding antimony) (solidsamples) (1)Method 3050, for ICP-AES, Flame AAS, and antimony by Furnace AAS (solifesamples) (1)

Analytical Methods

EPA-Method 204.2 and Internal SOP R3-QA132, antimony by Furnace AAS (2)EPA Method 206.2 and Internal SOP R3-QA132, arsenic by Furnace AAS (2)EPA Method 270.2 and Internal SOP R3-QA132, selenium by Furnace AAS (2)EPA Method 279.2 and Internal SOP R3-QA132, thallium by Furnace AAS (2)EPA Method 200.7 and Internal SOP R3-QA132, remaining elements by ICP-AES (2)

(1) SW-846, 2nd Edition, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods

(2) 1979/83 EPA Manual of Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes

Results for solid samples are reported in ug/g (ppm) DRY weight at 60 degreescentigrade. This Percent Dry Weight test pertains only to metals results.The drying temperature of 60 degrees centigrade is selected to retain volatileelements. The Percent Dry Weight (60°C) is reported to allow for conversionto wet weight.

AR3UU2


Quality Control:

Samples analyzed in duplicate (method duplicates) are reported as the Mean andthe Relative Percent Difference (RPD) of the two analytical values. RoutineQuality Control (QC) performed includes preparation and analysis of auditmaterials; check standards; interference check samples (ICS--for ICP-AESonly); method blanks; method spikes; analytical spikes; method duplicates; andanalytical duplicates. Calibration standards for ICP-AES are prepared fromNIST stock solutions. Calibration standards for Furnace AAS are prepared fromBaker stock solutions. Method blanks are prepared with each analytical setand are acceptable if they are found to be below the quantification level forthe sample set. Audit materials are analyzed at the beginning of each run todocument proper instrument calibration. For ICP-AES the acceptable range is90-110% recovery; for other techniques it is the 95% confidence intervalgenerated using the True Values and algorithms from EMSL-Cincinnati. Checkstandards are analyzed periodically (generally a 1/10 frequency) throughoutthe run to document instrumental stability, and are acceptable at 90-110%.The ICS is obtained from EMSL-Las Vegas and is analyzed at the beginning ofeach ICP-AES run to document proper selection of analytical lines, backgroundcorrection factors, and interelement correction factors; it is acceptable at80-120% recovery. The remaining QC items are sample specific and areperformed at a frequency of 1/10 samples for sample sets > 10 and 1 per sampleset for sample sets <10, except for analytical spikes for Furnace AAS whichrequires a passing analytical spike or successful Method of Standard Additionsfor each sample. Acceptance limits for Precision (method and instrumentalduplicates) are generated for each element/matrix/analytical procedure using aShewhart Chart and the most recent 25 duplicate values. Acceptance limits foranalytical spikes for Flame AAS and for ICP-AES are generated for 95%confidence intervals for each element/matrix/analytical procedure using themost recent 25 spike recoveries. Acceptance limits for analytical spikes forFurnace AAS are set at 85-115%. Acceptance limits for matrix spikes are 80-120% recovery; when matrix spikes fail an acceptable analytical spike must beprepared and analyzed.

AR3UU3


MERCURY DETERMINATIONS

Analyst:

Melanie T. WilkersonChemist/Lockheed

TID #: 03941060

Method:

Samples 940928-03, 940928-05, 940928-07 and 940928-10 from Keystone SanitationLF were analyzed for total mercury using EPA Method 245.51.

Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA 600/4-79-020. *

Results for solid samples are reported in ug/g (ppm) DRY weight at 60 degreescentigrade. This Percent Dry Weight test pertains only to metals results.The drying temperature of 60 degrees centigrade is selected to retain volatileelements. The Percent Dry Weight (60°C) is reported to allow for conversionto wet weight.

AR3Uli*l*

o!°~Eo refr«

(1)-:Ori "

.iD- Sro c

AR3UU5

cnvo i4co cnH S5j« cocn o

H JJA dO 9JJ 0«J Om o

•<

H

CJ

§CO§< M

CO II•* IIO II

s.

S

unuCM IIQ II -OU. II .ii in ..._

II ' -» «-:¥:C: 33 3

2

Oil

O CO II «!$*: -I;» H K:|@ -l -» -j -iO II «-:«ar 3 to 3 3 3

Uino

bUS•V CJO ^< S.

cncn enH 55O ^ coH cn oH fa

O rt! Q*• t •! |—J

d o> JJ0 Cn A d•H m opJJ P4 JJ 0o moo> noco <

IH S

coEH

COww

CO

H

uH

§s;O"•J"o

aa>JJ

'0> II OffiSJ: • «-SS35 O

O cn II•J- IIS. ii

CM CM II V*Cf> 00 ' 00 VimO Q II •!:«: «- CM Sir*: COO u. I! gj t O O :o:;>i . •O II in&i£ O O «-::':::S «—

00CM CM~ rr :-:-:-jii: rvj ru

OO

O II Wia: CM CM «—U- II CMSSSjE O

S 1 i 1| *:d d d ^ll RJ

o in° °d d

AR3UU7

cnvo Jco cnHfcO *ji coH o\ o% &<ft M faS« **O rtj

CO

Q*• " if*. H :•>:•£*: • r> motji j3 g•H (fl OPJJ 04 JJ OO (CO<D noco <

coEHgCO

04S<CO

<o cod CM

iCM

in uo u00 IICM CM II° s

ao•»

to

eo CM . »- t ^ ~ r v j c M m <o• ^ * ' IT) * 1A • • •POI3O eo»- in «— o o N to

m ~a3 CM d

IIIIII _II ..... CO

i! ill§ "Oii «-!t! 3 d

$4?

CM

00 IICM CM II ....... -3 CO -1g £ il j|i|| CM <O CMo ii «-:;s;S 3 d d d

caCM

CO HCM ag ii -3-s co -3O «C II ivlwF:O W I I :1HJS CM •* -O CM** II '•&&?. -3 . . . .O II fftsm 3 O O O O

oN-ino <O •O O CM O h. O

S 4 "• g . £ I I .a — —i n c j i r u r u i i 4 - > 6 c 4)f fe i? f i l i i g s c s a *5

A R 3IMU8

cnvo i-3co cnHfcO •* coH en o

5 Orfia H faQ*H

•H (fl OPJJ P4 JJ OO flJ Oo) noco u »-waS 3

i iiCM CM II -3O O II £:£*3 "-. II ISS TO II "-SS3: O 3

CM se uo S uo cn no> !!

ii•*o

11

I *i*! «-Sl* d

-3

O-33

S S IIp c/> ||

I

«- CM o «- »- -> CMtO OC> OO3 ^-C\i

*- I— IU V WO. eg j: M Ni S S e. i -B JQ S!

a -5 o I g .=Q) T — J= S «

oE e 2 î. L

£9 *j - s s «to "• O £ S,iJ g "S .5 .5 « 5 g

t f e f e t t i r i S g J J

!/"a ''*lrfrflla z| p c, . c, u o

O rij

>1MoJJ

H 5 TJH n SH S n)d0•H _. flJtnâ•a-sj rr

a) R)

a

&jjd0)

envo iJco cnH 5Z!'(f COcn o- -- — - —~ ^1

di

§s> -I•H nj rj 3JJ 04 JJ OO R) OHW 5 O« D,' -j *M « Q uH -a H

s §

ID

co

CM a. iiSQ£ II

i- !'

CMS;dl

Si 5 ii wist ana-.S M i! ii "i Jo ii «-8fts o®a;

u

JOeo cot> os lo u. ivr i5. i

« CM mH g £® S

2 -S5 S

m0)jj

CM:• :!:O ;::

-O «—; to N*I s ii K - - ~|i 8 SO» II «- §•:•»: CM f\J O •ii$3; O O

™ jj00 II

uCM IIO IILu II

o M~»O

••i •<-. i i o m i»3 I.P- i* •£ -i- S t- J-*wl O ry r\j -» T C Q ^ Q Q t.o€

.Z)l a r 3 C D C Q ^ O O * ~ O ^ ( M L , , _ a i o j

AR3UI50

cnvo iJco cnH53* COen oOti«!H fa(4 EH• • ••

Q*H

JJ•d. gO PJJ Oni o

H

*i$o$:

r-1 ftSS

SO

hi . 1O II «-83S».t

>O II«- II00 II

co iiCM CO II0.0:11O u. II

•- I U U U U00 IC M 3 E I ' O C O ' O O ' ^ *— O •- ~~*O O IO .*«-»- :S*ia;O Cn I S-Sft OOO O O OOO ;:::::1si: «—S ! dfe odd d p odd «-**§; 3 d

to n

00 IICM CM It s......, ....... -3

O U. II " ^ ^ ^

?: !!8 * iig 1 i! CM« ' SO II dSSS «-l¥:S

•MI i iI—I W Nd s gsi < m

AR3UI5

CJHi0«•§•HJJO

CO

HHH

dO

2•*8)cflO4

&

Laborato

•H _.tn^Q) «02 CK 0oT&«3« «

du

ryland

Annapolis, Ma

cnvo Jco cnH Z* cocn oOt gj

•• ..H

JJ

o 3JJ OR) On o« 0

N1 jjO H

fa W

IIEH O§wMCO

O faEH PHCO W

£«4J S•H 03H M"d oflj Mfa 0.

CO|H

cnS

L SAMPLE

NIC ANALYTICA

iqCP

oeo&Sl>

is<ocogo

f.COCM

°0

2i00

•* CM«i Oj

Sample Num

94092813

94092814

CM

1oo;JO

_

00

5CN

a«jj

1orit

Jcn

£

_cn

a.ati—

u.

motu.

Cn

CMou.

zcn

!!uuH

!111iin

u|jnnuu

unuuuniin

ununnu

uu!!ni!uni!nnMnu

n!!i!uujjunMnuun1!!u

-» atto o>d d

-» -J -J -? -» CO -> -J

co -o in -j1?^; *"I *J ™ ""Id d CM 3 d o o o o o

CO•o

mO

-m

i n t O C M C M »*st CM fO^t CM r ^ - f O C M « -o o t o o 300 «- «— o o o o o o

o • «- • CM to mc\J3 £ r o « - d d CM

COO • «- CM CO NOo «- o o o o

in <or^ C M > C M N . ' t o < « oa oa• - 3 i t O . » r - > « •CM3 O « - O I > O C M O O tO O

AR3IM52

01U> i4co cnH fcU •* coH cn o

Be,

o 0) .d.•d 'nJ o.y ft JJ oo n) o•4) m Uco <i

S

8 mg £ i

g

OOO

O O

5 OT II « r- CM CM lf\Si! .il CM d 3 d d

§ 5 i!o cn nvt IIO- II

- 5 - 3 -3 -3

!|Sj •* CM «- CM to N-

::i:::SX: CM «™ O O 3 O O

g 3 !! II S.^' m

a

i »Hm:4:<IC: _1i@: O

..I £ r r _. _. r i t> >.qla-.-s-g-*.1". -c-i-s..?II ,21 Z-11 " 11 i 1

AR3IU53

0

u

cnvo Jco enHfc•* COcn o

Q*H

O PJJ 0n> on o

CO « „II!!

u H«5MHfl-O *

S|Sd^ Bg* &•H _. (flS1* S^ d HW O•aJ'fi-HS S?rHW 5 O

• rtw-3 g u& H

S« RU| ajj "•§ c5 M

S

CMO

O>

mo>

H(tf

g H !!

CMfS

O IICM Z II§< ii wxt 'wax.in n saw CM ass^* II :y:@. "3 - 3 - 3 - 3 »:X':tjT|0> II .:«¥» 3 333 O 83S

«-:*;» 3SSSJ:

(M :|:;sgdil

.'WWffSSS-OffS

,|| 53 -vi-iS: O

A)4JQ

i Is5 £ J

CA

U O X . C - ' C . O W C . L .< — < ^ S - X 3 — ' * *.'*Jfi 4J Q 4J H- .C TL •— «•-

" V >" fc 2 P. o T- c- cCM CM — ? Cw w j; c CD.* .

. ^g .* .2 V i 5 **. £•co cn cn sj- Q o ,-" Q

AR3UI5U

cnVO H4<n cn

i«j .. *~*H cn ofCC M IV.O ° 2 H# HO »s! Q at ?. _ !

_ . ***c ,0,0 0)•rl fljJJ IVO0)CO

p*JJ

0 PJJ 0(i on ortj

1o§

in

CMOoS

|

1 ! CM!?i dl

n

5 i ••!••;cn i CM;;;;u o:;i;i

H

OO

SB*SJ*

o nO Its; 5 iio cn II CMS'04SS:

§ ii diliiS d d .;gH CM d

CM IIS l l U U X JIIC M I I I . CM f O « O O I O -3O < II . 5::S3: CM .... SiSSf;o en ii S K ° o o o o gi c -3 .o u oigSE o o o o o .-1:3; in o

ito cnS ii OS® o o *-?m r~ o

^ a «. « v w _. o o Q r_ c.TL *j «» -» «t — «>-2'2'fi'H"5_ ti . ..cj— c c c c ciu iu o a a: sfa 04

... •-.::.•:v:,:::— ; AR3UI55

uH§•J2) f"fCd H5*•• ••

88,'H (0JJ 04Od)CO

&0JJ

on III

Labora

ryland

•H _. d&1*« 0 *

-si,"B 2°'OS Q.

C

* -1 rtco *j d. * 3a n a>-> 4J «•.HgU

enU? 1-3co cnH S5•* COcn oOrtJU fa04 EH• • ••

0*H

JJ.d d0 PJJ 0R) On on o

COHJPCOKOlPLh•o<CO

^<c.HE-ijri!Z(4

CSrtc!•g

CNJU fd

O HQ

fa P3|JJ JK

W55 pj

8*S§^9H*C*

rf|55 Q3 01CO

O faH 01CO WtH OjH PW CO• •

-I•H SH Ij•H O1O 0m Mfa 04

N. ji* 5 I «<: °°

o ii .8 3 d«S !a z i ...... <ng 3 ! 1^ mS ! S*»C ^ do l .*xa- 3 <^

in IIO IIR; z ii -^g 1 ii ii « <o*tf II '•'•''Cft ~3 "™3 • "o !! .sia 33 o o^ nO llO IICM Z II 00o S ii sim . t-O cn II ssiBs >O^ II ffiffi -3 . 'O II v-Sf&t: 3 O

to ii§ 1 1IICM z ii .001 1 ii 11S ii .il 3 dCM It

•• CM SC II CDn g 1 ii ll . «® c5 ii .11 3 d3 . ii*y. o ii" CM z ii ca

3 I8!! .• 3 3 S§ to ii|Q CM IICO S z i! -3 cn

g g i! P CM CM <0§ !! .IwS 3d d d

CM IICM IICO IICM Z II -3 "3 COO < II I'K-Jo cn ii :;>:>*i CM . N.N* II Sftfaj -3 -3 . « •0 II .fttS: 330 00

. IICM II

1 5 i m* " - -. .O C/> II ftttVi CM IO CM CM 00.» II KVw -3 • -3 • • • •O II .SiS 3 O 3 O O O 0

c. ucu u eJ= C V V** n C frjj E V P ' < - > 4 - > 4 ^ O ^ l . r B oQ . p u _, B J 5 3 " V « ; r u _ - o i 3 . C j N —® . i . a r u x i - o — ' O O O £ — o c c ^ :• • O l - C f O f - H - l - l _ i _ u o l . r u I i uJ J a : — • « * * J « 4 J E — < o — o o o — r O N itr_ o j c p e v f i u E f — T3 — — - - O C M — c— «;>1 i- O C Q l - w S o U J z S f f f r . f r G X CH S-. ?°lcSc3vSl^c3i.S.iicl7.iiB'|l* "-sils^cjSfeE?^'???'-^?-?.^^G :¥:«•: _J — 5 O CO I. — • U — • J3 ^ O . CM . CO «J CM j: O*'!j :5:B: O Z I - l - r B f r f v - . .— . . . .^ 1_ . 4-< U rlj^ '-ffSk Z 3 C O C O C M C J U C M U C 3 . O...CJI— .IU"-Z

OT-

-3

ind

-3 -7

CM CMd d

-3 "3

to .d d

|4-»

1 1a « j=5 £ •g. x h5 Z 2

AR3UI56

VO I-?co a\H S3^ COcn o

P*

•d. do PJJ Om om o

• rt!

04§ z

to H o 5

CD01o

S

CM E IIg S ii IIS ii .i!

g

CMg S,s

*£•O

Q

•• sfd

tO CM CM >OCM d 3 d d

-3 -3

>* CM . CMCM ZI sO ii .ft':::3 CM O O OO

AR3UI57

Section: ORGANICNarrative Page: 1

PC/MS KXTRACTABLB ANALYSIS

Analyst:

Hoang NguyenChemist/Lockheed

TID #: 03941011

Method :

The thirty-eight (38) aqueous and four (4) .soil samples from the KeystoneSanitation LF OU-2 Site were analyzed for the presence of organic compoundslisted as extractable Priority Pollutants and CLP Hazardous Substances ListCompounds. Low level detection limit was requested for the aqueous samples whichwas achievable at an NQL of 5ug/L for all compounds except for pentachlorophenol(10 ug/L) . The samples were collected from September 26 to 29, 1994. Theaqueous samples were extracted by the continuous liquid-liquid extraction methodat a pH<2 on September 30, October 04, 05 and 06, 1994 and the soil samples wereextracted by the sonication method on October 03, 1994. These samples wereanalyzed on October 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 25, 1994 following SOP# R3-QA211.0.This SOP is a consolidated method derived from the Superfund Contract LaboratoryProgram Statement of Work and from RCRA methodology (SW-846). Instrumentationutilized consisted of a Hewlett Packard (HP) 5970 MSD coupled to a HP .5890 SeriesII gas chromatograph equipped with an HP-76.73A auto-sampler and SPB-5 30 metercapillary column. Concentrations of compounds were determined using the relativeresponse of authentic standards to the closest internal standard. The soilconcentration results are reported on a wet weight basis. These values have be^hreported in the RLIMS Final Report. Only those compounds for which results arereported were detected. Sample target compound values less than the quantitationlimit were labeled with a "J". This indicates that the mass spectra obtained forthe sample met the identification criteria, yet the quantity present was belowthe level for which the instrument accurately quantitates. These results,qualified with a "J", should be. considered estimated quantities. The NQLs(nominal quantitation limits) are the quantitation limits that have beendetermined for each parameter analyzed by this method. The actual quantitationlimit is the NQL multiplied by a factor specific for each sample.

The samples were also examined for the presence of compounds in addition to thoseon the Target Compound list. Authentic standards were not available to verifythese tentatively identified compounds (TIC) results. Tentative identificationof these compounds was made by the comparison of sample spectra to the EPA/NBS54KMass Spectral Library. Concentrations for these compounds were estimated basedon the response of the closest internal standard and the assumption that theinstrument.response for a given tentative compound was the same as the instrumentresponse for the internal standards. These identifications have been reportedas tentative identifications with the associated quantitation values reported asestimated concentrations and qualified with a "T". The TICs in all sampleextracts have been corrected for any blank contamination.

Quality Control:

Before acquisition of any sample data, the mass spectrometer is calibrated usingFC43. The calibration is verified by obtaining the spectrum of a known compound(DFTPP). All mass assignments and relative abundances are found to be inacceptable ranges or the instrument is adjusted until an acceptable spectrum ofthe known is obtained.

Immediately before analysis, each sample is spiked with an internal standard mixfrom Supelco, Inc. containing D4-l,4-dichlorobenzerie, D8-naphthalene,DIO-acenaphthene, Dlp-phenanthrene, D12-chrysene and D12-perylene. Allquantitations or estimates of concentration are made in comparison to theinternal standard nearest to the compound of interest.


Quantitation was based on the 50 ng/ul standard, and the initial calibrationconsisted of a five (5) point calibration (5, 10, 20, 50 and 80 ng/uL) except forpentachlorophenol which consisted of a four (4) point calibration (10, 20, 50 and80 ng/uL). The percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) for all compounds inthe initial calibration of the instrument on October 18, 1994 was below thirty(30) percent. The percent difference (%D) for several compounds in thecontinuing calibration check standard on October 19, 20, 21, 22 and 25, 1994 wasabove twenty-five (25) percent when comparing the daily calibration standard tothe initial calibration curve.

For each group of samples extracted, a method blank is prepared and examined forlaboratory introduced contamination. Only target compounds in the samples withvalues less than or equal to ten times (<10X) the method blank, field blank,rinsate blank and/or equipment blank are reported with a "B" qualifier.

The samples were spiked with a mixture of six surrogate compounds prior toextraction. Recovery for each was determined to check for matrix effect. Allsurrogaite recoveries were within Q.C. limits. The target limits are thoseestablished for the CLP.

Two (2) aliquots each of the aqueous samples 940928-09, 940928-20, 940930-16 andsoil sample 940928-10 were spiked with a priority pollutant cocktail mixcontaining twelve compounds at 100 ng/uL for acids and 50 ng/uL for base/neutrals(in the extract) and carried through the extraction and GC/MS. All matrix spikerecoveries and all %RPDs were within acceptable limits for the soil matrix.Thirty-four (34) out of thirty-six (36) matrix spike recoveries and all %RPDswere within acceptable limits for the aqueous matrix. The outlier recoverieswere qualified "A".

AR3UI59


TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

Site: Keystone Sanitation LF OU-2Program: Superfund Removal/RemedialUNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO.940928-01

UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO.940928-02

UNITS: mg/KgSAMPLE NO.940928-03






GAS #c c'Jf k'k c******

GAS #************

GAS #******>$C'$t'fC'$!'$C'fC

************

GAS #******

GAS #c c fffc f c************************

GAS #******************************

GAS #tfc'k'fc'fc'k'k'fc'ff'ft'fc'k'fc******************

GAS #******'fc'rC'fc'yc'ic'fc******

TIC NAMEUnknown m/z - 41Unknown m/z - 81

TIC NAMEUnknown m/z - 41Unknown m/z - 68

TIC NAMEUnknown m/z - 55Unknown m/z - 69Unknown alkane m/z - 57Unknown alkane m/z - 57

TIC NAMEUnknown m/z - 41

TIC NAMEUnknown m/z - 41Unknown m/z - 55Unknown m/z - 69Unknown alkane m/z - 57Unknown alkane m/z - 57

TIC NAMEUnknown m/z - 55Unknown alkane m/z - 57Unknown alkane m/z - 57Unknown m/z - 43Unknown alkane m/z - 57

TIC NAMEUnknown m/z — 41Unknown m/z — 68Unknown m/z - 205Unknown m/z - 63Unknown m/z - 221

TIC NAMEUnknown m/z - 41Unknown m/z - 68Unknown m/z - 81

RT9.3613.52

RT9.3611.02

RT10.4033.8034.4437.50

RT9.35

RT7.0010.4033.7934.4537.51

RT10.4032.2434.4636.6237.53

RT9.1910.8720.6923.7523.99

RT9.2010.8613.36

GONG11 T5 T

GONG10 T4 T

GONG0.3 T0.2 T0.3 T0.3 T

CONC10 T

CONC0.4 T0.5 T0.4 T0.4 T0.4 T

CONC0.8 T0.3 T0.3 T0.2 T0.2 T

CONC14 T6 T11 T19 T9 T

CONC17 T4 T6 T

AR3UI60




UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO.940928-12-

UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE -NO.940928-13


UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO. '940928-15

UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO940928-16


UNITS : ' ug/LSAMPLE NO.940928-19

GAS #

* **n******7v » W "A" » Tf

******************

GAS #******

GAS #************

GAS #************

GAS #******'******************************************************

GAS #******

GAS #******

GAS #******

GAS #************

TICUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknown

TICUnknown

TICUnknownUnknown

TICUnknownUnknown

TICUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknown

TICUnknown

TICUnknown

TICUnknown

TICUnknownUnknown

NAMEm/z —alkanealkanealkanealkanem/z -m/z -

NAMEm/z -

NAMEm/z -m/z -

NAMEm/z —m/z -

NAMEm/z -m/z -m/z -m/z -m/z -m/z -m/z -m/z -=m/z -m/z -

NAMEm/z -

NAMEm/z -

NAMEm/z -

NAMEm/z -m/z -

41m/z - 57m/z - 57m/z - 57m/z - 57159223

41

4168

4168

417057685757572365757

41

70

83

4157

RT7.0022.2922.9924.3225.4227.1927.93

RT9.19

RT9.20

10.86

RT9.32

11^00

RT9.32

10.0010.3911.0012.9320.2120.5823.1828.0229.68

RT9.32

RT13 . 58

RT9.32

RT9.3220.21

CONC0.2 T0.3 T0.4 T0.2 T0.3 T0.4 T1 T

CONC6 T

CONC13 T4 T

CONC18 T5 T

CONC19 T7 T8 T4 T18 T21 T4 T4 T28 T18 T

CONC5 T

CONC12 T

CONC7 T

CONC13 T13 T

AR3UI6


UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE HP,940928-20




-







GAS #******

GAS #************

GAS #•*******************fc }c"ft'$CTtc'$c******

GAS #******************************************************************

GAS #

CAS #******

CAS #

CAS #

CAS #

CAS #

TIC NAMEUnknown m/z -

TIC NAMEUnknown m/z -Unknown m/z -

TIC NAMEUnknown m/z «•Unknown m/z —Unknown m/z -Unknown .m/z —Unknown m/z -

TIC NAMEUnknown m/z —Unknown m/z -Unknown m/z —Unknown m/z -Unknown m/z -Unknown m/z -Unknown m/z —Unknown m/z -Unknown m/z -Unknown m/z -Unknown m/z -

TIC NAMENone Detected

TIC NAMEUnknown m/z -





70

70236

41685723657

417057685741165571685757

205

RT13.44

RT13.5923.18

RT9.3511.0120.2423.2129.69

RT9.3510.0010.3911.0112.9418.3920.2220.6121.9228.0329.70

RT

RT20.86

RT

RT

RT

RT

CONC10 T

CONC12 T15 T

CONC11 T4 T10 T9 T5 T

CONC19 T7 T

13 T5 T10 T5 T27 T9 T5 T14 T14 T

CONC

CONC6 T

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC













CAS # TIC NAME RT CONCNone Detected

CAS #' C'ftyf' C'tC Iff

******************************

CAS #******

CAS #******

CAS #************

CAS #************

CAS #************

CAS #************

CAS #

TICUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknown

TICUnknown

TICUnknown

•TICUnknownUnknown

TICUnknownUnknown

TICUnknownUnknown

TICUnknownUnknown

TIC

NAMEm/z -m/z -m/z -m/z -m/z -m/z -

NAMEm/z -

NAMEm/z -

NAMEm/z -m/z -

NAMEm/z —m/z —

NAMEm/z -m/z -

NAME"m/z -m/z -

NAME

70574319321957

41

41

41221

41205

161219

4168

RT9.8620.0820.6722.7924.0429.53

RT9.34

RT9.33

RT9.3424.18

RT9.1920.68

RT20.2724.05

RT9.2010.86

RT

CONC14 T74 T12 T5 T8 T11 T

CONC5 T

CONC6 T

CONC5 T18 T

CONC7 T11 T

CONC5 T5 T

CONC8 T4 T

CONCNone Detected

CAS #************

CAS #******

TICUnknownUnknown

TICUnknown

NAMEm/z -m/z -

NAMEm/z -

70219

205

RT9.8824.05

RT20.70

CONC5 T7 T

CONC15 T

AR3UI63


UNITS:SAMPLE

ug/LNO. CAS #

940930-18 ******

UNITS:SAMPLE

ug/LNO. CAS #

940930-19 ******

UNITS:SAMPLE

ug/LNO.

940930-20CAS #******************

TICUnknown

TICUnknown

TICUnknownUnknownUnknown

NAMEm/z -

NAMEm/z -

NAMEm/z -m/z -m/z -

RT70 9•91

RT70 9•91

RT70205221

92024

•917101

CONC5 T

CONC6

CONC6511

T

TTT

UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO. CAS #______TIC NAME__________________RT_______CONC940930-21 None Detected

AR3UI61*


PERCENT DRY WEIGHT DETERMINATIONS

Analyst:

William Pabst, IIIChemist/Lockheed

TID: Keystone Sanitation LF

Method:

The soil samples from Keystone Sanitation LF (Batch ID # REQ94136) were analyzedfor Percent Dry Weight as required by EPA analytical methods. The samples weredried at 105°C following the procedure outlined in EPA Region III CentralRegional Laboratory's SOP #R3QA056.0.

These results are to be used to convert analyte concentrations to a dry weightbasis for organic and non-metal analyses. Normally, analytical values arereported on a wet weight basis for organics and non-metals. All metals reporteduse a 60°C drying temperature for the percent dry weight determinations, asrequired by the methodology. The 60°C percent dry weight values are reportedwith the metals results, if applicable.

Weighing dishes used for these samples were sequentially numbered, oven-driedovernight at 105°C, and then cooled in a desiccator before the empty dish weightwas recorded. Five to ten grams of each sample was then placed on an empty dishand the total weight recorded. The samples were then placed in an oven and oven-dried overnight at 105"C. When the samples were removed from the oven they werecooled in a desiccator before their weight was recorded for the determination ofpercent; dry weight. All weights were recorded after all appropriate calibrationchecks were completed on the balance using Class S weights.

AR3UI65


PCB/PESTICIDE ANALYSIS BY GC

Analyst:

Sybil L. LucasChemist/Lockheed

Method:

The samples from Keystone Sanitation LF OU-2 were analyzed by capillary columngas chromatography for polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticideslisted on the priority pollutants compound list. The samples were collected onSeptember 26, 27, 28, and 29, 1994. The extraction procedure was modified forthe aqueous samples in order to achieve lower detection limits. The extractionsof the aqueous samples were performed on September 29, October 3, 4, and 27,1994. One liter of each aqueous sample was extracted between eighteen andtwenty-four hours with methylene chloride by continuous liquid-liquid extraction.Each aqueous extract was subsequently reduced to 2 mL in hexane using Kuderna-Danish flasks. The extractions of the soil samples were performed on September29, 1994. Approximately 30 gram portions of each soil sample were weighed, andthe soil extracted by sonication in a 1:1 mixture of methylene chloride andacetone. Each soil extract was subsequently reduced to 10 mL in hexane usingKuderna-Danish flasks. All extractions and analyses were performed according toSOP R3-QA207.0. This SOP is a consolidated method derived from the Superfund CLPStatement of Work.

Analysis of all sample extracts began on October 6, 1994 and continued untilOctober 28, 1994. All sample extracts were analyzed on a Hewlett-Packard 5890gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with an automatic injector and dual electroncapture detectors (ECDs). All samples, standards, and laboratory controlsolutions were run on dual columns connected by an injector port tee. The fusedsilica capillary column connected to the front ECD was a J&W Scientific DB-608(30 m. , 0.53 mm ID). The fused silica capillary column connected to the rear ECDwas a Restek Rtx-1701 (30 m. , 0.53 mm ID). Data were obtained from theseanalyses using the Millennium data acquisition and processing software. Sinceboth the front and rear columns were fully calibrated during analyses, the lowerof the results from the two columns was used for reporting.

Identification of organochlorine pesticides was accomplished by comparingretention times of known pesticides with the peaks observed in the sample extractchromatograms. A retention time window of 1% of the retention time of thestandard chromatogram was used for identification of target compounds.Identification of PCBs was accomplished by matching the profile of known PCBswith patterns exhibited in the target sample chromatograms. Quantitation ofmulti-responding compounds was based on the average of several calibrated peaks.The quantitation of all surrogate compounds and target analytes was based on afive-point linear regression where the correlation coefficient is greater than0.995 for pesticides, and on a three-point linear regression where thecorrelation coefficient is greater than 0,995 for PCBs.

AR3UI66


The NQLs (nominal quantitation limits) are the quantitation limits that have beendetermined for each compound analyzed by this method. The actual quantitationlimit is the NQL multiplied by an NQL factor specific for each sample. The NQLfactors for each sample are listed elsewhere in the report.

All soil results are reported on a WET WEIGHT basis

Quality Control:

The two fused silica capillary columns of the HP5890 Gas Chromatograph werecalibrated with five levels of the certified pesticide standards. A breakdowncheck standard and a mid- level check standard were analyzed concurrent withsample analyses. To monitor instrument stability, each sample sequence wasinterspersed with mid- level check standards and ended with a mid- level checkstandard. If initial and/or continuing calibration check criteria are notsatisfied for a particular analyte on one column, quantitation of that analytewill be performed using the other column (assuming valid linearity) . Iflinearity cannot be achieved on either column, the problem will be addressed, anda new curve will be generated.

A representative standard or a three -point calibration for each Toxaphene andeach PCB was analyzed at the beginning of the analytical -sequence for patternrecognition or quantitation. The injection volume was 3 uL for the standards.,samples, and quality control solutions. An automatic sampler (HP 7673A) was usedfor injection.

Continuing calibration criteria were monitored for target pesticides. Severalcheck standards did not meet acceptance criteria for selective pesticideanalytes. This did not affect the data however since no target analytes werereported for these compounds , and a new five point calibration was analyzed priorto further quantitation of pesticides .

Due to the required lower quantitation limits, and the complex nature of thesample matrix, numerous target analytes were quantified at or near thequantitation level. Target analyte results with elevated relative percentdifferences between the two analytical columns may be considered suspect and havebeen flagged with a "C".

Surrogates tetrachloro-meta-xylene (TMX) and decachlorobiphenyl (DCBP) were addedto all target samples and quality control samples. With each sample set, alaboratory blank and matrix spikes (in duplicate) are analyzed. An in-houseperformance audit is analyzed at least quarterly to assure satisfactory methodperformance. Recoveries and duplicate results are monitored to demonstrateacceptable system performance.

Sample 940928-04 was re-extracted outside of sample holding time due to surrogaterecoveries outside advisory limits. The results for this sample are regarded asestimate only and have been qualified with a "J".

Four of the eighty-four (84) sample surrogate recoveries were outside the 60% -150% advisory windows .

Quality control acceptance was based on matrix spike and duplicate results.

R3UI67


All twenty-six (26) quality control sample surrogate recoveries were within the60% - 150% advisory limits.

All thirty-six (36) aqueous matrix spike results were within advisory limits.One (1) of the eighteen (18) relative percent differences (RPD) was outside ofthe advisory limits due to matrix and has been flagged with an "A".

All twelve (12) soil matrix spike results were within advisory limits.

All remaining recoveries for spiked compounds were within advisory limits.

All soil samples required sample extract dilution due to matrix effects. Inaddition, all soil samples were analyzed following a mercury cleanup to removesulfur interferences.

AR3UI68


VOA ANALYSIS BY GC/MS

Analyst;

Frederick PetraitisChemist/Lockheed

TIP #; 03941012

Methods

Forty-two (42) aqueous and four (4) soil samples from Keystone Sanitation wereanalyzed for the presence of volatile organic compounds amenable to purge andtrap and identifiable by mass spectrometry. Samples were collected on September26, 27, 28 and 29, 1994, and-analyzed on September 29, 30, October 03 through 07and October 11, 1994 following SOP #R3-QA210.0. This SOP is derived from theSuperfund Contract Laboratory Program Statement of Work and from RCRA methodology(SW-846). Instrumentation utilized consisted of a .purge and trap apparatus(Tekmar ALS 2016/LSC 2000) interfaced to a gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer(HP 5890/HP 5970) equipped with a fused silica capillary column (VOCOL 105m x0.53mm ID x 3.Oum film thickness). Concentrations of compounds were determinedusing the relative response of authentic standards to the closest internalstandard. Only detected results are reported. Sample target compound valuesless than the quantitation limit were labeled with a "J". This indicates thatthe mass spectrum obtained for the sample met the identification criteria, yetthe quantity present was below the level for which the instrument accuratelyquantitates. All results qualified with a "J" are estimated quantities. TheNQLs (nominal quantitation limits) are the quantitation limits that have beendetermined for each parameter analyzed by this method. The actual quantitationlimit is the NQL multiplied by a factor.specific for each sample.

Additional dilutions were performed at 5X and 25X • for the target compoundsacetone and 1,1-dichloroethene in sample 940928-01. The results from the 25Xdilution were reported for the above targets. Soil sample results wereuncorrected for % dry weight and reported on a WET weight basis.

The samples were also examined for the presence of compounds in addition to thoseon the Target Compound list. Authentic standards were not available to verifythese tentatively identified compound (TIC) results. Tentative identificationof these compounds was made on the comparison of sample spectra to the EPA/NBS54KMass Spectral Library. Concentrations for these compounds were estimated basedon the response of the closest internal standard-and the assumption that theinstrument response for a given tentative compound was .the same as the instrumentresponse for the internal standards. These identifications have been reportedas tentative identifications with the associated quantitation values reported asestimated concentrations and qualified with a "T".

Quality Control:

Before acquisition of any sample data, the mass spectrometer is calibrated usingFC43. The.calibration is verified by obtaining the spectrum of a known compound(BFB) . All mass assignments and relative abundances are found to be inacceptable ranges or the instrument is adjusted until an acceptable spectrum ofthe known is obtained. All samples and related Q.C. were analyzed within thetwelve hour BFB time criteria.

AR3UI69


Immediately before analysis, each sample is spiked with internal standardsobtained from Supelco, Inc. All quantitations or estimates of concentrations aremade in comparison to the internal standard nearest to the compound of interest.

The initial calibration consisted of a five-point calibration curve (1, 5, 10,20 and 40 ug/L standards) for the low level aqueous method and a five-pointcalibration curve (5, 10, 50, 100 and 200 ug/L standards) for the soil method.Twenty-five (25) milliliters of aqueous samples and five (5) grams of soilsamples for the heated method were purged. The daily calibration check standardwas analyzed at a concentration of 10.0 ppb (for low level aqueous) and 50.0 ppb(for soil method). The nominal quantitation limit (NQL) for the compoundsacetone and 2-chloroethylvinylether is 5.0 ug/L (for low level aqueous method).

For each day of sample analysis, a method blank (lab reagent blank - LRB) wasprepared and examined for laboratory introduced contamination. All compoundswhich were found in both a LRB, trip or rinsate blank and a sample were qualified"B" if the concentration of the compound in the sample was less than ten times(<10X) the compound's concentration in the blank.

The percent Relative Standard Deviation (%RSD) for all compounds in the initialcalibration of the instrument on September 28, 1994 was below thirty (30) percentexcept methylene chloride and 2-chloroethylvinylether. The percent RelativeStandard Deviation (%RSD) for all compounds in the initial calibration of theinstrument on October 05,' 1994 was below thirty (30) percent except 2-chloroethylvinylether. The percent difference (%D) for several compounds in thecontinuing calibration standards was above twenty-five (25) percent on September29, 30, October 03 through 07 and October 11, 1994 when comparing the dailycalibration standards to the initial calibration curve. These compounds arequalified "J", estimated, for the positive results and "UJ", undetectedestimated, for non-detected results in the affected samples.

The samples were spiked with a mixture of surrogate compounds prior to analysis.Recovery for each was determined to check for matrix interferences. The targetlimits are those established by the CLP. All surrogate recoveries except 1,2-dichloroethane-d4 in sample 940928-09-MSD were within acceptable recovery limits.

Two (2) aliquots of aqueous samples 940928-09, 940928-20, 940930-16 and soilsample 940928-10 were spiked with 5 ul of the matrix spike mix containing allspike compounds at a concentration of 10 ppb (low level aqueous) and 50 ppb(soil). The recovery for each compound was determined to check for matrixeffect. Recoveries have been corrected for target compounds present in thesample. The target limits are those established by the CLP. All MS/MSDrecoveries and RPDs were within CLP'target limits.

AR3UI70


TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

Site: Keystone SanitationProgram: Superfund Removal/Remedial


._.

UNITS : ug/LSAMPLE NO.940928-02

UNITS: ug/KgSAMPLE NO.940928-03






CAS #75456******************354234

******108203******

CAS #

CAS #

CAS #

CAS #

CAS #

CAS #

CAS #************75434354234

************

TIC NAMEMethane, chlorodifluoro-Unknown Freon, m/z - 51Unknown m/z =67Unknown Freon m/z — 67Ethane, l,'2-dichloro-l,l,2-trifluoro-Unknown m/z — 45Diisopropyl etherUnknown m/z =57







TIC NAMEUnknown Freon, m/z - 51Unknown, m/z - 67Methane, dichlorofluoro-Ethane, l,2-dichloro-l,l,2-trifluoro-Unknown m/z - 59Unknown m/z - 101

RT6.127.39

11.1012 . 21

13.0313.8017.1031.37

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT7.39

11.0812.19

• 13.0113.8114.06

CONC5 T4 T7 T14 T

11 T7 T1 T1 T

' CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC2 T4 T14 T

25 T1 T3 T

AR3UI7I


UNITS: ug/LSAM?LE NO,940928-09





UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO..940928-14



UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO.

CAS #75434

CAS #

CAS #******75434354234

CAS #75434354234

CAS #75434354234

CAS #******

CAS #

CAS #

CAS #

TIC NAMEMethane , dlchlorof luoro -


TIC NAMEUnknown, m/z - 67Methane, dichlorof luoro -Ethane, .l,2-dichloro-l,l,2-tr if luoro -

TIC NAMEMethane, dichlorof luoro -Ethane, l,2-dichloro.-l,l,2-trif luoro -

TIC NAMEMethane, dichlorof luoro -Ethane, l,2-dichloro-l,l,2-tr if luoro -

TIC NAMEUnknown, m/z - 41



TIC NAME

RT12.16

RT

RT11.0812.18

13.01

RT12.03

12.87

RT12.18

13.01

RT8.81

RT

RT

RT

CONC7 T

CONC

CONC1 T4 T

5 T

CONC2 T

1 T

CONC3 T

3 T

CONC8 T

CONC

CONC

CONC940928-17 None Detected

AR3UI72


UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO. CAS #_____TIC NAME_________________RT______CONC940928-18

UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO. CAS #940928-19 115117

UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO. CAS #940928-20 76131

UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO. CAS #940928-21









UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO. CAS #

None Detected

TIC NAME RT1-Propene, 2-methyl- 8.80

TIC NAME RTEthane, l,l,2-trichloro-l,2,2-trif luoro- 13.88

TIC NAME ' RTNone Detected

TIC NAME RTNone Detected








TIC NAME RT

CONC2 T

CONC

2 T

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC940929-07 None Detected

AR3UI73


UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO. CAS #_____TIC NAME_________________RT______CONC940929-08









UNITS: ug/L «*SAMPLE NO. CAS #940930-15



UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO. CAS #

None Detected

TIC NAME RT CONCNone Detected











TIC NAME RT CONC940930-18 None Detected


UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO. CAS #___TIC NAME___________RT____CONC940930-19 None Detected

UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO. CAS #______TIC NAME__________________RT_______CONC940930-20 None Detected

UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO. CAS # TIC NAME_____|___________RT______CONC940930-21 None Detected

AR3UI75

0\vo U]ro enH 55<* nCM oO«rt!H totf EH

jjH

A ao 3JJ Ort on q

H

COEH

CO

c.

on

g

OS

a

IIZ II

IIIIIO SE II

IIII

i i!cn nnn

g l lII

O IIro I iio 8 no cn ii

o in n-j no u

ii ,1 33

~l

cnvo »3n en'S' COcn oM £[,2 EH

HJJ

A flO 3JJ Oflj Ono g

uH

J2 iio nKl JE II

Sio cn .••» lo l

afl>jjHflj

g g

. llO IIS! 5 ii *e*s w ii ™mO II O :¥:3:

. II CJ CJO IIro i u CM oo < M s-ts; CM " .o cn ll SSoJ °. °,S li OS:» C> (3

g l lII

5 «° ii ^11o ii offi»

coo5SSS*:gse

S55J.11

o «•" o 60 ^ o w **• N- ro J ™3f^Kl Klw- ^ CNJ «-f \ J M ^ ^ I M ::;::iS:OO O O O O O O O O £&& CO *-

M w^

o o o o o o o «-§:-S; N. o"

gm

AR3UI77

tt

cn10 i>3n cnH S5*4* rocn oW £5§ H• • ••

H

"o §JJ 0(0 On o

§ a S ii o

2 !!O II

« 83 I

1g

co

CMO ii ..... m

u &*¥ o>i! .i! 3 3 d

g 5 Io cn nS i!O II5- iro I

I5

cn

moo

co u§ 1 1u£! 5 '! ....* "> •*O < II ;::::iS;~ "

UCJCMCJC3.0...CJI-.

cnvo *4tn cnHfccn o&<

g vo 8spj H " O CN ** **

Q*""" St jj

tt II

o 01 A a•rl 10 O 3JJ ft JJ 0o ttj oa) noCO <

S

ro i;o u

o§

10 z: ig Si '

g

§ nnO II§3? i'<C IItn n~T IIo n

il°?.i io

& o I g gfe c ro ai o)

OW •• o x r v ^ a t j i i i g c .• o m M- e e *j o uro — o o — — ru _ c

* > C . L . r _ t . C . U X ; C J r l l.i— 0 0 1 — i— ,

=1 o £ "I T T K MI .- .t S

H ^(0

AR3UI79

cn10 lJro enH S5<« COcn oOtrf!W E« EH

Q*H JJA Qo 3JJ OnJ On o

COICO

s_ H&0

B S-a ' S°M " M g s is ii _ _ * _ _ cMii

b^ C1alS S™ n

u

* «• .1 rtM rt S upjlg g

ro as H _ -a ....g S ii ii u, • CM«-4- II fcittF -i -3 . "D - 3 - 3 • •: :-wO II T-I&3; 3303 33 Q&m

(1) 3 3 O 3• WCT.W3:

i-v * "Z o nS S ii

a) 2 "• !!

CO giix ll< IIcn nIIII

01 01 l_ _J= ^ 01 O*J ro .c c

0)"> ra ru .e"x 5 "xa Jc c 01 a) "xp a. cj «j c j:c- ^ j: co 0) 4-»a — ' CL — • N O I O I• • o x v c ^ x

_ M X — ' ^ ( b o T

''JJ g

<«n

AR3UI80

cnvo Jro en

H cn o

tfHO i< " "

O*.. .. HCO) _ JJo tn A a•H 10 O 3JJ (14 JJ 0O (0 Ov noco <

ro co* £ i* ii* •• ' dii. • .iiO IICM IIO II

CM!! . mii dii .«

3ES

S i!O II

1 1 ii CM!! " ' ' m

a<Djj

IAR3UI8I

cnvo Jro cnHfcO «* roH cn o

_ Hgen «O rtj ..

Q.. .. H(H Q)O 0) .4•H (0 OJJ CM JJ OO (0 Oo) noco <!

Pn CM

COaCO

g < !!

aa>jjS(0

CM IIO IIro m ii ca

.Ii o

mcoo

mcoo

••••«* m

.•®3: 3 3 O

N II. IIO IIS § !! g**3 w i! il «c> I! .dS 33 d

II ..... . . CDin u K.>4 l>-

II SSS " 3 - 3 "II .¥f:S 33 O

AR3UI82

UH

O oO •<*• Itd a)0 D)•H (0JJ 111O(1)CO

SU

EPA Region III

Regional Laborato:

polis, Maryland

• (TJ

CO rJ Cj

o H <50)u

ento Jco cnH a* COcn oM SS£p*H

JJxl do 3JJ 0(0 On o

CO

COp*l

r\NALYTICAL SAMPLE

UJZa.K"

CN' jjO Hfa H

H J

H O11 "Jc<

CO

0 faEH ejCO WH!DW CO• •

Jj &•H SrH M•H 0)0 On) Mfa CM

CM II§CQ II

Sf i!

ample Number:

118

94093019

94093020

94FD2

SAM

CO ro z iig Sj i!-4- IIO II

r- n. nO IIro z uo < uo cn nv^ Iii> ll

-O ll. IIO Ii

o cn ii•J- nO II

a0)jjSH10rtt%

. .-s 2 -. " M

AR3UI83

uH

0-4 ô n.. ..

Section

Page

>iojj

H §d

"$H$«*^ 2 n

W ft•H «°i <0 §dQ)u

Wl

co cnH 55•«• COcn o

H*• ••

HBatch

Account

CS' t3O H

failS

S 04

H ijc™* rtj

H S3J 04CO

O faEH 0!CO HH PW CO••1 1 ••JJ 6•H (oH K•H O10 O10 Hfa CM

*r* s

COpaH

1ouS3.H3oo

co

oHouJHIuHi5jSo

COSgCO

X•HJJ

S

O II. uCO II

• t CM SE «-N II1. O < M IIH o tn iiS * !1•S1 ° !!2 to ii

S! 5 S ii® 0 « ,|H o "

§ in nW O O , I I

CM CM ^ IIg e e ii-j- u0 II

ro u0 IICO IICM ae ** iio 3 »< ito cn C u-7 IIO II

0)4-* IIa m ucn 4-» uO •«- *•* IIL. S M n(. •*• w «3—1 IIcn n

QQ)JJ10tnOt.£j

CO

o o

ESS

£5: i

O\ 5 *" — r * Ifr Q

i - OO CO r*» iN. 00 OO &*

tnT-c\j,Noro oor - r a c M r o i M ^ - inm

to

IIS £ S |IE sis s

S ~ -so » oi- at wm tj T3

AR3UI8I*

cnVO rjco cnH 55

O -4« CO

H faP4 H• • M

Q*H jjAA do 3JJ Om q

g>tjrt

12 !!8 a « !!

8 5 a Ig W v5 "•* I!

. II

. II00 IICM Z ^ IIO < <M IIO 00 O II-J- IIO II

g iico ii<M 3E *> II

•O IIO IICO IIf*i ye *~* \io <. *t uo cn ^x n

-. . sE «L. ••- *~f

•

8ro

28! 228:05H ro nH 5 !!rtj CM JE IIEC o in vx i! eg -p <\j p <- o 25Di*» u > o N - < o r ~ N - f « - cocoO n••5 CM II'[I 5 iiH CM CM ** IIij O O «K II N-^ o " vx ii in in *—* o * *"* f— O(A *& n S - e o o c o o o o «-coM O I I

!8§

o oo vx ii >o>QN.N.rooro roo c o o o co

CM E 'N IIO 5 3< IIo c n ^ x i i N N . C M C M C V J C M C M Oii

II»» ii K o o o o o o o o ooO

o *o- *

§ niiCM CVJ > IIO Q S< II CO O f-o u _ v n o o c M O c o r ^ o ^ r o o c o•* ii os.<oP-r^co .o ...o

CM IIO II00 IICM Z «•» II

(CS

O IICO II

o 5 « i! * .oS"^!! !S«!nfcS[C MS 2?&:

u ^ o o i o v - ^ o oo mô

o r o m o oo -o -o.ioro. >o<o cOh-

L| Jj % «o K £ 1: ^p "5 o

CO llS c\if\ifM5!8l6liii OK|« eo^SiS

cnu> Jco cnCJ «# coH cn o

a«0«

co

o ii^ do 3•H (0JJ p, JJ OO 10 Ono

H

04H . ii

5 3

CM IIoo iiCM a: iio 3 *! u.

CMo

00O 5 »?

(0

O CM CO <O CMin in NC5 in <O

sJJ g 5l £ ii "- f- 9 :* :* rflj •» ii ^ MS 35 «o <o Is-S3 *

X « IIcn w ii to r> m 'Q o . com o o o on h- K <o 3> >o co oo o..

< O - * C M O . O o. ooc oi n m i n » o * O i n . o o . o

porjK.

- .f)Q *- « -t-r-O*

t i!co uCM O- n IIo a: M ii ro oo i- v ;; mooS ii o . .

2 iiCM CO ••* iig S? v5 ii yj . MO

•o o ro «- vj- o oo in -4- o<r- r- (M «t •" «- inin ...'i r i r r i r r r r rr o . o r o m o oo >o >o co-»cM.roro. <o>o to r- 55

am "5. jj C x" N• -^ Q C .e r c _o

c at-.41 «, £r^ § g•g-i c ^t - oS Iflfll mil II,H o o 7 t> *j a! ggSt jc y C c\j û to o » o*" ••" S T~ *~"

C M CMC^SSlt IHP & « 9

•cnu> i-qco cnH a

^ rocn o

HJJ

A dO PJJ O10 Om o

O faEH (4CO H{H 04H DX CO• *

IS ••JJ S•H 10rH U•H CJJO 010 Hfa CM

caHH §

rrCl

&pj o < j? ii . _ _ . . . _ _ .. rr <M

9oco

OU

EHHJIUH

CMO p ::

0; O

o

•HM

M

ro E ~

o

c o c aD>4->Q "- r*t- E J<

s s 12 s s s s s §

* ii a t g gj § 8!

3 § 18 g S S S & 8: £ 8:

o cn w n N- o ro o eg o »t •* ^ o• o cn w n N- o ro o eg o »t •* ^ o oflj ~t II «0 r>- vO N. «O S- CO CO O . O

o i n w u v Q . c o o c M i n c o m o.<O.* n <oivin<o<oS. ooo ..o

CM a. r* uo at: X n ' CM on o .o.o»— . O

§ 1 1IICM 2E * IIO <C 94 II O O roo co ii ro o in vg Q o N-CM co o o«» ii o o o o c l S o o o. o > ^ « _

b0)

o «< a* ii s* ro/I) o in w n ro in o o >£ in CMO o.coWST u co S- in oo co co coco ..oi—t o u

H3 in iim o no uCO CM _ ..o *t X ii co o ino c n v ^ u o N. CM IV in S. oin o o N -•* ll F- h- >o CO CO CO .00 ..o*? J *D^ °°Sfc HK-5 2|

13 «O -».H A

S ^ ,5 -' W !! 3 ?3 ° to ro °- §Hhet._ f4tZ @3 rtco

<o o to . -3- o..CM-*..

o e •c — ' oi oi foi x — c. 4J.Tta: oo" - r —

& • • 0 > I _ C C JOO O JZJjl T'iS..'ni_ .OC- t.001O o S" 'E •£ "8 "S ssw; o .2 § 5 Sc. U i. I— I. t. c :¥:&>: — » JZ — . 1 3M g O r 0) w 01 &** jc O - -^Ll 3 3 -O h- ••- JC :SC: u aj

— • — • * t CL fe:**: CO L....... .P $ W: t*. u- ** *<• r i x&$ o 4 >':::: O r iW : - x > 3 R i i « r- in in fl$: ru ru £*Q: l- «* CO

Si» <M tM CM -O TJ XI S:Sf O I-- Wl/k a T& tS

O.ti0 ,.04 "Io n•• ••rt fl)

Sectio:

Pag

L

.S. EPA Region III

al Regional Laboratory

nnapolis, Maryland

t> £ <3d0)u

'

VI

co enH a«<»« COcn o

01 H•• ••

Q*H

JJ

Batch

Accoun

es' H-jO Hfa WJi§3rfj EH 0HNe*

«£{

< 04CO

O faEH KCO H>H 04

M COt*IS ••JJ 13•H (ur^ M

Is10 tHfa 04

CO

H0S

j>ouH

ITY CONTROL (SURROGATE

1auH

CD0So

0S1 s..S 8 a. i?0i O ^ ^^

s

M O-H gM ro I *jjj O < X*^ O V) vTO i*s

or-oS S PI "• wo

[umber:

15

94093016

94093017

94093018

SAM

SAM

SAM

c%)

m ex)

55 S£«(|J 0 H- -

H *o<§ ~*CO S z ~

o

ro

0 in SS

CD V)O> 4->

t. ..-

in

••m0)jj£tnpMLICO

iiuunnni!nui!uunniiuuuununuuunuununniiiiniinuiinuii

iinnnuunuiinnnunniiiiiiI!un

!!It

IIIIII

a 8Jic 8:°i

CM CM OO I S - M 2 N . O C Q N. O OOOS.COCOK-N.CO COCO ...

8:

(MN- o- o co R eo J- «5

§ S S S §

K 8 8o . «-

8:°

«- O Kl 4/1 O

•*•», . S I N N *-O O LA sj Oin in ...O>

g £ SIf * I °•82 2 -gfe 3 § s

AR3UI88

U.S. EPA Region III Section: ORGANICCentral Regional Laboratory Page: Cl

Annapolis, Maryland

Facility: KEYSTONE SANITATION LF OU-2 Batch ID: REQ94136Program: SUPERFOND REMOVAL/REMEDIAL Account #: TFA03N9L9

ORGANIC Quality Control (Matrix Spike Recoveries)

Matrix Spike Recovery Matrix: SOLIDS

Spike Recovery Recovery RPD94092810 94092810 Limits RPD Limits

Compound MS MSD (SOLIDS) (SOLIDS)(%) (X) (%) (X) (X)

Acenaphthene 84 80 31-137 4 194-Chloro-3-Hethylphenol 73 71 26-103 2 332-Chlorophenol ' 66 67 25-102 1 50Di-n-Butylphthalate 74 71 11-117 A 401,4-Dichlorobenzene 79 78 28-104 1 272,4-Dinitrotoluene 86 82 28-89 5 47N-Nitroso-di-n-Propylainine 74 76 41-126 2 384-Nitrophenol ' 75 72 11-114 5 50Pentachlorophenol 72 70 17-109 3 47Phenol 63 64 26-90 2 35Pyrene 93 90 35-142 4 361,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 79 74 38-107 6 23


Compound MS MSD (SOLIDS) (SOLIDS)(X) (X) (X) (X) (%)

Aldrin 80 75 34-132 6 434,4'-DDT """ 89 81 23-134 10 50Dieldrin 98 93 31-134 6 38Endrin 104 98 42-139 6 45Gamma BHC (Lindane) 93 . 89 46-127 4 50Heptachlor 108 101 35-130 7 31


Compound MS MSD (SOLIDS) (SOLIDS)(X) (X) (X) (X) (X)

Benzene 102 101 66-142 1 21Chlorobenzene 99 99 60-133 2 211,1-Dichloroethene 115 108 59-172 7 22Toluene 108 100 59-139 8 21Trichloroethene 98 98 62-137 0 24

AR3IM89

U.S. EPA Region III Section: ORGANICCentral Regional Laboratory Page: C2

Annapolis, Maryland

Facility: KEYSTONE SANITATION LF OU-2 Batch ID: REQ94136Program: SUPERFUND REMOVAL/REMEDIAL Account #: TFA03N9L9


Matrix Spike Recovery Matrix: WATER


Compound MS MSD (WATER) (WATER)(X) (X) (X) (X) (X)

Acenaphthene 73 85 46-118 15 314-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 61 70 23-97 14 422-Chlorophenol 51 66 27-123 27 40Di-n-Butylphthalate 78 87 11-117 10 401,4-Dichlorobenzene 48 58 36-97 19 282,4-Dini.trotoluene 70 82 24-96 16 38N-Nitroso-di-n-Propylamine 59 69 41-116 16 384-Nitrophenol 67 80 10-80 18 50Pentachlorophenol 64 72 9-103 12 50Phenol 53 65 12-110 21 42Pyrene 75 79 26-127 5 311,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 51 61 39-98 17 28


Compound MS MSD (WATER) (WATER)(X) (X) (X) . (X) (X)

=====: ===5:==============:== s=s===== s==s==== ======== ======== ========

Aldrin 90 102 40-120 13 224,4'-DDT 97 110 38-127 12 27Dieldrin 104 118 52-126 12 18Endrin 106 118 56-121 11 21Gamma BHC (Lindane) 109 122 56-123 12 15Heptachlor 98 109 40-131 11 20



========================= ======== ss====== 3======= ======== ==sss===

Benzene 98 102 76-127 4 11Chlorobenzene 103 103 75-130 5 131,1-Dichloroethene 98 108 61-145 8 14Toluene 91 91 76-125 1 13Trichloroethene 94 97 71-120 3 14


Annapolis, Maryland




Compound MS MSD (WATER) (WATER)(X) (X) , (X) (X) (X)

Acenaphthene 68 61 46-118 10 314-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 57 51 23-97 11 422-Chlorophenol 53 51 27-123 4 40Di-n-Butylphthalate 69 64 11-117 9 401,4-Dichlorobenzene 48 44 36-97 8 282,4-Dinitrotoluene 65 59 24-96 11 38N-Nitroso-di-n-Propylamine 46 43 41-116 6 384-Nitrophenol 61 55 10-80 10 50Pentachlorophenol 53 48 9-103 10 50Phenol 53 51 12-110 5 42Pyrene . 66 60 26-127 9 311,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 51 45 39-98 11 28



Aldrin 97 96 40-120 1- 224,4'-DOT 96 94 38-127 2 27Dieldrin 105 100 52-126 5 ' 18Endrin 102 61 56-121 50 A 21Gamma BHC (Lindane) 100 96 56-123 4 15Heptachlor 100 ' 98 40-131 2 20

. Spike Recovery Recovery RPD94092820 94092820 Limits RPD. Limits


Benzene 100 .104.. 76-127 5 11Chlorpbenzene 106 110 . 75-130 3 131,1-Dichloroethene 95 102 61-145 8 14Toluene 105 107 76-125 2 13Trichloroethene 97 104 71-120 7 14


Annapolis, Maryland





Acenaphthene 90 91 46-118 1 314-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 68 71 23-97 3 422-Chlorophenol 73 71 27-123 3 40Di-n-Butylphthalate 92 91 11-117 1 401,4-Dichlorobenzene 72 75 36-97 3 282,4-Dinitrotoluene ' 92 94 24-96 2 38N-Nitroso-di-n-Propylamine 70 66 41-116 6 384-Nitrophenol 97 A 96 A 10-80 0 50Pentachlorophenol 68 59 9-103 13 50Phenol 68 67 12-110 1 42Pyrene 87 93 26-127 7 311,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 69 72 39-98 4 28



=s====s;s =================: ======== ======== ======== ======== ====s===

Aldrin 86 78 40-120 9 224, 4' -DOT 88 84 38-127 5 27Dieldrin 97 ' 92 52-126 5 18Endrin . 92 86 56-121 7 21Gamma BHC (Lindane) 95 88 56-123 8 15Heptachlor 88 82 40-131 7 20



========================= ======== ======== ======== ======== ========Benzene 105 107 76-127 2 11Chlorobenzene 113 111 75-130 2 131,1-Dichloroethene 100 102 61-145 3 14Toluene 106 107 76-125 1 13Trichloroethene 102 107 71-120 4 14

AR3UI92

AR3UI93

3

I s3•o

3tn- 8

D.cr. u

o

a

5

<

a-

c/5f

CO

IN3

_,O000

-o-

73

07°

->i

i

2l - • :• '1 ?D G xo1

H

CAc? •n

•n00

on (A in IA U/ CA

uJ OU U) CU w w

r V 9;

CO CO CO CO

«

P"•!..:'i O_

CftIrTi.

fvX X X a;

3uii i ~. i i i

ifi

LA)db

fe

o05\oTIAJ1

VJ

CT i-r J3 CU CN. * LA 33•<

Ul< OJ

0cn

oW-XMCA

M_C

o<3V

Cxf 00

oJt

Crd

o

IGO

t?

•a5

V w •*

to

»•« s

3 oCD _

^

~ ———— '————'———'———'————'———'————'————'————'————'———'————'———'————'———'————'———————" ^'^ C3m

3 P a. 3 iJD

I— ^ tZ

Q_ **i rt •« ' T " I." * " _ *" *® ™*r*

S?

« ? t i i i i i \ i i i i t f > > i i * _ _ _ _ _ _ i 5>i.«; 4 < "• o m<D /-.

•i-T'Es

Z s I

§":£:£":£s *

I

8

m

33O

3 2S

•2O

o

> o _ "z o o g nm Z T P *J3) ' Ctn C/J

rnOO3D0

S.33 CD.m •O CD

<

u y; - -

- "

-'-'• -

REGION 3

O/) 7

B41

Chestnut St.

Philadelphia.

Pennsylvania

1910

7/

CHAIN OF CUSTODY

RECORD"

ENVI

RONM

ENTA

L PROTECTION AGENCY

Of '

e or Enforcement

UJcr

incc

ST

9VUO

dlfMOO

UJS\-

O

I

In

â

CO

GD

so

V

to

ctv~ tx* t^n v ~ |— » •—Tl ^^

J)vX

CsCi

o

&

I*

o0

.cioo

VoXoV,

Ui

£

(V

/V

10

tCO

x. V

cn

\a

NT

<QV

o

3

VoA

U 'tlto

uo

I "d £ & 7 " ." a 3<

n

Cr(73

C;

C73

co

a

\cl

o

VJ*C75

N

8

nC5-J

\G'sd

9

Region III, Central Regional LaboratoryAnnapolis, Maryland

HAZARD AND RISK EXPOSURE DATA. SHEETLEVELS OF PERSONAL PROTECTION DURING SAMPLING

BACKGROUND

Under the authority of Section 104 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation, and Liability Ace (CERCLA or Superfund) of 1980, Section 311 of the CleanWater Act,, and Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), EPA hasbeen delegated the responsibility to undertake response actions with respect to therelease or potential release of oil, petroleum, or hazardous substances that pose asubstantial threat to human health or welfare, or the environment.

GENERAL .

This form is to be used when collecting Environmental Samples (i.e. streams, farmponds, wells, soils etc.) and for Hazardous Samples (i.e. drums, storage tanks,lagoons, leachates, hazardous waste sites). This information is intended for use as aguide for the safe handling of these laboratory samples in accordance with EPA and OSHAregulations. The sample classification(s) and levels of personal protection used bythe sampler in all situations- will enable the analyst to be better aware of potentialexposure to substances in air, splashes of liquids, or other direct contact withmaterial due to work being done.

DEGREE OF PROTECTION/

____ Level A: Highest level of respiratory, skin, and eye protection needed.Fully encapsulated suit, respirator self-contained (Tank type)

____ Level B: Highest level of respiratory protection but lesser level ofskin protection needed.Chemical suit, respirator self-contained (Tank type)

____ Level C: Lesser level of respiratory protection than Level B. Skinprotection criteria are similar to Level B.Chemical suit, cannister respirator/cartridge

Level D: Work uniform without any respirator or skin hazards.Lab coat, gloves etc.-X

CLASSIFIED FIELD SAMPLES ' _ ' '.

X Environmental • ___ Hazardous ___ Comb. (Env. & Haz.) ___ Radioactive

Site Name: faifikm //a.nd/A,l/ ________________ Sampling Date: 9^-_, — -L-

sta. NO. mft-4 . mft-S" .rmu)-E .ffl.jj.ch.mui.bi. MJ JS , irnuirr . muflft, rnu-HField pH: 5g> . TIP , 1.10 .iQ,q . °I.D6 .

(must be taken prior to submission of aqueous samples)

Sampler: Tiunc.'C*— If IdJgc- ________________ Work Phone Number: /Q

Personal observations at time of sampling (surroundings ) : <&

J i\n 0.0\ r>\" 4 /a. n &£ 'II

Sample collection observations (physical sample, odors etc.) AF/Clr /' /\

AH3UI97

Region III, Central Regional Laboratory , ?Annapolis, Maryland T). _ / 0 *3

HA7.ABn AND RISK EXPOSURE DATA SHEETLEVELS OF-PERSONAL PROTECTION DURING SAMPLING

BACKGROUND

Under the authority of Section 104 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) of 1980, Section 311 of the CleanWater Act, and Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), EPA hasbeen delegated the responsibility to undertake response actions with respect to therelease or potential release of oil, petroleum, or hazardous substances that pose asubstantial threat to human health or welfare, or the environment.

GENERAL

This form is to bei used when collecting Environmental Samples (i.e. streams, farmponds, wells, soils etc.) and for Hazardous Samples (i.e. drums, storage tanks,lagoons, leachates, hazardous waste sites). This information is intended for use as aguide for the safe handling of these laboratory samples in accordance with EPA and OSHAregulations. The sample classification(s) and levels of personal protection used bythe sampler in all situations will enable the analyst to be better aware of potentialexposure to substances in air, splashes of liquids, or other direct contact withmaterial due to work being done.

DEGREE OF PROTECTION


____ Level B: Highest level of respiratory protection but lesser level ofskin p ro tec tioh~ne e d¥d.Chemical suit, respirator self-contained (Tank type)


Level D: Work uniform without any respirator or skin hazards.Lab coat, gloves etc.

CLASSIFIED FIELD SAMPLES

Environmental •___Hazardous ___Comb. (Env. & Haz.) ___Radioactive

Site Name: KP \£>JT)JO&-______________________Sampling Date: J/3& ~ ?/$?/9?f

Sta No.Field


Sampler; - U M j r G ja-gJ<5&/ ________ Work Phone Number:-y,---

Personal observations at time of sampling (surroundings):

Sample collection observations (physical sample, odors etc . ) /j'^

AR3UI98


nA7Asn AND RISK EXPOSURE DATA SHEETLEVELS OF PERSONAL PROTECTION DURING SAMPLING

,_cZ' tf 2y-• / Z-'

BACKGROUND


GENERAL . -

This form is to be used when collecting Environmental Samples (i.e. streams, farmponds, wells, .soils etc.) and for Hazardous Samples (i.e. drums, storage tanks,lagoons, leachates, hazardous waste sites). This information is intended for use. as aguide for Che safe handling of these laboratory samples in accordance with EPA and OSHA

' regulations. The sample classification(s) and levels of personal protection used bythe sampler in all situations will enable the analyst to be better aware of potentialetxposure to substances in air, splashes of liquids, or other direct contact withmaterial due to work being done.



_ Level B: Highest level of respiratory protection but lesser level ofskin protection needed. .,.' •Chemical suit, respirator self-contained (Tank type)

_ Level C: Lesser level of respiratory protection than Level B. Skinprotection criteria are similar to Level B.Chemical suit, cannister respirator/cartridge

Level D: Work uniform without any respirator or skin hazards..Lab coat, gloves etc.


Environmental Hazardous ___ Comb. (Env., & Haz.) ___ Radioactive

Site Name: £jZ .< T K/ -A ,fjC'// _________ Sampling Date :

/\

Sta No.Field pH:

(must be taken prior t/o submission o*f aqueous samples)

Sampler '.jAjW/Ufi ajL>0/5l>7 ______ Work Phone Number: 9/fi ¥32,s - — —Personal observations at time of sampling (surroundings) : - xf $•*£<£.£' (

Sample collection observations (physical sample, odors etc.) p'£?& '

AR3UI99"


HAZARD AND RISK EXPOSURE DATA SHEETLEVELS OF PERSONAL PROTECTION DURING SAMPLING

BACKGROUND


GENERAL

This form is to be used when collecting Environmental Samples (i.e. streams, farmponds, wells, soils etc.) and for Hazardous Samples (i.e. drums, storage tanks,lagoons, leachates, hazardous waste sites). This information is intended for use as aguide for the safe handling of these laboratory samples in accordance with EPA and OSHAregulations. The sample classification(s) and levels of personal protection used bythe sampler in all situations will enable the analyst to be better aware of potentialexposure to substances in air, splashes of liquids, or other direct contact withmaterial due to work being done.



____ Level B: Highest level of respiratory protection but lesser level ofskin protection needed.Chemical suit, respirator self-contained (Tank type)




Environmental .___Hazardous ___Comb. (Env. & Haz.) ___Radioactive

Site Name; /< f CffhtD /*&<*&'37 /(_____________Sampling Date: ^ —/

Sta No. MW~/fb, Mltf-fa,_____>______,______._____,_____,_____•_____-_____Field pH:/AX . tf.3& ,____,;____,____,____,____,____,____,____ I

(must be taken prior to submission of aqueous samples) I

Sampler: (--aAstfhs*? (--b &sfd&gK/_____Work Phone Number: *??£> ~—-p—

Personal observations at time of sampling (surroundings) : cg-g / S-ff r

Sample collection observations (physical sample, odors etc.)


nA7.Apn AND RISK EXPOSURE DATA SHEETLEVELS OF PERSONAL PROTECTION DURING SAMPLING

BACKGROUND

Under the authority of Section 104 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) of 1980, Section 311 of the CleanWater Act, and Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), EPA hasbeen delegated the responsibility to undertake response actions, with respect to the .,release or potential release of oil, petroleum, or hazardous substances that pose asubstantial threat to human health or welfare, or the environment.

GENERAL . • ; ' . <

This form is to be used when collecting Environmental Samples (i.e. streams, farmponds, wells, soils etc.) and for Hazardous Samples (i.e. drums, storage tanks,lagoons, leachates, hazardous waste sites). This information is intended for use as aguide for the safe handling of these laboratory samples in accordance with EPA and OSHAregulations. The sample classification(s) and levels of personal protection used bythe sampler in all situations will enable the analyst to be better aware of potentialexposure to substances in air, splashes of liquids, or other direct contact withmaterial due to work being done.

DEGREE O'F PROTECTION '

____ Level A: Highest level of respiratory, skin, and eye protection needed..Fully encapsulated suit, respirator self-contained (Tank type)

___ Level B: Highest level of respiratory protection but lesser level ofskin protection needed.Chemical suit, respirator self-contained (Tank type)




Environmental :___Hazardous ___Comb. (Env. & Haz.) ___Radioactive

Site Name: p-~JUd-$.7/9VL (—£z si<Z*T7 ('________Sampling Date:/_

Sta No.Field


Sampler; &-/>j ',*;<> *£/ £>-S&- ____________ Work Phone Number:

Personal observations at time- of sampling (surroundings): £>g_n /L/' *t /OCti.r>'.<VlJ>

Sample collection observations (physical sample, odors

r7

Documents

U.S. ERA Region IIIU.S. EPA Region in Central Regional Laboratory Annapolis, Maryland November 23, 1994 ANALYTICAL RESULTS I WYSTONS SANITATION LF OU-2 [R2Q94136] Dear chrlti Corbett,