3
   Executive Summary US 51 Alternative Selection Report January 2014 PROJECT OVERVIEW The US 51 Bridge Project proposes replacement or rehabilitation of the existing US 51 Bridge that connects Ballard County, Kentucky with Cairo, Illinois. The planning phase of this project was completed in 2014; this Executive Summary summarizes the findings of the planning phase. The US 51 Bridge carries US 51, US 60, and US 62 traffic across the Ohio River. It also provides a connection to the US 60/US 62 Mississippi River Bridge to Missouri, approximately ½ mile to the south. Maintaining the cross-river connectivity is important to the local communities, resident farms, and other businesses in the region. During the traffic counts completed in January 2013, over 150 large trucks (including farm, grain, and logging trucks) were observed using the US 51 bridge over an 8-hour period. If the US 51 Bridge were not available for local traffic, the detour trip between Wickliffe, KY and Cairo, IL increases from 7 miles to 80+ miles per direction. Adding approximately 70 miles per direction to trips between Illinois and Kentucky would be a hardship to area residents. This is especially true for the population of Cairo, IL which exhibits elevated concentrations of minority and low income populations, which rely on the US 51 Bridge to access jobs in Wickliffe, KY. On the Kentucky side of the river, the US 51 Bridge is essential to farmers. Agriculture is a major component of Ballard County’s economy and the bridge facilitates transport of crops and livestock from the county’s farms to the interstates and ports in Illinois. Existing US 51 Bridge PROJECT PURPOSE & NEED The primary purpose of the proposed project is to rehabilitate or replace the existing US 51 Ohio River Bridge in order to: improve or replace the functionally obsolete/structurally deficient bridge; maintain cross-river connectivity between Wickliffe, KY and Cairo, IL; and improve safety on the bridge and its approaches. CONDITION OF THE EXISTING BRIDGE The existing bridge was constructed between 1936 and 1938. The bridge is rated both Functionally Obsolete (because of its substandard geometric features) and Structurally Deficient (because the original design load for the bridge is less than today’s current design standards). This does not mean the existing bridge is unsafe. Following the 2012 inspection and 2013 load rating analysis, KYTC assigned the US 51 Bridge a sufficiency rating of 39.8 on a 100-point scale. Bridges considered structurally deficient or functionally obsolete with a sufficiency rating less than 50.0 are eligible for replacement with federal funds under the Federal-Aid Highway Bridge Replacement or Rehabilitation Program. The existing bridge was designed before seismic design was required. Applying today’s seismic design criteria, preliminary estimates indicate that severe damage or collapse is probable in the event of a major earthquake. The functional and geometric deficiencies affect the bridge’s ability to carry traffic over the river in an effective manner. Bridge Geometric Deficiencies: Narrow 10-foot lanes Narrow 1’-3” shoulders No accommodations for pedestrians or bicyclists One of the sag vertical curves in Span 2 does not meet current AASHTO design standards for headlight sight distance. The horizontal curve on the Kentucky approach does not meet current AASHTO or state design standards. US 51 OHIO RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT KYTC Item No. 1-100.00 & 1-1140.00 Wickliffe, KY to Cairo, IL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

US 51 OHIO RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT KYTC Item … Studies and Reports... · KYTC Item No. 1-100.00 & 1-1140.00 Wickliffe, KY to Cairo, IL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ... d L ap Rolin gs R d 1 S

  • Upload
    vuxuyen

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: US 51 OHIO RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT KYTC Item … Studies and Reports... · KYTC Item No. 1-100.00 & 1-1140.00 Wickliffe, KY to Cairo, IL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ... d L ap Rolin gs R d 1 S

      Executive Summary US 51 Alternative Selection Report 

January 2014 

PROJECT OVERVIEW The US 51 Bridge Project proposes replacement or rehabilitation of the existing US 51 Bridge that connects Ballard County, Kentucky with Cairo, Illinois. The planning phase of this project was completed in 2014; this Executive Summary summarizes the findings of the planning phase. The US 51 Bridge carries US 51, US 60, and US 62 traffic across the Ohio River. It also provides a connection to the US 60/US 62 Mississippi River Bridge to Missouri, approximately ½ mile to the south. Maintaining the cross-river connectivity is important to the local communities, resident farms, and other businesses in the region. During the traffic counts completed in January 2013, over 150 large trucks (including farm, grain, and logging trucks) were observed using the US 51 bridge over an 8-hour period. If the US 51 Bridge were not available for local traffic, the detour trip between Wickliffe, KY and Cairo, IL increases from 7 miles to 80+ miles per direction. Adding approximately 70 miles per direction to trips between Illinois and Kentucky would be a hardship to area residents. This is especially true for the population of Cairo, IL which exhibits elevated concentrations of minority and low income populations, which rely on the US 51 Bridge to access jobs in Wickliffe, KY. On the Kentucky side of the river, the US 51 Bridge is essential to farmers. Agriculture is a major component of Ballard County’s economy and the bridge facilitates transport of crops and livestock from the county’s farms to the interstates and ports in Illinois.

Existing US 51 Bridge

PROJECT PURPOSE & NEED The primary purpose of the proposed project is to rehabilitate or replace the existing US 51 Ohio River Bridge in order to: improve or replace the functionally obsolete/structurally deficient bridge; maintain cross-river connectivity between Wickliffe, KY and Cairo, IL; and improve safety on the bridge and its approaches. CONDITION OF THE EXISTING BRIDGE The existing bridge was constructed between 1936 and 1938. The bridge is rated both Functionally Obsolete (because of its substandard geometric features) and Structurally Deficient (because the original design load for the bridge is less than today’s current design standards). This does not mean the existing bridge is unsafe. Following the 2012 inspection and 2013 load rating analysis, KYTC assigned the US 51 Bridge a sufficiency rating of 39.8 on a 100-point scale. Bridges considered structurally deficient or functionally obsolete with a sufficiency rating less than 50.0 are eligible for replacement with federal funds under the Federal-Aid Highway Bridge Replacement or Rehabilitation Program. The existing bridge was designed before seismic design was required. Applying today’s seismic design criteria, preliminary estimates indicate that severe damage or collapse is probable in the event of a major earthquake. The functional and geometric deficiencies affect the bridge’s ability to carry traffic over the river in an effective manner. Bridge Geometric Deficiencies:

Narrow 10-foot lanes Narrow 1’-3” shoulders No accommodations for pedestrians or

bicyclists One of the sag vertical curves in Span 2

does not meet current AASHTO design standards for headlight sight distance.

The horizontal curve on the Kentucky approach does not meet current AASHTO or state design standards.

US 51 OHIO RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT KYTC Item No. 1-100.00 & 1-1140.00

Wickliffe, KY to Cairo, IL

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Page 2: US 51 OHIO RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT KYTC Item … Studies and Reports... · KYTC Item No. 1-100.00 & 1-1140.00 Wickliffe, KY to Cairo, IL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ... d L ap Rolin gs R d 1 S

      Executive Summary US 51 Alternative Selection Report 

January 2014 

Currently the bridge is allowed to carry legal loads, but permit loads (i.e. oversize or overweight vehicles) are not allowed. Under the no-build scenario it is anticipated the bridge would be closed to truck traffic around 2025 and closed to all traffic around 2030.

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS The 2013 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volume on the US 51 Bridge is 5,400 vehicles per day (vpd). Approximately 35% of the bridge traffic is trucks. By 2040, the bridge AADT is anticipated to increase to 6,200 vpd, which translates to 370 vehicles per hour traveling in the peak direction during the 2040 design hour. Based on these volumes, a two lane facility provides adequate capacity for anticipated future traffic demands. CRASHES AND SAFETY During October 2008-September 2012, there were 18 vehicle crashes on the bridge between the 20 mph curve in Kentucky and the US 60/US 62/US 51 intersection in Illinois. Of these, there were no fatalities and one injury collision. Crashes were largely concentrated at either end of the bridge. The bridge approach in Kentucky has a critical rate factor (CRF) of 1.13 and the bridge approach in Illinois has a CRF of 1.52; both are considered high crash spots under KYTC analysis methodology. The primary crash types were sideswipes and single vehicle collisions. INPUT During coordination activities in April and May 2013, agencies, local officials, and members of the public were given opportunities to review and comment on the range of alternatives considered. Input indicated that the bridge is a vital link for farming operations; therefore, closures and lane restrictions should be minimized during any future construction efforts. Survey respondents indicated a strong preference for constructing a new river crossing at or near the existing location.

RECOMMENDATION Combined Alternate 2 shown in the attached map is recommended to advance for additional development. Combined Alternate 2 represents a range of potential crossing locations located upstream of the current US 51 Bridge structure - within 2,000 feet of its present location. In future project development phases, designers should look at alignment, cross-section, and bridge type options that best fit within this corridor. Cable stay, truss, and arch bridges are all considered suitable bridge types at this location. Combined Alternate 2 is approximately 1.8 miles in length and would require a horizontal clearance of 900 feet for the navigational channel based on correspondence provided by the US Coast Guard. A vertical clearance of at least 113 feet above the zero gage at Cairo is recommended for the mid 700-foot portion of the primary navigation channel. Final vertical clearance requirements will be determined in future phases of project development when more detailed information is available. Construction is estimated to cost $180-210 million¹ depending on the selected cross-section.

Combined Alternate 2 Planning Level Cost Estimate 

(44 ft Clear Roadway Width on Bridge) 

Phase  Cost (millions)¹ 

Design  $25.2 

Right‐of‐Way  $0.9 

Utilities  $0.1 

Construction  $210.0 

Total  $236.2 

EVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS FOR RECOMMNED ALTERNATE A windshield survey was conducted in Fall 2013 to identify environmental concerns that should be addressed as part of any future project development activities. The survey found the following environmental considerations in the Combined Alternative 2 footprint that will require further analysis in future project phases:

Habitat for endangered species: Indiana bat, Gray bat, listed mussel species, pallid sturgeon

Potential bald eagle habitat, including a known nest site in the vicinity

Streams, Floodplains, & Wetlands Potential for economic effects associated with

barge moorings along shore

Narrow lanes and shoulders

¹ Cost Estimates in 2013 Dollars

Page 3: US 51 OHIO RIVER BRIDGE PROJECT KYTC Item … Studies and Reports... · KYTC Item No. 1-100.00 & 1-1140.00 Wickliffe, KY to Cairo, IL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ... d L ap Rolin gs R d 1 S

Z

Zh

ê

Æe

"K

4

ÆJ

4

"K

"K

ÆJ

"K

ï

ï

!y

îî

î îî

î

î

î

îî

î

î

îî

î

î

î

î

î

î

î

î

î

î

î

î

î

î

îî

î

î

î

îîî

î

î

î

ï

ÆJ

ï

§¦57

£¤51

£¤60

£¤62

£¤51

£¤60

¹·286

¹·1105¹·37

1290

1368

Holloway Landing Rd

Cairo

Hollo

way R

d

Crews Rd

Gum Corner Rd

King Rd

212

V F W Rd

Redmond Rd

Bord

en R

d

Oldham Rd

Adkin

s Dixo

n Rd

Curtis Rd

Sallie

Cric

e Rd

28Th St

Monroe Dr

Levee Rd

Swan

Lake

Rd

Lap Rollings Rd

1St S

t

Commerce Ave

Prairie Lake Rd

205

301

34Th St

Sleepy Rd

Ohio St

Washington Ave

Fish Lake Rd

24Th St

Hancock Rd

23Rd St

33Rd St

J Joh

nson

Rd

6Th S

t

Jim Ireland Rd

Terrell Rd

204

Coun

ty Fa

rm R

d

Hugh

es R

d

Wall St

Park Ave

17Th S

t

Leasetown Rd

19Th S

t

30Th St

Stev

e Den

ton R

d

Lake Dr

Edwa

rds R

d

22Nd St

5Th S

t

18Th St

8Th St

Dynamite Rd

10Th S

t

Illinois

Bob L

n

Main St

Libert

y Rd

9Th St

14Th S

t

20Th St

Railroad St

27Th S

t

Sheppard Ln

16Th St

26Th St

21St S

t

7Th S

t

11Th St

Allen Ln

Beac

h Ridg

e Rd

12Th S

t

4Th St

Cedar St

Court St

Center

St

Flat L

ake L

n

Lisa D

r

Clay St

Hartm

an Ln

Farmers St

2Nd St

Fort Defience Rd

39Th St

Cemeta

ry Hill R

d

3Rd S

t

Crys

tal La

ke R

d

Armstrong Ln

Elm St

Taylo

r Dr

Cane

Cree

k Cuto

ff Rd

Turner Ln

Pine St

Short St

38Th St

Charles Ln

Circle DrKentu

cky S

t

Cairo Holloway Rd

Beach Ridge Rd

V F W Rd

Redmond Rd

Elm St

1St S

t

Terrell Rd

6Th St

Levee Rd

6Th S

t

7Th St

Fish Lake Rd

9Th S

t

205

£¤60

£¤51

£¤62

£¤62

¹·3

Cairo

Wickliffe

Barlow

MoundCity

Wyatt

Deep

Slou

gh

CaneCre ek

Shawnee Creek

B uzza rd C re e k

CacheR iver

H aze l C re ek

S odo m C re ek

L ittle Sha w nee C r e ek

M in o r S loug h

S a ndy S lo u gh

K in g C r e

ek

C ypr e

ssS l

oug h

S te venso n B ayo u

C o t ton w o o d S lo u g h

Ohio River

Mississippi River

KENTUCKY

MISSOURIILLINOIS

MISSOURI

KENT

UCKY

ILLIN

OIS

Mississippi River

Alex

ande

r Cou

nty

Alex

ande

r Cou

nty

Combin

edAlter

nate2

E x is t in g U S 5 1 B r id g e

R e c o m m e n d e dN e w B r id g e C o r r id o r

WickliffeWyatt

Balla

rd C

ounty

Alexander County

Miss

issipp

i Cou

nty

Pulaski County

Boatwright WMA

N

0 2,000 4,000Feet

US 51Ohio River Bridge

RecommendedAlternate

0 0.5 1Miles

InterstateUS HighwayState HighwayLocal RoadRailroadState BoundaryCounty BoundaryStudy AreaStreamsCombined Alternate 2

Community ResourcesÆe Airport!y Boat Rampï Cemetery"K Health FacilityÆJ Park4 School

Major Employersê Industrial Areah Marine Transportation