8/14/2019 URITKCRPeerRubric
1/3
F08 CR EVAL RUBRIC PREVIEW
Actions
New Page
Recent Changes
Manage Wiki
Search
Navigation
URITK Lounge
...Suggestion Box
...Your 2
EDP 631 Home
...Syllabus
...Paper Topics
EDC 484 Home
...Syllabus/Schedule
...Student Profiles
...Teaching Rationales
...Student Journals
...IPlans
...Lrng fr Clsrm Assess
...Shared Contributions
...Student Wikispaces
...Unit Plans
...CT Advice
...Advice fr Last Year
...Teaching Resources
...Graduation Gifts
Alumni Home
Reference Shelf
...Learning Theories
...Learning Lexicon
fogleman My Account Help Sign Out
Peer Evaluation / Feedback for EDC 102 Context
Statement
Author: (Person who wrote report.)
Editor: (Person evaluating report.)
Total Score for this Evaluation: _/35 pts
The purpose of the context statement in EDC 102 is to provide
each student with an
opportunity to demonstrate his or her ability to research a
school, its district, and its
community in order to better understand its strengths and
challenges. Each report
should describe their school based solely on evidence that they
cite in their
Reference section.
As a peer editor, your tasks are:
Read author's report.
Carefully evaluate report by assigning a score for each
criterion
provide constructive comments that will help the strengthen the
author's
report for each category.
Create a link to your evaluation at the end of the report.
Rubric
Introduction = REPLACEWITHSCORE/ 5 pts.
5 - Intro provides an
overview of the
upcoming analysis,
including what
school/district
/community is being
analyzed, what
aspects are being
analyzed, and who
the report is
intended to inform.
4 - Intro names the
school/district
/community and
previews the
scope of the
report, but does
not describe who
the report is
intended to inform.
3 - Intro names
the
school/district
/community but
not much else.
2 - Intro fails
to name the
school,
district, and
community.
0 - No
introduction
section is
apparent.
page
discussion history notify me
8/14/2019 URITKCRPeerRubric
2/3
...RI Schools Map
...Learning Taxonomies
...URI Library
...Wikispaces Tips
...Job Search
SOE Resources
...Test Prep
...Advising FAQ
...Pathways in Science
...Stu Tchg Prep
...GPA Calculator
...URI Calendar
URITK Research
... CR Project
... EIP Project
Archives
...EDC 102 F07
...EDC 430/1 F07
...EDC 484/5 S08
...EDC 430 F08
...EDC 102 F08
...URITK Basement
edit navigation
Constructive comments about report's introduction:
Organization = REPLACEWITHSCORE / 5 pts.
5 - Report includes anIntroduction, a
Conclusion, and sections
for the School, District,
and Community. Within
each section, paragraphs
logically group the
information presented.
4 - Report includesall of the sections
mentioned
previously, but does
not break down
information into
paragraphs within
each section.
3 - Reportis missing
one of the
sections.
2 - Reportis missing
more than
one
section.
0 - Reportdoes not
include any
sections.
Strengths and constructive comments about report's
organization:
Mechanics = REPLACEWITHSCORE / 5 pts.
5 - All information
in the report is
cited using APA
styled- citations
after the
information and in
a Reference
section at the end
of the report.
and
There are
extremely few
typos and
misspelled words
in the report.
4 - Most
information is
cited using
APA style.
and/or
There are a
noticeable
number of
typos or
misspellings.
3 - Some citations
in the References
section are not in
APA style, e.g.
URLs are listed
without the title of
the website.
and/or
There are many
typos,
misspellings, or
other writing
errors.
2 - Most of the
report's
information is
not cited, or
APA style was
not used.
0 - Report
does not
include a
Reference
section.
Strengths and constructive comments about report's
organization:
Conclusion = REPLACEWITHSCORE / 5 pts.
5 - Conclusion reviews
analysis of school, district
4 - Conclusion
reviews analysis of
3 - Conclusion
does not refer
0 - No
conclusion
