Upload
jocelyn-bowser
View
221
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Urban timber volume estimation
How to measure forests in urban areas with limited resources
Technische Universität München
Content
1. Need of forest measurements2. Single tree volume measurement3. Measuring forest stands4. Methodological background5. Urban forest cover6. Application in Dar es Salaam7. Draft results8. Considerations9. References
Technische Universität München
2
Need of forest measurements
Three principle reasons (WEST, 2004):1. To help with decisions about how to manage forest at different scales
(timber import/export; source of employment/water supply; contribution to income)
2. To assist their management (level of change over time; timber supply in the long term)
3. Research (factors determining forest growth; climate impacts; etc.)
Technische Universität München
3
Single tree volume measurement Technische Universität München
Function Species and location
Vu=0,298*D²*H Eucalyptus regnans, New Zealand
Vu=0,005+0,330*D²*H Pinus taeda, southern USA
Vo=0,450*D1.92*H0.90 Juniperus procera, Ethiopia
Pictures from AVERY & BURKHARD, 2002; table below adapted from WEST, 2004
4
Measuring forest stands
1. Using stand volume tables: limited to monocultures, no dynamics
Technische Universität München
Stand volume table for Scots Pine in north eastern Germany (LEMBCKE, KNAPP & DITTMAR, 2000)5
Measuring forest stands
2. Conduct a complete survey, i.e. measuring all trees of a single forest stand: limited to small stands (time and cost intense)
3. Conduct an inventory, i.e. measuring samples of the forest stand: different inventory designs• Random sampling• Block sampling• Stratified sampling• Systematic sampling• …• …
Technische Universität München
Problem: they all need ground measurements…
6
Methodological background
How to measure forest where resources (time, money, persons, access rights etc.) are limited?Idea: To adapt the statement: “…FAO estimated total growing stock by taking subregional averages of growing stock per hectare and multiplying these by the forest area for the respective years.“ (FAO 2010)for our UMT and LC Analysis
Technische Universität München
7
Urban forest cover
Part of the LC-analysis Tree cover classes according to FAO landcover classes have to be defined Def. of forest (FAO 2010): land spanning more than 0.5 ha with a minimum tree
height of 5m and at least 10% tree cover Def. of OWL: …5-10% tree cover or accumulated cover of trees, shrubs and
bushes above 10%
UMTs with tree cover
Land cover analysis
UMTs
Technische Universität München
8
Application in Dar es Salaam
Case study: Dar es Salaam (area of whole city according to UMT map approximately 1500 km²?)
Inputs: aerial image of 2008 (pixel size approximately 0,45m*0,45m), Urban Morphology Type Map (extent covering approximately 390 km²)
first land cover analyses for UMTs „1.3 Mixed farming“ and „2.5 Bushland“
Differentiated tree cover by tree/crown size for Dar 2 classes distinguished by crown diameter (threshold 6m
diameter):– Large trees– Small trees/shrubs
Technische Universität München
9
UMT Code UMT Class
Polygon count
Area_Sum [sq_km] Area [ha]
# Sample points
1.3 Mixed farming 12 49,072683 4907,27 400
2.5 Bushland 16 8,28113 828,11 100
Draft results Technische Universität München
10
bare ground/soil
grasses large trees sand small trees/shrubs
05
101520253035404550
surface share in UMT 2.5 Bushland (100 sample points)
%
bare gr
ound/soil
cultiva
ted cr
ops
grasse
s
large
tree
s
palm tr
ees
sand
small
tree
s/shru
bs
urban
stru
ctures
IIwate
r05
10152025303540
surface share in UMT 1.3 Mixed farming (400 sample points)
%
LC-type
Land cover within UMT
1.3
Growing Stock per ha (FAO
2010, Tab 10) [m³/ha]
Growing stock in
UMT [m³]Large trees 2,75%
10(OWL) 490727
Small trees/ shrubs
12,75%
LC-type
Land cover within UMT
2.5
Growing Stock per ha (FAO
2010, Tab 10) [m³/ha]
Growing stock in
UMT [m³]Large trees 2,00%
10(OWL) 82811
Small trees/ shrubs
39,00%
Considerations
Calculated volumes are intended to act as general overview/orientation Range of tree species might differ from rural areas Ground truthing to validate Method is applicable to each case study city with an UMT mapping and
LC-analysis Single trees grow different compared to trees in forest stands Forest growth calculation is dependant from standing volumes Can be the basis for estimation of the biomass and carbon sequestration
Technische Universität München
11
References
Avery, T.E., Burkhart, H.E., 2002: Forest Measurements, Fifth Edition; McGraw-Hill Series in Forest Resources
FAO 2010: Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 – Main Report; FAO Forestry Paper 163; Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations, Rome
Lembcke, Knapp, Dittmar, 2000: Ertragstafel für die Kiefer (Pinus sylvestris L.) im nordostdeutschen Tiefland; Landesforstanstalt Eberswald
West, P.W., 2004: Tree and Forest Measurement; Springer-Verlag, Berlin Zöhrer, F., 1980: Forstinventur, ein Leitfaden für Studium und Praxis; Pareys
Studientexte 26; Verlag Paul Parey, Hamburg und Berlin
Technische Universität München