18
Upgrade of the VLBA C- Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis Dinwiddie (Mechanical Design) Everett Callan (Master Receiver Builder) Gordon Coutts & Craig Hennies (OMT Testing) Marian Pospieszalski & the CDL Amplifier Group Pat Madigan & the VLA Machine Shop Michael Hedrick & the Green Bank Machine Shop

Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver

Design ReviewPresented by S durand

Designed by Bob Hayward and:Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design)

Hollis Dinwiddie (Mechanical Design)

Everett Callan (Master Receiver Builder)

Gordon Coutts & Craig Hennies (OMT Testing)

Marian Pospieszalski & the CDL Amplifier Group

Pat Madigan & the VLA Machine Shop

Michael Hedrick & the Green Bank Machine Shop

21 April 2011

Page 2: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

• Astronomers were eager to:• Access the Methanol Maser at 6,668 MHz GHz• Access to OH at 6016-6049 MHz• Carry out continuum observations with two IF’s separated

by several GHz to allow the effects of the atmosphere to be subtracted out

Example : IF-AC=4.0-4.5 and ID-BD=7.5-8.0 GHz

• Limitations of the existing C-Band system:• Mediocre sensitivity due to old GAsFET LNA’s• Narrow bandwidth due to:

– Septum Polarizer (4.5-5.2 GHz)– LNA’s (4.5-5.2 GHz)– Warm IF (4.5-5.2 GHz)– T105 Conversion (4.5-5.2 GHz)

Why Upgrade the VLBA C-band ?

Page 3: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

T(Rx) for Old VLBA vs. New EVLA Rx’sAverage of 8 Dual-Channel Receivers

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.00

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Receiver Noise Temperature - VLBA vs. EVLA Receivers

VLBA RxEVLA Rx

Frequency (GHz)

Noi

se T

emp

erat

ure

(K

)

Page 4: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

Required Specifications

• To modify the VLBA Receiver to give us the RF performance that is as close to that achieved by an EVLA Receiver as possible.

Page 5: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

Sri’s VLBA 4-8 GHz Feed Design

• Profiled Corrugated Horn• Four machined sections • Ring-Loaded Mode Converter• Plugs into old feed location• Total Length = 37.5”• Outer Diameter = 18.5”• Weight = 55 lbs

Page 6: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

Installation of the New Feed at VLBA Pie Town• Done with Feed S/N 01• And Unmodified C-Band Rx• Uses a Transition Plate so an

old Receiver can be attached to a new Feed and thus allow installation of lateral support brackets and turnbuckles.

• Luckily feed is small enough to fit through the hatch (i.e., a crane is not required for hoisting it over the dish).

Page 7: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

Existing VLBA C-Band Receiver

SeptumPol

RCP

LCP

LNA

LNA

PamtechCTB1107

PamtechCTB1107

Omni-Spectra2089-6203-00

T

-30 dB

Narda4014C-30

AtlanticMicrowaveAMC 0935

GAsFET4.5-5.2 GHz

GAsFET4.5-5.2 GHz

TNoiseDiode+20

-10 dB

High-Cal( Not implemented on VLBA)

TNoiseDiode

-6 dB

Omni-Spectra2020-6617-10

Om

ni-S

pectra

2020-6616-06

PulseCal

TCal

PA

Reactel6B1-4850-700S12

4.5-5.2 GHz

MiteqAMF-2B-4552

4.5-5.2 GHz

DitomD3I4080-14-8 GHz

DitomD3I4080-14-8 GHz

PA

Reactel6B1-4850-700S12

4.5-5.2 GHz

MiteqAMF-2B-4552

4.5-5.2 GHz

DitomD3I4080-14-8 GHz

DitomD3I4080-14-8 GHz

T

Narda4014C-30

-30 dB

TCal

& PCal

TCal

& PCal

PCal

The Cryogenic Pamtech Isolators were a surprise. There was no mention of them in the VLBA Technical Report #3. There must have been added after the 1st prototype Receiver was built.

Keep

New

N/A

Toss

Key:

Cryo

Page 8: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

Upgraded VLBA C-Band ReceiverO

MT

T

-30 dB

RCP

LCP

TCal

TCal

& PCal

PCal

LNA

LNA

Hyb

rid

Dorado3ICC60-1

Dorado3ICC60-1

Mac

tech

CA

7205

U

In HEMT4-8 GHz

InP HEMT4-8 GHz

-30 dB

T

Narda4014C-30

Narda4014C-30

Omni-Spectra2089-6203-00

T

NoiseDiode

-10 dB

Noise/ComNC3205-G

10 dB

Omni-Spectra2020-6617-10

PulseCal

TCal

& PCal

RCP4-8 GHz

Out

PA

TTEK5221-4/8G

4-8 GHz

CiaoCA48-281G=26dB

DitomD3I4080-14-8 GHz

DitomD3I4080-14-8 GHz

PA

TTEK5221-4/8G

4-8 GHz

CiaoCA48-281G=26dB

LCP4-8 GHz

Out

DitomD3I4080-14-8 GHz

DitomD3I4080-14-8 GHz

Note that we leave out the High-Cal feature, which has never been used on the VLBA

Keep

New

N/A

Toss

Key:

Cryo

Page 9: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

Modifications & Problems• Making the modifications to the RF path of the receiver were

relatively straight forward.• However, cooling the beast was a problem.

– The old VLBA receiver had its Septum Polarizer tied to the 50°K Stage.

– We wanted the new OMT to be tied to the 15°K Stage since it has more resistive losses.

• Hollis spent quite a while fighting to minimize the final temperature that the 15°K Stage reached.– It was hard to get it much below 30°K and the temperature was very

dependent on how many other receivers were on the same Helium line.

– Required reducing the weight of the OMT as well as adding Space Blankets around the 50°K Radiation Shield.

• It was also decided that the Thermal Gap assembly used in the EVLA design would need to be improved.

Page 10: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

EVLA-StyleOMT &

Thermal Gap

Includes:

“Old” Thermal Gap+

Heavy Blocks+

Absorber Strip

AN72 Absorber wrapped around

Thermal Gapto prevent

Cavity Resonances.

Page 11: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

VLBA-StyleOMT &

Thermal Gap

Includes:

New Circular Thermal Gapwith Choke Ring and long standoffs

+“Swiss Cheese” Blocks

to reduce thermal mass

+Mount for Hybridmakes for an integrated

Circular Polarizer

Page 12: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

Recent Cool-down Results• Thanks to Hollis’ new Thermal Gap Assembly, the

Model 22 is now cooling the RF Tree in the Prototype Receiver down to acceptable temperature levels.

• The 15°K Cold Stage temperature is also less susceptible to variations from other fridges being connected to the Helium lines:– ~12-14°K when alone– ~14-16°K with one Model 350 on the loop– ~16-18°K with two Model 350 on the loop

• The 2 x Model 350 scenario is what occurs on a VLBA Antenna.

• VLBA C-Bands typically 15-25°K

Page 13: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

VLBA C-Band Prototype (VC#11)

Page 14: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.00

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Receiver Noise Temperature on VLBA C-Band #11-RCPUnmod (Circ) & Modified (Linear) Rx vs. EVLA Rx C#16 (Circ)

(RHH : 13 April 2011)

VLBA C#11, Unmodified, CircularEVLA C#16, Old T-Gap, CircularVLBA C#11, New T-Gap, Linear

Frequency (GHz)

Rec

eive

r T

emp

erat

ure

(K

)Early RF Sensitivity Tests on VC#11Old EVLA vs. New VLBA Thermal Gap

Using the new T-Gap assembly with its proper Choke Ring yields a vast improvement over that

achieved on the EVLA with the old T-Gap design.

Page 15: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

VLBA C-Band ReceiverOld vs. Interim vs. New Configuration

C

RCP

LCP

RCP

LCP

Old T1054.5-5.2 GHzConverter

Module

4.5-5.2GHz

L104 #2

IF OutputA & C

500-1000 MHz4.5-5.2 GHz

C

RCP

LCP

RCP

LCP

New T4054 - 8 GHzConverter

Module

4.0-8.0GHz

IF OutputA, B, C & D

500-1000 MHz

4.0-8.0 GHz

L104 #2

L104 #3

Old C-Band Rx with Old T105

Modified C-Band Rx with New T405

C

RCP

LCP

RCP

LCP

Old T1054.5-5.2 GHzConverter

Module

4.5-5.2 GHz

4.0-8.0GHz

IF OutputA & C

500-1000 MHz4.0-8.0 GHz

(From old Rx) L104 #2

4.5-5.2GHz

Modified C-Band Rx with Old T105 SMA

Page 16: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

Downconverter Design3900-5900 and 5600-7900MHz

Front Panel

Front Panel

Front Panel

Front Panel

3400 to 8600 MHz

512 to 1024 MHz3900 to 5900

5600 to 7900

Page 17: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

Conclusions• Thanks to the new Thermal Gap design, the

upgraded VLBA C-Band is now superior to the EVLA receiver.

• Expect T(Rx) < 10°K from 4.2-8.0 GHz• It is now probably the most sensitive

wideband system in the world at this frequency.

Page 18: Upgrade of the VLBA C-Band Feed & Receiver Design Review Presented by S durand Designed by Bob Hayward and: Sivasankaran Srikanth (Feed Design) Hollis

Questions ?