Upload
riona
View
37
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Update on the Diphoton + MET Analysis. Bruce Schumm, channeling Ben Auerbach (Argonne), Osamu Jinnouchi (Tokyo Tech), Susan Fowler (Penn) UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 6 March 2014 SUSY General Analysis Meeting. Conference Note public in early January: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Update on the Diphoton + MET Analysis
Bruce Schumm, channeling Ben Auerbach (Argonne), Osamu
Jinnouchi (Tokyo Tech), Susan Fowler (Penn)
UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP
6 March 2014 SUSY General Analysis Meeting
06 March 2014 2
Conference Note public in early January:
Search for Supersymmetry in Diphoton Events with Large MissingTransverse Momentum in 8 TeV pp Collision Data with the ATLASDetector
ATLAS-CONF-2014-001
List of Tasks generated to move from note to paper…
04 June 2013 3
First: MC performance on tight-tight sample
LocHadTopo has slightly larger tails than MetRefFinal
04 June 2013 4
• QCDtg+Iso close to tight-tight (signal) distribution proxy for high MET• QCDtg provides good representation of tight-tight MET distribution• QCDg+Iso also looks good but statistics are low.
04 June 2013 5
• For LocHadTopo, both QCDtg and QCDg seen to provide a good representation of the tight-tight MET distribution (again, using QCDtg-Iso as a proxy at high MET)
16 July 2013 6
Next: Signal Regions
We define five signal regions, for:
• Strong production, high and low bino mass (SP1,SP2)• Weak production, high and low bino mass (WP1,WP2)• Choose MET cut to suppress backgrounds (MIS)
04 June 2013 7
Direct Background Estimate Methodology
A CB
e.g. for signal region WP2
Estimate = C*(A/B)
Nominal control sample is QCDtg_50_noIso
This is METRefFinal; can also look at QCDtg and QCDg of LocHadTopo
Met
Ref
Fin
al
Met
Ref
Fin
al
19 December 2012 8
Nominal QCD Background
Control Region Study
19 December 2012 9
We have performed the WP2 QCD background estimate without the \dphij cut, finding that the expected background rises from $0.90 \pm 0.35$ to $1.7 \pm 0.5$. It should be noted that the background would be expected to rise with the removal of the \dphij cut; if the `gg' distribution of Fig.~\ref{fig:dphij} is the correct distribution of the WP2 QCD background, this increase would be about 20\%, to 1.1 events. The observed value of 1.7 events is approximately 50% higher than this, which we interpret as an additional 50% systematic uncertainty on both the WP2 and MIS QCD background estimates.
DPHI_JET_MET SYSTEMATIC
19 December 2012 10
QCDg+Iso Comparison
LocHadTopo Comparison
16 July 2013 11
SP1 Meff
Extrapolations
16 July 2013 12
SP2 Meff
Extrapolations
16 July 2013 13
Combining all the above information yields the following overall result for
QCD background(See Note for justifications…)
04 June 2013 14
Electroweak Backgrounds (W, ttbar, etc.)
~75% involve e fake; much of remainder incorporatedin QCD backgrounds
Reconstruct e sample; scale by measured e fake rate
+/- 25% uncertainty from non e fake processes
+/- 10% uncertainty from fake rate measurement
04 June 2013 15
e Fake Rate Results
04 June 2013 16
e Sample Statistics and EW Background Estimates
04 June 2013 17
Irreducible Backgrounds
Z; Z
• Small contribution • NLO K-factor 2.0 +/- 0.3 (well understood) Estimate directly from MC
W; Wl
• Larger contribution• NLO K-factor 3.0 +/- 3.0• Dominant background systematic Constrain with new data-driven study
04 June 2013 18
W K Factor
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1103.4613v1.pdf
LO “radiation zero” eliminated at NLOGrows with hardness of radiation Rapidly-varying function of W system recoil
04 June 2013 19
Can we constrain the W K factorwith an lgg (l = e,) sample?
Ben Auerbach
04 June 2013 20
Choose study region to be • 50 < MET < 250 (leave MIS signal region blind)
• PT(l) > 100
Ben Auerbach
Nexpected = 7.4 (6.5 W)
Nobserved = 7.0
K factor of 3.0 +\- 1.2
16 July 2013 21
Irreducible background results
And then putting it all together…
16 July 2013 22
60 < MET < 100 Sideband Studies – No Dphi cut
100 < MET < 150 Sideband Studies – No Dphi cut
16 July 2013 23
60 < MET < 100 Sideband – Dphi_g_MET > 0.5
100 < MET < 150 Sideband – Dphi_g_MET > 0.5
16 July 2013 24
Wrap-Up
• Preliminary estimates of background completed
• Note updated with new background studies (nearly done) ATL-COM-PHYS-2013-109
• Addressing comments from prior review (before p1328/p1181 MET changes that threw us back)
• Starting to build toward request for unblinding
• In the mean time, are developing limit-setting approach, and beginning to evaluate signal systematics
04 June 2013 25
MET Issues
• Are latest (“post-Moriond”?) object definitions included in p3128 EGamma10NoTauLoose MET?
• We will need in any case to assemble our own “fluctuated” EGamma10NoTauLoose in order to do systematic studies
• But for now, background estimates largely insensitive to MET systematics (data-driven), so could use intrinsic p1328 variable if “approved”
• Will definitely need to be able to assemble EGamma10NoTauLoose from scratch soon though.