16
Diphoton + MET Analysis Update Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 3 April 2013 Editorial Board Meeting

Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

  • Upload
    anais

  • View
    26

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Diphoton + MET Analysis Update. Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 3 April 2013 Editorial Board Meeting. In January, we were preparing to unblind our two strong-production analyses Many studies had been done and we were addressing finer points in assuring that backgrounds were understood - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

Bruce Schumm

UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP

3 April 2013 Editorial Board Meeting

Page 2: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

03 April 2013 2

In January, we were preparing to unblind our two strong-production analyses

Many studies had been done and we were addressing finer points in assuring that backgrounds were understood

We were then asked to move to p1328

EGamma10NoTauLooseRef had been chosen for p1181 after substantial study

Studies needed to be redone for p1328; several questions raised that we have been exploring since then

This update will be solely on our MET studies & status since then.

Page 3: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

03 April 2013 3

MET performance of new variables, vs. old: DATA

• Points are p1181 EGamma10NoTauLooseRef (prior chosen variable)

• LocHadTopo did not change between p1181 and p1328

Numbers of events in last two bins

Tight-tight (signal) sample, blinded for MET>100

Page 4: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

03 April 2013 4

LocHadTopo

Others

p1328

p1181

MET performance of new variables, vs. old: MC• Gamma-gamma MC; 18 GeV filter

• Limited tails for LocHadTopo (more stats on way…)

Page 5: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

03 April 2013 5

Control Samples: MC• Signal (gg,GG) is from gamma-gamma MC

• Control samples (QCDtg, QCDg) from gamma-jet MC

• Control photon in control sample NOT ISOLATED

Proposed nominal control sample

Page 6: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

03 April 2013 6

Control Samples: MC

• EGamma10NoTauLoose in p1328

Page 7: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

03 April 2013 7

Control Samples: MC

• LocHadTopo in p1328

Page 8: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

03 April 2013 8

Control Samples: MC

• MetRefFinal in p1328

Page 9: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

03 April 2013 9

Control Samples: DATA

• QCDg

• Significant change between p1181 and p1328

p1181

p1328

P1328 MetRefFinal

Page 10: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

03 April 2013 10

Control Samples: DATA

• QCDtg

• Significant change between p1181 and p1328, although not as much as for QCDg

Page 11: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

03 April 2013 11

Control Samples: DATA (shows higher MET)

• EGamma10NoTauLoose in p1328

Signal (blinded)

Good proxy for signal?

Page 12: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

03 April 2013 12

Control Samples: DATA (shows higher MET)

• LocHadTopo in p1328

Page 13: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

03 April 2013 13

Control Samples: DATA (shows higher MET)

• MetRefFinal in p1328

• Again QCDtg looks OK but QCDg not as good

Page 14: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

03 April 2013 14

CONCLUSIONS/OUTLOOK FOR p1328

Hope to get more statistics for gamma-gamma MC by raising filtering thresholds; being generated now. But for now:

LocHadTopo• Has smallest tails for tight-tight sample• All control samples look very good (including high-statistics QCDg-noIso, which was used for 7 TeV)

MetRefFinal• Bigger tails for tight-tight sample• QCDtg-noIso and QCDg-iso control samples look OK

EGamma10NoTauLoose• Bigger tails• No acceptable control samples

Page 15: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

03 April 2013 15

Page 16: Diphoton + MET Analysis Update

03 April 2013 16