47
University of Groningen Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Verbeek, Hans IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2015 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Verbeek, H. (2015). Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: from diagnosis to treatment. [S.n.]. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 05-06-2021

University of Groningen Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma ......3 ((thyroid* or thyreoid*) adj6 (neoplas* or cancer or carcinoma* or macrocarcinoma* or microcarcinoma* or tumo?r*)).tw,ot

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • University of Groningen

    Medullary Thyroid CarcinomaVerbeek, Hans

    IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite fromit. Please check the document version below.

    Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

    Publication date:2015

    Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

    Citation for published version (APA):Verbeek, H. (2015). Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: from diagnosis to treatment. [S.n.].

    CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of theauthor(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

    Take-down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.

    Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons thenumber of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

    Download date: 05-06-2021

    https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/medullary-thyroid-carcinoma(80c21d68-d89e-4b94-b377-f01dc4d73aef).html

  • Appendices

  • Appendices

    154

    Appendix 1

    Search strategy

    Search terms

    Unless otherwise stated, search terms are free text terms.

    Abbreviations:

    '$': stands for any character; '?': substitutes one or no character; adj: adjacent (i.e. number of words

    within range of search term); exp: exploded MeSH; MeSH: medical subject heading (MEDLINE

    medical index term); pt: publication type; sh: MeSH; tw: text word.

    The Cochrane Library

    #1 MeSH descriptor Thyroid Neoplasms explode all trees

    #2 MeSH descriptor Goiter, Nodular explode all trees

    #3 ( (thyroid* in All Text near/6 neoplas* in All Text) or (thyroid* in All Text near/6 cancer in All Text)

    or (thyroid* in All Text near/6 carcinoma* in All Text) or (thyroid* in All Text near/6

    macrocarcinoma* in All Text) or (thyroid* in All Text near/6 microcarcinoma* in All Text) )

    #4 ( (thyreoid* in All Text near/6 neoplas* in All Text) or (thyreoid* in All Text near/6 cancer in All

    Text) or (thyreoid* in All Text near/6 carcinoma* in All Text) or (thyreoid* in All Text near/6

    macrocarcinoma* in All Text) or (thyreoid* in All Text near/6 microcarcinoma* in All Text) )

    #5 ( (thyroid* in All Text near/6 tumor* in All Text) or (thyroid* in All Text near/6 tumour* in All Text)

    or (thyreoid* in All Text near/6 tumor* in All Text) or (thyreoid* in All Text near/6 tumour* in All

    Text) )

    #6 ( (thyroid* in All Text near/6 nodul* in All Text) or (thyroid* in All Text near/6 multinodul* in All

    Text) or (thyreoid* in All Text near/6 nodul* in All Text) or (thyreoid* in All Text near/6 multinodul*

    in All Text) )

    #7 MTC in All Text

    #8 MeSH descriptor Carcinoma, Medullary explode all trees

    #9 (carcinoma* in All Text near/6 medull* in All Text)

    #10 (#8 or #9)

    #11 (thyroid* in All Text or thyreoid* in All Text)

    #12 (#10 and #11)

    #13 (#1 or #2 or #3 or #4 or #5 or #6 or #7 or #12)

    #14 MeSH descriptor Calcitonin explode all trees

    #15 (calcitrin* in All Text or calcitonin* in All Text or thyrocalcitonin* in All Text)

    #16 (#14 or #15)

    #17 (#13 and #16)

    #18 MeSH descriptor Diagnostic Tests, Routine explode all trees

    #19 MeSH descriptor Biopsy, Fine-Needle explode all trees

    #20 MeSH descriptor Diagnostic techniques, endocrine explode all trees

    #21 MeSH descriptor Magnetic resonance imaging explode all trees

    #22 MeSH descriptor Ultrasonography explode all trees

    #23 MeSH descriptor Biological markers explode all trees

    #24 MeSH descriptor Carcinoembryonic antigen explode all trees

    #25 MeSH descriptor Diagnostic imaging explode all trees

    #26 MeSH descriptor Immunoassay explode all trees

    #27 MeSH descriptor Chemiluminescent measurements explode all trees

  • Appendices

    155

    #28 diagnos* in All Text

    #29 ( (tumor in All Text near/6 marker* in All Text) or (biological in All Text near/6 marker* in All

    Text) or (tumour in All Text near/6 marker* in All Text) )

    #30 ( (calcitonin* in All Text and test* in All Text) or (pentgastrin* in All Text and test* in All Text) )

    #31 (PET-CT in All Text or RET in All Text or MRI in All Text)

    #32 (fine in All Text and (needle in All Text near/6 biops* in All Text) )

    #33 (MRI in All Text or FNAC in All Text or FNAB in All Text)

    #34 CEA in All Text

    #35 (cytology in All Text or immunohistochem* in All Text or ultrasonograph* in All Text or

    echograph* in All Text)

    #36 (imaging in All Text and technique* in All Text)

    #37 (RIA in All Text or IRMA in All Text or ILMA in All Text)

    #38 (#18 or #19 or #20 or #21 or #22 or #23 or #24 or #25 or #26 or #27 or #28 or #29 or #30 or #31

    or #32 or #33 or #34 or #35 or #36 or #37)

    #39 (#17 and #38)

    MEDLINE

    1 exp Thyroid Neoplasms/

    2 exp Goiter nodular/

    3 ((thyroid* or thyreoid*) adj6 (neoplas* or cancer or carcinoma* or macrocarcinoma* or

    microcarcinoma* or tumo?r*)).tw,ot.

    4 (nodul* adj3 (thyroid* or thyreoid* or goiter)).tw,ot.

    5 ((thyroid* or thyreoid*) adj3 (multinodul* or multi nodul*)).tw,ot.

    6 MTC*.ab.

    7 or/1-6

    8 exp Carcinoma, medullary/

    9 (medullary adj6 (thyroid* or thyreoid*)).tw,ot.

    10 8 or 9

    11 (thyroid* or thyreoid*).tw,ot.

    12 10 and 11

    13 7 or 12

    14 exp Calcitonin/

    15 (Calcitrin* or calcitonin*).tw,ot.

    16 thyrocalcitonin*.tw,ot.

    17 9007-12-9.rn.

    18 or/14-17

    19 (screen* or detect*).tw,ot.

    20 exp Diagnostic Tests, Routine/

    21 exp Biopsy, Fine-Needle/

    22 exp Diagnostic Techniques, Endocrine/

    23 exp Magnetic Resonance Imaging/

    24 exp Ultrasonography/

    25 exp Biological markers/

    26 exp Carcinoembryonic antigen/

    27 exp diagnostic imaging/

    28 exp Pentagastrin/du [Diagnostic Use]

    29 exp Immunoassay/

    30 Carcinoma, medullary/di [diagnosis]

    31 chemiluminescent.mp.

    32 ((tumo?r or biological) adj6 marker*).tw,ot.

    33 diagnos*.tw,ot.

  • Appendices

    156

    34 (RIA or IRMA or ILMA).tw,ot.

    35 calcitonin* test*.tw,ot.

    36 PET-CT.mp.

    37 RET.mp.

    38 fine needle aspiration*.tw,ot.

    39 pentagastrin-test*.tw,ot.

    40 MRI.tw,ot.

    41 (MRI or FNAC or FNAB).tw,ot.

    42 (cytology or immunohistochem* or ultrasonograph* or echograph*).tw,ot.

    43 CEA.tw,ot.

    44 imaging technique*.tw,ot.

    45 or/19-44

    46 13 and 18 and 45

    47 (animals not (animals and humans)).sh.

    48 46 not 47

    EMBASE

    1 thyroid tumor/

    2 exp thyroid cancer/

    3 exp thyroid nodule/

    4 exp thyroid medullary carcinoma/

    5 exp nodular goiter/

    6 ((thyroid* or thyreoid*) adj6 (neoplas* or cancer or carcinoma* or macrocarcinoma* or

    microcarcinoma* or tumo?r)).tw,ot.

    7 ((thyroid* or thyreoid*) adj6 medullary carcinoma*).tw,ot.

    8 (nodul* adj3 (thyroid* or thyreoid*)).tw,ot.

    9 ((thyroid* or thyreoid*) adj3 (multinodul* or multi nodul*)).tw,ot.

    10 MTC*.tw,ot.

    11 or/1-10

    12 exp calcitonin/

    13 (calcitrin* or calcitonin* or thyrocalcitonin*).tw,ot.

    14 9007-12-9.rn.

    15 or/12-14

    16 11 and 15

    17 exp diagnostic test/

    18 exp needle biopsy/

    19 exp endocrine system examination/

    20 exp nuclear magnetic resonance imaging/

    21 exp echography/

    22 exp biological marker/

    23 exp carcinoembryonic antigen/

    24 exp diagnostic imaging/

    25 exp immunoassay/

    26 exp chemiluminescent/

    27 pentagastrin test.mp.

    28 exp medullary carcinoma/di [Diagnosis]

    29 ((tumo?r or biological) adj6 marker*).tw,ot.

    30 diagnos*.tw,ot.

    31 (RIA or IRMA or ILMA).tw,ot.

    32 ((calcitonin* or pentagastrin*) adj6 test*).tw,ot.

    33 (screen* or detect*).tw,ot.

  • Appendices

    157

    34 PET-CT.mp.

    35 RET.mp.

    36 needle biop*.tw,ot.

    37 (MRI or FNAC or FNAB).tw,ot.

    38 (cytology or immunhistochem* or ultrasonograph* or echograph*).tw,ot.

    39 CEA.tw,ot.

    40 imaging technique*.tw,ot.

    41 or/17-40

    42 16 and 41

    43 limit 42 to human

    Web of Science

    # 1 Topic=(thyroid* tumor*) OR Topic=(thyroid* cancer) OR Topic=(thyroid* neoplas*) OR

    Topic=(thyroid* carcinoma*) OR Topic=(thyroid* microcarcinoma*) OR Topic=(thyroid*

    macrocarcinoma) OR Topic=(thyroid* medullary carcinoma*) OR Topic=(thyroid* nodul*) OR

    Topic=(thyroid* multinodul*) OR Topic=(nodul* goiter*)

    # 2 Topic=(thyreoid* tumor*) OR Topic=(thyreoid* cancer) OR Topic=(thyreoid* neoplas*) OR

    Topic=(thyreoid* carcinoma*) OR Topic=(thyreoid* microcarcinoma*) OR Topic=(thyreoid*

    macrocarcinoma) OR Topic=(thyreoid* medullary carcinoma*) OR Topic=(thyreoid* nodul*) OR

    Topic=(thyreoid* multinodul*) OR Topic=(nodul* goiter*) OR Topic=(MTC)

    # 3 Topic=(calcitonin*) OR Topic=(calcitrin*) OR Topic=(thyrocalcitonin*)

    # 4 #1 OR #2

    # 5 #3 AND #4

    # 6 Topic=(diagnostic test*) OR Topic=(needle biopsy) OR Topic=(endocrine examination*) OR

    Topic=(echograph*) OR Topic=(ultrasonograph*) OR Topic=(magnetic resonance imaging) OR

    Topic=(MRI) OR Topic=(biological marker*) OR Topic=(diagnostic imaging) OR Topic=(immunoassay)

    OR Topic=(chemiluminescent*) OR Topic=(tumor marker*)

    # 7 Topic=(carcioembryonic antigen) OR Topic=(CEA) OR Topic=(pentagastrin test*) OR

    Topic=(diagnos*) OR Topic=(calcitonin* test*) OR Topic=(screen*) OR Topic=(detect*) OR Topic=(RIA)

    OR Topic=(IRMA) OR Topic=(ILMA) OR Topic=(PET-CT) OR Topic=(RET)

    # 8 Topic=(FNAC) OR Author=(FNAB) OR Publication Name=(cytology) OR Topic=(immunhistochem*)

    OR Topic=(imaging technique*)

    # 9 #6 OR #7 OR #8

    # 10 #5 AND #9

    # 11 Topic=(animal*)

    # 12 #10 NOT #11

    'My NCBI' alert service

    ("thyroid nodule"[MeSH Terms] OR ("thyroid"[All Fields] AND "nodule"[All Fields]) OR "thyroid

    nodule"[All Fields]) AND ("calcitonin"[MeSH Terms] OR "calcitonin"[All Fields])

  • Appendices

    158

    Appendix 2

    Additional Table 2 Data extraction form

    Design

    Design:

    Inclusion criteria:

    Exclusion criteria:

    Patient characteristics

    and setting

    Number of participants:

    Number with NTD:

    Number with NTD and calcitonin testing:

    Sex (female%):

    Age (mean/SD): range:

    MTC:

    Type of thyroid nodules:

    Thyroid nodules detected by palpation or US:

    Nodule size:

    Number of nodules:

    Sonographic morphology of thyroid nodules:

    FNA procedures performed through ultrasound guidance or palpation:

    Setting:

    Country:

    Index test

    Index test:

    Calcitonin as a triage or add-on test:

    Used calcitonin assay:

    Stimulated calcitonin performed:

    Indication stimulated calcitonin:

    Stimulative:

    Dose:

    Time:

    Reported and extracted cut-off values

    Basal:

    Stimulated:

    Reference standard

    Target condition:

    Reference standards:

    Indication surgical treatment:

    Type of surgical treatment:

    Calcitonin negative (n)

    Number FNA:

    Number operated:

    Calcitonin positive (n)

    Number FNA:

    Number operated:

    Flow and timing

    Follow-up calcitonin negative:

    Type:

    Duration:

    Follow-up calcitonin positive:

    Type:

    Duration:

  • Appendices

    159

    Appendix 3

    QU

    AD

    AS

    -2 S

    ign

    all

    ing

    qu

    est

    ion

    s fo

    r b

    ias

    Do

    ma

    in

    Sig

    na

    llin

    g q

    ue

    stio

    n

    Cri

    tera

    Ye

    s U

    ncl

    ea

    r N

    o

    Pa

    tie

    nt

    sele

    ctio

    n

    1.

    Co

    nse

    cuti

    ve

    or

    ran

    do

    m s

    am

    ple

    en

    roll

    ed

    ?

    A c

    on

    secu

    tive

    or

    ran

    do

    m s

    am

    ple

    of

    pa

    tie

    nts

    we

    re e

    nro

    lle

    d in

    th

    e

    stu

    dy.

    It is

    un

    cle

    ar

    wh

    eth

    er

    a

    con

    secu

    tive

    or

    ran

    do

    m s

    am

    ple

    of

    pa

    tie

    nts

    wa

    s e

    nro

    lled

    in t

    he

    stu

    dy.

    Th

    ere

    wa

    s n

    o c

    on

    secu

    tive

    or

    ran

    do

    m s

    am

    ple

    incl

    ud

    ed

    in

    the

    stu

    dy

    (e.g

    . o

    nly

    pa

    tie

    nts

    alr

    ea

    dy

    in s

    usp

    icio

    n o

    f

    (me

    du

    llary

    ) th

    yro

    id

    ma

    lign

    an

    cy a

    nd

    pa

    tie

    nts

    wit

    h

    hig

    h r

    isk

    for

    (fa

    mili

    al)

    MT

    C.

    2.

    Ca

    se c

    on

    tro

    l d

    esi

    gn

    av

    oid

    ed

    ?

    Th

    ere

    wa

    s n

    o c

    ase

    co

    ntr

    ol d

    esi

    gn

    . It

    is u

    ncl

    ea

    r if

    th

    ere

    wa

    s a

    ca

    se

    con

    tro

    l de

    sig

    n

    Th

    ere

    wa

    s a

    ca

    se c

    on

    tro

    l

    de

    sig

    n

    3.

    Ina

    pp

    rop

    ria

    te

    ex

    clu

    sio

    ns

    av

    oid

    ed

    ?

    Th

    ere

    are

    no

    pa

    tie

    nts

    ina

    pp

    rop

    ria

    te e

    xclu

    de

    d (

    e.g

    .

    pa

    tie

    nts

    wit

    h s

    usp

    icio

    us

    US,

    wh

    o

    will

    alr

    ea

    dy

    be

    op

    era

    ted

    on

    )

    It is

    un

    cle

    ar

    if t

    he

    re w

    as

    avo

    ida

    nce

    of

    ina

    pp

    rop

    ria

    te

    exc

    lusi

    on

    s

    Th

    ere

    is

    ina

    pp

    rop

    ria

    te

    exc

    lusi

    on

    of

    pa

    tie

    nts

    (e

    .g.

    exc

    lusi

    on

    of

    pa

    tie

    nts

    wit

    h

    hig

    h r

    isk

    of

    ma

    lign

    an

    cy)

    Ind

    ex

    te

    st

    1.

    Ind

    ex

    te

    st r

    esu

    lts

    inte

    rpre

    ted

    wit

    ho

    ut

    kn

    ow

    led

    ge

    re

    sult

    s

    refe

    ren

    ce s

    tan

    da

    rd?

    Th

    is it

    em

    will

    be

    om

    itte

    d a

    s o

    nly

    stu

    die

    s a

    re in

    clu

    de

    d in

    wh

    ich

    th

    e r

    efe

    ren

    ce s

    tan

    da

    rd

    (his

    top

    ath

    olo

    gic

    al e

    xam

    ina

    tio

    n)

    is p

    erf

    orm

    ed

    aft

    er

    calc

    ito

    nin

    te

    stin

    g.

    Furt

    he

    rmo

    re c

    alc

    ito

    nin

    te

    stin

    g i

    s

    a o

    bje

    ctiv

    e t

    est

    (a

    lth

    ou

    gh

    inte

    rpre

    tati

    on

    de

    pe

    nd

    s o

    n t

    he

    th

    resh

    old

    , b

    ut

    this

    will

    be

    ass

    ess

    ed

    in t

    he

    ne

    xt it

    em

    )

    2.

    Pre

    -sp

    eci

    fie

    d

    thre

    sho

    ld?

    Th

    ere

    wa

    s a

    pre

    -sp

    eci

    fie

    d

    calc

    ito

    nin

    cu

    t-o

    ff l

    eve

    l.

    It is

    un

    cle

    ar

    if t

    he

    re w

    as

    a p

    re-

    spe

    cifi

    ed

    cu

    t-o

    ff l

    eve

    l

    Th

    ere

    wa

    s n

    o p

    re-s

    pe

    cifi

    ed

    calc

    ito

    nin

    cu

    t-ff

    le

    vel.

  • Appendices

    160

    Q

    UA

    DA

    S-2

    Sig

    na

    llin

    g q

    ue

    stio

    ns

    for

    bia

    s

    Do

    ma

    in

    Sig

    na

    llin

    g q

    ue

    stio

    n

    Cri

    tera

    Ye

    s U

    ncl

    ea

    r N

    o

    Re

    fere

    nce

    sta

    nd

    ard

    1.

    Re

    fere

    nce

    sta

    nd

    ard

    lik

    ely

    to

    co

    rre

    ctly

    cla

    ssif

    y

    targ

    et

    con

    dit

    ion

    ?

    In p

    ati

    en

    s re

    ceiv

    ing

    su

    rge

    ry

    the

    re is

    ad

    eq

    ua

    te

    his

    top

    ath

    olo

    gic

    al e

    xam

    ina

    tio

    n

    of

    thyr

    oid

    tis

    sue

    .

    In p

    ati

    en

    ts r

    ece

    ivin

    g f

    oll

    ow

    -up

    ,

    the

    re is

    at

    lea

    st t

    hre

    e y

    ea

    rs

    follo

    w-u

    p y

    ea

    rs in

    clu

    din

    g a

    t

    lea

    st o

    ne

    US

    exa

    min

    ati

    on

    an

    d if

    ind

    ica

    ted

    FN

    AC

    .

    In p

    ati

    en

    ts r

    ece

    ivin

    g s

    urg

    ery

    it's

    un

    cle

    ar

    ho

    w h

    isto

    pa

    tho

    log

    ica

    l

    exa

    min

    ati

    on

    is p

    erf

    orm

    ed

    .

    In p

    ati

    en

    ts r

    ece

    ivin

    g f

    oll

    ow

    -up

    the

    tim

    e a

    nd

    pro

    toco

    l fo

    r

    follo

    w-u

    p is

    un

    cle

    ar

    In p

    ati

    en

    ts r

    ece

    ivin

    g s

    urg

    ery

    his

    top

    ath

    olo

    gic

    al e

    xam

    ina

    tio

    n

    is n

    ot

    ad

    eq

    ua

    te.

    In p

    ati

    en

    ts w

    ith

    ou

    t su

    rge

    ry,

    follo

    w-u

    p is

    to

    sh

    ort

    or

    do

    es

    no

    t

    incl

    ud

    e a

    t le

    ast

    on

    e U

    S

    exa

    min

    ati

    on

    an

    d F

    NA

    C.

    2.

    Re

    fere

    nce

    sta

    nd

    ard

    resu

    lts

    inte

    rpre

    ted

    wit

    ho

    ut

    kn

    ow

    led

    ge

    resu

    lts

    ind

    ex

    te

    st?

    Th

    e o

    utc

    om

    e a

    sse

    sso

    r o

    f

    his

    top

    ath

    olo

    gic

    al a

    nd

    fo

    llow

    -up

    resu

    lts

    wa

    s n

    ot

    aw

    are

    of

    calc

    ito

    nin

    te

    stin

    g r

    esu

    lts

    It is

    no

    t cl

    ea

    r if

    th

    e o

    utc

    om

    e

    ass

    ess

    or

    of

    his

    top

    ath

    olo

    gic

    al

    an

    d f

    ollo

    w-u

    p r

    esu

    lts

    wa

    s

    aw

    are

    of

    calc

    ito

    nin

    te

    stin

    g

    resu

    lts

    Th

    e o

    utc

    om

    e a

    sse

    sso

    r o

    f

    his

    top

    ath

    olo

    gic

    al a

    nd

    fo

    llow

    -up

    resu

    lts

    wa

    s a

    wa

    re o

    f ca

    lcit

    on

    in

    test

    ing

    re

    sult

    s

    Flo

    w a

    nd

    tim

    ing

    1.

    Ap

    pro

    pri

    ate

    in

    terv

    al

    be

    twe

    en

    in

    de

    x t

    est

    an

    d

    refe

    ren

    ce s

    tan

    da

    rd?

    Tim

    e b

    etw

    ee

    n c

    alc

    ito

    nin

    te

    stin

    g

    an

    d h

    isto

    pa

    tho

    log

    ica

    l

    exa

    min

    ati

    on

    is <

    3 m

    on

    ths

    It is

    un

    cle

    ar

    wh

    at

    the

    tim

    e

    pe

    rio

    d b

    etw

    ee

    n r

    efe

    ren

    ce

    sta

    nd

    ard

    an

    d in

    de

    x te

    st is

    .

    Tim

    e b

    etw

    ee

    n c

    alc

    ito

    nin

    te

    stin

    g

    an

    d h

    isto

    pa

    tho

    log

    ica

    l exc

    ee

    ds

    3

    mo

    nth

    s.

    2.

    All

    pa

    tie

    nts

    re

    ceiv

    ed

    refe

    ren

    ce s

    tan

    da

    rd?

    All

    pa

    tie

    nts

    re

    ceiv

    ed

    su

    rge

    ry,

    an

    d p

    ati

    en

    ts w

    ho

    did

    no

    t

    rece

    ive

    su

    rge

    ry h

    ave

    clin

    ica

    l

    follo

    w-u

    p o

    f a

    t le

    ast

    th

    ree

    yea

    rs.

    It is

    no

    t cl

    ea

    r if

    th

    e w

    ho

    le

    sam

    ple

    did

    re

    ceiv

    e s

    urg

    ery

    or

    follo

    w-u

    p.

    On

    ly a

    se

    lect

    ed

    su

    bse

    t o

    f th

    e

    pa

    tie

    nts

    re

    ceiv

    ed

    or

    surg

    ery

    or

    no

    t a

    ll p

    ati

    en

    ts h

    ave

    clin

    ica

    l

    follo

    w-u

    p.

    3.

    Pa

    tie

    nts

    re

    ceiv

    ed

    sam

    e r

    efe

    ren

    ce

    sta

    nd

    ard

    ?

    All

    pa

    tie

    nts

    we

    re o

    pe

    rate

    d a

    nd

    his

    top

    ath

    olo

    gic

    al e

    xam

    ina

    tio

    n

    of

    the

    th

    yro

    id w

    as

    pe

    rfo

    rme

    d.

    It is

    no

    t cl

    ea

    r if

    all

    pa

    tie

    nts

    we

    re

    op

    era

    ted

    an

    d r

    ece

    ive

    d

    his

    top

    ath

    olo

    gic

    al e

    xam

    ina

    tio

    n.

    No

    t a

    ll p

    ati

    en

    ts w

    ere

    op

    era

    ted

    or

    his

    top

    ath

    olo

    gic

    al

    exa

    min

    ati

    on

    wa

    s n

    ot

    pe

    rfo

    rme

    d in

    all

    pa

    tie

    nts

    .

    4.

    All

    pa

    tie

    nts

    in

    clu

    de

    d i

    n

    the

    an

    aly

    sis?

    All

    pa

    tie

    nts

    en

    roll

    ed

    we

    re

    incl

    ud

    ed

    in t

    he

    an

    aly

    sis

    It is

    no

    t cl

    ea

    r if

    all

    pa

    tie

    nts

    we

    re

    incl

    ud

    ed

    in t

    he

    an

    aly

    sis.

    No

    t a

    ll p

    ati

    en

    ts e

    nro

    lled

    we

    re

    incl

    ud

    ed

    in t

    he

    an

    aly

    sis

    (e.g

    .

    pa

    tie

    nts

    lost

    to

    fo

    llow

    -up

    )

  • Appendices

    161

    Appendix 4

    Characteristics of included studies

    Rieu 1995 Patient Selection

    A. Risk of Bias

    Patient Sampling Design: Prospective cohort study.

    Inclusion criteria: Pts with thyroid nodules detected by clinical examination or with

    abnormal TSH levels or both.

    Exclusion criteria: Not reported.

    Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes

    Was a case-control design avoided? Yes

    Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear

    Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Patient

    characteristics

    and setting

    Number of participants: 657 patients.

    Number with NTD: 469 patients.

    Number with NTD and calcitonin testing: 469 patients.

    Sex (female%): 88,1% (579/657); only reported of whole study population.

    Age (mean/SD): 45, SD: Not reported range: 15-87 years; only reported of whole study

    population.

    MTC: 4 patients.

    Type of thyroid nodules: non toxic uninodular goitre (n = 136), autonomously functioning

    thyroid nodule (n = 14), non toxic multinodular goitre (n = 224), toxic multinodular goitre (n =

    15), nodular Hashimoto thyroiditis (n = 53), nodular Graves' disease (n = 25), nodular

    formation related to subacute thyroiditis in a hyperthyroid phase (n = 2).

    Thyroid nodules detected by palpation or US: both, number not specified.

    Nodule size: not reported.

    Number of nodules: Uninodular (n = 150), multinodular (n = 239), not reported (n = 80).

    Sonographic morphology of thyroid nodules: A localized thyroid area was considered

    nodular when it had a distinctive rim at two different incidences. When this rim was absent, a

    thyroid area with round or oval patterns, and also echogenicity different from that of the

    surrounding normal tissue, was classified as nodular.

    FNA procedures performed through ultrasound guidance or palpation: Not

    reported.

    Setting: Not reported.

    Country: France

    Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the

    review question?

    Low concern

    Index Test

    Index tests Index test: Basal and stimulated calcitonin.

    Calcitonin as a triage or add-on test: Not reported.

    Used calcitonin assay:

    01-1989 – 12-1989, RIA (Mallinckrodt Medical SA, Evry, France).

    01-1990 – 12- 1993: IRMA (CIS-Oris International, Saint Quentin en Yvelins, France.

    Stimulated calcitonin: Yes.

    Indication: Patients with basal serum CT above normal range.

    Stimulative: Pentagastrin.

    Dose: 0.5 ug/kg.

  • Appendices

    162

    Time: 0, 3, 5, 15 and 30 min after injection.

    Reported and extracted cut-off values

    Basal: reported: RIA: 35 ng/l, IRMA 10 ng/l; extracted 50 ng/l; 100 ng/l.

    Stimulated: reported: 100 ng/l; extracted 100 ng/l.

    A. Risk of Bias

    If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? Yes

    Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from

    the review question?

    Low concern

    Reference Standard

    A. Risk of Bias

    Target condition

    and reference

    standard(s)

    Target condition: MTC.

    Reference standards: FNA in patients whose nodular formation was accessible to such a

    procedure, in selected patients histopathological examination after surgery.

    Indication surgical treatment: Patients with increased basal serum CT values, pentagastrin

    stimulated CT levels > 100 pg/l, regardless of FNAC result, FNAC suggestive of thyroid

    carcinoma (n = 7), compressive goitre (n = 4).

    Type of surgical treatment: For suspected MTC total thyroidectomy and central neck

    dissection. Bilateral modified neck dissection was performed only in the presence of evident

    lymph node involvement in one or both sides. For all other types of thyroid carcinoma, total

    thyroidectomy and lymph node dissection on the side of the thyroid nodule(s) or bilaterally

    (as appropriate).

    Calcitonin negative (n = 465)

    Number FNAC: Not reported.

    Number operated: 11 patients.

    Calcitonin positive (n = 4)

    Number FNAC: 4 patients.

    Number operated: 4 patients.

    Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear

    Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of

    the index tests?

    Unclear

    Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced

    bias?

    Unclear risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard

    does not match the question?

    Low concern

    Flow and Timing

    A. Risk of Bias

    Flow and timing Follow-up calcitonin negative: Not reported.

    Type: -

    Duration: -

    Follow-up calcitonin positive: Not reported.

    Type: -

    Duration: -

    Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear

    Did all patients receive the same reference standard? No

    Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes

    Did all patients receive the reference standard? No

  • Appendices

    163

    Could the patient flow have introduced bias? High risk

    User defined characteristics

    Publication

    details

    LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: English.

    FUNDING: Not reported.

    PUBLICATION STATUS: Full article.

    Stated aim of

    study

    Quote from publication: "to asses the prevalence of sporadic MTC in nodular and non -

    nodular thyroid diseases by routine basal serum CT measurements"

    Abbreviations FNAC: fine needle aspiration cytology, CT: calcitonin.

    Notes

  • Appendices

    164

    Ozgen 1999

    Patient Selection

    A. Risk of Bias

    Patient Sampling Design: Prospective study.

    Inclusion criteria: Patients with nodular goiter.

    Exclusion criteria: Patients with previously known medullary

    carcinoma and their relatives.

    Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes

    Was a case-control design avoided? Yes

    Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Yes

    Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Patient

    characteristics

    and setting

    Number of participants: 773 patients.

    Clinical features: Patients with nodular goiter.

    Number with NTD: 773 patients.

    Number with NTD and calcitonin testing: 773 patients.

    Sex (female%)(n): 75,8% (586).

    Age (mean/SD): range: 42.1 years, range 17-78.

    Number with MTC: 4 patients.

    Type of thyroid nodules: Multinodular goiter (nontoxic/toxic), solitary (nontoxic/toxic)

    thyroid nodules.

    Thyroid nodules detected by palpation or US: Both; number not specified.

    Nodule size: Not reported.

    Number of nodules: Not reported.

    Sonographic morphology of thyroid nodules: Not reported.

    FNA procedures performed through ultrasound guidance or palpation: Both (US guidance in

    nonpalpable nodules), number not specified.

    Setting: Outpatient clinic.

    Country: Turkey.

    Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the

    review question?

    Low concern

    Index Test

    Index tests Index test: Basal calcitonin.

    Calcitonin as a triage or add-on test: Not reported.

    Used calcitonin assay: Commercial kit; DSL-5200 Ultrasensitive calcitonin RIA kit, Diagnostic

    System Laboratories Inc., Webster, Tx.

    Sensitivity: Not reported.

    Stimulated calcitonin: No

    Indication: -

    Stimulative: -

    Dose: -

    Time: -

    Reported and extracted cut-off values

    Basal: Reported: 30 pg/ml; extracted:30 pg/ml, 50 pg/ml, 100 pg/ml.

    Stimulated: -

    A. Risk of Bias

    If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? Yes

    Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

  • Appendices

    165

    Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from

    the review question?

    Low concern

    Reference Standard

    A. Risk of Bias

    Target condition and

    reference standard(s)

    Target condition: MTC.

    Reference standards: FNAB and in selected cases histopathological examination after

    surgery,

    Indication surgical treatment: Malignant or suspicious results in FNAB, or elevated

    calcitonin levels regardless of the result of FNAB.

    Type of surgical treatment: Thyroid surgery.

    Calcitonin negative (n = 669)

    Number FNAB: 669 patients.

    Number operated: 171 patients.

    Calcitonin positive (n = 4)

    Number FNAB: 4 patients.

    Number operated: 4 patients.

    Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear

    Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results

    of the index tests?

    Unclear

    Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced

    bias?

    Unclear risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference

    standard does not match the question?

    Low concern

    Flow and Timing

    A. Risk of Bias

    Flow and timing Follow-up calcitonin negative: Not reported.

    Type: -

    Duration: -

    Follow-up calcitonin positive: Described for 3 MTC patients.

    Type: Basal and stimulated calcitonin levels.

    Duration: 14-18 months

    Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear

    Did all patients receive the same reference standard? No

    Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes

    Did all patients receive the reference standard? No

    Could the patient flow have introduced bias? High risk

    User defined characteristics

    Publication

    details

    LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: English.

    FUNDING: Not reported.

    PUBLICATION STATUS: Full article.

    Stated aim of

    study

    Quote from publication: " To identify MTC by screening patients who have thyroid nodules

    with basal calcitonin measurements and to determine whether basal serum calcitonin

    measurement should be a part of the routine evaluation of a nodular goiter."

    Abbreviations FNAB: Fine needle aspiration biopsy.

    Notes

  • Appendices

    166

    Hahm 2001

    Patient Selection

    A. Risk of Bias

    Patient

    Sampling

    Design: Cohort study.

    Inclusion criteria: Patients with nodular thyroid disease.

    Exclusion criteria: Not reported.

    Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes

    Was a case-control design avoided? Yes

    Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear

    Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Patient

    characteristics

    and setting

    Number of participants: 1448 patients.

    Number with NTD: 1448 patients.

    Number with NTD and calcitonin testing: 1448 patients.

    Sex (female%)(n): 80,3% (1163).

    Age (mean/SD): 46 years Range: 14-86 years.

    Number with MTC: 10 patients.

    Type of thyroid nodules: Not reported.

    Thyroid nodules detected by palpation or US: Not reported.

    Nodule size: Not reported.

    Number of nodules: Not reported.

    Sonographic morphology of thyroid nodules: Not reported.

    FNA procedures performed through ultrasound guidance or palpation: Not reported.

    Setting: Thyroid clinic of Samsung Medical Center.

    Country: Korea.

    Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the

    review question?

    Low concern

    Index Test

    Index tests Index test: Basal and stimulated calcitonin.

    Used calcitonin assay: Two-site immunoradiometric assay commercial kit (MED-GENIX CT-

    US.-IRMA kit) BioSource Europe S.A.,Belgium.

    Sensitivity: 0.8 pg/ml.

    Stimulated calcitonin: Yes.

    Indication: Reported for 39 patients: basal calcitonin > 10 pg/ml (n=23), family members of

    MEN2 or MTC patients (n=14) and FNAC findings suspicious for MTC (n=2).

    Stimulative: Pentagastrin (Peptavlon, Ayerst Laboratories Ind. Philadelphia, PA).

    Dose: 0.5 ug/kg body weight.

    Time: Just before, 2, 5, and 10 min.

    Reported and extracted cut-off values

    Basal: Reported: 10 pg/ml (n = 56); extracted: 10, 20, 30, 50, 100 pg/ml.

    Stimulated: Reported: 100 pg/ml; extracted: 100, 200 pg/ml.

    A. Risk of Bias

    If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? Yes

    Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from

    the review question?

    Low concern

  • Appendices

    167

    Reference Standard

    A. Risk of Bias

    Target condition

    and reference

    standard(s)

    Target condition: MTC.

    Reference standards: FNAC in all patients with palpable or visible thyroid nodule by US, in

    selected patients histopathological examination after surgery.

    Indication surgical treatment: Abnormal findings suspicious of malignancy by FNAC, patients

    who had basal or stimulated calcitonin concentrations of more than 100 pg/ml.

    Type: Thyroidectomy.

    Calcitonin negative (n = 1392 patients)

    Number FNAC: Not reported.

    Number operated: 169 patients.

    Calcitonin positive (n = 56 patients)

    Number FNAC: 55 patients.

    Number operated: 25 patients.

    Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear

    Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results

    of the index tests?

    Unclear

    Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced

    bias?

    Unclear risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard

    does not match the question?

    Low concern

    Flow and Timing

    A. Risk of Bias

    Flow and timing Follow-up calcitonin negative: Not reported

    Type: -

    Duration: -

    Follow-up calcitonin positive: Not reported

    Type:

    Duration:

    Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear

    Did all patients receive the same reference standard? No

    Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes

    Did all patients receive the reference standard? No

    Could the patient flow have introduced bias? High risk

    User defined characteristics

    Publication

    details

    LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: English

    FUNDING: OTHER FUNDING

    PUBLICATION STATUS: PEER REVIEW JOURNAL / JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT / FULL ARTICLE /

    CONFERENCE PAPER / OTHER)

    Stated aim of

    study

    Quote from publication: "To evaluate the usefulness of routine measurement of serum

    calcitonin concentration in patients with nodular thyroid diseases, and to identify the validity

    of pentagastrin simulation test and FNAC "

    Abbreviations US: Ultrasonography, FNAC: Fine needle aspiration cytology.

    Notes

  • Appendices

    168

    Hatzl-Griesenhofer 2002

    Patient Selection

    A. Risk of Bias

    Patient Sampling Design: Retrospective cohort study.

    Inclusion criteria: Patients with nodular thyroid disease or with evidence of nodular growth

    in follow-up examinations.

    Exclusion criteria: Not reported.

    Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Unclear

    Was a case-control design avoided? Yes

    Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear

    Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? High risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Patient

    characteristics

    and setting

    Number of participants: 3899 patients.

    Number with NTD: 3899 patients.

    Number with NTD and calcitonin testing: 3899 patients.

    Sex (female%)(n): 78,8% (3073).

    Age (mean/SD): 54.6 (+11.2) yrs range: 6 - 90 yrs.

    Number with MTC: 12 patients.

    Type of thyroid nodules: Not reported.

    Thyroid nodules detected by palpation or US: Not reported.

    Nodule size: Not reported.

    Number of nodules: Not reported.

    Sonographic morphology of thyroid nodules: Only reported for MTC patients.

    FNA procedures performed through ultrasound guidance or palpation: Not reported.

    Setting: Outpatient ward of the department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrinology of the

    General Hospital Linz.

    Country: Austria.

    Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the

    review question?

    Low concern

    Index Test

    Index tests Index test: Basal and stimulated calcitonin.

    Calcitonin as a triage or add-on test: Not reported.

    Used calcitonin assay: a two-site chemoluminesence immunoassay, Nichols institute diagnostics.

    Sensitivity: 0.7 pg/ml

    Stimulated calcitonin: Yes.

    Indication: Patients with slightly or moderately elevated normal calcitonin levels (< 80 pg/ml).

    Stimulative: Pentagastrin, Peptavlon, Zeneca, Vienna.

    Dose: 0.5 ug/kg.

    Time: before, 2, 5, and 8 min.

    Reported and extracted cut-off values

    Basal: Reported: females: 4.6 pg/ml; males 11.5 pg/ml; extracted: females: 4.6 pg/ml; males 11.5

    pg/ml.

    Stimulated: Reported:100 pg/ml (males and females); extracted: 100 pg/ml.

    A. Risk of Bias

    If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? Yes

    Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from

    the review question?

    Low concern

  • Appendices

    169

    Reference Standard

    A. Risk of Bias

    Target condition

    and reference

    standard(s)

    Target condition: MTC.

    Reference standards: Histological evaluation in patients referred to surgery.

    Indication surgical treatment: Markedly elevated bCT and positive pentagastrin stimulation

    tests.

    Type: Hemithyroidectomy, (sub)total thyroidectomy, node dissection in selected patients.

    Calcitonin negative ( n = 3639 patients)

    Number FNA: -

    Number operated: Not reported.

    Calcitonin positive (n= 230 patients)

    Number FNA: -

    Number operated: 39 patients (?)

    Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear

    Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results

    of the index tests?

    Unclear

    Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced

    bias?

    Unclear risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard

    does not match the question?

    Low concern

    Flow and Timing

    A. Risk of Bias

    Flow and timing Follow-up calcitonin negative: Not reported

    Type: -

    Duration: -

    Follow-up calcitonin positive: (1) Patients with pathological stimulation test in which the

    consultant for internal medicine dissuaded against surgery because of elevated risks (n =2).

    (2) patients with elevated basal calcitonin levels who declined pentagastrin stimulation (n

    =41).

    Type: (1) Ultrasound and determination of basal and stimulated calcitonin (2) clinical and

    biochemical follow up.

    Number with follow-up: 43 patients.

    Duration: Not reported

    Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear

    Did all patients receive the same reference standard? No

    Were all patients included in the analysis? No

    Did all patients receive the reference standard? No

    Could the patient flow have introduced bias? High risk

    User defined characteristics

    Publication

    details

    LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: English

    FUNDING: Not reported

    PUBLICATION STATUS: Full article

    Stated aim of

    study

    Quote from publication: "To evaluate retrospectively the results of routine calcitonin

    measurements in patients with nodular thyorid disease "

    Abbreviations bCT: basal calcitonin,

    Notes

  • Appendices

    170

    Elisei 2004

    Patient Selection

    A. Risk of Bias

    Patient

    Sampling

    Design: Cohort study.

    Inclusion criteria: Patients with nodular thyroid disease.

    Exclusion criteria: Not reported.

    Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes

    Was a case-control design avoided? Yes

    Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear

    Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Patient

    characteristics

    and setting

    Number of participants: 10864 patients.

    Number with NTD: 10864 patients.

    Number with NTD and calcitonin testing: 10864 patients.

    Sex (female%)(n): 81.4% (8692).

    Age (mean/SD): 49 yr SD not reported Range: 12 - 82 yr.

    MTC: 44 patients.

    Type of thyroid nodules: Single nodules, nontoxic multinodular goiter, autonomous

    functioning thyroid nodules, and autoimmune thyroid disease associated with distinct cold

    nodules.

    Thyroid nodules detected by palpation or US: Not reported.

    Nodule size: Not reported.

    Number of nodules: Not reported.

    Sonographic morphology of thyroid nodules: Not reported.

    FNA procedures performed through ultrasound guidance or palpation: Not reported.

    Setting: Not reported.

    Country: Italy

    Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the

    review question?

    Low concern

    Index Test

    Index tests Index test: Basal and stimulated calcitonin.

    Calcitonin as a triage or add-on test: Not reported.

    Used calcitonin assay: Solid phase 2 site immunoradiometric assay (ELSA-hCT, CIS, Gif Sur

    Yvette, France).

    Sensitivity: 14 pg/ml.

    Stimulated calcitonin: Yes.

    Indication: Patients with detectable levels of basal CTand twice confirmed.

    Stimulative: Pentagastrin.

    Dose: 0.5 ug/kg.

    Time: before, 2, 5, 15 and 30 min.

    Reported and extracted cut-off values

    Basal: reported: 20 pg/ml; extracted: 20 pg/ml.

    Stimulated: reported 60 pg/ml; extracted: 60, 100 pg/ml.

    A. Risk of Bias

    If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? Yes

    Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from

    the review question?

    Low concern

  • Appendices

    171

    Reference Standard

    A. Risk of Bias

    Target condition

    and reference

    standard(s)

    Target condition: MTC.

    Reference standards: FNAC in nodules > 1 cm or in nodules < 1 cm with suspicious aspects at

    neck US, in selected patients histopathological examination after surgery.

    Indication surgical treatment: Patients with elevated bCT levels (confirmed by abnormal Pg-

    stimulated CT levels) regardless of the results of FNAC and in those with FNAC suspicious of

    malignancy indepently from the results of serum CT.

    Type:Total thyroidectomy and dissection of the central neck compartment

    Calcitonin negative (n = 10817)

    Number FNAC: Not reported.

    Number operated: Not reported.

    Calcitonin positive (n = 47)

    Number FNAC: 47 patients.

    Number operated: 44 patients.

    Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear

    Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results

    of the index tests?

    Unclear

    Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced

    bias?

    Unclear risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard

    does not match the question?

    Low concern

    Flow and Timing

    A. Risk of Bias

    Flow and timing Follow-up calcitonin negative: Not reported.

    Type: -

    Duration: -

    Follow-up calcitonin positive: Only reported of MTC patients.

    Type: Not reported.

    Number with follow-up: 44 patients.

    Duration: Mean 6.2 + 2.5 yr (range, 3-10 yr).

    Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear

    Did all patients receive the same reference standard? No

    Were all patients included in the analysis? No

    Did all patients receive the reference standard? No

    Could the patient flow have introduced bias? High risk

    User defined characteristics

    Publication

    details

    LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: English.

    FUNDING: Non-commercial.

    PUBLICATION STATUS: Full article.

    Stated aim of

    study

    Quote from publication: "To asses whether we could confirm the results of our preliminiary

    study of 1991 and to compare the outcome of patients diagnosed by serum CT measurement

    with that of a historical group of MTC patients diagnosed and treated before the introduction

    of serum CT screening".

    Abbreviations CT: Calcitonin, FNAC: fine needle aspiration cytology, US: Ultrasonography.

    Notes

  • Appendices

    172

    Karanikas 2004

    Patient Selection

    A. Risk of Bias

    Patient

    Sampling

    Design: Cohort study

    Inclusion criteria: Patients referred for the work-up of various suspected thyroid disorders.

    Exclusion criteria: Not reported.

    Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes

    Was a case-control design avoided? Yes

    Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear

    Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Patient

    characteristics

    and setting

    Number of participants: 414 patients.

    Number with NTD: 195 patients.

    Number with NTD and calcitonin testing: 195 patients.

    Sex (female%)(n): 79.5% (329) NB only reported for whole study population.

    Age (mean/SD): 56 year; SD not reported range: 18 - 88 years, NB only reported for whole

    study population.

    MTC: 1 patients. (1 MTC patient in non-nodular study population)

    Type of thyroid nodules: Uni and multinodular disease.

    Thyroid nodules detected by palpation or US: Not reported.

    Nodule size: Only for patients with elevated CT; volume 21 + 10 ml.

    Number of nodules: Not reported.

    Sonographic morphology of thyroid nodules: Not reported.

    FNA procedures performed through ultrasound guidance or palpation: Not reported.

    Setting: Out-patient department.

    Country: Austria.

    Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the

    review question?

    Low concern

    Index Test

    Index tests Calcitonin as a triage or add-on test: Not reported.

    Index test: Basal and stimulated calcitonin.

    Used calcitonin assay: Commercial assay by a Nichols Advantage Chemiluminescence System

    (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, Ca, USA)

    Sensitivity: 1 pg/ml.

    Stimulated calcitonin: Yes.

    Indication: Basal serum CT equal to or exceeding 10 pg/ml.

    Stimulative: Pengagastrin Injection BP, Cambridge Laboratories, Tyne & Wear, UK

    Dose: 0.5 ug/kg

    Time: Before, 2 and 5 min after injection.

    Reported and extracted cut-off values

    Basal: reported: 10 pg/ml; extracted: 10 pg/ml, 100 pg/ml.

    Stimulated: reported: 100 pg/ml (abnormal), 500 pg/ml (pathological); extracted 100 pg/ml.

    A. Risk of Bias

    If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? Yes

    Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from

    the review question?

    Low concern

  • Appendices

    173

    Reference Standard

    A. Risk of Bias

    Target condition

    and reference

    standard(s)

    Target condition: MTC.

    Reference standards: In selected patients histological examination after total thyroidectomy,

    follow-up.

    Indication surgical treatment: Patients with abnormal and pathological PG tests.

    Type of surgical treatment: Total thyroidectomy and lymph node dissection along both

    recurrent nerves in patients.

    Calcitonin negative (n = 182)

    Number FNAC: -

    Number operated: Not reported.

    Calcitonin positive (n = 13)

    Number FNAC: -

    Number operated: 1 patient.

    Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear

    Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results

    of the index tests?

    Unclear

    Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced

    bias?

    Unclear risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard

    does not match the question?

    Low concern

    Flow and Timing

    A. Risk of Bias

    Flow and timing Follow-up calcitonin negative: Not reported.

    Type: -

    Duration: -

    Follow-up calcitonin positive: Only for MTC patient.

    Type: Basal and stimulated CT.

    Number with follow-up: 1.

    Duration: Not reported

    Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear

    Did all patients receive the same reference standard? No

    Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes

    Did all patients receive the reference standard? No

    Could the patient flow have introduced bias? High risk

    User defined characteristics

    Publication

    details

    LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: English.

    FUNDING: Not reported.

    PUBLICATION STATUS: Full article.

    Stated aim of

    study

    Quote from publication: "To compare the distribution and relevance of elevated CT levels in

    referrals with nonneoplastic and neoplastic thyroid disease (...)"

    Abbreviations CT: calcitonin.

    Notes

  • Appendices

    174

    Vierhapper 2005

    Patient Selection

    A. Risk of Bias

    Patient

    Sampling

    Design: Cohort study.

    Inclusion criteria: Patients with suspected thyroid disorders.

    Exclusion criteria: Patients with a known elevation of hCT.

    Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes

    Was a case-control design avoided? Yes

    Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear

    Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Patient

    characteristics

    and setting

    Number of participants: 25669 patients.

    Number with NTD: 10292 patients.

    Number with NTD and calcitonin testing: 10157 patients.

    Sex (female%)(n): 79.9% (8114).

    Age (mean/SD): Not reported range: Not reported.

    MTC: 36 patients.

    Type of thyroid nodules: Not reported.

    Thyroid nodules detected by palpation or US: Both.

    Nodule size: Only reported of MTC patients.

    Number of nodules: Not reported.

    Sonographic morphology of thyroid nodules: Not reported.

    FNA procedures performed through ultrasound guidance or palpation: Not reported.

    Setting: Thyroid outpatient clinic.

    Country: Austria

    Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the

    review question?

    Low concern

    Index Test

    Index tests Index test: Basal and stimulated calcitonin.

    Calcitonin as a triage or add-on test: Not reported.

    Used calcitonin assay:

    1994-1999: A commercially available immunoradiometric assay (CIS-biointernational, Gif-Sur-

    Yvette, France).

    1999-2004: Acridinium-ester-labeled chemiluminescent immunoassay, running on the

    ‘Advantage’ auto-analyser (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, US).

    Sensitivity: Not reported.

    Stimulated calcitonin: Yes.

    Indication: All patients with basal hCT> 10.0 pg/ml.

    Stimulative: Pentagastrin (CambridgeLaboratories, Wallsend, UK).

    Dose: 0.5 ug/kg.

    Time: Prior to, 2, 5 and 10 min.

    Reported and extracted cut-off values

    Basal: Reported: 10 pg/ml extracted: 10 pg/ml.

    Stimulated: Reported 100 pg/ml extracted: 100 pg/ml.

    A. Risk of Bias

    If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? Yes

    Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from Low concern

  • Appendices

    175

    the review question?

    Reference Standard

    A. Risk of Bias

    Target condition

    and reference

    standard(s)

    Target condition: MTC.

    Reference standards: FNAB, in selected patients histopathological examination after surgery,

    follow-up.

    Indication surgical treatment: Elevated basal and/or pentagastrin stimulated serum

    concentrations of hCT(>100 pg/ml) or cytological findings.

    Type: In patients with elevated basal and/or stimulated calcitonin a total thyroidectomy was

    performed. Routinely both recurrent nerves were dissected carfully and a systematic

    microdissection of the central lymph node compartment. If MTC was documented

    intraoperatively a systematic bilateral microdissection of the lateral lymph node

    compartments was added.

    Calcitonin negative (n = 9960)

    Number FNA: Not reported.

    Number operated: Not reported, at least 1 pt.

    Calcitonin positive (n = 507)

    Number FNAB: 15 patients (only reported for MTC patients)

    Number operated: 75 patients.

    Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear

    Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results

    of the index tests?

    Unclear

    Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced

    bias?

    Unclear risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference

    standard does not match the question?

    Low concern

    Flow and Timing

    A. Risk of Bias

    Flow and timing Follow-up calcitonin negative: Not reported.

    Type: -

    Duration: -

    Follow-up calcitonin positive: Only reported of MTC patients.

    Type: stimulated hCTs.

    Number with follow-up: 32 patients.

    Duration: 1-9 years.

    Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear

    Did all patients receive the same reference standard? No

    Were all patients included in the analysis? No

    Did all patients receive the reference standard? No

    Could the patient flow have introduced bias? High risk

    User defined characteristics

    Publication details LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: English.

    FUNDING: Non-commercial.

    PUBLICATION STATUS: Full article.

    Stated aim of study Quote from publication: Not reported.

    Abbreviations hCT; serum calcitonin.

    Notes

  • Appendices

    176

    Papi 2006

    Patient Selection

    A. Risk of Bias

    Patient

    Sampling

    Design: Cohort study of consecutive patients.

    Inclusion criteria: (1) male & female pts > 18 yrs (2) palpable nodules (3) non-palpable

    nodules > 10 mm (4) non palpable nodule < 10 mm with malignant features on US.

    Exclusion criteria: (1) patients < 18 years (2) non palpable nodules < 10 mm without

    malignant US features (3) pts previously evaluated for nodular goiter by FNA and/or CT

    measurement (4) patients reporting familial history of MEN and pts with known MTC (5) pts

    with hyper- and hypothyroidism without thyroid nodules (6) patients in follow-up for thyroid

    disease (7) patients not confirmed as having thyroid diseases.

    Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes

    Was a case-control design avoided? Yes

    Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Yes

    Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Patient

    characteristics

    and setting

    Number of participants: 1474 patients.

    Number with NTD: 1474 patients.

    Number with NTD and calcitonin testing: 1425 patients.

    Sex (female%)(n): 80% (1144).

    Age (mean/SD): 49.6(+ 6.8) yr range: 18 - 91 yr.

    MTC: 9 patients.

    Type of thyroid nodules: Euthyroid nodular thyroid disease (n = 1369), hypothyroid nodular

    thyroid disease (n = 32), sub acute de Quervain's thyroiditis (n = 1), Graves' disease (n=2),

    toxic nodular goiter (n = 21).

    Thyroid nodules detected by palpation or US: both.

    Nodule size: 21.8 + 4 mm

    Number of nodules: Not reported.

    Sonographic morphology of thyroid nodules: Not reported.

    FNA procedures performed through ultrasound guidance or palpation: Ultrasound.

    Setting: Not reported.

    Country: Italy.

    Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the

    review question?

    Low concern

    Index Test

    Index tests Index test: Basal and stimulated calcitonin.

    Calcitonin as a triage or add-on test: Not reported.

    Used calcitonin assay: Two-site chemiluminesence assay, Nichols instute diagnostics, San

    Juan Capristano, CA92675, USA).

    Sensitivity: 1 pg/ml.

    Stimulated calcitonin: Yes.

    Indication: When basal serum CT concentrations exceeded 5 pg/ml, but not exceeded 100

    pg/ml.

    Stimulative: Pentagastrin (Cambridge laboratories, Walsend, Tyne and Wear, NE289NX).

    Dose: 0.5 ug/kg.

    Time: Before, 2, 5 and 10 min after injection.

    Reported and extracted cut-off values

    Basal: Reported: 5 pg/ml extracted: 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 50,100 pg/ml.

    Stimulated: Reported: 100 pg/ml extracted: 100, 200 pg/ml.

    A. Risk of Bias

  • Appendices

    177

    If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? Yes

    Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from

    the review question?

    Low concern

    Reference Standard

    A. Risk of Bias

    Target condition

    and reference

    standard(s)

    Target condition: MTC.

    Reference standards: FNAC and in selected patients, histopathological examination after

    surgical treatment.

    Indication surgical treatment: Basal serum CT concentrations > 5 pg/ml < 100 pg/ml and Pg-

    stimulated CT levels > 100 pg/ml or basal serum CT concentrations > 100 pg/ml; patients with

    a suspicious or repeatedly non-diagnostic FNAC and patients with a benign FNAC and

    compressive symptoms.

    Type: In patients with benign FNAC and compressive symptoms a lobectomy or near-total

    thyroidectomy. In patients with suspicious or non-diagnostic FNAC, surgical extent depended

    on histological examination of frozen sections. In patients with malignancy other than MTC a

    total thyroidectomy and in case of lymph node involvement a lymphadenectomy. In MTC

    patients a total thyroidectomy and a systematic microdissection of both central neck and

    bilateral neck compartments. Contralateral lymph node dissection was omitted in MTC

    patients with a unilateral thyroid tumor and no ipsilateral and central lymph node

    involvement.

    Calcitonin negative (n = 1402)

    Number FNAC: 1402 patients.

    Number operated: 292 patients.

    Calcitonin positive: (n = 23)

    Number FNAC: 23 patients.

    Number operated: 23 patients.

    Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear

    Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results

    of the index tests?

    Unclear

    Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced

    bias?

    Unclear risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard

    does not match the question?

    Low concern

    Flow and Timing

    A. Risk of Bias

    Flow and timing Follow-up calcitonin negative: Not reported.

    Type: -

    Duration: -

    Follow-up calcitonin positive: Not reported.

    Type: -

    Duration: -

    Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear

    Did all patients receive the same reference standard? No

    Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes

    Did all patients receive the reference standard? No

    Could the patient flow have introduced bias? High risk

  • Appendices

    178

    User defined characteristics

    Publication

    details

    LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: English.

    FUNDING: Not reported.

    PUBLICATION STATUS: Full article.

    Stated aim of

    study

    Quote from publication: " To assess the prevalence of hypercalcitoninemia and MTC in NTD

    patients, to compare the ability of CT measurement and fine needle aspiartion cytology (FNAC)

    to predict MTC, to identify age groups of NTD patients who should be better candidates than

    others to undergo routine measurement of CT."

    Abbreviations CT: calcitonin, FNAC: fine needle aspiration cytology.

    Notes

  • Appendices

    179

    Schuetz 2006

    Patient Selection

    A. Risk of Bias

    Patient

    Sampling

    Design: Cohort study

    Inclusion criteria: Patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis with documented positivity for TPOAb,

    Negativity for anti-TSH receptor antibodies and thyroid ultrasound imaging suggestive of a

    chronic thyroiditis.

    Exclusion criteria: Not reported.

    Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes

    Was a case-control design avoided? Yes

    Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear

    Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Patient

    characteristics

    and setting

    Number of participants: 568 patients.

    Number with NTD: 105 patients.

    Number with NTD and calcitonin testing: 105 patients.

    Sex (female%)(n): 88.0% (500) NB only reported for whole study population.

    Age (mean/SD): 55 + Not reported range: 18 - 88 years, NB only reported for whole study

    population.

    MTC: 0 patients. (1 MTC patient in non-nodular study population)

    Type of thyroid nodules: Not reported.

    Thyroid nodules detected by palpation or US: US.

    Nodule size: Only reported for patients with elevated calcitonin (13 + 5 mm; range 4.5-17 mm).

    Number of nodules: Not reported.

    Sonographic morphology of thyroid nodules: Only reported for patients with elevated

    calcitonin; all nodules were hypoechic/circumscribable.

    FNA procedures performed through ultrasound guidance or palpation: Not reported.

    Setting: Out-patient department.

    Country: Austria.

    Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the

    review question?

    Low concern

    Index Test

    Index tests Calcitonin as a triage or add-on test: Not reported.

    Index test: Basal and stimulated calcitonin.

    Used calcitonin assay: Commercial assay by a Nichols Advantage Chemiluminescence System

    (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, Ca, USA)

    Sensitivity: 1 pg/ml.

    Stimulated calcitonin: Yes.

    Indication: Basal serum CT equal to/or exceeded 10 pg/ml.

    Stimulative: Pengagastrin Injection BP, Cambridge Laboratories, Tyne & Wear, UK

    Dose: 0.5 ug/kg

    Time: Before, 2,3 and 5 min after injection.

    Reported and extracted cut-off values

    Basal: reported: 10 pg/ml; extracted: 10 pg/ml.

    Stimulated: reported: 100 pg/ml; extracted 100 pg/ml.

    A. Risk of Bias

    If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? Yes

    Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

  • Appendices

    180

    Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from

    the review question?

    Low concern

    Reference Standard

    A. Risk of Bias

    Target condition

    and reference

    standard(s)

    Target condition: MTC.

    Reference standards: In selected patients histological examination after total thyroidectomy,

    follow-up.

    Indication surgical treatment: Patients with abnormal and pathological PG tests.

    Type of surgical treatment: Total thyroidectomy and lymph node dissection along both

    recurrent nerves in patients with a abnormal PG tests and an additional lateral lymph node

    dissection in patients with a pathological PG test or intraoperatively verified MTC.

    Calcitonin negative (n = 100)

    Number FNAC: -

    Number operated: Not reported.

    Calcitonin positive (n = 5)

    Number FNAC: Not reported.

    Number operated: 0 patients.

    Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear

    Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results

    of the index tests?

    Unclear

    Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced

    bias?

    Unclear risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard

    does not match the question?

    Low concern

    Flow and Timing

    A. Risk of Bias

    Flow and timing Follow-up calcitonin negative: Not reported.

    Type: -

    Duration: -

    Follow-up calcitonin positive: Not reported.

    Type: -

    Number with follow-up: -

    Duration: -

    Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear

    Did all patients receive the same reference standard? No

    Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes

    Did all patients receive the reference standard? No

    Could the patient flow have introduced bias? High risk

    User defined characteristics

    Publication

    details

    LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: English.

    FUNDING: Not reported.

    PUBLICATION STATUS: Full article.

    Stated aim of

    study

    Quote from publication: " To evaluate the relevance of routine CT measurements for

    detection of MTC or its premalignant associated conditions (micro MTC and neoplastic C cell

    hyperplasia) in HT patients."

    Abbreviations CT: calcitonin.

    Notes

  • Appendices

    181

    Costante 2007

    Patient Selection

    A. Risk of Bias

    Patient

    Sampling

    Design: Cohort study.

    Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with thyroid nodules.

    Exclusion criteria: Renal failure, persistent or recurrent MTC, or a family history of MTC.

    Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes

    Was a case-control design avoided? Yes

    Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Yes

    Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Patient

    characteristics

    and setting

    Number of participants: 5817 patients.

    Number with NTD: 5817 patients.

    Number with NTD and calcitonin testing: 5817 patients.

    Sex (female%)(n): 80.9% (4706).

    Age (mean/SD): 49.7 + 16.6 yr range: 11 - 72 yr.

    MTC: 15 patients.

    Type of thyroid nodules: Euthryoid nodular/multinodular goiter (n = 4894), hashimoto's

    thyroiditis with nodules (n = 436), autonomously functioning thyroid nodules (n = 276), toxic

    nodular goiter ( n = 211).

    Thyroid nodules detected by palpation or US: Not reported.

    Nodule size: Not reported.

    Number of nodules: Not reported.

    Sonographic morphology of thyroid nodules: Not reported.

    FNA procedures performed through ultrasound guidance or palpation: Not reported.

    Setting: A national healthcare system hospital (outpatient and inpatient) sectors.

    Country: Italy.

    Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the

    review question?

    Low concern

    Index Test

    Index tests Index test: Basal and stimulated calcitonin.

    Calcitonin as a triage or add-on test: Not reported.

    Used calcitonin assay: Chemiluminesence assay (Nichols advantage Calcitonin

    Chemiluminesence assay, San Juan Capistrano, CA).

    Sensitivity: 1 pg/ml.

    Stimulated calcitonin: Yes.

    Indication: Basal calcitonin levels > 20 pg/ml and < 100 pg/ml.

    Stimulative: Pentagastrin.

    Dose: 0.5 ug/kg.

    Time: 2 and 5 min after iv injection.

    Reported and extracted cut-off values

    Basal: 10 pg/ml, 20 pg/ml, 50 pg/ml and 100 pg/ml; extracted 10, 20, 50 and 100 pg/ml

    Stimulated: 100 pg/ml; extracted: 100 pg/ml.

    A. Risk of Bias

    If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? Yes

    Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from

    the review question?

    Low concern

  • Appendices

    182

    Reference Standard

    A. Risk of Bias

    Target condition

    and reference

    standard(s)

    Target condition: MTC.

    Reference standards: FNAB in patients with nonautonomous nodules exceeding 10 mm in

    diameter; in selected patients histological examination after surgery, follow-up.

    Indication surgical treatment: 1) FNAB indicative or suggestive of thyroid malignancy, 2)

    multinodular autonomous or toxic goiters, 3) large euthyroid goiters causing compression, 4)

    serum CT levels (basal or PG stimulated) more than 100 pg/ml.

    Type: Not reported.

    Calcitonin negative (n = 5535)

    Number FNAB: Not reported.

    Number operated: 723 patients.

    Calcitonin positive (n = 216)

    Number FNAB: Not reported.

    Number operated: 24 patients.

    Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear

    Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results

    of the index tests?

    Unclear

    Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced

    bias?

    Unclear risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference

    standard does not match the question?

    Low concern

    Flow and Timing

    A. Risk of Bias

    Flow and timing Follow-up calcitonin negative: Not reported.

    Type: -

    Duration: -

    Follow-up calcitonin positive: In patients with basal CT between 10-100 pg/ml and negative

    Pg testing.

    Type: Basal CT in patients with basal CT between 10-20 pg/ml; yearly stimulated CT in

    patients with basal CT between 20-100 pg /ml.

    Number with follow-up: 212 patients.

    Duration: 2-4 yr.

    Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear

    Did all patients receive the same reference standard? No

    Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes

    Did all patients receive the reference standard? No

    Could the patient flow have introduced bias? High risk

    User defined characteristics

    Publication

    details

    LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: English.

    FUNDING: Non-commercial.

    PUBLICATION STATUS: Full article.

    Stated aim of

    study

    Quote from publication: " To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of systematic CT

    measurement in non-multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 patients with nodular thyroid

    disease."

    Abbreviations CT: calcitonin, FNAB: fine needle aspiration biopsy, PG: pentagastrin.

    Notes

  • Appendices

    183

    Rink 2009

    Patient Selection

    A. Risk of Bias

    Patient

    Sampling

    Design: Cohort study.

    Inclusion criteria: Nodular thyroid disease diagnosed by high-resolution US.

    Exclusion criteria: Not reported.

    Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes

    Was a case-control design avoided? Yes

    Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear

    Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Patient

    characteristics

    and setting

    Number of participants: 21928 patients.

    Number with NTD: 21928 patients.

    Number with NTD and calcitonin testing: 21928 patients.

    Sex (female%)(n): 76.9% (16857).

    Age (mean/SD): not reported range: 8 - 97 yrs.

    MTC: 28 patients.

    Type of thyroid nodules: Not reported.

    Thyroid nodules detected by palpation or US: US.

    Nodule size: Only reported for MTC patients.

    Number of nodules: Not reported.

    Sonographic morphology of thyroid nodules: Not reported.

    FNA procedures performed through ultrasound guidance or palpation: Not reported.

    Setting: Four sites in central Germany.

    Country: Germany.

    Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the

    review question?

    Low concern

    Index Test

    Index tests Index test: Basal and stimulated calcitonin.

    Calcitonin as a triage or add-on test: Not reported.

    Used calcitonin assay: Radioimmunoassays Calcitonin-IRMA (IBL GmbH, Hamburg, Germany)

    and Calcitonin-IRMA magnum (Medipan GmbH, Dahlewith/Berlin, Germany).

    Sensitivity: 0.7 ng/l (IBL), 1.5 ng/L (Medipan).

    Stimulated calcitonin: Yes.

    Indication: If basal CT > 10 ng/l and if renal insufficiency as well as proton pump inhibiotr

    medication could be ruled out.

    Stimulative: Pentagastrin (Pentagastrin Injection BP, Cambridge Laboratiries Ltd., Tyne &

    Wear, England).

    Dose: 0.5 ug/kg.

    Time: Not reported.

    Reported and extracted cut-off values

    Basal: reported: 10 ng/l; extracted: 10, 15 ng/l.

    Stimulated: reported males: 80 ng/l, females 50 ng/l.; extracted 50, 80 ng/l.

    A. Risk of Bias

    If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? Yes

    Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from

    the review question?

    Low concern

  • Appendices

    184

    Reference Standard

    A. Risk of Bias

    Target condition

    and reference

    standard(s)

    Target condition: MTC.

    Reference standards: In selected patients histopathological examination after thyroid

    surgery, follow-up.

    Indication surgical treatment: An abnormal PGT, a basal CT exceeding 30 ng/l, increasing

    basal or progressive morphologic alterations during follow-up.

    Type: Not reported.

    Calcitonin negative (n = 21073)

    Number FNA: -

    Number operated: Not reported.

    Calcitonin positive (n = 855)

    Number FNA: -

    Number operated: 157 patients.

    Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear

    Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results

    of the index tests?

    Unclear

    Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced

    bias?

    Unclear risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard

    does not match the question?

    Low concern

    Flow and Timing

    A. Risk of Bias

    Flow and timing Follow-up calcitonin negative: Not reported.

    Type: -

    Duration: -

    Follow-up calcitonin positive: In patients not having surgery and without renal insufficiency.

    Type: Ultrasound and determination of basal CT.

    Number with follow-up: 214 patients.

    Duration: mean observation 21 months, median 17 months, range 3-87 months.

    Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear

    Did all patients receive the same reference standard? No

    Were all patients included in the analysis? No

    Did all patients receive the reference standard? No

    Could the patient flow have introduced bias? High risk

    User defined characteristics

    Publication

    details

    LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: English.

    FUNDING: Non-commercial.

    PUBLICATION STATUS: Full article.

    Stated aim of

    study

    Quote from publication: " the calculation and validation of upper limits for basal and

    stimulated pCT-Cs in a large patient population with nodular thyroid disease, to distinguish

    bewteen the subgroups with and without MTC."

    Abbreviations pCT-C: plasma calcitonin concentration, PGT: pentagastrin test.

    Notes

  • Appendices

    185

    Hasselgren 2010

    Patient Selection

    A. Risk of Bias

    Patient

    Sampling

    Design: Retrospective study.

    Inclusion criteria: Patients with non-toxic nodular goiter.

    Exclusion criteria: Patients with missing data or with wrongly registered diagnosis.

    Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes

    Was a case-control design avoided? Yes

    Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Yes

    Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Patient

    characteristics

    and setting

    Number of participants: 959 patients.

    Number with NTD: 959 patients.

    Number with NTD and calcitonin testing: 702 patients.

    Sex (female%)(n): 84.6% (811) NB of whole study population (n=959).

    Age (mean/SD): mean not reported; median 49 yrs range: 13-93 yrs NB of whole study

    population (n=959).

    MTC: 6 patients.

    Type of thyroid nodules: Non toxic nodular goiter.

    Thyroid nodules detected by palpation or US: Not reported.

    Nodule size: Only reported of MTC patients.

    Number of nodules: Not reported.

    Sonographic morphology of thyroid nodules: Not reported.

    FNA procedures performed through ultrasound guidance or palpation: Ultrasound.

    Setting: Secondary/tertiarry referral centre.

    Country: Denmark.

    Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the

    review question?

    Low concern

    Index Test

    Index tests Index test: Basal calcitonin

    Calcitonin as a triage or add-on test: Not reported.

    Used calcitonin assay: (1) double-antibody radioimmunoassay technique (MediLab A/S,

    Copenhagen, Denmark) (n =668) (2) solid-phase, enzyme-labelded, 2-site chemiluminescent

    immunometric principle (Immulite 2000, Calcitonin, Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics,

    Erlangen, Germany) (n=14).

    Sensitivity: Not reported (1 and 2).

    Stimulated calcitonin: No.

    Indication: -

    Stimulative: -

    Dose: -

    Time: -

    Reported and extracted cut-off values

    Basal: reported 0.10 ug/l, 0.20 ug/l, 0.50 ug/l (= 100 ng/l(pg/ml)).

    Stimulated: -

    A. Risk of Bias

    If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? Yes

    Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? Low risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicability

    Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from Low concern

  • Appendices

    186

    the review question?

    Reference Standard

    A. Risk of Bias

    Target condition

    and reference

    standard(s)

    Target condition: MTC.

    Reference standards: FNAB, in selected patients histopathological examination after surgery,

    cross-linkage with the Danish Thyroid Cancer Database.

    Indication surgical treatment: Based on the composition of the following variables: (1) clincal

    evaluation including age, comorbidity, thyroid size, suspicion of malignancy; (2) sonographic

    appearance; (3) result of FNAB; (4) result of serum calcitonin measurement; (5) patient

    preference.

    Type: Not reported.

    Calcitonin negative: (n = 663)

    Number FNAB: Not reported.

    Number operated: 223 patients.

    Calcitonin positive (n = 39)

    Number FNAB: Not reported.

    Number operated: 23 patients.

    Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Yes

    Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of

    the index tests?

    Unclear

    Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced bias? Unclear risk

    B. Concerns regarding applicabili