UnExpected Outcomes (5)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 UnExpected Outcomes (5)

    1/6

    Images not displaying properly? Click here to view the online version.

    A Weekly Column By Walter B. Hoye II

    Conflict Of

    Interest

    In the abortion debate, is there a "Conflict of Interest"within the Black community and among her leaders?

    Subscribe Unsubscribe Forward Archives Issue No.: 2012.107

    UnExpected Outcomes (5)

    "It's Not About Slavery" (19th Century)

    "This war must go on till the last of this generation

    falls in his tracks, and his children seize his musket and

    fight our battle, unless you acknowledge our right to self-

    government. We are not fighting for slavery; we are

    fighting for independence, and that or extermination we

    will have." Jefferson Finis "Jeff" Davis President ofthe Confederate States of America 1

    Did Black American Slaves Fight For The Confederacy?

    "The free colored population love their home, their property, their own slaves and recognize no other country than Louisiana, and

    are ready to shed their blood for her defense. They have no sympathy for Abolitionism; no love for the North, but they have plenty

    for Louisiana. They will fight for her in 1861 as they fought in 1814-15." A letter written to the New Orleans' Daily Delta

    (December 1860) referencing Black American participation in the Louisiana Campaign of December 13th, 1814 2,3

    Yes, Black American Slaves served as Confederate soldiers! Here's the story.

    In January of 1864, with the defeat of the South all but

    certain and since the Confederacy was "not fighting for

    slavery," Confederate Major General Patrick R.

    Cleburne, proposed using Slaves as confederate soldiers.

    In return for their loyal service to the noble ideals of the

    Confederacy, the Slaves would be offered their freedom if

    they fought and survived. 4This proposal was met with

    abject abhorrence and Jefferson Davis, President of the Confederate States of

    America quickly rejected it and wrote clearly that he thought it was:

    http://www.sharethis.com/share?url=http://www.issues4life.org/blast/2012107.html&title=Conflict+Of+Interest&summary=Is+there+a+conflict+of+interest+within+the+Black+community+and+among+her+leaders?+Could+her+leaders+be+complicit+in+the+carnage+of+their+own+people?+Walter+Hoye%27s+weekly+column+examines+the+abortion+debate+from+an+Black-American%27s+perspective+with+a+Judeo+Christian+Worldview.&img=http://www.issues4life.org/images/20090525walterhoye.jpg&publisher=cd4a03ed-661d-424c-8305-634e10fbd2d5mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe&body=Newsletter%20Manager:%0A%0aPlease%20remove%20my%20email%20address%20from%20your%20list.%0A%0AThank%20you.mailto:?subject=You%20Gotta%20Read%20This...&body=Greetings%20%5BYour%20Friend%27s%20Name%20Here%5D:%0A%0aI%20recommend%20you%20check%20out%20this%20link:%0A%0a-%20%20http://www.issues4life.org/blast/2012107.html%0A%0aYou%20gotta%20read%20this%20article%20from%20Walter%20Hoye%27s%20weekly%20column.http://www.issues4life.org/newsletters.htmlhttp://www.sharethis.com/share?url=http://www.issues4life.org/blast/2012107.html&title=Conflict+Of+Interest&summary=Is+there+a+conflict+of+interest+within+the+Black+community+and+among+her+leaders?+Could+her+leaders+be+complicit+in+the+carnage+of+their+own+people?+Walter+Hoye%27s+weekly+column+examines+the+abortion+debate+from+an+Black-American%27s+perspective+with+a+Judeo+Christian+Worldview.&img=http://www.issues4life.org/images/20090525walterhoye.jpg&publisher=cd4a03ed-661d-424c-8305-634e10fbd2d5http://www.issues4life.org/newsletters.htmlmailto:?subject=You%20Gotta%20Read%20This...&body=Greetings%20%5BYour%20Friend%27s%20Name%20Here%5D:%0A%0aI%20recommend%20you%20check%20out%20this%20link:%0A%0a-%20%20http://www.issues4life.org/blast/2012107.html%0A%0aYou%20gotta%20read%20this%20article%20from%20Walter%20Hoye%27s%20weekly%20column.mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe&body=Newsletter%20Manager:%0A%0aPlease%20remove%20my%20email%20address%20from%20your%20list.%0A%0AThank%20you.http://www.issues4life.org/foundationnewsletter.htmlhttp://www.issues4life.org/blast/2012107.html
  • 8/2/2019 UnExpected Outcomes (5)

    2/6

    " injurious of the public service that such subject should

    be mooted or even known to entertain by persons

    possessed of confidence and respect of the people. If it be

    kept out of the public journal its ill effect will be much

    lessened." 5

    However, the Confederate Army suffered massive defeats in the spring and

    summer of 1864 and with her manpower and morale depleted by the winter of 1864-

    1865, President Davis was forced to change his mind. William Smith, Governor of

    Virginia, said:

    "With two hundred thousand Negro soldiers already in the

    Union Army, can we hesitate, can we doubt, when the

    question is, whether the enemy shall use our Slaves

    against us or we use them against him; when the

    question may be between liberty and independence on one

    hand or our own subjugation and utter ruin on the other." 6

    Apparently Governor Smith did not like the idea of his faith-filled and freedom

    loving Antebellum South lacking liberty, independence or being subject to

    subjugation. Still, the debate over using Black American Slaves as soldiers in the

    Confederate Army raged on in the Confederate Congress in 1865.

    Robert Mercer Taliaferro Hunter, the very powerful

    Confederate Senator from Virginia and caustic critic of

    Confederate President Jefferson Davis feared, such

    legislation would trigger Slaves running away in mass to

    join the Union Army said: "Negroes now are deterred

    from going to the enemy only by the fear of being put in the army. If

    we put them in they will all go over." 7

    At the heart of this debate was the issue of freeing the Slaves to fight for the

    Confederacy. Henry Cousins Chambers, who killed his opponent for

    Confederate Congress, William Augustus Lake, in a duel in 1861, represented

    Mississippi in the First Confederate Congress and the Second Confederate

    Congress from 1862 to 1865.

    It was the Honorable Mr. Chambers from Mississippi

    who said he was ashamed to debate the question. Since

    the Confederacy was "not fighting for slavery," Mr.

    Chambers expressed his heart felt sentiments this way: "All nature

  • 8/2/2019 UnExpected Outcomes (5)

    3/6

    cries out against it. The Negro was ordained to slavery by the

    Almighty. Emancipation would be the destruction of our social and

    political system. God forbid that this Trojan horse should be

    introduced among us." 8

    Many viewed this proposal as a measure that would

    threatened the very foundations of the Confederacy.

    However, in the end, a compromise was reached and onMarch 13th, 1864 Confederate President Jefferson

    Davis, who made it clear that the Confederacy was "not

    fighting for slavery," signed a narrowly passed bill that

    did not include a provision to emancipate those

    Slaves who left the plantations to fight for the

    Confederate Army. 9 Facing their own "subjugation,"

    "utter ruin" and the "destruction of [their] social and political system," should the

    South lose the war, the Confederate Congress chose to leave the freedom of the

    Slaves up to the individual states and General Order No. 14 (click here or on

    image to the left to enlarge and read) was officially issued setting a fixed numberof300,000 Slaves for the Confederate States Colored Troops. 10

    "It's Not About Abortion" (21st Century)

    "This all deals with women's health. Everything has

    been resolved. Everything. It's an ideological battle. It has

    nothing to do with fiscal integrity in this

    country." Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid

    (Democrat, Nevada), the morning of the Friday, April 8th,2012 deadline for the federal government's fiscal year 2012 budget 11

    Did The Federal Government Almost Shut Down Over Abortion?

    "A woman's ability to decide how many children to have and when, without interference from the government, is one of the most

    fundamental rights we possess. It is not just an issue of choice, but equality and opportunity for all women ." Barack

    Hussein Obama II, as a United States Senator12

    On Thursday, April 7th, 2011 the nation was

    facing the possibility of the federal government

    shutting down if President Barack HusseinObama II, the Democrat-Controlled Senate and

    the Republican-Controlled House in Congress

    cannot agree with a final 2011 budget by Friday,

    April 8th, 2011. 13 With the federal government

    twenty-four (24) hours away from shut down, Republican-Controlled House

    passed their third (3rd) Continuing Resolution (CR) to carry the federal

    government for at least one (1) more week. 14 However, the President Barack

    Hussein Obama II and the Democrat-Controlled Senate have rejected the latest

    http://www.issues4life.org/images/generalordersno14.jpg
  • 8/2/2019 UnExpected Outcomes (5)

    4/6

    Republican-Controlled House proposed CR because it contains a policy rider in it

    that would cut abortion funding. According to a CNN report dated, on Friday,

    April 8th, 2011 at 10:54 A.M. (EST), Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid

    (Democrat, Nevada), admitted that "the abortion

    issue is the lone remaining stumbling block for

    negotiators trying to reach a budget deal that

    would stop the federal government from being

    shutdown." 15 In the end government shutdown

    was averted. When the Republicans agreed todrop their demand to defund Planned

    Parenthood and the Democrats agreed to much

    larger budget cuts, on Friday, April 8th, 2011,

    just before 11:00 P.M. (EST) House Speaker John Andrew Beohner

    (Republican, Ohio) announced a deal was done just before the midnight

    deadline. 16

    Like it or not

    It's All About Abortion.

    Indeed history repeats itself.

    Just like it was about slavery in the past, it's about abortion today.

    It's been over forty-five (45) years since abortion

    was legalized in America. 17 Since 1967 over fifty-

    five (55) million lives have been lost to abortion on

    demand. 18 That's over fifty (50) million more lives

    than the documented number of United States

    military dead, wounded and missing since 1775

    (2,527,494) 19 or almost one percent (1%) of the

    world's population to date. 20 In the past forty-five

    (45) years abortion has taken over fifty-five (55)

    million American lives, more than twenty-two (22)

    times the totality of lives loss in ALL the wars America has ever fought in one-fifth

    (1/5th) of the time. Both the Democrats and Republicans seem to be blind to thesocial, economic and spiritual impact of fifty-five (55) million unborn Americans

    missing in action. Fifty-five (55) million lives is 30 percent (30%) of the entire

    generation under forty-five (45) or seventy-two percent (72%) of all the babies born

    during the Baby Boom from 1945 to 1963. 21 Apparently, the Democrats would

    rather shut down the entire federal government before defunding the largest

    abortion provider in the country with tax-payer dollars. Apparently, the

    Republicans would rather fund the largest abortion provider in the country with tax-

    payer dollars before shutting down the entire federal government. Either way, the

  • 8/2/2019 UnExpected Outcomes (5)

    5/6

  • 8/2/2019 UnExpected Outcomes (5)

    6/6

    20. United States Census Bureau (http://www.census.gov).

    21. Dennis M. Howard, The Movement for a Better America, Inc., "America's Silent Killer: 55.3 Million Lives Lost!"

    (http://bit.ly/IprTXN).

    22. Ecclesiastes 11:5 Bible.cc provides a parallel, verse by verse view of 8 translations (http://bit.ly/I659tF).

    Click Here To Support Our Work. The Issues4Life Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization. All

    donations are tax deductible. To send a donation via U.S. Mail, please make the check or money order

    payable to the "Issues4Life Foundation" and send it to the address below. Or we have partnered with Real

    Estate ForLife, where you can support our Pro-Life work at no cost to you! For more information please click

    here.

    Issues4Life Foundation

    1684 Decoto Road, Suite 261

    Union City, California 94587-3544

    [email protected]

    www.issues4life.org

    California Civil Rights Foundation

    1684 Decoto Road, Suite 251

    Union City, California 94587-3544

    [email protected]

    www.civilrightsfoundation.org

    Copyright 2012 Issues4Life Foundation | California Civil Rights Foundation. All rights reserved.To ensure our newsletter always reaches your inbox, please add the above "FROM" email address to your

    address book. If you prefer not to receive news from us in the future, you can unsubscribe here.

    mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe&body=Newsletter%20Manager:%0A%0aPlease%20remove%20my%20email%20address%20from%20your%20list.%0A%0AThank%20you.http://www.civilrightsfoundation.org/mailto:[email protected]://www.issues4life.org/mailto:[email protected]://www.realestateforlife.org/http://www.issues4life.org/donations.htmlhttp://www.issues4life.org/donations.htmlhttp://www.issues4life.org/donations.htmlhttp://bit.ly/I659tFhttp://bit.ly/IprTXNhttp://www.census.gov/