Upload
blaine-mathieu
View
14
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Blaine MathieuDirector, Market Strategy & IntelligenceCorel Corporation
November 19, 2002
Understanding Market Sizing
PMeasures of market sizePExamples and scenarios PHow growth is calculated
�– Note: all examples and scenarios are theoretical only
Overview
PTotal Addressable Market (TAM) is the most common waythat market sizes are reported by companies
But it is important to understand TAM in a larger context
Note that these measures can generally be expressed both in terms of revenues and seats/installations
Reporting Market SizeThere is more to the market than TAM
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
TPM:Total Potential
Market
TAM:Total Addressable
Market
TCM:Total Captured
Market
Sample Market Sizing
PMarket size that accounts for the maximum possiblerevenues/seats that could theoretically be captured
Assumes every potential user will actually purchase the product�– Example: 1.5b knowledge workers in the world x $250 ASP= the Total Potential Market for
Word Processing ($375b)�– Note that TPM does not count all 6b people in the �“universe�”. Even TPM must be �“reasonable�”Unlikely to be achieved in the real worldCreates a upper boundary (top cap) for TAMMay exhibit low (or even negative) rates of growth�– I.e., a declining ASP would likely cause TPM to decline over time�– Remember: User vendor (sell-in) ASP, not retail/channel (sell-thru) ASP
TPM: Total Potential Market
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
TPM
PBased upon the proportion of TPM seats that will actually purchase amarket solution given realistic product and marketing assumptions
PDerived from TPM based on two key factors:Product factor: The extent to which products in the market address real customer needsMarketing execution factor: The extent to which the customers perceive that the products address theirneeds (i.e., awareness)
PThese factors combine to create a rate of adoption of the TPM that resultsin TAM seats/revenues
�– Example:$375b Potential Word Processing market x 0.2% yearly adoption rate= the Total AddressableMarket for Word Processing ($750m)
TAM: Total Addressable Market
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
TAM
P Size of revenues/seats that a particular vendor will capture
Usually we think of that vendor as being Corel
P Based on the vendor's share of the market�– Example:$750m Addressable Word Processing market x 95% share= the Total Captured
Market for Microsoft Word ($713m)
TCM: Total Captured Market
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
TCM
PWhen understanding markets, it is often important tounderstand all three elements of market sizing
PTPMEasiest to forecast. Therefore useful particularly in emergingmarkets since it is difficult to forecast actual adoption rates with anyaccuracyProvides a �“top cap�” to the actual market value to help comparepotential market attractiveness
PTAMDescribes how much activity is actually taking place in the marketReal revenues that Corel could gain a share ofOften used for resource allocation
PTCMActual revenue and share forecasts are critical for obvious reasons
Why TPM, TAM & TCM
Example: EPM Market Sizing
$-
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Total Potential Market (TPM)CAGR = 4.6%
Assumption: Every singleenterprise manager and processowner either purchases orupgrades a copy of the software
Total Addressable Market (TAM)CAGR = 37.6%
Assumption: Based on actualEPM software sales trends(actual and forecasted adoption)
Total Captured Market (TCM)CAGR = 40.4%
Assumption: Corel will increaseits share of market over time
EPM Market Sizing
Note: Theoretical example only. These numbers are not real market size numbers.
P When all possible users are actually addressableP More likely in very mature or saturated marketsP The Pro Layout market (Tier 1 geos only) might resemble
this scenario
Unique Scenario 1TAM = TPM
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
TAM = TPM
TCM
Sample Scenario Market Sizing
(by the out-year)
P When Corel projects 100% market shareP Possible if Corel defines a new market that only its solution
serves (Grafigo?)Scenario usually not sustainable as significant revenues will attract competition
Unique Scenario 2TCM = TAM
TCM = TAM
TPM
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Sample Scenario Market Sizing
P In certain markets, TAM may include revenues/seats that are earned by substitutetechnologies and not only directly competing products
P Possible when demand exists that is currently unmet directly by existing products but isbeing met via alternative solutions that are competing for the same dollars
P Example:The �“value�” of home grown/proprietary solutions might also be included in TAM
P But don't forget that product and marketing factors affect TAMA market is not considered �“addressable�” unless Corel can (and will) execute against that opportunity
Unique Scenario 3TAM may include indirect competitors
Proportion of TAM that ismet by direct competitors
TAM
Sample Scenario Market SizingOver time, TAM may become 100% met bydirect competitors ascompanies realize thatthere is a need for adirect solution in the space.
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
This scenariodescribes the mostproblematic area ofTAM sizing. Talk toMS&I if you areunsure how this consideration may affect the sizing ofyour market.
P In general, the following logic flow is used to take the�“universe�” down to TCM
PUniverse to TPMTPM = Universe size x % of seats/revenues �“potentially�” in the market
PTPM to TAMTAM = TPM x Adoption rate which is fn(product x marketing)
PTAM to TCMTCM = TAM x Company market share
Conversion Formula Summary
Actual buyers/revenues fora particular productTCM
Actual buyers/revenuesTAMPotential buyers/revenuesTPMTo summarize:
PGrowth is reported in terms of �“% CAGR�”PCAGR
Compound Annual Growth RateThe average annual rate of growth between two points in time
(Year 1 and Year X)CAGR Formula = (Year Xvalue / Year 1value) ^ (1 / # Years) -1
PExampleVideo game market size: 2000 = $232m, 2004 = $831mCAGR = (831 / 232) ^ (1 / 4) �–1CAGR = 37.6%
Reporting Growth
PFor �“emerging�” markets, TPM is often more useful than TAMBecause there is no TAM until real products are in the market
PTheory aside,TAM can be calculated in a number of waysSupply side (adding up competing vendor revenues)Demand side (based on seats and adoption/purchase rates)TPM is nearly always based on a demand-side analysis only
PPlease use proper terms and definitions when describingmarket sizes �– avoids confusion and controversy
And be careful in interpreting how others use these terms. Definitionsare not standardized in the wider business community
PFor further information and assistance with market sizing andforecasting, contact
Blaine Mathieu, Director Market Strategy & Intelligence x1387
Final Issues