Upload
tiezheng-yuan
View
34
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MKT2004
Research Methods for Business and Marketing
Group Project Report
Secondary Data Analysis and Qualitative Research
Understanding Consumer Purchasing Behaviour and Consumption
In The Oral Care Product Industry
Researcher Members:
CHEN CHEN – 110558091
CHING HANG HO (MIKE) – 110558231
ZIXIANG KENNETH KAN – 110558275
AMY LOUISE SCOTT – 110177940
ANGELINE TJANDRA – 110562630
ROXANNE MELISSA TUCK – 110471871
CHRISTIE LOUISE WOODHOUSE – 110108391
TIEZHENG YUAN – 110562836
Date: 3rd December 2012
Word Count: 6423 words
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
2
Table of Contents
5 Executive Summary
6 Introduction
6 Research Background
8 Research Problem
8 Research Aim and Objectives
9 Research Methodology
11 Analysis and Findings
11 Findings from Secondary Research
21 Findings from Focus Group
31 Findings from Personal Experience Record
32 Conclusion & Recommendations
35 Limitations
36 References
39 Appendices
39 Appendix 1 – Focus Group Moderator Guide
42 Appendix 2 – Focus Group Result Coding
57 Appendix 3 – Group Members’ Personal Experience Records
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
3
List of Tables
11 Table 1.1 – Most popular oral care benefits sought
21 Table 2.1 – Demographic variables
22 Table 2.2 – Functions sought after in toothpaste
23 Table 2.3 – Consumer behaviour & influence of functionalities
(toothbrush)
23 Table 2.4 – Consumer behaviour & influence of functionalities
(mouthwash)
23 Table 2.5 – General trends in packaging, aesthetics and flavour
24 Table 2.6 – Consumer behaviours & packaging, aesthetics and
flavour (toothpaste)
25 Table 2.7 – Consumer behaviours & packaging, aesthetics and
flavour (toothbrush)
26 Table 2.8 – Consumer behaviours & packaging, aesthetics and
flavour (mouthwash)
27 Table 2.9 – Consumer behaviours and influence of advertisements
28 Table 2.10 – Consumer behaviours and influence of price (general trend)
29 Table 2.11 – Consumer behaviours and influence of price (toothbrush)
29 Table 2.12 – Consumer behaviours and influence of price (toothbrush)
30 Table 2.13 – Consumer behaviours and influence of price (mouthwash)
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
4
List of Figures
15 Figure 1.1 – Main monitored media advertising
16 Figure 1.2 – Toothpaste Brand Shares 2008 – 2011
17 Figure 1.3 – Mouthwash Brand Shares 2008 – 2011
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
5
Executive Summary
Modern consumerism is getting increasingly sophisticated as consumers indulge in emotional
buying motives. This, coupled with the competitive business landscape, makes it vital for oral
care product manufacturers to gain a thorough understanding of consumer behavior in order
to develop effective marketing strategies. This report seeks to understand the consumer
behavior of young adults (ages 18-30) in this industry by critically analyzing two rational
(Price and Product functionality) and two irrational (Advertisement and Packaging/Aesthetics)
factors.
Research for this report included reviews of literature on academic papers, online marketing
research databases, a focus group and personal experience records.
The key findings indicates that young adults are especially interested in oral care products
with teeth whitening benefits, packed to be modern and professional looking, with a
professional sounding name. It is also established that effective advertisements for young
adults are those that has the ability to draw an association with them. Lastly, young adults
have strong brand loyalty to oral care products.
This report recommends that oral care product manufactures review their product naming and
packaging policies whilst emphasizing on their products’ teeth whitening benefits. For more
effective advertising, they could consider hiring celebrities who appeal to young adults to be
their brand ambassadors in advertisements.
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
6
Introduction
1. Research Background
“Consumer behaviour is most frequently modelled as a cognitive process, intellectual
sequence of thinking, evaluating and deciding” (Foxall, 2005). As such, consumers would
first be made aware of a need or want and how they can go about to fulfil it. The behavioural
aspect of the consumer would then be determined by a series of thought processes. This
process ranges from mentally calling on information they have on hand to acquiring
information from sales people and even friends (Baker, 2003).
On the other hand, Baines (2011) believes that consumer behaviour contains both rational and
irrational components. In today’s age, Baines (2011) argues that consumers are more likely to
“indulge in emotional buying motives” which are influenced by a buyer’s “social and
psychological interpretation of the product and its performance.” Although the current
marketing literature is dominated by rational theories as seen in Foxall’s definition above, it
is now equally as important to consider irrational components in today’s modern world.
The oral care industry is an increasingly saturated and competitive one. The difficulty faced
by oral healthcare manufactures to expand or consolidate their market share is exacerbated by
the dynamic marketing environment and changes in lifestyle of consumers. Vani (2010)
states that “the study of consumer behaviour is concerned not only with what consumer buy,
but also with why they buy it, when and how they buy it and how often they buy it”.
Understanding the motives of consumers’ purchasing behaviour is thus key for oral care
manufacturers to achieve their respective targets.
As modern consumerism gets increasingly sophisticated, there is a gradual shift in emphasis
on the markets to become more customer oriented. The significance of understanding
consumer behaviour is thus made all the more important (Jain, 2010). By means of analysing
two rational (Price and Product functionality) factors and two irrational (Advertisements and
Packaging and aesthetics) factors, this report seeks to gain a better understanding of
consumers’ behaviour in the oral healthcare products industry across three product categories;
Toothbrush, Toothpaste and Mouthwash.
Pricing and product functionalities are two rational factors which affects consumer behaviour.
Diamantopolous (1995) suggests that price has a strong influence on consumer behaviour
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
7
while Euromonitor (2012) indicated that consumers are increasingly looking for value-added
product functionality.
The oral care industry has products with a wide selection of substitute goods (eg. numerous
brands of toothpaste). In traditional economic sense, this will dictate that oral care products
are highly price elastic, and therefore a lower price will bring in more profits (Baines, 2011).
Yet, Euromonitor (2012) has indicated that the top 5 selling brands in the industry are all
manufacturers of relatively medium-high price range products. The delicate balance of price
and product functionalities will be researched in later chapters.
The packaging and aesthetics factors are significant emotional elements in consumer
behaviour. Euromonitor has observed that premium looking oral care products are becoming
increasingly popular (2012). It is therefore imperative to explore consumer behaviour towards
different forms of packaging and aesthetics to determine the right formula for the perceived
“premium looking” product.
Advertising is also vital to raising brand profile and promoting new products features to the
market, appealing to the emotional consciousness in consumers (Mintel, 2012).
Understanding the different level of impacts between the emotional and the rational aspect of
an advertisement can help the industry to produce more effective marketing materials.
Despite the economic downturn, oral care sector in the United Kingdom is valued at £981
million in 2011, a growth of 5% on 2010 (Euromonitor, 2012). The industry is projected to
grow by a compound annual growth rate of 2% until 2016. Industry observers believe that
this momentum for growth is derived from the rise in demand of oral care products due to
decreasing dentist visits (Mintel, 2012).
In 2011, Procter & Gamble UK Ltd re-entered the toothpaste market with the launch of the
Oral-B Pro-Expert range, leading to a supermarket shelf space war. The total industry
advertising expenditure reached £120 million, a 300% increase on 2010, making the oral care
sector one of the most competitive among the beauty and personal care industry
(Euromonitor, 2012).
Youth and young adults are groups of highly innovative consumers, and revenue from new
products adopted by them is a pivotal success for oral care firms (Cowart et al., 2008). Being
a highly competitive landscape, oral care firms should be actively adjusting themselves to an
increasingly aware consumer base (Alain, S. et al., 2001). Consumers may alter their buying
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
8
behaviours of oral care base on a variety of factors, including the functionalities, price,
advertising materials, packaging and aesthetics.
2. Research Problem
The task of consolidating and expanding market share remains a puzzling conundrum to oral
healthcare manufacturers (Zuckerman, 2005). This could primarily be attributed to two
reasons. Firstly, the dynamic marketing environment means that manufacturers have to be
constantly kept abreast of the latest changes (Keegan, 2013). Secondly, different product
categories of the oral healthcare industry are dominated by different manufacturers who have
carved out a niche market in each category (Mintel, 2012). Amarchand et al (1979) argues
that marketing success depends upon the company’s ability to find and satisfy customers. It is
thus imperative that oral healthcare manufacturers have a succinct understanding of the
consumers’ purchasing behaviour in order to develop effective marketing strategies.
3. Research Aims and Objectives
This report seeks to discern consumers’ purchasing behaviour, particularly young adults (ages
18-30) in United Kingdom, of the following oral care products: toothpaste, toothbrush, and
mouthwash. Four main factors (Product Functionality, Aesthetics/Packaging, Advertising,
and Price) which influence consumer behaviour would be critically examined in this report
and appropriate recommendations would be made from the results of this research. The key
objectives of this study are outlined as follows:
1. Which function in oral care products consumers prefer the most, hygiene or cosmetic
benefit?
2. How does aesthetics/packaging affect consumer behaviour?
3. How advertising can be utilised to capture consumers?
4. Is price the deciding factor in consumer purchasing behaviour?
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
9
Research Methodology
Secondary Research
The data collected in this research was mainly external secondary data from published
materials and computerized databases. Books and business sources were the two main types
of published materials used. Books regarding marketing research and consumer behaviour
were used to provide more understanding about this study. Business source used came from
mainly three categories which are directories, indexes and non-government statistics, such as
Newcastle University library guides, Financial Times, and Euromonitor. Internet full-text
database such as e-journals was the main type of computerized database used.
The main focus of secondary research was four key factors which influences consumer
behaviour in purchasing oral care products: price, advertisement, product functionality, and
packaging/aesthetics.
Focus Group
An experiencing focus group was conducted in Newcastle University Business School room
2.10 on 14th
November 2012. The focus group consists of 7 participants (4 females and 3
males) and a moderator, all personnel are researchers involved in this report. A moderator
guide containing open and non-leading questions was used by the moderator to facilitate the
discussion. The topics of discussion were delivered in accordance to the following themes:
general pattern of consumption, top of the mind imaging, consumption of oral care products
and the factors affecting purchase. The focus group lasted sixty minutes; video and audio
recording was used with the approval of the participants.
Four steps were taken in the analysis of focus group data. They were data assembly, data
reduction, data display, and data verification. Theoretical support from secondary research,
photographs, audiotape recording, and transcript were used in the process of data assembly.
The transcript was then coded according to question categories in order to facilitate data
reduction. Next, the organised and compressed data was displayed in table form to permit
conclusion drawing. Lastly, data was verified through participant validation.
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
10
Personal Experience Record
The personal experience records were collected from a sample size of 8 (4 males and 4
females), who are members of this research project. In this study, the duration of personal
experience recorded was 2 weeks. Informants were asked to make record of their
consumption in personal care and beauty products listed in the form. In the record, informants
recorded the number of usage, brand name, and whether they would like to keep, change, or
recommend the current brand they are using to others. Informants were asked to hand in their
completed personal experience record forms at the end of study. Lastly, some trends and
findings were drawn from the analysis of the records.
Data Analysis
Data collected from the three methods of research would then be critically examined. By
means of triangulation, conclusive findings could be drawn to gain a succinct understanding
of consumer behaviour. Appropriate recommendations can thus be made for oral care
products manufacturers.
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
11
Analysis and Findings
1. Findings based on Secondary Research
Functionality
General Trends
Hygiene and cosmetic properties are the features that can be considered in purchasing
decision when looking at different oral care brands and products. Daily Mail (2009) stated
that most people want to have dazzling teeth in an age when image is everything.
Toothpaste has always been used since 5000BC (BBC, 2012) primarily to maintain oral
hygiene. ‘Recipes for preserving and whitening teeth are everywhere, everyone from
Hildegard of Bingen to Nostradamus - fennel, lovage, mint, rubbing with salt and sage,
rinsing with alcohol, all have recognisable elements of modern mouth hygiene, though
pulverising crystal, marble, glass, cuttlefish bone, fragmented pearls and riverbed stones into
a paste makes one doubt Nostradamus' accuracy in others area of prediction’ (BBC, 2012).
This reveals that while taking care of oral hygiene, teeth whitening has always been in the
forefront of consumers’ minds and is a way in which people can boost their own self esteem.
Table 1.1 Most popular oral care benefits sought, by demographic, November 2012
Base: 1,490 adults age 16+ who use branded item
Whitens
teeth
Prevents
cavities
Kills germs
and bacteria
Strengthens
enamel
Gum disease
control
Tartar
control
% % % % % %
All 66 51 49 45 40 37
Gender:
Male 65 50 48 41 41 35
Female 67 53 50 49 39 38
: : : : : : :
: : : : : : :
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
12
Whitens
teeth
Prevents
cavities
Kills germs
and bacteria
Strengthens
enamel
Gum
disease
control
Tartar
control
% % % % % %
All 66 51 49 45 40 37
Gender:
Male 65 50 48 41 41 35
Female 67 53 50 49 39 38
Age:
16-24 75 43 53 49 26 14
25-34 76 45 51 42 35 32
(source: Mintel, 2012)
Hygiene
There are many functions which fall under the heading of hygiene which include decay
prevention, protection against gum disease, and enamel protection. These functions can be
found not only in toothpaste, but also in mouthwash and toothbrushes which have been
created in order to help prevent teeth from decaying or eroding. Decay prevention is one of
the most important factors within the hygiene function, as this is one of the most common
features within all toothpastes and dental care.
Nowadays, oral care products, such as toothpaste, mouthwash, and toothbrushes, are
specialized to meet consumers’ needs. In terms of toothpaste, there are wider varieties in
products which focus on decay prevention.
Cosmetic
Mintel (2011) suggested that when purchasing toothpaste, consumers are more likely to
search for cosmetic benefits, such as teeth whitening, as opposed to hygiene benefits, such as
plaque and tartar control, despite plaque and tartar build-up being the nation’s key oral health
concern. This could be evident in the increasing number of teeth whitening products available
to benefit the consumer’s needs, as opposed to taking into account the major concerns of
tooth decay. To date, Colgate produces twelve different teeth whitening toothpastes (Colgate,
2012), compared with Sensodyne who specialize in teeth whitening for sensitive teeth,
producing only four teeth whitening toothpastes (Sensodyne, 2012). Although this doesn’t
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
13
seem like a high number it is relatively high due to the specialized nature of Sensodyne,
causing it to sell fewer products. Oral B produces only four toothpastes specifically targeting
people who seek for teeth whitening (Oral B, 2012).
The popularity of teeth-whitening increased tenfold in the past five years and at least 100,000
people have some form of treatment every year (Daily Mail, 2012). This is not only in
toothpastes that have an increased focus on teeth whitening, but also mouthwashes that have
seen advancements to appeal to the consumers wants. Listerine, who currently is the market
leader in mouthwash sector, currently produces three mouthwash products which have teeth
whitening function (Listerine, 2012). Colgate only produces one mouthwash, also features
whitening function. Oral B attempts to meet the needs of the consumers by combining
toothpaste and mouthwash which is more effective to produce whiter teeth. However, it failed
to meet the high demand for mouthwash and therefore is losing out to their competitors.
Oral-B’s functionality in toothbrushes is generally better that their competitors, as Oral-B is
currently the leading brand within the UK toothbrush market and the top toothbrush brand
recommended by dentists (Pharmacy Business, 2012). It can be seen that Oral-B sell three
different types of manual and electric toothbrushes that mainly have teeth whitening function.
In comparison, Colgate only sells two toothbrushes that help towards teeth whitening and
Sensodyne do not sell any products specialising in this aspect.
Aesthetic/Packaging
General Trends
Between 2006 and 2011, the oral healthcare market grew by only 2% (Mintel, 2012). In this
highly saturated market, product differentiation is becoming increasingly crucial to sales.
This section of the report studies the effects of aesthetics, packaging and flavour on consumer
buying behaviour.
As manufacturers are increasingly trying to reposition products as premium item in-store,
huge attention is directed to the aesthetics of the packaging (Euromonitor, 2012). Increasingly,
outer cartons and labels are designed with foil textures, embossing and holographic printing,
as manufacturers believe that the luxury look will add value to the brand and that consumers
are willing to pay higher prices. This belief is backed by sales reports, as the top 10 brands by
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
14
sales in 2011 are high cost premium products rather than cheap retailer brands (Euromonitor,
2012).
The majority of non-mint oral care products are targeted at the children market, leaving very
limited mint-free choices for the adult consumers (Mintel, 2012). While this may be
indicative of the lack of demand for non-mint products, opportunities may be present for
innovation.
Toothpaste
For toothpaste, the packaging device has not experience much changes in the last century.
Since 1892, the tube packaging dominated consumer market (Elliott, 2010). Consumers resist
new innovations in the market.
Houghton, a leading UK supplier, experienced with cartonless toothpaste for 15 years
nationwide in the UK to no success. Dented tube was cited as a main factor putting
consumers off (Elliott, 2010).
Toothbrush
The manual toothbrush market is segmented into two tiers – the high end and the low end.
Toothbrushes are heavily differentiated through aesthetics and packaging. The high end ones
looking complex with multi-material brush heads, and the low end ones simple (Euromonitor,
2012). Manufacturers are also attempting to adopt environmental friendly packaging in an
attempt to capture consumers (Packaging-Gateway, 2012). For electronic toothbrushes,
packaging are increasingly designed to persuade non-users to try this branch of products, as
evident in the increasing usage of packaging that allows consumers to power on the motor
before purchasing (Ziobro, 2011).
Mouthwash
According to market data, Listerine has the widest range of packaging design and flavours in
the market (Euromonitor, 2012). The top brands have very different packaging and aesthetics
philosophies, with Oral-B packaged to look clinical, and Colgate and Listerine looking
modern and appealing to youth.
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
15
Advertising
General Trend
Advertising is defined as ‘promotion of a product, service, or message by an identified
sponsor using paid-for media’ (Marketing, 2012). In this section, the report studies the usage
of advertising in the oral care industry.
Advertising is vital to raising awareness of a particular brand or product. Advertising also
helps to promote new products and allow consumers to appreciate their product benefits
(Mintel, 2012). Some £59 million was spent on promoting oral healthcare products in 2010,
with TV and press remaining the key media used by advertisers (Mintel, 2012). Big oral care
product manufacturers are spending huge sum of money on advertisement to maintain and
gain market share (Mintel, 2012).
Figure 1.1 – Main monitored media advertising (source: Mintel, 2012)
Based on the graph above, the top 4 advertisement spending companies are GlaxoSmithKline
Plc, Colgate Palmolive Ltd, Johnson & Johnson Ltd and Oral B Laboratories Ltd. They
occupy 40%, 22%, 14% and 10% of total advertisement expenditure in the industry
respectively.
GlaxoSmithKline Plc 40%
Colgate Palmolive Ltd 22%
Johnson & Johnson Ltd 14%
Oral B Laboratories
Ltd 10%
Church & Dwight UK Ltd
4%
Fresh Breath Ltd 2%
Others 8%
Main monitored media advertising, by company, 2010
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
16
Besides that, toothpaste sector accounts for 49% of advertisement-spending (adspend)
(Mintel, 2012). Mouthwash occupies a third of total adspend in 2010, with expenditure rising
by a third in 2010. (Mintel, 2012).
Figure 1.2 – Toothpaste Brand Shares 2008 – 2011 (source: Euromonitor, 2012)
From the graph, Colgate has the highest brand share of 45.4% in 2011, followed by
Sensodyne at 16.7% and Oral-B has 3.1%.
The sales of toothpaste have increased by almost 3% in 2011, which is the fastest of all
sectors. This is primarily driven by the launch of Oral-B Pro-Expert Toothpaste in August
2011 (Mintel, 2012). Toothpaste sector accounts for 43% share of oral care sales in 2011,
ahead of the toothbrush sector’s 29%. However, the fastest growing sector is mouthwash, it
grew by 27% between 2006 and 2011 (Mintel, 2012).
14.3 15.5 16.7 16.7
42.5 41.7
46.5 45.4
0 0 0 3.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2008 2009 2010 2011
% r
eta
il va
lue
rsp
Year
Toothpaste Brand Shares 2008-2011
Sensodyne
Colgate
Oral-B
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
17
Figure 1.3 – Mouthwash Brand Shares 2008 – 2011 (source: Euromonitor, 2012)
From the graph, Listerine has the highest brand share of 43.4%, followed by Colgate at 12.2%
and Oral-B at 2.7%.
Characteristics of Oral Care Market
Mintel discovered that over 50% of adults are concerned about stained teeth, with two thirds
looking for toothpastes which have teeth-whitening properties. Under-35s are more
concerned about their physical appearance than older consumers and they are more likely to
try teeth-whitening treatments. Besides that, single adults are more likely to be interested in
trying professional teeth-whitening treatments compared to married adults. Furthermore,
advertisement featuring Hollywood superstars with whitened teeth makes most people to
aspire to have their teeth whitened (Mintel, 2012). Sensitive teeth and cavities are adults’
other major oral health concerns.
A survey done by Oral-B in 2011 found that four in ten patients cancelled dental
appointments because they could not afford. The survey also reviewed that consumers are
turning to their pharmacists for dental advice to avoid the cost of visiting their dentist (Mintel,
2012). The Oral-B survey identifies that around 10% of consumers said they were consulting
a pharmacist, with almost a third of these consumers doing so because the advice was free.
41.5 44.5 45.7
43.4
12.6 11.5 12.1 12.2
1.4 2.1 2.4 2.7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2008 2009 2010 2011
% r
eta
il va
lue
rsp
Year
Mouthwashes Brand Shares 2008-2011
Listerine
Colgate Plax
Oral-B
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
18
Advertisement activities by company
1. GlaxoSmithKline
In August 2010, Sensodyne launched a three-week national television campaign, featuring
Sensodyne Total Care Gentle Whitening, Sensodyne Rapid Relief and Sensodyne Total Care
Extra Fresh. The campaign used endorsement from dentists for the first time. Besides that,
GlaxoSmithKline also allocated 17% (£4 million) of its advertising budget to promote its
Corsodyl mouthwash with its ‘gorgeous’ TV ad.
2. Colgate-Palmolive
Colgate’s Sensitive Pro-Relief brand, which was launched in August 2010, was backed by
£5.4 million in advertising support during 2010, giving it the highest adspend in the oral care
category in 2011.
July 2011, Colgate introduced a £4 million TV campaign to promote the launch of Colgate
Total Advanced Enamel Protection. The TV push was backed by press and digital activity.
As part of the campaign, 50ml packs of Total Advanced Enamel Protection were given away
with selected Colgate 360° toothbrushes.
Furthermore, Colgate also uses Facebook to raise its brand awareness. For example, it
encourages Facebook users to upload photos on their page. It also encourages people to
comment or ‘like’ these photos. As part of its advertisement effort, Colgate also sponsored
breakfast shows across the radio network in May 2011.
In September 2012, Colgate is making aggressive efforts to maintain its market share against
the return of Oral-B in toothpaste sector (Euromonitor, 2012a). A £1 million “Oral health
month” campaign was organised to drive awareness of dental healthcare and hygiene. The
campaign was supported by social networking sites and TV. It also included roadshows in 50
retailer locations across the UK, also supported by dental practitioners and in-store sampling.
3. Johnson & Johnson
Brand communications activity included the use of illuminated panels on buses to
complement TV and radio activity, to support its Listerine Total Care Sensitive range, which
was launched in May 2010.
In June 2011, Listerine rolled out its ‘Mouth vs. Life’ video campaign on YouTube to
promote the importance of oral care.
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
19
4. Oral-B
In May 2010, Oral-B launched ‘Seize Power Today’ TV campaign to promote its power
toothbrush. The TV campaign was supported by print, online and in-store activity, which
included a 50% discount offer on a number of Oral-B power toothbrushes.
In February 2011, Oral-B signed Dr James Russell, Director of the British Academy of
Cosmetic Dentistry (BACD), as brand ambassador. The partnership is likely to add more
weight to Oral-B’s positioning of being the ‘the toothbrush brand dentists recommend and
use worldwide’.
Oral-B re-entered the toothpaste category in 2011 with its Oral-B Pro-Expert range after
spending 15 years in R&D and being approved after more than 70 scientific studies. In July
2011, the company gave away 10 million samples through dentists and another 10 million
samples through on-line and retail channels (Euromonitor, 2012b).
Price
General Trend
Despite the current sluggish economic climate, consumers are unlikely to cut back on their
oral hygiene spending as people view this as a grooming necessity. However, research has
suggested that nearly a quarter (22% for both toothpaste and mouthwash and 26% for
toothbrush) of respondents surveyed, purchases whatever brands that are on promotion
(Mintel, 2012). This could be attributed to the reason that consumers strive to keep to their
household budget low. This research also shows that 20% of consumers purchase the
cheapest available oral care product.
There are many factors which affect consumer behaviour. However, pricing is believed to be
one of the most important aspects of consumer motives (Kin and Jin, 2001). This part of the
report seeks to address the relevance of this factor in the oral healthcare industry by means of
comparisons with other determinants of consumer behaviour such as product functionality,
brand loyalty and socioeconomic group standing.
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
20
Functionality
The functionality of the product (whitening, plaque and tartar control, strengthening enamel
etc.) is also a key consideration made by consumers when purchasing oral care products.
According to the British dental health, electric powered toothbrushes removes plaque 25%
more efficiently as compared to conventional brushes while a study conducted by Mintel has
forecasted the sales of electric powered toothbrush to increase.
Brand Loyalty
A recent study revealed that 80% of respondents’ consumer behaviour is likely to be
influence by brand loyalty (Batra et al, 2012).
Batra’s research findings has been substantiated by market research results gathered by
Mintel where more than a quarter of those surveyed choose to always purchase the same
brand when shopping for oral care products (38% for toothpaste, 30% for toothbrush and 25%
for mouthwash).
Socio-economic Group
Mintel (2012) reports that brand switching occur prominently among those who belong to the
income-squeezed group and stay in the North West of the country and this purchasing
behaviour is most prevalent in the socio-economic group with household income < £9,500.
On the contrary, 53% of the respondents surveyed disagreed, when asked if they would
purchase the cheapest product available.
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
21
Analysis and Findings
2. Findings based on Focus Group
Functionality
Majority of participants are more concerned with teeth whitening than decay prevention.
Responses from the focus group found that consumers do not just look for teeth whitening
function at the point of purchase, but will also consult in friends who have significantly
whiter teeth. In addition, those who do not look for both functions, whitening and decay
prevention, naturally assume that all toothpastes prevent decay. However, they consciously
seek out whitening properties as an extra benefit.
Table 2.1 – Demographic Variables
Demographic variable Number of respondents Percentage
Age (Years)
18 – 20
21 – 23
24 – 26
26 – 30
4
1
2
0
57%
14%
29%
0%
Gender
Male
Female
3
4
43%
57%
Educational
Qualification
Up to primary
Up to secondary
Up to tertiary
0
0
7
0%
0%
100%
Monthly Income
Below £500
£500 - £800
£801 - £1000
£1000 or more
2
3
2
0
29%
42%
29%
0%
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
22
When considering toothbrushes, the majority of participants use manual toothbrush. The
significantly higher cost of electrical toothbrush is cited as a main reason why consumers are
hesitant in its purchase. However, they agree that electrical toothbrushes are generally better
at cleaning teeth, and will try them when given more disposal income. This implies that
unlike the case with toothpaste, consumers are primarily concerned with the decay prevention
functions of toothbrush. Participants too stated that their most wanted new functionality for
toothbrush is teeth whitening.
Table 2.2 – Functions sought after in toothpaste
Functions (multiple selections) Number of responses Percentage
Whitening
Hygiene
Sensitivity
Fresh Breath
7
0
3
1
100%
0%
43%
14%
Table 2.3 – Consumer behaviour & influence of functionalities (toothbrush)
Variables Number of respondents Percentage
Electrical Toothbrush Usage
Yes
No
1
6
14%
86%
Reason for non-usage of electrical
toothbrush
Too expensive
Not significantly better
Same as manual toothbrush
Worse than manual toothbrush
5
1
0
1
72%
14%
0%
14%
Is electrical toothbrush better than
manual toothbrush (any degree)
Yes
No
6
1
86%
14%
New functions wanted in
toothbrush
Whitening
Personalisation
More brush head sizes
More grip sizes
4
1
1
1
58%
14%
14%
14%
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
23
For mouthwash, none of the participants use it for cosmetic effects. It is used for hygiene
concerns (decay prevention and enamel protection) and fresh breath. Those who do not use
mouthwash have reported a variety of reason including the burning feelings.
Aesthetic, Packaging & Flavour
General Trends
The focus group found that consumers will pay a higher price for premium products. When
shown a variety of toothpastes and mouthwashes, products with premium packaging are often
stated as the preferred choice over basic budget products. The naming of products is also a
deciding factor for consumers, as premium-sounding products are preferred.
Table 2.4 – Consumer behaviour & influence of functionalities (mouthwash)
Variables Number of respondents Percentage
Regular usage of mouthwash
Yes
No
4
3
57%
43%
Reason for regular usage
Hygiene
Fresh breath
Like the feeling
Cosmetics
2
2
0
0
50%
50%
0%
0%
Reason for non-regular usage
Burning feeling
Effects not significant
No habit
Too expensive
1
1
1
0
33%
33%
33%
0%
Table 2.5 – General trends in packaging, aesthetics and flavour
Variables Number of respondents Percentage
Preferred flavours
Mint
Strong mint
Mild Mint
Non-mint
4
1
2
0
57%
14%
29%
0%
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
24
In term of flavours, consumers prefer familiarity to innovation. The focus group found that all
consumers prefer mint-based flavours for their oral care products, and majority will be
hesitant to try out a new innovative flavour. The focus group participants cited “not clean
enough feeling” as a primary concern for non-mint products. Therefore, there is a speculative
demand for a new flavour that is robust at bacteria killing and can offer consumers this
desired ‘clean feel’.
Toothpaste
The focus group found that innovations such as pump mechanisms are not catching on with
consumers, who generally find it more of a hassle than convenience.
Table 2.6 – Consumer behaviours & packaging, aesthetics and flavour (toothpaste)
Variables Number of respondents Percentage
Preference of toothpaste based on name of
product
Smile Whitening Freshmint Toothpaste
Total Advanced Whitening
Pro Expert Whitening
Gentle Whitening
0
3
4
0
0%
43%
57%
0%
Preference of toothpaste based on packaging
of product
Boots Smile Whitening Freshmint Toothpaste
Colgate Total Advanced Whitening
Oral-B Pro Expert Whitening
Sensodyne Gentle Whitening
0
2
4
1
0%
29%
57%
14%
Preference for pump mechanism
Yes
No
No interest in trying
0
4
3
0%
57%
43%
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
25
Toothbrush
When shown product samples from two price tiers, focus group participants are
overwhelmingly favouring the more lush looking toothbrushes. The flagship product lines
from top brands, such as the Colgate 360°® and the Oral-B CrossAction® toothbrushes, are
characterised by their complex looking coloured bristles, mixtures of materials used, and
thick rubber grips. These are more than simply functionality features. Majority of participants
agree that these toothbrushes brush better than simple budget toothbrushes, basing their
judgement on only visuals. They too generally agree that they will pay the premium price for
these products.
Other than the aesthetics factors, participants also judge toothbrushes based on their
packaging. Singly packed toothbrushes are agreed to be more functional than multi-packs, as
the latter is deemed to be of the budget range.
Participants also generally agree that the design and aesthetics of electronic toothbrushes
make them look superior to manual toothbrush at maintaining oral hygiene. However, they
find the better looks do not justify the significantly higher price.
Mouthwash
In the aesthetic and packaging section, focus group participants are equally split in opinions.
When shown a variety of products, participants generally agree on the point that the Oral-B
mouthwash packaging is designed to look clinical and professional, while the Listerine
mouthwash packaging is designed to be cool and modern. However, while half the
Table 2.7 – Consumer behaviours &packaging, aesthetics and flavour (toothbrush)
Variables Number of respondents Percentage
Preference of toothbrush based on visual
Oral-B CrossAction® (complex looking)
Colgate budget range (plain looking)
7
0
100%
0%
Willingness to purchase after discovery of
price
Oral-B CrossAction® (£3.5)
Colgate budget range (3 for £1.5)
7
0
100%
0%
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
26
participants stated their preference for the clinical look, the other half are more supportive of
the modern look.
Mouthwash colour is also found to be an important part of aesthetics that determine consumer
behaviour. Majority of the participants reject colours such as yellow or purple, typically
found in Listerine products. They do not find such colours to be in line with the mouthwash’s
cleaning and hygiene purposes. Overwhelmingly, the preferred colour for mouthwash is clear
blue or green.
Table 2.8 – Consumer behaviours & packaging, aesthetics and flavour (mouthwash)
Variables Number of respondents Percentage
Preference of mouthwash based on product
names
Plax Mouthwash Multi Protection
Multi-Protection Mouthwash
Total Care Mouthwash
0
5
2
0%
71%
29%
Preference of mouthwash based on product
packagings
Colgate Plax Mouthwash Multi Protection
Oral-B Multi-Protection Mouthwash
Listerine Total Care Mouthwash
0
3
4
0%
43%
57%
State the more clinical/ professional looking
packaging
Colgate Plax Mouthwash Multi Protection
Oral-B Multi-Protection Mouthwash
Listerine Total Care Mouthwash
1
6
0
14%
86%
0%
Preference of colour
Blue
Green
Purple, yellow, others
5
2
0
71%
29%
0%
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
27
Advertisement
Major oral care companies, such as Colgate, Sensodyne, and Oral-B, use dentist
recommendation as one of their primary advertisement. From the focus group result, it is
found that dentist recommendation gives big impact on consumer behaviour while purchasing
oral care product as majority of the participants agreed that they will buy a brand that is
recommended by their dentist. However, using dentist as primary advertisement is not
effective because none has been actively recommended any oral care product brands by the
dentist.
Variables (multiple selections) Number of responses Percentage
Reasons for switching brand Peer recommendation 0 0%
Effects seen on peers 5 71%
Price 1 14%
Advertisement 0 0%
Dentist recommendation 7 100%
Interest in advertisements Oral-B 6 86%
Colgate 0 0%
Sensodyne 1 14%
Listerine 3 43%
Most seen form of advertisement TV 3 43%
Internet 3 43%
In-store 1 14%
Print media 0 0%
On the other hand, TV and Internet are the types of advertisement most participants come
across most of the time. Whilst the participants have been showed some sample of TV
commercial from some major brands (Colgate, Sensodyne, Oral-B, and Listerine), Oral-B
toothpaste advertisement which featured by "All By Myself" song interests the majority.
Another important aspect is effects seen on peers play a role in consumers’ decision to switch
brand as majority tend to choose the product that can guarantee whitening effect.
Table 2.9 – Consumer behaviours and influence of advertisements
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
28
Price
General Trend
The result of our focus group indicate similar findings: price is a huge consideration when
buying most of the oral care products. When asked about the prices that members are willing
to pay for toothpaste and toothbrush, the majority will pay between £1.5 and £3.5.
However, the majority will spend more on toothbrush and mouthwash but not for toothpaste
if they have a higher disposable income (DI). This could be because toothpaste in the price
category that most respondents would pay for would already sufficiently satisfy them.
Functionality is the reason behind the preference of using electrical toothbrush instead of a
manual one as the majority of the focus group’s respondents felt that it would clean their
teeth more effectively. This was evident in the mouthwash category as well as it was stated
that one would purchase a mouthwash with teeth whitening functionality should he have a
higher DI.
Table 2.10 – Consumer behaviours and influence of price (general trend)
Variables Number of responses Percentage
Usual price paid for toothpaste (75-100ml)
<£1.5
£1.5 - £3
£3 - £4.5
>£4.5
0
6
1
0
0%
86%
14%
0%
Usual price paid for toothbrush
<£1.5
£1.5 - £3.5
>£3.5
1
5
1
14%
72%
14%
Usual price paid for mouthwash (500ml)
<£1.5
£1.5 - £3.5
>£3.5
0
4
3
0%
57%
43%
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
29
Toothbrush
Findings from the report suggests that people would be willing to pay more for a toothbrush
that provided better product functionality (e.g. ability to clean teeth more effectively) given a
higher disposable income.
Toothpaste
The majority believe that more expensive toothpaste provides better functionality. Contrary
to the general trend, the majority of members opt not to purchase more expensive toothpastes
if they have a higher disposable income and are only willing to pay for toothpaste in the price
range from £1.50 to £4.50. This shows that respondents believe that toothpaste in this price
range would clean their teeth just as effectively as any other more premium priced toothpaste.
Table 2.11 – Consumer behaviours and influence of price (toothbrush)
Variables Number of responses Percentage
Willingness to spend more when disposable
income rises
Yes
No
7
0
100%
0%
Table 2.12 – Consumer behaviours and influence of price (toothpaste)
Variables Number of responses Percentage
More expensive toothpaste will come with
better functionalities
Yes
No
5
2
72%
28%
Willingness to spend more when disposable
income rises
Yes
No
1
6
14%
86%
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
30
Mouthwash
The findings show that half of the members don’t use mouthwash. The reason varies but none
mentioned that the price of mouthwash is so expensive that it hinders them using it. In this
perspective, price is not a large concern for members.
Those who use mouthwash, choose to use Listerine instead of other brands. Furthermore, the
majority rejected the situational promotion offer by Oral-B when asked if they would choose
to buy a toothpaste and mouthwash packaged together at a promotional price. Even with an
incentive of price reduction, members still choose not to purchase Oral-B mouthwash
together with the toothpaste. It can thus be seen that brand loyalty plays a significant role in
the mouthwash category.
Participant Validation
All participants of the focus group have verified the transcript and result coding, and agree
that the findings used in this report is representative of their opinions.
Table 2.13 – Consumer behaviours and influence of price (mouthwash)
Variables Number of respondents Percentage
Willingness to purchase an Oral-B
promotional package (toothpaste &
mouthwash)
Yes
No
2
5
57%
43%
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
31
Analysis and Findings
3. Findings based on Personal Experience Record
From the personal experience records, it can be seen that majority of the members, who use
mouthwash either regularly or occasionally, choose Listerine and are more likely to keep
using that brand. It is also found that Oral-B is the brand that majority use for toothbrush,
followed by Colgate. In toothpaste sector, majority of the members use Colgate.
Ultimately, it is found that majority choose to stay with their current and less likely to change.
It also can be seen that in different product category (toothbrush, toothpaste, and mouthwash),
the brands that majority use are different.
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
32
Conclusion & Recommendations
Conclusion
Several conclusions can be made regarding the purchasing behavior of young adults (18-30
years old) on oral care products, after studying the data collected from secondary research,
focus group and personal experience record. This section of the report will answer the
research questions by drawing on the findings in all three sections of the research.
Firstly, young adults are looking for teeth whitening attribute, which is one of cosmetic
benefits, in oral care products. From secondary research, 75% of those age 16 – 25 and 76%
of those age 25 - 34 are interested in whitening benefit in oral care products. In addition,
more than 50% of adults are concerned about stained teeth. This is further supported by focus
group, where majority of participants chose teeth whitening as the most important function.
Hence, cosmetic benefit is preferred over hygiene.
Secondly, modern looking packaging and professional product name for oral care products
have a big impact on consumer behaviour. Under the aesthetic section of secondary research
it mentioned that sophisticated looking packaging adds value to the brand. The findings from
focus group substantiate this point, where majority participants favouring lush looking
toothbrush over those with simple design. Besides that, participants also associate modern
design with quality. In addition, from focus group findings, product name with phrase such as
total advance and pro expert are preferred by young adults. This is because they sound
professional and gives the impression that they are of good quality.
Thirdly, young adults are more interested in advertisements that they can associate with and
they are more likely to purchase these products. Both data from secondary research and focus
group supports this point. From secondary research, it discovered that most people would
aspire to have their teeth whitened after watching advertisement featuring Hollywood star
with whitened teeth. In addition, findings from focus group suggested that majority
participants preferred the advertisement with the theme song ‘All By Myself’. In both
scenarios, young adults were attracted to advertisement featuring something/someone that
they are familiar and able to associate with.
Lastly, it is found that young adults have strong brand loyalty on oral care products. Based on
secondary research findings, more than a quarter of young adults always purchase the same
brand when shopping for oral care products. This finding is further supported by focus group,
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
33
where majority of participants rarely switch brand however when they do it is due to certain
factors such as creative advertisements and improved functionality. Furthermore, the data
from personal experience record also shows that majority of participants did not switch brand
for a substantial period of time. Apart from that, price is not a major concern for young adults.
This can be seen from secondary research where 53% of the population disagreed when asked
if they would purchase the cheapest product available. In addition, majority of participants
said ‘no’ when asked will they buy a package of toothpaste and mouthwash at promotional
price. Overall, price is not the deciding factor in consumer purchasing behaviour.
Recommendations
Based on the research findings, four recommendations were made for oral care industry to
enhance their marketing effort.
Firstly, there could be more advertisement targeting young single adults. It would be
advantageous to capture consumers from 18-30 years old category. This is because they tend
to be brand loyal and would form a regular customer base for oral care product manufacturers,
such as Oral-B. Besides that, young single adults are more images conscious and are more
likely to try products that have cosmetic benefits. Manufacturers could focus their advertising
efforts in trade areas with high concentration of young people. For example, advertisements
could be put up on university newspaper and radio. There could also be some on-campus
promotion where samples are given away. In addition, manufacturers could target single
adults by advertising their products on online dating websites such as match.com,
datingdirect.com and speeddater.co.uk. Furthermore, manufacturers could also advertise at
pubs and nightclubs where there are more image conscious single adults.
Next, oral care product manufacturers, such as Oral-B, could advertise through celebrities in
its television and online advertisements, emphasizing cosmetic benefits. As stated in
conclusion, young adults are interested in advertisements that they can associate with.
Furthermore, findings from focus group show that young adults come across television and
online advertisements most often. Facebook and Youtube are some good online
advertisement channels however based on secondary research findings, manufacturers, such
as Oral-B, under-utilized these channels. Most importantly, celebrities in the advertisement
should emphasis on the cosmetic benefits of the product for instance whitening effect. This is
primarily because young adults sought after oral care products that have cosmetic benefits.
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
34
Oral care product manufacturers could balance between modern and professional design for
its packaging and product design. Based on focus group research, 50% of participants find
packaging that looks clinical and professional boring and dull. Hence, by striking a balance
between looking modern and professional, majority of young adults would welcome it.
Besides that, it is also recommended that manufacturers have clear blue and green as their
mouthwash color. Based on focus group finding, clear blue and green are the two most
preferred colors for mouthwash and young adults are more likely to purchase it.
Lastly, manufacturers could choose a professional name for its products. It is advisable to use
words such as advance, professional and expert in its product name. Based on focus group
finding, participants preferred more professional sounding product name. This is simply
because young adults associate professional product name with good quality.
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
35
Limitations
Secondary research was majorly based on external secondary source, as there is a lack of
internal secondary data from the oral care manufacturers in the market. As a result it was
difficult to gather valuable information on the manufacturers’ marketing strategy and their
understanding of consumer behaviour in the oral care industry.
There is a problem of fit with the secondary data collected. Some of the data collected were
for other purposes and there is no direct link to the study of consumer behaviour on oral care
products. As a result, the data collected did not fit the research problem perfectly. Besides
that, it was difficult to find information specifically targeting 18-30 years old age category.
There was only one focus group conducted in this study. There were no later groups to
generate additional insight into the phenomenon under study. As a result, the finding
developed lack representation with regard to the target population. More focus group should
be conducted in order to give a better representation of the target population.
There was no screening done during the selection of focus group participants. As a result, the
focus group was too heterogeneous, compromising a mixture of males and females of
different cultural background. More focus groups with differences maximized between
groups and minimized within groups will produce richer information about every
demographic group.
Result triangulation, a process of cross-checking focus group results with prior researches in
the industry and conduct further interviews to verify any contradictions, was not conducted in
this research report due to time limitation. Conducting this process can ensure the validity of
results and discover new finding.
The sample size of the personal experience record was too small and it did not provide an
accurate representation of the target population. In addition, the time period of the record was
too short. Furthermore, the questions asked were too few and too general. Due to all these
factors, limited information was being extracted; as a result, comparisons with secondary and
focus group findings were limited.
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
36
References
Alain, S. et al. (2001) ‘New developments in marketing communications and consumer
behavior’, Journal of Business Research, 53 (2), pp.59-61. [online] Available at:
http://www.sciencedirect.com.libproxy.ncl.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S0148296399000752
(Accessed: 22 November 2012)
Baines, P., Fill, C., & Page, K. (2011) Marketing. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Baker, M. J. (2003) The Marketing Book. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann.
BBC (2012) A point of View: Mouthing off. [online] Available at:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19748199 (Accessed: 6 November 2012)
Boots (2012) Electric Toothbrushes . [online] Available at:
http://www.boots.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?langId=-
1&Ntk=DIM_PARENT_CATEGORY_IDS&Nr=AND%28DIM_PREMIUM_BRAND_FL
AG%3aN%2cDIM_PARENT_PRODUCT_ID%3aIS_PARENT%29&catalogId=11051&cat
egoryParentId=15292695&Ne=2&Rpp=12&Ntt=4682&storeId=10052&Ntx=mode%2bmatc
hall&Ns=P_IS_HERO_PRODUCT%7c1%7c%7cCAT_SEQ_4682&N=478&categoryId=46
82&st=category. (Accessed: 1 November 2012)
Boots (2012) Toothbrushes . [online] Available at:
http://www.boots.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/EndecaSearchListerView?storeId=10052&
searchTerm=toothbrush&catalogId=11051&langId=-
1&searchTerm=toothbrush&t1_N=4294949821_4#container. (Accessed: 1 November 2012)
Chartered Institute Marketing (CIM) (2012) Glossary: Advertising. [online] Available at:
http://www.cim.co.uk/Resources/JargonBuster.aspx (Accessed: 1 November 2012 )
Colgate (2012) Tooth Whitening. [online] Available at:
http://www.colgate.com/app/CP/US/EN/OC/Information/Articles/Cosmetic-Dentistry/Tooth-
Whitening/Tooth-Whitening-Basics/article/Tooth-Whitening.cvsp (Accessed: 5 November
2012)
Cowart, K. O., Fox, G. L. and Wilson, A. E. (2008) ‘A structural look at consumer
innovativeness and self-congruence in new product purchases’, Psychology & Marketing,
25(12), pp. 1111-1130.
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
37
Daily Mail (2009) Teeth-whitening sales soar 15% as Britons grow more image conscious.
[online] Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1157482/Teeth-whitening-
sales-soar-15-Britons-grow-image-conscious.html (Accessed: 6 November 2012)
Diamantopoulos, A. and Mathews, B. (1995) Making pricing decisions: a study of
managerial practice. London: Chapman & Hall.
Elliott, D. (2010) Markets: Toothpaste seeks fresh ideas. [online] Available at:
http://www.packagingnews.co.uk/news/markets-toothpaste-seeks-fresh-ideas/ (Accessed: 11
November 2012)
Euromonitor International (2012a) Colgate-Palmolive UK Ltd In Beauty and Personal Care
(United Kingdom).
Euromonitor International (2012b) Oral Care in the United Kingdom.
Jain, A. (2010) Principles of Marketing. India: Victory of Knowledge.
Keegan, W. J. and Green, M. C. (2013) Global marketing. London: Pearson.
Kim, J. O. and Jin, B. (2001) ‘Korean Consumers’ Patronage of Discount Stores: Domestic
vs. Multinational Discount Stores Shoppers’ Profile’, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(3),
pp. 236-255.
Mintel (2011) A breath of fresh air as sales of mouthwash boom. [online] Available at:
http://www.mintel.com/press-centre/press-releases/688/a-breath-of-fresh-air-as-sales-of-
mouthwash-boom (Accessed: 6 November 2012)
Mintel (2012) Oral Healthcare - UK - January 2012. United Kingdom: Mintel.
Packaging-Gateway (2012). P&G adopts sustainable packaging for toothbrush - Packaging
Gateway. [online] Available at: http://www.packaging-gateway.com/news/newspg-adopts-
sustainable-packaging-for-toothbrush (Accessed: 27 November 2012)
Pharmacy Business (2011) Oral B - the leading brand in the UK toothbrush market. [online]
Available at: http://www.pharmacy.biz/Newsdetails.aspx?HeadlineID=959 (Accessed: 5
November 2012)
Rajeev, Batra (2012) ‘Brand Love’, Journal of Marketing, 2(76), pp.1-16. [online] Available
at: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=4&hid=9&sid=df02805d-2e70-4c47-91ed-
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
38
982f79108768%40sessionmgr14&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=buh&
AN=71960581 (Accessed: 1 November 2012)
Vani, G. and Babu, M. G. (2010) Toothpaste Brands – A Study of Consumer Behavior in
Bangalore City. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 1(1), pp.27-39. Available at:
http://www.ifrnd.org/JEBS/1(1)%20Dec%2010/Toothpaste%20Brands_A%20Study%20of%
20consumer%20behavior.pdf (Accessed: 21 November 2012)
Ziobro, P. (2011) Church & Dwight Sues Colgate Over Toothbrush Packaging. [online]
Available at:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704615504576172360509745644.html
(Accessed: 27 November 2012)
Zuckerman, A. (2005) ‘Growth in the trenches: increasing market share’, Healthcare
Financial Management, 59(2), pp.106-108.
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
39
Appendices
1. Appendix 1 – Focus Group Moderator Guide
i) General Patterns
• Do you use toothpaste and toothbrush as your primary tools for cleaning?
• How often do you brush your teeth?
• How much do you usually spend on toothpaste?
• How much are you willing to spend on toothpaste?
• Which form of oral care product advertisement do you come across most often?
e.g. TV, Magazine, Social Media
ii) Top of the Mind Image
• What brand comes to mind when you hear the word "toothpaste"?
• State your preference/ what do you think about these toothpastes? (words)
o Colgate Total Advanced Whitening
o Oral-B Pro Expert Whitening
o Boots Smile Whitening Freshmint Toothpaste
o Sensodyne Gentle Whitening
• State your preference/ what do you think about these toothpastes? (picture)
iii) Consumption
• How often do you buy toothpaste
• Have you ever discussed toothpaste with your friends?
• How often do you visit a dentist?
• Did any dentist recommend you any brand?
• Which brand?
• Did you follow dentist recommendation?
• If no, why?
iv) Factors affecting purchase/non-purchase
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
40
• What functions do you look for in toothpaste?
• What is the most important function?
• Are there any other properties that interest you when you are purchasing toothpaste?
• Do you have a preferred flavour? Why and why not?
• Have you seen/ used toothpaste with pump packaging mechanism before?
a. What do you think is good/ bad about this type of packaging?
b. If you like it, how much more will you be willing to pay for it?
c. Will you switch brand just for this type of packaging?
• Show advertisement video
o Which advertisement most interests you?
o Why?
o Would you switch brand after watching the advertisement (if the brand is
different from what u are using)?
• Have you ever discussed oral care products with your friends?
o If yes. Which brand is most widely mentioned?
o Have any of your friend/s recommend oral care products to you?
o If yes. Which brand?
o Would you switch brand if the brand recommended is different from what you
are using currently?
o Yes/no. Why?
v) Perceived Outcomes
• What factor with regards to packaging/flavour would make you stop using toothpaste?
• Have you ever switch brand?
• Yes. Why?
• No. why do you carry on with your current brand?
• Of the oral care advertisements you watched, which brand is most credible to you?
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
41
• Why?
• Is it the same with the brand you are using?
vi) Future Behavior
If you have more disposable income, will you buy better but more expensive oral care
product?
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
42
2. Appendix 2 – Focus Group Result Coding
Participants Number Code
Kenneth 1
Roxanne 2
Amy 3
Christie 4
Mike 5
Angeline 6
Tiezheng 7
Do you use toothbrush and toothpaste as your primary tool for cleaning?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Do you use toothbrush and toothpaste as your primary tool for cleaning
Participant Number of times
1 or 2 2 or 3 3 or more
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
How often do you buy toothpaste?
Participant Once in 2 weeks Once in 4 weeks Once in 6 weeks or >
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
43
Whom have you discussed toothpaste with?
Participant Friend Family Dentist Colleague No one
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Whom have you discussed toothpaste with? (Cross-Tabulation)
Participant Friend Family Dentist Colleague No one
Boy
0 1 0 0 2
Girl
1 1 1 0 1
How often do you buy toothbrush?
Participant Once in 1–2 mths
Once in 3 mths Once in > 3 mths
Whenever it is worn out
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Whom have you discussed toothbrush with?
Participant Friend Family Dentist Colleague No one
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
44
Do you use mouthwash regularly?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
For those who do use mouthwash regularly, why?
Participant Hygiene Fresh Breath Like the feeling Cosmetics
2
4
5
6
For those who do not use mouthwash regularly, why?
Participant Burns No significantly added hygiene
Do not have the habit
Too expensive
1
3
7
How often do you buy mouthwash?
Participant Once in 1–2 mths or more
Once in >= 3 mths
Not at all
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
45
Whom have you discussed mouthwash with?
Participant Friend Family Dentist Colleague No one
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Do you all agree that Listerine is the preferred brand of mouthwash?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3 NA NA
4
5
6
7
What do you look for in functions of toothpaste?
Participant Whitening Hygiene Sensitivity Fresh Breath
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
What do you look for in functions of toothpaste? (Cross-Tabulation)
Participant Whitening Hygiene Sensitivity Fresh Breath
Males 3 0 1 1
Females 4 0 2 0
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
46
Do you expect all toothpaste to kill bacteria, therefore not looking for that function in toothpastes specifically?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Do you use an electrical toothbrush?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Why do you not use an electrical toothbrush?
Participant Too expensive Not significant better
Same as manual
Worse than manual
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Do you think electrical toothbrush is better than manual toothbrush?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
47
What new functions/ improvements do you want to see in toothbrushes?
Participant Whitening Personalization More brush head sizes
More grip sizes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Just looking at the names of these toothpaste, which one will you prefer the least?
Participant Smile Whitening Freshmint
Toothpaste
Total Advanced Whitening
Pro Expert Whitening
Gentle Whitening
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Just looking at the names of these toothpaste, which one will you prefer?
Participant Smile Whitening Freshmint
Toothpaste
Total Advanced Whitening
Pro Expert Whitening
Gentle Whitening
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
48
Now after seeing the packaging of these toothpaste, which one will you prefer?
Participant Boots Smile Whitening Freshmint
Toothpaste
Colgate Total Advanced Whitening
Oral-B Pro Expert
Whitening
Sensodyne Gentle
Whitening
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Now after seeing the packing of these toothpaste, which one will you prefer?
Participant Boots Smile Whitening Freshmint
Toothpaste
Colgate Total Advanced Whitening
Oral-B Pro Expert
Whitening
Sensodyne Gentle
Whitening
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Now after seeing the packing of these toothpaste, which one will you prefer least?
Participant Boots Smile Whitening Freshmint
Toothpaste
Colgate Total Advanced Whitening
Oral-B Pro Expert
Whitening
Sensodyne Gentle
Whitening
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
49
Do you have any preferred flavours?
Participant Mint Strong Mint Mild Mint Non-Mint
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Do you like the pump mechanism?
Participant Yes No No interest in trying
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
What brand comes to mind when you think of toothbrush?
Participant Oral-B Colgate Sensodyne Others
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Looking at these 2 sample toothbrushes, which one do you think is better?
Participant Oral-B (more complex looking) Colgate (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
50
Will you pay £3.5 for product one after learning that product is 1/3 the price?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Just looking at the product names, which one do you prefer?
Participant Plax Mouthwash Multi Protection
Multi-Protection Mouthwash
Total Care Mouthwash
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Now looking at the product, which one do you prefer?
Participant Colgate Plax Mouthwash Multi
Protection
Oral-B Multi-Protection
Mouthwash
Listerine Total Care Mouthwash
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Ignoring the purple colours, which one do you prefer?
Participant Colgate Plax Mouthwash Multi
Protection
Oral-B Multi-Protection
Mouthwash
Listerine Total Care Mouthwash
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
51
Which product looks more clinical, something you will see in a dentist’s lab?
Participant Colgate Plax Mouthwash Multi
Protection
Oral-B Multi-Protection
Mouthwash
Listerine Total Care Mouthwash
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Which form of oral care product advertisement do you come across most of the time?
Participant TV Internet In-store Print media
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
What brand comes to mind when you hear the word toothpaste?
Participant Colgate Oral-B Sensodyne Others
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
How often do you visit a dentist?
Participant Once in 6 months Once a year <Once a year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
52
Did the dentist recommend any oral care product brands?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
If your dentist recommends a brand, will you buy it?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
If you only saw products in your dentist’s office, but without his active recommendation.
Will you buy it?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Which of these advertisements interests you?
Participant Oral B Colgate Sensodyne Listerine
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
53
Which of these advertisements interests you (Cross-Tabulation)?
Participant Oral B Colgate Sensodyne Listerine
Males 3 0 0 3
Females 3 0 1 0
Will you be interested in switching to the product which has an interesting advertisement?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
What will make you switch brand?
Participant Peer recommendation
Effects seen on
peers
Price Advertisement Dentist Recommendation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
What will make you switch brand? (Cross-Tabulation)
Participant Peer recommendation
Effects seen on
peers
Price Advertisement Dentist Recommendation
Males 0 3 0 0 3
Females 0 3 1 0 4
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
54
How much do you usually pay for toothpaste?
Participant <£1.5 £1.5 - £3 £3 - £4.5 >£4.5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Will you be willing to spend more on toothpaste if you have more disposable income?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Do you think more expensive toothpaste will come with better functionalities?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
How much do you spend on toothbrush?
Participant <£1.5 £1.5 - £3.5 >£3.5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
55
How much do you spend on toothbrush?
Participant <£1.5 £1.5 - £3.5 >£3.5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Will you spend more on toothbrush if you have more disposable income?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
How much do you spend on mouthwash?
Participant <£1.5 £1.5 - £3.5 >£3.5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Will you spend more on mouthwash if you have more disposable income?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3 NA NA
4
5
6
7
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
56
Are you willing to use different brands for mouthwash and toothpaste?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3 NA NA
4
5
6
7
Why is there a mixture of brands?
Participant Price concerns Quality concerns >£3.5
1
2
3 NA NA NA
4
5
6
7
If Oral-B offers a package for toothpaste and mouthwash at a promotional price, will you buy it?
Participant Yes No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
57
3. Appendix 3 – Group Members’ Personal Experience Records
Amy Scott’s Personal Experience Record
Item Frequency
(For 2
Weeks)
Brand Do you want to:
Keep it? Change it? Recommend
it to others?
Cleansing Pads 8 Skin Wisdom Yes No No
Facial Tissue 14 Asda Yes No No
Shampoo 10 Herbal Essences Yes No Yes
Body Wash 16 Palmolive honey Yes No Yes
Soap 53 Palmolive No Yes No
Conditioner 10 Herbal Essences Yes No Yes
Razors 6 Bic Yes No No
Shaving Cream NA
After Shave NA
Colognes 8 1881Cerruti Yes No Yes
Deodorant 20 Nivea Yes No No
Skin Cream 28 Simple
Moisturiser
Yes No No
Lotion 16 Vaseline / Nivea Yes No Yes
Mouthwash NA
Toothbrush 32 Colgate No Yes No
Toothpaste 32 Colgate Yes No No
Other: Floss 7 Asda No Yes No
Other: Eye
makeup remover
8 Garnier Yes No No
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
58
Angeline Tjandra’s Personal Experience Record
Item Frequency
(For 2
Weeks)
Brand Do you want to:
Keep it? Change it? Recommend
it to others?
Cleansing Pads 28 Body Shop Yes No No
Facial Tissue 28 Kleenex Yes No No
Shampoo 7 L’oreal Yes No Yes
Body Wash 14 Body Shop Yes No Yes
Soap 24 Marks &
Spencer
Yes No Yes
Conditioner 7 L’oreal Yes No Yes
Razors NA
Shaving Cream NA
After Shave NA
Colognes 14 Body Shop Yes No Yes
Deodorant NA
Skin Cream 28 Body Shop Yes No Yes
Lotion 14 Body Shop Yes No Yes
Mouthwash 7 Listerine Yes No No
Toothbrush 28 Pepsodent Yes No No
Toothpaste 28 Sensodyne No Yes No
Other: facial wash 28 Olay No Yes No
Other: facial
toner
28 Olay Yes No No
Other: hair spray
(vitamin)
7 L’oreal Yes No Yes
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
59
Chen Chen’s Personal Experience Record
Item Frequency
(For 2
Weeks)
Brand Do you want to:
Keep it? Change it? Recommend
it to others?
Cleansing Pads NA
Facial Tissue 7 Kleenex Yes No No
Shampoo 28 Body Shop Yes No No
Body Wash 28 Body Shop Yes No No
Soap 28 Body Shop Yes No No
Conditioner NA
Razors 2 Gilette Yes No No
Shaving Cream NA
After Shave 2 Calvin Klein Yes No No
Colognes 8 Ralph Lauren Yes No Yes
Deodorant 14 Nivea Yes No No
Skin Cream NA
Lotion NA
Mouthwash 5 Listerine Yes No No
Toothbrush 28 Oral-B Yes No No
Toothpaste 28 Colgate No Yes No
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
60
Christie Woodhouse’s Personal Experience Record
Item Frequency
(For 2
Weeks)
Brand Do you want to:
Keep it? Change it? Recommend
it to others?
Cleansing Pads 28 Johnson Baby Wipes Yes No Yes
Facial Tissue NA
Shampoo 16 Herbal Essences Yes No Yes
Body Wash 16 Imperial Leather Yes No Yes
Soap 53 Imperial Leather Yes No Yes
Conditioner 16 Herbal Essences Yes No Yes
Razors 14 Bic Yes No Yes
Shaving Cream NA
After Shave NA
Colognes 28 Paco Rabanne Yes No Yes
Deodorant 28 Nivea Yes No Yes
Skin Cream 42 E45 Yes No Yes
Lotion NA
Mouthwash 28 Listerine Yes No Yes
Toothbrush 31 Colgate Yes No Yes
Toothpaste 31 Colgate Yes No Yes
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
61
Kenneth Kan’s Personal Experience Record
Item Frequency
(For 2
Weeks)
Brand Do you want to:
Keep it? Change it? Recommend
it to others?
Cleansing Pads NA
Facial Tissue 14 Tesco No Yes No
Shampoo 14 Head & Shoulders Yes No No
Body Wash 14 Original Source Yes No Yes
Soap NA
Conditioner NA
Razors 7 Gillette Yes No No
Shaving Cream NA
After Shave NA
Colognes 14 Ermenegildo
Zegna
Yes No Yes
Deodorant NA
Skin Cream NA
Lotion NA
Mouthwash 5 Listerine Yes No Yes
Toothbrush 28 Oral B Yes No Yes
Toothpaste 28 Colgate Yes No Yes
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
62
Mike Ho’s Personal Experience Record
Item Frequency
(For 2
Weeks)
Brand Do you want to:
Keep it? Change it? Recommend
it to others?
Cleansing Pads NA
Facial Tissue NA
Shampoo 14 Dove Yes No Yes
Body Wash 14 Johnson Baby Yes No Yes
Soap NA
Conditioner NA
Razors NA
Shaving Cream NA
After Shave NA
Colognes NA
Deodorant NA
Skin Cream NA
Lotion NA
Mouthwash 28 Listerine Yes No Yes
Toothbrush 28 Colgate Yes No Yes
Toothpaste 28 Colgate Yes No Yes
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
63
Roxanne Tuck’s Personal Experience Record
Item Frequency
(For 2
Weeks)
Brand Do you want to:
Keep it? Change it? Recommend it
to others?
Cleansing Pads 24 Johnson Baby Wipes Yes No Yes
Facial Tissue NA
Shampoo 8 Pantene Pro-V Yes No Yes
Body Wash 8 Soap and Glory Yes No Yes
Soap 80 Palmolive
Catering Soap
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
Conditioner 8 Pantene Pro-V Yes No Yes
Razors 5 Gillette Venus Yes No Yes
Shaving Cream 5 Gillette Yes No Yes
After Shave NA
Colognes 3 Marc Jacobs - Daisy Yes No Yes
Deodorant 14 Dove Yes No Yes
Skin Cream 18 Clarins Yes No Yes
Lotion 8 Bio-Oil Yes No Yes
Mouthwash 24 Listerine Yes No Yes
Toothbrush 24 Oral B Yes No Yes
Toothpaste 24 Sensodyne Yes No Yes
MKT2004 Group Project Report 2012
64
Tiezheng Yuan’s Personal Experience Record
Item Frequency
(For 2
Weeks)
Brand Do you want to:
Keep it? Change it? Recommend
it to others?
Cleansing Pads NA
Facial Tissue 14 Kleenex Yes No No
Shampoo 14 Pantene Yes No No
Body Wash 14 Body Shop Yes No No
Soap 14 Marks & Spencer Yes No No
Conditioner NA
Razors 14 Gilette Yes No Yes
Shaving Cream 14 Nivea Yes No No
After Shave NA
Colognes 14 Burberry Sport Yes No Yes
Deodorant NA
Skin Cream NA
Lotion NA
Mouthwash 7 Listerine Yes No No
Toothbrush 28 Oral-B Yes No No
Toothpaste 28 Colgate Yes No No