Upload
andrew-ferguson
View
2.309
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
+
Basic Ultrasound PhysicsDr. A. Ferguson
+Objectives
Level 1 Knowledge Components
Ultrasound physics, terminology, and safety
Equipment care, ultrasound techniques, and controls
+The transducer
Damper material
Piezoelectric crystal(sends and receives)
Acoustic lens
Impedancematching to skin
CABLE
+The ultrasound wave
Am
plit
ude (
dB
)
Wavelengthl
1 second: cycles/second = frequency(Hz)Clinical use varies from 2.5-20MHz
Velocity m/s1540 m/s approx
Delivered in pulses (bursts)• Length of pulse varies• Frequency of pulse varies
V = fl
+Velocity in tissue
Medium Velocity of US (m/sec)
Air 330
Fat 1450
Water 1480
Soft tissue 1540
Kidney 1560
Blood 1570
Muscle 1580
Bone 4080
+The ultrasound beam
Near zone
Unfocused transducer
Divergenceangle
Side lobes
Beam width
Focal zone
Focused transducer
+Ultrasound beam lobes
Feldman M K et al. Radiographics 2009;29:1179-1189
+ResolutionAxial (along length of beam) – most precise
Smallest resolvable distance = 2 x l Higher frequency = better resolution Independent of depth
Lateral (across beam) Varies with depth Within focal zone may be as good as axial
Elevational (within the slice) Slice might be 3-8mm wide with some probes Strong reflectors at edges may appear in centre
Contrast (shades of gray)
+Ultrasound/tissue interaction
Transducer
Scattering
Reflection
Refraction
Attenuation
Tissue interface
Skin
1 2
3 4
+Scattering
Structures with radius < wavelength scatter US
e.g. RBCs and micro-structures within tissues
Scattering is multidirectional
Only small portion of incident US gets back to probe
Scattering from RBCs contributes to DOPPLER effect
Tissue scattering results in speckled appearance
+Reflection
Critical to image generation
Depends on: Angle of beam relative to tissue Change in acoustic impedance* across
boundary Smooth tissue boundaries act almost as
mirrors Called “specular reflectors” e.g. pleura
* Acoustic impedance = tissue density x US velocity in the tissue
+Acoustic impedance
Medium Acoustic impedance*
Air 0.0004
Lung 0.18
Fat 1.34
Liver 1.65
Blood 1.65
Kidney 1.63
Muscle 1.71
Bone 7.8* x106 Rayls
+Refraction
Waves deflected passing through interface
Can be useful in focusing US waves
Results in artefacts
+Attenuation
Loss of US energy as it passes through tissue
Depends on Attenuation coefficient of tissue Frequency of transducer Distance from transducer Intensity of transmitted US
AIR has a very large attenuation coefficient
Lower frequencies penetrate better than high
+Attenuation values
Medium Half-power distance (cm)
Water 380
Blood 15
Soft-tissue (non-muscle)
1-5
Muscle 0.6-1
Bone 0.2-0.7
Air 0.08
Lung 0.05
+Image artifacts
Poor image quality
Images of structures that are either Not there at all Present in a different location than image
suggests
Lack of visualisation of structures
Images that differ in size or shape from reality
Some artifacts are clinically useful
+Image artifacts Acoustic shadowing
Acoustic enhancement
Refraction artifact
Reverberation artifact
Comet-tail artifact
Mirror-image artifact
Ghosting artifact
Beam-width artifact
Ring-down artifact
Speed-displacement artifact
+Beam-width artifact
Feldman M K et al. Radiographics 2009;29:1179-1189
Grey dot assumed to be in main beam areaArea of interest outside focal zone
Adjust focal zone
Grey dot outside beamArea of interest inside focal zone
+Side-lobe artifact
Feldman M K et al. Radiographics 2009;29:1179-1189
Black dot signal may return from multiple side-lobes resulting in duplication on screen
+Reverberation artifact
Feldman M K et al. Radiographics 2009;29:1179-1189
US bounces back and forth between two strong reflectors
+Ring-down artifact
Feldman M K et al. Radiographics 2009;29:1179-1189
Ring of bubbles with fluid trapped centrally. Fluid vibrations detected as strong signal and displayed as line behind true source.
+Mirror-image artifacts
Feldman M K et al. Radiographics 2009;29:1179-1189
US beam bounces between structure and deeper strong reflector e.g. diaphragm.This means probe receives signals as if from same object on other side of reflector.
+Speed-displacement artifact
Feldman M K et al. Radiographics 2009;29:1179-1189
Part of beam encounters tissue where velocity is much lower than 1540 m/s,e.g. fat. Returning signal appears to come from deeper in body.
Discontinuous diaphragm sign
+Refraction artifact
Feldman M K et al. Radiographics 2009;29:1179-1189
Refraction at an interface between two objects makes the deeper object appear in false location.
+Acoustic shadowing
Feldman M K et al. Radiographics 2009;29:1179-1189
Strong attenuator means weak beam beyond = shadow
+Acoustic enhancement
Feldman M K et al. Radiographics 2009;29:1179-1189
Signal behind weak attenuator is stronger than at same level in adjacent tissues.Gives impression of brighter structures deep to low attenuator =enhancement
+ Probe typesSector Linear array Curved array
+ Use of Gain
GainMin
Max
Near field Far field
Attenuation
Time-gain compensation (TGC)
Pro
cess
ed
Ori
gin
al