UGC Pay Related Orders

Pay Related Orders

General criteria for giving exemption from NET

UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSIONBAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MAG

NEW DELHI - 110002

F. 1-1/2003 (PS) Meeting

December 9, 2004

The Registrar(All Universities)All Sate/ Union TerritoriesEducation Secretaries

Sir

The Commission at its meeting held on 13th August, 2004 considered the recommendationsof the Exemption Committee and approved the General criteria formulated by the ExemptionCommittee for giving exemption from NET and also decided to consider individual cases forNET exemption based on the criteria evolved as under :

1. NET Exemption is not allowed and candidates for lectureship must clear NET in thesubject or in the relevant subject.

2. However, NET Exemption may be granted in view of clearly spelt out specialcircumstances, which may be any of the following :

a. No NET Examination is held in the subject.b. NET/SLET qualified/exempted candidates were not available when interviews

were held following due procedures.3. In case, NET Exemption is granted in view of special circumstances, the candidates

be compulsorily required to clear the NET within a period of two years from the dateof issue of communication of exemption by UGC.

4. The Commission also reiterates the position as conveyed vide UGC Circular No. F.3-3/2000 (PS) of the 17th July, 2003. The main contents of the same are once againreproduced here below :

"No person shall be appointed to a teaching post in University (or)in any of the institutionsincluding constituent or affiliated Colleges recognized under Clause (f) of the Section 2 ofUGC Act, 1956 (or) in an institution deemed to be University under Section 3 of the said Actin a subject if she/he does not fulfill the requirements as to the qualifications for theappropriate subjects as prescribed by the Commission".

At present the Universities/Colleges are following the practice of first appointing thecandidate who are not qualified as per UGC Regulations and then sending their proposals for

exemption. The appointments are made before the clearance is received from the UGC. Thisleads to several litigations.

To avoid this, all the State Governments/Universities/Colleges are advised not to appointsuch candidates till the clearance is received from UGC. The proposals may be sent to theUGC immediately after the selection of the candidates by the Selection Committee in theprescribed proforma alongwith sound justification (through the University in the case ofaffiliated colleges) for relaxation/exemption as per UGC norms in a particular subject inwhich NET/SLET is not being conducted or sufficient number of candidates are not availablewith NET/SLET qualifications for a specified period only.

The appointment letter shall be issued only after receiving the relaxation from the UGC.

This may also be brought to the notice of the colleges affiliated to your University.

Yours faithfully,

(Mrs. Shashi Munjal )Under Secretry

Pay Related Orders

Teachers having Ph.D Degree availing exemption fromNET

Dr. (Mrs.) Pankaj MittalJoint Secretary


NEW DELHI - 110002

No F 3-1/2002 (PS)

15 th July, 2003

The Vice-Chancellor(All Universities)

Dear Sir/Madam,

This is in supersession to this office letter No. F.3-1/2002 dated 16th January, 2003regarding withdrawal of increments from the teachers who have been appointed afteravailing the exemption from NET on account of having a Ph.D Degree. The above circularshall be kept in abeyance until further orders. Consequently, the universities may continueto give increments to the above category of teachers till they hear a word on it from theUniversity Grants Commission.

This may also be brought to the colleges affiliated to your University.

Yours faithfully,

(Dr. (Mrs.) Pankaj Mittal)Deputy Secretary

Pay Related Orders

Orientation/Refresher Courses to Regular PermanentPart-Time Teachers


NEW DELHI - 110 002

15th May, 2002

F.6-1 / WRO / 02 (PS)

The RegistrarAll Universities(As Per List Attached)

Sub : Providing UGC orientation / Refresher Courses to regular permanent part-timeteachers.

Dear Sir / Madam,

It has come to the notice of the UGC that regular permanent part time teachers are not beingallowed to complete / admit the Orientation / Refresher Courses by the Academic StaffColleges.

As such the Academic Staff Colleges are requested to admit / allow the regular permanentpart time teachers to complete orientation / refresher Courses, as they are also eligible to beconsidered for Sr. Grade (Lecturer) and Selection Grade (Lecturer) under CareerAdvancement Scheme.

The Universities / Institutes are also requested not to appoint part-time teachers and whereverrequired Guest Faculty could be appointed on per lecture basis.

Yours Sincerely,

(Narain Singh)Under Secretary

Pay Related Orders

Exemption from Refresher/Orientation Courses forTeachers Holding Ph.D Degrees in Universities/Collegesfrom Promotion Under Career Advancement Scheme


NEW DELHI - 110 002

17th May, 2001

No. F.2-9/97 (PS)

The RegistrarAll Universities

The Education Secretaries(All State Governments)

The Officer In charge(All Regional Offices of UGC)

Dear Sir / Madam,

The UGC has been receiving repeated queries regarding exemption from Orientation /Refresher Courses for teachers holding Ph.D degree in University / Colleges for promotionunder Career Advancement Scheme to Lecturer (Sr. Scale). The matter has been examined.The following decisions has been taken in this regard.

1. A Ph.D. holder may be exempted for not having attended one course whether refresher ororientation courses as regards the eligibility for promotion under the Career AdvancementScheme to Lecturer (Sr. Scale)

2. M.Phil. can not be equated to Ph.D in this regard.

Yours faithfully,


Pay Related Orders

Regulation on minimum qualification for appointment forCareer Advancement of Lecturers, Readers andProfessors in Universities and Colleges (Relaxation forPh.D Degree holders)

Dr. (Mrs.) Pankaj MittalJoint Secretary


NEW DELHI - 110002

D.O.No.F.1-7/98 (PS)

26 th July, 2001

The Registrar,(All Universities)

Subject : Guidelines for counting of past service for promotion from Reader toProfessor under Career Advancement Scheme.

Dear Sir/Madam,

In continuation to this office letter number F.3-1/2000 (PS) dated 4th April, 2000 and F.1-6/98 (PS) dated 24.4.2000 vide which the UGC Regulations on minimum qualifications forappointment for Career Advancement of Lecturers, Readers and Professors in Universitiesand Colleges were issued, it is to inform you that the Ph.D. degree holders whoseexaminations were completed by 19th September, 1991 (irrespective of date of declaration ofresults) shall be eligible for relaxation of 5% of marks from 55% to 50% to appear in Net.

This may also be brought to the colleges affiliated to your University.

With Regards,

Yours faithfully,

(Pankaj Mittal)Joint Secretary

Pay Related Orders

Extention of Date for Participation in Refresher Coursesfor Eligible Teachers


NEW DELHI - 110 002

17th October, 2002

F.2-16/2002 (PS)

The Registrar (All Universities)Secretary, MHRD, Education SecretariesAll State Governments & Union Territories

Dear Sir / Madam,

The Commission at its meeting held on 25th September, 2002 considered the issue to extendthe date for participation in Refresher Courses beyond 31.2.2000 in respect of eligibleteachers for the purpose of promotion / placement under Career Advancement Scheme anddecided as under :-

1. Date for joining Refresher Courses may be extended upto 31st December, 2004.

2. The teachers who are superannuating within the next three years be exempted fromattending Refresher Courses

This may please be brought to the notice of the Colleges affiliated to your University.

Yours faithfully,

(Dr. K. P. Singh)Deputy Secretary

Pay Related Orders

Proforma for Seeking Relaxation in the MinimumQualifications Prescribed by the UGC for Appointmentto the Post of Lecturer


NEW DELHI - 110 002

(The Universities and colleges should furnish the following information for obtainingapproval of the Commission while seeking relaxation in qualifications as per UGCRegulations 1991)

1. Name of the University/College :2. Name of the candidate for whom the

relaxation is being sought his qualification :3. Number of posts approved :4. Relaxation/Exemption sought :5. Special reason/merit of the candidate for

selection to the post with justification(s) :6. Whether the post was advertised in all the

leading newspapers, Employment News,Rojgar Samachar and Doordarshan etc. (Acopy of the advertisement may be Attached) :

7. Whether the post was reserved for SC/ST orany other category :

8. Number of candidates called for interview :9. Number of candidates interviewed with their

respective bio-data :10. Number of candidates having NET

qualifications out of the interviewedcandidates :

11. Number of candidates exempted from NETout of interviewed candidates :

12. Number of candidates having more than 55%marks at Master's level out of interviewedcandidates :

13. Composition of the Selection Committee andmembers present (as per UGC's norms) :

14. Recommendations of the SelectionCommittee along with a copy of the Minutesof the Selection Committee :

Note : Comprehensive list of candidates, decision, criterion and recommendations of theCommittee to be enclosed.

Signature of Principal Signature of RegistrarWith seal With seal

PROFORMA IN WHICH PROFILE OF TEACHERS BEMAINTAINED IN THE COLLEGES EACH YEAR

Period of Report____________________________________________________I. GENERAL

1. Name & Designation of the Teacher2. Academic Qualifications3. Date of Birth4. Date of Joining the College5. Date of Confirmation6. Previous experience (with dates)

if served in other colleges / institutions.7. Courses taught at Various Levels

a. Undergraduate Levelb. Postgraduate Level

8. Workload per weeka. Lecturersb. Tutorialsc. Practicalsd. Seminar / Group Discussionse. Total number of hours / periods provided in the time table under (a), (b),

(c) & (d) in the academic year and the number actually taken during theyear.

9. Teaching methods applied:10. Details of academic planning / preparation of Lecturers during the session.11. How far the lecturers planned at the session were carried through up to the end

of the session.12. Details of lecture notes, bibliography etc. circulated to the students before

delivering the lecturers.13. Whether topics for discussion in the tutorials were intimated in advance? If so,

details of topics on which discussions were held in the tutorials may be given on aseparate sheet of paper.

14. Has the college provided audio-visual aids and if so, how far the teacher usedthese in teaching demonstration experience etc.?

15. Formulation of schemes under COSIP/CCHSSIP, if the college is participating inthese schemes and teachers own contribution thereto:

16. Significant contribution made in the field of:a. Teaching Methodsb. Evaluation Techniquesc. Course Developments, etc.d. Teaching aids developed, if any,e. Any experiment / apparatus designed or fabricated by him for improving

teaching.

II. Academic & Professional Advancement during the year:

a. Research facilities offered in the college.b. Research qualifications acquired.c. Research Projects undertaken indicating the name of project, and

duration source of funds, if any.d. Research projects completed.e. Papers published indicating titles and names of journals in which

published.f. Guidance rendered to Research Scholars working for Ph.D. / award of

Ph.D. degrees.

g. Name of Seminars / Workshop / Conferences in which participatedduring the year and titles of papers presented at such gatherings.

h. Names of refresher courses / orientation programmes in whichparticipated.

i. Any other training obtained.j. Participation in other activities of the college like Adult & Continuing

Education, Community Services, NSS, Sports & Culture, Activities etc.k. Membership of various professional / other bodies in the college.l. Membership of various bodies of the University.m. Membership of other academic and professional bodies.

III. Any other distinct contribution which the teacher has made during the year underreference, in the improvement of higher education / Development programmes.

Note: Please give information on separate sheet of paper wherever necessary andindicate the enclosure number against the relevant column.

I certify that the information given above is correct and factful to the bestof my knowledge.

Signature of Teacher.Department of ___________.

IV. Evaluation by Head of Department / Incharge / Principal with regard to:

a. Correctness of factual information.b. Evaluation of the overall contribution of the teacher.

SignatureIncharge of the Department /

Head of the Department.Observations / recommendation of the Principal on the overall standing / performance ofteacher in college:SignaturePrincipal

Pay Related Orders

Guidelines for implementation of the Merit PromotionScheme for College Teachers


NEW DELHI - 110002

L.O.No.F.1-87 / 78 (CP) Part I

31 st December, 1982

Dear Vice - Chancellor,

The role of the teacher is crucial in the maintenance of academic standards and discipline inan educational institution. A great responsibility therefore, lies on the teacher to ensure thatproper academic atmosphere is maintained in the institution and that all academic work iscarried out efficiently and with devotion to duty as on full-time employees of the institution.Every profession, for its orderly progress, needs certain rules of professional ethics, andeducation is no exception. In order to do justice to this challenging task, the teacher has to bedevotedly involved in programmes of teaching, research, examination and extension:activities taken as a whole. There should be regular assessment of his work and also of theinstitution. At the same time, it is necessary that teachers are provided reasonableopportunities for career advancement, and recognition of merit.

a). Objective

A scheme of Merit Promotion is to be introduced during the 6th Plan Period, with a viewto providing suitable opportunities to the teachers working in the Colleges for careeradvancement in recognition of their significant contributions in the field of teaching,research and allied educational activities. The scheme is intended to be in the nature of aflexible complementing scheme where a teacher after critical assessment of his work atthe end of a specified period can be promoted to the next higher level and the positionthus held by him is treated as personal to the incumbent and no resultant vacancy isrequired to be filled. It is falt that such a scheme would go in a long way in encouragingthe teachers in colleges to engage in teaching, research and allied educational activitiesand make a distinct contribution to the teacher profession and thus help to improve thequality and standards of higher education.

b). Method of Implementation

I. Teachers working in colleges affiliated to a university and included under section 2(f)and which come within the purview of Section 12(A) of the UGC Act who have made

significant contribution and achievement in the field of the teaching and research may beconsidered for Merit Promotion, if they have put in a minimum of eight years ofpermanent service as a teacher of which at least four years have been in the institutionwhere he / she is being considered for such assessment for merit promotion.

II. A teacher who has been considered and not selected for merit promotion in the initialpresentation could, however, submit his / her work again only after a lapse of threeyears.

III. College teachers wishing to have their work assessed and considered for MeritPromotion should present the details of their work to their college latest by 31stDecember, each year. For this purpose, the institutions may keep the profile of teacherswith them in which the teachers may at the end of each year indicate the details of theircontributions of teaching, research, curriculum development, educational reforms,innovative teaching and other forms of academic work done in the institution as well asthe work done in the field of extension and continuing education, sports and culturalactivities etc. Improvement of academic qualifications should also be recorded. Theenclosed proforma (Annexure) could be used for this purpose and these profiles may besubmitted by the college to the university concerned, along with the proposal of theteacher who are seeking assessment of their work, a consolidated report for the period ofpreceding eight years may be made available, incorporating the major contributionsmade by the teacher.

IV. The Vice-Chancellor or his nominee should refer the proposal of the teacher to at least 2experts in the subject / discipline concerned out of a panel of names prepared by theUniversity according to the procedure prescribed by the University for such SelectionCommittees.

The evaluation reports from the experts should be kept confidential and should be madeavailable at least three weeks in advance of the Selection Committee. The SelectionCommittee would consist of the Vice-Chancellor or his nominee, two experts other thanthe referees and the Principal of the College where the lecturer is working.

Merit Promotion be given by the appointing Authority to a teacher only if the SelectionCommittee recommends the same.

V. While considering the proposal of a teacher for Merit Promotion, only merit as definedin Para III may be taken into account. All other factors being equal, seniority may begiven due consideration.

VI. The University should generally take a decision on the proposal of a teacher for MeritPromotion as far as possible before the beginning of the next academic year so that suchpromotions can become effective from the date of the beginning of the next academicsession.

VII. The promotion given to a person would be personal to the incumbent concerned for theperiod he serves the institution where he has been granted promotion.

VIII.The promotion on merit to a teacher under this scheme will not entitle him to any otherresponsibility, administrative or otherwise such as Head of Department / Principal,except where he is even other wise to be considered and will also not lead to any other

reduction in this teaching or other work.

IX. While promotion a teacher on merit, his salary may be fixed in the prescribed scale ofpay for the next higher post with marginal adjustment nearest to the salary being drawnby the promotee, as per usual rules of pay fixation. Since most teachers in the collegeswould be in the scale of lecturer i.e. 700-1600, the teacher, on selection for MeritPromotion may be placed in the scale of Rs.1200-50-1300-60-1900 and be designatedlecturer in Merit Promotion Selection Grade.

X. The financial involvement will vary from State to State but the Commission would assistthe Institution in the implementation of the Merit Promotion Scheme by makingavailable on average contribution at the rate of Rs. 600/- per annum per teacherpromoted to the next higher level in accordance with the guidelines laid down by theCommission up to 31st March, 1985 only, on the condition that the institution concernedcontinues implementation of the scheme and meets expenditure on the salary of theperson concerned as committed expenditure from 1st April, 1985 out of its ownresources or with the assistance of grant-in-aid from the State Government as the casemay be.

XI. No. person promoted by the college prior to the introduction of the UGC Scheme andnot in conformity with the guidelines laid down by, the commission will qualify forassistance from the Commission.

XII. The University would furnish to the UGC, every year latest by 15th August, necessaryparticulars of the persons promoted in the colleges under its jurisdiction, under the MeritPromotion Scheme for college teachers alone with the evaluation report of the expertsand the recommendations of the Selection Committees and also the names of all thepersons considered from each colleges, to enable the Commission to consider remittinggrants due to the concerned colleges.

General

The number of teachers promoted under Merit Promotion Scheme will not exceed 33% of thetotal number of permanent posts in the College, spread over a period of 3 years.

Pay Related Orders


NEW DELHI - 110002

L.O.No.F.1-87 / 78 (CP) Part I 31 st December, 1982

Dear Vice - Chancellor,

1. Kindly refer to my d.o letter of even number dated November 23, 1982 regardingthe Merit Promotion Scheme for University appointed teachers in the Universities.

2. The Commission had also under Consideration the implementation of a similarscheme for college appointed teachers and a copy of guidelines for theimplementation of Merit Promotion Scheme for these teachers as accepted isenclosed.

3. The Commission would make a contribution of Rs. 600/- per annum for eachperson promoted under the above scheme, in accordance with these guidelines forthe remaining period f the Sixth Plan only after which the expenditure involvedunder the scheme would be taken over as committed expenditure out of thecollege own resources or with the assistance of grant-in-aid from the StateGovernment as the case may be.

4. Any scheme which the University may already have for merit / personalpromotion for college teachers and persons already promoted under which ascheme prior to the present scheme of the UGC becoming effective will notqualify for UGC assistance.

5. The University would supply to the UGC necessary particulars, each year, of thepersons considered under the scheme, the referees evaluations andrecommendations along with minutes of the Selection Committees and personsfinally promoted.

6. I shall be grateful if the University kindly give an assurance after consulting StateGovernment concerned to the effect that the recurring additional liability forimplementation of the scheme would be met by the college, concerned or with theassistance form the State Government concerned with effect from 1-4-1985. Thescheme should be introduced by the University only after obtaining the aboveassurance from the State Government.

With regards,

Yours Sincerely,

Pay Related Orders

Sd/-

<< Back

UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSIONBAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG

NEW DELHI 110 002

F.NO. 7-2/2004(PS)

January 14, 2005

The RegistrarAll Universities.

Subject:- Leave Rules Prescribed by the UGC for Teachers of the Universities / Colleges

Dear Sir,

The Commission vide its Notification dated 24 December, 1998 on revision of pay scales,minimum qualifications for the appointment of teachers in universities and colleges, andother measures for the maintenance of standards has laid down service conditions (includingleave rules) for teachers. It may please be noted that while issuing this notification, it wasexpected that entire scheme of revision of pay scales, together with all the conditions attachedto it, would be implemented as a composite scheme without any modifications.

It has now been brought to the notice of the UGC that some of the universities have not giveneffect to the Leave Rules prescribed by the UGC as an integral part of the revised pay scales.For implementation of the Leave Rules, it is necessary for the Universities to suitably amendthe relevant statutes / ordinances / rules / regulations as may be required. A copy of the LeaveRules is enclosed for your kind reference.

May I request you to kindly confirm if your university has implemented the prescribed leaverules. In case, your university is yet to implement the revised leave rules, you may pleaseinitiate action for its implementation forthwith. You may also advise the colleges affiliated toyour university to follow the prescribed leave rules. I would appreciate if you could send mea status on the same. If you require any clarifications from us on this issue, please feel free todo so.

Yours faithfully,

sd/-(Ved Prakash)

Secretary

Encl : as stated aboveCopy to:

State Secretaries of Higher Education with the request to ensuring the implementation of theaforesaid Leave Rules in all the Universities and Colleges in the state.Addl. Secretary, Department of Secondary and Higher Education, Ministry of Human

Resource Development, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi� 110002 for his kind information andnecessary action.

sd/-(Ved Prakash)

Secretary

Pay Related Orders

Revision of Pay Scale and Minimum Qualification ofTeachers (Eligibility at Master's Level)


NEW DELHI - 110002

No.F.1-13/99 (PS) Pt.File

27 Nov, 2001

To

The Vice Chancellors of all the UniversitiesThe Educational Secretaries of all the States(As per list attached)

Dear Sir/Madam,

In continuation to the UGC Notification dated 24.12.1998 and Regulation No.F.3-1/2000(PS) dated 4.4.200 regarding revision of pay scale and minimum qualification of teachers, Iwould like to inform you that the minimum requirement of 55% marks at Master's level shallnot be insisted upon for Principals, Professors, Readers, Registrars, Deputy Registrars,Librarians, Deputy Librarian, Directors of Physical Education, Deputy Director of PhysicalEducation for the existing incumbents who are already in the university system. Theminimum requirement in their case shall be at least 50% of marks at Master's level. However,55% of marks at Master's level should be insisted upon for those entering the system fromoutside and those at the entry point of Lecturers, Assistant Registrars, Assistant Librarians,Assistant Director of Physical Education.

Yours faithfully,

(Dr. (Mrs.) Pankaj Mittal)Joint Secretary

Pay Related Orders

Appointment of Substitute Teachers Under FacultyDevelopment Programme


NEW DELHI - 110002

No. F 3-8/2000 (PS) TFPD

February, 2001

Dear Sir/Madam,

This has reference to UGC's earlier correspondence / letters regarding appointment ofsubstitute teacher under Faculty Development Programme (Teachers Fellowship) during IXthPlan Period.

In this connection, I am to say that the substitute teacher against the vacancy of teacherfellow, may be made from the candidates, who fulfil the qualifications prescribed by theUGC as per UGC Regulations - 2000. The college should first appoint the qualifiedteachers only, as per the guidelines of the Faculty Development Programme (TeacherFellowship), and the teacher fellow should be allowed to join the research place thereafter. Incase the qualified substitute teachers are not available within a period of one year, teacherfellowship should be withdrawn.

The above decision will be applicable on teacher fellow(s) to whom the approval / awardletter(s) are yet to be issued. The teacher fellowship may not be withdrawn for those teachersfellows who have already joined the research place.

You are requested to comply with the above decision and also circulate the above decision toall the colleges under jurisdiction for immediate compliance.

Yours faithfully,


Pay Related Orders

Appointment of Retired Teachers in Universities/Colleges


NEW DELHI - 110 002

NARAIN SINGHUNDER SECRETARY

D.O.No.F.3-1 / 97 (PS)

9th March, 2002

The RegistrarAll Universities

Dear Sir / Madam,

It has been brought to the notice of UGC that some of the Universities are appointing retiredteachers to the statutory and non-statutory bodies of the University. The matter has beenexamined by the UGC and it is decided that no retired teachers after the age of 62 years beappointed on any statutory or even non-statutory position, in Universities / Colleges.

This is for your information and necessary action.

With regards,

Yours Sincerely,

(Narain Singh)

Pay Related Orders

UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSIONBAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG

NEW DELHI 110 002

F.NO. 7-2/2004(PS)

January 14, 2005

The RegistrarAll Universities.

Subject:- Leave Rules Prescribed by the UGC for Teachers of the Universities / Colleges

Dear Sir,

The Commission vide its Notification dated 24 December, 1998 on revision of pay scales, minimumqualifications for the appointment of teachers in universities and colleges, and other measures for themaintenance of standards has laid down service conditions (including leave rules) for teachers. It may pleasebe noted that while issuing this notification, it was expected that entire scheme of revision of pay scales,together with all the conditions attached to it, would be implemented as a composite scheme without anymodifications.

It has now been brought to the notice of the UGC that some of the universities have not given effect to theLeave Rules prescribed by the UGC as an integral part of the revised pay scales. For implementation of theLeave Rules, it is necessary for the Universities to suitably amend the relevant statutes / ordinances / rules /regulations as may be required. A copy of the Leave Rules is enclosed for your kind reference.

May I request you to kindly confirm if your university has implemented the prescribed leave rules. In case,your university is yet to implement the revised leave rules, you may please initiate action for itsimplementation forthwith. You may also advise the colleges affiliated to your university to follow theprescribed leave rules. I would appreciate if you could send me a status on the same. If you require anyclarifications from us on this issue, please feel free to do so.

Yours faithfully,

sd/-(Ved Prakash)

Secretary

Encl : as stated aboveCopy to:

State Secretaries of Higher Education with the request to ensuring the implementation of the aforesaid LeaveRules in all the Universities and Colleges in the state.Addl. Secretary, Department of Secondary and Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development,Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi � 110002 for his kind information and necessary action.

sd/-(Ved Prakash)

Secretary

Documents

UGC Pay Related Orders