Upload
vicky-wilson
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Find your own pace and move together. Considering UD at the level of Degree Requirements The faculty in the UW dance program recently considered the role technique class plays for a new dance studies degree. Acknowledging the hegemony set by the technique classes on offer 17 , we explored different options for students to complete this requirement. Discussing the possibility of waiving the technique requirement
Citation preview
Findyourownpace
andmovetogether.
TheApplicationofUniversalDesignofInstructioninDanceDegreesinHigherEducation.1
"Ilovedthediversity,allofthelanguages,thesimultaneoustranslations,thephysicaltranslatingofwhatcanmybodydo?Theanswersbyamultitudeofabilitiesandages.ItseemedrepresentativeofthekindofworldIliketolivein.”
Studentresponsetointegrateddanceclass
Overview
Overthepastthirtyyearsdancecompaniesworkingwithdisabledandnon‐disabled
performershavedevelopedsuccessfulmethodologieseffectiveinworkshopsand
companytraining.Integrateddance2hasspreadbeyondpostmodernWestern
TheaterDancewithprominentproponentssuchasDanceAbility,AXISDance
CompanyorDancingWheelsintheU.S.orAmiciDanceTheaterandCandocoDance
CompanyintheUKtoplacesasdiverseasIndia,Ethiopia,Uzbekistan,Brazil,etc.
spanningamultitudeofdanceformsandgenres.Whiletheprincipleofinclusionin
thecreativeprocessandperformanceseemstospreadrelativelyeasily,itproves
bothdifficultandproblematictotransferintegrateddanceintomainstream
teachingandtoprovidecomprehensivetrainingandeducationforperformerswith
disabilities.Thelastdecadesawconcertedefforts,particularlyintheUK,toincrease
accesstodancedegreeprogramsforstudentswithdisabilities3.Theresearchand
theresultingpublicationsareusuallyabletoaddressphysicalaccesstofacilities,
information,inclusivelanguageandoverarchingartisticandeducationalprinciples.
Thereishoweveragreaterchallengetodisseminatebestpracticeinaccessible,
instructionalprocesses.Whileindividualsolutionsexist,theseapproachesareby
andlargenon‐verbal,applied,visual‐kineticandembodied.
Mypersonalhistoryasadancersomewhatmirrorsthedevelopmentof
integrateddanceandthechallengetotransferthepracticeintohighereducation.I
completedanMAinContemporaryDanceattheLondonContemporaryDance
Schoolin1997,trainingconventionallyasacontemporarydanceperformer.In2000
IgainedapositionwithCandocoDanceCompany4,aprofessionaltouringcompany
withdisabledandnon‐disabledperformers.Experiencingintegrateddance
fundamentallyshiftedandcontinuestoinfluencemyartisticandpedagogic
approach.Movingbackintohighereducation,joiningthefacultyintheDance
ProgramattheUniversityofWashingtonin2004,itwasimportanttomenotonlyto
teachaboutintegrateddance,butalsototeachstudioclassesinanaccessibleway.
Writingaboutanembodiedpracticeisalwaysanactoftranslation.The
process,however,ofwritingthischapterservesseveralimportantpurposesand
contributestothediscussionofUniversalDesignofInstructionfromadance
practitioner’sperspective.Thearticledocumentsimportantchangesmyapproach
tointegrateddanceunderwent,whenImovedfromaspecificcompanypracticeinto
highereducation.ConsideringUDofInstructionrequiredmetorethinkteaching
processandmaterial,andtogeneratenewideas,tasksandexercises.Theresulting
documentisasmucharecordandcritiqueofpastandestablishedworkasitisa
blueprintforcontinueddevelopment.Furthermore,thisarticlecanhopefullyreach
morepeople,andgenerateamorefar‐reachingdiscussionofaccessandteaching
practiceindanceaswellasinotherdisciplines.
Afterprovidingahistoricoverviewofintegrateddance,Idiscussthe
applicationofUDofInstructiontodancedegreeprogramsandstudiopractice.
Centralinthisdiscussionishowtomovebeyondworkingwithadaptationsasa
deviceforstudentswithdisabilities.Theaiminsteadistocreateaccessforamore
diversestudentpopulationbydevelopingaskill‐specificcurriculumwithteaching
methodologies,assessmentcriteria,classstructuresandmaterialrelevanttoall
participantsintheclass.
HistoricOverview
Artisnotamirrorhelduptoreality,butahammerwithwhichto
shapeit.‐BertholdBrecht
IntheUKandU.S.dancerswithdisabilitiestooktothestudioandthestagefromthe
late1960sonward.Inatimewhenthedisabilityrightsmovementwasgaining
momentumandfirstlegislationwasmovingaheadtoensureequalaccessforpeople
withdisabilities,postmoderndancefundamentallyquestionedwhatdancewasand
setouttodevelopanaestheticthatincorporateseverydaymovements,workswith
untrainedperformersandmixessocialdance,theatricalforms,etc.5
Duringthe90s,whiletheADA(American’swithDisabilitiesAct,U.S.A.1990)
andtheDDA(DisabilityDiscriminationAct,UK1995)werepassed,anumberof
integrateddancecompaniesformalizedtheirpracticefromgrassroots,short‐term
projectstotouringrepertorycompanies,offeringprojectorfulltimeemploymentto
theirdancers.6Thesedevelopmentstookplacedespitemarginalaccesstoformal
trainingfordancerswithdisabilities.7Intermsofthetrainingavailableto
performerswithdisabilitiesthe2003UKstudyDisabilityandtheDanceandDrama
Awardsconcludes.
Onthewhole,manydisabledpeoplecanonlygainaccesstoinformaltrainingprovision.”
(Verrent,2003,pp26)Studentswithdisabilitiesareunderrepresentedinmainstreamdanceeducation.8
Theirtrainingisdelegatedtospecializeddancecompaniesandschoolsor
workshopsforthedisabled.Artistswithdisabilities“learnonthejob”andthe
trainingremainsunaccredited.Theseseparatetracksfordisabledandnon‐disabled
artistsareproblematic.
• Itaffectsartistswithdisabilitiesintheirimmediatejobprospectsandlong‐term
careers
• Itlimitstheexposureofmainstreamdancers,teachersandartiststoinclusive
practice.
• Integrateddancecompaniesareprovidingtrainingtonewdancersotherwise
coveredbycollegesanduniversities.
Theteachingandtrainingintheacademyisstrugglingtokeeppacewith
developmentsintheperformingartworld.Thislackofaccessibleandaccredited
trainingstandsinstrikingdiscrepancytothegrowingpresenceofperformerswith
disabilitiesandthedemandfortrainedandqualifiedperformers(bothdisabledand
non‐disabled)tojoinestablishedintegratedcompanies.Companiestraditionally
workingwithdisabledperformersaresheddingthemarginalizinglabelof
“integrated”and“disabilitydance”whileotherscastartistswithdisabilitieswithout
evertakingupadisabilitylabel.9TruetoBrecht’squote,Art,inthiscase,dance
companiesandperformerswithdisabilitiesareleadingthewayanditistheReality
ofdancedegreecoursesandformaltrainingthatrequiressomeofthe“hammering”
tochangeshape.
UniversalDesign,DefinetheUniverse
UniversalDesignis,asdefinedbyRonMaceattheCenterforUniversalDesign
(CUD)atNorthCarolinaStateUniversity:
“Thedesignofproductsandenvironmentstobeusablebyallpeople,tothegreatestextendpossible,withouttheneedforadaptationorspecializeddesign”
(TheCenterforUniversalDesign,1997Website)10
InitiallyconceivedandappliedinthedesignofproductsandarchitecturetheCUD
establishedasetofsevenprinciples:
1. Equitableuse
2. Flexibilityinuse
3. Simpleandintuitive
4. Perceptibleinformation
5. Toleranceoferror
6. Lowphysicaleffort
7. Sizeandspaceapproachanduse
Thesegeneralprincipleshavebeenreconsideredforvariousspecificsettings,
amongstthemteachingandinstruction.SherylBurgstahlerandRebeccaCory’s
publicationUniversalDesigninHigherEducation;FromPrinciplestoPractice
presentsanumberofexampleswhereresearchersandpractitionershaveusedthe
sevenprinciplesofUDtodevelopguidelinesrelevanttotheirfields.Burgstahler
developedanumberofrubricsforUniversalDesignofInstructioninhigher
education:
1. Classclimate
2. Interaction
3. Physicalenvironment/products
4. Deliverymethods
5. Informationresources/technology
6. Feedback
7. Assessment
8. Accommodation
InordertoapplythediscussionofUDofInstructiontodance,weneedtostartwith
areflectionontheconventionsofteachingindancedegreeprograms,toteaseout
whichaspectspromoteandwhichoneschallengeaccessandinclusion.Atthispoint
Ialsocriticallyexamineapproachesusedbyanumberofintegrateddance
companiesanddiscusswhythesemethodologiesdonottranslateintomainstream
teaching.Subsequently,IaddressspecificpointsofbothUDandUDofInstruction.
Inparticular,theprincipleofEquitableUsereallystartedmyrethinkingofinclusive
practice.Thediscussionofspecific,moreequitablemethodologiesisthereforeatthe
centerofthisarticle.
ConventionsinDanceDegreePrograms
Atfirstglancethereisanarrayofdifferentcollegesanddegreeprograms
availabletostudydance.Onfurtherinvestigationhowever,itseemsthatmost
undergraduatedegreesareprettysimilarintheircurricularstructure.Students
interestedinperformanceandthoseinterestedindanceeducation,therapy,
communityorsocialdanceformsallgothroughsimilarundergraduatedegrees11,
withthebulkoftimededicatedtodancetechnique.Itisstandardtohaveadaily
balletclassfollowedbyasecondtechniqueclassinanotherstyle(e.g.modern,jazz,
tapandotherethnicforms).12Whiletherearesignificantdifferencesinemphasis,
techniqueclassesshareasystematicapproachtotrainingskills.13Intermsof
access,lecturecoursesindancefaceconsiderationssimilartootheruniversity
courses.Studiobasedcourseslikecreativeprocess,improvisation,repertoryand
composition,arelargelydeemedaccessible14.Techniqueclasshoweverworking
withsetmaterialislessaccessiblematerialandthereforedeservesparticular
attention.
Withintechniqueclasseswecandifferentiatebetweencodifiedandnon‐
codifiedforms.Codifiedtechniqueslikeclassicalballetandhistoricmodernforms
(e.g.Graham,LimónandCunningham)workwithanestablishedandsetvocabulary.
Non‐codifiedtechniques,associatedwithpostmodernandcontemporarydancecan
includepedestrianmovements,somaticpracticesandidiosyncraticmaterial
relevanttotheindividualteacher.Whileoftenstillset,non‐codifiedtechniquescan
offermorefreedomintermsofselectionandperformanceofthematerial.
Usinggenericorspecificassessmentcriteriaintechniqueclassalsogreatly
affectsaccessibility.TheTrinityCollegeinLondonforinstancesetsstandardcriteria
forinstitutionsawardingtheNationalDiplomainProfessionalDanceintheUK.15
Fromthesixassessmentobjectivesfortechniqueclass,numbertwoisagood
exampleforgenericassessmentcriteria.
Oncompletionofthiscomponentthecandidatemustbeableto:Executesustainedmovementsequencesconsolidatingstrength,balance,co‐ordination,flexibilityandcontrolwithaccuracy,safetyandtechnicalfluency.
(TrinityCollegeLondon,pp3)
Thesegenericcriteriaaddress“meta‐skills”ofdanceapplicabletofundamentally
differentdancestyles.GretchenWardWarren’sClassicalBalletTechniqueandthe
HandbookforTeachers,VocationalGradedExaminationsfortheRoyalAcademyof
Dance(RAD)ontheotherhandbothpresentexactinglistsofstandardized
movementsforexaminations.Warrenincludesanumberofmeta‐skills,yetalso
stressesthefollowingqualitiesaboveall:
Mostimportant,howeveristheevaluationof(1)adancer’snaturalphysicalcapacityforclassicaltechniquewithregardsto“turn‐out,”extension,andballon,and(2)adancer’sfeet,height,weight,andbodyproportions.
(Warren,1989,pp64)Shegoesfurther.
Allaspiringballetdancers,however,mustmeetcertainbasicrequirements;itisneveracceptabletobeoverweight,awkward,extremely“turned‐in”orinflexible,ortopossesscertainexaggeratedphysicalcharacteristicsthatdonotconformtothetraditionalclassicallook.Classicalballetisavisualartform,andwhataudiencesseeonthestagemustbepleasingtotheeye.16
(Warren,1989,pp64)
Whileinstitutionsandinstructorsteachingdancemaynotactuallyspelloutsuch
specificcriteria,thesevaluesstilllingerinthemind‐setandpracticeofmany
instructorsandstudents.
Codifiedstyleswithspecificassessmentcriteriaposeveryevidentchallenges
toinclusionastheformofthestepbecomesabsoluteandunchangeable.Thereare
dancerswithdisabilities,KittyLunnandMarcBrueamongstthem,whoworkwith
theprinciplesandcharacteristicsofballet.Thisrequiresatranslationofthespecific
criteriatogeneralones.Adancerwithadisabilitywhilemaybenotinapositionto
executethedoublepirouetteendedansasspecifiedbytheRADcriteria,can
demonstrateitsgenericskillsofbalancingandturning,conveyingcontrol,
specificityandvirtuosity.
Non‐codifiedmaterialandgeneralassessmentcriteriaarepotentiallymore
inclusive.Yeteventheyareoftenstillassessedthroughuniformperformancesofthe
samemovementmaterial.Howevergenericcriteriadon’tprescribehowastudent
demonstratestherequiredskills.Theessenceisthatthestudentdemonstratesthe
abilitytoretainher(notauniform)setphrasewithaccuracyandperformitwith
appropriatecontrolanddetail.TimeandtimeagainhaveIseendancerswith
disabilitiesdemonstratethis.
Traditionaltechniqueclassandthehegemonicpositionballetandmodern
hold,arethesinglechallengetothesuccessfulinclusionofstudentswithdisabilities
intodancedegreeprograms.Examiningthegenericassessmentcriterialeadstothe
conclusionthatitisnotthecriteriaandthecurriculumbutwhatactuallyhappensin
theprocessofteaching,whicheitherexcludesorcreatesaccess.Thebasicquestions
fortechniqueclassthereforeare:
• HowcanIprovideclassmaterialandprocessesthatpromotetheskills
stipulatedbythecurriculumforadiversestudentbody?
• Howcanstudentsdemonstratetheseskillsthroughtheirmovementrange?
• HowdoIgivefeedbackandassesstheirperformance?
ConsideringUDatthelevelofDegreeRequirements
ThefacultyintheUWdanceprogramrecentlyconsideredtheroletechniqueclass
playsforanewdancestudiesdegree.Acknowledgingthehegemonysetbythe
techniqueclassesonoffer17,weexploreddifferentoptionsforstudentstocomplete
thisrequirement.Discussingthepossibilityofwaivingthetechniquerequirement
forstudentswithsignificantprevioustraining,Iwaskeentointroducethe
possibilityforstudentstocompletepartorallofthetechniquerequirements
throughindependentstudiesandtomaketechnicaltrainingpracticedoutsidethe
confinesoftheuniversitycount.Thisapproachtoaccesspresentsanumberof
benefitsforallstudents:
• Itopensupthedegreetostudentsinterestedinamultitudeofemerging,popular
andethnicdanceformsthatarenotpartoftheacademiccanon.
• Fortechniquesstudiedoutsidetheuniversity,thedegreeprogramprovides
qualityassuranceandaccreditationwhileothersubjectsarestudiedinthe
contextofdegreecourse.
• Thetechniquestudiedisrelevanttothestudent’spractice,whichwillcarryover
intoherprofessionalwork.
Sincetechniqueclassisthemajorobstaclefordisabilityaccess,itisworthitto
discussdifferentwaysinwhichthisrequirementcanbemet.Itisimportantthatwe
imaginethestudentpopulationwecouldteachandnotjustthinkoftheaverage
studentwealreadyteach.Solutionsdiscussedatthelevelofdegreerequirements
alonealreadyleadtoanumberofrigorousyetadaptableroutestoasuccessful
completionofadegreewithimprovedaccess.Diversityisbothincreasedinterms
ofstudentsattendingaswellasdanceformsrepresentedinthedegreeprogram.
ConventionsinIntegratedDance
Integrateddancerangesfromworkingexclusivelywithpeoplewithaspecific
disabilitytocompaniesintegratingdancersofall(dis)abilities18.Needlesstosay
aims,criteriaandartisticmissionvarygreatly–notallofthemrelevanttohigher
educationandthediscussionoftechniqueclass.Amongstthecompaniesworking
withtechniqueclass,Iamawareoftwodistinctapproaches:Disabilityspecific
dancetechniques19andworkingwithadaptations.
Disabilityspecifictechniques,whilevaluableinaparticularcompanyand
individualpractice,areineffectdiscriminatoryinthecontextofhighereducation,as
theyselectparticipantsongroundsoftheirdisabilitywhilepotentiallyexcluding
others.NothavinggeneralapplicationIvaluethesetechniquesaspointsof
referencewithgreatrelevancetoaspecificstudentImayhaveinaclass.Working
withadaptationsthedancerstranslateaspectsoftheoriginalphrasetotheir
individualmovementrange.Eachversionstaysconsistentwiththeoverall
principlesofaphrase,butallowsforaspectslikebodypartsused,actions,spaceuse,
time,anddynamicstobechanged.Inthisprocessinstructorandstudentshaveto
clarifyiftheformofthephraseismoreimportant(bodyshape,pathways,actions
etc.)oritsfunction(warmup,stretch,developstrengthandbalance,complexspace
useetc.).20Workingwithadaptationsismoreflexibleandabletoincludeabroader
rangeofabilities.WorkingwithCandoco,teachingcompanyclasstoexperienced
dancers,Iunderstandthechallengesofworkingwithadaptations.Teachingin
highereducationintensifiesthesechallenges.
• Inthecompanyformatparticipantswithadisabilityhaveacriticalmass,making
theapproachrelevanttotheindividualandthegroup.IntheuniversitysettingI
mayormaynothavestudentswithadisabilitypresent.
• Knowingthedancersandunderstandingtheirmovementrangeallowsthe
teachertopreparemultipleversions.Thisaddstimetoclassplanningand
instruction,reducingtimespentmoving.
• Notknowingthedancersoftenleavestheburdenofdevelopingadaptationswith
thedancer(s).
• Thematerialismodeledonnon‐disableddancers,favoringnormativemovement
patterns.
• Workingwithadaptationsisaprocessthatpresumesahighlevelofdanceskills,
skillsthatfirstneedtobetrained.
• Adaptingsinglesthedancerwithadisabilityout,andcanmarginalizeshim/her
intheprocess.
• Adaptationsengagestudentswithvalidandappliedchallenges.Thesechallenges
arehoweververydifferentfromthosefacedbytherestoftheclass.
• Non‐disabledstudentshaveeachotherandtheinstructoraspointsof
references,toobserveandcopy.Adaptingstudentsperformindividualversions
independentlyassolos.
Evennon‐disabledstudentswithprevioustrainingexperienceoftenfindthemselves
overwhelmedbythechallengeofworkingwithadaptations.TheonlydancersI
observedworkingsuccessfullywiththismethodareperformers,bothdisabledand
non‐disabled,withsignificantdanceexperience.Overyearsofpracticetheyhave
developedanalyticalskills,anunderstandingofhowmovementmaterialis
structuredandhowthisrelatestotheirmovementrangeandtraininglevel.21These
arepreciselythemeta‐skillsthatweultimatelywanttotrain,butwecan’tpossibly
expectthemfromabeginnerstudent.
UDprinciple:EquitableUse
WorkshopApproachestoWorkingwithVariations
TheUDprincipleofEquitableUseinparticularchallengedmetorethinkthepractice
ofworkingwithadaptationsinintegrateddance.Workinginhighereducationit
becameevidenthowinequitablethisapproachis,challengingmetomovebeyond
workingwithadaptationsasadevicesolelyforstudentswithdisabilities.Theskills
usedinadaptingarerelevanttoallparticipantsandneedtobetrainedaspartof
techniqueclass.TodistinguishtheapproachesIprefertalkingabout“translating”
material,developing“individualversions”or“variationstoatheme”.
Techniqueinitsrootmeansskill,yetindance,techniqueusuallystandsfor
thephysical‐anatomicaltrainingalone.Thisexcludescreative/compositional,
improvisational,analytical,rehearsalandperformanceskillspracticedinother
studio‐basedclasses.22Integrateddancecompaniesoftentrainrequiredskillsas
partofthecreativeprocessinafluidworkshop‐basedapproachnotnecessarily
usingformaltechniquematerial.Formaltrainingindegreecoursestendsto
segregatedanceintoseparateareasofskills,technique,improvisation,composition
andperformance.Thereisacertaintensionbetweenthismodernistapproachto
learningandtherealityand“messiness”ofthedancers’workinglives.Itseemsthat
postmodernpracticehasnotmadeitswayfullyintovocationaldancetraining.
RethinkingtechniqueIadvocateforthemixingofstudioapproachesandthe
inclusionofimprovisation,compositionalandcreativematerialinthecontextofa
techniqueclass.Thisapproachisbothaccessibleandrelevanttoprofessionalpraxis.
ImplementingthemixingofstudioapproachesIincludeimprovisationand
compositionexercisesinthecontextoftechniqueclassanduseaworkshopprocess
tointroduceworkingwithtranslations.Shortofprovidinganinstructionalmanual
here,Isummarizetheprocessanddiscussequitableuseandsharedteachinggoals.
Ifacilitateanice‐breakerduringafirstclassmeeting.Gettingparticipants“tomove
aroundthespace”Igraduallylayermoreinformation:Gothroughthegapsbetween
people,acknowledgeeachother,greeteachother,followsomebody,staycloseto
themorfaraway,introducetouchetc.SubsequentlyIsetothertaskswherewefind
outnames,eyecolor,whatpeopleeatforbreakfast,favoritemovements,etc.While
onthesurfaceabout“gettingtoknoweachother”,theicebreakerservesanumber
ofpurposes,influencinghowIcontinueinstructinganddeveloptheclass.
• Itinvitesaninformalexchangewherestudentsandinstructormeeteachother
asacommunityoflearners.23
• Itintroducesimprovisation,tasks,communicating,workingwithtouchas
methodologiesusedinthistechniqueclass.
• Itshowspreferencesinwaysofmoving,communicatingandprocessing
information,importantaspectsforrecognizingmultiplewaysofparticipating
andfacilitatingaccess.
Introducingworkingwithvariations,IregularlyuseasequenceofMirroring
exercisesatthebeginningofthequarterinalllevelsoftechniqueclasses.Following
eachtaskIaskanumberofquestions:“Whatwasyourexperience?”“Whatwere
challengesinperformingthistask?”“Howdidyousolvethem?”leadingintoa
discussionaboutpredominantwaysofworkingandtheroleofindividualized
material.
Mirroring:VersionISpoken,writtenanddemonstratedinstructions:
Findpartner(s)Faceyourpartner(s)Mirroreachother’smovementsSwaptheleadseamlessly(Makeitimpossibleforanaudiencetodetectwhoinitiatesatanygivenmovement)
Aclassicworkshopexerciseforchildrenandbeginners,Mirroringisnotan
accessibleexerciseandisnotusuallyusedinintegrateddancesettings.Copyingand
mirroringarehowevernotonlydominantformsofinstructionindance,theyare
alsorelevantinmanyotherformalandinformalteachingsituationsfromnewborns
toadults.Inamixedabilityclasspartneringupispotentiallyasensitivesituation,I
needtofacilitateandmakesureallparticipantsareincluded.Ialsohavetheoption
togostraighttoVersion2or3andjustdemonstrateVersion1anddiscussthe
valuesitimplies.24Thediscussionusuallyestablishesthesepoints:
• Demonstratingandcopyingisthepredominantteachingmethodologyin
techniqueclass.
• Itassumessamenessandvaluesuniformperformance.
• Thedemonstratingdancerinadvertentlysetsan“ablist”standardor“correct”
version.
Versiononeisnotidealintermsofinclusionandhighlights“ablist”assumptions
thatarebuiltintotheteachingmethodology.Withtheaimtobeaccurateand
“correct”Mirroringisoftenexecutedslowly.Thisapproachcharacterizesmany
techniqueclasssettingsandotherformsofinformationbasedinstruction,looking
foronecorrectsolution.
InasecondroundIencouragedtheparticipantstoshiftfromaccuracyto
challengingeachother,freeingupthefacing,spaceandtempouse.Ialsoaskthemto
consider“joining”or“dropping”amovementsuggestionfromtheirpartner.The
resultinthisversionisafastertempo,moreanddifferentmovementmaterial,
experimenting,findingmultiplesolutionsandmakingdecisionsispartofthe
“correct”completionofthetask.Thesubsequentdiscussionestablishes:
• Therearemoremovementpossibilitiesthaninthepreviousversion.
• Tempoandspacerangearegreater.
• Thereisalwaysaclearconnectionbetweenthetwopartners,observersstill
knowwhoisdancingtogether.
• Version2leadstoanotherteachingstyle:explorationandplay.
InthethirdroundIaskthepartnerstochoosedifferentstartingpositionsfromeach
other(standing‐kneeling,sittinginachair–sittingonthefloor,lyingdown,etc.)In
amixed‐abilityclass,workingwithdifferentpositionsandlevelsmaybepresent
already.Iremindstudentsthatworkingwithdifferentpositionsorlevelsisnot
aboutassumingrolesasdisabledornon‐disabledparticipants.Thediscussion
establishesthefollowingpoints:
• Standinguprightonyourfeetisoftenassumedasauniversal,neutralposition
fromwhichallothermovementpossibilitiesfollow.
• Differentlevels/bases/positionsofferdifferentmovementranges.
• Copyingaloneisaninadequatestrategy;thematerialneedstobetranslatedinto
achangedrange.
Manystudentsstarttheexerciseassumingthestandingversionisthestandard,the
“proper”version.Astheytradetheleadbackandforthwiththeirpartner,thereisa
momentofrealization,whentheyseethatstandinghasitsownlimitations.The
seriesofmirroringexercisesaddressesthedominantwayofworkingindanceand
introducestheanalytical,playfulandimprovisationalskillsrequiredintranslating
material.Afterintroducingtheconceptoftranslatingitneedstobepracticedand
appliedfurther.
Traditionaltechniqueclassesuseasetseriesofexercisestowarmupand
trainspecificarticulationsandgeneralmovementpossibilities.Ialsoworkwith
thesecategoriesbuttrytogeneralizethemfurtherbyincludingapproachesfrom
Choreology,LabanMovementAnalysisandBartenieffMovementFundamentals25.
Generallyspeakingtheclassmaterialdevelopsfromexplorationandimprovisation
towardsvaryingdegreesofsettingandsharingofindividualmaterial.Forawarm
upexercisesforinstanceIpresentasequenceoffundamentalmovementconcepts
like:Reachingupanddown,shiftingforwardandbacketc.WhileinstructingI
demonstrateseveralwaysinwhichIinterpretthesameelement.ThefirsttimeI
may“Foldandreach,up‐down”withmyarms,thenexttimewithmylegsetc.
ChangingmyownversionisimportantsothatIdon’tsetanormativephrase.
Demonstratingalsomakesmepartofasharedprocessandallowsmetomodela
committedperformancequality.Afteraninitialexplorationtheorderofthe
elementsisgivenandeachsetinatimeframeofeightcountsonamediumpaced
pulse.Withinthetimeframeeachparticipantisfreetochoosespeed,bodyparts
usedandrangeofmotion.Whileeachparticipantdevelopsherindividualversion
thedancerssharethesequentialorderandtimeframes,theyrecognizeanduse
theirfullrangeofmotion,warmupeffectivelyandprepareformorecomplex
movementsequences.Iusethissameapproach,definingandexploringelements,
andmovingfromimprovisingtosettingformorecomplexcenterphrases,where
studentsdeveloptheirindividualversionsaccordingtomoreandmorespecific
information.
Mymaincritiquepointofadaptationsis,thatitisinequitablesinceitis
usuallyjustofferedtoordemandedofstudentswithdisabilities.Usingmovement
categoriesanddescriptionsasexplainedhere,allthestudentsundergothesame
processandpracticeworkingwithtranslationsinanequitableway.Oncethe
processisestablishedtherearemultiplewaysinwhichthematerialcanbe
developed:
• Thephrasecanremainimprovisedorgraduallybecomeset
• Thetimingiskeptopen
• Thetempoisspecifiedasslow,sustained,fluidorfastbutnotsetona
meteredpulse
• Twoormoredancersperformthematerialinasharedtempo
• Thephraseissettospecificcountsandperformedindifferenttempogroups
• Timeframesareshortenedandrepetitionsremoved
• Dancerstranslate/copymaterialfromeachother
Theemergingmaterialallowsmetorespondwithspecificfeedback,assessthe
performancesandmakesuggestionsfordevelopment.Acommonunderstandingof
theapproachiscrucialasitallowsparticipantstoharnessthebenefitsofworking
withstructuredmaterial,practiceandgraspfundamentalmovementprinciples,and
demonstratetheirunderstandingandskillsthroughtheirindividuallysetphrases.
UDPrinciple:FlexibilityinUse
Itisimportantthatworkingwithvariationsisnotjustintroducedasatool
once,butthatitispracticedrepeatedlyintheclasscontext.Introducingthe
approachtotheclassasacollectivemakesavastdifferenceinthereadinessto
applythemethodologyandthelevelofaccomplishmentachieved.Allowingfor
flexibilityinuse,studentseventuallyworkwithvariationsindependentlywhereand
whenappropriate,translatinganythingfromasingle,specificmovementtoan
entirephrase.
Thereareanumberofwaysinwhichtofurtherincreasetheflexibilityinuse.
Thecomplexityoftheindividualphrasescanbeadjustedbyaddingorsubtracting
simultaneousmaterial.“Asyoureachuphighcanyoualsoaddaturn,travelor
jump?”“Whatmaterialsuggestsitselftoanexistingmovement?”“Doyouneedto
adjusttheoriginalmaterial,tostaywiththetimeframe,yourpartneretc.?”These
questionsengagestudentstoadjustthecomplexityoftheindividualvariationto
reflecttheircurrentabilities.
Peerobservationandfeedbackingroupsorone‐on‐oneisanotherwayof
flexiblyvaryingparticipation.Studentsobserveandreviewanexistingphrase
accordingtothesetcriteria.“Arealltheelementsandspecificsinthephrase
performedwithclarity?”“Whatarethetransitionsbetweentheelements?”“What
wouldcreateafullerperformance?”Thesearejustsomeoftheconcernsapeercan
commenton.
Whilemovingandreviewingarenotnecessarilyequivalentwaysof
participatinginadanceclass,studentscandemonstrateaclearunderstandingof
movementskillsbygivingfeedback.Isetobservationtasksbothforthewholeclass
andforindividualstudentswhoarenotinapositiontophysicallyperformthe
phraseatthistime.Thelong‐termaimisforstudentstousetranslating,adjusting
complexity,observingandgivingfeedbackindependentlyandflexibly.
UDPrinciple:SimpleandIntuitive
Inmyexperienceworkingwithindividualvariationsisinitiallynotsimpleor
intuitive.Whilethecomplexitycanbeadjustedtoanindividuallevel,having
multipleversionsofthematerialperformedsimultaneouslybecomesconceptually
moredemanding.Somedancersfindtheapproachfreeing,astheysetmoreand
morespecificsattheirpace.Participantswhoareusedtoperformuniform,set
materialandthosewhorelyontheirpeerstoremembermovementsequencescan
findworkingwithvariationsdisconcertingandconfusing.Othersalsoforgetabout
thespecificsofataskandindulgeinsafe,habitualmovements.Allofthese
preferencestakesomecoaching.Iencourageallstudentswhostrugglewith
retainingmaterialtoworkwithspecificpartnersandto“staywiththem”while
performing.Igivestudentsmoretimetoobserveandassisttheminfinding
compatiblepartners.Ialsoprovidefeedbacktoguidestudentstomaterialthat
addressesthespecificsofthetask.
UDPrinciple:ToleranceofErrorandLowPhysicalEffort
ToleranceofErroratthelevelof,gettingthesequence“wrong”andmakingmistakes
ispartofthelearninginthestudiospaceandaquestionofmakingsurethelevelof
complexityissetright.Moreseriouslythereisalsothepossibilityoflossofcontrol,
resultingininjury.Itisimportantinallclassestoconsiderthepotentialfor
accidentsandtoprovidehealthandsafetyadvice.
InprinciplestudentsknowtheirbodiesandpossibilitiesbestandI
encouragethemtorecognize,respectandaddresstheirlimits.AtthesametimeI
alsoencouragediscoveryandrisktakingtoexpandthecurrentmovement
possibilities.Theconflictbetweenthesetwostatementsisattheheartofthe
learningprocesseswiththeaimofbuildingawarenessforadancer’sabilitieswhile
alsoexpandingherrange.
Inmostclassesinstructorsteachsafealignmentanduseofeffortbasedon
personalexperienceaswellasabodyofknowledgedevelopedindanceover
generations.Thisadvicebuildsontheassumptionthattheinstructorandthe
studentsharethesamephysicalandperceptualpossibilitieswhichisnotagiven.
Workingwithstudentswhohavedifferentwaysofhearing,seeing,movingand
processinginformationfurtherchallengesnormativeassumptionsaboutrangeof
motion,awareness,centerofgravityetc.Eveninaveryhomogenousclasswehave
tobeawarethatassumptionsaboutsimilaritiescanbeverymisleading.The
externalformofamovement,thatisobservedandcopied,isoftenverydifferent
fromitsinternalconnectionsandefforts.Thereareongoingdebatesaboutthe
aestheticversusthefunctionofamovementorposition,andwhichismore
important.26Movingbeyond“thelook”ofamovementorpositionrequiresan
unpackingofitsfunction;safepracticewithdiverseparticipantsrequiresastute
observationandanongoingdialoguebetweentheinstructorandthestudent.Untila
dancerandinstructoraremorefamiliarwitheachotherandtheprocessIerronthe
sideofcaution.
Besidesencouragingstudentstotakeresponsibilityforasafeclass
environmenttheinstructorisinchargeofsettingupsafeplacementandtiming
betweengroupsandindividuals.Performingmultipleversionsratherthanunison
makesthemovementofindividualsinagrouplesspredictable,sogivingmore
distanceandtimeaswellasopportunitiestoobserveisadvisable.Itispreciselya
strengthoftechniqueclassthatbybuildingfromsmaller,repetitivemovementsto
larger,complexphrasesandgraduallydevelopingawarenessandskillsitallowsfor
savepractice,minimizingaccidentsandinjuries.
TheUDprincipleofLowPhysicalEffortneedsrethinkingfordanceandother
physicaldisciplines.Indanceweseektofindandpushadeeplyphysical
performancetogainenduranceandstrength,whilealsomovingefficiently,only
usingasmucheffortasneeded.IproposeAdjustableandAppropriateEffort.
Inthesamewayastheactioncomponentofadancephrasecanbeadjusted
wecanalsovaryeffortanddynamicsused.“Marking”materialisawayofadjusting
effortdancerslearnintheprocessofsettingpiecesonastage.Markingreduces
effortwhilestayingconsistentinrelevantspace,actionandtimeaspectsofaphrase.
Thiscanbepracticedinthestudiosettingbyaskingstudentstoperformthephrase
onthesidewhiletheyareobservingtheirpeersorbybuildingaversionworking
withspecificeffortelements.
Understandingindividualrangeofeffort,encouragingpushinglevelsof
exhaustion,andmovingefficientlyareimportantteachingpoints.Allstudentsare
challengedtolearnanddifferentiatebetweenpainasaresultofgrowthandpains
thatleadtoinjuries.Workingwithstudentswithdifferentbodytypesthanmine,I
havetobeparticularlyawareofthedangerofassumptionsandengageinthis
dialoguethroughquestionsandobservations.
UDPrinciple:FeedbackandAssessment
Eachnewstudenttoourclassesshouldencourageustore‐evaluatethebodyandthebodyofknowledgethatwehavecometotakeforgranted.Assessmentproceduresinschoolsmayneedtoberevisedwhenwerecognizethateachstudentisplayingadifferentinstrument…
(Benjamin,2002,pp8)
Degreeprogramsinhighereducationaimtopreparestudentsforlifeasworking
danceartists.Consideringthemanywaysinwhichdancersworkasperformers,
choreographers,teachersinvarioussettingsitisimportantthatwedon’tdetermine
toonarrowlywhatthisentails.Assessmentcriteriatoooftenserveafunctionofgate
keeping,tellingpeoplewhocanandwhocannotdance,ratherthanoneofguiding
explorationandencouragingdevelopment.Allowingstudentstounderstanddance
asadisciplineandtodiscovertheirartisticvoiceisprobablymoreimportantthan
topredictifandwhattypeofcareertheywillhaveindance.Paradoxicallythereare
studentsgainingdancedegreeswhoneverworkinthefieldwhiledancerswithout
degreesfindemployment.
Increatingaccesstheintentisnottoreplacetheexistingcriteriabuttoassesshowtheyarerelevanttothequalificationandhowindividualstudentscanmeetthem.AsdiscussedpreviouslyIhavefoundgenericcriteriamosthelpfulinworkingwithUD.Benjaminalsoproposesanumberofprerequisitesandassessmentcriteriarootedincurrentdancepraxiswhilealsoconsideringdiversityinthestudiospace.
Prerequisitesfordancers• Stagepresence• Aptitudeforlearning(creating)movementsequences• Stamina• Versatility• Arangeofmovementappropriatetothepiecebeingmadeoran
individualsuitabilitytotheethos(aesthetic)ofthecompany[school]• Otherexperiencesinperformingarts• Understandingforstagecraftandperformanceskills
(Benjamin,2002,pp74)
Assessmentcriteria
• Theachievementofsetandagreedphysicalgoalsindancetechnique• Demonstrateanunderstandingofdanceterminology• Interpretationandadaptationofsetmaterial• Individualperformanceskills• Partneringskills• Communication/Teachingskills• ChoreographicSkills• Improvisationalskills
(Benjamin,2002,pp8/9)
Asinanydisciplinenoteverybodywillbesuccessfulinmeetingalltherequired
criteria;theabilitytomeetthem,however,isnottiedtothedisabilityornon‐
disabilitystatusofastudentbutdependentonthestudent’stalentandabilities.
Ialreadydiscussedhowworkingwithvariationsallowsmetogivegeneralaswell
asindividualfeedbackinthesamewayaswhenIworkwithothersetmaterial.
Referringtogeneralgradingcriteria,workingwithvariationscanbeassessedasa
technicalskillbutalsoasself‐directedlearningandworkingindependently.In
givingfeedbackIoftenoptforaskingquestionsordescribingwhatIobserverather
thansuggestingcorrectionsrightaway.Differencesintheperformancecanhave
manyreasonssomeofthemexposinghabitsandlackofawarenessandothers
actuallydemonstratingunderstandingandindependentapplication.These
instancesoffeedbackdevelopintoformulatingindividuallearninggoalsandself‐
assessmentaswellasinstructorbasedevaluation.
InassessingIexperienceabiggapbetweentheverbalfeedbackIprovide
duringtheclassandthefinalnumbergradeIissue–wordsgetforgotteneasilyand
numbergradesdon’tarenotspecificaboutaccomplishmentsandneedsforlearning.
TobridgethatgapIcurrentlyexchangenoteswithmystudentshalfwaythrough
thequarter.Theywriteaself‐assessmentandincludequestionsabouttheclass.At
thesametimeIletthemseemycollectednotesofclassobservations.Inacollective
feedbackclassIaddressquestionsandclarifyteachingpoints.Thefinalnumerical
gradeispublishedonlinewithashortcomment,allowingmetodifferentiate,create
individualrelevancewhilediscussingsharedteachingaimsandassessmentcriteria.
Discrepanciesinthestudents’self‐assessmentsandtheinstructor’sevaluationare
oftenasinterestingasareasofagreement.Hereanexampleofastudent’sself‐
assessmentandmyfeedback.
“Istrugglewithtechniquealot.Iaskmyselfisthisreallybeneficialforme?…Afterworkingonthesolo,IfeelabitrestrictedintechniqueclassbecauseIknowIcandoalotmoreandIknowmyphysicalstrengths.”
Self‐assessmentofastudentwithadisability
“Youhavemadegreatprogress,demonstratingastrongunderstandingoftheclassmaterialandyourownrangeandpossibilities.Yourtranslationofmaterialhasmaturedtremendouslyandyoudemonstratethatbothonthe
floorandinthechair.Iwouldstillliketoseeyouchallengeassumptionsandfindingnewpossibilitiesespeciallyinreoccurringmaterial.Yourabilitytoobserve,analyze,translateandretainisexcellent.”
MyassessmentandresponsetothesamestudentUDPrinciple:ClassClimateandInteraction
Theprevailingimageaboutdance,whereyouhavetobethin,fitandableto“stand
onyourtoes”havetobeconsideredwhencreatinganinclusiveclassclimateand
interactions.Iincludethefollowinginformationinmyonlinesyllabusto
communicatemyapproachtotechniqueclassandtheaccessibilitythesecourses
promote:
Instructor’sEducationalPhilosophyDanceclassisalearningenvironmentwhereweareexposedtoset,experientialandimprovisedmaterial.Theemphasisisontrainingdanceskillsbyaccessingandchallengingeachindividualdancer'sfacilitiesandabilities.Throughregularandsystematicpracticewenotonlystrivetoexpandandsustainourphysical,conceptualandartisticrangebuttoapplytheseskillsconsciouslyandwithgrowingawareness.Indanceweengagewiththechangingrealityofourbodyandmind,thisalsoincludesouridentityintermsofbody‐type,age,race,ethnicity,gender,sexualityanddisability.
Koch,ModernTechniqueClassSyllabus
BesidesemphasizingmixingapproachesfromdifferentstudioclassesIalsoaddress
disabilityaspartofdiversity.Itisimportantforallstudentstorealizethatthereis
noneutralbodyandthattakingidentityandindividualityintoconsiderationispart
oftheartisticendeavour.Mycourseoverviewalsostatesprerequisitesand
reiteratespredominantwaysofinstructing.
Theclassisstructuredtofitanaveragestudentatthislevel.Yourabilitiesandexperiencemaydifferanditisimportanttorespectthisinthewayyouworkwiththemovementmaterialandinstructionalprocess.Danceoftenreliesonastudent’sabilitytoprocessvisualandverbalinformationviademonstrationsandinstructionsandtoworkincloseproximitytootherdancerswithimprovisedaswellassetmaterial.
Koch,OnlineQuestionnaire
ThroughanonlinequestionnaireIaskstudentsabouttheirprevioustraining
experience,possibleconcerns,expectations,andlearninggoalsforthecourse.Ialso
includeinformationaboutacademicaccommodationsduetodisabilityandinvite
studentswhoareusingthesedisabilityresourcestosetupameetingwithme. All
studentsarerequiredtosubmitthequestionnaire.Whilenotassessed,completingit
countstowardstheirparticipationgrade.Thisensuresthatallstudentshaveseen
thesyllabusinformation.Thequestionnairestartsadialoguebetweentheindividual
studentandme.Itisconfidentialbutnotanonymousandwhileitfacilitates
disclosureitdoesnotrequireit.Theresponsesinformmyapproachinthestudio
andallowmetofollowupwithindividualstudentswherenecessary.
Learning,practicingandtestingofskillsfolloweachothercloselyindance
andareunlikeinmanyotherdisciplinesalwayspublic–soistheuseofvariationsor
accommodations.Reasonstoadjustthelearningprocesshowevercutacross
stereotypicalgroupingsofdisabledornon‐disabled.Age,injury,gender,bodytype,
height,size,etc,areallrelevantaspectsthatmayinvolveworkingwithvariations.
Consideringthepublicandperformativeaspectsofdancestudentsinahigher
educationdanceclassneedtobeopentobeingwitnessedinperformance,and
interestedinengagingonthispersonallevel.Facilitatingaccessandanoptimal
learningengagementmayrequiresomeformofdisclosurewherethestudent‐
teacherdialogueneedstobeextendedtothestudiopracticeandinvolvepeers.This
includes:Keepingsite‐linesclearforASLinterpreters,reservingworkingspacenear
thefrontforspecificstudents,adjustinguseoftouch,momentum,forceandweight
whendancingwithapartner,etc.Itisimportantthoughthattheseconversations
focusonfacilitatingandoptimizingthelearningprocessanddonotveerinto
discussingpersonalinformationandsituations.Thesyllabusalsoestablishes
explicitlygroundrulesaroundclassclimateandinteractions:
• Takeandshareresponsibilityincreatinganaccessibleclass
environment.
• Makeyourneedsknown,whilerespectingtheneedsofothers.
• Berespectfulofyourpeersandinstructors.
• Worksafelyandeffectivelyinclass. Youknowyourabilitiesbest,be
bothactiveandsafeinexploringnewandestablishedmaterial.
Koch,OnlineModernTechniqueSyllabusPhysicalEnvironmentDeliveryMethodandPerceptibleInformation
Dancestudiospacesareonthewholesomeofthemostaccessibleteaching
environmentsIknow.Theyarewelllit,havegoodacousticsandarespecificallybuilt
forunobstructedmovement.Itisagainsomeoftheconventionsintheuseofthe
spaceandclassorganizationthatneedtobeconsideredwithregardstoaccess.
Mosttechniqueclassesstartstationarywiththestudentsworkingintheir
ownkinesphere,eitherupright,sittingorlyingonthefloorandthenprogressively
increasetheuseofspacetoincludelevelchangescoveringincreaseddistances,
changeoffacingsanddirections.Verbalandvisualinformationthrough
demonstrationsareoftenpresentsimultaneously,andwhilesomeinformation
overlaps,theytendtocomplementeachother.Verbalinformationoftenonly
highlightsspecificaspectsofthemovementphraseratherthandescribingallthe
material.Accompanyingmusicalsoprovidesimportantimplicittempo,phrasing
anddynamicinformation.Thereislittletonouseofwrittentext,books,projection
andothermediaintheteachingprocess.Thephysicalenvironment,wherewe
teach,andperceptibleinformationarenotjusttheenvironmentwelearninandthe
mediumwetransfercontentwith,itisitselfteachingcontent.Dancespecifically
trainstheuseofspaceaswellasawarenessforsensoryinformationand
proprioception.Movinginto,outofandacrossthefloor,usinglevelsfromthefloor
toflyingthroughtheair,rhythm,sound,spaceandtimerelationship,areimportant
skillsandmovementprincipleswetrain.Accesstothephysicalenvironmentand
perceivableinformationthereforealsoimmediatelyinvolvesquestionsofteaching
aimsandcontent,methodology,assessmentandclassclimate.
Whilethepredominantuseofverbalandvisualinformationpresentssome
specificchallenges,accesstoperceivableinformationforstudentswithsensory
impairmentsissimilartootherclasses.
• Theplacementofthestudentneartheinstructor
• Usingclearprojectedspeech
• Keepingverbalinformationconcise.
• FortheinstructionpartanASLinterpreterneedstosharethesightlinewiththe
instructor.
• Wearingclothesthatcontrastwiththeenvironment
• Uselivemusicforbettersoundtransference.Livemusicalsoallowsforflexible
phrasingandtempochanges.
Methodologiesdescribedinequitableusealsofacilitateaccesstoperceptible
information.Separatingdemonstrations,verbalinstructionsanddescriptionsas
wellasusingtouchfurtherlayerstheinformationintoseveralinstructionalstages.
Involvingtouchintheteachingprocessispartofmanyexperientialpracticeswith
theadvantagethatitdoesnotonlyrevealtheformofthemovementbutalsothe
underlying,anatomicalaspectsofthematerial.Whilepracticedinisolated
explorationsitismoredifficulttousetouchintheinstructionofmorecomplex
movementphrases.Asimportantastheproximitytotheinstructoriswhile
instructing,proximitytopeerswhileperformingisjustasimportanttomaster
sequencing,timingandmovementdetailsofaphrase.Icansetupspecificpeer
relationshipstofacilitatethis.Sincelevelsofperceptionandpreferencesdifferthis
isultimatelyalearningprocessformeastheinstructoranditishelpfultoinvolve
thestudent(s)andgettingfeedbackintheprocess.
Thereisaclearneedtomakethetransientinformationofdancemore
accessible.Ihavebeenusingpowerpointprojectionatanexperimentallevelto
displaywrittentaskandphrasedescriptions.Iamstillindoubthoweffectivethisis
andamconsideringlow‐techoptionslikeastudenttranscribingtheexercisetoa
whiteboardwhileIaminstructing.Thetranscriptthenstayspresentduringthe
practiceoftheexercise.Usingacodifiedstyleactuallymaypresentanadvantage
hereasaterminologydescribingspecificmovementsalreadyexistsandcanbeused
directlytosummarizeanexercise.Printeddefinitions,glossariesandphotosofthe
codifiedmovementcanalsobetranslatedintoaccessibleformatsandstudied
outsidetheclassroom.Teachingnon‐codifiedmaterialIamconsideringlistingand
definingrecurringelements,materialandprocessesandtodevelopaglossaryof
definitionsaspartoftheclass.Thesedescriptionsanddefinitionscanthenbeused
infutureclasses.
Consideringtheuseofspaceasteachingcontentitisimportanttodiscuss
theuseofdifferentlevels,stancesanddistancesindesigningaccess.Oneground
ruleistoreflectonthepurposeofworkingonaparticularlevelratherthansimply
tocopyaposition.Iftraditionallystudentsarestandinguprighttohavethemost
optionsworkingintheirkinesphere,onewheelchairusermaywanttobeinthe
chairandanotherprefertositonthefloortohavethesamemaximumrange.
Thisprocessrequiressomeexperimentation.Atfirstpossiblyneitherthe
instructornorthestudentmayknowwhatthebestsolutionis.Inaoneonone
meetingIdiscusswiththestudenthowtobestworkwithlevelsanddistancesand
findoutiftransferringisofinterest.Itisworthasking,ifandhowastudentcan
accessdifferentspatiallevelsanddistancestoexplorethepotentialoftheseoptions.
Transferringfromawheelchaircanbebeneficialforonestudent,allowingherfull
useofthekinesphere,whileforanotherstudenttransferringmaynotbeproductive.
Ifastudentisinterestedintransferringtherearesomequestionstoclarify:Does
shetransferherselfordoessheneedassistance?Whoispartoffacilitating
(instructor,peers)?Whatdoesitinvolve(lifting,movingandstoringofequipment,
etc.)?Isthetimeusedeffectivelyforthewholeclass?Doesthestudentneedspecial
equipmentorclothingwhileworkingonthefloor(mat,stool,longsleeves,kneepads
etc.)?
Somepeoplemayfeeluncomfortableatthesuggestionofinstructorsand
peersliftingfellowstudents.Howevertouch,liftingandworkingwithpartnersis
notanaddedaspecttodance,itispartofourartandtraining.Instructingsafe
practiceinlifting,takingandsharingweightareimportantskills,and,whilenot
traditionallypartoftechniqueclasscaneasilybemadeexplicitlearningand
teachinggoals.Onceagain,access,safetyandaestheticaspectsarepartofthe
teachingprocessandcontent.Itisparamountthatthisisadialogue.Ionlyconsider
transferringanoptionwhenastudentindicatesthatthisisofinterest,ispossible
andhasthepotentialtoincreasethemovementrange.Noparticipantshouldever
feelobligedtotransfer.Ialsodon’texpectanyparticipant(instructororpeers)to
liftorpartneranotherdancerinthecontextofthetechniqueclass.Itisimportant
thatIprovidealternativesandfacilitatethisdialoguewithsomesensitivity,assess
transferringonacase‐by‐casebasisandallowforchangesovertimeforboththe
transferringstudentandtheirpartners.
Consideringworkingwithdistance,notallstudentswillnecessarilybeable
tocoverthesamedistancesorfeelsafeincrossingthestudiospace.Distancescan
beadjustedtoanindividual’smaximumrange,usingdifferentpointsofreturn
ratherthanthemaximumdistanceaspaceoffers.Forsafetystudentscanshadow
eachotherwhilecrossingthespace.Shadowingorwitnessingiscommonpracticein
danceensuringpartnersstayssafe,whenmovingwithclosedeyes,during
experientialexercises,inauthenticmovementpraxis,improvisationsandwhile
movingandexitingbackwards.Interventionsbytheobservingdancerrangefrom
calling,placingherselfbetweenthedancerandanobstacle,usingtouchandcatching
thepartner.Eachpairingwillhavetodiscusswhatworksbestfortheminrelation
tothetask.
Whiledancestudiosoffergreatflexibilityandareinprincipleveryaccessible
physicalenvironments,accesstoinformation,differentlevelsanduseofdistance
requiresomeexperimentation,researchandeffectivefacilitating.Besidesstartinga
dialogueandprovidingassistance,thismayalsoincludetheintroductionofnew
processesinvolvingpeersandtheclasscollective.Workingasacommunityof
learners,creatingaccessisnotthesoleresponsibilityoftheinstructorortheperson
withadisability,butsomethingthatconcernsalltheparticipantsinaclass.Creating
accessispartoftheclassclimateandtheteachinggoalsoftechniqueclass.
Conclusion
Asstatedbymanyinstructors,workingwithUDresultsinageneral
investmentingoodteachingpracticewithpositivespin‐offsforallstudentsinthe
class.Theapproachesdiscussedextendbeyondtheinitialideaofadaptationsasa
disabilityaccommodationanddisabilitybecomesapartofthespectrumofdiversity
presentinoursocieties,institutionsofhighereducationanddancestudiosrather
thanaseparategroupofstudents.Differencesinbody‐type,age,levelortypeof
training,acuteorchronicinjuries,currentform,individuallearninggoals,etcare
not“issues”buteducationalandartisticinterests.ApplyingUDofinstructionalsoin
mymainstreamclassesheresomespecificbenefitsIobserved:
• Studentsversedintraditionaltechniquematerialarechallengedbyworking
withimprovisationandcommentonitsspecificandrigorousnature
• Studentswithvaryinglevelsoftrainingmanagetofindtheirindividual100%in
termsofcomplexityandperformanceofthematerial
• Studentsoftendemonstrateasenseofconnectionandcoordinationthatisnot
presentwhenworkingwithsettechniquematerial
• Thematerialanditsprogressioncreateacommongroundwithoutaimingatthe
“lowestcommondenominator”(Performingonlymaterialalltheparticipants
canperforminunison)
• Studentswithinjurieslearntopacethemselvesandmakechoicesabouthow
theyworkandwhichmaterialtheyvary
• Thereisanoverallsenseofincreasedagencyinthelearningprocessand
ownershipofthematerial
• Theapproachistransferrabletootherclasseswherestudentsapplythese
strategiesindependently
• ImplementingUDinthestudioandwritingaboutithasstimulateddiscussionsin
thewiderfaculty,raisingquestionsaboutaccess,diversityandconventionsin
teachingtechniqueclass
Intheprocessofcreatingaccesstotrainingopportunitiesandaccreditationfor
dancerswithdisabilitiesthroughUniversalDesignofInstructionitisclearthatthe
formandthemethodologiesdonotstaythesame.Challengingandcomplexasthe
processmaybeIhavealsoexperiencedhowrewardingandcreativelystimulatingit
isformeasaninstructorandforthedancersintheclass.TheaspectsIhave
implementedandtheresultstheycreatedencouragemetocontinuethisprocess.
Havingcompletedthisarticleitnowmeansmovingawayfromthedrawingboard
andbacktothepraxisandlivedexperienceinthestudio.
ReferencesWheelchairdancesport:Aboutthesport.inInternationalParalympicCommittee
[databaseonline].2009[citedMay,122009].Availablefrom
http://www.paralympic.org/release/Summer_Sports/Wheelchair_Dance_Sport/About_the_sport/
Handbookforteachers,vocationalgradedexaminations2007.England:RoyalAcademyofDanceExaminationsBoard,http://www.rad.org.uk/05exams/documents/Vocational_handbook_Aug_07_000.pdf
Albright,AnnCooper.1997.Choreographingdifference:Thebodyandidentityincontemporarydance.[Middletown,Conn.];Hanover,NH:WesleyanUniversityPress;UniversityPressofNewEngland.
Benjamin,Adam.2002.Makingandentrance;theoryandpracticefordisabledandnondisableddancers.London:Routlegde.
Burgstahler,Sheryl.2007.Equalaccess:Universaldesignofinstruction.Seattle:UniversityofWashington,http://www.washington.edu/doit/Brochures/PDF/equal_access_udi.pdf(accessedApril22,2009).
Burgstahler,Sheryl,E.,andRebeccaCoryC.,Eds.2008.Universaldesigninhighereducation;fromprinciplestopractice.CambridgeMA:HarvardEducationPress.
CollegeofDesignNCStateUniversity.Thecenterforuniversaldesign.inCollegeofDesignNCStateUniversity[databaseonline].2008[citedMay2009].Availablefromhttp://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/index.htm.
Darbyshire,Charlotte.,andNilsen,Stine.Investigatingintegratedteachingpractice.London:IndependentDance.
Kaufmann,KarenA.2002.Adaptationtechniquesformodelingdiversityinthedanceclass.(teachingtips).Vol.73,http://find.galegroup.com/itx/infomark.do?&contentSet=IAC‐Documents&type=retrieve&tabID=T002&prodId=EAIM&docId=A91821291&source=gale&srcprod=EAIM&userGroupName=wash_main&version=1.0.
Lunn,Kitty.1999.Infinitydancetheaterpresents:Ballettechniquetransposedforstudentsusingwheelchairs,ed.InfinityDanceTheater.Vol.VHS.NewYork:.
NDEOTaskForce.2005.Nationaldanceeducationorganization:Standardsforlearningandteachingdanceinthearts:Ages5‐18.BethesdaMD:,http://www.ndeo.org/standards_%20L%26T.pdf.
Sandahl,Carrie,andPhilipAuslander,eds.2005.Bodiesincommotion:Disability&performance.AnnArbor:UniversityofMichiganPress.
TrinityCollegeLondon.Nationaldiplomainprofessionaldance.London:,http://www.trinitycollege.co.uk/site/?id=270.
Verrent,Jo.2003.Disabilityandthedanceanddramaawards.London:DepartmentofEducationandSkills,UK,,readingroom.lsc.gov.uk/lsc/National/nat‐dada‐disabilityandthedada‐re.doc.
WardWarren,Gretchen.1989.Classicalballettechnique.Tampa:UniversityofSouthFloridaPress.
Whatley,Sarah.2008.Movingmatters:SupportingdisableddancestudentsinHigherEducation.Coventry:CeMAP.
———.2007.Danceanddisability:Thedancer,theviewerandthepresumptionofdifference.ResearchinDanceEducation8,(1)(04):5‐25,
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ibh&AN=24634811&site=ehost‐live.
Endnotes:
1IwouldliketoacknowledgethatpartsofthisarticlehavebeenpresentedandpublishedinapapertitledWorkshop:Ready,set,unsetattheCORDSpecialTopicsConference,June25‐27,2009atCEPA,DeMontfortUniversity,UK.InthearticleathandIsummarizethisinformationandthenfocusontheapplicationofUDinthedancestudioingreaterdepth2Disabilityinperformancespansacrossmanygenresandtherearemanytermscoinedtotalkaboutit:DanceandDisability,DanceAbility,InclusiveDancetonamebutafew.IgenerallyuseintegrateddanceorIDknowingthatitisnotatermunderstoodbythegeneralpublicandalsonotoneacceptedbyallpractitioners.3Anumberofthesepublicationsarecitedandreferencedinthispaper.TheyincludeAdamBenjamin’sMakingandEntranceandJoVerrent’sDisabilityandtheDaDAReportfundedbytheUKDepartmentforEducationandSkillsDfES.AdirectresultfromthereportwastheCandocoFoundationCoursethatranfrom2004to2007.ThishassincebeenreplacedbytheADAPTProgramattheUrdangAcademyLondonruninconjunctionwithCandocoDanceCompany.In2007SarahWhatleyfromCeMapatCoventryUniversityrantwoconferencesconcernedwithDanceandDisabilityaccesstoHigherEducationthefindingsofwhichwerepublishedin2008underthetitleMovingMatters:SupportingDisabledDanceStudentsinHigherEducation.4ThecompanyrecentlychangedthespellingoftheirnamefromCandoCoorCandoCotoCandoco.5 Sandahl andAuslanderdiscuss the connectionbetweenart and societalmovements andstresstheradicalrootsattheheartofdisabilityandperformance.(SandahlandAuslander,2005,pp8)AdamBenjamindescribeshow integrateddanceemerged throughpostmoderndanceemphasizing the link tocontact improvisation(Benjamin,2002).SeenmorebroadlyIDemergedthroughseveralsocialandcommunitydanceforms.6ThisincludesCandocoDanceCompany,AXISDanceCompanyandDancingWheels.Othercompaniesdeliberatelychoosetobecommunityandprojectbased.Iammakingthispointnottobuyintothehierarchyofartmakingbuttonoteaparticularstageintheprocessofperformerswithdisabilitiesestablishingthemselves.1990‐2000alsosawanumberofimportantpublicationsdiscussingperformance,traininganddisabilitybyauthorslikeAlbright,Benjamin,Kuppers,Sandahl,etc.7AdamBenjaminmentionsandcriticallydiscussesAlexSpitzer(US)andDavidTool(UK)asearliestattemptstoroutedisableddancersthroughconventionaldancetrainingprograms.SpitzerreceivedhisB.A.degreeinDancefromTexasWoman’sUniversityinDenton,Texas,andaccordingtohiswebsitesholdsthedistinctionofbeingthefirstdancerinawheelchairtoreceiveafour‐yeardegreeindanceintheUnitedStates.(http://www.spitzerdancecompany.org/index.htm)DavidToolecompletedaone‐year"ProfessionalDiplomainCommunityDanceStudies"attheLabanCentre–Londonin1992(http://www.dtoole.co.uk/)FromconversationwiththetwoartistsBenjamincontendsthatneitheroftheseattemptsatinclusionwereparticularlysuccessful.(Benjamin,2002,pp8) 8FromfourhundredstudentsindanceanddramaschoolsintheUKonly1.5%statedthattheyhadadisability.Inallcasesthestudentsnotingadisabilityweredyslexic.(CEDARJuly2002inVerrent,2003,pp5and11)2004‐05incourseswheredanceformed50%ormoreofthetotalstudytime,only13studentswereregisteredashavingphysicalorsensorydisabilities:evenfeweroftheserequiredlearningsupportinstudio‐basedactivities.Thisrepresents0.5%ofstudentsonthesecourses.(Whatley,2008,pp3)IamnotawareofanyU.S.baseddata.Inmyestimateitissafetoassumethatindividualswith
disabilitiesarejustasunderrepresentedindancecollegesanddegreeprogramsintheU.S.astheyareintheUK.9DavidTooleperformedinanumberofperformancesandproductionswithDV8directedbyLloydNewsonwithoutthecompanyeverreferringtoitselfortheirworkbeingreferredtoasintegrated.10ItisnoteworthyhowstronglytheambitiousobjectivesofUDresonatewithAdamBenjamin’saimsforintegrateddancetraining.“Intermsofteachingmethodology,anintegratedworkshoporclasscanfunctionperfectlywellwithoutthepresenceofadisabledstudent;itsimplydoesn’tmissabeatwhenadisabledpersonjoins.”(Benjamin,2002,pp16)11ItwouldbeworthconductingamorecomprehensivestudyexaminingdifferencesandsimilaritiesintheBAandBFAdancedegreesandhowthisaffectsthedemographicsofthestudentpopulation.InmylimitedresearchIfoundmostprogramsfocustheirBA/BFAprogramsonasimilarrangeofsubjectsincludingtechnicaltrainingthroughballetandmodern.SomeofferareasofconcentrationfortheirBAorBFAstudentsincludingK–12TeachingCertificates.TheUniversityofNorthCarolinaGreensboroCommunityDanceoffersaconcentrationincommunitydancetotheirBAorBFAstudents.NotabledifferencesareColumbiaCollege,ChicagoofferingmoredifferentiatedBA/BFAdegreesin:DanceStudies,Dance‐making,PerformanceandTeaching.TheAmsterdamSchooloftheArts(AHK)offersanumberofdifferentiateddegreesinballet,moderntheaterdance,jazzandmusicaldance,newdancedevelopmentanddanceteaching.OtherschoolsliketheLabanCenterofferanindependentstudyprogramandapostgraduatecertificateincommunitydancetheformerculminatesinacertificateonlywhereasthelatterpresumesaccesstoafirstdegree.12Classicalballetandmoderndanceareofcourseethnicformsaswell.13Benjaminappreciatestraditionaltechniqueclassastraining“skillsthatarenecessaryandhighlyvalued…forprofessionaldancers”(Benjamin,2002,pp44),butisalsojustifiablycriticalofthelimitedselectionofdanceformsofferedandthecontinuedexclusionofimprovisationasaformoftechnicaltraining.
14AnexperienceIsharewithmanycompaniesworkinginthefieldaswellasauthorssuchasAnneAlbright,AdamBenjaminandSarahWhatley.15IntheU.S.,asimilardocument,theStandardsofLearningandTeachingDanceintheArts:Ages5‐18bytheNationalDanceEducationOrganizationprovidesanevenmoredetailedcatalogueoflearninggoals.Thelanguageusedagainisgeneralandinclusive.16Warren’scriteriaareinmyviewbeyonddiscussion.Placingappearancebeforeskillandequalingaestheticwithphysicalbeautyisnotonlyhighlyexclusiveitalsodiminishesdanceasanartformtosomethingdecorativewithnothingmuchtosayaboutthecomplexityofhumanexistence.17TheUWDanceProgramfocusesitstechniqueclasstrainingonballetandmodernwiththeadditionofjazz,ballroomdancingandintegrateddanceaselectivesthatcanalsocoverpartsofthetechniquerequirements.18Companydforinstanceworkswithteenagerswithdownsyndrome,companieslikeAXISandCandocoworkwithdancerswithphysicaldisabilitiesintheirtouringcompanybutworkwithabroaderrangeofdisabilitiesintheireducationalworkandcompanieslikeAmiciDanceTheaterorDanceAbilityworkwithcommunitiesofdancersincludingavastagerangeandalltypesofdisabilities.19ExamplesfordisabilityspecificdancetechniquesincludeKittyLunndevelopingballetclassesfor(manual)wheelchairusers(Lunn,1999),CompanydteachingandperformingjazzdancewithyoungpeoplewithDownsyndrome,andStevePaxtonandAnneKilcoyneteachingcontactimprovisationtovisuallyimpairedandnon‐disabledparticipants.20KarenKaufmann’sarticle,AdaptationTechniquesforModelingDiversityintheDanceClass(Kaufmann,2002),isaconcise,ifnotunproblematicsummaryofthemethodology.StineNilsenand
CharlotteDarbyshirealsopublishedashortpaperInvestigatingIntegratedTeachingPractice(DarbyshireandNilsen,undated)wheretheydiscusstheuseofadaptations.21IhadthepleasureofhavingPetraKuppersvisitforonedayduringaweeklongintegrateddanceintensiveinSeattlein2009.Petraattendedamid‐weeksessionandindependentlydevelopedherfloorversionofatravelingphrasewithrelish,whileIworkedwiththerestofthegroup,mostofthemwithlessexperienceindance,tilltheendoftheweektodevelopamoreindependentunderstandingoftheapproach.22Ipreferthetermtraditionaltechniqueclasswhentalkingaboutcoursestrainingphysical‐anatomicalskillsandrefertoworkingwithset,improvisedandexperientialmaterialwhenreferringtoabroaderunderstandingoftechnique.23Whiledancersworkincloseproximitywitheachotherthenon‐verbalnatureoftheworkoftenpreventsthemgettingtoknoweachother.Studentssometimesdon’tevenknoweachother’snamesbytheendofthequarter.Thisdoesnotmeanthattherearenototherwaysofknowingeachotherinaclass.Usingwordsandopeningupadialoguewillnottakeawayfromtheprofoundpossibilitiesthenon‐verbalexperienceofdanceoffers,butwillbeimportantinfacilitatingaccessandcollaboratingwitheachother.24Sincetheexercisefocusesexclusivelyonvisualinformation,dependingonthegroupImaywanttodemonstratehowthetaskcanbeperformedthroughverbaldescriptionsorthroughtouch.25In2002IwasabletoconductaresearchprojectconcernedwiththeapplicationofChoreologyand,inparticular,thestudyofmovementanalysis,incontemporarydanceintegratingdancerswithandwithoutphysicaldisabilities,underthetutelageofLondon‐basedchoreologistRosemaryBrandt.26Thediscussionofturnoutofthelegsisonesuchexample.Classicalballetinparticularfavorsaturnoutasnearto180degreesaspossible.Ifthisisanatomicallynotpossibleforastudentthequestionsisifthelook(aesthetic)oftheturnoutismoreimportantthanthefunctionofusingthecorrectturnout.Whilenowadaysmanypractitionersteachtheuseofanindividual,anatomicallycorrectalignmentthisisnotalwaysthecase.Morerecentlythissamedebatealsoextendedtotheparallelpositionusedinmoderndanceandthealigningofthekneesoverthefeet,thecarriageofthearms,etc.