Tveit Complaint Disbarment/Prosecution WSBA and Commission on Judicial Conduct

Connie LaRue 1045 Kitt-Narcisse Rd Colville, Washington 99114

USPS Cert. Mail 7011 3500 0001 8625 5608 TO: Commission on Judicial Conduct

210 11th Ave SW #400 Olympia, WA 98501

USPS Cert. Mail 70113500 000186255622 TO: Office of Disciplinary Counsel Washington State Bar Association 1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite 600 Seattle, WA 98101-2539

THE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT

COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION OF GINA A. TVEIT, WSBA #19607, FOR CRIMINAL IMPERSONATION OF A PUBI.IC OFFICIAL,

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND VIOLATING HER SWORN OATH OF ATTORNEY.

LaRue relies on the following relevant facts, statutes and court rulings from the Washington state and Federal courts in making this complaint.

FACTS:

1. GINA A. TVEIT (hereafter TVEIT) was appointed to the position of STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, and on August 26,2009.

TVEIT swore, subscribed and FILED her Oath of Office with the COUNTY AUDITOR, paying the required filing fee of $63.00 (RCW 36.18.010\ that empowered the COUNTY AUDITOR to record the Oath into the official public records: Auditor File No. 2009 0007449 in compliance with state law (RCW 65.04.015(2), (3) and (4)). (See Oaths of TVEIT enclosed).

2. Subsequent to TVEIT's appointment, she won two consecutive general elections, 2010 and 2014, for the Office of STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT JUDGE but both times thumbing her nose2 at Washington state law and her Oath of Attorney.

RCW 36.18.010 (3) All such other papers or writing as are required by law to be recorded and such as are reqUired by law to be filed. 2 Thumbed Her Nose: Idiom: "to show that you do not respect rules, laws..."

COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION - GINA A. TVEIT Page 1 of 12

I

3. In 2010 and 2014, after election, TVEIT did not pay the requisite FILING Fees RCW 65.04.030 and the COUNTY AUDITOR was not empowered to assign a unique Auditor File Number on TVEIT's Oath of OFFICE to record and incorporate it into the official public records in accordance with RCW 65.04.015(2), (3) and (4).

4. TVEIT's failure to comply with state law in 2010 and 2014 - to "duly qualify" (RCW 42.20.030) - BEFORE assuming the duties of the office of DISTRICT COURT JUDGE (RCW 36.16.040)' has resulted in TVEIT's criminal usurpation of that elective office.

5. TVEIT swore an OATH OF ATIORNEY (see RCW 2.48.210) on file with the WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT stating in relevant part:

"I am fully subject to the laws of the State of Washington and the laws of the United States, and will abide by the same."; "I will support the constitution of the State of Washington and the constitution of the United States"; and "I will abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct approved by the Supreme Court of the State of Washington."

6. TVEIT, by her own actions of paying the requisite FILING Fee in 2009, had knowledge of the law that all filing fees are mandatory and are to be paid in advance. See RCW 65.04.130; State v Nelson; State v. Conners quoted under the Relevant Law Relied Upon" herein below; "ignorance of the law does not excuse".

7. TVEIT has been knowingly, willfully and criminally impersonating a public officer and usurping a public office since the first of January 2011.

8. TVEIT was served by the People on Stevens County with a Notice of Non-Compliance with State Law, a Notice of Vacancy of Office, and a Directive to Answer to the People, and all three times she remained silent3 when she had "a legal or moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading."

9. During TVEIT's "tenure" of the criminal usurpation of the office of STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, TVEIT has conducted thousands of illegal "prosecutions" by fraud and deception, passing off a simulated legal process as legitimate legal process, resulting in the deprivations of people's property through unauthorized fines and their lives through illegal imprisonments.

3 U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d. 1021;U.S. v. Tweel, SSO F. 2d. 297, 299, 300 (1977) Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is a legal and moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. We cannot condone this shocking conduct... If that is the case we hope our message is clear. This sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is routine it should be corrected immediately.


10. Also, during TVEIT's "tenure" of criminally impersonating a STEVENS COUNlY DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, TVEIT has appointed at least one DISTRICT COURT COMMISSIONER/PRO TEM "JUDGE", named LLOYD NICKEL.

11. NICKEL is a WASHINGTON STATE BAR licensed attorney, BAR #9065, and is charged with being fully subject to and abiding by the law as stated on his sworn Oath of Attorney.

12. It was NICKEL's duty to vet the legality of TVEIT's duly-qualified status before accepting an appointment from TVEIT.

13. NICKEL is relevant to this complaint against TVEIT because NICKEL was "assigned" to sit in "judgment" over LaRue in CllY OF CHEWELAH v. CONNIE LARUE in STEVENS COUNlY DISTRICT COURT, Cases No. 5Z0133878 and No. 5Z0133879.

14. Because of TVEIT's unauthorized and illegal appointment, NICKEL has criminally usurped that Commissioner/Pro Tem Office and has conducted an illegal "prosecution" of LaRue by fraud and deception, passing off a simulated legal process as legitimate legal process.

15. NICKEL's actions have resulted in the illegal deprivation of LaRue's property through unauthorized fines, and her life through illegal imprisonment including extortion of LaRue's time, energy and meager finances to defend against an illegal prosecution.

16. TVEIT, having failed to "duly qualify" for the OFFICE OF STEVENS COUNlY DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, illegally "found probable cause" to pass off a simulated legal process as a legitimate and lawful process; an action that instituted a RIC04 extortion case against LaRue.

17. From LaRue's experiences during election campaigning (a candidate for STEVENS COUNlY CORONER in the 2014 election cycle) LaRue believes she has been targeted for harassment through an illegal traffic stop. The stop resulted in a false arrest, false imprisonment in the county jail and other such illegal acts like extortion in the second degree, by impersonators in public office operating a RICO enterprise in STEVENS COUNlY, namely, GINA TVEIT WSBA #19607; LLOYD NICKEL WSBA #9065; TIMOTHY RASMUSSEN WSBA #32105; JESSICA TAYLOR WSBA #36248; and NICHOLAS FORCE WSBA #37659, for exercising her right to travel to a safe and welllighted area because STEVENS COUNlY is renown for its recent rash of rapist cops.

4 The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly referred to as the RICO Act or simply RICO, is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization.


18. Again, TVEIT has participated in "recharging" LaRue, this time naming the STATE OF WASHINGTON as the Plaintiff (STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT No. P7944) which has resulted in LaRue remaining under threat, duress and coercion, with the continuing deprivation of LaRue's time, energy and meager finances.

19. LaRue filed an Application for Writ of Prohibition, Injunction and Show Cause Order in the STEVENS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT demanding a duly-qualified SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE hear LaRue's case.

20. LaRue states that she is being illegally prosecuted in STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT using a deceptive simulated legal process, for exercising one of her constitutionally protected right.

21. More than 20 days have passed and LaRue's efforts in STEVENS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT have been stifled (obstructing justice) by a non-qualified "judge" named ALLEN C. NIELSON, who is holding up the process of approving LaRue's application to proceed without costs (in forma pauperis status).

22. Although LaRue has been unable to obtain justice in the STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT (through the illegal actions of criminal usurpers to public office, TVEIT, NICKEL, RASMUSSEN, TAYLOR and FORCE) and STEVENS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT "JUDGES" (ALLEN C. NIELSON and PATRICK A. MONASMITH), the WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING has continued to move forward by issuing a NOTICE OF SUSPENSION of LaRue's license, (an unjustified extortion threat with the very real potential of punishment) that could result in LaRue being stopped, assaulted, kidnapped and falsely imprisoned again, in spite of the fact that LaRue has not been found guilty of anything.

23. TVEIT has illegally usurped a public office and criminally impersonated a public officer and her illegal conduct has been protected by one or more persons in STEVENS COUNTY that have also not duly qualified to occupy certain public offices related to LaRue's complaints.

24. An honest audit of STEVENS COUNTY would expose that thousands of Citizens have been deprived of their unalienable rights of life, liberty and property through illegal fines and/or incarceration from TVEIT's actions in conspiracy with other persons. This STEVENS COUNTY RICO enterprise has infected this County with illegal assaults (and assaults with a deadly weapon), false arrests, kidnapping, false imprisonment, extortion and other crimes against the people.

25. TVEIT has repeatedly violated her OATH OF ATTORNEY.

26. Every action taken by TVEIT while impersonating a public officer is a criminal act for which she has yet to be held accountable.


I declare that the foregoing facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, understanding and belief.

Further I sayeth naught.

All Rights Reserved

Ccoot\,i r k~u...e Connie LaRue, Affiant

JURAT Washington State } Stevens County } ss.

I, aML t4 01 doCcH ' a Washington Notary Public, do certify that Connie LaRue appeared before me and swears under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true.

On this, the2.l-~ay of ::S~i -" 2015. ... :~::I::~,,! .. . I,' "t '. -.

{ .... ' .. /1~t?)~ /V\ ~l!--:~ .;.' c.': ",.,"'>' .;-,-'"\ ..~. 6~~ LLJ ~~ ~Ctt ,7 :~:,'.~ Washington Notary Public """--'---;,., .... ~ 'yJ: 1....;t'~! My appointment expires 0e2 _0,3 . ~/~. I;; ~ , ,'p;

~,' y ~ ....... ...."t ~~. ~:....: "'" '-}J ,I"~, \.J ",:", ~. .' T........ "F.. '" V .'t,f>'.." "":..,.r

'~'/,

RELEVANT LAW RELIED UPON IN SUPPORT OF THIS COMPLAINT:

'We have no officers in this government from the President down to the most subordinate agent, who does not hold office under the law, with prescribed duties and limited authority. And while some of these...exercise powers in some sense left to the more general definitions necessarily incident to fundamental/aw found in the Constitution the larqer portion of them are the creation of statutory law. with duties and powers prescribed and limited bv law/' [Pierce v. United States] THE FLOYD ACCEPTANCES, 74 US 666 at 676-677; (7 Wall. 666), Supreme Court 1868, Washington Law Reporter, Vol. XUI Page 297.

Maxim of Law: "What does not appear does not exist."

Maxim of Law: Ignorantia juris non excusat: "Ignorance of the law does not excuse."

Black's Law 6th Edition states: "Duly Qualified" - Being "duly qualified" to fill an office, in the constitutional sense and in the ordinary acceptation of the words, means that the officer shall possess every qualification; that he shall in all respects comply with every requisite before entering on duties of the office; and that he shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution and to perform the duties of the office with fidelity. Black's Law Dictionary 6th Edition.

RCW 42.20.030 (in relevant part) - Intrusion into and refusal to surrender public office. Every person who shall falsely personate or represent any public officer, ... or who shall willfully exercise any of the functions or perform any of the duties of such officer, without having dulv qualified therefore, as required by law, ... shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

"The fact that the candidate is qualified at the time of his election is not sufficient to entitle him to hold the office if, at the time of his commencement to his term of office, or during the continuance of the term, he ceases to be qualified. Eligibility to public office is of a continuing nature, and must subsist at the commencement of the term, and during the occupancy of the office. 1/ Washington Attorney General Opinion - AGO 63-64, no. 17.

COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION - GINA A. lVEIT Page 6 of 12

LEGISLATIVE MANDATES TO DULY QUALIFY FOR PUBLIC OFFICE SUPPORTED BY WASHINGTON COURT RULINGS

1. RCW 2.48.210 Oath on admission requires an Oath of Attorney before authorization to practice law in Washington stating: "Every person before being admitted to practice law in this state shall take and subscribe the following oath".

2. Right to hold public office is subject to qualifications imposed by legislature." State ex rei. Carroll v. Simmons (1962) 61 Wash.2d 146, 377 P.2d 421, cert, denied 83 S. Ct. 1698,374 U.S. 808, 10 L. Ed.2d 1032

3. "Use of word "shaWl in statute imposes mandatory duty/I Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities and Trans. Com'n, 869 P.2d 1034, 123 Wash.2d 621, reconsideration denied (1994).

4. RCW 36.16.040 Oath of office. "Every person elected to county office shall before he or she enters upon the duties of his or her office take and subscribe an oath or affirmation that he or she will faithfully and impartially discharge the duties of his or her office to the best of his or her ability."

5. RCW 36.16.060 Place of filing oaths and bonds. "Every county officer, before entering upon the duties of his or her office, shall file his or her oath of office in the office of the county auditor and his or her official bond in the office of the county clerk... Oaths and bonds of deputies shall be filed in the offices in which the oaths and bonds of their principals are required to be filed."

6. RCW 65.04.030 Instruments to be recorded or filed. The auditor or recording officer must, upon the payment of the fees as required in RCW 36.18.010... (3) All such other papers or writing as are required by law to be recorded and such as are required by law to be filed.

7. RCW 65.04.130 Fees to be paid or tendered. Said county auditor is not bound to record any instrument, or file any paper or notice, or furnish any copies, or to render any service connected with his or her office, until his or her fees for the same, as prescribed by law, are if demanded paid or tendered.

"Provision requiring payment of fees in advance is mandatory." State v. Nelson (1940) 6 Wash.2d 190, 107 P.2d 1113.


"When papers are received by officer for filing, filing will not become effective until necessary fees have been paid." State v. Conners (1942) 12 Wash.2d 128, 120 P.2d 1002; State v. Nelson (1940) 6 Wash.2d 190, 107 P.2d 1113.

"Statutes relating to compensation of public officer must be strictly construed in favor of government, and such officers are entitled only to what is clearly given by law." Murphy v. State Dept. of Licensing (1981) 28 Wash. App. 620, 675 P.2d 732.

"Day on which oath of office is signed and filed by judge of superior court Ii. day on which he assumes office for purposes of pension benefits. and day of Governor's announcement of proposed appointment is immaterial./I Jordan v. O'Brien (1971) 79 Wash.2d 406, 486 P.2d 890.

8. RCW 65.08.150 Duty to Record: A recording officer, upon payment or tender to him or her of the lawful fees therefor, shall record in his or her office any instrument authorized or permitted to be so recorded by the laws of this state or by the laws of the United States.

9. "When legislative body provides definitions for statutory terms, it is that definition to which the person must conform his conduct." City of Seattle v. Koh, 26 Wash. App. 708, 614 P.2d 665 (1980).

"'Where an act uses the word in a special sense which it defines, definition by average man or by ordinary dictionary is not substitute for the definitions contained in the act." National Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of District of Columbia et.al. v. Britton, Deputy Com'r., 147 F2d 561.

10. Legislative Definitions (summation) of "FILE", "FILED", or "FILING" and "RECORD", "RECORDED" or "RECORDING" RCW 65.04.015(2) FILED for "recording into the official public record" RCW 65.04.015 (3) RECORD "after filing to incorporate the instrument into the public records" RCW 65.04.015 (4) "RECORDING NUMBER" Assignment of an "auditor or recording officer file number""that identifies the storage location" "of each instrument in the public records" "accessible in the same recording office where the instrument containing the reference to the location is found."

11. RCW 5.44.040 Certified copies of public records as evidence. Copies of all records and documents on record or on file in the offices of the various departments of the United States and of this state or any other state or territory of the United States, when duly certified by the respective officers having by law the custody thereof, under their respective seals where such officers have official seals,


shall be admitted in evidence in the courts of this state. [NOTE: If the fees for filing and/or recording are not paid in advance, an oath of office cannot be made a part of the official public record.]

12. RCW 42.20.100 Failure of duty by public officer a misdemeanor. Whenever any duty is enjoined by law upon any public officer or other person holding any public trust or employment, their wilful neqlect to perform such duty, except where otherwise speciallv provided for, shall be a misdemeanor.

13. RCW 9A.80.010 Official Misconduct, (l)(a) ... intentionally commits an unauthorized act under color of law (b) ... intentionally refrains from performing a duty imposed upon him or her by law. (2) Official misconduct is a gross misdemeanor, defined at RCW 9.92.020.

14. RCW 42.12.010 Causes of vacancy, Every elective office shall become vacant on the happening ofany of the following events: (5) ... any offense involving a violation of his or her official oath; (6) His or her refusal or neglect to take his or her oath of office, or to give or renew his or her official bond, or to deposit such oath or bond within the time prescribed bv law.

15. RCW 42.20.030 -Intrusion into and refusal to surrender public office. Every person who shall falsely personate or represent any public officer, or who shall willfully intrude himself into a public office to which he has not been duly elected or appointed, or who shall willfully exercise any of the functions or perform any of the duties, without having duly qualified as required by law, ..., shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

16. RCW 9A.56.130 Extortion in the second degree. (1) A person is guilty of extortion in the second degree if he commits extortion by

means of threat as defined in RCW 9A.04.110(28)(d) through (j). (2) Extortion in the second degree is a class Cfelony.

RCW 9A.04.110 - Definitions. (28) ((Threat" means to communicate directly or indirectly the intent: (h) To take wrongful action as an official against anyone or anything, or wrongfully withhold official action, or cause such action or withholding;

The Washington Legislature enacted two laws, one which was enacted in 1866 and another that was enacted in 1909, both of which are still on the books and are now recodified as RCW 42.12.010 and 42.20.030.


RCW 42.12.010 originally enacted in 1866 and to date, remains almost unchanged, allows no grace period under subsection (6) for any refusal or neglect [to duly qualify] within the time prescribed by law.

RCW 42.20.030 was originally enacted in 1909 and has never been changed and contains four different offenses that constitute the act of intrusion into public office and one for refusal to surrender public office.

Three of these offenses require certain acts to be performed "willfully" in order to be a crime, but two of the offenses only require that certain acts be performed.

The first element states, "Every person who shall falsely personate or represent any public officer, or ... " Notice that no intent is required.

The second element states, "who shall willfully intrude himself into a public office to which he has not been duly elected or appointed, or ... " Willfulness is established by knowledge (RCW 9A.08.010) and "duly" is defined in Black's Law Dictionary 6th Ed. as "In due and proper form or manner; according to legal requirements....; according to law in both form and substance. "

The third element states, "who shall willfully exercise any of the functions or perform any of the duties ofsuch officer, without having duly qualified therefor, as required by law; or... "

"Being duly qualified to fill an office, in the constitutional sense and in the ordinary acceptation of the words, means that the officer shall possess every qualification; that he shall in all respects comply with every requisite before entering on the duties of the office; and that he shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution, and to perform the duties of the office with fidelity. " Black's Law Dictionary 6th Ed.

The fourth element states, "Who, having been an executive or administrative officer, shall willfully exercise any of the functions of his office after his right to do so has ceased, or ..."

The fifth element states, "wrongfully refuse to surrender the official seal or any books or papers appertaining to such office, upon the demand of his lawful successor shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor." See RCW 9A.60.040 Impersonating a Public Officer and RCW Chapter 7.56 Quo Warranto.

RCW 9a.60.040 Criminal impersonation in the first degree. (1) A person is guilty of criminal impersonation in the first degree if the person:

(a) Assumes a false identity and does an act in his or her assumed character with intent to defraud another or for any other unlawful purpose; or

(b) Pretends to be a representative of some person or organization or a public servant and does an act in his or her pretended capacity with intent to defraud another or for any other unlawful purpose.

(2) Criminal impersonation in the first degree is a class Cfelony.


CONCLUSIONS RELIED UPON FOR THIS CRIMINAL COMPLAINT:

First, if the fees for filing are not paid in advance, an oath of office cannot be made a part of the official public record. see RCW 5.44.040.

second, if the official oath is not made part of the official public record, it grants no lawful authority.

Third, if the oath is not filed as defined in RCW 65.04.040, it is not part of the official public record.

RCW 65.04.040 Method for recording instruments - Marginal notations Arrangement of records. Any state. county, or municipal officer charged with the duty of recording instruments in public records shall record them by *record location number in the order filed, irrespective of the type of instrument, using a process that has been tested and approved for the intended purpose bv the state archivist. In addition the county auditor or recording officer, in the exercise of the duty of recording instruments in public records, may, in lieu of transcription record all instruments, that he or she is charged by law to record, by any electronic data transfer, photographic, photostatic, microfilm, microcard, miniature photographic or other process that actually reproduces or forms a durable medium for so reproducing the original, and which has been tested and approved for the intended purpose by the state archivist. If the county auditor or recording officer records any instrument by a process approved by the state archivist it shall not be necessary thereafter to make any notations or marginal notes, which are otherwise required by law, thereon if, in lieu of making said notations thereon, the auditor or recording officer immediately makes a note of such in the general index in the column headed "remarks," listing the record number location of the instrument to which the current entry relates back. Previously recorded or filed instruments may be processed and preserved by any means authorized under this section for the original recording of instruments. The county auditor or recording officer may provide for the use of the public, media containing reproductions of instruments and other materials that have been recorded pursuant to the provisions of this section. The contents of the media may be arranged according to date of filing, irrespective of type of instrument, or in such other manner as the county auditor or recording officer deems proper.

Fourth, if the oath of office is not actually made part of the official public record, as defined in law, it cannot be admitted into evidence under ER 902(d) or ER 1005 to support a lawful claim for salaries or benefits [or for any other purpose] relating to a public office.


Fifth, as shown by the case law already supplied to you, all filing fees are mandatory and are to be paid in advance and your [STATE AUDITOR] examiners are supposed to know that an oath of office, an appointment to a public office, and an official bond are required by law to be filed and/or recorded into and made part of the official public record, requiring a paid receipt for those transactions. AUDITORs know that there can be no lawful occupation of the intended office by a person impersonating a public official or usurping a public office.

Sixth, there are several sections in RCW 43.09 that would cover your [STATE AUDITOR's] department responsibility to verify that the bonds, appointments and oaths were filed, as required by law, such as RCW 43.09.200, 43.09.210, 43.09.230, and 43.09.245 but, under 43.09.260 your department has specific information as to what is required pursuant to subsection (5). RCW 43.09.260(5) ({On every such examination, inquiry shall be made as to the financial condition and resources of the local government; whether the Constitution and laws of the state, the ordinances and orders of the local government and the requirements of the state auditor have been properly complied with, and into the methods and accuracy of the accounts and reports."

IN CLOSING

For the foregoing reasons supported by facts, relevant law, statutes, and Washington court rulings, GINA A. TVEIT WSBA #19607, should be disbarred and referred by this body of examiners and mandatory reporters for criminal prosecution before the appropriate authorities, state or federal.

It is my firmly held conviction that the laws and legislative mandates relied upon herein are relevant to support the conclusions that LaRue's unalienable rights were violated. GINA A. TVEIT's CRIMINAL IMPERSONATION OF A PUBLIC OFFICIAL, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND VIOLATING HER SWORN OATH OF ATTORNEY warrant this COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION.

All Rights Reserved

Connie LaRue


INDEX OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 1: TVEITs originally FILED Oath of Office compliant with state law.

EXHIBIT 2: TVEITs 2010 and 2014 non-compliant-with-state law Oaths of Office impersonating a DISTRICT COURT JUDGE in STEVENS COUNTY. EXHIBIT 3: Unauthorized appointment of NICKEL by TVEIT. EXHIBIT 4: Non Compliant NICKEL Oath of Office. EXHIBIT 5: TVEIT Notice of Non-Compliance with State Law EXHIBIT 6: TVEIT Notice of Vacancy of Office EXHIBIT 7: TVEIT Directive to Answer to the People EXHIBIT 8: First two charging instruments CITY OF CHEWELAH v. CONNIE LARUE Case No. 5Z0133878 & Case No. 5Z0133879; Orders and Affidavits. EXHIBIT 9: Order for dismissal of cases No. 5Z0133878 & No 5Z0133879 EXHIBIT 10: New Charge STATE OF WASHINGTON v. Connie LaRue, Case No. P7944 using the same illegal police report to justify re-prosecuting LaRue to extort over $1062. EXHIBIT 11: WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EXHIBIT 12: STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT NOTICE OF DELINQENCY

NOTICE There is no evidence that any of the below-named impersonators of a public official and criminal usurpers of a public office are compliant with state law. None have an oath of office or appointment properly filed and incorporated into the official public records. This blatant disregard for Washington State Law has deprived LaRue of her right to Justice through Due Process of Law at minimum.

TIMOTHY RASMUSSEN JESSICA TAYLOR SAUNDRA RICHARTZ NICHOLAS FORCE KENDLE ALLEN TROY ANDERSON

JOHNATHAN BOWERS GINA A. TVEIT

LLOYD B. NICKEL ALLEN C. NIELSON

PATRICK A. MONASMITH

This "Oath of Office" is in compliance with state law as defined in RCW 65.04.015(2), (3) and (4). It contains the requisite Auditor File #, required Fee Paid RCW 36.18.010(3), etc.

EXHIBIT 1

/

"

STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss OATH OF OFFICE

County of Stevens

I, Gina A. Tveit, do solemnly swear and affirm that I am a Citizen of the United States of America and the State ofWashingtonj that I will support the Constitution and Laws of the United States ofAmerica and the Constitution and Laws of the State of Washington, and the laws of Stevens County, and will to the best of my judgment, skill, and abitity, faithfully, diligently and impartially perform the duties of the office of District Court Judge in and for the County of Stevens, Washington as such duties are prescribed by law.

Gina A. Tveit

Subscribed and sworn to before me this c77)'4- day of December, 2010.

Tim Gray Auditor for Stevens Coun

/

RECEIVED DEC 27 ZOJ

Initials /Timeh /ov~t/:H:1 Stevens County Auditor

This "Oath of Office" does not comply with state law as defined in RCW 65.04.015(2), (3) and (4). There is no Auditor File #, No evidence of required Fee Paid (RCW 36.18.010(3)), etc. This "oath" has not been made a part of the official public record. This "oath" is just a worthless piece of paper.

EXHIBIT 2

STATE OF WASH~01GTON}

COUNTY OF STEVENS

OATH OF OFFICE

Subscribed and sworn to before me this d~ day of )J~(~V

Person administering 0

Rctu n Document to: Stevens Count)' Auditor 215 S Oak, Room 106 Colville, WA. 99114-2836 RECEIVED ,t.ro hU"J)

DEC 22 2014

BY:~

This "Oath of Office" does not comply with state law as defined in RCW 65.04.015(2), (3) and (4). There is no Auditor File #, No evidence of required Fee Paid (RCW 36.18.010(3)), etc. This "oath" has not been made a part of the official public record. This "oath" is just a worthless piece of paper.

This "Appointment" of NICKEL is a false document signed by criminal usurper of the office of STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT JUDGE. Has no force in law.

EXHIBIT 3

For the same reasons as the "Appointment" and "Oath" above, it is VOID. Plus, this "Oath of Office" does not comply with state law as defined in RCW 65.04.015(2), (3) and (4). There is no Auditor File #, No evidence of required Fee Paid (RCW 36.18.010(3)), etc. This "oath" has not been made a part of the official public record. This "oath" is just a worthless piece of paper.

EXHIBIT 4

J}.OTICE OF J}.ON-COMPLIANCE WITH ~TATE 'l.AW in Common Law Court of Record Over Two Witnesses

Lex Naturalis Dei Gratia Notice to Respondeat Superior is Notice to Respondeat Inferior. Notice to Respondeat Inferior is Notice to Respondeat Superior.

FROM: The Sovereign People on Stevens county, on Washington state.

TO: Gina A. Tveit 215 S. Oak St. Colville, Washington 99114

The people ofStevens County hereby serve Notice to you, Gina A. Tveit, that there appears to be evidence you are not compliant with Washington State Law.

1. By not causing your own personal Oath of Office I to be properly filed and made a permanent part of the official public records of Stevens County [RCW 65.04.015(2); RCW 36.16.060; RCW 65.04.030(3); RCW 65.04.130]; and

2. You may also be responsible for having caused any appointed "deputies and assistants" who are defmed as officers2, to similarly fail to make their Appointment(s) and Oath(s) of Office properly indexed wherein they are actually of record in the office of the Stevens County Auditor.

Non-compliance with state law calls into question your knowledge of the law, ability to administer the law and to function in the capacity of Stevens County District Court Judge. You knew, or should have known, that neglect and/or willful failure to comply with certain legislative acts codified in the Revised Codes of Washington, and your sworn Oath to uphold the laws and Constitution of the State ofWashington establishes a defect and failure to duly qualify for office.

"... ifan officer is so careless ofthe requirements ofthe law under which he is elected that he neglects to qualifY, it is a fair indication that he will be neglectful in the transaction ofthe duties ofhis office. " State ex reI. Vanderveer v. Gormley 104 P. 620, 53 Wash. 543 - 1909

Furthermore, a breach of a duty imposed by law is a violation of the Oath of Office. You knew or should have known that your actions - or lack thereof - to remain at all times compliant with the law as enjoined by law upon any public officer, is a violation of your Oath ofOffice3 and Washington State Law. Fines and penalties associated with the commission of acts are defmed as a misdemeanor and/or gross misdemeanor, or a felony if one of the people incurred a personal injury as a result of actions that may have been taken by you under color oflaw, color of office and/or color of authority [18 USC 242].

1 See copy of your Oath of Office (attached) which is not compliant with Washington State Law as codified in the RCWs. 2 CODE OF ETHICS: RCW 42.23020(1): "officer" shall each include all elected and appointed officers together with all deputies and assistants of such an officer. 3 See RCW 29A.56.11O Definitions (1) "Misfeasance" or "malfeasance" in office means any wrongful conduct that affects, interrupts, or interferes with the performance of official duty;

(a) Additionally, "misfeasance" in office means the performance of a duty in an improper manner; and (b) Additionally, "malfeasance" in office means the commission of an unlawful act; (2) "Violation of the oath of office" means the neglect or knowing failure by an elective public officer to perform faithfully a

duty imposed by law.

,BoTleE OF .f}ON-COMPLIANCE WITH 6TATE J.Aw .J)age 1 of 2

EXHIBIT 5

Your office may also be vacant. Per RCW 42.12.010 Causes of vacancy, wherein (5) ... any offense involving a violation of his or her official oath; (6) His or her refusal or neglect to take his or her oath of office, or to give or renew his or her official bond, or to deposit4 such oath or bond within the time prescribed by law.

The people require the highest of ethical standard from their elected officers so that public confidence in their ability to abide by the law and effectively serve the people is assured. Therefore, this Notice ofNon-compliance with State Law by the Stevens County District Court Judge is to be served upon you by one of sovereign people on Stevens County, Washington state, ever mindful that "sovereignty itselfremains with the people, by whom and/or whom all government exists and acts. "Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886).

,2014.

Printed Narne

1)'fV1lA~ J~l e. Ho..VLT 2_W,LL\(),ffl ~ Sn-q-th 3) Fr~JrA'~ () {!//tOcV ~ta ~ ~~

" ... at the mouth oftwo witnesses, or at the mouth ofthree witnesses, shall e matter be established" Deuteronomy 19: 15; see also Deuteronomy 17:6 " ... receive not an accusation unless where there are two or three witnesses. " I Timothy 5: 19

Declaration of Service Washington state County of Stevens tl. tLI n.. o~ fJ,,,r: ,/ / " -vI

I, w~ II, ~ ~./P.M., this the da of 20 ,in the city of /', at the address of :. ,vl, uly served a copy of the forego~ Notice of Non-compliance

with State Law by deli ering a copy of the above to the within named l..lL) .. ~ :3 6 fL..p/ .I declare under penalty ofperjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. ~ (

By: ~~1.&o~~~~=t--5I~j-L~~=\'

4 Chapter 6504 RCW, Duties of County Auditor - specific, but not limited to, RCW 65.04.015 Defmitions, (1) ''Recording officer" means the county auditor ... charged with the responsibility for recording instruments in the county records.; (2) "File," "filed." or "filing" means the act ofdelivering or transmitting electronically an instrument to the auditor ... (or recording into the official public records.; (3) "Record," "recorded." or "recording" means the process ... used by the ouditor ... aoer filing to incorporate the instrument into the public records.; (4) "Recording number" means a unique number that identifies the storage location (book or volume and page, reel andframe, instrument number, auditor ... file number. .. .) ofeach instrument in the public records ... ; RCW 36.16.060 Place of filing oaths and bonds; RCW 65.04.030 (3) including oaths of office required by law to be filed in the county auditor's office; RCW 6504.130 Fees to be paid; RCW 65.08.150 Duty to record; Failure of Duty by Public Officer is subject to the penalties of the law described in RCW 42.20.100IRCW 9A.20.010 (2); RCW 9A.80010 (l)(a) ... intentionally commits an unauthorized act under color oflaw (b) ... intentionally retrains trom performing a duty imposed ''Pan him or her by law. (2) OffiCial misconduct is a gross misdemeanor, defined at RCW 9.92.020.

1l0TICE OF .BON-COMPLIANCE WITH ilTATE J..AW ,J)age 2 of 2

STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss OATH OF OFFICE

County ofStevens

I, Gina A. Tveit, do solemnly swear and affirm that I am a Citizen of the United States ofAmerica and the State ofWashingron; that I will support the Constirution and Laws of the United States ofAmerica and the Constitution and Laws of the State of Washington, and the laws of Stevens County, and will to the best of my judgment, skill, and ability, faithfully, diligently and impartially perform the duties of the office of District Court Judge in and for the County of Stevens, Washington as such duties are prescribed by law.

Gina A. Tveit

Subscribed and sworn to before me this cTl ~ day of December, 2010.

Tim Gray Auditor for Stevens Coun

RECEIVED DEC 27 20':8

f.

Initials I Timeh /()V~AH:r '.r. Stevens County Auditor

-"'" ~;~ .::: ':J

~; .::;~ ;..... "+-,,'" ~

'...

", ;r "

RECE\VE 2~ 20\~J}OTICE OF l)ACANCY OF C!&FFICE

in Common Law Court of Record Over Two Witnesses Lex Naturalis Dei Gratia

Notice to Respondeat Superior is Notice to Respondeat Inferior. Notice to Respondeat Inferior is Notice to Respondeat Superior.

FROM: The Sovereign People on Stevens county, on Washington state.

TO: Gina A. Tveit 215 S. Oak St. Colville, Washington 99114

The people of Stevens County hereby serve you, Gina A. Tveit, Notice that the Office of Stevens County District Court Judge is vacant per RCW 42.12.010.

On April 8, 2014, you were served Notice that you were in non-compliance with Washington state law because your oath of office was not made a part of the official public records of Stevens County it therefore does not exist. See: RCW 65.04.015(2); RCW 36.16.060; RCW 65.04.030(3). RCW 65.04.130 makes it clear you were to submit your oath of office and pay the requisite filing fee. By failing to file your oath and make it a permanent part of the official public records of Stevens County as the law requires, you have neglected to qualify for that office.

"Officers are elected not for the benefit of the indiVidual, but for the benefit of the community; and ~f an officer is so careless of the requirements ofthe law under which he is elected that he neglects to qucili./Y. it is a fair indication that he will be neglectful in thi! transaction ofthe duties ofhis office. " Lysons v. Ruff, 4 Wash. 234,29 P. 999 (1892).

Although the above quote was Justice Dunbar's dissenting opinion, it is, however, important because that case was overturned in Vandeveer v. Gormley, 153 Wash. 543, 102 P. 435 (1909). Also see; Attorney General Opinion AGO 63-64, April 16, 1963, No. 17 and; AGLO January 11, 1980 NO.2.

Right to hold public office is subject to qualifications imposed by legislature. " State ex rel. Carroll v. Simmons (1962) 61 Wash.2d 146, 377 P.2d 421, cert, denied 83 S. Ct. 1698, 374 U.S. 808, 10 L. Ed.2d 1032.

Now, as to your "oath", there are a few cases and RCW's that confinn that your "oath" is invalid according to law.

"Use of word "shall" in statute imposes mandatory duty." Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities and Trans. Com'n, 869 P.2d 1034, 123 Wash.2d 621, reconsideration denied (1994).

Every official oath of office, whether for elective or appointive office in the State of Washington shall be fIled.

RCW 36.16.060 Place offiling oaths and bonds.

Every county officer, before entering upon the duties ofhis or her office, shall file his or her oath ofoffice in the office of the county auditor and his or her offiCial bond in the office of the county clerk:

..fl,OTICE OF ~ACANCY OF eFFICE J)age 1 of 5

EXHIBIT 6

PROVIDED, That the official bond of the county clerk, ajier first being recorded by the county auditor, shall be filed in the office ofthe county treasurer.

Oaths and bonds of deputies shall be filed in the offices in which the oaths and bonds of their principals are required to be filed.

The word "filed" has been defined by the State Legislature, as it relates to the state, in RCW 65.04.015. RCW 65.04.015 Definitions. The definitions set forth in this section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly

reqUires otherwise. (1) "Recording officer" means the county auditor, or in charter counties the county offiCial charged with

the responsibility for recording instruments in the county records. (2) "File," "filed, " or ''filing'' means the act ofdelivering or transmitting electronically an instrument to the auditor or recording officer for recording into the offlcial public record~. (3) "Record," "recorded," or "recording" means the process, such as electronic, mechanical, optical, magnetiC, or microfilm storage used by the auditor or recording officer after filing to incorporate the instrument into the public records. (4) "Recording number" means a unique number that identifies the storage location (book or volume and page, reel and frame, instrument number, auditor or recording officer tile number, receiving number, electronic retrieval code, or other specific place) of each instrument in the public records accessible in the same recording offlce where the instrument containing the reference to the location is found.

In order to incorporate a document into the official public record, RCW 65.04.040 requires that a prescribed procedure shall be complied with:

RCW 65.04.040 Method for recording instruments - Marginal notations - Arrangement ofrecords. Any state, county, or municipal officer charged with the duty of recording instruments in public records shall record them by *record location number in the order filed, irrespective of the type oOnstrument, using a process that has been tested and approved for the intended purpose by the state archivist. Notes:

*Reviser's note: The definition "recopd locdlion number" was changed to "recording numoer" oy 1999 c 233 10.

Fees for recording instruments are found at: RCW 36.18.010.

"When legislative body proVides definitions for statutory terms, it is that definition to which the person must conform his conduct. " City of Seattle v. Koh, 26 Wash. App. 708, 614 P.2d 665 (1980).

"Where an act uses the word in a special sense which it defines, definition by average man or by ordinary dictionary is not substitute for the definitions contained in the act. " National Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of District of Columbia etal. v. Britton, Deputy Com'f., 147 F2d 561.

Now, since your "oath of office" does not contain a "record location number", it has not been "incorporated into the official public record". It is invalid by operation of law. When there is no principle there can be no agent and your invalid oath does not come within the Washington Court Rules Of EvideJice 902(d) ot 1005. It is therefore tender iIiadini.~sibletd slippbft yom claim to the dffice.

RCW 42.20. 030 -Intrusion into and refusal to surrender public office. Every person who shall falsely personate or represent any public officer, or who shall willfully intrude himself into a public office to which he has not been duly elected or appointed, or who shall willfully

J}OTICE OF ~ACANCY OF .eFFICE ~age 2 of 5

exercise any of the functions or peiform any of the duties, without having duly qualified as required by law, ..., shall be gUilty ofa gross misdemeanor.

The word "willfully" is defmed in RCW 9A.08.010 as "knowingly".

Ignorance offacts excuses, ignorance oflaw does not excuse. 1 Coke, 177.

It is required to be a registered voter to run for and hold office. One must also declare to be a citizen of the United States.

"Every citizen of the United States is supposed to know the law, .... " Pierce v. United States, 7 Wall (74 U.S. 169) 666 (1869).

Again, as shown by the following Washington case law, neither the County Auditor nor his agents have authority to waive the mandatory filing fees, and further, not even the State is exempt from these fees.

"Provision reqUiring payment offees in advance is mandatory. " State v. Nelson (1940) 6 Wash.2d 190, 107 P.2d 1113.

"When papers are received by officer for filing, filing will not become effective until necessary fees have been paid." State v. Conners (1942) 12 Wash.2d 128, 120 P.2d 1002; State v. Nelson (1940) 6 Wash.2d 190, 107 P.2d 1113.

"Statutes relating to compensation ofpublic officer must be strictly construed in favor of government, and such officers are entitled only to what is clearly given by law. " Murphy v. State Dept. of Licensing (1981) 28 Wash. App. 620,675 P.2d 732.

"Day on which oath of office is signed and filed by judge ofsuperior court is day on which he assumes offlce (or purposes o( pension benefits, and day of Governor's announcement ofproposed appointment is immaterial." Jordan v. O'Brien (1971) 79 Wash.2d 406, 486 P.2d 890.

If no fee was charged, collected and paid into the treasury for the ftling and/or recording of the oath of office, the oath of office has not actually been filed and has never been incorporated into the official public record as required by law. Assuming a public office and not processing ALL of the qualifications of that office renders the person occupying the office a usurper.

One fmal issue is the filing of false certified salary warrants.

"An officer defacto can not maintain a suit for fees." 24 Am. Rep. 715; People v. Hobson, 1 Denio, 579.4.

RCW 42.20. 060 Falsely auditing and paying claims. Every public officer, or person holding or discharging the duties of any public office or place of trust under the state or in any county, town or city, a part ofwhose duty it is to audit, allow or pay, or take part in auditing, allowing or paying, claims or demands upon the state or such county, town or City, who shall knowingly audit, allow or pay, or, directly or indirectly, consent to or in any way connive at the auditing, allowance or payment of any claim or demand against the state or such county, town or city, which is false or fraudulent or contains any charge, item or claim which is false or fraudulent, shall be guilty ofa gross misdemeanor.

JiOTICE OF 'lJACANCY OF eFFICE llage 3 of 5

"Use oj-word "false" in connection with word "fraudulent" does not indicate legislative purpose to include only such acts as are corruptly false, or are done with willful design to cheat and defraud public funds." State v. Case (1915) 88 Wash. 664, 153 P.2d 1070.

"Specific intent to violate law is impliedfrom fact ofviolation even though person had no wrongful intent to do anything beyond doing ofprohibited act. " State v. Case (1915) Supra.

RCW 9A. 72.080 - Statement ofwhat one does not know to be true. Every unqualified statement of that which one does not know to be true is equivalent to a statement ofthat which he knows to be false.

"Statute defining perjury in any testimony, affidavit or "other writing subscribed as [rue ", must be considered wilh tlfis slalUle, (fl proseeurion for perjury in making statement or affidavit before notary public. " State v. Ledford (1938) 195 Wn. 581, 81 P.2d 830.

Violation of two of the following RCW's will invoke the ten year statute of limitation under RCW 9A.04.080 regarding public officers.

RCW 9A. 72. 030 - Perjury in the second degree. (1) A person is guilty ofperjury in the second degree if, in an examination under oath under the

terms ofa contract of insurance, or with intent to mislead a public servant in the performance ofhis or her duty, he or she makes a materially false statement, which he or she knows to be false under an oath req-uiredorauthorized by law.

(2) Perjury in the second degree is a class C felony.

"The distinction between perjury and false swearing is this, viz.: "if the false statement be made in an oath or affidavit" required by law, or made in "the course of a judicial proceeding," the offense is perjury; if the false voluntary oath or affidavit is "not 'required l5y law or made ,n "the course of a judiCial proceeding. "then it 'is false swearing. " State v. Howard, 91 Wash. 481.

RCW 9A.56.130 Extortion in the second degree. (1) A person is guilty ofextortion in the second degree ifhe commits extortion by means of threat as

defined in RCW9A. 04.110(27)(d) through 0). (2) ... (3) Extortion in the second degree is a class C felony.

RCW 9A. 04.11 0 - Definitions. (27) "Threat" means to communicate directly or indirectly the intent: (h) To take wrongful action as an official against anyone or anything, or wrongfUlly withhold

official action, or cause such action or withholding;

The law is clear, your office is vacant. More than 30 days have transpired since you were served notice that you were in non-compliance with state law. You have chosen to remain silent and have continued to intrude into and usurp an office for which you have failed to duly qualifY. That silence is your tacit admission that you have no defense for your actions. You have a legal and moral duty to speak. Having chosen to remain silent is tantamount to fraud.

j}(JflEE Of '4JACANCY OfeFFICE ~age 4 of'S

The people require the highest of ethical standard from their elected officers so that public confidence in their ability to abide by the law and effectively serve the people is assured. You have violated these standards of ethics and the people's trust. You have unjustly taken compensation from the people's treasury you did not qualify to receive.

You are hereby directed by the sovereign people on Stevens County to:

1. Remove yourself from the County office you have usurped, and 2. Reimburse the people's treasury for your unjust enrichment acquired since your intrusion into

that office (plus interest accrued at 12% compounded annually), and/or 3. Face indictment for numerous and varied crimes.

"Sovereignty itselfremains with the people, by whom andfor whom all government exists and acts. "Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886).

The sovereign people have so spoken.

Dated: May 24,2014

Printed Name

1) 20.\\j"

~EOPLE'S ~VERSIGHT ~OMMISSION POTENTATUS REs PUBLICA

Date: June 11,2014

To: Gina Tveit 215 S. Oak Colville, WA 99114

Re: Directive to answer to the People

We, the People's Oversight Commission on Stevens County, issue this directive to answer to the people by affidavit or to appear in person to testify under oath why you have not responded or otherwise answered the People's charges that you:

1. Are in non-compliance with Washington state law!; and 2. Are occupying an elective county office you have failed to dilly qualify to possess2.

Please submit your sworn or affirmed affidavit properly addressing the above charges no later than 72 hours from the date of service of this Directive.

If you wish to testify under oath before this Commission, please notify the Commission within 48 hours of service of this Directive, at the address below, and a date that will accommodate the parties shall be scheduled.

As an elected official you have a duty to answer to the people. Failure to answer and provide facts, evidence and law that the accusations levied against you are a misunderstanding by the People or are wholly inaccurate as applied to the law will be your tacit admission that the People's charges are true and correct.

Please govern yourself accordingly. 609:q.3iQ D3lQ~

ClA..JA.- Y'Y'\4.Q. : h~ I "N 1 Acrao4' I Chairman of the Board of Oversight Commissioners Commissio er - Witness cc. file . I" (' ~-~---::~::_-----~--ll~

Commissioner - Witness

1 Referencing the Notice of Non-Compliance with State Law served upon you on April 8, 2014. 2 Referencing the Notice of Vacancy of Office served upon you on May 27, 2014.

People's Oversight Commission * P.O. Box 448 * Chewelah, Washington 99109

(1QMc.t~i\ yr ~ '7 melil. C!oIY\

EXHIBIT 7

DECLARATION OF SERVICE

I, William-Benjamin Sr.; Klinger, do hereby state that on the 0ay of June, 2014, I did personally hand deliver one copy of the following:

1. Re: Directive to answer to the People (one page)

upon Gina Tveit, occupying the office of District Court Judge or his/her

representative identified as II S I-t Le 1 ' authorized to receive service of process at q:A AM/~ at the Stevens County Courthouse

,

Complex with physical address of 215 S. Oak, Colville, WA 99114.

The above identified and served document originated from the

People's Oversight Commission.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States

of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on June ) j1i;2014.

VENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON

215 South Oak Street RE: STATE OF WASHINGTON Room 213

Colville, Washington 99114 .CITY OF , ) Telephone (509) 684-5249

vs.

Cause No. __----'--":--'--'--,...--'----=-----":-----' _ Violation Date: __--=--=---'-=-'----=----=::....::... _ Violation:

SUMMONS and

NOTICE OF CASE SETTING AVISO DE CASO SENALADO

THE ABOVE CAUSE HAS BEEN SET / CONTINUED TO THE DATE, TIME AND LOCATION STATED

FAILURE TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF A WARRANT FOR YOUR ARREST.

TIME: _~-,e...:....:.---='-=----------- ARRAIGNMENT' TRIAL

DATE __.:...:...:..._-:....:.....,,:----=--: ----'--..:..:.....:--'-'--_ SENTENCING ,. HEARING

COURTROOM: JUDGE: ---'--'-'--"'-'--'----:----'-----'--'''-'-'----=-'- _ See Reverse COURT APPEARANCE IS MANDATORY.

__ COURT APPEARANCE IS MANDATORY UNLESS $ CASH BAIL IS POSTED. YOU MAY FORFEIT BAIL BY YOUR NON-APPEARANCE.

ce. Pros. Atty.: _ Officer: __-:-''-'':-,...-...:..:.....:.:..".:.--:....,.,..-'--'-,..:..:-:.'--.:"....... _ Defense Atty.: _ Bondsman: _ Probation: _

Deputy Clerk By: _----':...::....,---=-"-'--'-'-_-=-_=:--:__-=..:.-"-"..:......:.::::....

-~TEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON

215 South Oak Street RE: STATE OF WASHiNGTON Room 213

Colville, Washington 99114 CITYOF ()TTY OF CHEWELAH Telephone (509) 684-5249 February 24, 2015

w. LA RUE, CONNIE

Cause No. 5Z0133878 HPD C'l' Violation Date: 02/02/20 15

LA RUE, CONNIE Violation:

VEH OPR-REFUSE COMPLY POLICE 1045 KITT NARCISSE COLVILLE WA 99114

RD SUMMONS and

NOTICE OF CASE SETTING AVISO DE CASO SENALADO

THE ABOVE CAUSE HAS BEEN SET / CONTINUED TO THE DATE, TIME AND LOCATION STATED

FAILURE TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF A WARRANT FOR YOUR ARREST.

TIME: 0 1 ; 30 PM ~RRAIGNMENT' TRIAL

DATE Mar rob 06 2010 SENTENCING HEARING

COURTROOM: 21 2 JUDGE: NI CKEL, LLOYD B 'See Reverse ----X-- COURT APPEARANCE IS MANDATORY.

COURT APPEARANCE is MANDATORY UNLESS $ CASH BAIL IS POSTED. YOU MAY FORFEIT BAIL BY YOUR NON-APPEARANCE.

cc. Pros. Atty.: _

Officer: BOWERS, .IOHNATHAN I, Defense Atty.: _ Bondsman: _

Probation BJYRDERS, NADINE M BrrwJ

Deputy Clerk BMW

(

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STEVENS

)c,'h of chefPeJ~ ))

5Z{)/33F7~ Is Z O/338'7jNO. IPlamtifffP8titioR8f )

) vs ) ORDER

Conn i e. L tL R~e..-- ) )

DefendantIRest'oftdeftt )

J 1. BASIS_De (.nda rn: moved the court for 0 t:d -br ()f 7

E IVE

:::; It:VH\J::i -::OUN 1\ ;';HOSFC' ITI"'1(:i ..1\TT'JRNt:Y

Washington State District Court

CITY OF CHEWELAH, Plaintiff [No. 5Z0133878]

v.

Connie LaRue, Abused Affidavit in Support of Recusal

Comes now, Connie LaRue, your Affiant, being competent to testify after first being duly sworn on oath under penalty of perjury, to bring a Motion to Recuse Gina Tveit under RCW 4.12.050. Affiant states that she has first-hand knowledge of the facts stated herein.

Affiant states that Gina Tveit has exhibited extreme prejudice toward Affiant by:

1. Altering court recordings of two Probable Cause hearings. 2. Ordering her clerk to issue a warrant for Affiant's arrest (for Failure to Appear) when

Affiant was standing in front of Gina Tveit and was talking with her and Gina Tveit had ordered Affiant out of the courtroom.

3. Refusing Affiant a phone call to get help for her two cats and over 100 chickens. 4. Ordering Affiant to "book" into jail, and when Affiant requested a copy of the "law requiring her

to book", Gina Tveit said, "I don't give legal advice." 5. Telling Affiant that she was not allowed to challenge jurisdiction, that Affiant could talk

about it later, and "later" never came. 6. Finding Probable Cause in Affiant's case when the arrest situation was manufactured by

the arresting policeman.

Further, Affiant sayeth naught.

All Rights Reserved

Connie LaRue, Affiant

Affidavit in Support of Recusal

JURAT

Washington State} Stevens County } ss.

. a Washington Notary Public, do certify that Connie LaRue is the living woman who appeared before me, first duly sworn upon oath, under penalty of perjury, and signed this instrument acknowledging it to be her free and voluntary act for the purpose mentioned in the instrument on this

the 1- day of'G\Uv\( Jo .2015.

Notary PubIic fo r _\J\f---=--....:....:.."""""'-'--'-'--'--"T~....::....'-My appointment eXPires~ --1-1 ~

Affidavit in Support of Recusal

')

FILEDRECEIVED FEB 23 2015

DISTRICT COURT STEVENS COUNT' STEVENS COUNTY, WA

PROSECUTING ATIORNEY

DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR STEVENS COUNTY

U\A e>f cMWEL~\\ Plainti

vs.

Defendant

Motion/Note for Hearing

(Clerk's action required) Hearing Date and Time: DATE: BCl'fC h \ ~ I 20\5 TIME: I', ~~ I Stevens County istrict Court 215 S. Oak, Rm 212, Colville WA

I certify/declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct.

Signed on this a~ day of ~~""'~'(120~at~\vJ\.t.., S+~e.:n...~1.~.u~~ (Day) (Month) 1\ " _ \ ') (City, Coynty & State) "l

I"'1-L 'fU\~~~ ""'~"(''JeoL ~\-;2.C>T-3~ ( ~ ,C'ffi)(IJ.' 0 l2\.L'-

Signature of Defendant

Motion and Note for Hearing

Washington State District Court ('f"\OV

CITY OF CHEWELAH, Plaintiff

v.

Connie LaRue, Abused

[No.5Z0133878j

Affidavit of Facts

ORIGINAL FILED

FEB 09 2015 DISTRICT COURT

STEVENS COUNTY WA

ol=rl=lVFD ~ ~,

Comes now Affiant, a real woman created by God, STEVENS COUNTY PROSECUTING ATIORNEY

1. I was in Stevens County District Court at 13:25 today and Gina Tveit walked in about 13:50. 2. Gina Tveit began calling names of accused individuals and when my name was called I

responded with "I am here in regard to that matter." 3. Every abused party was called and I was the last Abused in the courtroom. The time was

roughly 15:20 hours and there were about twenty (20) witnesses in the courtroom. 4. One of the prosecuting attorney women called my name and I stood up to prepare to go up

front. 5. I removed the headset I had been using for hearing the proceedings, because I am exceptionally

hard of hearing, and inserted my hearing aids. 6. As I was adjusting my hearing aids, I heard someone behind the bar asking me if I was going to

come up. 7. When my hearing aids were inserted 1 stated that the prosecuting attorney had called the

names of the abused, and I asked if this was standard operating procedure. 8. Gina Tveit said I was not allowed to talk from outside the bar, and instructed me to pass through

the bar. 9. I asked if I would be recognized as a living woman created by God, or as a PERSON. 10. There was no response to this question. 11. I asked if Gina Tveit would recognize the fact that I am not the surety, fiduciary or liable party.

She did not respond. 12. Gina Tveit said no one was there by the name she called, and she ordered me to leave the court

room or to be removed by authorities.

I Connie LaRue swear under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true;

510

15

20

25

30

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26 27

28

29

DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF STEVENS

[X] CITY OF CHEWELAH Plaintiff,

No.5Z0133878

vs. RULE 3.2 HEARlNG ORDER CONNIE nlmli LARUE CONDITIONS OF RELEASE DOB: 06/20/1948 Defendant [ JSUPERVISION ACTION REQUIRED

THIS MATTER came before the court for a Rule 3.2 hearing. The court orally informed the defendant:

(1) of the nature of the charge(s) against him/her, to wit: VEH OPERATOR REFUSE TO COMPLY POLICE and (2) of his/her Constitutional rights.

( ) The defendant requested the appointment of counsel to represent himlher, and the court finds that defendant is financially unable to obtain counsel without causing substantial hardship to defendant or defendant's family. It is

therefore ORDERED that , a member of the bar, be

and is hereby appointed as attorney for the above named defendant, pursuant to Criminal Rule 3.1 (d). ( ) The defendant is being held on a warrant from which requires bail in the amount of $ . The defendant is remanded to custody pursuant to the terms and conditions of the warrant and any additional conditions stated herein.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-named defendant shall be released from Stevens County Jail under this

cause number on the following conditions:

( ) On personal recognizance without conditions. (~The court, having determined that release on defendant's personal recognizance wilJ not reasonably assure the presence of the defendant when required; and/or that there exists a substantial danger that the defendant will commit a

serious crime, jeopardize the personal safety of the victim, or of the defendant or that of others, or will unlawfully interfere with the administration ofjustice, imposes the following conditions of release:

~efendant shall be in the custody of_. _ Defendant shall post a surety bond or cash in the sum of $_ . Said bond shall be:

( ) for appearance onl) .. Jr appearance and to guarantee compliance with conditions of release.

STEVENS COUNTY PROSECUTTNG ATTORNEY 215 S. Oak Street, Room J J4

Colville, WA 99 J J4 RULE 32 HEARfNG ORDER CONDITIONS OF RELEASE - J (509) 684-7500 fax (509) 684-7589

510

15

20

25

30

Approved for entry:

~~ ~~~~od.II!loIoI~u..ul..~_ ~~~ ~\. der of the co .

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

29

( ) Defendant shall not approach or communicate with nor attempt to approach or communicate with (by telephone, in writing, in person, or in any other way) either directly, indirectly, or through third parties, while in jailor after release, the following individuals:

ADDRESS

( ) Defendant shall not go to the following premises/areas: _ ( ) Pursuant to RCW 9.41.800 the defendant shall immediately surrender all firearms and other dangerous weapons

within the defendant's possession or control and any concealed pistol license to _

[name/law enforcement agency] and defendant is prohibited from obtaining or possessing a firearm, other dangerous weapon or concealed pistol license until further order of the court.

( ) Defendant shall not use or posses any drugs or alcohol unless prescribed by a physician. ( ) Defendant shall, pursuant to RCW 10.21.055:

[ ] have a functioning ignition interlock device installed on all motor vehicles operated by the person, with proof of installation filed with the court by the person or the certified interlock provider within five business days of the date

of release from custody or as soon thereafter as determined by the court based on availability within the jurisdiction; [ ] comply with 24/7 sobriety program including 24/7 electronic alcohoVdrug monitoring. (RCW 36.28A.330). [ lor both.

( ) Defendant shall submit to continuous alcohol monitoring via SCRAM. ( ) Defendant shall to submit to a portable breath test upon request of any law enforcement officer, the probation officer,

or the court.

( ) Defendant shall not drive without a valid operator's license and insurance. (0Defendant shall commit no other criminal offenses. ( ) Defendant may go to the residence only in the company of law enforcement officers to retrieve personal effects. (~efendant shall appear at the Stevens County District Court on -.:=fw q I dO /5 at /: .3f;p for

first appearance, arraignment andlor review for compliance with the above release conditions.

(.I) Other: 1'(~o

510

15

20

25

30

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

29

DEFENDANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT

1. I have read or have had read to me all of the above conditions of release and any other conditions of release that may

be attached; 2. 1agree to follow the above conditions and understand that any violation may lead to the forfeiture of any bond posted

and to the issuance of a warrant for my immediate arrest, and that I may be charged with a separate crime;

3. I understand that a law enforcement officer having probable cause to believe that 1 have violated a condition of my

release, may arrest me and bring me immediately before the court; 4. I understand that failure to appear when required by this court is a crime punishable by up to five (5) years in the

state penitentiary;

5. I agree to notify the clerk of court of any change of address, telephone, or employment; and

6, [ have 0' w;[[ ""Ive a oopy of thIs o,d" and w;[[ keep It w~~/Ida

Dated: _

Address:

STEVENS COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 215 S. Oak Street, Room 114

Colville, WA 99J 14 RULE 3.2 HEARING ORDER CONDITIONS OF RELEASE - 3 (509) 684-7500 fax (509) 684-7589

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

10

II

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON APR 1 6 2015

DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STEVENS STEVENS COUNTY, WA

No.5Z0133878 Plaintiff,

IZJ CITY/TOWN OF CHEWELAH MOTION AND ORDER

~ DISMISSING CHARGE(S) vs. [Z] DISMISSING 3.2 CONDITIONS ,

o DISMISSING DV NO-CONTACT ORDER o DISMISSING AH NO-CONTACT ORDER

CONNIE LARUE, a/k/a Connie LaRue o EXONERATING OF BAIL Defendant o DISMISSING DEFERRED SENTENCE

o DISMISSING DEFERRED PROSECUTION The [gJ Plaintiff 0 Defendant 0 Court moved for and the court finds good cause to

IZJ Dismiss the Charge(s) of Refusal to Give Information to or Cooperate with Officer [gJ Dismiss the Conditions of release set forth in the Rule 3.2 Hearing Order D Dismiss the Domestic Violence No-Contact Order D Dismiss the Anti-harassment No-Contact Order D Exonerate the Bail posted D Dismiss the Deferred Sentence ..J .. ) :.' D Dismiss the Deferred Prosecution . .

For the following reason(s): Pending Further ReVIew and Determination RE: Venue/Jurisdiction

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that: [gJ The charge(s) are dismissed D with prejudice ~ without prejudice IZJ All conditions of release entered in the Rule 3.2 Hearing Order, and any modifications or

supplements thereto, are hereby dismissed. o The Domestic Violence No-Contact Order is hereby dismissed o The Anti-Harassment No-Contact Order is hereby dismissed o Any bail/bond posted herein shaJ.1 be exonerated. o The finding of guilt is withdrawn and the cause is dismissed with prejudice. D The deferred prosecution herein is terminated and the charge(s) of _ = against the Defendant is dismissed with prejudice

D The Defendant forfeits any property interests in any evidence seized. DATED this \G~ day of April, 2015.

. ; I ..l . / DefendantlDefe'ndant's Attorney


Colville, WA 99114 (509) 684-7500 fax (509) 684-7589

Reviewedc:nd"A

EXHIBIT 9

--------------

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

/1

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

/9

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE DISTRlCT COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGT~~R. J 6 2015 TN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STEVENS ;'" DI~,! /--:ICT COURT

STEVEN;:; COUNTY, WA No. 520133879

Plaintiff, cg] CITY/TOWN OF CHEWELAH

MOTION AND ORDER ~ DISMISSING CHARGE(S)

vs. o DISMISSING 3.2 CONDITIONS o DISMISSING DV NO-CONTACT ORDER o DISMISSING AH NO-CONTACT ORDER

CONNIE LARUE, a/k/a Connie LaRue D EXONERATING OF BAIL Defendant D DISMISSING DEFERRED SENTENCE

D DISMISSING DEFERRED PROSECUTION The ~ Plaintiff 0 Defendant D Court moved for and the court finds good cause to

k8J Dismiss the Charge(s) of Failure to Yield Right of Way to an Authorized Emergency Vehicle and Failure to Renew Expired Vehicle License Less than two (2) Months Old

o Dismiss the Conditions of release set forth in the Rule 3.2 Hearing Order o Dismiss the Domestic Violence No-Contact Order o Dismiss the Anti-harassment No-Contact Order o Exonerate the Bail posted

D Dismiss the Deferred Sentence D Dismiss the Deferred Prosecution . .

For the following reason(s): Pending FurtherReview and Determination RE: Venue/Jurisdiction

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that: [gJ The charge(s) are dismissed D with prejudice k8J without prejudice 0 All conditions ofreJease entered in the Rule 3.2 Hearing Order, and any modifications or

supplements thereto, are hereby dismissed. D The Domestic Violence No-Contact Order is hereby dismissed D The Anti-Harassment No-Contact Order is hereby dismissed o Any baillbond posted herein shaJJbe exonerated. o The finding of guilt is withdrawn and the cause is dismissed with prejudice.D The deferred prosecution herein is terminated and the charge(s) of= against the Defendant is dismissed with prejudice o The Defendant forfeits any property interests in any evidence seized. DATED this l~-t' day of April, 2015. . ~O

Judge/~ !pr-a-\cff\

# 44789

Reviewed and Approved br//7 (. ./ ~ ZG/ZEJ

ant's Attorney Jessica L. Taylor, WSB 36248/ Deputy Prosecuting Attorney


Colville, WA 99114 (509) 684-7500 fax (509) 684-7589

-------

-------

0RI COPy STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT GINAL FILED

215 S OAK ROOM 213 MAY 0520'5 DfSTR ICOLVILLE, WA 99114 STEVEN fCT CaUR

BUSN: 509-684-5249 FAX: 509-684-7571 TTY: 800-833-6388 I S COUNTY, "c"4

NOTIFICATION OF INFRACTION Date Mailed: 4/24/2015

Name/Address NAY 0 t~ ?n- rCase No.: P7944 I v ._'J:]Connie LaRue 1045 Kitt Narcisse Rd Amount Due: $1,062.00 . STEVENS CCJUNTY

'JHOr'>Er'lJT' ' -'Date Due: 5/9/2015 i ,. ::-> oJ. hG .6,'IORrJE'(Colville, WA 99114

A notice of traffic infraction has been issued to you by a law enforcement officer and filed with this court.

To respond you must check one of the boxes below, sign your name, and return this form to the ,court by 5/9/2015

1. 0 I choose to pay the penalty and have enclosed full payment in the amount of $ 1,062.00

2. 0 J request a hearing to explain the circumstances. If you agree that you committed the infraction but would like to explain the circumstances, the court will notify you, in writing, of the hearing date. You may not require witnesses to appear at the hearing, but they may attend voluntarily.

3. 0 I request a hearing to contest this infraction. If you believe you did not commit the infraction, you may request a hearing, At the hearing, the state/city must prove by a preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not) that you committed the infraction. You may require witnesses, including the officer who issued the notice, to appear at this hearing. The court will notify you, in writing, of the,bearing date and how to request that t"'itnesses be present. ' \. (' ~. 'Sa ~ No:t:1.tL cA In.\e\.\ .\0 J\.pr'.M ~ -\-k was\.\;I-.~teN\. S~le.:rt\.e c.o~ -\u( a If you do not respond by 5/9/2015 , the court m\ist add an additional penalty of $52.00 to the original ! bail. In addition, your driving priviledge may be suspended until you have paid all the penalties ~equired ~ bylaw. ~'i~~()"""' l0".~ ,,~ WO~tA-tO"V\.J~~~ ot~ ~h.e~ 0.-a~

, D"'I'ae.~ Rt-ul 1- \ \., .~

STATE OF WASHINGTON

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING PO Box 9030. Olympia, Washington 98501-9030

06/09/2015 Notice of Suspension CERTIFIED

ABFf LA RUE,CONNIE 1045 KilT NARCISSE RD COLVILLE WA 99114-9711 . Lie. # LARUEC*527LO

On 07/24/2015 at 12:01 a.m. we will suspend your driving privilege because you failed to respond, appear, pay, or comply with the terms of the citation below:

Citation number Violation date Reason for Citation P00007944 02/0212015 Fail To Yield-Emgy Veh

What do I have to do? 1. Use the contact information below to find out how to take care of this citation:

Stevens Co Dist Ct District Court 215 SOUTH OAK Colville WA 99114-2861 (509)684-524.9

2. Don't wait until the last minute. We must receive and process proof that this citation has been resolved prior to your suspension date. Processing can take 7-10 business days from the date we receive it. Ask the court to notify us as soon as this matter is resolved.

Will DOL notify my state of record? Washington State will notify your state licensing department about this Washington suspension. It is your responsibility to check with your state of record.

What happens if I don't resolve it? Your driving privilege will be suspended and any Washington driver license or permit, including occupational (ORL) or ignition interlock licenses (IlL), will not be valid. Your license must be returned to Department of Licensing, PO Box 9030, Olympia, WA 98507-9030. You will be charged a nonrefundable reissue fee, along with other applicable fees, to get your license back.

What other options are available? You can contest this action by returning the enclosed form or a written request postmarked within 15 days from the date of this notice.

We suggest that you always check the status of your driving privilege before you drive. Find out more at www.dol.wa.gov or by calling Customer Service at 360-902-3900.

Driver Records Authority: RCW 46.20.289

The Department a/Licensing certifies that this document was mailed via US post office on 0610912015 to the person named herein at the address shown, which is the last address a/record with the Department.

We are committed to providing equal access to our services. Ifyou need accommodation, please call 360-902-3900 or TTY 360-664-0116.

52987085

EXHIBIT 11

414785

STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT CO 215 S OAK ROOM 213

509-684-5249COLVILLE WA 99114

JuneS 2015

RE, FAIL TO YIELD TO EMERGENC CONNIE LARUE Case Number: P00007944 SCS IT 1045 Kitt Narcisse Rd Violation Date: 06-05- 15 Colville WA 99114-9711 Balance Due: $ I I 14.00

DELINQUENCY NOTICE

YOU MUST PAY IN FULL WITHIN 30 DAYS OF MAILING.

Your account balance is past due and needs your immediate attention. Ifpayment in full is not received within 30 days, your account will be assigned to Armada Corp. and may be reported on your credit bureau files. In addition, a collection fee will be assessed pursuant to the provisions ofRCW 19.16.500. Depending on your balance, the additional costs may range from 40% to 100% of the current amount due.

Please remit the full amount owing. Ifyou have any questions regarding your balance you may call 509-684-5249.

It is suggested that you pay with cashier's check or money order as payment by personal check may cause delays in processing/resolution of this account. Do not send cash.

USTED DEBE DE PAGAR LA DEUDA ENTERA DENTRO DE 30 DIAS DEPUES DE QUE RECIBAN ESTA CARTA.

Su saldo de cuenta esta sobre pasada y necesita su atenci n inmediata. Si el pago no es recibido dentro de 30 d as, su cuenta ser asignada a Armada Corp. Y puedemos informales a sus archivos de la oficina del cr dito. Adem s, un honorario de colecci n sera argregara de acuerdo con la ley de RCW 19.16.500. Dependiendo con su balance, los costos adicionales pueden recorrer de 40% a 100% de la cantidad actual debida.

Remita por favor la cantidad que debe. Nota: Si usted ya tiene un plan de pagos en existencia este nueva multa NO es incluida. Si usted tiene cualquier pregunta sobre su cuenta 0 sobre su balance por favor de llamar al 509-684-5249. Gracias.

Se Ie sugiere que page por cheque bancario 0 money order por la razon que cheques personales pueden causar retrasos sobre el procesos y resolucion en su cuenta. Por favor no manden dinero en efectivo por coreo.

427-HWARMA01-252-1/06/10

*** Please detach the lower portion and return with your payment -k*,.

Y18C5FBCD8

111111111111 11111111111 11111111111111111111 ""1111111111111 PO Box 505 Linden MI 48451-0505 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED

Case #: Balance Due:

P00007944 SCS IT $1114.00

June 5 2015

II, ,'II I, I' 11'1 II 111 11 I' 'II II II'" I II II, 'I 'II, I', ,"I" 111111 0008120024016525855799114971145-1YA1-Y18C5FBC08427 252 - 427

STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COCONNIE LARUE 215 S OAK ROOM 213 1045 Kitt Narcisse Rd COLVILLE WA 99114Colville WA 991 14-9711

EXHIBIT 12

07hCertified Fee Certified Fee r-'l 05 Postmark05 Postmark r-'l o Retum Receipt Fee o Retum Receipt Fee Hereo (Endorsement Required) Here ~ (Endorsement Required) ~--I~r-----io ~-----l~---J

Restricted Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee o (Endorsement Required) o (Endorsement Required) I---ti-~----i o ~----'l+-,",,""--J 071231201507123/2015 o U1 Total POSI'~-"-":"-'....LlI~---------'------------, U1 Total Post:a-'--"--":......~"'--------------'-------

Postage $ $3 ~ 5 0714 $3.~5Postage $1-------------1

USE

rn Sent To State Of.Washington

: SentTo Office of di$~plinaryCounsel J~ -st-----t--Ap--CCommission on Judicial Conduct . _ -=t Washington State Bar Association .---o ree, o Street, Apt. l' ~:,~~_~~~ P.O. Box 1817 ' ~:_~~.~~! 1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite 600 .---C,ty,State City, State,.

Olympia, WA 98507 a-.II:L~S:ea::t:tl~e,~WA98101-2539 .

7/28/2015 USPS.com - USPS Tracking

https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?qtc_tLabels1=70113500000186255608 1/2

USPS TrackingCustomer Service

Have questions? We're here to help.

Get Easy Tracking Updates

Sign up for My USPS.

Track It

Track all your packages from a dashboard.

No tracking numbers necessary.

Manage Incoming Packages

Sign up for My USPS

Postal Product:

Priority Mail 2-Day Certified Mail Up to $50 insurance includedRestrictions Apply

Features:

Product & Tracking Information

DATE & TIME STATUS OF ITEM LOCATION

July 27, 2015 , 12:21 pm Delivered OLYMPIA, WA 98501

Your item was delivered at 12:21 pm on July 27, 2015 in OLYMPIA, WA 98501.

July 25, 2015 , 9:27 am Available for Pickup OLYMPIA, WA 98507

July 25, 2015 , 7:36 am Out for Delivery OLYMPIA, WA 98501

July 25, 2015 , 7:26 am Sorting Complete OLYMPIA, WA 98501

July 25, 2015 , 4:46 am Arrived at Unit OLYMPIA, WA 98501

July 25, 2015 , 2:15 am Departed USPS Facility FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003

July 24, 2015 , 6:24 pmArrived at USPS OriginFacility

FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003

July 24, 2015 , 4:15 am Departed USPS Facility SPOKANE, WA 99224

July 23, 2015 , 8:37 pmArrived at USPS OriginFacility

SPOKANE, WA 99224

July 23, 2015 , 5:05 pm Departed Post Office COLVILLE, WA 99114

July 23, 2015 , 3:12 pm Acceptance COLVILLE, WA 99114

Available Actions

Text Updates

Email Updates

Tracking Number: 70113500000186255608

Track Another PackageTracking (or receipt) number

Customer Serv ice USPS MobileEnglish Register / Sign In

Documents

Tveit Complaint Disbarment/Prosecution WSBA and Commission on Judicial Conduct