Upload
dodat
View
219
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Simulation-based study on turbocharging dual-fuel engines Paper no. 187
C. Christen, D. Brand, CIMAC 2013
GAS MODE
Low NOx emission
NOx Level < IMO Tier 3
Dual-fuel enginesAs a solution for IMO Tier III
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 2
GAS or DIESEL MODE
Regular NOx emission
NOx Level < IMO Tier 2
pric
e4lim
o.co
m/im
ages
sc
ienc
ewor
ld-
front
iers
.blo
gspo
t.com
Dual-fuel enginesEstablished engine technology
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 3
Moderate power density
Single stage turbocharging
Low compression ratio
Constant speed or CPP operation
Micro pilot spray ignition
img.
naut
icex
po.c
om
Dual-fuel enginesDevelopment targets: Fuel efficiency and power density
Increased pmax /imep
Increased CR
Miller cycle
Improved closed cycle efficiency
Reduced gas exchange losses
Improved turbocharger efficiency
Fuel-efficient control device
Miller cycle
Lean burn combustion
Extending knock limit to allow for higher bmep
POWER DENSITY
FUEL EFFICIENCY
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 4
T no
t bur
ned
Pressure
Dual-fuel engine process design challengesPilot spray ignition vs. knocking combustion
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 5
Cyl
inde
rsta
te
Crank angle
Not burned
Temperature
Pressure
Burned
Risk of engine knocking
Risk ofunrealiableignition
T no
t bur
ned
Pressure
Dual-fuel engine process design challengesPilot spray ignition vs. knocking combustion
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 6
bmep CR
MillerIgnition Timing
PARAMETER KNOCK IGNITION
BMEP
CR
MILLER
IGNITION TIMING
- +- ++ -
+ +
Risk ofunrealiableignition
Risk of engine knocking
Optimal combination high bmep high efficiency
Boundary conditions / limitations
Max. cylinder pressure pmax Below limit pmax = 220 bar
Turbine inlet temperature TTI Below limit TTI = 530 °C (HFO mode)
Pilot spray ignition delay Below threshold value
Knock integral Below calibrated value
Air fuel ratio V Constant (gas), above limit (diesel)
Cycle optimization simulation resultsCombined result of diesel and gas engine operation
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 7
Engi
ne E
ffici
ency
+ M
ot[%
]
Compression ratio [-]
xxx
20
22
24
26
28
bmep [bar]
1% point
2
1% point
Establisheddual-fueltechnology
Case studybmep = 26 bar
Cha
rge
air p
ress
ure
Compression ratio [-]
Cycle optimization simulation resultsHigh compression ratio calls for strong Miller effect
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 8
Sing
le-s
tage
Two-
stag
e
2
Establisheddual-fueltechnology
Case study
Cyl
inde
rpre
ssur
e
V / VD [-]
Engine cycle optimization in gas modeImproving gas exchange
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 9
Increased turbochargingefficiency
VVT control
EWG control
Throttle control+
+
-
Power2
High charge air pressure for strong Miller timing
High turbocharging efficiency
Air managmentABB’s contribution for optimized engine process
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 10
VCM
Fuel efficient air/fuel ratio control device
Flexible Miller timing
Power2
High charge air pressure for strong Miller timing
High turbocharging efficiency for improved fuel efficiency
Paper no. 134
Paper no. 389
Case studySimulation setup and boundary conditions
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 11
Simulation Case Bmep CR Turbocharging
systemBore
V
control
Reference 20 bar Ref. single-stage Ref. EWG
VCM 26 bar +4 two-stage -6% VCM
Boundary conditions / limitations
Max. cylinder pressure pmax Below limit pmax = 220 bar
Turbine inlet temperature TTI Below limit TTI = 530 °C (HFO mode)
Pilot spray ignition delay Below threshold value
Knock integral Below calibrated value
Air fuel ratio V Constant (gas), above limit (diesel)
Rated engine power ≈ 5 MW
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
bsfc
[g/k
Wh]
Engine load [-]
Case study results CONSTANT SPEEDbsfc against reference
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 12
Reduction of brake-specific fuel consumption
14 to 20 g/kWh
Increased potential in gas mode at engine part load withskip firing enabled by VCM
GAS MODE DIESEL MODE
skip firing0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
bsfc
[g/k
Wh]
Engine load [-]
10 g/kWh
Reference Reference
Case study results FPPbsfc against reference
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 13
Reduction of brake-specific fuel consumption in FPP mode
15 to 20 g/kWh
GAS MODE DIESEL MODE
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
bsfc
[g/k
Wh]
Engine load [-]0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
bsfc
[g/k
Wh]
Engine load [-]
10 g/kWhReference
Reference
Conclusions
Potential for dual-fuel engines according to simulation
Power2 and VCM as a package allow for a step-change in fuel efficiency and power density
VCM enables FPP operation on dual-fuel engines
Paper no. 187
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 14
Paper no. 134
Paper no. 389
感谢您的关注
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 15
Thank You for Your Attention
Engine cycle optimizationAir path loss reduction
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 17
Compressor Throttle Cylinder
Receiver ExhaustIntake
Pres
sure
pEngine
pEngine,VCM
IncreasedMiller Effect
Open Throttle
pTIincreased turbocharging efficiency
pTI
Engine cycle optimization
Increase of TC system efficiency due to intercooling
Two-stage turbocharging efficiency improvement
© ABB GroupNovember 26, 2013 | Slide 18
1.00
1.05
1.10
1.15
1.20
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
tw
o-st
age
/ si
ngle
-sta
ge[-]
Compression ratio tot [-]
2st / 1st TAmb = 25 °CTIC = 60 °C
Example
Single-stage:
s,C = 82%
Two-stage:
tot = 6-8
s,C,eq >= 90%
Case study
© ABB Group November 26, 2013 | Slide 19
ABB’s Valve Control Management VCMPrototype Testing
VCM has been tested on a medium speed engine
Functionality and mechanical integrity have been proved
Endurance tests have been carried out
> 1000 running hours on mechanical test rig
> 300 running hours on fired engine
The prototype demonstrated maturity for industrial application
VCM prototype module allowing for variability on both intake and exhaust valves
VCM prototype module mounted on small medium speed engine
© ABB Group November 26, 2013 | Slide 20
ABB’s Valve Control Management VCMWorking Principle
Full valve lift mode
Control valve stays closed
Synchronous movement of valves and camshaft
Crank Angle
Valv
e Li
ft
© ABB Group November 26, 2013 | Slide 21
Crank Angle
Valv
e Li
ft
ABB’s Valve Control Management VCMWorking Principle
Early valve closure mode
Control device opens during valve lift period
Valve closes irrespective of camshaft position and the pressure accumulator is charged
As the camshaft is reduced, the pressure accumulator passes its spring energy onto the camshaft
© ABB Group November 26, 2013 | Slide 22
Power Control of Premix Gas EnginesValve Control Management VCM
Crank Angle
Valv
e Li
ft
a) Full lift
b) Early valve closure
c) Late valve opening with reduced lift
d) Double valve lift
e) Zero lift
ba
c
d