Upload
agapeto-mancera
View
221
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Tratamiento en Cáncer de Próstata en progresión con
niveles de castración de testosterona (CPRC)
Dr Pablo MarotoHospital de Sant Pau
Abbreviation: LHRH=luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone.
Natural History of Prostate Cancer
• Typical presentation of patients as they move through the different stages. The line represents level burden of disease. Time is not proportional
Under the care of ONCOLOGISTUnder the care of ONCOLOGIST
Castration Sensitive
Asymptomatic
Non Metastatic
Castration Resistant
Metastatic
Symptomatic
Local Therapy
Androgen Deprivation
Therapies After LHRH Agonists and Antiandrogen
Chemotherapy
Post Chemo
Death
RANDOMISE
Mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2
Prednisone 10 mg q dayQ 21 days up to 10 cycles
Docetaxel 75 mg/m2
Prednisone 10 mg q dayQ 21 days up to 10 cycles
Docetaxel 30 mg/m2/wkPrednisone 10 mg q day5 on; 1 off x 6 cycles
N = 1,006
TAX 327
SWOG 9916 Mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2
Prednisone 5 mg bidQ 21 days
Docetaxel 60 mg/m2 D2Estramustine 280 mg D1–5a
Dexamethasone 20 mg, tid D1–2
N = 770
aWarfarin and aspirin.SWOG = Southwest Oncology Group.
Tannock et al, 2004; Petrylak et al, 2004.
Phase III Docetaxel Studies in CRPC
Demonstrating Survival Benefit
RANDOMISE
Opciones de tratamiento en CPRC en segunda línea
• Prevención de EREs
• Segundas líneas hormonales– Abiraterona– Enzalutamida
• Quimioterapia: Cabazitaxel
• Con enfermedad predominantemente ósea
– Radioisótopos: Radium 223
RANKL: Mediador en el “Círculo Vicioso” de destrucción ósea de RANKL: Mediador en el “Círculo Vicioso” de destrucción ósea de la metástasisla metástasis
PTHrP, BMP,TGF-β, IGF, FGF,VEGF, ET1, WNT
Osteoblasts
Activated Osteoclast
PDGF, BMPsTGF-β, IGFs
FGFs
Adapted from Roodman D. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1655.
RANKL
RANKTumor
Cell
Denosumab interrumpiría el “Círculo Vicioso”Denosumab interrumpiría el “Círculo Vicioso”
PDGF, BMPsPDGF, BMPsTGF-β, IGFsTGF-β, IGFs
FGFsFGFs
OsteoblastsOsteoblasts
RANKLRANKL
RANKRANK
DenosumabDenosumabTumor Tumor CellCell
FormationFormationInhibitedInhibited
Apoptotic Apoptotic OsteoclastOsteoclast
PTHrP, BMP,PTHrP, BMP,TGF-β, IGF, FGF,TGF-β, IGF, FGF,VEGF, ET1, WNTVEGF, ET1, WNT
Adapted from Roodman D. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1655.
Study Design: Study Design: International, Randomized, Double-International, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled StudyBlind, Active-Controlled Study
Zoledronic acid 4 mg IV* and Placebo SC every 4 weeks (N = 951)
Denosumab 120 mg SC and Placebo IV* every 4 weeks (N = 950)
Key Inclusion•Hormone-refractory (castration resistant) prostate cancer and bone metastases
Key Exclusion•Current or prior IV bisphosphonate treatment
*Per protocol and Zometa® label, IV product dose adjusted for baseline creatinine clearance and subsequent dose intervals determined by serum creatinine.
No SC dose adjustments made due to increased serum creatinine.
• Calcium and Vitamin D supplemented in both treatment groups• Accrual period from May 2006 to December 2008• Analysis cut-off date October 2009
Time to First and Subsequent On-Study SRE* Time to First and Subsequent On-Study SRE* (Multiple Event Analysis)(Multiple Event Analysis)
*Events occurring at least 21 days apart
Rate Ratio = 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.94)
Month
0.0
2.0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Cum
ula
tive M
ean N
um
ber
of
SR
Es
per
Pati
ent
30 33 36
0.2
0.6
1.0
1.4
1.8
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
18%18%
Risk Reduction
Denosumab Zoledronic acid 584
494
Events
P = 0.008
TROPIC: Cabazitaxel vs MitoxantroneTROPIC: Cabazitaxel vs Mitoxantrone
Primary endpoint: OSSecondary endpoints: Progression-freesurvival (PFS), response rate, and safety
Inclusion: Patients with measurable disease must have progressed by RECIST; otherwise must have had new lesions or PSA progression
cabazitaxel 25 mg/m²cabazitaxel 25 mg/m² q 3 wk + prednisone* for 10 cycles
(n=378)
mitoxantrone 12 mg/m²mitoxantrone 12 mg/m² q 3 wk+ prednisone* for 10 cycles
(n=377)
*Oral prednisone/prednisolone: 10 mg daily.
Stratification factorsECOG PS (0, 1 vs. 2) • Measurable vs. non-measurable disease
mCRPC patients who progressed during and after treatment with a docetaxel-
based regimen (N=755)
¿Es importante una
rama control con
mitoxantrone?
Primary Endpoint: Overall Survival (ITT Analysis)
28
11
4
1
231
188
90
67300377 MP
321378 CBZP
Numberat risk
Proportionof OS (%)
80
60
40
20
0
100
0 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months 30 months
15.112.7
Median OS (months)
0.59–0.8395% CI
<.0001P-value
0.70Hazard Ratio
CBZPMP
11
FactorHazard ratio
(95% CI)
f a v o r s C B Z P | f a v o r s
M P
All patients 0.70 (0.59–0.83)
ECOG status: 0,1 0.68 (0.57–0.82)
ECOG status: 2 0.81 (0.48–1.38)
Measurable disease: No 0.72 (0.55–0.93)
Measurable disease: Yes 0.68 (0.54–0.85)
No. of prior chemo: 1 0.67 (0.55–0.83)
No. of prior chemo: ≥2 0.75 (0.55–1.02)
Age: <65 0.81 (0.61–1.08)
Age: ≥65 0.62 (0.50–0.78)
Rising PSA: No 0.88 (0.61–1.26)
Rising PSA: Yes 0.65 (0.53–0.80)
Total docetaxel dose: <225 mg/m² 0.96 (0.49–1.86)
Total docetaxel dose: ≥225 to 450 mg/m² 0.60 (0.43–0.84)
Total docetaxel dose: ≥450 to 675 mg/m² 0.83 (0.60–1.16)
Total docetaxel dose: ≥675 to 900 mg/m² 0.73 (0.48–1.10)
Total docetaxel dose: ≥900 mg/m² 0.51 (0.33–0.79)
Progression: During last docetaxel treatment
0.65 (0.47–0.90)
Progression: <3 months since last docetaxel dose
0.70 (0.55–0.91)
Progression: ≥3 months since last docetaxel dose
0.75 (0.51–1.11)0 1 20.5 1.5
0 1 20.5 1.5
Most Frequent Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent AEs*Safety Population
1.934.20.322.9Nausea
1.922.6010.2Vomiting
1.916.70.53.8Hematuria
57.495.739.488.4Any adverse event
1.911.603.5Abdominal pain
3.816.2312.1Back pain
4.620.52.412.4Asthenia
Grade ≥3 (%)Grade ≥3 (%) All grades (%)All grades (%)
36.7
46.6
7.5
CBZP (n=371)
4.9
6.2
7.5
3
0.3
1.3
27.5Fatigue
10.5Diarrhea
1.3Febrile neutropenia
MP (n=371)
¿Cómo condiciona el tratamiento la toxicidad?
VOLUMEN 26, Nº28 2008VOLUMEN 26, Nº28 2008
Prostate Cancer: Moving Forward by Prostate Cancer: Moving Forward by Reinventing the Wheel ... But This Reinventing the Wheel ... But This
Time It Is RoundTime It Is Round
Resistance to castration: is there still a way to play with hormonal drugs
Scher H et al, J Clin Oncol 2005
1
4
3
2
ACTHLH
Brain
LHRH
Pituitary
LHRH analogues Antiandrogens
Prostate Cancer
Testosterone
Testis
AdrenalGland
ACTHLH
Brain
LHRH
Androgens
LHRH Analogue
Pituitary
Prostate Cancer
Testosterone
Testis
AdrenalGland
Androgens
Antiandrogen
AbirateroneAbiraterone: Inhibición síntesis teste, adrenal, ¿intratumoral?: Inhibición síntesis teste, adrenal, ¿intratumoral?
Prostate CancerProstate Cancer
TestosteroneTestosterone
TestisTestis AdrenalAdrenalGlandGland
ACTHACTHLHLH
BrainBrain
LHRHLHRH
AndrogensAndrogens
PituitaryPituitary
InhibitorInhibitor
Inhibitor?Inhibitor?
? De novo synthesis? De novo synthesis
RO
MW = 391.55
N
3β-Acetoxy-17-(3-pyridyl)androsta-5,16-diene
RO = AcO
CYP17 blockade inhibits androgen synthesisCYP17 blockade inhibits androgen synthesis
Ligand
1. AR Binding Affinity• DHT ~ 5nM• Bicalutamide ~160 nM• MDV3100 ~35 nM
2. Nuclear Import• DHT: ++++• Bicalutamide: ++++• MDV3100: ++
3. DNA Binding• DHT: ++++• Bicalutamide: ++• MDV3100: -
4. Coactivator recruitment• DHT: ++++• Bicalutamide: ++• MDV3100: -
The Effects of MDV3100 on the Androgen Receptor Are Distinct from Bicalutamide
1
2
3
4
DNA
POL II
HSP 9
0
LBD
HD
DBD
NTD
COU-AA-301: Fase III post-quimioterapia
Fase III, multicéntrico, aleatorizado, doble ciego, para estudiar los beneficios clínicos de abiraterona junto a prednisona, en pacientes con cáncer de próstata metastásico que han progresado tras uno o dos regímenes de quimioterapia.
Abiraterona 1000 mg/díaPrednisona 10 mg/día
N=797
Objetivo principal
•OS
Objetivos secundarios
•TTPP
•rPFS
•Respuesta PSA
PlaceboPrednisona 10 mg/día
N=398ALEA
TO
RIZ
AC
IÓN
2:1
•N=1195
•1 o 2 regímenes de QT previa, uno de ellos docetaxel
Pacientes
Gráfico extraído de: de Bono, J.S. et al. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastasic prostate cancer. NEJM: 2011;364(21):1995-2005.
¿Influye en la decisión de tratar
la necesidad de prednisona?
¿Metástasis viscerales también?
¿Tiene importancia
la respuesta por PSA?
TRATAMIENTO
6 injections at 4-week intervals
Radium-223 (50 kBq/kg) + Best standard of care
Placebo (saline) + Best standard of care
RAND
OMISED
2:1
N = 922
PACIENTES
• Confirmed symptomatic CRPC
• ≥ 2 bone metastases
• No known visceral metastases
• Post-docetaxel or unfit for docetaxel
Diseño del estudio ALSYMPCA
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00699751.
• Total ALP: < 220 U/L vs ≥ 220 U/L• Bisphosphonate use: Yes vs No• Prior docetaxel: Yes vs No
ESTRATIFICACIÓN
Planned follow-up is 3 years
Month 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Radium- 223
541 450 330 213 120 72 30 15 3 0
Placebo 268 218 147 89 49 28 15 7 3 0
ALSYMPCA: Supervivencia Global
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
%Radium-223, n = 541Median OS: 14.0 months
Placebo, n = 268Median OS: 11.2 months
HR 0.695; 95% CI, 0.552-0.875P = 0.00185
Month 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21
Radium-223
541 379 214 111 51 22 6 0
Placebo 268 159 74 30 15 7 2 0
ALSYMPCA: Tiempo al primer SRE
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% W
ith
ou
t S
RE
HR 0.610; 95% CI, 0.461-0.807 P = 0.00046
Radium-223, n = 541Median: 13.6 months
Placebo, n = 268Median: 8.4 months
ALSYMPCA: Efectos adversos de interés
All Grades Grades 3 or 4
Radium-223 n (%)
Placebon (%)
Radium-223 n (%)
Placebon (%)
Haematologic
Anaemia 136 (27) 69 (27) 54 (11) 29 (12)
Neutropenia 20 (4) 2 (1) 9 (2) 2 (1)
Thrombocytopenia
42 (8) 14 (6) 22 (4) 4 (2)
Non-Haematologic
Bone pain 217 (43) 147 (58) 89 (18) 59 (23)
Diarrhoea 112 (22) 34 (13) 6 (1) 3 (1)
Nausea 174 (34) 80 (32) 8 (2) 4 (2)
Vomiting 88 (17) 32 (13) 10 (2) 6 (2)
Constipation 89 (18) 46 (18) 6 (1) 2 (1)
Resumen: Resultados Ensayos fase III en CPRC
Agent (trial, year) Disease State Comparator Hazard Ratio P value
Radium-223(ALSYMPCA 2011)
Symptomatic Bonemetastases
Placebo 0.695 0.00185
Docetaxel1(TAX327 2004) Chemo-naive Mitoxantrone
Prednisone 0.76 0.009
Cabazitaxel2(TROPIC 2010) Post-docetaxel Mitoxantrone
Prednisone 0.70 <0.0001
Enzalutamide3
(AFFIRM 2012)Post-Docetaxel Placebo 0.63 0.0001
Abiraterone4
(COU-AA-301 2010) Post-docetaxel Placebo Prednisone 0.65 <0.001
No hay criterios definitorios para recomendar un tratamiento para un
paciente dado
¿Seguro?
PMR: 60 a. ECOG 0. Gleason 9. Respuesta hormona previa <12 m. Metástasis hepáticas. PSA de 19. Respuesta docetaxel intervalo 2 meses sin toxicidades relevantes
JMR: 70 a. ECOG 0. Gleason 7. Respuesta hormona previa 19 m.
Metástasis Óseas. PSA de 198. Respuesta docetaxel intervalo 4
meses
Definir un algoritmo similar
para hormonoterapia de rescate
GRACIAS