Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Transforming your IT Infrastructure for
Improved ROI October 2013
1
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Legal Notices
This presentation is for informational purposes only. INTEL MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN THIS SUMMARY.
Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products.
For more complete information about performance and benchmark results, visit www.intel.com/benchmarks
Intel, the Intel logo, and Xeon are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and other.
* Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
2
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Intel IT Data Center Transformation
Strategy
3
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Vision: Run Intel data center service like a factory and apply breakthrough
technologies, solutions and processes to achieve industry leadership
Data Center Transformation Strategy
Build on practices established over the last decade. Improve the quality, velocity, and efficiency of data center services
4
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Intel Data Center and Infrastructure Profile
5
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Intel has five major functions (DOMES) driving DC requirements
Silicon Design Computing
• Chip Design & tapeout function
• HPC, Grid Computing
Office General Purpose
• Typical IT and internal customer services
Examples: email, collaboration tools
Manufacturing FAB/ATM
• Manufacturing computing that supports fabrication and assembly
Enterprise
• Enterprise applications supporting eBiz and ERP
D
O
M
E Services S
• External facing applications
Example: Intel® AppUp®
Diverse data center infrastructure capabilities support DOMES
Intel Data Center Profile
6
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Intel IT Data Center Infrastructure Trends
7
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
56 48 45 39
20 29
40
53
69
93
124
27 31 38
45
61
82
107
11 15
21
32
43
58
79
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Y2009 Y2010 Y2011 Y2012 Y2013 Y2014 Y2015
Compute Servers (K)
EDA MIPS (10K)
Cores (10K)
Storage Raw (PB)
Intel Design Data Center Capacity Silicon design compute and storage demand vs utilization
8
EDA-MIPS – Electronic Design Automation Meaningful Indicator of Performance per System
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
2013 (plan) 2012
Design Data Center Spend and Capacity Trends
Faster server refresh rate gets data center facilities cost down
2010 2011
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
2010 2011 2012 2013 (plan)
Design - Total Spends
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2010 2011 2012 2013 (plan)
Design - Total Environment Units Growth
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2010 2011 2012 2013 (plan)
Design – Cost Per Unit (lower is better)
Head Count (BB+GB)
17%
Facilities 35% Server
25%
OS+mgmt 2%
Storage & BaR 14%
Network 7% Head Count
(BB+GB) 17%
Facilities 36% Server
21%
OS+mgmt 2%
Storage & BaR 16%
Network 8%
Head Count (BB+GB)
20%
Facilities 33%
Server 23%
OS+mgmt 2%
Storage & BaR 13%
Network 9%
Head Count (BB+GB)
22%
Facilities 30% Server
25%
OS+mgmt 2%
Storage & BaR 13%
Network 8%
100% 100%
102%
95% 100%
136%
183%
239% 100%
74%
56%
40%
9
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Notes External pricing is based on volume list price; Minimum required internal IT heads to support external cloud is included; Full technical feasibility of ability to use External not done.; Overall MOR data jointly developed with Finance; External data to be reviewed with Finance
Large internal Design DC is Cost Competitive with External Cloud
External Comparison for Design DC Total and unit cost comparison
100%
186%
74%
121%
56% 62%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
Design Internal
2010 Costs
Design External
2010 Estimated
Design Internal
2011 Costs
Design External
2011 Estimated
Design Internal
2012 Costs
Design External
2012 Estimated
26% Reduction
25% Reduction
35% Reduction
49% Reduction
2010 Costs 2011 Costs 2012 Costs
10
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Intel Enterprise Data Center Capacity
6,256 5,746 4,601 3,895 3,524 3,224 2,924
7,684
9,977
13,014
16,103
19,807
24,362
29,966
6
7.5
10.5
11.8
14.8
18.4
23
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
Y2009 Y2010 Y2011 Y2012 Y2013 Y2014 Y2015
Sto
rag
e (
PB
)
Se
rve
r/O
S In
sta
nce
Co
un
t
Servers
Total OS Instances
Storage (PB)
11
Intel IT – Office/Enterprise compute and storage demand
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
2013 (plan) 2012 2010 2011
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
2010 2011 2012 2013
(plan)
Design - Total Spends
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
2010 2011 2012 2013
(plan)
Design - Total Environment Units Growth
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2010 2011 2012 2013
(plan)
Design – Cost Per Unit (lower is better)
Head Count (BB+GB)
35%
Facilities 21%
Server 7%
OS+mgmt 7%
Storage & BaR 16%
Network 14%
Head Count (BB+GB)
34%
Facilities 20%
Server 7%
OS+mgmt 8%
Storage & BaR 16%
Network 15%
Head Count (BB+GB)
30%
Facilities 18%
Server 7%
OS+mgmt 9%
Storage & BaR 12%
Network 24%
Head Count (BB+GB)
27%
Facilities 19%
Server 6%
OS+mgmt 10%
Storage & BaR 12%
Network 26%
100% 105% 107%
90%
100%
131% 162%
200%
100%
80% 66%
45%
Enterprise Data Center Spend & Capacity Trends
Delayed server refresh increased cost on network & storage
12
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Notes External pricing is based on volume list price; Minimum required internal IT heads to support external cloud is included; Full technical feasibility of ability to use External not done.; Overall MOR data jointly developed with Finance; External data to be reviewed with Finance
178%
100% 111%
142%
84% 92%
117%
58% 66%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
O+E Internal 2010
Costs
(Physical+Virtual)
O+E Internal 2010
Costs (Virtual)
O+E External
2010 Estimated
(Virtual)
O+E Internal 2011
Costs
(Physical+Virtual)
O+E Internal 2011
Costs (Virtual)
O+E External
2011 Estimated
(Virtual)
O+E Internal 2012
Costs
(Physical+Virtual)
O+E Internal 2012
Costs (Virtual)
O+E External
2012 Estimated
(Virtual)
31% Reduction
16% Reduction
17% Reduction
2010 Costs 2011 Costs 2012 Costs
Internal virtual offerings are in line with external cloud costs
External Comparison for O&E DC Total and unit cost comparison
29% Reduction
13
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Reducing Rack Cost through Converged
Infrastructure
14
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Converged infrastructure reduced network cost
Effect of Converged Infrastructure Infrastructure capital costs for virtualized environment (per host)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Rackmount
Server
Multiple GigE
Rackmount
Server 10GbE
Gen-1
Integrated
Appliance
Gen-2
Integrated
Appliance
Server
Ethernet/FC
Connectivity
65.5%
34.5%
65.5%
23.9%
56.5%
3.6%
53.4%
3.6%
39% Reduction
15
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Intel Tapeout HPC Case Study
16
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Intel IT Tapeout Compute Challenge
• Deliver 10x more computing
• Reduce tapeout from 25 days to 10 days
• Find greater than 128GB RAM servers
• Increase compute environment reliability
• Reduce capital spending by $20 Million
• Make it all happen in 11 months
17
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Delivered Scale & Increased Reliability
18
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Higher Density, Superior Performance, and
Lower Power
Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or
configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the
performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.
Dual-Core Intel® Xeon®
Processor 5150-based
servers
Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor
X5355-based servers
Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor
E5450-based servers
Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor
X5570-based servers
Six-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor
X5670-based servers
Servers 30 15 10 6 4
RAM per server
RAM per core
16 GB 4 GB
32 GB 4 GB
32 GB 4 GB
24 GB 3 GB
48 GB 4 GB
Total power consumed
9,360 Watts 6,450 Watts 3,200 Watts 2,250 Watts 1,532 Watts
Distributed OPC jobs
120 120 80 78 72
Time(mm:ss) 11:41 11:04 11:36 10:25 11:12
OPC – Optical Proximity Correction
10:57
Eight-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor
E5-2670-based servers
3
64 GB 4 GB
1,218 Watts
48
Intel® processor-based multi-core servers offer significant Data Center efficiency!
19
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Intel internal measurements May 2007, November 2007, February 2009, March 2010, February 2012
Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system
hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering
purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.
Intel® Architecture Delivering Consistent
Performance Improvement for OPC
1 1.34 2.98
5 6.6
11.39
16.73
25.99
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Xeon 1MB L2
(NCN 3.6)
Xeon 2MB L2
(IRW 3.8)
Xeon 5160
(WDC 3.0)
Xeon X5365
(CVT 3.0)
Xeon X5460
(HPT 3.16)
Xeon X5570
(NHM 2.93)
Xeon X5675
(WSM 3.06)
Xeon E5-2680
(SNB 2.7)
Intel architecture performance improvement for Optical Proximity Correction
Re
lati
ve
Th
rou
gh
pu
t
20
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Intel IT HPC Results Summary
HPC has offered significant business value to Intel silicon tapeout
• Met 13X increase in compute demand with 11x improvement in stability
• $44.72M net present value to Intel
21
HPC has improved Intel’s ability to bring newer chips to market more
quickly
• Reduced tapeout time from 25 days to 6 days (65nm to 45nm)
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
EDA Application Throughput Enhancer Intel SSD-Based ‘Fast Swap’ Compute Platform
22
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Intel SSD Enabling Core Over Subscription
1.33 1.22
1.37 1.29 1.30
1.37
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
Core Workload Uncore Workload FullChip Workload Core Workload Uncore Workload FullChip Workload
SLES10SP3 SLES11SP1
Throughput Gain with HT and Intel SSD
Base HT-SSD
As of September 2013, we have deployed more than 13,000 Intel SSDs for more than $10M in IT business value
SSDs deployed (Q4'12 -Q3'13) 13,319
Additional Server Capacity Gained 2,615
Net Power Saved in terms of servers 1,151
Total Data Center Rack avoidance 47
Total 10GbE port avoidance 94
23
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. 24
RTL Throughput gain with job slots increase
SNB Core workload with HT (32 Jobs – No Swap)
SNB Uncore workload with HT & SSD swap (Swap: Peak 62GB, Avg 43GB)
SNB Fullchip workload with SSD swap (Swap: Peak 86GB, Avg 59GB)
Gain is 29%-37% for RTL Simulation Throughput with SLES11-SP1
Gain is 22%-37% for RTL Simulation Throughput with SLES10-SP3
24
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
EDA Application Performance Enhancer Higher Clock 1S Intel Xeon-based Platform
25
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
2S vs 1S Server Rack Comparison
3x1S servers = 1x 2S server on throughput basis
2S vs 1S server comparison ratios: • Number of cores difference is 4:1
• Throughput difference is 3:1
• Cost difference is 3:1
Intel Xeon E3-1280v2 3.6GHz, 4-cores/8MB,
(TDP:69W) Supports 32GB memory & 4 drives
Cost, DC space, TPT near neutral - EDA license count, power, performance positive
26
SandyBridge-EP Blade-based 3-chassis Rack
IvyBridge-based 12-chassis Rack
Power Per Rack (KW) 17.14 15.14
Data Center Space 1 Rack 1 Rack
Number of Servers 48 144
Number of IA CPU Sockets 96 144
Number of IA Cores 768 576
Memory Per Core 8GB 8GB
EDA Licenses Need (%) 100% 75%
EDA Throughput Per RACK 100% 95%
EDA Performance 100% 127%
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Specifications, Performance, Throughput
Better performance, equal throughput with 25% Fewer Cores require 25% less number of EDA application licenses
Server Specifications
Components Intel Xeon E5-2670 (2.6GHz) Intel Xeon E3-1280v2 (3.6GHz)
Form Factor 16 Blades in 10U 12 SLED's in 3U
CPU 2 x 2.6GHz 1 x 3.6GHz
TDP 115W 69W
Cores Eight Quad
Memory 8GB x16, 128GB 8GB x 4, 32GB
L3 Cache 20MB Shared 8MB Shared
QPI Speed 8.0 GT/s Not Applicable
Max HD Supported and Type 2 x SAS Drives 4 x SATA Drives
Network 1GbE or 10GbE Shared 2 x 1GbE (front) per server
Runtime Summary
Workload
2S Xeon E5-2670
(2.6GHz/20M/115W/8C)
128GB
1S Xeon E3-1280v2
(3.6GHz/8M/69W/4C)
32GB
VCS Core - N++ (113 Tests) 16J/4J 3:06:05 9:45:46
VCS Uncore - N++ (111 Tests) 16J/4J 13:57:03 43:26:11
Raw Performance
VCS Core - N++ (113 Tests) 16J/4J 1.00 1.27
VCS Uncore - N++ (111 Tests) 16J/4J 1.00 1.28
Average (Higher is Better) 1.00 1.27
Throughput
VCS Core - N++ (113 Tests) 16J/4J 1.00 0.32
VCS Uncore - N++ (111 Tests) 16J/4J 1.00 0.32
Average (Higher is Better) 1.00 0.32
27
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Intel IT Data Center Facility Consolidation
28
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Intel DC space, power and cooling distribution
Power & C ooling C apacity
Power (MW ) 52.18
C ooling (MW ) 57.40
Data center consolidation to optimally meet business demand
Segment Space (Sqft) DC# Space (Sqft) DC#
Design 211,474 26 162,570 22
Manufacturing 124,863 29 124,863 29
OES 64,620 9 62,907 8
Mixed 18,320 4 18,320 4
Grand Total 419,277 68 368,660 63
EOY 2012 EOY 2013 (Planned)
Fewer data centers meeting compute demand
Data Center Facility Reduction
29
100% 97% 93% 87%
76%
152
136
91
68 63
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0%2003 2005 2011 2012 2013
Square Ft.
Data Centers
Intel Data Centers (2003-2013)
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Goal: 90 to 59 in 2 years, Completed Execution
• DC Strategy on facilities reduction set in June 2011 to go from 90 data centers
to 59 in 2 years
• Actual is trending to 58 data centers vs. goal of 59 data centers
Right focus to find IT cost efficiency
Data Center Facility Reduction
DC Count DC SqFt Distribution
Dispose 32
Keep 58
ITIR+xCR 23,609 SF
27.65%
Give Back 61,770 SF
72.35%
30
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Intel IT Data Center Strategy Key Summary
31
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Goals
Vision: Run Intel data center service like a factory and apply breakthrough
technologies, solutions and processes to achieve industry leadership
2013-2015 Focus
DC Optimization
Vectors
MOR
POR
Drive LAN/WAN Efficiency
Adopt Open Source Storage
Embrace Disruptive Servers
Increase Facilities Efficiency
Scope
Cost: >10% YOY improvement in $ per service delivery Utilization: >80% “useful utilization” of data center facilities, NW, server, storage capacity SLA: >99% of Tier-1, >95% of Tier-2 & Tier-3 Infrastructure SLA met
Intel Data Center Strategy
32
OS
Virtualization
Server, Storage, BaR
Facilities
Middleware (NetBatch, NUMABooster, START, etc) Utilization Cost
SLA
Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Dive deeper into the information discussed today in these white papers.
You can find them all at www.intel.com/IT
Sharing Intel IT Best Practices with the World
Intel Confidential — Do Not Forward