Upload
sherilyn-parker
View
218
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Transfer Pricing: Issues, Risks & Opportunities for Multinationals
8-9 May 2013
Chair: Mukesh Butani – Taxand IndiaPanelists:
Shiv Mahalingham – Taxand UK Clemens Thym – Standard and Poor Sam Sim – Standard Chartered Steven Carey – Quantera Global
1. UN Manual & the Acceptance of Arm’s Length Principle – an OECD Comparison
2. Intangibles: Tax Controversies, Enforcement & Litigation in Asia
3. The OECD BEPS Study & the “Grey Area” Definition
4. Valuation in Business Restructurings: the Different Approaches of Tax Authorities
5. Developments in Policy on Advance Pricing Agreements
6. Intercompany Loans Focus
7. Managing TP In-House Across Asia-Pacific
8. Taxand’s Take
9. Key Contacts & About Taxand
Contents
UN Manual & the Acceptance of Arm’s Length Principle & OECD
8-9 May 2013
UN Manual was prepared by the Subcommittee on Transfer Pricing, constituted in 2009
Developed with a purpose to provide a practical manual on transfer pricing for developing countries
Manual covers aspects starting from methodologies to documentation to dispute resolution. It also covers country specific chapters on Brazil, China, India and South Africa
UN Manual, Arm’s Length Principle & OECD41 UN Manual & the Acceptance of Arm’s Length Principle – an OECD Comparison
Issues to be debated:
Discussions on important aspects covered in India and China chapter
Comparison with OECD Guidelines
Implications on non-OECD member countries
UN Manual, Arm’s Length Principle & OECD51 UN Manual & the Acceptance of Arm’s Length Principle – an OECD Comparison
Key topics covered in the India Chapter of UN Manual include:
Location savings
India provides ‘Location Specific Advantages’ (LSA) in addition to location savings
LSAs include access to market, skilled manpower, large customer base, information and distribution networks
Quantification and allocation of location savings and location rent (in case of LSA) to be an important area of concern
Use of Profit Split Method endorsed by Indian Revenue (in case of absence of Comparable Uncontrolled transactions)
UN Manual - India Chapter61 UN Manual & the Acceptance of Arm’s Length Principle – an OECD Comparison
Intangibles
Marketing intangibles and co-branding activities - particularly relevant for India owing to unique market characteristics
Enhancement of brand, creation of efficient supply chain, conducting market research identified as factors relevant to creation of marketing intangible
Ways of compensation for creation of marketing intangibles eg: Reimbursement of extra-ordinary expenses, with a mark-up; or share of profits in relation to marketing intangible
UN Manual - India Chapter71 UN Manual & the Acceptance of Arm’s Length Principle – an OECD Comparison
R&D related intangibles
Remuneration received by captive providers should commensurate to functions performed and risks assumed
Routine and low cost plus mark up perceived to be insufficient – day to day decision making and operational risks lie in India
Additional compensation on account of creation of intangibles and ‘more than’ routine functions / risks required
UN Manual - India Chapter81 UN Manual & the Acceptance of Arm’s Length Principle – an OECD Comparison
Intra-group services
Categorised as high risk area
Nature of allocation keys is a grey area
Non-receipt of mark-up on provision of services considered as a ‘pain-point’ by Indian Revenue
Use of contemporaneous data – relevance of current year data re-emphasised
UN Manual - India Chapter91 UN Manual & the Acceptance of Arm’s Length Principle – an OECD Comparison
Allocation of risks between taxpayer and AEs – contingent on core functions, responsibility and decision making
Comparability adjustments
Burden to proof on taxpayers
Difficulty in undertaking risk adjustment
highlighted, however no guidance / solutions
provided in Manual
UN Manual - India Chapter101 UN Manual & the Acceptance of Arm’s Length Principle – an OECD Comparison
Lack of reliable local comparables
Location specific advantages (LSAs)
Location savings
Market premium
Very structured approach to defining and calculating
UN Manual - China Chapter11UN Manual & the Acceptance of Arm’s Length Principle – an OECD Comparison1
Intangibles
General position that Chinese intangibles under-
compensated
Confidence in effectiveness of documentation and audits to achieve compliance
UN Manual - China Chapter12UN Manual & the Acceptance of Arm’s Length Principle – an OECD Comparison1
Intangibles: Tax Controversies, Enforcement & Litigation in Asia
8-9 May 2013
Increased interest of tax authorities regarding:
Economic ownership vs legal ownership of intangible
Attribution of benefits of intangibles to parties
OECD’s draft guidelines on intangibles (released in June 2012) - emphasis on FAR for intangible related returns
Intangibles142 Intangibles: Tax Controversies, Enforcement & Litigation in Asia
Issues to be debated
Views of tax administrators and taxpayers on intangibles and transfer pricing in relevant jurisdiction
Recent tax controversies
Intangibles152 Intangibles: Tax Controversies, Enforcement & Litigation in Asia
Legislative developments
Definition of intangibles introduced vide Finance Bill 2012
New definition includes marketing, human capital, customer related intangibles
Definition introduced retrospectively
Intangibles - India Perspective162 Intangibles: Tax Controversies, Enforcement & Litigation in Asia
Disputes in India primarily focus on:
Creation of marketing intangibles by Indian entities manufacturing / distributing branded products
Contribution of Indian contract software service providers to the overall product development lifecycle
Recent Special Bench ruling in case of LG
Electronics
Intangibles - India Perspective172 Intangibles: Tax Controversies, Enforcement & Litigation in Asia
The OECD BEPS Study & the “Grey Area” Definition
8-9 May 2013
BEPS – a debate gaining recognition across BRICS and G20 nations
Meeting of G20 leaders in July 2012 and November 2012 emphasised on “the need to prevent base erosion and profit shifting”
OECD highlights the ‘grey area’ between tax planning and tax evasion
The OECD BEPS Study - An Overview193 The OECD BEPS Study & the “Grey Area” Definition
Joint Communiqué issued by BRICS identified the following as primary reasons leading to erosion of the tax base:
Abuse of tax treaty benefits
Incomplete disclosure of information between tax administrations
The OECD BEPS Study - An Overview203 The OECD BEPS Study & the “Grey Area” Definition
Primary ways of cross-border profit shifting:
Pricing of international transactions between two associated enterprises
Capital structuring / financing between associated enterprises
Development of international standards, improving access to data and information and capacity building is ‘need of the hour’
The OECD BEPS Study - An Overview213 The OECD BEPS Study & the “Grey Area” Definition
Issues to be debated:
How to draw the line between tax planning and tax evasion
Impact of BEPS on emerging economies
Learning from international best practices
Suggest improvements that may be made to transfer pricing rules
Other ways to resolve BEPS (areas such as GAAR, thin capitalization to be discussed)
The OECD BEPS Study223 The OECD BEPS Study & the “Grey Area” Definition
Valuation in Business restructurings & Tax Authorities
8-9 May 2013
Historical stand - transfer pricing provisions do not apply to cross-border business restructuring if there is no bearing on taxable income
Important amendment introduced (with retrospective effect) in Budget 2012 – ‘business restructuring’ to be considered an international transaction irrespective of its bearing on taxable income (at the time of transaction or in future years)
Valuation in Business Restructurings - India244 Valuation in Business Restructurings: the Different Approaches of Tax Authorities
Transactions such as issuance, conversion, buy-back of shares targeted
Discounted cash flow (DCF) preferred by Indian Revenue
Valuation reports and methods such as DCF and NAV likely to gain acceptance with introduction of ‘Other Method’
Highly litigative area at present
Valuation in Business Restructurings - India 254 Valuation in Business Restructurings: the Different Approaches of Tax Authorities
Developments in Policy on Advance Pricing Agreements
8-9 May 2013
Developments in APAs - India Perspective275 Developments in Policy on Advance Pricing Agreements
Guidelines notified on August 31, 2012
Taxpayer community reposing faith in the APA regime
Encouraging response – about 150 pre-filings in 8 months
Approx 80% of the pre-filings are for unilateral APA
Developments in APAs - India Perspective285
Relationship between Indian – US Competent Authority cause of concern
In absence of Art 9(2), bilateral APAs not available
Transactions targeted – Royalty, Contract R&D, software, management fees, contract manufacturing, cost allocations
Developments in Policy on Advance Pricing Agreements
Proliferation of countries now with APA rules
Various countries such as HK growing DTA network partly to support APAs
Indonesia and Vietnam now on steep learning curve
HK IRD enthusiastic but only limited cases underway so far
China focus on bilateral/multilateral due to severe limitations on resources
29
Developments in APAs - Asia PerspectiveDevelopments in Policy on Advance Pricing Agreements5
Intercompany Loans Focus
8-9 May 2013
Intercompany Loans Focus - India Perspective316 Intercompany Loans Focus
Financial transactions such as loans and guarantees – highly litigative area in Indian TP arena
Expressly introduced in definition of international transaction vide Finance Act 2012
CUP mostly relied upon as the most appropriate method – PLR, LIBOR typically used for benchmarking
More sophisticated quantification techniques gaining importance: Credit rating comparison of borrower & its AEs
Managing TP In-House Across Asia-Pacific
8-9 May 2013
337 Managing TP In-House Across Asia-Pacific
Transfer Pricing is the Number One Challenge
Increasingly sophisticated tax authorities are utilising commercial databases for risk- based audit selection, increasing the number of audit and calculated adjustmentsLack of consistency from country to country pose added difficultiesDispute resolution on undocumented cases is a very challenging and potentially expensive problemBusiness continues to change as a result of globalisation, M&A and reorganisationImportance of business aligned tax planning is rising
Response to a Taxand survey of tax professionals
Transfer Pricing – Managing the Challenge34
Considerations in establishing best practice
Market rates for interest
Credit premium reflecting credit risk?
Quantifiable? (spreads, historical default information)
Comparables? (bonds, credit default swap spreads, liquidity issues)
Challenges in emerging markets
Sovereign intervention
Country risk
Resulting risk / pricing impact
Managing TP In-House Across Asia-Pacific7
How do issues of ‘Transfer Pricing’ originate?The process of producing a ‘Coke’
Coke
USA
Parent level
Coke
Mex
Concentrate Producing Sub
Coke
Chile
Bottler Sub
Secret Coke Recipe
Funds & Financial Flexibility
CokeConcentrate
Tran
sfer
of
inta
ngib
les
Tran
sfer
of
tang
ible
s
Tran
sfer
of I
nter
com
pany
Fin
anci
ng
How do issues of ‘Transfer Pricing’ originate?The process of producing a ‘Coke’
Coke
USA
Parent level
Coke
Mex
Concentrate Producing Sub
Coke
Chile
Bottler Sub
Secret Coke Recipe
Funds & Financial Flexibility
CokeConcentrate
Tran
sfer
of
inta
ngib
les
Tran
sfer
of
tang
ible
s
Tran
sfer
of I
nter
com
pany
Fin
anci
ng
?
How do issues of ‘Transfer Pricing’ originate?The process of producing a ‘Coke’
Coke
USA
Parent level
Coke
Mex
Concentrate Producing Sub
Coke
Chile
Bottler Sub
Secret Coke Recipe
Funds & Financial Flexibility
CokeConcentrate
Tran
sfer
of
inta
ngib
les
Tran
sfer
of
tang
ible
s
Tran
sfer
of I
nter
com
pany
Fin
anci
ng
Managing TP In-House Across Asia-Pacific7
Example: How do Intercompany Loan Issues Originate?
• CDS are good proxy for actual risk premium• Most responsive market to changes in risk perception• Very liquid market for parent company’s funding• High credit quality, high liquidity => low spreads
Managing TP In-House Across Asia-Pacific7
Example: Credit Default Spreads at the Parent Level
Source: S&P Capital IQ, Standard & Poor’s Ratings
=*
* … broadly the same credit quality; within +/- 1 notch
Source: S&P Capital IQ, Standard & Poor’s Ratings
Standard & Poor’s Ratings
S&P Capital IQ – Credit Model
CMS - CDS Prices
?
Managing TP In-House Across Asia-Pacific7
Example: Using an Objective Model to Score Where no Risk Indicators are Available
The reliance on empirical basedapproaches assures transparencyand trustworthiness of the pricingapproach• Build custom empirical yield curves
based on actual historical data only,utilizing typical polynomial or moreadvanced approaches
• Pre-generated templates allow you toinstantly review relevant statistic onthe a custom yield curve
Note: Graph contains hypothetical data.
Building Robust Market Based Reference PricingCalculate Yield Curves for Custom Pool of Comparables
Empirical Term Structure
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Term (years)
Yie
ld (
%)
Median
Upper Quartile
Lower Quartile
Exposure Weighted Average
Establishing a market based comparable requires:
Transparent methodologyAppropriate segmentation (geography, industry, credit rating, duration, etc.)Cover all risk factors (sovereign risk, T&C)Strong grounding on empirical data
Credit Spread Models
7 Managing TP In-House Across Asia-Pacific
Alternatives in Establishing Effective Reference Prices
Sovereign Default Risk
(LC / FC)
Transfer & Convertibility Risk
“Country risk is the risk that economic, social, and political conditions and events in a foreign country will adversely affect an
institution’s financial interests. […] Country risk includes the possibility of nationalization or expropriation of assets, government
repudiation of external indebtedness, exchange controls, and currency depreciation or devaluation.
Risk associated with the non-repaymentof a sovereign’s financial obligations
issued in local or foreign currency
Country Risk
Likelihood of sovereign interference in the exchange rate market to prevent non-sovereign entities to repay their financial obligations in
foreign currency
The risk that a government will discriminatorily change the laws, regulations, or contracts governing an investment—or will fail to
enforce them—in a way that reduces an investor’s financial returns is what we call “policy risk.”
Policy Risk
Managing TP In-House Across Asia-Pacific7
Emerging Markets – Look Beyond Sovereign Risk
Incongruity Between Country Risk Scores & Sovereign Ratings
Source: S&P Capital IQ Country Risk Framework and Rating information from Global Credit Portal (R) as of September 30, 2011 and provided for illustrative purposes.
Concentrating on Country Risk - Its Impact on Corporations
Managing TP In-House Across Asia-Pacific7
Malaysia Thailand China Cambodia
Country Risk Score
a a- bb+ b
Standalone Score
bbb- bb+ bb- b+
* FC… Foreign Currency* FC… Foreign Currency
Country risk impacts the standalone score significantly and across a number of countries with different risk, that leads to 4 notches difference
Country risk impacts the standalone score significantly and across a number of countries with different risk, that leads to 4 notches difference
Sovereign Rating FC*(as at 21 Jun 2012)
A- BBB+ AA- B
Credit Score bbb- bb+ bb- b
Where the sovereign rating is low (Cambodia), it would limit the company’s ability to get a higher rating, even if the standalone score is strongerThe range of scores, depending on industry and country selection is from bbb- to b (5 notches)!
Where the sovereign rating is low (Cambodia), it would limit the company’s ability to get a higher rating, even if the standalone score is strongerThe range of scores, depending on industry and country selection is from bbb- to b (5 notches)!
Scoring the same financial profile across different countries… Scoring the same financial profile across different countries…
Managing TP In-House Across Asia-Pacific7
Impact of Sovereign & Country Risk Scores to Individual Co.s
Global consistency vs local customisation
Adapting Master-file to local circumstances
Preference for local methods, comparables
Reconciling different local studies
Optimal TP team structure & infrastructure
Governance
Engagement of key stakeholders (business, tax, finance, legal/compliance) and local teams
Operational: embedding TP into BAU
Managing TP Risk In-house Across Asia-Pacific42Managing TP In-House Across Asia-Pacific7
Taxand’s Take
8-9 May 2013
Financial transactions, intangibles gaining focus globally
Need for “glocal” documentation - MNEs should tailor their global documentation to manage risks in complex jurisdictions
Involvement of in-house tax department in operational changes critical
Proactive approach towards controversy management
Convergence of global tax policies with local risks
Increased transparency and sharing of information - need of the hour
Exploring alternate dispute resolution mechanisms
Taxand’s Take44Managing TP In-House Across Asia-Pacific8
Key Contacts Key Contacts 456
Mukesh ButaniTaxand IndiaE. [email protected]. +91 124 339 5011
Clemens ThymStandard and PoorsE. [email protected]
Shiv MahalinghamTaxand UKE. [email protected]. +44 207 715 5234
Steven CareyQuantera GlobalE. [email protected]
Understanding and managing the tax consequences of cross-border tax transactions
Considering organisational (re)structuring options in full awareness of the tax implications
Realising tax, supply chain and overall operational efficiencies
Interpreting technical tax provisions
Our Global Service Commitment469 Key Contacts & About Taxand
Lowering effective tax ratesAddressing and preventing tax leakagesEnsuring tax complianceManaging relationships with tax authorities
Global CoverageKey Contacts & About Taxand 479
From 9 to 48 countries in just 7 years
59 ITR awards won since 2009
95% recommended in World Tax 2012
Argentina Ireland Puerto Rico
Australia Italy Romania
Austria Japan Russia
Belgium Korea Singapore
Brazil Luxembourg South Africa
Canada Malaysia Spain
Chile Malta Sweden
China Mauritius Switzerland
Colombia Mexico Thailand
Cyprus Netherlands Turkey
Denmark Norway UK
Finland Pakistan Ukraine
France Panama USA
Germany Peru Venezuela
Greece Philippines
India Poland
Indonesia Portugal
Dedicated to tax
Independence advantage – conflict free, un-bureaucratic, best practice
Local knowledge, global view
Partner led from start to finish
Complex problems, customised advice
Passionate about working together
Practical advice, responsively delivered
Why Taxand?489 Key Contacts & About Taxand
ABOUT TAXAND
Taxand provides high quality, integrated tax advice worldwide. Our tax professionals, more than 400 tax partners and over 2,000 tax advisors in nearly 50 countries - grasp both the fine points of tax and the broader strategic implications, helping you mitigate risk, manage your tax burden and drive the performance of your business.
We're passionate about tax. We collaborate and share knowledge, capitalising on our expertise to provide you with high quality, tailored advice that helps relieve the pressures associated with making complex tax decisions.
We're also independent—ensuring that you adhere both to best practice and to tax law and that we remain free from time-consuming audit-based conflict checks. This enables us to deliver practical advice, responsively.
Taxand is a global organisation of tax advisory firms. Each firm in each country is a separate and independent legal entity responsible for delivering client services.
© Copyright Taxand Economic Interest Grouping 2013Registered office: 1B Heienhaff, L-1736 Senningerberg – RCS Luxembourg C68