28
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION  NEIL GILLESPIE Plaintiff Case No.: 05CA7205 Division: F vs. BARKER RODEMS & COOK P.A. a Florida corporation; and WILLIAM J . COOK Defendants. _/ TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE: Honorable Richard A. Nielsen Circuit Judge TAKEN AT: Hillsborough County Courthouse Tampa Florida DATE: June 28 2006 TIME: 3:30 p.m. REPORTER: William Herrmann Court Reporter Notary Public State of Florida a t Large Berryhill & Associates Inc. 813-229-8225

TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 1/28

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL

CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA

CIVIL DIVISION 

NEIL GILLESPIE

Pla in t i f f Case No.: 05CA7205

Divis ion : F

vs .

BARKER RODEMS & COOK P.A.

a Flor ida corpora t ion; and

WILLIAM J . COOK

Defendants.

_/

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE: Honorable Richard A. Niel sen

Circu i t Judge

TAKEN AT: Hil lsborough County CourthouseTampa Florida

DATE: June 28 2006

TIME: 3:30 p.m.

REPORTER:Will iam HerrmannCourt Reporter

Notary PublicSta te of Flor ida a t Large

Ber ryh i l l & Assoc ia tes Inc.813-229-8225

Page 2: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 2/28

APPEARANCES

RYAN CHRISTOPHER RODEMS, ESQUIRE

Barker, Rodems & Cook, PA

400 North Ashley Drive, Sui te 2100

Tampa, FL 33602

NEIL J . GILLESPIE, (pro se l i t i gan t )

8092 SW 115 t Loop

Ocala , Flor ida 34481

Page 3: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 3/28

INDEX

PAGE

Appearances 2

Index 3

Proceed ings 4

e r t i f i c a t e o f eporter 23

Page 4: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 4/28

4

PROCEEDINGS

THE COURT: What case?

MR RODEMS:Your Honor, t h i s i s G i l l e s p i e v.

Barker and J . Cook, William J . Cook.

THE COURT: All r igh t , what s up for today?

MR RODEMS: Your Honor, the f i r s t motion i s

the defendant s Motion to Compel Discovery and to

cont inue p l a i n t i f f s hearing on his Motion for

Summary Judgment. That was served, I be l i eve , on

May 11 t•

THE COURT: Yes, s i r , I see t ha t . And go

ahead.

MR RODEMS: All r igh t . Your Honor, Chris

Rodems for defendants . On June - - on March 28 t

2006, we served some i n t e r roga to r i e s and a Request

for Product ion on Mr. Gi l l esp ie . We d i d n t

5 treceive a response. On May of 2006, I sent an

e-mai l to Mr. Gil lesp ie advis ing him t ha t the

in te r roga tor ie s were overdue and it s our good-

f a i t h e f fo r t to t ry to resolve it. Fina l ly a week

ago, on June 21 s t 2006, very untimely, we

rece ived responses to the i n t e r roga t o r i e s and a

response to the Request for Produc t ion and a

number of object ion to each but , of course ,

untimely object ions to discovery are waived under

Page 5: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 5/28

Page 6: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 6/28

6

s ha l l be spec i f ied, closed quote . He d i d n t make

2 those ob jec t i ons in h i s Apri l 29th l e t t e r .

3 He a l so promised in t ha t l e t t e r and d i d n t

4 f u l f i l l t tha t he would send us the responses by

5 May 17 th• I t says, quote - and I m reading from

6 h is l e t t e r which he a t t ached to Exhib i t 3 - to a

7 motion t ha t he f i l ed today, quote , in the

8 a l t e r na t i ve , I wi l l respond to your Request for

9 Product ion by mail ing copies of the i tems

1 reques ted , comma sub jec t to ob jec t ion , comma, by

May 15 t 2006, c losed quote. That d id not

12 happen. He a l so made the same promise about the

13 i n t e r roga tory answers and t ha t did not happen.

14 So, what we r e seeking today i s an order , Your

15 Honor, compell ing him to respond to the

16 i n t e r r oga to r i e s without the ob jec t ions and for

17 a t t o rn e y s fees . He r a i sed a number of ob jec t ions

18 on pr iv i l ege and t h e r e s some debate, I be l i eve ,

19 st ll in the appe l l a t e cour t s about whether

2 pr i v i l e ge s can be waived by not t imely objec t ing .

21 But regard less of whether they can or cannot , he

d i d n t provide a pr iv i l ege log as r equ i r ed by

23 Flor ida Rule of Civ i l Procedure 1.280 (b) (5) .

4 As fa r as the i n t e r r oga to r i e s , in a number of

25 the answers he says he was r e ly ing on Flo r ida Rule

Page 7: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 7/28

7

of Civ i l Procedure 1.340, sub paren C, which, as

2 Your Honor knows, i s the opt ion to produce

3 records . The only problem was, he d i d n ' t produce

4 any records , d idn ' t make any ava i l ab le to us and

5 d i dn ' t point to us in these unproduced o r

undeclared records where we could f ind the answers

7 to i n t e r ro g a t o r i e s . Ins tead , h is response was,

8 You have these records , and he says we have them

9 from rep re sen t ing him in the pas t . But I would

1 poin t out to the Court two th ings : F i r s t o f a l l ,

11 t h a t ' s not proper procedure under Rule 1 .340(c ) ;

12 you can ' t j u s t say, you a l ready know , t h a t ' s not

13 the way you respond. And second, our

14 r ep resen ta t ion of him ended some four or f ive

IS years ago. So, whatever has happened the l a s t

6 four or f ive years , we c e r t a in ly have no idea

17 about . So, hi s responses are de f i c i e n t in t h a t

18 regard .

19 Now we've a l so moved to con t inue h i s August

1s t2 Motion for Summary Judgment on the ba s i s tha t

21 he h a sn ' t provided the discovery t ha t we've

22 reques ted

23 THE COURT: All r i gh t . Well, we ' l l t ake t ha t

24 up i we have t ime a t the end of t h i s hea r ing .

25 Le t ' s address - - are you through with your

Page 8: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 8/28

8

discovery i ssues?

MR RODEMS: Yes s i r .

3 THE COURT: Mr. Gil lespie?

4 MR GILLESPIE: Good af te rnoon, Judge. I did

5 respond to the defendant s Request for Product ion.

6 Attached i s a - - to my p l a i n t i f f s Motion for an

7 Order of Protec t ion , Exhibi t 3. I address each

area of product ion. This i s in reply to

9 defendan t s Request for Product ion. They were

1 demanding tha t I come to t he i r of f i c e on May the

4U, 2006 a t 9:00 a.m. I objec ted to t h e i r

12 reques t and I t o ld him I wi l l not appear i n h i s

13 of f i c e for any reason due to h is t h r e a t s aga ins t

14 me. And Judge he has asked for a b a i l i f f to be

15 here; for him to ask me to come to h i s of f i ce , I

16 th ink , i s outrageous.

17 I offered to - - in the a l t e rna t i ve , I of fe red

18 to respond to h is reques t by mai l ing copies of the

19 i tems requested subject to ob jec t ion by May 15 t•

20 He never responded to t h i s o ther than to f i l e h is

21 Motion to Compel. And with regard to the

22 in te r roga tor ie s , I gave him the same answer I

23 wil l provide the answers subject to ob jec t ion by

24 May 15 t; again he did not respond to t ha t o ther

25 than to f i l e a Motion to Compel. And he f i l ed

Page 9: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 9/28

9

tha t Motion to Compel before May 15th

• So, when

2 he did tha t , I took tha t as a cons t ruc t ive

re jec t ion of what he was offe r ing - - of what I

4 of fe red him and, therefore , I j u s t responded to

5 his Motion to Compel with t h i s l e t t e r o f

6 pro tec t ion and the responses are a t t ached .

7 I also noted tha t he has - - a l l the i tems

8 requested to which you are e n t i t l e d by way o f your

9 pr i o r r ep resen ta t ion of me. Now Mr. Rodems has

1 t o ld the Court t ha t t h i s was four or f ive years

11 ago and t h a t s t rue , but nothing pe r t i ne n t to t h i s

12 case has happened dur ing t ha t t ime. The mat te r s

3 t ha t he knows about involve fraud and breach of

14 cont rac t are from t ha t t ime per iod .

15 I m asking the Court in my Order of

6 Protect ion to l imi t t he i r tha t the records

7 asked to be produced are kept in Ocala . I f Mr.

18 Rodems wants to view them because he r e j e c t e d my

19 of f e r to send copies , then he can view them a t the

2 Marion County Law Library upon not ice to me. And

21 the law l i b r a ry has f ac i l i t i e s t he re to copy the

22 documents for Mr. Rodems. It s a l so a secure

23 f a c i l i t y with a ba i l i f f present as i s requ i red

24 here .

25 As to the discovery where I invoke the

Page 10: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 10/28

10

a t torney-c l ien t pr iv i l ege , I m going to ask t ha t

2 t ha t discovery be prohib i ted . He s asked for my

3 medical records which bear nothing on t h i s case

4 whatsoever. I v e asked - I v e invoked the

5 doc to r -pa t i en t p r iv i l ege and asked for t ha t

6 discovery to be prohib i ted .

7 As to the discovery I objec ted to , I ask the

8 Court to proh ib i t t ha t discovery and to r e ly on

9 the records under Rule 1.340(c) , opt ion to produce

1 records . The records are a l ready in t h e i r

possess ion and, spec i f ica l ly , those records are

12 the answers to i n t e r roga to r i e s in two cases : That

3 would be the Amscott lawsui t and the Ace l awsu i t .

14 The discovery for produc t ion of documents in those

15 lawsui ts , a depos i t ion on May 14 2001,

16 se t t lement on October 30 t and November p o f 2001

17 and another depos i t ion on October 10 lh 2000 and

18 another se t t lement on June 12 t 2000. I fee l

19 t ha t they have every th ing t ha t t h e y r e e n t i t l e d

20 t o .

21 And I also asked - because Mr. Rodems

22 ind ica ted tha t he in tends to depose Am scot t s

23 a t to rney , Mr. John -

24 THE COURT: Emmanuel.

25 MR GILLESPIE: Pardon?

Page 11: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 11/28

11

THE COURT: Wasn t it Emmanuel?

2 MR GILLESPIE: No it s

3 THE COURT: Pardon me.

4 MR GILLESPIE: - - Mr. Anthony. I asked for a

5 preemptive l e t t e r of pro tec t ion as to the sub jec t

6 mat te r allowed, the t ime, place and s e c ur i t y

7 dura t ion and persons in a t tendance . T h a t s a l l I

8 have to say on tha t and then I have some comments

9 about t he i r Motion to Continue Summary Judgment.

1 THE COURT: Mr. Rodems?

MR RODEMS: All r igh t . Fi r s t o f a l l , Judge,

12 t h i s cont inued a l l ega t ion by Mr. G i l l e s p i e t ha t

13 t h e r e s been a t h r e a t agains t him, t h e r e s been no

14 t h r e a t agains t him; he i s the one t ha t th rea tened

15 me when we had a te lephone conversa t ion and he

16 t o ld me he was going to slam me up aga ins t your

17 hear ing chambers wall . Th a t s never been

18 followed, but he cont inues to repeat it in every

19 plead ing and then, you know, the idea i s t ha t , I

20 guess, i f you ve got j ud i c i a l immunity from what

21 you say - - but the bottom l i ne i s , i s t h a t t h e r e s

22 been nothing but cord ia l behavior on our par t .

23 We ve asked him to send the records to us . He s

24 phras ing t h i s record - - the l e t t e r of Apr i l 29 th

25 as his reques t ; t h e r e s nothing in here t ha t

Page 12: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 12/28

12

reques ts me to do anything. He d i d n t give us the

2 records . He's the one tha t asse r t ed he would send

] them to me by May 15 th • Ei ther way, they were

l a t e . He f i l ed no object ions , he did not f i l e a

5 Motion fo r Continuance, he did not ask me for a

6 cont inuance, he did not f i l e a Motion for

7 Pro tec t ive Order. He j u s t did not do anyth ing

8 un t i l a week ago, knowing t ha t t h i s hear ing was

9 the books by t ha t t ime.

1 As fa r as his argument the records are in our

possess ion, we are en t i t l ed to discovery in t h i s

12 case of the mat te rs t ha t he has. I f he has

13 records tha t he says we can gather a l l the answers

14 t ha t we're seeking, h e s got an ob l iga t ion to

15 produce those . He can t j u s t say, you have them N

16 or you know the answer N; t h a t s not a proper

17 discovery response .

18 We're in a s i t ua t ion here, Judge, where Mr.

19 Gi l l esp ie i s not fol lowing the Flor ida Rules of

2 Civ i l Procedure. And so we're here saying, look,

21 the ru les say 3 days to respond; i you choose to

not respond for severa l months and u n t i l a week

23 before the hearing, you know, we have - - we re

24 e n t i t l e d to have the ru les complied with by Mr.

25 Gi l l esp ie . And we would ask you to ru l e h i s

Page 13: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 13/28

13

objec t ions unt imely as the case law h o l d s , o rd e r

2 him to prov ide the d i scovery . And if you want to

3 s e t a spec ia l procedure for how he can produce the

4 records to us, I d o n t have any problem with t ha t ,

5 but t h a t d o e s n t excuse f a i l i n g to respond to the

6 Request for Product ion u n t i l a week ago or the

i n t e r ro g a t o r i e s un t i l a week ago.

8 MR GILLESPIE: May I respond to t ha t , Judge?

9 THE COURT: Jus t a moment. Mr. Rodems,

1 address the i ssue of the l oca t ion of p roduc t ion in

t h i s s i t u a t i o n where y o u r e ask ing p ro d u c t i o n from

2 the p l a i n t i f f and y o u r e ask ing for it to be

3 produced in Hil lsborough County.

14 MR RODEMS: Well , the - he brought the case

5 in Hil lsborough County, Mr. G i l l e s p i e d id . And we

16 t h ink it s ap p ro p r i a t e s ince t h i s i s - obviously

7 hear ing t h i s case in Hil lsborough County, we t h ink

18 it s appropr ia te to have the records t h a t we ve

9 reques ted produced here . I f he wants to charge us

2 15 cen t s a page, if the records d o n t exceed 1,000

2 pages , w e l l be happy to pay 15 cen t s if he can

22 send us cop ies . I have no o b j e c t i o n to t h a t as a

23 procedure . You know, so t h a t s p e r f e c t l y f ine .

24 THE COURT: All r i g h t . As to the ob jec t ions ,

25 those are over ru led as being unt imely f i l e d .

Page 14: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 14/28

5

1

15

2

25

14

MR GILLESPIE: Judge, can I

2 THE COURT: No s i r . Let me f i n i sh my ru l ing ,

3 s i r . The way it opera tes i s the par ty br inging

4 the motion ge ts to argue, the par ty responding

ge ts a response, the par ty br ing ing the motion

6 ge ts a reply and then it s over unless I ask for

7 some c la r i f i ca t ion . That app l ies not j u s t to pro

8 se par t i e s but everybody tha t comes i n to t h i s

9 hearing room. Do you unders tand?

MR GILLESPIE: Thank you, Judge.

THE COURT: As to the produc t ion , the Rule

12 1.340(c) wil l apply , Mr. Gi l l esp ie , if

13 appropr ia te , as to records t ha t are in your

14 possess ion and kept in the ordinary course of your

record-keeping. I bel ieve you wil l f ind if you

16 research tha t ru le and the terms of the ru l e t ha t

17 tha t permits the opposing party to i n spec t those

18 records as they are kept, In the l oca t ion t ha t

19 they are kept. So, you have the a l t e rna t ive to

comply in tha t manner. In some of your responses ,

21 I th ink you suggest tha t tha t i s not acceptable to

22 you, but I m j u s t t e l l i ng you tha t i s one of your

23 opt ions . I t i s not an opt ion tha t records kept in

24 someone e l s e s possess ion , whether it i s the

p la in t i f f , the defendant or a co-defendant or co

Page 15: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 15/28

15

p l a i n t i f f , it i s a r i g h t t h a t e x i s t s only as to

2 the pa r ty d i r e c t l y responding. So you must

respond to t h e Request for Product ion e i t h e r by

4 as I say making those records a v a i l a b l e wherever

5 they are kept in your possess ion; you can make

6 co p ies o f them sub jec t to p r i o r agreement of the

7 p a r t i e s as to volume co s t and t h e l i k e , which i s

R t y p i c a l l y done; or you wil l have to produce them

9 in Hi l l sborough County.

1 Now you can se l e c t the l oca t ion in Hil l sborough

11 County if you dec ide to produce them in

12 Hi l l sborough County.

13 I f anyone wants s ecu r i t y prov ided fo r t ha t ,

14 t h a t s ecu r i t y w i l l be a t the cos t o f t h e p a r ty

15 reques t ing the s ecu r i t y . In o t h e r words t h a t

16 pa r ty , whether it s in Marion County o r

17 Hil lsborough County or some n eu t r a l s i t e in

18 between the pa r ty t h a t wants se c u r i t y makes

19 arrangements for t ha t s ecu r i t y a t t h e i r own cos t .

20 The reason t h a t t h e r e s a b a i l i f f p re s e n t i n t h i s

21 hear ing room i s t ha t it i s the p o l i c y o f t h i s

Cour t whenever t h e r e s a pro se p a r ty , a b a i l i f f

23 i s p res en t i n t h e cour t room - - o r in t h e h ea r in g

24 room o r cour t room. And t h a t s not j u s t my pol icy ,

25 but the p o l i cy o f most othe r j udges and I th ink ,

Page 16: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 16/28

16

the preference of the Sher i f f , David Gee, in

2 Hi l l sborough County.

3 As to any p r iv i l eg e t h a t y o u r e r a i s i n g fo r

4 now and s u b j ec t to any cour t dec i s ions t h a t may

5 sway me to the con t ra ry , I m pre se rv ing t h o s e

6 objec t ions , but those objec t ions must be s t a t e d

7 sp e c i f i c a l l y , a p r iv i l eg e log must be produced in

8 accordance wi th the Rules of C i v i l Procedure so

t h a t - and I won t r e c i t e t h a t to you, but in

1 essence you must descr ibe the document

s u f f i c i e n t l y t h a t it can be - some assessment

12 could be made, not only by the o t h e r p a r t y but by

13 t h e Court as to the s u f f i c i e n c y o f t h e c l a im o f

14 p r iv i l eg e on the document and the na tu re of the

15 p r iv i l eg e being asse r ted .

16 Did I miss anyth ing in your motion, Mr.

17 Rodems?

18 MR RODEMS: Yes, s i r , t h e i s sue about

19 a t t o rn e y s fees fo r b r ing ing t h i s motion.

20 THE COURT: That w i l l be g ran t ed and I ll

21 al low the p a r t i e s to e i t h e r agree on some

22 ap p ro p r i a t e amount o r you can se t a s ep a r a t e

23 h ea r in g on t ha t i s sue .

24 MR RODEMS: That covers it, Your Honor.

25 THE COURT: All r i g h t . Now it s 4:39 . M r .

Page 17: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 17/28

17

G i l l e s p i e , you have one minute .

2 MR RODEMS: Your Honor I m so r ry , t h e r e was

3 the second p a r t of my motion about the con t inuance

4 o f the summary judgment motion.

THE COURT: When i s summary judgment se t ?

6 MR RODEMS: I be l ieve t h a t s sch ed u led August

7 1s t but obviously - and I guess we a l s o did not

8 di scuss a t ime frame to comply with t h i s C o u r t s

9 order today.

1 THE COURT: Mr Gil lesp ie , i s 20 days

su f f i c i e n t ?

12 MR GILLESPIE: What parameters a re av a i l ab l e

3 fo r mai l ing and so fo r th?

14 THE COURT: Well depending on the - when the

15order ge t s over here , y o u l l have 20 days from the

16 date of the o rder and on the 20 th day from the

17 da te of order , they must be shown as postmarked.

18 MR GILLESPIE: Are you o v e r ru l i n g - did I

19 hear you r i g h t , y o u r e ove r ru l ing the ob jec t ions?

20 THE COURT: I m o v e r ru l i n g a l l o b jec t i o n s

21 except as to p r iv i l eg e .

22 MR GILLESPIE: Can I t ake an i n t e r l o c u t o ry

23 appeal on t h i s , Judge?

24 THE COURT: Y o u l l have to make t h a t dec i s ion

25 on your own based upon your assessment o f my cour t

Page 18: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 18/28

18

ru l ing and the ap p l i cab l e case law.

2 MR GILLESPIE: Yes I - I have some case law

3 here bu t I guess I d i d n t p res en t it t ime ly

4 enough. But in any even t , w i l l t h a t s t a y your

5 co u r t order?

6 THE COURT: Y o u l l have to check t he r u l e s on

t h a t , s i r .

8 MR GILLESPIE: Okay. I m probab ly going to

9 t ak e an i n t e r l o cu to r y appeal because I do be l i eve

1 t h a t Mr. Rodems was n o t i f i e d t h a t I objec t ed and

it was qui t e c l ea r in my Apri l 29 th l e t t e r to him.

12 I would a l so poin t out to the Cour t t h a t pro se

13 l i t i g a n t s are not held to the same s t r i n g e n t

14 requi rement as a t to rneys because they h a v e n t gone

15 to lawschool

and t h e y r enot

members o f t h e Bar

16 and I t h ink t h a t t h i s l e t t e r meets t he

17 requ i rements o f a pro se l i t i g a n t .

18 THE COURT: Al l r i g h t , s i r . t makes fo r an

19 i n t e r e s t i n g i s sue .

2 MR GILLESPIE: Okay. And as fo r t he - I

21 t h ink you sa id something about 15 c e n t s a page o r

22 someone sa id t h a t -

2J THE COURT: Well you can t a l k about t h a t

24 out s ide the cour t room.

25 MR GILLESPIE: - t h a t s what t h e law l i b r a ry

Page 19: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 19/28

19

charges . I would seek the maximum under Flor ida

2 law I th ink it s a d o l l a r a page.

3THE COURT: It s a

d o l l a r fo r the c l e rk o f the

4 cour t , it s not going to be an amount t h a t I m

5 going to approve.

6 MR GILLESPIE: Okay.

7 THE COURT: Or f ind to be reasonab le .

8 Legi s l a tu re apparen t ly has found it to be

9 reasonab le for t h e c l e rk to charge t ha t , but

1 t h a t s charg ing fo r l abor and t h e s e r v i ce s o f the

c l e rk of the cour t . I ll not ru le on t ha t ,

12 whether it s reasonab le o r not .

13 MR GILLESPIE: Okay.

14 MR RODEMS: Your Honor we do have a summary

1 s t15 judgment hear ing scheduled on August and we

16 would j u s t ask t h a t t h a t be con t inued u n t i l we can

17 complete discovery . And I have the case law on

18 t h a t i s s u e a l so .

9 THE COURT: Well Mr. G i l l e s p i e , do you want

2 agree to t ha t o r r e se t t h i s i s sue?

21 MR GILLESPIE: No w e l l r e s e t t h a t because

22 t h i s i s n t even a mat t e r fo r the Uniform Discovery

23 Motion Calendar and

24 THE COURT: I m so r ry ?

25 MR GILLESPIE: - - we can r e se t t ha t .

Page 20: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 20/28

20

THE COURT: On the summary judgment? You re

agreeing to the re se t t ing of t ha t?

3 MR GILLESPIE: No I m not agreeing .

4 THE COURT: All r igh t . So your motion w i l l be

5 r e se t .

6 MR RODEMS: On the cont inuance of the summary

7 judgment, I need to rese t i t ?

8 THE COURT: That s cor rec t .

9 MR RODEMS:Yes, s i r .

Wese t

t

today

1 because the j ud i c i a l ass i s t an t advised t ha t we

should do the d i scovery and t ha t a t the same t ime.

12 Is there a - i s t okay to se t the cont inuance of

13 the summary judgment on the t r a d i t i o n a l or the

14 customary UM document -

15 THE COURT: I th ink you can probably do tha t .

16 MR RODEMS: Yes, s i r .

17 THE COURT: That s f ive minutes per s ide .

18 MR RODEMS: Okay. And t h a t s in the morning.

19 Mr. Gil lesp ie has had problems with t ha t before .

20 As long as I m able to schedule a hear ing pr i o r to

21 August p I o n t h i s , I m f ine but , obvious ly , i f

22 the Court were to ru le t ha t we were not to get a

23 cont inuance, I would need t ime to complete the

24 discovery. So, i f Mr. Gi l l esp ie can coopera te

25 with me in ge t t ing a hear ing scheduled with in the

Page 21: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 21/28

21

next two weeks I t h ink it would be f ine .

THE COURT: Well my j ud i c i a l a s s i s t a n t has

3 l e f t fo r the day. We are not here nex t week so

4 t ha t l i m i t s your t ime s ubs t a n t i a l l y . And if you

5 t h ink you need add i t iona l t ime beyond 10

6 minutes -

7 MR RODEMS: I d o n t th ink so.

8 THE COURT: - I would mention it to her and

w e l l t r y to accommodate t h a t sometime in the next

1 few weeks.

MR RODEMS: Yes s i r . Okay. And i s it a l l

12 r i g h t i f I prepare the proposed orde r , Your Honor?

13 THE COURT: Yes s i r .

14 MR RODEMS: Okay. And of course , I ll

15 t r ansmi t t ha t to Mr. Gil lesp ie be fore br ing ing it

16 to the Court . And was the 20 days based on -

17 THE COURT: Date of the orde r .

18 MR RODEMS: - date of the order? Yes s i r .

19 Thank you fo r your t ime Judge.

20 MR GILLESPIE: Thank you Judge. And Your

21 Honor would you ask t ha t Mr. Rodems l eave the

22 area . The l a s t t ime he l e f t , he was t au n t i n g me

3 in the hal lway and I d o n t want t ha t to happen

24 today.

5 THE COURT: Well you can s t ay nex t to my

Page 22: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 22/28

22

ba i l i f f un t i l he goes home and then you can decide

what you want to do, s i r

3 MRGILLESPIE: Thank you.

MR RODEMS: Good day, Your Honor.

5 Hearing concluded)

6

7

8

9

1

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

4

5

Page 23: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 23/28

23

C-E-R-T-I-F-I-C-A-T-E

STATE OF FLORIDA

COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH

I , WILLIAM HERRMANN Court Reporter fo r the

Circui t Court of the Thi r teenth Jud ic ia l Circui t of the

Sta te of F lor ida , in and for Hillsborough County,

DO HEREBY CERTIFY, t ha t I was author ized to and did ,

through the County of Hil lsborough, r epor t in shor thand the

proceedings and evidence in the above-s ty led cause, as

s t a t ed in the capt ion here to , and tha t the fo rego ing pages,

numbered 1 to 22 inc lus ive , c o n s t i t u t e a t r ue and c o r re c t

t r a n s c r i p t i o n of my s tenograph ic repor t o f sa i d proceedings

and evidence.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto s e t my hand in the

City of Tampa, County of Hil lsborough, Sta te of Flor ida t h i s

5th day of Ju ly , 2006.

WILLIAM HERRMANN Court Reporte r ,

By w . / L . . ~  Will iam Herrmann

Ber ryh i l l Assoc ia tes , Inc .

Page 24: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 24/28

  4th[1]8:11 ..................2 [1]3:3

appellate [1]6:19

applicable [2] 5:1 18:

1applies [1]14:7

apply [1]14:12

books [1]12:9

bottom [1]11 :21

breach [1]9:13

bringing [4]14:3,5 16:

1921 :15brought [1]13:14

{[1]1:12 5

5th [2]4:17 23:160

05CA7205 [1]1:5 8

1 8092 [1]2:7

1 [1]23:11 813-229-8225 [1]1 :25 appropriate [4]13:16, C

1,000 [1]13:201.280(b)(5 [1]6:23

1.340 [1]7:1

836 [1]5:49

9:00 [1]8:11

1814:1316:22approve [1]19:5

April [4]5:14 6:211:

2418:11area [2] 8:8 21 :22argue [1]14:4

argument [1]12:10

arrangements [1]15:

19Ashley [1]2:4

asserted [2]12:2 16:

15assessment [2]16:11

17:25assistant [2] 20: 10 21:

2Associates [2]1 :2423:20

attached [3] 6:6 8:6 9:

6attendance [1]11:7

attorney [1]10:23

attorney s [2]6:1716:

19attorney-client [1]10:

1

attorneys [1]18:14August [4]7:1917:6

19:1520:21authorized [1]23:7

available [3]7:415:4

17:12

C-E-R-T-I-F-I-C-A-T-E[1]23:1

Calendar [1]19:23

cannot [1]6:21

caption [1]23:10

Case [12]1:54:25:1

9:1210:312:1213:1,

14,1718:1,219:17

cases [3]5:3,7 10:12

t e g o ~  [2] 5:23,25cause [ ]23:9

cents [3]13:20,21 18:

21

certainly [2]5:19 7:16

Certificate [1]3:6

CERTIFY [1]23:7

chambers [1]11:17

charge [2]13:1919:9

charges [1]19:1

charginR [1]19:10

check [1 18:6choose [1]12:21

Chris [1]4:13

CHRISTOPHER [1]2:

2

CIRCUIT [5]1:1,2,1523:5,5

City [1]23:15

CIVIL [5]1:36:237:1

12:2016:8

claim [1]16:13

claims [1]5:13

clarification [1]14:7

1.340(c [3]7:11 10:9

14:121.350 [1] 5:2010 [1]21:5

107 [1]5:5

10th [1]10:17

115th [1]2:7

11th [1]4:10

12th [1]10:18

1369 [1]5:6

14th [1]10:1515 [3]13:20,21 18:2115th [5]6:11 8:19,249:1 12:317th [1] 6:5

1st [5]7:2010:1617:

719:1520:21

A

a.m[1]8:11

able [1] 20:20above-styled [1]23:9

acceptable [1]14:21accommodate [1]21:

9accordance [1]16:8

Ace [1]10:13

additional [1] 21:5

address [3]7:25 8:713:10

advised [1]20:10advising [1]4:18

afternoon [1] 8:4

Ageny [1]5:4

ago [7 4:21 5:107:15

9:1112:813:6,7

agree [2]16:21 19:20

agreeing [2] 20:2,3agreement [1]15:6

ahead [1]4:12

allegation [1]11:12

allow [1]16:21allowed [1]11:6

already [2]7:1210:10

alternative [3]6:8 8:

1714:19

America [1] 5:2

2

20 [3]17:10,15 21:162000 [2]10:17,182001 [2]10:15,162006 [8]1:184:15,17,

21 5:146:11 8:11 23:

1620th [1]17:16

2100 [1]2:4

21st [1]4:2122 [1]23:1128[1]1:18

28th [1]4:14 American [1]5:6 B

29th [4]5:14 6:211: amount [2]16:22 19: bailiff [5] 8:14 9:23

2418:11 4Amscott [1]10:13Amscott s [1]10:22

anothed2] 10:17,18answer [2] 8:22 12:16

answers [6] 6:13,25 7:68:2310:1212:13

Anthony [1]11:4

apparently [1]19:8

appeal [2]17:23 18:9appear [1]8:12

APPEARANCES [1]2:

1

Appearances..............

15:20,2222:1Bad1] 18:15barely [1]5:10

BARKER [3]1:8 2:3 4:

4

based [2]17:25 21:16basis [1]7:20

bear [1]10:3

behavior [1]11 :22believe [5]4:9 6:18

14:1517:618:9

Berryhill [2]1 :24 23:20between [1]15:18

beyond [1]21:5

clear [1]18:11

clerk [3]19:3,9,11closed [2]6:1,11co [1]14:25

co-defendant [1]14:

25come [2]8:10,15

comes [1]14:8

comma [2] 6: 10 10comments [1]11:8

companr [1]5:1Compel 5]4:78:21,

259:1,5

o m p l l i n ~  [1]6:15

complete 2]19:17

3

3 [2]6:6 8:73:30 [1]1:19

30 [1]12:2130th [1]10:16

33602 [1]2:5

34481 [1] 2:8352 [1]5:5

398 [1]5:3

4

4:39 [1]16:25

400 [1]2:4

402 [1]5:6

Sheet 1 complete

Page 25: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 25/28

20:23 day [4]17:1621:322: essence [1] 16:10 6 4:3,16,18 5: 3 8:3,complied [1]12:24 423:16 even [1]19:22 410:2511:2,4,1212:

comply [3] 5:20 14:20 days [4]12:21 17:10, event [1]18:4 19,2513:8,1514:1,

17:8 1521:16 everybody [1]14:8 10,1217:1,10,12,18,concluded [1] 22:5 debate [ ] 6:   8 e v e r y t h i n ~   [1]10:19 22 18:2,8,20,25 19:6,constitute [1] 23:   decide [2]15: 22: 1 evidence 2] 23:9,13 13,19,21,2520:3,19,constructive [1] 9:2 decision [1]17:24 exceed [1] 13:20 24 21:15,20 22:3

contain [1] 5:18 decisions [1] 16:4 except [1] 17:21 give [1] 12:1Continuance [6] 12:5, defendant [1] 14:25 excuse [1] 13:5 got [2] :2012:14

617:320:6.12,23 defendant s [3]4:7 8: Exhibit [2] 6:6 8:7 granted [1] 16:20

continue [3] 4:8 7:19 5,9 exists [1]15:1 guess [3]11 :20 17:7

11:9 Defendants [2] 1:  4: extent [1] 5:10 18:3continued [2]11:12 4 F H19:16

continues [1] 11:18

contract [1] 9:14

contrary [1]16:5

conversation [1] 11:

5COOK [5]1:8,10 2:3

4:4,4cooperate [1] 20:24copies [6] 5:2 6:9 8:

189:1913:2215:6copy [1]9:21

cordial [1] 11:22corporation [1]1:9

correct [2]20:8 23:11cost [3]15:7.14,19COUNTY [16]1:2,16

9:2013:13,15,1715:

9,11,12,16,1716:223:3,6,8.15course [4]4:24 5:2414:1421:14

COURT [56]1:1,214:

2,5,11 7:10,238:39:

10,1510:8,2411:1,3,1013:9,2414:2,11

15:22 16:4,13,20,25

17:5,10,14,20,24,2518:5,6,12,18,2319:3,4,7,11,19,2420:1,4,8,15,17,2221:2,8,13,16,17,2523:4,5,17

Court s [1]17:8

Courthouse [1] 1:16courtroom [3]15:23,2418:24

courts [1]6:19

covers [1]16:24

customary [1]20:14

deficient [1] 7:17demanding [1] 8:10

d e p e n d i n ~   [ ] 17:14depose [ 10:22

deposition [2] 10:15,

7

describe [ ] 16:10

directly [1]15:2Discovery [18] 4:7,25

5:87:21 8: 9:2510:

2,6,7,8,1412:11,1713:219:17,2220:11,24

discuss [1]17:8

DIVISION [2]1 :3,6doctor-patient [1]10:

5document [3]16:10,

1420:14

documents [3]5:169:

2210:14

dollar [2]19:2,3Don [1]5:4

done [1] 15:8Drive [1] 2:4due [1]8:13

duration [1]11:7

during [1]9:12

facilities [1] 9:21facility [1] 9:23

failinr [1] 13:5faith ] 4:20far [2] 6:24 12:10feel [1] 10:18fees [2]6:1716:19

few [1] 21:10file [4] 8:20,25 12:4,6filed [4]6:7 8:25 12:4

13:25i n l ~  [1] 4:20

find [ ]7:614:1519:

7fine [3]13:23 20:21

21:1finish [1]14:2

first [3]4:6 7:1011:

five [4]7:14,16 9:10

20:17FL [1]2:5

FLORIDA [12]1:2,9,

17,232:86:23,2512:

1919:123:2,6,15

followed [1]11:18

following [1]12:19

foregoing [1]23:10

forth [1]17:   3

found [1]19:8

four [3]7:14,16 9:10frame [1]17:8

fraud [1]9:13

fulfill [1] 6:4

hallwar [1] 2 :23hand [ ] 23:14happen [3]6:12,13

21:23happened [2] 7:15 9:

2

happr [1] 13:21

hear ] 17:19hearing [14]4:8 7:24

11:1712:8,2313:17

14:915:21,2316:23

19:1520:20,2522:5

held [1]18:13

HEREBY [1]23:7

hereto [1]23:10

hereunto [1]23:14

Herrmann [4]1 :2023:

4,17,19Hill [1]5:6

HILLSBOROUGH

[14]1:2,1613:13,15,1715:9,10,12,1716:

2 23:3,6,8,15holds [1] 13:1

home [1]22:1

Honor [12] 4:3,6,13 5:

3 6:15 7:2 16:24 17:219:1421:12,21 22:4

Honorable [1]1:14

however [1]5:17

E

e-mail [1]4:18

each [3]4:24 5:22 8:7effort [1]4:20

Either [3]12:315:3

16:21else s [1]14:24Emmanuel [2]10:24

:end [1]7:24

ended [1]7:14

enough [1]18:4

entitled [4]9:810:19

12:11,24ESQUIRE [1] 2:2

I

idea [2]7:1611:19

immunity [1] 11:20

Inc [3]1 :24 5:4 23:20including [1]5:1

inclusive [1] 23:INDEX [1]3:1

Index......................................3 [1]3:4

indicated [1] 10:22

inspect [1]14:17

Instead [1] 7:7

G

gathed1] 12:13gave [1]8:22

Gee [1]16:1

gets [4]14:4,5,6 17:

5getting [1]20:25

GILLESPIE [39]1:4 2:

D

DATE [5]1:1817:16,

1721:17,18

David [1]16:1

Sheet 2 complete - Instead

Page 26: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 26/28

insurance [1] 5:1 18:11,16 Nielsen [1]1:14 outside [1]18:24

intends [1]10:22 Library [3]9:20,21 18: Nor th [2] 2:4 5:2 over [2]14:617:15

interesting [1]18: 19 25 Notary [1]1 :22 overdue [1]4:19

interlocutory [2]17: limit [1]9:16 noted [1] 9:7 overruled [1]13:25

22 18:9 limits [1] 21:4 nothing [4]9:11 10:3 overruling [3]17: 18

interrogatories [9] 4: line [1]11:21 11:22,25 19,2015,19,226:16,247:7 litigant [2]2:618:17 notice [1] 9:20 own [2]15:19 17:25

8:2210:1213:7 litigants [1]18:13 notified [1]18:10 Pi n t e r r o ~ t o r y   [1]6:13

invoke [1] 9:25invoked [1] 10:4involve [1] 9: 13

isn t [1] 19:22issue [6] 13:10 16:18,

2318:1919:18,20

issues [1]8:1

item [2]5:22,25

items [3] 6:9 8:19 9:7

itself 1] 5: 19

location [3]13:10 14:

1815:10

log [2]6:22 16:7long [1]20:20look [1]12:20Loop [1] 2:7

November [1]10:16

Noya phonetic [1] 5:

2number [3]4:246:17,

24numbered [1]23:11

P-U-L-L-U-M [1] 5:5P.A [1] 1:8p.m [1]1:19

PA [1]2:3

PAGE [4] 3:213:20

18:21 19:2pages [2]13:21 23:10parameters [1]17:12

Pardon [2]10:2511:3

paren [1]7:1

part [4]5:25,2511:22

17:3parties [3] 14:8 15:7

M

made [3]5:25 6:1216:

12mailing [3]6:98:18

17:13manner [2]5:1514:

20

objected [3]8:1110:

718:10

objecting [2]5:14 6:

20objection [6]4:24 5:

246:108:19,2313:

J

John [1]10:23

Judge [11]1:15 8:4, March [1]4:14 22 16:211411:1112:1813:8 Marion [2] 9:20 15:16 objections [14] 4:25 party [10]14:3,4,5,17

14:1,1017:2321:19, matterl2] 11:619:22 5:8,11,226:2,16,17 15:2,14,16,18,2216:20 matters [2]9:12 12: 12:413:1,2416:6,6 12

judges [1]15:25 12 17:19,20 past [1] 7:9Judgmen t [9]4:9 7: maximum [1]19:1 obligation [1]12:14 pay [1]13:21

2011:917:4,519:15 medical [1]10:3 obviously [3]13:16 per [1]20:17

20:1,7,13 meets [1]18:16 17:720:21 perfectly [1]13:23

JUDICIAL [5] 1: 1 11: members [1] 18:15 Ocala [2] 2:8 9: 17 period [1]9:14

2020:1021:223:5 mention [1] 21:8 October [2] 10:16,17 permits [1] 14:17July [1]23:16 minute [1]17:1 offer [1]9:19 persons [1]11:7

June [4]1:18 4:14,21 minutes [2]20:17 21: offered [3]8:17,17 9: pertinent [1] 9: 11

10:18 6miss [1]16:16moment [1]13:9

months [1]12:22

m o r n i n ~  [1]20:18most [1 15:25motion [21]4:6,7,86:

77:208:6,21,259:1,

511:912:5,614:4,5

16:16,1917:3,419:2320:4

Mott [1] 5:4

moved [1]7:19

must [5]15:216:6,7,1017:17

N

4o f f e r i n ~  [1] 9:3office [ ]8:10,13,15Okay [8]18:8,20 19:6,

1320:12,1821:11,14one [4]11:1412:214:

2217:1only [3] 7:3 15:116:

12operates [1]14:3

oPPosinR [1] 14:17option [3 7:2 10:9 14:23

options [1]14:23orderl13] 6:14 8:7 9:

1512:713:117:9,15,

16,1718:521:12,17,18

o r i n ~   [1]14:14

other [ 8:20,24 15:15,2516:12

out [2] 7:10 18:12outrageous [1] 8:16

Phrasinr [1]11 :24place [1 11:6

Plaintiff [4]1:513:12

14:2515:1

plaintiffs [2]4:8 8:6

Pleadinr [1] 11:19point [3 7:5,1018:12

policy [3]15:21,24,25portion [1] 5:20

possession [5]10:1112:11 14:14,2415:5

postmarked [1] 17:17preemptive [1] 11:5

preference [1] 16:1prepare [1]21:12

present [4]9:2315:

20,2318:3

preserving [1]16:5

prior [3] 9:915:620:

20privilege [9]6:18,22

10:1,516:3,7,14,1517:21

K

kept [6] 9:1714:14,18,

19,2315:5

n o w n ~ [1]12:8

knows ] 7:2 9: 13

L

labor [1]19:10

Large [1] 1:23last [2] 7: 15 21 :22late [1] 12:4launch [1] 5:22

law [10] 5:1 9:20,2113:1 18:1,2,15,2519:2,17lawsuit [2]10:13,13lawsuits [1] 10:15leave [1] 21:21left [2] 21 :3,22Legislature [1] 19:8letter [11] 5: 14 17 186:2,3,6 9:5 11 :5,24

nature [1] 16:14need [3] 20:7,23 21:5NEIL [2] 1:4 2:6neutral [1]15:17never [2] 8:20 11:17

next [4]21:1,3,9,25

heet 3 Insurance - privilege

Page 27: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 27/28

privileqes [1] 6:20 record [1]11:24 34:3,6,13,148:2 9:9 1621:11,13,1822:2

pro [5]2:6 14:7 15:22 record-keeping [1] 18,2210:2111:10,11 site [1]15:17

18:12 17 14:15 13:9 1416:17 18 24 situation [2]12:18 13:probably [2]18:8 20: records [21]7:3 4 6 8 17:2,618:1019:14 11

15 9:1610:3 9 10 10 11 20:6 9 16 1821:7 11 slam [1]11:16

problem [3] 5:23 7:3 11:2312:2,10,1313: 14 18 21 22:4 So.2d [3] 5:4 5 6

13:4 4 18 2014:13 18 23 room [3]14:9 15:21 someone [2]14:24

problems [1]20:19 15:4 24 18:22Procedure [7] 6:23 7: regard [2]7:188:21 Rule [11]5:20 6:23 sometime [1]21:9

1,1112:2013:3,23 regarding [1]5:21 257:11 10:912:25 sorry [2]17:2 19:24

16:8 regardless [1]6:21 14:11,16,1619:1120: special [1]13:3

PROCEEDINGS [4]1: rejected [1]9:18 22 specifically [2]10:11

134:123:9,12 rejection [1] 9:3 rules [6]5:2412:19, 16:7

Proceedings............... rely [1]10:8 21,2416:818:6 specified [1]6:1

.................4 [1]3:5 relying [1]6:25 ruling [2]14:2 18:1 stand [1]5:7

produce [7] 7:2 3 10: repeat [1]11:18 RYAN [1]2:2 State [4]1 :2323:2,6,

15stated [2]16:6 23:10

stay [2]18:4 21 :25

stenographic [1] 23:

12still [1]6:19

stringent [1]18:13

sub [1]7:1

sUbject [6] 6: 10 8: 19

2311:515:616:4

s U b s t a n t i a l l ~  [1] 21:4

sufficiencr 1]16:13

sufficient 1]17:11

sufficiently [1]16:11

suggest [1]14:21

Suite [1]2:4

Summary [9]4:9 7:20

11:917:4,519:1420:1 6 13

SUPf0rt [1] 5:9SW 1]2:7

sway [1]16:5

912:1513:315:8,11 reply [2]8:8 14:6 Sproduced [5]5:169:

1713:13,1916:7

Production [14]4:16,

235:15,196:98:5,8,910:1413:6,10,11

14:1115:3

Productions [1]5:21

prohibit [1]10:8

prohibited [2]10:2,6

promise [1]6:12

promised [1]6:3

proper [2]7:11 12:16proposed [1]21:12

proposition [1]5:7

Protection [4]8:7 9:6

1611:5

Protective [1]12:7provide [3] 6:22 8:23

13:2

provided [2]7:21 15:

13

report [2] 23:8 12

REPORTER [4]1:20,

21 23:4 17

~ [ o ~ ~ r ....................2

representation [2]7:

149:9

r e p r e s e n t i n ~  [1] 7:9Request [13 4:15 23

5: 15 19 21 6:88:5,9,

12,1811:2513:615:

3requested [5]6:107:

228:199:813:19

requestinR [1]15:15

requests 1]12:1

required [2] 6:22 9:23requirement [1]18:14

requirements [1]18:

17requires [1]5:21

same [4]6:12 8:22 18:

1320:11

S a Y i n ~  [1]12:20

says ]5:24 6:5 25 7:812:13

schedule [1]20:20

scheduled [3]17:6

19:1520:25

school [1]18:15

se [5]2:6 14:8 15:22

18:12 17second [2]7:13 17:3

secure [1]9:22

security [6]11:6 15:

13 14 15 18 19see [1]4:11

seek [1]19:1seeking [2]6:14 12:

14select [1]15:10

send [6]5:17 6:4 9:19Public [1]1:22 research [1]14:16

11:2312:213:22 TPullum(phonetic [1]

5:5

reset [5]19:20 21 25

20:5 7resettiny [1]20:2

resolve 1] 4:20respond [11] 6:8 15 7:

138:5,18,2412:21,

2213:5,815:3

responded [2]8:20 9:4responding [2]14:4

15:2response [5]4:17,23

7:712:1714:5

responses [6] 4:22 5:

96:47:179:614:20

Richard [1]1:14

RODEMS [33]1:8 2:2

sent [2]4:175:13

separate [1]16:22

served [3]4:9,15 5:9

services [1]19:10

set [6]13:316:2217:

520:9,1223:14

settlement [2]10:16,

18several [1]12:22

shall [1]6:1

Sheriff [1]16:1

shorthand [1]23:8

shown [1]17:17

side [1]20:17

since [1]13:16

sirl13] 4:11 8:2 14:2

316:1818:7,1820:9,

Tampa [3]1:172:5

23:15

taunting [1] 21 :22telephone [1]11:15

terms [1]14:16

there s [8]5:10 6:18

11:13,13,21,2515:20,

22therefore [1] 9:4

THIRTEENTH [2]1:1

23:5

threat [2]11:13,14

threatened [1]11:14

threats [1]8:13

three [1]5:6

timely [2] 6:20 18:3

today [6]4:5 6:7 14

Q

quite [1]18:11

quote [5] 5:24 6:1 5 7

11

R

raised [1] 6: 17raising [1]16:3

reading [1]6:5

reason [2]8:13 15:20

reasonable [3]19:7,9,

12receive [1]4:17

received [1]4:22

recite [1]16:9

Sheet 4 pnvlleges - today

Page 28: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 28/28

17:9 20:9 21 :24 4:423:4,17,19took [1]9:2 within [1] 20:25traditional [1] 20: 13 without [1] 6:16

TRANSCRIPT [1]1: WITNESS [1] 23:14

13 words [1] 15:15

transcription [1] 23: y12 years [3] 7:15,16 9:10

transmit [1] 21: 15true [3]5:17 9:1123:

11try [2] 4:20 21:9

two [3] 7:10 10:12 21:

1typically [1] 15:8

U

UMC [1] 20:14

undeclared [1] 7:6

under [4] 4:25 7:11

10:919:1

understand [1] 14:9Uniform [1] 19:22

unless [1] 14:6

unproduced [1] 7:5

until [6]12:8 22 13:6,719:1622:1

untimely [6] 4:21,25

5:8 1113:1 25

up [3] 4:5 7:2411:16

V

view [2] 9:18,19volume [1] 15:7vs[1]1:7

Wwaived [4] 4:25 5:8,

126:20

wall [1]11 :17

wanted [1] 5: 16

wants [4] 9:1813:19

15:13,18way [4] 7:13 9:8 12:3

14:3week [7] 4:20 5:1012:

8 2213:6 721:3

weeks [2] 21:1,10

whatever [1] 7:15

whatsoever [1] 10:4whenever [1] 15:22WHEREOF [1] 23:14wherever [1] 15:4

whether [5]6:19,2114:2415:1619:12

will [10]6:8 8:12,23

14:12 1515:8 1416:

2018:420:4

WILLIAM [6] 1:10,20