Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    1/25

    INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION(WITH REFERENCE TO TRANSACTIONALANALYSIS)

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    2/25

    TRANSACTIONAL ANALYSIS

    Transactional Analysis is a theory developed by Dr. Eric Berne in the 1950s.

    Originally trained in psychoanalysis, Berne wanted a theory which could beunderstood and available to everyone.

    Transactional Analysis is an outcome of social psychology and a method toimprove communication.

    The theory outlines how we have developed and treat ourselves, how werelate and communicate with others, and offers suggestions andinterventions which will enable us to change and grow.

    TA includes 4 major areas that are Ego States, Transaction, Life positionsand Strokes & Games.

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    3/25

    EGO STATES

    A. Parent Ego Statecharacterized by domineering,over protective & loving, stern and critical. It isillustrated by those who establish standard and rule forother

    B. Adult Ego StateIn this people attack problems in acool minded rational manner. In adult state informationis gathered, carefully analyzed, alternatives generated,and make logical choices

    C. Child Ego Statesubmissive & conforming,emotional, joyful, or rebellious. Characterized by veryimmature behaviors

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    4/25

    TRANSACTION BETWEEN EGO STATES

    A. Complimentary transaction: It shows 3 possible complementary.Transactions are complimentary if the message sent or behavior exhibitedby 1 person ego state receive the appropriate and expected response fromthe other person ego state.

    P

    A A

    P

    C

    P

    C

    P

    C

    A A

    C

    P

    CC

    AA

    P

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    5/25

    B. Crossed Transaction: It is occurs when message sent the behaviorexhibited by the 1 personsego state is reacted to by an incompatible andunexpected ego state on the part of the other person.

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    6/25

    C. Ulterior Transaction: They are very damaging to interpersonalrelation because it always involve at least two ego state on the partof 1 person. Individual may say one thing but mean quite another.

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    7/25

    LIFE POSITIONS

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    8/25

    STROKES AND GAMES

    Strokes: Simply means giving some kind of recognition to theother

    Positive

    Negative

    Games: A series of ulteriorly motivated transactions thatappear complementary on the surface but end in bad

    feelings

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    9/25

    INTERPERSONALCOMMUNICATION

    Interpersonalcommunication deals with relationshipsbetween people, usually in face-to-face private settings.

    Interpersonalcommunication is the primary way through

    which relationships are created, maintained, and changed.

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    10/25

    USES OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION

    Give and collect information.

    Influence the attitudes and behavior of others.

    Give and receive emotional support.

    Form contacts and maintain relationships.

    Make sense of the world and our experiences in it.

    Make decisions and solve problems.

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    11/25

    ISSUES INFLUENCING INTERPERSONALCOMMUNICATION

    Personality conflict:

    Each of us has a unique way of interacting with

    others. Personal opposition always based on :

    personal dislikes

    personal Ego states

    life positions

    personal disagreements

    different personality styles

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    12/25

    EXAMPLE: IMAGINE THE POTENTIAL FOR A TOP LEVEL PERSONALITYCONFLICT AT EMC CORP. A LEADING MAKER OF DATA STORAGEEQUIPMENT.

    Mr. A was CEO for 9yrs. Mr. B was working under him.

    Gave up his position in 2001,due topersonality conflict.

    Become new CEO in 2001.

    In 2002, interview he gave A grade to Mr.Bfor innovation & Strategic mgmt. but F inFin. Mgmt. because of loss.

    Mr. B wanted to move faster to cut cost,make acquisitions & introduce newsoftware's.

    He is not interested in one to one relation. He would like to make one-to-one relation.

    Make tough decisions slowly. Make tough decisions quickly.

    He thinks thank-you is a sign of weakness. Mr. B praises & thanks his troops regularly.

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    13/25

    GENDER DIFFERENCES

    13

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    14/25

    Communication Barriers between men

    & women: Difference in style of conversation.

    Both have different mind set, priorities and principles.

    Ways of dealing with the same situation are very different.

    A research shows that Men use to talk to emphasize statuswhereas women use it to create connection.

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    15/25

    CULTURAL DIFFERENCES

    15

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    16/25

    CROSS CULTURAL COMMUNICATION

    Barriers caused by differences among perception

    Barriers caused by tone difference

    Barriers caused by semantics

    Barriers caused by word connotations. Words imply different

    things in different languages.

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    17/25

    Politically Correct Communication

    How do you describe a person who is wheelchair bound (ashandicapped or physically challenged)

    Elderly or senior

    We must be sensitive to others feelings

    Should choose politically correct word

    Words might have the same meaning but politically correctnessrefers either words are soothing or hurting someone

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    18/25

    CASE STUDYHeading off a Permanent Misunderstanding

    Mindy Martin, Edward Sharp, Walter Murdoch are workingtogether in an organization.

    Martin and Sharp were good friends and all three had very

    healthy competition between them as they all were at the samelevel.

    Martin was very hard working, ambitious and responsibleemployee. Because of their hard work and good efforts, Martinsdivision had become the leader in the company and the uppermanagement had praised her lavishly.

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    19/25

    She believed that with a good recommendation from Sharp, shewould get that promotion.

    But unfortunately Murdoch received the promotion and movedto Topeka.

    Martin was shocked. It was bad enough that she did not get thepromotion, but she could not stand the fact that Murdoch hadbeen chosen.

    She and Sharp had taken to calling Murdoch Mr. Intolerable,because neither of them could stand his pompous arrogance.

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    20/25

    She felt that his being chosen was an insult to her.

    When the grapevine confirmed her suspicion that Al Sharphad strongly influenced the decision, she determined to

    reduce her interaction with Sharp to a bare minimum.

    Relations in the office were very chilly for almost amonth. Sharp soon gave up trying to get in Martins favor

    and they began communicating only in short.

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    21/25

    Finally William Attridge, their immediate boss, called the two

    for a meeting. William said, were going to sit here until youtwo become friends again.

    Martin resisted for a few minutes, denying that anything had

    changed in their relationship, but when she saw that Attridgewas serious, she finally said, Sharp seems more interested indealing with Walter Murdoch.

    Sharp could not say anything. Attridge came to the rescue.

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    22/25

    Attridge said that, Martin if youre upset about thatpromotion, you'd know that Sharp had nothing but praisedfor you and kept pointing out how this division would suffer ifwe buried you in Topeka.

    With your bonuses you are making as much as Murdoch and ifyou work here continues to be outstanding, youll be headedfor much better place than Topeka.

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    23/25

    Embarrassed, Martin looked up at Sharp and apologizedfor treating him unfairly.

    The next day office was almost back to normal. Martinand Sharp use to take a coffee break together every dayas earlier.

    Stages/ Ego States Strokes Games Interpersonal

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    24/25

    Stages/periods

    Ego States Strokes Games InterpersonalCommunication

    Before

    Promotion

    Adult Ego Expecting

    promotion.

    Friendly, giving time

    to each other, trust& enjoy free timetogether.

    informal & formal,

    face-to-facecommunication.

    Promotiontakes place

    Parent Ego Did not get thepromotion.

    Chilly environment inoffice, not listening

    to Sharp.

    No interpersonalcommunication.

    Cold warperiod

    Child Ego

    Felt that wasbetrayed bySharp.

    Cold war, avoidance& escape fromconfrontations.

    Only work relatedshortcommunication.

    Meeting andthereafter

    Adult Ego Came to know thetruth, realized hermistake &

    apologized.

    New relation havebeen established,more healthy &

    strong.

    HealthyCommunicationre-established.

  • 8/11/2019 Transactional Analysis_Interpersonal Communication.ppt

    25/25

    CONCLUSION

    Now with the help of Psychoanalytical theory i.e. Transactional Analysis,Martin can understand her different behavior in different situation and canimprove those behavior which are not fruitful in those situation.

    She can also use Interpersonal communication as to understand the person,real situation/conflicts better.

    She can apply both to understand others behavior so that she can negotiate

    with them easily and effectively.