Traffic Impact Study for the Altura Apartments - Petalumacityofpetaluma.net/cdd/pdf/temp/F_TrafficImpactStudy.pdf · Traffic Impact Study for the Altura Apartments in the City of

Balancing Functionality and LivabilityTraffic Engineering l Transportation Planning

Traffic Impact Study for the Altura Apartments

Prepared for the

City of Petaluma

July 2, 2015

Submitted byWhitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc.

490 Mendocino AvenueSuite 201Santa Rosa, CA 95401

voice 707.542.9500

475 14th StreetSuite 290Oakland, CA 94612

voice 510.444.2600

web www.w-trans.com

Traffic Impact Study for the Altura Apartments in the City of Petaluma July 2, 2015 Page i

Table of Contents

Page

Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 1

Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 2

Transportation Setting ..................................................................................................................................... 4

Capacity Analysis .............................................................................................................................................. 9

Alternative Modes ..........................................................................................................................................26

Access and Circulation ..................................................................................................................................27

Conclusions and Recommendations ..........................................................................................................28

Study Participants and References ..............................................................................................................29

Figures

1 Study Area and Lane Configurations.............................................................................................................. 3 2 Existing Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................................................. 12 3 Baseline Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................................................. 15 4 Future Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................................................... 18 5 Site Plan ............................................................................................................................................................... 20 6 Project Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................................................... 22

Tables

1 Collision Rates at the Study Intersections .................................................................................................... 6 2 Bicycle Facility Summary ................................................................................................................................... 8 3 Intersection Level of Service Criteria .......................................................................................................... 10 4 Existing Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service ................................................................................... 13 5 Existing Highway Segment Peak Period Volumes ..................................................................................... 13 6 Baseline Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service................................................................................... 16 7 Future Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service ..................................................................................... 17 8 Trip Generation Summary .............................................................................................................................. 19 9 Trip Distribution Assumptions ...................................................................................................................... 21 10 Existing and Existing plus Project Peak Hour Levels of Service ............................................................ 21 11 Existing and Existing plus Project Highway Segment Peak Period Volumes ....................................... 23 12 Baseline and Baseline plus Project Peak Hour Levels of Service ........................................................... 24 13 Future and Future plus Project Peak Hour Levels of Service ................................................................ 25

Appendices

A Collision Rate Calculations B Intersection Level of Service Calculations

Traffic Impact Study for the Altura Apartments in the City of Petaluma July 2, 2015 Page 1

Executive Summary

The proposed Altura Apartments project would result in construction of 150 apartment units on an existing vacant lot. The project’s anticipated trip generation includes 988 daily trips on average during a weekday, with 77 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 93 during the p.m. peak hour.

The study area was established by the City and includes intersections along Baywood Drive and Lakeville Street-Lakeville Highway. Analysis indicates that the eleven study intersections are operating acceptably under Existing conditions both with and without project. Under the Baseline and Baseline plus Project scenarios, which include trips from projects that have already been approved and are likely to be occupied within the next few years, the study intersections are projected to continue operating acceptably, except Lakeville Street/East Washington Street and Lakeville Highway/McDowell Boulevard South, which are expected to operate at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour and a.m. peak hour, respectively. With the project, the deficiently operating intersections continue to operate at LOS E, which has been defined as being less than significant under the standards applied.

Three of the study intersections are expected to operate unacceptably under projected Future volumes. The City’s General Plan indicates that Lakeville Street/East D Street and Lakeville Street/Caulfield Lane are expected to operate unacceptably and this has been deemed significant and unavoidable in the City’s General Plan, and no improvements such as roadway widening are suggested. With the project, Lakeville Street/Caulfield Lane is expected to continue operating unacceptably at LOS E which is a less-than-significant impact under the applied standards.

The East Washington Street approaches to Lakeville Street were recently modified to have protected-only left-turn phasing to address safety concerns. While this operation is safer, it is also less efficient, and results in deficient operation under projected Future volumes. With the addition of one through lane in both the eastbound and westbound directions this intersection would be expected to operate acceptably at LOS D. However, the addition of capacity is contrary to policy in the General Plan.

Because the project does not cause East Washington Street/Lakeville Street and Caulfield Lane/Lakeville Street to deteriorate to LOS F, the impact of the project on the future unacceptable operating conditions is less-than-significant. Similarly, the project is expected to have a less-than-significant impact on US 101 as it increases volumes by less than one percent and the project residents will pay sales tax in the area, helping to fund planned future improvements as needed.

Vehicles will access the project via a full access driveway on Baywood Drive north of its intersection with Perry Lane. A center turn lane on Baywood Drive is available for left turns into and out of the site. Additionally, a driveway on Perry Lane west of Baywood Drive would also provide access for vehicles. Sight distance at the project driveway locations for both entering and exiting drivers is adequate.

Upon the construction of sidewalks along the site’s Perry Lane frontage and contribution toward enhancement of bus stops at Lakeville Highway/Baywood Drive, facilities for alternative modes will be adequate.


Introduction

Introduction

This report presents an analysis of the potential traffic impacts that would be associated with development of a proposed apartment complex to be located on the northwest corner of Baywood Drive and Perry Lane in the City of Petaluma. The traffic study was completed in accordance with the criteria established by the City of Petaluma, and is consistent with standard traffic engineering techniques.

Prelude

The purpose of a traffic impact study is to provide City of Petaluma staff and policy makers with data that they can use to make an informed decision regarding the potential traffic impacts of a proposed project, and any associated improvements that would be required in order to mitigate these impacts to a level of insignificance as defined by the City of Petaluma’s General Plan or other policies. Vehicular traffic impacts are typically evaluated by determining the number of new trips that the proposed use would be expected to generate, distributing these trips to the surrounding street system based on existing travel patterns or anticipated travel patterns specific to the proposed project, then analyzing the impact the new traffic would be expected to have on critical intersections or roadway segments. Impacts relative to access for pedestrians, bicyclists, and to transit are also addressed.

Project Profile

The project consists of an apartment complex that would consist of 150 dwelling units. The project site is currently vacant and is bounded by Baywood Drive to the east, Perry Lane to the south, single-family homes on Alderwood Court to the northeast, and open space to the northwest, as shown in Figure 1.

No

rth

No

t to

Sca

le

St. F

ranc

is D

rive

101

116

11

10

9 67

8

34

5

12

Lak

evill

e S

tree

t

E. Wash

ington Street

D Street

Caulfield Lane

Perr

yLa

ne

McD

owel

l Bou

leva

rd S

o.

Casa Grande Road

Baywood D

rive

Fig

ure

1 –

Stu

dy

Are

a an

d L

ane

Co

nfig

ura

tio

ns

191p

et.a

i 5/

15

Traf

fic Im

pact

Stu

dy fo

r th

e Al

tura

Apa

rtm

ents

LEG

END

Stu

dy I

nte

rsec

tion

5

Lake

ville H

wy

US 10

1 NB

Ramp

s2

Lakev

ille St

D St

11 Baywood

Dr

McDo

well B

lvd

9

Baywood Dr

Perry

Ln

10 St Fra

ncis

Dr

Baywood Dr

7 Lake

ville S

t Casa Grande Rd

6

Bayw

ood D

rLake

ville S

t

3

Lake

ville

St

Caulf

ield L

n1

Lakev

ille St

Washington St

8Mc

Dowe

ll Blvd

Lake

ville S

t

4

Lakevil

le Hwy

US 10

1 SB

Ramp

s

Drive

way


Transportation Setting

Operational Analysis

Study Area and Periods

The study area as selected with input from City staff consists of the following eleven intersections:

1. Lakeville Street/East Washington Street 2. Lakeville Street/D Street 3. Lakeville Street/Caulfield Lane 4. Lakeville Highway/US 101 South Ramps 5. Lakeville Highway/US 101 North Ramps 6. Lakeville Highway/Baywood Drive 7. Lakeville Highway/Casa Grande Road 8. Lakeville Highway/McDowell Boulevard South 9. Baywood Drive/Perry Lane 10. Baywood Drive/St. Francis Drive 11. Baywood Drive/McDowell Boulevard South

Operating conditions during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods were evaluated to capture the highest potential impacts for the proposed project as well as the highest volumes on the local transportation network. The morning peak hour occurs between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. and reflects conditions during the home to work or school commute, while the p.m. peak hour occurs between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. and typically reflects the highest level of congestion during the homeward bound commute.

Study Intersections

Because of the skewed nature of the street system in Petaluma, the streets are described using US 101 and East Washington Street as north-south streets within the study area, and Lakeville Highway (SR 116) as an east-west street.

Lakeville Street/East Washington Street is a signalized, four-legged intersection with split phasing on the Lakeville Street approaches (in other words, the two approaches operate separately) and protected left-turn phasing on the East Washington Street approaches (protected/permitted left-turn phasing is being replaced by protected only left-turn phasing). The SMART/Northwest Pacific Railroad tracks run parallel to and along the south side of Lakeville Street and pass through the southern East Washington Street leg of the intersection. Railroad signal infrastructure and crossing arms are located across the East Washington Street legs. Marked crosswalks and pedestrian signals are provided on all legs of the intersection.

Lakeville Street/D Street is a four-legged signalized intersection with protected left-turn phasing on the westbound Lakeville Street approach, permitted left-turn phasing on the eastbound Lakeville Street approach and split phasing of the D Street approaches as well as a right-turn overlap on the northbound D Street approach. The SMART/Northwest Pacific Railroad tracks run parallel to and along the south side of Lakeville Street and pass through the southern leg of the intersection. Railroad signal infrastructure and crossing arms are located across the intersection’s northern and southern D Street legs. Marked crosswalks and pedestrian signals are provided for all four legs of the intersection.

Lakeville Street/Caulfield Lane is a four-legged, signalized intersection. The Lakeville Street approaches have protected left-turn phasing and the Caulfield Lane approaches are split phased. Marked crosswalks and pedestrian phasing are provided across all but the eastern leg of the intersection.


Lakeville Highway (SR 116) /US 101 Southbound Ramps is a four-legged, signalized intersection with the north leg the US 101 Southbound on- and off-ramps and the south leg a parking lot driveway. Protected left-turn phasing is provided on the highway, while the ramp and driveway approaches are split-phased. Crosswalks are provided across the northern and western legs of the intersection.

Lakeville Highway (SR 116)/US 101 Northbound Ramps is a three-legged, signalized intersection with protected left-turn phasing on the highway. A marked crosswalk is provided across the western leg of the intersection.

Lakeville Highway (SR 116)/Baywood Drive is a signalized, four-legged intersection with protected left turns on all four approaches. Marked crosswalks and pedestrian phasing are provided across all but the western leg of the intersection.

Lakeville Highway (SR 116)/Casa Grande Road is a signalized, four-legged intersection with protected left-turn phasing on the Lakeville Highway approaches and permitted left turns on Casa Grande Road, which intersects the highway at a skewed angle. Marked crosswalks and pedestrian phasing are provided across the eastern and southern legs of the intersection.

Lakeville Highway (SR 116)/McDowell Boulevard South is a four-legged, signalized intersection with protected left-turn phasing on all approaches.

Baywood Drive/Perry Lane is a four-legged intersection with a public driveway forming the fourth leg. The eastbound and westbound approaches are stop-controlled while the northbound and southbound approaches are uncontrolled. No marked crosswalks are provided at this intersection.

Baywood Drive/St. Francis Drive is a four-legged all-way stop-controlled intersection with marked crosswalks across all legs.

Baywood Drive/McDowell Boulevard South is a four-legged roundabout intersection with marked crosswalks across all legs.

The locations of the study intersections and the existing lane configurations and controls are shown in Figure 1.

Collision History

The collision histories for the study intersections were reviewed to determine any trends or patterns that may indicate a safety issue. Collision rates were calculated based on records available from the California Highway Patrol as published in their Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) reports. The most current five-year period available is July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2012.

As presented in Table 1, the calculated collision rates for the study intersections were compared to average collision rates for similar facilities statewide, as indicated in 2010 Collision Data on California State Highways, California Department of Transportation. Nine of the 11 intersections have rates that are higher than the statewide average.


Table 1 Collision Rates at the Study Intersections

Study Intersection Number of Collisions

(2007-2012)

Calculated Collision Rate

(c/mve)

Statewide Average

Collision Rate (c/mve)

1. Lakeville St/East Washington St 47 0.95 0.27

2. Lakeville St/D St 4 0.10 0.27

3. Lakeville St/Caulfield Ln 14 0.31 0.27

4. Lakeville Hwy/US 101 South Ramps 17 0.35 0.27

5. Lakeville Hwy/US 101 North Ramps 14 0.23 0.21

6. Lakeville Hwy/Baywood Dr 25 0.44 0.27

7. Lakeville Hwy/Casa Grande Rd 17 0.34 0.27

8. Lakeville Hwy/McDowell Blvd South 19 0.36 0.27

9. Baywood Dr/Perry Ln 3 0.36 0.15

10. Baywood Dr/St. Francis Dr 1 0.08 0.21

11. Baywood Dr/McDowell Blvd South 14 0.57 0.15

Note: c/mve = collisions per million vehicles entering; Bold text = higher collision rate than statewide average

While Lakeville Street/East Washington Street had an above-average calculated collision rate, the City is in the process of replacing the protected-permissive left-turn phasing at the intersection with protected only phasing. This change is expected to reduce collisions.

The collision rates for Lakeville Street/Caulfield Lane and Lakeville Highway/US 101 North Ramps were only slightly over the statewide average, so still within the range that would be considered typical.

The most common type of collision at both Lakeville Highway/US 101 South Ramps and Lakeville Highway/Baywood Drive was rear-end crashes due to speeding. Rear-ends were also the most prevalent collision type at Lakeville Highway/Casa Grande Road due to speeding and improper turning. Increased enforcement on Lakeville Highway may help to reduce unsafe speeding, or changes to improve coordination and reduce queuing could also help address the incidence of collisions.

Lakeville Highway/McDowell Boulevard South had “broadside” as the most common type of collision and sideswipe second most common, with a majority due to right-of-way violations and improper turning. With a long cycle length at this intersection, drivers familiar with the area may be more inclined to enter at the very end of the yellow clearance interval, or even after the light turns red, in order to avoid the long wait for the next green light. Increased enforcement may decrease collisions.

While the calculated collision rate at Baywood Drive/Perry Lane is higher than the Statewide average, the collisions occurred due to improper turning and speeding. A decrease in collisions may occur with increased enforcement.

The intersection of Baywood Drive/McDowell Boulevard South was converted from all-way stop control to a roundabout in 2008. Of the 14 reported collisions, half occurred between 2007 and 2008, while the roundabout either had not been built or construction had just finished. If only the time period since the


roundabout was completed and drivers had a chance to familiarize themselves with the new controls is evaluated, approximately one collision occurs per year, with the exception of 2010, when there was an unusual spike in collisions.

Alternative Modes

Pedestrian Facilities

Pedestrian facilities include sidewalks, crosswalks, pedestrian signal phases, curb ramps, curb extensions, and various streetscape amenities such as lighting, benches, etc. In general, a network of sidewalks, crosswalks, pedestrian signals, and curb ramps provide access for pedestrians in the vicinity of the proposed project site; however, sidewalk gaps, obstacles, and barriers can be found along some of the roadways connecting to the project site. Existing gaps and obstacles along the connecting roadways impact convenient and continuous access for pedestrians and present safety concerns in those locations where appropriate pedestrian infrastructure would address potential conflict points.

• Perry Lane – Intermittent sidewalk coverage is provided on Perry Lane east of Baywood Drive with significant gaps on both sides of the street. No sidewalks are provided along Perry Lane west of Baywood Drive.

• Baywood Drive – Continuous sidewalks are provided on the east side of Baywood Drive in the vicinity of the project site, between Lakeville Highway and South McDowell Boulevard. An existing gap in sidewalk connectivity exists north of Perry Lane, along the proposed project frontage. Lighting is provided by overhead street lights.

Bicycle Facilities

The Highway Design Manual, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2012, classifies bikeways into three categories:

• Class I Multi-Use Path: a completely separated right-of-way for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians with cross flows of motorized traffic minimized.

• Class II Bike Lane: a striped and signed lane for one-way bike travel on a street or highway.

• Class III Bike Route: signing only for shared use with motor vehicles within the same travel lane on a street or highway.

In the project area, Class II bike lanes exist on Baywood Drive between Lakeville Highway and South McDowell Boulevard. Bicyclists ride in the roadway and/or on sidewalks along all other streets within the project study area. Table 2 summarizes the existing and planned bicycle facilities in the project vicinity, as contained in the City of Petaluma Proposed and Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities map dated February 2014 and prepared by Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA).


Table 2 Bicycle Facility Summary

Status Facility

Class Length (miles)

Begin Point End Point

Existing

Petaluma River Trail 1 3.11 Marina Ave Shollenberger Park

NWP Trail I 0.22 US 101 Ramps Baywood Dr

Baywood Dr II 0.57 Lakeville Hwy S McDowell Blvd

Planned

NWP Trail I 1.2 D Street Baywood Dr

NWP Trail I 0.9 Baywood Dr Adobe Creek

Lakeville Hwy II 5.00 D St City Limits

St. Francis Dr/Stuart Dr III 1.60 S McDowell Blvd Maria Dr

Source: City of Petaluma Proposed and Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities, SCTA, February 2014 Transit Facilities

Petaluma Transit provides fixed route bus service in the City of Petaluma. Petaluma Transit Route 24 provides loop service to destinations throughout the City with stops near the project site at Lakeville Highway/Marina Avenue and Baywood Drive/St. Francis Drive. Route 24 operates Monday through Friday with approximately one hour headways between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.

Sonoma County Transit provides regional service between Petaluma and surrounding communities. Route 40, which travels between the City of Petaluma and City of Sonoma, has stops on Lakeville Highway at Baywood Drive and operates Monday through Friday during morning and evening peak hours with approximately 30 to 90 minute headways between 6:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m.

Golden Gate Transit provides regional service between communities in the North Bay Area and San Francisco. Route 76 is a commuter bus route operating Monday through Friday that heads toward San Francisco during the morning peak period and toward Petaluma during the evening commute with approximately one-half-hour headways and has stops at Lakewood Highway Park and Ride.

Two bicycles can be carried on most Petaluma Transit, Sonoma County and Golden Gate Transit buses. Bike rack space is on a first come, first served basis. Additional bicycles are allowed on Petaluma Transit buses at the discretion of the driver.

Dial-a-ride, also known as paratransit, or door-to-door service, is available for those who are unable to independently use the transit system due to a physical or mental disability. Paratransit is designed to serve the needs of individuals with disabilities within Petaluma and the greater Petaluma area.


Capacity Analysis

Intersection Level of Service Methodologies

Level of Service (LOS) is used to rank traffic operation on various types of facilities based on traffic volumes and roadway capacity using a series of letter designations ranging from A to F. Generally, Level of Service A represents free flow conditions and Level of Service F represents forced flow or breakdown conditions. A unit of measure that indicates a level of delay generally accompanies the LOS designation.

The study intersections were analyzed using methodologies published in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), Transportation Research Board, 2000 for signalized and two-way stop-controlled intersections and methodologies published in the HCM 2010 for all-way stop-controlled and roundabout intersections. These sources contain methodologies for various types of intersection control, all of which are related to a measurement of delay in average number of seconds per vehicle.

The Levels of Service for Baywood Drive/Perry Lane, which has side-street stop controls, or is unsignalized and has two approaches stop controlled, were analyzed using the “Two-Way Stop-Controlled” intersection capacity method from the HCM 2000. This methodology determines a level of service for each minor turning movement by estimating the level of average delay in seconds per vehicle. Results are presented for individual movements together with the weighted overall average delay for the intersection.

The study intersection of Baywood Drive/St. Francis Drive, which has stop signs on all approaches, was analyzed using the “All-Way Stop-Controlled” Intersection methodology from the HCM 2010. This methodology evaluates delay for each approach based on turning movements, opposing and conflicting traffic volumes, and the number of lanes. Average vehicle delay is computed for the intersection as a whole, and is then related to a Level of Service.

The study intersections that are controlled by a traffic signal were evaluated using the signalized methodology from the HCM 2000. This methodology is based on factors including traffic volumes, green time for each movement, phasing, whether or not the signals are coordinated, truck traffic, and pedestrian activity. Average stopped delay per vehicle in seconds is used as the basis for evaluation in this LOS methodology. For purposes of this study, delays were calculated using actual signal timing for existing and baseline conditions and optimized signal timing for future conditions.

The intersection of Baywood Drive/McDowell Boulevard South is controlled by a modern roundabout and was evaluated using the FHWA Roundabout Method, also contained within the Unsignalized Methodology of the HCM 2010. This methodology determines intersection operation using the gap acceptance method using basic geometric and volume data to calculate entering and circulating flows. This information is then translated to an overall average vehicle delay, with LOS break points at the same delays as used in the signalized methodology. Because the HCM roundabout methodology is relatively unsophisticated, the much more advanced SIDRA roundabout analysis software was utilized in any cases where the basic HCM methodology predicts operation worse than LOS B.

The ranges of delay associated with the various levels of service are indicated in Table 3.


Table 3 Intersection Level of Service Criteria

LOS Two-Way Stop-Controlled Signalized All-Way Stop-Controlled Roundabout

A Delay of 0 to 10 seconds. Gaps in traffic are readily available for drivers exiting the minor street.

Delay of 0 to 10 seconds. Most vehicles arrive during the green phase, so do not stop at all.

Delay of 0 to 10 seconds. Upon stopping, drivers are immediately able to proceed.

Delay of 0 to 10 seconds.

B Delay of 10 to 15 seconds. Gaps in traffic are somewhat less readily available than with LOS A, but no queuing occurs on the minor street.

Delay of 10 to 20 seconds. More vehicles stop than with LOS A, but many drivers still do not have to stop.

Delay of 10 to 15 seconds. Drivers may wait for one or two vehicles to clear the intersection before proceeding from a stop.


C Delay of 15 to 25 seconds. Acceptable gaps in traffic are less frequent, and drivers may approach while another vehicle is already waiting to exit the side street.

Delay of 20 to 35 seconds. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many still pass through without stopping.

Delay of 15 to 25 seconds. Drivers will enter a queue of one or two vehicles on the same approach, and wait for vehicle to clear from one or more approaches prior to entering the intersection.


D Delay of 25 to 35 seconds. There are fewer acceptable gaps in traffic, and drivers may enter a queue of one or two vehicles on the side street.

Delay of 35 to 55 seconds. The influence of congestion is noticeable, and most vehicles have to stop.

Delay of 25 to 35 seconds. Queues of more than two vehicles are encountered on one or more approaches.


E Delay of 35 to 50 seconds. Few acceptable gaps in traffic are available, and longer queues may form on the side street.

Delay of 55 to 80 seconds. Most, if not all, vehicles must stop and drivers consider the delay excessive.

Delay of 35 to 50 seconds. Longer queues are encountered on more than one approach to the intersection.


F Delay of more than 50 seconds. Drivers may wait for long periods before there is an acceptable gap in traffic for exiting the side streets, creating long queues.

Delay of more than 80 seconds. Vehicles may wait through more than one cycle to clear the intersection.

Delay of more than 50 seconds. Drivers enter long queues on all approaches.

Delay of more than 80 seconds.

References: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2010

Traffic Operation Standards

The Petaluma General Plan 2025 has an adopted Level of Service (LOS) standard for streets that indicates the minimum acceptable operation is LOS D, with the following standard of significance for motor vehicle circulation:

Policy 5-P-10: Maintain an intersection level of service (LOS) standard for motor vehicle circulation that ensures efficient traffic flow and supports multi-modal mobility goals. LOS should be maintained at Level D or better for motor vehicles due to traffic from any development project.

With the current General Plan, the City is shifting toward a multimodal emphasis and LOS standard. “A multimodal analysis that, in addition to motor vehicles, takes into consideration the overall mobility and conditions for non-auto road users (i.e., bicycles and pedestrians) is highly encouraged.” The Community Character Element of the General Plan also contains circulation-related objectives and policies. This element directs that pedestrian and bicycle circulation be integrated into street designs and improvements.


It also states that the amount of paving and the apparent width of streets should be reduced where possible.

The Petaluma General Plan 2025 Draft Environmental Impact Report, 2006, included cumulative analysis of major intersections in Petaluma. On pages 3.2-34 and 3.2-35 of the DEIR, it is acknowledged that buildout of the General Plan would result in unacceptable operations at the intersection of Lakeville Street/D Street. The DEIR found these impacts to be significant and unavoidable, citing that the addition of new lanes and/or expanded capacity would be in conflict with the Plan’s policies relating to improving multi-modal circulation.

Per the General Plan, the project would have a significant impact if it causes the average delay at an intersection already operating or expected to operate at LOS D or E to deteriorate to the next lower level of service.

The General Plan indicates that Baywood Drive, along with several other roadways, have excess capacity, both currently and in the future, and would benefit from a “road diet.” A road diet may provide social, aesthetic, multi-modal and/or safety benefits.

Caltrans

Although located within Petaluma city limits, Caltrans has jurisdiction over the study intersections of Lakeville Highway (SR 116) with US 101 South Ramps, US 101 North Ramps, Baywood Drive, Casa Grande Road and South McDowell Boulevard. Caltrans indicates that they endeavor to maintain operation at the transition from LOS C to LOS D. Where intersections are integral to a local jurisdictions transportation system, Caltrans often accepts the operational standard applied by the local agency, in this case, the City of Petaluma.

Existing Conditions

The Existing Conditions scenario provides an evaluation of current operation based on existing traffic volumes during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods. This condition does not include project-generated traffic volumes. Volume data was collected on March 27, 2014, August 26, 2014, and August 28, 2014 while local schools were in session.

Intersection Levels of Service

Under existing conditions, all intersections are operating acceptably at LOS D or better. The existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. A summary of the intersection level of service calculations is contained in Table 4, and copies of the Level of Service calculations are provided in Appendix A.

No

rth

No

t to

Sca

le

St. F

ranc

is D

rive

101

116

11

10

9 67

8

34

5

12

Lak

evill

e S

tree

t

E. Wash

ington Street

D Street

Caulfield Lane

Perr

yLa

ne

McD

owel

l Bou

leva

rd S

o.

Casa Grande Road

Baywood D

rive

LEG

END

xx

(xx)

A.M

. Pea

k H

our

Vol

um

eS

tudy

In

ters

ecti

on

P.M

. Pea

k H

our

Vol

um

e

Fig

ure

2 –

Exi

stin

g T

raff

ic V

olu

mes

191p

et.a

i 5/

15

Traf

fic Im

pact

Stu

dy fo

r th

e Al

tura

Apa

rtm

ents

1117

(27

)34

1(51

7)29

(54

)

(50

) 24

(280

)327

(94

) 68

(78)105(104) 62 (38) 64

65 (31)119(49)35 (12)

5

688(

833)

765(

718)

(11

4)

71(11

08)1

471102(305)

302(241)

4

331(

253)

505(

763)

6 (

27)

(138

)283

(649

)647

(8

) 6

(8)4(10)3(19)7

152(226)3 (12)915(576)

314

2(36

2)51

9(61

0)40

(33

)

(212

)129

(638

)625

(25

) 25

(48)38(45)27(33)52

300(206)25 (17)282(219)

214

(15

)34

9(41

1)39

4(13

5)

(2

) 1

(325

)336

(80

)102

(110) 56(155)156(566)498

8 (20)139(155)18 (13)

172

(11

8)11

2(17

0)22

6(26

2)

(46)

28

(95)

145

(37)

23

(53) 21(782)567(201)180

40 (45)635(792)107(97)

631

(3

4)11

52(1

304)

14

(15)

(18

8)

68(11

01)1

584

(2

7)

35

(101)25 (31) 9 (16)12

298(133)20 (10)28 (23)

714

(32

)90

0(12

17)

17 (

31)

(188

) 13

5(8

94)1

472

(75

) 3

8

(91)81(71)55(15)27

231(86)41 (53)16 (7)

855

(19

2)71

0(84

4)32

(13

)

(12

) 4

(767

)879

(104

)616

(455)205(315) 83 (9) 9

13 (13)231(76)175(57)

1055

(47)

73(5

1)78

(38)

(60)

38(8

8)74

(42)

60

(44)25(151)97 (49)47

31 (27)150(103)43 (31)

932

(17)

0 (0

)29

(17)

(0)0

(0)0

(0)1

(0) 1(242)89 (29)15

0 (0)320(153)1 (0)


Table 4 Existing Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service

Study Intersection Approach

AM Peak PM Peak

Delay LOS Delay LOS

1. Lakeville St/East Washington St 33.1 C 39.0 D

2. Lakeville St/D Street 42.8 D 35.9 D

3. Lakeville St/Caulfield Ln 30.6 C 28.1 C

4. Lakeville Hwy/US 101 South Ramps 33.3 C 34.8 C

5. Lakeville Hwy/US 101 North Ramps 10.7 B 33.8 C

6. Lakeville Hwy/Baywood Dr 16.0 B 19.4 B

7. Lakeville Hwy/Casa Grande Rd 12.8 B 19.9 B

8. Lakeville Hwy/McDowell Blvd South 28.0 C 35.6 D

9. Baywood Dr/Perry Ln 1.2 A 0.7 A

Eastbound Approach 0.0 A 0.0 A

Westbound Approach 9.5 A 10.0 B

10. Baywood Dr/St. Francis Dr 12.0 B 11.1 B

11. Baywood Dr/McDowell Blvd South 7.8 A 8.4 A

Notes: Delay is measured in average seconds per vehicle; LOS = Level of Service; Results for minor approaches to two-way stop-controlled intersections are indicated in italics

US 101 Study Segments

The portions of US 101 between East Washington Boulevard and Lakeville Highway and Lakeville Highway and Petaluma Boulevard South currently carry 92,000 vehicles per day according to data published by Caltrans on their website. Table 5 shows how many vehicles travel through each study segment during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods.

Table 5 Existing Highway Segment Peak Period Volumes

US 101 Segment NB Volume SB Volume

AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak

East Washington Blvd – Lakeville Hwy 3,950 4,930 4,850 3,870

Lakeville Hwy – Petaluma Blvd South 3,550 4,420 4,350 3,480

Source: 2013 All Traffic Volumes on California State Highway System, Traffic Data Branch, Caltrans Baseline Conditions

Baseline operating conditions were assessed to reflect the addition of traffic associated with known projects that may be constructed and/or become operational in the study area in the next two to three years. City Staff identified the following projects to be included in this scenario.


• Lynch Creek Plaza – 22,500 square feet of retail at Lynch Creek Way and North McDowell Boulevard • Riverfront 2010 – 273 residential units, 120-room hotel, up to 60,000 square feet of office and 30,000

square feet of retail/service space • Deer Creek Village – Approximately 345,000 square feet of commercial center located on North

McDowell Boulevard between Lynch Creek Way and Rainier Avenue • Keller Court Commons – 8 single-family homes located on West Street at Keller Street • Davidon Homes – 93 single family residential subdivision on Windsor Drive and D Street • Petaluman Hotel – 57-room hotel located at 2 Petaluma Boulevard South • Maria Drive Apartments – 144-unit apartment complex to be located at 35 Maria Drive • Addison Ranch Apartments -- 100 multi-family units in an existing apartment complex located at 200

Greenbriar Circle • Petaluma Poultry – 24-hour production facility at the southwest corner of Lakeville Highway and

McDowell Boulevard South • Safeway Fuel Center – Gas station with 8 fueling stations and convenience market at 335 South

McDowell Boulevard • North McDowell Commons – 34 residential units located on North McDowell Boulevard • Avila Ranch Subdivision – 21 single-family homes located at 511 Sonoma Mountain Parkway • Quarry Heights – 136 single family homes located in southwest Petaluma • Sid Commons – 282-unit apartment complex located at the end of Graylawn Avenue at the Petaluma

River • Sunny Slope II – 18 single family homes located on Sunnyslope Road • Pinnacle Ridge – 11 single family homes located at 2762 I Street • Birches/Yarberry – 21-lot single family residential subdivision on Wood Sorrel Drive near North

McDowell Boulevard • Haystack Landing -- Mixed-use development with 21,111 square feet of commercial space, 120 units of

apartments units, and 31 units of senior adult housing located between Copeland Street and Weller Street • Ferrin Subdivision – 11 single-family homes located at 2832 I Street • Corona Road Subdivision – 30 single-family homes located at 470 and 498 Corona Road • Cader Corporate Center – 267,840 square feet of light industrial space • Cader Lane Industrial Park – 241,000 square feet of light industrial space • Marina Apartments – 80-unit apartment complex located on the northwest corner of the Petaluma

Marina • Brewster’s Garden -- New restaurant with average seating of 111 patrons and maximum of 300 patrons

at 242 and 238 Petaluma Blvd N • Baywood Village – 150 apartments and 105 townhomes at the southern terminus of Casa Grande Road,

south of Lakeville Highway • Adobe Animal Hospital –3,900 square-foot veterinary clinic at 408 Madison Street

The projected traffic associated with these projects was added to the volumes analyzed in the “Existing Conditions” scenario in order to determine Baseline volumes. Under these conditions, the study intersections are projected to continue operating acceptably, except Lakeville Street/East Washington Street during the p.m. peak hour and Lakeville Highway/McDowell Boulevard South during the a.m. peak hour, which are expected to operate unacceptably at LOS E. Baseline volumes are shown in Figure 3, and the resulting operating conditions are summarized in Table 6.

No

rth

No

t to

Sca

le

St. F

ranc

is D

rive

101

116

11

10

9 67

8

34

5

12

Lak

evill

e S

tree

t

E. Wash

ington Street

D Street

Caulfield Lane

Perr

yLa

ne

McD

owel

l Bou

leva

rd S

o.

Casa Grande Road

Baywood D

rive

LEG

END

xx

(xx)

A.M

. Pea

k H

our

Vol

um

eS

tudy

In

ters

ecti

on

P.M

. Pea

k H

our

Vol

um

e

Fig

ure

3 –

Bas

elin

eTra

ffic

Vo

lum

es

191p

et.a

i 5/

15

Traf

fic Im

pact

Stu

dy fo

r th

e Al

tura

Apa

rtm

ents

1117

(27

)37

8(58

1)35

(57

)

(50

) 24

(317

)398

(94

) 68

(78)105(106) 66 (44) 65

65 (31)120(53)35 (12)

5

740(

936)

889(

836)

(13

2)

95(1

224)

1673

120(356)345(285)

4

379(

304)

598(

882)

6 (

27)

(169

)330

(740

)766

(8

) 6

(8)4(10)3(19)7

166 (252)3 (12)1023(619)

315

3(39

8)592(

672)

63 (

80)

(218

)132

(709

)712

(87

) 55

(88)96(75)71(63)96

304(213)48 (64)317(240)

215

(16

)453(

478)

424(

176)

(2

) 1

(424

)425

(91

)112

(120) 64(168)175(604)529

8 (20)146(177)18 (14)

194

(13

3)200(

227)

228(

268)

(60

) 33

(176

)233

(46

) 26

(61) 27(885)609(207)180

45 (59)678(894)118(120)

631

(3

4)12

98(1

509)

15

(20)

(19

4)

69(1

232)

1822

(2

7)

35

(114)49 (33)13 (19)17

304(136)21 (14)28 (23)

714

(32

)975(

1391

)21

(47

)

(188

) 13

5(9

58)1

699

(145

) 5

5

(128)153 (77) 67 (23) 43

231(86)44 (65)16 (7)

873

(22

6)761(

940)

32 (

13)

(6

)

8(8

08)1

015

(119)

714

(571)227(366) 92 (9) 9

18 (15)281(91)209(79)

932

(17)

0 (0

)29

(17)

(0)0

(0)0

(0)1

(0) 1(250)94 (29)15

0 (0)327(160)1 (0)

1055

(47)

73(5

1)78

(38)

(60)

38(8

8)74

(42)

60

(44) 25(159)102 (49) 47

31 (27)157(110)43 (31)


Table 6 Baseline Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service


Baseline Conditions

AM Peak PM Peak

Delay LOS Delay LOS

1. Lakeville St/East Washington St 46.5 D 55.2 E

2. Lakeville St/D St 44.7 D 38.6 D

3. Lakeville St/Caulfield Ln 33.3 C 33.7 C

4. Lakeville Hwy/US 101 South Ramps 35.8 D 35.3 D

5. Lakeville Hwy/US 101 North Ramps 15.2 B 36.2 D

6. Lakeville Hwy/Baywood Dr 22.8 C 21.0 C

7. Lakeville Hwy/Casa Grande Rd 17.0 B 22.5 C

8. Lakeville Hwy/McDowell Blvd South 65.4 E 42.0 D



Westbound Approach 9.6 A 10.1 B

10. Baywood Dr/St. Francis Dr 12.1 B 11.2 B

11. Baywood Dr/McDowell Blvd South 8.8 A 11.7 B


Future Conditions

The Future Conditions scenario presents a review of the correlation between the project and Petaluma General Plan. The City of Petaluma has developed a Traffic Model for use in evaluating the potential traffic impacts of buildout of the land uses described in the General Plan together with new or improved streets. The General Plan was developed based on a horizon year of 2025; however, due to changes in economic conditions since the General Plan was completed, it is expected that buildout of the General Plan land uses would occur after 2025.

Recently developed future volumes for the intersections of East Washington Street/Lakeville Street, East D Street/Lakeville Street, Lakeville Street/Caulfield Lane, Lakeville Highway/US 101 Northbound Ramps, and Lakeville Highway/US 101 Southbound Ramps were obtained from the Riverfront 2010 EIR.

As directed by the City, a 1.5 percent per year increase, or growth factor of 1.178, was applied to the existing volumes at North McDowell Street/Lakeville Highway.

Peak hour volumes for the remaining five intersections for the horizon year of 2025 were obtained from the City of Petaluma’s gravity demand model and translated to turning movement volumes using the “Furness” method and factoring, depending on how the model was configured at each intersection. The Furness method is an iterative process that employs existing turn movement data, existing link volumes and future link volumes to project likely turning future movement volumes at intersections.

Optimized network signal timing was used in analyzing the Future scenario. It is expected that volume splits would change sufficiently under future (General Plan Year 2025) volumes that improvements would need to be made to signal timing along the Lakeville Highway corridor as a part of normal maintenance.


As a result of optimized signal timing, in some instances operation was seen to improve under the Future scenario as compared to the Baseline scenario, for which the existing timing plans were used.

Future Intersection Operations

Under Future conditions without the project, it is expected that all of the study intersections will operate acceptably at LOS D or better with the exception of Lakeville Street/Washington Street, Lakeville Street/D Street and Lakeville Street/Caulfield Lane; all three of these locations are expected to operate at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour.

East Washington Street/Lakeville Street was identified in the City’s General Plan as operating acceptably under future conditions. However, recent safety-related changes to the signal phasing have reduced efficiency, resulting in projected LOS E operation in the future during the p.m. peak period. The addition of through lanes to the eastbound and westbound approaches would bring level of service up to acceptable D. However, capacity improvements that widen roadways are contrary to the City’s General Plan.

The intersections of East D Street/Lakeville Street and Lakeville Street/Caulfield Lane were studied in the City’s General Plan. It was determined in the General Plan that no feasible improvements would achieve acceptable operation without adversely affecting multimodal circulation, therefore, unacceptable operation at this intersection has been deemed significant and unavoidable in the City’s General Plan, and no improvements such as roadway widening are suggested.

Future operating conditions are summarized in Table 7 and Future volumes are shown in Figure 4, with calculations provided in Appendix B.

Table 7 Future Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service


Future Conditions

AM Peak PM Peak

Delay LOS Delay LOS

1. Lakeville St/East Washington St 44.3 D 74.8 E

2. Lakeville St/D Street * 40.6 D 63.4 E

3. Lakeville St/Caulfield Ln * 51.8 D 67.2 E

4. Lakeville Hwy/US 101 South Ramps 31.4 C 34.4 C

5. Lakeville Hwy /US 101 North Ramps 13.7 B 33.8 C

6. Lakeville Hwy/Baywood Dr 20.3 C 21.0 C

7. Lakeville Hwy/Casa Grande Rd 18.9 B 27.0 C

8. Lakeville Hwy/McDowell Blvd South 36.7 D 37.0 D



Westbound Approach 10.2 B 11.0 B

10. Baywood Dr/St. Francis Dr 11.9 B 17.4 C

11. Baywood Dr/McDowell Blvd South 14.9 B 38.8 D

Notes: Delay is measured in average seconds per vehicle; LOS = Level of Service; Results for minor approaches to two-way stop-controlled intersections are indicated in italics; Bold text = deficient operation; * Unacceptable operation is considered significant and unavoidable in the City’s General Plan

No

rth

No

t to

Sca

le

St. F

ranc

is D

rive

101

116

11

10

9 67

8

34

5

12

Lak

evill

e S

tree

t

E. Wash

ington Street

D Street

Caulfield Lane

Perr

yLa

ne

McD

owel

l Bou

leva

rd S

o.

Casa Grande Road

Baywood D

rive

LEG

END

xx

(xx)

A.M

. Pea

k H

our

Vol

um

eS

tudy

In

ters

ecti

on

P.M

. Pea

k H

our

Vol

um

e

Fig

ure

4 –

Fu

ture

Tra

ffic

Vo

lum

es

191p

et.a

i 5/

15

Traf

fic Im

pact

Stu

dy fo

r th

e Al

tura

Apa

rtm

ents

1117

(28

)79

9(99

5)29

(56

)

(83

) 28

(961

)789

(156

) 76

(78)109(104) 62 (41) 64

70 (50)119(51)35 (21)

5

670

(660

)10

85(1

485)

(15

9) 1

32(1

587)

145031 (223)

270(200)

4

360(

270)

756(

1357

)5

(5)

(13

6)28

9(1

096)

922

(1

5) 1

0

(25)5 (5)5(10)5

298(377)5 (5)700(670)

370

(31

0)78

0(98

0)13

4(42

4)

(250

)200

(780

)620

(133

) 46

(123)113(409)378(201)262

300(350)207(332)270(200)

241

(62

)42

0(66

8)41

6(35

2)

(22

) 9

(534

)430

(101

)110

(169)110(196)204(428)374

21 (104)174(288)43 (66)

112

1(15

2)21

0(31

9)23

0(45

0)

(60

) 44

(259

)240

(80

) 40

(68) 50(767)574(257)171

54 (122)857(1023)141(111)

643

(4

7)14

18(1

725)

67

(72)

(22

6)

81(1

591)

1836

(11

3) 1

43

(205)97 (66)40 (40)51

298(174)23 (48)28 (37)

743

(7

6)10

92(1

416)

17

(31)

(28

5) 2

16(11

84)1

476

(7

5)

38

(91)81(71)55(15)27

255(133)41 (53)28 (19)

853

2(10

07)

731(

881)

32 (

14)

(56

) 24

(961

)879

(105

)616

(456)205(439)384 (9) 9

134(101)264(616)916(600)

1055

(47)

90(1

89)

78(5

5)

(60

)39

(225

)92

(49

)62

(64)31(151)97 (61)47

38 (46)150(103)43 (45)

950

(26)

0 (0

)45

(26)

(0)0

(0)0

(0)2

(0) 2(375)138 (45) 23

0 (0)496(237)2 (0)


Project Description

The proposed project consists of a 150-dwelling-unit apartment building. The project site is currently vacant and is bounded by Baywood Drive to the east, Perry Lane to the south, single-family homes on Alderwood Court to the northeast, and single-family homes and US 101 to the northwest.

Baywood Drive Road Diet

As requested by City staff, a road diet on Baywood Drive would be implemented between Alderwood Court and Perry Lane, where the existing four-lane section would be converted to a three-lane section including one through lane in each direction plus a center turn lane, leaving adequate width for bike lanes in both directions as well as parking along both sides. It is noted that this results in an increase in the parking supply as parking is current allowed on only one side of this section of Baywood Drive. The road diet would change the lane configuration on the southbound Baywood Drive approach to a left-turn lane and through-right lane, by removing one southbound through lane. The remaining Baywood Drive intersections would not be affected by the road diet.

The proposed project site plan is shown in Figure 5.

Trip Generation

The anticipated trip generation for the proposed project was estimated using standard rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, 2012 for “Apartment” (ITE LU 220). Because the site is currently unoccupied, the trip generation of the existing use was not considered.

The expected trip generation potential for the proposed project is indicated in Table 8. The proposed project is expected to generate an average of 998 trips per day, including 77 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 93 during the p.m. peak hour. These new trips represent the increase in traffic associated with the project compared to existing volumes.

Table 8 Trip Generation Summary

Land Use Units Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

Rate Trips Rate Trips In Out Rate Trips In Out

Proposed

Apartment 150 du 6.65 998 0.51 77 15 62 0.62 93 60 33

Note: du = dwelling unit Trip Distribution

The patterns used to allocate new commercial and residential project trips to the street network were based on the adjacent roadway network, likely origin/destination points and current traffic patterns. These assumptions are consistent with assumptions applied to other recent traffic impact studies for projects in the area. The applied distribution assumptions and resulting trips are shown in Table 9.

Fig

ure

5 –

Sit

e P

lan

191p

et.a

i 5/

15

Traf

fic Im

pact

Stu

dy fo

r th

e Al

tura

Apa

rtm

ents

Sour

ce:

TSD

Eng

inee

ring

, Inc

. 4/

15


Table 9 Trip Distribution Assumptions

Route Percent Daily Trips AM Trips PM Trips

To/from the south via US 101 30% 299 23 28

To/from the north via US 101 18% 180 14 17

To/from the west via Lakeville Hwy 22% 220 17 20

To/from the east via Lakeville Hwy 15% 150 12 14

To/from the north via McDowell Blvd 11% 109 7 10

To/from the south via McDowell Blvd 2% 20 2 2

To/from the east via Baywood Dr 2% 20 2 2

TOTAL 100% 998 77 93

Intersection Operation

Existing plus Project Conditions

Upon the addition of project-related traffic to the Existing volumes, the study intersections are expected to operate acceptably at LOS D or better. These results are summarized in Table 10. Project traffic volumes are shown in Figure 6.

Table 10 Existing and Existing plus Project Peak Hour Levels of Service


Existing Conditions Existing plus Project


Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS

1. Lakeville St/East Washington St 33.1 C 39.0 D 33.3 C 39.9 D

2. Lakeville St/D Street 42.8 D 35.9 D 42.7 D 35.9 D

3. Lakeville St/Caulfield Ln 30.6 C 28.1 C 30.7 C 28.4 C

4. Lakeville Hwy/US 101 South Ramps 33.3 C 34.8 C 33.0 C 33.7 C

5. Lakeville Hwy /US 101 North Ramps 10.7 B 33.8 C 10.8 B 34.6 C

6. Lakeville Hwy/Baywood Dr 16.0 B 19.4 B 17.0 B 20.9 C

7. Lakeville Hwy/Casa Grande Rd 12.8 B 19.9 B 12.8 B 20.0 B

8. Lakeville Hwy/McDowell Blvd South 28.0 C 35.6 D 28.8 C 35.7 D

9. Baywood Dr/Perry Ln 1.2 A 0.7 A 1.8 A 1.3 A

Eastbound Approach 0.0 A 0.0 A 9.7 A 8.9 A

Westbound Approach 9.5 A 10.0 B 9.9 A 10.6 B

10. Baywood Dr/St. Francis Dr 12.0 B 11.1 B 11.9 B 11.1 B

11. Baywood Dr/McDowell Blvd South 7.8 A 8.4 A 7.9 A 10.0 A


No

rth

No

t to

Sca

le

St. F

ranc

is D

rive

101

116

11

10

9 67

8

34

5

12

Lak

evill

e S

tree

t

E. Wash

ington Street

D Street

Caulfield Lane

Perr

yLa

ne

McD

owel

l Bou

leva

rd S

o.

Casa Grande Road

Baywood D

rive

LEG

END

xx

(xx)

A.M

. Pea

k H

our

Vol

um

eS

tudy

In

ters

ecti

on

P.M

. Pea

k H

our

Vol

um

e

Fig

ure

6 –

Pro

ject

Tra

ffic

Vo

lum

es

191p

et.a

i 9/

14

Traf

fic Im

pact

Stu

dy fo

r th

e Al

tura

Apa

rtm

ents

110(

0)7(

4)0(

0)

(0)0

(7)2

(0)0

(0)0(1)1(0)0

0(0)0(1)0(0)

5

11(6

)32

(17)

(0)

0(2

4)60(0)

5(18)

4

18(1

0)13

(7)

0 (0

)

(0)

0(1

3)3

(0)

0

(0)0(0)0(0)0

0(0)0(0)3(11)

31

(0)

13(7

)0

(0)

(0)

0(1

3)3

(0)

0(0)0(0)0(0)0

0(0)0(0)0(1)

21

(0)

11(6

)1

(1)

(0)

0(11

)3 (

0)0

(0)0(0)0(1)0

0(0)0(0)0(1)

17(

4)3(

2)1(

1)

(0)0

(3)1

(0)0

(0)0(0)0(1)0

0(0)0(0)2(7)

64(

17)

0(0)

0(0)

(42)

10 (

0) 0

(0)

0

(0)0(0)0(0)0

43(23)0 (0)17(9)

70(

0)4(

17)

0(0)

(0)

0(9

)17

(0)

0

(0)0(0)0(0)0

0(0)0(0)0(0)

80(

0)2(

9)0(

0)

(4)7

(5)9

(1)1

(1)0(0)0(0)0

2(7)0(0)0(0)

100(

0)0(

0)0(

0)

(0)0

(0)0

(0)0

(0)0(1)1(0)0

0(0)0(1)0(0)

90(

0)0(

0)0(

0)

(0)

1 (

0) 0

(16)

30

(29)7(29)7 (0)0

0 (1)30(16)0 (0)


Finding: The study intersections are expected to continue operating acceptably at the same levels of service upon the addition of project-generated traffic to Existing volumes.

US 101 Study Segments

The portions of US 101 between East Washington Boulevard and Lakeville Highway and Lakeville Highway and Petaluma Boulevard South currently carry 92,000 vehicles per day. The Existing plus Project scenario represents the most conservative scenario of project-related impacts since project trips make up a larger percentage of the existing overall volumes on the highway compared to future scenarios. Table 11 shows how many vehicles travel through each study segment during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods under Existing and Existing plus Project conditions.

Table 11 Existing and Existing plus Project Highway Segment Peak Period Volumes

US 101 Segment Scenario

NB Volume SB Volume


Vol. % Inc. Vol. % Inc. Vol. % Inc. Vol. % Inc.

E Washington Blvd – Lakeville Hwy

Existing 3,950 4,930 4,850 3,870

Existing + Project 3,961 0.2% 4,936 0.1% 4,853 0.1% 3,881 0.3%

Lakeville Hwy – Petaluma Blvd S

Existing 3,550 4,420 4,350 3,480

Existing + Project 3,555 0.1% 4,438 0.4% 4,368 0.4% 3,490 0.3%

Improvements are currently under construction along various portions of US 101, including between Lakeville Highway and Petaluma Boulevard South, to add one travel lane in each direction. These lanes will serve as High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes during the morning and evening peak periods. These improvements are funded in part by a quarter-cent sales tax approved by Sonoma County voters. The added lanes and associated interchange improvements are the only improvements currently planned along US 101 with the exception of the future interchange at Rainier Avenue, though this latter project is currently unfunded.

Finding: Project trips would increase overall directional volumes on either of the two freeway study segments during the peak hours by no more than 0.4 percent. In addition, both of these segments are slated for widening with the Marin Sonoma Narrows project under way. Given the increased capacity available once construction has completed and that the project would increase volumes on the freeway segments by less than one percent, the project-related impacts are less-than-significant.

Baseline plus Project Conditions

With project-related traffic added to Baseline volumes, the study intersections are expected to operate acceptably at LOS D or better, except Lakeville Street/East Washington Street, which is expected to continue operating at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour and Lakeville Highway/McDowell Boulevard South, which is expected to continue operating at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour. These results are summarized in Table 12.


Table 12 Baseline and Baseline plus Project Peak Hour Levels of Service


Baseline Conditions Baseline plus Project



1. Lakeville St/East Washington St 46.5 D 55.1 E 47.5 D 56.5 E

2. Lakeville St/D Street 44.7 D 38.6 D 44.7 D 38.7 D

3. Lakeville St/Caulfield Ln 33.3 C 33.7 C 33.4 C 33.8 C

4. Lakeville Hwy/US 101 South Ramps 35.8 D 35.3 D 36.6 D 34.9 C

5. Lakeville Hwy /US 101 North Ramps 15.2 B 36.5 D 14.8 B 34.8 D

6. Lakeville Hwy/Baywood Dr 22.9 C 21.0 C 26.5 C 23.0 C

7. Lakeville Hwy/Casa Grande Rd 16.9 B 22.5 C 16.7 B 22.9 C

8. Lakeville Hwy/McDowell Blvd South 65.4 E 42.1 D 67.9 E 43.5 D


Eastbound Approach 9.3 A 0.0 A 9.7 A 8.9 A

Westbound Approach 9.6 A 10.1 B 9.9 A 10.7 B

10. Baywood Dr/St. Francis Dr 12.1 B 11.2 B 12.1 B 11.2 B

11. Baywood Dr/McDowell Blvd South 8.8 A 11.7 B 8.9 A 11.9 B


Finding: The study intersections are expected to continue operating acceptably upon the addition of project-generated traffic to Baseline volumes, except at Lakeville Street/East Washington Street and Lakeville Highway/McDowell Boulevard South where LOS E operation is projected to continue during the p.m. and a.m. peak hours, respectively. However, with the project the intersection would be expected to continue to operate at LOS E, which is considered less-than-significant under the standards applied.

Future plus Project Conditions

With the implementation of the road diet on Baywood Drive, the southbound approach of Baywood Drive to Perry Lane would be reduced to one left-turn lane and one through lane; the analysis reflects this change in the configuration.

It should be noted that the signal timing for the study intersections used to evaluate Future plus Project Conditions is the same as that applied for the Future Conditions scenario.

Upon the addition of project-generated traffic to the anticipated Future volumes, and with the road diet implemented, all but three of the study intersections are expected to operate acceptably. The intersections that are not projected to operate acceptably under Future plus Project conditions are the same ones that are projected to operate unacceptably under Future conditions. Project added volumes would increase average delay by no more than three seconds at intersections that would already have unacceptable intersection operation. Future plus Project operating conditions are summarized in Table 13.


Table 13 Future and Future plus Project Peak Hour Levels of Service


Future Conditions Future plus Project



1. Lakeville St/East Washington St 44.3 D 74.8 E 45.0 D 76.2 E

2. Lakeville St/D Street 40.6 D 63.4 E 40.7 D 63.6 E

3. Lakeville St/Caulfield Ln 51.8 D 67.2 E 49.9 D 67.8 E

4. Lakeville Hwy/US 101 South Ramps 31.4 C 34.4 C 28.7 C 34.4 C

5. Lakeville Hwy /US 101 North Ramps 13.7 B 33.8 C 12.1 B 33.0 C

6. Lakeville Hwy/Baywood Dr 20.3 C 21.0 C 22.0 C 24.1 C

7. Lakeville Hwy/Casa Grande Rd 18.9 B 27.0 C 17.1 B 27.4 C

8. Lakeville Hwy/McDowell Blvd South 36.7 D 37.0 D 36.0 D 37.8 D


Eastbound Approach 9.9 A 0.0 A 10.2 B 9.1 A

Westbound Approach 10.2 B 11.0 B 10.5 B 11.5 B

9. Baywood Dr/Perry Ln (with Road Diet) 1.5 A 0.8 A 2.0 A 1.2 A

Eastbound Approach 12.2 B 0.0 A 12.8 B 9.9 A

Westbound Approach 11.6 B 11.3 B 12.2 B 11.8 B

10. Baywood Dr/St. Francis Dr 11.9 B 17.4 C 11.4 B 16.0 C

11. Baywood Dr/McDowell Blvd South 14.9 B 38.8 D 15.1 B 40.1 D

Notes: Delay is measured in average seconds per vehicle; LOS = Level of Service; Results for minor approaches to two-way stop-controlled intersections are indicated in italics; Bold text = deficient operation; Shaded cells indicate operation with road diet improvements on Baywood Drive

Finding: With project traffic added, Lakeville Street/East Washington Street, Lakeville Street/D Street and Lakeville Street/Caulfield Lane are expected to continue operating at LOS E, which is the same as under Future conditions without the project, which is considered a less-than-significant impact under the applied standard. The intersection affected by the “road diet” would continue to operate acceptably.

Recommendation: The applicant should pay traffic impact fees as indicated by the City of Petaluma.


Alternative Modes

Alternative Modes

Pedestrian Facilities

Given the proximity of residences to the north and west and retail areas to the south and east of the site, it is reasonable to assume that some project patrons and employees will want to walk, bicycle, and/or utilize transit for trips to and from the Altura Apartments.

Project Site – Sidewalks are provided along the project’s frontage on Baywood Drive. The site plan indicates that sidewalks will be installed along the north side of Perry Lane.

Finding: Pedestrian facilities serving the project site are adequate with the proposed improvements.

Bicycle Facilities

Existing bicycle facilities, including bike lanes on Baywood Drive and South McDowell Boulevard together with shared use of minor streets, provide adequate access to the site for bicyclists.

Bicycle Storage

The Petaluma Zoning Code (Standard 11.090) requires that bicycle parking be provided at a rate of 10 percent of automobile parking spaces required. The site requires 225 automobile parking spaces, therefore a minimum of 23 bicycle parking spaces should be provided.

Recommendation: A minimum of 23 bicycle parking spaces should be provided.

Transit

Existing transit routes are adequate to accommodate project-generated transit trips. Existing stops are within acceptable walking distance of the site. As part of the project, installation of a solar-powered bus shelter on westbound Lakeville Highway just east of its intersection with Baywood Drive is proposed.

Finding: Transit facilities serving the project site while adequate, would benefit from enhancements.

Recommendation: It is recommended that the City of Petaluma accept the applicant's proposal to install a solar-powered bus shelter on Lakeville Highway.


Access and Circulation

Site Access

The project would have four driveways for both ingress and egress. Two driveways would be located approximately 200 feet and 500 feet north of Perry Lane on the west side of Baywood Drive, which has a center turn lane to accommodate left turns into and out of the site. The additional two driveways would be located on the north side of Perry Lane approximately 275 feet and 540 feet west of Baywood Drive.

Sight Distance

At driveways a substantially clear line of sight should be maintained between the driver of a vehicle waiting to cross or enter the street and the driver of a vehicle approaching on that street. Adequate time must be provided for the waiting vehicle to either cross, turn left, or turn right, without requiring the through traffic to radically alter their speed. Sight distances along Baywood Drive and Perry Lane at the project driveway locations were evaluated based on sight distance criteria contained in the Highway Design Manual published by Caltrans. The recommended sight distances for driveways are based on stopping sight distance, which use the approach travel speed as the basis for determining the recommended sight distance.

Sight distance at the proposed driveways was measured on the project site plan. Although sight distance requirements are not technically applicable to urban driveways, the stopping sight distance criterion for private street intersections was applied for evaluation purposes. Based on a design speed of 35 mph for Baywood Drive, the minimum stopping sight distance needed is 250 feet, and a review of the site plan showed that the sight distance from the Baywood Drive project driveway locations is adequate. Based on the prima facie speed of 25 mph for Perry Lane, the minimum stopping sight distance needed is 150 feet, and a review of the site plan shows that the sight distance from the Perry Lane project driveways is adequate.

Adequate sight lines are also required for drivers following a vehicle entering the site via either a left or right turn. Visibility approaching the driveway, which is located on the outside of a curve, will be more than adequate for following drivers. The existing center turn lane on Baywood Drive will accommodate left turns into the site, allowing drivers to make the move without impeding through traffic.

In order to maintain adequate sight lines for vehicles leaving the site, it is recommended that landscaping be trimmed such that tree canopies are at least seven feet above the ground; other landscaping should be limited to low-lying vegetation no greater than three feet in height. In addition, signs and monuments planned along the project’s frontage should be placed in a manner that does not obstruct sight distance at the project driveways.

Finding: Adequate sight distance is available provided that trees and other landscaping are trimmed to maintain clear sight lines.

Recommendation: Landscaping should be maintained such that foliage stays above seven feet and below three feet from the ground. Signs or monuments to be installed along the project frontage should be placed so that sight distance is not obstructed at the project driveway.


Conclusions and Recommendations

Conclusions

• Nine out of eleven study intersections had collision rates that are higher than the statewide average for similar facilities, though most are only marginally higher. The City has recently completed improvements at East Washington Street/Lakeville Highway which are expected to reduce the incidence of collisions. Also, conversion of the all-way stop-controlled intersection at McDowell Boulevard South/Baywood Drive has reduced crashes at this location. Speed enforcement could address trends along Lakeville Highway.

• Currently, all eleven study intersections operate acceptably during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours.

• Under Baseline conditions, the study intersections are expected to continue to operate acceptably during both peak periods, except Lakeville Street/East Washington Street during the p.m. peak hour and Lakeville Highway/McDowell Boulevard South during the a.m. peak hour, which are expected to operate unacceptably at LOS E.

• Under Future conditions, East D Street/Lakeville Street and Caulfield Lane/Lakeville Street are expected to operate at LOS E; however, in the City’s General Plan, unacceptable operations at this location were found to be significant and unavoidable.

• East Washington Street/Lakeville Street was identified in the City’s General Plan as operating acceptably under future conditions. However, recently completed safety-related changes to the signal phasing have reduced efficiency, resulting in projected LOS E operation in the future.

• The proposed project would generate 998 new daily trips, of which 77 trips would be generated during the a.m. peak hour and 93 trips would be generated during the p.m. peak hour.

• With the addition of project-generated traffic, there would be no change in the acceptability of intersection operations under Existing, Baseline or Future Conditions as the intersections are projected to continue operating at the same levels of service.

• Trips associated with the project are expected to increase total traffic volumes on the two US 101 study segments by less than one percent; therefore, the project is expected to have a less-than-significant impact to the US 101 study segments.

• The intersection of Baywood Drive/Perry Lane, which will have reduced capacity as a result of the road diet on Baywood Drive between Perry Lane and Alderwood Court as requested by City staff, will continue to operate acceptably under all scenarios evaluated.

• With the implementation of the recommended improvements, pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities are expected to adequately serve the project site.

Recommendations

• The applicant should pay applicable fees to address cumulative traffic impacts.

• The City of Petaluma should accept the proposed installation of a solar-powered bus shelter on Lakeville Highway.

• A minimum of 23 bicycle parking spaces should be provided in order to meet City requirements.

• Landscaping and signs or monuments should be maintained such that sight distance is not obstructed at the project driveway.


Study Participants and References

Study Participants

Principal in Charge: Dalene J. Whitlock, PE, PTOE Associate Engineer: Smadar Boardman, EIT Assistant Engineer: Lauren Davini, EIT Technician/Graphics: Deborah J. Mizell Editing/Formatting: Angela McCoy

References

2010 Collision Data on California State Highways, California Department of Transportation, 2010 All Traffic Volumes on CSHS, Traffic Data Branch, Caltrans, 2013, http://traffic-

counts.dot.ca.gov/2013all/Route101.html City of Petaluma Proposed and Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Map, Sonoma County Transportation

Authority, 2014 City of Petaluma: Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan: an Appendix to the General Plan 2025, City of Petaluma, 2008 City of Petaluma: General Plan 2025, City of Petaluma, 2008 Golden Gate Transit, http://goldengatetransit.org/schedules/pages/Bus-Schedules.php Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2010 Highway Design Manual, 6th Edition, California Department of Transportation, 2012 Implementing Zoning Ordinance (IZO): Chapter 11 – Parking and Loading Facilities, Off-Street, City of Petaluma,

2008, http://cityofpetaluma.net/cdd/pdf/izo/chapter11-off-street-parking-and-loading-facilities.pdf Petaluma General Plan 2025 Draft Environmental Impact Report, Dyett & Bhatia, 2006 Petaluma Municipal Code, Code Publishing Company, 2014 Petaluma Transit, http://cityofpetaluma.net/pubworks/schedules.html Riverfront Mixed-Use Project EIR, Strelow Consulting, 2014 Sonoma County Transit, http://www.sctransit.com/SchedulesMaps.aspx Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), California Highway Patrol, 2007-2012 Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012

Communications

Telephone conversation regarding future volumes with Curt Bates and Gian Aggarwal, October 16, 2014

PET191

Traffic Impact Study for Altura Apartments in the City of Petaluma July 2015

Appendix A

Collision Rate Calculations

Date of Count:

Number of Collisions: 47Number of Injuries: 14

Number of Fatalities: 0ADT: 27000

Start Date: End Date:

Number of Years: 5

Intersection Type: Four-LeggedControl Type: Signals

Area: Urban

47 x27,000 x x 5

Study Intersection 0.95 c/mveStatewide Average* 0.27 c/mve

c/mve = collisions per million vehicles entering intersection* 2010 Collision Data on California State Highways, Caltrans

Date of Count:




Number of Years: 5


Area: Urban

4 x22,900 x x 5



25.0%Collision Rate Fatality Rate

collision rate = 365

2:

Number of Collisions x 1 Million

0.4%

collision rate = ADT x 365 Days per Year x Number of Years

29.8%

1,000,000

Injury Rate

Fatality Rate0.0%

ADT x 365 Days per Year x Number of Years

0.0%

ADT = average daily total vehicles entering intersection

0.4%

Collision Rate Injury Rate

Intersection Collision Rate Calculaions

July 1, 2007June 30, 2012

Intersection # Lakeville Street & E Washington Street

collision rate = 1,000,000

Lakeville Street & D Street

41.9%


July 1, 2007

365

Intersection #

June 30, 2012

Number of Collisions x 1 Millioncollision rate =

1:

Altura Apartments

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Thursday, March 27, 2014

41.9%

Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc.10/21/2014Page 1 of 6

Date of Count:




Number of Years: 5


Area: Urban

14 x24,500 x x 5



Date of Count:




Number of Years: 5


Area: Urban

17 x26,900 x x 5



41.9%

Altura Apartments

July 1, 2007

41.9%

Fatality Rate Injury Rate

July 1, 2007

collision rate =

Intersection #

0.0%

June 30, 2012

collision rate =


Intersection Collision Rate Calculaions

Intersection #

Fatality Rate

365

Collision Rate

3: Lakeville Street & Caulfield Lane


Number of Collisions x 1 MillionADT x 365 Days per Year x Number of Years

Injury Rate

June 30, 2012

Lakeville Highway & US 101 South Ramps


0.4%

Thursday, August 28, 2014

14.3%

4:


0.4%0.0% 29.4%

1,000,000365


Tuesday, August 26, 2014

collision rate =

Collision Rate


Date of Count:




Number of Years: 5

Intersection Type: TeeControl Type: Signals

Area: Urban

14 x33,200 x x 5



Date of Count:




Number of Years: 5


Area: Urban

25 x29,800 x x 5



July 1, 2007June 30, 2012

collision rate =

Intersection Collision Rate CalculaionsAltura Apartments

July 1, 2007June 30, 2012

0.0%

collision rate = Number of Collisions x 1 Million

48.0%


0.4% 41.9%



Collision Rate Fatality Rate Injury Rate


Intersection # 5:



0.0%Injury Rate

14.3%



Collision Rate Fatality Rate

42.4%

Intersection # 6: Lakeville Highway & Baywood Drive

0.3%

Lakeville Highway & US 101 NB Ramps



Date of Count:




Number of Years: 5


Area: Urban

17 x27,600 x x 5



Date of Count:




Number of Years: 5


Area: Urban

19 x28,600 x x 5




Intersection # 7: Lakeville Highway & Casa Grande Road


July 1, 2007June 30, 2012

collision rate = Number of Collisions x 1 MillionADT x 365 Days per Year x Number of Years


Collision Rate Fatality Rate Injury Rate0.0% 11.8%0.4% 41.9%


Intersection # 8: Lakeville Highway & McDowell Blvd S


July 1, 2007June 30, 2012






Date of Count:




Number of Years: 5

Intersection Type: Four-LeggedControl Type: Stop & Yield Controls

Area: Urban

3 x4,600 x x 5



Date of Count:




Number of Years: 5

Intersection Type: Four-LeggedControl Type: 4 Way Stop

Area: Urban

1 x7,300 x x 5




Intersection # 9: Baywood Drive & Perry Lane


July 1, 2007June 30, 2012





Intersection # 10: Baywood Drive & St. Francis Drive


July 1, 2007June 30, 2012






Date of Count:




Number of Years: 5

Intersection Type: Four-LeggedControl Type: Stop & Yield Controls

Area: Urban

14 x13,400 x x 5




Intersection # 11: Baywood Drive & McDowell Boulevard South


July 1, 2007June 30, 2012






Traffic Impact Study for Altura Apartments in the City of Petaluma July 2015

Appendix B

Intersection Level of Service Calculations

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s1:

Was

hing

ton

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t10

/17/20

14

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing A

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

2814

523

226

112

7221

567

180

107

635

40Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.2

4.24.2

4.04.2

4.04.2

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

0.98

1.00

0.94

1.00

0.96

1.00

0.99

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

90.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1715

1770

1643

1770

3349

1770

3499

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.99

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

1517

7016

4317

7033

4917

7034

99Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

3115

925

248

123

7923

623

198

118

698

44RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

00

170

020

00

30

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

021

50

248

185

023

801

011

873

90

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

67

76

418

184

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

1320

12He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Split

NASp

litNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s7

78

85

21

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)18

.921

.321

.33.7

38.5

11.8

46.6

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)18

.921

.321

.33.7

38.5

11.8

46.6

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

80.2

00.2

00.0

30.3

60.1

10.4

4Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.2

4.24.2

4.04.2

4.04.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.52.5

2.52.0

4.02.0

4.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

302

352

326

6112

0319

515

22v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.13c0

.140.1

10.0

1c0

.24c0

.070.2

1v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.7

10.7

00.5

70.3

80.6

70.6

10.4

9Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

41.5

40.0

38.7

50.6

28.9

45.4

21.7

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

7.25.8

1.81.4

1.53.6

0.3De

lay (s

)48

.745

.840

.652

.030

.449

.022

.0Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DD

DD

CD

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)48

.743

.531

.025

.7Ap

proa

ch LO

SD

DC

C

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y33

.1HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

8Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

107.1

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.6

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

69.7%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s1:

Was

hing

ton

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t10

/17/20

14

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing P

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

4695

3726

217

011

853

782

201

9779

245

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.24.2

4.24.0

4.24.0

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s0.9

91.0

00.9

81.0

00.9

81.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

71.0

00.9

41.0

00.9

71.0

00.9

9Flt

Pro

tected

0.99

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

3317

7016

6017

7033

5517

7035

01Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

90.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1733

1770

1660

1770

3355

1770

3501

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

6Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)48

9939

273

177

123

5581

520

910

182

547

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

018

00

150

03

0La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)0

186

027

328

20

5510

090

101

869

0Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)28

1818

287

3232

7Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

813

2012

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%6%

2%2%

7%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

eSp

litNA

Split

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

77

88

52

16

Perm

itted P

hase

sAc

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

18.1

25.5

25.5

12.6

46.2

11.3

44.9

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)18

.125

.525

.512

.646

.211

.344

.9Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.15

0.22

0.22

0.11

0.39

0.10

0.38

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.24.2

4.24.0

4.24.0

4.2Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.5

2.52.5

2.04.0

2.04.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)26

638

335

918

913

1616

913

35v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.110.1

5c0

.170.0

3c0

.300.0

6c0

.25v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.7

00.7

10.7

90.2

90.7

70.6

00.6

5Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

47.2

42.7

43.5

48.4

31.1

51.0

30.0

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

7.25.8

10.4

0.32.9

3.81.3

Delay

(s)

54.4

48.5

53.9

48.7

34.0

54.8

31.2

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

DD

DC

DC

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

54.4

51.3

34.7

33.7

Appr

oach

LOS

DD

CC

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y39

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

6Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

117.7

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.6

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

86.0%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s2:

E D

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t10

/17/20

14

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

133

610

239

434

914

5615

649

818

139

8Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s0.9

61.0

01.0

00.8

91.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

71.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

9Flt

Pro

tected

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)30

9717

7017

1214

1118

3815

8317

7018

45Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

50.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

91.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

2957

1770

1712

1411

1838

1583

1770

1845

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)1

373

113

438

388

1662

173

553

2015

49

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

00

60

028

00

20

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

048

70

438

388

100

235

273

2016

10

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

2231

3122

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)21

171

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NApt+

ovSp

litNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s4

38

22

2 36

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

48

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)43

.538

.286

.286

.223

.966

.617

.017

.0Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

43.5

38.2

86.2

86.2

23.9

62.1

17.0

17.0

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.3

10.2

70.6

20.6

20.1

70.4

40.1

20.1

2Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

4.02.0

4.04.0

2.52.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

918

482

1054

868

313

702

214

224

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.25

0.23

c0.13

0.17

0.01

c0.09

v/s R

atio P

erm

c0.16

0.01

v/c R

atio

0.53

0.91

0.37

0.01

0.75

0.39

0.09

0.72

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d139

.849

.213

.410

.455

.226

.254

.759

.2Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d22.2

20.4

0.30.0

9.30.3

0.19.9

Delay

(s)

42.0

69.6

13.7

10.4

64.5

26.4

54.8

69.1

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

EB

BE

CD

EAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)42

.042

.737

.867

.5Ap

proa

ch LO

SD

DD

E

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y42

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

2Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

69.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s2:

E D

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t10

/17/20

14

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

232

580

135

411

1511

015

556

613

155

20Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s0.9

71.0

01.0

00.9

11.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

71.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

8Flt

Pro

tected

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)32

1717

7017

7614

4418

2515

8317

7018

24Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

50.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

81.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3069

1770

1776

1444

1825

1583

1770

1824

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

6Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)2

339

8314

142

816

115

161

590

1416

121

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

00

70

027

50

30

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

042

40

141

428

90

276

315

1417

90

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

1632

3216

24

42

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)21

171

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%7%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NApt+

ovSp

litNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s4

38

22

2 36

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

48

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)39

.837

.581

.881

.826

.968

.918

.418

.4Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

39.8

37.5

81.8

81.8

26.9

64.4

18.4

18.4

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

80.2

70.5

80.5

80.1

90.4

60.1

30.1

3Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

4.02.0

4.04.0

2.52.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

872

474

1037

843

350

728

232

239

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.08

c0.24

c0.15

0.20

0.01

c0.10

v/s R

atio P

erm

c0.14

0.01

v/c R

atio

0.49

0.30

0.41

0.01

0.79

0.43

0.06

0.75

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d141

.640

.815

.912

.253

.825

.553

.258

.6Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

00.7

30.6

41.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d21.9

0.11.2

0.010

.80.3

0.111

.4De

lay (s

)43

.529

.811

.412

.264

.725

.853

.370

.0Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DC

BB

EC

DE

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

43.5

15.8

38.2

68.8

Appr

oach

LOS

DB

DE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y35

.9HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.5

8Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

76.2%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s3:

Cau

lfiel

d Ln

& L

akev

ille

St

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

129

625

2540

519

142

3827

5228

225

300

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.04.9

4.04.9

4.94.0

4.04.9

4.94.9

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

50.9

50.9

51.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.97

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.90

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

50.9

61.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3267

1770

3252

1554

1770

3080

1681

1698

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

0.96

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7032

6717

7032

5215

5417

7030

8016

8116

9815

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

145

702

2845

583

160

4330

5831

728

337

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

30

00

850

540

00

116

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

145

727

045

583

7543

340

171

174

221

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

46

64

33

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

58

3He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

pt+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

34

44 5

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)13

.449

.75.6

41.9

41.9

7.27.2

29.7

29.7

48.0

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)13

.449

.75.6

41.9

41.9

7.27.2

29.7

29.7

48.0

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

20.4

50.0

50.3

80.3

80.0

70.0

70.2

70.2

70.4

4Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.0

4.94.0

4.94.9

4.04.0

4.94.9

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

215

1476

9012

3859

111

520

145

345

869

0v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.08c0

.220.0

30.1

8c0

.020.0

10.1

0c0

.100.1

4v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.0

5v/c

Rati

o0.6

70.4

90.5

00.4

70.1

30.3

70.1

70.3

80.3

80.3

2Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

46.2

21.3

50.8

25.7

22.1

49.2

48.6

32.6

32.7

20.3

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.04

1.11

1.79

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

8.11.2

1.51.2

0.40.7

0.12.4

2.40.3

Delay

(s)

54.3

22.4

54.2

29.7

40.1

50.0

48.7

35.0

35.0

20.6

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

CD

CD

DD

DD

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)27

.733

.249

.127

.9Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

CD

C

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y30

.6HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.4

9Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

67.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s3:

Cau

lfiel

d Ln

& L

akev

ille

St

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

212

638

2533

610

362

4845

3321

917

206

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.04.9

4.04.9

4.94.0

4.04.9

4.94.9

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

50.9

50.9

51.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

0.98

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.94

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

50.9

61.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3387

1770

3374

1552

1770

3261

1681

1697

1552

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

0.96

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

8717

7033

7415

5217

7032

6116

8116

9715

52Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

216

651

2634

622

369

4946

3422

317

210

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

10

00

900

320

00

188

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

216

676

034

622

279

4948

012

012

022

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

52

25

11

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

58

3He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%7%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

Perm

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

34

4Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

64

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)22

.693

.24.8

75.4

75.4

9.79.7

14.5

14.5

14.5

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)22

.693

.24.8

75.4

75.4

9.79.7

14.5

14.5

14.5

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

60.6

70.0

30.5

40.5

40.0

70.0

70.1

00.1

00.1

0Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.0

4.94.0

4.94.9

4.04.0

4.94.9

4.9Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

285

2254

6018

1783

512

222

517

417

516

0v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.120.2

0c0

.02c0

.18c0

.030.0

1c0

.070.0

7v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.1

80.0

1v/c

Rati

o0.7

60.3

00.5

70.3

40.3

30.4

00.2

10.6

90.6

90.1

4Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

56.1

9.866

.618

.318

.262

.461

.660

.660

.657

.1Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.1

00.5

70.7

90.6

70.5

91.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d29.6

0.36.6

0.51.0

0.80.2

8.78.5

0.1De

lay (s

)71

.15.8

59.2

12.7

11.8

63.2

61.7

69.3

69.1

57.2

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

AE

BB

EE

EE

EAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)21

.613

.962

.363

.6Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

BE

E

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y28

.1HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.4

7Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

66.7%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s4:

In-n

-Out

Driv

eway

/US

101

SB

Ram

ps &

Lak

evill

e S

t/Lak

evill

e H

wy

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing A

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

283

647

66

505

331

43

791

53

152

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.55.0

3.55.0

5.03.5

4.94.9

4.5La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.97

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

41.0

01.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

50.9

31.0

01.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.99

0.95

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)34

3332

8017

7031

3915

8316

0916

8116

8615

83Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

90.9

50.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3433

3280

1770

3139

1583

1609

1681

1686

1583

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

6Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)29

567

46

652

634

54

37

953

315

8RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

023

50

70

00

80La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)29

567

90

652

611

00

70

476

480

78Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)2

3Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

9He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

15%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

pm+o

vPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

88

44

5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

64

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)17

.852

.61.2

35.0

35.0

2.836

.536

.554

.3Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

17.8

52.6

1.235

.035

.02.8

36.5

36.5

54.3

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

60.4

80.0

10.3

20.3

20.0

30.3

30.3

30.4

9Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

5.03.5

5.05.0

3.54.9

4.94.5

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.03.0

2.03.0

3.03.0

3.03.0

3.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

555

1568

1999

850

340

557

559

846

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.09

0.21

0.00

c0.17

c0.00

0.28

c0.28

0.01

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.07

0.03

v/c R

atio

0.53

0.43

0.32

0.53

0.22

0.18

0.85

0.86

0.09

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d142

.318

.954

.030

.727

.552

.534

.334

.314

.8Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

11.1

40.9

60.7

01.1

21.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d20.9

0.83.3

1.90.9

2.212

.212

.40.0

Delay

(s)

43.7

22.3

55.3

23.3

31.7

54.6

46.4

46.8

14.8

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

CE

CC

DD

DB

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

28.8

26.8

54.6

42.1

Appr

oach

LOS

CC

DD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y33

.3HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

5Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.9

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

66.8%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s4:

In-n

-Out

Driv

eway

/US

101

SB

Ram

ps &

Lak

evill

e S

t/Lak

evill

e H

wy

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing P

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

138

649

827

763

253

810

1957

612

226

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.05.0

4.05.0

5.04.4

4.94.9

4.0La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.97

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

31.0

01.0

00.9

8Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

50.9

31.0

01.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.99

0.95

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)34

3334

0017

7033

1215

8316

0316

8116

8915

54Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

90.9

50.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3433

3400

1770

3312

1583

1603

1681

1689

1554

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

8Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)14

166

28

2877

925

88

1019

588

1223

1RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

00

012

10

180

00

114

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

141

670

028

779

137

019

030

030

011

7Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)2

25

55

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)15

8He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%9%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

pm+o

vPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

88

44

5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

64

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)11

.171

.713

.774

.374

.35.6

30.7

30.7

41.8

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)11

.171

.713

.774

.374

.35.6

30.7

30.7

41.8

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.0

80.5

10.1

00.5

30.5

30.0

40.2

20.2

20.3

0Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.0

5.04.0

5.05.0

4.44.9

4.94.0

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.03.0

2.03.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

3.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

272

1741

173

1757

840

6436

837

046

3v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.040.2

00.0

2c0

.24c0

.01c0

.180.1

80.0

2v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.0

90.0

6v/c

Rati

o0.5

20.3

80.1

60.4

40.1

60.2

90.8

20.8

10.2

5Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

61.9

20.7

57.9

20.2

16.9

65.3

52.0

51.9

37.3

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.86

0.76

1.03

1.10

1.64

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

1.60.6

0.10.8

0.40.9

13.0

12.6

0.3De

lay (s

)54

.816

.359

.722

.928

.166

.264

.964

.537

.6Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DB

EC

CE

EE

DAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)23

.025

.166

.257

.2Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

CE

E

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y34

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.5

4Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

18.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

60.8%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eB

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s5:

Lak

evill

e H

wy

& U

S 1

01 N

B R

amps

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

7114

7176

568

830

210

2Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.0

5.05.0

5.04.4

4.4La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

0.97

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

81.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

7031

1231

3915

4734

3315

83Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1770

3112

3139

1547

3433

1583

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

50.9

50.9

50.9

50.9

50.9

5Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)75

1548

805

724

318

107

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

248

079

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

7515

4880

547

631

828

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

44

42

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%15

%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

NAPe

rmPr

otpt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

64

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

6Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

9.786

.072

.372

.314

.628

.7Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

9.786

.072

.372

.314

.628

.7Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.09

0.78

0.66

0.66

0.13

0.26

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.4Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.03.0

3.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)15

624

3320

6310

1645

541

3v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

4c0

.500.2

6c0

.090.0

2v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.3

1v/c

Rati

o0.4

80.6

40.3

90.4

70.7

00.0

7Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

47.8

5.28.7

9.345

.630

.6Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.1

31.0

50.5

20.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d20.7

1.00.5

1.33.8

0.0De

lay (s

)54

.56.5

5.01.4

49.4

30.6

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

AA

AD

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)8.8

3.344

.6Ap

proa

ch LO

SA

AD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y10

.7HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

7Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

13.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

58.0%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eB

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s5:

Lak

evill

e H

wy

& U

S 1

01 N

B R

amps

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing P

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

114

1108

718

833

241

305

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.54.5

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

50.9

51.0

00.9

71.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3374

3312

1550

3433

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

7433

1215

5034

3315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.97

0.97

0.97

0.97

0.97

0.97

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

118

1142

740

859

248

314

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

417

015

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

118

1142

740

442

248

299

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

11

33

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%7%

9%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

NAPe

rmPr

otpt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

64

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

6Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

9.849

.836

.036

.010

.724

.5Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

9.849

.836

.036

.010

.720

.5Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.14

0.71

0.51

0.51

0.15

0.29

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.5Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.03.0

3.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)24

724

0017

0379

752

446

3v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

70.3

40.2

20.0

7c0

.19v/s

Rati

o Per

mc0

.28v/c

Rati

o0.4

80.4

80.4

30.5

50.4

70.6

5Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

27.7

4.410

.611

.527

.121

.6Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.1

21.8

60.9

27.8

31.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d20.5

0.60.7

2.30.2

2.3De

lay (s

)31

.68.8

10.4

92.8

27.3

23.9

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

AB

FC

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)10

.954

.725

.4Ap

proa

ch LO

SB

DC

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y33

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.5

9Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

70.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

13.5

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

65.9%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s6:

Bay

woo

d D

r & L

akev

ille

Hw

y10

/17/20

14

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing A

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

6815

8435

1411

5231

259

1228

2029

8Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.44.4

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.91

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3108

1770

3134

1770

1671

1770

1863

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7031

0817

7031

3417

7016

7117

7018

6315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

7216

6737

1512

1333

269

1329

2131

4RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

10

012

00

015

1La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)72

1703

015

1245

026

100

2921

163

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

101

110

77

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

23

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NApt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

38

74

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)17

.076

.92.6

63.1

4.37.2

6.59.4

26.4

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)17

.076

.92.6

63.1

4.37.2

6.59.4

26.4

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

50.7

00.0

20.5

70.0

40.0

70.0

60.0

90.2

4Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.4Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

4.02.0

4.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

273

2172

4117

9769

109

104

159

379

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.04

c0.55

0.01

c0.40

c0.01

0.01

0.02

0.01

c0.10

v/s R

atio P

erm

v/c R

atio

0.26

0.78

0.37

0.69

0.38

0.09

0.28

0.13

0.43

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d141

.011

.052

.916

.651

.548

.349

.546

.535

.4Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor0.9

70.9

01.2

60.5

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d20.4

2.51.8

2.01.3

0.10.5

0.10.3

Delay

(s)

40.2

12.4

68.2

11.1

52.8

48.5

50.0

46.7

35.7

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

BE

BD

DD

DD

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

13.5

11.8

50.8

37.5

Appr

oach

LOS

BB

DD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y16

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

4Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

71.0%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s6:

Bay

woo

d D

r & L

akev

ille

Hw

y10

/17/20

14

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing P

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

188

1101

2715

1304

3410

131

1623

1013

3Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.44.4

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3361

1770

3304

1770

1748

1770

1863

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

6117

7033

0417

7017

4817

7018

6315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

190

1112

2715

1317

3410

231

1623

1013

4RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

10

015

00

092

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

190

1138

015

1350

010

232

023

1042

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

211

112

111

111

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

23

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%7%

2%2%

9%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NApt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

38

74

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)22

.210

1.42.8

82.6

12.4

12.2

6.86.6

28.8

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)22

.210

1.42.8

82.6

12.4

12.2

6.86.6

28.8

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

60.7

20.0

20.5

90.0

90.0

90.0

50.0

50.2

1Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.4Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

4.02.0

4.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

280

2434

3519

4915

615

285

8732

5v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.110.3

40.0

1c0

.41c0

.060.0

2c0

.010.0

10.0

3v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.6

80.4

70.4

30.6

90.6

50.2

10.2

70.1

10.1

3Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

55.5

8.067

.819

.961

.759

.464

.263

.945

.4Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor0.9

71.2

71.2

50.4

81.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d26.2

0.62.5

1.77.3

0.30.6

0.20.1

Delay

(s)

60.3

10.9

87.4

11.2

69.0

59.7

64.8

64.1

45.4

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

BF

BE

EE

ED

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

17.9

12.0

66.1

49.2

Appr

oach

LOS

BB

ED

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y19

.4HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

7Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

74.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s7:

Cas

a G

rand

e R

d &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

135

1472

3817

900

1481

5527

1641

231

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.55.5

4.55.5

4.04.1

4.14.1

4.1La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

91.0

00.9

8Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.99

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

7031

0717

7031

3915

8317

6117

6018

3615

46Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.7

21.0

00.9

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1770

3107

1770

3139

1583

1327

1760

1684

1546

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

1Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)14

816

1842

1998

915

8960

3018

4525

4RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

00

020

00

022

3La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)14

816

590

1998

915

8970

00

6331

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

44

41

14

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

21

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAFr

eePe

rmNA

Perm

NAPe

rmPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

84

Perm

itted P

hase

sFr

ee8

44

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)13

.779

.52.8

68.6

110.0

13.6

13.6

13.6

13.6

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)13

.779

.52.8

68.6

110.0

13.6

13.6

13.6

13.6

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

20.7

20.0

30.6

21.0

00.1

20.1

20.1

20.1

2Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

5.54.5

5.54.1

4.14.1

4.1Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

3.02.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

220

2245

4519

5715

8316

421

720

819

1v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

8c0

.530.0

1c0

.320.0

4v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.0

1c0

.070.0

40.0

2v/c

Rati

o0.6

70.7

40.4

20.5

10.0

10.5

40.3

20.3

00.1

6Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

46.0

9.152

.811

.40.0

45.3

44.0

43.9

43.1

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.16

0.23

0.70

0.37

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

4.51.6

2.10.8

0.03.6

0.90.6

0.3De

lay (s

)57

.73.7

38.8

5.00.0

48.9

44.9

44.5

43.4

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

AD

AA

DD

DD

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

8.15.6

46.9

43.6

Appr

oach

LOS

AA

DD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y12

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

1Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

14.1

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

70.1%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s7:

Cas

a G

rand

e R

d &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

188

894

7531

1217

3291

7115

753

86Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

5.54.5

5.54.0

4.14.1

4.14.1

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.97

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

91.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3094

1770

3139

1583

1762

1808

1852

1549

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.70

1.00

0.97

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7030

9417

7031

3915

8312

9418

0818

0415

49Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

198

941

7933

1281

3496

7516

756

91RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

04

00

00

06

00

081

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

198

1016

033

1281

3496

850

063

10Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)10

103

22

3Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

42

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

16%

2%2%

15%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Free

Perm

NAPe

rmNA

Perm

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

68

4Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Free

84

4Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

20.0

95.4

14.6

90.0

140.0

15.9

15.9

15.9

15.9

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)20

.095

.414

.690

.014

0.015

.915

.915

.915

.9Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.14

0.68

0.10

0.64

1.00

0.11

0.11

0.11

0.11

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.55.5

4.55.5

4.14.1

4.14.1

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.03.0

2.03.0

3.03.0

2.52.5

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)25

221

0818

420

1715

8314

620

520

417

5v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.110.3

30.0

2c0

.410.0

5v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.0

2c0

.070.0

30.0

1v/c

Rati

o0.7

90.4

80.1

80.6

40.0

20.6

60.4

10.3

10.0

6Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

57.9

10.6

57.2

15.1

0.059

.457

.757

.055

.4Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor0.8

50.7

30.8

30.7

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d212

.80.7

0.11.0

0.010

.21.4

0.60.1

Delay

(s)

62.2

8.447

.411

.50.0

69.7

59.1

57.6

55.5

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

AD

BA

EE

EE

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

17.2

12.1

64.5

56.4

Appr

oach

LOS

BB

EE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y19

.9HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

6Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

14.1

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

68.1%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s8:

McD

owel

l Bl &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

487

961

632

710

5520

583

917

523

113

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.94

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.99

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3073

1770

3128

1770

3479

1770

3508

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7030

7317

7031

2817

7034

7917

7035

08Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

494

566

234

763

5922

089

1018

824

814

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

770

03

00

90

04

0La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)4

1530

034

819

022

090

018

825

80

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

11

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)1

52

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

38

74

Perm

itted P

hase

sAc

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

2.457

.84.6

60.0

18.8

15.9

15.4

12.5

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)2.4

57.8

4.660

.018

.815

.915

.412

.5Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.02

0.53

0.04

0.55

0.17

0.14

0.14

0.11

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.03.0

2.03.0

3.02.0

2.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)38

1614

7417

0630

250

224

739

8v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.00c0

.500.0

2c0

.26c0

.120.0

3c0

.110.0

7v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.1

10.9

50.4

60.4

80.7

30.1

80.7

60.6

5Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

52.7

24.7

51.5

15.4

43.2

41.3

45.5

46.6

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.77

0.51

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

0.310

.01.6

1.08.5

0.111

.72.7

Delay

(s)

40.7

22.5

53.1

16.4

51.7

41.4

57.3

49.3

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

CD

BD

DE

DAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)22

.517

.848

.552

.7Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

BD

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y28

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

5Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

74.7%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s8:

McD

owel

l Bl &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing P

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

1276

710

413

844

192

455

315

957

7613

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.97

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3327

1770

3248

1770

3520

1770

3452

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

2717

7032

4817

7035

2017

7034

52Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

1382

511

214

908

206

489

339

1061

8214

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

70

012

00

10

011

0La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)13

930

014

1102

048

934

80

6185

0Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)3

11

316

16Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

15

2He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

7%2%

2%9%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

87

4Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)2.7

59.4

4.260

.951

.451

.98.2

8.7Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

2.759

.44.2

60.9

51.4

51.9

8.28.7

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.0

20.4

20.0

30.4

30.3

70.3

70.0

60.0

6Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)3.0

5.53.0

5.53.0

4.83.0

4.8Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

3414

1153

1412

649

1304

103

214

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.01

c0.28

0.01

c0.34

c0.28

0.10

c0.03

0.02

v/s R

atio P

erm

v/c R

atio

0.38

0.66

0.26

0.78

0.75

0.27

0.59

0.40

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d167

.832

.266

.433

.838

.830

.864

.363

.1Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

40.6

81.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d22.4

2.21.0

4.34.9

0.05.9

0.4De

lay (s

)73

.124

.167

.438

.243

.730

.870

.263

.6Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EC

ED

DC

EE

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

24.7

38.5

38.3

66.1

Appr

oach

LOS

CD

DE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y35

.6HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

5Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

73.3%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

n10

/17/20

14

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing A

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)0

00

290

320

8915

132

00

Sign

Con

trol

Stop

Stop

Free

Free

Grad

e0%

0%0%

0%Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.90

0.90

0.91

0.90

0.91

0.90

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.90

Hour

ly flo

w ra

te (vp

h)0

00

320

350

9816

135

20

Pede

strian

sLa

ne W

idth (

ft)W

alking

Spe

ed (f

t/s)

Perce

nt Bl

ocka

geRi

ght tu

rn fla

re (v

eh)

Media

n typ

eTW

LTL

TWLT

LMe

dian s

torag

e veh

)2

2Up

strea

m sig

nal (f

t)27

0pX

, plat

oon u

nbloc

ked

vC, c

onflic

ting v

olume

438

468

176

284

460

5735

211

4vC

1, sta

ge 1

conf

vol

354

354

106

106

vC2,

stage

2 co

nf vo

l84

114

178

354

vCu,

unblo

cked

vol

438

468

176

284

460

5735

211

4tC

, sing

le (s)

7.56.5

6.97.5

6.56.9

4.14.1

tC, 2

stag

e (s)

6.55.5

6.55.5

tF (s

)3.5

4.03.3

3.54.0

3.32.2

2.2p0

queu

e fre

e %10

010

010

096

100

9610

010

0cM

capa

city (

veh/h

)60

759

783

775

459

999

712

0414

73

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

SB 3

Volum

e Tota

l0

670

6549

123

411

7Vo

lume L

eft0

320

00

10

0Vo

lume R

ight

035

00

160

00

cSH

1700

865

1700

1700

1700

1473

1700

1700

Volum

e to C

apac

ity0.0

00.0

80.0

00.0

40.0

30.0

00.1

40.0

7Qu

eue L

ength

95th

(ft)

06

00

00

00

Contr

ol De

lay (s

)0.0

9.50.0

0.00.0

7.40.0

0.0La

ne LO

SA

AA

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

0.09.5

0.00.0

Appr

oach

LOS

AA

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 1.2

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

19.1%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

n10

/17/20

14

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)0

00

170

170

242

290

153

0Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opFr

eeFr

eeGr

ade

0%0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor0.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

0Ho

urly

flow

rate

(vph)

00

019

019

026

932

017

00

Pede

strian

sLa

ne W

idth (

ft)W

alking

Spe

ed (f

t/s)

Perce

nt Bl

ocka

geRi

ght tu

rn fla

re (v

eh)

Media

n typ

eTW

LTL

TWLT

LMe

dian s

torag

e veh

)2

2Up

strea

m sig

nal (f

t)27

0pX

, plat

oon u

nbloc

ked

vC, c

onflic

ting v

olume

323

471

8537

045

515

117

030

1vC

1, sta

ge 1

conf

vol

170

170

285

285

vC2,

stage

2 co

nf vo

l15

330

185

170

vCu,

unblo

cked

vol

323

471

8537

045

515

117

030

1tC

, sing

le (s)

7.56.5

6.97.5

6.56.9

4.14.1

tC, 2

stag

e (s)

6.55.5

6.55.5

tF (s

)3.5

4.03.3

3.54.0

3.32.2

2.2p0

queu

e fre

e %10

010

010

097

100

9810

010

0cM

capa

city (

veh/h

)72

461

395

766

962

286

914

0512

57

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

SB 3

Volum

e Tota

l0

380

179

122

011

357

Volum

e Left

019

00

00

00

Volum

e Righ

t0

190

032

00

0cS

H17

0075

617

0017

0017

0017

0017

0017

00Vo

lume t

o Cap

acity

0.00

0.05

0.00

0.11

0.07

0.00

0.07

0.03

Queu

e Len

gth 95

th (ft

)0

40

00

00

0Co

ntrol

Delay

(s)

0.010

.00.0

0.00.0

0.00.0

0.0La

ne LO

SA

BAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)0.0

10.0

0.00.0

Appr

oach

LOS

AB

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 0.7

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

17.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

eh12

Inter

secti

on LO

SB

Move

ment

EBU

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBU

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBU

NBL

NBT

NBR

Vol, v

eh/h

038

7460

078

7355

025

9747

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor0.9

00.8

80.8

80.8

80.9

00.8

80.8

80.8

80.9

00.8

80.8

80.8

8He

avy V

ehicl

es, %

22

22

22

22

22

22

Mvmt

Flow

043

8468

089

8362

028

110

53Nu

mber

of La

nes

00

10

00

10

01

11

Appr

oach

EBW

BNB

Oppo

sing A

ppro

ach

WB

EBSB

Oppo

sing L

anes

11

2Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftSB

NBEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Left

23

1Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach R

ight

NBSB

WB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t3

21

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay11

.913

10HC

M LO

SB

BA

Lane

NBLn

1NB

Ln2

NBLn

3EB

Ln1

WBL

n1SB

Ln1

SBLn

2Vo

l Left

, %10

0%0%

0%22

%38

%10

0%0%

Vol T

hru,

%0%

100%

0%43

%35

%0%

83%

Vol R

ight, %

0%0%

100%

35%

27%

0%17

%Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opTr

affic

Vol b

y Lan

e25

9747

172

206

4318

1LT

Vol

097

074

730

150

Thro

ugh V

ol0

047

6055

031

RT V

ol25

00

3878

430

Lane

Flow

Rate

2811

053

195

234

4920

6Ge

ometr

y Grp

77

77

78

8De

gree

of U

til (X

)0.0

540.1

940.0

830.3

310.4

010.0

960.3

66De

partu

re H

eadw

ay (H

d)6.8

336.3

245.6

16.1

056.1

687.0

366.4

03Co

nver

genc

e, Y/

NYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sCa

p52

356

563

658

658

350

855

9Se

rvice

Tim

e4.5

944.0

843.3

73.8

653.9

254.7

994.1

66HC

M La

ne V

/C R

atio

0.054

0.195

0.083

0.333

0.401

0.096

0.369

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay10

10.6

8.911

.913

10.6

12.9

HCM

Lane

LOS

AB

AB

BB

BHC

M 95

th-tile

Q0.2

0.70.3

1.41.9

0.31.7

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing P

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

eh11

.1Int

erse

ction

LOS

B

Move

ment

EBU

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBU

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBU

NBL

NBT

NBR

Vol, v

eh/h

060

8842

038

5147

044

151

49Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

22

22

22

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

6799

470

4357

530

4917

055

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

01

00

01

00

11

1

Appr

oach

EBW

BNB

Oppo

sing A

ppro

ach

WB

EBSB

Oppo

sing L

anes

11

2Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftSB

NBEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Left

23

1Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach R

ight

NBSB

WB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t3

21

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay12

.210

.910

.3HC

M LO

SB

BB

Lane

NBLn

1NB

Ln2

NBLn

3EB

Ln1

WBL

n1SB

Ln1

SBLn

2Vo

l Left

, %10

0%0%

0%32

%28

%10

0%0%

Vol T

hru,

%0%

100%

0%46

%38

%0%

79%

Vol R

ight, %

0%0%

100%

22%

35%

0%21

%Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opTr

affic

Vol b

y Lan

e44

151

4919

013

631

130

LT V

ol0

151

088

510

103

Thro

ugh V

ol0

049

4247

027

RT V

ol44

00

6038

310

Lane

Flow

Rate

4917

055

213

153

3514

6Ge

ometr

y Grp

77

77

78

8De

gree

of U

til (X

)0.0

890.2

810.0

80.3

590.2

570.0

680.2

56De

partu

re H

eadw

ay (H

d)6.4

795.9

725.2

616.0

616.0

626.9

776.3

19Co

nver

genc

e, Y/

NYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sCa

p55

360

168

059

359

151

356

8Se

rvice

Tim

e4.2

23.7

123.0

013.8

013.8

064.7

264.0

68HC

M La

ne V

/C R

atio

0.089

0.283

0.081

0.359

0.259

0.068

0.257

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay9.9

118.5

12.2

10.9

10.2

11.2

HCM

Lane

LOS

AB

AB

BB

BHC

M 95

th-tile

Q0.3

1.10.3

1.61

0.21

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

ehInt

erse

ction

LOS

Move

ment

SBU

SBL

SBT

SBR

Vol, v

eh/h

043

150

31Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.88

0.88

0.88

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

4917

035

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

11

0

Appr

oach

SBOp

posin

g App

roac

hNB

Oppo

sing L

anes

3Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftW

BCo

nflict

ing La

nes L

eft1

Confl

icting

App

roac

h Righ

tEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t1

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay12

.5HC

M LO

SB

Lane

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

ehInt

erse

ction

LOS

Move

ment

SBU

SBL

SBT

SBR

Vol, v

eh/h

031

103

27Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

3511

630

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

11

0

Appr

oach

SBOp

posin

g App

roac

hNB

Oppo

sing L

anes

3Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftW

BCo

nflict

ing La

nes L

eft1

Confl

icting

App

roac

h Righ

tEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t1

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay11

HCM

LOS

B

Lane

MO

VEM

ENT

SUM

MA

RYSi

te:S

McD

owel

l Bl &

Bay

woo

d D

r (A

M E

xist

ing)

AM

Pea

k H

our

Exi

stin

g C

ondi

tions

Rou

ndab

out

Mov

emen

t Per

form

ance

-Ve

hicl

esD

eman

d Fl

ows

95%

Bac

k of

Que

ueM

ov IDO

DM

ovD

eg.

Satn

Aver

age

Del

ay

Leve

l of

Serv

ice

Prop

. Q

ueue

dEf

fect

ive

Stop

Rat

eAv

erag

eSp

eed

To

tal

HV

Vehi

cles

Dis

tanc

eve

h/h

%v/

cse

cve

hft

per v

ehm

phSo

uth:

NB

Bay

woo

d D

r3

L212

52.

00.

314

7.5

LOS

A1.

538

.40.

600.

5523

.98

T174

2.0

0.31

47.

5LO

S A

1.5

38.4

0.60

0.55

23.4

18R

277

2.0

0.31

47.

5LO

S A

1.5

38.4

0.60

0.55

22.9

Appr

oach

276

2.0

0.31

47.

5LO

S A

1.5

38.4

0.60

0.55

23.5

East

: WB

S M

cDow

ell B

l1

L235

2.0

0.41

37.

5LO

S A

2.5

62.4

0.51

0.37

31.2

6T1

406

2.0

0.41

37.

5LO

S A

2.5

62.4

0.51

0.37

30.9

16R

220

2.0

0.41

37.

5LO

S A

2.5

62.4

0.51

0.37

30.1

Appr

oach

461

2.0

0.41

37.

5LO

S A

2.5

62.4

0.51

0.37

30.9

Nor

th: S

B B

ayw

ood

Dr

7L2

422.

00.

331

8.4

LOS

A1.

639

.40.

650.

6424

.04

T114

22.

00.

331

8.4

LOS

A1.

639

.40.

650.

6423

.614

R2

792.

00.

331

8.4

LOS

A1.

639

.40.

650.

6423

.0Ap

proa

ch26

22.

00.

331

8.4

LOS

A1.

639

.40.

650.

6423

.5

Wes

t: E

B S

McD

owel

l Bl

5L2

292.

00.

444

7.9

LOS

A2.

870

.00.

520.

3831

.12

T138

92.

00.

444

7.9

LOS

A2.

870

.00.

520.

3830

.812

R2

822.

00.

444

7.9

LOS

A2.

870

.00.

520.

3829

.9Ap

proa

ch50

02.

00.

444

7.9

LOS

A2.

870

.00.

520.

3830

.7

All V

ehic

les

1499

2.0

0.44

47.

8LO

S A

2.8

70.0

0.55

0.46

27.7

Leve

l of S

ervi

ce (L

OS)

Met

hod:

Del

ay &

v/c

(HC

M 2

010)

. R

ound

abou

t LO

S M

etho

d: S

ame

as S

igna

lised

Inte

rsec

tions

.Ve

hicl

e m

ovem

ent L

OS

val

ues

are

base

d on

ave

rage

del

ay a

nd v

/c ra

tio (d

egre

e of

sat

urat

ion)

per

mov

emen

tLO

S F

will

resu

lt if

v/c

> 1

irres

pect

ive

of m

ovem

ent d

elay

val

ue (d

oes

not a

pply

for a

ppro

ache

s an

d in

ters

ectio

n).

Inte

rsec

tion

and

Appr

oach

LO

S va

lues

are

bas

ed o

n av

erag

e de

lay

for a

ll m

ovem

ents

(v/c

not

use

d as

spe

cifie

d in

HC

M 2

010)

.R

ound

abou

t Cap

acity

Mod

el: U

S H

CM

201

0.H

CM

Del

ay F

orm

ula

optio

n is

use

d. C

ontro

l Del

ay d

oes

not i

nclu

de G

eom

etric

Del

ay s

ince

Exc

lude

Geo

met

ric D

elay

opt

ion

appl

ies.

Gap

-Acc

epta

nce

Cap

acity

: Tra

ditio

nal M

1.H

V (%

) val

ues

are

calc

ulat

ed fo

r All

Mov

emen

t Cla

sses

of A

ll H

eavy

Veh

icle

Mod

el D

esig

natio

n.

Pro

cess

ed: W

edne

sday

, Sep

tem

ber 1

0, 2

014

11:5

5:52

AM

SID

RA

INTE

RSE

CTI

ON

6.0

.24.

4877

Cop

yrig

ht ©

200

0-20

14 A

kcel

ik a

nd A

ssoc

iate

s Pt

y Lt

dw

ww

.sid

raso

lutio

ns.c

omP

roje

ct:

N:\A

AA\S

OX\

PET\

191P

ET\S

IDR

A\Ba

ywoo

d-M

cDow

ell.s

ip6

8000

493,

601

9158

, W-T

RAN

S, P

LUS

/ Fl

oatin

g

MO

VEM

ENT

SUM

MA

RYSi

te:S

McD

owel

l Bl &

Bay

woo

d D

r (PM

Exi

stin

g)P

M P

eak

Hou

rE

xist

ing

Con

ditio

nsR

ound

abou

t

Mov

emen

t Per

form

ance

-Ve

hicl

esD

eman

d Fl

ows

95%

Bac

k of

Que

ueM

ov IDO

DM

ovD

eg.

Satn

Aver

age

Del

ay

Leve

l of

Serv

ice

Prop

. Q

ueue

dEf

fect

ive

Stop

Rat

eAv

erag

eSp

eed

To

tal

HV

Vehi

cles

Dis

tanc

eve

h/h

%v/

cse

cve

hft

per v

ehm

phSo

uth:

NB

Bay

woo

d D

r3

L284

2.0

0.24

56.

1LO

S A

1.2

29.4

0.53

0.44

24.4

8T1

112

2.0

0.24

56.

1LO

S A

1.2

29.4

0.53

0.44

23.9

18R

241

2.0

0.24

56.

1LO

S A

1.2

29.4

0.53

0.44

23.3

Appr

oach

237

2.0

0.24

56.

1LO

S A

1.2

29.4

0.53

0.44

24.0

East

: WB

S M

cDow

ell B

l1

L258

2.0

0.58

910

.9LO

S B

4.6

117.

00.

660.

5329

.86

T155

62.

00.

589

10.9

LOS

B4.

611

7.0

0.66

0.53

29.6

16R

229

2.0

0.58

910

.9LO

S B

4.6

117.

00.

660.

5328

.8Ap

proa

ch64

32.

00.

589

10.9

LOS

B4.

611

7.0

0.66

0.53

29.6

Nor

th: S

B B

ayw

ood

Dr

7L2

132.

00.

143

6.8

LOS

A0.

614

.60.

620.

6024

.54

T153

2.0

0.14

36.

8LO

S A

0.6

14.6

0.62

0.60

24.0

14R

233

2.0

0.14

36.

8LO

S A

0.6

14.6

0.62

0.60

23.4

Appr

oach

992.

00.

143

6.8

LOS

A0.

614

.60.

620.

6023

.8

Wes

t: E

B S

McD

owel

l Bl

5L2

542.

00.

368

6.4

LOS

A2.

256

.40.

360.

2131

.62

T130

12.

00.

368

6.4

LOS

A2.

256

.40.

360.

2131

.312

R2

102

2.0

0.36

86.

4LO

S A

2.2

56.4

0.36

0.21

30.4

Appr

oach

457

2.0

0.36

86.

4LO

S A

2.2

56.4

0.36

0.21

31.1

All V

ehic

les

1435

2.0

0.58

98.

4LO

S A

4.6

117.

00.

540.

4228

.5

Leve

l of S

ervi

ce (L

OS)

Met

hod:

Del

ay &

v/c

(HC

M 2

010)

. R

ound

abou

t LO

S M

etho

d: S

ame

as S

igna

lised

Inte

rsec

tions

.Ve

hicl

e m

ovem

ent L

OS

val

ues

are

base

d on

ave

rage

del

ay a

nd v

/c ra

tio (d

egre

e of

sat

urat

ion)

per

mov

emen

tLO

S F

will

resu

lt if

v/c

> 1

irres

pect

ive

of m

ovem

ent d

elay

val

ue (d

oes

not a

pply

for a

ppro

ache

s an

d in

ters

ectio

n).

Inte

rsec

tion

and

Appr

oach

LO

S va

lues

are

bas

ed o

n av

erag

e de

lay

for a

ll m

ovem

ents

(v/c

not

use

d as

spe

cifie

d in

HC

M 2

010)

.R

ound

abou

t Cap

acity

Mod

el: U

S H

CM

201

0.H

CM

Del

ay F

orm

ula

optio

n is

use

d. C

ontro

l Del

ay d

oes

not i

nclu

de G

eom

etric

Del

ay s

ince

Exc

lude

Geo

met

ric D

elay

opt

ion

appl

ies.

Gap

-Acc

epta

nce

Cap

acity

: Tra

ditio

nal M

1.H

V (%

) val

ues

are

calc

ulat

ed fo

r All

Mov

emen

t Cla

sses

of A

ll H

eavy

Veh

icle

Mod

el D

esig

natio

n.

Pro

cess

ed: W

edne

sday

, Sep

tem

ber 1

0, 2

014

11:5

5:56

AM

SID

RA

INTE

RSE

CTI

ON

6.0

.24.

4877

Cop

yrig

ht ©

200

0-20

14 A

kcel

ik a

nd A

ssoc

iate

s Pt

y Lt

dw

ww

.sid

raso

lutio

ns.c

omP

roje

ct:

N:\A

AA\S

OX\

PET\

191P

ET\S

IDR

A\Ba

ywoo

d-M

cDow

ell.s

ip6

8000

493,

601

9158

, W-T

RAN

S, P

LUS

/ Fl

oatin

g

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s1:

Was

hing

ton

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

3323

326

228

200

9427

609

180

118

678

45Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.2

4.24.2

4.04.2

4.04.2

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

0.99

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.97

1.00

0.99

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

90.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1717

1770

1656

1770

3352

1770

3497

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.99

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

1717

7016

5617

7033

5217

7034

97Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

3625

629

251

220

103

3066

919

813

074

549

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

012

00

190

03

0La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)0

321

025

131

10

3084

80

130

791

0Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)6

77

64

1818

4Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

813

2012

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%10

%2%

2%11

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

eSp

litNA

Split

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

77

88

52

16

Perm

itted P

hase

sAc

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

27.7

28.4

28.4

4.443

.713

.052

.3Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

27.7

28.4

28.4

4.443

.713

.052

.3Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.21

0.22

0.22

0.03

0.34

0.10

0.40

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.24.2

4.24.0

4.24.0

4.2Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.5

2.52.5

2.04.0

2.04.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)36

738

836

360

1132

177

1413

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.19

0.14

c0.19

0.02

c0.25

c0.07

0.23

v/s R

atio P

erm

v/c R

atio

0.87

0.65

0.86

0.50

0.75

0.73

0.56

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d149

.245

.948

.661

.438

.056

.529

.7Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d219

.93.3

17.6

2.42.9

12.7

0.6De

lay (s

)69

.149

.266

.163

.840

.969

.230

.3Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

ED

EE

DE

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)69

.158

.741

.735

.8Ap

proa

ch LO

SE

ED

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y46

.5HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

0Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

129.4

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.6

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

78.7%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s1:

Was

hing

ton

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

6017

646

268

227

133

6188

520

712

089

459

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.24.2

4.24.0

4.24.0

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s0.9

91.0

00.9

81.0

00.9

81.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

81.0

00.9

41.0

00.9

71.0

00.9

9Flt

Pro

tected

0.99

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

4517

7016

6817

7033

5817

7034

95Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

90.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1745

1770

1668

1770

3358

1770

3495

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

6Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)62

183

4827

923

613

964

922

216

125

931

61RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

00

150

013

00

30

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

029

30

279

360

064

1125

012

598

90

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

2818

1828

732

327

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

1320

12He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%7%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Split

NASp

litNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s7

78

85

21

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)25

.632

.832

.89.7

51.0

13.5

54.8

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)25

.632

.832

.89.7

51.0

13.5

54.8

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

80.2

40.2

40.0

70.3

70.1

00.3

9Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.2

4.24.2

4.04.2

4.04.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.52.5

2.52.0

4.02.0

4.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

320

416

392

123

1227

171

1372

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.17

0.16

c0.22

0.04

c0.33

0.07

c0.28

v/s R

atio P

erm

v/c R

atio

0.92

0.67

0.92

0.52

0.92

0.73

0.72

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d155

.948

.452

.162

.742

.261

.235

.9Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d229

.43.8

26.1

1.810

.912

.92.0

Delay

(s)

85.3

52.3

78.2

64.5

53.1

74.2

37.9

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

DE

ED

ED

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

85.3

67.1

53.7

42.0

Appr

oach

LOS

FE

DD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y55

.2HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.9

0Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

139.5

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.6

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

94.8%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s2:

E D

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

142

511

242

445

315

6417

552

918

146

8Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s0.9

61.0

01.0

00.8

91.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

71.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

9Flt

Pro

tected

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)31

1517

7017

1214

1118

3815

8317

7018

46Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

50.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

91.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

2973

1770

1712

1411

1838

1583

1770

1846

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)1

472

124

471

503

1771

194

588

2016

29

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

00

70

026

30

20

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

059

70

471

503

100

265

325

2016

90

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

2231

3122

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)21

171

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NApt+

ovSp

litNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s4

38

22

2 36

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

48

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)38

.940

.183

.583

.526

.070

.617

.617

.6Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

38.9

40.1

83.5

83.5

26.0

66.1

17.6

17.6

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

80.2

90.6

00.6

00.1

90.4

70.1

30.1

3Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

4.02.0

4.04.0

2.52.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

826

506

1021

841

341

747

222

232

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.27

0.29

c0.14

0.21

0.01

c0.09

v/s R

atio P

erm

c0.20

0.01

v/c R

atio

0.72

0.93

0.49

0.01

0.78

0.44

0.09

0.73

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d145

.748

.616

.111

.554

.224

.554

.158

.9Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d25.4

23.7

0.50.0

10.2

0.30.1

10.3

Delay

(s)

51.1

72.3

16.7

11.5

64.5

24.8

54.2

69.2

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

EB

BE

CD

EAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)51

.143

.037

.267

.6Ap

proa

ch LO

SD

DD

E

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y44

.7HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

0Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

75.2%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s2:

E D

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

242

491

176

478

1612

016

860

414

177

20Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s0.9

71.0

01.0

00.9

11.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

71.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

8Flt

Pro

tected

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)32

3517

7017

7614

4418

2515

8317

7018

29Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

50.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

81.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3086

1770

1776

1444

1825

1583

1770

1829

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

6Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)2

442

9518

349

817

125

175

629

1518

421

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

00

70

025

80

30

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

053

90

183

498

100

300

371

1520

20

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

1632

3216

24

42

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)21

171

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%7%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NApt+

ovSp

litNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s4

38

22

2 36

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

48

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)36

.837

.578

.878

.828

.670

.619

.719

.7Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

36.8

37.5

78.8

78.8

28.6

66.1

19.7

19.7

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

60.2

70.5

60.5

60.2

00.4

70.1

40.1

4Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

4.02.0

4.04.0

2.52.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

811

474

999

812

372

747

249

257

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.10

c0.28

c0.16

0.23

0.01

c0.11

v/s R

atio P

erm

c0.17

0.01

v/c R

atio

0.66

0.39

0.50

0.01

0.81

0.50

0.06

0.78

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d146

.141

.918

.613

.553

.125

.552

.158

.1Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

00.7

60.7

02.0

71.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d24.3

0.21.6

0.011

.70.4

0.114

.0De

lay (s

)50

.432

.114

.727

.964

.825

.952

.272

.1Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DC

BC

EC

DE

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

50.4

19.6

38.4

70.7

Appr

oach

LOS

DB

DE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y38

.6HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

8Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

82.9%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s3:

Cau

lfiel

d Ln

& L

akev

ille

St

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

132

712

5563

592

153

9671

9631

748

304

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.04.9

4.04.9

4.94.0

4.04.9

4.94.9

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

50.9

50.9

51.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.97

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.91

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

50.9

61.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3255

1770

3252

1554

1770

3152

1681

1707

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

0.96

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7032

5517

7032

5215

5417

7031

5216

8117

0715

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

148

800

6271

665

172

108

8010

835

654

342

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

50

00

850

990

00

66La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)14

885

70

7166

587

108

890

203

207

276

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

46

64

33

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

58

3He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

pt+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

34

44 5

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)13

.550

.55.6

42.6

42.6

9.09.0

27.1

27.1

45.5

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)13

.550

.55.6

42.6

42.6

9.09.0

27.1

27.1

45.5

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

20.4

60.0

50.3

90.3

90.0

80.0

80.2

50.2

50.4

1Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.0

4.94.0

4.94.9

4.04.0

4.94.9

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

217

1494

9012

5960

114

425

741

442

065

4v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.08c0

.260.0

40.2

0c0

.060.0

30.1

2c0

.120.1

7v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.0

6v/c

Rati

o0.6

80.5

70.7

90.5

30.1

50.7

50.3

50.4

90.4

90.4

2Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

46.2

21.8

51.6

26.0

21.9

49.4

47.7

35.5

35.6

22.9

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.09

1.00

1.49

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

8.51.6

30.7

1.40.5

17.5

0.34.1

4.10.4

Delay

(s)

54.7

23.5

87.0

27.4

33.0

66.9

48.0

39.6

39.6

23.4

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

CF

CC

ED

DD

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)28

.033

.154

.932

.2Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

CD

C

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y33

.3HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

0Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

69.7%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s3:

Cau

lfiel

d Ln

& L

akev

ille

St

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

218

709

8780

672

398

8875

6324

064

213

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.04.9

4.04.9

4.94.0

4.04.9

4.94.9

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

50.9

50.9

51.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

0.98

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.93

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

50.9

71.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3353

1770

3374

1552

1770

3248

1681

1719

1553

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

0.97

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

5317

7033

7415

5217

7032

4816

8117

1915

53Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

222

723

8982

686

406

9077

6424

565

217

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

50

00

970

590

00

190

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

222

807

082

686

309

9082

015

415

627

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

52

25

11

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

58

3He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%7%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

Perm

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

34

4Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

64

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)23

.185

.58.0

70.4

70.4

11.5

11.5

17.2

17.2

17.2

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)23

.185

.58.0

70.4

70.4

11.5

11.5

17.2

17.2

17.2

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

70.6

10.0

60.5

00.5

00.0

80.0

80.1

20.1

20.1

2Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.0

4.94.0

4.94.9

4.04.0

4.94.9

4.9Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

292

2047

101

1696

780

145

266

206

211

190

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.13

0.24

c0.05

c0.20

c0.05

0.03

c0.09

0.09

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.20

0.02

v/c R

atio

0.76

0.39

0.81

0.40

0.40

0.62

0.31

0.75

0.74

0.14

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d155

.814

.065

.321

.721

.662

.160

.559

.359

.254

.8Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.1

00.4

90.8

60.8

80.9

61.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d29.0

0.532

.50.6

1.35.8

0.212

.211

.10.1

Delay

(s)

70.6

7.388

.519

.922

.168

.060

.871

.570

.354

.9Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EA

FB

CE

EE

ED

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

20.9

25.4

63.6

64.3

Appr

oach

LOS

CC

EE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y33

.7HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.5

6Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

73.2%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s4:

In-n

-Out

Driv

eway

/US

101

SB

Ram

ps &

Lak

evill

e S

t/Lak

evill

e H

wy

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

330

766

66

598

379

43

710

233

166

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.55.0

3.55.0

5.03.5

4.94.9

4.5La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.97

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

41.0

01.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

50.9

31.0

01.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.99

0.95

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)34

3332

8017

7031

3915

8316

0916

8116

8615

83Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

90.9

50.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3433

3280

1770

3139

1583

1609

1681

1686

1583

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

6Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)34

479

86

662

339

54

37

1066

317

3RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

028

50

70

00

81La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)34

480

30

662

311

00

70

533

536

92Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)2

3Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

9He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

15%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

pm+o

vPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

88

44

5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

64

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)18

.949

.31.2

30.6

30.6

2.839

.839

.858

.7Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

18.9

49.3

1.230

.630

.62.8

39.8

39.8

58.7

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

70.4

50.0

10.2

80.2

80.0

30.3

60.3

60.5

3Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

5.03.5

5.05.0

3.54.9

4.94.5

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.03.0

2.03.0

3.03.0

3.03.0

3.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

589

1470

1987

344

040

608

610

909

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.10

c0.24

0.00

c0.20

c0.00

0.32

c0.32

0.02

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.07

0.04

v/c R

atio

0.58

0.55

0.32

0.71

0.25

0.18

0.88

0.88

0.10

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d141

.922

.254

.035

.830

.852

.532

.832

.812

.6Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

21.1

21.2

60.7

31.1

61.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d21.3

1.23.2

4.51.2

2.213

.413

.60.0

Delay

(s)

43.9

26.2

71.3

30.6

37.1

54.6

46.2

46.4

12.7

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

CE

CD

DD

DB

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

31.5

33.4

54.6

41.6

Appr

oach

LOS

CC

DD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y35

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

5Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.9

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

73.0%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s4:

In-n

-Out

Driv

eway

/US

101

SB

Ram

ps &

Lak

evill

e S

t/Lak

evill

e H

wy

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

169

740

827

882

304

810

1961

912

252

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.05.0

4.05.0

5.04.4

4.94.9

4.0La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.97

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

31.0

01.0

00.9

8Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

50.9

31.0

01.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.99

0.95

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)34

3334

0117

7033

1215

8316

0216

8116

8815

55Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

90.9

50.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3433

3401

1770

3312

1583

1602

1681

1688

1555

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

8Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)17

275

58

2890

031

08

1019

632

1225

7RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

015

20

180

00

98La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)17

276

20

2890

015

80

190

322

322

159

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

22

55

5Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

158

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%6%

2%2%

9%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPe

rmSp

litNA

Split

NApm

+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

68

84

45

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

4Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

12.3

69.7

14.0

71.4

71.4

5.532

.532

.544

.8Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

12.3

69.7

14.0

71.4

71.4

5.532

.532

.544

.8Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.09

0.50

0.10

0.51

0.51

0.04

0.23

0.23

0.32

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.05.0

4.05.0

5.04.4

4.94.9

4.0Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

2.03.0

3.03.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)30

116

9317

716

8980

762

390

391

497

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.05

0.22

0.02

c0.27

c0.01

c0.19

0.19

0.03

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.10

0.07

v/c R

atio

0.57

0.45

0.16

0.53

0.20

0.30

0.83

0.82

0.32

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d161

.322

.857

.623

.118

.765

.451

.151

.036

.1Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor0.8

60.8

01.0

01.0

31.4

91.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d22.4

0.80.1

1.10.5

1.013

.313

.10.4

Delay

(s)

54.9

19.1

57.8

24.8

28.2

66.4

64.4

64.2

36.4

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

BE

CC

EE

ED

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

25.7

26.4

66.4

56.3

Appr

oach

LOS

CC

EE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y35

.3HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

0Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

18.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

65.1%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s5:

Lak

evill

e H

wy

& U

S 1

01 N

B R

amps

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

9516

7388

974

034

512

0Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.0

5.05.0

5.04.4

4.4La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

0.97

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

81.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

7031

1231

3915

4734

3315

83Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1770

3112

3139

1547

3433

1583

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

50.9

50.9

50.9

50.9

50.9

5Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)10

017

6193

677

936

312

6RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

028

60

64La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)10

017

6193

649

336

362

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

44

42

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%15

%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

NAPe

rmPr

otpt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

64

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

6Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

10.9

84.5

69.6

69.6

16.1

31.4

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)10

.984

.569

.669

.616

.131

.4Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.10

0.77

0.63

0.63

0.15

0.29

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.4Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.03.0

3.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)17

523

9019

8697

850

245

1v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

6c0

.570.3

0c0

.110.0

4v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.3

2v/c

Rati

o0.5

70.7

40.4

70.5

00.7

20.1

4Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

47.3

6.810

.610

.944

.829

.2Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.1

31.0

70.4

71.5

11.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d22.1

1.50.6

1.34.3

0.1De

lay (s

)55

.78.8

5.617

.849

.229

.3Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EA

AB

DC

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

11.4

11.1

44.0

Appr

oach

LOS

BB

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y15

.2HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

6Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

13.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

64.7%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s5:

Lak

evill

e H

wy

& U

S 1

01 N

B R

amps

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

132

1224

836

936

285

356

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.54.5

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

50.9

51.0

00.9

71.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3374

3312

1550

3433

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

7433

1215

5034

3315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.97

0.97

0.97

0.97

0.97

0.97

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

136

1262

862

965

294

367

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

468

07

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

136

1262

862

497

294

360

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

11

33

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%7%

9%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

NAPe

rmPr

otpt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

64

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

6Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

10.0

47.8

33.8

33.8

12.7

26.7

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)10

.047

.833

.833

.812

.722

.7Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.14

0.68

0.48

0.48

0.18

0.32

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.5Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.03.0

3.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)25

223

0315

9974

862

251

3v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

80.3

70.2

60.0

9c0

.23v/s

Rati

o Per

mc0

.32v/c

Rati

o0.5

40.5

50.5

40.6

60.4

70.7

0Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

27.9

5.612

.713

.825

.720

.7Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.1

71.7

31.1

36.7

31.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d21.0

0.81.0

3.40.2

3.5De

lay (s

)33

.610

.615

.396

.225

.924

.2Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CB

BF

CC

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

12.8

58.1

24.9

Appr

oach

LOS

BE

C

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y36

.2HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

8Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

70.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

13.5

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

72.9%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s6:

Bay

woo

d D

r & L

akev

ille

Hw

y7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

6918

2235

1512

9831

4913

1728

2130

4Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.44.4

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.92

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3109

1770

3135

1770

1682

1770

1863

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7031

0917

7031

3517

7016

8217

7018

6315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

7319

1837

1613

6633

5214

1829

2232

0RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

10

016

00

010

7La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)73

1954

016

1398

052

160

2922

213

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

101

110

77

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

23

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NApt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

38

74

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)17

.073

.92.7

60.2

6.810

.26.4

9.826

.8Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

17.0

73.9

2.760

.26.8

10.2

6.49.8

26.8

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

50.6

70.0

20.5

50.0

60.0

90.0

60.0

90.2

4Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.4Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

4.02.0

4.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

273

2088

4317

1510

915

510

216

538

5v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

4c0

.630.0

1c0

.45c0

.030.0

10.0

20.0

1c0

.13v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.2

70.9

40.3

70.8

20.4

80.1

00.2

80.1

30.5

5Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

41.0

16.0

52.8

20.4

49.9

45.7

49.6

46.2

36.4

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.95

0.88

1.23

0.62

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

0.48.3

1.73.7

1.20.1

0.60.1

1.0De

lay (s

)39

.522

.366

.916

.351

.145

.850

.246

.337

.4Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DC

EB

DD

DD

DAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)22

.916

.949

.138

.9Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

BD

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y22

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

7Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

77.7%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s6:

Bay

woo

d D

r & L

akev

ille

Hw

y7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

194

1232

2720

1509

3411

433

1923

1413

6Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.44.4

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3362

1770

3305

1770

1739

1770

1863

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

6217

7033

0517

7017

3917

7018

6315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

196

1244

2720

1524

3411

533

1923

1413

7RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

10

017

00

077

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

196

1270

020

1557

011

535

023

1460

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

211

112

111

111

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

23

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%7%

2%2%

9%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NApt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

38

74

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)19

.298

.74.2

84.3

13.4

12.7

7.66.9

26.1

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)19

.298

.74.2

84.3

13.4

12.7

7.66.9

26.1

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

40.7

10.0

30.6

00.1

00.0

90.0

50.0

50.1

9Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.4Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

4.02.0

4.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

242

2370

5319

9016

915

796

9129

5v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.110.3

80.0

1c0

.47c0

.060.0

2c0

.010.0

10.0

4v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.8

10.5

40.3

80.7

80.6

80.2

20.2

40.1

50.2

0Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

58.6

9.866

.621

.061

.259

.163

.463

.848

.1Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor0.9

01.0

81.2

70.5

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d216

.70.8

1.12.2

8.60.3

0.50.3

0.1De

lay (s

)69

.311

.485

.813

.669

.959

.363

.964

.048

.3Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EB

FB

EE

EE

DAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)19

.214

.566

.651

.6Ap

proa

ch LO

SB

BE

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y21

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

5Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

81.1%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s7:

Cas

a G

rand

e R

d &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

135

1699

5521

975

1415

367

4316

4423

1Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

5.54.5

5.54.0

4.14.1

4.14.1

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.98

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.94

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

91.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3106

1770

3139

1583

1761

1743

1837

1552

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.71

1.00

0.91

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7031

0617

7031

3915

8313

2417

4316

9915

52Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

148

1867

6023

1071

1516

874

4718

4825

4RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

00

024

00

020

9La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)14

819

260

2310

7115

168

970

066

45Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)4

44

11

4Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

42

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

16%

2%2%

15%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Free

Perm

NAPe

rmNA

Perm

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

68

4Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Free

84

4Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

13.4

73.0

3.663

.211

0.019

.319

.319

.319

.3Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

13.4

73.0

3.663

.211

0.019

.319

.319

.319

.3Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.12

0.66

0.03

0.57

1.00

0.18

0.18

0.18

0.18

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.55.5

4.55.5

4.14.1

4.14.1

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.03.0

2.03.0

3.03.0

2.52.5

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)21

520

6157

1803

1583

232

305

298

272

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.08

c0.62

0.01

c0.34

0.06

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.01

c0.13

0.04

0.03

v/c R

atio

0.69

0.93

0.40

0.59

0.01

0.72

0.32

0.22

0.16

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d146

.316

.452

.115

.10.0

42.8

39.6

38.9

38.5

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.12

0.36

0.68

0.36

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

3.95.6

1.51.2

0.010

.70.6

0.30.2

Delay

(s)

55.6

11.5

37.0

6.70.0

53.5

40.2

39.2

38.7

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

BD

AA

DD

DD

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

14.6

7.347

.938

.8Ap

proa

ch LO

SB

AD

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y17

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

9Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

14.1

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

80.8%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s7:

Cas

a G

rand

e R

d &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

188

958

145

4713

9132

128

7723

765

86Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

5.54.5

5.54.0

4.14.1

4.14.1

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.97

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3082

1770

3139

1583

1762

1791

1854

1552

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.67

1.00

0.97

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7030

8217

7031

3915

8312

3717

9118

1615

52Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

198

1008

153

4914

6434

135

8124

768

91RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

09

00

00

08

00

078

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

198

1152

049

1464

3413

597

00

7513

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

1010

32

23

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

21

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAFr

eePe

rmNA

Perm

NAPe

rmPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

84

Perm

itted P

hase

sFr

ee8

44

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)19

.190

.016

.387

.214

0.019

.619

.619

.619

.6Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

19.1

90.0

16.3

87.2

140.0

19.6

19.6

19.6

19.6

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

40.6

40.1

20.6

21.0

00.1

40.1

40.1

40.1

4Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

5.54.5

5.54.1

4.14.1

4.1Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

3.02.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

241

1981

206

1955

1583

173

250

254

217

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.11

0.37

0.03

c0.47

0.05

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.02

c0.11

0.04

0.01

v/c R

atio

0.82

0.58

0.24

0.75

0.02

0.78

0.39

0.30

0.06

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d158

.814

.356

.218

.70.0

58.1

54.8

54.0

52.2

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.88

0.88

0.74

0.59

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

17.1

1.10.1

1.20.0

20.0

1.00.5

0.1De

lay (s

)68

.613

.641

.812

.20.0

78.2

55.8

54.5

52.3

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

BD

BA

EE

DD

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

21.6

12.9

68.4

53.3

Appr

oach

LOS

CB

ED

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y22

.5HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

6Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

14.1

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

74.8%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s8:

McD

owel

l Bl &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

810

1571

432

761

7322

792

920

928

118

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.94

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.99

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3072

1770

3126

1770

3484

1770

3504

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7030

7217

7031

2617

7034

8417

7035

04Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

910

9176

834

818

7824

499

1022

530

219

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

830

04

00

80

05

0La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)9

1776

034

892

024

410

10

225

316

0Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)1

1Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

15

2He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

16%

2%2%

15%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

87

4Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)2.4

54.5

4.656

.720

.317

.417

.214

.3Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

2.454

.54.6

56.7

20.3

17.4

17.2

14.3

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.0

20.5

00.0

40.5

20.1

80.1

60.1

60.1

3Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)3.0

5.53.0

5.53.0

4.83.0

4.8Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

3815

2274

1611

326

551

276

455

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.01

c0.58

0.02

c0.29

c0.14

0.03

c0.13

0.09

v/s R

atio P

erm

v/c R

atio

0.24

1.17

0.46

0.55

0.75

0.18

0.82

0.69

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d152

.927

.851

.518

.142

.440

.144

.945

.8Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor0.7

60.5

71.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d20.5

78.8

1.61.4

9.10.1

15.9

3.7De

lay (s

)40

.794

.553

.119

.451

.540

.260

.849

.4Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DF

DB

DD

ED

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

94.3

20.7

48.0

54.1

Appr

oach

LOS

FC

DD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y65

.4HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.9

9Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

84.3%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s8:

McD

owel

l Bl &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

680

811

913

940

226

571

366

979

9115

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.97

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3323

1770

3245

1770

3523

1770

3456

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

2317

7032

4517

7035

2317

7034

56Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

686

912

814

1011

243

614

394

1085

9816

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

80

013

00

10

011

0La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)6

989

014

1241

061

440

30

8510

30

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

31

13

1616

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)1

52

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%7%

2%2%

9%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

38

74

Perm

itted P

hase

sAc

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

1.254

.94.6

58.3

55.1

53.3

10.9

9.1Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

1.254

.94.6

58.3

55.1

53.3

10.9

9.1Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.01

0.39

0.03

0.42

0.39

0.38

0.08

0.06

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.03.0

2.03.0

3.02.0

2.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)15

1303

5813

5169

613

4113

722

4v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

0c0

.300.0

1c0

.38c0

.350.1

1c0

.050.0

3v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.4

00.7

60.2

40.9

20.8

80.3

00.6

20.4

6Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

69.0

36.8

66.0

38.6

39.4

30.3

62.5

63.1

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.36

0.58

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

5.43.6

0.811

.412

.60.0

6.10.5

Delay

(s)

99.2

25.0

66.8

50.0

52.1

30.4

68.7

63.6

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

CE

DD

CE

EAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)25

.550

.243

.565

.8Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

DD

E

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y42

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

9Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

83.5%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

n7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)0

01

290

321

9415

132

70

Sign

Con

trol

Stop

Stop

Free

Free

Grad

e0%

0%0%

0%Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.90

0.90

0.91

0.90

0.91

0.90

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.90

Hour

ly flo

w ra

te (vp

h)0

01

320

351

103

161

359

0Pe

destr

ians

Lane

Widt

h (ft)

Walk

ing S

peed

(ft/s

)Pe

rcent

Bloc

kage

Righ

t turn

flare

(veh

)Me

dian t

ype

TWLT

LTW

LTL

Media

n stor

age v

eh)

22

Upstr

eam

signa

l (ft)

270

pX, p

latoo

n unb

locke

dvC

, con

flictin

g volu

me45

148

418

029

747

560

359

120

vC1,

stage

1 co

nf vo

l36

236

211

411

4vC

2, sta

ge 2

conf

vol

8912

218

336

2vC

u, un

block

ed vo

l45

148

418

029

747

560

359

120

tC, s

ingle

(s)7.5

6.56.9

7.56.5

6.94.1

4.1tC

, 2 st

age (

s)6.5

5.56.5

5.5tF

(s)

3.54.0

3.33.5

4.03.3

2.22.2

p0 qu

eue f

ree %

100

100

100

9610

096

100

100

cM ca

pacit

y (ve

h/h)

599

591

832

744

592

993

1196

1466

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

SB 3

Volum

e Tota

l1

671

6951

124

012

0Vo

lume L

eft0

321

00

10

0Vo

lume R

ight

135

00

160

00

cSH

832

857

1196

1700

1700

1466

1700

1700

Volum

e to C

apac

ity0.0

00.0

80.0

00.0

40.0

30.0

00.1

40.0

7Qu

eue L

ength

95th

(ft)

06

00

00

00

Contr

ol De

lay (s

)9.3

9.68.0

0.00.0

7.50.0

0.0La

ne LO

SA

AA

AAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)9.3

9.60.1

0.0Ap

proa

ch LO

SA

A

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 1.2

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

25.9%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

n7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)0

00

170

170

250

290

160

0Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opFr

eeFr

eeGr

ade

0%0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor0.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

0Ho

urly

flow

rate

(vph)

00

019

019

027

832

017

80

Pede

strian

sLa

ne W

idth (

ft)W

alking

Spe

ed (f

t/s)

Perce

nt Bl

ocka

geRi

ght tu

rn fla

re (v

eh)

Media

n typ

eTW

LTL

TWLT

LMe

dian s

torag

e veh

)2

2Up

strea

m sig

nal (f

t)27

0pX

, plat

oon u

nbloc

ked

vC, c

onflic

ting v

olume

336

488

8938

347

215

517

831

0vC

1, sta

ge 1

conf

vol

178

178

294

294

vC2,

stage

2 co

nf vo

l15

831

089

178

vCu,

unblo

cked

vol

336

488

8938

347

215

517

831

0tC

, sing

le (s)

7.56.5

6.97.5

6.56.9

4.14.1

tC, 2

stag

e (s)

6.55.5

6.55.5

tF (s

)3.5

4.03.3

3.54.0

3.32.2

2.2p0

queu

e fre

e %10

010

010

097

100

9810

010

0cM

capa

city (

veh/h

)71

560

695

266

061

486

313

9612

47

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

SB 3

Volum

e Tota

l0

380

185

125

011

959

Volum

e Left

019

00

00

00

Volum

e Righ

t0

190

032

00

0cS

H17

0074

817

0017

0017

0017

0017

0017

00Vo

lume t

o Cap

acity

0.00

0.05

0.00

0.11

0.07

0.00

0.07

0.03

Queu

e Len

gth 95

th (ft

)0

40

00

00

0Co

ntrol

Delay

(s)

0.010

.10.0

0.00.0

0.00.0

0.0La

ne LO

SA

BAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)0.0

10.1

0.00.0

Appr

oach

LOS

AB

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 0.7

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

17.8%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

eh12

.1Int

erse

ction

LOS

B

Move

ment

EBU

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBU

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBU

NBL

NBT

NBR

Vol, v

eh/h

038

7460

078

7355

025

102

47Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.88

0.88

0.88

0.90

0.88

0.88

0.88

0.90

0.88

0.88

0.88

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

22

22

22

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

4384

680

8983

620

2811

653

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

01

00

01

00

11

1

Appr

oach

EBW

BNB

Oppo

sing A

ppro

ach

WB

EBSB

Oppo

sing L

anes

11

2Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftSB

NBEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Left

23

1Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach R

ight

NBSB

WB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t3

21

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay12

13.2

10.1

HCM

LOS

BB

B

Lane

NBLn

1NB

Ln2

NBLn

3EB

Ln1

WBL

n1SB

Ln1

SBLn

2Vo

l Left

, %10

0%0%

0%22

%38

%10

0%0%

Vol T

hru,

%0%

100%

0%43

%35

%0%

84%

Vol R

ight, %

0%0%

100%

35%

27%

0%16

%Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opTr

affic

Vol b

y Lan

e25

102

4717

220

643

188

LT V

ol25

00

3878

430

Thro

ugh V

ol0

102

074

730

157

RT V

ol0

047

6055

031

Lane

Flow

Rate

2811

653

195

234

4921

4Ge

ometr

y Grp

77

77

78

8De

gree

of U

til (X

)0.0

540.2

040.0

840.3

340.4

040.0

960.3

82De

partu

re H

eadw

ay (H

d)6.8

596.3

55.6

366.1

576.2

187.0

646.4

35Co

nver

genc

e, Y/

NYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sCa

p52

056

363

258

257

850

655

8Se

rvice

Tim

e4.6

234.1

133.3

993.9

183.9

764.8

284.1

99HC

M La

ne V

/C R

atio

0.054

0.206

0.084

0.335

0.405

0.097

0.384

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay10

10.7

8.912

13.2

10.6

13.2

HCM

Lane

LOS

AB

AB

BB

BHC

M 95

th-tile

Q0.2

0.80.3

1.51.9

0.31.8

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

eh11

.2Int

erse

ction

LOS

B

Move

ment

EBU

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBU

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBU

NBL

NBT

NBR

Vol, v

eh/h

060

8842

038

5147

044

159

49Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

22

22

22

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

6799

470

4357

530

4917

955

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

01

00

01

00

11

1

Appr

oach

EBW

BNB

Oppo

sing A

ppro

ach

WB

EBSB

Oppo

sing L

anes

11

2Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftSB

NBEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Left

23

1Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach R

ight

NBSB

WB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t3

21

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay12

.311

10.5

HCM

LOS

BB

B

Lane

NBLn

1NB

Ln2

NBLn

3EB

Ln1

WBL

n1SB

Ln1

SBLn

2Vo

l Left

, %10

0%0%

0%32

%28

%10

0%0%

Vol T

hru,

%0%

100%

0%46

%38

%0%

80%

Vol R

ight, %

0%0%

100%

22%

35%

0%20

%Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opTr

affic

Vol b

y Lan

e44

159

4919

013

631

137

LT V

ol44

00

6038

310

Thro

ugh V

ol0

159

088

510

110

RT V

ol0

049

4247

027

Lane

Flow

Rate

4917

955

213

153

3515

4Ge

ometr

y Grp

77

77

78

8De

gree

of U

til (X

)0.0

890.2

980.0

810.3

630.2

60.0

680.2

72De

partu

re H

eadw

ay (H

d)6.5

065.9

985.2

876.1

176.1

217.0

136.3

62Co

nver

genc

e, Y/

NYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sCa

p55

059

867

658

758

551

056

3Se

rvice

Tim

e4.2

53.7

423.0

313.8

623.8

714.7

674.1

16HC

M La

ne V

/C R

atio

0.089

0.299

0.081

0.363

0.262

0.069

0.274

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay9.9

11.3

8.512

.311

10.3

11.5

HCM

Lane

LOS

AB

AB

BB

BHC

M 95

th-tile

Q0.3

1.20.3

1.71

0.21.1

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

ehInt

erse

ction

LOS

Move

ment

SBU

SBL

SBT

SBR

Vol, v

eh/h

043

157

31Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.88

0.88

0.88

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

4917

835

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

11

0

Appr

oach

SBOp

posin

g App

roac

hNB

Oppo

sing L

anes

3Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftW

BCo

nflict

ing La

nes L

eft1

Confl

icting

App

roac

h Righ

tEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t1

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay12

.7HC

M LO

SB

Lane

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

ehInt

erse

ction

LOS

Move

ment

SBU

SBL

SBT

SBR

Vol, v

eh/h

031

110

27Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

3512

430

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

11

0

Appr

oach

SBOp

posin

g App

roac

hNB

Oppo

sing L

anes

3Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftW

BCo

nflict

ing La

nes L

eft1

Confl

icting

App

roac

h Righ

tEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t1

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay11

.3HC

M LO

SB

Lane

MO

VEM

ENT

SUM

MA

RYSi

te:S

McD

owel

l Bl &

Bay

woo

d D

r (A

M B

asel

ine)

A

M P

eak

Hou

rB

asel

ine

Con

ditio

nsR

ound

abou

t

Mov

emen

t Per

form

ance

-Ve

hicl

esD

eman

d Fl

ows

95%

Bac

k of

Que

ueM

ov IDO

DM

ovD

eg.

Satn

Aver

age

Del

ay

Leve

l of

Serv

ice

Prop

. Q

ueue

dEf

fect

ive

Stop

Rat

eAv

erag

eSp

eed

To

tal

HV

Vehi

cles

Dis

tanc

eve

h/h

%v/

cse

cve

hft

per v

ehm

phSo

uth:

NB

Bay

woo

d D

r3

L212

52.

00.

348

8.5

LOS

A1.

742

.20.

650.

6423

.78

T179

2.0

0.34

88.

5LO

S A

1.7

42.2

0.65

0.64

23.2

18R

277

2.0

0.34

88.

5LO

S A

1.7

42.2

0.65

0.64

22.6

Appr

oach

281

2.0

0.34

88.

5LO

S A

1.7

42.2

0.65

0.64

23.2

East

: WB

S M

cDow

ell B

l1

L242

2.0

0.46

18.

3LO

S A

2.9

73.5

0.54

0.41

30.9

6T1

450

2.0

0.46

18.

3LO

S A

2.9

73.5

0.54

0.41

30.6

16R

220

2.0

0.46

18.

3LO

S A

2.9

73.5

0.54

0.41

29.8

Appr

oach

512

2.0

0.46

18.

3LO

S A

2.9

73.5

0.54

0.41

30.6

Nor

th: S

B B

ayw

ood

Dr

7L2

422.

00.

349

9.1

LOS

A1.

641

.80.

670.

6823

.94

T114

32.

00.

349

9.1

LOS

A1.

641

.80.

670.

6823

.414

R2

772.

00.

349

9.1

LOS

A1.

641

.80.

670.

6822

.8Ap

proa

ch26

22.

00.

349

9.1

LOS

A1.

641

.80.

670.

6823

.3

Wes

t: E

B S

McD

owel

l Bl

5L2

292.

00.

522

9.3

LOS

A3.

690

.20.

580.

4430

.52

T147

42.

00.

522

9.3

LOS

A3.

690

.20.

580.

4430

.312

R2

812.

00.

522

9.3

LOS

A3.

690

.20.

580.

4429

.4Ap

proa

ch58

32.

00.

522

9.3

LOS

A3.

690

.20.

580.

4430

.2

All V

ehic

les

1638

2.0

0.52

28.

8LO

S A

3.6

90.2

0.59

0.50

27.6

Leve

l of S

ervi

ce (L

OS)

Met

hod:

Del

ay &

v/c

(HC

M 2

010)

. R

ound

abou

t LO

S M

etho

d: S

ame

as S

igna

lised

Inte

rsec

tions

.Ve

hicl

e m

ovem

ent L

OS

val

ues

are

base

d on

ave

rage

del

ay a

nd v

/c ra

tio (d

egre

e of

sat

urat

ion)

per

mov

emen

tLO

S F

will

resu

lt if

v/c

> 1

irres

pect

ive

of m

ovem

ent d

elay

val

ue (d

oes

not a

pply

for a

ppro

ache

s an

d in

ters

ectio

n).

Inte

rsec

tion

and

Appr

oach

LO

S va

lues

are

bas

ed o

n av

erag

e de

lay

for a

ll m

ovem

ents

(v/c

not

use

d as

spe

cifie

d in

HC

M 2

010)

.R

ound

abou

t Cap

acity

Mod

el: U

S H

CM

201

0.H

CM

Del

ay F

orm

ula

optio

n is

use

d. C

ontro

l Del

ay d

oes

not i

nclu

de G

eom

etric

Del

ay s

ince

Exc

lude

Geo

met

ric D

elay

opt

ion

appl

ies.

Gap

-Acc

epta

nce

Cap

acity

: Tra

ditio

nal M

1.H

V (%

) val

ues

are

calc

ulat

ed fo

r All

Mov

emen

t Cla

sses

of A

ll H

eavy

Veh

icle

Mod

el D

esig

natio

n.

Pro

cess

ed: F

riday

, May

22,

201

5 2:

11:4

1 PM

SID

RA

INTE

RSE

CTI

ON

6.0

.24.

4877

Cop

yrig

ht ©

200

0-20

14 A

kcel

ik a

nd A

ssoc

iate

s Pt

y Lt

dw

ww

.sid

raso

lutio

ns.c

omP

roje

ct:

N:\A

AA\S

OX\

PET\

191P

ET\S

IDR

A\Ba

ywoo

d-M

cDow

ell.s

ip6

8000

493,

601

9158

, W-T

RAN

S, P

LUS

/ Fl

oatin

g

MO

VEM

ENT

SUM

MA

RYSi

te:S

McD

owel

l Bl &

Bay

woo

d D

r (PM

Bas

elin

e)P

M P

eak

Hou

rB

asel

ine

Con

ditio

nsR

ound

abou

t

Mov

emen

t Per

form

ance

-Ve

hicl

esD

eman

d Fl

ows

95%

Bac

k of

Que

ueM

ov IDO

DM

ovD

eg.

Satn

Aver

age

Del

ay

Leve

l of

Serv

ice

Prop

. Q

ueue

dEf

fect

ive

Stop

Rat

eAv

erag

eSp

eed

To

tal

HV

Vehi

cles

Dis

tanc

eve

h/h

%v/

cse

cve

hft

per v

ehm

phSo

uth:

NB

Bay

woo

d D

r3

L293

2.0

0.30

67.

4LO

S A

1.5

37.3

0.59

0.54

24.1

8T1

126

2.0

0.30

67.

4LO

S A

1.5

37.3

0.59

0.54

23.6

18R

252

2.0

0.30

67.

4LO

S A

1.5

37.3

0.59

0.54

23.0

Appr

oach

271

2.0

0.30

67.

4LO

S A

1.5

37.3

0.59

0.54

23.7

East

: WB

S M

cDow

ell B

l1

L268

2.0

0.74

716

.4LO

S B

9.0

228.

20.

850.

8227

.86

T169

22.

00.

747

16.4

LOS

B9.

022

8.2

0.85

0.82

27.6

16R

232

2.0

0.74

716

.4LO

S B

9.0

228.

20.

850.

8226

.9Ap

proa

ch79

22.

00.

747

16.4

LOS

B9.

022

8.2

0.85

0.82

27.6

Nor

th: S

B B

ayw

ood

Dr

7L2

142.

00.

194

8.5

LOS

A0.

819

.50.

670.

6724

.14

T163

2.0

0.19

48.

5LO

S A

0.8

19.5

0.67

0.67

23.6

14R

237

2.0

0.19

48.

5LO

S A

0.8

19.5

0.67

0.67

23.0

Appr

oach

114

2.0

0.19

48.

5LO

S A

0.8

19.5

0.67

0.67

23.4

Wes

t: E

B S

McD

owel

l Bl

5L2

602.

00.

452

7.7

LOS

A3.

076

.10.

440.

2831

.12

T137

72.

00.

452

7.7

LOS

A3.

076

.10.

440.

2830

.812

R2

112

2.0

0.45

27.

7LO

S A

3.0

76.1

0.44

0.28

29.9

Appr

oach

549

2.0

0.45

27.

7LO

S A

3.0

76.1

0.44

0.28

30.6

All V

ehic

les

1726

2.0

0.74

711

.7LO

S B

9.0

228.

20.

670.

5927

.4

Leve

l of S

ervi

ce (L

OS)

Met

hod:

Del

ay &

v/c

(HC

M 2

010)

. R

ound

abou

t LO

S M

etho

d: S

ame

as S

igna

lised

Inte

rsec

tions

.Ve

hicl

e m

ovem

ent L

OS

val

ues

are

base

d on

ave

rage

del

ay a

nd v

/c ra

tio (d

egre

e of

sat

urat

ion)

per

mov

emen

tLO

S F

will

resu

lt if

v/c

> 1

irres

pect

ive

of m

ovem

ent d

elay

val

ue (d

oes

not a

pply

for a

ppro

ache

s an

d in

ters

ectio

n).

Inte

rsec

tion

and

Appr

oach

LO

S va

lues

are

bas

ed o

n av

erag

e de

lay

for a

ll m

ovem

ents

(v/c

not

use

d as

spe

cifie

d in

HC

M 2

010)

.R

ound

abou

t Cap

acity

Mod

el: U

S H

CM

201

0.H

CM

Del

ay F

orm

ula

optio

n is

use

d. C

ontro

l Del

ay d

oes

not i

nclu

de G

eom

etric

Del

ay s

ince

Exc

lude

Geo

met

ric D

elay

opt

ion

appl

ies.

Gap

-Acc

epta

nce

Cap

acity

: Tra

ditio

nal M

1.H

V (%

) val

ues

are

calc

ulat

ed fo

r All

Mov

emen

t Cla

sses

of A

ll H

eavy

Veh

icle

Mod

el D

esig

natio

n.

Pro

cess

ed: F

riday

, May

22,

201

5 2:

11:4

6 PM

SID

RA

INTE

RSE

CTI

ON

6.0

.24.

4877

Cop

yrig

ht ©

200

0-20

14 A

kcel

ik a

nd A

ssoc

iate

s Pt

y Lt

dw

ww

.sid

raso

lutio

ns.c

omP

roje

ct:

N:\A

AA\S

OX\

PET\

191P

ET\S

IDR

A\Ba

ywoo

d-M

cDow

ell.s

ip6

8000

493,

601

9158

, W-T

RAN

S, P

LUS

/ Fl

oatin

g

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s1:

Was

hing

ton

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t6/4

/2015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Futur

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

4424

040

230

210

121

5057

417

114

185

754

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.24.2

4.24.0

4.24.0

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

00.9

91.0

00.9

81.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

81.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

71.0

00.9

9Flt

Pro

tected

0.99

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

1317

7016

4817

7033

5117

7034

99Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

90.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1713

1770

1648

1770

3351

1770

3499

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)44

240

4023

021

012

150

574

171

141

857

54RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

00

150

021

00

30

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

032

40

230

316

050

724

014

190

80

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

67

76

418

184

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

1320

12He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Split

NASp

litNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s7

78

85

21

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)26

.426

.626

.64.9

32.5

13.7

41.3

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)26

.426

.626

.64.9

32.5

13.7

41.3

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

30.2

30.2

30.0

40.2

80.1

20.3

6Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.2

4.24.2

4.04.2

4.04.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.52.5

2.52.0

4.02.0

4.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

390

406

378

7494

020

912

47v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.190.1

3c0

.190.0

3c0

.22c0

.08c0

.26v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.8

30.5

70.8

30.6

80.7

70.6

70.7

3Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

42.6

39.5

42.5

54.7

38.2

48.9

32.4

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

13.7

1.514

.417

.54.2

6.62.3

Delay

(s)

56.3

41.0

56.9

72.1

42.4

55.5

34.7

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

DE

ED

EC

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

56.3

50.4

44.3

37.5

Appr

oach

LOS

ED

DD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y44

.3HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

0Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

115.8

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.6

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

81.9%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s1:

Was

hing

ton

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t6/4

/2015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Futur

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

6025

980

450

319

152

6876

725

711

110

2312

2Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.2

4.24.2

4.04.2

4.04.2

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

0.99

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.97

1.00

0.99

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

0.97

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.96

1.00

0.98

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

90.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1738

1770

1683

1770

3298

1770

3462

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.99

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

3817

7016

8317

7032

9817

7034

62Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

6025

980

450

319

152

6876

725

711

110

2312

2RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

00

120

023

00

70

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

039

90

450

459

068

1001

011

111

380

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

2818

1828

732

327

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

1320

12He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%7%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Split

NASp

litNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s7

78

85

21

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)32

.237

.837

.86.0

44.4

9.047

.4Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

32.2

37.8

37.8

6.044

.49.0

47.4

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

30.2

70.2

70.0

40.3

20.0

60.3

4Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.2

4.24.2

4.04.2

4.04.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.52.5

2.52.0

4.02.0

4.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

399

477

454

7510

4511

311

72v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.230.2

5c0

.270.0

4c0

.300.0

6c0

.33v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o1.0

00.9

41.0

10.9

10.9

60.9

80.9

7Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

53.9

50.1

51.1

66.7

46.9

65.4

45.6

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.00

0.91

0.91

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

45.1

18.1

33.7

71.0

19.3

78.5

20.2

Delay

(s)

99.0

63.6

80.1

137.8

66.2

143.9

65.9

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

EF

FE

FE

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

99.0

72.0

70.7

72.8

Appr

oach

LOS

FE

EE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y74

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio1.0

1Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.6

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

99.3%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s2:

E D

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t6/4

/2015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

943

011

041

642

041

110

204

510

4317

421

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.54.5

4.54.5

4.24.2

4.24.2

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor0.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

0.97

1.00

1.00

0.90

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

0.97

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.98

Flt P

rotec

ted1.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

81.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

3129

1770

1712

1428

1831

1583

1770

1828

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)29

6317

7017

1214

2818

3115

8317

7018

28Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

943

011

041

642

041

110

204

510

4317

421

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

00

190

019

70

30

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

054

90

416

420

220

314

313

4319

20

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

2231

3122

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)21

171

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NApt+

ovSp

litNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s4

38

22

2 36

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

48

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)26

.831

.863

.163

.125

.661

.917

.017

.0Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

26.8

31.8

63.1

63.1

25.6

57.4

17.0

17.0

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

30.2

70.5

30.5

30.2

20.4

80.1

40.1

4Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

4.02.0

4.04.0

2.52.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

669

474

910

759

395

766

253

262

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.24

0.25

c0.17

0.20

0.02

c0.10

v/s R

atio P

erm

c0.19

0.02

v/c R

atio

0.82

0.88

0.46

0.03

0.79

0.41

0.17

0.73

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d143

.641

.517

.213

.244

.019

.744

.648

.6Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d28.3

16.1

0.50.0

10.2

0.30.2

9.5De

lay (s

)52

.057

.717

.713

.254

.319

.944

.858

.1Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DE

BB

DB

DE

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

52.0

36.5

33.0

55.7

Appr

oach

LOS

DD

CE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y40

.6HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

2Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

118.6

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

81.0%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s2:

E D

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t6/4

/2015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

2253

410

135

266

862

169

196

428

6628

810

4Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s0.9

71.0

01.0

00.9

11.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

9Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

81.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

6Flt

Pro

tected

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)32

5517

7017

7614

4118

2115

8317

7017

75Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

10.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

81.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

2981

1770

1776

1441

1821

1583

1770

1775

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)22

534

101

352

668

6216

919

642

866

288

104

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

00

260

019

00

90

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

065

70

352

668

360

365

238

6638

30

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

1632

3216

24

42

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)21

171

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%7%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NApt+

ovSp

litNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s4

38

22

2 36

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

48

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)40

.323

.568

.368

.330

.954

.427

.927

.9Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

40.3

23.5

68.3

68.3

30.9

54.4

27.9

27.9

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

90.1

70.4

90.4

90.2

20.3

90.2

00.2

0Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

4.02.0

4.04.0

2.52.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

858

297

866

703

401

615

352

353

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.20

c0.38

c0.20

0.15

0.04

c0.22

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.22

0.02

v/c R

atio

0.77

1.19

0.77

0.05

0.91

0.39

0.19

1.09

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d145

.558

.229

.418

.853

.230

.846

.656

.0Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor0.5

60.6

41.1

21.2

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d22.4

104.1

4.50.1

24.3

0.30.2

72.7

Delay

(s)

27.8

141.5

37.5

22.6

77.5

31.1

46.8

128.8

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

FD

CE

CD

FAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)27

.870

.552

.511

7.0Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

ED

F

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y63

.4HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.9

7Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

110.9

%IC

U Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

HAn

alysis

Per

iod (m

in)15

c C

ritica

l Lan

e Gro

up

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s3:

Cau

lfiel

d Ln

& L

akev

ille

St

6/4/20

15

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

200

620

4613

478

070

113

378

262

270

207

300

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.04.9

4.04.9

4.94.0

4.04.9

4.94.9

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

50.9

50.9

51.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.94

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

50.9

91.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3255

1770

3252

1553

1770

3282

1681

1757

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

0.99

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7032

5517

7032

5215

5317

7032

8216

8117

5715

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

200

620

4613

478

070

113

378

262

270

207

300

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

50

00

460

114

00

010

1La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)20

066

10

134

780

2411

352

60

235

242

199

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

46

64

33

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

58

3He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

pt+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

34

44 5

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)12

.038

.810

.437

.237

.217

.017

.026

.026

.042

.9Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

12.0

38.8

10.4

37.2

37.2

17.0

17.0

26.0

26.0

42.9

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

10.3

50.0

90.3

40.3

40.1

50.1

50.2

40.2

40.3

9Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.0

4.94.0

4.94.9

4.04.0

4.94.9

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

193

1148

167

1099

525

273

507

397

415

617

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.11

0.20

0.08

c0.24

0.06

c0.16

c0.14

0.14

0.13

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.02

v/c R

atio

1.04

0.58

0.80

0.71

0.05

0.41

1.04

0.59

0.58

0.32

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d149

.028

.948

.831

.724

.542

.046

.537

.337

.223

.4Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

00.9

00.8

61.6

91.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d274

.62.1

19.9

3.40.1

0.449

.96.4

5.90.3

Delay

(s)

123.6

31.0

63.9

30.8

41.6

42.4

96.4

43.6

43.1

23.7

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

CE

CD

DF

DD

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)52

.436

.088

.335

.8Ap

proa

ch LO

SD

DF

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y51

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

8Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

87.8%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s3:

Cau

lfiel

d Ln

& L

akev

ille

St

6/4/20

15

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Futur

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

250

780

133

424

980

310

123

409

201

200

332

350

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.04.9

4.04.9

4.94.0

4.04.9

4.94.9

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

50.9

50.9

51.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

0.98

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3333

1770

3374

1550

1770

3338

1681

1765

1557

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

3317

7033

7415

5017

7033

3816

8117

6515

57Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

250

780

133

424

980

310

123

409

201

200

332

350

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

100

00

770

430

00

280

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

250

903

042

498

023

412

356

70

180

352

70Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)5

22

51

1Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

85

83

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%6%

2%2%

7%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPe

rmSp

litNA

Split

NAPe

rmPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

33

44

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

4Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

22.1

39.1

33.0

50.0

50.0

22.0

22.0

28.1

28.1

28.1

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)22

.139

.133

.050

.050

.022

.022

.028

.128

.128

.1Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.16

0.28

0.24

0.36

0.36

0.16

0.16

0.20

0.20

0.20

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.04.9

4.04.9

4.94.0

4.04.9

4.94.9

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)27

993

041

712

0555

327

852

433

735

431

2v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.1

4c0

.27c0

.240.2

90.0

7c0

.170.1

1c0

.20v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.1

50.0

5v/c

Rati

o0.9

00.9

71.0

20.8

10.4

20.4

41.0

80.5

30.9

90.2

3Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

57.8

49.9

53.5

40.8

34.1

53.4

59.0

50.1

55.9

46.8

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.89

0.96

0.81

0.77

0.65

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

25.1

20.9

39.7

4.01.5

0.463

.30.8

46.0

0.1De

lay (s

)76

.568

.683

.035

.523

.653

.912

2.350

.910

1.947

.0Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EE

FD

CD

FD

FD

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

70.3

45.1

110.9

69.7

Appr

oach

LOS

ED

FE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y67

.2HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio1.0

1Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

99.5%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s4:

In-n

-Out

Driv

eway

/US

101

SB

Ram

ps &

Lak

evill

e S

t/Lak

evill

e H

wy

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

310

922

106

756

360

55

792

05

298

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.55.0

3.55.0

5.03.5

4.94.9

4.5La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.97

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

31.0

01.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

50.9

41.0

01.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.99

0.95

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)34

3332

7917

7031

3915

8316

1816

8116

8615

83Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

90.9

50.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3433

3279

1770

3139

1583

1618

1681

1686

1583

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)31

092

210

675

636

05

57

920

529

8RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

00

023

00

70

00

93La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)31

093

20

675

613

00

100

460

465

205

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

23

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)9

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%10

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPe

rmSp

litNA

Split

NApm

+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

68

84

45

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

4Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

16.8

56.4

1.239

.839

.82.0

33.5

33.5

50.3

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)16

.856

.41.2

39.8

39.8

2.033

.533

.550

.3Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.15

0.51

0.01

0.36

0.36

0.02

0.30

0.30

0.46

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.55.0

3.55.0

5.03.5

4.94.9

4.5Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

3.03.0

3.03.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)52

416

8119

1135

572

2951

151

378

8v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

9c0

.280.0

0c0

.24c0

.010.2

7c0

.280.0

4v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.0

80.0

9v/c

Rati

o0.5

90.5

50.3

20.6

70.2

30.3

50.9

00.9

10.2

6Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

43.4

18.2

54.0

29.5

24.4

53.4

36.6

36.7

18.4

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.03

1.15

1.20

0.47

0.80

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

1.41.0

3.02.7

0.87.2

18.8

19.5

0.2De

lay (s

)46

.222

.067

.816

.620

.260

.555

.556

.318

.6Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DC

EB

CE

EE

BAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)28

.018

.160

.546

.8Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

BE

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y31

.4HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

4Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.9

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

74.7%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s4:

In-n

-Out

Driv

eway

/US

101

SB

Ram

ps &

Lak

evill

e S

t/Lak

evill

e H

wy

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

160

1096

1532

1357

270

255

1067

05

377

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.05.0

4.05.0

5.04.4

4.94.9

4.0La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.97

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

71.0

01.0

00.9

8Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

50.9

71.0

01.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.97

0.95

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)34

3333

9917

7033

1215

8316

9216

8116

8715

55Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

70.9

50.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3433

3399

1770

3312

1583

1692

1681

1687

1555

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)16

010

9615

3213

5727

025

510

670

537

7RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

00

013

50

90

00

60La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)16

011

110

3213

5713

50

310

335

340

317

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

22

55

5Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

158

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%6%

2%2%

9%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPe

rmSp

litNA

Split

NApm

+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

68

84

45

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

4Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

11.9

72.2

9.870

.170

.15.8

33.9

33.9

45.8

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)11

.972

.29.8

70.1

70.1

5.833

.933

.945

.8Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.09

0.52

0.07

0.50

0.50

0.04

0.24

0.24

0.33

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.05.0

4.05.0

5.04.4

4.94.9

4.0Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

2.03.0

3.03.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)29

117

5212

316

5879

270

407

408

508

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.05

c0.33

0.02

c0.41

c0.02

0.20

c0.20

0.05

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.09

0.15

v/c R

atio

0.55

0.63

0.26

0.82

0.17

0.45

0.82

0.83

0.62

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d161

.524

.461

.729

.619

.165

.550

.250

.439

.8Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.2

00.4

70.9

70.9

41.4

91.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d21.0

0.90.3

2.90.3

1.712

.613

.62.4

Delay

(s)

74.9

12.4

59.8

30.6

28.8

67.2

62.9

64.0

42.2

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

BE

CC

EE

ED

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

20.3

30.9

67.2

55.8

Appr

oach

LOS

CC

EE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y34

.4HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

9Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

18.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

79.5%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s5:

Lak

evill

e H

wy

& U

S 1

01 N

B R

amps

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

132

1490

1085

780

305

118

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.44.4

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

50.9

51.0

00.9

71.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3112

3139

1547

3433

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7031

1231

3915

4734

3315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

132

1490

1085

780

305

118

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

288

041

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

132

1490

1085

492

305

77Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)4

44

2He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

16%

15%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NANA

Perm

Prot

pt+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

26

44 5

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)13

.086

.469

.469

.414

.231

.6Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

13.0

86.4

69.4

69.4

14.2

31.6

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

20.7

90.6

30.6

30.1

30.2

9Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.0

5.05.0

5.04.4

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.03.0

3.03.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

209

2444

1980

976

443

454

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.07

c0.48

0.35

c0.09

0.05

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.32

v/c R

atio

0.63

0.61

0.55

0.50

0.69

0.17

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d146

.24.9

11.5

11.0

45.8

29.4

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.14

1.04

0.62

1.07

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

3.30.8

0.91.4

3.50.1

Delay

(s)

55.7

5.98.0

13.2

49.3

29.4

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

AA

BD

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)9.9

10.2

43.8

Appr

oach

LOS

AB

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y13

.7HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

5Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

13.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

63.5%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eB

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s5:

Lak

evill

e H

wy

& U

S 1

01 N

B R

amps

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Futur

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

159

1587

1485

840

250

237

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.54.5

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

50.9

51.0

00.9

71.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3374

3312

1550

3433

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

7433

1215

5034

3315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

159

1587

1485

840

250

237

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

389

00

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

159

1587

1485

451

250

237

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

11

33

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%7%

9%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

NAPe

rmPr

otpt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

64

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

6Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

10.0

50.7

36.7

36.7

9.823

.8Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

10.0

50.7

36.7

36.7

9.819

.8Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.14

0.72

0.52

0.52

0.14

0.28

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.5Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.03.0

3.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)25

224

4317

3681

248

044

7v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

9c0

.47c0

.450.0

7c0

.15v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.2

9v/c

Rati

o0.6

30.6

50.8

60.5

60.5

20.5

3Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

28.3

5.014

.411

.227

.921

.2Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.2

81.5

71.7

08.0

91.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d23.0

1.14.9

2.30.5

0.6De

lay (s

)39

.19.0

29.3

92.7

28.4

21.8

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

AC

FC

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)11

.752

.225

.2Ap

proa

ch LO

SB

DC

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y33

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

8Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

70.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

13.5

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

69.7%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s6:

Bay

woo

d D

r & L

akev

ille

Hw

y10

/17/20

14

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

7717

8239

1612

9635

2810

1432

2333

5Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.44.4

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.91

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3108

1770

3134

1770

1675

1770

1863

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7031

0817

7031

3417

7016

7517

7018

6315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

7717

8239

1612

9635

2810

1432

2333

5RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

10

013

00

064

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

7718

200

1613

300

2811

032

2327

1Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)10

11

107

7Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

42

3He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

16%

2%2%

15%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

pt+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

87

44 5

Perm

itted P

hase

sAc

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

19.4

73.2

2.456

.83.0

9.08.6

14.6

34.0

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)19

.473

.22.4

56.8

3.09.0

8.614

.634

.0Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.18

0.67

0.02

0.52

0.03

0.08

0.08

0.13

0.31

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

3.55.3

4.15.3

3.04.4

3.04.4

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.04.0

2.04.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)31

220

6838

1618

4813

713

824

748

9v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

4c0

.590.0

1c0

.42c0

.020.0

10.0

20.0

1c0

.17v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.2

50.8

80.4

20.8

20.5

80.0

80.2

30.0

90.5

5Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

39.0

14.9

53.1

22.3

52.9

46.7

47.6

41.9

31.7

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.89

0.78

1.22

0.64

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

0.45.2

2.23.9

11.1

0.10.3

0.10.8

Delay

(s)

35.1

16.8

66.9

18.2

64.0

46.8

47.9

41.9

32.4

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

BE

BE

DD

DC

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

17.6

18.7

56.0

34.3

Appr

oach

LOS

BB

EC

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y20

.3HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

3Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

76.7%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s6:

Bay

woo

d D

r & L

akev

ille

Hw

y10

/17/20

14

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

221

1297

3218

1536

4011

937

1927

1215

7Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.44.4

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3361

1770

3303

1770

1749

1770

1863

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

6117

7033

0317

7017

4917

7018

6315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

221

1297

3218

1536

4011

937

1927

1215

7RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

10

015

00

062

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

221

1328

018

1575

011

941

027

1295

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

211

112

111

111

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

23

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%7%

2%2%

9%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NApt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

38

74

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)21

.894

.28.3

81.3

13.7

16.1

4.67.0

28.8

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)21

.894

.28.3

81.3

13.7

16.1

4.67.0

28.8

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

60.6

70.0

60.5

80.1

00.1

20.0

30.0

50.2

1Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.4Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

4.02.0

4.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

275

2261

104

1918

173

201

5893

325

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.12

0.40

0.01

c0.48

c0.07

0.02

0.02

0.01

c0.06

v/s R

atio P

erm

v/c R

atio

0.80

0.59

0.17

0.82

0.69

0.20

0.47

0.13

0.29

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d157

.012

.462

.623

.561

.156

.166

.563

.647

.0Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

20.8

30.8

70.4

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d212

.90.9

0.22.5

8.70.2

2.10.2

0.2De

lay (s

)71

.211

.254

.813

.269

.856

.368

.663

.847

.2Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EB

DB

EE

EE

DAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)19

.713

.665

.551

.1Ap

proa

ch LO

SB

BE

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y21

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

8Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

83.7%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s7:

Cas

a G

rand

e R

d &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Futur

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

227

1550

4018

1147

4585

5828

2943

268

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.55.5

4.55.5

4.04.1

4.14.1

4.1La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

91.0

00.9

8Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.98

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

7031

0817

7031

3915

8317

6117

6218

2515

46Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.7

11.0

00.8

61.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1770

3108

1770

3139

1583

1316

1762

1592

1546

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)22

715

5040

1811

4745

8558

2829

4326

8RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

00

019

00

023

5La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)22

715

890

1811

4745

8567

00

7233

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

44

41

14

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

21

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAFr

eePe

rmNA

Perm

NAPe

rmPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

84

Perm

itted P

hase

sFr

ee8

44

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)22

.278

.83.6

60.2

110.0

13.5

13.5

13.5

13.5

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)22

.278

.83.6

60.2

110.0

13.5

13.5

13.5

13.5

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

00.7

20.0

30.5

51.0

00.1

20.1

20.1

20.1

2Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

5.54.5

5.54.1

4.14.1

4.1Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

3.02.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

357

2226

5717

1715

8316

121

619

518

9v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.1

3c0

.510.0

1c0

.370.0

4v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.0

3c0

.060.0

50.0

2v/c

Rati

o0.6

40.7

10.3

20.6

70.0

30.5

30.3

10.3

70.1

7Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

40.2

9.152

.017

.80.0

45.3

44.0

44.3

43.3

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.03

0.62

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

1.51.1

1.22.1

0.03.1

0.80.9

0.3De

lay (s

)43

.06.7

53.2

19.8

0.048

.444

.845

.243

.6Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DA

DB

AD

DD

DAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)11

.219

.646

.643

.9Ap

proa

ch LO

SB

BD

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y18

.9HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

0Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

14.1

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

72.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s7:

Cas

a G

rand

e R

d &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

299

1243

7933

1487

8096

7516

2056

140

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.55.5

4.55.5

4.04.1

4.14.1

4.1La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

8Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

00.9

91.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

71.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.99

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

7030

9817

7031

3915

8317

6218

0818

3715

49Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.6

51.0

00.9

11.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1770

3098

1770

3139

1583

1203

1808

1690

1549

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)29

912

4379

3314

8780

9675

1620

5614

0RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

03

00

00

06

00

012

4La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)29

913

190

3314

8780

9685

00

7616

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

1010

32

23

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

21

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAFr

eePe

rmNA

Perm

NAPe

rmPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

84

Perm

itted P

hase

sFr

ee8

44

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)30

.497

.512

.179

.214

0.016

.316

.316

.316

.3Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

30.4

97.5

12.1

79.2

140.0

16.3

16.3

16.3

16.3

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

20.7

00.0

90.5

71.0

00.1

20.1

20.1

20.1

2Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

5.54.5

5.54.1

4.14.1

4.1Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

3.02.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

384

2157

152

1775

1583

140

210

196

180

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.17

0.43

0.02

c0.47

0.05

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.05

c0.08

0.04

0.01

v/c R

atio

0.78

0.61

0.22

0.84

0.05

0.69

0.40

0.39

0.09

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d151

.611

.259

.525

.10.0

59.4

57.3

57.2

55.2

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.77

0.74

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

8.01.2

0.34.9

0.113

.01.3

0.90.2

Delay

(s)

47.9

9.559

.830

.00.1

72.4

58.6

58.2

55.4

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

AE

CA

EE

EE

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

16.6

29.1

65.7

56.4

Appr

oach

LOS

BC

EE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y27

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

0Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

14.1

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

82.0%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s8:

McD

owel

l Bl &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

510

3572

638

836

6598

1120

627

215

5Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)3.0

5.53.0

5.53.0

4.83.0

4.8La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

81.0

00.9

9Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

00.9

41.0

00.9

91.0

00.8

61.0

00.9

6Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

7030

7217

7031

2817

7029

6717

7033

79Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1770

3072

1770

3128

1770

2967

1770

3379

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)5

1035

726

3883

665

9811

206

272

155

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

740

03

00

109

00

50

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

516

870

3889

80

9810

80

272

150

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

11

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)1

52

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

38

74

Perm

itted P

hase

sAc

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

5.076

.53.2

74.7

30.4

12.5

21.0

3.1Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

5.076

.53.2

74.7

30.4

12.5

21.0

3.1Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.04

0.59

0.02

0.58

0.23

0.10

0.16

0.02

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.03.0

2.03.0

3.02.0

2.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)68

1814

4318

0441

528

628

780

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.00

c0.55

c0.02

0.29

0.06

c0.04

c0.15

0.00

v/s R

atio P

erm

v/c R

atio

0.07

0.93

0.88

0.50

0.24

0.89d

r0.9

50.1

9Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

60.0

24.1

63.0

16.3

40.1

54.8

53.7

62.0

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

0.29.1

91.0

0.20.3

0.338

.50.4

Delay

(s)

60.2

33.2

154.0

16.5

40.4

55.2

92.2

62.4

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

CF

BD

EF

EAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)33

.322

.050

.690

.1Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

CD

F

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y36

.7HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

7Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

129.5

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

85.9%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15dr

De

facto

Righ

t Lan

e. R

ecod

e with

1 tho

ugh l

ane a

s a rig

ht lan

e.c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s8:

McD

owel

l Bl &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

1490

412

315

994

226

536

371

1167

9015

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.97

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3327

1770

3249

1770

3520

1770

3454

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

2717

7032

4917

7035

2017

7034

54Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

1490

412

315

994

226

536

371

1167

9015

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

70

013

00

20

011

0La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)14

1020

015

1207

053

638

00

6794

0Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)3

11

316

16Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

15

2He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

7%2%

2%9%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

87

4Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)1.5

50.8

1.550

.841

.742

.87.4

8.5Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

1.550

.81.5

50.8

41.7

42.8

7.48.5

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.0

10.4

30.0

10.4

30.3

50.3

60.0

60.0

7Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)3.0

5.53.0

5.53.0

4.83.0

4.8Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

2214

2222

1389

621

1268

110

247

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.01

0.31

0.01

c0.37

c0.30

c0.11

c0.04

0.03

v/s R

atio P

erm

v/c R

atio

0.64

0.72

0.68

0.87

0.86

0.30

0.61

0.38

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d158

.428

.158

.431

.035

.927

.354

.352

.6Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d236

.71.8

52.0

6.111

.90.0

6.40.4

Delay

(s)

95.1

29.8

110.4

37.0

47.8

27.3

60.7

53.0

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

CF

DD

CE

DAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)30

.737

.939

.356

.0Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

DD

E

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y37

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

4Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

118.8

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

83.0%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

n10

/17/20

14

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)0

02

470

532

145

242

521

0Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opFr

eeFr

eeGr

ade

0%0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ho

urly

flow

rate

(vph)

00

247

053

214

524

252

10

Pede

strian

sLa

ne W

idth (

ft)W

alking

Spe

ed (f

t/s)

Perce

nt Bl

ocka

geRi

ght tu

rn fla

re (v

eh)

Media

n typ

eTW

LTL

TWLT

LMe

dian s

torag

e veh

)2

2Up

strea

m sig

nal (f

t)27

0pX

, plat

oon u

nbloc

ked

vC, c

onflic

ting v

olume

654

698

260

428

686

8452

116

9vC

1, sta

ge 1

conf

vol

525

525

161

161

vC2,

stage

2 co

nf vo

l13

017

326

652

5vC

u, un

block

ed vo

l65

469

826

042

868

684

521

169

tC, s

ingle

(s)7.5

6.56.9

7.56.5

6.94.1

4.1tC

, 2 st

age (

s)6.5

5.56.5

5.5tF

(s)

3.54.0

3.33.5

4.03.3

2.22.2

p0 qu

eue f

ree %

100

100

100

9310

094

100

100

cM ca

pacit

y (ve

h/h)

477

496

738

654

497

958

1041

1406

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

SB 3

Volum

e Tota

l2

100

297

722

347

174

Volum

e Left

047

20

02

00

Volum

e Righ

t2

530

024

00

0cS

H73

878

610

4117

0017

0014

0617

0017

00Vo

lume t

o Cap

acity

0.00

0.13

0.00

0.06

0.04

0.00

0.20

0.10

Queu

e Len

gth 95

th (ft

)0

110

00

00

0Co

ntrol

Delay

(s)

9.910

.28.5

0.00.0

7.60.0

0.0La

ne LO

SA

BA

AAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)9.9

10.2

0.10.0

Appr

oach

LOS

AB

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 1.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

33.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

n10

/17/20

14

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Futur

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)0

00

270

270

394

470

249

0Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opFr

eeFr

eeGr

ade

0%0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ho

urly

flow

rate

(vph)

00

027

027

039

447

024

90

Pede

strian

sLa

ne W

idth (

ft)W

alking

Spe

ed (f

t/s)

Perce

nt Bl

ocka

geRi

ght tu

rn fla

re (v

eh)

Media

n typ

eTW

LTL

TWLT

LMe

dian s

torag

e veh

)2

2Up

strea

m sig

nal (f

t)27

0pX

, plat

oon u

nbloc

ked

vC, c

onflic

ting v

olume

473

690

124

542

666

220

249

441

vC1,

stage

1 co

nf vo

l24

924

941

841

8vC

2, sta

ge 2

conf

vol

224

441

124

249

vCu,

unblo

cked

vol

473

690

124

542

666

220

249

441

tC, s

ingle

(s)7.5

6.56.9

7.56.5

6.94.1

4.1tC

, 2 st

age (

s)6.5

5.56.5

5.5tF

(s)

3.54.0

3.33.5

4.03.3

2.22.2

p0 qu

eue f

ree %

100

100

100

9510

097

100

100

cM ca

pacit

y (ve

h/h)

626

522

903

556

533

783

1314

1115

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

SB 3

Volum

e Tota

l0

540

263

178

016

683

Volum

e Left

027

00

00

00

Volum

e Righ

t0

270

047

00

0cS

H17

0065

017

0017

0017

0017

0017

0017

00Vo

lume t

o Cap

acity

0.00

0.08

0.00

0.15

0.10

0.00

0.10

0.05

Queu

e Len

gth 95

th (ft

)0

70

00

00

0Co

ntrol

Delay

(s)

0.011

.00.0

0.00.0

0.00.0

0.0La

ne LO

SA

BAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)0.0

11.0

0.00.0

Appr

oach

LOS

AB

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 0.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

22.4%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

eh11

.9Int

erse

ction

LOS

B

Move

ment

EBU

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBU

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBU

NBL

NBT

NBR

Vol, v

eh/h

041

9765

082

9558

033

102

49Pe

ak H

our F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

22

22

22

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

4197

650

8295

580

3310

249

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

01

00

01

00

11

1

Appr

oach

EBW

BNB

Oppo

sing A

ppro

ach

WB

EBSB

Oppo

sing L

anes

11

2Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftSB

NBEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Left

23

1Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach R

ight

NBSB

WB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t3

21

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay12

12.9

10HC

M LO

SB

BA

Lane

NBLn

1NB

Ln2

NBLn

3EB

Ln1

WBL

n1SB

Ln1

SBLn

2Vo

l Left

, %10

0%0%

0%20

%35

%10

0%0%

Vol T

hru,

%0%

100%

0%48

%40

%0%

80%

Vol R

ight, %

0%0%

100%

32%

25%

0%20

%Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opTr

affic

Vol b

y Lan

e33

102

4920

323

545

198

LT V

ol0

102

097

950

158

Thro

ugh V

ol0

049

6558

040

RT V

ol33

00

4182

450

Lane

Flow

Rate

3310

249

203

235

4519

8Ge

ometr

y Grp

77

77

78

8De

gree

of U

til (X

)0.0

630.1

790.0

760.3

420.4

0.088

0.351

Depa

rture

Hea

dway

(Hd)

6.83

6.32

5.607

6.058

6.123

7.039

6.384

Conv

erge

nce,

Y/N

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cap

523

566

636

593

588

508

562

Servi

ce T

ime

4.591

4.081

3.367

3.812

3.875

4.84.1

44HC

M La

ne V

/C R

atio

0.063

0.18

0.077

0.342

0.40.0

890.3

52HC

M Co

ntrol

Delay

10.1

10.5

8.812

12.9

10.5

12.6

HCM

Lane

LOS

BB

AB

BB

BHC

M 95

th-tile

Q0.2

0.60.2

1.51.9

0.31.6

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Futur

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

eh17

.4Int

erse

ction

LOS

C

Move

ment

EBU

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBU

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBU

NBL

NBT

NBR

Vol, v

eh/h

063

236

510

5819

849

067

159

64Pe

ak H

our F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

22

22

22

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

6323

651

058

198

490

6715

964

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

01

00

01

00

11

1

Appr

oach

EBW

BNB

Oppo

sing A

ppro

ach

WB

EBSB

Oppo

sing L

anes

11

2Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftSB

NBEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Left

23

1Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach R

ight

NBSB

WB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t3

21

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay22

.119

.112

.5HC

M LO

SC

CB

Lane

NBLn

1NB

Ln2

NBLn

3EB

Ln1

WBL

n1SB

Ln1

SBLn

2Vo

l Left

, %10

0%0%

0%18

%19

%10

0%0%

Vol T

hru,

%0%

100%

0%67

%65

%0%

69%

Vol R

ight, %

0%0%

100%

15%

16%

0%31

%Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opTr

affic

Vol b

y Lan

e67

159

6435

030

547

156

LT V

ol0

159

023

619

80

108

Thro

ugh V

ol0

064

5149

048

RT V

ol67

00

6358

470

Lane

Flow

Rate

6715

964

350

305

4715

6Ge

ometr

y Grp

77

77

78

8De

gree

of U

til (X

)0.1

460.3

230.1

170.6

640.5

860.1

110.3

35De

partu

re H

eadw

ay (H

d)7.8

377.3

226.6

016.8

36.9

188.4

77.7

27Co

nver

genc

e, Y/

NYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sCa

p45

749

054

152

952

242

346

5Se

rvice

Tim

e5.5

955.0

84.3

584.5

84.6

76.2

335.4

9HC

M La

ne V

/C R

atio

0.147

0.324

0.118

0.662

0.584

0.111

0.335

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay11

.913

.610

.222

.119

.112

.314

.4HC

M La

ne LO

SB

BB

CC

BB

HCM

95th-

tile Q

0.51.4

0.44.9

3.70.4

1.5

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

No P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

ehInt

erse

ction

LOS

Move

ment

SBU

SBL

SBT

SBR

Vol, v

eh/h

045

158

40Pe

ak H

our F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

4515

840

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

11

0

Appr

oach

SBOp

posin

g App

roac

hNB

Oppo

sing L

anes

3Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftW

BCo

nflict

ing La

nes L

eft1

Confl

icting

App

roac

h Righ

tEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t1

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay12

.2HC

M LO

SB

Lane

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

10/17

/2014

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Futur

e PM

Peak

Hou

r - N

o Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

ehInt

erse

ction

LOS

Move

ment

SBU

SBL

SBT

SBR

Vol, v

eh/h

047

108

48Pe

ak H

our F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

4710

848

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

11

0

Appr

oach

SBOp

posin

g App

roac

hNB

Oppo

sing L

anes

3Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftW

BCo

nflict

ing La

nes L

eft1

Confl

icting

App

roac

h Righ

tEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t1

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay13

.9HC

M LO

SB

Lane

MO

VEM

ENT

SUM

MA

RYSi

te:S

McD

owel

l Bl &

Bay

woo

d D

r (A

M F

utur

e)A

M P

eak

Hou

rFu

ture

Con

ditio

nsR

ound

abou

t

Mov

emen

t Per

form

ance

-Ve

hicl

esD

eman

d Fl

ows

95%

Bac

k of

Que

ueM

ov IDO

DM

ovD

eg.

Satn

Aver

age

Del

ay

Leve

l of

Serv

ice

Prop

. Q

ueue

dEf

fect

ive

Stop

Rat

eAv

erag

eSp

eed

To

tal

HV

Vehi

cles

Dis

tanc

eve

h/h

%v/

cse

cve

hft

per v

ehm

phSo

uth:

NB

Bay

woo

d D

r3

L210

92.

00.

398

12.1

LOS

B1.

948

.40.

740.

8022

.88

T162

2.0

0.39

812

.1LO

S B

1.9

48.4

0.74

0.80

22.4

18R

264

2.0

0.39

812

.1LO

S B

1.9

48.4

0.74

0.80

21.9

Appr

oach

235

2.0

0.39

812

.1LO

S B

1.9

48.4

0.74

0.80

22.4

East

: WB

S M

cDow

ell B

l1

L229

2.0

0.73

515

.0LO

S B

8.6

219.

50.

780.

6228

.46

T179

92.

00.

735

15.0

LOS

B8.

621

9.5

0.78

0.62

28.2

16R

217

2.0

0.73

515

.0LO

S B

8.6

219.

50.

780.

6227

.5Ap

proa

ch84

52.

00.

735

15.0

LOS

B8.

621

9.5

0.78

0.62

28.2

Nor

th: S

B B

ayw

ood

Dr

7L2

352.

00.

413

13.3

LOS

B2.

049

.80.

750.

8322

.94

T111

92.

00.

413

13.3

LOS

B2.

049

.80.

750.

8322

.414

R2

702.

00.

413

13.3

LOS

B2.

049

.80.

750.

8321

.9Ap

proa

ch22

42.

00.

413

13.3

LOS

B2.

049

.80.

750.

8322

.3

Wes

t: E

B S

McD

owel

l Bl

5L2

282.

00.

765

16.1

LOS

B9.

925

0.7

0.81

0.63

28.0

2T1

789

2.0

0.76

516

.1LO

S B

9.9

250.

70.

810.

6327

.812

R2

762.

00.

765

16.1

LOS

B9.

925

0.7

0.81

0.63

27.1

Appr

oach

893

2.0

0.76

516

.1LO

S B

9.9

250.

70.

810.

6327

.7

All V

ehic

les

2197

2.0

0.76

514

.9LO

S B

9.9

250.

70.

790.

6726

.6

Leve

l of S

ervi

ce (L

OS)

Met

hod:

Del

ay &

v/c

(HC

M 2

010)

. R

ound

abou

t LO

S M

etho

d: S

ame

as S

igna

lised

Inte

rsec

tions

.Ve

hicl

e m

ovem

ent L

OS

val

ues

are

base

d on

ave

rage

del

ay a

nd v

/c ra

tio (d

egre

e of

sat

urat

ion)

per

mov

emen

tLO

S F

will

resu

lt if

v/c

> 1

irres

pect

ive

of m

ovem

ent d

elay

val

ue (d

oes

not a

pply

for a

ppro

ache

s an

d in

ters

ectio

n).

Inte

rsec

tion

and

Appr

oach

LO

S va

lues

are

bas

ed o

n av

erag

e de

lay

for a

ll m

ovem

ents

(v/c

not

use

d as

spe

cifie

d in

HC

M 2

010)

.R

ound

abou

t Cap

acity

Mod

el: U

S H

CM

201

0.H

CM

Del

ay F

orm

ula

optio

n is

use

d. C

ontro

l Del

ay d

oes

not i

nclu

de G

eom

etric

Del

ay s

ince

Exc

lude

Geo

met

ric D

elay

opt

ion

appl

ies.

Gap

-Acc

epta

nce

Cap

acity

: Tra

ditio

nal M

1.H

V (%

) val

ues

are

calc

ulat

ed fo

r All

Mov

emen

t Cla

sses

of A

ll H

eavy

Veh

icle

Mod

el D

esig

natio

n.

Pro

cess

ed: F

riday

, Oct

ober

17,

201

4 6:

58:2

0 PM

SID

RA

INTE

RSE

CTI

ON

6.0

.24.

4877

Cop

yrig

ht ©

200

0-20

14 A

kcel

ik a

nd A

ssoc

iate

s Pt

y Lt

dw

ww

.sid

raso

lutio

ns.c

omP

roje

ct:

N:\A

AA\S

OX\

PET\

191P

ET\S

IDR

A\Ba

ywoo

d-M

cDow

ell.s

ip6

8000

493,

601

9158

, W-T

RAN

S, P

LUS

/ Fl

oatin

g

MO

VEM

ENT

SUM

MA

RYSi

te:S

McD

owel

l Bl &

Bay

woo

d D

r (PM

Fut

ure)

PM

Pea

k H

our

Futu

re C

ondi

tions

Rou

ndab

out

Mov

emen

t Per

form

ance

-Ve

hicl

esD

eman

d Fl

ows

95%

Bac

k of

Que

ueM

ov IDO

DM

ovD

eg.

Satn

Aver

age

Del

ay

Leve

l of

Serv

ice

Prop

. Q

ueue

dEf

fect

ive

Stop

Rat

eAv

erag

eSp

eed

To

tal

HV

Vehi

cles

Dis

tanc

eve

h/h

%v/

cse

cve

hft

per v

ehm

phSo

uth:

NB

Bay

woo

d D

r3

L278

2.0

0.46

816

.4LO

S B

2.3

57.5

0.78

0.90

22.0

8T1

104

2.0

0.46

816

.4LO

S B

2.3

57.5

0.78

0.90

21.6

18R

241

2.0

0.46

816

.4LO

S B

2.3

57.5

0.78

0.90

21.1

Appr

oach

223

2.0

0.46

816

.4LO

S B

2.3

57.5

0.78

0.90

21.7

East

: WB

S M

cDow

ell B

l1

L255

2.0

1.00

448

.1LO

S F

39.2

996.

01.

001.

5620

.16

T199

52.

01.

004

48.1

LOS

F39

.299

6.0

1.00

1.56

20.0

16R

228

2.0

1.00

448

.1LO

S F

39.2

996.

01.

001.

5619

.6Ap

proa

ch10

782.

01.

004

48.1

LOS

D39

.299

6.0

1.00

1.56

20.0

Nor

th: S

B B

ayw

ood

Dr

7L2

212.

00.

272

12.4

LOS

B1.

126

.90.

750.

7623

.04

T151

2.0

0.27

212

.4LO

S B

1.1

26.9

0.75

0.76

22.6

14R

250

2.0

0.27

212

.4LO

S B

1.1

26.9

0.75

0.76

22.0

Appr

oach

122

2.0

0.27

212

.4LO

S B

1.1

26.9

0.75

0.76

22.4

Wes

t: E

B S

McD

owel

l Bl

5L2

832.

00.

970

37.3

LOS

D36

.392

1.1

1.00

0.86

22.2

2T1

961

2.0

0.97

037

.3LO

S D

36.3

921.

11.

000.

8622

.012

R2

156

2.0

0.97

037

.3LO

S D

36.3

921.

11.

000.

8621

.6Ap

proa

ch12

002.

00.

970

37.3

LOS

D36

.392

1.1

1.00

0.86

22.0

All V

ehic

les

2623

2.0

1.00

438

.8LO

S D

39.2

996.

00.

971.

1521

.1

Leve

l of S

ervi

ce (L

OS)

Met

hod:

Del

ay &

v/c

(HC

M 2

010)

. R

ound

abou

t LO

S M

etho

d: S

ame

as S

igna

lised

Inte

rsec

tions

.Ve

hicl

e m

ovem

ent L

OS

val

ues

are

base

d on

ave

rage

del

ay a

nd v

/c ra

tio (d

egre

e of

sat

urat

ion)

per

mov

emen

tLO

S F

will

resu

lt if

v/c

> 1

irres

pect

ive

of m

ovem

ent d

elay

val

ue (d

oes

not a

pply

for a

ppro

ache

s an

d in

ters

ectio

n).

Inte

rsec

tion

and

Appr

oach

LO

S va

lues

are

bas

ed o

n av

erag

e de

lay

for a

ll m

ovem

ents

(v/c

not

use

d as

spe

cifie

d in

HC

M 2

010)

.R

ound

abou

t Cap

acity

Mod

el: U

S H

CM

201

0.H

CM

Del

ay F

orm

ula

optio

n is

use

d. C

ontro

l Del

ay d

oes

not i

nclu

de G

eom

etric

Del

ay s

ince

Exc

lude

Geo

met

ric D

elay

opt

ion

appl

ies.

Gap

-Acc

epta

nce

Cap

acity

: Tra

ditio

nal M

1.H

V (%

) val

ues

are

calc

ulat

ed fo

r All

Mov

emen

t Cla

sses

of A

ll H

eavy

Veh

icle

Mod

el D

esig

natio

n.

Pro

cess

ed: F

riday

, Oct

ober

17,

201

4 6:

58:3

1 PM

SID

RA

INTE

RSE

CTI

ON

6.0

.24.

4877

Cop

yrig

ht ©

200

0-20

14 A

kcel

ik a

nd A

ssoc

iate

s Pt

y Lt

dw

ww

.sid

raso

lutio

ns.c

omP

roje

ct:

N:\A

AA\S

OX\

PET\

191P

ET\S

IDR

A\Ba

ywoo

d-M

cDow

ell.s

ip6

8000

493,

601

9158

, W-T

RAN

S, P

LUS

/ Fl

oatin

g

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s1:

Was

hing

ton

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing A

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

2814

623

227

115

7921

567

180

109

635

40Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.2

4.24.2

4.04.2

4.04.2

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

0.98

1.00

0.94

1.00

0.96

1.00

0.99

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

90.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1715

1770

1640

1770

3348

1770

3499

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.99

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

1517

7016

4017

7033

4817

7034

99Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

3116

025

249

126

8723

623

198

120

698

44RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

00

180

021

00

30

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

021

60

249

195

023

800

012

073

90

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

67

76

418

184

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

1320

12He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Split

NASp

litNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s7

78

85

21

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)18

.921

.521

.53.7

38.6

11.9

46.8

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)18

.921

.521

.53.7

38.6

11.9

46.8

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

80.2

00.2

00.0

30.3

60.1

10.4

4Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.2

4.24.2

4.04.2

4.04.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.52.5

2.52.0

4.02.0

4.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

301

354

328

6012

0219

515

23v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.13c0

.140.1

20.0

1c0

.24c0

.070.2

1v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.7

20.7

00.5

90.3

80.6

70.6

20.4

9Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

41.8

40.0

39.0

50.8

29.0

45.6

21.7

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

7.45.8

2.41.5

1.54.0

0.3De

lay (s

)49

.245

.841

.452

.330

.649

.622

.1Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DD

DD

CD

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)49

.243

.831

.225

.9Ap

proa

ch LO

SD

DC

C

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y33

.3HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

8Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

107.5

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.6

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

69.9%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s1:

Was

hing

ton

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

4698

3726

317

212

253

782

202

104

792

45Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.2

4.24.2

4.04.2

4.04.2

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

0.99

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

0.97

1.00

0.94

1.00

0.97

1.00

0.99

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

90.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1734

1770

1659

1770

3354

1770

3501

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.99

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

3417

7016

5917

7033

5417

7035

01Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

4810

239

274

179

127

5581

521

010

882

547

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

018

00

150

03

0La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)0

189

027

428

80

5510

100

108

869

0Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)28

1818

287

3232

7Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

813

2012

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%6%

2%2%

7%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

eSp

litNA

Split

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

77

88

52

16

Perm

itted P

hase

sAc

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

18.4

26.0

26.0

12.7

46.3

11.7

45.3

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)18

.426

.026

.012

.746

.311

.745

.3Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.15

0.22

0.22

0.11

0.39

0.10

0.38

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.24.2

4.24.0

4.24.0

4.2Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.5

2.52.5

2.04.0

2.04.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)26

838

636

218

813

0417

413

32v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.110.1

5c0

.170.0

3c0

.300.0

6c0

.25v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.7

10.7

10.8

00.2

90.7

70.6

20.6

5Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

47.7

43.0

44.0

49.0

31.8

51.5

30.4

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

7.65.5

11.1

0.33.1

4.91.3

Delay

(s)

55.3

48.5

55.1

49.3

34.9

56.4

31.6

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

DE

DC

EC

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

55.3

52.0

35.6

34.4

Appr

oach

LOS

ED

DC

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y39

.9HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

6Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

119.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.6

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

86.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s2:

E D

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

133

910

239

536

015

5615

649

818

139

8Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s0.9

61.0

01.0

00.8

91.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

71.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

9Flt

Pro

tected

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)30

9917

7017

1214

1118

3815

8317

7018

45Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

50.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

91.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

2958

1770

1712

1411

1838

1583

1770

1845

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)1

377

113

439

400

1762

173

553

2015

49

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

00

70

028

00

20

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

049

10

439

400

100

235

273

2016

10

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

2231

3122

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)21

171

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NApt+

ovSp

litNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s4

38

22

2 36

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

48

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)43

.438

.386

.286

.223

.966

.717

.017

.0Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

43.4

38.3

86.2

86.2

23.9

62.2

17.0

17.0

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.3

10.2

70.6

20.6

20.1

70.4

40.1

20.1

2Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

4.02.0

4.04.0

2.52.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

916

484

1054

868

313

703

214

224

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.25

0.23

c0.13

0.17

0.01

c0.09

v/s R

atio P

erm

c0.17

0.01

v/c R

atio

0.54

0.91

0.38

0.01

0.75

0.39

0.09

0.72

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d140

.049

.113

.510

.455

.226

.154

.759

.2Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d22.2

20.1

0.30.0

9.30.3

0.19.9

Delay

(s)

42.2

69.2

13.8

10.4

64.5

26.4

54.8

69.1

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

EB

BE

CD

EAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)42

.242

.237

.767

.5Ap

proa

ch LO

SD

DD

E

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y42

.7HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

2Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

69.7%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s2:

E D

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

233

680

136

417

1511

015

556

714

155

20Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s0.9

71.0

01.0

00.9

11.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

71.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

8Flt

Pro

tected

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)32

2217

7017

7614

4418

2515

8317

7018

24Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

50.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

81.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3073

1770

1776

1444

1825

1583

1770

1824

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

6Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)2

350

8314

243

416

115

161

591

1516

121

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

00

70

027

20

30

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

043

50

142

434

90

276

319

1517

90

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

1632

3216

24

42

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)21

171

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%7%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NApt+

ovSp

litNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s4

38

22

2 36

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

48

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)39

.837

.581

.881

.826

.968

.918

.418

.4Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

39.8

37.5

81.8

81.8

26.9

64.4

18.4

18.4

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

80.2

70.5

80.5

80.1

90.4

60.1

30.1

3Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

4.02.0

4.04.0

2.52.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

873

474

1037

843

350

728

232

239

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.08

c0.24

c0.15

0.20

0.01

c0.10

v/s R

atio P

erm

c0.14

0.01

v/c R

atio

0.50

0.30

0.42

0.01

0.79

0.44

0.06

0.75

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d141

.840

.816

.012

.253

.825

.653

.358

.6Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

00.7

20.6

31.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d22.0

0.11.2

0.010

.80.3

0.111

.4De

lay (s

)43

.829

.611

.312

.264

.725

.953

.370

.0Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DC

BB

EC

DE

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

43.8

15.7

38.2

68.7

Appr

oach

LOS

DB

DE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y35

.9HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.5

8Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

76.5%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s3:

Cau

lfiel

d Ln

& L

akev

ille

St

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing A

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

129

628

2540

532

143

3827

5228

225

300

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.04.9

4.04.9

4.94.0

4.04.9

4.94.9

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

50.9

50.9

51.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.97

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.90

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

50.9

61.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3267

1770

3252

1554

1770

3080

1681

1698

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

0.96

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7032

6717

7032

5215

5417

7030

8016

8116

9815

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

145

706

2845

598

161

4330

5831

728

337

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

30

00

850

540

00

113

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

145

731

045

598

7643

340

171

174

224

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

46

64

33

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

58

3He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

pt+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

34

44 5

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)13

.449

.75.6

41.9

41.9

7.27.2

29.7

29.7

48.0

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)13

.449

.75.6

41.9

41.9

7.27.2

29.7

29.7

48.0

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

20.4

50.0

50.3

80.3

80.0

70.0

70.2

70.2

70.4

4Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.0

4.94.0

4.94.9

4.04.0

4.94.9

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

215

1476

9012

3859

111

520

145

345

869

0v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.08c0

.220.0

30.1

8c0

.020.0

10.1

0c0

.100.1

4v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.0

5v/c

Rati

o0.6

70.5

00.5

00.4

80.1

30.3

70.1

70.3

80.3

80.3

3Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

46.2

21.3

50.8

25.8

22.2

49.2

48.6

32.6

32.7

20.4

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.04

1.11

1.79

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

8.11.2

1.51.3

0.40.7

0.12.4

2.40.3

Delay

(s)

54.3

22.5

54.4

29.9

40.1

50.0

48.7

35.0

35.0

20.6

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

CD

CD

DD

DD

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)27

.733

.349

.127

.9Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

CD

C

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y30

.7HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.4

9Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

67.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s3:

Cau

lfiel

d Ln

& L

akev

ille

St

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing P

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

212

651

2533

617

362

4845

3322

017

206

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.04.9

4.04.9

4.94.0

4.04.9

4.94.9

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

50.9

50.9

51.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

0.98

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.94

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

50.9

61.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3388

1770

3374

1552

1770

3261

1681

1697

1552

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

0.96

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

8817

7033

7415

5217

7032

6116

8116

9715

52Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

216

664

2634

630

369

4946

3422

417

210

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

10

00

890

320

00

188

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

216

689

034

630

280

4948

012

112

022

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

52

25

11

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

58

3He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%7%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

Perm

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

34

4Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

64

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)22

.693

.14.8

75.3

75.3

9.79.7

14.6

14.6

14.6

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)22

.693

.14.8

75.3

75.3

9.79.7

14.6

14.6

14.6

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

60.6

60.0

30.5

40.5

40.0

70.0

70.1

00.1

00.1

0Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.0

4.94.0

4.94.9

4.04.0

4.94.9

4.9Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

285

2253

6018

1483

412

222

517

517

616

1v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.120.2

0c0

.02c0

.19c0

.030.0

1c0

.070.0

7v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.1

80.0

1v/c

Rati

o0.7

60.3

10.5

70.3

50.3

40.4

00.2

10.6

90.6

80.1

4Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

56.1

9.966

.618

.418

.262

.461

.660

.560

.557

.0Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.1

00.5

60.8

10.7

00.6

71.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d29.6

0.36.6

0.51.0

0.80.2

9.18.4

0.1De

lay (s

)71

.55.8

60.5

13.4

13.2

63.2

61.7

69.7

68.8

57.1

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

AE

BB

EE

EE

EAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)21

.514

.962

.363

.6Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

BE

E

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y28

.4HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.4

7Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

66.7%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s4:

In-n

-Out

Driv

eway

/US

101

SB

Ram

ps &

Lak

evill

e S

t/Lak

evill

e H

wy

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

283

650

66

518

349

43

791

83

152

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.55.0

3.55.0

5.03.5

4.94.9

4.5La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.97

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

41.0

01.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

50.9

31.0

01.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.99

0.95

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)34

3332

8017

7031

3915

8316

0916

8116

8615

83Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

90.9

50.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3433

3280

1770

3139

1583

1609

1681

1686

1583

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

6Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)29

567

76

654

036

44

37

956

315

8RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

024

90

70

00

80La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)29

568

20

654

011

50

70

478

481

78Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)2

3Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

9He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

15%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

pm+o

vPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

88

44

5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

64

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)17

.852

.51.2

34.9

34.9

2.836

.636

.654

.4Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

17.8

52.5

1.234

.934

.92.8

36.6

36.6

54.4

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

60.4

80.0

10.3

20.3

20.0

30.3

30.3

30.4

9Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

5.03.5

5.05.0

3.54.9

4.94.5

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.03.0

2.03.0

3.03.0

3.03.0

3.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

555

1565

1999

550

240

559

560

847

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.09

0.21

0.00

c0.17

c0.00

0.28

c0.29

0.01

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.07

0.03

v/c R

atio

0.53

0.44

0.32

0.54

0.23

0.18

0.86

0.86

0.09

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d142

.319

.054

.031

.027

.752

.534

.234

.314

.7Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

11.1

31.0

10.6

81.0

61.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d20.9

0.83.3

2.01.0

2.212

.212

.40.0

Delay

(s)

43.4

22.2

58.0

23.1

30.4

54.6

46.4

46.7

14.8

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

CE

CC

DD

DB

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

28.6

26.2

54.6

42.1

Appr

oach

LOS

CC

DD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y33

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

5Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.9

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

66.9%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s4:

In-n

-Out

Driv

eway

/US

101

SB

Ram

ps &

Lak

evill

e S

t/Lak

evill

e H

wy

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing P

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

138

662

827

770

263

810

1958

712

226

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.05.0

4.05.0

5.04.4

4.94.9

4.0La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.97

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

31.0

01.0

00.9

8Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

50.9

31.0

01.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.99

0.95

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)34

3334

0017

7033

1215

8316

0316

8116

8815

54Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

90.9

50.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3433

3400

1770

3312

1583

1603

1681

1688

1554

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

8Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)14

167

68

2878

626

88

1019

599

1223

1RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

00

012

70

180

00

112

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

141

684

028

786

141

019

030

530

611

9Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)2

25

55

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)15

8He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%9%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

pm+o

vPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

88

44

5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

64

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)11

.171

.413

.673

.973

.95.6

31.1

31.1

42.2

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)11

.171

.413

.673

.973

.95.6

31.1

31.1

42.2

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.0

80.5

10.1

00.5

30.5

30.0

40.2

20.2

20.3

0Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.0

5.04.0

5.05.0

4.44.9

4.94.0

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.03.0

2.03.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

3.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

272

1734

171

1748

835

6437

337

446

8v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.040.2

00.0

2c0

.24c0

.01c0

.180.1

80.0

2v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.0

90.0

6v/c

Rati

o0.5

20.3

90.1

60.4

50.1

70.2

90.8

20.8

20.2

5Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

61.9

21.0

58.0

20.5

17.1

65.3

51.8

51.8

37.0

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.85

0.77

0.99

1.01

1.19

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

1.60.7

0.20.8

0.40.9

13.0

13.0

0.3De

lay (s

)54

.316

.857

.621

.420

.866

.264

.864

.837

.3Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DB

EC

CE

EE

DAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)23

.222

.266

.257

.2Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

CE

E

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y33

.7HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.5

4Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

18.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

61.3%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eB

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s5:

Lak

evill

e H

wy

& U

S 1

01 N

B R

amps

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

7114

7779

769

930

710

2Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.0

5.05.0

5.04.4

4.4La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

0.97

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

81.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

7031

1231

3915

4734

3315

83Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1770

3112

3139

1547

3433

1583

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

50.9

50.9

50.9

50.9

50.9

5Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)75

1555

839

736

323

107

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

254

079

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

7515

5583

948

232

328

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

44

42

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%15

%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

NAPe

rmPr

otpt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

64

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

6Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

9.785

.872

.172

.114

.828

.9Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

9.785

.872

.172

.114

.828

.9Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.09

0.78

0.66

0.66

0.13

0.26

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.4Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.03.0

3.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)15

624

2720

5710

1346

141

5v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

4c0

.500.2

7c0

.090.0

2v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.3

1v/c

Rati

o0.4

80.6

40.4

10.4

80.7

00.0

7Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

47.8

5.38.9

9.545

.530

.4Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.1

51.0

90.5

10.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d20.7

1.10.5

1.33.9

0.0De

lay (s

)55

.86.9

5.11.4

49.4

30.5

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

AA

AD

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)9.1

3.444

.7Ap

proa

ch LO

SA

AD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y10

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

8Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

13.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

58.3%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eB

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s5:

Lak

evill

e H

wy

& U

S 1

01 N

B R

amps

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

114

1132

735

839

259

305

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.54.5

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

50.9

51.0

00.9

71.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3374

3312

1550

3433

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

7433

1215

5034

3315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.97

0.97

0.97

0.97

0.97

0.97

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

118

1167

758

865

267

314

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

423

013

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

118

1167

758

442

267

301

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

11

33

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%7%

9%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

NAPe

rmPr

otpt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

64

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

6Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

9.849

.635

.835

.810

.924

.7Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

9.849

.635

.835

.810

.920

.7Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.14

0.71

0.51

0.51

0.16

0.30

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.5Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.03.0

3.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)24

723

9016

9379

253

446

8v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

70.3

50.2

30.0

8c0

.19v/s

Rati

o Per

mc0

.29v/c

Rati

o0.4

80.4

90.4

50.5

60.5

00.6

4Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

27.7

4.510

.811

.727

.121

.4Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.1

41.8

80.9

28.0

51.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d20.5

0.60.7

2.30.3

2.3De

lay (s

)32

.29.2

10.6

96.4

27.3

23.7

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

AB

FC

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)11

.356

.325

.4Ap

proa

ch LO

SB

EC

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y34

.6HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.5

9Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

70.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

13.5

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

66.2%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s6:

Bay

woo

d D

r & L

akev

ille

Hw

y5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

7815

8435

1411

5235

259

1245

2034

1Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.44.4

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.91

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3108

1770

3134

1770

1669

1770

1863

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7031

0817

7031

3417

7016

6917

7018

6315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

8216

6737

1512

1337

269

1347

2135

9RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

10

012

00

015

0La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)82

1703

015

1249

026

100

4721

209

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

101

110

77

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

23

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NApt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

38

74

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)16

.976

.02.6

62.3

4.35.4

9.210

.327

.2Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

16.9

76.0

2.662

.34.3

5.49.2

10.3

27.2

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

50.6

90.0

20.5

70.0

40.0

50.0

80.0

90.2

5Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.4Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

4.02.0

4.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

271

2147

4117

7469

8114

817

439

1v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

5c0

.550.0

1c0

.40c0

.010.0

10.0

30.0

1c0

.13v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.3

00.7

90.3

70.7

00.3

80.1

20.3

20.1

20.5

4Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

41.3

11.6

52.9

17.2

51.5

50.0

47.4

45.7

35.9

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.95

0.89

1.31

0.56

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

0.52.7

1.82.1

1.30.2

0.50.1

0.7De

lay (s

)39

.813

.171

.011

.752

.850

.347

.945

.836

.6Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DB

EB

DD

DD

DAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)14

.312

.451

.638

.3Ap

proa

ch LO

SB

BD

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y17

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

5Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

71.0%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s6:

Bay

woo

d D

r & L

akev

ille

Hw

y5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

230

1101

2715

1304

5110

131

1632

1015

6Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.44.4

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3361

1770

3299

1770

1748

1770

1863

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

6117

7032

9917

7017

4817

7018

6315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

232

1112

2715

1317

5210

231

1632

1015

8RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

20

015

00

087

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

232

1138

015

1367

010

232

032

1071

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

211

112

111

111

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

23

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%7%

2%2%

9%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NApt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

38

74

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)27

.910

1.42.8

76.9

12.4

12.2

6.86.6

34.5

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)27

.910

1.42.8

76.9

12.4

12.2

6.86.6

34.5

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

00.7

20.0

20.5

50.0

90.0

90.0

50.0

50.2

5Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.4Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

4.02.0

4.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

352

2434

3518

1215

615

285

8739

0v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.130.3

40.0

1c0

.41c0

.060.0

2c0

.020.0

10.0

4v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.6

60.4

70.4

30.7

50.6

50.2

10.3

80.1

10.1

8Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

51.7

8.067

.824

.361

.759

.464

.563

.941

.6Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor0.8

81.0

91.2

30.5

71.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d24.2

0.62.4

2.47.3

0.31.0

0.20.1

Delay

(s)

49.7

9.486

.016

.169

.059

.765

.664

.141

.7Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DA

FB

EE

EE

DAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)16

.216

.966

.146

.6Ap

proa

ch LO

SB

BE

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y20

.9HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

1Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

77.5%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s7:

Cas

a G

rand

e R

d &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

135

1489

3817

904

1481

5527

1641

231

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.55.5

4.55.5

4.04.1

4.14.1

4.1La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

91.0

00.9

8Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.99

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

7031

0817

7031

3915

8317

6117

6018

3615

46Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.7

21.0

00.9

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1770

3108

1770

3139

1583

1327

1760

1684

1546

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

1Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)14

816

3642

1999

315

8960

3018

4525

4RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

00

020

00

022

3La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)14

816

770

1999

315

8970

00

6331

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

44

41

14

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

21

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAFr

eePe

rmNA

Perm

NAPe

rmPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

84

Perm

itted P

hase

sFr

ee8

44

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)13

.779

.52.8

68.6

110.0

13.6

13.6

13.6

13.6

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)13

.779

.52.8

68.6

110.0

13.6

13.6

13.6

13.6

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

20.7

20.0

30.6

21.0

00.1

20.1

20.1

20.1

2Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

5.54.5

5.54.1

4.14.1

4.1Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

3.02.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

220

2246

4519

5715

8316

421

720

819

1v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

8c0

.540.0

1c0

.320.0

4v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.0

1c0

.070.0

40.0

2v/c

Rati

o0.6

70.7

50.4

20.5

10.0

10.5

40.3

20.3

00.1

6Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

46.0

9.252

.811

.40.0

45.3

44.0

43.9

43.1

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.18

0.22

0.70

0.37

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

4.51.7

2.10.8

0.03.6

0.90.6

0.3De

lay (s

)58

.83.7

39.1

5.10.0

48.9

44.9

44.5

43.4

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

AD

AA

DD

DD

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

8.25.6

46.9

43.6

Appr

oach

LOS

AA

DD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y12

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

2Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

14.1

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

70.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s7:

Cas

a G

rand

e R

d &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

188

903

7531

1234

3291

7115

753

86Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

5.54.5

5.54.0

4.14.1

4.14.1

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.97

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

91.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3095

1770

3139

1583

1762

1808

1852

1549

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.70

1.00

0.97

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7030

9517

7031

3915

8312

9418

0818

0415

49Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

198

951

7933

1299

3496

7516

756

91RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

04

00

00

06

00

081

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

198

1026

033

1299

3496

850

063

10Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)10

103

22

3Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

42

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

16%

2%2%

15%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Free

Perm

NAPe

rmNA

Perm

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

68

4Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Free

84

4Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

20.0

95.3

14.7

90.0

140.0

15.9

15.9

15.9

15.9

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)20

.095

.314

.790

.014

0.015

.915

.915

.915

.9Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.14

0.68

0.10

0.64

1.00

0.11

0.11

0.11

0.11

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.55.5

4.55.5

4.14.1

4.14.1

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.03.0

2.03.0

3.03.0

2.52.5

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)25

221

0618

520

1715

8314

620

520

417

5v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.110.3

30.0

2c0

.410.0

5v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.0

2c0

.070.0

30.0

1v/c

Rati

o0.7

90.4

90.1

80.6

40.0

20.6

60.4

10.3

10.0

6Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

57.9

10.7

57.1

15.2

0.059

.457

.757

.055

.4Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor0.8

60.7

00.8

20.7

11.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d212

.80.7

0.11.0

0.010

.21.4

0.60.1

Delay

(s)

62.6

8.347

.111

.80.0

69.7

59.1

57.6

55.5

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

AD

BA

EE

EE

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

17.0

12.4

64.5

56.4

Appr

oach

LOS

BB

EE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y20

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

7Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

14.1

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

68.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s8:

McD

owel

l Bl &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing A

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

1188

861

732

712

5520

583

917

523

115

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.94

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.99

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3073

1770

3128

1770

3479

1770

3503

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7030

7317

7031

2817

7034

7917

7035

03Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

1295

566

334

766

5922

089

1018

824

816

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

770

03

00

90

05

0La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)12

1541

034

822

022

090

018

825

90

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

11

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)1

52

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

38

74

Perm

itted P

hase

sAc

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

2.457

.74.6

59.9

18.9

16.0

15.4

12.5

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)2.4

57.7

4.659

.918

.916

.015

.412

.5Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.02

0.52

0.04

0.54

0.17

0.15

0.14

0.11

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.03.0

2.03.0

3.02.0

2.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)38

1611

7417

0330

450

624

739

8v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.01c0

.500.0

2c0

.26c0

.120.0

3c0

.110.0

7v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.3

20.9

60.4

60.4

80.7

20.1

80.7

60.6

5Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

53.0

25.0

51.5

15.5

43.1

41.2

45.5

46.7

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.77

0.52

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

1.211

.01.6

1.08.3

0.111

.72.7

Delay

(s)

41.8

24.0

53.1

16.5

51.3

41.3

57.3

49.4

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

CD

BD

DE

DAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)24

.117

.948

.252

.7Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

BD

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y28

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

6Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

75.0%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s8:

McD

owel

l Bl &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

1677

210

513

853

192

456

315

957

7620

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.97

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.97

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3326

1770

3249

1770

3520

1770

3413

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

2617

7032

4917

7035

2017

7034

13Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

1783

011

314

917

206

490

339

1061

8222

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

70

012

00

10

020

0La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)17

936

014

1111

049

034

80

6184

0Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)3

11

316

16Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

15

2He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

7%2%

2%9%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

87

4Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)2.9

59.3

4.160

.551

.652

.18.2

8.7Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

2.959

.34.1

60.5

51.6

52.1

8.28.7

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.0

20.4

20.0

30.4

30.3

70.3

70.0

60.0

6Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)3.0

5.53.0

5.53.0

4.83.0

4.8Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

3614

0851

1404

652

1309

103

212

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.01

c0.28

0.01

c0.34

c0.28

0.10

c0.03

0.02

v/s R

atio P

erm

v/c R

atio

0.47

0.66

0.27

0.79

0.75

0.27

0.59

0.40

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d167

.832

.466

.534

.338

.630

.664

.363

.1Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

50.6

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d23.2

2.31.1

4.64.9

0.05.9

0.4De

lay (s

)74

.423

.367

.638

.943

.530

.770

.263

.6Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EC

ED

DC

EE

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

24.2

39.3

38.1

66.0

Appr

oach

LOS

CD

DE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y35

.7HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

6Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

73.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

n5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)1

031

290

328

9615

135

00

Sign

Con

trol

Stop

Stop

Free

Free

Grad

e0%

0%0%

0%Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.90

0.90

0.91

0.90

0.91

0.90

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.90

Hour

ly flo

w ra

te (vp

h)1

034

320

359

105

161

385

0Pe

destr

ians

Lane

Widt

h (ft)

Walk

ing S

peed

(ft/s

)Pe

rcent

Bloc

kage

Righ

t turn

flare

(veh

)Me

dian t

ype

TWLT

LTW

LTL

Media

n stor

age v

eh)

22

Upstr

eam

signa

l (ft)

270

pX, p

latoo

n unb

locke

dvC

, con

flictin

g volu

me49

352

719

236

051

861

385

122

vC1,

stage

1 co

nf vo

l38

738

713

213

2vC

2, sta

ge 2

conf

vol

106

140

229

387

vCu,

unblo

cked

vol

493

527

192

360

518

6138

512

2tC

, sing

le (s)

7.56.5

6.97.5

6.56.9

4.14.1

tC, 2

stag

e (s)

6.55.5

6.55.5

tF (s

)3.5

4.03.3

3.54.0

3.32.2

2.2p0

queu

e fre

e %10

010

096

9510

096

9910

0cM

capa

city (

veh/h

)57

657

281

766

856

899

111

7014

63

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

SB 3

Volum

e Tota

l36

679

7052

125

612

8Vo

lume L

eft1

329

00

10

0Vo

lume R

ight

3435

00

160

00

cSH

806

806

1170

1700

1700

1463

1700

1700

Volum

e to C

apac

ity0.0

40.0

80.0

10.0

40.0

30.0

00.1

50.0

8Qu

eue L

ength

95th

(ft)

37

10

00

00

Contr

ol De

lay (s

)9.7

9.98.1

0.00.0

7.50.0

0.0La

ne LO

SA

AA

AAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)9.7

9.90.6

0.0Ap

proa

ch LO

SA

A

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 1.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

26.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

n5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing P

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)0

016

170

1729

271

290

169

1Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opFr

eeFr

eeGr

ade

0%0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor0.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

0Ho

urly

flow

rate

(vph)

00

1819

019

3230

132

018

81

Pede

strian

sLa

ne W

idth (

ft)W

alking

Spe

ed (f

t/s)

Perce

nt Bl

ocka

geRi

ght tu

rn fla

re (v

eh)

Media

n typ

eTW

LTL

TWLT

LMe

dian s

torag

e veh

)2

2Up

strea

m sig

nal (f

t)27

0pX

, plat

oon u

nbloc

ked

vC, c

onflic

ting v

olume

422

586

9449

357

116

718

933

3vC

1, sta

ge 1

conf

vol

188

188

382

382

vC2,

stage

2 co

nf vo

l23

439

811

218

9vC

u, un

block

ed vo

l42

258

694

493

571

167

189

333

tC, s

ingle

(s)7.5

6.56.9

7.56.5

6.94.1

4.1tC

, 2 st

age (

s)6.5

5.56.5

5.5tF

(s)

3.54.0

3.33.5

4.03.3

2.22.2

p0 qu

eue f

ree %

100

100

9897

100

9898

100

cM ca

pacit

y (ve

h/h)

647

547

944

568

550

848

1382

1223

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

SB 3

Volum

e Tota

l18

3832

201

133

012

564

Volum

e Left

019

320

00

00

Volum

e Righ

t18

190

032

00

1cS

H94

468

113

8217

0017

0017

0017

0017

00Vo

lume t

o Cap

acity

0.02

0.06

0.02

0.12

0.08

0.00

0.07

0.04

Queu

e Len

gth 95

th (ft

)1

42

00

00

0Co

ntrol

Delay

(s)

8.910

.67.7

0.00.0

0.00.0

0.0La

ne LO

SA

BA

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

8.910

.60.7

0.0Ap

proa

ch LO

SA

B

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 1.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

30.4%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Exist

ing A

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

eh11

.9Int

erse

ction

LOS

B

Move

ment

EBU

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBU

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBU

NBL

NBT

NBR

Vol, v

eh/h

038

7460

078

7355

025

9847

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor0.9

00.8

80.8

80.8

80.9

00.8

80.8

80.8

80.9

00.8

80.8

80.8

8He

avy V

ehicl

es, %

22

22

22

22

22

22

Mvmt

Flow

043

8468

089

8362

028

111

53Nu

mber

of La

nes

00

10

00

10

01

11

Appr

oach

EBW

BNB

Oppo

sing A

ppro

ach

WB

EBSB

Oppo

sing L

anes

11

2Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftSB

NBEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Left

23

1Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach R

ight

NBSB

WB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t3

21

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay11

.913

10HC

M LO

SB

BA

Lane

NBLn

1NB

Ln2

NBLn

3EB

Ln1

WBL

n1SB

Ln1

SBLn

2Vo

l Left

, %10

0%0%

0%22

%38

%10

0%0%

Vol T

hru,

%0%

100%

0%43

%35

%0%

83%

Vol R

ight, %

0%0%

100%

35%

27%

0%17

%Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opTr

affic

Vol b

y Lan

e25

9847

172

206

4318

1LT

Vol

250

038

7843

0Th

roug

h Vol

098

074

730

150

RT V

ol0

047

6055

031

Lane

Flow

Rate

2811

153

195

234

4920

6Ge

ometr

y Grp

77

77

78

8De

gree

of U

til (X

)0.0

540.1

960.0

830.3

320.4

010.0

960.3

66De

partu

re H

eadw

ay (H

d)6.8

336.3

245.6

16.1

096.1

727.0

396.4

06Co

nver

genc

e, Y/

NYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sCa

p52

256

663

658

658

150

855

9Se

rvice

Tim

e4.5

964.0

863.3

723.8

693.9

34.8

044.1

71HC

M La

ne V

/C R

atio

0.054

0.196

0.083

0.333

0.403

0.096

0.369

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay10

10.6

8.911

.913

10.6

12.9

HCM

Lane

LOS

AB

AB

BB

BHC

M 95

th-tile

Q0.2

0.70.3

1.41.9

0.31.7

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

eh11

.1Int

erse

ction

LOS

B

Move

ment

EBU

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBU

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBU

NBL

NBT

NBR

Vol, v

eh/h

060

8842

038

5147

044

152

49Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

22

22

22

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

6799

470

4357

530

4917

155

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

01

00

01

00

11

1

Appr

oach

EBW

BNB

Oppo

sing A

ppro

ach

WB

EBSB

Oppo

sing L

anes

11

2Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftSB

NBEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Left

23

1Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach R

ight

NBSB

WB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t3

21

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay12

.210

.910

.4HC

M LO

SB

BB

Lane

NBLn

1NB

Ln2

NBLn

3EB

Ln1

WBL

n1SB

Ln1

SBLn

2Vo

l Left

, %10

0%0%

0%32

%28

%10

0%0%

Vol T

hru,

%0%

100%

0%46

%38

%0%

79%

Vol R

ight, %

0%0%

100%

22%

35%

0%21

%Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opTr

affic

Vol b

y Lan

e44

152

4919

013

631

131

LT V

ol44

00

6038

310

Thro

ugh V

ol0

152

088

510

104

RT V

ol0

049

4247

027

Lane

Flow

Rate

4917

155

213

153

3514

7Ge

ometr

y Grp

77

77

78

8De

gree

of U

til (X

)0.0

890.2

840.0

810.3

60.2

580.0

680.2

59De

partu

re H

eadw

ay (H

d)6.4

855.9

775.2

676.0

696.0

76.9

846.3

27Co

nver

genc

e, Y/

NYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sCa

p55

260

167

959

159

151

256

7Se

rvice

Tim

e4.2

273.7

193.0

083.8

143.8

194.7

364.0

79HC

M La

ne V

/C R

atio

0.089

0.285

0.081

0.36

0.259

0.068

0.259

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay9.9

11.1

8.512

.210

.910

.211

.3HC

M La

ne LO

SA

BA

BB

BB

HCM

95th-

tile Q

0.31.2

0.31.6

10.2

1

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

ehInt

erse

ction

LOS

Move

ment

SBU

SBL

SBT

SBR

Vol, v

eh/h

043

150

31Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.88

0.88

0.88

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

4917

035

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

11

0

Appr

oach

SBOp

posin

g App

roac

hNB

Oppo

sing L

anes

3Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftW

BCo

nflict

ing La

nes L

eft1

Confl

icting

App

roac

h Righ

tEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t1

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay12

.5HC

M LO

SB

Lane

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Ex

isting

PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

ehInt

erse

ction

LOS

Move

ment

SBU

SBL

SBT

SBR

Vol, v

eh/h

031

104

27Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

3511

730

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

11

0

Appr

oach

SBOp

posin

g App

roac

hNB

Oppo

sing L

anes

3Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftW

BCo

nflict

ing La

nes L

eft1

Confl

icting

App

roac

h Righ

tEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t1

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay11

.1HC

M LO

SB

Lane

MO

VEM

ENT

SUM

MA

RYSi

te:S

McD

owel

l Bl &

Bay

woo

d D

r (A

M E

xisi

ting

+ Pr

ojec

t) A

M P

eak

Hou

rE

xist

ing

plus

Pro

ject

Con

ditio

nsR

ound

abou

t

Mov

emen

t Per

form

ance

-Ve

hicl

esD

eman

d Fl

ows

95%

Bac

k of

Que

ueM

ov IDO

DM

ovD

eg.

Satn

Aver

age

Del

ay

Leve

l of

Serv

ice

Prop

. Q

ueue

dEf

fect

ive

Stop

Rat

eAv

erag

eSp

eed

To

tal

HV

Vehi

cles

Dis

tanc

eve

h/h

%v/

cse

cve

hft

per v

ehm

phSo

uth:

NB

Bay

woo

d D

r3

L212

52.

00.

314

7.5

LOS

A1.

538

.50.

600.

5623

.98

T175

2.0

0.31

47.

5LO

S A

1.5

38.5

0.60

0.56

23.4

18R

276

2.0

0.31

47.

5LO

S A

1.5

38.5

0.60

0.56

22.8

Appr

oach

276

2.0

0.31

47.

5LO

S A

1.5

38.5

0.60

0.56

23.5

East

: WB

S M

cDow

ell B

l1

L235

2.0

0.42

17.

7LO

S A

2.5

64.2

0.51

0.38

31.1

6T1

414

2.0

0.42

17.

7LO

S A

2.5

64.2

0.51

0.38

30.9

16R

220

2.0

0.42

17.

7LO

S A

2.5

64.2

0.51

0.38

30.0

Appr

oach

469

2.0

0.42

17.

7LO

S A

2.5

64.2

0.51

0.38

30.9

Nor

th: S

B B

ayw

ood

Dr

7L2

422.

00.

333

8.5

LOS

A1.

639

.40.

650.

6524

.04

T114

22.

00.

333

8.5

LOS

A1.

639

.40.

650.

6523

.514

R2

772.

00.

333

8.5

LOS

A1.

639

.40.

650.

6522

.9Ap

proa

ch26

12.

00.

333

8.5

LOS

A1.

639

.40.

650.

6523

.4

Wes

t: E

B S

McD

owel

l Bl

5L2

292.

00.

445

7.9

LOS

A2.

870

.20.

520.

3831

.12

T139

22.

00.

445

7.9

LOS

A2.

870

.20.

520.

3830

.812

R2

812.

00.

445

7.9

LOS

A2.

870

.20.

520.

3829

.9Ap

proa

ch50

12.

00.

445

7.9

LOS

A2.

870

.20.

520.

3830

.7

All V

ehic

les

1507

2.0

0.44

57.

9LO

S A

2.8

70.2

0.56

0.46

27.7

Leve

l of S

ervi

ce (L

OS)

Met

hod:

Del

ay &

v/c

(HC

M 2

010)

. R

ound

abou

t LO

S M

etho

d: S

ame

as S

igna

lised

Inte

rsec

tions

.Ve

hicl

e m

ovem

ent L

OS

val

ues

are

base

d on

ave

rage

del

ay a

nd v

/c ra

tio (d

egre

e of

sat

urat

ion)

per

mov

emen

tLO

S F

will

resu

lt if

v/c

> 1

irres

pect

ive

of m

ovem

ent d

elay

val

ue (d

oes

not a

pply

for a

ppro

ache

s an

d in

ters

ectio

n).

Inte

rsec

tion

and

Appr

oach

LO

S va

lues

are

bas

ed o

n av

erag

e de

lay

for a

ll m

ovem

ents

(v/c

not

use

d as

spe

cifie

d in

HC

M 2

010)

.R

ound

abou

t Cap

acity

Mod

el: U

S H

CM

201

0.H

CM

Del

ay F

orm

ula

optio

n is

use

d. C

ontro

l Del

ay d

oes

not i

nclu

de G

eom

etric

Del

ay s

ince

Exc

lude

Geo

met

ric D

elay

opt

ion

appl

ies.

Gap

-Acc

epta

nce

Cap

acity

: Tra

ditio

nal M

1.H

V (%

) val

ues

are

calc

ulat

ed fo

r All

Mov

emen

t Cla

sses

of A

ll H

eavy

Veh

icle

Mod

el D

esig

natio

n.

Pro

cess

ed: F

riday

, May

22,

201

5 2:

04:4

5 P

MS

IDR

A IN

TER

SEC

TIO

N 6

.0.2

4.48

77C

opyr

ight

© 2

000-

2014

Akc

elik

and

Ass

ocia

tes

Pty

Ltd

ww

w.s

idra

solu

tions

.com

Pro

ject

: N

:\AAA

\SO

X\PE

T\19

1PET

\SID

RA\

Bayw

ood-

McD

owel

l.sip

680

0049

3, 6

0191

58, W

-TR

ANS

, PLU

S /

Floa

ting

MO

VEM

ENT

SUM

MA

RYSi

te:S

McD

owel

l Bl &

Bay

woo

d D

r (PM

Exi

sitin

g +

Proj

ect)

PM

Pea

k H

our

Exi

stin

g pl

us P

roje

ct C

ondi

tions

Rou

ndab

out

Mov

emen

t Per

form

ance

-Ve

hicl

esD

eman

d Fl

ows

95%

Bac

k of

Que

ueM

ov IDO

DM

ovD

eg.

Satn

Aver

age

Del

ay

Leve

l of

Serv

ice

Prop

. Q

ueue

dEf

fect

ive

Stop

Rat

eAv

erag

eSp

eed

To

tal

HV

Vehi

cles

Dis

tanc

eve

h/h

%v/

cse

cve

hft

per v

ehm

phSo

uth:

NB

Bay

woo

d D

r3

L293

2.0

0.28

66.

9LO

S A

1.4

34.8

0.57

0.50

24.2

8T1

125

2.0

0.28

66.

9LO

S A

1.4

34.8

0.57

0.50

23.7

18R

245

2.0

0.28

66.

9LO

S A

1.4

34.8

0.57

0.50

23.1

Appr

oach

263

2.0

0.28

66.

9LO

S A

1.4

34.8

0.57

0.50

23.8

East

: WB

S M

cDow

ell B

l1

L264

2.0

0.67

613

.5LO

S B

6.6

168.

70.

760.

6928

.86

T162

02.

00.

676

13.5

LOS

B6.

616

8.7

0.76

0.69

28.6

16R

232

2.0

0.67

613

.5LO

S B

6.6

168.

70.

760.

6927

.8Ap

proa

ch71

72.

00.

676

13.5

LOS

B6.

616

8.7

0.76

0.69

28.6

Nor

th: S

B B

ayw

ood

Dr

7L2

142.

00.

174

7.7

LOS

A0.

717

.70.

650.

6524

.34

T160

2.0

0.17

47.

7LO

S A

0.7

17.7

0.65

0.65

23.8

14R

237

2.0

0.17

47.

7LO

S A

0.7

17.7

0.65

0.65

23.2

Appr

oach

111

2.0

0.17

47.

7LO

S A

0.7

17.7

0.65

0.65

23.6

Wes

t: E

B S

McD

owel

l Bl

5L2

602.

00.

420

7.2

LOS

A2.

768

.00.

410.

2531

.22

T134

22.

00.

420

7.2

LOS

A2.

768

.00.

410.

2531

.012

R2

112

2.0

0.42

07.

2LO

S A

2.7

68.0

0.41

0.25

30.1

Appr

oach

513

2.0

0.42

07.

2LO

S A

2.7

68.0

0.41

0.25

30.8

All V

ehic

les

1604

2.0

0.67

610

.0LO

S A

6.6

168.

70.

610.

5227

.9

Leve

l of S

ervi

ce (L

OS)

Met

hod:

Del

ay &

v/c

(HC

M 2

010)

. R

ound

abou

t LO

S M

etho

d: S

ame

as S

igna

lised

Inte

rsec

tions

.Ve

hicl

e m

ovem

ent L

OS

val

ues

are

base

d on

ave

rage

del

ay a

nd v

/c ra

tio (d

egre

e of

sat

urat

ion)

per

mov

emen

tLO

S F

will

resu

lt if

v/c

> 1

irres

pect

ive

of m

ovem

ent d

elay

val

ue (d

oes

not a

pply

for a

ppro

ache

s an

d in

ters

ectio

n).

Inte

rsec

tion

and

Appr

oach

LO

S va

lues

are

bas

ed o

n av

erag

e de

lay

for a

ll m

ovem

ents

(v/c

not

use

d as

spe

cifie

d in

HC

M 2

010)

.R

ound

abou

t Cap

acity

Mod

el: U

S H

CM

201

0.H

CM

Del

ay F

orm

ula

optio

n is

use

d. C

ontro

l Del

ay d

oes

not i

nclu

de G

eom

etric

Del

ay s

ince

Exc

lude

Geo

met

ric D

elay

opt

ion

appl

ies.

Gap

-Acc

epta

nce

Cap

acity

: Tra

ditio

nal M

1.H

V (%

) val

ues

are

calc

ulat

ed fo

r All

Mov

emen

t Cla

sses

of A

ll H

eavy

Veh

icle

Mod

el D

esig

natio

n.

Pro

cess

ed: F

riday

, Oct

ober

17,

201

4 6:

40:0

6 PM

SID

RA

INTE

RSE

CTI

ON

6.0

.24.

4877

Cop

yrig

ht ©

200

0-20

14 A

kcel

ik a

nd A

ssoc

iate

s Pt

y Lt

dw

ww

.sid

raso

lutio

ns.c

omP

roje

ct:

N:\A

AA\S

OX\

PET\

191P

ET\S

IDR

A\Ba

ywoo

d-M

cDow

ell.s

ip6

8000

493,

601

9158

, W-T

RAN

S, P

LUS

/ Fl

oatin

g

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s1:

Was

hing

ton

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

3323

426

229

204

101

2760

918

111

967

845

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.24.2

4.24.0

4.24.0

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

00.9

91.0

00.9

81.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

91.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

71.0

00.9

9Flt

Pro

tected

0.99

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

1717

7016

5417

7033

5117

7034

97Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

90.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1717

1770

1654

1770

3351

1770

3497

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

1Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)36

257

2925

222

411

130

669

199

131

745

49RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

00

120

019

00

30

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

032

20

252

323

030

849

013

179

10

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

67

76

418

184

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

1320

12He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Split

NASp

litNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s7

78

85

21

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)27

.629

.329

.34.4

44.0

13.1

52.7

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)27

.629

.329

.34.4

44.0

13.1

52.7

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

10.2

20.2

20.0

30.3

40.1

00.4

0Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.2

4.24.2

4.04.2

4.04.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.52.5

2.52.0

4.02.0

4.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

362

397

371

5911

2817

714

11v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.190.1

4c0

.200.0

2c0

.25c0

.070.2

3v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.8

90.6

30.8

70.5

10.7

50.7

40.5

6Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

50.0

45.8

48.8

62.0

38.5

57.1

30.0

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

22.2

2.918

.82.5

3.113

.50.6

Delay

(s)

72.3

48.7

67.6

64.5

41.5

70.6

30.6

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

DE

ED

EC

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

72.3

59.5

42.3

36.3

Appr

oach

LOS

EE

DD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y47

.5HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

1Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

130.6

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.6

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

79.3%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s1:

Was

hing

ton

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

6017

946

268

228

137

6188

520

812

789

459

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.24.2

4.24.0

4.24.0

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s0.9

91.0

00.9

81.0

00.9

81.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

81.0

00.9

41.0

00.9

71.0

00.9

9Flt

Pro

tected

0.99

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

4617

7016

6717

7033

5717

7034

95Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

90.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1746

1770

1667

1770

3357

1770

3495

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

6Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)62

186

4827

923

814

364

922

217

132

931

61RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

00

150

013

00

30

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

029

60

279

366

064

1126

013

298

90

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

2818

1828

732

327

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

1320

12He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%7%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Split

NASp

litNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s7

78

85

21

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)25

.833

.333

.310

.151

.413

.755

.0Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

25.8

33.3

33.3

10.1

51.4

13.7

55.0

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

80.2

40.2

40.0

70.3

70.1

00.3

9Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.2

4.24.2

4.04.2

4.04.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.52.5

2.52.0

4.02.0

4.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

319

418

394

126

1225

172

1365

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.17

0.16

c0.22

0.04

c0.34

0.07

c0.28

v/s R

atio P

erm

v/c R

atio

0.93

0.67

0.93

0.51

0.92

0.77

0.72

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d156

.648

.752

.663

.042

.762

.036

.5Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d231

.93.6

27.7

1.211

.116

.72.1

Delay

(s)

88.5

52.3

80.3

64.1

53.9

78.7

38.5

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

DF

ED

ED

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

88.5

68.5

54.4

43.2

Appr

oach

LOS

FE

DD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y56

.5HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.9

1Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.8

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.6

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

95.4%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s2:

E D

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

142

711

242

546

416

6417

552

918

146

8Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s0.9

61.0

01.0

00.8

91.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

71.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

9Flt

Pro

tected

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)31

1517

7017

1214

1118

3815

8317

7018

46Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

50.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

91.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

2974

1770

1712

1411

1838

1583

1770

1846

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)1

474

124

472

516

1871

194

588

2016

29

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

00

70

026

30

20

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

059

90

472

516

110

265

325

2016

90

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

2231

3122

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)21

171

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NApt+

ovSp

litNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s4

38

22

2 36

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

48

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)38

.940

.183

.583

.526

.070

.617

.617

.6Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

38.9

40.1

83.5

83.5

26.0

66.1

17.6

17.6

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

80.2

90.6

00.6

00.1

90.4

70.1

30.1

3Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

4.02.0

4.04.0

2.52.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

826

506

1021

841

341

747

222

232

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.27

0.30

c0.14

0.21

0.01

c0.09

v/s R

atio P

erm

c0.20

0.01

v/c R

atio

0.73

0.93

0.51

0.01

0.78

0.44

0.09

0.73

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d145

.748

.616

.311

.554

.224

.554

.158

.9Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d25.5

24.0

0.50.0

10.2

0.30.1

10.3

Delay

(s)

51.2

72.7

16.9

11.5

64.5

24.8

54.2

69.2

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

EB

BE

CD

EAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)51

.243

.037

.267

.6Ap

proa

ch LO

SD

DD

E

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y44

.7HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

0Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

75.8%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s2:

E D

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

243

591

177

484

1612

016

860

615

177

20Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s0.9

71.0

01.0

00.9

11.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

71.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

8Flt

Pro

tected

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)32

3817

7017

7614

4418

2515

8317

7018

29Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

50.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

81.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3089

1770

1776

1444

1825

1583

1770

1829

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

6Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)2

453

9518

450

417

125

175

631

1618

421

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

00

70

025

50

30

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

055

00

184

504

100

300

376

1620

20

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

1632

3216

24

42

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)21

171

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%7%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NApt+

ovSp

litNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s4

38

22

2 36

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

48

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)36

.837

.578

.878

.828

.670

.619

.719

.7Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

36.8

37.5

78.8

78.8

28.6

66.1

19.7

19.7

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

60.2

70.5

60.5

60.2

00.4

70.1

40.1

4Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

4.02.0

4.04.0

2.52.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

811

474

999

812

372

747

249

257

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.10

c0.28

c0.16

0.24

0.01

c0.11

v/s R

atio P

erm

c0.18

0.01

v/c R

atio

0.68

0.39

0.50

0.01

0.81

0.50

0.06

0.78

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d146

.341

.918

.713

.553

.125

.652

.258

.1Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

00.7

50.7

01.9

91.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d24.5

0.21.7

0.011

.70.4

0.114

.0De

lay (s

)50

.831

.714

.726

.864

.826

.052

.272

.1Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DC

BC

EC

DE

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

50.8

19.4

38.5

70.6

Appr

oach

LOS

DB

DE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y38

.7HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

8Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

83.5%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s3:

Cau

lfiel

d Ln

& L

akev

ille

St

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

132

715

5563

605

154

9671

9631

748

304

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.04.9

4.04.9

4.94.0

4.04.9

4.94.9

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

50.9

50.9

51.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.97

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.91

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

50.9

61.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3255

1770

3252

1554

1770

3152

1681

1707

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

0.96

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7032

5517

7032

5215

5417

7031

5216

8117

0715

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

148

803

6271

680

173

108

8010

835

654

342

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

50

00

850

990

00

63La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)14

886

00

7168

088

108

890

203

207

279

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

46

64

33

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

58

3He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

pt+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

34

44 5

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)13

.550

.55.6

42.6

42.6

9.09.0

27.1

27.1

45.5

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)13

.550

.55.6

42.6

42.6

9.09.0

27.1

27.1

45.5

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

20.4

60.0

50.3

90.3

90.0

80.0

80.2

50.2

50.4

1Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.0

4.94.0

4.94.9

4.04.0

4.94.9

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

217

1494

9012

5960

114

425

741

442

065

4v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.08c0

.260.0

40.2

1c0

.060.0

30.1

2c0

.120.1

8v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.0

6v/c

Rati

o0.6

80.5

80.7

90.5

40.1

50.7

50.3

50.4

90.4

90.4

3Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

46.2

21.9

51.6

26.1

21.9

49.4

47.7

35.5

35.6

23.0

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.09

1.00

1.48

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

8.51.6

30.5

1.50.5

17.5

0.34.1

4.10.4

Delay

(s)

54.7

23.5

86.9

27.6

32.9

66.9

48.0

39.6

39.6

23.4

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

CF

CC

ED

DD

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)28

.133

.254

.932

.3Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

CD

C

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y33

.4HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

0Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

69.7%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s3:

Cau

lfiel

d Ln

& L

akev

ille

St

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

218

721

8780

679

398

8875

6324

064

213

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.04.9

4.04.9

4.94.0

4.04.9

4.94.9

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

50.9

50.9

51.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

0.98

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.93

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

50.9

71.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3354

1770

3374

1552

1770

3248

1681

1719

1553

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

0.97

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

5417

7033

7415

5217

7032

4816

8117

1915

53Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.98

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

222

736

8982

693

406

9077

6424

565

217

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

50

00

960

590

00

190

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

222

820

082

693

310

9082

015

415

627

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

52

25

11

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

58

3He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%7%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

Perm

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

34

4Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

64

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)23

.185

.58.0

70.4

70.4

11.5

11.5

17.2

17.2

17.2

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)23

.185

.58.0

70.4

70.4

11.5

11.5

17.2

17.2

17.2

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

70.6

10.0

60.5

00.5

00.0

80.0

80.1

20.1

20.1

2Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.0

4.94.0

4.94.9

4.04.0

4.94.9

4.9Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

292

2048

101

1696

780

145

266

206

211

190

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.13

0.24

c0.05

c0.21

c0.05

0.03

c0.09

0.09

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.20

0.02

v/c R

atio

0.76

0.40

0.81

0.41

0.40

0.62

0.31

0.75

0.74

0.14

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d155

.814

.065

.321

.821

.662

.160

.559

.359

.254

.8Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.1

10.4

90.8

60.9

00.9

91.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d28.9

0.532

.40.6

1.35.8

0.212

.211

.10.1

Delay

(s)

70.9

7.388

.720

.222

.768

.060

.871

.570

.354

.9Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EA

FC

CE

EE

ED

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

20.8

25.8

63.6

64.3

Appr

oach

LOS

CC

EE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y33

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.5

6Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

73.2%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s4:

In-n

-Out

Driv

eway

/US

101

SB

Ram

ps &

Lak

evill

e S

t/Lak

evill

e H

wy

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

330

769

66

612

398

43

710

253

166

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.55.0

3.55.0

5.03.5

4.94.9

4.5La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.97

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

41.0

01.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

50.9

31.0

01.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.99

0.95

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)34

3332

8017

7031

3915

8316

0916

8116

8615

83Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

90.9

50.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3433

3280

1770

3139

1583

1609

1681

1686

1583

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

60.9

6Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)34

480

16

663

841

54

37

1068

317

3RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

029

90

70

00

81La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)34

480

60

663

811

60

70

534

537

92Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)2

3Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

9He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

15%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

pm+o

vPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

88

44

5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

64

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)18

.849

.31.2

30.7

30.7

2.839

.839

.858

.6Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

18.8

49.3

1.230

.730

.72.8

39.8

39.8

58.6

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

70.4

50.0

10.2

80.2

80.0

30.3

60.3

60.5

3Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

5.03.5

5.05.0

3.54.9

4.94.5

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.03.0

2.03.0

3.03.0

3.03.0

3.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

586

1470

1987

644

140

608

610

908

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.10

c0.25

0.00

c0.20

c0.00

0.32

c0.32

0.02

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.07

0.04

v/c R

atio

0.59

0.55

0.32

0.73

0.26

0.18

0.88

0.88

0.10

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d142

.022

.254

.035

.930

.852

.532

.832

.912

.7Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

21.1

31.2

50.7

51.2

81.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d21.3

1.33.1

4.81.3

2.213

.613

.90.0

Delay

(s)

44.1

26.3

70.8

31.8

40.7

54.6

46.4

46.8

12.7

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

CE

CD

DD

DB

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

31.6

35.5

54.6

41.9

Appr

oach

LOS

CD

DD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y36

.6HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

5Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.9

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

73.5%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s4:

In-n

-Out

Driv

eway

/US

101

SB

Ram

ps &

Lak

evill

e S

t/Lak

evill

e H

wy

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

169

753

827

889

313

810

1962

912

252

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.05.0

4.05.0

5.04.4

4.94.9

4.0La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.97

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

31.0

01.0

00.9

8Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

50.9

31.0

01.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.99

0.95

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)34

3334

0117

7033

1215

8316

0216

8116

8815

55Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

90.9

50.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3433

3401

1770

3312

1583

1602

1681

1688

1555

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

80.9

8Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)17

276

88

2890

731

98

1019

642

1225

7RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

015

70

180

00

97La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)17

277

50

2890

716

20

190

327

327

160

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

22

55

5Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

158

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%6%

2%2%

9%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPe

rmSp

litNA

Split

NApm

+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

68

84

45

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

4Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

12.3

69.5

13.8

71.0

71.0

5.532

.932

.945

.2Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

12.3

69.5

13.8

71.0

71.0

5.532

.932

.945

.2Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.09

0.50

0.10

0.51

0.51

0.04

0.23

0.23

0.32

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.05.0

4.05.0

5.04.4

4.94.9

4.0Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

2.03.0

3.03.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)30

116

8817

416

7980

262

395

396

502

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.05

0.23

0.02

c0.27

c0.01

c0.19

0.19

0.03

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.10

0.07

v/c R

atio

0.57

0.46

0.16

0.54

0.20

0.30

0.83

0.83

0.32

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d161

.323

.057

.823

.418

.965

.450

.950

.835

.8Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor0.8

50.8

11.0

10.9

81.3

71.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d22.4

0.80.1

1.10.5

1.013

.313

.10.4

Delay

(s)

54.7

19.5

58.3

24.0

26.5

66.4

64.2

64.0

36.2

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

BE

CC

EE

ED

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

25.9

25.4

66.4

56.2

Appr

oach

LOS

CC

EE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y34

.9HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

1Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

18.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

65.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s5:

Lak

evill

e H

wy

& U

S 1

01 N

B R

amps

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

9516

7992

075

035

012

0Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.0

5.05.0

5.04.4

4.4La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

0.97

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

81.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

7031

1231

3915

4734

3315

83Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1770

3112

3139

1547

3433

1583

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF0.9

50.9

50.9

50.9

50.9

50.9

5Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)10

017

6796

878

936

812

6RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

029

00

58La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)10

017

6796

849

936

868

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

44

42

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%15

%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

NAPe

rmPr

otpt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

64

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

6Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

10.9

84.4

69.5

69.5

16.2

31.5

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)10

.984

.469

.569

.516

.231

.5Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.10

0.77

0.63

0.63

0.15

0.29

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.4Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.03.0

3.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)17

523

8719

8397

750

545

3v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

6c0

.570.3

1c0

.110.0

4v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.3

2v/c

Rati

o0.5

70.7

40.4

90.5

10.7

30.1

5Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

47.3

6.910

.811

.044

.829

.3Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.1

41.0

60.4

71.3

31.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d22.1

1.60.6

1.34.4

0.1De

lay (s

)55

.88.9

5.716

.049

.229

.3Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EA

AB

DC

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

11.4

10.3

44.2

Appr

oach

LOS

BB

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y14

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

7Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

13.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

65.0%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s5:

Lak

evill

e H

wy

& U

S 1

01 N

B R

amps

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

132

1248

853

942

303

356

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.54.5

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

50.9

51.0

00.9

71.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3374

3312

1550

3433

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

7433

1215

5034

3315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.97

0.97

0.97

0.97

0.97

0.97

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

136

1287

879

971

312

367

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

469

07

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

136

1287

879

502

312

360

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

11

33

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%7%

9%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

NAPe

rmPr

otpt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

64

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

6Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

10.0

47.7

33.7

33.7

12.8

26.8

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)10

.047

.733

.733

.712

.822

.8Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.14

0.68

0.48

0.48

0.18

0.33

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.5Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.03.0

3.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)25

222

9915

9474

662

751

5v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

80.3

80.2

70.0

9c0

.23v/s

Rati

o Per

mc0

.32v/c

Rati

o0.5

40.5

60.5

50.6

70.5

00.7

0Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

27.9

5.712

.813

.925

.720

.6Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.1

81.7

51.1

86.2

41.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d21.0

0.91.0

3.50.2

3.4De

lay (s

)33

.810

.916

.190

.425

.924

.0Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CB

BF

CC

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

13.1

55.1

24.9

Appr

oach

LOS

BE

C

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y34

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

8Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

70.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

13.5

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

73.3%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s6:

Bay

woo

d D

r & L

akev

ille

Hw

y7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

8018

2235

1512

9835

4913

1745

2134

7Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.44.4

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.92

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3109

1770

3134

1770

1682

1770

1863

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7031

0917

7031

3417

7016

8217

7018

6315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

8419

1837

1613

6637

5214

1847

2236

5RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

10

016

00

010

4La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)84

1954

016

1402

052

160

4722

261

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

101

110

77

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

23

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NApt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

38

74

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)17

.071

.92.7

58.2

6.810

.38.3

11.8

28.8

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)17

.071

.92.7

58.2

6.810

.38.3

11.8

28.8

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

50.6

50.0

20.5

30.0

60.0

90.0

80.1

10.2

6Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.4Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

4.02.0

4.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

273

2032

4316

5810

915

713

319

941

4v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

5c0

.630.0

1c0

.45c0

.030.0

10.0

30.0

1c0

.16v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.3

10.9

60.3

70.8

50.4

80.1

00.3

50.1

10.6

3Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

41.3

17.8

52.8

22.1

49.9

45.6

48.3

44.4

35.9

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.96

0.90

1.30

0.64

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

0.511

.41.7

4.71.2

0.10.6

0.12.3

Delay

(s)

40.1

27.3

70.4

18.7

51.1

45.7

48.9

44.4

38.2

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

CE

BD

DD

DD

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

27.8

19.3

49.0

39.7

Appr

oach

LOS

CB

DD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y26

.5HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.9

0Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

78.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s6:

Bay

woo

d D

r & L

akev

ille

Hw

y7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

236

1232

2720

1509

5111

433

1932

1415

9Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.44.4

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3362

1770

3301

1770

1739

1770

1863

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

6217

7033

0117

7017

3917

7018

6315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

238

1244

2720

1524

5211

533

1932

1416

1RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

10

017

00

075

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

238

1270

020

1575

011

535

032

1486

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

211

112

111

111

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

23

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%7%

2%2%

9%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NApt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

38

74

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)22

.598

.74.2

81.0

13.4

12.7

7.66.9

29.4

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)22

.598

.74.2

81.0

13.4

12.7

7.66.9

29.4

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

60.7

10.0

30.5

80.1

00.0

90.0

50.0

50.2

1Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.4Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

4.02.0

4.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

284

2370

5319

0916

915

796

9133

2v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.130.3

80.0

1c0

.48c0

.060.0

2c0

.020.0

10.0

5v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.8

40.5

40.3

80.8

20.6

80.2

20.3

30.1

50.2

6Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

57.0

9.866

.623

.861

.259

.163

.863

.846

.2Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor0.8

81.0

31.2

50.5

91.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d217

.60.8

1.12.9

8.60.3

0.70.3

0.2De

lay (s

)67

.710

.984

.417

.069

.959

.364

.564

.046

.4Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EB

FB

EE

EE

DAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)19

.817

.866

.650

.4Ap

proa

ch LO

SB

BE

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y23

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

9Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

84.0%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s7:

Cas

a G

rand

e R

d &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

135

1716

5521

979

1415

367

4316

4423

1Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

5.54.5

5.54.0

4.14.1

4.14.1

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.98

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.94

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

91.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3106

1770

3139

1583

1761

1743

1837

1552

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.71

1.00

0.91

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7031

0617

7031

3915

8313

2417

4316

9915

52Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

148

1886

6023

1076

1516

874

4718

4825

4RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

00

024

00

020

9La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)14

819

450

2310

7615

168

970

066

45Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)4

44

11

4Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

42

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

16%

2%2%

15%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Free

Perm

NAPe

rmNA

Perm

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

68

4Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Free

84

4Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

13.4

73.0

3.663

.211

0.019

.319

.319

.319

.3Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

13.4

73.0

3.663

.211

0.019

.319

.319

.319

.3Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.12

0.66

0.03

0.57

1.00

0.18

0.18

0.18

0.18

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.55.5

4.55.5

4.14.1

4.14.1

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.03.0

2.03.0

3.03.0

2.52.5

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)21

520

6157

1803

1583

232

305

298

272

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.08

c0.63

0.01

c0.34

0.06

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.01

c0.13

0.04

0.03

v/c R

atio

0.69

0.94

0.40

0.60

0.01

0.72

0.32

0.22

0.16

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d146

.316

.652

.115

.20.0

42.8

39.6

38.9

38.5

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.15

0.32

0.63

0.29

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

3.76.0

1.41.2

0.010

.70.6

0.30.2

Delay

(s)

57.1

11.3

34.2

5.70.0

53.5

40.2

39.2

38.7

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

BC

AA

DD

DD

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

14.5

6.247

.938

.8Ap

proa

ch LO

SB

AD

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y16

.7HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.9

0Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

14.1

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

81.3%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s7:

Cas

a G

rand

e R

d &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

188

968

145

4714

0832

128

7723

765

86Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

5.54.5

5.54.0

4.14.1

4.14.1

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.97

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3082

1770

3139

1583

1762

1791

1854

1552

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.67

1.00

0.97

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7030

8217

7031

3915

8312

3717

9118

1615

52Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

198

1019

153

4914

8234

135

8124

768

91RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

09

00

00

08

00

078

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

198

1163

049

1482

3413

597

00

7513

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

1010

32

23

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

21

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAFr

eePe

rmNA

Perm

NAPe

rmPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

84

Perm

itted P

hase

sFr

ee8

44

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)19

.190

.216

.187

.214

0.019

.619

.619

.619

.6Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

19.1

90.2

16.1

87.2

140.0

19.6

19.6

19.6

19.6

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

40.6

40.1

20.6

21.0

00.1

40.1

40.1

40.1

4Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

5.54.5

5.54.1

4.14.1

4.1Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

3.02.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

241

1985

203

1955

1583

173

250

254

217

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.11

0.38

0.03

c0.47

0.05

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.02

c0.11

0.04

0.01

v/c R

atio

0.82

0.59

0.24

0.76

0.02

0.78

0.39

0.30

0.06

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d158

.814

.256

.418

.90.0

58.1

54.8

54.0

52.2

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.87

0.90

0.76

0.62

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

17.1

1.10.1

1.20.0

20.0

1.00.5

0.1De

lay (s

)68

.414

.042

.813

.00.0

78.2

55.8

54.5

52.3

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

BD

BA

EE

DD

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

21.8

13.6

68.4

53.3

Appr

oach

LOS

CB

ED

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y22

.9HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

7Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

14.1

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

75.3%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s8:

McD

owel

l Bl &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

1510

2471

532

763

7322

792

920

928

120

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.94

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.99

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3073

1770

3126

1770

3484

1770

3499

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7030

7317

7031

2617

7034

8417

7034

99Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

1611

0176

934

820

7824

499

1022

530

222

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

820

05

00

80

05

0La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)16

1788

034

893

024

410

10

225

319

0Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)1

1Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

15

2He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

16%

2%2%

15%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

87

4Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)4.8

54.4

4.654

.220

.317

.517

.214

.4Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

4.854

.44.6

54.2

20.3

17.5

17.2

14.4

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.0

40.4

90.0

40.4

90.1

80.1

60.1

60.1

3Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)3.0

5.53.0

5.53.0

4.83.0

4.8Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

7715

1974

1540

326

554

276

458

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.01

c0.58

0.02

c0.29

c0.14

0.03

c0.13

0.09

v/s R

atio P

erm

v/c R

atio

0.21

1.18

0.46

0.58

0.75

0.18

0.82

0.70

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d150

.827

.851

.519

.842

.440

.044

.945

.7Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor0.7

30.5

61.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d20.2

83.0

1.61.6

9.10.1

15.9

3.7De

lay (s

)37

.198

.653

.121

.451

.540

.160

.849

.4Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DF

DC

DD

ED

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

98.1

22.6

48.0

54.1

Appr

oach

LOS

FC

DD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y67

.9HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio1.0

2Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

84.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s8:

McD

owel

l Bl &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

1081

311

913

949

226

573

366

979

9121

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.97

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.97

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3323

1770

3246

1770

3523

1770

3426

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

2317

7032

4617

7035

2317

7034

26Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

1187

412

814

1020

243

616

394

1085

9823

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

80

014

00

10

017

0La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)11

994

014

1249

061

640

30

8510

40

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

31

13

1616

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)1

52

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%7%

2%2%

9%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

38

74

Perm

itted P

hase

sAc

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

2.655

.54.0

56.9

55.0

53.3

10.9

9.2Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

2.655

.54.0

56.9

55.0

53.3

10.9

9.2Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.02

0.40

0.03

0.41

0.39

0.38

0.08

0.07

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.03.0

2.03.0

3.02.0

2.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)32

1317

5013

1969

513

4113

722

5v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

1c0

.300.0

1c0

.38c0

.350.1

1c0

.050.0

3v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.3

40.7

50.2

80.9

50.8

90.3

00.6

20.4

6Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

67.9

36.4

66.6

40.1

39.6

30.3

62.5

63.0

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.28

0.54

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

2.03.5

1.115

.013

.00.0

6.10.6

Delay

(s)

89.0

23.3

67.7

55.1

52.6

30.4

68.7

63.6

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

CE

ED

CE

EAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)24

.055

.243

.865

.7Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

ED

E

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y43

.5HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.9

0Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

83.8%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

n7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)1

031

290

328

102

151

357

0Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opFr

eeFr

eeGr

ade

0%0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor0.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

10.9

00.9

10.9

00.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

10.9

0Ho

urly

flow

rate

(vph)

10

3432

035

911

216

139

20

Pede

strian

sLa

ne W

idth (

ft)W

alking

Spe

ed (f

t/s)

Perce

nt Bl

ocka

geRi

ght tu

rn fla

re (v

eh)

Media

n typ

eTW

LTL

TWLT

LMe

dian s

torag

e veh

)2

2Up

strea

m sig

nal (f

t)27

0pX

, plat

oon u

nbloc

ked

vC, c

onflic

ting v

olume

503

541

196

371

533

6439

212

9vC

1, sta

ge 1

conf

vol

395

395

138

138

vC2,

stage

2 co

nf vo

l10

914

623

339

5vC

u, un

block

ed vo

l50

354

119

637

153

364

392

129

tC, s

ingle

(s)7.5

6.56.9

7.56.5

6.94.1

4.1tC

, 2 st

age (

s)6.5

5.56.5

5.5tF

(s)

3.54.0

3.33.5

4.03.3

2.22.2

p0 qu

eue f

ree %

100

100

9695

100

9699

100

cM ca

pacit

y (ve

h/h)

570

567

812

663

563

987

1163

1455

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

SB 3

Volum

e Tota

l36

679

7554

126

213

1Vo

lume L

eft1

329

00

10

0Vo

lume R

ight

3435

00

160

00

cSH

801

800

1163

1700

1700

1455

1700

1700

Volum

e to C

apac

ity0.0

40.0

80.0

10.0

40.0

30.0

00.1

50.0

8Qu

eue L

ength

95th

(ft)

37

10

00

00

Contr

ol De

lay (s

)9.7

9.98.1

0.00.0

7.50.0

0.0La

ne LO

SA

AA

AAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)9.7

9.90.5

0.0Ap

proa

ch LO

SA

A

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 1.7

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

26.8%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

n7/1

/2015

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)0

016

170

1729

279

290

176

1Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opFr

eeFr

eeGr

ade

0%0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor0.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

0Ho

urly

flow

rate

(vph)

00

1819

019

3231

032

019

61

Pede

strian

sLa

ne W

idth (

ft)W

alking

Spe

ed (f

t/s)

Perce

nt Bl

ocka

geRi

ght tu

rn fla

re (v

eh)

Media

n typ

eTW

LTL

TWLT

LMe

dian s

torag

e veh

)2

2Up

strea

m sig

nal (f

t)27

0pX

, plat

oon u

nbloc

ked

vC, c

onflic

ting v

olume

434

603

9850

658

717

119

734

2vC

1, sta

ge 1

conf

vol

196

196

391

391

vC2,

stage

2 co

nf vo

l23

840

711

619

7vC

u, un

block

ed vo

l43

460

398

506

587

171

197

342

tC, s

ingle

(s)7.5

6.56.9

7.56.5

6.94.1

4.1tC

, 2 st

age (

s)6.5

5.56.5

5.5tF

(s)

3.54.0

3.33.5

4.03.3

2.22.2

p0 qu

eue f

ree %

100

100

9897

100

9898

100

cM ca

pacit

y (ve

h/h)

640

540

938

561

544

843

1373

1214

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

SB 3

Volum

e Tota

l18

3832

207

136

013

066

Volum

e Left

019

320

00

00

Volum

e Righ

t18

190

032

00

1cS

H93

867

413

7317

0017

0017

0017

0017

00Vo

lume t

o Cap

acity

0.02

0.06

0.02

0.12

0.08

0.00

0.08

0.04

Queu

e Len

gth 95

th (ft

)1

42

00

00

0Co

ntrol

Delay

(s)

8.910

.77.7

0.00.0

0.00.0

0.0La

ne LO

SA

BA

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

8.910

.70.7

0.0Ap

proa

ch LO

SA

B

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 1.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

30.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

eh12

.1Int

erse

ction

LOS

B

Move

ment

EBU

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBU

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBU

NBL

NBT

NBR

Vol, v

eh/h

038

7460

078

7355

025

104

47Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.88

0.88

0.88

0.90

0.88

0.88

0.88

0.90

0.88

0.88

0.88

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

22

22

22

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

4384

680

8983

620

2811

853

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

01

00

01

00

11

1

Appr

oach

EBW

BNB

Oppo

sing A

ppro

ach

WB

EBSB

Oppo

sing L

anes

11

2Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftSB

NBEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Left

23

1Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach R

ight

NBSB

WB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t3

21

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay12

13.2

10.2

HCM

LOS

BB

B

Lane

NBLn

1NB

Ln2

NBLn

3EB

Ln1

WBL

n1SB

Ln1

SBLn

2Vo

l Left

, %10

0%0%

0%22

%38

%10

0%0%

Vol T

hru,

%0%

100%

0%43

%35

%0%

84%

Vol R

ight, %

0%0%

100%

35%

27%

0%16

%Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opTr

affic

Vol b

y Lan

e25

104

4717

220

643

188

LT V

ol25

00

3878

430

Thro

ugh V

ol0

104

074

730

157

RT V

ol0

047

6055

031

Lane

Flow

Rate

2811

853

195

234

4921

4Ge

ometr

y Grp

77

77

78

8De

gree

of U

til (X

)0.0

540.2

090.0

840.3

350.4

050.0

960.3

82De

partu

re H

eadw

ay (H

d)6.8

626.3

535.6

396.1

666.2

287.0

726.4

44Co

nver

genc

e, Y/

NYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sCa

p52

056

363

258

157

650

555

5Se

rvice

Tim

e4.6

274.1

173.4

033.9

273.9

864.8

44.2

11HC

M La

ne V

/C R

atio

0.054

0.21

0.084

0.336

0.406

0.097

0.386

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay10

10.8

8.912

13.2

10.6

13.2

HCM

Lane

LOS

AB

AB

BB

BHC

M 95

th-tile

Q0.2

0.80.3

1.52

0.31.8

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

eh11

.2Int

erse

ction

LOS

B

Move

ment

EBU

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBU

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBU

NBL

NBT

NBR

Vol, v

eh/h

060

8842

038

5147

044

160

49Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

22

22

22

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

6799

470

4357

530

4918

055

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

01

00

01

00

11

1

Appr

oach

EBW

BNB

Oppo

sing A

ppro

ach

WB

EBSB

Oppo

sing L

anes

11

2Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftSB

NBEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Left

23

1Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach R

ight

NBSB

WB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t3

21

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay12

.311

10.5

HCM

LOS

BB

B

Lane

NBLn

1NB

Ln2

NBLn

3EB

Ln1

WBL

n1SB

Ln1

SBLn

2Vo

l Left

, %10

0%0%

0%32

%28

%10

0%0%

Vol T

hru,

%0%

100%

0%46

%38

%0%

80%

Vol R

ight, %

0%0%

100%

22%

35%

0%20

%Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opTr

affic

Vol b

y Lan

e44

160

4919

013

631

138

LT V

ol44

00

6038

310

Thro

ugh V

ol0

160

088

510

111

RT V

ol0

049

4247

027

Lane

Flow

Rate

4918

055

213

153

3515

5Ge

ometr

y Grp

77

77

78

8De

gree

of U

til (X

)0.0

890.3

0.081

0.363

0.26

0.068

0.274

Depa

rture

Hea

dway

(Hd)

6.51

6.002

5.291

6.126

6.13

7.019

6.37

Conv

erge

nce,

Y/N

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cap

550

599

676

587

585

510

563

Servi

ce T

ime

4.252

3.744

3.033

3.869

3.878

4.77

4.12

HCM

Lane

V/C

Rati

o0.0

890.3

010.0

810.3

630.2

620.0

690.2

75HC

M Co

ntrol

Delay

9.911

.38.5

12.3

1110

.311

.5HC

M La

ne LO

SA

BA

BB

BB

HCM

95th-

tile Q

0.31.3

0.31.7

10.2

1.1

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e AM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

ehInt

erse

ction

LOS

Move

ment

SBU

SBL

SBT

SBR

Vol, v

eh/h

043

157

31Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.88

0.88

0.88

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

4917

835

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

11

0

Appr

oach

SBOp

posin

g App

roac

hNB

Oppo

sing L

anes

3Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftW

BCo

nflict

ing La

nes L

eft1

Confl

icting

App

roac

h Righ

tEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t1

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay12

.7HC

M LO

SB

Lane

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

7/1/20

15

Bayw

ood A

partm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

ySy

nchr

o 8 R

epor

tBa

selin

e PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

ehInt

erse

ction

LOS

Move

ment

SBU

SBL

SBT

SBR

Vol, v

eh/h

031

111

27Pe

ak H

our F

actor

0.90

0.89

0.89

0.89

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

3512

530

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

11

0

Appr

oach

SBOp

posin

g App

roac

hNB

Oppo

sing L

anes

3Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftW

BCo

nflict

ing La

nes L

eft1

Confl

icting

App

roac

h Righ

tEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t1

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay11

.3HC

M LO

SB

Lane

MO

VEM

ENT

SUM

MA

RYSi

te:S

McD

owel

l Bl &

Bay

woo

d D

r (A

M B

asel

ine

+ Pr

ojec

t) A

M P

eak

Hou

rB

asel

ine

plus

Pro

ject

Con

ditio

nsR

ound

abou

t

Mov

emen

t Per

form

ance

-Ve

hicl

esD

eman

d Fl

ows

95%

Bac

k of

Que

ueM

ov IDO

DM

ovD

eg.

Satn

Aver

age

Del

ay

Leve

l of

Serv

ice

Prop

. Q

ueue

dEf

fect

ive

Stop

Rat

eAv

erag

eSp

eed

To

tal

HV

Vehi

cles

Dis

tanc

eve

h/h

%v/

cse

cve

hft

per v

ehm

phSo

uth:

NB

Bay

woo

d D

r3

L212

52.

00.

350

8.6

LOS

A1.

742

.50.

650.

6423

.78

T180

2.0

0.35

08.

6LO

S A

1.7

42.5

0.65

0.64

23.2

18R

277

2.0

0.35

08.

6LO

S A

1.7

42.5

0.65

0.64

22.6

Appr

oach

282

2.0

0.35

08.

6LO

S A

1.7

42.5

0.65

0.64

23.2

East

: WB

S M

cDow

ell B

l1

L242

2.0

0.46

88.

4LO

S A

3.0

75.1

0.55

0.41

30.8

6T1

457

2.0

0.46

88.

4LO

S A

3.0

75.1

0.55

0.41

30.6

16R

220

2.0

0.46

88.

4LO

S A

3.0

75.1

0.55

0.41

29.7

Appr

oach

519

2.0

0.46

88.

4LO

S A

3.0

75.1

0.55

0.41

30.6

Nor

th: S

B B

ayw

ood

Dr

7L2

422.

00.

352

9.2

LOS

A1.

742

.30.

670.

6923

.94

T114

32.

00.

352

9.2

LOS

A1.

742

.30.

670.

6923

.414

R2

772.

00.

352

9.2

LOS

A1.

742

.30.

670.

6922

.8Ap

proa

ch26

22.

00.

352

9.2

LOS

A1.

742

.30.

670.

6923

.3

Wes

t: E

B S

McD

owel

l Bl

5L2

292.

00.

524

9.3

LOS

A3.

690

.90.

580.

4430

.52

T147

62.

00.

524

9.3

LOS

A3.

690

.90.

580.

4430

.312

R2

812.

00.

524

9.3

LOS

A3.

690

.90.

580.

4429

.4Ap

proa

ch58

62.

00.

524

9.3

LOS

A3.

690

.90.

580.

4430

.1

All V

ehic

les

1649

2.0

0.52

48.

9LO

S A

3.6

90.9

0.60

0.50

27.6

Leve

l of S

ervi

ce (L

OS)

Met

hod:

Del

ay &

v/c

(HC

M 2

010)

. R

ound

abou

t LO

S M

etho

d: S

ame

as S

igna

lised

Inte

rsec

tions

.Ve

hicl

e m

ovem

ent L

OS

val

ues

are

base

d on

ave

rage

del

ay a

nd v

/c ra

tio (d

egre

e of

sat

urat

ion)

per

mov

emen

tLO

S F

will

resu

lt if

v/c

> 1

irres

pect

ive

of m

ovem

ent d

elay

val

ue (d

oes

not a

pply

for a

ppro

ache

s an

d in

ters

ectio

n).

Inte

rsec

tion

and

Appr

oach

LO

S va

lues

are

bas

ed o

n av

erag

e de

lay

for a

ll m

ovem

ents

(v/c

not

use

d as

spe

cifie

d in

HC

M 2

010)

.R

ound

abou

t Cap

acity

Mod

el: U

S H

CM

201

0.H

CM

Del

ay F

orm

ula

optio

n is

use

d. C

ontro

l Del

ay d

oes

not i

nclu

de G

eom

etric

Del

ay s

ince

Exc

lude

Geo

met

ric D

elay

opt

ion

appl

ies.

Gap

-Acc

epta

nce

Cap

acity

: Tra

ditio

nal M

1.H

V (%

) val

ues

are

calc

ulat

ed fo

r All

Mov

emen

t Cla

sses

of A

ll H

eavy

Veh

icle

Mod

el D

esig

natio

n.

Pro

cess

ed: F

riday

, May

22,

201

5 2:

14:4

4 P

MS

IDR

A IN

TER

SEC

TIO

N 6

.0.2

4.48

77C

opyr

ight

© 2

000-

2014

Akc

elik

and

Ass

ocia

tes

Pty

Ltd

ww

w.s

idra

solu

tions

.com

Pro

ject

: N

:\AAA

\SO

X\PE

T\19

1PET

\SID

RA\

Bayw

ood-

McD

owel

l.sip

680

0049

3, 6

0191

58, W

-TR

ANS

, PLU

S /

Floa

ting

MO

VEM

ENT

SUM

MA

RYSi

te:S

McD

owel

l Bl &

Bay

woo

d D

r (PM

Bas

elin

e +

Proj

ect)

PM

Pea

k H

our

Bas

elin

e pl

us P

roje

ct C

ondi

tions

Rou

ndab

out

Mov

emen

t Per

form

ance

-Ve

hicl

esD

eman

d Fl

ows

95%

Bac

k of

Que

ueM

ov IDO

DM

ovD

eg.

Satn

Aver

age

Del

ay

Leve

l of

Serv

ice

Prop

. Q

ueue

dEf

fect

ive

Stop

Rat

eAv

erag

eSp

eed

To

tal

HV

Vehi

cles

Dis

tanc

eve

h/h

%v/

cse

cve

hft

per v

ehm

phSo

uth:

NB

Bay

woo

d D

r3

L293

2.0

0.30

97.

5LO

S A

1.5

37.8

0.60

0.55

24.1

8T1

127

2.0

0.30

97.

5LO

S A

1.5

37.8

0.60

0.55

23.6

18R

252

2.0

0.30

97.

5LO

S A

1.5

37.8

0.60

0.55

23.0

Appr

oach

273

2.0

0.30

97.

5LO

S A

1.5

37.8

0.60

0.55

23.7

East

: WB

S M

cDow

ell B

l1

L268

2.0

0.75

316

.7LO

S B

9.2

233.

50.

860.

8327

.76

T169

62.

00.

753

16.7

LOS

B9.

223

3.5

0.86

0.83

27.5

16R

232

2.0

0.75

316

.7LO

S B

9.2

233.

50.

860.

8326

.8Ap

proa

ch79

62.

00.

753

16.7

LOS

B9.

223

3.5

0.86

0.83

27.5

Nor

th: S

B B

ayw

ood

Dr

7L2

142.

00.

197

8.6

LOS

A0.

819

.80.

670.

6724

.04

T164

2.0

0.19

78.

6LO

S A

0.8

19.8

0.67

0.67

23.6

14R

237

2.0

0.19

78.

6LO

S A

0.8

19.8

0.67

0.67

23.0

Appr

oach

115

2.0

0.19

78.

6LO

S A

0.8

19.8

0.67

0.67

23.4

Wes

t: E

B S

McD

owel

l Bl

5L2

602.

00.

460

7.8

LOS

A3.

178

.10.

450.

2831

.02

T138

62.

00.

460

7.8

LOS

A3.

178

.10.

450.

2830

.812

R2

112

2.0

0.46

07.

8LO

S A

3.1

78.1

0.45

0.28

29.9

Appr

oach

557

2.0

0.46

07.

8LO

S A

3.1

78.1

0.45

0.28

30.6

All V

ehic

les

1742

2.0

0.75

311

.9LO

S B

9.2

233.

50.

670.

6027

.4

Leve

l of S

ervi

ce (L

OS)

Met

hod:

Del

ay &

v/c

(HC

M 2

010)

. R

ound

abou

t LO

S M

etho

d: S

ame

as S

igna

lised

Inte

rsec

tions

.Ve

hicl

e m

ovem

ent L

OS

val

ues

are

base

d on

ave

rage

del

ay a

nd v

/c ra

tio (d

egre

e of

sat

urat

ion)

per

mov

emen

tLO

S F

will

resu

lt if

v/c

> 1

irres

pect

ive

of m

ovem

ent d

elay

val

ue (d

oes

not a

pply

for a

ppro

ache

s an

d in

ters

ectio

n).

Inte

rsec

tion

and

Appr

oach

LO

S va

lues

are

bas

ed o

n av

erag

e de

lay

for a

ll m

ovem

ents

(v/c

not

use

d as

spe

cifie

d in

HC

M 2

010)

.R

ound

abou

t Cap

acity

Mod

el: U

S H

CM

201

0.H

CM

Del

ay F

orm

ula

optio

n is

use

d. C

ontro

l Del

ay d

oes

not i

nclu

de G

eom

etric

Del

ay s

ince

Exc

lude

Geo

met

ric D

elay

opt

ion

appl

ies.

Gap

-Acc

epta

nce

Cap

acity

: Tra

ditio

nal M

1.H

V (%

) val

ues

are

calc

ulat

ed fo

r All

Mov

emen

t Cla

sses

of A

ll H

eavy

Veh

icle

Mod

el D

esig

natio

n.

Pro

cess

ed: F

riday

, May

22,

201

5 2:

14:4

8 P

MS

IDR

A IN

TER

SEC

TIO

N 6

.0.2

4.48

77C

opyr

ight

© 2

000-

2014

Akc

elik

and

Ass

ocia

tes

Pty

Ltd

ww

w.s

idra

solu

tions

.com

Pro

ject

: N

:\AAA

\SO

X\PE

T\19

1PET

\SID

RA\

Bayw

ood-

McD

owel

l.sip

680

0049

3, 6

0191

58, W

-TR

ANS

, PLU

S /

Floa

ting

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s1:

Was

hing

ton

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

4424

140

231

213

128

5057

417

114

385

754

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.24.2

4.24.0

4.24.0

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

00.9

91.0

00.9

81.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

81.0

00.9

41.0

00.9

71.0

00.9

9Flt

Pro

tected

0.99

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

1317

7016

4717

7033

5117

7034

99Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

90.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1713

1770

1647

1770

3351

1770

3499

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)44

241

4023

121

312

850

574

171

143

857

54RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

00

160

021

00

30

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

032

50

231

325

050

724

014

390

80

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

67

76

418

184

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

1320

12He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Split

NASp

litNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s7

78

85

21

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)26

.627

.327

.34.5

33.9

12.6

42.0

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)26

.627

.327

.34.5

33.9

12.6

42.0

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

30.2

30.2

30.0

40.2

90.1

10.3

6Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.2

4.24.2

4.04.2

4.04.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.52.5

2.52.0

4.02.0

4.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

389

413

384

6897

019

012

56v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.190.1

3c0

.200.0

30.2

2c0

.08c0

.26v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.8

40.5

60.8

50.7

40.7

50.7

50.7

2Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

43.1

39.5

42.8

55.7

37.7

50.7

32.5

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

14.1

1.315

.429

.53.4

13.8

2.2De

lay (s

)57

.240

.958

.385

.141

.064

.534

.7Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

ED

EF

DE

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)57

.251

.243

.838

.7Ap

proa

ch LO

SE

DD

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y45

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

1Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

117.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.6

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

82.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s1:

Was

hing

ton

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

6026

280

451

321

156

6876

725

811

810

2312

2Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.2

4.24.2

4.04.2

4.04.2

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

0.99

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.97

1.00

0.99

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

0.97

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.96

1.00

0.98

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

90.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1738

1770

1682

1770

3298

1770

3462

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.99

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

3817

7016

8217

7032

9817

7034

62Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

6026

280

451

321

156

6876

725

811

810

2312

2RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

00

120

024

00

70

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

040

20

451

465

068

1001

011

811

380

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

2818

1828

732

327

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

1320

12He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%7%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Split

NASp

litNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s7

78

85

21

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)32

.237

.837

.86.0

44.4

9.047

.4Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

32.2

37.8

37.8

6.044

.49.0

47.4

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

30.2

70.2

70.0

40.3

20.0

60.3

4Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.2

4.24.2

4.04.2

4.04.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.52.5

2.52.0

4.02.0

4.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

399

477

454

7510

4511

311

72v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.230.2

5c0

.280.0

4c0

.300.0

7c0

.33v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o1.0

10.9

51.0

20.9

10.9

61.0

40.9

7Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

53.9

50.1

51.1

66.7

46.9

65.5

45.6

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.00

0.90

0.90

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

46.9

18.2

37.0

71.0

19.4

97.0

20.2

Delay

(s)

100.8

63.5

83.1

137.8

66.3

162.5

65.9

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

EF

FE

FE

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

100.8

73.6

70.7

74.9

Appr

oach

LOS

FE

EE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y76

.2HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio1.0

1Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.6

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

100.2

%IC

U Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

GAn

alysis

Per

iod (m

in)15

c C

ritica

l Lan

e Gro

up

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s2:

E D

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

943

311

041

743

142

110

204

510

4317

421

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.54.5

4.54.5

4.24.2

4.24.2

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor0.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

0.97

1.00

1.00

0.90

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

0.97

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.98

Flt P

rotec

ted1.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

81.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

3129

1770

1712

1428

1831

1583

1770

1828

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)29

6217

7017

1214

2818

3115

8317

7018

28Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

943

311

041

743

142

110

204

510

4317

421

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

00

200

019

60

30

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

055

20

417

431

220

314

314

4319

20

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

2231

3122

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)21

171

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NApt+

ovSp

litNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s4

38

22

2 36

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

48

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)26

.731

.762

.962

.925

.657

.317

.017

.0Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

26.7

31.7

62.9

62.9

25.6

57.3

17.0

17.0

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

30.2

70.5

30.5

30.2

20.4

80.1

40.1

4Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

4.02.0

4.04.0

2.52.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

667

473

909

758

395

766

254

262

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.24

0.25

c0.17

0.20

0.02

c0.10

v/s R

atio P

erm

c0.19

0.02

v/c R

atio

0.83

0.88

0.47

0.03

0.79

0.41

0.17

0.73

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d143

.741

.617

.413

.243

.919

.744

.548

.5Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d28.7

16.9

0.50.0

10.2

0.30.2

9.5De

lay (s

)52

.458

.417

.913

.254

.219

.944

.758

.0Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DE

BB

DB

DE

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

52.4

36.7

33.0

55.6

Appr

oach

LOS

DD

CE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y40

.7HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

2Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

118.4

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

81.2%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s2:

E D

St &

Lak

evill

e S

t5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

2254

510

135

367

462

169

196

429

6728

810

4Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

4.2La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s0.9

71.0

01.0

00.9

11.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

9Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t0.9

81.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

6Flt

Pro

tected

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)32

5717

7017

7614

4118

2115

8317

7017

75Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

10.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

81.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

2984

1770

1776

1441

1821

1583

1770

1775

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)22

545

101

353

674

6216

919

642

967

288

104

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

00

260

018

80

90

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

066

80

353

674

360

365

241

6738

30

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

1632

3216

24

42

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)21

171

1He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

6%2%

2%7%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NApt+

ovSp

litNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s4

38

22

2 36

6Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

48

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)40

.323

.568

.368

.330

.954

.427

.927

.9Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

40.3

23.5

68.3

68.3

30.9

54.4

27.9

27.9

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

90.1

70.4

90.4

90.2

20.3

90.2

00.2

0Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

4.54.5

4.54.2

4.24.2

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

4.02.0

4.04.0

2.52.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

858

297

866

703

401

615

352

353

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.20

c0.38

c0.20

0.15

0.04

c0.22

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.22

0.02

v/c R

atio

0.78

1.19

0.78

0.05

0.91

0.39

0.19

1.09

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d145

.858

.229

.618

.853

.230

.946

.656

.0Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor0.5

70.6

41.1

21.1

91.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d22.4

105.3

4.60.1

24.3

0.30.2

72.7

Delay

(s)

28.3

142.6

37.8

22.5

77.5

31.2

46.8

128.8

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

FD

CE

CD

FAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)28

.370

.952

.511

6.8Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

ED

F

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y63

.6HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.9

7Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

111.5

%IC

U Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

HAn

alysis

Per

iod (m

in)15

c C

ritica

l Lan

e Gro

up

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s3:

Cau

lfiel

d Ln

& L

akev

ille

St

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

200

623

4613

479

371

113

378

262

270

207

300

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.04.9

4.04.9

4.94.0

4.04.9

4.94.9

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

50.9

50.9

51.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.94

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

50.9

91.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3255

1770

3252

1553

1770

3282

1681

1757

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

0.99

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7032

5517

7032

5215

5317

7032

8216

8117

5715

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

200

623

4613

479

371

113

378

262

270

207

300

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

50

00

470

114

00

010

7La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)20

066

40

134

793

2411

352

60

235

242

193

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

46

64

33

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)8

58

3He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

10%

2%2%

11%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Perm

Split

NASp

litNA

pt+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

34

44 5

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)12

.038

.211

.037

.237

.217

.017

.026

.026

.038

.0Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

12.0

38.2

11.0

37.2

37.2

17.0

17.0

26.0

26.0

38.0

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

10.3

50.1

00.3

40.3

40.1

50.1

50.2

40.2

40.3

5Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.0

4.94.0

4.94.9

4.04.0

4.94.9

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

193

1130

177

1099

525

273

507

397

415

546

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.11

0.20

0.08

c0.24

0.06

c0.16

c0.14

0.14

0.12

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.02

v/c R

atio

1.04

0.59

0.76

0.72

0.05

0.41

1.04

0.59

0.58

0.35

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d149

.029

.448

.231

.924

.542

.046

.537

.337

.226

.8Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

00.7

50.6

71.1

91.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d274

.62.2

13.1

3.50.1

0.449

.96.4

5.90.4

Delay

(s)

123.6

31.7

49.1

24.8

29.3

42.4

96.4

43.6

43.1

27.2

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

CD

CC

DF

DD

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)52

.828

.488

.337

.1Ap

proa

ch LO

SD

CF

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y49

.9HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

8Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

87.8%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s3:

Cau

lfiel

d Ln

& L

akev

ille

St

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

250

793

133

424

987

310

123

409

201

201

332

350

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.04.9

4.04.9

4.94.0

4.04.9

4.94.9

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

50.9

50.9

51.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

0.98

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3334

1770

3374

1550

1770

3338

1681

1765

1557

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

3417

7033

7415

5017

7033

3816

8117

6515

57Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

250

793

133

424

987

310

123

409

201

201

332

350

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

90

00

760

430

00

280

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

250

917

042

498

723

412

356

70

181

352

70Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)5

22

51

1Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

85

83

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%6%

2%2%

7%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPe

rmSp

litNA

Split

NAPe

rmPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

33

44

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

4Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

22.1

39.1

33.0

50.0

50.0

22.0

22.0

28.1

28.1

28.1

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)22

.139

.133

.050

.050

.022

.022

.028

.128

.128

.1Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.16

0.28

0.24

0.36

0.36

0.16

0.16

0.20

0.20

0.20

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.04.9

4.04.9

4.94.0

4.04.9

4.94.9

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)27

993

141

712

0555

327

852

433

735

431

2v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.1

4c0

.27c0

.240.2

90.0

7c0

.170.1

1c0

.20v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.1

50.0

5v/c

Rati

o0.9

00.9

81.0

20.8

20.4

20.4

41.0

80.5

40.9

90.2

3Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

57.8

50.2

53.5

40.9

34.1

53.4

59.0

50.1

55.9

46.8

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.89

0.95

0.81

0.78

0.65

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

25.0

23.5

39.5

4.11.5

0.463

.30.8

46.0

0.1De

lay (s

)76

.271

.383

.035

.823

.753

.912

2.351

.010

1.947

.0Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EE

FD

CD

FD

FD

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

72.4

45.3

110.9

69.7

Appr

oach

LOS

ED

FE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y67

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio1.0

1Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

99.9%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s4:

In-n

-Out

Driv

eway

/US

101

SB

Ram

ps &

Lak

evill

e S

t/Lak

evill

e H

wy

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

310

925

106

769

378

55

792

35

298

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.55.0

3.55.0

5.03.5

4.94.9

4.5La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.97

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

31.0

01.0

01.0

0Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

50.9

41.0

01.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.99

0.95

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)34

3332

7917

7031

3915

8316

1816

8116

8615

83Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

90.9

50.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3433

3279

1770

3139

1583

1618

1681

1686

1583

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)31

092

510

676

937

85

57

923

529

8RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

00

024

10

70

00

90La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)31

093

50

676

913

70

100

461

467

208

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

23

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)9

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%10

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPe

rmSp

litNA

Split

NApm

+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

68

84

45

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

4Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

16.6

56.2

1.239

.839

.82.0

33.7

33.7

50.3

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)16

.656

.21.2

39.8

39.8

2.033

.733

.750

.3Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.15

0.51

0.01

0.36

0.36

0.02

0.31

0.31

0.46

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.55.0

3.55.0

5.03.5

4.94.9

4.5Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

3.03.0

3.03.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)51

816

7519

1135

572

2951

451

678

8v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

9c0

.280.0

0c0

.24c0

.010.2

7c0

.280.0

4v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.0

90.0

9v/c

Rati

o0.6

00.5

60.3

20.6

80.2

40.3

50.9

00.9

10.2

6Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

43.6

18.4

54.0

29.7

24.5

53.4

36.5

36.6

18.4

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.91

0.75

1.24

0.53

0.57

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

1.41.0

3.02.8

0.97.2

18.1

19.3

0.2De

lay (s

)40

.914

.969

.718

.514

.860

.554

.655

.918

.6Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DB

EB

BE

DE

BAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)21

.417

.660

.546

.3Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

BE

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y28

.7HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

4Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

17.9

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

74.8%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s4:

In-n

-Out

Driv

eway

/US

101

SB

Ram

ps &

Lak

evill

e S

t/Lak

evill

e H

wy

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

160

1109

1532

1364

280

255

1068

15

377

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.05.0

4.05.0

5.04.4

4.94.9

4.0La

ne U

til. F

actor

0.97

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

0.95

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

71.0

01.0

00.9

8Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

50.9

71.0

01.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.97

0.95

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)34

3334

0017

7033

1215

8316

9116

8116

8715

55Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.9

70.9

50.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

3433

3400

1770

3312

1583

1691

1681

1687

1555

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)16

011

0915

3213

6428

025

510

681

537

7RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

00

00

014

10

90

00

60La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)16

011

240

3213

6413

90

310

340

346

317

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

22

55

5Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

158

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%6%

2%2%

9%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPe

rmSp

litNA

Split

NApm

+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

68

84

45

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

4Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

11.9

72.0

9.669

.769

.75.7

34.4

34.4

46.3

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)11

.972

.09.6

69.7

69.7

5.734

.434

.446

.3Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.09

0.51

0.07

0.50

0.50

0.04

0.25

0.25

0.33

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.05.0

4.05.0

5.04.4

4.94.9

4.0Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)3.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

2.03.0

3.03.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)29

117

4812

116

4878

868

413

414

514

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.05

c0.33

0.02

c0.41

c0.02

0.20

c0.21

0.05

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.09

0.15

v/c R

atio

0.55

0.64

0.26

0.83

0.18

0.46

0.82

0.84

0.62

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d161

.524

.761

.930

.019

.465

.649

.950

.139

.4Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.2

00.4

80.9

80.9

11.5

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d21.0

0.90.3

3.00.3

1.812

.513

.62.2

Delay

(s)

75.0

12.6

60.9

30.4

30.4

67.4

62.4

63.7

41.6

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

BE

CC

EE

ED

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

20.4

31.0

67.4

55.5

Appr

oach

LOS

CC

EE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y34

.4HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

0Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

18.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

80.0%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s5:

Lak

evill

e H

wy

& U

S 1

01 N

B R

amps

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

132

1496

1117

791

310

118

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.44.4

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

50.9

51.0

00.9

71.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3112

3139

1547

3433

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7031

1231

3915

4734

3315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

132

1496

1117

791

310

118

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

287

033

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

132

1496

1117

504

310

85Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)4

44

2He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

16%

15%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NANA

Perm

Prot

pt+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

26

44 5

Perm

itted P

hase

s6

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)12

.186

.270

.170

.114

.430

.5Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

12.1

86.2

70.1

70.1

14.4

26.5

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

10.7

80.6

40.6

40.1

30.2

4Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.0

5.05.0

5.04.4

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.03.0

3.03.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

194

2438

2000

985

449

381

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.07

c0.48

0.36

c0.09

0.05

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.33

v/c R

atio

0.68

0.61

0.56

0.51

0.69

0.22

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d147

.15.0

11.2

10.7

45.7

33.5

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.92

0.71

0.64

0.66

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

5.60.8

0.91.6

3.70.1

Delay

(s)

49.0

4.48.1

8.649

.333

.6Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DA

AA

DC

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

8.08.3

45.0

Appr

oach

LOS

AA

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y12

.1HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

5Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

13.4

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

64.2%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s5:

Lak

evill

e H

wy

& U

S 1

01 N

B R

amps

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

159

1611

1502

846

268

237

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.54.5

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

50.9

51.0

00.9

71.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3374

3312

1550

3433

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

7433

1215

5034

3315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

159

1611

1502

846

268

237

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

00

392

00

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

159

1611

1502

454

268

237

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

11

33

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%7%

9%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

NAPe

rmPr

otpt+

ovPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

64

4 5Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

6Ac

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

10.0

50.3

36.3

36.3

10.2

24.2

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)10

.050

.336

.336

.310

.220

.2Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.14

0.72

0.52

0.52

0.15

0.29

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

4.05.0

5.05.0

4.5Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.03.0

3.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)25

224

2417

1780

350

045

6v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

9c0

.48c0

.45c0

.080.1

5v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.2

9v/c

Rati

o0.6

30.6

60.8

70.5

70.5

40.5

2Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

28.3

5.314

.811

.527

.720

.8Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.2

71.5

81.7

07.1

81.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d23.0

1.25.6

2.40.6

0.4De

lay (s

)38

.99.6

30.9

84.9

28.3

21.3

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

AC

FC

CAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)12

.250

.425

.0Ap

proa

ch LO

SB

DC

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y33

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.7

9Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

70.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

13.5

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

70.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eC

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s6:

Bay

woo

d D

r & L

akev

ille

Hw

y5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Futur

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - pl

us P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

8717

8239

1612

9639

2810

1449

2337

8Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.44.4

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.91

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3108

1770

3134

1770

1677

1770

1863

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7031

0817

7031

3417

7016

7717

7018

6315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

8717

8239

1612

9639

2810

1449

2337

8RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

20

012

00

087

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

8718

200

1613

330

2812

049

2329

1Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)10

11

107

7Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

42

3He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

16%

2%2%

15%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

pt+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

87

44 5

Perm

itted P

hase

sAc

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

17.8

72.2

2.057

.04.4

15.2

3.814

.632

.4Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

17.8

72.2

2.057

.04.4

15.2

3.814

.632

.4Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.16

0.66

0.02

0.52

0.04

0.14

0.03

0.13

0.29

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

3.55.3

4.15.3

3.04.4

3.04.4

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.04.0

2.04.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)28

620

3932

1623

7023

161

247

466

v/s R

atio P

rot

0.05

c0.59

0.01

c0.43

0.02

0.01

c0.03

0.01

c0.18

v/s R

atio P

erm

v/c R

atio

0.30

0.89

0.50

0.82

0.40

0.05

0.80

0.09

0.62

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d140

.615

.753

.522

.251

.541

.152

.741

.933

.5Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor0.9

40.8

11.3

10.5

81.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d20.6

6.03.6

4.01.4

0.049

.50.1

1.9De

lay (s

)38

.718

.673

.616

.852

.941

.210

2.241

.935

.4Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DB

EB

DD

FD

DAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)19

.517

.547

.543

.0Ap

proa

ch LO

SB

BD

D

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y22

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

5Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

76.7%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s6:

Bay

woo

d D

r & L

akev

ille

Hw

y5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

263

1297

3218

1536

5711

937

1936

1218

0Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)3.5

5.34.1

5.33.0

4.43.0

4.44.4

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3361

1770

3300

1770

1749

1770

1863

1583

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

6117

7033

0017

7017

4917

7018

6315

83Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

263

1297

3218

1536

5711

937

1936

1218

0RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

20

015

00

062

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

263

1328

018

1591

011

941

036

1211

8Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)2

1111

21

1111

1Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

42

3He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

7%2%

2%9%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

pt+ov

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

87

44 5

Perm

itted P

hase

sAc

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

22.3

94.6

8.181

.013

.714

.36.2

6.829

.1Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

22.3

94.6

8.181

.013

.714

.36.2

6.829

.1Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.16

0.68

0.06

0.58

0.10

0.10

0.04

0.05

0.21

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

3.55.3

4.15.3

3.04.4

3.04.4

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

3.04.0

2.04.0

2.02.0

2.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)28

122

7110

219

0917

317

878

9032

9v/s

Rati

o Pro

tc0

.150.4

00.0

1c0

.48c0

.070.0

20.0

20.0

1c0

.07v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.9

40.5

80.1

80.8

30.6

90.2

30.4

60.1

30.3

6Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

58.1

12.2

62.8

24.0

61.1

57.8

65.3

63.8

47.5

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.03

0.86

0.86

0.50

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

31.8

0.90.2

2.78.7

0.21.6

0.20.2

Delay

(s)

91.5

11.4

54.4

14.6

69.8

58.0

66.8

64.0

47.7

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

BD

BE

EE

ED

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

24.6

15.1

66.0

51.6

Appr

oach

LOS

CB

ED

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y24

.1HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

1Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

86.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s7:

Cas

a G

rand

e R

d &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Futur

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - pl

us P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

227

1567

4018

1151

4585

5828

2943

268

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.55.5

4.55.5

4.04.1

4.14.1

4.1La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

91.0

00.9

8Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.98

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

7031

0817

7031

3915

8317

6117

6218

2515

46Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.7

11.0

00.8

61.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1770

3108

1770

3139

1583

1316

1762

1592

1546

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)22

715

6740

1811

5145

8558

2829

4326

8RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

01

00

00

018

00

023

5La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)22

716

060

1811

5145

8568

00

7233

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

44

41

14

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

21

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAFr

eePe

rmNA

Perm

NAPe

rmPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

84

Perm

itted P

hase

sFr

ee8

44

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)18

.779

.92.5

63.7

110.0

13.5

13.5

13.5

13.5

Effec

tive G

reen

, g (s

)18

.779

.92.5

63.7

110.0

13.5

13.5

13.5

13.5

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.1

70.7

30.0

20.5

81.0

00.1

20.1

20.1

20.1

2Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

5.54.5

5.54.1

4.14.1

4.1Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

3.02.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

300

2257

4018

1715

8316

121

619

518

9v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.1

3c0

.520.0

1c0

.370.0

4v/s

Rati

o Per

m0.0

3c0

.060.0

50.0

2v/c

Rati

o0.7

60.7

10.4

50.6

30.0

30.5

30.3

10.3

70.1

7Un

iform

Dela

y, d1

43.5

8.553

.115

.40.0

45.3

44.0

44.3

43.3

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

1.12

0.25

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

5.01.0

2.91.7

0.03.1

0.80.9

0.3De

lay (s

)53

.63.2

56.0

17.1

0.048

.444

.945

.243

.6Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DA

EB

AD

DD

DAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)9.4

17.0

46.6

43.9

Appr

oach

LOS

AB

DD

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y17

.1HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

BHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.6

9Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

110.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

14.1

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

73.0%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s7:

Cas

a G

rand

e R

d &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Futur

e PM

Peak

Hou

r plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

299

1252

7933

1504

8096

7516

2056

140

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

4.55.5

4.55.5

4.04.1

4.14.1

4.1La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

8Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

00.9

91.0

01.0

00.8

51.0

00.9

71.0

00.8

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.99

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

7030

9917

7031

3915

8317

6218

0818

3715

49Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

01.0

00.6

51.0

00.9

11.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1770

3099

1770

3139

1583

1203

1808

1690

1549

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)29

912

5279

3315

0480

9675

1620

5614

0RT

OR R

educ

tion (

vph)

03

00

00

06

00

012

4La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)29

913

280

3315

0480

9685

00

7616

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

1010

32

23

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)4

21

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAFr

eePe

rmNA

Perm

NAPe

rmPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

84

Perm

itted P

hase

sFr

ee8

44

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)30

.497

.612

.079

.214

0.016

.316

.316

.316

.3Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

30.4

97.6

12.0

79.2

140.0

16.3

16.3

16.3

16.3

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.2

20.7

00.0

90.5

71.0

00.1

20.1

20.1

20.1

2Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)4.5

5.54.5

5.54.1

4.14.1

4.1Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

3.02.5

2.5La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

384

2160

151

1775

1583

140

210

196

180

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.17

0.43

0.02

c0.48

0.05

v/s R

atio P

erm

0.05

c0.08

0.04

0.01

v/c R

atio

0.78

0.61

0.22

0.85

0.05

0.69

0.40

0.39

0.09

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d151

.611

.259

.625

.40.0

59.4

57.3

57.2

55.2

Prog

ress

ion F

actor

0.78

0.76

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incre

menta

l Dela

y, d2

8.01.2

0.35.2

0.113

.01.3

0.90.2

Delay

(s)

48.3

9.859

.930

.60.1

72.4

58.6

58.2

55.4

Leve

l of S

ervic

eD

AE

CA

EE

EE

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

16.8

29.7

65.7

56.4

Appr

oach

LOS

BC

EE

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y27

.4HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

CHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

1Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

140.0

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

14.1

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

82.4%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s8:

McD

owel

l Bl &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Futur

e AM

Peak

Hou

r - pl

us P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

1210

4472

738

838

6598

1120

627

215

7Ide

al Flo

w (vp

hpl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Total

Lost

time (

s)3.0

5.53.0

5.53.0

4.83.0

4.8La

ne U

til. F

actor

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

Frpb

, ped

/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

00.9

81.0

00.9

9Flp

b, pe

d/bike

s1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Fr

t1.0

00.9

41.0

00.9

91.0

00.8

61.0

00.9

5Flt

Pro

tected

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(pro

t)17

7030

7317

7031

2817

7029

6517

7033

43Flt

Per

mitte

d0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

erm)

1770

3073

1770

3128

1770

2965

1770

3343

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor, P

HF1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ad

j. Flow

(vph

)12

1044

727

3883

865

9811

206

272

157

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

720

03

00

109

00

70

Lane

Gro

up F

low (v

ph)

1216

990

3890

00

9810

80

272

150

Confl

. Ped

s. (#

/hr)

11

Confl

. Bike

s (#/h

r)1

52

Heav

y Veh

icles

(%)

2%16

%2%

2%15

%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

Turn

Typ

ePr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otecte

d Pha

ses

52

16

38

74

Perm

itted P

hase

sAc

tuated

Gre

en, G

(s)

5.076

.63.2

74.8

27.8

11.5

21.0

4.7Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

5.076

.63.2

74.8

27.8

11.5

21.0

4.7Ac

tuated

g/C

Ratio

0.04

0.60

0.02

0.58

0.22

0.09

0.16

0.04

Clea

ranc

e Tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Vehic

le Ex

tensio

n (s)

2.03.0

2.03.0

3.02.0

2.02.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)68

1830

4418

1938

226

528

912

2v/s

Rati

o Pro

t0.0

1c0

.55c0

.020.2

90.0

6c0

.04c0

.150.0

0v/s

Rati

o Per

mv/c

Rati

o0.1

80.9

30.8

60.4

90.2

60.9

0dr

0.94

0.13

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d159

.823

.562

.515

.841

.855

.353

.260

.0Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d20.5

8.782

.60.2

0.40.4

37.0

0.2De

lay (s

)60

.332

.214

5.116

.042

.255

.790

.260

.1Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

EC

FB

DE

FE

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

32.4

21.2

51.5

88.0

Appr

oach

LOS

CC

DF

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y36

.0HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

8Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

128.6

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

86.1%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15dr

De

facto

Righ

t Lan

e. R

ecod

e with

1 tho

ugh l

ane a

s a rig

ht lan

e.c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M S

igna

lized

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s8:

McD

owel

l Bl &

Lak

evill

e H

wy

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

vph)

1890

912

415

1003

226

537

371

1167

9022

Ideal

Flow

(vphp

l)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal Lo

st tim

e (s)

3.05.5

3.05.5

3.04.8

3.04.8

Lane

Util.

Fac

tor1.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

5Fr

pb, p

ed/bi

kes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Flpb,

ped/b

ikes

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.97

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.97

Flt P

rotec

ted0.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

00.9

51.0

0Sa

td. F

low (p

rot)

1770

3326

1770

3249

1770

3520

1770

3423

Flt P

ermi

tted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

Satd.

Flow

(per

m)17

7033

2617

7032

4917

7035

2017

7034

23Pe

ak-h

our f

actor

, PHF

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Adj. F

low (v

ph)

1890

912

415

1003

226

537

371

1167

9022

RTOR

Red

uctio

n (vp

h)0

70

013

00

20

018

0La

ne G

roup

Flow

(vph

)18

1026

015

1216

053

738

00

6794

0Co

nfl. P

eds.

(#/hr

)3

11

316

16Co

nfl. B

ikes (

#/hr)

15

2He

avy V

ehicl

es (%

)2%

7%2%

2%9%

2%2%

2%2%

2%2%

2%Tu

rn T

ype

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prot

NAPr

otNA

Prote

cted P

hase

s5

21

63

87

4Pe

rmitte

d Pha

ses

Actua

ted G

reen

, G (s

)1.5

50.8

1.550

.841

.742

.97.4

8.6Ef

fectiv

e Gre

en, g

(s)

1.550

.81.5

50.8

41.7

42.9

7.48.6

Actua

ted g/

C Ra

tio0.0

10.4

30.0

10.4

30.3

50.3

60.0

60.0

7Cl

eara

nce T

ime (

s)3.0

5.53.0

5.53.0

4.83.0

4.8Ve

hicle

Exten

sion (

s)2.0

3.02.0

3.03.0

2.02.0

2.0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

2214

2122

1388

620

1270

110

247

v/s R

atio P

rot

c0.01

0.31

0.01

c0.37

c0.30

c0.11

c0.04

0.03

v/s R

atio P

erm

v/c R

atio

0.82

0.72

0.68

0.88

0.87

0.30

0.61

0.38

Unifo

rm D

elay,

d158

.628

.258

.531

.236

.027

.254

.352

.6Pr

ogre

ssion

Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Inc

reme

ntal D

elay,

d210

5.71.8

52.0

6.512

.10.0

6.40.4

Delay

(s)

164.3

30.0

110.4

37.7

48.1

27.3

60.7

53.0

Leve

l of S

ervic

eF

CF

DD

CE

DAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)32

.338

.639

.555

.9Ap

proa

ch LO

SC

DD

E

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryHC

M 20

00 C

ontro

l Dela

y37

.8HC

M 20

00 Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DHC

M 20

00 V

olume

to C

apac

ity ra

tio0.8

4Ac

tuated

Cyc

le Le

ngth

(s)

118.9

Sum

of los

t time

(s)

16.3

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

83.3%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

eE

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15c

Criti

cal L

ane G

roup

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

ane/

Per

ry L

n5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)1

032

450

509

145

232

526

0Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opFr

eeFr

eeGr

ade

0%0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ho

urly

flow

rate

(vph)

10

3245

050

914

523

252

60

Pede

strian

sLa

ne W

idth (

ft)W

alking

Spe

ed (f

t/s)

Perce

nt Bl

ocka

geRi

ght tu

rn fla

re (v

eh)

Media

n typ

eTW

LTL

TWLT

LMe

dian s

torag

e veh

)2

2Up

strea

m sig

nal (f

t)27

0pX

, plat

oon u

nbloc

ked

vC, c

onflic

ting v

olume

670

716

263

474

704

8452

616

8vC

1, sta

ge 1

conf

vol

530

530

174

174

vC2,

stage

2 co

nf vo

l14

018

629

953

0vC

u, un

block

ed vo

l67

071

626

347

470

484

526

168

tC, s

ingle

(s)7.5

6.56.9

7.56.5

6.94.1

4.1tC

, 2 st

age (

s)6.5

5.56.5

5.5tF

(s)

3.54.0

3.33.5

4.03.3

2.22.2

p0 qu

eue f

ree %

100

100

9692

100

9599

100

cM ca

pacit

y (ve

h/h)

472

491

735

599

487

958

1037

1407

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

SB 3

Volum

e Tota

l33

959

9771

235

117

5Vo

lume L

eft1

459

00

20

0Vo

lume R

ight

3250

00

230

00

cSH

723

746

1037

1700

1700

1407

1700

1700

Volum

e to C

apac

ity0.0

50.1

30.0

10.0

60.0

40.0

00.2

10.1

0Qu

eue L

ength

95th

(ft)

411

10

00

00

Contr

ol De

lay (s

)10

.210

.58.5

0.00.0

7.60.0

0.0La

ne LO

SB

BA

AAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)10

.210

.50.4

0.0Ap

proa

ch LO

SB

B

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 1.7

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

33.4%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

n5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)0

016

260

2629

404

450

253

1Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opFr

eeFr

eeGr

ade

0%0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ho

urly

flow

rate

(vph)

00

1626

026

2940

445

025

31

Pede

strian

sLa

ne W

idth (

ft)W

alking

Spe

ed (f

t/s)

Perce

nt Bl

ocka

geRi

ght tu

rn fla

re (v

eh)

Media

n typ

eTW

LTL

TWLT

LMe

dian s

torag

e veh

)2

2Up

strea

m sig

nal (f

t)27

0pX

, plat

oon u

nbloc

ked

vC, c

onflic

ting v

olume

540

760

127

627

738

224

254

449

vC1,

stage

1 co

nf vo

l25

425

448

448

4vC

2, sta

ge 2

conf

vol

286

507

142

254

vCu,

unblo

cked

vol

540

760

127

627

738

224

254

449

tC, s

ingle

(s)7.5

6.56.9

7.56.5

6.94.1

4.1tC

, 2 st

age (

s)6.5

5.56.5

5.5tF

(s)

3.54.0

3.33.5

4.03.3

2.22.2

p0 qu

eue f

ree %

100

100

9895

100

9798

100

cM ca

pacit

y (ve

h/h)

579

482

900

494

488

779

1308

1108

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

SB 3

Volum

e Tota

l16

5229

269

180

016

985

Volum

e Left

026

290

00

00

Volum

e Righ

t16

260

045

00

1cS

H90

060

413

0817

0017

0017

0017

0017

00Vo

lume t

o Cap

acity

0.02

0.09

0.02

0.16

0.11

0.00

0.10

0.05

Queu

e Len

gth 95

th (ft

)1

72

00

00

0Co

ntrol

Delay

(s)

9.111

.57.8

0.00.0

0.00.0

0.0La

ne LO

SA

BA

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

9.111

.50.5

0.0Ap

proa

ch LO

SA

B

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 1.2

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

35.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

eh11

.4Int

erse

ction

LOS

B

Move

ment

EBU

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBU

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBU

NBL

NBT

NBR

Vol, v

eh/h

039

9262

078

9055

031

9847

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0He

avy V

ehicl

es, %

22

22

22

22

22

22

Mvmt

Flow

039

9262

078

9055

031

9847

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

01

00

01

00

11

1

Appr

oach

EBW

BNB

Oppo

sing A

ppro

ach

WB

EBSB

Oppo

sing L

anes

11

2Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftSB

NBEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Left

23

1Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach R

ight

NBSB

WB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t3

21

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay11

.512

.39.7

HCM

LOS

BB

A

Lane

NBLn

1NB

Ln2

NBLn

3EB

Ln1

WBL

n1SB

Ln1

SBLn

2Vo

l Left

, %10

0%0%

0%20

%35

%10

0%0%

Vol T

hru,

%0%

100%

0%48

%40

%0%

80%

Vol R

ight, %

0%0%

100%

32%

25%

0%20

%Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opTr

affic

Vol b

y Lan

e31

9847

193

223

4318

8LT

Vol

310

039

7843

0Th

roug

h Vol

098

092

900

150

RT V

ol0

047

6255

038

Lane

Flow

Rate

3198

4719

322

343

188

Geom

etry G

rp7

77

77

88

Degr

ee of

Util

(X)

0.058

0.169

0.072

0.319

0.373

0.083

0.327

Depa

rture

Hea

dway

(Hd)

6.708

6.199

5.487

5.948

6.02

6.914

6.259

Conv

erge

nce,

Y/N

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cap

533

577

651

604

598

517

573

Servi

ce T

ime

4.459

3.95

3.237

3.697

3.768

4.668

4.013

HCM

Lane

V/C

Rati

o0.0

580.1

70.0

720.3

20.3

730.0

830.3

28HC

M Co

ntrol

Delay

9.910

.28.7

11.5

12.3

10.3

12HC

M La

ne LO

SA

BA

BB

BB

HCM

95th-

tile Q

0.20.6

0.21.4

1.70.3

1.4

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

eh16

Inter

secti

on LO

SC

Move

ment

EBU

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBU

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBU

NBL

NBT

NBR

Vol, v

eh/h

060

225

490

5518

947

064

152

61Pe

ak H

our F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

22

22

22

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

6022

549

055

189

470

6415

261

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

01

00

01

00

11

1

Appr

oach

EBW

BNB

Oppo

sing A

ppro

ach

WB

EBSB

Oppo

sing L

anes

11

2Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftSB

NBEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Left

23

1Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach R

ight

NBSB

WB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t3

21

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay19

.717

.411

.9HC

M LO

SC

CB

Lane

NBLn

1NB

Ln2

NBLn

3EB

Ln1

WBL

n1SB

Ln1

SBLn

2Vo

l Left

, %10

0%0%

0%18

%19

%10

0%0%

Vol T

hru,

%0%

100%

0%67

%65

%0%

69%

Vol R

ight, %

0%0%

100%

15%

16%

0%31

%Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opSt

opTr

affic

Vol b

y Lan

e64

152

6133

429

145

150

LT V

ol64

00

6055

450

Thro

ugh V

ol0

152

022

518

90

104

RT V

ol0

061

4947

046

Lane

Flow

Rate

6415

261

334

291

4515

0Ge

ometr

y Grp

77

77

78

8De

gree

of U

til (X

)0.1

360.3

010.1

090.6

190.5

460.1

030.3

13De

partu

re H

eadw

ay (H

d)7.6

487.1

356.4

156.6

756.7

548.2

57.5

1Co

nver

genc

e, Y/

NYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sCa

p46

850

355

854

153

543

447

9Se

rvice

Tim

e5.3

954.8

814.1

614.4

144.4

956.0

025.2

61HC

M La

ne V

/C R

atio

0.137

0.302

0.109

0.617

0.544

0.104

0.313

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay11

.612

.99.9

19.7

17.4

1213

.7HC

M La

ne LO

SB

BA

CC

BB

HCM

95th-

tile Q

0.51.3

0.44.2

3.30.3

1.3

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture A

M Pe

ak H

our -

plus

Pro

ject

W-T

rans

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

ehInt

erse

ction

LOS

Move

ment

SBU

SBL

SBT

SBR

Vol, v

eh/h

043

150

38Pe

ak H

our F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

4315

038

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

11

0

Appr

oach

SBOp

posin

g App

roac

hNB

Oppo

sing L

anes

3Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftW

BCo

nflict

ing La

nes L

eft1

Confl

icting

App

roac

h Righ

tEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t1

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay11

.7HC

M LO

SB

Lane

HC

M 2

010

AW

SC

10: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

St.

Fran

cis

Dr

5/22/2

015

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our p

lus P

rojec

tW

-Tra

ns

Inter

secti

onInt

erse

ction

Dela

y, s/v

ehInt

erse

ction

LOS

Move

ment

SBU

SBL

SBT

SBR

Vol, v

eh/h

045

104

46Pe

ak H

our F

actor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Heav

y Veh

icles

, %2

22

2Mv

mt F

low0

4510

446

Numb

er of

Lane

s0

11

0

Appr

oach

SBOp

posin

g App

roac

hNB

Oppo

sing L

anes

3Co

nflict

ing A

ppro

ach L

eftW

BCo

nflict

ing La

nes L

eft1

Confl

icting

App

roac

h Righ

tEB

Confl

icting

Lane

s Righ

t1

HCM

Contr

ol De

lay13

.3HC

M LO

SB

Lane

MO

VEM

ENT

SUM

MA

RYSi

te:S

McD

owel

l Bl &

Bay

woo

d D

r (A

M F

utur

e pl

us P

roje

ct)

AM

Pea

k H

our

Futu

re p

lus

Pro

ject

Con

ditio

nsR

ound

abou

t

Mov

emen

t Per

form

ance

-Ve

hicl

esD

eman

d Fl

ows

95%

Bac

k of

Que

ueM

ov IDO

DM

ovD

eg.

Satn

Aver

age

Del

ay

Leve

l of

Serv

ice

Prop

. Q

ueue

dEf

fect

ive

Stop

Rat

eAv

erag

eSp

eed

To

tal

HV

Vehi

cles

Dis

tanc

eve

h/h

%v/

cse

cve

hft

per v

ehm

phSo

uth:

NB

Bay

woo

d D

r3

L210

92.

00.

401

12.1

LOS

B1.

948

.80.

740.

8022

.88

T163

2.0

0.40

112

.1LO

S B

1.9

48.8

0.74

0.80

22.4

18R

264

2.0

0.40

112

.1LO

S B

1.9

48.8

0.74

0.80

21.8

Appr

oach

236

2.0

0.40

112

.1LO

S B

1.9

48.8

0.74

0.80

22.4

East

: WB

S M

cDow

ell B

l1

L229

2.0

0.74

215

.3LO

S B

8.9

226.

80.

790.

6428

.36

T180

62.

00.

742

15.3

LOS

B8.

922

6.8

0.79

0.64

28.1

16R

217

2.0

0.74

215

.3LO

S B

8.9

226.

80.

790.

6427

.4Ap

proa

ch85

22.

00.

742

15.3

LOS

B8.

922

6.8

0.79

0.64

28.1

Nor

th: S

B B

ayw

ood

Dr

7L2

352.

00.

416

13.4

LOS

B2.

050

.30.

750.

8322

.84

T111

92.

00.

416

13.4

LOS

B2.

050

.30.

750.

8322

.414

R2

702.

00.

416

13.4

LOS

B2.

050

.30.

750.

8321

.9Ap

proa

ch22

42.

00.

416

13.4

LOS

B2.

050

.30.

750.

8322

.3

Wes

t: E

B S

McD

owel

l Bl

5L2

282.

00.

766

16.2

LOS

B10

.025

2.8

0.81

0.64

28.0

2T1

791

2.0

0.76

616

.2LO

S B

10.0

252.

80.

810.

6427

.812

R2

762.

00.

766

16.2

LOS

B10

.025

2.8

0.81

0.64

27.1

Appr

oach

895

2.0

0.76

616

.2LO

S B

10.0

252.

80.

810.

6427

.7

All V

ehic

les

2207

2.0

0.76

615

.1LO

S B

10.0

252.

80.

790.

6726

.5

Leve

l of S

ervi

ce (L

OS)

Met

hod:

Del

ay &

v/c

(HC

M 2

010)

. R

ound

abou

t LO

S M

etho

d: S

ame

as S

igna

lised

Inte

rsec

tions

.Ve

hicl

e m

ovem

ent L

OS

val

ues

are

base

d on

ave

rage

del

ay a

nd v

/c ra

tio (d

egre

e of

sat

urat

ion)

per

mov

emen

tLO

S F

will

resu

lt if

v/c

> 1

irres

pect

ive

of m

ovem

ent d

elay

val

ue (d

oes

not a

pply

for a

ppro

ache

s an

d in

ters

ectio

n).

Inte

rsec

tion

and

Appr

oach

LO

S va

lues

are

bas

ed o

n av

erag

e de

lay

for a

ll m

ovem

ents

(v/c

not

use

d as

spe

cifie

d in

HC

M 2

010)

.R

ound

abou

t Cap

acity

Mod

el: U

S H

CM

201

0.H

CM

Del

ay F

orm

ula

optio

n is

use

d. C

ontro

l Del

ay d

oes

not i

nclu

de G

eom

etric

Del

ay s

ince

Exc

lude

Geo

met

ric D

elay

opt

ion

appl

ies.

Gap

-Acc

epta

nce

Cap

acity

: Tra

ditio

nal M

1.H

V (%

) val

ues

are

calc

ulat

ed fo

r All

Mov

emen

t Cla

sses

of A

ll H

eavy

Veh

icle

Mod

el D

esig

natio

n.

Pro

cess

ed: F

riday

, May

22,

201

5 2:

17:4

1 P

MS

IDR

A IN

TER

SEC

TIO

N 6

.0.2

4.48

77C

opyr

ight

© 2

000-

2014

Akc

elik

and

Ass

ocia

tes

Pty

Ltd

ww

w.s

idra

solu

tions

.com

Pro

ject

: N

:\AAA

\SO

X\PE

T\19

1PET

\SID

RA\

Bayw

ood-

McD

owel

l.sip

680

0049

3, 6

0191

58, W

-TR

ANS

, PLU

S /

Floa

ting

MO

VEM

ENT

SUM

MA

RYSi

te:S

McD

owel

l Bl &

Bay

woo

d D

r (PM

Fut

ure

plus

Pro

ject

)P

M P

eak

Hou

rFu

ture

plu

s P

roje

ct C

ondi

tions

Rou

ndab

out

Mov

emen

t Per

form

ance

-Ve

hicl

esD

eman

d Fl

ows

95%

Bac

k of

Que

ueM

ov IDO

DM

ovD

eg.

Satn

Aver

age

Del

ay

Leve

l of

Serv

ice

Prop

. Q

ueue

dEf

fect

ive

Stop

Rat

eAv

erag

eSp

eed

To

tal

HV

Vehi

cles

Dis

tanc

eve

h/h

%v/

cse

cve

hft

per v

ehm

phSo

uth:

NB

Bay

woo

d D

r3

L278

2.0

0.47

416

.6LO

S B

2.3

58.4

0.79

0.90

22.0

8T1

105

2.0

0.47

416

.6LO

S B

2.3

58.4

0.79

0.90

21.6

18R

241

2.0

0.47

416

.6LO

S B

2.3

58.4

0.79

0.90

21.1

Appr

oach

224

2.0

0.47

416

.6LO

S B

2.3

58.4

0.79

0.90

21.6

East

: WB

S M

cDow

ell B

l1

L256

2.0

1.00

949

.5LO

S F

40.4

1025

.81.

001.

6019

.96

T199

92.

01.

009

49.5

LOS

F40

.410

25.8

1.00

1.60

19.8

16R

228

2.0

1.00

949

.5LO

S F

40.4

1025

.81.

001.

6019

.4Ap

proa

ch10

832.

01.

009

49.5

LOS

D40

.410

25.8

1.00

1.60

19.8

Nor

th: S

B B

ayw

ood

Dr

7L2

212.

00.

274

12.4

LOS

B1.

127

.10.

750.

7623

.04

T152

2.0

0.27

412

.4LO

S B

1.1

27.1

0.75

0.76

22.6

14R

250

2.0

0.27

412

.4LO

S B

1.1

27.1

0.75

0.76

22.0

Appr

oach

123

2.0

0.27

412

.4LO

S B

1.1

27.1

0.75

0.76

22.4

Wes

t: E

B S

McD

owel

l Bl

5L2

832.

00.

978

38.9

LOS

D38

.798

3.5

1.00

0.90

21.8

2T1

968

2.0

0.97

838

.9LO

S D

38.7

983.

51.

000.

9021

.712

R2

156

2.0

0.97

838

.9LO

S D

38.7

983.

51.

000.

9021

.3Ap

proa

ch12

072.

00.

978

38.9

LOS

D38

.798

3.5

1.00

0.90

21.7

All V

ehic

les

2637

2.0

1.00

940

.1LO

S D

40.4

1025

.80.

971.

1820

.9

Leve

l of S

ervi

ce (L

OS)

Met

hod:

Del

ay &

v/c

(HC

M 2

010)

. R

ound

abou

t LO

S M

etho

d: S

ame

as S

igna

lised

Inte

rsec

tions

.Ve

hicl

e m

ovem

ent L

OS

val

ues

are

base

d on

ave

rage

del

ay a

nd v

/c ra

tio (d

egre

e of

sat

urat

ion)

per

mov

emen

tLO

S F

will

resu

lt if

v/c

> 1

irres

pect

ive

of m

ovem

ent d

elay

val

ue (d

oes

not a

pply

for a

ppro

ache

s an

d in

ters

ectio

n).

Inte

rsec

tion

and

Appr

oach

LO

S va

lues

are

bas

ed o

n av

erag

e de

lay

for a

ll m

ovem

ents

(v/c

not

use

d as

spe

cifie

d in

HC

M 2

010)

.R

ound

abou

t Cap

acity

Mod

el: U

S H

CM

201

0.H

CM

Del

ay F

orm

ula

optio

n is

use

d. C

ontro

l Del

ay d

oes

not i

nclu

de G

eom

etric

Del

ay s

ince

Exc

lude

Geo

met

ric D

elay

opt

ion

appl

ies.

Gap

-Acc

epta

nce

Cap

acity

: Tra

ditio

nal M

1.H

V (%

) val

ues

are

calc

ulat

ed fo

r All

Mov

emen

t Cla

sses

of A

ll H

eavy

Veh

icle

Mod

el D

esig

natio

n.

Pro

cess

ed: F

riday

, May

22,

201

5 2:

17:4

4 P

MS

IDR

A IN

TER

SEC

TIO

N 6

.0.2

4.48

77C

opyr

ight

© 2

000-

2014

Akc

elik

and

Ass

ocia

tes

Pty

Ltd

ww

w.s

idra

solu

tions

.com

Pro

ject

: N

:\AAA

\SO

X\PE

T\19

1PET

\SID

RA\

Bayw

ood-

McD

owel

l.sip

680

0049

3, 6

0191

58, W

-TR

ANS

, PLU

S /

Floa

ting

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

n5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Apa

rtmen

ts Tr

affic

Impa

ct St

udy

Futur

e AM

Peak

Hou

r with

Roa

d Diet

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)0

02

470

532

145

242

521

0Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opFr

eeFr

eeGr

ade

0%0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ho

urly

flow

rate

(vph)

00

247

053

214

524

252

10

Pede

strian

sLa

ne W

idth (

ft)W

alking

Spe

ed (f

t/s)

Perce

nt Bl

ocka

geRi

ght tu

rn fla

re (v

eh)

Media

n typ

eTW

LTL

TWLT

LMe

dian s

torag

e veh

)2

2Up

strea

m sig

nal (f

t)27

0pX

, plat

oon u

nbloc

ked

vC, c

onflic

ting v

olume

654

698

521

688

686

8452

116

9vC

1, sta

ge 1

conf

vol

525

525

161

161

vC2,

stage

2 co

nf vo

l13

017

352

752

5vC

u, un

block

ed vo

l65

469

852

168

868

684

521

169

tC, s

ingle

(s)7.5

6.56.9

7.56.5

6.94.1

4.1tC

, 2 st

age (

s)6.5

5.56.5

5.5tF

(s)

3.54.0

3.33.5

4.03.3

2.22.2

p0 qu

eue f

ree %

100

100

100

9010

094

100

100

cM ca

pacit

y (ve

h/h)

477

496

500

473

497

958

1041

1406

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

Volum

e Tota

l2

100

297

722

521

Volum

e Left

047

20

02

0Vo

lume R

ight

253

00

240

0cS

H50

064

610

4117

0017

0014

0617

00Vo

lume t

o Cap

acity

0.00

0.15

0.00

0.06

0.04

0.00

0.31

Queu

e Len

gth 95

th (ft

)0

140

00

00

Contr

ol De

lay (s

)12

.211

.68.5

0.00.0

7.60.0

Lane

LOS

BB

AA

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

12.2

11.6

0.10.0

Appr

oach

LOS

BB

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 1.5

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

46.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

n5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Fu

ture P

M Pe

ak H

our w

ith R

oad D

ietW

-Tra

ns

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)0

00

270

270

394

470

249

0Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opFr

eeFr

eeGr

ade

0%0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ho

urly

flow

rate

(vph)

00

027

027

039

447

024

90

Pede

strian

sLa

ne W

idth (

ft)W

alking

Spe

ed (f

t/s)

Perce

nt Bl

ocka

geRi

ght tu

rn fla

re (v

eh)

Media

n typ

eTW

LTL

TWLT

LMe

dian s

torag

e veh

)2

2Up

strea

m sig

nal (f

t)27

0pX

, plat

oon u

nbloc

ked

vC, c

onflic

ting v

olume

473

690

249

666

666

220

249

441

vC1,

stage

1 co

nf vo

l24

924

941

841

8vC

2, sta

ge 2

conf

vol

224

441

249

249

vCu,

unblo

cked

vol

473

690

249

666

666

220

249

441

tC, s

ingle

(s)7.5

6.56.9

7.56.5

6.94.1

4.1tC

, 2 st

age (

s)6.5

5.56.5

5.5tF

(s)

3.54.0

3.33.5

4.03.3

2.22.2

p0 qu

eue f

ree %

100

100

100

9510

097

100

100

cM ca

pacit

y (ve

h/h)

626

522

751

525

533

783

1314

1115

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

Volum

e Tota

l0

540

263

178

024

9Vo

lume L

eft0

270

00

00

Volum

e Righ

t0

270

047

00

cSH

1700

629

1700

1700

1700

1700

1700

Volum

e to C

apac

ity0.0

00.0

90.0

00.1

50.1

00.0

00.1

5Qu

eue L

ength

95th

(ft)

07

00

00

0Co

ntrol

Delay

(s)

0.011

.30.0

0.00.0

0.00.0

Lane

LOS

AB

Appr

oach

Dela

y (s)

0.011

.30.0

0.0Ap

proa

ch LO

SA

B

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 0.8

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

23.1%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

ane/

Per

ry L

n5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Futu

re

AM P

eak H

our p

lus P

rojec

t with

Roa

d Diet

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)1

032

450

509

145

232

526

0Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opFr

eeFr

eeGr

ade

0%0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ho

urly

flow

rate

(vph)

10

3245

050

914

523

252

60

Pede

strian

sLa

ne W

idth (

ft)W

alking

Spe

ed (f

t/s)

Perce

nt Bl

ocka

geRi

ght tu

rn fla

re (v

eh)

Media

n typ

eTW

LTL

TWLT

LMe

dian s

torag

e veh

)2

2Up

strea

m sig

nal (f

t)27

0pX

, plat

oon u

nbloc

ked

vC, c

onflic

ting v

olume

670

716

526

736

704

8452

616

8vC

1, sta

ge 1

conf

vol

530

530

174

174

vC2,

stage

2 co

nf vo

l14

018

656

253

0vC

u, un

block

ed vo

l67

071

652

673

670

484

526

168

tC, s

ingle

(s)7.5

6.56.9

7.56.5

6.94.1

4.1tC

, 2 st

age (

s)6.5

5.56.5

5.5tF

(s)

3.54.0

3.33.5

4.03.3

2.22.2

p0 qu

eue f

ree %

100

100

9489

100

9599

100

cM ca

pacit

y (ve

h/h)

472

491

496

418

487

958

1037

1407

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

Volum

e Tota

l33

959

9771

252

6Vo

lume L

eft1

459

00

20

Volum

e Righ

t32

500

023

00

cSH

496

595

1037

1700

1700

1407

1700

Volum

e to C

apac

ity0.0

70.1

60.0

10.0

60.0

40.0

00.3

1Qu

eue L

ength

95th

(ft)

514

10

00

0Co

ntrol

Delay

(s)

12.8

12.2

8.50.0

0.07.6

0.0La

ne LO

SB

BA

AAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)12

.812

.20.4

0.0Ap

proa

ch LO

SB

B

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 2.0

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

46.6%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

HC

M U

nsig

naliz

ed In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity A

naly

sis

9: B

ayw

ood

Dr &

Per

ry L

n5/2

2/201

5

Sync

hro 8

Rep

ort

Altur

a Ap

artm

ents

Traff

ic Im

pact

Stud

y Futu

re

PM P

eak H

our p

lus P

rojec

t with

Roa

d Diet

W-T

rans

Move

ment

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

Lane

Con

figur

ation

sVo

lume (

veh/h

)0

016

260

2629

404

450

253

1Si

gn C

ontro

lSt

opSt

opFr

eeFr

eeGr

ade

0%0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor1.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

01.0

0Ho

urly

flow

rate

(vph)

00

1626

026

2940

445

025

31

Pede

strian

sLa

ne W

idth (

ft)W

alking

Spe

ed (f

t/s)

Perce

nt Bl

ocka

geRi

ght tu

rn fla

re (v

eh)

Media

n typ

eTW

LTL

TWLT

LMe

dian s

torag

e veh

)2

2Up

strea

m sig

nal (f

t)27

0pX

, plat

oon u

nbloc

ked

vC, c

onflic

ting v

olume

540

760

254

754

738

224

254

449

vC1,

stage

1 co

nf vo

l25

425

448

448

4vC

2, sta

ge 2

conf

vol

286

507

269

254

vCu,

unblo

cked

vol

540

760

254

754

738

224

254

449

tC, s

ingle

(s)7.5

6.56.9

7.56.5

6.94.1

4.1tC

, 2 st

age (

s)6.5

5.56.5

5.5tF

(s)

3.54.0

3.33.5

4.03.3

2.22.2

p0 qu

eue f

ree %

100

100

9894

100

9798

100

cM ca

pacit

y (ve

h/h)

579

482

746

465

488

779

1308

1108

Dire

ction

, Lan

e #EB

1W

B 1

NB 1

NB 2

NB 3

SB 1

SB 2

Volum

e Tota

l16

5229

269

180

025

4Vo

lume L

eft0

2629

00

00

Volum

e Righ

t16

260

045

01

cSH

746

583

1308

1700

1700

1700

1700

Volum

e to C

apac

ity0.0

20.0

90.0

20.1

60.1

10.0

00.1

5Qu

eue L

ength

95th

(ft)

27

20

00

0Co

ntrol

Delay

(s)

9.911

.87.8

0.00.0

0.00.0

Lane

LOS

AB

AAp

proa

ch D

elay (

s)9.9

11.8

0.50.0

Appr

oach

LOS

AB

Inter

secti

on S

umma

ryAv

erag

e Dela

y 1.2

Inter

secti

on C

apac

ity U

tiliza

tion

36.4%

ICU

Leve

l of S

ervic

e A

Analy

sis P

eriod

(min)

15

Documents

Traffic Impact Study for the Altura Apartments - Petalumacityofpetaluma.net/cdd/pdf/temp/F_TrafficImpactStudy.pdf · Traffic Impact Study for the Altura Apartments in the City of