Upload
duane-greene
View
228
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TPC status
Marian Ivanov
Outlook
TPC performance ExB correction Alignment Nonlinearities and edge effects Drift velocity calibration
TPC - report June (2008)
TPC - DCA resolution
TPC resolution for fully
aligned and calibrated TPC
The systematic effect Dash line – full
miscalibration Full line Day 0
Expected Day 0 mis-
calibration on the level
comparable to intrinsic TPC
resolution up to 3 GeV
Day 0: z ~ 1mm
y ~ 0.3 mm
Full mis-calibration z ~ 5 cm
y ~ 3 mm
TPC - DCA resolution - rphi - Cosmic
TPC local y resolution for aligned
and calibrated TPC Status – 09.09.08 Rectangle A side, triangle C side
Sigma – fitter sigma of residuals
between tracks from upper part and
lover part In case the error uncorrelated to
be divided by sqrt(2.)
Systematic effects estimate A side +-0.1 cm C side +-0.3 cm
TPC - DCA resolution - z - Cosmic
TPC local z resolution for aligned
and calibrated TPC Status – 09.09.08 Rectangle A side, triangle C
side
Sigma – fitter sigma of residuals
between tracks from upper part
and lover part In case the error uncorrelated
to be divided by sqrt(2.)
Tracks crossing CE ~ 0.3 cm
TPC - curvature resolution
Day 0: C ~ 0.001 1/GeV
Full mis-calibration C ~ 0.01 (1/GeV) TPC resolution for fully
aligned and calibrated TPC
The systematic effect Dash line – full
miscalibration (mainly
ExB) Full line Day 0
Expected Day 0 mis-
calibration on the level order
of magnitude bellow intrinsic
resolution
TPC – 1/pt resolution - Cosmic
TPC 1/pt resolution for aligned
and calibrated TPC Status – 09.09.08 Rectangle A side, triangle C
side
Sigma – fitter sigma of residuals
between tracks from upper part
and lover part In case the error uncorrelated
to be divided by sqrt(2.)
Laser beam 1-3-3-3 example
Delta rfi and delta fi (direction vector) as function of the magnetic field
The interpolated value to field 0 – removed later from
the ExB global fit – assumed misalignment error
ExB correction – Taylor expansion
Left side - ExB correction – Taylor expansion Ltr.fP[1]/250 – normalized z position – (z^3-1) and (z-1) Ltr.fP[2] – local inclination angle – sin(fi) and cos(fi) bz – magnetic field
Different color for different fi laser positions
ExB correction
Left side - ExB correction versus measurement
Right side – residuals
Implemented ExB correction map – good agreement of correction factor
for symmetrized magnetic field map (after adjustment of omega-tau
factor)
Alignment and Non-linearities
Alignment coefficients Study of the cosmic production
5000000 events with magnetic field 5T
Y, Z misalignment on the level of 150-200 microns Correction for un-linearities necessary
Combine with Central electron plane study Combine with laser tracks
Alignment - y
Residuals between tracklets from inner and outer sectors
sigma ~ 150 microns – shift ~ 260 microns
Alignment - z
Residuals between tracklets from inner and outer sectors sigma ~ 220 microns – shift ~ 0.5 mm (distance to wire)
Alignment - phi
Residuals between tracklets from inner and outer sectors sigma ~ 0.38 mrad – shift ~ 0.2 mrad
Alignment - theta
Residuals between tracklets from inner and outer sectors sigma ~ 0.7 mrad – shift ~ 0.7 mrad
Laser scan – Non-linearities and Edge effect
Laser beams emitted from
the sector boundaries in
OROC to sector
boundaries in IROC ==> Difficult to disentangle
edge effect in r (local x)
and in r-phi )local y Work in progress
Non-linearities study using laser tracks - Parameters to monitor
The fitted curvature – global effect – (Parabola fit) Edge effect
Non-linearities - Gate/skirt voltage scan – Tuning of operational conditions
The step +-20 V, drift voltage (400 V/cm)=>Effective shift 0.05cm – comparable to missalignemnt
Edge effect -Outer sectors
Residuals between clusters y position and the linear extrapolation as function of the distance to the chamber edge Left (50 V setting) – Right (90 V setting)
Edge gain calibration / results
Fit function: f(x) = 1 - exp(-[0]*(x-[1]))
Edge effect - Inner sectors
Residuals between clusters y position and the linear extrapolation as function of the distance to the chamber edge Left (50 V setting) – Right (90 V setting)
Parabolic term Y – Nominal voltage (70 V GG)
Parabolic distortion from ideal line ~ 300 microns The track position resolution ~ 150 microns for infinite pt tracks
Inclination angle dependent
dY (cm)
Parabolic term Z – Nominal voltage (70 V GG)
Parabolic distortion form ideal line ~ 300 microns Inclination angle dependent
dZ (cm)
dZ (cm):z (cm)
Z position calibration,Drift velocity and
alignment
Drift velocity – calibration strategy Options:
Goofie calibration + DCS values (T, P) - (ONLINE) Time dependence (Goofie) - to be corrected for the T and P at
TPC Space dependence DCS values (T,P) – linear fit Relative precision 0.05% (1 mm at vertex)
Laser Central electrode - (ONLINE) Space and time dependence of drift velocity Relative precision ~ 0.01 cm/250cm ~ 0.004 %
Calibration using tracks – (OFFLINE) Track crossing central electrode Reconstructed primary vertex position using the tracks from A
and C side of the TPC Relative precision ~ 2 mm / sqrt(Nevents)
Drift calibration using laser tracks
Histogram of the fitted correction parameters – Delta z offset, and the drift velocity correction
Drift calibration using laser tracks - stability
Graph of the fitted correction parameters – Delta z offset, and the drift velocity correction
For some runs offset splitted by (shift by +- 0.5 time bin) – Similar effect in CE studiies
Drift calibration using laser tracks
Histogram of the fitted correction parameters – global y correction up-middle at CE position
Drift calibration - P/T
The drift velocity depends in gas density N/V ~ P/T The relative change of the P ~ 2 %, in temperature ~
0.1 K /293 K ~ 10^-4
Drift calibration - P/T resolution
Relative resolution ~ 10^-5 – 10^-4 => 250 microns
Day-night variation (TOF switching ON/OFF) Depends
Drift correction Laser - P/T correction
The drift velocity correction as function of time The drift velocity correction versus P/T relative
change
Drift correction Cosmic - P/T correction
The delta Z (cm) (A-C side) form cosmic as function of time
Red color – SPD trigger, Black – ACORDE
Delta z as function of the normalized P/T
Drift velocity - Open points
The time 0 offset – trigger dependent The current implementation – only one L1 delay Array of L1 delays (for trigger types) to be added
P/T correction ~ 200-300 microns precision The gas composition change in time
Information from the GOOFIE not (yet) reliable Necessary to refit the v drift versus P/T run by run
(optimally only offset) Vd ~ Vdnom*corr(P/T)*corr(GC)
ROC temperatures
Skirt temperatures
Drift calibration - CE
CE arrival time (in mm) as function of the global y Smaller effect as before – Smaller temperature gradient Some non-linearities visible
Drift calibration - CE
CE arrival time (in mm) as function of the global lx (after global y subtraction)
Drift calibration - CE
CE arrival time (in mm) as function of the pad phi position (after global y and local x subtraction)
Used as time 0 correction – z alignment in the current reconstruction
- the status of overlaps in the case of ideal, residual and full
misalignment ; - the status of survey, in particular the availability of alignment objects
generated from survey and if they have been tested (e.g. they are reliable
enough to be loaded into the OCDB for official use) ... and concerning
this I think you have only the alignment for the full TPC, which has
already been loaded into OCDBs.