Trabajo Prctico 1

Karin ElgieserTP1

Trabajo Prctico 1Taller de Herramientas Informticas

IESLV JR FernndezKarin ElgieserAbril 2015

Cannibal ex-policeman is jailed for just eight years for killing and cutting up a WILLING victim he met on an internet site in GermanyDetlef Guenzel sliced Polish-born Wojciech Stempniewicz into small pieces. Video reportedly shows him strangling victim using a rope tied to a pulley. Defence argued victim could have stopped strangulation if he wanted to. Guenzel then buried the body parts in the garden of his bed and breakfast. Prosecutors sought lower sentence because Stempniewicz wanted to die.By SIMON TOMLINSON FOR MAILONLINEPUBLISHED: 11:06 GMT, 1 April 2015 | UPDATED: 16:01 GMT, 1 April 2015

A German former police officer who dismembered a willing victim he met on a website for cannibal fetishists was today sentenced to eight years and six months in prison.Detlef Guenzel chopped Polish-born Wojciech Stempniewicz into small pieces while listening to pop music before burying them in the garden of his home in Hartmannsdorf-Reichenau in 2013.'He was found guilty of murder and disturbing the peace of the dead,' said presiding judge Birgit Wiegand at the regional court in the eastern city of Dresden. State attorneys had sought 10 and a half years in prison for the defendant, a trim, soft-spoken father of three whom neighbours described as friendly, generous and unfailingly polite.Lawyers representing the family of Stempniewicz, 59, had requested a 15-year sentence, usually the maximum in a murder case.But prosecutors said they stopped short of this demand because Stempniewicz said he wanted to die.

Macabre: Former German police officer Detlev Guenzel smirks in court before being sentenced to eight years and six months in jail for killing a willing victim he met on a website for cannibalism fetishists

Deranged: Guenzel, 57, went on trial in August over the killing of Polish-born business consultant Wojciech Stempniewicz whose body he had cut into small pieces and buried them in his garden.The defendant sat impassively with arms folded as the verdict was read out. The men came across each other in October 2013 on a website for slaughter and cannibalism fantasies billed as the '#1 site for exotic meat' and boasting more than 3,000 registered members. The two kept in contact via email, text message and telephone before finally arranging the fatal date for November 4 that year.Gunezel picked Stempniewicz up at Dresden's main railway station and drove him back to his house in Hartmannsdorf-Reichenau which he ran as a bed and breakfast with his male partner. Prosecutors said Gunezel then took his victim to the basement where he strangled him using a rope tied to a pulley before chopping the corpse up into small pieces.A video reportedly shows Guenzel in his underwear slicing the naked body of his victim into pieces while it hangs from a hook.The back garden of Guenzel's home in Hartmannsdorf-Reichenau where the body parts were buried in 2013Described as 'absolutely horrific' and 'beyond belief' by lawyers, the 50-minute tape features Guenzel dismembering the corpse while pop music plays. At one point he stops to listen for a heartbeat before continuing. However the defence team argue that the video shows Stempniewicz had his feet in constant contact with the ground, meaning he could have stopped the strangulation if he had wanted to. They claimed the video, which was shown to judges behind closed doors, proves the victim hanged himself. Gunezel then spent a total of four hours cutting the body up with a knife and saw, before burying it in shallow holes the garden.Policemen search for evidences in the area where body parts were found in Reichenau near Dresden in 2013Officers traced him via computer messages and telephone calls and he was arrested at the police HQ where he worked as a handwriting specialist.When police arrived at the property he showed them where the pieces were buried, but officers say the victim's penis has never been found.The case mirrors that of Armin Meiwes, a man found guilty of killing, dismembering and eating computer technician Bernd Brandes at his remote farmhouse home near Kassel.Meiwes, now serving life imprisonment, packaged the flesh of his 16-stone victim into neat parcels which he froze and ate portions of over a ten month period.When police finally arrived to arrest him there was less than 40lbs of Brandes remaining.Laughing to the cameras Detlef after his arrestRead more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3021258/Former-German-police-officer-chopped-willing-victim-listening-pop-music-meeting-cannibal-fetish-website-jailed-eight-years.html#ixzz3W69Qv3lf British couple celebrate winning second 1m EuroMillions prizeDavid and Kathleen Long scoop their second million in as many years, plus a luxury car, and say they always believed they would do it againHelen Pidd Northern editorWednesday 1 April 2015 16.58 BST Last modified on Wednesday 1 April 2015 19.02 BST

Winning the lottery is often thought to be a life-changing experience. But little altered for David and Kath Long from Scunthorpe when David won 1m on the EuroMillions almost two years ago. Were not extravagant people, said former lorry driver David, 59. We still live in a mobile home, believe it or not. Weve done it up nice, mind weve extended it, put in a modern kitchen and added a conservatory.They were in no rush to move, though they recently had an offer accepted on a two-bedroom house up the road. They may never move in after David beat odds of more than 283bn to one to scoop a second 1m prize on the EuroMillions lottery last Friday. I want somewhere bigger now, he said. Weve seen a four-bed advertised that looks nice, said Kath, 63, a retired pub landlady.The down-to-earth couple were giving interviews on Wednesday from the Mallard, the Scunthorpe pub where David has spent a chunk of the million he won in July 2013. He can usually be seen propping up the bar with a pint of bitter, but was swigging champagne on Wednesday. I could get used to this, he said cheerily, several glasses in. We havent been living the champagne lifestyle, but maybe well start now. Nonsense, said one of Kaths daughters: Youll be back on the John Smiths tonight.After the first win, the Longs finally had the money to get married after a 12-year engagement David had proposed drunk one night in the Mallard. Kath had her hen do in Ibiza. David had his stag night in the Mallard.The wedding wasnt too fancy, Kath said. They spent 12,000 on it, hardly outrageous by modern standards. One of her daughters did the table decorations and slipped a lottery ticket into each napkin. None of the guests were as lucky as the groom. Asked how it felt to be married to the luckiest man in Britain, Kath said simply: Good, int it?David almost missed his first win, back in July 2013, when he misread his numbers and thought hed only won 2.70. He threw the ticket in the bin, only fishing it out on a whim when he decided to go to the shop to buy a paper. By the time Id got to the shop I realised it was worth a heck of a lot more, he said. Last Friday he played again and won another million, plus a luxury car.He insisted he didnt feel guilty about doing the double. Not at all, he said. Theres no guilty feeling at all. I always believed I would do it again. He didnt play every week, he said, but always knew he would strike it lucky twice. I always had a feeling it was going to be me. I tend to play when I know there are a lot of prizes on the go.After his first win, David learned money cannot buy you everything. He was able to pack in his job driving trucks but has suffered with persistent health problems resulting from an old industrial accident involving steel beams. And what he wanted he couldnt get: a Liverpool season ticket.He will try again to secure a regular seat at Anfield, he said, and would stump up cash for the honeymoon he and Kath never had. She spent his lottery winnings on various exotic holidays with the girls, including a trip to Cuba, but the couple couldnt agree on a honeymoon destination because David doesnt like flying. Ive tried it twice and I dont like it, David said. Kath would love me to book a Mediterranean cruise and I think I have run out of excuses.Asked whether riches brought happiness, he paused. Its got to, ant it? he said in broad North Lincolnshire. But he admitted he had struggled since the win. I think its the fact hes got nothing to get up for in the morning, Kath added. Helping friends and family has been a joy, the couple said. David has bought his mum, Joan, a static caravan backing on to their own. The 81-year-old retired nurse was in the Mallard on Wednesday for the great reveal, dressed in her Sunday best, along with friends and family who were getting stuck into the cider on Davids tab. Joan said she had been badgering her son to buy her a ticket but he wouldnt. I play every single week and the most Ive ever won is three numbers 25, she said.Her sons luck is not down to choosing the right numbers. Both of Davids wins have come not from numbers he has chosen he has stuck to the same combinations for years but the random EuroMillions Maker draw, a bonus raffle in which a computer generates a combination of three letters and six numbers.Even now, he is not willing to stop playing the lottery. Ill keep on with it, he said. And Ive got a feeling Im going to win again.

If you want to write about feminism online[footnoteRef:2], be ready to take on the haters [2: Post about it on the Internet.]

My years of campaigning against the Suns Page 3 have given me a whole armoury of retorts to fire back at the delightful randoms who take time out of their busy days to call me a mingerWednesday 1 April 2015 17.04 BST Last modified on Wednesday 1 April 2015 18.11 BST

Ah, the internet, simultaneously an exciting tool for creating feminist movements and affecting change, and an introduction agency to the not-so-nice. Yes, we have this terrific space where symbols and symptoms of sexism are brought to their knees by tweeters, bloggers and online petitions, yet anyone who has ever said anything feminist-y online will be aware that they can be left to drown in a murky pool of abuse. Chances are, a range of complete strangers will take time out of their busy days to offer you their viewpoints and suggestions. Heres just a few I run into regularly ...

DIE! LOL! ACK!For a surprising number of people, someone they dont know discussing the issue of female objectification or womens representation in the media will upset them so much they want you to die. Sometimes they even offer to help you. Obviously you dont have to respond at all. If the threat is violent, consider going to the police. But there are other ways of dealing with these armchair death squads. You could offer to help the person by explaining that their response was a bit extreme and that they may, possibly, want to talk to someone about it. Or maybe you could go for a Zen approach along the lines of: We are all of us dying and being reborn in every moment. Zing!

Youre just jealousTroll with it: the net is an introduction agency for the not-so nice.I heard this frequently over my years working on the No More Page 3 campaign and liked to combat it by suggesting an alternative reality. I asked people to imagine that, rather than it being breasts that have been on Page 3 for the past 45 years, News Corp had decided that young, big, hairless scrotums were what its readers wanted to see. Perhaps men would speak up, saying that they wanted them to drop these scrotum pictures. That they wanted their sons to feel they could do anything in the world, and yet when they walked down the street to buy a paper they were grabbed, ogled and shouted at by people who wanted to see a bit more scrotum. In this parallel universe, men had become so worried about the size of their balls that they were using surgery to make them bigger and were insisting that the reason why they were small was because it was cold or that they hadnt finished growing yet. The response? Women and some other men would snort derisively that they were jealous and bitter. See?

Youre a flat-chested mingerYoull be told youre unattractive in a variety of embarrassingly uncreative ways online. For instance, I had years of Youve got shit tits, which isnt entirely true. The irony is that I spent decades being ashamed of my rather fine breasts, which was, in large part, thanks to growing up with Page 3. When youre 11 years old and the men around you talk about the breasts in their newspaper everyday, it shapes the way you see your own. Its particularly damaging given that breasts in the media are of a staggeringly uniform shape and size. I debunked all of this harmful nonsense in my 30s and was finally able to say: I love my boobs! In fact, I started the campaign for partly that reason, only to be swiftly reminded by strangers that they were still shit. You could say something fairly direct and equally loathsome in response slagging off their body, their face, their tiny penis etc but theres something inherently unsatisfying about that. Just say something gnomic, such as We are all one, or reach for the surreal by naming the first town you can think of. Like Swindon.

There are more important issues to worry about"What about the men" being frenziedly typed again. Facebook Twitter Pinterest What about the men being frenziedly typed again. Photograph: Richard Drury/Getty ImagesWhatever it is you campaign about, you will at some point be told that there is another issue, vastly more important, that you should be focusing on. It could be the incipient sexism of womens magazines, which demand perfection and then denounce it in the same breath, FGM or world peace. Most people campaign on a whole range of issues and recognise that concern about one doesnt preclude you from caring about others. But, if you encounter this, you could simply say in passing: Tonight is media sexism night, tomorrow is FGM, Saturday well tackle the pixelated upskirt shots in the Star. But a more effective method is to simply question the strangers own humanitarian work. Try asking them how they organise their own activism, or ask them what issues they focus on and how you can get involved. As a last resort, try observing that once we have empowered and liberated half the population of the world through feminism, imagine what we could achieve globally. Finish by adding a smiley.

What about the men?At some point you will hear a plaintive voice wail: What about the men? They might add that men experience domestic violence and are objectified too. A good question to ask here is: Are you involved in any projects that work to help boys and men? Feminism, as far as I have witnessed, is a lot of women (and men) trying to make life a bit better, safer and kinder for future generations of girls and women, with an additional perk that it also makes life easier for men as well. Yes, there are issues that affect men too, but a movement for men and boys would be more effective working alongside feminism, supporting and gaining strength from it, not setting itself up in opposition.Pgina 9 de 10