Upload
francine-cunningham
View
231
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A Unique Class of Fluoroalkyl Silicones with
Synergistic BehaviorTom Cheung, Bob Ruckle,
Adam Horne, Steve Wilkowski Siltech Corporation; Toronto, Canada
Challenges from Staining, Fouling, Graffiti, Fingerprints, Chemicals....
Silicone Fluoropolymer Low surface energy Very low surface energy
Very good thermal flexibility
Marginal thermal flexibility
Good chemical resistance Very good chemical resistance
Marginal oil resistance-swelling Very good oil resistance
Very good water resistance Good water resistance
Low abrasion resistance Low abrasion resistance
High cost ($10/lb.) Very high cost ($80/lb.)
Effective at low use levels Effective at low use levels
Comparison of Selected Properties of Silicone and Fluoropolymers
Fluoroalkyl Silicone Variants
Silicone
Fluoroalkyl
Organic
By varying the number, length and type of fluoroalkyl and/or organic substituents covalently bound to the silicone we can control properties.
• Silicone provides slip, surface tension reduction, mar resistance, water resistance, flexibility.
• Fluoroalkyl provides these and oleophobicity, stain and chemical resistance.
• Organic provides miscibility.
Soluble Non-PFOS Fluorosilicones
Condensation Reactive Solvent Soluble Water Soluble
Non-Reactive Solvent Soluble
a b c
x
a b c
n
Reactive non-PFOS Fluorosilicones
Condensation Reactive◦ Urethane◦ Epoxy◦ Polyester
UV and Free Radical Reactive◦ Acrylate◦ Vinyl
Condensation Reactive
a b ca b c
Fluoroalkyl Silicone Variantsc b R
FPE >0 >0 (CH2)3(OC2H4)d(OC3H6)e OH
FS 0 >0 None
AFS >0 >0 CnH(2n) R’
AS >0 0 CnH(2n) R’
a b c
Silicone
Wt % Silicone
Wt % CF2
Wt % organic
Reactive Site
MW Type
FPE 2010 L L H OH 3000 fluoroalkyl polyether siliconeFPE 2110 L L H OH 7000
FS D2 M H 0% no 2000 fluoroalkyl siliconeFS J15 H M 0% no 14000
AFS G2-F H L M OH 3000alkyl,
fluoroalkyl silicone
AFS E3.5-F M L L OH 2000
AFS C7-F H L L OH/ACR 2000
AFS H418 M M M no 5000
AS OH C50 VH 0% L OH 12000 alkylsiliconeAS OH J10 H 0% M OH 8000
Comparison Silicones Design
Various silicones are evaluated for slip, COF, defects and mar, stain, and fingerprint and chemical resistance.
The overall design used four systems:◦ SB 2k Urethane◦ UV cured urethane acrylate◦ UV cured epoxy acrylate◦ Commercial flat white paint (post addition)
Experimental Design and Methods:
CoF (sled method)
Gloss (gloss meter)
Fingerprint (internal test method)
Stain (variations on standard and internal test methods)
ASTM D543 (chemical resistance)
ASTM D1308 (chemical resistance)
ASTM D870 (water absorption)
Test Methods Utilized
Gloss: SB Urethane
• FPE are most miscible, improve gloss• AFS type decrease gloss cause
defects
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
Control AFS G2 AFS E3.5 AFS C7AFS C7ACR FPE 2010 FPE 2110
Deg
ree
of G
loss
Fisheyes
Gloss: Urethane Acrylate
• FPE are most miscible, keep gloss• AFS, AS and FS types decrease gloss
020406080
100120
Control FS D2 FS J15 FPE 2010FPE 2110 AFS C7ACR AFS H418
Deg
rees
Defects
Slip: Urethane Acrylate
• All improve COF• AFS C7 is best
Control FS D2 FS J15 FPE 2010
FPE 2110
AFS C7ACR
AFS H418
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5 M/H%SIL/%CF2
H/M L/L H/L M/M
Sta
tic
Kin
etic
Slip: SB Urethane
• All improve COF• AFS C7 structures are best
• ACR better than OH
Control AFS G2 AFS E3.5
AFS C7 AFS C7ACR
FPE 2010
FPE 2110
0.00.30.50.81.01.31.5
Sta
tic
Kin
etic
M/L%SIL/%CF2 M/L H/L L/L
Slip: Post-added to Paint
• All improve COF, more at 5%
• FPEs are very good
Control
1% AFS G2
5% AFS G2
1% AFS E3.5
5% AFS E3.5
1% AFS C7
5% AFS C7
1% AFS H418
5% AFS H418
1% FS D2
5% FS D2
1% FPE 2010
5% FPE 2010
1% FPE 2110
5% FPE 2110
0.500.550.600.650.700.750.800.850.900.95
Sta
tic
Kin
etic
Mar Resist: SB Urethane
• All improve mar resistance• FPE are better than expected
Control
AFS G2
AFS E3.5AFS C7
AFS C7ACR
FPE 2010
FPE 21100%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0
2
4
6
8
10
Glo
ss R
etai
ned
Mar
Res
ist R
ating
Control FS D2 FS J15 FPE 2010
FPE 2110
AFS C7 ACR
AFS H418
0123456789
10Ra
ting
UV Epoxy Acrylate: Mar, Stain, Print
• All are improved over control• The high %CF2 FS D2 is not best
• FPEs are weak on fingerprint• AFS C7 ACR strong on all
Mar
Res
ist
Sta
in R
esis
tF
ing
erp
rin
t R
esis
t
Control FS D2 FS J15 FPE 2010
FPE 2110
AFS C7ACR
AFS H418
0123456789
10Ra
ting
UV Ureth Acryl: Mar, Stain, Print
Mar
Res
ist
Sta
in R
esis
tF
ing
erp
rin
t R
esis
t
• All are improved over control• The high %CF2 FS D2 is not best
• FPEs are weak on fingerprint• AFS C7 ACR strong on all
Control
1% AFS G2
5% AFS G2
1% AFS E3.5
5% AFS E3.5
1% AFS C7
5% AFS C7
1% AFS H418
5% AFS H418
1% FS D2
5% FS D2
1% FPE 2010
5% FPE 2010
1% FPE 2110
5% FPE 2110
0123456789
10
Mar and Stain: Post-added to Paint
• All improve mar resistance/ more at 5%
• Both %CF2 and %Sil help • Lesser improvement in stain/ 5%
better
Mar
Res
ist
Sta
in R
esis
tM/L
%SIL/%CF2
M/L H/L L/LM/HM/M
Control AFS G2 AFS E3.5
AFS C7 AFS C7ACR
FPE 2010
FPE 2110
0123456789
10
Stai
n Re
ist R
ating
Stain Resist: SB Urethane
• AFS C7 structures again perform well
HB
Pen
cil
Bla
ck
Mar
ker
Blu
e P
enci
lB
row
n C
rayo
nB
lac
k C
rayo
n
Stain Resist: Urethane Acrylate
• AFS C7 ACR and FPEs are effective
Control FS D2 FS J15 FPE 2010
FPE 2110
AFS C7ACR
AFS H418
0
2
4
6
8
10St
ain
resi
st R
ating
HB
Pen
cil
Bla
ck
Mar
ker
Blu
e P
enci
lB
row
n C
rayo
nB
lac
k C
rayo
nR
ed P
enci
l
Control FS D2 FS J15 FPE 2010 FPE 2110 AFS C7ACR
AFS H4180123456789
10
Ratin
gStain: UV Epoxy Acrylate
• Highest %CF2 is least effective• AFS C7 ACR and FPEs are effective
HB
Pen
cil
Bla
ck
Mar
ker
Blu
e P
enci
lB
row
n C
rayo
nB
lac
k C
rayo
n
Water Repellency: SB Urethane
AFS C7-2F
AFS D5-2F
AFS C7 ACR
AFS C7
AFS E3
.5
AFS G2
FPE 2
010
FPE 2
110none
AS C50
AS C50 ACR
AS J10
AS C7-0CT
AS D2
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Height/Radius
% CF2
Heig
ht/
Radi
us
% C
F2
• Highest %CF2 is most effective• AS type alone are very effective
Additive (1%) IPA
Vinegar Soap NH4OH HCl
Average
NormalizedRating
AFS E3.5 5 2 3 2 2 2.8 1.0FPE 2110 6 1 4 3 2 3.2 2.0AFS C7 6 4 5 2 3 4 4.0AS C7-OCT 6 2 4 6 4 4.4 5.3FPE 2010 7 3 5 1 6 4.4 5.3AFS G2 8 2 4 5 5 4.8 6.7AS C50 8 3 4 5 5 5 7.3AS C50 ACR 7 7 6 3 2 5 7.3C7-2F 6 5 5 5 4 5 7.3Control 8 4 5 5 4 5.2 8.0AS D2 8 2 7 6 5 5.6 9.3AS J10 7 6 6 6 3 5.6 9.3AFS C7 ACR 8 7 6 5 3 5.8 10.0
Chemical Resistance: SB Urethane
AFS C7 ACR and two AS types gave an improvement here
Summary Chemical: Post add
• AS C50 is best. • AFS C7 and FS D2 are next best• AFS C7 ACR is worst.
AFS C7 ACRAS D2AFS C7-2FAFS H418AFS D2
FPE 2110AS C50 ACR AS C7 OCTAFS E3.5AFS C7
ControlAFS D5-2FFPE 2010AFS G2AS C50
All AFS additives improve COF, mar and stain resistance and to a lesser degree fingerprint.
The FPE type are the most compatible. Surprisingly, they are also among the best for slip and mar resistance, but not for fingerprint resistance.
The very incompatible FA types are not as effective as expected for slip and mar. Formulation should help.
Increasing % CF2 is often not the best in performance.
Low CF2 content AFS structures are usually the best Post-added AFS have little effect on slip and gloss but do
affect mar and stain resistance. Use levels needed were up to 5% and more is usually
better.
Results
Higher use level is better for mar and stain. Best stain results are for waxy stains. Water repellency can be improved with high CF2 or high
silicone content additives. For chemical and water resistance performance varied
more depending on the coating system and use level.
AFS H418 - which has a balance of % Sil, %CF2, & %CH2 - gives a very good balance of properties.
AFS C7-F is often the best for slip, mar and stain resistance. FS J15, AFS H418 and AFS C7 give the best finger print
resistance
Results
Thank You
Fluorosil 2010 and Fluorosil 2110. These are very good for all but fingerprint resistance
Fluorosil ACR C7-F or Fluorosil OH C7-F are best overall including fingerprint resistance. They are not always compatible.
Use levels are up to 5% and more is better in most cases.
Recommendations