Time Line of Events Former RAF Coltishall Eco Town Bid

Time Line of EventsTime Line of Events

Former RAF Coltishall Eco Town BidFormer RAF Coltishall Eco Town Bid

22

Summer 2005Summer 2005 The Government announced through the Ministry of Defence The Government announced through the Ministry of Defence

that no successor military or Government use had been that no successor military or Government use had been identified or proposed for the facility and therefore the base identified or proposed for the facility and therefore the base would be advertised for disposal through Defence Estates. would be advertised for disposal through Defence Estates.

Scottow Farm Estates asks the MOD if the land that was Scottow Farm Estates asks the MOD if the land that was originally compulsory purchased from them, when the RAF originally compulsory purchased from them, when the RAF Station was built, be returned to them for agricultural use once Station was built, be returned to them for agricultural use once more on the closure of RAF Coltishall.more on the closure of RAF Coltishall.

The Government declines to sell the site back to Scottow Farm The Government declines to sell the site back to Scottow Farm Estates.Estates.

33

Early 2006Early 2006

North Norfolk District Council presents a paper ‘Disposal of North Norfolk District Council presents a paper ‘Disposal of RAF Coltishall’ to the RAF Coltishall Task Force, set up to RAF Coltishall’ to the RAF Coltishall Task Force, set up to ensure the site is marketed expediently, and sympathetically ensure the site is marketed expediently, and sympathetically with respect to its location and in consultation with the local with respect to its location and in consultation with the local population.population.

The Task Force was concerned that the site should not be The Task Force was concerned that the site should not be ‘moth balled’ and thus fall into a state of disrepair as had ‘moth balled’ and thus fall into a state of disrepair as had happened in former closed military bases.happened in former closed military bases.

Local communities and businesses had lost economically from Local communities and businesses had lost economically from the closure of the RAF base.the closure of the RAF base.

44

Autumn 2006Autumn 2006

Defence Estates appointed agents Defence Estates appointed agents Drivers Jones Drivers Jones to market to market the site.the site.

Drivers JonesDrivers Jones included a position paper prepared by the included a position paper prepared by the local authorities in the information pack used for potential local authorities in the information pack used for potential bidders. bidders.

55

11stst November 2006 November 2006 The first of viewing dates arranged for prospective bidders The first of viewing dates arranged for prospective bidders

takes placetakes place Further viewing dates are arranged for 16Further viewing dates are arranged for 16thth November, and 6 November, and 6thth

December.December. Mr Richard Davies (Norfolk based developer) viewed the site Mr Richard Davies (Norfolk based developer) viewed the site

and outlined his proposal for a new eco settlement on the site and outlined his proposal for a new eco settlement on the site to Officers from NNDC and the County Council.to Officers from NNDC and the County Council.

Both Councils advised that the proposal would raise Both Councils advised that the proposal would raise significant issues in terms of the prevailing and anticipated significant issues in terms of the prevailing and anticipated planning policy framework for the area, strategic location and planning policy framework for the area, strategic location and the capacity of the local highway network.the capacity of the local highway network.

66

2222ndnd November 2006 November 2006

An announcement is made that the Home Office are An announcement is made that the Home Office are considering the site as a detention centre for asylum seekers.considering the site as a detention centre for asylum seekers.

There are local concerns about this proposal. Councils spend There are local concerns about this proposal. Councils spend time and resources considering the implications for the local time and resources considering the implications for the local communities and submitting their viewscommunities and submitting their views

77

Early 2007Early 2007

During the early part of 2007 local communities and the local During the early part of 2007 local communities and the local authorities heard little, if anything, formally from the Home authorities heard little, if anything, formally from the Home Office or Defence Estates regarding the future use and/or Office or Defence Estates regarding the future use and/or disposal of the site. In the late autumn the proposal for the site disposal of the site. In the late autumn the proposal for the site to be used as a category ‘C’ prison by the Ministry of Justice to be used as a category ‘C’ prison by the Ministry of Justice was made public was made public

88

Later in 2007Later in 2007 Ownership of the site transferred from the Home Office to the Ownership of the site transferred from the Home Office to the

Ministry of JusticeMinistry of Justice Plans for the new Prison were submittedPlans for the new Prison were submitted Subsequently, the new prison plans were passed by North Subsequently, the new prison plans were passed by North

Norfolk District Council using 30 acres of the total 650 acre Norfolk District Council using 30 acres of the total 650 acre site.site.

One of the planning conditions involves the Ministry of Justice One of the planning conditions involves the Ministry of Justice providing 30 acres for the planting of a community woodland providing 30 acres for the planting of a community woodland to compensate for protected trees felled to accommodate the to compensate for protected trees felled to accommodate the prison. prison.

The site is 660 acres, minus the prison and woodland site, The site is 660 acres, minus the prison and woodland site, leaves approximately 600 acres remaining for other uses. leaves approximately 600 acres remaining for other uses.

99

2323rdrd July 2007- July 2007- Eco-Eco-

town Prospectus published by DCLGtown Prospectus published by DCLG

Eco-towns will be small new towns of at least 5-20,000 homes. Places with Eco-towns will be small new towns of at least 5-20,000 homes. Places with a separate and distinct identity but with good links to surrounding towns a separate and distinct identity but with good links to surrounding towns and cities in terms of jobs, transport and servicesand cities in terms of jobs, transport and services

The development as a whole to achieve zero carbon and to be an exemplar The development as a whole to achieve zero carbon and to be an exemplar in at least one area of environment technology;in at least one area of environment technology;

A good range of facilities within the town including a secondary school, A good range of facilities within the town including a secondary school, shopping, business space and leisure;shopping, business space and leisure;

Between 30 and 50 per cent affordable housing with a good mix of tenures Between 30 and 50 per cent affordable housing with a good mix of tenures and size of homes in mixed communities;and size of homes in mixed communities;

A delivery organisation to manage the town and its development and A delivery organisation to manage the town and its development and provide support for people, businesses and community services provide support for people, businesses and community services

We will also continue with targeted funding for Growth Areas, New We will also continue with targeted funding for Growth Areas, New Growth Points and eco-towns including a £300m Community Growth Points and eco-towns including a £300m Community Infrastructure Fund over the next three years’.Infrastructure Fund over the next three years’.

1010

March 2008March 2008(DCLG scrutiny report compiled in March (DCLG scrutiny report compiled in March

but report not published until 3 but report not published until 3rdrd June 2008) June 2008)

Communities and Local Government carried out an initial Communities and Local Government carried out an initial scrutiny of the proposals in relation to the eco-towns criteria, scrutiny of the proposals in relation to the eco-towns criteria, and where proposals met these, looked across government and and where proposals met these, looked across government and its agencies at the transport and environment issues and its agencies at the transport and environment issues and opportunities in locations put forward. This publication opportunities in locations put forward. This publication provides a summary for each assessment. provides a summary for each assessment.

The report provides details for the Coltishall site The report provides details for the Coltishall site and responses from various other government and responses from various other government departments and agencies such as Natural departments and agencies such as Natural England, English Heritage, Defra etc and also England, English Heritage, Defra etc and also views from local District and County Councils and views from local District and County Councils and Highways etcHighways etc

Details follow:-Details follow:-

1111

March 2008March 2008Initial DCLG scrutiny (2)Initial DCLG scrutiny (2)

The number of homes proposed at Coltishall site-The number of homes proposed at Coltishall site-

10,00010,000 ( ( CETAG comment-Nobody locally was aware of CETAG comment-Nobody locally was aware of

this figure that the DCLG were using in this this figure that the DCLG were using in this scrutiny report in March 2008-indeed ‘The scrutiny report in March 2008-indeed ‘The Greener Future’ publication in April 2008 by DCLG Greener Future’ publication in April 2008 by DCLG on Eco Towns specifically states 5000 homes at on Eco Towns specifically states 5000 homes at Coltishall and local parish councils were unaware Coltishall and local parish councils were unaware of a formal proposal for 10 000 homes until 9of a formal proposal for 10 000 homes until 9thth June 2008 at CETAG’s inaugural meeting)June 2008 at CETAG’s inaugural meeting)

1212


QuestionQuestion – posed for scrutiny report by DCLG – posed for scrutiny report by DCLG Does proposal include commitment /agreement by local Does proposal include commitment /agreement by local

authority partners to growth? authority partners to growth? AnswerAnswer (summarised answer from DCLG) (summarised answer from DCLG) Possible support by North Norfolk Council (where the site is Possible support by North Norfolk Council (where the site is

located). Not aware of support or objection by the Greater located). Not aware of support or objection by the Greater

Norwich councils of Broadland / Norwich City / S NorfolkNorwich councils of Broadland / Norwich City / S Norfolk (CETAG comment- Not aware of views of (CETAG comment- Not aware of views of

Broadland/Norwich City or Sth NorfolkBroadland/Norwich City or Sth Norfolk and says and says possible support from Nth Norfolk but Nth Norfolk possible support from Nth Norfolk but Nth Norfolk were unaware of the size being proposed by were unaware of the size being proposed by DCLG at this stage.) DCLG at this stage.)

1313


QuestionQuestion posed by DCLG Scrutiny:- posed by DCLG Scrutiny:- Approach to environmental issue and impacts- environmental exemplar Approach to environmental issue and impacts- environmental exemplar

and opportunity ?and opportunity ? Answers Answers (summarised by DCLG) from Natural England, Environment (summarised by DCLG) from Natural England, Environment

Agency and DEFRAAgency and DEFRA Expensive new infrastructure needed and uncertainty over ability to issue Expensive new infrastructure needed and uncertainty over ability to issue

discharge consents into R Bure because of water quality issues in the discharge consents into R Bure because of water quality issues in the Broads . Relationship with Norwich water cycle strategy needs to be made. Broads . Relationship with Norwich water cycle strategy needs to be made.

However, given the levels of growth at Norwich, the cumulative impacts However, given the levels of growth at Norwich, the cumulative impacts are potentially severe especially due to drainage into the river and its are potentially severe especially due to drainage into the river and its impact on the Broadsimpact on the Broads

Extremely sensitive catchment. 30km directly upstream of Broads SAC, Extremely sensitive catchment. 30km directly upstream of Broads SAC, environment may not be able to accommodate level of building. environment may not be able to accommodate level of building.

1414

March 2008March 2008

Initial DCLG scrutiny (5) Initial DCLG scrutiny (5)

QuestionQuestion - Heritage views from English Heritage ? - Heritage views from English Heritage ?

Answer Answer The fighter pen (WW2) and 1950s Blast Walls are The fighter pen (WW2) and 1950s Blast Walls are currently being recommended for scheduling. The setting of currently being recommended for scheduling. The setting of these will need to be preserved which could in part be these will need to be preserved which could in part be achieved by maintaining the line of the runway and taxiways. achieved by maintaining the line of the runway and taxiways. We would also hope to see a visual link retained whereby the We would also hope to see a visual link retained whereby the blast walls can be seen from the line of the runway. The late blast walls can be seen from the line of the runway. The late 1930s layout has some design value and English Heritage is 1930s layout has some design value and English Heritage is currently funding study currently funding study

1515


QuestionQuestion-Approach to Transport. Issues and impacts on -Approach to Transport. Issues and impacts on network? network?

AnswerAnswer (summarised by DCLG) from Department of (summarised by DCLG) from Department of Transport and Highways AgencyTransport and Highways Agency

The Northern Distributor road has no funding and there are The Northern Distributor road has no funding and there are environmental issues surrounding the preferred route". A140 environmental issues surrounding the preferred route". A140 does not pass site, some link needed. Role of existing rail does not pass site, some link needed. Role of existing rail likely to be very limited - need to develop a strong and likely to be very limited - need to develop a strong and realistic public transport offer. realistic public transport offer.

1616


Other comments listed in report are:-Other comments listed in report are:-

Government Office East GO-E – eco-town scheme relies on Government Office East GO-E – eco-town scheme relies on NNDR going ahead which is by no means certain. However, NNDR going ahead which is by no means certain. However, NNDR well-promoted by Norfolk County Council and the NNDR well-promoted by Norfolk County Council and the Councils forming Greater Norwich. Strategic fit with growth Councils forming Greater Norwich. Strategic fit with growth of Norwich also needs consideration. of Norwich also needs consideration.

1717


Report Summation:- Report Summation:- The summary section of the report categorised each bid The summary section of the report categorised each bid

individually, on the basis of the reports from the various individually, on the basis of the reports from the various agencies, into 4 categories labelled A-Dagencies, into 4 categories labelled A-D

Details of categories are:-Details of categories are:- A ) No significant issues at this stage A ) No significant issues at this stage B ) Significant issues but can probably be addressed through conditions, studies etcB ) Significant issues but can probably be addressed through conditions, studies etc C) A location where growth is possible but major issues – assurance needed C) A location where growth is possible but major issues – assurance needed D) High level constraints – reasons why growth in this location is unsustainable. D) High level constraints – reasons why growth in this location is unsustainable.

(Otherwise labelled ‘show stopper’)(Otherwise labelled ‘show stopper’)

1818


Coltishall site achieved category Coltishall site achieved category

C on transport,C on transport, Potential D on environmentPotential D on environment Rated C/D overall Rated C/D overall Final assessment of Coltishall site? - ‘C’ - (Final assessment of Coltishall site? - ‘C’ - (A location where growth is possible but A location where growth is possible but

major issues – assurance needed).major issues – assurance needed).

( ( CETAG comment- Please note this information was not published until 3CETAG comment- Please note this information was not published until 3rdrd June 2008 and even then not as a publication in it’s own right but as June 2008 and even then not as a publication in it’s own right but as additional information on the DCLG web site headed ‘further details’ additional information on the DCLG web site headed ‘further details’ under a section named ‘How Eco Town proposals were assessed’ . Local under a section named ‘How Eco Town proposals were assessed’ . Local communities/councils were, in June, consulting on the basis of, initially, a communities/councils were, in June, consulting on the basis of, initially, a figure of 2500 - 5000 given by R Davies the bidder at his presentation in figure of 2500 - 5000 given by R Davies the bidder at his presentation in April and then the figure of 5000 in the DCLG Eco Towns consultation April and then the figure of 5000 in the DCLG Eco Towns consultation published in April).published in April).

1919

April 2008April 2008’Living A Greener Future’ DCLG’s Eco Town ’Living A Greener Future’ DCLG’s Eco Town

Consultation publishedConsultation published

Coltishall site is listed at 5000 homes in this prospectusColtishall site is listed at 5000 homes in this prospectus

More specifics in this consultation to the Coltishall site include:-More specifics in this consultation to the Coltishall site include:-

‘ ‘ Proposed benefits Proposed benefits An exemplar eco-settlement with a zero carbon An exemplar eco-settlement with a zero carbon footprint, 5,000 eco homes with different sizes types and tenures. Business footprint, 5,000 eco homes with different sizes types and tenures. Business and technology park accommodating 3,000 jobs. Over 100 hectares of and technology park accommodating 3,000 jobs. Over 100 hectares of wetlands and open space, renewable energy sources, integrated transport wetlands and open space, renewable energy sources, integrated transport system and additional facilities including schools, shops, community system and additional facilities including schools, shops, community facilities, crafts centre, and heritage museum. The eco-town proposal would facilities, crafts centre, and heritage museum. The eco-town proposal would make use of the former airfield site to provide a zero carbon new settlement make use of the former airfield site to provide a zero carbon new settlement adapted to Norfolk needs and design character, with extensive proposals on adapted to Norfolk needs and design character, with extensive proposals on green infrastructure including creation of a new Broad, SUDs and local green infrastructure including creation of a new Broad, SUDs and local renewables’renewables’

20

2020

April 2008April 2008 ‘Living A Greener Future’ (2)‘Living A Greener Future’ (2)

General criteria for all eco towns :-General criteria for all eco towns :-

•New settlement - minimum 5000 homesNew settlement - minimum 5000 homes

•Zero carbon buildZero carbon build

•Good range of local facilities - schools, shops, Good range of local facilities - schools, shops, leisure and employmentleisure and employment

•30-50% affordable housing30-50% affordable housing

•A new approach to area managementA new approach to area management

2121

33rdrd April 2008 April 200815 Potential locations for ‘Eco’ Towns announced by Ms Flint, Housing Minister15 Potential locations for ‘Eco’ Towns announced by Ms Flint, Housing Minister

1.1. Pennbury, Leicestershire: 12-15,000,Pennbury, Leicestershire: 12-15,000,2.2. Manby and Strubby, Lincolnshire: 5,000Manby and Strubby, Lincolnshire: 5,0003.3. Curborough, StaffordshireCurborough, Staffordshire: : 5,000 5,000 4.4. Middle Quinton, WarwickshireMiddle Quinton, Warwickshire: : 6,000,6,000,5.5. Bordon-Whitehill, Hampshire: 5-8,000Bordon-Whitehill, Hampshire: 5-8,0006.6. Weston Otmoor, Oxfordshire: 10-15,000Weston Otmoor, Oxfordshire: 10-15,0007.7. Ford, West Sussex: 5000Ford, West Sussex: 50008.8. Imerys China Clay Community, Cornwall around 5,000 Imerys China Clay Community, Cornwall around 5,000 9.9. Rossington, South Yorkshire: Up to 15,000Rossington, South Yorkshire: Up to 15,00010.10.Coltishall, Norfolk: 5,000 on a former RAF airfield Coltishall, Norfolk: 5,000 on a former RAF airfield 11.11. Marston Vale and New Marston,Marston Vale and New Marston,12.12. Bedfordshire: Up to 15,400 Bedfordshire: Up to 15,400 13.13. Elsenham, Essex Elsenham, Essex 14.14. Rushcliffe, Nottinghamshire Rushcliffe, Nottinghamshire 15.15. Leeds City Region, Yorkshire (a number of sites admitted)Leeds City Region, Yorkshire (a number of sites admitted)

2222

33rdrd April 2008 April 2008 This consultation is the first of This consultation is the first of four key stagesfour key stages in the eco-towns in the eco-towns

process.process. Stage OneStage One: Three month consultation on preliminary views on eco-town : Three month consultation on preliminary views on eco-town

benefits and these shortlisted locations;benefits and these shortlisted locations; Stage TwoStage Two: Further consultation this summer on a Sustainability : Further consultation this summer on a Sustainability

Appraisal, which provides a more detailed assessment of these locations, Appraisal, which provides a more detailed assessment of these locations, and a draft Planning Policy Statement.and a draft Planning Policy Statement.

Stage ThreeStage Three: A decision on the final list of locations with the potential : A decision on the final list of locations with the potential to be an eco-town and the publication of a final Planning Policy Statement, to be an eco-town and the publication of a final Planning Policy Statement, later this year.later this year.

Stage FourStage Four: Like any other proposed development, individual schemes : Like any other proposed development, individual schemes in these locations will need to submit planning applications which will be in these locations will need to submit planning applications which will be decided on the merits of the proposal.decided on the merits of the proposal.

2323

99thth April 2008 April 2008 Twelve experts from the worlds of design, the environment, transport and Twelve experts from the worlds of design, the environment, transport and

sustainability have signed up to join the Eco-towns Challenge and play a key role in sustainability have signed up to join the Eco-towns Challenge and play a key role in shaping eco towns. shaping eco towns.

The panel of leading figures will provide expert advice and support to developers The panel of leading figures will provide expert advice and support to developers whose proposed locations were announced in the shortlist of fifteen potential eco whose proposed locations were announced in the shortlist of fifteen potential eco town sites. town sites.

They will also play an important role in challenging the developers to meet the They will also play an important role in challenging the developers to meet the highest standards possible for sustainability and design in their final proposals. highest standards possible for sustainability and design in their final proposals.

They will address issues such as using resources and the site's natural assets and They will address issues such as using resources and the site's natural assets and opportunities efficiently, ensuring house designs are sensitive to local surroundings opportunities efficiently, ensuring house designs are sensitive to local surroundings and create homes people will want to live in, creating a vibrant and healthy and create homes people will want to live in, creating a vibrant and healthy community for people of all ages to live in, and encouraging more journeys on foot, community for people of all ages to live in, and encouraging more journeys on foot, bicycle and public transport.bicycle and public transport.

The Eco-town Challenge panel will publish recommendations to each bidder on The Eco-town Challenge panel will publish recommendations to each bidder on how they could improve their vision for eco-towns development.how they could improve their vision for eco-towns development.

Housing Minister Caroline Flint said: ‘Up to ten eco-towns will be built by 2020Housing Minister Caroline Flint said: ‘Up to ten eco-towns will be built by 2020

2424

17th April 200817th April 2008

Local parish councillors requested a presentation from R. Local parish councillors requested a presentation from R. Davies on his ‘Eco Town bid’Davies on his ‘Eco Town bid’

The Presentation given was of an Eco ‘Village’ of 2500 to The Presentation given was of an Eco ‘Village’ of 2500 to 5000 homes on the former RAF Coltishall airbase5000 homes on the former RAF Coltishall airbase

Parish councillors presented the information to their respective Parish councillors presented the information to their respective parish councilsparish councils

2525

9th June 20089th June 2008 Glyn Williams of Swanton Abbott Parish Council invited other local Parish Glyn Williams of Swanton Abbott Parish Council invited other local Parish

Councils’ representatives to a meeting to discuss the Eco Town BidCouncils’ representatives to a meeting to discuss the Eco Town Bid Representatives of NNDC, Broadland DC, and MP Norman Lamb also Representatives of NNDC, Broadland DC, and MP Norman Lamb also

attendattend NNDC informs the meeting that an Eco-town Panel meeting in London NNDC informs the meeting that an Eco-town Panel meeting in London

considered a Coltishall Eco Town bid of up to 10 000 homesconsidered a Coltishall Eco Town bid of up to 10 000 homes All parish representatives were concerned that little consultation has taken All parish representatives were concerned that little consultation has taken

place between Government and local government and the people they place between Government and local government and the people they represent.The deadline for submission of comments on the Eco Town represent.The deadline for submission of comments on the Eco Town consultation is 30consultation is 30thth June 2008, leaving 21 days to report back to Parish June 2008, leaving 21 days to report back to Parish Councils and local communities and feedback to DCLG. Councils and local communities and feedback to DCLG.

Norman Lamb MP for North Norfolk states that he is unaware of any Norman Lamb MP for North Norfolk states that he is unaware of any further consultation period after 30further consultation period after 30thth June and has no further information June and has no further information that has been given to him as the relevant constituency MP.that has been given to him as the relevant constituency MP.

2626

9th June (2)9th June (2)

Local PC representatives decide to report back to their own Local PC representatives decide to report back to their own PCs as quickly as possible and do their utmost to make their PCs as quickly as possible and do their utmost to make their representations to government as individuals, as individual representations to government as individuals, as individual Parish Councils and as a group formed from this meeting.Parish Councils and as a group formed from this meeting.

Coltishall Eco Town Action Group Coltishall Eco Town Action Group

or CETAG is formedor CETAG is formed

2727

23rd June -Ministerial Visit23rd June -Ministerial Visit

Ms Flint, Housing Minister, visits RAF Coltishall for a Ms Flint, Housing Minister, visits RAF Coltishall for a presentation with Henry Cleary, lead official on Eco Towns presentation with Henry Cleary, lead official on Eco Towns within CLGwithin CLG

Ms Flint hears a presentation from the bidder with plans for Ms Flint hears a presentation from the bidder with plans for 10,000 homes on and outside the original site. The lake has 10,000 homes on and outside the original site. The lake has been reduced to accommodate the extra houses and been reduced to accommodate the extra houses and infrastructure and also doubled up as a ‘means of treating the infrastructure and also doubled up as a ‘means of treating the towns sewage’ using reed bed technology. towns sewage’ using reed bed technology.

The additional 5000 homes are to be located at the southern The additional 5000 homes are to be located at the southern end of the site down towards the Bure valley.end of the site down towards the Bure valley.

2828

23rd June - Ministerial Visit (2)23rd June - Ministerial Visit (2)

NNDC presented their views and their reasons to oppose the bid and NNDC presented their views and their reasons to oppose the bid and stressed that local councils had been preparing their own Local stressed that local councils had been preparing their own Local Development Frameworks for some years with careful planning with Development Frameworks for some years with careful planning with regard to the whole structure of Norfolk and that the ‘Eco’ Town did not fit regard to the whole structure of Norfolk and that the ‘Eco’ Town did not fit into Local Plans. North Norfolk DC are actually above Government targets into Local Plans. North Norfolk DC are actually above Government targets on new houses.on new houses.

Norfolk County Council presented reasons as to why the bid should be Norfolk County Council presented reasons as to why the bid should be opposed. The transport links, and other infrastructure required, the location opposed. The transport links, and other infrastructure required, the location unsuitable for commuting to and from employment and the lack of unsuitable for commuting to and from employment and the lack of sufficient on site employment. The feasibility studies from NCC all sufficient on site employment. The feasibility studies from NCC all deemed the project unsustainabledeemed the project unsustainable

All present, other than the bidder and his team, reiterated the basic reasons All present, other than the bidder and his team, reiterated the basic reasons for opposing the proposed development in this location.for opposing the proposed development in this location.

2929

23rd June - Ministerial Visit (3)23rd June - Ministerial Visit (3)

The Carbon Reduction Team UEA stated that although initially at the 2500 The Carbon Reduction Team UEA stated that although initially at the 2500 size they were willing to assess the bid as possibly having credibility, this size they were willing to assess the bid as possibly having credibility, this scheme was no longer an ‘Eco’ Town but simply a new town. The bidders scheme was no longer an ‘Eco’ Town but simply a new town. The bidders claims of attracting people world wide to a new Science Park (as part of claims of attracting people world wide to a new Science Park (as part of their 3000 total on - site employment target) was ‘pure fantasy’ in this their 3000 total on - site employment target) was ‘pure fantasy’ in this locationlocation

Ms Flint advised that there would be a further 3 months consultation period Ms Flint advised that there would be a further 3 months consultation period after 30after 30thth June whilst the Eco Town sustainability appraisals were taking June whilst the Eco Town sustainability appraisals were taking place and bidders would, as part of their appraisals, have to prove that place and bidders would, as part of their appraisals, have to prove that these consultation with the local communities had taken place.these consultation with the local communities had taken place.

The meeting was advised that the shortlist of up to 10 of the bids would The meeting was advised that the shortlist of up to 10 of the bids would follow these appraisals in early Autumn 2008.follow these appraisals in early Autumn 2008.

3030

June 2008 June 2008 Publication of notes and recommendations from the Eco-Town Challenge Publication of notes and recommendations from the Eco-Town Challenge

Panel on sites proposed for Eco TownsPanel on sites proposed for Eco Towns

Coltishall - extracts from the report and challenges to the Coltishall - extracts from the report and challenges to the developer team from the reportdeveloper team from the report

The comprehensive approach and presentation is impressive. The comprehensive approach and presentation is impressive. The proposal posed pertinent questions and is developing a The proposal posed pertinent questions and is developing a

strong vision; however, strong vision; however, The location presents major challengesThe location presents major challenges The area has low economic activity and a narrow employment The area has low economic activity and a narrow employment

base. The proposal is not yet persuasive enough around the issue base. The proposal is not yet persuasive enough around the issue of employment at Coltishall.of employment at Coltishall.

The transport strategy is the principle issue in rural Coltishall - The transport strategy is the principle issue in rural Coltishall - Examine the viability of upgrading the Bure Valley railway to Examine the viability of upgrading the Bure Valley railway to tram-train standard into Norwich. Develop the business model for tram-train standard into Norwich. Develop the business model for the bus network and explore traffic management options.the bus network and explore traffic management options.

Explain how a resident’s carbon footprint will be reduced by 80% Explain how a resident’s carbon footprint will be reduced by 80% in 2020. in 2020.

Detail how the development will achieve zero carbon throughout Detail how the development will achieve zero carbon throughout the town, both for new and existing buildings. the town, both for new and existing buildings.

3131

30th June 200830th June 2008 Response to government on the Eco town consultationResponse to government on the Eco town consultation North Norfolk District CouncilNorth Norfolk District Council Norfolk County CouncilNorfolk County Council Broadland District CouncilBroadland District Council CETAG (a group representing 14 local parish Councils)CETAG (a group representing 14 local parish Councils) Individual local parish CouncilsIndividual local parish Councils Many individualsMany individuals

ALL OPPOSED THE ECO TOWN PROPOSALS FOR ALL OPPOSED THE ECO TOWN PROPOSALS FOR COLTISHALL ON THE BASIS OF WELL COLTISHALL ON THE BASIS OF WELL RESEARCHED AND CONFIRMED SUSTAINABILITY RESEARCHED AND CONFIRMED SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES.ISSUES.

3232

30th June 200830th June 2008

CETAG ‘flies a flag’ at a protest of all ‘Eco town action CETAG ‘flies a flag’ at a protest of all ‘Eco town action groups’ across the country at 10 Downing St. along with other groups’ across the country at 10 Downing St. along with other well known action groups such as B.A.R.D. and Oppose well known action groups such as B.A.R.D. and Oppose Hanley Grange.Hanley Grange.

CETAG representatives speak on behalf of parishes at NND CETAG representatives speak on behalf of parishes at NND full council meetingfull council meeting

NND full council vote unanimously against the ‘Eco’ Town NND full council vote unanimously against the ‘Eco’ Town bid.bid.

3333

July 2008 July 2008

Living a greener future - progress report published.Living a greener future - progress report published.

No details of Coltishall scheme included.No details of Coltishall scheme included.

Reference made to a review of alternative schemes in the Reference made to a review of alternative schemes in the Greater Norwich areaGreater Norwich area

Challenge Panel publish notes of second meeting - Coltishall Challenge Panel publish notes of second meeting - Coltishall not included in the various assessments / comments.not included in the various assessments / comments.

3434

Other interested partiesOther interested parties English Heritage have scheduled part of the site confirming their interest in English Heritage have scheduled part of the site confirming their interest in

the fighter pen and the blast walls mentioned in their initial report to the the fighter pen and the blast walls mentioned in their initial report to the DCLGDCLG

The Polish Government has an interest in the site since Polish squadrons The Polish Government has an interest in the site since Polish squadrons fought alongside the British RAF in WW2 and flew out of Coltishall from fought alongside the British RAF in WW2 and flew out of Coltishall from 1943-1947 Indeed Coltishall Air Base was totally under Polish Control 1943-1947 Indeed Coltishall Air Base was totally under Polish Control from August 1945 until February 1947 when the base was officially from August 1945 until February 1947 when the base was officially handed back to RAF control. However there are no graves in the grave handed back to RAF control. However there are no graves in the grave yard for the ‘Polish period’ post 1943 and thus it is possible there may be yard for the ‘Polish period’ post 1943 and thus it is possible there may be Polish Airmen buried on site in unmarked graves Polish Airmen buried on site in unmarked graves

English `nature have confirmed there are wildlife-protected species known English `nature have confirmed there are wildlife-protected species known to be on site to be on site

The majority of the site is classified as ‘The majority of the site is classified as ‘greenfield undevelopedgreenfield undeveloped’, ’, with a minority brownfield where the buildings are already in existence, with a minority brownfield where the buildings are already in existence, (this does NOT include the runway) a portion residential (Annington (this does NOT include the runway) a portion residential (Annington Homes and private individuals own the former RAF houses) and thus most Homes and private individuals own the former RAF houses) and thus most of the site does not have a ‘footprint’ of previous building.of the site does not have a ‘footprint’ of previous building.

3535

22ndnd August 2008 August 2008

Rackheath is announced as a possible alternative to the RAF Rackheath is announced as a possible alternative to the RAF Coltishall site with potential of up to 4000 homesColtishall site with potential of up to 4000 homes

Broadland DC had been in negotiations with the Government Broadland DC had been in negotiations with the Government as part of The Greater Norwich Partnership and suggested that as part of The Greater Norwich Partnership and suggested that funds government were offering for infrastructure might help funds government were offering for infrastructure might help build the Northern Distributor Road.build the Northern Distributor Road.

3636

22ndnd August 2008 (2) August 2008 (2) Quotation from EDP on Rackheath bidQuotation from EDP on Rackheath bid

A Broadland District Councillor said “The north east sector is an area which has been A Broadland District Councillor said “The north east sector is an area which has been identified as an area for planned and managed growth and Rackheath is a part of this.identified as an area for planned and managed growth and Rackheath is a part of this.

“We would want any houses planned to be as carbon neutral as possible for environmental “We would want any houses planned to be as carbon neutral as possible for environmental reasons and also to keep fuel bills affordable for the generations of families we hope will live reasons and also to keep fuel bills affordable for the generations of families we hope will live in them.in them.

“The most important next step now is to talk to local residents about how they would like to “The most important next step now is to talk to local residents about how they would like to see their community grow and develop. We are looking forward and planning for the long see their community grow and develop. We are looking forward and planning for the long term needs of our communities. Managed growth needs to be sustainable and well thought term needs of our communities. Managed growth needs to be sustainable and well thought through with jobs and infrastructure to support any growth.”through with jobs and infrastructure to support any growth.”

And addressing the importance of the Northern Distributor Road (NDR) alongside the And addressing the importance of the Northern Distributor Road (NDR) alongside the Rackheath plan, South Norfolk Council leader John Fuller said: “If the government wants to Rackheath plan, South Norfolk Council leader John Fuller said: “If the government wants to see an eco-town, and Rackheath is considered suitable, then it must fund the infrastructure to see an eco-town, and Rackheath is considered suitable, then it must fund the infrastructure to provide it, and that includes the NDR.provide it, and that includes the NDR.

“That's the deal Norfolk people would expect us to agree and which they would support. They “That's the deal Norfolk people would expect us to agree and which they would support. They should not be short-changed on this”.should not be short-changed on this”.

3737

August 2008August 2008

CETAG questioned DCLG whether the inclusion of CETAG questioned DCLG whether the inclusion of Rackheath as an Eco-Town bid meant that the Coltishall bid Rackheath as an Eco-Town bid meant that the Coltishall bid was dropped.was dropped.

The reply was that both bids are very much alive and are being The reply was that both bids are very much alive and are being assessed for sustainability and hopefully results of the initial assessed for sustainability and hopefully results of the initial appraisal stage will be available in September. appraisal stage will be available in September.

3838

The present situationThe present situation The local area has had no consultation as promised by Ms Flint Housing Minister / The local area has had no consultation as promised by Ms Flint Housing Minister /

DCLGDCLG The ‘Eco’ town bidder is alleged to be considering legal action concerning granting The ‘Eco’ town bidder is alleged to be considering legal action concerning granting

of planning consent for the category C prison.of planning consent for the category C prison. The Local Government Association are threatening legal action of the whole The Local Government Association are threatening legal action of the whole

Government process pertaining to their Eco town PolicyGovernment process pertaining to their Eco town Policy The B.A.R.D campaign are questioning, in the High Court, the legality of the The B.A.R.D campaign are questioning, in the High Court, the legality of the

Governments imposition of new towns on a national basis regardless of local Governments imposition of new towns on a national basis regardless of local planning forecasts carefully worked out over years.planning forecasts carefully worked out over years.

The announcement of the shortlist of Eco towns has been delayed until early 2009The announcement of the shortlist of Eco towns has been delayed until early 2009 The Coltishall eco town bidder is threatening to pull out all together BUT under The Coltishall eco town bidder is threatening to pull out all together BUT under

present circumstances this does not prevent another bidder seeking to develop the present circumstances this does not prevent another bidder seeking to develop the sitesite

Some of the nationwide bids have been dropped by the land owners and or bidders Some of the nationwide bids have been dropped by the land owners and or bidders e.g. Hanley Grange in Cambridgeshire, meaning that the shortlist of up to 10 is now e.g. Hanley Grange in Cambridgeshire, meaning that the shortlist of up to 10 is now from a shorter list of possibles meaning both Coltishall and Rackheath have a from a shorter list of possibles meaning both Coltishall and Rackheath have a higher probability of being chosen.higher probability of being chosen.

..

3939

Now and the futureNow and the future

CETAG are working hard to represent the views of the local CETAG are working hard to represent the views of the local communities on any plans for the former RAF Coltishall. communities on any plans for the former RAF Coltishall. CETAG wants to be engaged in any present, or future plans CETAG wants to be engaged in any present, or future plans for the site and try and ensure that it is not just left to decay as for the site and try and ensure that it is not just left to decay as many former MOD sites have been, but used for a purpose many former MOD sites have been, but used for a purpose acceptable and in sympathy with its location, surroundings and acceptable and in sympathy with its location, surroundings and economyeconomy

4040

The latest Information receivedThe latest Information received “ “The situation at Coltishall is unusual because following the Minister's The situation at Coltishall is unusual because following the Minister's

visit it became clear that the scheme for Coltishall was not being further developed visit it became clear that the scheme for Coltishall was not being further developed by the promoter at the present time while an alternative scheme was put forward by by the promoter at the present time while an alternative scheme was put forward by the Greater Norwich Development Partnership. Both schemes are currently being the Greater Norwich Development Partnership. Both schemes are currently being evaluated as part of the CLG sponsored Sustainability Appraisal by Scott wilson evaluated as part of the CLG sponsored Sustainability Appraisal by Scott wilson and we hope to publish this later this month - that will trigger the formal start of the and we hope to publish this later this month - that will trigger the formal start of the second period of 3 month consultation. Depending on the report of the second period of 3 month consultation. Depending on the report of the Sustainability Appraisal it is likely that only one of the Norwich schemes would go Sustainability Appraisal it is likely that only one of the Norwich schemes would go forward. If that were to be Coltishall we would certainly put in hand the detailed forward. If that were to be Coltishall we would certainly put in hand the detailed local consultation which the Minister described and we would expect from the local consultation which the Minister described and we would expect from the promoter also. If not we would not be taking forward an eco-town scheme for this promoter also. If not we would not be taking forward an eco-town scheme for this location.location.

Apologies that there has been this uncertainty but I would expect it to be resolved Apologies that there has been this uncertainty but I would expect it to be resolved

in the next 3 weeks”. in the next 3 weeks”.

Ref. Henry Cleary DCLG September 2008Ref. Henry Cleary DCLG September 2008

4141

What next?What next? That is the history and the main reasons for CETAG’s That is the history and the main reasons for CETAG’s

opposition are clear and ‘well publicised’ See opposition are clear and ‘well publicised’ See www.cetag.co.nrwww.cetag.co.nr for full details for full details

Questions now have to include what might happen in the Questions now have to include what might happen in the future as well as resolving the eco town issue.future as well as resolving the eco town issue.

What do you think?What do you think? What would like to see happen at RAF Coltishall?What would like to see happen at RAF Coltishall? Do you agree that CETAG should be part of any future Do you agree that CETAG should be part of any future

negotiations to ensure that the local communities have a say in negotiations to ensure that the local communities have a say in their local community?their local community?

Have your say tonight!Have your say tonight! Ask the panel for their views Ask the panel for their views

Documents

Time Line of Events Former RAF Coltishall Eco Town Bid