55
Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Tim Marker

Laboratory & Full Scale Testing ofNon Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats

FAA Technical Center

Page 2: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Problem: Next Generation aircraft seats utilizing lighter materials in theirconstruction are unfairly restricted by the FAR-mandated 10% weight loss criteria.

Example: 5 lb seat [(5.0-4.6) / 5.0] x 100 = 8.0% PASS

% Weight Loss = (initial weight – final weight) / (initial weight) x 100

Example: 3 lb seat [(3.0-2.6) / 3.0] x 100 = 13.3% FAIL

Proposed Testing: Evaluate performance of lightweight seat cushions underrealistic conditions.

Page 3: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Testing Proposed by FAATC in June 2002

Supply 18 Sets of Test Cushions to FAATC

Test Cushion Construction per FAR 25.853(c) Appendix F, Part II (or Handbook)

“Each specimen tested must be fabricated using the principal components (i.e., foam core,flotation material, fire blocking material, if used, and dress covering) and assemblyprocesses (representative seams and closures) intended for use in the production articles.If a different material combination is used for the back cushion than the bottom cushion,both material combinations must be tested as complete specimen sets, each set consistingof a back cushion specimen and a bottom cushion specimen.”

Bottom: 18 W x 20 D x 4 T

Back: 18 W x 25 H x 2 T

Page 4: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

•FAATC randomly selects 6 sets of cushions to conductlab-scale tests (oil burner)

•Proceed with full-scale evaluation using remaining 12 sets

•Confirm seats exceed 10% weight loss

Testing Proposed by FAATC in June 2002

If Yes

Page 5: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Description of Materials

Baseline Seat 1 (6 tests)

Standard fire retardant foam, 2.75 lb/ft3 density

Standard 90/10 wool/nylon blend dress cover

Baseline Seat 2 (3 tests)

Standard fire retardant foam, 2.75 lb/ft3 density

Standard 90/10 wool/nylon blend dress cover

PBI felt fire blocking fabric, 290 g/m2

PBI felt fire blocking fabric, 290 g/m2

Page 6: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Description of Materials (con’t)

Lightweight Seat A (6 tests)

Fire hardened foam, 0.62 lb/ft3 density, no blocking layer

Lightweight Seat B (6 tests)

Lightweight Seat C (6 tests)

Lightweight Seat D (6 tests)

Fire hardened foam 3.0 lb/ft3 + lightweight foam 0.59 lb/ft3, no blocking layer

Dress Cover: Wool 91% / PA 9% 380 g/m2

Lightweight foam 0.59 lb/ft3, no blocking layer

Dress Cover: Wool 91% / PA 9% 380 g/m2

Fire hardened foam, 2.2 lb/ft3 density, no blocking layer

Dress Cover: Wool 91% / PA 9%, 375 g/m2

Dress Cover: Wool 90% / PA 10%, 380 g/m2

Page 7: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Seat

Initial Weight Bottom Cushion

(lbs)

Initial Weight Bottom Cover (lbs)

Initial Weight Back

Cushion (lbs)

Initial Weight Back Cover (lbs)

Initial Weight Total (lbs)

Final Weight Total (lbs)

Weight Loss (%)

Avg Weight Loss (%)

2.25 0.75 1.48 0.78 5.26 4.94 6.032.25 0.75 1.48 0.78 5.26 4.81 8.542.25 0.75 1.48 0.78 5.26 4.73 10.042.19 0.72 1.47 0.78 5.16 4.75 7.952.19 0.72 2.08 0.78 5.77 5.35 7.282.21 0.80 1.5 0.78 5.29 4.87 7.94

2.21 0.72 1.5 0.78 5.21 4.790 8.062.22 0.74 1.52 0.79 5.27 4.970 5.692.22 0.75 1.56 0.79 5.32 4.990 6.20

0.55 0.71 0.42 0.77 2.45 2.07 15.500.54 0.69 0.41 0.75 2.39 2.01 15.890.54 0.69 0.41 0.75 2.39 1.96 17.990.54 0.70 0.41 0.75 2.40 1.80 25.000.54 0.70 0.41 0.76 2.41 1.98 17.780.54 0.70 0.41 0.75 2.40 2.02 15.86

1.86 0.74 1.19 0.78 4.56 4.06 10.961.83 0.74 1.18 0.78 4.54 4.01 11.671.83 0.74 1.15 0.78 4.50 3.98 11.561.86 0.74 1.15 0.78 4.55 3.98 12.531.86 0.74 1.18 0.78 4.58 4.02 12.231.83 0.74 1.17 0.78 4.52 3.90 13.72

1.48 0.56 1.05 0.60 3.68 3.07 16.621.46 0.55 1.06 0.57 3.64 3.23 11.211.46 0.54 1.06 0.60 3.65 3.28 10.101.46 0.54 0.95 0.57 3.52 3.10 11.841.42 0.55 1.05 0.58 3.60 3.21 10.951.44 0.55 1.03 0.58 3.60 3.21 10.95

1.01 0.55 0.80 0.60 2.97 2.57 13.330.98 0.55 0.79 0.58 2.91 2.52 13.410.99 0.54 0.83 0.58 2.94 2.54 13.700.99 0.54 0.83 0.58 2.94 2.54 13.701.00 0.56 0.83 0.57 2.97 2.58 12.990.99 0.55 0.84 0.58 2.97 2.57 13.33

Lightweight D 13.41

Lightweight A 18.00

Lightweight B 12.11

Lightweight C 11.94

Baseline 1 7.96

Baseline 2 6.65

Lab-Scale Test Results

PASS

PASS

FAIL

FAIL

FAIL

FAIL

Page 8: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Lab Scale Test ResultsLightweight A Seat Cushion

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

1 2 3 4 5 6

Wei

gh

t L

oss

(%

)

Weight Loss Average = 18.00%

Bottom Cushion

Bottom Dress Cover

Back Cushion

Back Dress Cover

Page 9: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Lab Scale Test ResultsLightweight B Seat Cushion

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

1 2 3 4 5 6

Wei

gh

t L

oss

(%

)

Bottom Cushion

Bottom Dress Cover

Back Cushion

Back Dress Cover

Weight Loss Average = 12.11%

Page 10: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Lab Scale Test ResultsLightweight C Seat Cushion

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

1 2 3 4 5 6

Wei

gh

t L

oss

(%

)

Weight Loss Average = 11.94%

Bottom Cushion

Bottom Dress Cover

Back Cushion

Back Dress Cover

Page 11: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Lab Scale Test ResultsLightweight D Seat Cushion

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

1 2 3 4 5 6

Wei

gh

t L

oss

(%

)

Weight Loss Average = 13.41%

Bottom Cushion

Bottom Dress Cover

Back Cushion

Back Dress Cover

Page 12: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Laboratory Comparison of Lightweight Seats6 Test Average

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Wei

gh

t L

oss

(%

)

Lightweight Seat A Lightweight Seat B Lightweight Seat C Lightweight Seat D

Bottom Cushion

Bottom Dress Cover

Back Cushion

Back Dress Cover

Page 13: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Analysis of Laboratory Tests on Lightweight Seats

•Bottom dress cover yields higher % weight loss than bottom cushion in all cases

•Back dress cover yields higher % weight loss than back cushion in A, C, and D

•Ratio of total cushion weight to total dress cover weight ranged from .65 to 2.2

Lightweight Seat A ratio = 0.65

Lightweight Seat B ratio = 1.99

Lightweight Seat C ratio = 2.19

Lightweight Seat D ratio = 1.60

Page 14: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Full-Scale Test Parameters

Interior Materials0.25-Inch thick crushed-core Nomex honeycomb panels, meets 65/65

Aircraft-grade carpet, meets VBB

Test Execution

Test ArticleB707 fuselage, fully fire hardened interior

InstrumentationContinuous gas analysis at 2 locations, 2 heights

Temperature measurement: 3 thermocouple trees + individual seat thermocouples

Smoke measurement: smoke-meters at 2 locations, 3 heights each

4 interior video cameras, 2 external

55 gallon JP8 fuel fire in 8’ by 10’ pan adjacent to fuselage

External fuel fire extinguished following noticeable flashover

Page 15: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Baseline Test

Fire Blocked Urethane Using PBI Felt Material with 90/10 Wool/Nylon Dress

Weight Loss ranged from 6 to 10% in Lab Test

AFFF applied to pan fire @ 5:30

CO2 Extinguishing Agent applied to interior @ 6:30

Full-Scale Test Parameters

Page 16: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Fire hardened foam, no blocking layer, with 91/9 Wool/Nylon dress cover

Weight Loss ranged from 15 to 25% in Lab Test

Lightweight Seat A

Lightweight Seat B

Fire hardened foam, no blocking layer, with 90/10 Wool/Nylon dress coverWeight Loss ranged from 11 to 14% in Lab Test

AFFF applied to pan fire @ 5:30

CO2 Extinguishing Agent applied to interior @ 6:30

AFFF applied to pan fire @ 4:30

CO2 Extinguishing Agent applied to interior @ 5:30

Full-Scale Test Parameters

Page 17: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Fire hardened foam, no blocking layer, with 91/9 Wool/Nylon dress cover

Weight Loss ranged from 10 to 17% in Lab Test

Lightweight Seat C

Lightweight Seat D

Fire hardened foam, no blocking layer, with 90/10 Wool/Nylon dress coverWeight Loss ranged from 13 to 14% in Lab Test

AFFF applied to pan fire @ 5:30

CO2 Extinguishing Agent applied to interior @ 6:00

AFFF applied to pan fire @ 5:15

CO2 Extinguishing Agent applied to interior @ 5:30

Full-Scale Test Parameters

Page 18: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Full-Scale Test Apparatus

Page 19: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Seat Identification & Thermocouple Location

Page 20: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Full-Scale Test Configuration in 707

Page 21: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Full-Scale Test Configuration in 707

Page 22: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Full-Scale Test Configuration in 707

Page 23: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

View Into Fire Door in 707

Page 24: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Thermocouple Placement on Seats

Page 25: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Close-up of Seat Thermocouple

Page 26: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Typical Cabin Fire @ 1:00

Page 27: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Typical Cabin Fire @ 2:00

Page 28: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Typical Cabin Fire @ 3:00

Page 29: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Typical Post Event

Page 30: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Full-Scale Weight Loss Results

Page 31: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

Baseline Seat Weight Loss (%)

Seat 1Seat 2Seat 3

Seat 4

Page 32: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

Lightweight Seat A Weight Loss (%)

Seat 1

Seat 2

Seat 3

Seat 4

Page 33: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

Lightweight Seat B Weight Loss (%)

Seat 1

Seat 2

Seat 3

Seat 4

Page 34: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

Lightweight Seat C Weight Loss (%)

Seat 1

Seat 2

Seat 3

Seat 4

Page 35: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

Lightweight Seat D Weight Loss (%)

Seat 1

Seat 2

Seat 3

Seat 4

Page 36: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Analysis of Full-Scale Weight % Loss Data

•All tests resulted in high percentage weight loss of seats near fire door

•Percentage weight loss of seat 4 a good indicator of fire crossing aisle

•Percentage weight loss during full-scale tests largely dependent on lengthof test/suppression of the external fire, and not a good indicator of overallcushion performance.

Page 37: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Temperature, Fire Gas, and Smoke Levels

Page 38: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Seat 1 Temperatures

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480

Time (Seconds)

Tem

per

atu

re (

oF

)

Baseline Seat 1 Avg

Lightweight A Seat 1 Avg

Lightweight C Seat 1 Avg

Lightweight D Seat 1 Avg

Page 39: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Seat 2 Temperatures

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480

Time (Seconds)

Tem

per

atu

re (

oF

)

Baseline Seat 2 Avg

Lightweight A Seat 2 Avg

Lightweight C Seat 2 Avg

Lightweight D Seat 2 Avg

Page 40: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Seat 3 Temperatures

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480

Time (seconds)

Tem

per

atu

re (

oF

)

Baseline Seat 3 Avg

Lightweight A Seat 3 Avg

Lightweight C Seat 3 Avg

Lightweight D Seat 3 Avg

Page 41: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Seat 4 Temperatures

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480

Time (Seconds)

Tem

per

atu

re (

oF

)

Baseline Seat 4 Avg

Lightweight A Seat 4 Avg

Lightweight C Seat 4 Avg

Lightweight D Seat 4 Avg

Page 42: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Mid Cabin Temperatures

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480

Time (Seconds)

Tem

per

atu

re (

oF

)

Baseline MID Tree Avg

Lightweight A MID Tree Avg

Lightweight C MID Tree Avg

Lightweight D MID Tree Avg

Page 43: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Forward Cabin Temperatures

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480

Time (Seconds)

Tem

per

atu

re (

oF

) Baseline FWD Tree Avg

Lightweight A FWD Tree Avg

Lightweight C FWD Tree Avg

Lightweight D FWD Tree Avg

Page 44: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Aft Cabin Temperatures

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480

Time (Seconds)

Tem

per

atu

re (

oF

)

Baseline AFT Tree Avg

Lightweight A AFT Tree Avg

Lightweight C AFT Tree Avg

Lightweight D AFT Tree Avg

Page 45: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Cabin Area Heat Flux Level

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480

Time (Seconds)

Hea

t F

lux

(Btu

/ft2 s

ec)

Baseline Calorimeter Avg

Lightweight A Calorimeter Avg

Lightweight C Calorimeter Avg

Lightweight D Calorimeter Avg

Page 46: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Mid Cabin Smoke Level

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480

Time (Seconds)

Lig

ht

Tran

smis

sio

n (

%)

Baseline MID Smokemeter Avg

Lightweight A MID Smokemeter Avg

Lightweight C MID Smokemeter Avg

Lightweight D MID Smokemeter Avg

Page 47: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Forward Cabin Smoke Level

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480

Time (Seconds)

Lig

ht

Tran

smis

sio

n (

%)

Baseline FWD Smokemeter Avg

Lightweight A FWD Smokemeter Avg

Lightweight C FWD Smokemeter Avg

Lightweight D FWD Smokemeter Avg

Page 48: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Carbon Monoxide Level

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480

Time (Seconds)

Car

bo

n M

on

oxi

de

(%)

Baseline Carbon Monoxide AvgLightweight A Carbon Monoxide AvgLightweight C Carbon Monoxide AvgLightweight D Carbon Monoxide Avg

Page 49: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Carbon Dioxide Level

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480

Time (Seconds)

Car

bo

n D

ioxi

de

(%)

Baseline Carbon Dioxide AvgLightweight A Carbon Dioxide AvgLightweight C Carbon Dioxide AvgLightweight D Carbon Dioxide Avg

Page 50: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Oxygen Level

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480

Time (Seconds)

Oxy

gen

(%

)

Baseline Oxygen AvgLightweight A Oxygen AvgLightweight C Oxygen AvgLightweight D Oxygen Avg

Page 51: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Full-Scale Test Analysis

•Baseline test using traditional fire-blocked seats resulted in a flashover condition at approximately 5:00 minutes.

•Lightweight seats A, C, and D resulted in a more subtle flashover condition, occurring slightly later, approximately 5:00 to 5:30 minutes.

•Lightweight B resulted in a quicker flashover condition, approximately 3:30 from start.

•Lightweight C produced more smoke and higher gas levels than all others.

•Lightweight D resulted in lowest temperatures, smoke, heat flux, and gas levels.

Page 52: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

$$$$ What is Lightweight? $$$

Page 53: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Possible Acceptance Criteria

Total Seat Weight (lbs)

Average Ratio of Cushion Weight to Cover Weight

Corrected Allowable Weight

Loss (%)

Corrected Allowable Burn Length (Inches)

Less than 3 1.8 to 2.0 12 161.5 to 1.79 14 151.1 to 1.49 16 14.60 to 1.09 18 13

0 to .59 20 12

Page 54: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Seat

Initial Weight Bottom Cushion

(lbs)

Initial Weight Bottom

Cover (lbs)

Initial Weight Back

Cushion (lbs)

Initial Weight Back

Cover (lbs)

Initial Weight

Total (lbs)Final Total

(lbs)Weight

Loss (%)

Avg Weight Loss (%)

Ratio Cushion

Weight to Cover Weight

Average Ratio

Corrected Allowable Weight

Loss (%) Pass/Fail

2.25 0.75 1.48 0.78 5.26 4.94 6.03 2.442.25 0.75 1.48 0.78 5.26 4.81 8.54 2.442.25 0.75 1.48 0.78 5.26 4.73 10.04 2.442.19 0.72 1.47 0.78 5.16 4.75 7.95 2.442.19 0.72 2.08 0.78 5.77 5.35 7.28 2.852.21 0.80 1.5 0.78 5.29 4.87 7.94 2.35

2.21 0.72 1.5 0.78 5.21 4.790 8.06 2.472.22 0.74 1.52 0.79 5.27 4.970 5.69 2.442.22 0.75 1.56 0.79 5.32 4.990 6.20 2.45

1.86 0.74 1.19 0.78 4.56 4.06 10.96 2.011.83 0.74 1.18 0.78 4.54 4.01 11.67 1.981.83 0.74 1.15 0.78 4.50 3.98 11.56 1.961.86 0.74 1.15 0.78 4.55 3.98 12.53 1.981.86 0.74 1.18 0.78 4.58 4.02 12.23 2.001.83 0.74 1.17 0.78 4.52 3.90 13.72 1.97

1.48 0.56 1.05 0.60 3.68 3.07 16.62 2.181.46 0.55 1.06 0.57 3.64 3.23 11.21 2.241.46 0.54 1.06 0.60 3.65 3.28 10.10 2.211.46 0.54 0.95 0.57 3.52 3.10 11.84 2.161.42 0.55 1.05 0.58 3.60 3.21 10.95 2.171.44 0.55 1.03 0.58 3.60 3.21 10.95 2.17

1.01 0.55 0.80 0.60 2.97 2.57 13.33 1.590.98 0.55 0.79 0.58 2.91 2.52 13.41 1.560.99 0.54 0.83 0.58 2.94 2.54 13.70 1.620.99 0.54 0.83 0.58 2.94 2.54 13.70 1.621.00 0.56 0.83 0.57 2.97 2.58 12.99 1.610.99 0.55 0.84 0.58 2.97 2.57 13.33 1.61

0.55 0.71 0.42 0.77 2.45 2.07 15.50 0.650.54 0.69 0.41 0.75 2.39 2.01 15.89 0.650.54 0.69 0.41 0.75 2.39 1.96 17.99 0.650.54 0.70 0.41 0.75 2.40 1.80 25.00 0.650.54 0.70 0.41 0.76 2.41 1.98 17.78 0.650.54 0.70 0.41 0.75 2.40 2.02 15.86 0.65

10 Pass2.497.96

6.65 2.46 10 Pass

12.11 1.99 10 Fail

11.94 2.19 10 Fail

13.41 1.60 14 Pass

18.00 0.65 18 Pass

Lightweight D

Lightweight A

Baseline 1

Baseline 2

Lightweight B

Lightweight C

Page 55: Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center

Cushion/Cover Ratio Vs. Weight Loss and Burn Length

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 to .59 .6 to 1.09 1.1 to 1.49 1.5 to 1.79 1.8 to 2.0

Cushion to Cover Weight Ratio

Wei

gh

t L

oss

(%

)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Bu

rn L

eng

th (

Inch

es)

Adjusted Allowable Weight Loss

Adjusted Allowable Burn Length